WEBVTT - OpenAI Unveils First Custom AI Chip With Broadcom

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>from the heart of Silicon Valley with ed La though

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in Van Francisco.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai unveils its first custom AI chip called Kalapino,

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 3>developed in partnership with Broadcom, plus s k Highnex's plane

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 3>to raise twenty nine billion dollars in a landmark US listing,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>racing to increased capacity to meet memory chip demand, and

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Cerebrus reports quarterly earnings for the first time since going public.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>CEO Andrew Feldman joins us later this hour. Let's get

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>to our top story custom Silicon open ai is tackling

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>one of AI's biggest challenges, the supply and costs of computing.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>The company unveiled Kalapino Intelligence process. So that's the wafer,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>a custom AI chip developed with broad coomp which the

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>companies say carries a fifty percent lower cost versus a

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>typical AIGPU. The focus faster, cheaper AI inference shares a

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>broad Open pretty higher round two percent. We're off session highs,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>but still up a percentage point or so. In a

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>market where tech at the index level kind of flat.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>This is outperformance. Blinbo Tech editor Seth Figgerman is here

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>with the details. This is the big picture, right, open

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>ai is compute constrained, heavily reliant on Nvidia.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>They want to diversify. What do we need to know?

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's very I think, you know, Opening I wants

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 4>to own more of the infrastructure stack, have more flexibility here,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 4>and then I think importantly, use the expertise that it's

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 4>developed into what makes air models run better and more

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>efficiently and apply that to the hardware and the same

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 4>way that I think we're seeing Google do with its TPUs,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>and the hope would be that over time they can

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 4>build a chip that's more cost efficient and also better

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>performing and eventually cuts down its own costs.

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News spoke to both Hocktan the CEO of Broadcom,

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 3>and open ai is hardware chief. I guess you know,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 3>from raw Comm's perspective, there was quite a lot of

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 3>fighting talk. Right, they see a lot of demand for

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a six or custom silicon. But what was interesting to

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>me is hock Tans saying to us they see a

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>world where every frontier lab goes to have a custom chip.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Why yeah, I mean.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>It gets back to what we said about Openny a

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 4>minie ago, I think giving them the versatility to kind

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 4>of control their infrastructure stack and build customer hardware that

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 4>meets their needs. And now I think Hocktan's com and

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 4>he's saying there's not that many of these frontier model developers.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 4>So I think agree between the lines we're kind of

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 4>talking about. Is anthropic, I'm going to move in this

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 4>direction and that's certainly possibility. And to your other point,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>I think Hocktan sounds quite bullish generally on the prospects

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 4>for this chip and chips like it going forward. He

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 4>sees no limit to the demand for this kind of

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure and is predicting that the demand and roll out

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 4>for this chip next year will exceed his prior estimates

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>for one point three gigawads to supply on.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>The open AI side, it's the latest example of them

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>being prepared to spend. Did we get any sense from

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 3>our conversation with the company about how this custom chip

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 3>will rank in their overall plan for compute, whether it's leasing,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>data center, buying and video chips, et cetera.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, they remain pretty tight. Lop DOWNE what

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 4>the financing for this will look like. We have previously

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 4>reported that Opening I planned to spend tens of billions

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 4>of dollars on these chips, with Broadcom part of its

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure commitments. Seeing Broadcom

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 4>has previously said that they were standing up a chip

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 4>financing vehicle that could help Opening I's efforts, but it's

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 4>unclear that's the primary financing mechanism for what Opening I

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 4>will do here.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's AI editor Seth Figemann, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>s k Heinez plans to raise twenty nine point four

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in its US market debut, a deal large

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 3>enough to rank among the top five share sales of

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>all time. The listing comes at a time when markets

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>are hungry for memory chips and semicindut to companies are

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>rushing for capital to expand capacity meet that demand. The

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>BOS Peter Elstrom, who leads our coverage of Asia tech,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>joins us that's part of it, right, Expand memory fab

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>capacity raise a lot of money. There's also this idea

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>of like valuation and prestige of an ADR situation where

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you get exposure to American investors.

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 6>Sk Heinez is a company we don't talk about that

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 6>often on the show. Obviously a leading memory chip company,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 6>but they often play second fiddle to Samsung, even in

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 6>South Korea. But what we've seen from them over the

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 6>past three years is really they've come from quite far

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 6>behind to essentially the same market cap size as Samsung

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 6>at this point. And that's largely because they've been so

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 6>successful in these memory chips for AI applications that HBM

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.559
<v Speaker 6>chips that we've talked about before. They especially HBM chips

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 6>are DRAM chips stacked on top of each other, and

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 6>their technology for doing that stacking has been very good.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>They got Nvidia's blessing.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 6>They've been able to jump ahead of Samsung in that

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 6>market quite effectively.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Samsung has struggled a little bit.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 6>So now what we're seeing with this twenty nine billion

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 6>dollar fundraising is really them announcing to the US, hey,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 6>that they're ready to raise this kind of capital. They

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 6>want more exposure in the US and yeah, they'd like

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 6>more of that pe multiple that you see with the

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 6>US tech companies too. They've traded at a discount to that.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 6>If they get some of that ADR exposure, that may

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 6>give them a little more opportunity to increase that valuation, and.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Just on the mechanics, Peter, so it will be ADRs

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe, on the Nasdaq. So we have a timeline

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>for this. And how much of a surprise was it

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that sk plowed ahead with this.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's certainly they've talked about wanting to raise money

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 6>in the US for a while, so I think in

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 6>terms of direction, this has been expected. I think in

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 6>terms of magnitude, it's a bit of a surprise though

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 6>it's a lot of money. As you mentioned, it could

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 6>be one of the top five offerings of its kind. Ever,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 6>they plan to start trading these ADRs on July tenth.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 6>They've talked about that. They still have a couple of

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 6>steps to go before they formally do that, but that's

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 6>the plan. At this point, they'd be able to raise

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 6>that money and then, as you say, they really want

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 6>to spend this money and trying to solve this choke

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 6>point that they've had in the AI industry where memory

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 6>chips are in short supply. Prices have been soaring, which

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 6>is driving profits for a bunch of companies, including Micron,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 6>as we'll see after the bell today. But they want

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 6>to be able to build additional capacity in South Korea.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 6>They're also expanding in the United States, where they have

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 6>some facilities too.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech Executive Editor details from Thank you very Much.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 3>The AI hardware story and memory in particular are set

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 3>to dominate market conversation today. We've got the perfect person

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to speak about it. Selin Wu is a portfolio manager

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>on Lazard Asset Management's Global Robotics and Automation team. She

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>manages the firms tech in Ai Focus ETF, called TECHI

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 3>or TEKY and actively managed ETF where sk Heinex and

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>its career and shares are the top holding.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the program, Thanks for having me.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>The situation with the memory makers is fascinating.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Demand is exceeding supply.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Historically, that's an enviable position to be in, and the

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>shares of those companies probably reflect that. How do you

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>see investor appetite to be exposed to the memory trade?

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean the shares have been fantastic, But even

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 7>after that, I think memory stocks still love for a

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 7>very compelling investment case. And here's why. I don't think

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 7>it's necessarily just driven by temporary supply bottlenecks. Instead, I

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 7>think there's something structured going on in the cycle. For example,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 7>memory's strate peagic value is rising and changing to a

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 7>primary driver for performance. Think about how cloudsher providers, one

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 7>of their largest clients. They're still adding more memory despite

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 7>the price of inflation because this is still the most

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 7>cost efficient way to maximize their system level performance. And

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 7>when of the when token demand, excuse me, the token

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 7>demand is rising on the back of the inference as

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 7>well as agent the AI. I think the bottlenecks in

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 7>terms of the capacity and bendwidth are becoming even more challenging,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 7>and this is a place where memory can come in

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 7>and help navigate those challenges.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Does it matter that investors will have the opportunity to

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>have US listed shares ADRs of sk How does that

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of change the mechanics of the market for you

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>as well?

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean a clearly the more exposure to more

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 7>diverse type of shareholder base is clearly a very positive

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 7>indication for any company in the world, especially when your fundamentals,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 7>when your fundamentals are improving. So yeah, super exciting us

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 7>and looking forward to the development.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 3>A couple of months ago, sitting down with Jensen Wong

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and I said to him, do we even need the

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:56.239
<v Speaker 3>textbooks anymore? That would tell us historically memory is cyclical,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it is boom and bust. All of the evidence suggests

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that in the context of HBM going into data center,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>it just doesn't behave the same way.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 2>What is your thesis on that?

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I agree with that. I mean, like I said,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 7>there's something structural going on. Yes, there is certain type

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 7>of cyclicality going on indoor market. But at the end

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 7>of at the end of the day, what you need

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 7>to remembered is structure side of booth, demand and supply,

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 7>and think about the supply side.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that all the three.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 7>Major companies are scrambling to add new supply, there are

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 7>three factors that you have to remember. Number one, manufacturing intensity.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 7>Manufacturing complexity is rising. Number two, capital intensity to open

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 7>a new fab is getting more expensive, and number three

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 7>the difficulty of technology and migration all together pointing out

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 7>that overall supply demand balance will stay in favor of

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 7>the memory stocks. I mean, I think that's really great.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to talk about your actively managed ETF for

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 3>a moment. T e k y Techy Techy I launched

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 3>last April, write sixty million in assets currently. What I

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 3>find so interesting about the composition of it is something

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about quite recently on the show. There are

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the capital expenditure deployers and there are the capital expenditure

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.599
<v Speaker 3>recipients in the same basket when you look at the

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:19.119
<v Speaker 3>top holdings. Is that a conscious, active decision on composition.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 7>I think it's the composition from our bottom up stock

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 7>selection and portfolio construction. But like you said, that's exactly

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 7>where majority of the capital is invested in currently. On

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 7>one hand, there are big spenders, big kip expenders that

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 7>are trying to build new competitive positioning in this AI

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 7>homage pace. But on the other hand, we find a

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 7>lot of exciting opportunities on the companies that we see

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 7>these capitals AI hardware supply chain, for example. I think

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 7>that's why there's more to come. In fact, we just

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 7>recently came from Asia where we sat down with a

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 7>number of different companies into supply chain. Everyone is telling

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 7>us how they are seeing an extended visibility from customers,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 7>how there are more conversations about ltas. Everything collectively is

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 7>highlighting that demand continues to substantially exceed the supply and

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 7>the AI demand outlook remains pretty robust as well.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 3>For in the ETF context, it's a very competitive market.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>How closely are you thinking about flows? And again, I

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>think people give you a lot of credit Sealine for

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.359
<v Speaker 3>identifying sk as being just critical to the broader infrastructure

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>build out right now, But you know what happens next

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to your mind? How do you see the world changing

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 3>in the next I guess six months to twelve months.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean even more than that. I mean that's why

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 7>we focus on AI tech stack, and at the top

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 7>of the step we have application layer and this is,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 7>for example, where we are going to expect really large

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 7>opportunities from physical AI. We think physical AI is going

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 7>to be multi trillion dollars long term opportunity. Essentially, AI

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 7>is in because it's a primary driver for productivity gains,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:09.359
<v Speaker 7>and historically productivity growths tend to translate to massive economic expansions.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 7>I think the same thing is going to happen for AI.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 7>All the innovation we're seeing today is eventually going to

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 7>open up very significant new end markets in physical AI,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 7>such as fully autonomous transformation transportations as well as a

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 7>humanoid robot. That's why we're really excited about physical AI

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 7>and in the meantime, that being said, it will still

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 7>take a couple of years for this to turn into

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 7>actual corporate earnings. So here's what we focus on instead.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Companies with vertically interiorted the manufacturing excellence that can speak

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 7>to the market with scale advantage for example, or open

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 7>source platform that can expedite the excelevation adoption and everything.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 7>And lastly, global technology companies that can massively benefit from

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 7>the mass adoption of the application in it sulf something

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.359
<v Speaker 7>to watch is something we're still pretty excited about.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Seline Wu from Lazard Asseid Management, first time on Bloomberg Tech.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Really grateful to have you here, Thank you very much. Indeed,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>now coming up, Meta and Microsoft are leading the spending

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 3>spree on future data center leases, adding tens of billions

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>of dollars just last quarter alone. We'll get into the

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>details next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Okay, today's big number,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>eight hundred and fifty billion dollars. That's how much the

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>world's largest cloud computing companies have committed in future data

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>center leases. Leading the charge in the AI spending spree,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Meta and Microsoft both committing tens of billions more just

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>last quarter. Bloombo's Brodie Ford has an astonishing story and

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>a hell of a.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Chart to show us.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 3>What I find interesting about this is that these are

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>future leases, essentially leases planned or announced separate from what

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 3>is already in operation, what they are already contractually committed to.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 8>It's a really good point, right, So we're talking about

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 8>eight hundred and fifty billion on data centers, which in

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 8>many cases aren't even built yet. It's they are working

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 8>through their current projects they have, and these are the

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 8>ones that they've committed to leasing once they're operational. And

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 8>so a lot of people wonder about what's the long

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 8>term spending trajectory on data centers? How long does this last? Well,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 8>there's eight hundred and fifty billion dollars of leases that

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 8>are going to be starting in the coming years.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>So when I was reading the story, I was trying

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>to understand the future costs. It's an amazing chart, by

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the way, we're just showing on the screen right now,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>like the level of capital and it's the commitment grows.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>But where did their current financial healths and balance sheet

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 3>stand relative to those future commitments.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there a concern about that?

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a lot of concern that seem to

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 8>always ebb and flow around the ROI of all this spending, right.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it feels like every quarter or two the

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 8>general sentiment flips about whether the market's worried or not,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 8>but every hyperscaler seems to agree that they must spend

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 8>an incredible amount to catch up an AI to have

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>enough data center capacity. I think about Microsoft, who through

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 8>a lot of twenty twenty five said we're nervous, we're

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 8>actually going to put on ice a lot of these leases,

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 8>and they've come to regret it pretty deeply. And I

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 8>think a lot of the biggest tech companies, as we

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 8>can see in this chart, are hoping to avoid that

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 8>kind of scenario.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft added forty one billion dollars in commitments to a

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>total of almost one hundred and ninety seven billion dollars.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Compare and can trust really quick Oracle.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 8>Oracle's very interesting because they signed a ton of leases,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 8>largely for open AI, and they've been flat for the

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 8>last two quarters, which says to us that they're digesting

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 8>a lot of capacity, contrasted with somebody like Meta, who

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 8>is just signing as much much as they seem to

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 8>be able.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>To Bloombanks, Brady Ford, thank you very much. Just get

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 3>out to New York where bloom Bek Jihara and and

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>is standing by Hi.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 9>Yahara, Hi ed It's time now for talking tech. First

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 9>up Softbanks. Masayoshi Sun says he has no plans to

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 9>retire anytime soon as he looks to capitalize on the

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 9>AI boom. Speaking at an annual shareholder meeting, the sixty

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 9>eight year old visionary fired back at skeptics, saying, quote,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 9>the AI revolution has only just begun. Calling it a

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 9>bubble is an insult plus and the latest showdown between

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 9>Chinese big tech and national security. Ali Baba has sued

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 9>the US Defense Department demanding removal from its blacklists. The

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 9>e commerce giant called a designation arbitrary and unjustified, following

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 9>a US crackdown earlier this month that accused several of

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 9>China's top companies of aiding Beijing's military, and TikTok parent

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 9>by Dance is in early talks to secure a record

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 9>twenty billion dollars global loan. Well the exact use of

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 9>the proceeds remains unclear. The massive borrowing push comes as

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 9>the company wis boosting data center and AI capital.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Spending ed Thank you very much, you Hira.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up on the program defense startup, Hadrian discusses

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 3>new funding at a seven point five billion dollar valuation

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that would be four times its past or latest value.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>We're going to discuss that next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Can AI replace human effort in the realm of scientific discovery?

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 2>In the latest episode of The Circuit.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Emily Chang spoke to Jennifer Dowdner, the inventor of

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 3>the groundbreaking crispher gene editing technology, about the future of biology.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Listened to this.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 10>Biology is complex. We're not going to be able to

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 10>simulate our way to an understanding of the human. We're

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.239
<v Speaker 10>not going to be able to avoid the need for

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 10>certain types of testing. I do think there are opportunities

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 10>to increase the efficiency in which we make discoveries about

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 10>the way our bodies work and the way they interact

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 10>with drugs that will be effective, and I think AI

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 10>will be helpful there. But it's going to come down

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 10>to training models on the right kind of data, and

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 10>a big need for better and more data for training

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 10>models if we want to achieve that.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 9>An Open AI executive recently suggested that if a discovery

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 9>happens on chat GPT, let's say a drug discovery that

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 9>open AI should get a cut of sales.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 11>What do you think of that?

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 10>Good luck expand how are chatbots going to change drug discovery?

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure the answer to that yet.

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 10>Lots of people are, of course, very very hopeful, so

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 10>I'm very helpeful about it. But I think that innovation

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 10>is still really in the domain of human beings right now.

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 10>I'm not seeing chatbots in our own experience innovating. They

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 10>can be helpful with summer rising data, that can be

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 10>helpful in writing reports and things of that nature, but

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm not seeing chatbots coming up with a brand new

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 10>idea for something that nobody else ever thought of.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying AI can't innovate.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 10>I don't know if it can't innovate, I just don't

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 10>think it is right now.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>What about after the AGI moment?

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, I never say never, so maybe that'll happen, but

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 10>I'm not holding my breath.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 3>That was Bloomberg's Emily Chang speaking with Jennifer Dowdner, Nobel

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Laureate and founder of Innovative Genomics Institute. What's the four

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>episode on Bloomberg Television tonight at six pm Eastern or

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Originals at eight pm Eastern time. Defense manufacturing

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 3>start up Hadrian has been in talks to more than

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 3>quadruple its valuation in a new funding round, according to sources,

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's venture reporter of BEC and Torrents and I teamed

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 3>up on this one.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 2>So let's go through the basics.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Right, these are talks, they're at a certain stage, but

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>they only raise money right at the beginning of this

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>year at a certain valuation. What's the jump and what

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 3>do we need to know?

0:19:58.720 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 2>That's correct ed?

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 12>So Hadrian raise money at a one point six billion

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 12>dollar valuation just in January. They've now had conversations to

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 12>raise up to a billion dollars in this latest round.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 12>That would more than quadruple their valuation, as you said,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 12>to seven point five billion dollars. The investor demand on

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 12>this one is pretty significant. We reported that several existing

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 12>investors are in talks for this one. We should note

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 12>that when we reach out to comment, Hadrian said that

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 12>the information provider was incorrect decline to provide further context.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>That said, we sitten by our reporting.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 12>This is an area that's extremely hot with investors right now,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 12>defense tech broadly. Hadrian makes facilities to speed up domestic

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 12>manufacturing and that's been hugely of interest to a lot

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 12>of folks and Silicon Valley.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for that.

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 3>I would also add that s fokes first and Hadrium

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>said the reporting was incorrect but declined to add further context.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I would have done that for you. Thank you very much.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 2>There is some reporting that we did about where they.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Approached debt or a lack of approach to debt.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 12>Just explain that bites so building large automated factories often

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 12>means that companies need to take on debt to take

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 12>you know, on the risks of building these large facilities.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 12>Hadrian currently has four factories, the latest which operate, which

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 12>opened in March off the back of a two point

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 12>four billion dollar contract with the US Navy. So this amount,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 12>this up to one billion dollars is just equity that

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 12>they would raise. It doesn't include any debt that they

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 12>may be discussing.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Rebecca, you did a great job explaining, you know what

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Hadrian does. It's basically an amazing factory or contract manufacturer. Generally,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 3>what is bench capital attitude right now to defense technology

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and this whole kind of reindustrializing America push.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>There's tons of excitement here.

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 12>Ed investors in Hadrin include Andres and Horowitz through its

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 12>American Dynamism Fund, Pedersfield's founder's fund, Lux Capital. This effort

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 12>to sort of reshore manufacturing and create the cycle where

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 12>consumers and companies can just rely on production and consumption

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 12>within the US is a huge interesting.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 3>These people Bloombergs, Rebecca Torrents teaming up with me on

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 3>that one on Hadrian potentially hitting seven point five billion

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 3>dollar valuation, Thank you very much. Now, coming up later

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in the show, we're going to sit down with David

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>George and Drees and horror Itz general partner on a

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 3>sixteen c's big bet on SpaceX conversation that we're really

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 3>looking forward to right now. This is what technology looks

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>like in financial markets, particularly inequity markets, and we are

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>all waiting for what is a big one that is

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Micron reporting earnings after the closing bell right now, Na's

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 3>like one hundred modestly hired, a flat underperformance in chip

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 3>stocks and bitcoin just shy of sixty one thousand US

0:22:49.040 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>dollars per token. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. It's a

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 3>big moment in time for Memory. The biggest headline is

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 3>probably the sk Heinex will try and raise twenty nine

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in a US listing.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But the AI trade is.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Going to get its next queue from Micron's earnings after

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the bell. There's a lot of literature on the Bloomberg

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 3>about that. The stocks down about one zero point three

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>percent right now. It's highly analogous from what we saw

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 3>in some of the earlier days of Nvidia twenty twenty

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 3>three to twenty twenty five, massive growth year on year,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>both on the top and bottom line. But the market

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 3>really wants a bullish signal, not that the bottleneck that

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>is Memory is unwinding a little on the AI infrastructure

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 3>build out, but that the demand has staying power. So

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 3>that is what we're watching for throughout the course of

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 3>the day. Another top story, Elon Musk is reshaping his

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 3>empire's balance sheet. SpaceX just pulled off a record twenty

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollar investment grade bond sale, taking on more

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>debt while lowering overall borrowing costs across must sprawling businesses.

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 3>For more Bloombergs, Private credit reporter Paula Sellison joins us,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 3>how did it go?

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 11>It went very well that the peak of demand. There

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 11>were eighty nine billion dollars in orders for what was

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 11>ultimately a twenty five billion dollar bond deal that allowed

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 11>the company to tighten or get lower borrowing costs over

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 11>the course of the marketing process, and investors are very

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 11>eager to lend.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 2>There is a bit of a history lesson in this.

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Find it fascinating.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, must takes Twitter private, x joins Xai, Xai

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 3>merges with SpaceX, and then SpaceX does the biggest IPO

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>in history. And if you look at how they kind

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of shuffled the deck with the proceeds of the bond

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 3>sale and what they planned to do in paying down

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 3>existing loans, it kind of takes us back to square one?

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, this was really all one long, convoluted way of

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 11>allowing Xai to become part of an investment grade company

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 11>and then be able to borrow at those borrowing costs. So,

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 11>you know, we had the Twitter LBO which ended up

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 11>adding about thirteen billion dollars of debt, and then the

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 11>Xai leverage loan and hiled bond sales which added five

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars of debt, So when SpaceX acquired XAI, there

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 11>was seventeen point five billion dollars of debt with interest

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 11>rates in the nine and a half percent to twelve

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 11>and a half percent range. All of that essentially just

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 11>got refinanced initially through a twenty billion dollar bridge loan

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 11>that was then taken out with the investment grade bond

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 11>sale on Tuesday, and now interest rates around five and

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 11>a half to six.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 2>And a half percent.

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>We broke the story in just the days before the

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 3>IPO that SpaceX had got IG rating from the free

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 3>main agencies. That was really important, right The story right

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 3>now in the AI space is borrowing and the IG

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 3>rating has proved to be pretty handy to SpaceX.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, so there is so much need for capital. Investment

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 11>companies just can't do it with cash flow. They have

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 11>to borrow, and they're borrowing across all the different debt markets.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 11>But the best place to borrow for most of them

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 11>is the investment grade bond market because it's very large,

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 11>very deep pockets, and it's a cheaper borrowing cost. So

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 11>being able to get those investment grade ratings just opens

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 11>up access to capital that makes it so much easier

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 11>to borrow all this money to finance the AI build

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 11>out the most.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Paula Cellison, thank you very much.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, in the equity space SpaceX actually hire again today

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty eight dollars per share SpaceX David,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>George Andresen horror it's general partner, is on set with

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>us right now. He led the firm's investment investment in SpaceX,

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a state which is now valued at more than ten

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars and it's proved to be Andresen's largest return

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 3>in history. And you're somebody that I've wanted to speak

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to about the company for a long time. There's a

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 3>lot here, but I think just as an opening reflect

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>on the IPO, David, and I guess not just in

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 3>a moment in time for Andresen, but what you think

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 3>it's signified for what is a very big and now

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>quite diverse company.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, look, thanks for having me on. A great

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 13>to be here with you. The IPO is just a

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 13>milestone in the history of the company. I think it's

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 13>a great event for the company to be able to

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 13>access a new investor's access capital that they couldn't otherwise access.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Before.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 13>And one of the things that I'm most excited about

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 13>as relates to the IPO is the fact that retail

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 13>was able to partake in such a big fashion. So

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 13>if you look at the allocation that went to retail

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 13>as a proportion of the overall IPO, it's around thirty percent.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 13>And so if you just take that portion that went

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 13>to retail, it's almost the largest IPO by itself in

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 13>the history of IPOs.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's fantastic that. Why is that part

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>of that? David, Sorry to interrupt you.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 13>Retail has proven to be an excellent group of buyers

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 13>and holders of stock. So obviously it's a large proportion

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 13>of the ownership of Tesla, but they also are large

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 13>owners of the meg seven at large, and so I

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 13>think it's excellent for SpaceX to be able to access that.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 13>I think you know, in large part, retail is long

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 13>term thinking, which aligns with the way Elon thinks and

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 13>how he's built SpaceX, and so I love that they're

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 13>a big part of it.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Probably the question I get for you most commonly is

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 3>about the lock up.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 2>What will happen?

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, to the venture firms would say, well, we

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>will redistribute to our LPs the stock and we expect

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>lots of them to hold. But that would seem to

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 3>make the retail holders important. And what was like a

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 3>very complex lockup, It wasn't straightforward.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, look, I think this is a great step forward

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 13>generally and how lockups are run, and I expect for

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 13>IPOs going forward, this is probably going to be the

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 13>way it's run. So cerebristed something similar where you have

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 13>the lockups come off gradually over time, and I think

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 13>this is good, this is healthy.

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 2>It allows you know.

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 13>The public market investors to be able to buy stock

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 13>over time as opposed to you know at cliff events.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 13>For us, we're very long term thinkers. You know, we're

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 13>happy shareholders of SpaceX. You know, we think very much

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 13>about the long term.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 13>Obviously, what makes us so excited about the business is

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 13>all of the things that can go right for SpaceX,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 13>all the optionality that you have. And so the way

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 13>that we look at it is you start with the

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 13>launch business, and in order to be successful as a

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 13>space business, you have to rely be able to get

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 13>things to space. And so SpaceX has the infrastructure in

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 13>an incredible way to be able to build applications on top. Obviously,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 13>Starlink is the first one. We expect that with Starship

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 13>and V three, they've achieved some de risking in terms

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 13>of what they can bring up to space. Eventually they'll

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 13>have rapid reusability with multiple launches per day on Starship.

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 13>It's a feat of physics magnificence that they can take

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 13>something that's the size of larger than a football field,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 13>send it up to space, grab it with chopsticks, and

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 13>then reuse it again. They'll rapidly be able to do that,

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.239
<v Speaker 13>and that's going to enable all the applications that they

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 13>want to build on top.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 3>It also now has a name starmind Yes as of

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 3>last night, and you know Elon Musk engaging with others

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 3>on X. There are many out there that believe that

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the timeline that was presented in the perspectus of Orbital

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Date Center SPACEXIT as early as twenty twenty eight, actually

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 3>we could see some pool forward on that. Again linked

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to the tracking of Starship. Where do you sit in

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 3>what's realistic.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 13>Near to Yeah, Look, I think the biggest hurdle to

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 13>cross is just rapid reusability of Starship, and I think

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 13>you know, there's a consistent theme with Elon's companies, and

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 13>certainly in SpaceX, which is physics has been de risked,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 13>and so now.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 2>It becomes an execution question.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 13>And so as you think about timelines, we feel like

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 13>it is inevitable that they can achieve these milestones, just

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 13>a question of how quickly and at what cost. And

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 13>so if you have starship that can rapidly, you know,

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 13>reliably get things up and back to space, we think

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 13>that's the major unlock for bringing compute to space.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I know earlier you.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 13>Were talking about the eight hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 13>of CAPEX for AI data centers on terrestrial grounds. Right

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 13>now it's getting harder and harder to get data centers

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 13>live on the ground here. I think it's a matter

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 13>of time before we have it in space. I actually

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 13>think I like to reframe it a little bit. I

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 13>don't talk about it as orbital data centers. I talk

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 13>about them as sort of airplane sized.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Gpu ras in space.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 13>So think of it as you know, something like seventy

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 13>two GPUs up in space with big wings that are

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 13>solar arrays that are kind of the size of a

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 13>seven thirty seven. And then you can have many, many

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 13>of those in space. They've demonstrated that they can do this.

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 13>They have ten thousand LEO satellites, So we feel like

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 13>it's a matter of time and execution before they can

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 13>do that. The physics has been de risked, you know,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 13>to the point about how it's getting harder and harder.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>To do this.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 13>You know, on the ground, I think at a minimum,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 13>orbital data centers will be incremental capacity that you can

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 13>have in space on top of what we have on Earth.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.719
<v Speaker 13>And I think there's a case that in the fullness

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 13>of time, the economics actually get better than on the ground.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 3>David the firm Andreessen Horowitz has been involved with must

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 3>companies in different ways for about six years, in different

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 3>ways x XAI, the different financial transactions that took place.

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>For you, how much was this this.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 3>IPO a referendum essentially on Musk himself or how central

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to the fate of this company do you see long being?

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Look, Elon is the centerpiece of all of those

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 13>investment thesis that we had right in backing his companies.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 13>You know, he's he's been remarkably strategic and how he's

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 13>put the companies together, and you know, he has done

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 13>very well by shareholders.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>He's taking care of shareholders.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 13>He takes a lot of pride in that, and we

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 13>appreciate that As his partner. I think as it relates to,

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 13>you know, the go forward, he's been very smart. He

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 13>and Brett Johnson and the team ASPACEX have been very

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 13>very smart about capital allocation, right, you know, when they

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 13>have done acquisitions, they have been remarkably strategic in terms

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 13>of putting things together first, you know, and putting X

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 13>with Xai, which is very logical, and then obviously the

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 13>fit of XAI and SpaceX together, you know, is undeniable.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 13>So we expect that will continue to be very smart

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 13>about capital allocation, take care of shoreholders, and we appreciate that.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Where do you stand, David then, on the transaction that

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 3>everyone continues to talk about, which is a future where

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Tesla merges with SpaceX, Is it rational to your mind?

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 13>I go back to the things that he's done in

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 13>the past, and the things that he's done in the past,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 13>is he has decided to do acquisitions of his companies

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 13>or mergers of his companies when there is very strong

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 13>strategic alignment and it makes business sense.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 2>So I wouldn't expect it to be any different going forward.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>There's this broader idea, if you extract it out from

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 3>from Elon Musk, that even at the growth stage, late

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>private companies staying private for longer, late stage growth, that

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the investment thesis is still around the founder, the person

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>at the top. I don't know, how whether you share

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>that view of others that even if you are talking

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 3>in the tens hundreds of billions of dollars of value,

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 3>that value is assignable to an individual or a group

0:33:58.120 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 3>of individuals.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 13>Look, I think you can see reflections of this actually

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 13>in the public markets. So I think you can see

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.479
<v Speaker 13>this in Elon companies. Certainly. I think you could see this,

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 13>you know, with Apple under Steve Jobs. I think you

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 13>could see it with Meta under Mark Zuckerberg. But certainly

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 13>in the private markets. You know, this is a centerpiece

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 13>of our investment thesis when we're backing companies at any

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 13>stage and any size. I recently wrote a piece that

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 13>basically said late stage venture, which is our asset class,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 13>is not about capital markets.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>It's about founders.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 13>Late stage venture is about late stage founders and enabling

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 13>them to think long term, make big decisions, and make

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 13>big bets, and oftentimes they choose to do that in

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 13>the private markets.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, our asset class.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 13>That we play in, it's about five trillion dollars in size.

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 13>It's grown ten x over the last ten years. It's

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 13>larger than the Russell two thousand. It's almost twenty percent

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 13>as large as the Nasdaq. So this has become a

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 13>real asset class. And I think there's reasons that we

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 13>should explore. Why is it that cost a title?

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 2>What would you call that late stage venture?

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 13>Late stage privates with the value crews, where the value yeah,

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 13>and where the value crews, yeah. And the centerpiece of

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 13>the investment thesis is around the founder and the big

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 13>decisions that the founder has to make.

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of key man risk to model for.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 13>Yes, that's right, But I think the more important thing

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 13>to model for is what can go right? Okay, you

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 13>know we always ask ourselves, you know, it's hard to

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 13>imagine what could go right. And we even see this

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.959
<v Speaker 13>with mature companies. If you look back at the time

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 13>when you know the iPhone came out, If you look

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 13>at the two thousand and nine consensus analyst estimates for

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 13>what Apple was going to do, and that in two

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 13>thousand and nine. For the next four years, and then

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 13>fast forward four years, they actually beat those numbers by

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 13>three x. And that's probably the most covered company in

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 13>the world. So we like to think with a great founder,

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 13>with a technology trend on its.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Back, what can go right?

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 13>And you know, if you look at this last cycle

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 13>that we've just gone through pre AI, you know, this

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 13>cycle of mobile phones, social e commerce, SaaS, cloud all

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 13>put together, the big story is that that big trend

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 13>added about twenty five to thirty.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Trillion of new market cap.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 13>And I happen to think that on this AI wave,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 13>on the back of this AI wave, the.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Trend's going to be even bigger.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>You head a growth team that manages twenty two billion

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 3>dollars across five funds. But if you think about it holistically,

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you're basically in the top fifteen private companies by valuation,

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 3>which would have included SpaceX before it went public. How

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 3>are you now deploying capital new capital into new companies,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, with those existing investments in mind.

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Look, our whole thesis is we want to be

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 13>involved in the best companies at the earliest stage possible

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 13>and then continue to back them every step of the

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 13>way as they need capital, and often that has been

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 13>through late stage rounds in the.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Private market because you have a newer fund, right which

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 3>you can deploy capital out there.

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we we have our LSV five Late Stage Venture

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 13>Fund five as we call it, it's our fifth fund.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 13>It's about a seven billion dollar fund that we're deploying

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 13>out of currently, and we see a ton of really

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 13>interesting opportunities. So you know, if you go back to

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 13>the market that we're seeing and just look at our

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 13>portfolio at a sixteen Z and our latest fund, our

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 13>portfolio dollar weighted is growing over one hundred percent year

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 13>over year. If you compare that to the size similar

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.919
<v Speaker 13>sized companies in the public markets, those companies are growing

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 13>about twenty percent year over year. So we put a

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 13>huge premium on very fast growth, great founders, market leadership,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 13>and sort of building.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>On the back of the big trends.

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Also noting the cap tables look a bit different like

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 3>with the mutual funds private growth equity. David George Havenjreson Horowitz,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 3>head of Growth and general partner.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Really grateful to have you on Bloomberg Tech. Thank you

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 2>very much.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Cerebris reported its first ever quarterly earnings since

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>going public. CEO Andrew Feldman's joining us. The stock is

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 3>down seventeen percent. There's a lot to unpack there. This

0:37:54.480 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech. Crebress reported quarterly earnings for the first

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 3>time since going public last month. It's sales outlook beat

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street estimates, but still disappointed investors hoping to see

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the company carve out a bigger slice of the aident

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 3>center market. Right now, shares down seventeen point five percent,

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>its biggest drop in its quite short history as a

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 3>public company. What's behind that? CEO Andrew Feldman's with us

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Andrew.

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, there was a time where we would talk

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 3>about the merits of top to tail server ownership, how

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>owning all of the content of Now we're going to

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about margin contraction, and we're going to talk about

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 3>the stock being down seventeen percent. That to me is

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of the mismatch that the outlook on the sales

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 3>side beat Wall Street estimates. I think a lot of

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 3>people are trying to understand the sequential margin decline and

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>for me that this is about ramping output for two

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 3>big customers Is that true.

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 14>I think what we did is we put forward a

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 14>plan in the start of twenty six, we shared it

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 14>with investors as we went public, and we're ahead of plan.

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 5>You know. We delivered record.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 14>Revenues of one hundred and ninety one million of ninety

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 14>two percent year over year, and for our cloud business,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 14>you know, it was up one hundred and sixty seven

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 14>percent year over year. We beat margin consensus substantially, and

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 14>then we guided for full year the growth.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Margins would be ten percent better than plant.

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 14>We also shared the in Q two and Q three

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 14>we would go back to some of our customers and

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 14>we would rent back year that we'd sold them to

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 14>try and keep up with demand, and then that would

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 14>have a margin impact on the order ten.

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Or fifteen points.

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 14>We did that to keep our customers close to be

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 14>sure we could keep up with their extraordinary demand for

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 14>or for our product for fast inference, and so that

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 14>that was the story.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 5>On every metric we put out, we're ahead of plan.

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Have the proceeds from.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 3>The IPO actually allowed you to move more quickly in

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 3>ramping up capacity?

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think capacity is the largest constraint right now

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 14>for everyone.

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 5>Data centers are and.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 14>We've significantly increased our our ability and our pipeline for

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 14>data centers, which is now very large. You know, we

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 14>announced a data center partnership with Bell Canada for one

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 14>hundred and twenty megawatts that will be delivered in twenty

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 14>twenty seven. We are pursuing data centers across the US,

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 14>in Canada, in Europe, in the Middle East.

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 5>There are.

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 14>The resources that we have now at our disposal give

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 14>us tremendous advantage in the pursuit of this The limiting

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 14>factor data centers.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 3>What you're talking about, like matter of factly, is buildings

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily the compute, right It's not what you guys

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 3>are offering. How difficult right now is it is to

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 3>get moving in America or other markets, to get planning approval,

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 3>get the concrete, get the labor, get the thing built.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 14>Now that that's the irony of this market, that the

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 14>AI market is moving at blistering speed and we are

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 14>being constrained by data centers which move with the speed

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 14>of real estate. And so that is a problem that

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 14>is being confronted by by everybody in the category, by

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 14>the hyperscalers, by the neo clouds, by the new generation clouds.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 14>Everybody is confronting this similar problem.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Cerebris does not rely on traditional chip HBM. Would

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 3>you just explain that the basics of the technology, But

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 3>how insulated are you from the memory bottleneck that others

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:08.919
<v Speaker 3>are experiencing.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a really good point.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 14>Because of our innovative architecture, because of our wafer scale approach,

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 14>we don't use HBM. HBM is a type of DRAM

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 14>and it's made by three companies, one of whom is

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 14>reporting shortly right. That's Microns, Heenex and Samsung. There's a

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 14>global shortage, it's extremely expensive, lead times are long, and

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 14>we don't use it, so we have a tremendous advantage there.

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 14>The other constraints in the supply chain for many are cooths,

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 14>which is a process inside of TSMC.

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Again we don't use it.

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 14>And the third is a capacity at the three nanometer node.

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 14>That's space in TSMC's factory that makes three and nanimeter chips.

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 5>Again we don't use it. We're at the five nanometer node.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 14>Our architecture has allowed us to deliver the fastest inference

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 14>in the world by an order of magnitude while avoiding

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 14>the main supply supply chain constraints faced by others in

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 14>the field.

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Can you say, hand on heart, not just winning business,

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 3>but if you actually been able to go to a

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 3>customer and say we can get this compute online faster

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 3>than others for those reasons you just outlined and then actually.

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Gone and done it.

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Oh for sure.

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean any cases I.

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 14>Signed, we signed. For example, we signed our contract with

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 14>open Ai on December twenty fourth and had them in

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 14>for production on February first. That's unheard of.

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's quick as I went really quickly Andrew this morning.

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai is out with Kalapino Intelligence processor. But everyone

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 3>is compute constrained, right, How do you interpret the Frontier

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Labs going to custom and a six alongside their other

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 3>compute options.

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 12>Ed.

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 14>One of the things we've been saying all along is

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 14>that this market is enormous and is going to be

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 14>met with a heterogeneous collection of architectures for hardware. This

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 14>market will not be consolidated around GPUs. There will be

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 14>a six, There will be a six from Hyperscalers, there

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 14>will be a six from from Labs, and then there'll

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 14>be companies like Cerebrase with pioneering architectures who all of

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 14>us will will will take big bites of this enormous market.

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 14>I think one of the things that's difficult to get

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 14>your head around is just how big the compute market

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 14>is right now. That one of the things AI does

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:48.439
<v Speaker 14>is it makes tractable for compute much of the world

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 14>around us, and that really wasn't the case prior to AI.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Andrew I it's if the world is simple, and it's

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 3>money that greases the wheels to get your industry going.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Can we see you come back to capital markets in

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 3>some form just so you can move quicker.

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 14>We have more than nine billion on the balance sheet,

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 14>I think, so we're really pleased with our position there.

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 14>But of course we are always scanning both the capital markets,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 14>both equity and debt for ways to accelerate our growth.

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Finally, how are you judging success yourself? What is the

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 3>milestone that you'd pitch to the market to keep closest

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 3>attention to.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think I think if my mother's proud of me,

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 14>I think that's the biggest.

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 5>Thing you can you can ask for.

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 14>I think for markets, I think when you lay out

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 14>a plan that is aggressive and you crush it, Uh,

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 14>that's how you feel good about both your ability to

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 14>execute in your ability to predict your own execution.

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 5>And so you know, we announced yesterday that.

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 14>That we would beat our our full year we give

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 14>full year guidance that was ten gross margin points above concernsus.

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 14>You ought to be proud of that, and we got

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 14>to continue to execute and continue to set extraordinarily high

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 14>barrows and then continue to.

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 5>Beat them.

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Cerebra Ceo, Andrew Feldman, thank you very much. Indeed, really

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 3>Andrew alluded to it. Micron is the big one after

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the closing bell. Top line growth almost three hundred percent

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 3>year on year, net income growth twelve hundred percent.

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Year on year. The bar is very very high the market.

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 3>It's very analogous to Nvidia what we saw twenty twenty

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 3>two to twenty twenty five, massive growth, but investors always

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 3>wanting more. The stocks down eight ten percent going into

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 3>that print. Another stock we're watching today US fast food

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 3>chain Wendy's surging as much as forty two percent.

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 2>But wait, what does that have to do with tech?

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, it appears Wendy's has become the latest memes stock

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 3>target shot up the rankings on stock Twitz climb to

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the top of the platform's trending list. Seems to have

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 3>been sparked by a now deleted post on Reddit's Wall

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Street Bets forum that urged members to save Wendy's before

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 3>it's too late. That does it for this edition of

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Recap everything on the podcast. You know where

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 3>to find it online, Apple, Spotify and iHeart and all

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg platforms.

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.