WEBVTT - Trump's Indictment and Accenture's Generative AI Outlook

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>From the herd of where Innovation, Money and Power Colne

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Vallet, NBR. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Hide and Ed Ludlow. I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hide off. This week this is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll bring you the latest headlines on the Trump indictment

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and break down the broader social media implications. We'll speak

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>also to the head of Accenture's technology group for their

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>outlook on generative AI as industry heavyweights call for a

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>pause in developing the disruptive technology. Plus Huawei posting its

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>first profit drop in a decade as US sanctions forced

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the China tech giant to invest in R and D.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We discuss with Huawei chief security officer Andy Purdy. Let's

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>bring you these markets when it comes to the technology sector.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>In the last day of what's been a constructive quarter.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>You look at the NAZAC one hundred by a percentage

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>point ending this quarter higher, best quarter back since the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>second quarter of twenty twenty, second best quarter of the decade.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Similar performance in the semiconductors. You look at the SOX,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Okay, four tenths of a percent higher,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but actually again the best quarter for that index going

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>back to June of twenty twenty, yield kind of pulling

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit three point five percent on the

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ten year risk on generally speaking, in bitcoin is certainly

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a part of that story. The main headlines are around

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>former President Trump and his indictment, how that's playing out

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the tech sector and in the equity markets. These

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are special purpose acquisition companies or spacks. Digital World up

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>six and a half percent. This is the spack that's

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>due to take true social public The idea here that

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the market's talking about is that the indictment of former

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump puts a spotlight on more conservative social media platforms.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Those more conservative social media platforms, including Rumble, for example,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a video platform, are seeing money flowing to them in

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets this Friday. Let's get the specifics of

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>what's happening from Laura Davison out in Washington, DC. Laura,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>where do we stand with the indictment of former President Trump. Well,

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he could be arraigned as soon as Tuesday of next week.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is something that you know, people have

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for ever since Trump said recently that he

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>could be arrested. But this, really, this announcement yesterday really

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>took everyone by surprise, including trumpsall and lawyers, who weren't

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>really expecting this to come and and certainly not expecting

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>an arraignment next week. But you know, this is going

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to look very similar to any other type of arraignment

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that would happen in New York. Trump is going to

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have to get fingerprinted, to have his mugshot take and

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have to sit in the basement of the courthouse in Manhattan. Laura,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have we heard from former President Trump on any of

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>these platforms. Yes, he's been on true social really you know,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>going you know, a full force as he has known for,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, his really bombastic language. In some cases. You know,

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>some have suggested that he's almost seen mainly trying to

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>start a riot, saying that we protest in the streets.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>There's increased security in Manhattan. This could really potentially be

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a problem for Trump. You know, it would not be

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented for judges to say that he can't go to

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms to try to incite violence or anything else.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Blombosloy Davison out of DC, thank you. Let's stick with

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversation and more on Trump's influence throughout social media accounts.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Greigel, Syracuse University Assistant Professor of Communications. We started

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this program talking about investors buying in two stocks related

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to more conservative social media platforms. What's your interpretation of

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that reaction. Well, if we can look at history for

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a second, Trump wouldn't be the first ex president to

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the face of trial. We had Roosevelt actually here in

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse and back in the day early nineteen hundred and

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it true an intense media spectacle. Okay, So I don't

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>know if people are focusing on these, you know, fringe platforms.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they're missing the point that the people aren't

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just going to be talking about this and following this

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>on social media. There will be legitimate media's interest. They'll

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>want to read the news. So this could bring a

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>spectacle like you would see with the OJ Simpson and

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Right, So, I think Trump knows how

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the media too, and all eyes will be

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>on that trial. It's if it reaches that point. Jennifer's

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>point out, what is a first right a first former

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>president to be indicted? But I hear your point on

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle. Twitter wants to be the place where

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the new cycle plays out. Do you think that's why

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it used to be? It used to be the place

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more where the news cycle, yeah, played out. But you know,

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that the platform is fundamentally changed

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>since Must took it over. You still don't have the

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>same type of user base there that used to see

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of academics and journal as. Sure some people

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>are out there still, but not like he used to.

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So people may follow more of the details, you know,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>almost like a reality TV show there, But I don't

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>think the same types of influential media folks are on

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter like they used to be. How strong a landscape

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>two conservative voices have in social media right now? How

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>strong are those conservative specific platforms. I think we need

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to look at it more collectively as those who are

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in power. I know there's a lot of attention on

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what, is Trump trying to cause a riot,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's also an ex president. I think we need

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to focus a lot more on the sitting president, on

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>those in Congress, and again that crosses political parties, right

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and looking at the influence that they're exerting. Now. It's

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>not just like is their voice being amplified more on

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this platform or that. But look at what's happening with

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>TikTok okay in the ability to influence a potentially shutter

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that app here in the United States, and that is

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>monumental and we are really not talking about that enough.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's influence, and it cuts across you know,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>conservative to you know, right left. It's a collaborative effort

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as I see it right now between the White House

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>hand Congress. So I'd be focused more on that if

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at investments, Jennifer. Have the risks to

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>social media and use of social media changed since Trump

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>left office? Yeah? I think again nothing has really changed

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to how presidents are using social If anything,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they're exerting more influence on regulation and

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the ability to maybe shutter apps as I mentioned before.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But like we have to keep in mind that censorship

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>will look different here in the United States, and also

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>just the increasing use of government social media. I just

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think that we need to to really address that as

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a country, not just here in the United States but

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So for me, it's a public We

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>really want these platforms and our media environment to function

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and be safe regardless of po's in power. And and

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I really don't think that that risk has gone away

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>under Biden or potentially future presidents, regardless of their party.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe some people are comfortable with, you know, kind

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of democrats steering some of the policy around social media

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, but we have to remember that they may

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>not always be in power. So you really want your

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms, your media environment to be a healthy

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one that is just good for the public, good for discourse,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>good for democracy. And still I still see that that's

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>right here today, Professor Jennifer Geigel of Syracuse, thank you

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for your time. Now. Sticking with social media, TikTok isn't

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the only social media company under bike Dance that's gone viral.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>US downloads of Lemonade are surging. It's a content sharing

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>plat form similar to TikTok, but focusing on longer form

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle videos. Think of it as a mix of Instagram

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and Pinterest, but information about the app is murky. However,

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>regulatory filings and various media reports suggest it is owned

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>by Bike Dance. Eliminates ties with the Chinese company may

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>expose it to similar scrutiny faced by the TikTok in

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I think there are different ways of

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>viewing what we're asking for. I think the idea that

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the CEOs of Microsoft and Google and deep

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Mind are going to read this and say, oh, sorry, yeah,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we completely messed up, and we'll definitely stop

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't think that's going to happen, but

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope that it at least begins a serious conversation

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about what would be necessary to develop systems that we

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>can have confidence in. And there's two parts to that, right,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Could we develop ways of testing the systems that we

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>already have so that we can show that they do

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not present risks, that they will not help people to

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>commit suicide and so go on, Or we change the

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>way we design the system so that we can do that.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think the latter is probably more likely.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I would also say that legislators the European Union, for example,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>are close to passing the AI Act, which would require

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of steps as a matter of law, so

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that you could not put systems on the market unless

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you could satisfy the regulators that they were safe. That

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>was Stuart Russell, Berkeley Computer Science professor an AI expern

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the signatories of the petition calling

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>for a halt to AI development, and that's where I

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>want to go more about generative AI the kinds of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that it opens up in the world of technology.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Paul Doughty, Excentious Technology Group, Chief executive, author of two

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>books on the impact of AI and machine learning, particularly

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on jobs and work, Human Machine and his most recent one,

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Radically Human, How new technology is transforming business and shaping

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>our future. Paul, welcome to the program. You heard there

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what Professor Russell had to say, The findings of your

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>report about the outlook for AI contrast with what the

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>industry is calling for right now. Yeah, I know, Stuart, Well,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's great to hear us comments. We do some work

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>together in a deep respect for Stuart and hiss views.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You know. Look, I think the open letter an AI

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was I think important attention to a real issue, which

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is getting serious dialog around the applications of AI and

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>really responsible AI. You know, I would say that if

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>an organization or a company is implementing AI and you

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have responsible AI policy and approach, is simply irresponsible.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think this call to attention around how the

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>impact the technology is having, guarding against bias, ensuring accuracy,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at intellectual property, and all these issues are really important.

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think a pause is a step we need.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what we need is more transparency and dialogue

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and more companies take steps you know that we've been

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>working on for four or five years, which is actually

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>having training policies, compliance programs and the like in our

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>company and companies that we work with to make sure

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>organizations aren't taking the right steps with artificial intelligence. You're

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>plugged into hundreds, if not thousands of tech companies globally.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Is a six month pause feasible? Can anyone actually make

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that happen? Now? I don't think it's the right You know,

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the pause is the right way to think about this

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is there's tremendous innovation and progress happening, and I think,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's I think there's approaches, many approaches and

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>plays to look at how we use the technology in

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate way. So I think the right thing to

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>do is to keep is to keep the experimentation, keep

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the innovation going, but increase the dialogue around you know,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the gardriels that we need to have some place on

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the topics that I mentioned earlier. So that's

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the approach we advocate. We're working you know, with many

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>organizations around the world, including some of the ones you mentioned,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on putting the right gardials in place as we move forward,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but we think the innovation experimentation actually helps contribute to

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that dialogue. The conclusion of your report and your survey

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>is that AI is going to spark a pretty large

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>wave of innovation right next generation technologies. How though, how

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>does that manifest itself? AI really unleashes kind of a

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>next level of capability for organizations, that's the way to

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>think about it. And we had a launch of our

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>annual Vision Report yesterday and on the launch we heard

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from everything from one hundred and twenty five year old

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>company to a twenty five year old, you know, AI

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>startup founder about the implications that it has on business,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and ninety eight percent of executives in the research that

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>we've done talk about the fact that they're going to

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>invest in and believe generative AI in particularly will have

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a big impact on their organization and the impact that

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>it will have its allowing organizations to do new things

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't do before. It's new new levels of creative

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>capability powered by the foundation models that you hear about.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's new ways for work to be done, new ways

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to empower people, and essentially in essence, to give workers

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>superpowers to do new things and work. You know, it

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>expanded things with copilot type of capability powered by genderative AI,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it really creates a great opportunity for

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>individuals to use technology in a different way and for

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>businesses to look at how they how they make these

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>big advances and how they compete, differentiate and grow. Well,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's got someone else's view on where we are in

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the AI cycle. This is what the Stability AI CEO

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had say in the last twenty four hours. This is

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger than five G or self driving. Cause we've had

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>others on the show that say what's happening in artificial

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is akin from the shift to mobile for example.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You are a technologist to agree with any of those statements. Yeah,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>What I've said is is that I believe what we're

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing now with foundation models and large language models is

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the three biggest innovations I've seen in my

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>multi decade career working in technology. The first was when

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I used one of the first browsers and saw the

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>potential and part of the Internet. The second was when

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw it the first iPhone come out and realize

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the power bringing that kind of access and technology of

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>billions of people around the world in them. When I

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>dove in with the foundation models and large language models

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of the transformer technology and saw the creative power that

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it had and the power to allow humans workers, you know,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people to interact with technology at a whole new level.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it is that type of breakthrough. Poul Accentia,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>your own company is laying off nineteen thousand staff across

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>technology mass layoffs. What is your assessment of the reasons

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>why layoffs are happening. Well, you know, we announced you know,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really record growth in our business. We had record sales

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and the results that we just announced, you know, thirty

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>five you know, at one point thirty five deals of

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred million dollars of war around technology, driven

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of what's happening with companies need to

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>reinvent faster by applying technology. So we see and we

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>see continued robust and strowing demand for technology. What we

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>announced was really something we do every year in terms

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of looking at Howard positioned with talent for the growth

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have going forward. And the only difference this

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>time is we we took a proactive step to get

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>fit for what we see coming. But this is you know,

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the realm of what we do every year.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And we think, you know, the market going forward, especially

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>with somebody's dot technology companies needing this technology to operate

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>more resiliently in the carpulicated world that they upbreading is

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue. Drive now to maim all right, Paul Doherty,

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Accentires Technology Group Chief executive, Thank you, coming up, Uber

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going more and more green, how it's intensifying its efforts

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to electrify the vehicles on its network. And now as

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that one hundred, we've said it best quarter going back

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to the second quarter of twenty twenty, actually the second

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>best quarter of the decade for this tech heavy index.

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Interesting story on Bloomberg about how insiders though are some

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sellers of technology shares, certainly worth checking out.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg time for talking tech. Alib and JD

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com have begun preparations for a trio of the

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>year's biggest Chinese debuts. Ali Baba's logistics firm Kanyell has

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>kicked off discussions with banks for what may become the

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>first of several IPOs by units of the e commerce giant,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and on Thursday, two JD subsidiaries filed for first time

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>share sales in Hong Kong. Those three listings could raise

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>about five billion dollars between them, according to sources and

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg reporting that Tesla is looking to build a battery

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>plant in the US, which would likely be a controversial

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>arrangement with China's dominant electric vehicle battery maker. Tesla discussed

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>plans involving the company CATL with White House officials over

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the past few days. Sources told myself and colleagues Gabby

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Coppola and Jen Jacobs that this has been going on

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months now now. Speaking of evs,

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Uber also has some news as Earth Month Fast approaches. Today,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>BP Pols and Uber announced a new global mobility initiative.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>The idea get the drivers in to the stations to

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>charge their vehicles, joining us on the program now. Adam

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>gramis the Uber's gloable head of sustainability policy. Interesting play.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Everyone wants to drive electric, Everyone wants to ride electric.

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Is this for the drivers or ultimately is this for

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the riders? Yes, good morning. First Uber wants to lead

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the ride share industry to an all electric, zero emission future.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to do that? We made a

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pledge to reach one hundred percent of rides in evs

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and micromobility by twenty thirty in the US, Canada, and

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Europe and everywhere we operate globally by twenty forty. How

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>do we do that? Working with drivers, helping them make

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the switch, working with consumers, make it easy, push a button,

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>get a clean ride. And finally transparency because we need

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>accountability and we know that we don't just earn it.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>This play is all about helping drivers, meeting drivers where

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they're at. When we talk to drivers, they say their

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>top two concerns are the EV cost in EV charging.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why this deal is so important. We're making deals

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like this with energy companies around the world. This deal

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>with BP Pulse helps make it so that we can

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>reach more drivers where they are in mini drivers today

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>or at the pub. So on that point, a lot

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of drivers watch this program, so we ask them, what's

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>holding you back from electrifying? These are the results. You

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>can see them on the screen over there. Cost of

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>evs fifty percent, respondents, lack of charging forty three percent.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>In San Francisco, it's pretty easy to get an electrified ride.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Other cities it's not to Actually, drives need a bit

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more financial help than just offering the infrastructure. This corroborates

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with what we hear from drivers as well. These top barriers.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>For US, it's finding ways to leverage our marketplace, to

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>leverage our scale, to find new ways to bring tools

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for drivers, supply for drivers through partnerships, and new innovations

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to make it easier to find the charging. For instance,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just this week we expanded Comfort Electric. Comfort Electric is

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a push a button get an EV and not just

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in EV. You can get a premium EV, a Tesla,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a Pulse, our Forward mark E. These are vehicles people

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>want as evs, but there are also cars that people

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be And let's think about this blistically. What

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the total ride chef fleet in the US

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or globally is currently electric. Last year, we quadrupled the

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>number of active drivers who are using evs on Uber

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, Canada, and Europe to forty thousand. We're

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>operating the largest all electric ridehail fleet outside of China.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's very exciting. In the US, we're seeing drivers switch

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to evs five to eight times faster than the general

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>population if you compared to say EV registrations. And what

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is that drivers on Uber in some markets

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like California and some markets like London are going even

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>faster ten fifteen percent of miles served. So for this forward,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any money changed hands between Uber and

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>BP on this transaction money. What is your dollar commitment

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to driving this initiative. Ubers made a commitment to make

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred million in total resources available to drivers to

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>help bing the switch. We talked about it at the

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning right driver's face a financial hurdle to get into evs.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So we've made a commitment to eight hundred million dollars

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to make it available to drivers by twenty twenty five

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to help hundreds of thousands make the switch in the

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>US that takes the form of a dollar trip in

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>center from Uber. Disagreement with BP creates a global framework

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>where we can create local besloke offerings right at meat

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>drivers where they're at and tailor to the local market. Conditions.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Adam grammis Uber, global head of sustainability Policy

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>here in San Francisco, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, ourmed

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>lovelow in San Francisco. Huawei posted is first annual profit

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>decline in more than a decade after years of US

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sanctions have all but obliterated the smartphone arm of the

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>business and compelled the Chinese telecom gearmaker to wratch it

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>up Research spending his talk about the outlook for Huawei

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is chief security Officer Andy Purdy. Andy, this is the

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>direct results of US sanctions on your financials. That's right.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be back on your show, and we're

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>joining the new new time slot. Yeah. This is a

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>major impact of the last couple of years, particularly decimating

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>our consumer business, causing a drop of thirty billion in

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a year. But we are work through this. Our business

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is stabilized and our operations are steady, and we're leveraging

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>our partnerships five G to business and our research and

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.479
<v Speaker 1>development historic numbers, and we see a path forward and

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that we are heartened and determined to move forward with

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous emphasis on innovation and partnership. Andy, what is

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your hope for the net result of spending on R

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and D to get out of the impacts of sanctions. Well,

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is working closely with partners finding new

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of technological capabilities that can be enabled by five

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>G and other technologies, so that when you look at

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ports and mining and healthcare manufacturing, it's clear that these

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>R and D investments are going to help strengthen operations,

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>create greater funding, greater efficiency, and it's going to drive

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>increases in gross domestic product in those countries that do

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it and those businesses that do it. So we're also

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>doing some hardcore research on some of the major problems

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>in science, such as Shannon's a limit the amount of

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>error free data that can pass through its channel. Because

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to start getting ready for five point five

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>G and the amount of uplinking downlike capabilities, it's going

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to be necessary. It's going to be a gigantic problem

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that the hard truth of science may limit the benefits

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of unless we can overcome some of those hurdles. What's

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>happening in Maitland, China is Ishuawei's push into five G

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for companies that are in China. How's that going and

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can you replicate what you're doing in that field outside

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of China and other jurisdictions. Well, I just got back

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>from the mobile to Congress, one of the largest conferences

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world in Barcelona in late February early Mark,

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so I had an opportunity to talk to a lot

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of customers, a lot of partners, represented a number of

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>governments around the world, talking about and sharing lessons learned

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>about what are the use cases for these technologies, Where

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can carriers, where can enterprise benefits? The benefit to most

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>from these new technologies to increase efficiency, reduce the carbon footprint,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and bring new capabilities for monetization to carriers and to customers.

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's an exciting story. And frankly, as an American,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>i'nheartened that the investments we're seeing in the United States

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>look to going to be increasing the amount of real

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>five G between now and twenty twenty five. So the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>at and ts and Verizons and t mobiles of the

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>world are investing heavily. So hopefully America is going to

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>learn some lessons and going to drive forward with some

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>important progress in these areas as well. Because it's not

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>just about making money, although it's important, it's about supporting

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>small and medium enterprises and bringing a greater quality of

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>life to our citizens and our There is changes a

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>foot within Huawei. Mang Yuanjo takes the rotating chair position

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>starting next week, I believe. How does that impact management structure,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>how Huawei is rum what's her grip on this technology

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>company right now? Well, it's an interesting situation and it's

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>highlighted again. But I think with Huawei two and a

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>half years and this concept of having a rotating chairman

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>coming in every six months, the structure of the company,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the organization of the company is not dependent on the

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>particular individual that's the rotating chairman. We have these structures,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we have these processes, we have these compliance systems. All

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>those things are in place. So the particular tone, the

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>particular priorities of the rotating chair can have an influence,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but the company is organized in a way that this

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>creates continuity and stability. Andy, there's a lot of focus

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>right now in Huawei's activities within the chip space semiconductors,

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot especially on the software and design side. How

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is that going? Is it actually a material path to

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>circumventing what the US is trying to do in terms

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of chip controls. Well, frankly, we're kind of at a

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>position of new normal. We're not looking back on those

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we can't do. We know that certain aspects

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the uncertainty looking forward we can't control. And frankly,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as an American, I'm heartened by the fact that the

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>US is investing in ship manufacturing. When I look at

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the efforts around the world to make up for the sanctions,

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a little concerned about the potential impact

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on American jobs of the American suma conductor industry, and

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not allowed to sell and continue to not be

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed to sell nonsensitive chips to Huawei and other companies.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But while it's going to be fine, I'm kind of

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the future for the United States and some

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the things we aren't doing to improve our competitiveness.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw China respond retaliate overnight, launching a cybersecurity review

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of Micron to specific case. But what's your interpretation of

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>China's action there? Well, from my perspective with a somewhat

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of a cybersecurity and privacy background, given the nature of

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the cybersecurity threats in the last couple of years, it's

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>been demonstrated, and there's not enough emphasis that in the

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>solar wins of microstoft exchange server attacks that so called

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>trusted suppliers are violated. So regarding cybersecurity and privacy, it's

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not about what company it is, it's not about what

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>country it is. We have to have measures in place

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that are objective providing assurance. There need to be transparency,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and there need to be accountability for companies and governments

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and individuals to do the right thing from a cybersecurity

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>perspective and to protect their data privacy, because we're not

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>doing nearly enough to protect data privacy in the United States.

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Huawei's USA chief security of Sandy Petty always grateful for

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>your time and for answering the tough questions. Thank you.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's stick with the world of chips, with Japan saying

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it will expand restrictions on exports of twenty three types

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of leading edge chipmaking technology. Tokyo's move follows months of

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lobbying by the US to get Japan to come on

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>board in tightening shipments of semiconductor tools to China. Japan

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Netherlands had agreed in principle to join the US,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but a sort to chart a middle road between the

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>two superpowers. Coming up, we're going to talk about the

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>state of fundraising in Silicon Valley following svb's collapse with

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Portage Adam Feleski, and again recap last

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>day of the quarter, last day of March. This is

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>where we stand year to day, a very different picture

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the banking sector. Can trust that with technology this

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is the impact of svb's collapse among regional banks and

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>other financials year to day the complete opposite of what

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we see. Frankly in the technology sector. This is bloomberg.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The digitalization and decoganization is eating up another larger share

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of GMP, and if you want an invest in growth,

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where you want to be. The dollar value going

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into climate related venture plateauing between twenty twenty one and

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, driven entirely by the decrease in the

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>growth rounds in Europe. It's largely isolated in the UK,

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>where sv IT was important, But I think it's interesting

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to see that there's been an explosion in venture that

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly last year. So I do expect to see a

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>change in underwriting policies around what profile of companies can

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get debt and on what terms relative to what we

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>were seeing in the past. For us, we're looking at

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>how can we support our startups so that they don't

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have to continuously get into that kind of heydnastic silicon

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>value treadmill of raising more and more corporate equity. I

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think founders have woken up to the reality that taking

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on more money at higher terms doesn't necessarily play to

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>their benefit in the long run. Just some of the

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Bench Capital guests throughout the week on the program, Let's

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get a rap of all things VC and deals bringing

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloombers Katie Ruth. You forget it seems a lifetime ago.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It was this week that First Citizens stepped in and

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>took some of the SVB. This is what some of

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the venture community wanted. Yes, so they found a home

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for Silicon Valley Bank. It's in North Carolina, so pretty

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>far from Silicon Valley, but at least you know, Silicon

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank will live on. I've talked to some vcs

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>who are cautiously optimistic about this. They don't know what

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the strategy will be for Silicon Valley Bank under First Citizens.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>They're hoping that, you know, it will be more of

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the same. They like Silicon Valley Bank. Before you know,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the bank had good ventor debt terms and they're hoping

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that will continue. Yeah, the big story is Ali Baba

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>spinning off units in Nabadabbi. They're IPOs, a tech IPOs back.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're back, but it's good to

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of activity here. I mean, obviously

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was super quiet on the IPO fright by Ali Baba

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is you know, splitting into six different businesses so that

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they can focus on their core business and bring value

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to shareholders as separate units. And so the logistics unit

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>which handles a delivery could go public before the end

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year in Hong Kong. I don't know that

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we're about to see a florry of IPOs and the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>new year term in the US, but certainly, you know

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing some spinoffs. The big tech IPO of

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>last year was Intel spinning up Mobili Katie stay with

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>us joining us now for a bit more on the

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>benched side. Adam Fleski Portage CEO Portage Capital Solutions delivering

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>flexible equity, capital and strategic resources help public and private

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>later stage fintech in financial services business Adam, it's been

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hell of a week, to be honest with you, but

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>just give me your broad strokes reaction to the saving

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of SVB in part well, let me start with saying

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that the market was really tight even before for this event.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was really two factors at play. One

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was the broader private markets. We're starting to see challenges

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>given the setback in public markets and the privates catching

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>up to the valuation compressions that were happening there, and

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>therefore private companies were really avoiding coming to market. And

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that was compounded by the fact that gps themselves were

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>starting to get concerned about raising capital and their next

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>funds and were slowing down their pacings. So the market

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was becoming very tight and actually relatively quiet, and many

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of these companies were using their their venture death facilities

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to extend their runways so that they could avoid potentially

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>coming into a market that where scarcity was high. And

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this is just obviously exacerbated you know, those factors, and

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>now we've got a situation where, you know, a lot

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of companies are going to be in a tighter window.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We call it the fundraising gauntlets of the fall, because

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they have potentially less flexibility than they Well, at any Adam,

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's good that you it's good that you're with us

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>because you can run that gaunt the icon. I'm not

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a vench capitalist. We're talking a lot about last day

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of the quarter and as that one hundreds going nuts,

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor index going nuts. When you're trying to benchmark your

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>private company portfolio companies against what you're saying in public markets,

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>why are those two competing ideas right now? Well, one,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the public markets and multiples fell a lot faster and

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>harder than the private markets. The private markets are are

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>really just catching up. I think, you know, at the

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>later stage, we're starting to see a flattening between the

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>premium the private premium as you go further down the

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>maturity curve into earlier stage. You know, the public and

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>private markets always have a little bit of different equilibrium,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but but I would say at the later stage, we're

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to see a little bit more balanced between the two. Adam,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you a little bit about structured equity.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I know your firm has some experience with that. Are

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>you finding right now that a lot of these unicorns,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, some of the largely highly valued companies

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would rather save face and take new money at difficult

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>terms rather than doing a down round. Look, it's not

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>just a question for the management team, it's it's a

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>question for all stakeholders. The you know, the management teams

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>just one component. Their investor base is another. Obviously, it's

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a debate that these stakeholders have to have. I think

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a structured actually solution like that that we have

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the offer does offer flexibility on valuation versus potentially

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a preferred security with some seniority and governance right, and

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone just has to weigh what are the different levers

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that construct the best outcome for both the company itself

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and the investor. And I think a structured equity solution

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just has more flexibility. If all you can do as

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>investor is offer a preferred security or a common security,

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to be much more sensitive to the valuation.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So are you guys busy right now? Are you finding

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of companies are about to raise more money?

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievably busy. You know, in the last four months,

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we've entered into over two hundred NDAs at this point,

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>you know our selection, we just close our first deal,

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so one deal versus two hundred companies that we've we've

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>dug into is a small conversion rate. We expect that

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>type of ratio to continue. So it's a really interesting

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and great time to deploy capital. U And and

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, some people may think it's adversarial

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>between stakeholders and US as capital and seeking a solution.

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>It's quite different. I think everyone understands the market. Um,

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if the company performs, we're all aligned

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and the downside protections we see won't be necessary and

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a win win for everyone. So um, you know,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very positive and quite frankly right now,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an energizing market because we're having so many interesting conversations

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>with great companies. Right hey, Adam, it sounds then that

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you at least are not staring into this kind of

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>post SVB B A base deploying Capit's aware, as Fisher

0:36:55.680 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligence fintech, where are the opportunities. So we're very focused

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>fund always have been for the last seven years. So

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>everything we do is fintech, mostly banking, insurance and wealth management.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>There's opportunities in all of those verticals. I would say

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>my insurance being down the most has some balance sheet intensity.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some great opportunities plays that are more balance

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sheet intensive or consumer facing. There's a lot of people

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that are concerned about the resilience, resiliency of the consumer

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and access to capital. We've got a lot of experience

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in both and we can price that risk. And as

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, if you've got capital and you can underwrite

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the risk, it's an amazing time to be in the market.

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam Volaskia Portage, bloom Bows, Katie Roof both with me.

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your time. So in today's Going Viral,

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>we're diving into the world of Hollywood and why are

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite video games now turning into motion pictures. Take Tetris,

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, the addictive puzzle game from the nineteen eighties,

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>or wasn't around then. It is part of Apple's for

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a in a tinsel Town. It takes viewers behind the

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>scenes in the bowl over distribution rights to the game,

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>part business biopic, part cold war spy thriller. The nearly

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>two hour film is almost certainly the best ever made

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about international copyright negotiations. The smartphonemaker ramping up to spend

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>over one billion a year on films for theaters and streaming,

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping most of its focus on movies that appeal to

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>adult audiences. Speaking of games, by the way, Dungeons and

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Dragons new owner Hasbro has big ambitions for the fantasy

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>role playing game. Bloomberg's Felix Gillette has the scoop on

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the game that's staging a comeback on the even but

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>its fiftieth birthday, Dungeons and Dragons has never been more popular.

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>The granddaddy of fantasy role playing games is currently enjoying

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a cultural renaissance, thanks in part to its prominent depiction

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and Netflix's hit series The Stranger Things. D and D

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>has minted a new generation of dicelinging fans, D and

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>D theme podcasts, twitch shows, and D and D influencers

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and TikTok. While a few games have enjoyed

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the kind of multigenerational influences D and D, the corresponding

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>business has often struggled over the years to live up

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to its potential, leaving in its wake not great fortunes,

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but instead a long legacy of infighting, litigation, and squandered opportunities.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So night, we begin with a story about make believe

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>adventure and real life violence and what some critics fear

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is a connection between the two in a game called

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Dungeons and Dragons. Throughout the nineteen eighties, evangelical Christian groups

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>frequently accused D and D, with its spells of magic

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or neat beastiaries and horned deities, as being a plaything

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of the devil, making it difficult for the game's owners

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to turn it into a family friendly mainstream brand. Now, Hasbro,

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the giant toy company that owns D and D, is

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>hoping that the business side of the game can finally

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 1>catch up with its cultural prowess. Over the next year,

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Hasbro will be unleashing some major D and D brand extensions,

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>aiming to rake in more money from D and d's

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>swelling fan base. The streaming service Paramount Plus is currently

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>developing a live action D and D series. In August,

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Balder's Gate three, the latest sequel in a popular series

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of video games based on D and D, is scheduled

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to go on sale, and sometime next year, Hasbro's expected

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to release one D and D, the next iteration of

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the classic game, this time with a whole new suite

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of digital enhancements. Most importantly on March thirty first, Hasbro's

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>E one Studio and Paramount will be releasing Dungeons and

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Dragons Honor among Thieves, a big budget CGI Layden Hollywood spectacle.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>For the D and D movie to succeed, it not

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>only has to produce big numbers in spring, but also

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>spawn the kind of long living entertainment franchise that Hasbro

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>has enjoyed with Transforms. Since two thousand and seven, the

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>six Transformer films based on its Warrior Car toys have

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>generated close to five billion dollars in theater ticket sense.

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Hasbro hopes that this time around, D and D fans

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>will embreecee the movie and everything else coming down the pipeline.

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>If they do, after fifty years, D and D may

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>finally live up to its business potential. All right, thanks

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg's Felix to Let for that report. I know

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for you dungeon masters and halflings out there, it's a

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>big Friday night You've got ahead of the movie theater

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that does it. For this edition of Bloomberg Technology catch

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>us in an hour. I'm going to be doing a

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter spaces and all things AI. It has been an

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>astonishing week for the world of ours, Fishal Intelligence, and

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 1>our very own Rachel Mets is going to be up

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>with me. Lots to recap in the show, so to

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>check out the podcast wherever you get your podcasts, Apple, Spotify,

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeart and of course on all the Bloomberg platforms. It

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is the last day of March. It is the last

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>day at the Quarter Technology absolutely jumping first three months

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of this year, so much more to go. This is

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg