WEBVTT - The Best Friends, The Cheating Husband and The Lies That Bind

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Falling in love is the best feeling in the world.

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You see stars, you feel giddy, But sometimes that makes

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you do crazy things, and sometimes that means murder. Just

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because the story starts out with Once upon a Times

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it ends happily ever after. Welcome to Crazy

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and Love, a production of Katie Studios and I Heart Radio.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Today's guests are producer Jeff Shane an investigative journalist Sue Buchanan.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Sue spent many years working in Thailand and ended up

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>writing the hip book The Curse of the Turtle, the

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>true story of Thailand's backpacker murders. The book is about

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>suspicious backpacker deaths that occurred on the island of Katao

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and is available now wherever you get your books. Sue

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can be found on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook at Sue Buchanan. Seventy,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Episode thirty two, The Case of the Best Friends, the

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Cheat Husband, and the Lies That Bind. For anyone who

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>knew thirty nine year old Brian Davis, the word that

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>would come to mind was fun. Whether he was out

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>on the lake fishing his biggest passion, or in the

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>office working on selling insurance, Brian had a jovial and

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>carefree attitude that was infectious. Friends and family said it

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>was impossible not to have a good time when Brian

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>was around, simply because he was that good natured. But

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>fun wasn't Brian's only good quality. He was also an

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>outgoing and intelligent man. He could strike up a conversation

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>with just about anyone, and it didn't hurt that he

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed to know a little something about everyone. That intelligent

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence allowed Brian to meet his fair share of ladies,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but one in particular caught his eye, a woman named

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Robin he met at work. Responsible and reserved, Robin didn't

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>care for Brian's personality. Despite both being single parents who

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>adored their kids, Robin didn't think they had anything in common.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Frankly put, she found him annoying. So after three years

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of working together, Robin was surprised when Brian asked her out,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and she was even more surprised at her response. Yes.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Despite some trepidations, the two hit it off and were

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>married within four years, living in Lake Charles, Louisiana. Here's

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeff So. While the story between Robin and Brian is

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly important to the case, the real relationship at the

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>core of everything is actually between Robin and her best friend,

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a woman named Sissy Saltzman. The two had been friends

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for over twenty years and they did everything together. When

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they went to the beauty salon, they had a standing

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>double appointment. They were both Southern women who were fiercely

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>loyal to not only each other, but also the men

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in their lives. Robin explained their ship, It's the kind

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of friendship that all people should have, she said. It's

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the one person that you can call no matter what,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're regardless. So do you know anything more

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about Robin and Brian's marriage, Well, I know that women

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>needed to lean on each other when Robin had to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>deal with Brian, her husband. Despite Brian being a loving husband,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he also had a wandering eye. Robin caught him cheating

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>on her at least twice, and one of the affairs

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was with a woman named Fanny, and that one lasted

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for two years. According to Fanny, she and Brian loved

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>each other, but it wasn't just Fanny. Brian was potatious

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with women everywhere he went. However, Robin gave him a pass.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>She decided to forgive him and move past it. So

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like while their marriage maybe worked, there were

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely some cracks. I think definitely. I mean, obviously he's um,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a flirtatious guy. He's got a roving eye. And

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the eye that's roving. I mean he's

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>acting on this and he's held down another relationship with

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this woman called Franny for for two years, So he's,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, slightly devious, I would imagine, and I'm not

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>quite sure how Robin could look past that and just

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>suck it up. But it seems that, you know, there

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was enough in the relationship for her to decide to

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>stay with him and stay low to him. Two years

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is not just a quick affair. That's a real relationship.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're with someone for two years, you

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>can't put that down to a mistake or one drunken

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>night out where you've done something wrong. I mean explaining

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>away how you've been, you know, having a double relationship

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>for two years. It's not easy, is it. So I'm

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>surprised Robin would would tolerate that. But then maybe she

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>loved him, maybe she didn't want to be on her own,

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she was willing to get past that. Just so

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know she didn't end up single, and by all accounts,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>she really leaned on her friends Sissy in good times

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and bad times. I think she had a really strong

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship with to See And obviously, you know, finding out

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>your husband's cheating on you as devastating, so she would

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have needed her friend a lot for moral support for

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>going out chewing over the fat discussing what her husband

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing, I mean, it has to be pretty devastating,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure her self esteem was very low, so

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine Cissy was the one that pepped her

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>back up and gave it back her self worth. And

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to know if if Cissy had

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ever suggested that perhaps she was in the wrong relationship,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if Robin should leave her husband. I mean, who knows.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>There were also kids involved in the relationship so well,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So while we don't know for sure, it's possible that

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Robin felt like keeping her family together was more important

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>than maybe happiness in her relationship. And I would imagine

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>being a single mother again would be quite a daunting prospect.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That maybe she was willing to not have a perfect

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship was better than going back to being a single mom.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>And remember this is the South. We obviously know that

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Robin really cared about her appearances. She went and got

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>her hair and nails done every week, and so perhaps

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>keeping up the appearance of this happy marriage was just

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>more important to her than having a faithful marriage. Yeah,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there was an element of pride and not

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting people to know that, you know, perhaps her relationship

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't all that it seemed to be. I mean, you're

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to go around announcing that your husband's you know,

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>regularly cheating on you, especially when one of the women

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>he cheated with, Fanny, you know, said they were in

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>love with each other. I mean, two years is a

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.239
<v Speaker 1>substantial amount of time to be dullying with somebody else.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean there must have had, you know, some level

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of love for each other for it to last that long. Otherwise,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>why would why would he stick around? On June two

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine, Brian was about to fulfill a lifelong

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>dream of buying a fishing boat. Ever, the supportive wife, Robin,

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>joined her husband for a day of shopping, but after

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a few hours, Robin grew tired of looking at boat

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>after boat, so around three thirty pm, Robin said that

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Brian dropped her off at home. He then switched cars

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and took off in his under accord it would be

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the last time Robin would ever see her husband alive.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>At ten PM, when Brian hadn't returned home, Robin called

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>nine one. Police told her she had to wait twenty

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>four hours to file a missing person's report. For two days,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>friends and family were panicked about Brian's whereabouts. It wasn't

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like the father of four to just up and leaf.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Two days after disappearing, a man found Brian's body on

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>wagon wheel drive, a small dirt road that is miles

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>from Brian's house and near the expanse of Marshland in

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the region. Brian's body had been laying close to a

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>swamp for at least two days in the southern summer heat,

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so there was a fair amount of decomposition. However, the

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>coroner determined Brian had been shot four times in the back.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Gunshell casings were also strewn around the area. Police studied

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire crime scene and made some interesting findings. Despite

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Brian's car being jacked up as if there were a

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>flat tire, the tire itself was in working condition and

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:07.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have required changing. Someone had also taken Brian's cell phone, wallet, laptop, gun,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and GPS device, but detectives didn't think this was a robbery.

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian was still wearing his ring and watch. Police surmise

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that if someone were trying to rob the man, they

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would have taken all the valuables. But the most mysterious

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thing about the scene was the fact that Brian's shoes

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>were off and his belt undone. One thing was clear.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>This case was not cut and dry here, Sue. Well,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we know that Robin told the cops that she was

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>really worried about Brian after he failed to come home,

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and she told the police she'd called him quite a

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>few times and she'd left multiple voice messages before she

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually called nine one one. She was obviously really concerned

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about his whereabouts. But while all that seems like the

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do, Robin struck a nerve with Brian's

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>family because she never called them so he was missing.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian went missing on Monday, and his family didn't find

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out until Wednesday, and that was only when Brian's ex

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>wife called his sister to ask her if she could

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>help search for him. The sister was furious. She called

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Robin and Robin told her don't freak out, she could

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>handle it, and as we know, later on that day

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Brian's body was found. Well, it seems like Robin had

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>her own way of dealing with it. The police were

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>hard at work trying to figure out what happened to Brian.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Nine days after finding his body, the police brought in

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Robin's best friend, Sissy, for questioning. She was very close

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>with the deceased and his wife, so it stood to

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>reason she would have some information. Let's take a listen

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to some of her interview. The night before Sunday night,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>when I went to get in my car, it would start,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>so I just too his car home because he was

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>taking her truck to work. Sissy told the cops that

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the last time she saw Brian was the day before

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the murder. What she said was that she borrowed his

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>car because she was having trouble with hers. Cissy said

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that she dropped it back at his house the morning

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian disappeared. Where did she spend the day, cops asked.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Sissy said that she had been harm between eleven am

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and three thirty pm, waiting for Robin to pick her up.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to her explaining her schedule to the police,

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't you anywhere come back? In all of the missing

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>people's cases I've covered or even watched on documentaries, suspicion

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>always goes to immediate family, normally partners. Do you have

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what family's husband was doing around this time.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's unusual to to bring people into questioning,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the wife, the friend of the wife, close family.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's where you're going to get all your

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>information from. But I do find it strange that Robin

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't bother to tell his family he not shown up

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that night. You know, if someone was missing from my life,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I do is call around and see

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if they'd seen him. That is weird. We know she

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was concerned enough that she said she called him multiple times,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>so you would sort of think, like you said, that

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>she would also call his family and ask if he's there,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Questions like have you seen him? Have you heard of

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>her m Those are all things that the family might

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not Yeah, of course, because potentially if he's not at home,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe he's called rand to see his family. You know,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe his mother fell ill, maybe he suddenly had to

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>divert to the family home, so that would seem to

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>me to be a logical place to start looking. But

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently she didn't make that call. And to play devil's advocate,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily know her relationship with his family, and

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it wasn't the kind of relationship that she

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>would even call in kind of a scary time. To me,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it does seem weird, but again, we don't know the

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of this family. Even if I didn't get on

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with my in laws, I still want to knock off

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>list of potential places he could be. But yeah, you're right,

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe they didn't have a good relationship. We don't know that,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so difficult to stay, but certainly not unusual for the

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>place to bring in, you know, close friends and family

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of investigation. In my experience, I'll just

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>find interesting that his ex wife knew he was missing

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>before his immediate family. As police looked at the people

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in good natured Brian's life, they wondered who would want

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>him dead. It seemed that one person might have motive,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the husband of Brian's long term mistress, a man named

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Shane Deets. Here's what we know about Shane. He had

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been married to Fanny who was having that two year

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>affair with Brian. Fanny, the mistress, had allegedly told her

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>husband Shane about the affair just two months before Brian

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was found dead. Getting back at the man who was

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>sleeping with your wife would certainly be a good enough

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>reason to kill So what else do we know about

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between Fanny and Brian. So we know that

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Fanny gave emails to the police between her and Brian,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and in those emails, Fanny and Brian often talked about

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian's interest in public sex. And remember when he was

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>found his belt and shoes were off. Could he have

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>been out on wagon wheel road to meet Fanny for

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a trust? Not so fast. People who knew Brian said

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he was obsessed with his car and wouldn't have taken

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it down such a dirty and bumpy roade for nothing.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Fanny said that even if he had flies

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on his windshield, he immediately got the car washed. But

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps he was lured there by Shane and the false

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 1>presentses about an open air rendezvous with Fanny. It turned

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out that, despite seemingly having a pretty good motive to

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kill him, the cops never even called Shane before questioning him.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The police called his place of work instead, and his

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>boss said that Shane had clocked in the day Brian disappeared.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That was good enough for detectives to dismiss him as

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a suspect. It just seems weird because we don't actually

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>know when Brian was killed, just the day that he disappeared.

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, Shane was never an official suspect.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's clarify that, because we know that Brian was last

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>seen sometime in the afternoon, either at the boat shop

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>or dropping his wife off, and as far as our

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>research could tell, we actually don't know a time of

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>death because if you look at the decomposite Shan, Brian

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't completely decomposed when the cops found him. And having

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>covered a fair amount of these true crime cases, we

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know that a body can decompose in the summer quickly,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and in Louisiana this time of year, Brian could have

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>been decomposed very quickly. So I think, you know, there's

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>very little evidence here in terms of time of death

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and the whereabouts the potential suspect. We're going to take

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a break, we'll be back in just a moment. I

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just can't believe that cops would not even call Shane

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>because at the very least he would have information about

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the case. What if Fanny had been the killer, Shane

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>could have at least provided some sort of insight into

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian's frame of mind or the relationship between Fanny and Brian.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And it did say that, you know, Fanny and Brian

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have been having an affair for two years, but it

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like it possibly could have come to an end.

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And if she was really upset that he was going

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to stay with his wife when perhaps previously she thought

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>she'd end up together with him, then that that gives

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>someone else a motive. And you know, as anyone checking

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for a DNA, is anyone checking for firearms or anything

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in Fanny's car or Shane's car? I mean, why aren't

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>these people being adequately investigated? That's a very good question.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did Fanny have a gun? You know, did

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>she go to the shooting range, did she have a

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>temper as she got, any history of previous criminal activity?

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And the same goes for Shane. So you have two

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>people here with a potential motive, and yet they've really

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not been investigated at all. What do we know about

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Shane's history. You know, has he got any criminal record,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>has he been involved in anything like this before, has

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he got a temper? I mean, who is this guy?

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We know so little about him, and so in your

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>experience covering criminal cases, do you think that the police should,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in their due diligence look at every single suspect thoroughly.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>From the information got here, I would say the police

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>have shown no due diligence and it was a really

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>shodly investigated case. I mean, you know, you've got a

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of potential suspect, you've not even been questioned, and

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they're just taking Shane's boss's word for it that he

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>clocked in. Where's the proof he clocked in? You know,

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and we don't even know if that day was the

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>day that Brian died anyway, so you know, they should

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be checking his whereabouts for you know, at least forty

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>eight hours from him going missing to his body being found.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't seem like a very tight investigation to me.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it seems that, you know, quite the opposite.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It really just seems that there's no true diligence going

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on here. I wouldn't trust this police force as Shane

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was cleared of the crime, police turn their attention back

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to the two best friends who seemed to have a

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>lot to hide. While Robin told the police she had

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>called Brian numerous times when he failed to come home

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>from boat shopping, her phone records proved otherwise. As it

0:16:55.320 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>turns out Robin never called Brian. It wouldn't be the

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>last lie the besties would allegedly tell. Sissy had told

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>officials she had been home the day Brian disappeared. The

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>police looked to sell tower records to see if this

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was true. It was not. Starting at one thirty pm,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Sissy's phone picked off a tower that was eleven miles

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>from her home. It also happened to be the closest

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tower to the crime scene. This means she made a

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>call near the scene of the crime. According to cell

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>tower experts, there was no way Sissy's cell phone would

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have picked from that tower if in fact, she had

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>been home. The police's theory was that Brian never actually

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>went home and switched cars like Robin had said, and

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that Sissy had never returned the car after borrowing it

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like she had said. The police thought that Sissy called

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian from wagon will drive, pretending to have a flat tire,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and when Brian and Robin arrived, one or both of

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the woman shot him. Robin stood to gain more than

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand dollars and insurance out She did, in fact,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>attempt to cash in on that policy just two weeks

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>after her husband's death. She had recently lost her job

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and had racked up considerable gambling debts, and the couple

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>were on the verge of losing their home. So so

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>why would Saysie also be involved? Well, that would be

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>sheer loyalty to her best friend. I guess so often

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we see in these cases that money becomes the motivation,

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or at least what the police think is the motivation,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to commit murder. I'd agree with that, but I also

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think that if I was about to lose my home

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I had gambling debts and he had life insurance policy,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be thinking of making myself financially secure anyway.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, that's what life insurance policies are born.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So if one of you dies, the other one doesn't

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, land in the suit. So although I think

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a motive, I don't think it's that unusual. And

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think if I had killed my husband, I

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>would be waiting more than two weeks before I cashed

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that in because they're looking too obvious. So you know,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>it's either not a very well thought out plan. But

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>then on the other hand, it could be a smoke

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>screen because she could say, well, you know, if I

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>killed him, why would I be claiming on the insurance

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later? So there's different ways of looking at it.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a very interesting point. If he had died of

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a heart attack, no one would bet an eyelash that

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>she waited two weeks to collect the money. In fact,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that would probably seem like a long time. So if

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't actually kill him, the two week timeline doesn't

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>really mean anything. No, I wouldn't have thought so. I mean,

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we know she'd lost her job, so you know, it

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>seems quite radical to kill your husband to get money

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just because you've lost your job. Then he was also

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>having affairs. If he died of natural causes, then you know,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting a fortnight before trying to make yourself financially is

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 1>actually quite a long time. Also, the fact that they

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>sold insurance, I think speaks to this two week timeline.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It's her job to know the system. So she knows

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>very well that when someone dies you have to file

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to claim the money. And when you've lost someone you love,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean six days is not going to bring him back,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but it takes this thing out of it when you're

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>not struggling for money. So and don't forget, you know,

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>she's got his kids and her kids. She's got six

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>kids now between them. Of course she's going to want

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some money. Six months after Brian was found dead, Robbin

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and Cissy were charged with murder. Internally, the police were

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>referring to the investigation as the Felmer and Louise case.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The two women would stay on trial as they did

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>everything else together. We know that. The May two thousand

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and twelve trial, the defense talked about the lack of

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence. I mean, we've got no fingerprints here, we've

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>got no DNA, And they also pointed to the fact

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that a local bar had a surveillance camera on the

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>road and that would have easily proved if Robin and

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Cissy were guilty because the CCTV would have picked them

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>up driving down that road. But amazingly, the cops actually

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>lost the take. The defense went on to say the

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>cops were incompetent to their theories just could not be trusted.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And they also showed surveillance of Robin the morning of

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the murder shopping for a boat with Brian, and she

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>could be seen wearing white capri pants and really flimsy

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>flip flop sandals. No one, they argued he was planning

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on murdering their husband in a marsh would be wearing

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>such an impractical life bit. The defense also performed tests

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.959
<v Speaker 1>with the cell phone towers that found when a tower

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes overloaded with calls, they get bounced to other towers,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>meaning Sissy might have been telling the truth. However, unfortunately

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for the defense, that test was ruled an admissible in court.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go back to what the defense

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was saying about the outfit, because I think it's pretty interesting.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>They argued that Robin, who allegedly was the murderer, would

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not have worn white pants and sandals to go kill

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>her husband. Basically, it's just an impractical outfit to do

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>such a strenuous and potentially dirty activity. I mean, from

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my point of view and from my investigations, I mean

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of points raised here. I mean, you know,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>she was wearing that at the time. But if she

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>premeditated this murder and she's been dropped off at home,

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was to say she hasn't got changed, And then you've

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>got to decide was it premeditated or not. You know,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if she just decided to kill her husband and hadn't

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pre planned it, you know, she's hardly going to be

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>worried about what she's wearing. So you've got the idea

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>here of premeditation or not premeditated, So you have to

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>look into that. And also I'd be interested to know

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>if she had ever shot a gun, you know, did

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>she have a gun, did she know how to shoot

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a gun? And she got any experience with firearms? And

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>she'd go to a shooting club, but she's been shooting

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with her husband and also Sissy, you know, did Cy

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have any experience with firearms. There's no information to say,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether these women would even know how to

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>handle a firearm. I know my mother certainly wouldn't. She's

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>never touched one, so that's something else. I think it

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is quite interesting. But I think the fact that you know,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the telling surveillance camera from that bar, that the fact

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that police lost it, did they not watch it. First,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>where's the evidence in court about what was on that tape?

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Even without the footage? You know, if someone has seen it,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>then that's another witness. That's a really good point. We

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to that. I would imagine if

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it had been good for the prosecution, someone would have

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>come forward and said, oh, I saw that tape. I mean,

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>how ad you lose the evidence like that? And like,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't deny the defense are right really

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>when they when they suggested the cups are incompetent, but

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>losing one piece of valuable evidence that would pinpoint who

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was at the steam Let's stop here for another break.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I've been interested in is m if

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this theory that you know he wasn't in his car,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't switched cars, and you know he'd gone down

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in in Robin's car, then why aren't we testing the

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>other car? Steve it had been down there? Look, you know,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>why aren't we checking the tires while aren't we checking

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, marsh soil would attach itself to the underside

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of a car. You know, why aren't they scraping to

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to do soil matches to find out where the cars

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have been or at least where Robin's car has been.

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's another great point. It just seems like a really

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ineffective investigation to me. I mean, there's just so many

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>points that haven't been covered, or at least if they have,

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about it. What about muddy footprints in

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the footwell, you know, if Robin's been down there and

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>shot her husband in this marshy land, you know, and

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>she and she's got away in her car, why aren't

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we checking the footwell of her car? Why aren't we

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>checking her shoes? Why aren't we checking her clothes to

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>see if there's any splatterings of this marsh? You know,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's really not much going on here in terms

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of pinpointing where she might have been. After both the

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecution and defense rested, Robin and Sissy remained pointedly emotionless

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>as the jury deliberated for three hours. By a vote

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of eleven to one, the women were both found guilty.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So you might be wondering how this was possible. As

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you might know, in nearly every state in America in

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven to one jury split with Cosmos trial. But Louisiana

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>actually has a lab that only ten jurors voting guilty

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are needed for a murder conviction, not a unanimous decision.

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Like most states, people who supported Robin and Cissy called

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>into question the ethics of this law. So it seems

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like up until the very end, there's just some things

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>here that did not go right, from the police losing

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the tape to focusing so much on Robin from the

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning to now this law that allows a jury to

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>convict the pair without a unanimous decision. Through it all,

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if Robin and Cissy got a

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>fair shake. It doesn't sound to me like they had

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a fair trial. But then you know, we have one

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>juror that was completely convinced that women didn't do it,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but the others were, So you know, what were they

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>basing that decision on, Because from what I understand about

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the case, I wouldn't be finding them guilty. I think

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a completely inadequate investigation, and they presented very

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>little in the way of evidence, and you know, there

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was no physical evidence. Where's the murder weapon and where

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are the belongings that were sing? And you know, why

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>would you rob your own husband but leave you know,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>his watches if you're going to try and make it

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like a robbery. Then that was kind of bungled too.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'd be interested to know what it was

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that these this jury found so compelling that they convicted them.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And had this trial had been in any other state,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this would have been a mistrial and they would have

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>walked away. As the judge sentenced the women to life

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>in prison without a chance of parole. The pair held hands. Today,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Robin and Sissy are both serving their sentences in the

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>same prison and claim they are closer than ever again.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You can find Suzanne Buchanan on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>at Soue Buchanan seven zero. Her book, The Curse of

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Turtle from Wild Blue Press is available now wherever

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you get your books. Yeah. The only thing I'd like

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to say about, you know, been the author of the

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Curse of the Turtle, which is the true story of

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Thailand's backpack and murders, is that you know, I've also

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time investigating cases where there's massive

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of evidence missing um and where the more questions

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you ask, the more questions you have, and where police

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>investigations have been pretty shoddy, and where families have walked away,

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, very unsatisfied with what's happened because nothing adds up.

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And this case is incredibly interesting to me because it's

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>very similar to all of the cases that I've investigated

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in Kotao on Thailand. So, you know, I really feel

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>for these kinds of stories because I've spent seven and

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a half years investigating crimes, despicious death, evidence that doesn't

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>add up, you know, theories that just don't make any

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>sense whichever way you look at it. And as a journalist,

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I've always said, if you can't figure out a story,

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it's because you've got the wrong information or you don't

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>have all of the information, and that certainly seems to

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be the case with this police investigation, because you know,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>whichever way you wrap it up, it still doesn't make sense.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Shameless plug. If you're enjoying Crazy and Love, leave us

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a review and listen to season three of our hit

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>series The Piked and Massacre. New episodes there every Wednesday

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, and don't forget to follow

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram at Katie Underscore Studios. Crazy in Love

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Stephanie Lydecker, Jeff Shane, Chris Grieves, and

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>me Courtney Armstrong. Editing and sound designed by Jeff Ta.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Crazy in Love is a production of I heart Radio

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and Katie Studios. For more podcasts from I heart Radio,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. Stay safe, lovers,