WEBVTT - Google Workers Rise Up: Inside the Protests

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Google is in the midst of a major upheaval. It's

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not an understatement to say it could change the way

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest Internet company operates forever. Since it was founded,

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Google has had a special relationship with its employees, especially

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the engineers who write the software code that runs the

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>services we love and have come to depend upon, things

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like online search, maps, Android phones, and the Chrome web browser.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Google pays these people very well. Famously, working at Google

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>also comes with tons of perks, like swimming pools and

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>free food. But what's really unique is the amount of

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>responsibility and autonomy the company gives staff. Google shares an

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>unusual amount of internal company information with its employees and

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>encourages them to speak up about things they disagree with.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Over the years, everything from app designs and search results

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to what kind of kale should be served in the

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>company kitchens has been up for debate, and as a result,

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Google services and products have benefited from the collective intelligence

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of many of the world's smartest engineers. It's a big

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>reason why the company's offerings are so user friendly and

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>why they make billions of dollars in profit every quarter.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>And this symbiosis ran pretty smoothly until about two years ago. Now,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>after a series of controversies and protests, some workers are

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>openly at war with Google. It's already duailed important business initiatives,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and its sparking employee uprisings at other tech giants like

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and Microsoft. We're going to take you inside these

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>foundations shaking developments with Irene Nap, a self taught senior

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>software engineer who's been at Google for almost five years

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>working on security and privacy projects. I'm Pierre Gadkari, and

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alistair Barr. You're listening to Decrypted, So Alista tell

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>us more about Irene. I first met Irene last year

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at Google shareholder meeting. Irene was there speaking in favor

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of a proposal to hie executive pay to progress on

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>diversity and inclusion. Irene has had a front row seat

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>throughout the last two tumultuous years at the company, either

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>by being personally involved in protests or via relationships with

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>co workers on the front lines. Irene is trans and

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>goes by the gender pronoun they or them. They agree

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about all this, but not any private work

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they're doing for Google. We met up last month at

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg office in Silicon Valley. Now I wanted to

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get into the first time, maybe where Google management and

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the workers maybe started parting ways a little bit.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So to me, things really got back to James the more.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>In August of seen you published what we have all

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>called the mammos since then. Um, when thinking that about

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>people realize that there were many versions of the mammo.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't refined over a period to read circuit focus

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>stance for argument, which was this misogynist view that women

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are not suit engineers. Let me quickly refresh everyone's memory

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>about this incident. A couple of years ago, Google was

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>facing accusations from a group of female employees that the

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>company was paying them less than men doing similar work.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Around that time, a long essay which had been circulating

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on Google message boards got picked up in the press.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It was written by James Damore, who was an engineer

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at Google at the time, and its central theme was

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that men may be more suited to working in tech

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>than women. Offensive and harmful. That is how the CEO

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of Google is describing an anti diversity memo written by

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>one of Google's male employees. Now, the engineer behind the manifesto,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which claims women are and how did how would you

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rate Google's response to that crisis? The company fired him

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>after getting its little ducks in a row. The Google

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>software engineer behind this controversial ten page memo is out

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>gone after blasting diversity and women in the workplace. A

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>source of go I was pleased out that I was

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not so pleased that there wasn't anything internal communication. Um,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and there were. There was a planned series of town

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>halls which was canceled actually about half an hour before

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the first one would have happened. And why did Google

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>scrap these meetings so abruptly, iron said. Questions and answers

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that had been prepared for the town halls were leaked

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>to the public. Then James Damore and other plaintiffs filed

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the suit against Google, alleging violation of their labor rights.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>The complaint included screenshots of internal company communications. Conveniently, all

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the people who pomittedly agreed with their names had been redacted.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, all of my friends had been named.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>In fall, and many people began featuring on harassment websites

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for Irene. This was the moment when Googlers began to

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>really work in unison to change things several of us

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>put together a petition UM and we did get a

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>meeting with the company's upper management the West time to

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge that a petitioners had not resolved. The company

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has some responsibility there because this is a part of

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a social change which was enabled by the Internet. Um

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know Google, Google is a big part of

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, part of the Okay. So that's how it

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>all got started. What happened next, I'd say the next

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>big flare up between workers and Google management happened several

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>months later. It had to do with the project that

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Google had in the works with the Pentagon to provide

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence to analyze drone footage. Internally, it was known

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as Project may Even Now I mean and most other

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>workers didn't hear about this until details were leaked to

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the press in March two thousand eighteen. Some three thousand Googlers,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as Google employees are known, have sent CEO Sumed Arpachai

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>an open letter asking him to end cooperation with the

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>U S Department of Defenses. Project may have it that

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>venture includes the secrecy around Project may Even seemed to

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>violate Google's actors for open communication with employees, and importantly,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it also veered away from the companies focus on consumer

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>products and into military work. As an engineer, I think

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>something perhaps a little bit different when I hear that.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think most people think bombs. I think surveillance, because

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the United States does have I fine drones

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>which could just survey an entire city at once. But

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any government deserves that level of power.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too much. If I had wanted to

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>work for a defense contract, or if I'd wanted to

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>work for Key Martin, I would have done that. Google

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>employees didn't like working on artificial intelligence projects for the military.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>They thought it was war work, so they demanded that

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we the Google step back, and they did. Google committed

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not to redo that contract. The best of my knowledge,

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that has happened, although I have the strong feeling that

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that the military may have simply hired some versity into

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a startup and that they're still running it on, you know,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>our public facing service. That last part is pretty damning.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Irone is saying that because Google's cloud services and many

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of us AI tools are available for anyone to use,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a way for the company to continue helping the

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon without directly working with it, so is that true?

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I ask Google about this and several other points Iron raised.

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The company declined to comment, but Google's top lawyer, Kent Walker,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>has said that Google let the contract expire and worked

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>closely with the Pentagon to make the transition quote in

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a way that is consistent with our AI principles and

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>contractual commitments. So Alistair, as I recall, the controversy over

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Project Maven, died down after Google said it wasn't going

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to renew the contract. But within a few months Google

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was back in hot water with its workers again. Google

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>has been working on a secret project code named Dragonfly.

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Dragonfly was a censored version of its search engine for China,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and so today the New York Times broke the news

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about a protest letter signed by four hundred employer ease.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to quote raise urgent moral and ethical issues,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>saying currently we do not news about this secret project.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Dragonfly caused an uproar inside Google once again. I found

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>out through the press, and I was frankly shocked. Of

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>course this was going to be a censored search engine. Um,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw a version of the search result page, and

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, working at Google, the search result page, we're

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>all well aware that it has a very high standard

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be neutral, to reflect the world as it is,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>which is not the only possible moral choice, but it

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is the moral choice that has been consistently made, and

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that the company's reputation is built on um And to

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>see a version of that page where with a search

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for Tianeman Square, which had I believe the first result

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was something about the myth of Tanneman Square and that

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen, or something to that effect, So I

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mean and other employees this undermined as the reason Google

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>exists to organize the world's information and make it universally

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>accessible and useful, because you know, if if Google can't

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be remid on to say what's true, who can? Who

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>do you trust? Project Dragonfly also divided staff. There were

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>other employees who argued that providing services to China's huge

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>population was aligned with Google's mission, But in Washington it

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>was a double punch. This combination of Google withdrawing from

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a US military contract while simultaneously building a search service

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that would help an authoritarian communist government censor information. It

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was too much for some politicians. Eventually, Google CEO Sunda

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Pichai had to testify in front of Congress to explain

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>himself that happened in December. So I want to ask

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>very specifically, are any employees currently having product meetings on

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this question, on this Chinese project and where, if not,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when did those end. We have undertaken an internal effort,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but right now there are no plans to launch a

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>search service in China. As I said earlier, are there

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>any current discussions with any member of the Chinese government

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>on launching this app? Currently we are not in discussions

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>around launching. And President Donald Trump was commenting on this

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as recently as March. In a tweet, he said, quote,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Google is helping China and their military, but not the US. Terrible.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. As two thousand and eighteen progressed,

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>it really started to feel like the clashes between Google

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>management and workers were heating up in a way we've

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>never seen before. The Dragonfly controversy was still playing out

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in Washington when the next bombshell landed And what was that?

0:10:58.160 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Here was a story published by The New York Time

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in late October, and it said that Google had given

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one of its top executives, a man called Andy Rubin,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>who co created the Android mobile operating system, a massive

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety million dollar exit package, even though he'd been accused

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of sexual harassment and an internal investigation by Google had

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>found the allegation to be credible. Andy Rubin has said

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>reports about his conduct and departure from Google misrepresented the facts.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I knew that was in the works. Um. I was

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very at least it was possible to tell that story,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was possible to gather testimony from so many

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people that it was simply an incontrovertible I fl um.

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>And the response was pretty much a media I think

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it was within a matter of days the walkout happened, yea.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>And who came up with that? That? Did that start spontaneously? Yes?

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually it was a number of people who had previously

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>worked little that I gathered that they had been doing

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>things very similar to the kinds of efforts I have

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been doing. You know, I came from a remote part

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of that campus that day I headed down UM to

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>join the It was really a protest atmosphere, UM and

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, all my sign not okay Google, and hear

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what people had to say and see the real strength

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and numbers, and then I believe the final number was

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand people worldwide structural change in the name of

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>transparency accountability. Google tried to contain the rage by going

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>along with the protest to some degree. CEO sund Our Pitch.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I made sure that managers could make arrangements to cover

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for staff who wanted to take part. And how how

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>did the company restpond because in a way, in a

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>way they were kind of supportive. I think they at

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>us a table of like pagels and coffee, a joke

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like the revolution will be catered. But then I've realized

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not really a joke. It's um it's

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a very common management tactic to portray any descent

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>as officially sanctioned fit for you personally. What what do

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you think of the most important things to actually have

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>changed so far? I think the biggest thing that has

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>changed is that Google's understand that we need to talk

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to each other or we won't understand what's going on

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>their company if we don't, you know, share our stories,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we won't. No, we'll just all be compartmentalized. And everyone

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>who's going through something horrible, something like any of what

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the women who spoke to that reporter experience

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll just think, Oh, this is just me. I'm alone.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm the crazy one, which is certainly how companies

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>everywhere have always tried to make people feel in those situations,

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and Google is no exception. Alista, what's happened to Irene

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the other Google workers who have been protesting

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>so much in the last couple of years. I can't

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine Google is very pleased with them. Well, some employees

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>said recently that Google has retaliated against them, so I

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>brought that up with Ireen Personally, what I have experienced

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is everybody I know, everybody who's doing positive change of

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the company, UM, who's working to make place better, UM,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>has been feeling disheartened, has experienced, you know, something, even

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's even if it's small, even if it's an

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>interaction with HR where they say, um, you know, step

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>back from communicating. I'm my internal mailing lists and you say, UM, well,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are you telling me that I have to do that?

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Or are you suggesting? And they say, oh, I'm just suggesting.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And then afterward they follow up and they try to

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>get it in writing that they told you you have to.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>When you follow up and say, no, I that's not

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>my recollection for meeting. It was just advice. Correct, you're

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>not telling me that I can't and why why why

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>would they do something like that? Just a difficult tactic.

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there are any different from any other

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>company in that regard. It's um you know, establishing a

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>contemporaneous written record of what happened is likely to carry

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>more weight than your testimony about how that conversation really went.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Some protesters say they've been demoted or had responsibilities taken away.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>One of these people is Meredith Whittaker. She's a Google

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>researcher who specializes in AI and co founded a group

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>called AI Now that studies the impact of this technology

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on society. So she founded a nonprofit called AI Now,

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which you know, in my opinion as an engineer who's

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>work is relevant to this stuff, is doing absolutely incredible work.

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Meredith was told, and I the form of it was

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit ambiguous. I think that she would not be

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>able to focus on that work in her capacity at Google,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and that the company's priorities were no longer online where

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they are now, which is a startin thing to say,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>since it's like saying the company's priorities are no longer

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>relige with what's good for the world. Then in May

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>some Google is organized a sit in to share stories

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of retaliation by the company. But this event was a

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>lot smaller than the walkout protest. Google has policies to

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>prohibit retaliation at work and provides ways for workers to

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>apport such behavior, and it investigates all reports. But I

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>mean said the company didn't sanction the sitting. Combined with

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the reports of retaliation, people may have felt nervous about

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>taking part. I think this is the test of um,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, can they get rid of what they must

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>view as the troublemaker saying all that work? I think

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is watching to see what happens to us,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the poor group. And how do you feel It sounds

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like you feel a bit targeted, yes, now as an individual,

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>as a member of that group, And what do you

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen to the group? I think

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we're wrong to wear I think the company tactics here

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>show a great desperation. They wouldn't do anything so blatant

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if they had any better options. Um. I think they

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>know how the world views this, now that they know

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that Google isn't some magical place where everything is perfect,

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's a company like any other corporation, um like

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>any other multinational corporation that you know, ultimately tries its

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>best to think of people's interchangeable. Okay, I want listeners

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop and mull that last comment for a second.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I've been covering Google on and off for about five years,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>so this is shocking to hear. Co founder Larry Page

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>has always wanted Google to be an unconventional company, but

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>here I mean is saying this is no longer the case.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>So Ali, I'm curious about whether all of these protests

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>by employees are starting to hurt Google's business in any way.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it could for sure. I think Google's ability

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to hire and keep talent is a really under appre

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>created part of its success. And you know, these these

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>protests really are are all about how that special relationship

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>between Google and its workers has started to break down.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So it could be it could be a lot harder

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep hold of talented people or higher new ones.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And so what about Google's actual businesses. You know, we've

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>already heard that Google had to step away from Project Maven,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>which is a valuable contract that could have led to

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>more business. So there are other projects that are at

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>risk in a similar way. I think the main thing

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at here is Google's cloud computing business. This

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is the business of where you basically have a bunch

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of servers and data centers and you rent them out

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to other companies. And Amazon and Microsoft really lead in

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that business. It's a really booming industry and Google is

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>third and a bit late to that business. Now. A

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>big cloud customer in the US is the US military

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and the border US government. So if officials worry that

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Google staff are going to keep derailing projects like Maven,

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that could make them pick Amazon or Microsoft, you know,

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>when other contracts come up forbidding. And what about the

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>popularity of the CEO, Sunder Patty. He's historically been quite

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>popular within the company, and I wonder if that's beginning

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to change at all. So there was a an internal

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>employee survey that actually Google does it every year that

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this latest one, which came out in around early two

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nineteen, again got leaked into the press. We

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote about it as well, and it showed that among

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>employees sunder pitch i is still still has a solid rating,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but actually it went down by by more than ten

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage points compared to compared to the previous years, So

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there has been there has been a drop in the

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>way that employees think about him, and over the last

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>few months, pitch I has had to address the protests

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>from workers. He said that Google has listened to concerns

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about the way the military users AI, and the company

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>has made quite a few changes in response. He's also

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>said that employees should be able to choose what they

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>work on, but he emphasized that Google is going to

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>continue working with the U. S. Military. Here's a clip

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of him talking about this in November the New York

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Times conference. We don't run the company by referendum, and

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there are many things good about

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We've given employees a lot of wars and out of

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>which we've done well as a company, and I think

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's part of the process. I think other companies may

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not be used to it. And so it looks like,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is how everything works, but that's not

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>how everything works. Our positions we make, which they may

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>not often you frustrated though, and then coming back to Irene,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how they're feeling at this point because employees

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have managed to push through some real change at Google.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, these recent reports of retaliation must

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not be very encouraging. Yeah, I did ask them about that.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I wondered looking back over this roughly a year, even

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>more than a year, Um, do you think it's all

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>been worth it? So? Clas absolutely no question. I came

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>through the tech industry and to Google with the idea

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as to go of making positive change in the world,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and I still feel that Google does that in some

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>respects um. And I also I feel greatly privileged to

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be in a position where I can make my own

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>positive change to the company, or at least try to.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And has this come at a personal cost to Irene? Yes.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Irene also talked about the toll of anonymous people goading

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and harassing them online. Frankly, we're talking about white supremacists here,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and they are as shallow as you can possibly imagine,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more shallow. I think they They would say that

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody like me is um, they might say effective, or

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they would just express dis belief that anybody of my

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>role could possibly be somebody at all important than anybody

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like me, you could do anything significant. I Rene managed

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>to remain calm through more than an hour of discussing

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>all this with me. The only time they really got

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>set was discussing how these anonymous harasses targeted Google co

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. But you see the

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>founders are you know, they have Jewish backgrounds of various natures,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and so to these as Larry and Sergey, who are

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>brilliant engineers who invented the algorithm that the company is

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>built on, personally, um are simply nonentities because Jewish it's

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just so shallow. It was clear to me from this

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that I mean still loves Google at least what the

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>company used to stand for and what it could once

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>again be. Now, what do you think the future looks

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for for both you? You and and Google and you

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at Google? Excellent question. I don't know. You know how

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>much mongerl be with the company. Everybody reaches their moment

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can't rely on single individuals forever. But I

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think that there are many people at the company now

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we're aware of all these issues and tapped in, and

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I know that we now have a robust movement to

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>hold the industry account of ball. It's not even just

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Google anymore. And that's it for this week's episode of Decrypted.

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. If you have a story to share,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>or if you're a tech worker who's concerned about the

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>company work app, I'd love to hear from you. You

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can write to us at Decrypted at bloomberg dot net,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>w I'm on Twitter at Alistair m bar and I'm

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at Pierre get Curry. And please help us spread the

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>word about our show by leaving us a rating or

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>review in your favorite podcast app. This episode was produced

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>by Pierre get Curry and Lindsay Cratterwell. Our story editor

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was Aki Eater. Thank you also to Ann vander May

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and Emily Abusa. Francesco Leavie is head of Bloomberg Podcast.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next week.