WEBVTT - Amazon Cutting 16,000 Jobs, ASML Reports Record Bookings

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low into San Francisco.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Amazon cuts sixteen thousand

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>corporate jobs to remove letyers of bureaucracy and quote increase ownership.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>That's ASML also announcing job cuts to boost efficiency and posting.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Strong fourth quarter orders, and.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Sources tell Bloomberg that SoftBank is in talks to invest

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>as much as thirty billion dollars more into Open AI.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on these markets though, because there's been

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>some interesting whipsawing airsm hell among them.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 4>But we go more macro right now.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>One point, we saw the S and P five hundred

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>above that seven thousand dollars seven thousand level. We have

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>never seen that before, and that is as we see

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the momentum in AI continuing.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 4>But we have a crucial FED meeting. What is going

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to be put to J.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Powell later today that independence of the Federal Reserve. We're

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 3>not thinking that there will be any move in terms

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>of race, but still there's nervousness, nervousness around Iran as well.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>And there's a lot to be focusing in on. But

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>for now, now as that one hundred holds on to

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 3>a gains of four tens percent, what are you looking.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 5>At the breaking new story of the morning.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Amazon is cutting sixteen thousand more corporate roles, eliminate middle management, streamline.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>It confirms a lot of what Bloomberg had already reported.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>The slot kind of bouncing around in the session now

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>softer by seven tenths of one percent. We're going to

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>get to that later in the program and go deep

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>on what's happening in Amazon and tech more broadly. Then

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>there's ASML at one point in the session up more

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 2>than seven percent and pushing to a fresh record high,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>great blockbuster bookings, bookending the thirteenth consecutive year of growth,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and also doing its own job cuts. I guess, you know,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>fix the roof while the sun is shining. Kind of

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>an allergy carrow. But now the stock is down softer

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>two and a half percent, something might have been happening

0:01:59.600 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>on the core.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we've got to.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Dig into it because, as you mentioned, seventeen hundred jobs

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to go in the Dutch maker.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>The semiconductor equipment is.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 3>World used, says it plans to cut seventeen hundred roles,

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>around four percent of the workforce, as an effort to

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>streamline the organization. The CEO has said. This is as

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the company reported earnings that you mentioned, showing record fourth

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 3>quarter bookings field of course by AI demand. The SML

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>CEO Christophe Fuget, did speak with Bloomberg on the phone earlier.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Take to listen to what he had to say.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 6>The last three months have brought a lot of clarity,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 6>and I think what you see basically is that the

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 6>semi industry, our customers start to believe that this AI

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 6>demand is sustainable, and therefore they have moved into building

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>capacity and they are moving very aggressively. And I think

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 6>this has been very nicely translated indeed into a record

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 6>booking number. So that's of course very good news for

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 6>the mid term.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Why are the shares down, then, let's talk about.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>The results when PFO is higher, global tech, infrastructure and

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>new street research. Why did we sell the rally the

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>record high and the shares earlier today?

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 7>Yes, that's a great question. So I think.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 8>A SML basically confirmed what everybody suspected that twenty twenty

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 8>six is going to be a great year. Now you

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 8>have to take a step back and think what does that.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 7>Mean agrate great year?

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 8>The guided revenue grows between four and nineteen percent, which

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 8>in absolute term is very strong growth. As you mentioned,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 8>like the bookings were never seen. We've never seen that

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 8>level of orders at the SML, like exceeding thirteen billion

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 8>in a single in a single quarter. Now, when you

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 8>take a step back, think about what is the downstream

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 8>of SML.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 7>Who are the clients. It's a Micron, it's a high.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 8>Nix, it's a Samsuing, it's a TSMC, and these player

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 8>are actually growing much much faster than that. They're growing,

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 8>Like if you take for instance, c SMC is probably

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 8>going to grow like between thirteen and thirty five percent

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 8>this year. So we already see that semiicap equipment starts

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 8>lagging a bit their clients in terms of growth, and

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 8>that's a very natural thing because they sell equipment to

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 8>add capacity. And when you look at the trajectory of

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 8>growth of air, we are actually just passing the inflection points.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 8>Going forward, gross is going to continue to be very strong,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 8>but it is going too slow and so it's going

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 8>to translate into slower growth at semicap equipment manufacturers. And

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 8>I really think this is the way the street is

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 8>digesting the news today and overnight. Initially the stock was

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 8>up and now the street is raising. Okay, but if

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty six is a peak spending air, maybe it's

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 8>time to actually take profits on SML as a stock.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>So you think this is peak, I mean, that's not

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>what one would hear from Johnson one who thinks we

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>still got trillions to go. Still in this mode of

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to question whether we're in an AI bubble or not,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 3>do you think that we've got any curacy on that

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 3>from ASML after we of course got TSMC of skah

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>next showed such strength and memory.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so we're definitely not at peak on AI. And

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 8>you look at the TSMC guide to twenty twenty nine

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 8>growth between fifty five and sixty percent, so we are

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 8>still in a very.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 7>High growth environment in AI. The peak I refer to

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 7>Caroline is.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 8>A peak in actually capacity increase, because if in twenty

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 8>twenty seven you still grow very fast but a bit

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 8>slower than twenty twenty six, you will not need more

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 8>equipment than you needed in twenty twenty six. So this

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 8>is this idea that Semica players are driven by incremental capacity,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 8>not by growth directly. It's the first order of derivative

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 8>of the growth of their clients. And that's the reason

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 8>why the market is right to be a bit nervous

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 8>specifically on submitting now when it comes to their clients.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 8>Like the groser for twenty six is amazing. It's already

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 8>very strong for twenty twenty seven, and it looks really

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 8>good for twenty twenty eighteen, twenty twenty nine. So we

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 8>are still in very, very very strong growth environments in AI.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if the stocks down and twenty twenty six is

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the peak, the market doesn't believe mister Fuque, he thinks

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 2>it's about sustainability.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Listen to this real quick.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 6>I think we have all been surprised by the magnitude

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 6>of AI, and we all saw it coming a bit.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time, you know, we see those

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 6>investment coming out and it's really big, and I think

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 6>that all of us are continuing to watch basically for

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 6>the sustainability of those investments. I think sustainability is a keyword.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 6>I think the question is always.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 7>Is this going to last?

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 6>I think that more and more of our customer are

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 6>responding positively to that question.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to last? And he's saying that the

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>signals from its customers are that it is going to last.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>And you're saying the market isn't showing us.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 8>That, whereas the market is showing is being careful about

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 8>it because this is going to last. For the CEO

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 8>of might mean we still have very good level of

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 8>spending in twenty twenty seven. But if twenty twenty seven

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 8>is as good as twenty twenty six, how is the

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 8>STUG going to work on that?

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 7>It's rightly not going to work.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have a question for you, what is the

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 2>leading indicator in the world of tech?

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 5>I can give you a chart right now.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>It shows you expected capital expenditures for the hyperscalers and

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>other associated names like Meta and Oracle. Right, is that

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the leading indicator? Or Bloomberg's Ian King is going to

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>come on next and tell us that Texas Instruments is

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a leading indicator for the health of the economy, or

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>ASML and EUV demand is a leading indicator? Which data

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>set is most critically important to you right now?

0:07:54.720 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 8>Per So what's most critically important? Ed east to connect

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 8>these data sets rightfully?

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 7>I love that chart you just showed.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 8>This is like capex and you see that we expect

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 8>capex to grow a lot this year growth next year,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 8>and as we are not too sure, we don't model

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 8>much beyond that. This is a leading indicator. Now, what

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 8>is going to drive the business of ASML is how

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 8>much incremental capex you add every year. And what you

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 8>see very clearly is that this incremental capex is now

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 8>plateauing and coming down. And that's the reason why in

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 8>semi cap equipment you have to be careful and expect

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 8>like a significant slowdown.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 7>In revenue growth for the rest of the industry.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 8>Capex growth is a very very good indicator and it

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 8>takes us instrument is actually a very interesting indicator. That

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 8>is the most important indicator today outside of AI, because

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 8>it's quite important to understand what is the global economy

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 8>doing outside of AI. And we've been into like a

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 8>very very painful, lengthy downce I can in automotives, in

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 8>industry roles and what simply said, it's confirmed signals that

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 8>we've had already for a few weeks that we are

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 8>at the bottom and things are improving.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Just trying to answer the question is this going to last,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Pierre fair Agree from New Street Research, thank you very much.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I alluded to it just then. Shares of texts instruments

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>soaring after the company gave a surprisingly robust forecast for

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter, signaling that customers have worked through inventory

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and a returning for chips analog chips. Multiple analysts are

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>raising price targets, calling the outlook encouraging. Bloomberg's inking is

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>here analog chips simple translation of a touch of a

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>button into a signal. But we always write in our story,

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in our summary of earnings, this is like the bell weather,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 2>the crystal ball for the economy. What do we learn

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 2>through their earnings prece.

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean, they've got tens of thousands of products, tens

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 9>of thousands of customers, so they are literally everywhere everything

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 9>that's got a on and off switch, that's where they are.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 9>What they said was again, you were very careful, and

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 9>they're incrementally better. They had been talking about a recovery

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 9>being kind of off pace, not as kind of robust

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 9>as we would normally get. Now they're saying, actually orders

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 9>are improving and are continuing to improve. The signs are

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 9>now better.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 3>How much are they able to harness any of the

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 3>AI vibes rather than auto's industrials, the bell Weather part.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's a very good question. The answer is they

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 9>confirmed the AI vibe is good for them. It's now

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 9>a significant business, but really it's not the main business.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 9>The main business for them remains industrial and automotive, the

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 9>things that are a broader I mean, we know that

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 9>data centers is a big right and they confirm that. What

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 9>they told us was that industrial is getting better as well,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 9>which is what we want to hear.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 2>We've really focused right now on how global these companies are,

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 2>like currency impacts, like China, what's going on with China.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything kind of extra that Texas Instruments can

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>tell us about different geographies, other industries? Industrial good? Is

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 2>there anything that's pretty bad?

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean they talked about consumer electronics not being fantastic,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 9>and that's because consumer electronic actually recovered earlier than other

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 9>markets and now it's kind of slowing down a little bit.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 9>Some of the consumer electronics devices, home theater maybe PCs

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 9>a little bit memory dependent. We talked about memory. The

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 9>press of memory is going up. That's snow secret and

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 9>that has a knock on impact.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Thinking as always breaking it down, and you mentioned memory,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>We're going to go there check out Skhiinex shares. They

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 3>have really rocketed on the back of their earnings, and

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 3>there's this relentless appetite for AI memory, which s CA

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Heinex serves. They're also in fact going to be establishing

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 3>an AI data center. Solutions from here in the usaid

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>how much has that to do with South Korea US

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 3>relationships going forward and the need to invest in the

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>United States. It's going to be backed by ten billion

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>dollars of capital to pursue partnerships and investments in the sector.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 4>So keep an eye on that stock. And that was

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.479
<v Speaker 4>its training in South Korea today.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, coming out, trade tensions rise between the US and

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>South Korea.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 5>More on the why. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look at shares of Amazon softer seven tens

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>of one percent, the company announcing the card of sixteen

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand corporate jobs worldwide, saying it's an effort to remove

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>layers of bureaucracy and to quote, increase ownership. It also

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>confirms quite a lot of what Bloomberg has been reporting

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of late. Bloomberg Spencer Soper, who covers Amazon joins us. Now,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 2>sixteen thousand corporate jobs is the latest.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Wave of more than one wave.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And the messaging and in line with your reporting, right

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>is that this is about efficiency and streamlining, not about AI.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>What are the details of this particular trim that we're seeing.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, definitely delayering, the kind of targeting the middle. And

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 10>this is something that goes back to last year when

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 10>Jase was talking about you know, more more people who

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 10>are doing the direct work and fewer people managing the

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 10>work you know in the middle. So there's that in there.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 10>It also hit a large you know, different parts of

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 10>the organization. So when they had initially laid off fourteen

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 10>thousand back in October, departments were given a choice, they

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 10>said they had to hit some numbers. They were given

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 10>a choice, do you want to cut people now or

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 10>wait until after after the holiday season. And so a

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 10>lot of departments, particularly the retail division, waited until after

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 10>Christmas to do their cuts. So now we're seeing a

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 10>total of thirty thousand, which is the biggest in Amazon's

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 10>history for the corporate side.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 5>And that's you know, compared.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 10>To I think twenty seven thousand, which was a few

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 10>years ago, Back in twenty twenty one and twenty two now.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Phil Spencer that they've been at length to say this

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>isn't some regular occurrence. I know, Beth Galetti, who's really

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>in charge of people experience technology, is this isn't going

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to be some rolling set of cuts that we see

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 3>every few months. But thirty thousand last three months is

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a huge amount.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, thirty thousand is a big amount. But also if

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 10>you read her statement very carefully, it's really corporate goblety

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 10>Google trying to strike that tone between you know, reassuring

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 10>employees but also not making any promises, you know what

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean. So's she's saying some might ask if this

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 10>is going to be a rolling theme and you know,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 10>but she's not really saying, hey, we're not going to

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 10>cut anymore over this period of time. So it's kind

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 10>of just not noncommittal Gobletygoog if you really read it carefully.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, saying is this the beginning of a new rhythm.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>That's not our plan.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>But just as we always have, every team will continue

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to evaluate the ownership, speeding capacity to invent for customers.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Expense of Sofa thanks for breaking it down for us. Now,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration is demanding the South Korea implement it's

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a six month old trade deal with the US to

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>prevent Harrison rising to twenty five percent. Trade Tensions between

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the two countries have been rising mean worse by the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>US's frustration with Korean digital services regulations. New Vaccinia tech

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>editor Mike Shephard joined US Now to unpack what is

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a tech centric story in many ways because it involves

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>key chip makers over in Korea, for example, Well, it

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>really does.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 11>And we saw actually the flashes of this growing as

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 11>long as ten days ago Caroen, we saw Howard Lutnik

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 11>threatening those memory makers with tariffs of up to one

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 11>hundred percent if they didn't step up their investments here.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 7>In the US.

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 11>And that is one of the issues that we have

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 11>seen surge more recently with the president's threat of increasing

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 11>tariffs to twenty five percent from the current agreed upon

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 11>fifteen percent level. And a lot of that has to

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 11>do with what is happening with those investments. Remember, under

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 11>the deal, South Korea had promised to invest as much

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 11>as three hundred and fifty billion dollars in the US

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 11>over the next several years, but that step has been

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 11>installed in the South Korean parliament. They are just beset

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 11>by a lot of issues, including currency woes and capital outflows,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 11>and so lawmakers there have really not been able to

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 11>codify how this investment would go forward.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 12>But we heard this morning from.

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 11>US Trade Representative Jamison Greer that time is up in

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 11>South Korea needs to start moving otherwise the US will

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 11>move to the next step, perhaps, and that is implementing

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 11>a potential tarer of increase.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Mike.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>The other news story at the intersection of tech and

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in Washington, DC is Intel pledging to match

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump account contributions for its employees.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 5>What do we need to know about that?

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's an interesting step, and it's one that other companies,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 11>including Blackrock, have already taken and that they are in Dell,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 11>of course, Michael Dell, the founder of Dell Computing, is

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 11>one of the pioneers behind this Trump accounts project and

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 11>has made some big pledges that we've talked about.

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 7>On this program before.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 11>But Intel is getting in line with that. And of

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 11>course the stakes for Intel are quite different. And when

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 11>I say stakes, it's quite literal. The US government owns

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 11>currently five point five percent of the company and is

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 11>on course to own as much as ten percent of

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 11>the chip maker. And it's also interesting ed that in

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 11>December the company hired Robin Colwell from the White House

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 11>to serve as its next government head of government affairs

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 11>here in Washington. So Intel is in a way really

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 11>aligning with this initiative, the Trump Accounts, which are designed

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 11>to encourage saving and investment by parents four young children

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 11>over the next several years, to try to get people

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 11>not only invested in the stock market, but saving over

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 11>the long haul. And in this way, Intel is trained

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 11>to get on the right side of the story with

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 11>the administration in another one of the president's priorities.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Blouemberg's Mike Shefard, thank you very much, Caro.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 4>It's time now for talking tech ed first up.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Elil Musk has suggested the timing of SpaceX is possible.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Blockbuster IPO could come in mid June and is according

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 3>to a report in the Financial Times. The owner of

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 3>the rocket maker, of course, is wanted to be targeting

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 3>the IPO for when Jupiter and Venus will appear very

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>close together in the sky.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Mask's fifty fifth birthday is also in June.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus, Snap has created a subsidiary dedicated to augmented reality

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 3>glasses specs. Now the unit is intended to give the

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 3>smart Iwear team more independence.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Will allow it to raise some money.

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 3>A spokesperson confirmed Snap will launch the AAR glasses regardless

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 3>of external investment, and Apple CEO Tim Cook, who has

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>joined other tech leaders weighing in on the killing of

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minnesota. In an internal memo,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Cook called for de escalation. He said he had spoken

0:18:52.520 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 3>to President Trump about the situation. Soft Bank as in

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>talks to invest as much as thirty billion dollars.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 4>More into Open Ai. And now that's according to sources, the.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Japanese firm is already one of opening Ice big as

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>backers within eleven percent steak in the chatchipt maker and

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 3>with More's bloomgs AI and data centers are Lin Dwan.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 3>And so thirty billion really makes massa all in. I mean,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 3>we know he takes big bets.

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and I think we had one of the nalysts

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 13>out in Asia saying he is literally betting the house

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 13>on open in other AI.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Six.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 13>Now that being said, it's probably worth pointing out that

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 13>it's as much as thirty billion dollars as opposed to

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 13>thirty billion dollars itself, So we'll see exactly where he

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 13>lands there. But I mean, let's face it, like Saffink

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 13>has already invested tens of billions of dollars in open Ai,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 13>so it's another thirty billion dollars at this point, right.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Lynn, There are lots of people in my world asking

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 2>equally if open ai is good for it in all

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>their capital commitments for infrastructure and where the soft bank

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 2>has up to thirty billion dollars. But the main thrust

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 2>of it is that this is part of a that

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 2>we know is happening. Right open ai wants to raise money.

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about its target raise overall and

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the valuation it wants to hit irrespective of how much

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>soft Bank contributes to that.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 13>That's exactly right, and we've been reporting on this funding

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 13>round that open ai has been orchestrating over the past

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 13>several months for a while now. Obviously stop Bank isn't

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 13>the only name that is intended to invest in this round.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 13>We very recently broke the news that open ai has

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 13>been in conversations with very big name investors in the

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 13>Middle East, and so it's possible that we see some

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 13>sovereign wealth money wind up in this round. Now in

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 13>terms of like what their targeting valuation wise, very difficult

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 13>to say. It's even like difficult to say exactly how

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 13>much they may end.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 4>Up raising in the end.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 13>The ranges that you see out there from us, from

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 13>others in the media are kind of all over the place.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 13>It's like anywhere from some hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 13>to eight hundred than fifty billion dollars depending on where

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 13>investors in Open AI decide to land in the end.

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 13>So it's very much an active round and we continue

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 13>to try to keep tabs of exactly where it lands.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is how SoftBank has been very focused on

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 3>the AI play, but also selling down an invidio to

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 3>be able to loosen up some cash. They made a

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>purchase of Ampare, for example in the chips area. Are

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>they deemed winner in the AI space right now?

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think it's probably two different questions that you're

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 13>looking to unpack there. One is what does stopping selling

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 13>down its sake and in VideA really mean? And I

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 13>think that for a moment, people were making the mistake

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 13>of interpreting that as ooh, stopping sees that it's getting

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 13>like way over its skis and it's not really you know,

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 13>all in on AI, when in fact, what it was

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 13>really doing is trying to raise enough money to make

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 13>even more bets on AI. Your other question though, was like,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 13>is Stoppank a winner in AI? I mean, is anybody

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 13>a winner in AI? I think that the concerns of

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 13>an AI bubble are still relevant. We saw is Sameltho

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 13>report some strong bookings, So.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on these markets which I've been flip flopping,

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>and we build anticipation of the FED decision and indeed

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>many feeling we're not going to get a rate change.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.719
<v Speaker 4>But what will J Powell say at the press conference.

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>We also got building geopolitical anxiety where it's about Iram,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>whether we've got still tensions with South Korea in terms

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of trade. Nevertheless, one point, the S and P five

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred go is above seven thousand, and then as that

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 3>one hundred holds onto its gains, earnings are coming thick

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and fast. This is where we see the fundamental picture

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 3>of this tech rally that we're so used to seagate

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 3>best performer in terms of actual percentage move when you're

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>look at the nast that one hundred and twenty percent.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>This is again winning formula on memory and it is

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>calling the numbers that came put out last night terrific.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments also came out with numbers. This is like

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the bell weather when you're thinking about industrials and ththing

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 3>about autos and we've hit a bottom word coming back

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>out of it. Were up almost eight percent on that

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 3>now ASML actually turns red it had blowout orders. But

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>see many people questioning perhaps where they can keep on

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>building momentums selling chip equipment to those chip makers such

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 3>as TSMC Intel here in the United States, Intel, as

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I say, up ten percent. Keep an eye on how

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the moon music has changed around AI or whether there's

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>a bubble or not ed. It's all about these.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Earnings right now.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>It is, and big tech earnings are well and truly

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 2>upon us, and that includes service now. Bloomberg Intelligence says

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 2>investors want to hear about the pending acquisition of cybersecurity

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 2>startup Arms, along with new AI sales and a lot more.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Brady Ford, who covers the software space, is here

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 2>with us generally right now that the IT spending environment

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 2>isn't great. What is the kind of read through an

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 2>expectation from the street on how service Now will talk

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>about that, right and how it will show up in

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>their own numbers.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 14>Application software has just had a really tough stretch the

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 14>last year, right. I Mean we've seen all of these

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 14>big vendors, whether it be Salesforce or Service Now, talk

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 14>up their new AI tools, but it just seems that

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 14>we can't quite see it in the numbers that there's

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 14>a real revenue uplift and with service Now, add on

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 14>top that they've made two big deals in the last years,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 14>so I just see a lot more investor anxiety about

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 14>them than I had at any point in recent years.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just have to look back to how

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 3>their shares have deeply underperformed last year, where they were

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 3>off by basically almost thirty percent. When you flip into

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 3>what we might hear from IBM, it has actually outperformed

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 3>software names, But their consultancy side of the business is

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe the one that you get the AI part of

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the equation coming in exactly.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 14>IBM is facing this moment where the discretionary spending is

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 14>being taken out of those traditional consulting projects. But it

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 14>doesn't seem to matter too much for them because a

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 14>lot of their infrastructure software is doing quite well and

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 14>people are still buying a ton of mainframes. Who knew

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 14>so IBM has actually face study pretty you know, positive

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 14>environment for a name that in the past was associated

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 14>with kind of stargy, boring, slow growth company.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Don't even get them started on quantum, Brody, We've got

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot to digest after the biles.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to you. We appreciate it, Brodie Forward. Now, another

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 4>stock we're watching is Microsoft.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Investors are paying close attention to its cloud computing service

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 3>as You and the impact of AI generalor AI how

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 3>thin can is.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 4>A Wolf Research analyst.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Expects the platform's growth to exceed guidance at thirty nine percent, writing,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>we believe that open ai training revenue will begin contributing

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 3>more materialy to as You're in the second fiscal quarter

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>and beyond, which could provide incremental upside to our preview.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 4>Alex joins us. Now, the question is do.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>They have the capacity to serve the relentless demand from

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 3>a player such as open ai ad it.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean that's the I think the big question

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 15>and look We're excited. We think this is the bell

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 15>weather that's going to help usher AI into the enterprise era,

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 15>the mo from co pilot to coworker that never sleeps,

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 15>never eats, never complains, just works on complicated problems all

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 15>the time with the same tool chain that you're used

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 15>to as a human. We think Microsoft is very well

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 15>positioned as a platform to deliver on all parts of

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 15>that stack and journey, the most important metric being Azure.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 15>The capacity constraint issues we think do start to get

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 15>resolved as they bring the Fairwater data centers online. We

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 15>see both the Wisconsin and Atlanta data center starting to

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 15>ramp and contribute. We think that unlocks about a gigawatt

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 15>of capacity over the course of the next year, which

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 15>we estimate about twenty billion dollars of incremental Azure unlock.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 15>We think that they also are contracting and expanding their

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 15>capacity with third parties like the Neo Clouds, n Scale, Nebius,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 15>and a few others that could be up to another

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 15>gigawatt of capacity or another potential twenty billion. So we

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 15>think that you start to see those resolutions come through

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 15>over the course of the next few quarters.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to where you started co

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>pilot and then you went coworker. What's so interesting really

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 3>on the show the last few days and really thinking

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>about anthropics offering cowork how much is that potentially a

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>real competitor to Microsoft?

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 4>Could it up end it in the space?

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 16>To me?

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 15>And the way we think about it is that we're

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 15>in phase zero of adoption in the enterprise. A lot

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 15>of the tools, the way they're being used right now,

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 15>we're in the discovery phase of what's possible. We think

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 15>that anthropic open AI really all the model companies have

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 15>an opportunity to massively expand the value creation that they're

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 15>delivering in their offerings in the enterprise specifically, and so

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 15>this is a demonstration, we believe where different vendors at

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 15>different times will be able to exhibit share gains with

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 15>functionality that they launch in their ecosystems to enable value creation.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 15>We view it less as a zero sum and more

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 15>of as an infinite game that we're just starting to play.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>A I find this so interesting that we started this

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 2>conversation about top line growth and Azure right almost the

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>reverse of a conversation we might have had one or

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 2>two quarters ago, which would have started with kappas or expenditures.

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 5>How much do you need to just get a projection.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Of confidence from Microsoft on their capital expenditure figures to

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>keep this big story alive.

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, So look, last quarter was the big shift quarter

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 15>in terms of CAPEX, going from you know something where

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 15>we thought it was going to be one hundred billion

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 15>to one hundred and fifty billion this year.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 12>We think that the CAPEX shift has been made.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 15>We think now it's a question of stability and you know,

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 15>to some extent, maybe aligning the increase from here with

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 15>some of your kind of core revenue growth assumptions.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 12>But look, that could change too. Over the last month, we.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 15>Think inference has quite frankly exploded with the amount of

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 15>tokens being generated for autonomous coding tasks that are now

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 15>running you know, at large when people sleep, as well

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 15>as some of the possible functionalities exhibited by things like

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 15>clog bot and these other kind of orchestration engines. So

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 15>it's anyone's guest. We don't think CAPEX is going down

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 15>anytime soon. We think kind of stable to up is

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 15>how we are thinking about it.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to genuinely autonomous agents. You know, Microsoft's

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>are very good. I always say this on the program.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what I grew up with, selling software that you

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can otherwise get for free elsewhere. They're not the only game, right.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to the coworker, AWS has a very

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>similar story they like to tell. They like to talk

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>up their prowess in observability, right, really important critical factor

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>when an agent is an autonomous and they talk up

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 2>at AWS how well they're doing to help engineers get

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>through backlog. How are you going to discern addicts which

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>companies better at that you know, and therefore which will

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 2>be adopted in the enterprise.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, I think all three hyperscalers have a role

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 12>to play.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 15>I think the one element about autonomous agents, particularly ones

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 15>that have to handle sensitive, oftentimes customer privileged information is security. Now,

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 15>we think one of the key differentiators for Microsoft is

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 15>their security portfolio, their security stack, their security graph as

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 15>well as you know, all of the investments that they've

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 15>made in other parts of the data platform has stayed

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 15>over time. So we think that is a critical piece

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 15>of the puzzle that will help them gain share of

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 15>this developing market that we're just kind of starting to discover.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>The use cases around Alex Zuchin and four research greats.

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Have you on the show in Advanced Microsoft now coming up?

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>While b CEO Raquel Eredison joins us to talk about

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the self driving startups, latest funding and push into robotaxis.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 5>A's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Self driving startup warbe I secured one billion dollars in

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 3>new funding and includes a seven hundred and fifty million

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Series C that was led by Coast Adventures by G

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 3>two venture partners, plus two hundred and fifty million in

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a milestone based investment from Uber to lunch.

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Wabi enabled robotaxis.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now Raquel Rotisen, she's a CEO founder of Wabi.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 3>How important is this focus on physical AI in the

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 3>trucking space now moving to the robo taxi?

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 4>How significant is that for you?

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, so it's a really exciting moment. I will say,

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 17>where you know, the physically a revolution is here and

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 17>sold Iran is what is going to skill first, and

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 17>you know we have a very Advanne system in tracking

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 17>and now we are entering rowo taxi with a massive

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 17>furnitshire with with Uber and you know it's really the

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 17>next stage for that company is really exciting to be

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 17>you know, reading their way in physical AI.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is we had gatekon yesterday also raising fun well,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 3>they're securing new deals, they're already commercializing.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 4>How is your go to market looking?

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 3>It's all about the platform that you offer when it

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>comes to trucking and now robotaxis.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 4>What is it that makes you so distinct?

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 17>So what makes us very very unique is the fact

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 17>that we have next generation technology physically I platform that

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 17>for the first time in the industry, in the industry

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 17>is going to be able to drive both fhon factors

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 17>robotaxes as well as the driving trucks. We are very

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 17>advanced in terms of both the technology as well as

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 17>commercialization in trucking and now you know entering robotaxi, and

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.479
<v Speaker 17>we're going to enter robotaxi really really quickly. So it's

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 17>very you know, it's great to see that, you know,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 17>this next generation technology enables you to go so much faster,

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 17>so much more capital efficient, and with a product that

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 17>really miss the customer demands.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Okue, Well, congratulations on the round, you know, really notable.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It reads like the money that's coming in from Uber

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>is continue on. You hitding some milestones in robotaxi, right,

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>your focus has been autonomous trucking.

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 5>What are those milestones in.

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Robotaxi that Uber requires you to hit so you can

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>unlock access to that cash.

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 17>So so not sharing a lot of details yet on

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 17>the amazing partnership with Uber, but those are simple milestones

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 17>that we can you know, we can achieve quickly and

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 17>you know, thanks to the technology that we have, you know,

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 17>already today we have the capabilities to you know, the

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 17>core capabilities required for robot taxis with our cell arriving

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 17>trucks unless the Unlike the rest of the industry, we

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 17>can drive not only on highways but in generalized surface streets.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 17>So that's why you know, we feel, you know, very

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 17>confident that you know, we can enter robot taxi and

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 17>dis wrapted market really really, you know, swiftly.

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>You're Canadian company essentially, and one of the conversations that

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>we were having yesterday with Gattik is in American US

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 2>a need for a federal regulation. Your framework you able

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 2>to give me a kind of assessment of going to

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>market in Canada versus the United States, which jurisdiction you

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 2>think is ahead right in accommodating this nascent technology.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, the US is definitely ahead of the Canadian market

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 17>in terms of you know, regulatory peace as well as adoption,

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 17>and Canada has to do you know, quite a bit

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 17>to catch up. But there is a lot of excitement

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 17>on the Canadian eical system to make this possible. They

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 17>really understand that this technology has so many benefits from

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 17>safety to you know, all the efficiency that is, sustainability,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 17>extra sustainability that is going to come with the technology.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 17>So definitely there is a desire, but the US is

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 17>way ahead of Canada. So we will you know, for us,

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 17>our first market has been over the last couple of

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 17>years for tracking really the US or a march lagger

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 17>market and then we will see a out you know,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 17>more expansion in the years to come.

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is that you've been in AI deeply entrenched

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 3>in the academic side of it, still a full professor

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.959
<v Speaker 3>over in the University of Toronto for twenty five years.

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Is talent everyone is for you people, so know who

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 4>you are.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>They must gravitate towards the expertise you've brought in physical AI.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's getting very expensive. Is that almost what some

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 3>of this funding round is for.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 17>It's a great, great point, Caroline. So there is definitely

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 17>you know, a lot of you know, talent war for

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 17>EI these days with obviously the revolution that is happening.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 17>But you know why we can't attract the best in

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 17>class without paying premiums.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 4>And the reason why is that if you're.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 17>Interested in physically, if you're interested in you know, bringing

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 17>a product that is you know, you said, once in

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 17>a lifetime or in a generation sort of opportunity to

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 17>really change the world as we know it today, and

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 17>you want to do it with innovative technology that and

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 17>really pushing the industry to the next level, then what

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 17>is the place to be? And that's what you know,

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 17>we have hired divesting class, you know, talent team, and

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 17>we continue to attract the best in class. And you

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 17>know also what attention numbers are of the chart, so

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 17>definitely you know, amassing team and we continue to double

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 17>down in terms of hiring.

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have another question about Canada, and you know,

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>forgive me, it's just been so much in the news

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 2>recently the ecosystem in Canada. You probably saw that why

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Combinator cut Canada from its list of countries that it

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>would invest in startups in what do you make of that?

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And like what is the ecosystem in Canada right now?

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Like on the software and hardware side, do you see

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the talent pool that you need available in your home country.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, so I'm not going to comment on you know,

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 17>you know why combinitory specifically, but I will say that,

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 17>you know, there is a vibrant, you know, take an

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 17>ecosystem in Canada. You know, as you as you know,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 17>Canada has been at the forefront of really all the

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 17>innovation and the majority of the innovation that under pin

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 17>the AI revolution that we're seeing today with folks like

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 17>you know, give Hinton, Nobel, Price, et cetera. Right, So,

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 17>so the talent is there, the CoSystem is there, and uh,

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 17>you know, from my perspective, you know, Wabi is a

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 17>proud Canadian company and there is you know a few

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 17>others that are really leading the way. And it's a mass.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 17>You know, it's an amazing market. And if you look

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 17>at that list of investors, you know, we have plenty

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 17>from the value plenty for Canada from Canada as well

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 17>as Europe and the even me the list now, so

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 17>you know, I will say that we you know, Canada

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 17>can really attract capital from you know, across the globe

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 17>and and you know it's it's a miss if you don't,

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 17>you don't invest in Canada.

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Riquel Edison, CEO and founder of WARB closing seven hundred

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and fifty million dollar Series C, taking up to a

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars with support from Uber to.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Wool Street.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Feeling some mixed signals on has ahead of its earnings

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 3>price targets. For the ev maker, they're rising despite investor

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 3>concerns over its earnings potential this year.

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Here with more is Steve Man a Bluemeg Intelligence and

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 4>for Tesla.

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 3>It's always a question of whether you care about the

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 3>fundamentals and the court are just gone, or whether you're

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 3>betting on AI optimists and the future of robotics.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 16>I think if you look at the stock price over

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 16>the last quarter, there's definitely some push and pull on

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 16>the stock price. It's been pretty steady where it's at

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 16>at the moment. So there are two camps. One is

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 16>looking at the business fundamentals. You know, sales in the

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 16>fourth quarter was down fifteen to sixteen percent, not you know,

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 16>there's been a lot of pull ahead before the seventy

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 16>five hundred dollars US tax credit went away, so earnings

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 16>are probably not gonna be pretty. But on the other camp,

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 16>you know, investors are really stoked with their cybercav robot

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 16>taxi rollout.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Steve, in your January twelfth preview, you wrote that twenty

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 2>six is the pivot for AI and robotics, right, and

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that you expect management to talk up those things.

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 5>But what do you actually need to hear?

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>What things of substance do you want Musks to say

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>on the call that actually will be a driver of

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 2>confidence in the near term, even if that is this year.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I think investors is very anxious about that. You know,

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 16>Elon Musk has talked about you know, the vision system,

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 16>self driving vision system that they're rolling out. There's a

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 16>lot of anticipation because you know, I think the next

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 16>leg for the company is really scaling that business. So

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 16>it's about robotaxi, it's about rolling out the cybercab, the

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 16>new you know, steering wheelless brake, pedaliss vehicle, and the

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 16>f ST subscription. So, I mean there's investors are very

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 16>stoked about this, and they're really looking for Elon mus

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 16>to tell them that, hey, in the next three to

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 16>six months. We are really going to scale it up

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 16>beyond astin.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>See Man of bloom Megan Intelligence. We're all bracing for

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 2>aftermarket today and Tesla. We're also bracing for Meta, which

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 2>reports after the bow. Investors are focused on AI capital

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 2>expenditure plans for twenty twenty six, which analysts say could

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 2>overshadow the company's advertising revenue growth. Luvis Kurt Wagner joins

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 2>us for the details. It's a pretty familiar formula at

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 2>this point. I hand it over to you. Give us

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the Meta earnings preview as best you can.

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 18>I feel like we've been talking about a lot of

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 18>the same stuff for the past year, which is what

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 18>is spending going to look like? And can the company

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 18>paint this picture for investors that all the spending ultimately

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 18>pay off down the line. And you remember it was

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 18>just a year ago that Mark Zuckerberg was saying, hey,

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 18>record spending up to sixty five billion in capital expenditures,

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 18>and everyone's head spun around, you know, crazy to think

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 18>of that. I saw the estimates on the Bloomberg today

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 18>that they think capital expenditures could be one hundred and

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 18>eleven billion dollars for Meta in twenty twenty six, and

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 18>so it's just hard to quantify, you know, easy to

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 18>quantify a harder rager head around the jump we've seen

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 18>and spending from this company in particular as they rush

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 18>toward AI, and there's going to be a lot of

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 18>questions about what the ROI on that is going forward.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 4>And that is why the stock has taken some hits.

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, initially it was talk up your capex and

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 3>you're rewarded for it, but then in the last innings,

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm just looking at the chart of how swiftly they

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 3>fell back in October as maybe we then started to

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 3>be worried about the commitment of capital expenditure.

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 4>How can they steady nerves in other parts of the business.

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 3>What do we need to hear on the bread and

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 3>butter of ads sales?

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 18>And they like, well, I imagine we'll hear them talk

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 18>about how AI is improving ads today, right, and that's

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 18>going to be in automated campaigns, that's going to be

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 18>in better targeting, pretty much anything they can do to show, hey,

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 18>look this this fifty billion dollar data center we're building

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 18>in Louisiana is actually helping our revenue or will help

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 18>our revenue immediately. I think that's going to be very

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 18>important because a lot of their futuristic bets we talked

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 18>about the metaverse on here, virtual reality, even the AI glasses,

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 18>which seem to be going well. I mean, these are

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 18>not driving meaningful revenue to the company, and yet they

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 18>are sucking tons of cash to operate, and so that

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 18>is the trade off. A lot of the big bets

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 18>still haven't materialized on the revenue side just yet. So

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 18>they need to show that AI is continuing to help

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 18>on that ads business.

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Most Kurt Wagner, He's going to be all over them

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 3>post the bell today.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. That does it for this meeting edition of

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Tech. So much more to comment.

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the mag seven starts in ernest. Today is the

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>day and it's the market run up going into it

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:40.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of got.

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 5>Me on edge, you know, recap on the podcast. Carry's right,

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 5>it was meeting.

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it on the Bloomberg platforms online, Apple, Spotify,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart. I know I'll be at my desk after

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 2>the market bell. I know what I'm bracing for. Question

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 2>is will you be back with us? This is Bloomberg

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Tech