WEBVTT - Group Chat Protocols, Bracket Updates, and thoughts on the WNBA 

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:34.244
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:34.244 --> 0:00:37.004
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova and.

0:00:37.004 --> 0:00:40.524
<v Speaker 2>Live on tape from the beautiful Pushkin Studios in the

0:00:40.564 --> 0:00:42.884
<v Speaker 2>Flying In District of New York City, New York. I'm

0:00:42.964 --> 0:00:43.484
<v Speaker 2>Nate Silver.

0:00:44.044 --> 0:00:46.804
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this is correct. This is the first time that

0:00:46.924 --> 0:00:49.404
<v Speaker 1>Nate and I are both in the studio in the

0:00:49.484 --> 0:00:52.444
<v Speaker 1>same place since the pilot of the show. Nate.

0:00:52.804 --> 0:00:56.324
<v Speaker 2>But if you detect an extra special chemistry, it's very

0:00:56.324 --> 0:00:58.484
<v Speaker 2>close quarters. You're actually it is.

0:00:58.724 --> 0:01:02.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And today we've got some some stories for you.

0:01:03.804 --> 0:01:06.764
<v Speaker 1>First up, the Failing Atlantic Monthly.

0:01:07.044 --> 0:01:08.724
<v Speaker 2>Failing Atlantic Monthly.

0:01:08.924 --> 0:01:12.364
<v Speaker 1>Has a quite the scoop, So we're going to be

0:01:12.404 --> 0:01:17.884
<v Speaker 1>talking about Jeffrey Goldberg's signal, information security and what not

0:01:18.044 --> 0:01:19.724
<v Speaker 1>to do on your group chat.

0:01:20.844 --> 0:01:25.084
<v Speaker 2>Then we'll talk ketchup on our NCAA brackets recap, for example,

0:01:25.164 --> 0:01:27.724
<v Speaker 2>how team Nate so far in the lead against Team

0:01:27.724 --> 0:01:31.924
<v Speaker 2>Maria and Monty. And we'll talk about women's basketball and

0:01:32.244 --> 0:01:35.604
<v Speaker 2>why on earth are women not allowed to join the

0:01:35.644 --> 0:01:38.124
<v Speaker 2>WNBA until twenty two years old.

0:01:42.804 --> 0:01:45.444
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it, Nate, but before we do, you moved.

0:01:45.644 --> 0:01:47.444
<v Speaker 1>You are now in a new apartment.

0:01:48.364 --> 0:01:52.364
<v Speaker 2>Now I moved from a neighborhood which might generously be

0:01:52.404 --> 0:01:54.924
<v Speaker 2>called Chelsea, but really is South Penn Station.

0:01:55.204 --> 0:01:58.124
<v Speaker 1>To thank you, name you finally, now that you moved

0:01:58.164 --> 0:01:59.484
<v Speaker 1>on final New.

0:01:59.444 --> 0:02:02.284
<v Speaker 2>York Times On the New York Times Leader map, it

0:02:02.364 --> 0:02:07.364
<v Speaker 2>was considered seventy percent Chelsea. All right, all right, Chelsea

0:02:07.684 --> 0:02:10.044
<v Speaker 2>Midtown West High correct.

0:02:10.044 --> 0:02:12.284
<v Speaker 1>Now that you're out of there, you can acknowledge that

0:02:12.364 --> 0:02:13.484
<v Speaker 1>it really was not Chelsea.

0:02:13.684 --> 0:02:15.524
<v Speaker 2>No, And like there is something about being like in

0:02:15.564 --> 0:02:20.964
<v Speaker 2>an actual like neighborhood. Yea, Like you know, South Penn

0:02:21.724 --> 0:02:25.644
<v Speaker 2>Northeast Chelsea as I call it, serves kind of this

0:02:25.764 --> 0:02:28.124
<v Speaker 2>transient community, right, so people commuting in and out of

0:02:28.124 --> 0:02:30.404
<v Speaker 2>the city. It's there are some working spaces there, right,

0:02:31.044 --> 0:02:34.204
<v Speaker 2>people go into Nixon Rangers games. I like Nick and Rangers, right,

0:02:34.244 --> 0:02:37.564
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, Massiesquare Garden like dominates in some

0:02:37.604 --> 0:02:40.364
<v Speaker 2>ways that profile the neighborhood. And so yeah, this is

0:02:40.364 --> 0:02:42.604
<v Speaker 2>a real neighborhood. And like they're you know, I'm reading

0:02:42.644 --> 0:02:45.164
<v Speaker 2>the esperate climb. But there's an abundance, right, Not only

0:02:45.204 --> 0:02:48.924
<v Speaker 2>do you have your independent coffee shops in the morning, right,

0:02:48.964 --> 0:02:54.164
<v Speaker 2>you have your French Vietnamese independent coffee shop on your

0:02:54.204 --> 0:02:59.884
<v Speaker 2>Scandinavian independent coffee shop. Right, you have your vaguely Russian,

0:02:59.964 --> 0:03:03.644
<v Speaker 2>Eastern European, mostly vegetarian wine bar. It's like, and they're

0:03:03.684 --> 0:03:04.444
<v Speaker 2>all pretty fucking good.

0:03:04.484 --> 0:03:06.684
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm glad you're now in your a new neighborhood.

0:03:06.844 --> 0:03:08.924
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you're finally moved, because, as we all know,

0:03:09.044 --> 0:03:13.404
<v Speaker 1>moving sucks the process that is, So I'm glad that's

0:03:13.444 --> 0:03:16.404
<v Speaker 1>behind you. Let's talk about something a little bit less fun.

0:03:16.444 --> 0:03:19.844
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on some level it's kind of hilarious, which

0:03:19.924 --> 0:03:24.004
<v Speaker 1>is that this week there was an absolute bombshell You know,

0:03:24.044 --> 0:03:26.084
<v Speaker 1>bombshell is usually overused, but I feel like this was

0:03:26.124 --> 0:03:30.044
<v Speaker 1>a bombshell piece in the Atlantic, unprecedented as far as

0:03:30.084 --> 0:03:34.004
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, in the amples of national security, where

0:03:34.084 --> 0:03:37.804
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of the Atlantic, was

0:03:37.964 --> 0:03:44.604
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently included on a signal chat with members top members

0:03:44.644 --> 0:03:49.164
<v Speaker 1>of US national security that we're discussing a then imminent

0:03:49.404 --> 0:03:53.884
<v Speaker 1>attack on the whoties. Let's start off by just talking

0:03:53.884 --> 0:03:58.404
<v Speaker 1>about info sec or information security and how the fuck

0:03:58.684 --> 0:04:00.404
<v Speaker 1>something like this happens.

0:04:00.804 --> 0:04:05.204
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I am a top Information security is my

0:04:05.244 --> 0:04:08.924
<v Speaker 2>top issue. Right. The reason I voted for Donald Trump

0:04:08.924 --> 0:04:11.084
<v Speaker 2>and twin Syxs teenage because of Hiller Clinton's email server.

0:04:11.204 --> 0:04:14.324
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was the most important story in the country.

0:04:14.444 --> 0:04:16.524
<v Speaker 2>I thought there was too little press coverage of it.

0:04:16.644 --> 0:04:20.884
<v Speaker 2>If anything, Sorry, I vote for Trump.

0:04:21.724 --> 0:04:24.044
<v Speaker 1>Yes, everyone who thought that they was serious night did

0:04:24.084 --> 0:04:27.524
<v Speaker 1>not vote for Trump in twenty sixteen. This was he

0:04:27.684 --> 0:04:29.164
<v Speaker 1>was being sarcastic.

0:04:29.204 --> 0:04:32.164
<v Speaker 2>Are you a group chat girl? Person?

0:04:32.964 --> 0:04:35.884
<v Speaker 1>I am only in a few group chats, and those

0:04:35.924 --> 0:04:38.564
<v Speaker 1>group chats are like three people, you know, Like I'm

0:04:38.564 --> 0:04:40.404
<v Speaker 1>in a group chat with you and your partner. Yeah,

0:04:40.684 --> 0:04:43.644
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in a similar group chat with you know,

0:04:43.684 --> 0:04:46.244
<v Speaker 1>my college roommates and a few others. But i hate

0:04:46.364 --> 0:04:47.004
<v Speaker 1>group chats.

0:04:47.124 --> 0:04:49.164
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not a big awful. I'm not a big

0:04:49.284 --> 0:04:51.124
<v Speaker 2>I think it's probably because now this is where I

0:04:51.164 --> 0:04:53.444
<v Speaker 2>sound like a fucking snob, right, But like Maria, you

0:04:53.484 --> 0:04:55.844
<v Speaker 2>and I like have we're kind of like we're able

0:04:55.844 --> 0:04:58.444
<v Speaker 2>to communicate. We kind of communicate professionally for a living, right,

0:04:58.484 --> 0:05:00.244
<v Speaker 2>And so like I could see the value of like

0:05:00.244 --> 0:05:02.644
<v Speaker 2>a group chat if like, if you want this cool

0:05:02.804 --> 0:05:05.284
<v Speaker 2>people that you're like who care about your opinions, right,

0:05:06.364 --> 0:05:08.204
<v Speaker 2>But like if you're writing all the time, I'm like,

0:05:08.204 --> 0:05:10.244
<v Speaker 2>it's with emails too. I want to fucking write a

0:05:10.324 --> 0:05:12.964
<v Speaker 2>long email. Now I'm making a fucking newsletter. Montize that

0:05:12.964 --> 0:05:17.524
<v Speaker 2>shit talk about in the podcast Monetize that shit. I'm

0:05:17.524 --> 0:05:19.004
<v Speaker 2>not giving free stuff away in group chats.

0:05:19.004 --> 0:05:22.404
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, no, that's absolutely true. So I've had to set

0:05:22.444 --> 0:05:25.604
<v Speaker 1>up group chats a few times for various reasons, and

0:05:25.844 --> 0:05:29.884
<v Speaker 1>whenever I do, I'm actually super paranoid about putting the

0:05:29.884 --> 0:05:32.724
<v Speaker 1>wrong person in the group chat. So Nate, for instance,

0:05:32.764 --> 0:05:34.924
<v Speaker 1>let me use you as an example, because I've had

0:05:34.924 --> 0:05:38.524
<v Speaker 1>to add you to group chats for scheduling purposes, and

0:05:39.004 --> 0:05:42.564
<v Speaker 1>I have several Nates in my phone, and you are

0:05:42.684 --> 0:05:44.964
<v Speaker 1>never the first Nate to come up, probably because you

0:05:44.964 --> 0:05:47.924
<v Speaker 1>don't have an iPhone, so my iPhone doesn't like that

0:05:48.084 --> 0:05:50.684
<v Speaker 1>and always is like, no, don't, don't use this Nate.

0:05:51.084 --> 0:05:54.804
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, barstool Nate, he is also in

0:05:54.884 --> 0:05:56.924
<v Speaker 1>my phone, Wow, And he is the one who is

0:05:57.004 --> 0:06:01.444
<v Speaker 1>always coming up before you. And I am always paranoid, Sorry,

0:06:01.484 --> 0:06:04.524
<v Speaker 1>barstool Nate, but I'm always paranoid that I'm going to

0:06:04.564 --> 0:06:07.244
<v Speaker 1>add the wrong Nate to one of these things. And

0:06:07.284 --> 0:06:09.724
<v Speaker 1>I triple check to make sure that you know, I

0:06:09.764 --> 0:06:12.444
<v Speaker 1>don't inadvertently say, you know, Ad, and I'm adding the

0:06:12.484 --> 0:06:17.004
<v Speaker 1>wrong person now I'm only highlighting this to say, Okay,

0:06:17.204 --> 0:06:19.964
<v Speaker 1>when you're starting a group chat, and this is just

0:06:19.964 --> 0:06:23.244
<v Speaker 1>about scheduling, you probably care about who's in it. Now,

0:06:23.324 --> 0:06:26.884
<v Speaker 1>imagine your schedule. You're doing a group chat about bombing

0:06:27.244 --> 0:06:31.444
<v Speaker 1>a country, right, or bombing a group? Shouldn't you double check,

0:06:31.484 --> 0:06:34.364
<v Speaker 1>triple check, quadruple joke? I mean, okay, wait, what am

0:06:34.404 --> 0:06:37.044
<v Speaker 1>I even talking about? Why are we starting a group

0:06:37.124 --> 0:06:41.644
<v Speaker 1>chat about national security? Rule number one? And you probably

0:06:41.684 --> 0:06:44.524
<v Speaker 1>have learned this as a journalist. You never put anything

0:06:44.524 --> 0:06:47.444
<v Speaker 1>in an email or in a chat that you don't

0:06:47.564 --> 0:06:49.444
<v Speaker 1>want on the front page of the New York Times,

0:06:49.524 --> 0:06:51.124
<v Speaker 1>potentially because.

0:06:51.164 --> 0:06:52.684
<v Speaker 2>And that's the other reason why I don't like, I'm

0:06:52.684 --> 0:06:55.204
<v Speaker 2>pretty circumctanted about what to say over email or even

0:06:55.804 --> 0:06:59.404
<v Speaker 2>you know, even a private event. I'm just careful about

0:06:59.404 --> 0:07:01.284
<v Speaker 2>what I gues say, whereas I kind of in call,

0:07:01.324 --> 0:07:03.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, I say lots of shit like yeah, well

0:07:03.164 --> 0:07:05.764
<v Speaker 2>the podcast and on Twitter and whatever else in the newsletter,

0:07:05.804 --> 0:07:09.764
<v Speaker 2>but like, but yeah, I don't assume that things stay

0:07:09.964 --> 0:07:13.324
<v Speaker 2>private without like explicit Yeah, understand.

0:07:13.004 --> 0:07:16.364
<v Speaker 1>You can't assume they stay private, and you can't assume

0:07:16.724 --> 0:07:19.324
<v Speaker 1>that things don't get passed along. That basically the only

0:07:19.364 --> 0:07:21.484
<v Speaker 1>people who see them are going to be the people

0:07:21.524 --> 0:07:24.844
<v Speaker 1>who you are sending them to. So nothing should be

0:07:24.884 --> 0:07:28.964
<v Speaker 1>done over chat that is sensitive. That's not how you

0:07:29.004 --> 0:07:32.764
<v Speaker 1>communicate national security, that's not how you communicate war plans.

0:07:33.044 --> 0:07:35.204
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, that is what happened. Now. One

0:07:35.244 --> 0:07:37.804
<v Speaker 1>of the things I learned when I was back when

0:07:37.804 --> 0:07:41.404
<v Speaker 1>I was working on the Confidence Game, I actually talk

0:07:41.484 --> 0:07:44.084
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people who do information security, who

0:07:44.124 --> 0:07:47.524
<v Speaker 1>do cybersecurity, because hacking and you know that that kind

0:07:47.524 --> 0:07:51.124
<v Speaker 1>of social engineering is huge for con artists. And they

0:07:51.204 --> 0:07:52.884
<v Speaker 1>all told me, I don't care what kind of a

0:07:52.884 --> 0:07:55.644
<v Speaker 1>security system you have, you know, I don't care how

0:07:56.084 --> 0:07:58.564
<v Speaker 1>up to date you are, who's your you know, who

0:07:58.604 --> 0:08:01.284
<v Speaker 1>does your infosec all of this stuff. You're only as

0:08:01.284 --> 0:08:03.804
<v Speaker 1>strong as your weakest human link. And it's always going

0:08:03.844 --> 0:08:06.124
<v Speaker 1>to be human. It's never going to be technological, right,

0:08:06.164 --> 0:08:09.364
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be that dumb person. And if

0:08:09.404 --> 0:08:12.404
<v Speaker 1>I can get to that dumb person, then I can

0:08:12.404 --> 0:08:14.404
<v Speaker 1>take you down, right, I don't, I don't. I can

0:08:14.404 --> 0:08:17.204
<v Speaker 1>get behind any firewall, I can get past anything. And

0:08:17.244 --> 0:08:20.684
<v Speaker 1>this that's just like one oh one ABC, And this

0:08:21.004 --> 0:08:24.364
<v Speaker 1>is like the textbook case of wait. I didn't even

0:08:24.404 --> 0:08:27.324
<v Speaker 1>need to do anything, right, you just fucked up so

0:08:27.484 --> 0:08:32.084
<v Speaker 1>badly that you know you just here here is the

0:08:32.084 --> 0:08:34.484
<v Speaker 1>weakest link, and the weakest link happens to be at

0:08:34.484 --> 0:08:36.684
<v Speaker 1>the top of our national intelligence.

0:08:37.324 --> 0:08:40.804
<v Speaker 2>So one thing I'd say is you are bringing a

0:08:40.804 --> 0:08:42.604
<v Speaker 2>lot of people that don't have a lot of experience

0:08:42.644 --> 0:08:47.524
<v Speaker 2>in government. Right. I listened to the as Recline podcast

0:08:47.644 --> 0:08:49.404
<v Speaker 2>with I think it was Ben Buchanan, who was like

0:08:49.444 --> 0:08:53.764
<v Speaker 2>a basically one of Biden's heads of AI policy, and

0:08:53.844 --> 0:08:55.684
<v Speaker 2>he's like, yeah, you go into the government and like

0:08:56.164 --> 0:08:58.404
<v Speaker 2>there are rooms where you're not allowed to use the internet,

0:08:58.444 --> 0:09:00.884
<v Speaker 2>and there are all these protocols that are quite cumbersome,

0:09:00.924 --> 0:09:02.364
<v Speaker 2>and if you come from the private sector, I'm sure

0:09:02.364 --> 0:09:05.444
<v Speaker 2>it's like extremely annoying. Right. And so the fact that like,

0:09:06.124 --> 0:09:08.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, JD. Van's only two years in government, right,

0:09:09.884 --> 0:09:12.484
<v Speaker 2>Pete Haig Stiff no years and government less, I'm forgetting

0:09:12.484 --> 0:09:14.644
<v Speaker 2>about something, Right. You bring in people that are like

0:09:14.644 --> 0:09:16.964
<v Speaker 2>our kind of Fox and count I think, you know,

0:09:17.044 --> 0:09:19.684
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of could be state on media. I don't know,

0:09:20.964 --> 0:09:22.884
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, you're bringing people who like are just like, hey,

0:09:22.924 --> 0:09:24.324
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of treating this like a group chat, like

0:09:24.324 --> 0:09:28.004
<v Speaker 2>we're negotiating some VC deal or whatever, and like, on

0:09:28.044 --> 0:09:30.364
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, it's kind of like, how do I

0:09:30.364 --> 0:09:33.324
<v Speaker 2>put this, the casualness of the language, I'm not you know,

0:09:33.324 --> 0:09:36.764
<v Speaker 2>I don't think any of them come off especially badly

0:09:36.884 --> 0:09:38.764
<v Speaker 2>in the text that are referent. I mean, if anything,

0:09:38.764 --> 0:09:42.524
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of like, if anything that seemed like, I mean,

0:09:42.564 --> 0:09:45.204
<v Speaker 2>there are internal politics, Like Steven Miller comes in. He's

0:09:45.204 --> 0:09:48.004
<v Speaker 2>the kind of Trump advisor and he's like, don't go

0:09:48.084 --> 0:09:50.404
<v Speaker 2>too far and interpreting crumps shit, right, and then they

0:09:50.444 --> 0:09:52.764
<v Speaker 2>kind of shut up, right, But like, but you know, look,

0:09:52.764 --> 0:09:55.884
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Jadi Vance is a smart guy, right, I

0:09:55.964 --> 0:09:57.644
<v Speaker 2>think he might be in over his debt. I think

0:09:57.684 --> 0:09:59.844
<v Speaker 2>he's like a smart guy. And it's kind of fun

0:09:59.844 --> 0:10:02.164
<v Speaker 2>to watch them to chatting. But yeah, why is this journalist?

0:10:03.364 --> 0:10:05.404
<v Speaker 2>Why is this journalist copied on this chain?

0:10:06.204 --> 0:10:09.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And and no one and no one catch which

0:10:09.604 --> 0:10:12.644
<v Speaker 1>is that he's on the chain at any point and

0:10:12.844 --> 0:10:15.484
<v Speaker 1>apparently so we don't know, but apparently there are very

0:10:15.484 --> 0:10:19.444
<v Speaker 1>sensitive details shared. And at this point, so just in

0:10:19.524 --> 0:10:23.124
<v Speaker 1>terms of journalistic ethics, you know, people are joking and saying,

0:10:23.124 --> 0:10:24.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're a journalist, why didn't you stay in

0:10:24.804 --> 0:10:28.964
<v Speaker 1>the chat? Well, it's because Jeffrey Goldberg actually understands the

0:10:29.324 --> 0:10:31.444
<v Speaker 1>repercussions of this, and at the moment that this was

0:10:31.484 --> 0:10:34.284
<v Speaker 1>actually said that this is that this is correct right,

0:10:34.324 --> 0:10:36.404
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't because at first he didn't know if

0:10:36.404 --> 0:10:38.524
<v Speaker 1>this was a spoof or like what this was right?

0:10:38.924 --> 0:10:41.324
<v Speaker 1>But once it was confirmed that this is legit, he left.

0:10:42.484 --> 0:10:45.884
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that is the ethical thing to do.

0:10:46.004 --> 0:10:49.284
<v Speaker 1>Although there's obviously a part of me that is like, oh,

0:10:49.364 --> 0:10:51.364
<v Speaker 1>but what else could you have learned? But I think

0:10:51.364 --> 0:10:54.724
<v Speaker 1>that that is the ethical and the legally safer thing

0:10:54.804 --> 0:10:58.164
<v Speaker 1>to do, because you know, people will try, I think,

0:10:57.964 --> 0:11:01.124
<v Speaker 1>to come after him, and it was smart to leave.

0:11:02.004 --> 0:11:05.524
<v Speaker 2>I think you can debate it. I mean, look fundamentally, Okay,

0:11:05.604 --> 0:11:09.244
<v Speaker 2>let's let's ask you. Let's say that you're added to

0:11:09.284 --> 0:11:11.204
<v Speaker 2>the group chat. What do you what do you do?

0:11:11.564 --> 0:11:15.964
<v Speaker 1>Well? I think at first, especially given you know my

0:11:15.964 --> 0:11:18.444
<v Speaker 1>my background and the books that I've written, the book

0:11:18.484 --> 0:11:21.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on, I would assume that it's fake. I

0:11:21.444 --> 0:11:23.764
<v Speaker 1>mean that would be my initial assumption. How could you

0:11:23.884 --> 0:11:25.124
<v Speaker 1>not assume that it's fake?

0:11:25.164 --> 0:11:28.364
<v Speaker 2>When he did say until he kind of performed this

0:11:28.484 --> 0:11:30.564
<v Speaker 2>out of sample test where he, like I guess, he

0:11:30.604 --> 0:11:33.364
<v Speaker 2>said he drove to they make a movie about it, right,

0:11:34.564 --> 0:11:38.164
<v Speaker 2>wrote he drives to some suburban grocery store and waits

0:11:38.164 --> 0:11:40.244
<v Speaker 2>in a parking lot, and it was like, well, if

0:11:40.284 --> 0:11:42.844
<v Speaker 2>they announced in the next fifteen minutes that were bombing Yemen, right,

0:11:42.924 --> 0:11:46.124
<v Speaker 2>and this is real? This is real and yeah, and

0:11:47.404 --> 0:11:50.084
<v Speaker 2>the Trump people kind of caught off guard, kind of

0:11:51.564 --> 0:11:54.924
<v Speaker 2>did acknowledge this was a real chat. Right. Where their

0:11:54.964 --> 0:11:56.684
<v Speaker 2>heads will roll because of this, I don't know, probably

0:11:56.684 --> 0:11:57.884
<v Speaker 2>depends on who Trump's mad at it.

0:11:58.004 --> 0:12:01.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I doubt heads will roll, And I think that

0:12:01.684 --> 0:12:05.684
<v Speaker 1>probably the the two heads that might roll are the

0:12:05.724 --> 0:12:08.004
<v Speaker 1>head of the person who acknowledged that it was real

0:12:08.124 --> 0:12:11.644
<v Speaker 1>immediately and Goldberg, right, like, they're they're going to try

0:12:11.644 --> 0:12:13.404
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to pin this on him instead,

0:12:14.284 --> 0:12:18.404
<v Speaker 1>because that is there, you know initially, you know, the

0:12:19.164 --> 0:12:22.444
<v Speaker 1>when Pete Hegsas was asked about this, he said, oh,

0:12:22.444 --> 0:12:25.644
<v Speaker 1>it's fake, this isn't real, right, but the government had

0:12:25.684 --> 0:12:28.004
<v Speaker 1>already acknowledged that it was very much real.

0:12:28.804 --> 0:12:30.444
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever gotten a scoop just by kind of

0:12:30.444 --> 0:12:31.484
<v Speaker 2>being in the reference at the right time.

0:12:31.564 --> 0:12:34.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have. I have, especially because I'm female and

0:12:34.484 --> 0:12:36.924
<v Speaker 1>so people tend to forget that I exist as an

0:12:37.004 --> 0:12:39.644
<v Speaker 1>actual person. With a brain. No, it's true. It's true.

0:12:39.724 --> 0:12:41.964
<v Speaker 1>It's true. I can, like I blend into the background

0:12:42.044 --> 0:12:45.684
<v Speaker 1>and people forget to take me into account. I'm assuming

0:12:45.684 --> 0:12:49.084
<v Speaker 1>with you, it's probably less likely that people are you.

0:12:49.004 --> 0:12:50.604
<v Speaker 2>Know, it's always just thing like kind of what people

0:12:50.684 --> 0:12:54.164
<v Speaker 2>And it's probably as different if you're male and in

0:12:54.164 --> 0:12:57.924
<v Speaker 2>white whatever, you know, mistakenly taken for heterosexual in my case.

0:12:58.204 --> 0:13:00.564
<v Speaker 2>But like what people feel comfortable sharing with you, I

0:13:00.564 --> 0:13:03.964
<v Speaker 2>mean this is true even at the at the poker table,

0:13:04.044 --> 0:13:07.484
<v Speaker 2>in both public games and private games and poker, there

0:13:07.564 --> 0:13:11.324
<v Speaker 2>is kind of, I think a pretty strong unspoken understanding

0:13:11.364 --> 0:13:16.204
<v Speaker 2>that like, you know, if something relates, if someone relates

0:13:16.204 --> 0:13:18.444
<v Speaker 2>to me at the poker table, then if I don't

0:13:18.644 --> 0:13:22.844
<v Speaker 2>have a relationship with them, right, I would kind of anonymize. Yeah, right,

0:13:23.364 --> 0:13:25.244
<v Speaker 2>But people do have a lot of trust, right, I

0:13:25.244 --> 0:13:30.204
<v Speaker 2>mean I've heard people discussing wildly illegal things at the

0:13:30.244 --> 0:13:31.484
<v Speaker 2>poker Oh for sure.

0:13:31.644 --> 0:13:33.404
<v Speaker 1>For sure, they do have a lot of trust, and

0:13:33.444 --> 0:13:36.684
<v Speaker 1>they do often forget that you're a journalist and you

0:13:36.764 --> 0:13:39.844
<v Speaker 1>do have to remind them. But but yeah, I think

0:13:39.964 --> 0:13:43.804
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting that not only Hexath, but like the

0:13:44.724 --> 0:13:48.284
<v Speaker 1>Trump reaction to this was, you know, what's the aleotic

0:13:48.364 --> 0:13:50.284
<v Speaker 1>failing magazine. Right, nobody cares.

0:13:50.044 --> 0:13:52.924
<v Speaker 2>About this, I'm sure a million plus page yeah and.

0:13:52.884 --> 0:13:56.244
<v Speaker 1>So and so if you if you think about, you know,

0:13:56.404 --> 0:14:00.764
<v Speaker 1>what is ideal risk mitigation strategy? Right, like, Okay, you

0:14:00.844 --> 0:14:03.764
<v Speaker 1>fuck up? What do you do now?

0:14:04.044 --> 0:14:04.164
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:14:04.244 --> 0:14:08.644
<v Speaker 1>Like, from a risk management mitigation standpoint, what is the

0:14:08.684 --> 0:14:11.564
<v Speaker 1>best thing to do next? And I would argue that

0:14:11.644 --> 0:14:14.284
<v Speaker 1>the best thing, the way that people usually come off

0:14:14.284 --> 0:14:17.204
<v Speaker 1>the best, and this comes from both organizations in on

0:14:17.244 --> 0:14:20.924
<v Speaker 1>an individual level, is to immediately acknowledge it and be like, yeah,

0:14:21.004 --> 0:14:25.364
<v Speaker 1>fucked up, sorry, and then like we'll get back to you,

0:14:25.764 --> 0:14:28.564
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, issue whatever, apology, et cetera. But

0:14:28.684 --> 0:14:31.724
<v Speaker 1>you always always always look a million times worse and

0:14:31.764 --> 0:14:34.444
<v Speaker 1>it spirals out of control and it gets like a

0:14:34.684 --> 0:14:37.884
<v Speaker 1>much bigger story. Right, It becomes much worse if you deny,

0:14:38.204 --> 0:14:40.364
<v Speaker 1>it becomes much worse if you try to, you know,

0:14:40.364 --> 0:14:43.324
<v Speaker 1>put a rug over it, me spill no, no, look,

0:14:43.644 --> 0:14:46.724
<v Speaker 1>the floor is beautiful. And so I think that this

0:14:46.884 --> 0:14:50.324
<v Speaker 1>is just being handled completely backwards. And you would think

0:14:50.404 --> 0:14:54.044
<v Speaker 1>that people who have media training that's something he does have,

0:14:54.444 --> 0:14:57.364
<v Speaker 1>would know better, right, would know that that always always

0:14:57.444 --> 0:15:00.484
<v Speaker 1>always backfires. I don't think there's a single case that

0:15:00.524 --> 0:15:02.524
<v Speaker 1>I can think of when it doesn't backfire, when the

0:15:02.564 --> 0:15:05.244
<v Speaker 1>person looks better because they initially denied and then they

0:15:05.244 --> 0:15:06.604
<v Speaker 1>were forced to acknowledge.

0:15:07.564 --> 0:15:11.284
<v Speaker 2>So ignoring is often a good strategy. Right. There is

0:15:11.324 --> 0:15:14.524
<v Speaker 2>a strissand effect thing where like the news cycle moves

0:15:14.524 --> 0:15:19.164
<v Speaker 2>on quickly. So a lot of you'll pay expensive money

0:15:19.204 --> 0:15:22.444
<v Speaker 2>for a PR person, or you'll have you know, if

0:15:22.644 --> 0:15:24.284
<v Speaker 2>for a big corporation, that PR team will come in

0:15:24.324 --> 0:15:26.844
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time to say, don't say anything. We'll

0:15:26.844 --> 0:15:29.844
<v Speaker 2>do a little bit of work in the background with reporters.

0:15:29.884 --> 0:15:32.324
<v Speaker 2>We're working on the story, but don't say anything. Go

0:15:33.284 --> 0:15:34.964
<v Speaker 2>take go to the woods for a couple of days,

0:15:35.004 --> 0:15:37.204
<v Speaker 2>and it'll probably go away. Right, Yeah, this is I mean,

0:15:37.204 --> 0:15:38.364
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're in the White House, it's a

0:15:38.404 --> 0:15:41.444
<v Speaker 2>little bit different than this has national security implications. I mean, look,

0:15:41.484 --> 0:15:45.804
<v Speaker 2>part of the issue is in general, you know, you're

0:15:45.884 --> 0:15:49.924
<v Speaker 2>a powerful person. You're the vice president, or you're the

0:15:49.924 --> 0:15:52.404
<v Speaker 2>secretary of Defense, or you're somebody who thinks you're kind

0:15:52.444 --> 0:15:56.044
<v Speaker 2>of like doing some of the most important work in

0:15:56.084 --> 0:15:57.644
<v Speaker 2>the world, and you're busy and you don't care that

0:15:57.724 --> 0:16:01.044
<v Speaker 2>much about like security, Right, that's someone else's problem, and

0:16:01.084 --> 0:16:02.884
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of like the annoying thing that like,

0:16:03.084 --> 0:16:04.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm mean, I'm worried about this, like in a lot

0:16:04.964 --> 0:16:10.244
<v Speaker 2>of ways I'm worried about like hacking of a labs.

0:16:10.284 --> 0:16:15.324
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure they take it somewhat seriously, but like

0:16:15.844 --> 0:16:18.684
<v Speaker 2>knowing that personality type, you know, I don't think they

0:16:18.684 --> 0:16:20.564
<v Speaker 2>probably take it seriously enough. It's seen as like is

0:16:20.604 --> 0:16:23.164
<v Speaker 2>pureaucratic shit. You have to like jump up. By the way,

0:16:23.324 --> 0:16:26.724
<v Speaker 2>I tell you something, if you want to use the

0:16:26.724 --> 0:16:30.564
<v Speaker 2>the men's bathroom at the at the Pushkin Studios in

0:16:30.644 --> 0:16:33.644
<v Speaker 2>Flat Iron, there's a four digit code. I'm telling you

0:16:33.724 --> 0:16:37.204
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not the most difficult code to guess.

0:16:40.244 --> 0:16:42.644
<v Speaker 1>Speaking about information security.

0:16:42.204 --> 0:16:42.964
<v Speaker 2>That's easiest.

0:16:45.924 --> 0:16:48.084
<v Speaker 1>Well, you'd be you know, can we can we just

0:16:49.604 --> 0:16:53.124
<v Speaker 1>go go way back in history. One of my favorite stories.

0:16:53.244 --> 0:16:56.444
<v Speaker 1>I love the writing of Richard Feynman. I think you

0:16:56.484 --> 0:16:59.324
<v Speaker 1>know he was a brilliant mind, brilliant writer, but he

0:16:59.364 --> 0:17:04.404
<v Speaker 1>has a hilarious story about information security where he had

0:17:04.564 --> 0:17:10.364
<v Speaker 1>a complete fascination with safe cracking, Like he would go

0:17:10.404 --> 0:17:12.284
<v Speaker 1>down these rabbit holes with different things, and at some

0:17:12.284 --> 0:17:15.964
<v Speaker 1>point he became fascinated with cryptography and safe cracking, and

0:17:16.604 --> 0:17:20.764
<v Speaker 1>he became very adept at cracking into safes, and mostly

0:17:20.804 --> 0:17:22.844
<v Speaker 1>how he did it wasn't he didn't you know, traind

0:17:22.844 --> 0:17:25.124
<v Speaker 1>with criminals and you know, figure out, like in the movies,

0:17:25.164 --> 0:17:27.124
<v Speaker 1>how do you listen to all of that? No, he

0:17:27.204 --> 0:17:30.124
<v Speaker 1>figured out that it was always easy to get the

0:17:30.124 --> 0:17:32.964
<v Speaker 1>code right because there was always a secretary who like

0:17:33.124 --> 0:17:36.284
<v Speaker 1>had written it down somewhere or something like that. And

0:17:36.324 --> 0:17:39.324
<v Speaker 1>then there was actually an incredibly important safe, and there

0:17:39.404 --> 0:17:42.444
<v Speaker 1>was a series of them that had national security secret

0:17:42.764 --> 0:17:44.964
<v Speaker 1>stuff because he worked in really important on you know,

0:17:45.044 --> 0:17:49.684
<v Speaker 1>important projects, important energy projects, things that were highly classified.

0:17:50.364 --> 0:17:52.004
<v Speaker 1>And he was like, oh, I wonder if I can

0:17:52.044 --> 0:17:55.804
<v Speaker 1>crack into these safes, and he couldn't find anyone writing

0:17:55.804 --> 0:17:58.884
<v Speaker 1>down the combination. He was striking out, and finally he

0:17:58.924 --> 0:18:00.284
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know what, I'm going to try the

0:18:00.324 --> 0:18:03.244
<v Speaker 1>factory code, and he did and the safe opened.

0:18:03.364 --> 0:18:05.244
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, and he was like huh.

0:18:05.284 --> 0:18:06.684
<v Speaker 1>So he went to the second one. There was three

0:18:06.684 --> 0:18:10.084
<v Speaker 1>of them. He tried the factory code, the safe opened

0:18:10.124 --> 0:18:11.884
<v Speaker 1>and the third one as well. So he wrote notes

0:18:11.884 --> 0:18:16.124
<v Speaker 1>in all three and it was like yeah, and left

0:18:16.164 --> 0:18:18.364
<v Speaker 1>them and then the guy opened them in the wrong

0:18:18.484 --> 0:18:21.284
<v Speaker 1>order and didn't realize that it was fein men, you know,

0:18:21.484 --> 0:18:24.004
<v Speaker 1>making a point and thought that they had been like

0:18:24.044 --> 0:18:26.764
<v Speaker 1>severely compromised and freaked the fuck out as he should have.

0:18:28.204 --> 0:18:31.364
<v Speaker 1>Just this goes to show, right that people are dumb.

0:18:31.964 --> 0:18:33.644
<v Speaker 2>And I mean there are trade offs, right if you

0:18:33.724 --> 0:18:37.004
<v Speaker 2>like need to go with draw money from your bank

0:18:37.124 --> 0:18:39.244
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, you know, you face this as a

0:18:39.284 --> 0:18:41.284
<v Speaker 2>poker player, right, They're like, what's it for. It's like,

0:18:41.324 --> 0:18:43.084
<v Speaker 2>it's my fucking money. You have custody of it, right,

0:18:43.844 --> 0:18:44.364
<v Speaker 2>give it to me.

0:18:44.604 --> 0:18:48.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and yeah, no, this there these these types of

0:18:48.244 --> 0:18:50.884
<v Speaker 1>things happen all the time, and but I think we

0:18:50.924 --> 0:18:53.364
<v Speaker 1>do need to be worried, like the bigger implication. I

0:18:53.404 --> 0:18:56.764
<v Speaker 1>think there are a few big implications here. First, it happened,

0:18:56.924 --> 0:18:58.964
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying, oh, well, it only happened once in

0:18:59.124 --> 0:19:01.764
<v Speaker 1>two months. Okay. First of all, it's never happened. That's

0:19:02.164 --> 0:19:05.684
<v Speaker 1>that it's never happened before. Like this is huge, and

0:19:05.804 --> 0:19:08.004
<v Speaker 1>they're denying it. They're taking it like no big deal.

0:19:08.044 --> 0:19:10.164
<v Speaker 1>It is a big deal, Like they were lucky that

0:19:10.164 --> 0:19:12.204
<v Speaker 1>it was Jeffrey Goldberg and not someone else who was

0:19:12.204 --> 0:19:14.484
<v Speaker 1>by mistake on this chat. By the way, maybe other

0:19:14.564 --> 0:19:17.604
<v Speaker 1>people and other chats had other actors on there that

0:19:17.644 --> 0:19:19.924
<v Speaker 1>were there by mistake, Like, this is a big deal.

0:19:20.284 --> 0:19:24.164
<v Speaker 1>Information security is incredibly important. Denying is not the correct

0:19:24.204 --> 0:19:27.564
<v Speaker 1>strategy if you want to mitigate risk. And we should

0:19:27.604 --> 0:19:30.084
<v Speaker 1>be really really worried about this. This is not something

0:19:30.204 --> 0:19:31.044
<v Speaker 1>that is.

0:19:31.604 --> 0:19:35.244
<v Speaker 2>Like an't even supposed to have signal government phones. No,

0:19:35.284 --> 0:19:37.204
<v Speaker 2>you're not saying private phones, which is kind of what

0:19:37.284 --> 0:19:39.324
<v Speaker 2>people were mad about with Hillary, and like.

0:19:39.484 --> 0:19:42.164
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, I mean everything about this, from start to finish

0:19:42.364 --> 0:19:44.524
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly worrisome. So I mean.

0:19:44.404 --> 0:19:46.964
<v Speaker 2>Triump Literally, do you know that if Anthony fucking Wiener

0:19:47.724 --> 0:19:51.324
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been sexing? Right? Like, yeah, probably know, Clinton becomes president?

0:19:51.364 --> 0:19:53.524
<v Speaker 2>Maybe trup because president in twenty twenty to be honest, right,

0:19:53.564 --> 0:19:54.724
<v Speaker 2>and then what happens in twenty five?

0:19:54.724 --> 0:19:57.604
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, right, But so many, so many stupid

0:19:57.644 --> 0:20:00.324
<v Speaker 1>miss so much stupidity here and so much mail you go,

0:20:00.564 --> 0:20:03.644
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that that results and things like this.

0:20:03.724 --> 0:20:06.564
<v Speaker 1>But yes, from a risky business standpoint, this is one bad,

0:20:06.684 --> 0:20:13.364
<v Speaker 1>risky decision after another. Nate, let's take a break and

0:20:13.444 --> 0:20:28.444
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some March madness. Brackets. Can we start

0:20:28.444 --> 0:20:33.484
<v Speaker 1>with a spoiler alert? Nate is currently winning our brackets competition, and.

0:20:33.524 --> 0:20:36.244
<v Speaker 2>Worse Maria and Monty have to root for Duke is

0:20:36.284 --> 0:20:37.804
<v Speaker 2>their only pathway back to victory.

0:20:38.244 --> 0:20:38.964
<v Speaker 1>And Tennessee.

0:20:40.724 --> 0:20:43.044
<v Speaker 2>First of all, it's probably gonna put me further ahead, right, but.

0:20:43.084 --> 0:20:46.684
<v Speaker 1>Like if Tennessee wins, it doesn't put you further ahead.

0:20:47.804 --> 0:20:50.364
<v Speaker 2>Hundred dogs, Maria, I know, I know, but they might win.

0:20:50.564 --> 0:20:53.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we have Purdue. We have one victor over Nate.

0:20:53.284 --> 0:20:55.044
<v Speaker 1>So far, we had Purdue as a pick and Nate

0:20:55.084 --> 0:20:55.324
<v Speaker 1>did not.

0:20:55.564 --> 0:21:00.284
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what I have at a Colorado State? Yeah, yeah, okay, yeah.

0:21:00.484 --> 0:21:03.684
<v Speaker 2>So how is a tournament going? I would say it's

0:21:03.724 --> 0:21:05.804
<v Speaker 2>a good tournament if you're betting on all the favorites

0:21:06.444 --> 0:21:11.084
<v Speaker 2>to win, right, you know, you have all the sixteen

0:21:11.124 --> 0:21:14.324
<v Speaker 2>teams left in the men's tournament are from major conferences. Right,

0:21:15.924 --> 0:21:17.924
<v Speaker 2>you have I think one double digit seed. You have

0:21:17.964 --> 0:21:19.684
<v Speaker 2>all the one seeds intact, all but one of the

0:21:19.684 --> 0:21:22.164
<v Speaker 2>two seeds intact. So and I read the article before

0:21:22.204 --> 0:21:23.524
<v Speaker 2>nand saying, hey, we have more and more upsets than

0:21:23.564 --> 0:21:26.204
<v Speaker 2>say tournament it's gradual, but it's happening this year. This

0:21:26.364 --> 0:21:29.204
<v Speaker 2>year we did not. We had lots of chalk. As

0:21:29.204 --> 0:21:30.764
<v Speaker 2>we defind the term lost swee, which means that like

0:21:31.284 --> 0:21:33.564
<v Speaker 2>you know, the one seeds go forward, the favorites.

0:21:33.164 --> 0:21:36.604
<v Speaker 1>Win, except there were some upsets in the earlier rounds, right.

0:21:36.524 --> 0:21:39.004
<v Speaker 2>Which is that is that some of the more like

0:21:39.044 --> 0:21:41.684
<v Speaker 2>the Colorado sticking they were like the lower seed who

0:21:41.684 --> 0:21:43.484
<v Speaker 2>they'd beat, but like they were actually a favorite in

0:21:43.484 --> 0:21:46.084
<v Speaker 2>our in our model, right, Like there were no you know,

0:21:46.124 --> 0:21:48.044
<v Speaker 2>Saint John's lost to Arkansas, which was I believe it

0:21:48.204 --> 0:21:51.364
<v Speaker 2>a ten seed, and you know, Saint John's kind of

0:21:51.724 --> 0:21:53.524
<v Speaker 2>was a foul trouble. They benched their best player and

0:21:53.604 --> 0:21:56.404
<v Speaker 2>kind of otherwise played like crap, right, but you know,

0:21:56.484 --> 0:21:58.564
<v Speaker 2>but you know Arkansas had one beating a pretty a

0:21:58.644 --> 0:22:01.244
<v Speaker 2>Kansas team, right, It wasn't like a yeah, very and

0:22:01.244 --> 0:22:03.364
<v Speaker 2>that's the biggest episode of the events so far. But

0:22:03.364 --> 0:22:05.844
<v Speaker 2>there have been like at most eighty twenty upsets, none

0:22:05.844 --> 0:22:08.364
<v Speaker 2>of the ninety five to five variety that are are

0:22:08.444 --> 0:22:11.404
<v Speaker 2>quite fun, right, And so like, you know, how do

0:22:11.444 --> 0:22:13.884
<v Speaker 2>you evaluate that from like a bracket standpoint. On the

0:22:13.884 --> 0:22:16.524
<v Speaker 2>one hand, if people are going to like the silver

0:22:16.524 --> 0:22:19.164
<v Speaker 2>built in model and picking the favorites, are probably pretty happy,

0:22:19.284 --> 0:22:21.324
<v Speaker 2>right if you're doing something we're trying to like calibrate

0:22:21.364 --> 0:22:25.364
<v Speaker 2>relative to the odds of an upset, like you know,

0:22:25.564 --> 0:22:30.204
<v Speaker 2>full disclosure. I do make bets on these games, right,

0:22:30.284 --> 0:22:37.044
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, in general I was betting more underdogs than favorites.

0:22:38.244 --> 0:22:39.044
<v Speaker 1>Why is that name?

0:22:41.004 --> 0:22:45.084
<v Speaker 2>So I think our our model, I think thought that,

0:22:45.164 --> 0:22:48.284
<v Speaker 2>like there's more parody in college basketball to a degree

0:22:48.484 --> 0:22:52.724
<v Speaker 2>that like maybe other systems aren't accounting for. So this

0:22:52.844 --> 0:22:55.844
<v Speaker 2>trend toward parody has reversed itself. Whether that's a small

0:22:55.884 --> 0:22:57.764
<v Speaker 2>sample sized thing or I mean, there are things that

0:22:57.804 --> 0:23:02.244
<v Speaker 2>are changing. So in college now there are nil deals,

0:23:02.244 --> 0:23:07.364
<v Speaker 2>which I believe standsford name, image and likeness, and so

0:23:07.484 --> 0:23:09.284
<v Speaker 2>now maybe there's more incentive to go to like a

0:23:09.404 --> 0:23:13.564
<v Speaker 2>big program like a Duke or a Kentucky, where I

0:23:13.564 --> 0:23:16.244
<v Speaker 2>mean all those big programs already had that advantage, right,

0:23:16.244 --> 0:23:19.924
<v Speaker 2>but maybe that could be changing things. Maybe some I mean,

0:23:20.004 --> 0:23:22.164
<v Speaker 2>Duke is clearly a very strong team. Maybe the one

0:23:22.164 --> 0:23:26.284
<v Speaker 2>seeds are particularly particularly good this year, you know, some

0:23:26.404 --> 0:23:30.684
<v Speaker 2>of the more plucky teams like Gonzaga is a minor

0:23:30.804 --> 0:23:33.684
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, a mid major team that our model thought

0:23:33.804 --> 0:23:37.044
<v Speaker 2>was like super underrated, but we're an eight C, which

0:23:37.084 --> 0:23:38.564
<v Speaker 2>means you faced the one seed. I believe it was

0:23:38.564 --> 0:23:41.284
<v Speaker 2>Houston in the around of thirty two, and like, so

0:23:41.804 --> 0:23:44.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, the teams that we thought had good potential

0:23:44.684 --> 0:23:48.644
<v Speaker 2>to overperform or in disadvantageous positions where they faced other

0:23:48.764 --> 0:23:52.004
<v Speaker 2>very good teams. Right, So that's part of it too.

0:23:52.364 --> 0:23:56.004
<v Speaker 2>The women's side, I mean, this is kind of how

0:23:56.044 --> 0:24:00.124
<v Speaker 2>it goes, right. I mean, there are in any given year,

0:24:00.284 --> 0:24:04.444
<v Speaker 2>you know, between like one to five or six women's

0:24:04.444 --> 0:24:08.364
<v Speaker 2>programs that are just like so much better than the rest, right,

0:24:08.444 --> 0:24:11.284
<v Speaker 2>the programs where men's college basketball is treated as like,

0:24:11.964 --> 0:24:15.724
<v Speaker 2>you know, co equal to to the men's program. Right,

0:24:15.724 --> 0:24:20.124
<v Speaker 2>that's not everywhere. It might be a dozen to two

0:24:20.164 --> 0:24:22.244
<v Speaker 2>dozen schools and a game in a year. A few

0:24:22.244 --> 0:24:24.604
<v Speaker 2>of those are really good, but like it's it's it's

0:24:24.724 --> 0:24:29.284
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of colleges are not aspiring to

0:24:29.364 --> 0:24:32.724
<v Speaker 2>treat women's basketball is like a revenue sport, as it's called,

0:24:32.724 --> 0:24:35.084
<v Speaker 2>whereas ones that are can do quite well. Right, But

0:24:35.084 --> 0:24:37.524
<v Speaker 2>there's you know, gigantic gaps. And if you look at

0:24:37.524 --> 0:24:39.604
<v Speaker 2>women's college basketball tenants and a gigantic gaps from some

0:24:39.644 --> 0:24:43.364
<v Speaker 2>team selling sixteen thousand seats a game to some literally

0:24:43.364 --> 0:24:46.604
<v Speaker 2>sell one hundred seats a game, right, and so and

0:24:46.644 --> 0:24:49.324
<v Speaker 2>so you see that, you see that lack of parody

0:24:49.324 --> 0:24:50.164
<v Speaker 2>play itself out.

0:24:50.964 --> 0:24:54.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, that all makes that all makes sense. And

0:24:54.204 --> 0:24:56.884
<v Speaker 1>in full disclosure, I have not watched any of the

0:24:56.924 --> 0:24:58.724
<v Speaker 1>women's games, and.

0:24:58.684 --> 0:24:59.444
<v Speaker 2>You watch the guys.

0:24:59.524 --> 0:25:01.644
<v Speaker 1>I've watched some of the guys, yes, because we had

0:25:01.684 --> 0:25:02.284
<v Speaker 1>a bracket.

0:25:02.524 --> 0:25:04.124
<v Speaker 2>How many hours over under.

0:25:03.924 --> 0:25:10.564
<v Speaker 1>An probably around two hours total, two hours more than

0:25:10.604 --> 0:25:15.404
<v Speaker 1>I would normally have watched. I'm baby steps, Nate, baby steps,

0:25:14.844 --> 0:25:19.004
<v Speaker 1>baby steps, I'm you know, I'm getting there. I was

0:25:19.124 --> 0:25:21.644
<v Speaker 1>really rooting for Illinois. I really wanted them to win

0:25:21.684 --> 0:25:25.044
<v Speaker 1>because they were one of my one of my Videosyncratic

0:25:25.324 --> 0:25:29.324
<v Speaker 1>picks your Rackett. No, I still haven't. I haven't. I

0:25:29.324 --> 0:25:32.644
<v Speaker 1>haven't bet any money on this. Yeah, but that was

0:25:32.764 --> 0:25:36.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wanted to have a free and clear

0:25:36.124 --> 0:25:38.364
<v Speaker 1>consultation with Monty. I did not want to use any

0:25:38.404 --> 0:25:41.084
<v Speaker 1>of his uh you know, any of his insights to

0:25:41.124 --> 0:25:47.524
<v Speaker 1>actually make money, although I think we would have lost money. Well,

0:25:47.564 --> 0:25:49.084
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it depends on how the bets went.

0:25:49.244 --> 0:25:51.964
<v Speaker 1>But no, I've never been on sports. You know. I

0:25:52.004 --> 0:25:56.684
<v Speaker 1>actually feel like I don't like for me, it's not

0:25:57.164 --> 0:25:59.764
<v Speaker 1>it's not fun, you know, just like I don't I

0:25:59.804 --> 0:26:00.644
<v Speaker 1>don't play table.

0:26:00.764 --> 0:26:05.124
<v Speaker 2>Just watched two hours more of because but yeah, but it's.

0:26:04.924 --> 0:26:07.164
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun bracket, but I don't have money on it.

0:26:07.244 --> 0:26:09.044
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just a sweat I you know, it's

0:26:09.084 --> 0:26:11.044
<v Speaker 1>like a you're kind of a pure I.

0:26:10.964 --> 0:26:13.564
<v Speaker 2>Want my team to I'll give you a little free bets.

0:26:13.564 --> 0:26:17.284
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes the first one's on me.

0:26:20.444 --> 0:26:24.684
<v Speaker 1>Gateway drug, Gateway drug. But no, I mean, in all honesty,

0:26:24.844 --> 0:26:28.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have zero edge in sports betting. I

0:26:28.364 --> 0:26:30.444
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to do I wouldn't want to engage in

0:26:30.444 --> 0:26:32.244
<v Speaker 1>an activity that I felt I had no edge. And

0:26:32.444 --> 0:26:34.884
<v Speaker 1>you have models like you actually have an edge, right,

0:26:34.924 --> 0:26:37.284
<v Speaker 1>Like you're one of the sports betting is hard, and

0:26:37.364 --> 0:26:38.964
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the well you're one of the few

0:26:38.964 --> 0:26:40.124
<v Speaker 1>people who actually.

0:26:40.084 --> 0:26:43.604
<v Speaker 2>The tournament last year and then this year. I'm down

0:26:43.804 --> 0:26:45.204
<v Speaker 2>a little bit cheer before that, I was up a

0:26:45.244 --> 0:26:46.844
<v Speaker 2>little bit, like it's but you know, look, if you

0:26:46.884 --> 0:26:49.124
<v Speaker 2>go so now, listen, you're I've lost more of the

0:26:49.164 --> 0:26:50.924
<v Speaker 2>women than I've made on the men's right. But if

0:26:50.964 --> 0:26:54.204
<v Speaker 2>you go through and say, okay, so so far are

0:26:54.204 --> 0:26:58.924
<v Speaker 2>the bets I've made, I'm down four percent? Right, ROI

0:26:59.604 --> 0:27:02.604
<v Speaker 2>what is the house's cut? Four percent? Right? So if

0:27:02.604 --> 0:27:04.484
<v Speaker 2>you haven't a year where you're winning someone losing someone

0:27:04.524 --> 0:27:06.604
<v Speaker 2>going fifty to fifty then that four percent gets straying

0:27:06.644 --> 0:27:08.644
<v Speaker 2>from your bank roll over and over again. And I

0:27:08.644 --> 0:27:10.964
<v Speaker 2>do think that probably you know I'm gonna but also

0:27:11.004 --> 0:27:12.364
<v Speaker 2>you know, but also you run in a shit like

0:27:12.404 --> 0:27:15.324
<v Speaker 2>where you're I'm restricted to kind of like two and

0:27:15.324 --> 0:27:18.564
<v Speaker 2>a half sights. As I complained about last week, some

0:27:18.604 --> 0:27:20.564
<v Speaker 2>of them don't take very much money on women's games.

0:27:20.604 --> 0:27:23.324
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's to my benefit this year's and so

0:27:24.004 --> 0:27:28.244
<v Speaker 2>the women's picks haven't been going great, but yeah, they're

0:27:28.324 --> 0:27:30.484
<v Speaker 2>much more they're much more cautious about about that.

0:27:31.044 --> 0:27:33.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So it's so it's increasingly more difficult to make money,

0:27:33.884 --> 0:27:34.844
<v Speaker 1>even if you do have an.

0:27:34.764 --> 0:27:38.244
<v Speaker 2>Inch you have to, like I mean, it's kind of

0:27:38.284 --> 0:27:39.844
<v Speaker 2>like the one thing about the tournament is like if

0:27:39.844 --> 0:27:42.084
<v Speaker 2>you were really dedicated like college basketball, it's kind of

0:27:42.084 --> 0:27:45.484
<v Speaker 2>like this short season but like yeah, basically, like, first

0:27:45.484 --> 0:27:47.604
<v Speaker 2>of all, the more serious experiment I did was like

0:27:47.604 --> 0:27:50.884
<v Speaker 2>trying to seriously bit the NBA for the book twenty

0:27:50.964 --> 0:27:54.604
<v Speaker 2>three season. This is probably like two hours a day

0:27:54.604 --> 0:27:57.924
<v Speaker 2>of work for seven I mean, that was real effort, right,

0:27:58.004 --> 0:28:02.164
<v Speaker 2>and that I was basically break even, right, which is

0:28:02.164 --> 0:28:05.004
<v Speaker 2>better than ninety nine percent of people, but like, and

0:28:05.004 --> 0:28:06.804
<v Speaker 2>that's break even so it's like, okay, if I want

0:28:06.804 --> 0:28:08.204
<v Speaker 2>to And by the way, at the start of that,

0:28:08.804 --> 0:28:10.324
<v Speaker 2>I have nine looks like a bet on New York

0:28:10.364 --> 0:28:11.644
<v Speaker 2>Im the end I have two and a half, right,

0:28:11.644 --> 0:28:14.444
<v Speaker 2>and so like so you know, first of all, to

0:28:14.484 --> 0:28:17.084
<v Speaker 2>make money, I'd have to like ad to vote more

0:28:17.324 --> 0:28:20.044
<v Speaker 2>than two hours a day, which is you know, my

0:28:20.084 --> 0:28:23.204
<v Speaker 2>time is valuable, it's real time. And then spend even

0:28:23.204 --> 0:28:26.564
<v Speaker 2>more time figuring out like okay, which friends can I

0:28:26.604 --> 0:28:29.884
<v Speaker 2>ask find a way get money down with or you know,

0:28:29.924 --> 0:28:34.684
<v Speaker 2>it's not like these like betting sites take appeals necessarily, right,

0:28:36.204 --> 0:28:38.084
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you can get some hamo fish, so

0:28:38.124 --> 0:28:39.924
<v Speaker 2>give me back. But like so it's like it's like

0:28:40.124 --> 0:28:41.804
<v Speaker 2>quite hard to make a living. You have to like

0:28:43.124 --> 0:28:46.164
<v Speaker 2>be kind of I don't know, I mean there's different

0:28:46.164 --> 0:28:47.764
<v Speaker 2>you can kind of capitalize it, right, Like you're a

0:28:47.764 --> 0:28:49.284
<v Speaker 2>smart guy who can get down money and you find

0:28:49.284 --> 0:28:50.644
<v Speaker 2>people who build a model for you and you can

0:28:50.684 --> 0:28:52.724
<v Speaker 2>do things like that a little bit. But like it's

0:28:52.764 --> 0:28:54.364
<v Speaker 2>not an easy way to It's like bookern noway, it's

0:28:54.364 --> 0:28:55.364
<v Speaker 2>not an easy way to make a living.

0:28:55.564 --> 0:28:59.004
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely not. Well I hope that uh this week,

0:28:59.084 --> 0:29:01.444
<v Speaker 1>I hope you do well financially and I hope I

0:29:01.524 --> 0:29:04.604
<v Speaker 1>do well in our bracket bets. So even though I

0:29:05.004 --> 0:29:09.324
<v Speaker 1>hate saying go Duke, go Duke, you you've put me

0:29:09.484 --> 0:29:13.164
<v Speaker 1>in this position. You have forced me. I know you

0:29:13.204 --> 0:29:16.324
<v Speaker 1>have forced me in the go Duke and go Tennessee position.

0:29:16.724 --> 0:29:17.924
<v Speaker 1>You don't mind the Tennessee.

0:29:18.684 --> 0:29:21.244
<v Speaker 2>You know they got a nice I like that orange.

0:29:21.284 --> 0:29:22.604
<v Speaker 2>I like that orange color.

0:29:25.564 --> 0:29:28.404
<v Speaker 1>On that note, show to tell.

0:29:28.244 --> 0:29:33.444
<v Speaker 2>Me for our our landing pages, for the tournament stuff

0:29:33.444 --> 0:29:35.644
<v Speaker 2>we have, like this thing we have to like manually

0:29:35.724 --> 0:29:39.044
<v Speaker 2>enter the team, some very sensitive like which shade of orange,

0:29:41.164 --> 0:29:43.204
<v Speaker 2>the burnt orange kind of Texas. By the way, it's

0:29:43.204 --> 0:29:44.444
<v Speaker 2>a night I like the orange shade.

0:29:44.604 --> 0:29:47.644
<v Speaker 1>Nice. So you have so you have used all your

0:29:47.684 --> 0:29:51.484
<v Speaker 1>Crayola colors from childhood? You know know what a burnt

0:29:51.524 --> 0:29:53.964
<v Speaker 1>sienna and all the others. You know exactly what they

0:29:53.964 --> 0:29:57.644
<v Speaker 1>look like. Yeah, do you do you remember those Crayola colors.

0:29:57.844 --> 0:30:00.564
<v Speaker 1>I have some of those colors just etched into my

0:30:00.604 --> 0:30:04.124
<v Speaker 1>mind because they were such cool colors. Relian was my favorite.

0:30:04.364 --> 0:30:04.924
<v Speaker 2>Is it like a blue?

0:30:05.084 --> 0:30:07.804
<v Speaker 1>It's a blue, but it just sounds so cool. Soulian.

0:30:08.204 --> 0:30:09.204
<v Speaker 1>How cool is that word?

0:30:09.884 --> 0:30:10.364
<v Speaker 2>I like it?

0:30:10.484 --> 0:30:12.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'd never heard it before, right, So I

0:30:12.444 --> 0:30:15.804
<v Speaker 1>just it really appealed to my writer's sensibility. What was

0:30:15.844 --> 0:30:16.564
<v Speaker 1>your favorite?

0:30:17.724 --> 0:30:21.004
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I like the red orange feels like a

0:30:21.084 --> 0:30:21.564
<v Speaker 2>Nate color.

0:30:21.684 --> 0:30:26.004
<v Speaker 1>Right that was burnt Sana yea, yeah that was more brownie.

0:30:26.044 --> 0:30:27.924
<v Speaker 2>I like you by the advance and there's like a

0:30:27.964 --> 0:30:29.284
<v Speaker 2>separate red orange and orange red.

0:30:29.484 --> 0:30:33.044
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true. Yeah, this is this is fun.

0:30:33.084 --> 0:30:34.924
<v Speaker 1>A lot of a lot of kids were shaped by

0:30:35.284 --> 0:30:38.684
<v Speaker 1>by Crayola colors. Guys, this will be a future episode.

0:30:39.004 --> 0:30:42.084
<v Speaker 1>For now, let's let's talk about.

0:30:41.604 --> 0:30:43.444
<v Speaker 2>Like the didn't have the white crayon, but the white

0:30:43.444 --> 0:30:44.604
<v Speaker 2>crayon doesn't really.

0:30:44.604 --> 0:30:46.324
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't do much. Yeah, there was a white one.

0:30:46.404 --> 0:30:51.604
<v Speaker 2>Discontinue, Hey, Crayola advice, discontinue the white crayon. It's at

0:30:51.684 --> 0:30:54.284
<v Speaker 2>best of placebos Well, I guess.

0:30:54.164 --> 0:30:56.084
<v Speaker 1>On black paper. You can do it on black paper.

0:30:56.204 --> 0:30:58.204
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, yeah.

0:30:57.964 --> 0:31:02.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, alright, Crayole, please please take our advice account. Maybe maybe,

0:31:02.724 --> 0:31:04.204
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's better than who knows.

0:31:04.284 --> 0:31:05.924
<v Speaker 2>You just have nine planets eight.

0:31:06.804 --> 0:31:09.244
<v Speaker 1>A lot of things have changed since we went to school.

0:31:13.124 --> 0:31:15.364
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break and when we come back, we'll

0:31:15.364 --> 0:31:17.484
<v Speaker 1>talk more about the women's side of things and that

0:31:17.604 --> 0:31:34.204
<v Speaker 1>pesky eligibility rule. Last week, Nate, I learned something totally

0:31:34.284 --> 0:31:39.284
<v Speaker 1>crazy from you. You just casually mentioned that women were

0:31:39.324 --> 0:31:44.084
<v Speaker 1>not eligible for the WNBA until they were twenty two

0:31:44.524 --> 0:31:49.484
<v Speaker 1>years old. That's just like totally bad shit. Let's talk

0:31:49.524 --> 0:31:52.324
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit more. This is something that

0:31:52.404 --> 0:31:55.524
<v Speaker 1>is not true of men. And why in the world

0:31:55.644 --> 0:31:58.244
<v Speaker 1>does this exist? Why is it a thing?

0:31:59.164 --> 0:32:06.484
<v Speaker 2>So let me theorize, right when Caitlin Clark is probably

0:32:06.524 --> 0:32:10.524
<v Speaker 2>going to offend people are sensitive out their women's basketball topics,

0:32:10.524 --> 0:32:14.004
<v Speaker 2>I will say, right, people who are longtime women's basketball fans.

0:32:14.004 --> 0:32:16.164
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, we been running women's models dating

0:32:16.204 --> 0:32:18.804
<v Speaker 2>back the five thirty eight days for ten years now.

0:32:18.804 --> 0:32:23.644
<v Speaker 2>It's something we've always taken seriously, right, you know, Okay,

0:32:23.724 --> 0:32:29.924
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to make some broadstroke generalizations. Right, until fairly recently,

0:32:29.924 --> 0:32:34.924
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA was not a very popular product and not

0:32:35.044 --> 0:32:39.764
<v Speaker 2>making a lot of money. It did have a loyal

0:32:40.004 --> 0:32:42.284
<v Speaker 2>fan base, and like the quality of the product is good.

0:32:42.284 --> 0:32:46.644
<v Speaker 2>Certainly these players are spectacular players, right, But you know

0:32:48.004 --> 0:32:52.444
<v Speaker 2>the reason why all these people were, like you know,

0:32:52.444 --> 0:32:54.964
<v Speaker 2>Britney Griner who was detained in Russia, Right, it's because

0:32:55.004 --> 0:32:58.764
<v Speaker 2>there was more money there than they were making from

0:32:59.324 --> 0:33:02.204
<v Speaker 2>from the American sport where they might get paid. I

0:33:02.244 --> 0:33:03.684
<v Speaker 2>mean it's kind of crazy, right, you talk about some

0:33:03.764 --> 0:33:06.804
<v Speaker 2>of the best athletes in the world and they're like

0:33:06.804 --> 0:33:10.964
<v Speaker 2>getting paid like, you know nothing, Yeah, some intern salary

0:33:11.444 --> 0:33:14.844
<v Speaker 2>basically right. By the way, most sports leagues have like

0:33:14.844 --> 0:33:18.284
<v Speaker 2>a rookie scale cap, right, where like you kind of

0:33:18.324 --> 0:33:21.924
<v Speaker 2>are are restricted in your free agent negotiating power for

0:33:21.964 --> 0:33:23.884
<v Speaker 2>some number of years. I don't know off handwo is

0:33:24.284 --> 0:33:28.244
<v Speaker 2>you know in baseball it's six years of professional servitude,

0:33:28.324 --> 0:33:30.444
<v Speaker 2>right or service time is how it's used. So there

0:33:30.484 --> 0:33:35.364
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of like protection. So their combination thing, well,

0:33:35.404 --> 0:33:39.084
<v Speaker 2>there's like there's protection of like the existing classes, right.

0:33:39.324 --> 0:33:44.724
<v Speaker 2>Labor unions in sports tend to bargain in ways that

0:33:45.044 --> 0:33:49.684
<v Speaker 2>fuck over young players and protect the veterans, which in

0:33:49.764 --> 0:33:52.844
<v Speaker 2>some ways is like and I'm you know, generally whatever,

0:33:52.884 --> 0:33:54.724
<v Speaker 2>I think. I'm a free country. People should form menions

0:33:54.764 --> 0:33:57.244
<v Speaker 2>if they want to think they've done benefited people in

0:33:57.284 --> 0:34:00.284
<v Speaker 2>some cases and maybe not in others. Right, I'm just

0:34:00.324 --> 0:34:02.604
<v Speaker 2>saying empirically, in sports, what happens is they tend to

0:34:02.644 --> 0:34:08.244
<v Speaker 2>protect the veterans, the aging stars, whereas they deny younger

0:34:08.244 --> 0:34:11.764
<v Speaker 2>players the right to have full bargaining power. Right, Younger

0:34:11.764 --> 0:34:15.164
<v Speaker 2>players are subject to a draft, and then they in

0:34:15.244 --> 0:34:17.964
<v Speaker 2>most sports, do not make their market salaries or particularly

0:34:18.004 --> 0:34:21.644
<v Speaker 2>close to it until they're several years in. Right, they

0:34:21.724 --> 0:34:25.564
<v Speaker 2>might say that, uh, well, we're actually doing a player

0:34:25.604 --> 0:34:27.884
<v Speaker 2>a service by developing him. It is true that like

0:34:27.884 --> 0:34:29.564
<v Speaker 2>a bad a young player in the nw and the

0:34:29.844 --> 0:34:33.324
<v Speaker 2>NBA is like is pretty bad. Right, So on, so

0:34:33.364 --> 0:34:36.004
<v Speaker 2>on one hand, you have like a restriction of supply

0:34:37.284 --> 0:34:42.244
<v Speaker 2>problem which is formulated by you know, you know, unions

0:34:42.284 --> 0:34:45.204
<v Speaker 2>that maybe don't care as much about these younger players.

0:34:45.244 --> 0:34:49.564
<v Speaker 2>And also, like from the league standpoint, they're probably kind

0:34:49.604 --> 0:34:52.324
<v Speaker 2>of indifferent toward this. Because one thing I've learned having

0:34:52.324 --> 0:34:54.724
<v Speaker 2>built basketball protection systems, and I haven't done it well,

0:34:54.724 --> 0:34:56.244
<v Speaker 2>have done the team ratings for women. I have done

0:34:56.244 --> 0:35:00.924
<v Speaker 2>player ratings for women. Right, in general, if you're a

0:35:01.004 --> 0:35:03.324
<v Speaker 2>nineteen year old twenty year old playing in the NBA,

0:35:03.884 --> 0:35:06.164
<v Speaker 2>you're pretty bad, right. I imagine the same is true

0:35:06.204 --> 0:35:11.004
<v Speaker 2>for the WNBA, And generally speaking, from age eighteen to

0:35:11.004 --> 0:35:12.844
<v Speaker 2>twenty two is when you do a lot of your

0:35:13.364 --> 0:35:16.484
<v Speaker 2>physical maturation when you become an adult. In other ways too,

0:35:16.524 --> 0:35:19.524
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's a little bit different. For do women hit

0:35:19.564 --> 0:35:23.524
<v Speaker 2>puberty earlier than they do. Maybe it's a little bit different, right.

0:35:23.564 --> 0:35:26.724
<v Speaker 1>It is, so everything you're saying though, should apply to

0:35:26.804 --> 0:35:29.324
<v Speaker 1>men and women, right in terms of the unions protecting

0:35:29.364 --> 0:35:30.684
<v Speaker 1>older players all of that.

0:35:30.804 --> 0:35:32.444
<v Speaker 2>So one thing, they're probably a few players who you know,

0:35:32.444 --> 0:35:35.204
<v Speaker 2>if you're making whatever, like sixty thousand dollars a year

0:35:35.244 --> 0:35:38.244
<v Speaker 2>in the wa and maybe maybe you run an ad

0:35:38.244 --> 0:35:40.204
<v Speaker 2>and local subway chain or something. Right, So on the

0:35:40.244 --> 0:35:44.444
<v Speaker 2>one hand, like then maybe the college experience is better

0:35:44.444 --> 0:35:46.164
<v Speaker 2>if you're playing it like a South Carolina or a

0:35:46.244 --> 0:35:50.204
<v Speaker 2>Yukon or an Iowa or a usc you know, maybe

0:35:50.204 --> 0:35:52.524
<v Speaker 2>the college experience is actually better. It's it's probably also

0:35:52.564 --> 0:36:00.084
<v Speaker 2>like less demand for your services, right, But yeah, I'm

0:36:00.084 --> 0:36:01.484
<v Speaker 2>surprised there hasn't been more.

0:36:01.804 --> 0:36:04.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because that seems like that seems like a very

0:36:04.204 --> 0:36:08.564
<v Speaker 1>paternalistic argument, right, like let them have the choice, Like,

0:36:09.484 --> 0:36:11.844
<v Speaker 1>if the college experience is better, then let them stay

0:36:11.844 --> 0:36:14.284
<v Speaker 1>in college. But let them also have the same choice

0:36:14.284 --> 0:36:18.044
<v Speaker 1>as their male counterparts, which is to leave early. Now,

0:36:18.124 --> 0:36:20.044
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I heard when I, you know,

0:36:20.084 --> 0:36:24.644
<v Speaker 1>started researching this a little bit is that speaking about paternalism,

0:36:25.404 --> 0:36:29.724
<v Speaker 1>that there was an argument made that you know, women

0:36:30.244 --> 0:36:33.724
<v Speaker 1>need the degree more than men do. So force them

0:36:33.764 --> 0:36:37.564
<v Speaker 1>basically to finish college because they will thank you for

0:36:37.604 --> 0:36:40.404
<v Speaker 1>it later, because they'll, you know, they'll be lucky that

0:36:40.404 --> 0:36:43.124
<v Speaker 1>they have an alternate career to fall back on, because

0:36:43.684 --> 0:36:46.404
<v Speaker 1>this isn't this is probably not going to work out.

0:36:46.724 --> 0:36:50.004
<v Speaker 1>And look, I understand that that like technically might be

0:36:50.604 --> 0:36:53.164
<v Speaker 1>might be the case, but I once again, you know,

0:36:53.244 --> 0:36:56.804
<v Speaker 1>I think that there should be you should be able

0:36:56.844 --> 0:36:59.004
<v Speaker 1>to make that choice. So one of my closest friends

0:37:00.564 --> 0:37:03.844
<v Speaker 1>was a professional dancer, right, a professional athlete, didn't go

0:37:03.844 --> 0:37:06.844
<v Speaker 1>to college, right, didn't finish college and danced full time.

0:37:07.124 --> 0:37:10.844
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know her as well, ended up after

0:37:10.964 --> 0:37:14.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, finishing her dance career, going to Columbia and

0:37:14.164 --> 0:37:17.724
<v Speaker 1>finishing a degree, writing a novel and becoming you know,

0:37:18.604 --> 0:37:23.084
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly successful entrepreneur, jewelry designer, all these wonderful things.

0:37:23.404 --> 0:37:26.404
<v Speaker 1>But she did that afterwards because she never went to

0:37:26.444 --> 0:37:29.924
<v Speaker 1>college because she was a professional athlete. So it's not like,

0:37:30.164 --> 0:37:32.484
<v Speaker 1>if you you know, leave at the age of nineteen

0:37:32.564 --> 0:37:34.764
<v Speaker 1>or twenty to go play basketball, oh my god, you

0:37:34.804 --> 0:37:37.284
<v Speaker 1>can never finish college. Right. I think a lot most

0:37:37.284 --> 0:37:40.244
<v Speaker 1>colleges would be thrilled to have a professional athlete come

0:37:40.284 --> 0:37:43.564
<v Speaker 1>back to finish their degree, because that's you know, it's

0:37:43.604 --> 0:37:46.324
<v Speaker 1>not like you're closing off that option, you're not precluding it.

0:37:47.244 --> 0:37:51.004
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, so that argument is

0:37:51.044 --> 0:37:54.284
<v Speaker 1>not doesn't suffice. And so it does seem like there

0:37:54.324 --> 0:37:57.524
<v Speaker 1>are these vested interests, as there often are when there's

0:37:57.564 --> 0:38:00.284
<v Speaker 1>something so crazy, right, when there's something that doesn't make sense,

0:38:00.844 --> 0:38:03.444
<v Speaker 1>usually it's because there are some old, vested interests that

0:38:03.524 --> 0:38:06.164
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to change. And so what you were

0:38:06.164 --> 0:38:08.644
<v Speaker 1>saying about unions about protecting older players, about kind of

0:38:08.684 --> 0:38:11.644
<v Speaker 1>enshrining that that to me kind of makes more sense

0:38:11.684 --> 0:38:13.644
<v Speaker 1>than oh, we're doing this for the good of the players,

0:38:14.124 --> 0:38:17.164
<v Speaker 1>because that seems like a disingenuous argument at best.

0:38:17.764 --> 0:38:20.884
<v Speaker 2>No, look, I mean you have you know, the other

0:38:20.964 --> 0:38:22.684
<v Speaker 2>risk is that you get some if you you know,

0:38:23.284 --> 0:38:27.244
<v Speaker 2>talk to college basketball players men, they'll sit now I'm

0:38:27.284 --> 0:38:29.564
<v Speaker 2>talking to them personally. If you read interviews with them, right,

0:38:29.604 --> 0:38:31.124
<v Speaker 2>they're like, look, I can't take the chance that I

0:38:31.124 --> 0:38:35.924
<v Speaker 2>get like injured, right and therefore have no career at all.

0:38:35.924 --> 0:38:39.964
<v Speaker 2>You know, USC's best player just tore her acl in

0:38:40.004 --> 0:38:44.524
<v Speaker 2>there around thirty two win last night, right, and you

0:38:44.564 --> 0:38:47.244
<v Speaker 2>know this is a long recovery and like if you

0:38:47.244 --> 0:38:48.884
<v Speaker 2>have that happen after you sign your kind of like

0:38:49.004 --> 0:38:52.644
<v Speaker 2>rookie contract, then like that gives you more protection, right.

0:38:52.684 --> 0:38:55.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so in some ways it's better if.

0:38:55.404 --> 0:39:01.804
<v Speaker 2>You can, like goodn to play professionally, and the professional

0:39:01.884 --> 0:39:03.924
<v Speaker 2>league and the NCAA are kind of like, I mean,

0:39:03.924 --> 0:39:06.564
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's not really the NCAA's fault, right, but

0:39:06.604 --> 0:39:09.324
<v Speaker 2>the league is supposed to represent women's basketball, is kind

0:39:09.324 --> 0:39:12.164
<v Speaker 2>of denying you a professional existence. I mean, it's kind

0:39:12.204 --> 0:39:14.644
<v Speaker 2>of fucked up, right, Somebody should sue. Somebody sue the NBA.

0:39:14.924 --> 0:39:16.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, somebody should sue.

0:39:16.924 --> 0:39:18.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it is un American.

0:39:19.324 --> 0:39:21.764
<v Speaker 1>Well no, it actually it is kind of fucked up

0:39:22.124 --> 0:39:27.004
<v Speaker 1>that you are just unilaterally denied the opportunity to do this,

0:39:27.524 --> 0:39:29.644
<v Speaker 1>and you know you you should have you should have

0:39:29.684 --> 0:39:32.324
<v Speaker 1>the choice. You should be able to make a living

0:39:32.364 --> 0:39:36.044
<v Speaker 1>however you want. And these days we have so many

0:39:36.044 --> 0:39:38.604
<v Speaker 1>people arguing that, oh, well, college degrees aren't even what

0:39:38.644 --> 0:39:40.804
<v Speaker 1>they used to be. You don't even need one, you know,

0:39:41.244 --> 0:39:43.924
<v Speaker 1>Peter Tiele paying people money not to go to college.

0:39:44.124 --> 0:39:47.204
<v Speaker 1>And yet here we are right that finish your college

0:39:47.204 --> 0:39:50.284
<v Speaker 1>degree before you can play basketball professionally. I mean, it

0:39:50.404 --> 0:39:52.124
<v Speaker 1>just it makes absolutely zero sense.

0:39:52.764 --> 0:39:56.364
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're good enough to be, uh, you know

0:39:56.444 --> 0:39:58.524
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA, right, one of the one hundred and two

0:39:58.604 --> 0:40:01.484
<v Speaker 2>hundred best players in the world, And like, yeah, I

0:40:01.484 --> 0:40:04.084
<v Speaker 2>mean that's more viable than a college degree. Absolutely it is.

0:40:04.324 --> 0:40:06.644
<v Speaker 2>It's more unique, and like you build life skills, and

0:40:07.924 --> 0:40:11.004
<v Speaker 2>absolutely it is, and we build.

0:40:10.204 --> 0:40:11.684
<v Speaker 1>And you can always and you can always go back

0:40:11.724 --> 0:40:13.844
<v Speaker 1>and ghetto college degree later if you want, and then

0:40:13.844 --> 0:40:16.644
<v Speaker 1>you'll be a former WNBA with a college degree. Right.

0:40:17.044 --> 0:40:19.804
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the kind of experience that you can't duplicate,

0:40:20.404 --> 0:40:24.164
<v Speaker 1>whereas a college degree is actually quite easy to duplicate

0:40:24.204 --> 0:40:26.564
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of different ways. So yes, let's I

0:40:26.564 --> 0:40:29.444
<v Speaker 1>think that you and I agree on this. WNBA, get

0:40:29.484 --> 0:40:32.364
<v Speaker 1>your shit together. This is not a good rule.

0:40:34.844 --> 0:40:35.244
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:40:35.324 --> 0:40:38.044
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's see what happens next week. I don't think

0:40:38.084 --> 0:40:41.564
<v Speaker 1>the WNBA rules will change, but maybe maybe I will

0:40:41.604 --> 0:40:44.644
<v Speaker 1>be redeemed in our bracket competition. And if not, Nate,

0:40:44.684 --> 0:40:47.724
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a survey of best burgers in

0:40:47.764 --> 0:40:50.084
<v Speaker 1>both New York and Vegas, depending on where we are,

0:40:50.724 --> 0:40:54.044
<v Speaker 1>and then we can pick a fun dinner whoever wants.

0:40:59.284 --> 0:41:01.804
<v Speaker 2>Risky business is hosted by me, Nate Silver.

0:41:01.724 --> 0:41:02.924
<v Speaker 1>And Me Maria Kannakovin.

0:41:03.124 --> 0:41:06.364
<v Speaker 2>The show was a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:41:06.444 --> 0:41:09.404
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Isabel carter or A. Social

0:41:09.604 --> 0:41:13.484
<v Speaker 2>producer is Gabriel hunter Chen. Sally Helm is our editor.

0:41:13.484 --> 0:41:17.644
<v Speaker 2>Our engineer is Sarah Bruger. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:41:17.804 --> 0:41:19.524
<v Speaker 1>If you want to listen to an ad free version,

0:41:19.644 --> 0:41:22.284
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Pushkin Plus. For six ninety nine a month,

0:41:22.404 --> 0:41:25.364
<v Speaker 1>you get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.