WEBVTT - Adam Neumann's Flow and Peloton's Amazon Partnership

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, a

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>concierge startup that is shaking up city living. We'll talk

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to the women behind the company, Alfred about why they

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>see big opportunity and what they think about their early

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>investor Adam Newman starting a different company that maybe trying

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to get in on that too. Plus Peloton on Amazon,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the struggling bike maker puts its bikes on the world's

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>largest e commerce site for the first time ever. Could

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it be the key to ending the slump? Will discuss

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and how did one of the biggest deals of the

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>year come together. We will go inside the seventy billion

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar Microsoft Activision deal with Microsoft Gaming CEO Bill Spencer

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>here to talk more about Peloton's partnership with Amazon. Is

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>what wish Managing director Dan I s Dan, what do

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you make of this? I mean until now you could

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>only get these bikes directly from Peloton. Now you can

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get them on Amazon. Is it going to open the floodgates? OK.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a starter in the right direction. I mean,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the director consumer model. Clearly, it's been an upbuild battle

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>for Peloton, especially coming out of the pandemic. They had

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to do something, and if you're gonna bet on someone,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Amazon was the right move. But now it's

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>an execution story going forward. I think the street really

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to see that. So, you know, obviously Peloton has

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to work through you know, multiple other issues there, you

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>know working on this. You know, send the bike, you

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>put it together yourself, someone maybe can help you put

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that bike together. Does that make it all a little complicated?

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it does, And that's part of the problem.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>They're a typical Peloton buyer. They don't want complexity, they

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>want simplicity. And obviously they've had some significant misses from

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>product perspective on treadmill and some mothers. Strategically, now they're

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>cutting costs. Look, and I think that's part of the

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>issue too, is that you're in growth mode cut and

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>costs especial the competition come from all angles, gyms and

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>other sort of fitness. I mean, this is clearly going

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a very very bumpy path. I think this

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is a step, but Obviously it's really baby steps in

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of what they need to do. How many people

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to buy a Peloton on Amazon that didn't

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go to Peloton directly, Well, I think it's probably low

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>single digits. And I think it's really more about accessories

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>or maybe part of the ultimate flywheel or ecosystem they're

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to build. It just comes down to that director

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>consumer model. I think writing was in the wall they

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>need to change. Look, I think it's the first step.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I could definitely see some more partnerships down the road,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>but right now, I mean they're on the white were

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what could ultimately move growth, and

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think when it comes to Amazon, especially, they had

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>their ears open. It made a ton of sent strategically

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>thing for both. What do you make of a speculation

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon as a potential buyer here? I think that's

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just more speculum. I mean, I would be just flabber

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>gas that if they went after they wouldn't strategically just

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>does not make sense in terms of them going down

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that route, you know. I think that's why this is

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>more of a partnership. And I think the problem with

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Peloton now is that the M and A chatter is obviously,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, falling, and I think it really comes down

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to strategically what they're gonna do. I I continue to

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to Amazon, it's more partnership and

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it really stops there. All right, let's talk a little

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bit about Tesla shares rising ahead of that three for

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one stock split. You know, how much of a difference

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is this really going to make. Obviously to the retail community,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 1>they're going to look back August two thousand twenty five

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for one with the stock since then, you know, but

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly a different market. But but no doubt. I mean

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it at a time that you're really starting

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to see demand continue to be firm despite oversee in

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of storm clouds, it's really production production story in China.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the key of the test of story. They do

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>not have never had demand issue. They have a supply issue,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's starting to get rectified. But I

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>do believe the stock split, you know, it really feeds

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the appetite or red town. It was a smart move. Meantime,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, another little Twitter kerfossil between Elon Musk and

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a customer replying to a customer that was critical of

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this beta driver assistance feature, Musk basically saying I don't

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about it. In so many words, what

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this? That's not what you want

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to see? I mean, I think Twitter, as we know

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there has been positive but obviously on degas when there

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to Musk, and especially with more and more scrutiny,

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, from FSD to some of the other areas

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing on test, So you don't want to

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>see this type back and forth. The street just wants

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the execution production ramp and obviously much more of the

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>software model take hold. And I think that's why things

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>like this becomes sad shaws. But again it's you know,

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>must goes to be a different drum. That's not going

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to change, allright, Webbish managing director Dan ives Dan, thank you.

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>The venture capital scene is still in the midst of

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a big debate about funding and second chances. This after

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Andreas and Horowitz wrote its biggest check ever to We

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Were co founder Adam Newman for his new real estate

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>venture Flow, a company portrayed in a recent Forbes article

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>as being awfully close to another company he invested in

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. It's called Alfred, and it's a residential

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>services company that aims to build community by fostering experiences

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>within residential properties. Alfred's co founders join us now, Marcella's

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Pony and Jessica Beeck Ladies, thank you so much for

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>joining us, as well as Bloomberg's own at Hammond. So

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>let's start here. Marcella, tell us why you founded, Hello Alfred,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Why you founded Alfred and the mission of the company today.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That's an easy one. So when jess and I were

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>working long hours and building our careers, one thing we

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>thought about was how do we make the places that

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we live in anticipate and support us and that ultimately

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a way to keep more women in the workforce.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And that vision has evolved a lot to really think

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>about housing as a whole, and for us, Alfred is

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>really about making housing focus on the consumer, putting the

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>resident at the center of the value chain. And today

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>housing is the largest asset class in the world and

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>therefore should be the largest consumer product, but it's really

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>lacking in terms of the branded experience, real technology, and

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a focus on the consumer as the end user. So

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we're excited to disrupt and evolve the industry with industry

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>players and to give renters more for their renting. Now,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of tech enabled property management is getting a

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention because, of course Adam Newman just got

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this big check before we go there. Why do you

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think this is such a big opportunity, Jessica, So, I

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think that housing is one of the largest opportunities we have,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>both because of the lives that it hits. Right, all

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of us consume housing, and no one's ever looked at

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it as a consumer product. And at the same time,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think housing is in crisis. If we look at

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the asking rents in most markets right now, there's seventy

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>pc higher than they were for what's being paid. And

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we also have a housing supply problem. We need to

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>build five million more apartments to meet the demand for housing. So,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>given the impact that it can have on people's lives

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and the challenges facing it, I think it is right

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of attention and a lot of investment

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and a vision for what it can be, Jessica. Emily

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just alluded to the was or rather a sorry, a

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise around this space that partly because of

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what Mr Newman has just announced with his new venture Flow.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He had a relationship that previously existed or maybe still

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>exists with al Freedom with you guys. Has founders talked

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about that, how you got

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to know him in his family office, and how that

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship really came to be in the first place. So

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at Alfred, we've always taken a very collaborative approach for

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>building our business and that started, you know, eight years

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ago when we started working with our initial landlords and partners.

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And among our partners, you know, we don't only count Adam,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but we count Grace Star and invest Go, and you

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>know our venture capital partners any A and and Spark

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think the key from our perspective has been

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to build a business by working with the best in

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry and doing that bottoms up, and that means

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>being part of a broad ecosystem and seeking out people

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on that ecosystem that sees something that is similar to

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you and want to have a hand in building that future.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the approach we've taken for the history of

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>how we've built the company, and you know, it's very

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>much for how we met Adam, and obviously Alfred has

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>its own product, unique product. We've just talked about the

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of this idea of owning the future of living.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What is it that Alfred does. It is sort of

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>unique and gives it some protection against new competitors potentially

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>coming into the space and looking to disrupt residential real

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>estate in a similar way. So ed if you look

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at the apartment space in particular, which is where most

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of us are actually living, and renters in fact are

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be the majority of home dwellers and future

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of homeowners. So multi family really hasn't evolved since

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the invention of the elevator. That is like the biggest

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>innovation that's had the opportunity to disrupt the space. And

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we believe that real estate, specificly residential

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>has been so resistant to disruption today it takes only

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>one percent of its budget and applies that towards technology,

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is because it's incredibly fractured. So to make a change,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't just attack one part of the problem. You

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the entire value chain and you

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have the aligned stakeholders in new ways that create value

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. So for us, what Alphred does that's so unique.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>We are the only prop tech company that's ever first

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>really focused on the resident. We started with home management.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>We earned the right and the trust of consumers to

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>provide services into the home. We then acquired a company

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>that allowed us to build technology and automate the management

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of a full building. We then acquired a property manager

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that gives us full understanding what it takes to drive

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>an asset and so what we're able to do when

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we put those three things together, which are very different businesses,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but we create a fly will and we treat the

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>consumer like they're the king. We add efficiencies with technology.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We automate the entire resident experience from signing your least,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>paying your rent, booking an amenity, booking a peloton um

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't hurt that we make the owner more money,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but we also make the neighborhood around the building more vibrant.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>We bring services into buildings, and we really think about

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>real estate as it's not just about the rent check.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It's about looking at retail and looking at the building

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>itself as a retail center for lifestyle and gaining access

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to the consumer wallet. So we're expanding the pie for everyone.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>We're changing the value chain, and we're doing that because

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we have these different core competencies that have taken us

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>eight years of really hard work and evolution, building by building,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>shareholder by Sharyld's holds are building like we have a

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand units on our platform in fifty

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>two cities across North America and US and Canada, and

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're really proud of the resilience we've had to be

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>able to build well. We believe will be a generation

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>defining company. So Forbes has done some reporting on your

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:52.239
<v Speaker 1>experience with Adam Newman and how you know his relationship

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with the company changed over the last couple of years.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>His representatives say he believes that the article is inaccurate

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and that in his family office still support the company.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your response to that and your assessment of this reporting.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's a great question, and I think a lot

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of people are asking probably similar questions. But the thing

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think is important is not necessarily what's accurate

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from a reporting perspective, it's what are we really focused

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>on building and what have we done already to get

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>us to this place. I think that this is a

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>huge market and a lot of people see the opportunity

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>here and that is something worth investing behind and investing

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in and as Marcella said, the thing that we're really

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on and alphad just what we've built today and

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>where we want to take this in the future. We've

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>only scratched the surface of what's possible in this market.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We have a hundred and fifty thou units, but that

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is small compared to the overall market size, not just

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US but globally. And I think that's really

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where we should focus the conversation and bring the res versus,

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>whether they are part of our company, are part of

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>other companies, to bear in solving what housing can be

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future. That said, Mark Andreason wrote in a

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>blog post that Flow aims to build quote the future

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of living. And if you look at your website on

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the home page, it says welcome to the future of living.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>I know that that can mean a lot of things.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But how do you feel about that? And and and

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do you believe there's a conflict of interest here? Well,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>we know for sure. I think the future. Go ahead? No,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, day, Marcella, Why don't you take I think

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the future? Yeah, go ahead. Um, what I was gonna

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>say is that Andreason is a storied firm and fantastic

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>investor and we're excited about the attention that they're bringing

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to the space. Obviously with the largest check they've ever written,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we have raised ourselves a hundred million dollars over eight

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>years UM, and there is a prints between those two

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers UM and we UH do see the opportunity to

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to expand UM to our investor set. But I

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to comment on our on other businesses as

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>much as I really want to focus a conversation on ours, Marcella,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just on the on the question of funding. And look,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously and Reeson has put in a very large amount

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of money now into this space, which should just say

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have serious appetite here have you guys as Outfred had

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with them about getting backing. Is it something

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you would now look to do? Clearly, as I say,

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they are very interested in this space. Yeah, so um,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have lots of investors, We're talking to

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of investors. But one thing I would note is

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that the company is on a path of profitability and

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we are a self sustaining company that's been doing we're

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>CRE eight years. This is not an idea that is

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on a whiteboard. We really feel like we have the

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>horse by the main and there's something really big here. UM.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>In terms of talking to other investors, especially E s

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>G investors, we have a ton of appetite. UM. I

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>would say that one thing that I hope UM a

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>positive silver lining that comes out of this is the

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>way we think about venture, especially for female lead companies.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Only two percent of venture dollars in the past year

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have gone to female lead companies, and that's strunk year

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>over year. And I really want to put um some

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>emphasis here and saying that female lead companies are no

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>less um, the ideas are no smaller, and our ability

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to execute is no less And I think that there's

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge arbitrage opportunity for backing female founders and especially

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the space. And I believe that the future of

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>living will require lots of collaboration across many different companies,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and that that's the new form of disruption, especially where

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we require so much change across so many stakeholders in

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a very complicated value chain. Jess, I'd love to give

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you a chance to weigh in on this question as well.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we know that you know women are historically underfunded,

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>UH in Silicon Valley have a much harder time raising money,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and here we have idea aside, you know, a controversial

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>mail founder getting a very big check. Uh. You know

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>what sort of feelings? Uh what was your reaction to

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that number? Yeah, I think that. I mean, it's a

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>great point and it's certainly not lost on us. I

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>think the positive space sort of view of it is

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a lot of investment to go into

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this space, and this is raising the awareness and the

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>visibility of housing and the rented rental residential real estate

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>market as an opportunity. And I think that size of check,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly from and Resent hardwhich which is a terrific company,

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>really validates that market and puts a spotlight on what

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>UM you know, I think hasn't been as visible previously.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think Marcella spoke to some of

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the um other elements of it. But if we kind

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of look into the future, we we and take that

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>as a benefit for sure. Obviously both of you have

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>worked very closely with miss Newman in this company and

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of over that period of time and the relationship

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>now looking at him starting his own business in this space,

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it competes directly with what you guys do.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>What is it going to take for Flow to be

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>successful in this market as it comes in as a

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of as a new entrant. Yeah, I think as

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with any business entering a market, it really comes down

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to understanding the customer. And when we started OFFRED, we

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>started by focusing on the resident and focusing on the

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>way that we could impact their life and give back

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>time past the front door of their home. And that's

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>how we really built the company by listening to what

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>does a resident need, what does a consumer need in

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the housing market, and how can we begin to deliver that?

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is going to be true of

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>all businesses entering this space UM, and probably not only

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>just for the resident, but how can we make the

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>UM operators, the folks that work in these buildings lives easier?

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>How can we elevate all of the attention in this

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>space just for the benefit of everyone. And listening and

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>really thinking from the consumer perspective and the customer perspective

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is critical for that. So bigger picture, obviously,

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we are battling inflation. You've got consumers under pressure. We

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are potentially going into a recession. You know, how do

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>uss how many people are going to want to pay

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>more for the kind of services you provide. Do you

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>see this as a luxury or necessity? Marcelo I let ye,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the really important thing that we are

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>doing is it's not about increasing rent prices. It's about

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>how do we do things more efficiently, how do we

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>use technology to automate processes, to anticipate needs, to deliver

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>services that allow revenue to come into the building and

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>effectively increasing the size of the pie, not just by

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>asking a resident to pay more. And we really think

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that as you see in the rental prices and increases

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to the rental housing market have been so extreme and

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there has not been a subsequent increase in the value proposition,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're still getting those four walls. And what we believe

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally people want to rent a lifestyle and rent

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a home, and that we can provide that with putting

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>our technology and staffing these buildings a little bit differently,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>training people to hotel standards, moving property management from a

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>focus on maintenance and rent collection and trash collection to

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>really how do we make a residence life fantastic? How

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>do we build a community, how do we make people

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>feel a sense of place and a sense of home.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just about how do we jack up

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the rent prices, it's how do we serve with consumer

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>in a in a better way? All right? The co

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>founders of Alfred Marcellas Opone and Jessica Beck, thank you

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>both so a lot much for joining us. Along with

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>our very own at Hammond. Regulators are taking a cool

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>us look at how Twitter calculates the number of spam

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and bought accounts on its platform. In June, the SEC

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote a letter to Twitter CEO asking to disclose the

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>methodology used in calculating the bot situation. In response, Twitter's

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>laws told the SEC that it already adequately discloses the

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>methodology that it uses towards estimate. Has become a central

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sticking point between the company and Elon Musk, who's looking

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to walk away from a forty four billion dollar buyout

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the platform. Here discuss s Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner. So

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Kirt brings us up to speed. Obviously, you know there

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>was another hearing today the whistleblower allegations we learned about yesterday.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Now potentially the SEC is involved. How so, yeah, Well,

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the allegations from the whistle blower kind of hit on

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two important things. One, as you pointed out what the

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sec is that, you know, he claims that Twitter has

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>been lining to shareholders. Right. If the company is indeed

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hiding the number of bots that make up you know,

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>part of its user base or something like that, that

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>be a securities violation and that could be a huge

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>reason for the SEC to investigate. Now, on the privacy side,

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these allegations were also that the company

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing enough around privacy. Twitter and the FTC gone

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into a consent to Caree back in two thousand eleven

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that the company would make all kinds of changes to

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>its privacy practices, and uh, you know, this whistle blower

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>says the company hasn't done that. So now both regulatory

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>agencies essentially have a good reason to it the very

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>least ask Twitter what's going on and see clarification about

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>what this whistle blower claims, what happened at the latest hearing,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and how does it potentially move the ball forward? Well,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the two sides have been fighting for a while as

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to you know, who should be bringing the information about

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>bots forward? Right. Elon Musk and his camp basically say

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter has not been forthcoming. Not only have they

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not shared the information with him directly, but they're not

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>being willing to put forward employees who do have access

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to that information or expertise, right, And Twitter, of course

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is arguing the opposite, Hey, we put everyone forward that

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>needs to be so right now, they're trying to settle

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that in court. One of the issues is that Musk's lawyers,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they want access to this whistleblower, right They

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>think he certainly qualifies as someone who would be an

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>expert on this kind of stuff. So they're working with

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the judge right now to basically figure out who does

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter need to put forward and make available as part

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of this trial to answer some of those bought questions. Now,

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're still learning more about these whistleblower allegations. I'm

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>curious what you're hearing from your your sources. I'm hearing

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Twitter is looking at the same redacted

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>document that you know appears in the Washington Post. There's

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information that is you know, not there

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>or that they can't see. Um, what more have we

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>learned about this complaint and the intentions of the person

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>making the complaint? Yeah, I mean, I can tell you

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who work at Twitter now

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or recently who are not happy with with this, right,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and that sounds obvious, but they see this as either

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>unfair or or certainly not reflective of what they truly

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>believe to be happening at the company. And the timing

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is very suspect, right, because a lot of these claims,

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>uh seemed to echo at least some of the stuff

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk and his lawyers are saying. And so

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't all hands meeting today with employees. I think management,

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>my understanding, has reiterated a lot of the things that

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we read in the email from CEO prog Roll yesterday

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Emily when we were on the show, right that he

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was basically saying, hey, uh, you know this is false.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>These allegations don't have any merit to them. But you know,

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point, if you work at Twitter, you're you're

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just for ust, You're annoyed, right, You're going through this

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>whole process already. Then this allegation comes on top of it.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>It just kind of is snowballing right now. I feel

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like for the company, and I start to sense that

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when I talk to people who are who are there,

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>who were recently there. Right, It's been going on now

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a while, many months. Okay, Kurt Wagner, thank you

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for that update. Appreciate it turning two earnings into its

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter report better than expected, led by the company's

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>small business unit, which year over year, but some of

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>into it's businesses facing headwinds from government changes to the

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>tax system, including part of President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act,

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which allocated money to study the creation of a government

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>run tax filing system. Here to talk about all of that,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Intuits CEO Sassan, Good Darzi Sasan. Let's start with the numbers. Uh,

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously they looked good. Interesting to see the

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>number of small businesses increase coming out of a pandemic.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>How is this informing your outlook? Hi, Emily, thank you

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for having me. You know, we're excited about our outlook.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we look at the macro environment, there's

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>two things I would say. One, small businesses do worry

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about the economy. Um. However, at the same time, consumer

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>spending is strong, the small business performance is strong, but

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to to manage you know, the rising inflation. UM.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The costs going up with their supply chain costs going

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>up with workers, so they're they're working through managing all

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of that, but they're very resilient if I then shift

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to our platform. It's really why our platform is probably

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>more mission critical now than ever before. You know, we

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>are not a line item on a small business budget.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>We are the platform that they use to be able

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to power their prosperity and and run their business, which

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is hence reflected in our results, but also reflected in

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the overall company guidance that we provided and specifically the

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>segment guidance around small business. So we are excited about

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. I'm curious what demand trends you're seeing. You've

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>got other software venture seeing lengthening sales cycles. I'm wondering

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if that's something that you're finding as well. We're not

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing that because the small businesses Emily that we serve

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>or either you know, one person shop or all the

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>way up to about a hundred employees, uh and and

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>these small businesses really use our platform to be able

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to manage their customers, grow their customers, to be able

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to manage their their cash flow. So these are not

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>really enterprise sales. So we don't see, um, the cell

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>cycle extending. In fact, what we are seeing is just

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>more reliance on our platform, especially in this environment, to

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>be able to feel their success. I do want to

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>ask about this Inflation Reduction Acts situation. Part of UH.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>This involves money to study the creation of a government

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>run tax filing program, which could completely disrupt turbo tax,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>one of your key products. How much does that concern you? Yeah, Well,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>first of all, to set context exactly as is your

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>question states, Um, the I R S got about fifteen

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to do just a study of what it

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>would take for the I R S to create a

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>tax platform. With that as context, you know, the first

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is free taxes is available to

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>all Americans through private industry, whether it's our US or

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>our competitors. And so from an availability of free tax

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>free software, it's already available. I think. Secondly, we're big

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>advocates for the consumer. You know, they know the story

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of their life better than anybody else when it comes

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to deductions for their their taxes. They really know their

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>story better than anybody else. And and I think we'll

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>have to let the consumer decide, you know, what is

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>most important in terms of where they want the I

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>R S to focus. Is that about the refund experience

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>or is about creating tax software for us? It's really

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>an immaterial event. It's a non event because free tax

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>software is already available to all Americans and this could

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>yet be another free tax software. So that's the way

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we see it. That's it. I mean, you have to

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>be planning ahead. Are you thinking about strategy contingency plans

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>if something like this could come to fruition? Well, really not,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>because we already have free software that you know, if

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the last nine years, we've served over

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirteen million consumers that have filed their

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>taxes for completely free. This past year was about thirteen

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>million customers. So it really doesn't change anything that we

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing. We have a platform that you can do

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, and for certain customers it's free. We also

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have now a live platform that gives us the ability

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to serve the assistant market, those that need expertise, which

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is really our biggest growth driver. So it really doesn't

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>change our strategy at all. And frankly, I think the

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>government has been back and forth for the last twenty

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>five years thinking about exactly this uh, this study and

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for us, it really doesn't change anything. You also recently

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>appointed a new leader of the mail Chimp division. Talk

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to us about the strategy there and how you see

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>this continuing to fit into the business longer term. Yeah, Emily,

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we're very excited about mail Chimp. You know, the whole

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why we acquired mail Chimp is it plays a

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>role in helping small businesses grow customer base. So it

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>helps them market to new customers on different channels, it

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 1>helps them manage their existing customers. And one of the

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>things that you know, we see as a huge opportunity

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is to how to marry a platform capability that not

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>only helps a small business growth customer base, but manage

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>their cash flow, which is where QuickBooks comes in. And

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so bringing those two platforms together allows us to have

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a one stop shop to really fuel the prosperity of

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>small businesses, and mail Chimp has incredible capabilities. We just

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>appointed a new leader to work hand in hand with

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the team there, um Ronnie. She has been actually leading

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>our payments group very successfully and now she's going to

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be leading both mail Chimp and Payments and it's an

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to really marry, growing customers, and managing your cash

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>flow in one place. So we're really excited about the

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunities ahead alright. The CEO of into It, Sasana Darzi,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Sissan for joining us and to have you

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>back time down for our crypto report. As both Wall

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Street and the crypto world are waiting to hear from

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>FED chair j Palal at Jackson Hole this Friday, Bitcoin meantime,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>could be headed for another downward slope, with the largest

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency down more than fifty percent this year already and

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a range of about nineteen to twenty five

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, Let's bring in Valkri chief investment officer Stephen

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>McClurg for his read on this, along with our own

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto contributor Shinnali Boss. Thank you both so much for

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us. So, Stephen, do you think bitcoin has further

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to fall and how far? Like below twenty or not? Absolutely?

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me well. I do believe that bitcoin

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit further that fall. From where it

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is today, we are pretty close to the bottom, and

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from here I think in the long run we're gonna

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be doing just fine. But really everything depends on macro

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, inflation as well as what risk I

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sets to in a hawk ish FED hawks FED. I

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think about the letter that Dan moorehead of Pantera, wrote

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to investors. I got it in my inbox today, and

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this idea that rates are going much higher than is expected.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>How is that going to play into where bitcoin goes next? Yeah,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so is anytime that liquidity is being taken out of

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the system, which is what's happening right now, all risk

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>assets will continue to fall. So Bitcoin, luckily and also unfortunately,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year did fall quite a bit due to

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>some local contagion risks. But Bitcoin is with the first

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>asset to go. We're waiting for the rest of the

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>financial markets to catch up. And by the way, I

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with Dan that we do have a lot further

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to go as far as rate hikes. We think rate hikes.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We think we'll see the FED target rates somewhere between

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>three seventy five and four hundred by the end of

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the year. So what does this mean for non bitcoin

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets? So what does it mean for etherorium which

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is about to hit a really pivotal moment in its

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>life cycle? People fall on two sides of the merge.

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Here you have some that are selling into the merge,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some that are kind of Bitcoin maxis here that are

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really more focused on the benefits that mining provides. How

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about this move to proof of stake? Well,

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think move to proof of steak is

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a great thing for Ethereum in the short run. In

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the long run it might actually work out, but the

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum network is actually more secures the as proof of work,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's what really makes Bitcoin the most secure network

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is a long period of time through proof of work

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>where essentially you have computers or validators that are validating

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>transactions all over the world in a decentralized manner. When

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you move to proof of steak, that that really falls

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>into the hands of a few and those are the

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that stake their tokens to master nose or validators. Uh.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>This is how some other more enterprise related block chains work,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>such as Avalanche or Zilica, where where there's a more

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>enterprise application, but in terms of Ethereum goes the security

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>will you know need to be seen how that's going

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to work out, because you know, we we think that

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're holding say you know, a million dollar plus

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>n f T and you're relying on the ethereum network

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's changing right now, that may not be a

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>great place to be right now. Okay, So where are

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you placing your bets? Obviously, Valkyrie has exposure to you know,

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the largest cryptocurrencies by market cap. You know, you know

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>which ones are you leaning into and leaning out of? Yeah?

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Bitcoin is really the flight to safety for

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our funds, and we're we're we're really

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at some of the more established proop of stake

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>protocols are also a great place to be, places like

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Avalanche and and Zilica. So these are these are the

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that we're really looking at to uh to move into.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We also have active accounts where we can take risk

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>off the table in times of uncertainty like we did

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this year through through most of

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the year. So we're really moving out of anything that

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has too much exposure to eat right now until we

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>see this merge goes through sometime in middle September and

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>into some of some of the safer uh you know,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>larger crypto protocols. What about Salana, how do you feel

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about that? Given more of the n f T ecosystem

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is also going towards Salana. You think about Magic Eden

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and the success that they've had there, do you, but

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>also very polarizing in terms of an asset. Do you

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>think that that has any room to benefit as if

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the things you're saying about Ethereum plays out. Yeah,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Salanta is really one of those block chains that sacrifice

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>security for speed. Uh, it's still a work in progress.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily a flight to safety, especially

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if you care about safe security right now. And that's

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>really our biggest fear on Ethereum is will it turn

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>out to be in this in this new entity as

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a proof of state protocol more like Salano and a

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lot less like Bigcoin. So so we're cautious on Salano,

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>though we're not selling it. Where does it ari Um

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and the year are you selling ethereum? We we we

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think that Ethereum very well could get back to a

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand or even lower if the merge doesn't go well.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>If the merge does go is expected and by the way,

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there's not a whole lot of doubts out there that

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it won't, but there is a big risk that it

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>will then we can see Atherorum really rally. So we're

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of holding off until September before we make any

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>big bets on Ethereum. All right, Valkyrie, Chief Investment Officer,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks for helping us navigate all all the different things

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you're working through. Stephen mcclerg appreciated along with Bloomberg Hinale

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>bask Microsoft's head of Gaming Phil Spencer says he is

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>optimistic the company's seventy billion dollar deal to buy Activision

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard will be approved. If that happens, Spencer will inherit

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a video game hit maker with a controversial leader. I

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Spencer for a wide ranging inner view in

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the latest edition of Bloomberg Studio. One point out here

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>some of our conversation. You know, I kind of come

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 1>at this that big deals should be scrutinized, right. I

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's the role of regulators, why they're in place.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about the progress that we've been making,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>asking good, hard questions about Okay, what is our intent?

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean if you play it out over

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>five years? Is this constricting a market? I feel good

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. So you're confident the deal is going to happen.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never done a seventy billion dollar deal, so I

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what my confidence means. I will say the

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>discussions that we've been had that we've been having seemed

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>positive UM, and we're actively engaged in the conversations trying

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to be transparent about what our motivations are. Well. Activision

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically is facing a lot of challenges here. There have

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>been lawsuits, there have been employee walkouts, there have been

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>accusations of sexual harassment, sexual assault. How much did that

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>concern you when you're thinking about this deal. We had

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>access to data for the company before we we announced

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition to see what the actual numbers were in

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of reports. UM, we definitely as a team signed

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>up to say, just like we're on our own journey

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>with Xbox, that we're going to expand that journey if

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this deal closes. It's a lot of people and a

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that will feel very dedicated to and

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>committed to to building a great workplace environment for them.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>That's true of any of our studios, right. But it's

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously a conversation that you're going to have. You think

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>about the board of Microsoft and when they're thinking about

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the deal and they're typing into their search engine activision,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the headlines that they're coming back and there

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>were questions that we had. We've learned from this, we

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>will continue to learn um and we're committed to that

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that journey not only for the betterment of our teams,

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but our customers, the creators on our platform. We think

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>it's critical to our business success that we make progress here.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Is Bobby going to stay on? Yeah, I'm not in

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a position to make comments about their leadership team. Were

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in the regulatory phase and and how that will close,

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Like when the deal closes, then we have say and

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>how they're managed and how it goes. But until that point,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really in position to say. There have been

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>very specific allegations of Bobby being aware of things uh

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened and not reporting it to the board. What

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is he communicated to you about what he knew, what

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know. The discussions we've had were about the

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>teams where they're at. Can they make the progress they

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>need to make because the closing is a long process.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Are they putting in the work that they need to

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>put in two move along their journey? And I believe

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.479
<v Speaker 1>they're committed to that. When I look at the work

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're doing now, there's always more that can be done.

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Activision has divisions that are unionizing. I don't know. Microsoft

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>has said they'll recognize those unions. What does that look like.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never run an organization that has unions in it, so,

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but what I can say and working through this, is

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>we recognize workers needs to feel safe and heard and

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and compensated fairly in order to do great work. So

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was important to make a public statement

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on that front for workers that are there, that are

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>making decisions about their employment and how they want to

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what that relationship looks like to understand what

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it would mean if Microsoft was able to close the deal.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You can watch my full interview with the Microsoft Gaming CEO,

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Phil Spencer, coming up nine pm Eastern Time right here

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television. And that does it for this edition

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology Thursday. John wou of All the Labs

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>joins us to talk about the latest with Avalanche and

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the crypto downturn. And don't forget to check out our

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast find it wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Emily

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Changing in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg