Speaker 1: An hour two Sean Hannity's show. Thank you, Scott Shannon.
Speaker 1: Here's our toll free number. It's eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four to one, Sean, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. We're always honored him, privileged to
Speaker 1: have back on the program. He is the founder, he's
Speaker 1: the editor in chief, he's the chief investigative reporter just
Speaker 1: thenews dot com. John Solomon is with us. We saw
Speaker 1: Tulsea Gabbard knowing about all of this. We've had now
Speaker 1: two document dumps. A lot of this information that we're
Speaker 1: hearing about are things that John Solomon broke and we
Speaker 1: reported on on both radio and TV on a regular basis.
Speaker 1: And here's what I want you to explain, John, because
Speaker 1: we're really talking about a grand conspiracy and whether or
Speaker 1: not deep state operatives and the term is applicable put
Speaker 1: cinderblocks on the scales of not one, not two, but
Speaker 1: three presidential elections. I have my way of saying it,
Speaker 1: but I'll let you say it in your words.
Speaker 2: What you have is a repeat pattern of the intelligence
Speaker 2: and law enforcement community of the federal government collaborating with
Speaker 2: Democrat operatives to repeatedly mislead the American people, to the
Speaker 2: disadvantage of Republicans, usually Donald Trump, and to the benefit
Speaker 2: of Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden who had
Speaker 2: real legal issues. As we would later come to understand,
Speaker 2: that pattern isn't just a political dirty trick. It could
Speaker 2: rise to the level of criminality if certain elements are met,
Speaker 2: the infringement of civil liberties of people like Mike Flynn
Speaker 2: and President Trump and Carter Page and others. If it
Speaker 2: is a conspiracy, it can be viewed as criminal activity.
Speaker 2: The effort to hide national security threats like a China
Speaker 2: intrusion on the twenty twenty election, or the real nature
Speaker 2: of the Hunter Biden laptop could rise to the level
Speaker 2: of a criminal conspiracy. And when you write an official
Speaker 2: intelligence product for the President of the United States, as
Speaker 2: John Brennan and his team did in December twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: which is what today's new revelation is about, and you
Speaker 2: intentionally violate the rules of the intelligence community to create
Speaker 2: a false conclusion, you could potentially face criminal activity because
Speaker 2: you're misleading the highest office of the land. And I
Speaker 2: think today's revelation is so important to now know it's irrefutable.
Speaker 2: There is concrete evidence that the dirty dossier. The Steele dossier,
Speaker 2: which had been discredited by December of twenty sixteen, was
Speaker 2: used to make the conclusion that.
Speaker 3: By the way, was it it really discredited?
Speaker 1: Didn't bruce Or in August of twenty sixteen warn them
Speaker 1: not to use it?
Speaker 3: Than he would know.
Speaker 2: Let's think of all the things that happened before John
Speaker 2: Brennan's team uses the dossier in twenty sixteen, Bruce Or
Speaker 2: discredits it in August. In September, the CIA tells the FBI,
Speaker 2: don't rely on Christopher Steele until you revalidate them because
Speaker 2: his network of sources has been infiltrated by Russian intelligence.
Speaker 2: In November, first the FBI fires him because they catch
Speaker 2: him leaking in violations of his thing. By December, a
Speaker 2: spreadsheet has been created of every sentence in the Steele dossier,
Speaker 2: and it either can be neither corroborated or it has
Speaker 2: been debunked. The FBI completed that spreadsheet. It's at that
Speaker 2: point that John Brennan forces that bad intelligence product into
Speaker 2: the Intelligence Committee assessment. And I want to take you
Speaker 2: to a key moment in December by Canstrom, just real quickly,
Speaker 2: so you can see how agregious. This is the Intelligence
Speaker 2: Committee was going to brief President Obama in December eighth that,
Speaker 2: in fact, Russia did intrude in the election, just like
Speaker 2: you and I reported, But they did not try to
Speaker 2: tip the election in favor of one candidate or the other.
Speaker 2: They did what they've done for elections for many years,
Speaker 2: which is try to sow chaos and dot doubt in
Speaker 2: division in America. That's a Soviet playbook that Newton knows well.
Speaker 2: There was no evidence in any prior election that Pewtin
Speaker 2: tried to pick a winner or loser. And they were
Speaker 2: going to tell the president President Obama on December eighth,
Speaker 2: once again, that's what we believe happened. President Obama doesn't
Speaker 2: take that briefing. It gets canceled. The next day, he
Speaker 2: orders a new review. He shrinks out most of the
Speaker 2: Intelligence Committee and brings it down to John Brennan and
Speaker 2: James Comy and one good guy in this whole episode
Speaker 2: of the NSA director at the time, and they come
Speaker 2: up with an entirely different conclusion. And to get to
Speaker 2: that conclusion, to get to that conclusion that Vladimir Putin
Speaker 2: was helping Trump, which no one in the Intelligence Committee
Speaker 2: believe they inject the dirty dossie. That is what flips
Speaker 2: this conclusion of the Intelligence Committe to a different fighting
Speaker 2: and then they hang that around Donald Trump, so that
Speaker 2: the beginning of his twenty seventeen presidency is beset by
Speaker 2: a fake Russia collusion allegation, one that leads to a
Speaker 2: special prosecutor, years of strife, years of misleading the American people.
Speaker 2: That is what Tulca Gabbert proves today by releasing this
Speaker 2: House Intelligence report. And by the way, this report was
Speaker 2: written by Devin Nunez and Cashptel. They were always right
Speaker 2: when they went to the podium and said what they
Speaker 2: said in eighteen. They were telling the American people the truth.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, Adam Schiff. They misled us.
Speaker 2: And that's what this report emphatically shows.
Speaker 1: Now we now also know that they were warned not
Speaker 1: to use the Russian disinformation dossier in August of twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and it became the basis for four fives applications, three
Speaker 1: of which James Comy himself signed. And we know that
Speaker 1: they had no degree of confidence in any of that.
Speaker 3: Is that true or false?
Speaker 2: I think there was a second warning in Septembers. You
Speaker 2: get two of them. You've got or and then the CIA,
Speaker 2: and then the fisas are signed. I think two were
Speaker 2: signed by Comy, one by Cave, and then won by
Speaker 2: rosen Stein, so they're four. I think going Komy did two.
Speaker 2: But other than that, one hundred percent accurate.
Speaker 1: Okay, we do know post election that our intel community,
Speaker 1: and these are career people, rank and file people determined
Speaker 1: that as it relates to Trump Russia collusion, putting aside
Speaker 1: Hillary's bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier, that they concluded, no,
Speaker 1: there was no assistance, There was no collusion with Trump
Speaker 1: and Plutin and Russia in any way, shape, bat or form,
Speaker 1: And that intelligence was repeated again and again. Is that
Speaker 1: true or false?
Speaker 2: It is true. And let me add one thing that's
Speaker 2: so important part of the conclusion of it, the part
Speaker 2: of the reason that the career people did not believe
Speaker 2: Putin was trying to help Trump, was that in October,
Speaker 2: when most Americans make up their mind, in October twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: when Hillary Clinton's race was tightening, she was actually in
Speaker 2: danger of losing, Russia pulled all of its active measures.
Speaker 2: They stopped any influence campaigns they have. If you were
Speaker 2: trying to help Donald Trump, the moment you would most
Speaker 2: help them is in October when voters are making up
Speaker 2: their mind. Russia pulled back and held back its information.
Speaker 2: That fact, which they had to intercept in human intelligence,
Speaker 2: led very strongly to the right conclusion, which is Puten
Speaker 2: wasn't trying to pick a winner or loser. He was
Speaker 2: just trying to sew dissension. But James Comy and John
Speaker 2: Brennan to try to hijack that finding and get to
Speaker 2: a different conclusion, and they have to use the dosia
Speaker 2: to get there.
Speaker 3: So another so fact.
Speaker 1: After the intel community, the rank and file career people
Speaker 1: concluded that there was no collusion with Trump and Russia,
Speaker 1: that information was passed on to the higher ups, and
Speaker 1: as time went on, as we got to December of
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, then those people in the highest levels of
Speaker 1: power within these agencies, and I'm talking about Clapper and Brennan, etc.
Speaker 1: That they took this information, they corrupted it, or to
Speaker 1: use your words, polluted it to say the exact opposite
Speaker 1: of what they had, what their rank and file had concluded,
Speaker 1: is that true? Is do these declassified documents prove that they.
Speaker 2: Do, as do the emails from the whistleblowers that we
Speaker 2: reported on last week. That is one hundred percent true.
Speaker 1: Next question, and did did Obama and Biden and Komy
Speaker 1: and Clapper and Brennan and Susan Rice? Did they all
Speaker 1: have a meeting about this very very issue, this very issue?
Speaker 1: And did that not lead to Susan Rice's cya? Only
Speaker 1: just a couple of minutes before Donald Trump was sworn
Speaker 1: into office in twenty seventeen, the CYA memo about a
Speaker 1: meeting that had taken place weeks earlier. Did they when
Speaker 1: she said, you know, by the book, Obama said, by
Speaker 1: the book?
Speaker 3: Comy said, by the book? Did that all happen?
Speaker 2: It did? I don't know whether that meeting prompts a
Speaker 2: memo or whether Susan Rice just does it to create
Speaker 2: the cya, But you're one hundred percent right. And there's
Speaker 2: been a lot of in the last twenty four hours
Speaker 2: about Barack Obama. He did the Sergeant Schultz from the
Speaker 2: old television show many years ago, Hogan heroes, I know nothing, I.
Speaker 3: Know nothing right.
Speaker 2: You did it much better than I did. Let me
Speaker 2: tell you what, Barack Obama's not telling you when he
Speaker 2: makes that statement. In July twenty sixteen, he attended the
Speaker 2: meeting with John Brennan that emphatically told them Hillary Clinton
Speaker 2: was going to fake create this fake scandal. He knows
Speaker 2: that before the FBI starts across fire hurricane. As president
Speaker 2: of the United States, knowing it's a false allegation, he
Speaker 2: doesn't stop the Russia collusion investigation in December, when you
Speaker 2: notice that the Intelligence Committee's going to come in and
Speaker 2: say Russia didn't try to help Donald Trump or Hillary
Speaker 2: couldn't win. They just interfered in their normal way, he
Speaker 2: stops that briefing and orders a new review, and that
Speaker 2: leads to John Brennan's hijacking of the Intelligence Community assessment
Speaker 2: in January. January fifth is the date, January fifth, twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama presides over the meeting where FBI the DOJ
Speaker 2: officials are conspiring to figure out how do we keep
Speaker 2: an investigation of Mike Flinn going. They have that meeting
Speaker 2: because the day before, the FBI career people had decided
Speaker 2: that Mike Flynn did not commit a single crime, he
Speaker 2: should be cleared, and the investigation should be ended. And
Speaker 2: instead they come out of that meeting trying to lure
Speaker 2: Mike Flynn into an interview where they can then charge
Speaker 2: him with lying. Barack Obama attended all three of those meetings.
Speaker 2: He cannot claim he wasn't an actor in this. He
Speaker 2: cannot complain he wasn't a conspirator in this political conspiracy.
Speaker 2: Whether it rises to criminality, I don't know yet, but
Speaker 2: he was in all three of those meetings, and his
Speaker 2: statement last night was dishonest.
Speaker 1: I quick break more with the founder, editor in chief
Speaker 1: and chief investigative reporter, John Solomon Justins dot Com on
Speaker 1: the other side than your calls eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one Sean as we continue, and later Bill O'Reilly
Speaker 1: much more.
Speaker 4: Biden answered one hundred questions in six months. Trump answered
Speaker 4: one hundred questions this morning. So fast America is so bad?
Speaker 4: On the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Hey, with crime on the rise, what's your personal protection
Speaker 1: plan for you and your loved ones? Well might include
Speaker 1: sig sour. Now, sig sour is the military issued firearm
Speaker 1: of choice. They're now celebrating the US armies two hundred
Speaker 1: and fiftieth anniversary with a very special offer on the
Speaker 1: M seventeen and M eighteen pistols, now the sig Sour
Speaker 1: M seventeen and M eighteen pistols. They are the official
Speaker 1: side arm of the US Army, the most innovative handguns
Speaker 1: ever for our military. Now through September the first you
Speaker 1: can get up to two hundred and fifty bucks and
Speaker 1: sigcash when you buy one of these amazing pistols.
Speaker 3: I own one, I know now.
Speaker 1: Sig Sour firearms, optics and suppressors include the industry's unique
Speaker 1: and only infinite guarantee. If something breaks, they'll fix it.
Speaker 1: If they can fix it, they replace it. You don't
Speaker 1: need to receipt a warranty card. It's fully transferable forever.
Speaker 1: Just go to six hour dot com slash Hannity Today,
Speaker 1: that's SI G S A U E R dot com
Speaker 1: slash Hannity. We continue with John Solomon. He is the founder,
Speaker 1: editor in chief and chief investigative reporter justinnews dot com.
Speaker 1: He broke a lot of these stories involving the Russia
Speaker 1: Russia Russia hoax. Let's go to the part of the
Speaker 1: Grand Conspiracy on another level. Let's go to twenty twenty
Speaker 1: and true or False. In March of twenty twenty, did
Speaker 1: the FBI corroborate the authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop? Did
Speaker 1: the FBI then come up with a plan to meet
Speaker 1: weekly with every big tech company and prebunk whether or
Speaker 1: not that laptop would be true, knowing that Rudy Juliani's attorney,
Speaker 1: Bob Costello had a copy and would likely drop that
Speaker 1: which happened in October of twenty twenty, before the election,
Speaker 1: and when they corroborated it in March of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: Then they met weekly with big tech companies. Then the
Speaker 1: New York Post drops the story, and then the New
Speaker 1: York Post then people like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey request,
Speaker 1: you know, is this what you were warning us about?
Speaker 1: They knew the truth was it was real, but they
Speaker 1: didn't tell big tech companies the truth, did they They
Speaker 1: did not.
Speaker 2: Now, now, those weekly meetings started before they knew that
Speaker 2: Giuliani had the laptop, but those weekly medians become the
Speaker 2: vehicle by which they suppress the laptop story. And then
Speaker 2: that suppression continues on in the form of Mike Morrell,
Speaker 2: who then organizes that letter. The former deputy CI director, former.
Speaker 3: Of Micael Morrell I thought it was wink and Tony Blinken.
Speaker 2: Well, Blincoln asked him to get it started. But Morell
Speaker 2: is the organizer. Just think about this. John Brennan's successor
Speaker 2: his deputy is the guy that helps organize a letter
Speaker 2: at Tony Blinken's recommendation. According to Morrell's own emails, to
Speaker 2: then say the laptop is rushing disinformation when it was
Speaker 2: just the opposite had already been authenticated.
Speaker 1: By that right, last question because of the constraints of time.
Speaker 1: Only reason I'm not trying to rush you out here
Speaker 1: because all of this is important and we'll have more
Speaker 1: of this on TV tonight with you. And then can
Speaker 1: you argue for the third you know, presidential election in
Speaker 1: a row, that all of the weaponization and lawfair used
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump was were more cinder blocks for a
Speaker 1: third presidential election put on the scales of an election
Speaker 1: to destroy Trump legally by weaponizing the justice system and
Speaker 1: having a two tier justice system just to prevent him
Speaker 1: from ever winning.
Speaker 3: Did that happen to it did?
Speaker 2: Indeed? And it is is.
Speaker 3: That a grand Is that a grand conspiracy?
Speaker 2: Well? That was other three cinder blocks that are at
Speaker 2: the heart of the cash Betel FBI kriminal investigation that
Speaker 2: was opened in April that we call the Grand Conspiracy Investigation,
Speaker 2: and all three of them literally parts of where Cash
Speaker 2: Bettel has been leading the FBI and the Justice Department.
Speaker 2: Here's the next thing that's going to happen, John, if
Speaker 2: the Justice Department follows his protocol, and I believe it
Speaker 2: will under Pambondi. When you have a conspiracy case like
Speaker 2: this against the mob or the drug cartels, the first
Speaker 2: thing you do is you create a federal strike force
Speaker 2: that then goes into action. You get your best and
Speaker 2: brightest agents and prosecutes, you put them on one team,
Speaker 2: and you go through the overt acts. I believe fam
Speaker 2: Bondi's at that moment now where she has to make
Speaker 2: a decision. Will she do that? I think she will.
Speaker 2: You create a federal strike task force. What does that mean?
Speaker 2: It means John Brennan, Barack Obama, James Comy, and all
Speaker 2: the gang that we've been talking about, They're going to
Speaker 2: be facing a strike force just like a mob boss did,
Speaker 2: just like a drug cartel kingpin did. That's going to
Speaker 2: be the next decision for Justice in the next few weeks.
Speaker 1: Amazing, and I have every belief that the American people
Speaker 1: will it'll take their breath away.
Speaker 3: The depths with which this.
Speaker 1: Scheme to stop Trump every step of the way was
Speaker 1: put in place, and how our entire constitutional republic, frankly,
Speaker 1: in my view my estimation based on what I know
Speaker 1: and what we've reported and what you reported, was put
Speaker 1: in jeopardy the entire time. And thankfully it's now coming
Speaker 1: to light. Let's see what happens with it. John Solomon,
Speaker 1: editor in chief, founder, chief investigative reporter justinnews dot com.
Speaker 3: Thank you, sir. We'll see it at night on TV.
Speaker 2: Great.
Speaker 1: I know, it's just shocking, so shocking in so many ways. Oh,
Speaker 1: that Russia collusion happened. I spent three years of my
Speaker 1: life covering all of this. Tulsea Gabbard, newly declassified information,
Speaker 1: gave a mini presser at the White House earlier today,
Speaker 1: and here's some of what she said, which we played earlier.
Speaker 5: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and
Speaker 5: his national security team directed creation of an intelligence community
Speaker 5: assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would
Speaker 5: promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty
Speaker 5: sixteen election to help President Trump win, selling it to
Speaker 5: the American people as though it were true.
Speaker 3: It wasn't.
Speaker 5: The report that we released today's shows in great detail
Speaker 5: how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources,
Speaker 5: They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims.
Speaker 5: They disobeyed traditional trade craft intelligence community standards, and withheld
Speaker 5: the truth from the American people. In doing so, they
Speaker 5: conspired to subvert the will of the American people who
Speaker 5: elected Donald Trump in that election in November of twenty sixteen.
Speaker 5: They worked with their partners in the media to promote
Speaker 5: this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump
Speaker 5: and launching what would be a year's long coup against
Speaker 5: him and his administration. Nation implicates former President Obama and
Speaker 5: criminal behavior. We have referred and will continue to refer
Speaker 5: all of these documents to the Department of Justice and
Speaker 5: the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this For
Speaker 5: even the evidence correct, The evidence that we have found
Speaker 5: and that we have released directly point to President Obama
Speaker 5: leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple
Speaker 5: pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Speaker 1: Wow anyway, here to shed some more light on this
Speaker 1: and give us more analysis of this. Alan Wilson, South
Speaker 1: Carolina Attorney General, currently running for governor, supports the efforts
Speaker 1: of the Department of National Intelligence and Tulsea Gabbard as
Speaker 1: they now push for a may end up being a
Speaker 1: special prosecutor or a council involved in this. You know,
Speaker 1: I've gone over this now with Bill O'Reilly and with
Speaker 1: John Solomon and my own analysis and my own of
Speaker 1: now what has been at two document disclosures, two declassifications
Speaker 1: that have taken place with Tulca Gabbett and what is
Speaker 1: beyond frustrating to me. It seems like deep state operatives,
Speaker 1: to use the appropriate term of my view, have now
Speaker 1: put cinder blocks on the scales of three presidential elections.
Speaker 1: Will work our way backwards in twenty twenty four, it
Speaker 1: was all the weaponization from twenty to twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: to make it impossible for Donald Trump to be a
Speaker 1: viable candidate. If you look at the twenty twenty race,
Speaker 1: we know that the FBI had verified the authenticity of
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's laptop. They knew that Bob Costello, then Rudy
Speaker 1: Giuliani's attorney at a copy of that laptop. They knew
Speaker 1: that it would leak, and they spent the summer of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty meeting with big tech companies on a weekly basis,
Speaker 1: warning them about that they may be victims of a
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation campaign that may involve Hunter and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and even Buris Holdings. And then when the New York
Speaker 1: Post story did break, in fact, a lot of these companies,
Speaker 1: including Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey then running Twitter, said
Speaker 1: is this what you've been warning about?
Speaker 3: Or is this true? They would not give them.
Speaker 1: The answer that they knew to be true is that
Speaker 1: the laptop was in fact authentic and that they had
Speaker 1: discovered that back in March, which means that they actively
Speaker 1: participated in influencing the election, because that would have had
Speaker 1: a big impact, in my view, on the election results.
Speaker 1: And you worked your way back to twenty twenty, we're
Speaker 1: discovering through these classified documents that FBI director at the time,
Speaker 1: James Comy, ignored key critical evidence in his determination about
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's top secret classified information. I would argue to
Speaker 1: give her a pass. We know that he himself and
Speaker 1: others were warned not to trust the dirty Russian disinformation
Speaker 1: dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for. There was Russian election interference,
Speaker 1: but that only came from that side, and that in fact,
Speaker 1: this unverifiable, completely debunked now information was used for four
Speaker 1: piza applications to backdoor spy on Donald Trump, both as
Speaker 1: a candidate, as a transition team, and as a president.
Speaker 1: To me, it sounds like cinder blocks on scales of elections.
Speaker 1: Do you see primes or a need for a huge investigation?
Speaker 2: What do you see in this showing absolutely?
Speaker 6: And you said at the very top of the block
Speaker 6: time here you said, this is how shocking this is.
Speaker 6: This is only four days since all this stuff has
Speaker 6: been revealed. And the question that I keep asking myself
Speaker 6: is if you look at how the intelligence assessment that
Speaker 6: was issued leading up to December seventh was that Russia
Speaker 6: had nothing to do with tampering of the between sixty election,
Speaker 6: and then you look at January sixth, the real controversial
Speaker 6: January sixth and twenty seventeen, that there was a newly
Speaker 6: issued intelligence assessment the same Russia did temper at the
Speaker 6: twenty sixteen the election, and you realize that the President
Speaker 6: of the United States directed that that new assessment be issued.
Speaker 6: Then the question I have for people is do you
Speaker 6: think Barack Obama would have reconvened the National Security Council
Speaker 6: and ordered a new assessment if Hillary Clinton had won?
Speaker 6: And the answer is no, he wouldn't have The people
Speaker 6: around Barack Obama and the Obama administration of some the
Speaker 6: same people who weaponized the criminal justice system against President
Speaker 6: Trump while using that same criminal justice system to protect
Speaker 6: the Biden family. These are the same people that weaponize
Speaker 6: the legacy media as well as our social media overlords
Speaker 6: against President Trump. These are also the same people who
Speaker 6: weaponized the intelligence community industrial complex against the president. So
Speaker 6: now they're calling all of us crazy and have called
Speaker 6: us crazy. They've called you crazy, John Solomon, crazy for
Speaker 6: daring to believe our eyes, our lying eyes, as opposed
Speaker 6: to them. So I would love to see a full
Speaker 6: on investigation and a full vetting of the truth for
Speaker 6: the American people. We owe the American people nothing less.
Speaker 1: What do you make of Tulsea Gabbard's comments from earlier today.
Speaker 6: Well, I think she's incredibly courageous. I mean she used
Speaker 6: very bold language, you know, treason, this conspiracy. She called
Speaker 6: out the president, she called out everyone in his National
Speaker 6: Security Council. I mean, she stood up there in front
Speaker 6: of the American people and laid it all out and
Speaker 6: stood up against the legacy media. So I mean, I'm very,
Speaker 6: very proud of her. I'm very impressed with the fortitude
Speaker 6: and the courage that she has had, and now they're
Speaker 6: going to go after her like nothing you've ever seen.
Speaker 6: But I stand behind her, and I'm going to call
Speaker 6: another Attorney's General in this country to stand for a
Speaker 6: full accounting and a full investigation. In Pam Bondy, who
Speaker 6: is a good friend of mine, I have full faith
Speaker 6: and confidence that she will put the best people on
Speaker 6: this and we will get an accounting of what happened
Speaker 6: four or five years ago.
Speaker 1: If you take a look at some of the classified
Speaker 1: materials that have come out to this point, we find
Speaker 1: that rank and file career intelligence officials came to a
Speaker 1: very different assessment than what ultimately evolved after and his
Speaker 1: cronies at the highest levels of these three letter agencies
Speaker 1: got their hands on it. In other words, they said, no,
Speaker 1: there was no Trump Russia collusion, and then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden that emerged into there was, which emerged into
Speaker 1: this narrative that literally took up an enormous inordinate amount
Speaker 1: of time during Donald Trump's presidency. Do you believe that
Speaker 1: the evidence is now showing that they purposely, to use
Speaker 1: John Solomon's words, polluted and corrupted that information for political purposes.
Speaker 1: And if they did, what is the crime?
Speaker 6: Well, I absolutely agree, John Solomon. I do believe that
Speaker 6: they polluted, you know, this whole process for their own
Speaker 6: personal political agenda. And again, the same people around President Obama,
Speaker 6: you know, during that period of time of the same
Speaker 6: people that were driving everything against President Trump during his
Speaker 6: first term, as well as all the criminal trials in
Speaker 6: the civil cases going against him when he was out
Speaker 6: of office, and they're the ones trying to discredit the president. Now, obviously,
Speaker 6: you know, I want to withhold my final judgment or
Speaker 6: what crimes have been committed, but until we get something
Speaker 6: more from the Department of Justice. But I stand one
Speaker 6: thousand percent behind Tulci Gabbard and you and everyone else
Speaker 6: calling on a full vetting and a full accounting. We
Speaker 6: need an investigation, We need a full report on this.
Speaker 6: And now I don't want the report coming from members
Speaker 6: of Congress, even in our own party. I want the
Speaker 6: report coming from the law enforcement community and the Justice
Speaker 6: Department as it stands right now.
Speaker 1: If you are the attorney Jeremal and you are the
Speaker 1: Attorney General of South Carolina, how would you approach this
Speaker 1: from an investigative standpoint based on what we now know
Speaker 1: that has been declassified?
Speaker 6: I mean full transparency. I mean Tulcie Gabbert's released all
Speaker 6: the documents that she has found. I think we have
Speaker 6: to allow the Justice Department an opportunity to appoint a
Speaker 6: special counsel if that's the direction they decide to go.
Speaker 6: We have to give them an opportunity to put things together.
Speaker 6: And I think Attorney General Bonding needs to have a
Speaker 6: press conference. My recommendation would be to her that trust
Speaker 6: and credibility must be restored into the criminal justice system
Speaker 6: at the federal level as well as the intelligence community.
Speaker 6: And the only way to do that is to allow
Speaker 6: the American people to have full sunlight, full transparency, full accounting,
Speaker 6: make everything available on public portals on the website, give
Speaker 6: us access to everything, and then let us look for ourselves, don't.
Speaker 6: I don't want talking heads on the left wing media
Speaker 6: news outlet's telling me what I should believe. I want
Speaker 6: to see it for myself, and that's what the attorneys
Speaker 6: all to do in my opinion.
Speaker 1: Quick break right back, we'll continue more with Alan Wilson,
Speaker 1: South Carolina Attorney General on the other side, and more
Speaker 1: of your calls coming up as well, and all things simple. Man,
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn is
Speaker 1: our number.
Speaker 3: Listen.
Speaker 1: I want to remind you about Berner BYRNA. It is
Speaker 1: they now have their new compact launcher. It's four inches long,
Speaker 1: it's two smartphones thick. It's easy to conceal carrier on
Speaker 1: your body. You won't attract unnecessary attention. And the beauty
Speaker 1: of this technology is you can incapacitate in any perpetrator,
Speaker 1: any size, thirty to forty minutes. It may save your life.
Speaker 1: It has a powerful range of fifty to sixty feet.
Speaker 1: They have powerful deterrence gas pepper spray kinetic rounds. And
Speaker 1: this technology is so trusted and so advanced that over
Speaker 1: five hundred government agencies, police departments, private security firms. Guess what,
Speaker 1: they're now using this technology. And it's also great because
Speaker 1: it's legal in all fifty states. You don't need a permit,
Speaker 1: you don't need a background check, and I urge all
Speaker 1: of you to get one. All of their pistols are
Speaker 1: hand assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana. It fires at four
Speaker 1: hundred feet per second forty one jewels of force per
Speaker 1: square inch. It's perfect for anybody that wants to protect
Speaker 1: themselves and anyway. Check out the videos for yourself. I
Speaker 1: guarantee that this technology will impress you. Go to Berner
Speaker 1: BYRNA dot com today check out their videos. Also look
Speaker 1: at their retail store locator find the nearest location near you,
Speaker 1: including select sportsmen's warehouse stores, Burner retail stores, or they
Speaker 1: can just mail it directly to your home. Check out
Speaker 1: the videos determine for yourself by RNA dot com today.
Speaker 4: Up next, our final roundup and information overload.
Speaker 1: Our all right, we continue now with South Carolina Attorney
Speaker 1: General Alan Wilson is with us. What about Cash Ptel,
Speaker 1: the FBI director, and his investigation that he opened weeks
Speaker 1: ago into this grand conspiracy that this has now gone
Speaker 1: on through three presidential elections. Is it possible in this
Speaker 1: great country of ours, this great constitutional republic that we
Speaker 1: live in, that in fact, that there are people at
Speaker 1: the highest levels of government that did try to influence
Speaker 1: the outcome of elections with disinformation.
Speaker 6: I mean, listen, it shatters people's trust and whatever trust
Speaker 6: and states some of us had in the federal government,
Speaker 6: which I really haven't had a lot of in the
Speaker 6: last ten years, but it has shatters people's faith and
Speaker 6: confidence and law enforcement. You know, when cash Tail came in,
Speaker 6: I heard that he cleaned out the top floor of
Speaker 6: the FBI building and got rid of all of the
Speaker 6: institutional people and started rebuilding his senior leadership team. I
Speaker 6: thought that was a great beginning to his administration at
Speaker 6: the FBI. Get rid of the old and put in
Speaker 6: fresh new people that don't have any political leanings or
Speaker 6: at least aren't beholden to political interest, and empower them
Speaker 6: to go find the truth. And I'm glad to see
Speaker 6: what he's done thus far, and I trusted this investigation
Speaker 6: will reveal the truth eventually.
Speaker 1: Well I think it will, but I mean, just based
Speaker 1: on what we're seeing now, there certainly seems to be
Speaker 1: a corruption of information for the purposes of undermining a
Speaker 1: newly and duly elected president of the United States, and
Speaker 1: it did consume three years of Trump's presidency, so it
Speaker 1: seems pretty overwhelming. As we begin our investigative part of
Speaker 1: it just your knowledge of the law on the periphery,
Speaker 1: what what might they be looking at legal legally in
Speaker 1: terms of laws that were broken. I would imagine if
Speaker 1: you're trying to influence the outcome of an election, that
Speaker 1: there's got to be statutes that are applicable.
Speaker 6: Well. Absolutely, And in this particular case, it's come down
Speaker 6: to intent and authority. What authority did the president have?
Speaker 6: Was he acting within the confines of his constitutional authority?
Speaker 6: And then what was his intent? And again, obviously there's
Speaker 6: a Supreme Court case on the President Trump regarding presidential
Speaker 6: authority and what is and what is not considered criminal
Speaker 6: or sanctionable conduct, and they're going to have to apply that.
Speaker 6: But right now is this is the post election of
Speaker 6: twenty sixteen, going into December of twenty sixteen. In January
Speaker 6: twenty seventeen, was President Obama trying to undermine intentionally undermine
Speaker 6: President Trump as he entered office? What did he know?
Speaker 6: When did he know it? Obviously? I think the evidence
Speaker 6: spares out right now that he had he had a motivation,
Speaker 6: Otherwise he wouldn't have reissued that intelligence assessment. Has Hillary
Speaker 6: Clinton won, there would have been no reissuing he would
Speaker 6: have gone with what they had because it wouldn't have
Speaker 6: mattered to him. But Trump was coming into office and
Speaker 6: they had stopping they had the undermining. That is what
Speaker 6: I believe, but I'm going to reserve my final judgment
Speaker 6: until we get a full vetting in an investigation.
Speaker 1: Well do you think, for example, in twenty twenty, when
Speaker 1: they knew and they had validated the authenticity of Hunter's laptop,
Speaker 1: and they were meeting weekly with big tech companies, and
Speaker 1: even though they knew the truth, when the story broke publicly,
Speaker 1: they would not validate that. But the very companies that
Speaker 1: they were were warning that they might be victims of
Speaker 1: a disinformation campaign. Of does that sound like election interference
Speaker 1: to you?
Speaker 6: It very well could be, Sean, I mean absolutely it
Speaker 6: could be election interference. And again I want to see
Speaker 6: more information, but absolutely these people were colluding with the
Speaker 6: big tech bros, the art tech overlords. They were colluding
Speaker 6: with folks within the criminal justices and the FBI. They've
Speaker 6: been colluding with folks across the political spectrum to undermine
Speaker 6: President Trump. And that's why you know, I want to
Speaker 6: I want to see cash Betail and Pambondy. I want
Speaker 6: to see them, shine a full light on this thing.
Speaker 6: I appreciate what told see Gabbart is done. Put it
Speaker 6: all out there, let's investigate it, and let's hold these
Speaker 6: people accountable under criminal law if we can. At a minimum,
Speaker 6: let's least shame the hell out of them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree. Anyway, we appreciate your time, Attorney General
Speaker 1: South Carolina, Alan Wilson, Thank you, sir for being with us.
Speaker 1: We appreciate it.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one. Shawn is our number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program.