Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom Huge Three big lies that
Speaker 1: the Ditch attorney told you about Officer Rolf Will, anarchists
Speaker 1: cause mayhem. At the Trump rally in Tulsa, Doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: says no second lockdown needed. Facebook polls, Trump ads for
Speaker 1: being hateful, fired for a Halloween costume two years ago,
Speaker 1: and is a rope on a tree a hate crime?
Speaker 1: That and more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake, you're a great
Speaker 1: American Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Analyst, he's a
Speaker 1: great guy. No welcome buck Sexton Show. Everyone. We have
Speaker 1: a jam packed Friday for you. Thank you for being here.
Speaker 1: As always an honor and a privilege to have you
Speaker 1: with me in what we call the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: was stunning for me, at least yesterday. I'm surprised that
Speaker 1: this is not getting a whole lot more media coverage.
Speaker 1: We will discuss the upcoming rally in Tulsa, Klahoma this
Speaker 1: weekend on how there's a belief that there could be
Speaker 1: massive protests rights. Remember, no one cares about protests. No
Speaker 1: one's worried about protests. This is just a question of
Speaker 1: whether there'll be a lot of folks who try to
Speaker 1: break the law, if people want to gather, if a
Speaker 1: hundred thousand crazy Libs want to show up outside a
Speaker 1: Trump rally and hold up their signs and yell their
Speaker 1: stupid stuff about Russia collusion or you know, trumpled babies
Speaker 1: died or whatever it is, right, whatever you know, whose
Speaker 1: streets are streets, whatever shouted a DC will make them
Speaker 1: feel better about themselves, It's fine. I don't care. Trump
Speaker 1: doesn't care either. What he does care about, what every
Speaker 1: one should care about is are they breaking the law?
Speaker 1: Are they trying to use violence and the threat of
Speaker 1: violence to silence speech? Remember one part of what's going
Speaker 1: on all across the country. And I think Republicans are
Speaker 1: waking up to the reality, and I mean powerful elected
Speaker 1: Republicans are waking up to the reality that they have
Speaker 1: been feeding the woke mob as though it were the
Speaker 1: crocodile that they were hoping would eat them last. And
Speaker 1: it turns out there's nobody else in the pond. Now
Speaker 1: it's just the woke mob versus the rest of American society.
Speaker 1: Which team are you on? There's no middle ground, there's
Speaker 1: no concessions to make, there's no getting them to be reasonable.
Speaker 1: So I do think that there's been a wake up
Speaker 1: call that has finally been answered, or at least is
Speaker 1: in the process of being answered with all of this.
Speaker 1: But we also have to remember that the acts of
Speaker 1: violence from the BLM movement, the acts of violence, the arson,
Speaker 1: de louting on all of this, and just the mob
Speaker 1: mentality on display that you will be shouted down, that
Speaker 1: they will shout epithets and slurs and viciousness at police officers.
Speaker 1: That's all meant as intimidation. The same reason you know
Speaker 1: that I can't go down to a rally with a
Speaker 1: trump had on and be physically safe. We all know
Speaker 1: that I would be attacked and they would say that
Speaker 1: I was provoking it or something. So there's always this
Speaker 1: looming threat of mob violence from these crowds. Because there
Speaker 1: has been violence from the crowds, they would say, oh,
Speaker 1: what about the Tea Party. Tea Party was peaceful, a
Speaker 1: perfect record of peacefulness at tea Party rallies, and they
Speaker 1: were huge, and they were across the country, and it
Speaker 1: was a movement. Why would we excuse the mayhem deluding
Speaker 1: the arson, the assaults going on right now, Well, clearly
Speaker 1: we should not. We shouldn't excuse those things. We should
Speaker 1: in fact highlight them. We should make the left accountable
Speaker 1: for what they've done. But they do this on purpose.
Speaker 1: These rallies, these protests aren't just meant to shape the
Speaker 1: culture and the conversation. There's always an implied threat behind this.
Speaker 1: It's never just is the left going to protest. It
Speaker 1: is the left going to protest and some faction thereof
Speaker 1: hit people with bricks, break windows, destroy things every time,
Speaker 1: every time that has its own power. These are the
Speaker 1: radicals from within the movement. They are not expelled by
Speaker 1: the movement. They are the vanguard. They are the shock
Speaker 1: troops of the left. They're the shock troops of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. That's what Antifa and the most radical BLM
Speaker 1: protesters who turn into rioters and looters, that is the
Speaker 1: purpose they serve. That is their role in all of this.
Speaker 1: So the peaceful or mostly peaceful protesters have a symbiotic
Speaker 1: relationship now with those who destroy, with those who threaten.
Speaker 1: That's why we have to get ready for this. Every
Speaker 1: time you notice, we don't do this, Conservative Republicans, we
Speaker 1: don't show up at you know, Joe Biden protests and
Speaker 1: threatened to destroy everything. I'm sorry, Joe Biden rallies rather
Speaker 1: and threatened to destroy everything and act like a bunch
Speaker 1: of maniacs. There's no parody here, There's no a pox
Speaker 1: on both houses, There's no this is a both sides
Speaker 1: what aboutism situation. No. So, as we go into this
Speaker 1: weekend in Tulsa, where I'm hoping this will be the
Speaker 1: turning of the tide, that all of a sudden the
Speaker 1: Trump movement will awaken from what feels like an extended somnambulance,
Speaker 1: I think the Trump movement is about to awaken, and
Speaker 1: I'm very very pleased. Well, I will be very pleased
Speaker 1: if in fact that's the case. I'll return to this
Speaker 1: anarchists plans at the Trump rally. And also that the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign has had ads taken down off of Facebook.
Speaker 1: That was a very interesting, interesting story that hit the wires,
Speaker 1: so to speak, yesterday. But I think the most important
Speaker 1: if we're really just looking at the news cycle right now,
Speaker 1: other than the big political movement stuff that I was
Speaker 1: just discussing with you, I think the biggest bombshell of
Speaker 1: the last twenty four hours is that we were told
Speaker 1: a lot of things by Now let's let's shift our
Speaker 1: focus to Fulton County, an Atlanta area, where we have
Speaker 1: these two police officers, Officer Rolf Officer Brasnen, who are
Speaker 1: charged with crimes. Officer Rolf facing a possible death penalty statute.
Speaker 1: This was an outrage of grotesque injustice merely just the
Speaker 1: way that the press conference was run and the decisions
Speaker 1: made with the charges. This was an abomination. But we
Speaker 1: already have information that this has not gotten nearly the
Speaker 1: play that it should. No one seems as interested in this,
Speaker 1: And I'll walk you through why. I think that is
Speaker 1: yesterday on MSNBC. And you know, whoever thought that it
Speaker 1: was a good idea for one of these hops to
Speaker 1: go on MSNBC, I mean, this lawyer does not understand
Speaker 1: the political and media environment at all. Before we even
Speaker 1: get into this interview where there were three major major
Speaker 1: revelations that are assertions that essentially the district attorney lied
Speaker 1: to the American people, that this district attorney in Fulton
Speaker 1: County was not telling the truth. Paul Howard was lying
Speaker 1: to the American people. Well, but before we get to that, MSNBC,
Speaker 1: I mean, I went to Katie Tchur, who is in
Speaker 1: no realm impressive at anything, but you know, does a
Speaker 1: job at MSNBC, and the executives are like her and whatever.
Speaker 1: Now we're supposed to listen to her. Doesn't know anything
Speaker 1: about anything, but she's already on a team here. She's
Speaker 1: on team BLM and destroy these two cops. That's been
Speaker 1: decided there there's no room at MSNBC for Hold on
Speaker 1: a second, let's give these cops a fair trial. Let's
Speaker 1: give them some actual due process in the pursuit of justice. No,
Speaker 1: that's that's not what MSNBC's going for. That's not the plan.
Speaker 1: It's bizarre to me that anybody could miss this. MSNBC
Speaker 1: are actively trying to brainwash the public to be a
Speaker 1: tainted jury pool against both of these officers. Remember they
Speaker 1: both faced criminal charges. This Broficer Brosin's facing a criminal
Speaker 1: charge because they say that he kicked the guy. Well,
Speaker 1: that that comes into question here too. But I just
Speaker 1: want to put you through some of this interview because
Speaker 1: it's so illuminating. It's so illuminating when here a so
Speaker 1: called TV journal has an opportunity to bring real information
Speaker 1: to the public, to tell people things that they should
Speaker 1: know because this is the biggest national news story this well,
Speaker 1: maybe the Supreme Court cases, but this is one of
Speaker 1: the biggest national news stories this week. It's got a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of attention. A man's life, a police officer's life,
Speaker 1: truly hangs in the balance. It's not just oh, he'll
Speaker 1: have a bad life. He might not have a life
Speaker 1: if the mob left gets their way here and I
Speaker 1: want to take you through some aspects of this interview,
Speaker 1: things that you need to know, you need to hear,
Speaker 1: because here is what comes across MSNBC is an activist
Speaker 1: might as well be the official channel along with CNN.
Speaker 1: They could both be the official channels of the BLM movement.
Speaker 1: And you're seeing that activism playout. They have picked sides.
Speaker 1: They do not want the truth. They are not looking
Speaker 1: for honesty, and I will show you. I will prove
Speaker 1: it to you with their own words. You're in the
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast that you are
Speaker 1: being hit with the assault charge because you stood on
Speaker 1: mister Brooks's shoulder while he lay dying. If you look
Speaker 1: at the video for as Officer Broston approaches and Officer
Speaker 1: Ralph is already there. He doesn't even know that that
Speaker 1: mister Brooks has been shot. First. He doesn't even realize
Speaker 1: that first Devin and he goes up there and he's
Speaker 1: trying to figure out is this scene secure? Is it safe?
Speaker 1: He knows that his taser has been taken from him.
Speaker 1: You can't see any blood at that point to be
Speaker 1: overly graphic here, so he puts his he puts his
Speaker 1: foot and he told the DA this. He puts his foot,
Speaker 1: he thought on his hand or on his arm to
Speaker 1: make sure he couldn't get a weapon, because he didn't
Speaker 1: know what the situation was. So literally, for a matter
Speaker 1: of seconds seconds he puts his foot on his arm
Speaker 1: to make sure he can't grab it. Then he realizes
Speaker 1: what's going on. He can see his taser is off
Speaker 1: to the side because it's got a flashlight on it,
Speaker 1: and he can see the taser, So he gets up
Speaker 1: and he Officer Bruston goes and gets the taser, puts
Speaker 1: it in his holster. Other officers are now arriving within
Speaker 1: fifty seconds and Officer Ralph runs and gets his first
Speaker 1: aid kit. He was not standing on his shoulders. This
Speaker 1: description by the DA is completely belied by the video
Speaker 1: if you look at it, it's all on video. It's
Speaker 1: all on video, and the distric attorney just kind of
Speaker 1: exaggerates this and makes it look like some terrible event
Speaker 1: where he's standing on his shoulders. It is preposterous and
Speaker 1: it is not true. And all you gotta do is
Speaker 1: look at the video and it'll show that he didn't
Speaker 1: do anything like that. And and they charged it quite
Speaker 1: a long time. Two quite a long time. Somebody isn't
Speaker 1: the da is saying it's two minutes. Oh okay, no,
Speaker 1: no can I I know that was a long clip,
Speaker 1: but but I wanted to hear that was the lawyer
Speaker 1: for officer Brosnan and this Katie ter who really, you know,
Speaker 1: I like, I don't want to be mean, but I
Speaker 1: have no idea. I don't know if her uncle is
Speaker 1: like one of the senior execs over at MSNBC or something.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm just I can't imagine they think
Speaker 1: this is the person that should be handling this interview
Speaker 1: for any reason. But I do want to just point
Speaker 1: out that she's given two bombshell pieces of information here
Speaker 1: that and she's not being asked to take the word
Speaker 1: of this lawyer who clearly has a vested interest in
Speaker 1: his client and a narrative. We get that, but two
Speaker 1: bombshell pieces of information. One that the representation of Officer
Speaker 1: Brosnen standing on the shoulder of and I believe they
Speaker 1: also said kicked, but the representation of standing on the
Speaker 1: shoulder of in some kind of you know, trophy pose,
Speaker 1: which was really what was being lied by the DA, like, haha,
Speaker 1: we got this guy horrific that that was completely untrue.
Speaker 1: The video shows it's untrue. Everyone has access to the video,
Speaker 1: and that the statement the DA made that it didn't
Speaker 1: take two minutes to get him made it took fifty seconds,
Speaker 1: which when you're trying to secure the situation. Understand, if
Speaker 1: you're still a threat, you've got to endorphin, you know,
Speaker 1: blasting out of your eye sockets. Okay, your heart's pumping
Speaker 1: a million beats a minute. You're trying to figure out
Speaker 1: what's going on. Within fifty seconds, you've got cops coming
Speaker 1: in and they're they're getting this guy, and one of
Speaker 1: the officers is giving him CPR and saying, you know,
Speaker 1: keep breathing for me, keep reading me, trying to keep
Speaker 1: this guy alive. And that was left out of the
Speaker 1: DA's press conference, that little bit of information which would
Speaker 1: have shattered the narrative. The DA was trying to make
Speaker 1: this sound like it was a lynching by two white cops.
Speaker 1: That's what the DA was doing. That's why he used
Speaker 1: the language he did. That's why he talked about standing
Speaker 1: on the shoulders and not and having weird thoughts after
Speaker 1: they had shot him. Oh what were those weird thoughts
Speaker 1: supposed to be? That's what was happening. Katie Churry is
Speaker 1: being handed a really, really worthwhile interview here, and notice
Speaker 1: how she sounds like the prosecution. Well, well, hold on,
Speaker 1: hold on, the DA says, check the tape, Katie. You
Speaker 1: don't think this is interesting? And he's wrong, as somebody
Speaker 1: is is. He's wrong, He's wrong. Look at the looks
Speaker 1: he's wrong. Yeah, like the DA would ever be wrong. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think this DA is clearly wrong. And anyone should
Speaker 1: be very suspect about a DA who's under investigation for
Speaker 1: corruption and harassment in a tight runoff primary to keep
Speaker 1: his job with tremendous pressure on him from the African
Speaker 1: American community and the entirety of the Democratic Party to
Speaker 1: bring you know, the full brimstone and fire of hell
Speaker 1: upon this cop. No matter what. The evidence is a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of pressure, and we're we're supposed to take
Speaker 1: their word for it, and we're supposed to take the
Speaker 1: word of the prosecutors here for and not listen to
Speaker 1: the devesitory assigned a call. Look at the video tape?
Speaker 1: Is a video tape that chosen? What is your impression?
Speaker 1: What was your impression of mister Brooks before the before
Speaker 1: the scuffle, before the This is so important. Okay, so
Speaker 1: we've already had two major and she she looks like, uh,
Speaker 1: just like the DA clearly already told us all the
Speaker 1: true stuff, and you're totally lying. It's all on video.
Speaker 1: You don't have to take anyone's word for it. You
Speaker 1: should say, sir, we're gonna go back and check that.
Speaker 1: Can we have you back on once we've checked to
Speaker 1: see what the video shows, because the video's over forty
Speaker 1: minutes long, can we we'll have you back on. We'll
Speaker 1: fact check you on that, but tell us more, give
Speaker 1: us more information. How long did it take? Who did
Speaker 1: he call? That's what a journalist would do, but she's
Speaker 1: not a journalist. She is a B LM. Activist with
Speaker 1: a news platform, just like everybody else at MSNBC, CNN,
Speaker 1: the rest of the mainstream media, the New York Times,
Speaker 1: you name it. That's what's happening here. Notice as well,
Speaker 1: how she when she gets those two very and there's
Speaker 1: a third one coming, two very critical pieces of information
Speaker 1: that he didn't just stand on his shoulders in some
Speaker 1: kind of bizarre celebratory pose, and you can see in
Speaker 1: the video. And then it didn't take two minutes to
Speaker 1: get him any aid. It took more like fifty seconds,
Speaker 1: less than half the time. You would think that there
Speaker 1: would be follow up questions. Notice how she goes, oh,
Speaker 1: this is not what we want and transitions to what
Speaker 1: a completely irrelevant line of questioning meant to bolster the
Speaker 1: BS politicized press conference that the Fulton County DA gave.
Speaker 1: What was what was Brooks like before? Before the little
Speaker 1: thing about him trying to rescue to the ground, take
Speaker 1: your taser, shoot you with it and perhaps you know,
Speaker 1: and l and punch you in the face. He did
Speaker 1: that too, But before that, tell us how tell us
Speaker 1: how gentlemanly he was? Tell us what a great guy
Speaker 1: Raychard Brooks was before he wrestled you and your partner
Speaker 1: to the ground, took your taser, shot you with it,
Speaker 1: punch you in the head, tell us how great he was. Now,
Speaker 1: she's not clever enough to understand what happened. She's just
Speaker 1: doing what she's been programmed. Meaning the news anchor here,
Speaker 1: missus tur program to do, which is give this audience
Speaker 1: what they want. Brooks, good cops, bat, Brooks, good cops bat.
Speaker 1: That's all that matters. And then you know you would
Speaker 1: sit here and say, for just forget about even professional
Speaker 1: integrity for the clicks for the you know, because I
Speaker 1: don't think any of these journalists have that either, for
Speaker 1: the clicks for the notoriety. Don't you want to take
Speaker 1: this interview and make it something that really blows up
Speaker 1: and gets attention. I'm giving it all this attention because
Speaker 1: one the information is important, not that she was eliciting it,
Speaker 1: but that the defense attorney is saying the DA's lying.
Speaker 1: And two, you're getting a clinic here on the propaganda
Speaker 1: mill that is MSNBC and how they do things. What
Speaker 1: do they sort of you're saying the das lying. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about how great Brooks is as a guy before
Speaker 1: he tries to do that thing. That was a little
Speaker 1: bit rough. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, we got
Speaker 1: a little more of this interview that I want to
Speaker 1: share with you. This is from a sit down on
Speaker 1: MSNBC with the lawyer for Officer Brosnan, who has the
Speaker 1: lesser charge but still criminally charged here in the shooting
Speaker 1: of Ray Schard Brooks. You have the lawyer, you have
Speaker 1: Officer Brosnin, and you have Katie Ur And then she
Speaker 1: gives this question which I mean, this is straight off
Speaker 1: of like the Talking Points Memo or Daily Coos or
Speaker 1: I don't know which of those sites is closed one
Speaker 1: of them has, but you know one of these left
Speaker 1: wing sites, you know that the Nation which is so
Speaker 1: woke over at the Nation dot com that that digital
Speaker 1: COMI dumping site. H Here you go. Here's the next question.
Speaker 1: You know she's gonna ask he was safe? Did public
Speaker 1: consideration into allowing him to walk home to his sister's house.
Speaker 1: I mean, you had the guy's car, he had his
Speaker 1: car keys, you knew his name, you presumably saw his license.
Speaker 1: I mean you could follow up. Was there any consideration
Speaker 1: giving him given to allowing him to go home and
Speaker 1: then pursuing him later. Why don't you just let him go?
Speaker 1: Was there any consideration just lett him go? He was
Speaker 1: drunk driving and on parole. That's why they don't just
Speaker 1: let him go. People die from drunk driving every day
Speaker 1: in this country. They kill people from drunk driving every
Speaker 1: day in this country. And now he's drunk driving, now
Speaker 1: like not a big deal. It wasn't even it wasn't
Speaker 1: like it was a point zero eight and you know
Speaker 1: he was at a point zero seven nine or some
Speaker 1: I think I was clearly over clearly. Oh and I
Speaker 1: believe the DA said, you know, it was just like
Speaker 1: a little bit drunk. No, he was clearly drunk. You
Speaker 1: watch the video. Doesn't know where he is, doesn't know
Speaker 1: what street he's on. You want him driving home? But
Speaker 1: more to the point, do we enforce the law or not?
Speaker 1: Why didn't you just hey, mister police officer, Katie Turns,
Speaker 1: I think, why don't you just not enforce the law
Speaker 1: because that's not their job. Very stupid question, stupid question.
Speaker 1: We need that Trump drop. Whenever we have MSNBC interviews,
Speaker 1: you've got to have a stupid question drop from Trump.
Speaker 1: But there's one more thing, and this is the other
Speaker 1: big lie that didn't come across in that clip I
Speaker 1: played you. But we have three big lies from the DA.
Speaker 1: From the DA here, Paul Howard, Fulton County District attorney
Speaker 1: up for reelection tight race, has some problems, corruption problems,
Speaker 1: harassment allegations, etc. We were all told in that press
Speaker 1: conference that the officer here, Officer Brosnin, had turned state's witness.
Speaker 1: Now I initially said, look, I mean, this guy, the
Speaker 1: only reason he's doing that is because they're they're going
Speaker 1: to try to lock him away for you to give
Speaker 1: him outrageous overcharging. Andy McCarthy who wrote a fantastic piece
Speaker 1: on National Review on this. And it's not even right
Speaker 1: to call it overcharging. It's just unjust. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: just they're making stuff up here to try to get
Speaker 1: these guys, meaning that they're they're conjuring ways to shoehorn
Speaker 1: even more charges than any reasonable person ever would, just
Speaker 1: to make a point. But they told us that officer
Speaker 1: Brosnin had turned States evidence. This kid was in the
Speaker 1: press conference. You go back and watch it. That's not true.
Speaker 1: Charged APD officer did not agree to be states state's
Speaker 1: witness in the Richard Brooks case. This is the CBS
Speaker 1: affiliate down in Atlanta. I mean, this is stunning. Officer
Speaker 1: Brosman quote, according to his attorney, has not agreed to testify.
Speaker 1: He has not agreed to plead guilty. He honestly told
Speaker 1: the DA's office everything had happened during a lengthy interview.
Speaker 1: He will can you continue to tell the DA or
Speaker 1: the GBI or any other investigator what happened. But he
Speaker 1: has not absolutely not guilty of any crime and will
Speaker 1: not plead guilty and has not agreed to be a
Speaker 1: state's witness. That's a bombshell. I mean, that's how does
Speaker 1: the DA get that wrong? That's so, that's not a
Speaker 1: detail you get wrong. That's a detail you lie about.
Speaker 1: That's something that you rush out there to tell people,
Speaker 1: to create a perception, to add to pressure to get
Speaker 1: a certain outcome. That's not a mistake. That's not something
Speaker 1: that just happens. There's absolute clarity in this understand that
Speaker 1: there would have been negotiations with the lawyer. They would
Speaker 1: have wanted something in writing, but this was all rushed
Speaker 1: through as fast as possible. This is all politics. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you something right now, Officer Brosnan is very likely.
Speaker 1: I mean, first of all, if i'm him, I'm assuming
Speaker 1: if they if they try to bring charges against him,
Speaker 1: because he's now saying he's not touched and doesn't not
Speaker 1: also make more sense now, so because you were thinking, wow,
Speaker 1: we were told that they kicked Brooks, stood on him,
Speaker 1: were showing a lack of respect for his human life
Speaker 1: for other reasons, as the DA was alluding to after
Speaker 1: they shot him, didn't give him aid. The here's what
Speaker 1: we had that we could all see what led up
Speaker 1: to the incident. The cops were perfect. Okay, what let
Speaker 1: up for you? Ray Schard Brooks broke the law, was
Speaker 1: on parole for other crimes, got a seven year sentence
Speaker 1: for violent domestic abuse, including against children. Only served a year.
Speaker 1: Because everyone's in prison forever for just having a one
Speaker 1: you know, one joint on the one marijuana cigarette. Right,
Speaker 1: that's what we're always told. Somebody had a dimebag on
Speaker 1: them and they got twenty years. That's not what happens.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it never happens, but that's not what's
Speaker 1: happening in the prison system. The so he so the
Speaker 1: lead up to the violent exchange, the officers are in
Speaker 1: the clear. The violent exchange itself, I think the officers
Speaker 1: have a very strong defense. So what does this guy do?
Speaker 1: What does the DA do in order to really stack
Speaker 1: the deck against them, creates this whole narrative after the
Speaker 1: shooting to suggest that these guys, because otherwise, why where's
Speaker 1: the motive here? These two cops, what they just decided
Speaker 1: They're going to put their own lives in jeopardy, probably
Speaker 1: ruin their lives even if they end up being found
Speaker 1: not guilty of all charges. I would note, I mean,
Speaker 1: these guys are never going to be able to go
Speaker 1: back to their old life. They wanted to kill this
Speaker 1: guy because of racial animus? Is that what we're supposed
Speaker 1: to believe that they just decided, Yeah, we're gonna kill
Speaker 1: this guy we don't like him because we're racists. That
Speaker 1: that is what That is the implication of all the
Speaker 1: different assertions and the BLM movement out there and the
Speaker 1: racist cops, and we demand justice. Otherwise, this was just
Speaker 1: a very unfortunate series of incidents instigated by the suspect,
Speaker 1: Raychard Brooks, for which he is ultimately responsible. Now that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that the man should have died, But it
Speaker 1: also means that the people that were defending themselves in
Speaker 1: this case, these law enforcement officers, are not criminally responsible.
Speaker 1: That that is what it means. But there was this
Speaker 1: whole narrative creation after the incident, stood on him, kicked him,
Speaker 1: showed indifference to him, did not give him aid, and
Speaker 1: one cop had already turned on the other. You turn
Speaker 1: on your partner. Who that's going to be a very
Speaker 1: tough case. Think about how much our perception. None of
Speaker 1: that's true, None of that's you think the defense attorney's
Speaker 1: going to go out there and say, oh, it's all
Speaker 1: on video, folks, No one, no one's asking you to
Speaker 1: take the guy's word for it. And now I think
Speaker 1: about the relationship. Now, the district Attorney's gonna say, hey,
Speaker 1: I know we lied about you turning state's evidence against
Speaker 1: against your partner, but you know, how about we do
Speaker 1: that now? Of course not, of course not. Why didn't
Speaker 1: he wait for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, which is
Speaker 1: supposed to look at exactly this kind of conduct, to
Speaker 1: conduct their investigation and they didn't even get a heads
Speaker 1: up about the press conference. He rammed this through as
Speaker 1: fast as he could to get what he wanted. Here
Speaker 1: this is Mike Nifong going after the Duke Lacrosse kids
Speaker 1: all over again. Remember that case. Nifong just kept pushing
Speaker 1: it when with it didn't do any due diligence. Didn't
Speaker 1: care that the accuser who went on to kill a
Speaker 1: man with a knife. By the way, and they never
Speaker 1: charged her with a criminal false complaint, maybe they should have.
Speaker 1: Crystal Mangum was her name. I still remember this case
Speaker 1: very well. The Duke Lacrosse kids were accused of this
Speaker 1: vicious gang rape of an exotic dancer a party. All
Speaker 1: a lot, all a lie she's accusing. They only use
Speaker 1: Duke Lacrosse kids in the lineup, so of course they're
Speaker 1: gonna get a Duke La great. I mean, it's the
Speaker 1: whole thing. Was a scam, a sham. One of the
Speaker 1: one of the kids that she claims is raping her.
Speaker 1: They have on an ATM camera three miles away when
Speaker 1: it's supposed to be happening, had left. Head who was
Speaker 1: on his way home, was getting money. Nothing to do
Speaker 1: with it. But Mike Nifong, a white Democrat prosecutor in Durham,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, decided that he was gonna just he could
Speaker 1: finish off these kids. He could Mike Flynn him if
Speaker 1: you would. You know what they've done to Mike Flynn.
Speaker 1: General Flynn put so much pressure so early on that
Speaker 1: you have no choice but to just break and allow
Speaker 1: them to get away with it because you're terrified and
Speaker 1: there's so much happening. They're coming at you with everything
Speaker 1: they've got before you can even pull together a defense,
Speaker 1: and it becomes do you want your life to be
Speaker 1: ruined or do you want your life to end effectively?
Speaker 1: That's what's happening to this cop. This is a grotesque injustice.
Speaker 1: And you'll see, let's see who has has real backbone
Speaker 1: on this one, because there's going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of heat over this case. And I'm seeing a lot
Speaker 1: of Republicans that have gotten weak very quickly. You know,
Speaker 1: there are people out there. There are people out there
Speaker 1: who were very opposed to Trump, maybe even called Trump
Speaker 1: an idiot on their radio show, which some of us
Speaker 1: never forget. And there are people out there who said
Speaker 1: stuff like that and then just ruined that Trump train
Speaker 1: as hard as they could as long as Trump was
Speaker 1: delivering victories. They want to be on the winning team. Right.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Now things are tough now, the polls are
Speaker 1: going against him. Now, the political pressure is intense. People
Speaker 1: are getting deep platform getting canceled, getting fired, getting threatened
Speaker 1: in ways they haven't seen in a long time. Who
Speaker 1: was standing tall, who was standing with their shield high?
Speaker 1: Pay very close attention to it, my friends, because those
Speaker 1: are the people you should be supporting, and those are
Speaker 1: the people you should be listening to, not those who
Speaker 1: are the fair weather wartime conservatives, or just not wartime
Speaker 1: conservators at all, because right now we are in an
Speaker 1: ideological war and our justice system is a front line
Speaker 1: of this battle. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Just as we thought they would,
Speaker 1: the protesters, the domestic terrorists of Antifa, the left wing lunatics,
Speaker 1: they have come for the founding fathers as expected, as
Speaker 1: as predicted, including here on this show. I told you
Speaker 1: it would happen. Protesters in Portland's from my friend Raheem
Speaker 1: Kassam let a US flag on fire and drape it
Speaker 1: around a George Washington statue that they later pulled down
Speaker 1: Entirely on the side of the fallen statue, they scrawled
Speaker 1: sixteen nineteen, which is the name of the New York
Speaker 1: Times project to cancel seventeen seventy six as America's founding.
Speaker 1: Oh that's right, the sixteen nineteen project full of historical inaccuracies,
Speaker 1: a total misrepresentation of US history, but meant to undermine
Speaker 1: the entire American project and have it remade, remade in
Speaker 1: the image of wokeness and social justice whatever that means. Marxism. Really,
Speaker 1: these are Marxists. We are in the midst of a
Speaker 1: Marxist revolution, my friends. Just remember that they won't call
Speaker 1: it Marxism. That's what's happening. That is the end goal
Speaker 1: that they seek a society in which the only way
Speaker 1: to achieve true equality is to make people unequal by law,
Speaker 1: but put the enlightened, the enlightened elites at the very
Speaker 1: top of the pyramid to determine who gets what and when.
Speaker 1: Doesn't that sound a bit like Marxism to you? Yes
Speaker 1: it does, Yes, it does, indeed. But they came for Washington,
Speaker 1: just as we knew they would. And this is why
Speaker 1: to cave to the mob on these issues. As I've
Speaker 1: said to you, I can't have an issue with a
Speaker 1: community deciding that they want to in a fashion that
Speaker 1: is within order and the rule of law. Change a statue,
Speaker 1: remove a statue. You know, I'm not the statue police.
Speaker 1: But also I don't believe in people taking it upon
Speaker 1: themselves because they're angry to destroy public property, whether it's
Speaker 1: writing BLM on federal buildings in DC with graffiti or
Speaker 1: destroying statues that have sat there for a very long
Speaker 1: time George Washington statue getting pulled down. Do you think
Speaker 1: that this will be discussed in any detail on CNN tonight?
Speaker 1: Do you think that the New York Times and other
Speaker 1: major lib outlets, remember the New York Times, there is
Speaker 1: providing the rallying cry for these right maniacs. Does anyone
Speaker 1: think that The Times would cover this on their front page?
Speaker 1: It's not on it right now. Tensions grow over masks
Speaker 1: in the US. Ah, that's right, masks. You know why,
Speaker 1: because masks are being used as a political tool and
Speaker 1: a tool of suppression. There are so many places in
Speaker 1: the country where masks are unnecessary, including anywhere outdoors. But
Speaker 1: now there's this fight, and we'll return to this. The
Speaker 1: lockdown two point zero fight is upon us, just as
Speaker 1: the election season is really kicking into gear, just as
Speaker 1: Trump is going to start rallies, just as all this
Speaker 1: is happening, we're hearing about coronavirus again. Did we hear
Speaker 1: much about coronavirus while there were thousands and thousands, hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of protesters, looters, riders, and assorted maniacs on
Speaker 1: the streets, chanting for an end to policing, defund the cops. No, No,
Speaker 1: coronavirus went on holiday. It seems during that coronavirus got
Speaker 1: scared of the protesters. It must have been hiding somewhere here.
Speaker 1: We are now, as as expected, seeing the return of
Speaker 1: the coronavirus pandemic panic right when it is most useful
Speaker 1: for the Democrats, and when they're all the lessons that
Speaker 1: we've been able to learn to the last month or two,
Speaker 1: based on the data that we've seen that it is
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly only a risk to a certain set of the population,
Speaker 1: people that are over seventy. Everyone else is at a
Speaker 1: relatively low risk. We don't even know if we're ever
Speaker 1: going to get a vaccine. Folks, what are we going
Speaker 1: to do? Live in terror forever? We're all gonna We're
Speaker 1: all gonna walk around with masks on constantly we're gonna
Speaker 1: sleep with them, shower with them, We're gonna do all
Speaker 1: this crazy crap because the Libs demand it. No, nope,
Speaker 1: not on my watch. So here we are now with
Speaker 1: the statues of the founders going. Why would they stop
Speaker 1: at the statues? They're not going to But this is
Speaker 1: a reminder that those who are believing concessions should be made.
Speaker 1: Let's sign I'm gonna say it. Let's sign an executive
Speaker 1: order on policing. Let's have Republicans put forward a police
Speaker 1: reform bill. No, that's not what they should have done.
Speaker 1: That was the wrong move, the wrong approach. In response
Speaker 1: to what's going on here. Republicans should have said, you
Speaker 1: know what, We're gonna have hearings to talk about the
Speaker 1: destruction of communities, what the looting and rioting has done
Speaker 1: to small businesses, particularly minority neighborhoods. Let's have hearings about
Speaker 1: what this means long term for real estate values and
Speaker 1: the school system in these areas. It's gonna help, is
Speaker 1: it gonna hurt? We have forty plus million Americans out
Speaker 1: of jobs, and a lot of them haven't yet figured
Speaker 1: out that they're not going back to their job because
Speaker 1: it's not going to be there. As long as these
Speaker 1: different restrictions are in place, the old economic models that
Speaker 1: these businesses relied on aren't functioning, will not function, so
Speaker 1: we're gonna have mass unemployment. We have an economy that
Speaker 1: has to get up and running, or we're gonna have
Speaker 1: even more civil unrest. And there are maniacs who are
Speaker 1: focusing on tearing down statues. They're going to tear down
Speaker 1: a Washington statue. Guess what They're gonna have to rename
Speaker 1: Washington DC next if you think they won't try, and
Speaker 1: Washington State and Washington University, all of it. They're trying
Speaker 1: to erase our history. My friends, that's what's happening. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Let's talk about the machinery, the anatomy,
Speaker 1: if you will, of cancel culture. What does it actually
Speaker 1: look like when it happens to a person who isn't famous,
Speaker 1: isn't well known, isn't in the public sphere at all?
Speaker 1: How do you get canceled when you're just a person
Speaker 1: going about his or her life, not thinking about the
Speaker 1: political fights that are going on around us all the time.
Speaker 1: You see, the woke mob doesn't care if you're just
Speaker 1: a normal person going about your life. It won't save
Speaker 1: you to stay off social media or hide your politics.
Speaker 1: On the contrary, the mob takes a particular pleasure in
Speaker 1: crushing private citizens for whatever offense it can reel or imagined.
Speaker 1: You see, if they come after me or if they
Speaker 1: come after another conservative in the media. Sure it has
Speaker 1: the effect of trying to silence someone with a platform,
Speaker 1: silence someone who speaks to hundreds of thousands or sometimes
Speaker 1: even millions of people across the country. But if they
Speaker 1: can silence and destroy a person who is just a person,
Speaker 1: that sends a signal to everybody. You think you're safe,
Speaker 1: you're not. Bend the knee. Now get ahead of this.
Speaker 1: Bend the knee before we come looking for you. And
Speaker 1: this is an unbelievable story of this in the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: I mentioned it on the show yesterday. I wanted to
Speaker 1: spend some time in a day because this is truly
Speaker 1: truly stunning, because the way that it's all set up to,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is a hero's and villain's tale,
Speaker 1: and it goes like this. Back in October of twenty eighteen. Oh,
Speaker 1: I mentioned you. I had a friend at this party.
Speaker 1: He didn't really, he didn't see the offending costume. He said,
Speaker 1: there a lot of people there. He wasn't there long,
Speaker 1: and I couldn't get any I was hoping he gets
Speaker 1: some really you know, juicy details from the event from him,
Speaker 1: but there were none. He didn't. He said, he came
Speaker 1: and left, and he's he's a secret conservative, so he
Speaker 1: just doesn't he and this party was full of the
Speaker 1: elite literati and twitterati of DC liberal society. So Tom Toles,
Speaker 1: and he's this is a remember this is a big
Speaker 1: Washington post piece. Over a thousand words written on this
Speaker 1: big Washington post piece. Tom Toles had a Halloween party
Speaker 1: two years ago. A lot of people were there from
Speaker 1: the what is ascribe here as the an eclectic mix
Speaker 1: of journalists and political types from Washington's power elite, but
Speaker 1: also artists and musicians jammed into small rooms and sprawled
Speaker 1: across the backyard, dancing and gossiping, checking out the crowd
Speaker 1: to see who has the most inventive and outrageous costumes.
Speaker 1: So someone came as the Mueller witch hunt someone else
Speaker 1: came as Justice Kavanaugh, I'd make I mean I could.
Speaker 1: I could obviously pull off Kavanaugh pretty easily, just because
Speaker 1: you know, the guy's got good hair. But the problem
Speaker 1: at this party, and remember we are now this is
Speaker 1: in the second most beloved liberal left wing newspaper in
Speaker 1: the United States. But we are now talking about this,
Speaker 1: even though it happened two years ago and was really
Speaker 1: dealt with at the time. So, a middle aged white
Speaker 1: woman named Sue Schaeffer wore a business suit with a
Speaker 1: name tag that said hello, my name is Megan Kelly
Speaker 1: and blackened her face with makeup, this being a reference
Speaker 1: to the Meghan Kelly incident where she said that when
Speaker 1: she was younger. She just said that when she was younger,
Speaker 1: people would sometimes put dark makeup on their faces if
Speaker 1: they were doing a character right me, And she meant
Speaker 1: that little kids would do this, And NBC basically fired
Speaker 1: her over that, like they pushed her out over that remark. So,
Speaker 1: and of course the Libs, you know, Meghan Kelly learned
Speaker 1: a lesson one that I already I would tell anybody.
Speaker 1: Once you've been on the right, you will never be
Speaker 1: accepted fully on the left. And NBC news is leftist.
Speaker 1: They sure they put this all. Oh, look at us,
Speaker 1: like we're just a national brand. And sometimes we talk
Speaker 1: about how to make the best, how to make the best,
Speaker 1: you know, chicken peccata, and then the neck, and then
Speaker 1: a moment later we've got serious journos asking the real questions,
Speaker 1: and then we're back to chicken peccata. These morning shows,
Speaker 1: this whole morning show culture, and people just turn it on.
Speaker 1: I'm watching and this it it's kind of boring, but
Speaker 1: there's nothing else to watch, so they just watch it anyway.
Speaker 1: So this woman showed up dresses Megan Kelly not funny.
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly learned a lesson that you will lever be
Speaker 1: accepted by the left. And I actually think Meghan is
Speaker 1: talented and should make a big comeback. Now I'm hoping
Speaker 1: she does. But anyway, and she was approached by two
Speaker 1: women at the party, one Lexi Gruber and Lyric Prince.
Speaker 1: One is Latina and the other is African American. And
Speaker 1: they approached her and said, can't you see how somebody
Speaker 1: would find this offensive? And Miss Sue Schaefer left the
Speaker 1: party in tears and humiliated, recognizing that what she thought
Speaker 1: because when she was confronted. She initially, according to the story,
Speaker 1: said I'm Megan Kelly. It's funny. What she thought it
Speaker 1: was funny was not accepted as funny at all, and
Speaker 1: people approached her. She left the party crying and humiliated.
Speaker 1: And she's a middle aged woman and probably, you know,
Speaker 1: you'd expect that she'd know better than everything else. But
Speaker 1: it's an embarrassing thing. Look, this is a party. People
Speaker 1: are trying to be funny, they're trying to be provocative.
Speaker 1: It was a dumb move, but humiliated, crying left. Not
Speaker 1: a public figure. This is not somebody with a platform.
Speaker 1: This is just a government contractor. The DC is full
Speaker 1: of these government contractors. You know. They pull you in
Speaker 1: with the sirens song of making a little more money
Speaker 1: than you will in the government early on, and then
Speaker 1: a lot of people end up realizing, so I'm just
Speaker 1: kind of doing government work without actually even really being
Speaker 1: a part of the government mission. I don't know if
Speaker 1: this is worth it, but anyway, conversation we can have
Speaker 1: another time. But she was a government contractor. And guess
Speaker 1: what the two women who approached her, the two minority
Speaker 1: females who approach her at this party in twenty eighteen. Okay,
Speaker 1: so two years ago they decided, or one of them,
Speaker 1: I should say, decided to reach out to Tolls, the
Speaker 1: guy who threw the party, whom she has never met,
Speaker 1: and wrote this quote. In twenty eighteen, I attended a
Speaker 1: Halloween party at your home. I understand that you are
Speaker 1: not responsible for the behavior of your guests, but at
Speaker 1: that party, a woman was in blackface. She harassed me
Speaker 1: and my friend, the only two women of color, and
Speaker 1: it was clear she made her racist costume or her
Speaker 1: costume racist with intent, Tolls told the sorry Gruber a
Speaker 1: twenty seven year old management consultant, So she's one of
Speaker 1: the women complaining here. One of the minority females told
Speaker 1: Tolls the incident had weighed heavily on her heart. It
Speaker 1: was abhorrent and egregious, and asked for him to identify
Speaker 1: the woman, and she said that I wanted to know
Speaker 1: who this woman was. After the killing of George Floyd
Speaker 1: and the protest, I begin and reflecting more on this incident. Oh,
Speaker 1: so here's how this goes down. She emails the guy
Speaker 1: who threw a party two years ago, who has no
Speaker 1: control over even not even just what costumes people wear,
Speaker 1: but people bring friends or friends or friends to this,
Speaker 1: and DC is a kind of you know, relatively especially
Speaker 1: these circles, tight knit community that way, people just will
Speaker 1: bring people to a party. And he is approached by
Speaker 1: a woman now via email saying tell me who wore
Speaker 1: the blackfaced costume and mentions as well here that there
Speaker 1: was a that she felt there was a collective responsibility.
Speaker 1: So everybody who's at this, here you go, she wrote,
Speaker 1: when it becomes public, it will be too much of
Speaker 1: a punishment. She said, it's unfair to go back and
Speaker 1: attack some clueless women because she's not a public person.
Speaker 1: And she was punished then but by Lexie who people
Speaker 1: chastise her afterward, by Tom Right. So she was already
Speaker 1: like called out, humiliated, cried, left the party. But on
Speaker 1: the other hand, people need to be held up as
Speaker 1: an example of the lines we're going to draw about
Speaker 1: what's accept the behavior. Every single person at that party
Speaker 1: should have said something to her. There's culpability all around.
Speaker 1: This is all in the Washington Post piece. So two
Speaker 1: women have decided, because of the conversations around George Floyd's killing,
Speaker 1: of course, that this has something to do with that.
Speaker 1: You know, everyone is now you know, scrambling for their
Speaker 1: narrative of how they're a civil rights hero. Right, they're
Speaker 1: pushing the narrative of black lives matter in ways that
Speaker 1: will bring about substantive change. So she says, you know,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't go after this woman and destroy her whole
Speaker 1: life and get her written about in a national newspaper
Speaker 1: as a racist. But it's really important we make examples
Speaker 1: of people. So we're going to do just that. So
Speaker 1: they did. So they did, and it's just stunning. It's
Speaker 1: just stunning. They wanted to go after this person, they
Speaker 1: wanted to find this private person, and it's just amazing,
Speaker 1: amazing to me. So there they decided, they decided that
Speaker 1: they were going to make an example of this woman,
Speaker 1: and they did, and she got fired, got fired, and
Speaker 1: the Post editorial and opinion pages. Sorry Toll's boss. Post
Speaker 1: editorial page editor Fred Hyatt said, blackface is abhorrent. I
Speaker 1: know Tom feels the same way. I know he wishes
Speaker 1: he had made that clear to the person who came
Speaker 1: to his party wearing an offensive costume. I'm glad he
Speaker 1: has apologized. You know, folks, the point is here, these
Speaker 1: women decided to be addition, really offended two years later
Speaker 1: and wanted like to get somebody and be here. There's
Speaker 1: a big post or big picture of them on the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. Oh, look at these ladies speaking up for injustice.
Speaker 1: You know, the whole the whole thing resurfaces amid protest. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: these women decided to resurface, and it didn't resurface on
Speaker 1: its own. They figured, hey, how can we be part
Speaker 1: of the cancel culture wave right now? It gets somebody,
Speaker 1: make an example of somebody here. Remember that woman two
Speaker 1: years ago, were that thing of the party or left
Speaker 1: in tears because everyone's like, why are you such an idiot?
Speaker 1: Get out of here. Let's have a national news story
Speaker 1: written about her to ruin her life. Let's do that.
Speaker 1: But let's pretend that we don't want to do that,
Speaker 1: because that's really mean and unnecessary and lacking in grace
Speaker 1: and forgiveness and decency. But let's do it anyway, because
Speaker 1: this is really important. Issues of race right now are
Speaker 1: too important to not ruin this stranger's life. That's what
Speaker 1: they did. It's disgusting, it's disgusting. Look, she was already humiliated, confronted, apologized.
Speaker 1: You know, she showed bad judgment. We get it. You're
Speaker 1: gonna bring this up again again. Oh, that's right. But
Speaker 1: now now you see, um when oh, and she went
Speaker 1: into you know, she when it came up with her employer,
Speaker 1: they fired her right away, of course, fired her right away.
Speaker 1: And she remember Schaeffer, the woman who wore the black face,
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly costume is a staunch opponent of President Trump,
Speaker 1: hates Trump. She's a lib. Oh you mean the libs
Speaker 1: will come for their own if it adds to the
Speaker 1: self righteousness and sanctimony of other libs. Yes, yes, they will,
Speaker 1: they will. Um. This is this is so so sad
Speaker 1: that people could so lose their sense of humanity and decency. Um,
Speaker 1: it's so it's so troubling. You know, I always remember
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you a quick story, a little departure
Speaker 1: from this. There was a radio host years ago. It's
Speaker 1: not Glenn Beck, who was my boss at the time,
Speaker 1: but there was a fellow radio host years ago who
Speaker 1: just we had developed a rapport and he sent me
Speaker 1: an email that was kind of a fired off, late
Speaker 1: in the night email and just going after people in
Speaker 1: the media business. And I don't know, I just came
Speaker 1: out of nowhere came he made media business and saying things,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, this guy, if the people that he's that,
Speaker 1: he's I mean, calling them all kinds of stuff that
Speaker 1: I can't repeat on the radio. If this ever got out,
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy, I don't know if he's ever
Speaker 1: gonna like work again. And I remember being being kind
Speaker 1: of pleased with myself or feeling like, well, I'm glad
Speaker 1: that he knows you all up to know that I
Speaker 1: read it. I deleted it and never thought of it again.
Speaker 1: Never even a heard to me try to use this
Speaker 1: for political advantage. Because I'm an honorable person and someone
Speaker 1: comes to me in confidence. Someone comes to me and
Speaker 1: I didn't ask him, He didn't say, hey, don't ever
Speaker 1: tell anybody about that. He just fired off this emailed me.
Speaker 1: I would never in a million years use that against somebody.
Speaker 1: Someone who trusts me is always going to feel like
Speaker 1: they've made a good decision. And that's just that's I
Speaker 1: won't even say, that's my brand. That's who I am
Speaker 1: as a person. We all have our ways of being
Speaker 1: honorable and decent to each other. We also have the
Speaker 1: ability to give other people the benefit of the doubt
Speaker 1: to help them out to make sure that we're not
Speaker 1: a part of the mob, and we're also is not
Speaker 1: a part of the dirty tricks behind the scenes, backstabbing, ugly,
Speaker 1: you know, lying about somebody on your radio show because
Speaker 1: you're terrified that they're actually better than you at this like,
Speaker 1: you don't want to be a part of that world.
Speaker 1: You know, you don't want to be that person. And
Speaker 1: you also don't want to be the person who thinks,
Speaker 1: how can I elevate myself in this moment of really
Speaker 1: moral panic across the country over race relations and wokeness
Speaker 1: and all this stuff, Let's find somebody and ruin that
Speaker 1: person's life. So we feel like we've advanced the conversation
Speaker 1: to the two people who outed this woman and pushed
Speaker 1: this story, which is written up in the Washington Post. Now,
Speaker 1: this woman cannot get is she is an athematic I
Speaker 1: don't think she'll ever be able to go to a
Speaker 1: party in DC again without you know, it's going to
Speaker 1: be really tough for her. To the two people that
Speaker 1: push this story, they feel good about themselves and also
Speaker 1: recognize that this doesn't do anything good for anybody. They
Speaker 1: didn't they're not confronting something that wasn't confronted. They're not
Speaker 1: making someone learn a lesson that wasn't learned. They're just,
Speaker 1: you know what, we want to get somebody because people
Speaker 1: are getting got right now. See, we want to get somebody.
Speaker 1: So that's what they did. So that's what they did.
Speaker 1: This is cancel culture at its worst. This woman lost
Speaker 1: her job, lost her reputation. I mean, I'm worried about her.
Speaker 1: I don't even know her. I'm worried about this person
Speaker 1: in her future. Does a Washington Post feel good about this?
Speaker 1: Do they think that they're exercising good judgment? This is
Speaker 1: just trying to keep order within the ranks, my friends,
Speaker 1: letting the leftists know, Hey, it's okay as long as
Speaker 1: you're riding with us here, but the moment that you
Speaker 1: step out of line will crush you too. So when
Speaker 1: we say cancel those conservatives and get after them and
Speaker 1: be vicious to them, you better do it or else
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Oh and there's another case of cancelation
Speaker 1: that I think you should know about, in case you're
Speaker 1: wondering whether the situation of Officer Rolf's prosecution is just
Speaker 1: being pushed by politics, and there's nothing about this that's
Speaker 1: going to be fair or decent. A company called Equity
Speaker 1: Prime Mortgage has fired Rolf's stepmother. They put out a statement. Now,
Speaker 1: so this is the officer who shot raychard Brooks and
Speaker 1: is facing a death penalty charge. All of a sudden,
Speaker 1: his stepmother gets fired from some corporate entity as an employer.
Speaker 1: It's imperative blah blah, safe environment. Melissa Rolf's termination was
Speaker 1: a direct result of her actions in the workplace and
Speaker 1: violation of company policy. As an HR director, she ultimately
Speaker 1: lost the confidence of her peers and many employees who
Speaker 1: no longer felt comfortable engaging with her. We value diversity
Speaker 1: of thought and respect her personal views. When those views
Speaker 1: create a hostile working environment, we must make decisions to
Speaker 1: part ways. Does anyone really think that she did anything right?
Speaker 1: I mean, we're not idiots. Doesn't really think that she
Speaker 1: violated any company policy? Nope? But this mortgage company was like,
Speaker 1: guess what, you're a familial relation of officer Rolf, who
Speaker 1: right now we're all supposed to believe it is worse
Speaker 1: than that Alf Hitler, even though he didn't break any law.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, and the trial will show that you're fired.
Speaker 1: You're gone. So now they're going to come after This
Speaker 1: is a very important and very insidious message. They're gonna
Speaker 1: come after your family now too. That's right. They're gonna
Speaker 1: come after your family after you get canceled. So it's
Speaker 1: not you know, this is like the way that cartels
Speaker 1: threatened people. They won't just take you out, They'll take
Speaker 1: out everybody you love. That's what cancel culture is now
Speaker 1: with their cancelations. It's not just if you get on
Speaker 1: the wrong side of us, you're done. It's everybody you've
Speaker 1: ever known and loved could be done too. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. When is a rope hanging from a
Speaker 1: tree a symbol of terror? And when is it actually
Speaker 1: just a rope hanging from a tree? I know it
Speaker 1: sounds like a strange philosophical question, but it's not. It's
Speaker 1: one that we're going to have to confront as a
Speaker 1: society because there are a series of reports out there
Speaker 1: that I've turned into national news stories about nooses mysteriously
Speaker 1: appearing in public in different places. They have at least
Speaker 1: two cases of this this week. We have one that
Speaker 1: is supposed to be a noose at Marcus Garvey Park
Speaker 1: here in New York, hanging from the watch tower. The
Speaker 1: NYPD Hate Crime Unit is investigating this. The park staff
Speaker 1: took this down and they're investigating this as aggravated harassment
Speaker 1: and a Class E felony. So a rope that has
Speaker 1: a loop at the bottom from a watch tower here
Speaker 1: is being investigated as a hate crime. Now this one,
Speaker 1: I suppose, you know, I'm going to follow up on
Speaker 1: this story maybe somebody, maybe somebody, But think about this,
Speaker 1: Who would go and do this? There have been numerous
Speaker 1: cases in the past of people who were trying to
Speaker 1: raise awareness about racism, including a professor at a university
Speaker 1: very famously who put a noose on his own door.
Speaker 1: And you think of this Marcus Garvey Park in Harlem.
Speaker 1: Who is going to go into Marcus Garvey Park in
Speaker 1: Harlem and put up a noose as a means of
Speaker 1: trying to terrify the community. Keep in mind, if you're
Speaker 1: seen doing this, you're committing a felony, and you're also
Speaker 1: in what is an overwhelmingly African American neighborhood of New
Speaker 1: York City. So you know, think of who's really gonna
Speaker 1: take who's really going to do that. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it's impossible, but remember when we had Jos smoletts with
Speaker 1: a noose surround his neck on the South Side of Chicago,
Speaker 1: and everyone who listened to that story. Two guys in
Speaker 1: maga hats and they were carrying a noose at one
Speaker 1: or two am on a freezing cold night in Chicago
Speaker 1: just happened to find gay black actor Jess Smolette to
Speaker 1: engage in a hate crime attack against him. No intelligent
Speaker 1: person believed that that was a true story. And I
Speaker 1: go back and listen, was saying he was lying, lying,
Speaker 1: lying all along, and I had blue checks coming after me.
Speaker 1: You don't understand the history of racism and oppressure, I said, no,
Speaker 1: I understand the history of racism and oppression. This just
Speaker 1: isn't it. This guy's lying obviously, and he was Is
Speaker 1: this new, say hate crime in this park in Harlem?
Speaker 1: Maybe is it a raising awareness self inflicted hate crime?
Speaker 1: And that someone does this so that everyone goes, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, there are hate crimes occurring. We need to
Speaker 1: talk more about hate crimes that has happened hate crime
Speaker 1: hoaxes many times in the past. I also note that
Speaker 1: if you were really trying to be offensive and frightening,
Speaker 1: there are much more prominent ways to display a news.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying. I mean, if you're if somebody had
Speaker 1: the mindset, who would really do this, Some neo Nazi
Speaker 1: would would go up into Harlem and put a noose
Speaker 1: up on a tower. And if this person was seen
Speaker 1: doing it, not only would they possibly be arrested, but
Speaker 1: you would be taking your life in your own hands
Speaker 1: to go do this. So I'm I'm suspect we don't know.
Speaker 1: Another noose case though in Oakland, which prompted a hate
Speaker 1: crime investigation and all kinds of people being, people being
Speaker 1: upset all over the place. And here's what happened to
Speaker 1: Mayor Libby chaff I believe it's the same mayor who
Speaker 1: also tipped off illegal aliens to an upcoming ice raid.
Speaker 1: Remember that, I think that's the same mayor. She said
Speaker 1: that there was a noose at the city's popular Lake Merit.
Speaker 1: In fact, they were five nooses, and the city officials
Speaker 1: were investing in this as a hate crime. And turns
Speaker 1: out that these were just ropes attached to a tree
Speaker 1: that a black man was using for exercise purposes. He's
Speaker 1: come forward and said this. He was using these for
Speaker 1: exercise purposes in the park, and there had been a
Speaker 1: piece of plastic pipe attached to one of the ropes.
Speaker 1: So basically this guy had set up like some swings,
Speaker 1: some levers and pulleys for workout purposes on a tree.
Speaker 1: And he said, quote, this is Victor Sengbey who has
Speaker 1: come forward who said that these ropes were part of
Speaker 1: a rigging that he and his friends used as part
Speaker 1: of a larger swing system, and he even shared a
Speaker 1: video of them in use. He said, remember, this man
Speaker 1: is black and has come forward and said no, no no,
Speaker 1: these are my ropes. They're not nooses. This is not
Speaker 1: a hate crime. Out of the dozen and hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of people that walk by, no one has thought
Speaker 1: that it looked anywhere close to a noose. Folks have
Speaker 1: used it for exercise. It was really a fun addition
Speaker 1: to the park that we tried to create. It's unfortunate
Speaker 1: that a genuine gesture of just wanting to have a
Speaker 1: good time got missinterpreted into something so heinous. The mayor
Speaker 1: jumps in here. So now we know that this is
Speaker 1: absolutely positively in no way. Not only was this not
Speaker 1: intended to be a noose hanging from a tree, but
Speaker 1: it didn't even look like a noose. It was some
Speaker 1: ropes plural that did not have a noose. And you
Speaker 1: know it's a very specific thing. A noose is for hanging.
Speaker 1: We all understand what the visualization of it would be.
Speaker 1: They're just ropes attached to a tree. So rope attached
Speaker 1: to a tree is a symbol of terror and requires
Speaker 1: a hate crime investigation. Now, the mayor here has said
Speaker 1: that quote, officials must start with the assumption that these
Speaker 1: are hate crimes, and the mayor and Nicholas Williams, the
Speaker 1: city's director of Parks and Recreation, This is All on
Speaker 1: ABC News, said it didn't matter whether the ropes were
Speaker 1: meant to send a racist message. Intentions don't matter when
Speaker 1: it comes to terrorizing the public. Cheft said, it is
Speaker 1: incumbent on all of us to know the actual history
Speaker 1: of racial violence of terrorism that a noose represents. That
Speaker 1: symbol of a rope hanging from a tree is malicious
Speaker 1: regardless of intent. It's evil and symbolizes hatred. So let's
Speaker 1: be very clear. They're now re establishing not just a
Speaker 1: noose on a tree as a symbol of terror and hate,
Speaker 1: but a rope or series of ropes with no noose.
Speaker 1: Because some people are so hyper sensitive right now and
Speaker 1: are looking for racism everywhere that now they're saying, well, actually,
Speaker 1: just a rope in a tree is that's that's a
Speaker 1: symbol of hate and terror, and we're going to have
Speaker 1: to do something about that. And you got to stop it,
Speaker 1: say to yourself, hold on, hold on a second. This
Speaker 1: is now, this is now effectively criminalizing something that no
Speaker 1: rational person removing intent from this, that alone is wrong.
Speaker 1: Right if someone creates a noose, let's say that, or
Speaker 1: something that looks like a noose to haul up some
Speaker 1: you know, some package or something. If they're building a
Speaker 1: treehouse and they create a noose and then and the
Speaker 1: rope is left behind, you know, and that's a that's
Speaker 1: not a hate crime, it's not a not a terror image.
Speaker 1: But now they're saying, oh, well, in ten doesn't matter
Speaker 1: and merely ropes and a tree. We should all know
Speaker 1: the history. This is terrifying to people. So if they're
Speaker 1: going to redefine things in a way that no sane
Speaker 1: person would agree with is a rope swing. Now that
Speaker 1: you know, people have set up in countless backyards across
Speaker 1: America forever, you know, they sit on a little piece
Speaker 1: of wood two ropes from the tree. Is that a
Speaker 1: symbol of terror if there's no one there to say,
Speaker 1: Oh no, that's just my swing for my kids and
Speaker 1: me to have like some nice outdoor time together. If
Speaker 1: we're going to redefine now just rope and tree equals terror,
Speaker 1: do we have an outer limit of that? No, No,
Speaker 1: of course not. Oh they notified the FBI and they're
Speaker 1: conducting a full investigation. They already have a person who
Speaker 1: came forward who's like, hey, this was just for me
Speaker 1: to work out with. They're not even nooses. What are
Speaker 1: you talking about? And by the way, the guy's like,
Speaker 1: I'm black, that's what he's saying. I mean, he is black, right,
Speaker 1: But he's come forward and taken responsibility and he says
Speaker 1: this is what it's for. And they're still investigating. So
Speaker 1: I just want to know are they are they continuing
Speaker 1: the hate crimes investigation of the non nooses hanging from
Speaker 1: the tree put there by his own admission, by a
Speaker 1: black man in order to work out to see if
Speaker 1: maybe he's actually a like a secret neo Nazi who's
Speaker 1: doing this as part of a some you know, deep infiltration,
Speaker 1: false flag maneuver or something. What the heck is wrong
Speaker 1: with people? Completely insane. This is completely insane. But you're
Speaker 1: going to see more of this. Oh my gosh, this
Speaker 1: is people are looking. People are looking everywhere for racist
Speaker 1: This is starting to feel like during the Salem witch trials,
Speaker 1: you know, when you had these young girls who come forward, Oh,
Speaker 1: I saw you know, I saw her, you know, and
Speaker 1: and the way the cat moved near her in the woods.
Speaker 1: I knew that the cat was a familiar right, people
Speaker 1: would would all start repeating that they had they were
Speaker 1: seeing things that were normal, but they were in They
Speaker 1: were suggesting that what they were seeing that was normal
Speaker 1: must actually be proof that someone was a witch. Right.
Speaker 1: That was a part of the site Wich girls. Now
Speaker 1: we're seeing that the level of mass hysteria in this
Speaker 1: country has now reached a point where a rope with
Speaker 1: a purpose attached to a tree, even when the purpose
Speaker 1: has been described and it does not look anything like
Speaker 1: a noose, is still a weapon of terror against the
Speaker 1: African American community that does not take into account the
Speaker 1: history of discrimination in this country. People are losing their minds, folks.
Speaker 1: We're not losing our minds here, but people are losing
Speaker 1: their minds out there. We need to help bring them
Speaker 1: back to reality. We need to get them to take
Speaker 1: a deep breath and start living in the real world
Speaker 1: and stop the moral panic and the virtue signaling and
Speaker 1: the sanctimony. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Okay, So big rally, first real
Speaker 1: Trump rally of the season, is happening this weekend in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Speaker 1: We have somebody joining us right now to tell us
Speaker 1: what it's like on the ground there and what we
Speaker 1: should be expecting this weekend. We have Aaron Perini on
Speaker 1: the phone. She is the principal Deputy Community Communications director
Speaker 1: for the Trump campaign. Aaron, thank thanks so much for
Speaker 1: joining us. Thank you for having me excited to be on. Okay,
Speaker 1: so let's start the part of this. It's getting the
Speaker 1: most attention right now, so I want to just lead
Speaker 1: with it and you can tell us what's going on.
Speaker 1: People are concerned. I'm sure the anarchist social media channels
Speaker 1: are full of all kinds of chatter, and there's expectations
Speaker 1: for a lot of protests. What can you tell us
Speaker 1: about what the city of tuls is going to be
Speaker 1: able to do to make sure, hey, people have the
Speaker 1: First Meendment rights. I want to protest, that's fine, but
Speaker 1: that things don't get out of hand as they've had
Speaker 1: a tendency to in recent weeks. Well, we always work
Speaker 1: with every municipality and locality we go to for a
Speaker 1: rally to make sure that people who are too peaceably
Speaker 1: assemble are able to do so. We this isn't our
Speaker 1: first time having this kind of situation where people want
Speaker 1: to voice their other opinion about President Trump. And actually
Speaker 1: I was walking the line this sporting of supporters who
Speaker 1: are already lined up to see President Trump and some
Speaker 1: folks who are at the very final line. We're telling me, Yeah,
Speaker 1: there were some protesters across the street and we want
Speaker 1: across the street to them, and we were talking with them.
Speaker 1: We made sure they had lunch and some water, and
Speaker 1: we just shared our views of them, and everybody was
Speaker 1: really nice that so, you know, we feel good about
Speaker 1: our ability to keep our rally goers safe, but also
Speaker 1: those who want to share a different opinion than the
Speaker 1: ones of President Trump is they're able to do so
Speaker 1: safely as well. Now, how many folks are expected? I
Speaker 1: saw from the campaign that there were a million requests
Speaker 1: for tickets. We know that there's no arena and Tulsa
Speaker 1: that's going ahead of a million people. Don't think there's
Speaker 1: one anywhere in the world that could do that. So
Speaker 1: how many people are expected to be inside and then
Speaker 1: outside the rally? And we have to ask, you know,
Speaker 1: what are the policies to keep everybody safe in this
Speaker 1: era of COVID's. What are the recommendations and the receidures
Speaker 1: that will be in place. So we express a fully
Speaker 1: packed arena here in Tulsa, and so we will also
Speaker 1: have a large overflow build out like we do for
Speaker 1: every rally we go to. For folks who can't make
Speaker 1: an inside, We're gonna have a festival like atmosphere outside,
Speaker 1: We're gonna have a big stage with live bans. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have original online broadcast. We'll be doing them live
Speaker 1: from the stage, so people will be able to see
Speaker 1: people at Laura Trump's and Mercedes schlap throughout the day.
Speaker 1: Katrina Pearson talking about what's going on with the President
Speaker 1: in the campaign, so we expect a huge card outside
Speaker 1: and a packed arena inside. But health and safety remains
Speaker 1: a key focus for the president and that's reflected in
Speaker 1: his campaign. So we are doing and putting in health
Speaker 1: and safety precautions to make this as safe a rally
Speaker 1: for our rally goers as we can. We will be
Speaker 1: doing temperature checks of every individual, and if they don't
Speaker 1: pass the first time, we will test them again to
Speaker 1: make sure that they are able to safely come in.
Speaker 1: We will then be providing hand sanitizer to everybody and
Speaker 1: having it readily available throughout, and we will be providing
Speaker 1: masks as well, so if people choose to wear them,
Speaker 1: they will have them rally available. Everybody will be given one.
Speaker 1: I don't see any of that in any of these
Speaker 1: protests that the left wing media is lauding as so
Speaker 1: heroic and so brave. We're putting out their important count
Speaker 1: and safety measures to make sure this is a safe
Speaker 1: atmosphere for President Trump supporters. We're speaking of Aaron Parini,
Speaker 1: who is the Team Trump Deputy Community Principal, deputy Communications Director,
Speaker 1: about the upcoming rally this weekend. Give us a sense
Speaker 1: of what the president is going to be addressing Aaron
Speaker 1: and how he's going to start to frame the message
Speaker 1: of why he should get four more years as president. Well,
Speaker 1: we certainly never fought a go ahead of President Trump,
Speaker 1: but I have a keen feeling that this is going
Speaker 1: to be a rocket speech from the President. He hasn't
Speaker 1: been able to give a rally speech in over three months,
Speaker 1: and so there's a lot of pent up enthusiasm and
Speaker 1: a lot of pent up things are the President to
Speaker 1: talk about as well as he punches past the fake news,
Speaker 1: you're gonna hear him talk about what it does that
Speaker 1: Sir Joe Biden would be for this country. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has terrible policy for over forty years in this country.
Speaker 1: President Trump, in three and a half years has been
Speaker 1: able to absolutely transform America and make her the greatest
Speaker 1: nation again. And that's because of his leadership. So you
Speaker 1: will see a stark contrast between the President and Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: You'll hear about all the great work that was being done,
Speaker 1: what America is doing to fight the coronavirus, and how
Speaker 1: together with four more years, we will secure America's greatness
Speaker 1: under President Trump. And Aaron, what can you tell us
Speaker 1: about the upcoming rallies. How many are already planned or
Speaker 1: any going to be added? What would it take to
Speaker 1: get you guys to swing through New York City. We
Speaker 1: could use some help here. I know that's probably not
Speaker 1: going to happen. Tell us about what else is coming
Speaker 1: up on the schedule. Well, we will be announcing some
Speaker 1: things hopefully the near future of events that we have
Speaker 1: coming up. The Vice President is going to be in
Speaker 1: Wisconsin next week for a Faith in America event, another
Speaker 1: one of our great events. As we get back out there,
Speaker 1: start to begin events again in person on the other
Speaker 1: side of coronavirus, you will see us out there throughout
Speaker 1: the country, not only campainting in person, but holding events
Speaker 1: with our top people, including the Vice President and the
Speaker 1: family throughout the country, and of course these signature MAGGA rallies.
Speaker 1: There's nothing like a Trump rally, and so we are
Speaker 1: excited to be able to get more locked into the book,
Speaker 1: block down to the calendar and be out there on
Speaker 1: the road with President Trump supporters. All right, Aaron Parini
Speaker 1: of the Trump campaign, thank you so much for joining
Speaker 1: us giving us a preview. We appreciate it. Have a
Speaker 1: great rally, Stay safe, and we'll talk to you soon.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thanks for listening to the bus Esson Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. All right, it's fry. Ya
Speaker 1: want to bring on as many of our good buddies
Speaker 1: as I can to kick you off. Right for the weekend,
Speaker 1: we have Ryan Gurdursky in the house. I hope I
Speaker 1: said his name right. It's not an easy one. I
Speaker 1: know his name is Ryan. Oh. So we got that
Speaker 1: going for us, which is nice. He's the author of
Speaker 1: a new book. They're not listening How the Elites created
Speaker 1: the National Populous Revolution, a very timely title, mister Gurdurski,
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir, thank you for having me. All Right, man,
Speaker 1: why aren't they listening? Who's not listening? What do we
Speaker 1: need to know? Okay? So the book basically after the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election, a lot of people sat there and said,
Speaker 1: in Trump and Briggs that it's just a bunch of
Speaker 1: old white reactionaries. They'll die off, don't or ignore them,
Speaker 1: and it's just really focused in these dying working class towns.
Speaker 1: And really, what I did, in my coauthor Hall and
Speaker 1: Hill did was we sat there and we analyzed it
Speaker 1: from a global perspective, national populist parties and politicians are
Speaker 1: being elected across the globe and every continent and all
Speaker 1: six of them. And we track the reasons why this
Speaker 1: is happening and how it's happening, the issues like immigration
Speaker 1: and trade, on foreign policy and income inequality, things like that,
Speaker 1: what's happening, how it's happening, why it's happening, and where
Speaker 1: it's going. Okay, well tell us some of those things,
Speaker 1: my friend, you know that the floor is yours, like why,
Speaker 1: like what are the family? You've outlined what the broad
Speaker 1: forces are, but let's start with here in America. Why
Speaker 1: is Why is there a populist movement that perhaps Trump
Speaker 1: in many ways in capsule it's but I think also
Speaker 1: stretches beyond Trump. Yeah, it definitely stretches a bebund Trump.
Speaker 1: And you see it right now in the rhetoric of
Speaker 1: Josh Holly and Jim Banks and Mark Rubio. Mark Rubio
Speaker 1: has changed a lot. All these people are starting to
Speaker 1: move towards this, whether they like it or not. They
Speaker 1: kind of the trans left the station. And really the
Speaker 1: Party of Dick Cheney and John McCain is over or
Speaker 1: it's dying maybe it's not over completely. But the big,
Speaker 1: the big seminal issue more than anything is immigration. It
Speaker 1: is the biggest focus of the book, and it's based
Speaker 1: on four different things. One is illegal immigration, which tells
Speaker 1: people that a state cannot function if they cannot control
Speaker 1: their borders. The secondly is and secondly is legal immigration.
Speaker 1: And legal immigration breaks down to three different topics as crime,
Speaker 1: a culture, and the economy and the welfare state. And
Speaker 1: basically and basically those three things or the reason why
Speaker 1: Donald Trump got elected. People sat there, a large enough
Speaker 1: percentage of working class Americans of both white and black
Speaker 1: sat there and said white, black, Hispanic sat there and
Speaker 1: said they don't recognize their own country anymore. And part
Speaker 1: of that is mass immigration. There's been many, many, many
Speaker 1: studies done at this point. They're cited in this book.
Speaker 1: They're not listening. How they least created the National Poppies Revolution.
Speaker 1: That when mass immigration happens, when there's too much diversity,
Speaker 1: and it happens too quickly, people don't only not trust
Speaker 1: people who look like them, but they trust people who
Speaker 1: trust people who don't look like them. But they also
Speaker 1: don't trust people who look like them. Social trust completely collapses.
Speaker 1: Is because of mass immigration and diversity. And actually they
Speaker 1: don't invest in institutions anymore either. So that is why
Speaker 1: it's been this eroding of society. Now, what is the
Speaker 1: generation that is the least trusting of any and least
Speaker 1: involved institution of any generation Z, the most diverse, the
Speaker 1: most impacted by mass immigration. So this was the number
Speaker 1: one thing, more than anything else, that really affected why
Speaker 1: Donald Trump became president and why we are having a surgeon.
Speaker 1: National populists ideas, at least in the Republican Party right now.
Speaker 1: A lot of them we're speaking to Ryan Guderski has
Speaker 1: got a new book out. They're not listening how the
Speaker 1: elites created the national populist revolution. Ryan, A lot of
Speaker 1: you know, the the talking points around why the right
Speaker 1: is bad or why conservatives the Republican parties is that
Speaker 1: we are the party of corporations. And I always think
Speaker 1: this is so interesting because if you see what has
Speaker 1: happened in the country right now, all of the top
Speaker 1: i mean, the most powerful and active activist corporations are
Speaker 1: are really left, and in some cases pretty hard left
Speaker 1: in terms of their politics, their leadership, and the way
Speaker 1: that they view the world. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, you know,
Speaker 1: these are These are companies that have bank rolls similar
Speaker 1: to what national economies dam and pretty good sized countries
Speaker 1: and they all have the woke politics of the left.
Speaker 1: So how does populism mesh with deal with opposed corporatism
Speaker 1: And has there been a shift from capitalism equals the
Speaker 1: free market equals good for conservatives to maybe corporations do
Speaker 1: need to be thought about differently. Yeah, there absolutely has.
Speaker 1: I mean, just look at the idea of breaking up Google.
Speaker 1: That is a conversation of Elizabeth Warren and josh hollywar Having.
Speaker 1: And if you look at national populace leaders around the globe,
Speaker 1: including in America, they are not free market ideologus. They
Speaker 1: are not they break up this, you know, the Ronald
Speaker 1: Reagan's Republican three legged stool. They don't believe that. You know,
Speaker 1: taxation is just that they don't sit there and say
Speaker 1: what it's good for the bottom line of the GDP
Speaker 1: of the country is good for everybody, and that what's
Speaker 1: good for these multinational corporations is good for the worker. No,
Speaker 1: they are much more workers party, and they sit there
Speaker 1: and they pay attention to the workers. And we're seeing
Speaker 1: even you know, there's a comic a libertarian comic who's
Speaker 1: very funny named David Smith, who sat there and said, Wow,
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson is losing thing advertisers and he's the number
Speaker 1: one show in America. Maybe the economy is in everything.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's partly the culture. And I think that everyone's
Speaker 1: kind of waking up to now as these big tech
Speaker 1: organizations and big media, m big corporation sit there and
Speaker 1: they kind of shove wokeism down to everyone's throat whether
Speaker 1: they like it or not. You'll be fired if your life,
Speaker 1: will be destroyed if you don't. If you don't there
Speaker 1: and subscribe to wokeism. And there's also a phenomenon that
Speaker 1: I think conservatives have become. And really, anyone who's center
Speaker 1: to center right or just in the center all the
Speaker 1: way over the right, anyone can understand that this exists.
Speaker 1: Where you know, if you turn on NBC News or
Speaker 1: even MSNBC or CNN, they are they are every bit
Speaker 1: as political and as hardline in their beliefs as anything
Speaker 1: that you would see on Fox News. And yet there's
Speaker 1: never any fear. Rachel Maddow never has advertiser flight, even
Speaker 1: when she does things like pretend that she has tax
Speaker 1: returns when she really only has like a xerox page
Speaker 1: nobody cares about, right, like she like, there's never even
Speaker 1: hint that that's going to happen. You turn on basically
Speaker 1: the question I post use, why is it that MSNBC
Speaker 1: will have Mercedes Benz, BMW, you know, Coca Cola, I mean,
Speaker 1: the biggest advertisers in the world and on Fox. You know,
Speaker 1: you're you're getting a different kind. I'm not gonna you know,
Speaker 1: I don't want to. I'm not trying to bash. I
Speaker 1: love the Fox advertisers, but you get a different tier
Speaker 1: in terms of the overall money spend and corporate reach.
Speaker 1: You have advertised you have my pillowbum yeah, you have
Speaker 1: my pillow. I mean, yeah, yeah. Part of it is
Speaker 1: the reason that that liberals and concerns are different. We
Speaker 1: don't sit. They're and aggressively push with our pocketbooks and
Speaker 1: we don't. And also there's there is a movement to
Speaker 1: get progressives on boards of companies. It's been this entire
Speaker 1: thing and is maybe in something I work for an
Speaker 1: article about later on, but there is a push to
Speaker 1: get progressives on the boards of companies in the way
Speaker 1: that you know, the left is very good at moving
Speaker 1: into into institutions and taking them over, and the right
Speaker 1: has been terrible at it, from education to the media,
Speaker 1: to the boards of corporations to the military. And how
Speaker 1: you're trying to see their woke policies. This is broad
Speaker 1: and and they just the rights. They're either a surrenders
Speaker 1: to be popular or be has never begun fighting at all.
Speaker 1: I mean, we did start decades after the left began,
Speaker 1: so that's part of the reason why we're still behind
Speaker 1: the ball. But that is that is that is a
Speaker 1: big deal, is how they've moved through the institutions one
Speaker 1: after the other, and that's why we're seeing like, you know,
Speaker 1: it's okay. These art institutions are saying, yeahad behead Columbus statutes,
Speaker 1: or get rid of Abraham Lincoln statutes or god of art.
Speaker 1: Art doesn't mean anything anymore. They've destroyed these institutions. And
Speaker 1: so we are we are in you know, as I
Speaker 1: said on Tucker Carlson Show the other day, we're in
Speaker 1: Fuco's um post post structural society. Everything is viewed from
Speaker 1: the vantage point of today and everything's being realigned, and
Speaker 1: we really need to sit there and either a make
Speaker 1: our own institutions or be retake the institutions that are
Speaker 1: gone right now, yeah, I want to dig into the
Speaker 1: why why we don't make more of our own institutions
Speaker 1: on the right, because because I think what we've seen,
Speaker 1: and it's really been occurring for the last last twenty
Speaker 1: years in my view, is that conservatives, you know, there's
Speaker 1: I forget who said it, but any institution that's not
Speaker 1: explicitly conservative will become explicitly left winger, become Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's true, that is true, but also but yeah, but
Speaker 1: my frustration with that is even like look at sea Pack.
Speaker 1: I mean Sepack run by Matt Schlap, who's the biggest
Speaker 1: you know hack there is of a person, and he
Speaker 1: sits there and he's getting corporation to corporate shills that
Speaker 1: they're in and push chief labor and low skill labor
Speaker 1: into the country. I mean, he doesn't care, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what to say him whatsoever. And that's an explicitly
Speaker 1: conservative organization. I think that, you know, people can be
Speaker 1: bought off by money, and there's a lot of money
Speaker 1: going around. Match Slap is bought off by money. So
Speaker 1: Sepack hence does not have conversation an immigration anymore. I
Speaker 1: think that anything is supposed to be being able to
Speaker 1: be bought off so long as the big corporate interest.
Speaker 1: But my point is, what I meant to get to
Speaker 1: is just that there is the belief that we can
Speaker 1: establish a decent and sort of friendly norm And yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I gotta also say, then that's some pretty
Speaker 1: rough stuff you're throwing match Lap's way. I mean, I mean,
Speaker 1: they're the only I'm not on Christmas. I'm not on
Speaker 1: his Christmas card list. I don't care him and mer
Speaker 1: Scene eighties whatever, but they are they're they're hacks. They're
Speaker 1: political hackste Look, I like Matt and I like Sea Pack.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're absolutely entitled to your opinion, but I
Speaker 1: like Matt and I like Seepacks. So because I feel like, well, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not speaking for anyone myself, No, no, I get that,
Speaker 1: but but I've got to say, I've got to say
Speaker 1: where at so they're at least see see here, let
Speaker 1: me just start put aside the personal issue that they're
Speaker 1: at least create there's a place where conservatives can get
Speaker 1: together and do things that are conservative and draw some attention.
Speaker 1: What's the secondary option? Like? Why, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw I had a thread
Speaker 1: recently that rush Limbo right onto show and now everyone
Speaker 1: know people I'm an emailing me all week and texting
Speaker 1: me talking about it. Then I'm just like, guys, we
Speaker 1: need to build our own institutions because if we don't Google, Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: they're never going to adjust the terms of service so
Speaker 1: that we get a fair shake. It's never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: So why don't we all get on board with that mission?
Speaker 1: Two things, One, Match Shop did not create seapack. He
Speaker 1: took it over and once he took it over. One
Speaker 1: not a personal thing. This is just him as an
Speaker 1: institutional thing. Secondly, he's a shill for mass immigration, which
Speaker 1: is really hurting our country. I mean, that's what he is.
Speaker 1: He is a corporate lawyer who did I do not
Speaker 1: like mass immigration. So I don't even know if that's slaps.
Speaker 1: By the way, you might know schlaps positions and seapacks.
Speaker 1: I've only been a seapack once in the last ten years.
Speaker 1: But I'm just spac does not have immigration panels anymore
Speaker 1: because of mass lap. They don't talk of an immigration anymore,
Speaker 1: and that is simply because they have a financial interests
Speaker 1: that sits there in they're being sponsored by freaking big tech.
Speaker 1: Now at these institutions, I mean, they're selling them out.
Speaker 1: That's my fustration things like that. But when it comes
Speaker 1: to yes, I believe in building our institutions, which you said,
Speaker 1: I think you're completely right about that. But the other
Speaker 1: thing that I wish the right did more is I
Speaker 1: think that you should we should wield the institutions that
Speaker 1: we have the power that we have inside the government
Speaker 1: while we have the presidency to dismantle these organizations. Ryan,
Speaker 1: I don't know what happened, but you froze buddy, Ryan Gerdersky. Everybody,
Speaker 1: they're not listening. How the people going to think that
Speaker 1: this was like a conspiracy. They're not listening. How the
Speaker 1: elites created the National populace Revolution is the book Ryan
Speaker 1: was Fired Up. You can check out his book. Thanks
Speaker 1: for joining Ryan, You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right, everybody, it's
Speaker 1: time for us to hear from some of you across
Speaker 1: the country. Producer Mark, I know you've been hearing all
Speaker 1: the wonderful voicemail messages eight four four nine d two
Speaker 1: eight two five eight four four nine hundred buck if
Speaker 1: you want to leave one and mark who's up first?
Speaker 1: This is from Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Hey, Buck, what shields hi mean?
Speaker 1: And second? Can you do Elmer Fud impression? Thanks? Bye?
Speaker 1: All right, shields high? That's a very good, very fair question.
Speaker 1: We get this from time to time, and it's it's
Speaker 1: just become something that well, it started back when I
Speaker 1: used to do the Saturday show. There was all this
Speaker 1: ancient history. When I started the Buck Section show, we
Speaker 1: would just talk about it. I would discuss ancient Greece
Speaker 1: from time to time, and one day I was speaking
Speaker 1: about the PHELENX and the military formation of heavily armored
Speaker 1: Greek warriors that we know as hop Lights because of
Speaker 1: the hop lawn shield they carried, and how they had
Speaker 1: all stands shoulder to shoulder with shields high to make
Speaker 1: the PHAELENX effective. Right, you can't have the shield down
Speaker 1: at waist level or down at your knees. It's got
Speaker 1: to be shields high. And the Spartans had a saying
Speaker 1: come back with your shield or on it. Leaning come
Speaker 1: back in Victor, your come back dead. Anyway, this was
Speaker 1: a discussion I had with Team Buck and is and
Speaker 1: it felt like, especially in those early Saturday days, we
Speaker 1: were in a fa LEANX together in the fight shields high,
Speaker 1: and it just sort of stuck as a rallying cry
Speaker 1: for the show. And it's kind of fun to say
Speaker 1: and gets people fired up. So there you go, right,
Speaker 1: it's well like, isn't like? The producer? Mark Alabama? University
Speaker 1: of Alabama? Right? Roll tide? Right? Does an't even know
Speaker 1: what that means? Yes? Oh, I like that kind of
Speaker 1: makes sense, but come on, just wow? Yeah, So so
Speaker 1: there you go. That's how we get it. And then
Speaker 1: he Elmer Fudd, Um, isn't that like? H? No? I
Speaker 1: actually I don't even know what Elmer Fudd sounds like,
Speaker 1: so I'd have to think about that. I can't I
Speaker 1: can't even hear him in my head, so I can't
Speaker 1: ear IMPRESSI do you know what Elmer Fudd sounds like? Producer?
Speaker 1: I mean, I know what he sounds like, but I
Speaker 1: am not trying an impression of that. No, No, that's fair,
Speaker 1: that's fair. I just want to know if that's something
Speaker 1: you knew. Um, All right, next voicemail please Hi? It
Speaker 1: is it Jane in Clifton Park, New York. I am
Speaker 1: from Miami, Florida, and UM, I would I would go
Speaker 1: back there in a heartbeat to Delray. That is the
Speaker 1: most fantastic place you could ever live. Nice people, beautiful beaches,
Speaker 1: really nice people. If you go to shoot for Florida,
Speaker 1: try Delray, go for a visit. It's incredible, wonderful. So okay, guys,
Speaker 1: Shield Tie and uh, you guys are the best. Another
Speaker 1: another UM vote for del Ray for Florida. So there
Speaker 1: you go, Producer Mark, it's the best call we've ever had.
Speaker 1: Have you have you ever been to del Ray? Yes? Great,
Speaker 1: it's so nice. I used to live in South Florida. Yeah.
Speaker 1: We got to find out what the station is down
Speaker 1: there and get them to add to get them to
Speaker 1: add us to whatever the del Ray station is. UM,
Speaker 1: all right, next voicemail please yeah, Hi Buck and producer Mark.
Speaker 1: This is John Collins from Dover, Delaware, listening to your
Speaker 1: boys on fourteen ten w DoD and I just wanted
Speaker 1: to let you fellas know that I love the show
Speaker 1: and I just wanted to make a comment about the
Speaker 1: Liberals and the way they've acted, you know, these past
Speaker 1: years since his president has been in office, they act
Speaker 1: like a bunch of children. They're very immature. I don't
Speaker 1: know who votes for these people. They've obviously been brainwashed.
Speaker 1: We need some changes. Hopefully Bill Barr will start getting
Speaker 1: the gears turning on, getting some prostitutions and getting things done. Anyway,
Speaker 1: thanks a lot for everything you guys do. God bless
Speaker 1: and Shield High. Yeah, man, thank you so much, calling
Speaker 1: in from Delaware. Nice that we have some team buck
Speaker 1: Delaware getting in the mix. Always appreciate that is bargainer
Speaker 1: roll with the prosecutions of people from the Trump that
Speaker 1: attacked Trump with the whole Russia collusion, Guys, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you I don't think so. If you're if you're
Speaker 1: hoping that they're gonna be prosecutions that will bring justice
Speaker 1: from what happened with the Obama the Obama team beforehand,
Speaker 1: I'm just here to tell you that I think that's
Speaker 1: very unlikely. I think it's very unlikely. I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: Maybe the Durham probe up in Connecticut and so maybe
Speaker 1: they've got some things planned that I'm I'm not privy to,
Speaker 1: but I haven't been wrong about this stuff yet really,
Speaker 1: So we'll find out more of the truth of the
Speaker 1: illegal targeting of Donald Trump in his campaign, and how
Speaker 1: egregious it was, and how Obama and Obama's team we're
Speaker 1: pushing this, we're complicit in this, we're directing this in
Speaker 1: some cases, and we'll know that for sure. But I
Speaker 1: don't think you're going to see prosecutions because I'll just say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: we were just so foolish that we believed all these
Speaker 1: Russia collusion fairy tale. Sorry, can't throw us in prison
Speaker 1: because we believed it and then they acted on it. See,
Speaker 1: all this starts with if you're so foolish, if you're
Speaker 1: so um so dumb, quite honestly, to believe that Trump
Speaker 1: did these things, it's very hard to hold that into
Speaker 1: account from them because if you believe it, then sure
Speaker 1: you can open investigation. If you work at the FBI,
Speaker 1: if you believe it, then sure you're going to write
Speaker 1: these articles in various newspapers and uh and put it
Speaker 1: on TV and all the rest of it. So yep,
Speaker 1: all very true. Um, what's next here, hey, book or
Speaker 1: chart for a certain vincil here US Army combat engineer marks.
Speaker 1: I want to get our friend from the Army on,
Speaker 1: but I just realize we're going to run into a
Speaker 1: break here. I want to hear him in full, so
Speaker 1: we'll come back on the flip side fire the same one.
Speaker 1: Stay with us. Thanks for listening to the buses and
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Our producer Mark.
Speaker 1: We have more voicemails. We have a gentleman, the veteran
Speaker 1: who was about to let us know what's up. Hit
Speaker 1: it hey book or chired for a certain Vincil here
Speaker 1: US Army combat engineer, just wanting to say thanks for
Speaker 1: what you're doing. Keep up the good word. Open everything
Speaker 1: turns out all oil, not only you guys, but for
Speaker 1: us as a country. Right now. I'm a little concerned,
Speaker 1: a little worried, but I still back the police no
Speaker 1: matter what anybody says, and I think they're doing a
Speaker 1: good job. Blue do them all see well. Thank you
Speaker 1: very much, sir, both for your your kind message and
Speaker 1: also for your service. And I'm concerned too, but I
Speaker 1: take that concern as a reason for us to rally.
Speaker 1: I take that concern is why we have to stay
Speaker 1: in the fight. So that's use it to motivate you
Speaker 1: and also to just be a reminder of why we
Speaker 1: why we all make choices every day that affect not
Speaker 1: just the reality around us, but what kind of a
Speaker 1: country we're living in. We all make choices every day.
Speaker 1: Next next voicemail, please, hey Buck, this is Strength from Portland, Oregon.
Speaker 1: You know, I have to contradict you on your statement
Speaker 1: about having a vote to take down statues for the
Speaker 1: people that live in the communities, because I think there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people that were in the communities at
Speaker 1: the time the statues mode up. I don't know if
Speaker 1: they has a chance to voice their opinion whether or
Speaker 1: not it should have been erected in the first place.
Speaker 1: Just my thoughts. Thank you. Well. Look, in terms of
Speaker 1: statues and stuff like that, I mean, I think that
Speaker 1: communities should be able to determine, you know, they should
Speaker 1: have a process. Here's all say it. If you can
Speaker 1: put up new statues, you should be able to remove
Speaker 1: or just move old statues. But there should be an
Speaker 1: established mechanism for doing that. And uh, you know that
Speaker 1: the producer Markham, what do you think what was I
Speaker 1: kind of missed what what his broader objection was. He
Speaker 1: just doesn't like people moving the statutes period. I think
Speaker 1: he's saying that the people don't vote to put the
Speaker 1: statues up, so why would they vote to take the
Speaker 1: statues down? That's fair. Look, that's that's a fair that's
Speaker 1: a fair point. That's a fair point. So I would
Speaker 1: just say, you know, well, how will we get rid
Speaker 1: of statues? Then? When we want to get rid of them,
Speaker 1: you know, what will we do at that phase? How
Speaker 1: will we be in a position to add statues? And look,
Speaker 1: I don't even know. I don't know if like I
Speaker 1: didn't even be honest with you guys, there are statues
Speaker 1: that I walk past in Central Park and in my
Speaker 1: neighborhoods in New York. I don't even know they're there.
Speaker 1: I mean I barely even I don't know. I'm not
Speaker 1: a big statue guy in general, there are some that
Speaker 1: I think have you know, Columbus Circle in New York,
Speaker 1: for example, is a very large statue of Christopher Columbus.
Speaker 1: Everyone kind of knows that one. But there are statues
Speaker 1: all of a city. I don't even know how they
Speaker 1: got there and at the city authority. But see you're
Speaker 1: gonna say, okay, well, the people didn't vote to put
Speaker 1: it there, why would they vote to remove it? My
Speaker 1: response to that would be if people, if people remove it,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. If the government authorities can put it there,
Speaker 1: then the government authorities can also take it away. And
Speaker 1: trust me, my friend, if it's just left to you know,
Speaker 1: the city authorities, cities are all blues. You're going to
Speaker 1: see all these statues go everywhere. But look, it's it's
Speaker 1: an interesting discussion, but just remember that it was never
Speaker 1: going to be just It was never going to be
Speaker 1: just the statues. It was never going to be just
Speaker 1: the ones of Confederate generals. Now they've added to this
Speaker 1: and you have the founders and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: Next voicemail, Hi, producer, Mark, This as front Vernon, Ohio.
Speaker 1: Buck and you are two of my favorites along with Rush.
Speaker 1: Just want to tell you what a fantastic job you're doing.
Speaker 1: I stand for Donald Trump, I stand for America, the Constitution.
Speaker 1: I'm sixty four years old, and I will not bendoney
Speaker 1: nor cave in to all these entities that want to
Speaker 1: turn our country upside down. Thank you very much for
Speaker 1: taking my call. Love you guys. Shield Tie such a
Speaker 1: nice lady. Thank you so much for calling in saying
Speaker 1: nice things about us. We appreciate that. That's a very
Speaker 1: nice and to be in the same category as Rash
Speaker 1: the greatest radio host of all time is, or rather
Speaker 1: to be in your same list as Russia Lambaugh is
Speaker 1: very much appreciate it. So thank you, Thank you for that,
Speaker 1: and let's see what we got here. Next up producer
Speaker 1: Mark hit It Producer markham Bucks listening to Wartime Contrivative episode. Listen,
Speaker 1: the question is what is the right wing alternative or
Speaker 1: a rule that equals community organizers. We are missing a
Speaker 1: vital link to connect our people to our events. They've
Speaker 1: been working on their community organizers for forty years. We
Speaker 1: have a gap that has to be filled and it
Speaker 1: has to be done for us to be available to
Speaker 1: take action shield till so it seems like the gentleman
Speaker 1: is saying, why don't we have community organizers the way
Speaker 1: the left does, And I think that's a it's a
Speaker 1: fair point. I would just say that the right does
Speaker 1: not have a culture of that of the same kind
Speaker 1: of grassroots mobilization usually around points of community agitation that
Speaker 1: have to do with inequality, economic inequality, racial inequality. We
Speaker 1: don't we don't have that st uture in place. We
Speaker 1: don't have a history of doing that the same way.
Speaker 1: And the closest thing I can think of when we're
Speaker 1: talking about political mass mobilization would be the tea party,
Speaker 1: which did really feel like a It just sort of happened.
Speaker 1: I mean it was Rick Santelli went on a rant
Speaker 1: on the floor of I think it was the Chicago
Speaker 1: Mercantile Exchange and said, you know, we should have a
Speaker 1: tea party. And fast forward a few months and all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, they're thousands and thousands of people gathering
Speaker 1: all across the country with Gadsden flags and saying that
Speaker 1: we need to stop spending all of our future generations money.
Speaker 1: So there's that we will keep our focus on it
Speaker 1: any more. Producer Marker was at it for today one more,
Speaker 1: one more hit it, Hey bucking producer Mark Love the show.
Speaker 1: This is Eric Collin from California. I have a solution
Speaker 1: that for anybody masks shaming or asking me to apologize
Speaker 1: for the color of my skin, which is an old
Speaker 1: family tradition, just saying you take care now. Local Mark
Speaker 1: used to do it. He was a little she didn't
Speaker 1: really like to talk to people much, so if anyone
Speaker 1: came up to him or tried to spark up a conversation,
Speaker 1: he would immediately just go with it. You take care now.
Speaker 1: So that's my answer. I hope you guys are well.
Speaker 1: Love the show. She'll tie you take care now. Huh,
Speaker 1: what do you think, Mark? I think it's a non
Speaker 1: confrontational way. Fair enough, fair enough. Well, thank you sir
Speaker 1: for calling from California, Team Buck. We got people from
Speaker 1: all over the country calling it on this voicemail box
Speaker 1: that you really appreciate it. Thank you all. Let's get
Speaker 1: to the written roll call in just a moment. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom huh. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast,
Speaker 1: all right. If you want to send us your thoughts
Speaker 1: via text of some kind, not like text messaging us,
Speaker 1: but if you want to send us your written thoughts,
Speaker 1: please send it to Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: or Team Buck at i heeart media com. And with that,
Speaker 1: let's get to it in the roll call box. Ryan, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I was listening to the show the other day and
Speaker 1: you were talking about New York State and their ludicrous
Speaker 1: gun laws. I'm a fellow New Yorker and a gun owner.
Speaker 1: I recently took an interest in obtaining a pistol permit
Speaker 1: in my county. In Schenectady, I have to jump through
Speaker 1: so many hoops it's nauseating, seems kind of crazy. You
Speaker 1: don't even have to have a photo ID to vote,
Speaker 1: but you need extensive references, three applications to notarize, letters
Speaker 1: to the judge, and fingerprinting. This is all just to
Speaker 1: exercise my Second Amendment rights. Just wanted to share my story.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work and shields high. My friend Ryan,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for writing in great to have
Speaker 1: you listening up in Schenectady. Is that probably? Is that
Speaker 1: to our WGY fill it up their producer mark. That
Speaker 1: sounds right, I believe Yeah, so I would say, let
Speaker 1: me think, I would say, yeah, it's probably just almost
Speaker 1: as bad for you as it is here in New
Speaker 1: York City. I was going through in my head the checklist.
Speaker 1: But that's basically what you have to do New York.
Speaker 1: I mean, they make it effectively impossible, and they make
Speaker 1: the rule so stringent and strict that it's really not
Speaker 1: possible for it's really not impossible for you to do
Speaker 1: it without a lot of pain and irritation. Kate, right, hey, Buck.
Speaker 1: I recently went back to college at thirty years old.
Speaker 1: To pursue my bachelor's in nursing, I'm required to take
Speaker 1: a sociology class as a prerequisite. Our textbook plainly states
Speaker 1: that the author supports Karl Marx himself. Kate, Oh, welcome
Speaker 1: back to the academy, Kate. That sounds about right as expected.
Speaker 1: The content has read like a far left indoctrination covering
Speaker 1: global warming, transgenderism, racism, and evil capitalism with strong anti American,
Speaker 1: anti Christian excerpts. I'm disgusted this is being taught at
Speaker 1: a public institution. I will not bend the knee, but
Speaker 1: I fear the career related retribution if I formally contest
Speaker 1: the course. I have no choice but to buckle down
Speaker 1: through it and hope the instructor cries at night from
Speaker 1: my well informed Buck sex and influence rebuttals to his
Speaker 1: garbage teaching. Okate, first of all, thank you so much,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate that we're able to help you with
Speaker 1: these arguments. I will tell you because this is the
Speaker 1: advice I always give to college to college team Buck
Speaker 1: when they reach out to me and say, oh, my
Speaker 1: professor is a crazy lib because they almost all are.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm going to write a term paper that
Speaker 1: says that, you know, America is not the worst, most
Speaker 1: rate What's up, Mark? Did you say something I did not? Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm hearing I'm hearing producer Mark's voice in
Speaker 1: my ear when he's not saying anything that America is
Speaker 1: not the worst, most racist, most evil place ever. You know,
Speaker 1: he look within bounds. Generally, you don't have to actually
Speaker 1: write that paper, but you don't. You'll have to write
Speaker 1: papers and things that you're not on board with. I
Speaker 1: do not want you to suffer academic consequences for standing
Speaker 1: up for your beliefs in a classroom. The public forum
Speaker 1: is different than a classroom forum. As far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: I want you to get good grades, get the best
Speaker 1: job you can, and be as influential in your career
Speaker 1: and in your community as you can so that conservatives
Speaker 1: can win. So and I know that's a little as
Speaker 1: a little bit of nuance, a little bit of dancing
Speaker 1: around on that one. But if you can engage, if
Speaker 1: you think you can engage safely in debate, safely in
Speaker 1: debate with the professor without getting a really bad grade
Speaker 1: because of it, by all means and that's why we're
Speaker 1: here to give you all the ammunition that you could
Speaker 1: ever have in a debate on these kinds of topics.
Speaker 1: But I'm telling you, if I if you're asking my advice,
Speaker 1: do what you need to do in the classroom to
Speaker 1: get the grade you need to get to move on
Speaker 1: to the next place you need to go in life.
Speaker 1: Don't because because you're you know what, you know what
Speaker 1: it is to write a paper that you know and
Speaker 1: I'm not saying you're doing this case. You seem like
Speaker 1: a very savvy lady, and we appreciate you listening. But
Speaker 1: if somebody writes a paper that they think they're making
Speaker 1: some big moral stand with and that the teacher gift
Speaker 1: just gives them an F, the teacher's winning, because all
Speaker 1: that happens is you can now get an F. Maybe
Speaker 1: you get an F on your transcript. And now when
Speaker 1: you go forward in life, you know, when you try
Speaker 1: to get into a grad school or whatever, does anyone
Speaker 1: remember the brave stand you took for the founding fathers
Speaker 1: in that paper or they they see an F on
Speaker 1: your transcript. I'm a realist, folks, I'm a realist. There's
Speaker 1: a time for principle there's a time for not bending
Speaker 1: the knee. What you're writing a classroom, I mean, and honestly,
Speaker 1: no one's even gonna remember. I mean, I don't even
Speaker 1: I can't even remember any of the things that I
Speaker 1: was writing in polysy class back at Amherst, and I
Speaker 1: took lots and lots and lots of polycy classes. So
Speaker 1: what do you think, producing Mark? Is that a little
Speaker 1: too little, too nuanced? Or does that make sense? No?
Speaker 1: I think you hit the nail on the head. Thank you. Yeah, Like,
Speaker 1: if you were taking grad classes somewhere right, if you
Speaker 1: were back in grad school, I would tell you exactly
Speaker 1: the same thing. You know, if you had to write
Speaker 1: a paper on the origins of conservative talk radio, you know,
Speaker 1: in your professor hated talk radio, I wouldn't be like,
Speaker 1: you should be writing about how rate Buck and Rush are.
Speaker 1: I'd say, right, whatever you gotta write to get a Nay,
Speaker 1: I don't care. I think I actually wrote a paper
Speaker 1: about the origins of sports talk right. Yeah. Once. Really,
Speaker 1: it's the only paper I remember writing in college. There
Speaker 1: you have it, Tatiana, Hey, Buck, just want to let
Speaker 1: you know how much I enjoy your show that I
Speaker 1: recently discovered by driving home from work in the Twin
Speaker 1: Cities area. Your insights are brilliant. I love your authenticity
Speaker 1: and the depth of your analysis. It's the best that
Speaker 1: I've heard so far on talk shows. I'm getting addicted
Speaker 1: to your show because you're doing such amazing work, Tatiana.
Speaker 1: That is the nicest. That's the nicest thing anyone said
Speaker 1: to me today or written to me today, and it's
Speaker 1: going to send me into the weekend in a good mood.
Speaker 1: So thank you for that. We really appreciate that. We
Speaker 1: work very hard at this show and we do all
Speaker 1: that we can, So thank you so much. Just so
Speaker 1: you all know, Producer Mark is going to be on
Speaker 1: VAKA next weekend. Everything's fine, but Producer Mark's going to
Speaker 1: be off for the week, so you won't be hearing
Speaker 1: Producer Mark on the show, but he's going to be.
Speaker 1: He's fine, everything's fine. He's just gone for a week
Speaker 1: and he'll be back in the saddle the following Monday.
Speaker 1: Pablo Hey Buck, I heard a fellow listener having a
Speaker 1: strong opinion about the NFL and Drew Breese. I feel
Speaker 1: similarly to that listener, although I believe we differ in reasoning.
Speaker 1: I'm upset that Drew apologized and what it will cause.
Speaker 1: If a player like Drew Breese stood his ground, other
Speaker 1: players could as well. As it stands right now, the
Speaker 1: national anthem will be played for kneeling and protesting. I
Speaker 1: personally was very excited for the season until the apology.
Speaker 1: Now I will spend Sunday going to service and family time.
Speaker 1: Sounds like a better time. Shields high Pablo, Absolutely, Look,
Speaker 1: if that's how you feel, that's absolutely what you should do.
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you this if they're if they're if
Speaker 1: all these teams are kneeling during the ant you know,
Speaker 1: it's also kind of weird because if everyone's kneeling during
Speaker 1: the anthem, are they Is this now a show of respect?
Speaker 1: During You know, it gets kind of If one person
Speaker 1: kneels wheneverone else is standing, they're clearly trying to make
Speaker 1: a scene. If everybody kneels, you look at this, you go, well,
Speaker 1: are they Is it like church? Or they kneeling? You know,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's a different I feel like the
Speaker 1: visual if everyone kneels is very might change over time,
Speaker 1: or you go, well, if everyone's doing it, is it
Speaker 1: really even a protest? Like what are they doing. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Maybe I'm wrong on that, but I think
Speaker 1: that it doesn't. I think it's when one or two
Speaker 1: players kneel during the anthem and everyone else is standing
Speaker 1: to show respect. I'm just saying, visually, if everyone kneels,
Speaker 1: it want to look like that's what you're supposed to do,
Speaker 1: kind of, so you know, because that's what you'll see
Speaker 1: on the field, and you won't see the people in
Speaker 1: the stands necessarily standing with their hands over their hearts.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We'll see how this plays out, but
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this if if it bothers me, if
Speaker 1: I'm watching it and they're doing the kneeling, I will
Speaker 1: not I will watch even fewer NFL games this year
Speaker 1: than I did last year, which means I think it'll
Speaker 1: be zero because I think I watched maybe two games
Speaker 1: last year. You're gonna watch some soccer instead, No, because
Speaker 1: they're gonna they're taking knee a knee too, and they know.
Speaker 1: I meant, how do you watch less than zero? Oh? Well, no,
Speaker 1: I watched like two games. Okay, I've got brothers. I've
Speaker 1: got brothers and a dad who are normal red blooded
Speaker 1: Americans who like professional sports. So sometimes so I can,
Speaker 1: so I can have bonding man time with them. I
Speaker 1: will watch. Yeah, you're the brother that knits the sweater
Speaker 1: in the corner during the Super Bowl, are right? Wow,
Speaker 1: that's cold. I'm the brother that's here defending freedom on
Speaker 1: the front lines, preparing talking points to crush the lives.
Speaker 1: How about that producer markin? Yeah? Yeah, sure, what do
Speaker 1: I mean like that? Yeah? Exactly? Although nitty would be
Speaker 1: kind of a cool skill, Like let's let's just be
Speaker 1: real about this. For you learn how to knit, that
Speaker 1: would be kind of cool. Just want to say it.
Speaker 1: I could never do it. I would get to board
Speaker 1: until you had that amazing new hat you'd made yourself.
Speaker 1: All right, Matthew's up next? Hey, Buck, your producer Mark
Speaker 1: are doing great things. Here's the thing about Trump. Our
Speaker 1: man hasn't been having his rallies. He's been getting all
Speaker 1: the usual hate and then someone without getting the love.
Speaker 1: Once the rallies are back in action, he will return
Speaker 1: to form. Keep it up, Buck, shield tie, Matthew, I
Speaker 1: certainly hope. So I where your heads at on this one,
Speaker 1: and I think you may be right. So this might
Speaker 1: be the missing piece for Trump getting back out there
Speaker 1: feeling those feeling the energy at those rallies, seeing the
Speaker 1: Trump supporters. It's going to energize this man and help
Speaker 1: him go on to win four more years. Everybody, have
Speaker 1: a great weekend. Thank you for being here every day.
Speaker 1: It is an honor and I do appreciate it so much.
Speaker 1: I'll be talking to all of you Monday. Shield Hie