Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Jess Smollett indicted on
Speaker 1: sixteen felony counts for making up that whole hoax hate
Speaker 1: crime situation. Bringing up speed on that. And also the
Speaker 1: Democrats vote on a ridiculous and completely superfluous resolution against
Speaker 1: all kinds of hate. I thought they just were opposed
Speaker 1: to anti Semitism. Could we focus on that this week?
Speaker 1: Apparently not. And also Paul Manafort sentenced to about four
Speaker 1: years in federal prison. Lib say it's not enough because
Speaker 1: they're always out to destroy him. We got that in
Speaker 1: more coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is
Speaker 1: the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with assionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake American, Frank, You're a great American. Again the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. Analysts remember the Sexton. No, I think
Speaker 1: that Johan Omar understands why her comments were problematic. I
Speaker 1: don't think that. Um, maybe it was intended in an
Speaker 1: anti Semitic way. I think it's just part of a
Speaker 1: learning process that we have as a country. Frankly from
Speaker 1: ilhan Omar is a refugee from Somalia. Um, she comes
Speaker 1: from a different culture, she has things to learn. This
Speaker 1: controversy over anti Semitic or not has really allowed us
Speaker 1: to cover over and paper over. I think some otherwise
Speaker 1: legitimate questions that are fair to be raised. I want
Speaker 1: to tell you that ilhan Omar or congresswoman is under
Speaker 1: tremendous attack death threats. Um. I think maybe she needs
Speaker 1: some security and why because I think in part the
Speaker 1: Republicans and the media have blown this up to be
Speaker 1: much more than it is. You know, I'm sure many
Speaker 1: people in their freshman term has said things they regret.
Speaker 1: She has apologized, she's accepted responsibility. It's now time to
Speaker 1: move on. Welcome to the buck sex and show everybody.
Speaker 1: Did you did you just get convinced by all those
Speaker 1: libs running to ilhan Omar's defense. I'm gonna guess no,
Speaker 1: you are not, in fact convinced that they are taking
Speaker 1: this issue seriously. That was that was pretty astonishing. They
Speaker 1: think that she doesn't really understand fully what she says here,
Speaker 1: Let's just separate that one out for a second. That
Speaker 1: was one of my favorite sort of defenses of this
Speaker 1: or efforts to mitigate the damage from her anti semitism. Here,
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, third in line for
Speaker 1: the presidency. It's not going to help you or me
Speaker 1: sleep at night to know that, but that's the truth.
Speaker 1: There's what she said about Omar, the incident that happened
Speaker 1: with I don't think our colleague is an anti Semitic.
Speaker 1: I think she has a different experience in the use
Speaker 1: of words, doesn't understand that some of them are fraught
Speaker 1: with meaning that she didn't realize, but nonetheless that we
Speaker 1: had to address. I mean, Pelosi kind of just went
Speaker 1: the foreigner, you know, don't really speak English, so good
Speaker 1: direction with that. That's what she just did. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine if a Republican or anybody who wasn't a Democrat
Speaker 1: running cover for Ilhan Omar was like, you know, she's
Speaker 1: not so good with the words stuff. Speaks English just fine.
Speaker 1: She understands exactly what she was saying. She keeps repeating it.
Speaker 1: This wasn't like she didn't understand some subtle meaning of this.
Speaker 1: She knows enough to go after Barack Obama, says the
Speaker 1: hope and change offered by Obama was a mirage, So
Speaker 1: she's she knows enough to bring the heat to Obama.
Speaker 1: I think she knew exactly what she was saying. But
Speaker 1: Democrats are desperate here. They're just looking to make it
Speaker 1: pass this current news cycle and hope the figure something
Speaker 1: else to attack Trump for. But oh, we've got something
Speaker 1: else to move to. Breaking news for you is why
Speaker 1: you know when you tune into the show, you get
Speaker 1: all the all the best breaking news nuggets, all the
Speaker 1: latest and greatest. Empire Acting actor Jessie Smollett has been
Speaker 1: indicted on sixteen felony counts by a Cook County grand jury,
Speaker 1: sixteen counts of disorderly conic for allegedly making false reports.
Speaker 1: He's going to have to take a plea deal, my friends,
Speaker 1: because I do not think he wants to see where
Speaker 1: this thing goes if he does not, and I think
Speaker 1: as part of that plea deal, he's going to have
Speaker 1: to do a recitation of the facts and the truth
Speaker 1: and then we will finally be able to move past
Speaker 1: because there's a there are some dead enders still out
Speaker 1: there there on the just small at issue. Maybe you know,
Speaker 1: he when he explains his truth, maybe we'll all know
Speaker 1: his truth. And I remember what Jesse Smallett used to
Speaker 1: say about all this stuff. I'm pissed off. What is
Speaker 1: it that has you so angry the attackers, the attackers,
Speaker 1: but it's also the attacks. It's like, you know, at
Speaker 1: first it was a thing of like, listen, if I
Speaker 1: tell the truth, then that's it, because it's the truth.
Speaker 1: Then it became a thing of like, oh, how can
Speaker 1: you doubt that? Like how do you how do you
Speaker 1: not believe that it's the truth. And then it became
Speaker 1: a thing of like, oh, it's not necessarily that you
Speaker 1: don't believe that this is the truth. You don't even
Speaker 1: want to see the truth. Oh no, we see the truth, Jesse.
Speaker 1: We see it just fine. So does the district attorney
Speaker 1: in Chicago apparently, who is now throwing fifteen felony or
Speaker 1: sixteen felony counts your way. He's out on a hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars bail, paid a ten thousand dollars bond, had
Speaker 1: to give up his passport, all of that stuff. Look,
Speaker 1: I know that we've taken a few victory laps here
Speaker 1: because this show, and I publicly was one of the
Speaker 1: very vocal Jesse Smallett is lying people early on in
Speaker 1: this whole process. Remember doing the Jesse updates, He said,
Speaker 1: I got another Jesse Smallett update for you, we're doing
Speaker 1: those many many of those. Before it really became obvious
Speaker 1: to everybody that not only was this not true, that
Speaker 1: if you still believe Jesse Smollett, you're either being actively
Speaker 1: actively foolish or dishonest. There really wasn't a middle ground here.
Speaker 1: There's no reason for a person to believe that what
Speaker 1: Jesse Smallett was saying added up or made any sense whatsoever.
Speaker 1: And now we know, of course it does not. And
Speaker 1: he's he should do some time. He should do some time.
Speaker 1: You know, we're gonna talk about Paul Manafort later on
Speaker 1: this hour, but Paul Manaphor got almost four years in
Speaker 1: federal prison for stealing from the government. Now, see, because
Speaker 1: I have principles, and I'm an honest person and don't
Speaker 1: just seek to score cheap political points on this show
Speaker 1: or in my life all the time. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think Jesse Small, he's facing sixteen felon accounts. You know,
Speaker 1: he should probably do six months in jail. I think
Speaker 1: that's about right. Some of you might think that's way
Speaker 1: too lenient, you know, you might say should be more
Speaker 1: like eighteen months or a year, but that's around the
Speaker 1: you know, if he takes a plea bargain, and he
Speaker 1: does a full, a full recitation of the facts here
Speaker 1: as they actually occurred, so his whole fraud and lays
Speaker 1: out the fraud and what he did. And you know,
Speaker 1: then I think you're looking at you know, a year,
Speaker 1: give or take, would be would be fair? Would be fair?
Speaker 1: Manaphort got almost four years stole. I think they said six.
Speaker 1: I think he hit six million dollars or failed to
Speaker 1: pay six million dollars in taxes to the federal government. Okay,
Speaker 1: they're going to say all kinds of things about how Maniford,
Speaker 1: and they have been saying it Maniford got some sweetheart
Speaker 1: deal because he should have gone away for decades. Criminal
Speaker 1: justice is one area of government where we should all
Speaker 1: at least be on the same page that the government
Speaker 1: should not be locking people up unless there's a really
Speaker 1: good reason, unless they are really sure they are guilty,
Speaker 1: and the punishment should be commensurate to the crime. And
Speaker 1: what we really need to be on guard for is
Speaker 1: this person is my team a Democrat, therefore they should
Speaker 1: get this punishment. That person is on their team a Republican,
Speaker 1: therefore they should get something else. That's what has been
Speaker 1: happening with Hillary and Maniford and Papadopolis and go down
Speaker 1: the list and Michael Flynn and Andrew McCabe are you
Speaker 1: on my team or their team? What side of the
Speaker 1: politics do you fall on? Here? That's how harshly you'll
Speaker 1: be punished. The justice system has lost a lot of
Speaker 1: credibility in the last two years already. We're going to
Speaker 1: talk more about where this is going with Maniphor in
Speaker 1: a moment here, but just on Smolette. If Smolette does
Speaker 1: not serve time for the hoax that he perpetrated, the many,
Speaker 1: many false statements, the police resources devoted to this, if
Speaker 1: he does not have to spend some time in a
Speaker 1: prison cell, then we have to ask why anyone convicted
Speaker 1: under the statute about false reports to authorities would spend
Speaker 1: time in a prison cell. How much more egregious could
Speaker 1: it be? Does a law enforcement officer have to be
Speaker 1: injured or lose his or her life investigating the false crime?
Speaker 1: Is that now going to be the standard? Because short
Speaker 1: of that, what Smolette did drew precious and scarce resources
Speaker 1: from the Chicago Police Department that has lots of unsolved
Speaker 1: murders to deal with, to chase around his little self indulgent,
Speaker 1: babyish hoax. He has to do the time he did
Speaker 1: the crime. Let's see if in fact we do have
Speaker 1: equal justice under law in this country. Manapour got four years.
Speaker 1: We'll talk more about that. Smollett should serve prison time.
Speaker 1: I've been saying it for a long time. When I
Speaker 1: keep saying it, let's watch how the politics plays out
Speaker 1: on this one, and a lot more will be right back.
Speaker 1: I think I was when Olman was unfairly singled out.
Speaker 1: You know, I think that I think that you know,
Speaker 1: I think that things came down on her a little
Speaker 1: too hard. We needed to take on the anti Semitism
Speaker 1: that was clearly expressed, A bigger tree, a hatred that
Speaker 1: needed to be addressed, needed to be called out, and
Speaker 1: you have to speak or even saying that this wasn't
Speaker 1: about Congresswoman Omar we didn't address it. We just generally
Speaker 1: said I real basically were against hate, except maybe not
Speaker 1: the kind of hate of a Democrat that hated Republicans,
Speaker 1: tried to kill a number of them, shot Steve's khalie. Now,
Speaker 1: they didn't want to call out any Semitism directly. They
Speaker 1: wanted to blend it in so they wouldn't offend anybody,
Speaker 1: and then then the result was that offended people who
Speaker 1: are very concerned about another Holocaust coming about some days.
Speaker 1: A resolution about everything, friends, is a resolution about nothing.
Speaker 1: That's what the Democrats wanted here, That's what they got.
Speaker 1: Include all the different things together and then be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're just we're opposed to hate. Well, there's no pro
Speaker 1: hate constituency worthy of discussing. I mean, there'll always be
Speaker 1: hateful morons in every society, in every country. But we
Speaker 1: don't need the Congress to just at this point take
Speaker 1: it upon themselves to give us a reminder that they
Speaker 1: hate hateful people. Thanks Congress. What we do need is
Speaker 1: an assurance, I think from the left, from the Democrats
Speaker 1: that they don't have a place in their party for
Speaker 1: obvious anti semitism, that it's not going to be okay,
Speaker 1: that this is not a part of discourse. And sure
Speaker 1: enough they don't want to give us that. They've got
Speaker 1: some problems here. They're intersectional politics. You know, what do
Speaker 1: you do when you know our Muslims? Who are is
Speaker 1: a female Muslim ethnic minority in a position to speak
Speaker 1: about Jewish people and Jewish Americans specifically, differently than other
Speaker 1: people are allowed to because of her background and her religion.
Speaker 1: Is that now the new is that? The new normal?
Speaker 1: Is that the new standard? Is that how this is
Speaker 1: supposed to work? To go? Democrats should be forced to
Speaker 1: answer this question, but they had some tough time answering questions.
Speaker 1: You heard there aoc Yeah, like I mean I just
Speaker 1: feel like, um, like I don't know, like I mean Omar,
Speaker 1: Like it just came like down on her, like really hard. Okay,
Speaker 1: something like that. That sounds more or less like she
Speaker 1: was talking that much, mean that much. We know Corey
Speaker 1: Booker though you know, he's a seasoned politician, right, He's
Speaker 1: gonna know exactly how to handle this one, isn't he?
Speaker 1: So any questions anybody? Anybody? They're right in front of me. Yes,
Speaker 1: and so regarding the controversy surrounding how someone omar? So,
Speaker 1: can we do you off off topic questions? When we finish,
Speaker 1: I will happily sit and stand and talk with you
Speaker 1: about that. But is there anything on this piece of legislation?
Speaker 1: There's out there. I can't see the people in the back.
Speaker 1: Such a big room. No questions want to happen. But
Speaker 1: I'm gonna end this press combs, let my colleague here
Speaker 1: take the law. Are you walking all the way back
Speaker 1: over there? Doesn't seem like he wants to answer the
Speaker 1: question about Omar. Yeah, I'm gonna let my colleagues, uh
Speaker 1: something a whoa? Did somebody pull a fire alarm where?
Speaker 1: You know? He could have just gone for it. You
Speaker 1: could alway. Hey, you know you got you guys. You
Speaker 1: gotta smell something burning. We gotta get out of here.
Speaker 1: He could always just got a veggie burger calling my name.
Speaker 1: He does of a veggie burger, call it his name.
Speaker 1: You know what, man, if if it's all veggie, you
Speaker 1: can't even call it a burger. You can call it
Speaker 1: a veggie puck. You can call it a veggie cylindrical object.
Speaker 1: But I don't think you're allowed to call it a burger. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm not a total purist, man. I mean you can
Speaker 1: if you want to have a turkey burger. I'm okay
Speaker 1: with that salmon burger. I'll even make an allowance. Veggie
Speaker 1: burger is not a burger. It is a veggie patty
Speaker 1: at best. So Corey Booker did not want to answer
Speaker 1: questions about Ilhan Omar. That is not surprising at all.
Speaker 1: None of them, it seems, want to answer questions about this.
Speaker 1: Why because the hypocrisy is just slap you in the
Speaker 1: face obvious here. And the Democrat Party is now run
Speaker 1: by the wackiest left wing elements Nancy Pelosi. Having the
Speaker 1: speaker's gabble or not doesn't doesn't change the fact that
Speaker 1: the people who are currently setting the agenda are wacko
Speaker 1: leftist idealogues, the ones that are pushing the Green New Deal,
Speaker 1: the ones that want socialism. That's right, socialism, not some
Speaker 1: Oh maybe it's just this other Let's not call it so, No,
Speaker 1: that's what they want. Let's at least use the terminology
Speaker 1: that they themselves are increasingly using and not move away
Speaker 1: from that just because because they tell us too, because
Speaker 1: they don't want the American people to know what the
Speaker 1: truth is. But the resolution today, I also like this,
Speaker 1: they decided to say. So here's how the whole breakdown went.
Speaker 1: A Democrat said something anti semitic. A lot of Democrats,
Speaker 1: not all of them, freaked out about it and said
Speaker 1: that this is unacceptable, and I agree with them that
Speaker 1: it's unacceptable. But then the Democrats said, well, we're gonna
Speaker 1: have a resolution that will condemn anti Semitism. I say, Okay,
Speaker 1: this won't really do anything, but I guess it's a
Speaker 1: good step. But then they have a resolution that condemns
Speaker 1: all hate, makes a mention of anti Semitism, It makes
Speaker 1: a lot of mention of anti Islam, and you know,
Speaker 1: white supremacist stuff and all this different stuff all packed
Speaker 1: in together. And then when Gohmer and some others, I
Speaker 1: mean there were some other Republicans won't vote I think
Speaker 1: there were twenty three of them won't vote for this.
Speaker 1: We don't like hate resolution, which is just just brainless thing,
Speaker 1: the whole thing. Who cares? At this point, do we
Speaker 1: really need Congress to have a racism it's bad resolution.
Speaker 1: We know racism is bad, Thanks Congress. Ilhan Omar apparently
Speaker 1: doesn't know that anti semitism is bad, but we know
Speaker 1: that racism is bad. But then is so classic Okazio
Speaker 1: Cortez today was pushing the narrative, the so obviously dishonest
Speaker 1: narrative that Republicans who would not vote for this won't
Speaker 1: stand up against anti semitism. It goes full circle. So
Speaker 1: you have a Democrats, anti Semitic. Democrats say they're gonna
Speaker 1: call an anti Semitism, they lose their nerve, they play
Speaker 1: political games, they call out all kinds of isms, and
Speaker 1: then the Republicans say this is a joke. They're playing
Speaker 1: political games. Guess what Republicans are the anti sem anti Semites.
Speaker 1: Now this is how the Democrats do it. Dude, God, question,
Speaker 1: this has hit me. Why didn't they do two resolutions?
Speaker 1: Why don't they just do one for it announces anti
Speaker 1: Semitism and then to go do whatever you want that
Speaker 1: other hate thing. Why does this two the too simplistic?
Speaker 1: It makes perfect sense to me, you know, But honestly,
Speaker 1: the real question is why do this at all at
Speaker 1: this point? And we've all seen the Democrats really right,
Speaker 1: I mean, I agree that you could go too, but
Speaker 1: you also could just say this one who really cares?
Speaker 1: What is this? What is this gonna? They're not gonna
Speaker 1: they're not gonna take any action against Ilana More and
Speaker 1: she's not going to change how she feels. Some people
Speaker 1: have caught on more. I've been seeing more of this.
Speaker 1: Like you guys know that what she says is pretty
Speaker 1: common in the Muslim world overall, pretty commonplace. In fact,
Speaker 1: based on a lot of very reputable polling. It's the
Speaker 1: dominant view in the Muslim world is that Jews have
Speaker 1: undue control of the United States because of money, because
Speaker 1: of media, because this is these conspiracies are all over
Speaker 1: the place in the Muslim world. So I wonder if
Speaker 1: we'll talk about that next week. We'll have to see.
Speaker 1: I thought yesterday's vote by the House was disgraceful because
Speaker 1: it's become the Democrats have become an anti Israel party.
Speaker 1: They become an anti Jewish party. And I thought that
Speaker 1: vote was a disgrace, and so does everybody else if
Speaker 1: you get an honest answer, if you get an honest
Speaker 1: answer from politicians, they thought it was a disgrace. The
Speaker 1: Democrats have become an anti Israel party. They've become an
Speaker 1: anti Jewish party, and that's true bad. I'm going to Alabama.
Speaker 1: President Trump is right, they can't defend this. They've got
Speaker 1: nothing here. I mean, anyone who is paying attention, being
Speaker 1: honest about the situation would tell you that the Democrats
Speaker 1: just look like utter frauds on this whole thing. I
Speaker 1: mean the resolution that they ended up putting. I read
Speaker 1: through the whole resolution today. It makes a lot more
Speaker 1: mention of white supremacists. I would note than it does
Speaker 1: anything having to do with anti semitism. And that's so
Speaker 1: so start with that. And they mentioned Charlottesville specifically in
Speaker 1: the resolution because that's really the worry the Democrats have
Speaker 1: when someone's being on the left being an anti Semite.
Speaker 1: But what is the tried and true mechanism when you
Speaker 1: have no argument to make in politics, when you're s
Speaker 1: i'd has gotten caught. What do you go for? Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, A little bit of classic what about ism,
Speaker 1: which is what we got from Samantha power over on CNN.
Speaker 1: And I am very uncomfortable with the way she has
Speaker 1: been singled out here at You know, while we have
Speaker 1: a president who routinely makes racist comments about African Americans IQs,
Speaker 1: he has made anti Semitic comments as well, and he
Speaker 1: has never been condemned. There has never been a resolution
Speaker 1: by anybody on the Republican side. There was no no
Speaker 1: resolution condemning him, you know, basically saying, you know, there's
Speaker 1: good people on both sides. So why is this woman
Speaker 1: being singled out in the way that she's being singled
Speaker 1: out and having the weight of all of Washington come
Speaker 1: down on her. I will I will just note that
Speaker 1: Steve King there was a result similar result right ten
Speaker 1: years later. I mean, come on, Jake, I'm not commit.
Speaker 1: Kirsten Powers there not Samantha Power. Sorry that although they
Speaker 1: probably agree on this, they'd be willing to bet. But
Speaker 1: that's all you gotta do, just say, well, yeah, maybe
Speaker 1: this was maybe this was anti semitic, and it comes
Speaker 1: from a female Democrat, African American Muslim. But Trump is
Speaker 1: so racist that nothing else matters. That's really what they're saying.
Speaker 1: Trump is so bad and Trump has done so much
Speaker 1: in the left's view that is just unforgivable in terms
Speaker 1: of issues of race and everything else, that that's always
Speaker 1: the excuse. Now, yeah, I heard this with the North
Speaker 1: and black face controversy in Virginia. Well, you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: he shouldn't have worn the black face the photo and
Speaker 1: lied about it and then gotten all weird about it.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't have done that. But Trump is so bad that
Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter. Nothing that Trump has now for
Speaker 1: the Left turned into the ever present pathetic excuse for
Speaker 1: otherwise inexcusable conduct. And it's just so transparent. You see
Speaker 1: it happening, You see these playing out time and time again,
Speaker 1: And that's why I think you're the the what aboutism
Speaker 1: could not be more clear. They know that what ilhan
Speaker 1: Omar said is a problem. They know that she's a
Speaker 1: thirty seven year old woman and she knows what she's saying,
Speaker 1: despite you know, Pelosi pretending otherwise on this one, and
Speaker 1: they know that the best thing that they can do
Speaker 1: is just say, yeah, well, whatever, whatever, whatever, Trump, whatever,
Speaker 1: whatever Trump. That's the answer, is Ilhan Omard or is
Speaker 1: she sorry for this? Or you know she was being
Speaker 1: anti submitted? Is that a problem? Whatever? Whatever? Trump? That's
Speaker 1: what That's what the left comes at you with it.
Speaker 1: They're just there's no intellectual honesty, no intellectual integrity in
Speaker 1: this whatsoever. They don't have standards that they enforced. They
Speaker 1: just have the weaponization of a frame of mind on
Speaker 1: how people speak about different things that is only used
Speaker 1: against the right, only used against Republicans, and the double
Speaker 1: standards is something we're all just supposed to choke on.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We got to talk about Manafort though,
Speaker 1: in the sentence saying almost four years, the left are
Speaker 1: saying not enough because they're lunatics. That's coming up. How
Speaker 1: in the world could this judge goes so far below
Speaker 1: guideline and Paul Manafort got the special clubby Washington elite
Speaker 1: friendly treatment. Look, the sentencing gap reflects what I call
Speaker 1: the value gap, and the value gap, Craig is the
Speaker 1: belief that white people matter more than others, particularly white
Speaker 1: people with money. It was they really shocking, astonishing downward
Speaker 1: departure from the sentencing guidelines. Just an absolutely shocking sentence. Shocking.
Speaker 1: I find this jaw dropping. To be a rich white
Speaker 1: man in a miracle, you get a whole different kind
Speaker 1: of justice. I mean, how can you be a person
Speaker 1: of color right now and not just be embarrassed for
Speaker 1: the criminal justices or if his name was Quam or Pedro,
Speaker 1: he would be going up the river. Actually, it could
Speaker 1: be argued that it damaged American democracy. We saw from
Speaker 1: the very beginning that Judge Ellis did not really seem
Speaker 1: to have a grasp on Paul Manifort's life of crime.
Speaker 1: From the very beginning, this judge seemed to have had
Speaker 1: a heart on for just the mulloprobe overall. From the beginning,
Speaker 1: he was hostile to this case, and he actually sounded
Speaker 1: like somebody at a Trump rally from the bench. It's
Speaker 1: hard to fit that much stupid into one minute. But
Speaker 1: MSNBC there did it. Everything you heard there is is
Speaker 1: wrong and idiotic, every last bit of it. All of
Speaker 1: it is pathetic. All of it is why people increasingly
Speaker 1: need to just not listen to these so called analysts
Speaker 1: that go on TV. They they have no understanding of
Speaker 1: how the federal criminal justice system actually works. To compare Manafort,
Speaker 1: they didn't really compare that just as well, you know,
Speaker 1: because he's rich and white. I mean, people of color
Speaker 1: must look at this and say, well, that's so unfair. Okay,
Speaker 1: which people of color and for what crime? Because nobody
Speaker 1: who is a first time tax offender, which is what
Speaker 1: Man of Ford is that you heard someone there say
Speaker 1: his life of crime, his life of actually not crime,
Speaker 1: but not paying his taxes adequately for the last ten
Speaker 1: years or so. They made it sound like he got
Speaker 1: off with nothing. He's getting an additional sentencing next week,
Speaker 1: which we'll get to in a moment. They gave this
Speaker 1: guy four years. Look, I think the judge was right.
Speaker 1: I think Judge Ellis, this is what was and you
Speaker 1: actually last night, I said on radio before they had
Speaker 1: the sentencing, Prucer Michael, back me up on this one.
Speaker 1: I said the three to five years is what this
Speaker 1: guy should get. That's what justice would be. This is
Speaker 1: what he should get. They take into account things like
Speaker 1: he's seventy years old. He doesn't have that much time left,
Speaker 1: you know, on this earth, a twenty year sentence would
Speaker 1: be effectively a life sentence. They take into account has
Speaker 1: he ever committed a crime before? The answers, no, he
Speaker 1: has no criminal record before this. And four years in
Speaker 1: federal prison when you're seventy at twenty five million dollars fine,
Speaker 1: and this coming after he had his home rated like
Speaker 1: he was Pablo Escobar and spent six months in solitary
Speaker 1: confinement like he's Hannibal Lecter. I don't think that this
Speaker 1: is the example that they think it is of how
Speaker 1: easy it is to be rich and white and tied
Speaker 1: to Trump in America at all. They have such crappy
Speaker 1: judgment on all these idiots on TV. These people are
Speaker 1: just they're just preening buffoons. They go on and they
Speaker 1: say that this, oh, this is such such an injustice.
Speaker 1: Do they really think that twenty years in federal prison
Speaker 1: would have been that would have been fair? Twenty years
Speaker 1: for not paying taxes? They said, oh, all these different crimes,
Speaker 1: the crimes are all variations on how he avoided paying taxes.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's it. If he hadn't been working for
Speaker 1: Trump for free, I might add, because he thought it
Speaker 1: would up his marketability in the international influenced peddling scene.
Speaker 1: But if he hadn't been worked for Trump, this guy
Speaker 1: would still be a very rich guy and you know,
Speaker 1: going about his business. The message that has been sent
Speaker 1: is if you were if you are part of Trump world,
Speaker 1: the left will get you. That's the message. The message
Speaker 1: is not that there's disparate justice. That people say that
Speaker 1: are morons. They don't know anything. I mean, I told
Speaker 1: you the story yesterday of the individual who shot the
Speaker 1: shopkeeper in the leg and caused him to be in
Speaker 1: a wheelchair for the rest of his life, who got
Speaker 1: three and a half years for a vicious armed robbery,
Speaker 1: attempted murder, blowing off some guy's leg, his wife and
Speaker 1: children running off to him, watching him almost bleed to
Speaker 1: death in the store that they had put, you know,
Speaker 1: their whole life savings and everything into to feed the family.
Speaker 1: That guy gets three years. There's three and a half
Speaker 1: to ten I think was the full range. But all
Speaker 1: has to do his good behavior gets three and a
Speaker 1: half years, you're gonna tell me that, oh, the justice
Speaker 1: system is so it's so terrible because of what happens here.
Speaker 1: Anyone who thinks you should get twenty years for underpaying
Speaker 1: your taxes doesn't know what the heck they're talking about.
Speaker 1: Twenty years for a tax violation, folks. And I also
Speaker 1: think that the corruption of the liberal soul is particularly
Speaker 1: on display when they're rooting for a fellow American, a
Speaker 1: fellow citizen, one of us, whether they like him or
Speaker 1: hate him, when they're rooting for him to spend the
Speaker 1: rest of his natural life in prison because he didn't
Speaker 1: give enough of his earnings to Uncle Sam. There's something very,
Speaker 1: very wrong with people who feel that way. And there's
Speaker 1: something really grotesque about those who, for obvious political reasons,
Speaker 1: cheer at the destruction of somebody's life Like this, Manaford
Speaker 1: is not Public Enemy number one, they've tried to make
Speaker 1: him into it because they're pathetic, stupid, worthless. Muller probe
Speaker 1: has been a farce all along, and the closest thing
Speaker 1: they can get to oh Russia and scheming and you know,
Speaker 1: hacking and all this other stuff, is to destroy Paul
Speaker 1: Manafort that that's the closest thing they can get to it.
Speaker 1: So that's why they're willing to cheer this whole thing on.
Speaker 1: But we should be very uncomfortable when our fellow Americans
Speaker 1: sit around and are rooting for this state to annihilate
Speaker 1: somebody ruin their life, lock them up for decades for
Speaker 1: a tax crime against the government. That's all he is
Speaker 1: really guilty of, your folks, is lying to the government
Speaker 1: and not giving the government enough of his money, money
Speaker 1: that he did earn. I might add, people were paying
Speaker 1: him this money. He did not steal money from anyone.
Speaker 1: His only crimes are lying to the government, hiding money
Speaker 1: from the government, and not giving the government enough of
Speaker 1: his money. And they really wish that they could, you know,
Speaker 1: just put him in a torture chamber for the next
Speaker 1: twenty years, which is basically what solitary confinement is anyway,
Speaker 1: which they've had him in for six months. This guy
Speaker 1: had to be wheeled in and a wheelchair. Now, this
Speaker 1: is the problem with lives. They have no their ideology
Speaker 1: has no room for mercy, has no room for grace
Speaker 1: and compassion and decency. It's all just power, power, power, me, me, me,
Speaker 1: anyone who stands in my way must be destroyed. And
Speaker 1: these networks that are just full of idiots these days,
Speaker 1: like CNN and MSNBC, just just just an overabundance of morons.
Speaker 1: They go on TV and they give they give more
Speaker 1: credibility to this narrative among the left that Manafort got
Speaker 1: got off easy. Here. Let's see what happens next week.
Speaker 1: This judge Ellis, who I'm sure you've probably heard from
Speaker 1: some of the news coverage on this. Ellis was appointed
Speaker 1: by Reagan, which automatically, in the eyes of a lot
Speaker 1: of people, means that he's you know, he's considered woo
Speaker 1: so politicized, right, he's a right wing judge. Guests, who
Speaker 1: appointed the judge in DC that Manaford's going to have
Speaker 1: to see next week for a hearing for sentencing here,
Speaker 1: Barack Obama. And now why is it that I consit
Speaker 1: here and tell you that there's an overwhelming likelihood that
Speaker 1: whatever that judge can do, and the way to do
Speaker 1: it would be to have him run the sentence back
Speaker 1: to back, right, so it would be he serves his
Speaker 1: four years on the charges and the trial that Ellis
Speaker 1: presided over, and then he'll serve on a conspiracy charge,
Speaker 1: which is the vague conspiracies usually what the government gets
Speaker 1: you on when you're not a sympathetic figure and they
Speaker 1: can't get you on anything else because conspiracy covers a
Speaker 1: lot of ground. It's basically, you agree to do something
Speaker 1: illegal with somebody else, says the government. You don't have
Speaker 1: to actually do anything. Often requires an affirmative step, but
Speaker 1: you don't have to go through with the conspiracy. So
Speaker 1: why is it that I know that the Obama appointed
Speaker 1: judge next week is going to give a very very
Speaker 1: harsh under the circumstances judgment, I should say, I know,
Speaker 1: why is it that I am I am able to
Speaker 1: foresee the likelihood of that? Because this is all about
Speaker 1: the politics. Manafort is Trump. Trump needs to be destroyed,
Speaker 1: and so if you can take down somebody like Manifort
Speaker 1: near him, then that's what the left will do. And
Speaker 1: I would just note that through all this process they
Speaker 1: haven't talked much about Russia collusion, even though we hear
Speaker 1: that Manaphort was doing all this work for Ukrainian oligarchs
Speaker 1: with ties to Russia and all this Russia Russia stuff.
Speaker 1: Where's the collusion? Shouldn't man neither Manafort nor Cohen. Not
Speaker 1: only do they not have collusion to offer up, they
Speaker 1: have explicitly said, under threat of additional prison time, that
Speaker 1: there was no collusion. But the media still thinks there was.
Speaker 1: So his lawyer of ten years that was with him
Speaker 1: during the campaign and his campaign manager have said, and
Speaker 1: they have no reason to lie, there's no collusion. Mueller
Speaker 1: has to be able to find them engaging in any collusion,
Speaker 1: despite seizing their records and all the pressure he has
Speaker 1: been able to use from the prosecutor's office, and yet
Speaker 1: they still pretend that they're going to find this out.
Speaker 1: In fact, they want the Congress to look even further
Speaker 1: into it. Here's what the President himself said about this,
Speaker 1: and he's right. His lawyer was out of his way
Speaker 1: actually to make a statement last night. No collusion with Russia.
Speaker 1: There was absolutely none. The judge, I mean, for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: I was very honored by it, also made the statement
Speaker 1: that this had nothing to do with collusion with Russia.
Speaker 1: Nothing to do with collusion with Russia. That is a fact.
Speaker 1: That is a fact. There is nothing about this that
Speaker 1: has to do with Russia collusion, which is why the
Speaker 1: Muller probe should end with all due haste as soon
Speaker 1: as possible. This has been such a waste of energy,
Speaker 1: of time, of taxpayer dollars, the whole thing. Notice how
Speaker 1: you don't hear much about election integrity and security anymore either.
Speaker 1: They no longer seem to have much interest in Oh
Speaker 1: what if the Russians with the Facebook pages and the
Speaker 1: bots and the sock puppets and the you don't even
Speaker 1: about that anymore. I thought we needed this to protect
Speaker 1: our protect our democracy, and protect the sanctity of our elections. No,
Speaker 1: this was just all about the sanctimony of hating Trump
Speaker 1: and those who want to pretend that they have some
Speaker 1: righteous mission in overturning the will of the American people
Speaker 1: has expressed in the all due and proper twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: election that Hillary lost, and they still just can't accept it.
Speaker 1: They won't accept it, they refused. I hope that they
Speaker 1: can bring this to an end soon. I really do.
Speaker 1: And I feel badly for Menaphorda, and any decent person
Speaker 1: should feel badly for the guys paying back all the
Speaker 1: money and then some that he didn't pay to the government.
Speaker 1: He didn't steal from old ladies, he didn't take food
Speaker 1: out of the mouths of babies. Okay, he's not. He's
Speaker 1: not running you know, elder fraud scams where people are
Speaker 1: losing their life savings. He hid money from from the
Speaker 1: federal government, and the federal government is now crushing him.
Speaker 1: But they're crushing him mostly because he's tied to Trump,
Speaker 1: and that's why you have this. This just hateful, spiteful.
Speaker 1: Oh he should have gotten even more time. The guy
Speaker 1: got four years. It's a long time. It sit in
Speaker 1: federal prison. Grew it back. Yeah, I find the AARP
Speaker 1: is a well known organization for seniors. Right, we probably
Speaker 1: heard of it. I've heard of it. But people need
Speaker 1: to know that the AARP is pretty left wing. Think
Speaker 1: of it like the Obama care of senior organizations. Well,
Speaker 1: if you want the conservative, free market loving alternative, I
Speaker 1: recommend you try AMAC. Why AMAC, Well, you've got over
Speaker 1: one point five million of your fellow Americans who've already joined,
Speaker 1: who are getting great discounts on car insurance, hotels, roadside assistants,
Speaker 1: dental plans. But also they know that they're part of
Speaker 1: a very powerful and growing organization that supports the same
Speaker 1: kind of conservative future that seniors should have and should want.
Speaker 1: For this country. That's why you should stand with AMAC
Speaker 1: as they fight the good fight. Become a member today.
Speaker 1: The benefits are great, the cause is even greater. Joined
Speaker 1: right now at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's am
Speaker 1: Ac dot us slash buck. One more time, Amac dot
Speaker 1: us slash buck. And they put all their eggs in
Speaker 1: the Michael Cullen basket and it blew up in their
Speaker 1: face last week because he came in here and lied again.
Speaker 1: Now they're gonna now he's what mister Nadlerson eighty one
Speaker 1: letters to sixty some different individuals. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I think what's important about that is, remember the two
Speaker 1: people mister Nader didn't send a letter two, Chris Steele
Speaker 1: and Glenn Simpson. Glenn Simpson the guy that Clinton's paid
Speaker 1: to put together the dossier, and Chris Stoper Steele, the
Speaker 1: guy who wrote the dossier which was the basis for
Speaker 1: this whole false investigation that the Democrats have launched. I
Speaker 1: spoke to Rudy Giuliani today for a bit about what's
Speaker 1: going on with all these investigations, all these maneuvers, all
Speaker 1: that stuff, and sure enough he thinks that Michael Cohen
Speaker 1: should be prosecuted for additional violations of statutes involving perjury,
Speaker 1: lying to Congress, lying under oath. He thinks that there
Speaker 1: should be more charges added into the mix. In fact,
Speaker 1: he said, and he said this on the show, if
Speaker 1: there's not charges broad against Michael Cohen, then you have
Speaker 1: to drop the charges against Flynn, who, as we know,
Speaker 1: is also hit with a perjury charge for the FBI
Speaker 1: initially thought was not a lie and might have been
Speaker 1: just something misremembered. But they wanted they wanted to get him,
Speaker 1: as we know, they wanted to They wanted to get
Speaker 1: General Flynn because he was tied to Trump and on
Speaker 1: national security, gave him some additional credibility, and was someone
Speaker 1: that the upper ranks of the Obama era national security
Speaker 1: apparatus had a problem with. So they wanted to take
Speaker 1: him out and they did. Unfortunately it was unjust, but
Speaker 1: they did. But Cohen, what you see now is how
Speaker 1: much this is all being stage managed, and the stagecraft
Speaker 1: that's involved for the Democrat narrative about Russia collusion and
Speaker 1: just forget Russia collusion, just get Trump, just get Trump.
Speaker 1: It was madness. And I asked Juliani this today. It
Speaker 1: was madness for Cohen to sit in front of Congress
Speaker 1: for those hours and subject himself to what's happened now,
Speaker 1: it seems would just to lie again under oath for
Speaker 1: what he was already going to prison. He could very
Speaker 1: well have pleaded the Fifth, you know, or taken the
Speaker 1: fifth you know, take the fifth, you know, whatever. He
Speaker 1: could have invoked his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self incrimination,
Speaker 1: not answered any of Congress's questions. Instead we find out
Speaker 1: is that Adam Schiff spanned ten hours I think they
Speaker 1: said ten hours, that's all. That's a really long time
Speaker 1: talking to Cohen in advance of his testimony. This was
Speaker 1: just a Democrat hit, that's all it was. They weren't looking,
Speaker 1: they weren't looking for any answers, they weren't looking to
Speaker 1: uncover any new information. They were merely trying to figure out,
Speaker 1: how can we create another news cycle of Trump and
Speaker 1: Stormy Daniels and the porn star. Find some way to
Speaker 1: pretend that this is oversight, which is the most abused
Speaker 1: word now among Democrats. Oversight is something that you would
Speaker 1: think it would involve an essential American interest. Instead, what
Speaker 1: you have here is the Congress asserting its right to
Speaker 1: stick its thumb in the President's eye and try to
Speaker 1: embarrass him, and try to embarrass his supporters. Whenever they
Speaker 1: get a chance to score political points, to score cheap shots,
Speaker 1: that's where they excel. But Cohen is not a very
Speaker 1: smart guy. What he did was very dumb. I know
Speaker 1: why he did it. I think it's because he wants
Speaker 1: to live his life as somebody going forward when he
Speaker 1: gets out of prison in three or four years, whenever
Speaker 1: it is. He wants the much bigger territory of the
Speaker 1: left to be a place of some remember the left
Speaker 1: when it comes to jobs, when it comes to positions
Speaker 1: and media treatment, that's where all that's where all the
Speaker 1: sweet stuff is. You know, if you're just picking from
Speaker 1: pure self interest in this country, whether you want to
Speaker 1: be a conservative or a leftist in terms of your
Speaker 1: career opportunities, in terms of where how the culture will
Speaker 1: treat you, much easier, much better to just go along
Speaker 1: and get along with the left. To be a conservative
Speaker 1: means you have to uphold principles, You have to believe
Speaker 1: in lines that aren't constantly changing based upon whoever happens
Speaker 1: to be crossing the line. I mean, it's it's harder
Speaker 1: to be a conservative. It's harder to be a conservative,
Speaker 1: a lot more fun, a lot easier to be a liberal.
Speaker 1: So I think Cohen was in a sense making his
Speaker 1: pitch that he wants to be considered one of the
Speaker 1: good people by the Libs when he comes out of prison,
Speaker 1: and that's why he did Adam Ship's bidding. I mean,
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff is as unseemly and dishonest a person in
Speaker 1: Congress as you will find. He has been at the
Speaker 1: absolute forefront of stoking of this insanity about Russia collusion
Speaker 1: and all this stuff all along, and now he's just
Speaker 1: going to move on to investigating Trump in every way
Speaker 1: that he can't however he can, and so is So
Speaker 1: it was now there. Before I get to the Nadler
Speaker 1: side of this, though, I just want to note that
Speaker 1: the issue of a pardon came up with Trump and
Speaker 1: a pardon for Cohen. Some people still think that that's
Speaker 1: going to happen. I can tell you I find that highly,
Speaker 1: highly unlikely. But here's what the President said about it.
Speaker 1: Michael Khane lied about the Partons. Was a stone cold lie,
Speaker 1: and he's lied about a lot of things. But when
Speaker 1: he lied about the parton that was really a lie,
Speaker 1: and he knew all about partons. His lawyers said that
Speaker 1: they went to my lawyers and asked for pardons. And
Speaker 1: I can go and step above that, but I won't
Speaker 1: go to bad lawyer. I had a bad lawyer. That happened.
Speaker 1: Bad lawyer, no question about that. I also asked rude
Speaker 1: to ask, said, why has President Trump, why has President
Speaker 1: Trump not been better equipped, more able to sniff out
Speaker 1: some of them? They're just they're just losers. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're bad apples. And Juliani said that, you know, he's
Speaker 1: made mistakes too about people. And I guess that's as
Speaker 1: good of an answer. He's not Trump. That's as good
Speaker 1: an answer as you can imagine. But to have been
Speaker 1: around this guy Cohen for ten years, Giuliani said that
Speaker 1: he thinks that he felt badly that Trump felt a
Speaker 1: kind of personal loyalty to Cohen, because you know, he
Speaker 1: liked the idea of lifting this guy up, who's obviously
Speaker 1: not from a fancy law school, not some big shot
Speaker 1: corporate lawyer, and elevating him in part of the process,
Speaker 1: and so there was a sense of personal loyalty that
Speaker 1: Trump felt to Cohen. I think that's a a credible response.
Speaker 1: I think that, you know, I could be convinced of that,
Speaker 1: but I still can't imagine having somebody as incompetent and
Speaker 1: unethical as Cohen close to me in the inner circle
Speaker 1: of the White House. But now there's the question whether
Speaker 1: they're going to press charges against him because of what
Speaker 1: he lied about in the Congress and he said he
Speaker 1: did not want a White House job. He did not
Speaker 1: want a White House job, and there are plenty of
Speaker 1: people that have come out to say he did. And
Speaker 1: one of those people is Michael Cohen, who said on
Speaker 1: CNN that he was hoping you get a job in
Speaker 1: the White House, and so there's tape of it. Now
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's going to say that he
Speaker 1: changed his mind. So it's all a question of what
Speaker 1: the timing is here. You know, I'm not clear on
Speaker 1: how Cohen is going to defend himself if that comes up.
Speaker 1: I don't know what his defense could possibly be. He's
Speaker 1: on tape saying he wants a White House job, and
Speaker 1: then he's saying, oh, no, I don't want a White
Speaker 1: House job. But he's created a lot of trouble for himself,
Speaker 1: and what a swing. Oh Nadler. I was gonna just
Speaker 1: say Anawler, They've got more investigations pending, and they're going
Speaker 1: to know what to do with They're going to just
Speaker 1: drag this stuff out as much as they can. And
Speaker 1: I think that Congress, in a sense here is really
Speaker 1: borrowing from what the Democrat media's played. The Democrats in
Speaker 1: Congress are borrowing from the Democrat media plan was around
Speaker 1: the dossier. In a weird way, BuzzFeed has actually been
Speaker 1: helpful to the cause of the Trump administration by publishing
Speaker 1: that dossier, because it is quite clear that what the
Speaker 1: CNNs of the world planned to do was use that
Speaker 1: dossier as a go to source, a little piggy bank
Speaker 1: of fake but very attention grabbing anti Trump APO and
Speaker 1: they wanted to just keep it and have it and
Speaker 1: the media would have known about it, and they'd run
Speaker 1: stories from it, and then they'd always claim, oh, there's
Speaker 1: additional sources if anyone brought up, is this from the
Speaker 1: dossier that people have been talking about. But because they
Speaker 1: published that, all of a sudden, people were able to
Speaker 1: see for themselves how ridiculous this Hillary Clinton into opposition
Speaker 1: document was. That death by a thousand cut strategy the
Speaker 1: drip drip, drip effect of anti Trump stories that they
Speaker 1: had or that they plan to have from the dossier.
Speaker 1: That is what they are going to do. Now with
Speaker 1: these investigations. You're not going to see bombshells because there
Speaker 1: are no bombs shells. You're not going to see Russian
Speaker 1: collusion because there is no Russian collusion. But you are
Speaker 1: just going to see a repetition of talking points that
Speaker 1: are damaging to Trump or at least paint him or
Speaker 1: members of his administration in a negative light. And I
Speaker 1: think they're just hoping to overwhelm people's cognitive systems with
Speaker 1: just well, I've heard so much about Trump that's bad.
Speaker 1: I've heard them say so many things about how Trump
Speaker 1: is terrible that some of it may be true. They're
Speaker 1: hoping that for twenty twenty, this will help them. I do.
Speaker 1: I do still believe that very likely this will backfire
Speaker 1: on them in twenty twenty, although they'll never admit that
Speaker 1: if they lose it's going to be because of Chinese collusion.
Speaker 1: Next time it's going to be something else. They'll have
Speaker 1: some other excuse. But they're getting very close to what
Speaker 1: is truly overreach. I mean, I think they're already passed it.
Speaker 1: But will the American pop well enough Americans see that
Speaker 1: for what it is. That's the open question and keep
Speaker 1: an eye on it. I was just talking to our
Speaker 1: head of HR at the Hill about how we've got
Speaker 1: some really important, really key positions open, and I told her, look,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna help you out here. She said, what do
Speaker 1: you got from me? Buck? I said, go to zippercruiter
Speaker 1: dot com. Slash Buck says, oh, that's what we use
Speaker 1: before to hire some great people. That's right, that is
Speaker 1: what we use before, and we're going to use it again.
Speaker 1: You should use it too. Zippercruiter is the best place
Speaker 1: for you to post jobs online because zippercouiter sends your
Speaker 1: job to over a hundred of the webs leading job boards.
Speaker 1: They don't stop there though. They have a powerful matching
Speaker 1: technology that scans thousands of resumes to find people with
Speaker 1: the right experience and invites them to apply to your job.
Speaker 1: And right now, listeners can try zippercouiter for free at
Speaker 1: this exclusive web address, zip recruiter dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck again one more
Speaker 1: time to try it totally free zip recruiter dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck for whatever job, whatever industry, This is the
Speaker 1: smartest way to hire zip recruiter. Check it out. I
Speaker 1: am very pleased that there's an increased awareness about the
Speaker 1: threat to our planet, uh that we the crisis that
Speaker 1: we are facing, because I do believe that as we
Speaker 1: save the planet, we can do so with jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs,
Speaker 1: good paying jobs, keeping us pre eminent in the world
Speaker 1: in the green technologies. It's a public health issue, clean air,
Speaker 1: clean mortars, and national security issue. U Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: Some of the elements of that may be part of
Speaker 1: the will certainly be part of the discussion. This is
Speaker 1: Pelosi more or less admitting to you right there that
Speaker 1: she no longer can just tell the left wing lunatics
Speaker 1: in her party in the Congress, okay, you you run
Speaker 1: in play now and let the adults. Let the adults
Speaker 1: handle this. She can't just dismiss it as monumentally stupid
Speaker 1: as the Green New Deal was, as completely ridiculous as
Speaker 1: the rollout of that with Okazi Cortez and all the
Speaker 1: different networks. They're like, oh, this is a mission statement
Speaker 1: for the government. Pelosi has to at least give some
Speaker 1: pretense of respect to the Green New Deals underlying principles.
Speaker 1: And I'm just hoping that everyone remembers going forward, and
Speaker 1: the voters, particularly in states like Florida and Ohio and
Speaker 1: Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, just how crazy the Democrats are on
Speaker 1: this issue. The stuff that they say doesn't even make
Speaker 1: any sense. It's not even clear what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: And Pelosi was a great New Deal. It's yeah, it's
Speaker 1: national security, it's it's so important, clean air, it's clean water,
Speaker 1: it's you know, making sure that like you know, you, hey,
Speaker 1: the maid in cash because she doesn't want to have
Speaker 1: to go to the bank, and you know, wait what
Speaker 1: you're all right, Nancy, what are you talking about? You know,
Speaker 1: Nancy's got a lot of maids. By the way, she
Speaker 1: loves it's very much of the people, as in, she
Speaker 1: likes the people that show up and do things for
Speaker 1: her in her huge estate in San Francisco. But she's
Speaker 1: she's all about the workingman and woman. Sure thing. Every
Speaker 1: time I hear someone talking about the Green New Deal,
Speaker 1: now I think about all the different ways that I
Speaker 1: want to do deep dives on how stupid this is.
Speaker 1: And some of you who are longtime listeners to this show.
Speaker 1: Know that I have I have certain pet peeps. One
Speaker 1: of them is I hate whistling. And I know that,
Speaker 1: and there's actually a medical condition that people and as
Speaker 1: a medical condition that's a little too strong, like I
Speaker 1: don't get to have a service, you know, a service
Speaker 1: ostrich with me because of my medical condition that I
Speaker 1: hate whistling. Although now that I say that aloud, it
Speaker 1: does sound pretty badass, but it does. The whistling frequency
Speaker 1: when people whistle can really irritate some some individuals, some
Speaker 1: human beings, ears like mine. I absolutely hate whistling. Another
Speaker 1: thing that I absolutely hate is recycling. I think recycling
Speaker 1: is stupid, and I've always felt that way, and it's
Speaker 1: it's very clear that there's a that a lot of
Speaker 1: the desire to recycle comes from people's need to feel
Speaker 1: like they're doing something good because they're a good person.
Speaker 1: But it won't cost them anything really and it won't
Speaker 1: be you know, it won't be anything that is difficult
Speaker 1: for them to do. And I just appreciate that. Kyle Smith,
Speaker 1: who's over at National Review, just wrote a piece today
Speaker 1: cycling is a waste, and he just takes this whole
Speaker 1: takes this whole thing to task and people have known
Speaker 1: this for a long time. Recycling maybe maybe for cardboard
Speaker 1: and I think metal cans, he says here, Yeah, aluminum
Speaker 1: cans and cardboard. Maybe that's not a terrible idea. Any
Speaker 1: other form of recycling is completely counterproductive and idiotic in
Speaker 1: every way. It is very expensive. It's much more expensive
Speaker 1: than taking anything to a landfill. And people say, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: but we are not running out of space for landfills.
Speaker 1: That is completely false. I think he says in here
Speaker 1: that you could fit all of the landfill that we
Speaker 1: currently have on one tenth of one percent of the
Speaker 1: land that we have for grazing in this country, one
Speaker 1: tenth of one percent. So that's just nuts here, Yeah,
Speaker 1: he says, over the next here we go, all of
Speaker 1: the ash Americans produced over the next millennium would fit
Speaker 1: on one tenth of one percent of the land available
Speaker 1: for grazing. And a lot of rural communities are open
Speaker 1: for business when it comes to accepting urban rubbish. There
Speaker 1: was no landfill shortage. Kyle Smith for the win, he
Speaker 1: is correct. This is another crazy thing. And then you
Speaker 1: know they have these stories occasionally of kids. It tends
Speaker 1: to happen in California, small children who go into school
Speaker 1: and they don't recycle something and the teacher. I remember
Speaker 1: being scolded when I was a kid, when I was
Speaker 1: a kid by a teacher here or there for not
Speaker 1: recycling something, you know, like that's this is a this
Speaker 1: is a a mental condition that people have that they
Speaker 1: really think that they're going to save the planet by
Speaker 1: recycling their aluminum Can you know the same people though,
Speaker 1: who will get all on your case about recycling. I
Speaker 1: will just note have far fewer problems with littering and
Speaker 1: trash because that is increasingly now a cultural differentiation, and
Speaker 1: you will see this between America and other countries and
Speaker 1: people come here from other countries. We have a different
Speaker 1: view of littering and trash than much of the rest
Speaker 1: of the world. That dealing with trash and litter appropriately
Speaker 1: meaning just not throwing it on the street and leaving
Speaker 1: it to be an eyesore and get into groundwater and
Speaker 1: all that stuff. That's considered a first world problem in
Speaker 1: a lot of ways, because in crowded areas of the
Speaker 1: Third world, you'll see the trash cleanup situation is completely
Speaker 1: beyond the control of the local municipality. So recycling is stupid.
Speaker 1: And I don't know if composting, I mean, if you
Speaker 1: want to do that, if you want to keep smelling
Speaker 1: old food in a box and then dump it out
Speaker 1: on your lawn or whatever. I mean, I'm fine with that,
Speaker 1: I guess, but strikes me as very unnecessary. I mean, Mike,
Speaker 1: I do not compost. I can tell you that. No.
Speaker 1: But the other part of this, with what the Green
Speaker 1: New deals Zelt's running around talking about all this stuff,
Speaker 1: you have to remember that if you add in the
Speaker 1: energy that is required hired to recycle things, and you
Speaker 1: factor that into this process, I mean the actual recycling
Speaker 1: process to recycle things and the carbon footprint of that process,
Speaker 1: you would be better off just taking to the landfill.
Speaker 1: So if you believe that CO two is endering the world,
Speaker 1: you should be opposed to recycling. But they don't want
Speaker 1: to believe that because it feels so good to take
Speaker 1: that metal. The worst is when you have the takeout
Speaker 1: food tray that's like aluminum and it gets like the
Speaker 1: you know, you get the tostada like kind of stuck
Speaker 1: in it, and then you gotta wash it because you
Speaker 1: don't want to put the you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: It Maybe you don't know what I'm talking about, but
Speaker 1: I'm just saying I hate recycling. You should hate recycling.
Speaker 1: To listen to me on this, people, it's bad. Don't
Speaker 1: believe all the hype. You're not saving the planet. You
Speaker 1: shouldn't be fine for this. You shouldn't have to take
Speaker 1: like a special bag down to your local dump or whatever.
Speaker 1: This is all. It's all madness. Folks. Left has gone mad.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. This campaign is about is not
Speaker 1: only that we're gonna win the Democratic nomination. It's not
Speaker 1: only that we're going to defeat Donald Trump. We are
Speaker 1: going to transform this country and create an economy and
Speaker 1: a government that works for all of us. I think
Speaker 1: that the sport is there. I think the grassroots aren't
Speaker 1: gonna let the DNC do what they did last time.
Speaker 1: So I'm confident that we're gonna get to win this time.
Speaker 1: For one, Hillary's not running, so they can't rig the
Speaker 1: election this opinion. It's true though, the DNC did ring
Speaker 1: the election for Hillary. Remember I was over at hillary
Speaker 1: Headquarters also known as CNN, for the election year, and
Speaker 1: it was very clear. One of the most fun things
Speaker 1: over there was I don't know what they were thinking,
Speaker 1: but once or twice and they never let it happen.
Speaker 1: I think it only happened once. Let me sit in
Speaker 1: because I needed a Republican to pretend that they were
Speaker 1: actually having something other than a liberal love fest for Hillary.
Speaker 1: And they brought me on after Hillary and Bernie had
Speaker 1: a debate, and it was funny because we all would
Speaker 1: sit there in the brakes were like, at least Bernie's
Speaker 1: at least Bernie's authentic, right, you know? I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: he's like, I'm gonna give everybody ice cream. It doesn't
Speaker 1: make you fat, there's no sugar taste amazing, you don't
Speaker 1: pay for it, eat as much as you want, and
Speaker 1: that's compelling. It's also a fairy tale. But I mean,
Speaker 1: this is food is gonna keep coming up from the
Speaker 1: show because I really haven't eaten that it. I'm just
Speaker 1: very hungry. But you know, Bernie's pitch. If you could
Speaker 1: believe that, you know, you'd be h He's a rocky
Speaker 1: road guy. I can tell I feel like you can
Speaker 1: pick Today. We got asked we had we went on
Speaker 1: the table at the Hill about favorite Girl Scout Cookie producer,
Speaker 1: my favorite Girl Scout Cookie. What is the correct answer
Speaker 1: not your opinion. What's the correct answer. There's only one
Speaker 1: correct answer. I like the smella that is the correct answer.
Speaker 1: I was gonna give you a whole you know, I
Speaker 1: was gonna code read him John, but I can't because
Speaker 1: he got and now you know the answer. And I've
Speaker 1: already said what I think I could put them away,
Speaker 1: not by the sleeve, by the box. Some people like
Speaker 1: thin mints. I'm like, thin mints are a good second
Speaker 1: choice when you run out of Samoa's. Yeah, it's a
Speaker 1: good second choice to Samoas Samoas. There we go like
Speaker 1: a boss Quinn like a boss. Soh Bernie's around. Bernie's
Speaker 1: running around them. He's saying that they're gonna do more,
Speaker 1: they're gonna beat Trump and all this stuff, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know it's funny to me, is I'm hearing. And
Speaker 1: I think Howard Schultz said this publicly this week, but
Speaker 1: I've heard from other sources for a while now that
Speaker 1: that's that Bernie is for Libs. He is the red line.
Speaker 1: Whereas there'll be if Bernie wins, there'll be a third
Speaker 1: a third party candidate, like like Howard Schultz will get
Speaker 1: in because he thinks there are some Democrats who do
Speaker 1: believe that the if the actual nominee for the Deocratic
Speaker 1: Party is a socialist, it's they can never come back
Speaker 1: from that, right because because right now the game is always, oh,
Speaker 1: it's just Bernie. The Democrats are still the Democrats I've
Speaker 1: come up against. As I spoke to a Hillary strategist
Speaker 1: earlier in the week, and that was what he said, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's just Burnie and maybe Elizabeth Warren a little bit.
Speaker 1: Alcazio Quartelz is not running for president, so it's not
Speaker 1: really a socialist party yet, even though the policies are
Speaker 1: all basically socialist. At this point democratic socialist, which is
Speaker 1: just a modifier meant to make people feel better about
Speaker 1: the fact that they're socialist. But if Bernie wins, then
Speaker 1: the talking point becomes and it's not just talking about
Speaker 1: its reality. Sometimes talking points are true that the last
Speaker 1: Democrat nominee was a socialist, and some Democrats view this
Speaker 1: as a long term threat to the party because they
Speaker 1: think the country, even if they want socialist policies, is
Speaker 1: not yet ready to accept psychologically the embrace of open
Speaker 1: socialism in that way. And so there's some Democrats who
Speaker 1: Schultz being you know, a guy who can read a
Speaker 1: balance sheet and didn't Honeymoon in the Soviet Union like
Speaker 1: a total weirdo. Such a weird move, by the way,
Speaker 1: think about that, dude. No, Honey, not Paris, not Florence,
Speaker 1: not the Caribbean, not Hawaii, Soviet Union. I think I
Speaker 1: think miss Molly would take a pass, Mike. I don't think.
Speaker 1: I think she'd say you can go eat your borsht alone.
Speaker 1: And there wouldn't be very much of it because the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union obviously was not a land of abundance anyway. Oh,
Speaker 1: I was telling about CNN with with the so we
Speaker 1: would go into these we go into this debate post
Speaker 1: debate show, sitting there with all the Anna Navarro Van
Speaker 1: Jones contingent. It wasn't them, but it was people like
Speaker 1: them over there, analysts who go on TV. But most
Speaker 1: of the of the seven or eight people we had
Speaker 1: of this mega panel you CNN brings out, it's like
Speaker 1: it's like if they had every Democrat candidate right now
Speaker 1: on stage at the same time. That's all of their
Speaker 1: annals these days. They figure if nobody can say anything smart,
Speaker 1: just put as many people on stage as possible and
Speaker 1: hope that they'll say so many things that nobody will
Speaker 1: remember anything. It's a plan. I don't think it's a
Speaker 1: good plan. But in the commercial breaks, everybody's saying, Bernie's authentic,
Speaker 1: Bernie's with the grassroots. But the thing was Hillary's electable,
Speaker 1: and that was all it took. That was all it took.
Speaker 1: So they all knew that Hillary was a horrible candidate.
Speaker 1: But you see this earlier this week, I was ready,
Speaker 1: I was ready throwing the towel John. I was ready
Speaker 1: because I've been saying for a long time that Hillary's
Speaker 1: Hillary's grand plan is to run in twenty twenty. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that means she will, but that is
Speaker 1: her plan. And people have been telling me, including former
Speaker 1: Hillary advisors one or two I know, who are actually
Speaker 1: relatively cute and kind of fun. They have told me
Speaker 1: that there's no chance Hillary's running, absolutely known whatsoever, and
Speaker 1: they mock me for even bringing up And I'm ken,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that that is going to happen. I'm
Speaker 1: saying Hillary wants it to happen. That's not the same thing.
Speaker 1: And I earlier this week people said Hillary's out, It's
Speaker 1: not happening. There was this whole moment, and I was like, no,
Speaker 1: why am I gonna do because now I can't do
Speaker 1: the Hillary, which sounds nothing like her. But so I know,
Speaker 1: you know that I won the Daily Callers Donald Trump
Speaker 1: impersonation contest on the spot at Sea Pack. Yes, awesome.
Speaker 1: They did like a little a little straw pole or something,
Speaker 1: that's what they told me. I don't know, but they
Speaker 1: brought it all the different conservatives that they could that
Speaker 1: walk past the Daily Caller booth at Sea Pack and
Speaker 1: you had to do with Donald Trump impressure, which I
Speaker 1: never do on the show because I don't think it's
Speaker 1: radio ready. But I was like, it's the Daily Caller.
Speaker 1: I love these guys. I'll give it a shot. Number one,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump impressure right here on the spot. It's awesome.
Speaker 1: It's what radio skills does for you. You You know, should
Speaker 1: Trump I can't just sit here in like like oh,
Speaker 1: like you know, put more hairspraying and look more serious
Speaker 1: at the camera, like you know, you gotta bring the content. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you should have Trump debate Beta and I'll do it
Speaker 1: in the same Oh my gosh, like he just wouldn't
Speaker 1: even know what hit him. But I don't believe in
Speaker 1: hitting because that's like such maloggression. But there's that he's running,
Speaker 1: by the way, Beato's running. Oh wait, my Hillary theory.
Speaker 1: I was telling you my Hillary theory. So I was
Speaker 1: willing to back office and say, all right, Buck, maybe
Speaker 1: on this one your analysis was And then sure enough
Speaker 1: she gave an interview I think on Wednesday where they
Speaker 1: said to her, um, you know, would you agree that
Speaker 1: there's no chance you're running or something like this, and
Speaker 1: she's like, well, I wouldn't say there's no chance. It
Speaker 1: was like wait what she is definitely waiting. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: ask you one other talking about people waiting. Seagulls that's
Speaker 1: steal the French fries from you. You know, when you
Speaker 1: go to one of those places with the seaside and
Speaker 1: the seagulls like wait there. It's not gonna try to
Speaker 1: like take them it out of your hand, although I
Speaker 1: guess maybe something, but it's waiting for you the second
Speaker 1: you get up. That seagull is gonna come out and
Speaker 1: take your French fries. That seagull is Hillary Clinton. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: it's just waiting for you to step step up and
Speaker 1: walk away from that table. The Democrats that are in
Speaker 1: front where were gonna say, though, I was gonna ask
Speaker 1: your I have one other person who I think it's
Speaker 1: waiting on the sidelines, waiting to see how it all
Speaker 1: shakes out and which like Hillary's doing. What do you
Speaker 1: think about Michelle Obama? I'm gonna get booed by the audience.
Speaker 1: We're setting this right now. If Michelle Obama ran, I
Speaker 1: think she would. I think she would be very tough
Speaker 1: for Trump to be because the media, the whole, at
Speaker 1: the whole successful narrative and apparatus of the media before
Speaker 1: from Obama would be transferred to Michelle Obama plus the
Speaker 1: whole I'm with her, you know me too, feminism, glass ceiling,
Speaker 1: all that stuff. Very tough, very tough for her to
Speaker 1: But you know, I have heard from people that know
Speaker 1: her that she's she's happy just being a bajillionaire who
Speaker 1: gets to do whatever the heck she wants, and like really,
Speaker 1: they say, she really just doesn't want to do it.
Speaker 1: But I would say, Mike, she would be the most
Speaker 1: from a purely fighting it out with Trump perspective, because
Speaker 1: she doesn't she wouldn't have to be you know what,
Speaker 1: idea she could just reper She could steal some of
Speaker 1: Bernie's ideas and then just be Michelle Obama and the
Speaker 1: media would oh my god, I think a lot of
Speaker 1: her more than Obama, which I didn't even that's possible,
Speaker 1: and she would get in super late. She wouldn't have
Speaker 1: to go through all this trash talking that's happening now.
Speaker 1: She'd wait till all these people beat each other up,
Speaker 1: and she'd like creep in the last second. And let mean,
Speaker 1: you know what, the the way that Hillary and this
Speaker 1: is this could work for Michelle Obama too, although I
Speaker 1: really I do believe, because I've heard from people that
Speaker 1: are in the Obama world that are pretty high up
Speaker 1: and close to the Obama's that she just doesn't have
Speaker 1: the stomach for it. She doesn't want to do it,
Speaker 1: which I can understand because it is nasty. Hillary obviously, though,
Speaker 1: is like this is the only stomach she has anything for.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is like all she exists now at
Speaker 1: this point. To do the way it happens is you
Speaker 1: go into and again I'm not saying it's going to him,
Speaker 1: saying it could you go into a brokered convention where
Speaker 1: there's really no front runner, and then the Hillary apparat's right,
Speaker 1: the apparatics of Hillary Clinton land make sure that the
Speaker 1: whole thing is just a mess. And you know, and
Speaker 1: so so her people who still think they should have
Speaker 1: been the you know, White House, this and that and
Speaker 1: everything else in this administration. You know, they still feel
Speaker 1: like they got cheated. They show up the Democrat Convention
Speaker 1: and they do all that, and then Hillary just swoops
Speaker 1: in and it's like, this is the only way to
Speaker 1: set the world right. If we want to set the
Speaker 1: clock back and erase Trump. This I'm the only option.
Speaker 1: I'm the consensus candidate. It is just so crazy, Mike
Speaker 1: that I don't think it's that crazy at all. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's Oh, people are gonna tell me the
Speaker 1: little book that's crazy. Corey Booker's gonna run against Trump.
Speaker 1: Corey Booker. If Trump runs against Cory Booker, Cory Booker
Speaker 1: is going to cry during a debate. He will actually
Speaker 1: start crying, I think, and not in a like theatrical way,
Speaker 1: but I'm like, you're a mean way. Absolutely. Yeah. Trump's
Speaker 1: will just go over. I told you just before he's
Speaker 1: gonna go over. Put a cheeseburger on his pot. Walk
Speaker 1: away dude. The vegan jokes alone will fish. Trump will
Speaker 1: show up the first debate of Corey Booker's the nominee,
Speaker 1: and he will just hand him some tofurky and just
Speaker 1: say enjoy and that you know, it'll be like little
Speaker 1: Marco he called. He called Marco Ruby a little Marco
Speaker 1: and that was that was the end of that. And
Speaker 1: so those are my theories about where the Democrats are.
Speaker 1: I tend to be right, but I'm not always right,
Speaker 1: but I'm mostly right. We'll see how it shakes out.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. Border is going to keep getting worse.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to spend an hour every night on
Speaker 1: the border robmously. We have other things to cover here.
Speaker 1: But the situation is absolutely going to continue to deteriorate.
Speaker 1: There's no reason to believe it's going to get better
Speaker 1: anytime soon. In fact, I think you'll see this year
Speaker 1: will be worse for inadmissible entry into the United States
Speaker 1: and just illegal entry in the United States than any
Speaker 1: year of the Obama administration. And my friends, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: there is no way to explain that away. There's nothing.
Speaker 1: I don't care, you know, we can sit around and
Speaker 1: try to point fingers or whatever. The fact of the
Speaker 1: matter is, this is happening on Trump's watch. He needs
Speaker 1: to get control of the Republicans, and he needs a
Speaker 1: unified front on this because this is out of control.
Speaker 1: I saw this today and I thought, there's there's no
Speaker 1: way that this is really There's no way this could
Speaker 1: be true. This is happening now more and more on
Speaker 1: the immigration issue. You find out what's going on the border,
Speaker 1: and you see what's happening. You dig into the facts
Speaker 1: and you think there must be some exaggeration. You're here.
Speaker 1: Here's a perfect example of that from the Center for
Speaker 1: Immigration Studies. Todd Benzman tweeted out, US asylum officers are
Speaker 1: told me that now elective lasic surgery is offered to
Speaker 1: all female migrants in family detention. Children are given braces,
Speaker 1: all at no cost. Then they're catching at least into
Speaker 1: the interior migrants. According to asylum officers are calling home
Speaker 1: with news of these incredible benefits and the rush goes on.
Speaker 1: They're giving people lasic surgery, which costs about ten grand
Speaker 1: in the actual healthcare market. As I understand it, now,
Speaker 1: that sounded I think that's about I haven't had it,
Speaker 1: but I think that's about right. It's expensive. You get
Speaker 1: elective lasic surgery done. And braces, I know are there
Speaker 1: was always a big thing when I was growing up.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, braces are so expensive. They're probably less
Speaker 1: expensive now, but they're still And remember these are elective
Speaker 1: cosm I mean, well, braces are an elective cosmetic procedure generally.
Speaker 1: I know it can be for health reasons, but usually
Speaker 1: it's a cosmetic procedure. And look, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: do I want little kids to have braces? Yeah? I wish.
Speaker 1: I wish we could give the whole world, the whole
Speaker 1: world's little kids braces, But we do have limited resources here.
Speaker 1: You know, there is a cause and effect to all this.
Speaker 1: This is not just well, we've got this endless and
Speaker 1: we're twenty two trillion dollars in debt. I just can't
Speaker 1: emphasize this enough. And one of the areas that we're
Speaker 1: constantly lied to about a legal immigration and what's happening
Speaker 1: at our southern border is they say that this is
Speaker 1: helping us financially and economically, and that is just not true.
Speaker 1: It is not true if bringing in non English speaking,
Speaker 1: generally less than ninth grade educated Honduran and El Salvadoran
Speaker 1: and Guatemalan migrants, if that made your country wealthy, then
Speaker 1: we should just make El Salvador the fifty first state,
Speaker 1: right offer them that. I'm sure they'd take it. You know,
Speaker 1: we provide law enforcement, all the federal benefits that come
Speaker 1: in with it. They'd probably signed on for that deal.
Speaker 1: I really much more certain even than Honduras would sign
Speaker 1: on for that deal. But we recognize at some level
Speaker 1: this can't this cannot be true. And America is in
Speaker 1: fact so wealthy because of the American people, because of
Speaker 1: our culture, our rule of law. It is us that
Speaker 1: makes this place so wealthy. Yeah, we have a lot
Speaker 1: of natural resources, so does Russia. Our economy is ten
Speaker 1: times the size of Russia something like that. I think
Speaker 1: they have a between a trillion and two trillion dollar
Speaker 1: economy and ours is, you know, ten x the Russian economy,
Speaker 1: and it's because of the American people. So I just
Speaker 1: thought that was a stunning. I'm hope we're gonna get
Speaker 1: down to El Paso, guys. I'll get you as much
Speaker 1: as this as I can. You know what, Mike, we
Speaker 1: should have to. Can we have Tom Benzman on because
Speaker 1: he's obviously doing a lot of research on this from
Speaker 1: Center for Immigration Studies. I think that people need to
Speaker 1: know what's really happening here and now it is just
Speaker 1: a free for all. I mean, this is like Obama
Speaker 1: Care for the whole world that the southern border and
Speaker 1: everyone knows and this is a big it's a big
Speaker 1: scam and it's and it needs to stop. And the
Speaker 1: other thing that was in the I can't believe the
Speaker 1: Democrats are actually doing this, but they are. Category is
Speaker 1: in this and we'll talk more about this in the
Speaker 1: next hour. I've just been trying to catch up on
Speaker 1: this one. But the Democrats in the House, based on
Speaker 1: this latest procedural or this this latest vote that's not
Speaker 1: a procedural, this latest legislative vote HR one, the For
Speaker 1: the People Act, which they say expands voter registration. They
Speaker 1: also say that they are favorable to illegal immigrants voting
Speaker 1: in local elections. They want to defend in this act
Speaker 1: people allowing illegal aliens. This is the Democrats now as
Speaker 1: part of this first or no the for the People Act. Rather,
Speaker 1: they want you to vote for your school board, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: Even if you're an illegal. This is if you don't
Speaker 1: think this is a this is where I was gonna say,
Speaker 1: first step, a first step toward Democrats pushing for anybody
Speaker 1: in the country being able to vote, regardless of immigration status.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you're you're you're missing what's happening here. That's coming.
Speaker 1: Trust me, Democrats want it and they will start to
Speaker 1: fight for it. It's a great feeling when you find
Speaker 1: that twenty dollar bill in your jacket that you haven't
Speaker 1: worn a while. Right, it's nice found money. We knowwhere
Speaker 1: else you might have some foul money, maybe even hundreds
Speaker 1: of dollars, maybe even more, sitting in the papers, in
Speaker 1: your filing cab, at desk or in your attic who
Speaker 1: knows where. But it's from that old four oh one
Speaker 1: k that you started but didn't really do anything with.
Speaker 1: We'll guess what that money's sitting there gathering financial dust.
Speaker 1: It could be working for you in a precious metals ira.
Speaker 1: My friends at Noble Goold can see if you qualify.
Speaker 1: They'll do all the heavy lifting for you. Could make
Speaker 1: you a lot of money, could cost you nothing. Give
Speaker 1: Noble Goold a call at eight seven seven six four
Speaker 1: six five three four seven or text Buck to five
Speaker 1: eleven five eleven to get their free investors Guide. Remember
Speaker 1: they can check for you to see if you qualify
Speaker 1: four A Precious Metals IRA. You should really check this out.
Speaker 1: Got a noble goold Investments dot com or text buck
Speaker 1: to five eleven, five eleven, or you can call eight
Speaker 1: seven seven six four six five three four seven. Individual
Speaker 1: results may vary invest wildly. Standard text rates may apply.
Speaker 1: Two premier ABC hosts have their own sorted passed with blackface,
Speaker 1: while on another network, ABC's Jimmy Kimmel don blackface to
Speaker 1: mock a former professional athlete, using what many would consider
Speaker 1: a racist minstrel dialect. Furthermore, the view host Joy Behar
Speaker 1: recently had a photo emerge in which she was donning
Speaker 1: black face as well at a party. Mister Iger, with
Speaker 1: all of the pride, that's quite clear to everyone in
Speaker 1: this room that the diversity that you place on Disney,
Speaker 1: the diversity of the characters in your films. I find
Speaker 1: it puzzling that the company seems okay with Kimmel and
Speaker 1: Behar's pasted racist actions and behaviors. Can you comment to
Speaker 1: us on their use of blackface and are they simply
Speaker 1: held to a different standard than politicians and newscasters because
Speaker 1: they're comedians. We don't condone the use of blackface under
Speaker 1: any circumstances in our world today, and the specific incidents
Speaker 1: that you raised, we chose to deal with privately. We
Speaker 1: did not feel that it required any particular comment, and
Speaker 1: nor do we have anything to say about what actions
Speaker 1: we may have taken in that regard. Oh, okay, can
Speaker 1: I have when I do something that for other people
Speaker 1: would get them a lot of trouble, I'd like to
Speaker 1: know if I can get it dealt with privately with
Speaker 1: no apparent detriment to my career. That sounds nice. That's
Speaker 1: the special liberal option, though, that's the Jimmy Kimmel Joy
Speaker 1: Behar option. Doesn't extend to conservatives. I can assure you
Speaker 1: of that. Hypocrisy and double standards are essential to the
Speaker 1: left because they know, first of all, their standards change
Speaker 1: on this stuff all the time. What is racist? Who
Speaker 1: is racist? What is sexist? What are you allowed to say?
Speaker 1: You know? What I found reason was a controversial opinion
Speaker 1: that I have. By the way, I had no idea
Speaker 1: that I think, and I don't even have to make
Speaker 1: this just about women. You could say it's of both sexist.
Speaker 1: I think people overwhelmingly look better with their natural hair color.
Speaker 1: And I've said this to a few female friends, because
Speaker 1: then a lot of women like to do a lot
Speaker 1: of things to their hair. I think that people look
Speaker 1: their best with their net. It goes. There's a reason,
Speaker 1: right though, the coloring, the eyebrows, the whole thing. And
Speaker 1: people think that I'm crazy for this, Mike. I don't
Speaker 1: know why. I don't know. I'm just this is like
Speaker 1: a controversial opinion that I apparently have it and in
Speaker 1: the realm of because today is you know, International Women's Day,
Speaker 1: And is this a sexist thing? If I say to
Speaker 1: all the ladies out there, I think the way God
Speaker 1: made you is the best way when it comes to
Speaker 1: your hair color overwhelming you not always. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you were borne with green hair, maybe you want to
Speaker 1: like get a you know, you want to deal with that.
Speaker 1: But overwhelmingly it's the best way. And yet I told
Speaker 1: a few ladies this and they think that I'm you say,
Speaker 1: it's a liberal lady. Of course, it's a most sexist
Speaker 1: thing in the world. Of course it is. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's really amazing, you know. On the one hand,
Speaker 1: you know, California a perfect example. This Ryan Savedra, who
Speaker 1: does great work over the Deli wire. He tweeted us out.
Speaker 1: Today California revoked the I mean, this is how modern
Speaker 1: feminism is just completely disjointed, and it ties into this
Speaker 1: conversation about the hypocrisy and the double standards, and no
Speaker 1: one knows what's okayty, everyone's just woke, which is an
Speaker 1: excuse for just you're miserable and you're angry and you
Speaker 1: want to see other people get in trouble. You don't
Speaker 1: even know what the rules are. You just want to
Speaker 1: see other people, you know, being told they're terrible and
Speaker 1: you're one of the good people, all right, because you're
Speaker 1: a liberal and you're woke. But California got rid of
Speaker 1: a h a ball I don't know what do you
Speaker 1: call it? A coffee bar, not a bar bar, a
Speaker 1: coffee bar because the baristas were too scantily clad. And
Speaker 1: I saw some photos and yeah, they're they're waved. They
Speaker 1: got a lot of business because they had very attractive,
Speaker 1: scantily clad women, and California shut that down because it
Speaker 1: was upsetting to people because it was sexism. And I
Speaker 1: just think to myself, Okay, so that the state is
Speaker 1: supposed to take take action on. You can't have just
Speaker 1: women being beautiful and selling coffee as a result of
Speaker 1: that is that is sexist. That is unacceptable. Meanwhile, California
Speaker 1: also wanted to make sure that if you give somebody
Speaker 1: HIV intentionally, you can't get in trouble for that. No
Speaker 1: need for state action there. I mean, these people are nuts.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the real divide now, and maybe
Speaker 1: this is this is gonna be a It is a
Speaker 1: recurring theme on the show. I'm just stuff. It's not
Speaker 1: even so much Democrat versus Republican or conservative versus liberal.
Speaker 1: It's really just crazy versus not crazy. Yeah, people that
Speaker 1: you can you can discuss things with, and people that
Speaker 1: you can't because they see things through this lens of
Speaker 1: the the psychological pollution that the left has built up
Speaker 1: in their minds. They speak in a pollution. They think
Speaker 1: the world's gonna If you think the world is gonna
Speaker 1: end in twelve years, you're wrong. I guarantee it. You're wrong.
Speaker 1: And it's not a smart position that you hold. I
Speaker 1: don't care how many scientists you're wrong. But they think
Speaker 1: that I'm weird, you know, I'm I keep saying I
Speaker 1: want to get some of that big oil money. I
Speaker 1: wish that was an okay way to explain why I
Speaker 1: feel the way I do about this, because I'd be
Speaker 1: walking around John, I would be slapping my butler with
Speaker 1: one hundred dollars bills courtesy of Shell Oil if I could.
Speaker 1: I have no shame about that, because I believe in
Speaker 1: fossil fuels. I believe in an advanced economy that has
Speaker 1: people that have I don't know, heat in the winter
Speaker 1: and gas for their cars and things like that. So
Speaker 1: I just I'd slap Jeeves around with all my fossil
Speaker 1: fuel money if I could. I don't have any, though.
Speaker 1: I just know the world's not ending in twelve years,
Speaker 1: all right. I know I've gotten off on a tangent
Speaker 1: here and where we started off talking about Jimmy Kimmel
Speaker 1: and Joy Behar and the way that they But the
Speaker 1: point is the double standards, and it's not even we
Speaker 1: don't know what the standards are. It's worse than a
Speaker 1: double standard, because it'd be one thing if they just
Speaker 1: said outright. And this goes also to my definition of
Speaker 1: true tyranny is not laws that are strictly enforced. It's
Speaker 1: laws that are capriciously enforced, laws that are enforced ad
Speaker 1: hoc based on who you are, Oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: like whether you're a Democrat or a Republican with regard
Speaker 1: to the Special Counsel and the DOJ and the FBI
Speaker 1: in recent years and political investigations that have happened, right,
Speaker 1: that's what that feels much more, much more tyrannical. But
Speaker 1: with the Libs now, you know, Jimmy Kimmel, he faced
Speaker 1: no punishment for what anyone else having done, even if
Speaker 1: it was twenty years ago, if you were a conservative,
Speaker 1: or if you weren't a beloved left wing comedian, because
Speaker 1: you have to be a left wing to be a
Speaker 1: comedian these days and be successful. They will not allow
Speaker 1: conservative comedians any of the big platforms, any of the
Speaker 1: stages that they offer up to deeply unfunny lib mouthpieces
Speaker 1: like Sarah Silverman and others out that what's the other?
Speaker 1: Who's the other? The female comedian who's just terrible, yes,
Speaker 1: thank you, the worst, just not funny. If she were funny,
Speaker 1: I'd be fine with it. She's not funny. But but
Speaker 1: they they allow Jimmy Kimmel to get away with this
Speaker 1: because he's Jimmy Kimmel, just like they allow Ilhan Omar
Speaker 1: to get away with all this because she's Illana Omar
Speaker 1: and Enjoy Joy Beha, Hello Buck the New York. Now,
Speaker 1: maybe we could have coffee and talk and snuggle. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Buck's kind of killed sometimes he's got those dimples.
Speaker 1: Kimmy at you. You can sit next to me on
Speaker 1: the view. Yeah, that's right that you try try to
Speaker 1: remove that one from your memory. Team Joy Behar hitting
Speaker 1: on Buck in real time. You just heard that happen,
Speaker 1: You know it could it could be. I don't even
Speaker 1: know she's married. I even know. I have no idea.
Speaker 1: I'm gad probably right, Probably isn't married A bunch kids
Speaker 1: who I have no idea. I don't know why she's
Speaker 1: on TV. Othern she sounds like this and she's very liberal.
Speaker 1: Where was I? Oh, we got to talk about this
Speaker 1: big Democrat move in the house that's going nowhere, that's
Speaker 1: coming up. Oh Buck, what are you drinking first thing
Speaker 1: in the morning every day? Wow, that's an easy question
Speaker 1: because it's the same thing every day. Black Rifle coffee
Speaker 1: because it is delicious and also Black Rifle is a
Speaker 1: company that shares your values. This is a company that
Speaker 1: was founded by veterans of the special operations community. They
Speaker 1: believe in freedom America and the most delicious roast or
Speaker 1: coffee you're gonna get anywhere. Join Black Rifles Coffee Club.
Speaker 1: They make things easy. You just pick your blend online
Speaker 1: the amount you want, and Black Rifle will ship it
Speaker 1: right to your door every month. Hassle free. I'm a member.
Speaker 1: You should be a member too. This is where I
Speaker 1: get my coffee, and this is how I get it
Speaker 1: every month. While liberals threatened to further tax you're hard
Speaker 1: earned money with their socialists agenda, Black Rifle Coffee is
Speaker 1: fueling the fight for freedom by upping their offer to
Speaker 1: twenty percent off. Take advantage by visiting Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck and received twenty percent off your
Speaker 1: entire order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck for
Speaker 1: twenty percent off again one more time. Black Riflecoffee dot
Speaker 1: Com slash buck to speak tonight on behalf of my
Speaker 1: Amendment to HR one. Throughout my life, I've abided by
Speaker 1: the mantra we should never make assumptions about who desires
Speaker 1: to have a stakehold in and a seat at the
Speaker 1: table of our democracy. Since the days of abolitionists, suffragists,
Speaker 1: and civil rights activists. Young people have been pushing the
Speaker 1: wheels of progress forward. These youth, our young people, who
Speaker 1: will inherit the nation we design here by virtue of
Speaker 1: our policies or by default of our policies and authority.
Speaker 1: These very same young people should also have a say
Speaker 1: in who represents them. For your consideration, Amendment number one
Speaker 1: two seven, which would lower the minimum voting age in
Speaker 1: federal elections from eighteen to sixteen years of age. Eighteen sixteen, folks,
Speaker 1: But the Libs are talking about now, that's Aiona Pressley.
Speaker 1: She's another one of these new members of Congress that's
Speaker 1: getting a lot of attention at the national level. A
Speaker 1: lot of people are talking about her and what she's
Speaker 1: going to do going forward for the Democratic Party. She's
Speaker 1: part of the left wing of it. But they want
Speaker 1: younger kids to vote. I do have to say that
Speaker 1: this is kind of funding me because we've heard so
Speaker 1: much from the last couple of years about the need
Speaker 1: to protect our institutions and the need for our sacred
Speaker 1: democracy to flourish. Also, let's have kids vote now for
Speaker 1: those who will say buck because an eighteen year old
Speaker 1: really know much more than a sixteen year old. I
Speaker 1: would say, actually, scientifically, the answer is yes, you're more
Speaker 1: likely to have your brain be fully formed. There they
Speaker 1: can show that the minds of teenagers in particular are
Speaker 1: less able to process long term consequences and that that
Speaker 1: kicks in further on in your development. This is hashtag science.
Speaker 1: John's for real, and this is why teenagers are you know,
Speaker 1: tend to be more impulsive and have less impulse control.
Speaker 1: So that's a real thing. I would also just point
Speaker 1: out that, you know, we could do this game all
Speaker 1: day where it's well, are you an adult at twenty one?
Speaker 1: Are you an adult at thirty seven? When you're ilhan
Speaker 1: Omar and Nancy Pelosi is saying it doesn't really understand
Speaker 1: the words. That was bad Nancy that I know Nancy
Speaker 1: was trying to help there, but she didn't help. Are
Speaker 1: you an adult at thirty seven? You know? Are you're
Speaker 1: adult at fifty or you're adult at ten eighteen? Is
Speaker 1: the line we draw for a lot of things. And
Speaker 1: it's just instructive about where the Democratic Party is going
Speaker 1: that they're they're not seeking to deal even with the
Speaker 1: population in America that is a voting age as it is,
Speaker 1: they're looking to import foreigners and to take kids and
Speaker 1: let them vote. That's the plan to changee who can vote,
Speaker 1: instead of focusing on the debate such as it is
Speaker 1: in front of the voting age population. So I don't
Speaker 1: think this is going to go anywhere. But that doesn't
Speaker 1: I could be wrong. They could decide that this is
Speaker 1: something they're really going to get into. And they also
Speaker 1: see all of the all the numbers on how young
Speaker 1: people there's a particular, a particularly strong advantage that the
Speaker 1: left has, the far left has among what do we
Speaker 1: call what are younger than millennials now? Right? I mean,
Speaker 1: if you're born post two thousand, you're not a millennial, right,
Speaker 1: You're a You're a tadpole? What are you? What do
Speaker 1: we call you? Is this? There's got to be some
Speaker 1: kind of a cool name, is it? Z? Generation Z?
Speaker 1: I mean I could take that. I don't know. Regardless,
Speaker 1: if you are of that age, chances are you're very
Speaker 1: liberal or very likely. And this is where I love
Speaker 1: it when I get people listen to show who are
Speaker 1: college age and like Buck, but some of us are
Speaker 1: still conservative. I'm like, thank god for you guys and gals.
Speaker 1: Otherwise we'd really be in trouble, I know, I know
Speaker 1: they're out there, but there's still this numerical advantage to
Speaker 1: the left when it comes to people who are of
Speaker 1: a certain you know, under the under the age of thirty,
Speaker 1: in particular under I think millennials now are the largest,
Speaker 1: the largest cohort in the United States. I think there's
Speaker 1: more millennials than boomers now, and I think that millennials
Speaker 1: have a particularly high skew toward the left. Anyway, They're
Speaker 1: trying to change the game here, folks, no surprise, trying
Speaker 1: to see if they can get sixteen year olds to vote.
Speaker 1: And this just reminds me of that still surreal conversation
Speaker 1: with the activist, the national level activist who from the
Speaker 1: Sunshine or Sunrise Sunshine, I think Sunshine or I forget,
Speaker 1: Who's training kids to go and walk into the offices
Speaker 1: of members of Congress to tell them what they should
Speaker 1: do about climate change and other incredibly complicated political policy
Speaker 1: issues right that? And I was like, should ten year
Speaker 1: olds vote? She wasn't sure about that one. I should
Speaker 1: have said, John, should five year old be able to vote?
Speaker 1: Because I still think she would have done the I
Speaker 1: don't know. Yeah, so we'd have like Google Gaga, like
Speaker 1: pulling levers and stuff like walking in four or five
Speaker 1: years old. But Libs love this stuff. They also like
Speaker 1: to play the game where they'll say, yeah, like, I'm
Speaker 1: just so upset about the latest thing that Trump said.
Speaker 1: Because my seven year old liberal journalists with blue checks
Speaker 1: do this all the time. It's ever knows. It's now
Speaker 1: become a big joke. It's its own meme factory. But
Speaker 1: my seven year old came in and was like, why
Speaker 1: is it that, like the Trump administration just completing the
Speaker 1: gates sis gender politics and the self actualization of all
Speaker 1: of the oppression theory that I'm being taught by watching
Speaker 1: MSNBC every night. But Buck, they're sentient beings. They are sentient.
Speaker 1: That's true, Mike. They maybe seven, but they're sentient beings.
Speaker 1: Look for Libs, it's just all you know, can you
Speaker 1: get all the sheep man bleeding and going in the
Speaker 1: same direction? And then, unfortunately this country if you listen
Speaker 1: to the far left, it's not gonna be sheep. We're
Speaker 1: all gonna be lemings because we're all gonna go off
Speaker 1: the cliff together. I'd rather that not happen. I would
Speaker 1: prefer that that not be the direction of the country.
Speaker 1: But unfortunately, I can't necessarily tell you for sure that
Speaker 1: that's not where we're going anymore. I mean Thomas Soul's
Speaker 1: words there are particularly haunting that he's not he's not
Speaker 1: sure that we're not going to collapse because of socialism.
Speaker 1: He can't he can't make Thomas Soul is a very
Speaker 1: smart guy. He's like, I can't make you any promises
Speaker 1: we may be going that way. What is this voting Mike,
Speaker 1: what's this voting rights bill? With Pelosi and McCarthy. I
Speaker 1: don't even see this one. This one just came up
Speaker 1: on the radar here. Yeah, it's something that they're talking about.
Speaker 1: The set to him, it's it's gonna be da when
Speaker 1: it gets to the center floor. But they had an
Speaker 1: interesting back and forth today this afternoon. All right, let's
Speaker 1: play it. Let's let everyone hear it. So the Senate,
Speaker 1: as you receive this bill, you will also be receiving
Speaker 1: the aspirations, the mobilizations, the persistence, the relentlessness of the
Speaker 1: American people to have government work for them, for the people.
Speaker 1: So this is a fight we're engaged in. I do
Speaker 1: not believe this bill is going to go anywhere. But
Speaker 1: the really sad part about this. This is the definition
Speaker 1: of the Democratic New Party that this is their number
Speaker 1: one bill, This is their most important bill because they
Speaker 1: chose what number to give it. We chose to give
Speaker 1: taxpayers make sure they get able to keep more of
Speaker 1: their own money. They chose to take more of the
Speaker 1: taxpayer money and give it to themselves as politicians. Ah no,
Speaker 1: now I know we're talking about here. I was like,
Speaker 1: wait a second, what is this. Oh? This is the
Speaker 1: Democrat's nonsense anti corruption voting rights bill that their path.
Speaker 1: This are the New York Times that are about the
Speaker 1: the House pass the Democrats showcase who anti corruption voting
Speaker 1: rights legislations dead in the Senate. So this is all
Speaker 1: just for show. An expansive measure that aims to dismantle
Speaker 1: barriers to the ballot box, end big money in politics,
Speaker 1: and impose stricter ethics rules on federal officials. The legislation
Speaker 1: passed two thirty four to one ninety three in the House.
Speaker 1: It makes good in the campaign pledge to clean up
Speaker 1: Washington that helped catapult Democrats in the majority. Isn't this, Mike,
Speaker 1: This is a fantastic example of how the New York
Speaker 1: Times does New York Times stuff. Just the passage of
Speaker 1: this legislation that will never be a law and that
Speaker 1: will do nothing. Quote makes good on the campaign pledge.
Speaker 1: Does all they have to do. That's all they gotta do.
Speaker 1: I mean, would you ever see Republicans pass a bill
Speaker 1: in the House that does not be doesn't even make it,
Speaker 1: doesn't even get a vote in the Senate, is dead
Speaker 1: on arrival in the Senate, does not become law, does
Speaker 1: not get signed by the president. That's making good on
Speaker 1: a campaign promise because they've cleaned it up. No, they've
Speaker 1: done a show vote to show bote. That means nothing.
Speaker 1: I don't think that cleans up anything. Man. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like when I've cooked and the dishes are all
Speaker 1: over because I cook. I cook. I'm a messy, messy cook.
Speaker 1: Because like when I'm in the zone right whatever needs
Speaker 1: to happen, you know, there's gonna be some kitchen casualties.
Speaker 1: Like there's gonna be some glasses again, maybe knocked over
Speaker 1: as grease everywhere. I mean, it looks like it looks
Speaker 1: like there was a there was a fight going on.
Speaker 1: And I look at it and I'm like, maybe if I,
Speaker 1: like watch my show or hang out. I come back
Speaker 1: in an hour to the kitchen. It's gonna be better. False.
Speaker 1: It is still a mess and this is this is
Speaker 1: that's that's how they've made good on their campaign promise. Yeah,
Speaker 1: DEM's won a messy man. They can't keep it clean
Speaker 1: because if it's if it gets cleaned up, you start
Speaker 1: seeing them for what they really are. Well, I love it,
Speaker 1: o'casio Cortez. Miss I just I just want to get
Speaker 1: like all the money out of politics, except for your
Speaker 1: like multi millionaire chief of staff boyfriend guy who is
Speaker 1: hiding millions of dollars in this shell game, which maybe legal.
Speaker 1: But even people that are totally in the tank for
Speaker 1: Rokazi Grtez are calling this a creative structure to a
Speaker 1: evade scrutiny. Exactly, dude, exactly. She thinks she's the boss.
Speaker 1: All Right, we're gonna get into some roll call action.
Speaker 1: Everybody stay with me, Hey, team Buck, It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call God for the role call everybody here in
Speaker 1: New York City. Very exciting, John. I heard from at
Speaker 1: least two very disturbed people screaming outside of Penn Station today,
Speaker 1: so I knew that I was home. They were yelling
Speaker 1: and cursing about something. I don't know if they were
Speaker 1: in a fight or if they just were happy to
Speaker 1: see each other or something. They were there were something
Speaker 1: going on, and I was like, this is home, this
Speaker 1: is New York. Now, now we're here. I almost got
Speaker 1: hit by a delivery guy on a bicycle when I
Speaker 1: was trying to get into my taxi. Again, that's when
Speaker 1: you know you reached the promised Land. All right? Uh,
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton if you want to
Speaker 1: have your thoughts read aloud so people can hear them.
Speaker 1: Coast to Ghosts, which is oh so fun. And it
Speaker 1: was awesome, by the way, that the name of a
Speaker 1: from what I understand, very excellent radio show also on
Speaker 1: this network later on tonight. So that's fun. Um. All right,
Speaker 1: now we have Julio up first. Buck, this may cost
Speaker 1: a few officers some disciplinary action for stopping for food
Speaker 1: thanks to a sanctuary sanctuary Liberal city and the stories
Speaker 1: about a panic in a New York City high school
Speaker 1: when immigration officials hold on what is this one? Immigration
Speaker 1: agents on the sidewalk but they just wanted lunch. Oh
Speaker 1: so people freaked out because as they saw immigration officials
Speaker 1: from ice and they thought they must be coming to
Speaker 1: do bad things, because Ice is supposed to be so
Speaker 1: scary and mean and evil. But they were actually just
Speaker 1: getting a sandwich. Just getting a sandwich, folks. That's enough
Speaker 1: or the Libs to freak out when you have somebody
Speaker 1: who shows up and seems like they work for Immigrations
Speaker 1: and Customs enforcement. Oh my, Tom, all right buck. If
Speaker 1: I were Christopher Ray, I would have the local Office
Speaker 1: of Minneapolis investigating the Democrat Farmers Labor Party. So far
Speaker 1: they provided us with Keith Allison, Amy Klobuchar, and ilhan Omar.
Speaker 1: All the hype about socialism and communism is primarily directed
Speaker 1: at California, Illinois, and New York. Maybe the media should
Speaker 1: be looking at Minnesota as a possible home camp for
Speaker 1: radical Muslims and socialists. Just a thought, Thomas, You know
Speaker 1: Minnesota is more liberal than I would have guessed. It
Speaker 1: turns out Minnesota's pretty liberal. They put al Frank in
Speaker 1: a office apparently he wasn't good enough and smart enough,
Speaker 1: and gosh darn it, they didn't like him enough though,
Speaker 1: because he got tossed. Then they had Minnesota's pretty progressive.
Speaker 1: I feel like it's probably even more blue than Wisconsin. Right.
Speaker 1: In the last election, Minnesota went straight up blue. Wisconsin
Speaker 1: obviously was Trump victory from victory states. So that's very fun.
Speaker 1: Good things to know. Casey, Hey Buck, There's something I
Speaker 1: just don't understand that I'd really like you to break down.
Speaker 1: You said the Dems will impeach forty five and what
Speaker 1: I want to know is, how can this be possible?
Speaker 1: And wouldn't that have to get past the Supreme Court?
Speaker 1: And because of that, wouldn't it be considered unconstitutional? Once again,
Speaker 1: I did not fully understand, so I'm not accurnist. Please
Speaker 1: shed some light. Thanks Casey from the Marine Corps Shields Eye. Well, Casey,
Speaker 1: first off, thanks for your service or appreciate it. As
Speaker 1: to whether the Democrats can impeach, No, the Democrats absolutely
Speaker 1: can impeach the president. That's a pretty straight forward process.
Speaker 1: There's there's a procedure in the House Representatives and they
Speaker 1: have majority vote majority votes. If they all stand together
Speaker 1: on this, which I'm sure they will, they won't go
Speaker 1: forward with it otherwise, and they will impeach the president.
Speaker 1: Removal is the part of it that is a much
Speaker 1: higher bar. That's where you need two thirds of the Senate.
Speaker 1: With the president to be removed from office. And unless
Speaker 1: it turns out that that Trump is in fact a
Speaker 1: speaking Russian in the wee hours of the morning to
Speaker 1: his handler who is transmitting things to Vladimir back in Moscow,
Speaker 1: then there's no reasonable person, I think, who would tell
Speaker 1: you that the president is in any danger being removed
Speaker 1: from office. So impeachment is kind of like a big,
Speaker 1: glorified version of what we just saw with Ilhan Omar
Speaker 1: this week, which is impeachment just then turns into a
Speaker 1: vote of disapproval. You know, it's a it's a resolution
Speaker 1: that does not actually have any teeth to it. And
Speaker 1: so that's what happened to Bill Clinton. By the way,
Speaker 1: Senna did not remove him from office. As you know,
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton finished his eight years in office, much to
Speaker 1: the chagrin of many people have thought that he should
Speaker 1: have been gone. Nicholas rides Buck, keep doing what you're doing.
Speaker 1: You are a voice of sanity and reason in the
Speaker 1: wasteland of social media, and your show is a daily
Speaker 1: dose of assurance. There's some folks out there in the
Speaker 1: media that do care about the truth. Thank you for emerging,
Speaker 1: I try to emerge. Appreciate that and giving us all
Speaker 1: another voice a reason in the slot that was formerly
Speaker 1: occupied by a rhino. Megan's a friend. You are saving
Speaker 1: our sanity, sir, Well Nicholas meant thank you so much
Speaker 1: for right again. Thanks for joining team Buck and for
Speaker 1: listening to the show. And it means a lot grace.
Speaker 1: Race here you are. I just made the Oh guys,
Speaker 1: when you send me links, Okay, here we go. Thank
Speaker 1: you for getting to my question the other night. I've
Speaker 1: tried calling in an emailing with no success over the years,
Speaker 1: So commandeer my wife's Facebook account. And that was the answer.
Speaker 1: I heard. You voiced the question David Harsani last night
Speaker 1: that puzzled me for years. Why are American Jews so
Speaker 1: predisposed of politics that counter Judeo Christian values. Found the
Speaker 1: answer to this question in a history podcast recommended by
Speaker 1: Jocko Willink about the history of the Israeli Palestinian Conflict.
Speaker 1: Martyr made by Daryl Martyr made by Daryl Cooper. The
Speaker 1: series is Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem. Huh,
Speaker 1: I have no idea what this is. Cooper does a
Speaker 1: great job of following a proven Stalin model of Dan's
Speaker 1: Carlin's hardcore history. The only way he comes up short
Speaker 1: as he fails to cite his material is frequently is Carlin.
Speaker 1: One of the fifty plus books he draws from is
Speaker 1: A Century of Ambivalence the Jews of Russia and the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union eighteen eighty one two present. The podcast is
Speaker 1: for I'll hear some links from Garrett Martyr martyrmaid dot com.
Speaker 1: Is this society's talking about? I've never heard of this,
Speaker 1: seen this, Mike Ebert, I don't. I don't know what
Speaker 1: that is, but sounds interesting. Thanks for educating me on
Speaker 1: the subject. Appreciate it very much. I haven't listened to
Speaker 1: Does Dan Carlin still do any Has he done any
Speaker 1: new podcasts recently? Problem with podcast these days is that
Speaker 1: everybody has a podcast, including people that really really shouldn't
Speaker 1: have a podcast. The problem podcasting is anking people are like, hello,
Speaker 1: welcome to my podcast, where we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: the best way to take your law and mulch and
Speaker 1: distribute it evenly across your front lot. Now, look, we
Speaker 1: got free speech. Anybody can do a podcast whatever they want.
Speaker 1: But now you've got everybody, including news anchors who are
Speaker 1: used to just reading off a problems like I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna read whatever's there. Now, I'm going to do a podcast.
Speaker 1: But guys, guess what, it's harder when you don't just read.
Speaker 1: I do both of these things. I read from prompters
Speaker 1: that I also talk for three hours. Talks for three hours.
Speaker 1: Try that sometime. You don't have that one, you know,
Speaker 1: come on, you gotta have that one ready, you gotta
Speaker 1: have that one read. I'm begging for a drop there.
Speaker 1: John got nothing for me, all right? David Wrights buck
Speaker 1: Shieldside Podcast, let's speaking a podcast podcast listener catching up
Speaker 1: on episodes. The best ice cream flavor is cookies and cream,
Speaker 1: and country music is the new rock check out Brothers Osborne,
Speaker 1: Luke Comb's driest Rucker from Hoodie and the Blowfish. And
Speaker 1: Aaron Lewis the guy from Stain. Yeah he's country now,
Speaker 1: I didn't know that. I know Aaron Lewis went to Stain. Also,
Speaker 1: Thomas soul is probably right, but we know how liberty
Speaker 1: will die with thunderous applause A lot a lot here.
Speaker 1: By the way, Cookies and cream, let me just say,
Speaker 1: is delicious, but I can't eat it because the cookies
Speaker 1: have gluten in them. I've yet to find gluten free cookies.
Speaker 1: And cream ice cream. I might have to make my
Speaker 1: my my own at some point. Probably wouldn't be hard, right,
Speaker 1: Cookie dough vanilla ice cream is not all it is.
Speaker 1: Do they really infuse the cookie dough flavor into the
Speaker 1: ice cream or is it just cookie dough chunks in
Speaker 1: vanilla ice cream? Think think on that one, Mike, this
Speaker 1: is a john. I don't know if you have an opinion,
Speaker 1: but that's a that's a that's a real thing that
Speaker 1: we should all be aware of. I would also just
Speaker 1: point out that I still stand behind pistachio is the
Speaker 1: best flavor. But I will tell you that when I
Speaker 1: when I have an excuse to have any kind of
Speaker 1: natilla ice cream, which I remember in Italy doing that
Speaker 1: a lot, I will go and the tel on anything. Though.
Speaker 1: I will eat the soul of my sweaty little moccasin
Speaker 1: if it's covered in attela, as any person would, because
Speaker 1: it's the most delicious thing ever made. You need to
Speaker 1: get on that Nia pottent ice cream. That's really is
Speaker 1: it good? It's outstanding. You get after it, It's smother it.
Speaker 1: Natela in there, you guess probably I'm very hungry, brother.
Speaker 1: Right now, As soon as you finished the show. I'm
Speaker 1: running over and stuffing my face with things. Oh what
Speaker 1: else do we have in this one that I wanted
Speaker 1: to get? Oh? Yeah, So I was at the Trump
Speaker 1: with some friends. The Trump which is how people refer
Speaker 1: to the Trump International Hotel in DC. It's where all
Speaker 1: the conservatives hang out. It's pretty amazing. Actually, there's two
Speaker 1: places where you can find a congregation of conservatives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill obviously, but they're mixed in with all the
Speaker 1: Libs and the Democrats. If you just want a place
Speaker 1: where you're going to be surrounded with most likely friendlies,
Speaker 1: there's at this point the White House, Trump International Hotel.
Speaker 1: I know Libs Mike who won't even go there. They
Speaker 1: don't get when there's a reception there or there's any
Speaker 1: kind of a party, they won't go there. The Trump International.
Speaker 1: I ordered the French fries. It's a little late. We've
Speaker 1: been at a party. The Daily Caller had an event
Speaker 1: for freshman members of Congress and all I wanted for
Speaker 1: French fries. And sure enough, I take my first bite
Speaker 1: of a French fry there and taste very good. But
Speaker 1: I realized that bit into I was like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: they you look at it. They flower their French fries
Speaker 1: there and the waiter, the waiter, the server pardon me,
Speaker 1: came over and I said, hey, do you guys. Do
Speaker 1: you guys flower your French fries? And he said, I'm
Speaker 1: ninety percent sure we do not flower our French fries.
Speaker 1: And I looked at I said, well, I have to
Speaker 1: pay attention to this because I have steeiac disease, So
Speaker 1: could you just ask the kitchen And sure enough, he
Speaker 1: comes back after saying he's ninety percent sure that they don't,
Speaker 1: He's like, yes, these French fries are all dredged in
Speaker 1: flour before they are deep fried. And I was like,
Speaker 1: I had a feeling. But you know, what's why this
Speaker 1: is important, producer Mike. The reason they do that is
Speaker 1: because the fries stick together because they're brought in from
Speaker 1: the outside. So whenever you find a restaurant important safety
Speaker 1: tip that has French fries that are flowered beforehand, it's
Speaker 1: very likely that's because they're being brought in pre made
Speaker 1: from the outside because they're too lazy to hand cut
Speaker 1: their own darned fries. Mike, I'm surprised the Trumpster doesn't
Speaker 1: have them dusted in gold there. I totally agree with you,
Speaker 1: and John obviously love that so that that is true,
Speaker 1: but it was disappointing to me. Man, French fries are
Speaker 1: not hard. If you've got a deep fryer, take some potatoes,
Speaker 1: cut them up is ridiculous. Gave me a little bit
Speaker 1: of a tom tom ache. All right, we're gonna get
Speaker 1: in a more roll call on a second. Stay with me, Irene.
Speaker 1: Every time I say or hear that name, I think
Speaker 1: of black hawk down when they say code word Irene,
Speaker 1: that's like the go thing. And then also remember limo
Speaker 1: is a word in common usage. Remember that. Yeah, Irene
Speaker 1: write so enjoying you here in Eastern Tennessee. Thank you
Speaker 1: for keeping us up a day well, Irene, thank you
Speaker 1: so much for writing in. I hope you really enjoy
Speaker 1: the show, get something out of it every time you
Speaker 1: listen to it. We certainly put our heart and soul
Speaker 1: into it every day here in the Freedom Hunt. So
Speaker 1: thank you so much for being a part of it
Speaker 1: and welcome, and we were honored to have you. Valerie.
Speaker 1: I was hoping for a list of books. The Matt
Speaker 1: Coyle series I'm reading, albeit entertaining, may not make me
Speaker 1: well read oh, okay, So this is in response, I
Speaker 1: wrote back to Valerie, I should include that. Valerie wrote,
Speaker 1: you frequently referred to being well read. What do you
Speaker 1: believe would make one well read? And I responded, reading
Speaker 1: a lot as a way of life is being well read?
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think that there's such a thing.
Speaker 1: There's so much out there in terms of books in
Speaker 1: the English language alone, never mind if you start adding
Speaker 1: in all the different great works that can be translated
Speaker 1: or have been translated into English. But when I say
Speaker 1: someone is well read, it really is just the habit
Speaker 1: of the habit of reading. Is somebody in the habit
Speaker 1: of reading as a major part of their life. It's
Speaker 1: a really important thing. I think it's among the most,
Speaker 1: probably the most important academic skill that kids and as
Speaker 1: they grow up into adulthood, can have. Do they enjoy
Speaker 1: the process of reading? Do they think that it's worth
Speaker 1: their time? Do they make time to read? It's essential,
Speaker 1: It's absolutely so. When I say well read, it's not oh,
Speaker 1: have you read the have you read all of the
Speaker 1: essays by Ernest Hemingway circle, blah blah blah. No, it's
Speaker 1: not that I know people will say it that way.
Speaker 1: When I say some is well read, I really mean
Speaker 1: have they read a lot because they're in the habit
Speaker 1: of always reading. That's my definition of what a well
Speaker 1: read person is, and it can be, you know, on
Speaker 1: any number of subjects. People usually have areas of greater
Speaker 1: interest or expertise. But are you a person who reads
Speaker 1: a lot? Do you like to borrow somebody else's mind
Speaker 1: through the reading of the words that they have written.
Speaker 1: It's a very very good thing, Ashley Rights. Austin is cool.
Speaker 1: It's a very funky, unique city. She must be one
Speaker 1: of our KLBJ folks. However, if you do make it
Speaker 1: to Austin during your El Paso trip, consider traveling an
Speaker 1: hour or two outside the city. We're nice folks, and
Speaker 1: it's wildflower season. Though I doubt you will because I
Speaker 1: recognize and appreciate your constant hustle. I've listened to you
Speaker 1: for a long time and I love to follow your success.
Speaker 1: Though I really missed your random history lessons. They were
Speaker 1: my favorite Shieldsai ash in Leek County, texas well as
Speaker 1: the first of all. Thank you so much for your note,
Speaker 1: and I really do want to get to Austin soon.
Speaker 1: That's not that's not just lip service and ask for
Speaker 1: the history lessons. I want to bring them back. I
Speaker 1: just ever since I took the job at the Hill,
Speaker 1: there's just been I've had no time whatsoever to pull
Speaker 1: together to do that. So that's why it's been a
Speaker 1: little bit of a It has been a challenge, but
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that I don't want to do it
Speaker 1: and will not possibly bring it back in the future.
Speaker 1: And I'm really glad you enjoyed them. And the good
Speaker 1: news about them is you know they're worth listening to.
Speaker 1: The older ones are worth listening to, even if you
Speaker 1: haven't gotten them before. Steve, if we can send people
Speaker 1: into take out Bin Laden in a foreign country because
Speaker 1: he killed three thousand people, why can't we send people
Speaker 1: into countries to take out cartel leaders who killed tens
Speaker 1: of thousands. Great show, by the way, thank you for it, Steve. Well, Steve,
Speaker 1: I can answer this question for you a think in
Speaker 1: a way that might surprise you, but it's it's important,
Speaker 1: and that is that the history of taking down cartel leadership,
Speaker 1: whether it is the Jlisco Nuevo Generation cartel, the Sinelo Cartel,
Speaker 1: the Zetas who are at a splinter faction of the
Speaker 1: Gulf Cartel, the bertrand Levia Cartel, all these different cartels,
Speaker 1: the history of them tells us that when the leadership
Speaker 1: gets taken out, there's often an increase in violence and
Speaker 1: no decrease or noticeable decrease in the drug trade because
Speaker 1: the leadership structure that's in place does have some There's
Speaker 1: still a lot of violence in Mexico at the cartels,
Speaker 1: but there's some ability to govern that violence in the underworld.
Speaker 1: And once you have somebody like a Chapo Guzman gone,
Speaker 1: that's a perfect example. He was the leader of the
Speaker 1: Sinaloa Cartel, the most powerful drug lord in the world.
Speaker 1: He's now sitting in a US federal penitentiary for the
Speaker 1: rest of his life. And guess what. Mexico last year
Speaker 1: had its most violent year in or maybe the year
Speaker 1: before in history. The violence is out of control. So
Speaker 1: taking out leadership, whether it's been Lauden or El Chapo,
Speaker 1: it's satisfying to people, but it does not always have
Speaker 1: the intended effect. That's gonna be it For this Friday
Speaker 1: edition of The Buck Saxon Show from New York City,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go wander around, maybe buy a couple of tourists,
Speaker 1: the iHeart New York t shirts, you know, do all
Speaker 1: that stuff. Maybe go to the Statue of Liberty. I
Speaker 1: don't know. We go to home Depot. I don't know.
Speaker 1: If I've got enough time. Everybody, have a great weekend.
Speaker 1: Were talking to you on Monday from the swamp. See
Speaker 1: you then she'll tie. Global Verification Network is the only
Speaker 1: dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company out there, folks.
Speaker 1: I know the CEO personally. He's a friend, and he
Speaker 1: is all about making sure that when you use Global
Speaker 1: Verification for your background checks, you are getting the best
Speaker 1: customer service. You are getting a program that is telled
Speaker 1: to your needs. So whatever size your company, whatever industry
Speaker 1: you're in, if you're the CEO, or if you're the
Speaker 1: head of HR, or you're just somebody who wants to
Speaker 1: help out the company, you should reach out to Global
Speaker 1: Verification Network. Make sure they're the ones doing your background checks.
Speaker 1: If you got somebody already doing them, Global can do
Speaker 1: them better and cheaper and more efficiently. And they do
Speaker 1: it all here in the States. So go check them
Speaker 1: out for yourself. Okay, call eight seven seven, six nine
Speaker 1: five one one seven nine. That's eight seven seven, six nine,
Speaker 1: five one one seven nine, Or go to MYGVN dot
Speaker 1: com again. That's MYGVN dot com.