Speaker 1: This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake, America, you're a great American Again, the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now. Welcome, Welcome,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen to the Buck Sexton Show. We are
Speaker 1: live broadcasting out of Washington in the District of Columbia,
Speaker 1: your nation's capital, here on Thursday, the eighteenth of July
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. We've got a great show for you today,
Speaker 1: so don't go absolutely anywhere. We've got Terry Shilling from
Speaker 1: the Americans Principles Project. He'll be joining us Jules Gomez,
Speaker 1: who I had the great honor of listening to speak
Speaker 1: at at a conference on National Conservatism this week, making
Speaker 1: Nationalism great again. From Opening the Books Adam and Jievsky
Speaker 1: to talk about their latest their latest reports and things
Speaker 1: that they're figuring out. Open the Books is, by the way,
Speaker 1: one of my favorite organizations in this country. Massive massive
Speaker 1: transparency efforts going into making sure that every cent and
Speaker 1: every dime that you guys give in your taxes is
Speaker 1: not being wasted, and of course we know so much
Speaker 1: of it is being wasted. That's why I always love
Speaker 1: to have Adam on. And I'll be down at the
Speaker 1: border in El Paso next week and I've got two people,
Speaker 1: Brian Colephage and Chris Koback, who are going to be
Speaker 1: there with me joining us on the show. In case
Speaker 1: you don't recognize my voice by now, my name is
Speaker 1: Raheim Kasama, the editor in chief of human Events dot com.
Speaker 1: That was Reagan's favorite magazine back in the day, the
Speaker 1: oldest conservative magazine in the United States of America. And
Speaker 1: I have the great honor of sometimes guest hosting for
Speaker 1: the great Buck Sexton, who is on the road at
Speaker 1: the moment, and more guests over the course of the
Speaker 1: show today as well, the most important guest as far
Speaker 1: as I am ever concerned, because I love radio as
Speaker 1: a medium, it's probably my favorite one. People say I
Speaker 1: have a face for radio as well as the voice
Speaker 1: as well as the dulcet tones. But I love when
Speaker 1: you guys call in. So here's the number. Are you ready?
Speaker 1: Eight four four nine zero zero two eight two five.
Speaker 1: That's eight four four nine hundred Buck. If you want
Speaker 1: to have a conversation with me, there is lots to
Speaker 1: talk about. Is they're not especially over the last twenty
Speaker 1: four forty eight hours to do with a certain squad.
Speaker 1: If you don't know what I'm talking about, you have
Speaker 1: obviously had your head buried in the sand all day long,
Speaker 1: perhaps all week long. For those who do know what
Speaker 1: I'm talking about, well, I'm sure we can agree. But
Speaker 1: there are some difficult things that America is going to
Speaker 1: have to deal with in terms of an internal conversation
Speaker 1: about who these representatives are, how they should best be
Speaker 1: dealt with. And indeed, what came out at the Trump
Speaker 1: rally last night in what was one it was in
Speaker 1: one of the carolines, North Carolina last night. I think
Speaker 1: first let's let's remind ourselves for a second, if you
Speaker 1: don't mind, lady and gentlemen, of just who Elan Omar is.
Speaker 1: Elane Omar, this congresswoman who has told President Trump and
Speaker 1: his supporters today that she is in the People's House
Speaker 1: and that they are going to have to deal. I
Speaker 1: don't know what she meant by deal, deal with it,
Speaker 1: do a deal. I don't know. It was unclear, but
Speaker 1: Elane Omar's record on any number of issues is not
Speaker 1: just questionable, it's downright nefarious, from things to do with
Speaker 1: anti Semitism, the things to do with how she's in
Speaker 1: the country in the first place, and something I keep
Speaker 1: banging on about in my rye and whenever I'm on
Speaker 1: anybody else's show, I have to talk about this about
Speaker 1: elan Omar, is that her parents and her left Somalia
Speaker 1: in an early nineties as quote unquote refugees. They went
Speaker 1: to Kenya and then they found their way to the
Speaker 1: United States. But what kind of refugees were they? Precisely
Speaker 1: because you see, elan Omar's family worked for the revolutionary
Speaker 1: socialist Islamist government of Somalia and they only left the
Speaker 1: country when the leader side Bar was deposed. Yea, they
Speaker 1: were about as much as refugees as Colonel Gaddaffi's kids were,
Speaker 1: to my mind, But nobody ever talks about that. Nobody
Speaker 1: ever talks about what exactly happened in the nineties in
Speaker 1: Somalia and how people like Elanoma found their way to
Speaker 1: the United States to spread revolutionary socialism here and all
Speaker 1: the things that come with fundamentalist interpretations of the Quran,
Speaker 1: as Bar increasingly did towards the end of his term.
Speaker 1: But let's remind ourselves for a second of just who
Speaker 1: elan Omar is. Let's play clip eight, mister producer. When
Speaker 1: I was in college, I took a terrorism class. Every
Speaker 1: time the professor said al Qaeda, he sort of like
Speaker 1: his shoulders went up, and you know it's in command
Speaker 1: al Qaeda. You know, hospital, you don't say America with
Speaker 1: an intensity. You don't say England with an intensity. You
Speaker 1: know you don't. You don't say the Army with an intensity.
Speaker 1: CARE was founded after nine eleven because they recognized that
Speaker 1: some people did something and that all of us were
Speaker 1: starting to lose access to our civil liberties. We need
Speaker 1: to abolish ice and had all inhimane deportation as concession progress.
Speaker 1: You need to fight back against the criminalization of immigrants
Speaker 1: and those crossing the border. Extraordinary stuff when you think
Speaker 1: about it, when you hear it all put close together,
Speaker 1: you cannot believe that somebody would have elected this person
Speaker 1: a representative in the United States. First, they let me
Speaker 1: make something very very clear. Maybe she doesn't say England
Speaker 1: with an intensity, but I certainly say England with an intensity.
Speaker 1: Maybe she doesn't say America with an intensity, but I
Speaker 1: certainly say America with an intensity. I'm sure you do too,
Speaker 1: And maybe she doesn't say the army with an intensity,
Speaker 1: but we say it, don't we, ladies and gentlemen, with
Speaker 1: both an intensity and a deference and gratitude. And there
Speaker 1: is something that elian Oma does not have. She does
Speaker 1: not have gratitude for the nation that took her and
Speaker 1: her family in despite their backgrounds, and allowed them to
Speaker 1: live the American dream, allowed them to pursue happiness, allowed
Speaker 1: them of its very nature. America is perhaps the most
Speaker 1: charitable country in the world in human history. Actually, probably
Speaker 1: when you look at how many immigrants America lets in
Speaker 1: every year, when you look at what it's based on,
Speaker 1: what the country has at its core, When you look
Speaker 1: at the average American and I say this as somebody
Speaker 1: who came from somewhere else, as you could probably hear
Speaker 1: from my accent, but to see the ordinary American in
Speaker 1: their charitable giving, in the work in their community. All
Speaker 1: of these things extend upwards to government. But charity is
Speaker 1: not limitless. We can't give more than we have. We
Speaker 1: can't expect to bleed the nation dry to accommodate the
Speaker 1: rest of the world and their socialist revolutionary refugees. No
Speaker 1: charity has its limits, and I fear those limits were
Speaker 1: reached over the course of the last couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: I think we are living that moment. I think the
Speaker 1: squad of Presley and Cortez and Omar and Talabe are
Speaker 1: exhausting and intentionally exhausting America's charitability. I think they are
Speaker 1: seeking to bring the worst out in people, and I
Speaker 1: do think we saw the worst, or at least some
Speaker 1: of the worst, at last night's Raleigh. Mister producer, can
Speaker 1: we played clip number two please? Obviously and importantly, Omar
Speaker 1: has a history of launching vicious anti semitic that's the
Speaker 1: crowd in North Carolina chanting send her back, the cause
Speaker 1: of great consternation amongst CNN and the New York Times
Speaker 1: and the Washington Post and the chattering classes here on
Speaker 1: the streets of Washington, DC today. I've even had some
Speaker 1: ex girlfriends texting me saying, how could you defend President
Speaker 1: Trump and his crowd after what they said last night?
Speaker 1: It's not about defense, It's about understanding. It's about understanding
Speaker 1: that people will reach their limits. When charity is extended
Speaker 1: so far and so courteously, and it's thrown back in
Speaker 1: people's faces, people will naturally reach their limits. But there's
Speaker 1: another thing to this as well. I don't necessarily think
Speaker 1: that Omars should be sent back to a place that
Speaker 1: she left when she was a child. But I also
Speaker 1: don't think that Elian Omas should be a member of Congress.
Speaker 1: I think she has shown herself to be a danger
Speaker 1: to the United States, a danger to the United States constitution.
Speaker 1: And nobody called it racist or xenophobic, or bigoted, or
Speaker 1: any of those catchy words. When in two and eleven
Speaker 1: there was a White House petition of about one hundred
Speaker 1: and ten thousand people who signed it, by the way,
Speaker 1: to deport Piers Morgan, one of my fellow countrymen. Now listen,
Speaker 1: we all want to deport Piers Morgan. Britain wants to
Speaker 1: deport peers more than we thought we had got rid
Speaker 1: of him to you in twenty eleven. Sadly we have
Speaker 1: him back now. But nobody called that racist. Nobody called
Speaker 1: it racist when Senator Dick Durbin Democrats said that he
Speaker 1: wanted to investigate whether doctor Sebastian Gawker, when he was
Speaker 1: a member of the Trump administration, should be sent back.
Speaker 1: But it's selective application of these terms, selective application of
Speaker 1: this outrage by CNN and all the others. By the way, CNN,
Speaker 1: the same CNN that puts puts white nationalist Richard Spencer
Speaker 1: on the air, CNN contributor Richard Spencer, I'm going to
Speaker 1: start calling him, by the way. These are the things
Speaker 1: that we're grappling with today. These are the things that
Speaker 1: we have to wander. Said. Forget whether or not it
Speaker 1: was presidential for Trump to tweet what he did a
Speaker 1: couple of days ago, saying she should go back, forget it.
Speaker 1: That's not the conversation we need to be having. We
Speaker 1: need to be having the conversation of why certain people
Speaker 1: are a in the country in the first place, if
Speaker 1: they don't like it be in the country, if they
Speaker 1: don't intend to constructively contribute, if they're only interested in destruction,
Speaker 1: as the case seems to be. And see what on
Speaker 1: earth we're doing with a democratic party that has led
Speaker 1: by revolutionary socialistic extremists, and how we deal with that.
Speaker 1: And those are the conversations that we're going to have
Speaker 1: today on this show. You're not going to want to
Speaker 1: miss out. I want you guys to call in and
Speaker 1: have your say. The number again is eight four four
Speaker 1: nine two eight two five eight four four nine hundred Buck.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show. I am Raheem Kassam.
Speaker 1: We're going to be right back after this break. Welcome back,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen. This is the Buck Sexton Show. He'll
Speaker 1: probably figured it out by now. I'm not Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: My name is Rahim Becausaman, the editor in chief of
Speaker 1: human Events dot com. Good friend of Buck Sexton. Although
Speaker 1: I don't profess to speak for Buck, he's my good friend.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe he doesn't put me up there at all,
Speaker 1: Who knows. I would be sad if that was the case, though.
Speaker 1: Keen to hear from you guys over the course of
Speaker 1: this show. Remember the phone lines are open eight four
Speaker 1: four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred buck. I'm also a big advocate again. I
Speaker 1: love radio. I'm gonna keep saying it because I don't
Speaker 1: get to do enough of it anymore. I used to
Speaker 1: do it every single day over at another network and
Speaker 1: no longer get to do it. So I jump at
Speaker 1: the opportunity to do it, and I jump at the
Speaker 1: opportunity to bring on great guests as well as great callers.
Speaker 1: And one of the great guests that we have on
Speaker 1: right now is my good friend Terry Shilling. Terry is
Speaker 1: the executive director at the American Principles Project. Terry, do
Speaker 1: I have you? I'm here with him. It's so great
Speaker 1: to hear your voice again. Yes, you're there. But do
Speaker 1: I have you, Terry? You have my full nivided attention. Fine, well, Terry. Look,
Speaker 1: I went on a bit of a tear about elan Omar.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be talking about that over the course
Speaker 1: of the show. But there's so much that happens nowadays.
Speaker 1: It feels like it's just increasing and increasing in terms
Speaker 1: of what's going on in the news cycle every day.
Speaker 1: But one of them that I didn't want to miss
Speaker 1: was something you guys have have been active on and
Speaker 1: around in the last couple of days, which is planned
Speaker 1: parenthoods chief executive. I think doctor Leanna when was was
Speaker 1: effectively fired terminated if you will. Yeah, she was terminated
Speaker 1: at eight ninth into her wow uh presidency. And it's aborted.
Speaker 1: She was aborted. Yeah, she was aborted about eight months in,
Speaker 1: which is which is something that she actually supports and
Speaker 1: advocates for. Um. She shouldn't really have any frums, but
Speaker 1: your your colleague, Frank Cannon at the American Principles Project
Speaker 1: has written an article It just happens to be up
Speaker 1: on human events dot com as well. So you know, nice,
Speaker 1: nice dovetailing of the matters here called planned parent Hoodsiana.
Speaker 1: When wasn't woken up and nor are you tell us
Speaker 1: what Frank was talking about in his article and tell
Speaker 1: us exactly what you guys think, because you guys are
Speaker 1: kind of one of the biggest voices in the country
Speaker 1: in terms of in terms of social conservatism, in terms
Speaker 1: of opposing this, this this broad pro abortion narrative. I mean,
Speaker 1: you guys are the ones getting the real work done,
Speaker 1: So give us, give us the skinny on this. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So basically our argument, uh in this came out in
Speaker 1: When's public stage means and even from the board of
Speaker 1: Plan Parenthood. The main reasons she was terminated at eight
Speaker 1: months prior gestation is because she wasn't looke enough. She
Speaker 1: did not want Plane Parenthood to go crazy down this
Speaker 1: gender theory, this this radical gender ideology stuff that's happening,
Speaker 1: which basically says that men who identify as women are
Speaker 1: women and that they should be treated equally with women.
Speaker 1: And Meanno n did not want to turn Plan Parenthood
Speaker 1: into an organization that performed path sneers on mails, possibly
Speaker 1: because they can't do that on a mail. But the
Speaker 1: concerning thing for us, and why everyone else should be concerned,
Speaker 1: is that this was a pattern for the left. They
Speaker 1: are growing ever more radical day by day, and they
Speaker 1: are now acquiring strict allegiance not just to the issue
Speaker 1: set that your organization focuses on, like plan Parenthood and abortion.
Speaker 1: And let's be clear, doctor Leanna Len, who's a doctor
Speaker 1: by the way, supports killing babies even after they're born.
Speaker 1: I mean, she supports the fanticide totally locked out of them.
Speaker 1: But because she doesn't think that biological men who identify
Speaker 1: as women should be eligible for mammogram referrals and pap
Speaker 1: smear referrals at Plain Parenthood, she was oust it. And
Speaker 1: the left is going to continue to grow more and
Speaker 1: more radical every day until they start suffering from real
Speaker 1: electoral losses. And I think we have that coming right
Speaker 1: up the pipe with the re election of President Trump.
Speaker 1: Is that true or did this law set of mid
Speaker 1: terms embolden them to move further to the left, And
Speaker 1: do these people on the stage of the Democrats debates
Speaker 1: encourage them to move further to the left, and does
Speaker 1: where the money's coming from encourage them to move further
Speaker 1: to the left. I mean, I don't see a great
Speaker 1: reorientation on the political left anytime, so, you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: look at the Labor Party in the United Kingdom. That's
Speaker 1: where this Democrat Party is going at the moment. Hardline revolutionary, Marxist,
Speaker 1: anti Semitic, and on social issues mental. You know, that's
Speaker 1: my serie. I think that you know, when you win
Speaker 1: or lose, it affects, it requires you to readjust in
Speaker 1: some way or the other. Obviously, Democrats one in twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen and it has definitely pushed them further to the left.
Speaker 1: But I think that you're onto something with how radical
Speaker 1: their basis. And let's be clear about who the base
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party is. It's not your everyday voters
Speaker 1: like the Republicans have. It's not your Joe Schmo in Detroit, Michigan, right.
Speaker 1: This is their base is the elite. It's the elite
Speaker 1: donor class. It's the elite corporate class, academia class. It's
Speaker 1: it's Manhattan, it's San Francisco, it's Los Angeles. Unfortunately, to
Speaker 1: some extent. It's Austin, Texas. UM, but it's it's it's
Speaker 1: all that, Terry. We've got about twenty seconds left. Just
Speaker 1: tell the audience where they can find out more about
Speaker 1: you guys, the American Principles Project and uh and give
Speaker 1: yourself as a good plug. It's a American Principles Project
Speaker 1: dot com and I urge everyone to check it out.
Speaker 1: We're producing a new report in the next few weeks
Speaker 1: that talks about how important the family is not just
Speaker 1: super future of country, but to the future of Republican
Speaker 1: Party and the conservative roomers love it. Thank you, Terry Shilling,
Speaker 1: American Principills Project dot com. This is the Buck Sections Show.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, of course at eight eight eight
Speaker 1: four five, five thirty six. He's hold in the line
Speaker 1: for America. Buckton is back. Welcome back, ladies and Gentlemen's
Speaker 1: with the Buck Sex Can Show. I'm rahem because I'm
Speaker 1: filling in for Buck today. And there's always say as
Speaker 1: I always say when when Buck steps out of the studio,
Speaker 1: he says, have you got it? Have you got it?
Speaker 1: I said, I've got it here, Buck, like just get
Speaker 1: you know, leave it to me. We're all good you
Speaker 1: go off on your jollys and your jaunts. Raheem's got
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hut today and the phone lines are open
Speaker 1: because we are broadcasting live out of Washington, DC. Eight
Speaker 1: four four nine two eight two five eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred buck is the number here, and we've got
Speaker 1: some fantastic I mean, the best, the best. I only
Speaker 1: take I only have the best guests. I know the
Speaker 1: best people, the best guests on today, and one of
Speaker 1: them that's joining us right now before we come to
Speaker 1: your calls, ladies and gentlemen, is my favorite meddlesome pre
Speaker 1: I'm very much hoping we have we have father Jules
Speaker 1: Gomez on the line. I'm here, Abraham. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for having me on. It's terrific to be on
Speaker 1: your show this evening. No, no, no, listen you are.
Speaker 1: You are one of my great heroes of this week.
Speaker 1: I had the great pleasure of being in the audience
Speaker 1: when Jules Gomez gives this barn storming speech at the
Speaker 1: inaugural National Conservatism Conference. I gotta tell you, and as
Speaker 1: you know, Jules, I know you were big on the conference.
Speaker 1: I was less big on the conference. I thought it
Speaker 1: could have been a lot tighter. I thought there was
Speaker 1: a lot more we could have got out of it,
Speaker 1: But it was a good inaugural conference as far as
Speaker 1: new things go, for new causes and new institutions go.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody complain can complain about that. You
Speaker 1: are one of the stars of the show in my estimation,
Speaker 1: and I want to hear from you, and I'm sure
Speaker 1: this audience wants to hear from you about what the
Speaker 1: National Conservatism Conference was, why you flew halfway around the
Speaker 1: world for it, and tell us a little bit about
Speaker 1: what you said and why it's important well to describe
Speaker 1: it in words that have been used before. It was
Speaker 1: a very big hand grenade throne on the playground of
Speaker 1: political theorists, on the playground of what's going on in
Speaker 1: terms of contemporary politics. And it was a It was
Speaker 1: a call to blend some very ancient conservative political theory
Speaker 1: with some very recent revivals in nationalism and populism that
Speaker 1: have mushroomed not only in the United States, but as
Speaker 1: you know, in certain parts of Europe. And we were
Speaker 1: privileged to have some of the finest speakers in the world,
Speaker 1: some of the brightest minds and minds in the world,
Speaker 1: and it did shake a lot of people. It did
Speaker 1: shake a traditional conservative thinking focused on the word national Yes,
Speaker 1: tell us, tell us why it's important. I'll tell you what, Jules.
Speaker 1: I have talked about this for nearly a decade now,
Speaker 1: so it feels like a great pat on the back,
Speaker 1: I suppose, or vindication of the return of nationalism. But
Speaker 1: tell us why. That's why that's important, Why nationhood is important?
Speaker 1: Because everyone in the United States, and I know you're back,
Speaker 1: You're back in crown sovereign territory right now. But everyone
Speaker 1: here in the United States is talking about this either
Speaker 1: hand Omar and all the squad with AOC and all
Speaker 1: those guys, and of course they are in opposition to
Speaker 1: the nation state. Remind this audience, as if they need reminding.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is one of the best audiences on radio.
Speaker 1: But just remind them why exactly that's important. Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, if I may very quickly interject here and
Speaker 1: say that elam Omar and the squad deserve precisely what
Speaker 1: Trump said to them. I am a brown skinned immigrant
Speaker 1: from India to the United Kingdom, and I can sense racism.
Speaker 1: But President Donald Trump does not have a single racist
Speaker 1: bone in his body. He was not asking them to
Speaker 1: get out of the country. He was asking I mean
Speaker 1: most people forget the second part of what he said.
Speaker 1: He was asking them to go back and learn if
Speaker 1: they can, from those you know what he previously called shit,
Speaker 1: and come back and teach us something new. So now
Speaker 1: coming back to nationalism, nationalism has become such a bad
Speaker 1: word because of phony myths. For example, there are people
Speaker 1: who say that the Two World Wars were caused because
Speaker 1: of nationalism. That's complete rubbish. The two World Wars were
Speaker 1: an exact, were created as a result of Hitlers and
Speaker 1: his predecessors desired to build a global interium, a global
Speaker 1: imperium that would be based on race. It is the
Speaker 1: diametric opposite of nationalism that caused the wars in Europe.
Speaker 1: It was globalist imperialism, absolutely, And the whole idea of
Speaker 1: a nation state goes back. And this is something of
Speaker 1: what I said, and I drew my ideas from urm
Speaker 1: Hazoni's great book The Virtue of Nationalism. It goes right
Speaker 1: back to three thousand years to God's call to Abraham
Speaker 1: to build a nation, and that nation would be intern
Speaker 1: a blessing to other nations. Interestingly, God also asks Ishmael,
Speaker 1: that tells Ishmael that he was going to make of
Speaker 1: him a great nation. And nationalism is in a sense particular,
Speaker 1: and that is its greatness since you we can talk
Speaker 1: about you know, I love humankind, but I can't stand
Speaker 1: the person living next to And nationalism is a counter
Speaker 1: Nationalism is also a counter narrative to the sheer hubris
Speaker 1: of thinking that we can build a globalist society for
Speaker 1: the common good. And that in biblical terms, if I
Speaker 1: may put it, that at this way is the is
Speaker 1: the archetypal story of Babel that seeks to build a
Speaker 1: totalitarian hegaministic rule that we were challenging at this particular conference. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's an incredible point. And as I say, Jules Gomers
Speaker 1: is one of my favorite speakers at this conference. This.
Speaker 1: I don't usually like conferences Jewels. I think they're a
Speaker 1: waste of time. There's a lot of there's a lot
Speaker 1: of backslapping that goes on. There's a lot of um
Speaker 1: just time wasting. People want a network and all this.
Speaker 1: I don't have time for that. I'm a duer, okay,
Speaker 1: but this one was a little bit different. And as
Speaker 1: I say, I think there could have been a little
Speaker 1: bit more substance in terms of the undergirding of the arguments.
Speaker 1: But it's inaugural, it's the first one. We forgive the
Speaker 1: little the little phrase around the edges, but Jewels, you know,
Speaker 1: this was something different because what it was was slap
Speaker 1: bang in the heart of Washington, DC, the West, if
Speaker 1: not the world's power hub. You had these people who
Speaker 1: were speaking out against this status quo in the status
Speaker 1: quo anti which has been globalism, open borders, one world government.
Speaker 1: And I felt like there was something real and something
Speaker 1: you know, in a good way disturbing, you know, grahem.
Speaker 1: If I may say this, people often confuse nationalism and
Speaker 1: they assume that nationalism is patriotism on steroids. This is
Speaker 1: not the case. This is not xenophobia. We're talking about
Speaker 1: a political theory, and that political theory talks about the
Speaker 1: nation state as the best organizing principle for doing political
Speaker 1: life together. Jules, We're going to talk about this more
Speaker 1: at length in the future. We want to talk to
Speaker 1: you more on this show. I'm sure Buck will have
Speaker 1: you on. I'll have you on whenever I'm guest hosting
Speaker 1: as well. Your website is Jules Gomez with an SMS
Speaker 1: dot com? Is that correct? The Rebel Priest to Jules
Speaker 1: Gomez with an s at the end dot com. Jules,
Speaker 1: I'm so grateful for you joining us here on the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show, especially because I know it's late in
Speaker 1: the night where you are, and so we're always grateful
Speaker 1: to people staying up and communicating with this audience. Jules
Speaker 1: Gomez dot com, Father Jewles Gomez, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for joining us here on the Bucks. More firepower to
Speaker 1: your rockets. Thank you so much. Well, my rocket needs
Speaker 1: all the help it can get. We're going to go
Speaker 1: to a break right now. This is the buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: I'm Rahem Kassam. We'll be back in just a moment.
Speaker 1: Welcome back into the buck Sexton Show. I'm Raheem Kausam,
Speaker 1: broadcasting live out of Washington, DC. If you want to
Speaker 1: find out more about me, you can go to human
Speaker 1: events dot com. You can go to at Raheem Kasan.
Speaker 1: That's r H E E M K A S S
Speaker 1: A M on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, parlor, all of the things.
Speaker 1: I'm all over those things mostly because I have to
Speaker 1: be on those things. If I could not be on
Speaker 1: social media, believe you me, I wouldn't be I come
Speaker 1: to you guys on the phone lines now. If you're
Speaker 1: looking to Collins eight four four nine two eight two
Speaker 1: five eight four four nine hundred buck, I want to
Speaker 1: start in. I think Philadelphia. Were in Philadelphia. We got
Speaker 1: Felix on the line. Phelix, are you with us? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Sol him what a pleasure always Hello. So how are
Speaker 1: you doing today? I'm fine. Well, I'm a little perplexed. Actually,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm a big Donald Trump supporter. Actually I
Speaker 1: was happy to hear that you were gonna be on.
Speaker 1: I had a number of topics I would have loved
Speaker 1: to discuss with you. But after hearing President's Trump's disavowal,
Speaker 1: you know, of this audience there and rally, I'm a
Speaker 1: little bit upset that he gave in and he basically
Speaker 1: kissed the boots of the left. Okay, well, I think
Speaker 1: he should have explained, you know what the people are thinking,
Speaker 1: because I mean, we're not racist, we're you know. But however,
Speaker 1: I mean, Felix, it's interesting, is it. Nobody's ever said
Speaker 1: send her back to Ian Hersey Ali, who is a
Speaker 1: refugee from Somalia who has integrated and assimilate and become
Speaker 1: a very, very constructive part of the American fabric. Nobody's
Speaker 1: ever said that to her, Nobody's ever said it to
Speaker 1: just a grand plethora of people who have come to
Speaker 1: the United States from all different walks of life, from
Speaker 1: all different backgrounds, from all different ethnicities, from all different
Speaker 1: skin colors. And I only say skin color because the
Speaker 1: left cares about skin color. Felix. It's this one woman,
Speaker 1: right who is particularly agregious, particularly offensive. I don't mean
Speaker 1: offensive as him, I'm offended. I mean she attempts to
Speaker 1: be on the offensive as far as the American Constitution
Speaker 1: is concerned, on a daily basis. Felix, I agree with
Speaker 1: you in the sense that Trump says, and I quote,
Speaker 1: I was not happy with it. I disagree with it
Speaker 1: when he's talking about to send her back chant. But again, Felix,
Speaker 1: I would add to that, he's speaking in the Oval office,
Speaker 1: two reporters in a circumstance that is about fifteen to
Speaker 1: twenty seconds long. He needs to get that one message
Speaker 1: across that says, actually, we don't need this woman to
Speaker 1: leave the country to defeat her ideas. We can defeat
Speaker 1: them right here. Felix. Yes, well, you're right. But unfortunately
Speaker 1: he opened the door, you know because right away, you know,
Speaker 1: the left everyone is jumping all over him, and he
Speaker 1: disavowed and so basically, you know, he cowed happed them.
Speaker 1: I know what you're saying, but I really was quite
Speaker 1: upset and I really actually wanted to talk to you
Speaker 1: about things that the left drows and that's like the
Speaker 1: history of slavery in this country. Slave owner that hello, yes,
Speaker 1: you've got time, go ahead. Oh I'm sorry, Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was actually a black slave owner that changed the what
Speaker 1: the court ensued and actually made turn to slaves into
Speaker 1: property that once the slave owner died, in other words,
Speaker 1: they were not set free. They were they were they
Speaker 1: were property. And this was actually accomplished by a black
Speaker 1: slave owner. And quite frankly, it was the Western jude
Speaker 1: or Christian cultures that put an end to slavery. And
Speaker 1: as far as being enslaved, they are already slaves before
Speaker 1: they came here. And it was you know, basically people
Speaker 1: of their own and probably particularly the Muslims, you know,
Speaker 1: who were the predominant slaves traders. And there were two
Speaker 1: and a half million to three million white slaves that
Speaker 1: were you know, in North Africa, look, Felix, and thank
Speaker 1: you so much for your call. Felix. We know the
Speaker 1: real serious people, the people who look at history. We
Speaker 1: know about the Arab slave trade, we know about William Wilberforce.
Speaker 1: We know who really started this whole thing and who
Speaker 1: really ended it. Okay, And I think in the grand
Speaker 1: scheme of things, most conscientious of voting Americans know that.
Speaker 1: And I share your concerns, and I'm sure you have them.
Speaker 1: I'm putting words in your mouth now, Phelix, but I'm
Speaker 1: sure you feel it this way, that the next generation
Speaker 1: is not that conscientious about what it knows. And the left,
Speaker 1: be it the left people in Nike or the left
Speaker 1: people on television, are intent in their falsehoods, are intending
Speaker 1: their lies. They are leading people down the wrong path
Speaker 1: of both American history and contemporaneous events. However, I feel
Speaker 1: like there's something changing. And it's not just changing in America.
Speaker 1: It's changing all across the Western world. People aren't willing
Speaker 1: to send their children to these common core schools anymore.
Speaker 1: People aren't willing to say to their children take on
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty thousand dollars worth of debt over
Speaker 1: the course of your lifetimes in order to be indoctrinated.
Speaker 1: And so I see, as long as we are willing
Speaker 1: to keep banging those drums and keep bringing that energy
Speaker 1: to the table, that we may well just win this
Speaker 1: fight in the long run. And I'm still delighted no
Speaker 1: matter what he cowtowed two this morning that the president
Speaker 1: is Trump and is anyone else at this point in time,
Speaker 1: because believe you me, it would be a lot us
Speaker 1: under Hillary certainly, but I think it might be a
Speaker 1: whole lot worse under Rubio or Bush or somebody that
Speaker 1: would have not just been willing to count out to
Speaker 1: the left, but actually go further than their agenda in
Speaker 1: the hopes of proving that they weren't a racist or
Speaker 1: weren't whatever it is ist they throw it us nowadays,
Speaker 1: I think we have a couple of minutes left. Can
Speaker 1: we get Darren in West Virginia on the line, darreny
Speaker 1: with us. Hello, Hey, Darren, how's it going. It's going well?
Speaker 1: Thank you? Let us have it. It's all yours, yeah,
Speaker 1: thank you. So, first of all, I just want to
Speaker 1: make a comment about the the chant last night in
Speaker 1: the President's response today. First of all, I think you
Speaker 1: know when you have a crowd of enthusiastic people, no
Speaker 1: matter no matter what their political strips are, whether it's
Speaker 1: at a sporting event or at a political event. Mob
Speaker 1: rule is a you'll sing and so once one person
Speaker 1: starts chanting it in the heat of the moment, other
Speaker 1: people start chanting in as well. And it's a wrestling match,
Speaker 1: come on, ye yes, yes. And I suspect that a
Speaker 1: lot of people that chanted that last night may have
Speaker 1: second thoughts about it today, that that perhaps that was
Speaker 1: one one step too far saying send her back yea.
Speaker 1: So so I agree with the president, Darren. We've got
Speaker 1: about we've got about twenty five seconds before the break,
Speaker 1: go ahead, Yeah, okay, yep. So the other thing I
Speaker 1: was gonna say is I just want to draw a
Speaker 1: parallel between Carter and you know, Carter and the malaise
Speaker 1: that the United States was in, and then Reagan coming
Speaker 1: in afterwards, and then we had Obama and now we
Speaker 1: have Trump, and I think that there's these pendulum swings
Speaker 1: that happen back and forth in politics, and sometimes we
Speaker 1: just have to wait for the cycles to get better. Darren,
Speaker 1: I do not disagree with you one bit, and thank
Speaker 1: you so much for your cool sorties, little bit rushed
Speaker 1: here at the end of the first hour. But the
Speaker 1: great news is this is only the first hour, ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen, we have two more left. This is Rhem
Speaker 1: Kassam on the Buck Sexton Show. Call in, don't miss
Speaker 1: out eight for four two five. We'll be guys buck
Speaker 1: Sexton here in the Freedom Hunt with Charles Thornbrenn, CEO
Speaker 1: of Noble Gold. Charles, China's buying up gold. Foreign governments
Speaker 1: are buying up gold. What do they know that your
Speaker 1: investor out there, that folks that are building their four
Speaker 1: oh one case and trying to prepare for retirement maybe
Speaker 1: could take a page from their book. It really comes
Speaker 1: down to this. It's the intrinsic value of metals. It's
Speaker 1: the safety of metals. In a time and place where
Speaker 1: everything is up one day, down the next, there's one
Speaker 1: thing that offers you security, and that's precious metals. China
Speaker 1: has known that for many years. That's why you've been
Speaker 1: a net buyer for such a long time. Precious metal
Speaker 1: should be a part of your portfolio. Head yourself, protect
Speaker 1: yourself against an uncertain future with Noble Gold. Go to
Speaker 1: Noblegold Investments Dot com today to receive your free Goold guide,
Speaker 1: or call eight seven seven six four six five three
Speaker 1: four seven eight seven seven six four six five three
Speaker 1: four seven or on the web at Noblegold Investments dot com.
Speaker 1: Be sure to tell them Bucks sent you. Welcome back
Speaker 1: since the Buck sex Can show. My name is Rhem
Speaker 1: because I'm filling in for Buck Sexton from the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hut in downtown Washington, d C. It is a swelteringly
Speaker 1: hot day, in case you are wondering here in DC
Speaker 1: one hundred degrees all that humidity and so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. So I can't wait, frankly to get down
Speaker 1: to the border next week. And we will be going
Speaker 1: down to the border in El Paso for the We
Speaker 1: Build the Wall organization, and I'm very glad to have
Speaker 1: the organization's founder and CEO joining us on the line.
Speaker 1: At Brian called Faja, US Air Force veteran and the
Speaker 1: founder of We Build the Wall dot US. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show, hey man, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1: Hey Brian, So I remember when you launched We Build
Speaker 1: the Wall, this crowdfunding operation to get around all of
Speaker 1: the nonsense that the US government is going through to
Speaker 1: try and get a secure border. You'd think it would
Speaker 1: be quite easy for a nation to get its secure border,
Speaker 1: but the Democrats don't want it to happen. The media
Speaker 1: doesn't want it to happen. So you guys said, you
Speaker 1: know what, we'll do it ourselves. And there's something about
Speaker 1: that that is just incredibly American and also incredibly American
Speaker 1: armed services that would get something like that done, and
Speaker 1: you have done it. Tell us a little bit about
Speaker 1: what you've done, and a little bit about what's taking
Speaker 1: place next week in El Paso, because I have never
Speaker 1: been there and I'm very excited to be there. Yeah. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, you'd think it would be something that you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of our politicians would want to have national security,
Speaker 1: but as we learned, they do and they I think
Speaker 1: it's because they're profiting off bits. And you know, we've
Speaker 1: been able to expose a lot of corruption, a lot
Speaker 1: of things with this process. And what we did was
Speaker 1: we built our first border section, which plugged a gap.
Speaker 1: There was a half mile gap on the border and
Speaker 1: this area was this overrun with illegals coming through. I
Speaker 1: mean it was crazy. It was like the Wild West
Speaker 1: like stuff. You've seen the videos of people running across
Speaker 1: in Europe and the property owner was sick of it.
Speaker 1: The sick and tired of it. And he was an
Speaker 1: eighty five year old Vietnam veteran, a fighter pilot and
Speaker 1: a chemical engineer, very smart, and no one would do
Speaker 1: anything for this guy. I mean the federal government denied
Speaker 1: building him a wall. They said they couldn't build it
Speaker 1: because it was impossible to build up the mountain. And
Speaker 1: it just struck a chord with me and our team
Speaker 1: were like, how can this be impossible? You know that
Speaker 1: this shouldn't be impossible to build a wall, build a fence,
Speaker 1: any type of barrier up this mountain. And that's what
Speaker 1: we did. It took us less than a month and
Speaker 1: we built it. And now this guy he has security
Speaker 1: and not a single sent of build across since we
Speaker 1: built it. It's amazing. I went from a hundred crossings
Speaker 1: a day, one hundred people across the day out to
Speaker 1: zero and then not a one in the sense we
Speaker 1: built it. Just just just think about that, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: I mean, you have a you have a hundred crossings
Speaker 1: a day illegally in just one little place. How How
Speaker 1: big is the stretch? Bryan a half a mile a
Speaker 1: half a mile and you're in you're stopping that, You're
Speaker 1: stopping thirty six odd thousand people. A Yeah, now maybe
Speaker 1: some of them are going elsewhere and whatever, But the
Speaker 1: point is that you you you build on that, you
Speaker 1: expand that, and you secure the nation's borders. Tell us
Speaker 1: a little bit about how, you know, how you guys
Speaker 1: did that, Like how did you fundraise for it? What
Speaker 1: were the logistical things? And tell us about El Paso
Speaker 1: next week. Yeah, Well, the fundraising was just a viral
Speaker 1: campaign to build a border wine. I think it did
Speaker 1: strect a chord with everyone who was fed up with
Speaker 1: our federal government of not taking action, and it gave
Speaker 1: people a way to donate and to speak up. And
Speaker 1: they were speaking up by donating, and that's how we
Speaker 1: raised every single penny and we raised over two million
Speaker 1: dollars just from people giving five dollars. That's a lot.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of five dollars donations the add up
Speaker 1: to two million, and you know it just it gave
Speaker 1: the American people a way to have direct impact and
Speaker 1: know that every single dollar they were donating was going
Speaker 1: to build something that would protect our nation and show
Speaker 1: the federal government that we can get it done. Um.
Speaker 1: I think it's in the time of crisis. Americans have
Speaker 1: always come together to fix a problem or come together
Speaker 1: to unite and get the job done. And that's what
Speaker 1: we saw here. Um. And every every wall that we
Speaker 1: build is basically it's protests wall. It's giving the middle
Speaker 1: finger to these politicians in DC who say Americans don't
Speaker 1: want it, and we're showing them that the Americans do
Speaker 1: want it because they're building it themselves, mile by mile
Speaker 1: and for half the cost. And you've taken and you've
Speaker 1: taken the flat personally on this as well from in
Speaker 1: a political sense, the media, you know, trying to smear
Speaker 1: you and now the latest things they've come up with.
Speaker 1: Oh and you're hitting roadblocks and you can't get it done.
Speaker 1: Oh what do they think? I mean, here's the thing.
Speaker 1: You are a person who has come along to this
Speaker 1: and said I want to build something that a lot
Speaker 1: of the country wants. Right, and of course there are
Speaker 1: going to be logistical problems. Of course that it's the
Speaker 1: same in any business. It's the same in any line
Speaker 1: of work. But they big it up and they say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know they're failing and this thing will never get done. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: I can see the diggers, I've seen the videos, I've
Speaker 1: seen the wall itself, and I'm flying down there to
Speaker 1: El Paso with you next week. Tell us a little
Speaker 1: bit about what's going down at the symposium next week
Speaker 1: and how people can can be a part of it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, if you go to our website, we build
Speaker 1: a Wall dot us, there's a link that goes to
Speaker 1: the Wall Symposium website and what this is we want
Speaker 1: to invite you know, Americans and you know, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what your political affiliation is. We want people to
Speaker 1: come down there and see what we build. And also
Speaker 1: we want to educate people and our politicians on what's
Speaker 1: going on and what we've learned, and UM, bring everyone
Speaker 1: together on this on the real crisis. And we've learned
Speaker 1: that you know, there's a lot of there's chaos going
Speaker 1: on at the border and certain politicians and certain people
Speaker 1: are benefiting from this. They're they're benefitting from the chaos. Um,
Speaker 1: it's all about money and it's only hurting the American
Speaker 1: people and that they're they're enabling this crisis. And uh,
Speaker 1: it's time that we start uniting and standing up and
Speaker 1: educating people on what's going on. And this this is
Speaker 1: what this is about about education and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: going into the twenty twenty elections, you want to make
Speaker 1: sure that the right people are educated on what's really
Speaker 1: going on because a lot of people don't understand what's
Speaker 1: really going on. And that's why even Louis Gombert's coming
Speaker 1: down there and saying he wants to see what's going
Speaker 1: on and see what we've build and learn and learn
Speaker 1: about all the craft going on and DC that we've
Speaker 1: been dealing with. Yeah, you have you have an old
Speaker 1: star cost coming down next week. I mean you, David
Speaker 1: All see Sheriff David Clark, A Congressman, Louis Gomet, Mike Sanovich,
Speaker 1: Adam Brandon, Chris Kobank who's going to be on the
Speaker 1: show just after you, and of course yours truly Rahem
Speaker 1: Kassam will be that. You know, this is going to
Speaker 1: be quite the event. Um just tell us, look, you
Speaker 1: can you can. You can put your name on a brick,
Speaker 1: you can put your name on a ball. Odd, tell
Speaker 1: us tell us a little bit about that and how
Speaker 1: people can get involved with that. Yes, um, you know
Speaker 1: that's just another another way to get the American people
Speaker 1: involved that they want to um buy a brick. Um.
Speaker 1: We're selling bricks for one hundred dollars and you put
Speaker 1: your name on it and those bricks will go down
Speaker 1: at the base of the wall. And there's many there's
Speaker 1: other things that people can buy if you just go
Speaker 1: to our website we build the Wall dot us and
Speaker 1: has it in there. But this will be enshrined at
Speaker 1: this wall for generations and it's it's a way to
Speaker 1: take part in it. And with with that donation, it
Speaker 1: goes to fund our next quarter wall segment, which we're
Speaker 1: working on right now. And so it's very important that
Speaker 1: you know we can keep we keep driving this for
Speaker 1: we want to keep standing up so that these politicians
Speaker 1: and DC you say that America that want it and
Speaker 1: we're not going to stop building and some of money
Speaker 1: runs out and it's people like yourself, are you know,
Speaker 1: putting the word out there to keep this moving and
Speaker 1: we really appreciate it. Well, Brian, we hope the money
Speaker 1: never does run out. That's Brian Coulfage, We Build the
Speaker 1: Wall dot US. Brian, thanks so much for joining us
Speaker 1: here on the buck Sex in the show. So proud.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me on. Thanks for the support absolutely,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen. We're going to have Chris Koback on
Speaker 1: next as well. You will perhaps remember him has run
Speaker 1: for Senates, has been one of the pioneers behind the
Speaker 1: voter fraud investigations that have been taking place over the
Speaker 1: last couple of years. Big, big supporter of the president,
Speaker 1: and the President's a big sport of his. He's also
Speaker 1: going to be down there in El Paso next week
Speaker 1: where a lot of us are we trying to bring
Speaker 1: attention to the fact that the border wall has not
Speaker 1: been built because of the obstructionism in Washington, DC. And
Speaker 1: so therefore, just as the founding of your nation, ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen, citizen action is required. I'm going to be
Speaker 1: pleased to be down there. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: My names or him, because on the phone lines are
Speaker 1: open if you want to have your say, eight four
Speaker 1: four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred bucks still to come on the show, as
Speaker 1: I say, Chris Koeback, Matt Peterson of the Claremont Institute,
Speaker 1: Peggy Grandy, who's going to be launching a new pro
Speaker 1: Brexit organization in the United States, in a couple of days.
Speaker 1: I'm want to talk to you about that and a
Speaker 1: whole lot more. Stay tuned, we'll be right back. Welcome back,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen. It's The Buck Sexton Show, broadcasting live
Speaker 1: out of Washington, DC, Thursday the eighteenth of July two
Speaker 1: thousand and nineteen. Delighted to have joining us now, Chris Koeback. Chris, good,
Speaker 1: good evening to you. Great through with you. Well, depending
Speaker 1: on where you are in the world. Where are you
Speaker 1: in the world at the moment, I am in Kansas,
Speaker 1: so it is oh, okay, it's just it's just into
Speaker 1: the Chris. We sadolged you're joining us, and I think
Speaker 1: you and I are going to bump into each other
Speaker 1: next week down at the border in El Paso as well. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so I want to talk to you a little bit
Speaker 1: about that and your work. Would we build the ball
Speaker 1: but you're also running again, tell us a little bit
Speaker 1: about that before we move on to south or on
Speaker 1: the border. Right. So, I threw my hat in the
Speaker 1: race for an open US Senate seat representing Kansas, and
Speaker 1: one of the driving issues is, of course, the failure
Speaker 1: of the US Senate to move the ball on building
Speaker 1: the wall. Indeed, the Senate has been dragged, kicking and screaming,
Speaker 1: it seems, whenever the President wants to make progress, I'm
Speaker 1: anything related to illegal immigration. And so, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: hoping that in the United States Senate, I'll actually be
Speaker 1: able to carry the flag to the President. And more specifically,
Speaker 1: because I've been litigating as an attorney, I've been fighting
Speaker 1: the ACLU and court on a number of these immigration issues,
Speaker 1: representing ICE agents, representing cities like Hableton, Pennsylvania, be able
Speaker 1: to you know, know more than the staffers do about
Speaker 1: what statutes need to be changed, you know, how to
Speaker 1: close the asylum loopholes. We really don't have an immigration
Speaker 1: expert in the US Senate right now, and I'm hoping
Speaker 1: to fill that void, not just for people of Kansas,
Speaker 1: but for all Americans to care about this issue well.
Speaker 1: And it's one of those seats where so many high
Speaker 1: profile names have been thrown in there. You know, you've
Speaker 1: had Mike Pompeio a jeep Pie. They've both declined on
Speaker 1: that match lap the head of the ACU and all
Speaker 1: these other guys. What sets you apart if you're doing
Speaker 1: your sort of pitch to the Kansas audience of this
Speaker 1: show right now, from from any other potential candidates. Well,
Speaker 1: there's there's two things. One is, of course, my experience
Speaker 1: on the immigration front, which is so critical. And then
Speaker 1: the second is I was a professor of constitutional law
Speaker 1: for fifteen years in the Kansas City area, and that
Speaker 1: expertise I think is important right now in our country
Speaker 1: because we've got so many constitutional principles that right down
Speaker 1: to one vote in the United States Supreme Court, whether
Speaker 1: you're talking about the Second Amendment, you're talking about the
Speaker 1: commerce power and its abuse in the passing of Obamacare,
Speaker 1: whether you're talking about the right to life, you name
Speaker 1: the issue. It seems like almost every one is a
Speaker 1: five four decision, including the ridiculous decision we got recently
Speaker 1: saying that the United States could not ask on the
Speaker 1: census whether a person is a citizen for an administrative reason,
Speaker 1: not for a constitutional reason. And so it's absolutely important.
Speaker 1: It's a very interesting point. Why is the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: weighing in on logistical concerns rather than what's constitutional or not.
Speaker 1: So the AHL you threw everything they could at the
Speaker 1: citizenship question, which is one of the things I've discussed
Speaker 1: with President Trump, and I was one of the early
Speaker 1: people to talk to him about that issue. And they
Speaker 1: threw the a constitutional challenge, They threw a statutory challenge
Speaker 1: under the Census Act, and then their last challenge they
Speaker 1: threw in an administrative law challenge, and the US Supreme
Speaker 1: Court said it. They denied the acl used constitutional challenge.
Speaker 1: They said it's perfectly constitutional to ask this question and
Speaker 1: it's been done for just about every census, and they
Speaker 1: said it doesn't violate the Census Act. But on the
Speaker 1: Administrative Procedure Act challenge, they went really into the into
Speaker 1: the weeds and said, well, the way you gave the
Speaker 1: justification for this Commerce Department is not quite right, and
Speaker 1: we need you to do it all over again. And
Speaker 1: because the Supreme Court issued its decisions so late in
Speaker 1: the game, the Commerce Department decided that they weren't going
Speaker 1: to try to rush through and do it a second
Speaker 1: time under the administrat procedirect is an absolute disgrace. I
Speaker 1: think it's an absolute disgrace, Chris. I mean, honestly, this
Speaker 1: is this is something that's taking place in almost every
Speaker 1: single US census that has ever been and it's something
Speaker 1: that at this point in time, I'm sure you would
Speaker 1: agree is needed now more than ever. Oh, it absolutely
Speaker 1: is needed. They're too There are multiple big reasons, I
Speaker 1: guess the three biggest ones are. First of all, we've
Speaker 1: got so many non citizens living in the United States
Speaker 1: right now that we have a gross violation of the
Speaker 1: principle of one man or one person, one vote. Let's
Speaker 1: imagine that you live in you know, in California, in
Speaker 1: a district that has three hundred fifty thousand citizens and
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty thousand non citizens. I live in
Speaker 1: Kansas and there are seven hundred thousand citizens and virtually
Speaker 1: no non citizens. So let's just imagine your vote is
Speaker 1: twice as strong as mine because you have half the
Speaker 1: number of voters in your district. And the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: ruled more than fifty years ago, but you can't have
Speaker 1: unequal district sizes. So that's one reason. Another is that
Speaker 1: the fourteenth Amendment requires the United States to know how
Speaker 1: many citizens it has, which is absolutely essential. And another
Speaker 1: reason is, you know, we've been estimating how many legal
Speaker 1: aliens we have for decades now, and nobody really knows.
Speaker 1: It could be eleven million, it could be thirty millions.
Speaker 1: If we ask this question. On the census, you can
Speaker 1: deduce pretty quickly how many you have because you then
Speaker 1: know how many aliens and how many citizens you have,
Speaker 1: and you can subtract the number of legal aliens that
Speaker 1: are currently authorized to be in the United States from
Speaker 1: the number of total number of aliens, and you can
Speaker 1: actually get a pretty accurate account of illegal aliens. But
Speaker 1: of course, travesty that's on there. But we hope, we
Speaker 1: hope President Trump's ways of getting around that will be equally,
Speaker 1: if not more accurate in terms of identifying that. The
Speaker 1: jury is still out. Let's talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: where we'll be next week al Paso. Yes, Chris, we
Speaker 1: build a wall dot US. We just had Brian Colpage
Speaker 1: on the show as well, just before you gave us
Speaker 1: a little rundown of what's going on there. Tell us
Speaker 1: why it's so important to you and why you think
Speaker 1: people should be involved. Well, let me put it in
Speaker 1: a personal perspective. So I've been fighting the fight on
Speaker 1: the immigration issue for the better part of two decades
Speaker 1: and including helping draft Arizona's SP ten seventy, representing ICE
Speaker 1: agents against the ahlu are Sorry, against the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: and of all the things I've done, I have to say,
Speaker 1: we build the Walls project has been the most exciting
Speaker 1: and tangible. We have actually, for the first time in
Speaker 1: American history, put up privately constructed wall on the border
Speaker 1: of the United States. And it's superior to the wall
Speaker 1: constructed by the US government. It's similar, but superior in
Speaker 1: many respects. And so it's an amazing opportunity for people
Speaker 1: to get involved and actually do something tangible to improve
Speaker 1: the security United States. And you can see your money
Speaker 1: going to work. And so this conference down on the
Speaker 1: border next week is partly about the building of the wall,
Speaker 1: but it's also about the larger issue of why we
Speaker 1: have a crisis in immigration right now. You'll be there speaking,
Speaker 1: I'll be there speaking a whole host of experts from
Speaker 1: all over the country, and indeed all over the world
Speaker 1: will be coming in to speak about why we need
Speaker 1: to secure our border and the various crises that are involved.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right. Please go back, tell people where they
Speaker 1: can go to check out more about your campaign. Maybe
Speaker 1: if they fancy donating, they might do that too. Yes,
Speaker 1: if anyone wants to support the campaign or just find
Speaker 1: out more, they can go to my website, which is
Speaker 1: Chris Koback dot com. It's k R I S. Kobac
Speaker 1: dot com. Thank you so much for joining us here
Speaker 1: this Thursday afternoon, Chris Koeback, My pleasure, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: The phone lines are open. I want your response to
Speaker 1: all of these things at eight four four nine hundred
Speaker 1: two eight two five eight four four nine hundred buck
Speaker 1: is the number here. We're gonna go to a quick break,
Speaker 1: and I have segmented the next section out for you guys,
Speaker 1: So don't be shy. Hop on the lines. If you're hostile,
Speaker 1: if you're favorable, if you're somewhere in between, you have
Speaker 1: a question, if you have a comment. I love hearing
Speaker 1: from you guys out there. Eight four four nine hundred
Speaker 1: two eight two five. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: I'm rahem because we'll be right back. Welcome back. It's
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. I'm rahem becauseum filling in for
Speaker 1: the traveling Buck Sexton this evening broadcasting live out of Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: Phone lines are open eight four two five eight four
Speaker 1: nine hundred buck. Coming to you guys on the lines. Now,
Speaker 1: let's go to line two. Anthony's in Baltimore, Anthony Good evening, Well,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to say that I really don't think
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's a racist at heart. I think because of
Speaker 1: the way he was brought up, you know, kind of
Speaker 1: insulated and living the lifestyle of you know that his
Speaker 1: father provided him, he didn't really grasp at depth of
Speaker 1: what racism really is. But he's been unligned with it because,
Speaker 1: you know, like during the Obama time when he was
Speaker 1: he said he had the proof that Obama wasn't a citizen,
Speaker 1: and that kind of played into the narrative that was
Speaker 1: going on because you know, most black people here in
Speaker 1: this country have the names of the people who owned,
Speaker 1: you know, when doing slavery. Obama came with a real
Speaker 1: African name, and you know that it's you know, it
Speaker 1: kind of you know, created a stare amongst folks that
Speaker 1: were willing to believe he wasn't a citizen. And when
Speaker 1: the NFL players got down on their knees begging for
Speaker 1: the same liberty that everyone else has, you know, I
Speaker 1: think he kind of fell in line with putting them down,
Speaker 1: not really knowing the extent of the terrorism that black people,
Speaker 1: including myself, have endured for decades in this country. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's you know, it was, it was, it was terrible.
Speaker 1: But you know, I think if he had, if he
Speaker 1: had handled the NFL situation differently, I think he'd had
Speaker 1: black people in his camp solidly Democrat, repubn whatever they are.
Speaker 1: But you know, I think you get wrong advice on
Speaker 1: that because what was going on on the street, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, I know and don't think that it's you know,
Speaker 1: I mean people say if people don't like this country
Speaker 1: should go. I mean, black people lived in this country
Speaker 1: for a couple of hundred years and they couldn't have
Speaker 1: been happy with the way they were treated. But they
Speaker 1: put too much into building this country too me, So
Speaker 1: you know, And I think, Anthony, you bring up some
Speaker 1: really interesting points because there are so many distinctions to
Speaker 1: be made where right, there are so many. It's like
Speaker 1: for me, it gets very and like you, I come
Speaker 1: from a sort of ethnic minority background. Although it doesn't
Speaker 1: you don't really care. It doesn't doesn't define who I am,
Speaker 1: and I very care about it. When I get the left, however,
Speaker 1: telling me how I should think and how I should act,
Speaker 1: and how I should feel about something, how I should vote,
Speaker 1: how I should behave as a result of all those things,
Speaker 1: then it starts a sort of way on me and
Speaker 1: grind my ears, and you know, like you, I don't think.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, if Donald Trump had been a racist
Speaker 1: for any part of his career, for any part of
Speaker 1: his life, we would have known about it way before
Speaker 1: the political campaign of twenty sixteen. And we would have
Speaker 1: known about it way before Elie Omar started flapping. It
Speaker 1: was about it as well. It's worth food for discrimination
Speaker 1: and housing. But again, you know, I think, yeah, but
Speaker 1: also Anthony, don't forget he also won an award. He
Speaker 1: won an award. He's pictured there winning an award from
Speaker 1: from ethnic minority. So this swings in life. You know,
Speaker 1: not everything is just clear cut. Yeah, I know it's not.
Speaker 1: That's why I say I don't believe he's a racist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree, I just believe that, you know, because of
Speaker 1: the way he was raised, he was somewhat insulated from
Speaker 1: what we you know, say would be a down south,
Speaker 1: down hardcore racist. I know that can and you know
Speaker 1: I lived a month from and I sort of damage
Speaker 1: that he did to my father and family and what
Speaker 1: they did to me. But you know, I don't think
Speaker 1: he had any clue to that. And that comes from
Speaker 1: you know, him having a life in commercial real estate.
Speaker 1: I mean, if he'd have been a studied sociology or
Speaker 1: you know some other you know, it might have given
Speaker 1: him more insight whether he could have you know, meld
Speaker 1: his position. And I mean, I'm a I'm a hardcore listen,
Speaker 1: but man like a baby. When George Bush died, and
Speaker 1: I have to say this, I am so glad for
Speaker 1: so very many reasons that this president never studied sociology. Okay,
Speaker 1: there is so many we have. We have this joke
Speaker 1: in England where I'm from about the allergies, right, and
Speaker 1: how people go into into pseudosciences and social sciences because
Speaker 1: they don't know how to build anything, and they don't
Speaker 1: want to create anything, and they don't want to risk
Speaker 1: take anything themselves. And this is something this man has done.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this and today, how do you
Speaker 1: let's let's take President Trump out of this equation for
Speaker 1: a second, how do you think that the country should
Speaker 1: receive the squad Eli Omar and Rashida Talaev and AOC
Speaker 1: and all these guys are you are you a fine?
Speaker 1: What do you think we should do with them? Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I am opposed to any band on Americans
Speaker 1: that prohibit them from protesting anything. Include No, I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about that. I'm not talking about that. You and
Speaker 1: I will agree on that. We're both liberals in that sense.
Speaker 1: But the issues she brought up, you know, we shouldn't
Speaker 1: be able to you know, you shouldn't lose your job
Speaker 1: because you boycott or have an opinion about a country.
Speaker 1: And that doesn't mean you're anti Semitic just because you
Speaker 1: don't like Israeli policies, you know, I mean, I can
Speaker 1: be convinced that, you know, for strategic reasons, we maybe
Speaker 1: need to support Israel. But I think in this country
Speaker 1: we got off track thinking that they are the biblical
Speaker 1: Hebrews or the descendants of Christ, and they are not there.
Speaker 1: You know, the converts from the you know, Cassarian Kingdom
Speaker 1: on the King's and they converted to Judius Anthony. That's
Speaker 1: that's Anthony. That's all fine, But what do you That's
Speaker 1: all fine for you to have and to hold as
Speaker 1: as an opinion to say that thing, But what do
Speaker 1: you do when you have a sitting congresswoman who has
Speaker 1: all I mean, I guess you've been listening to the
Speaker 1: whole show, did you did you hear me at the beginning?
Speaker 1: What do you do when you have the sketchy backs
Speaker 1: as far as what she has said? You know, these
Speaker 1: are the these are sore points in this country because
Speaker 1: you know, you really can't criticize the goodnment of Israel
Speaker 1: without repercussions, you know, senious repercussions. I mean, well, and
Speaker 1: I and I and I respect you for for for
Speaker 1: saying that and being clean about it. But there are
Speaker 1: a lot of people in this country you will accept,
Speaker 1: and in my country and all across Europe antony who
Speaker 1: who both want to criticize the government of Israel and
Speaker 1: one to criticize quote unquote the Jews. As a result,
Speaker 1: you understand that those people exist, right, Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: I understand that. But you know, you know, like I say,
Speaker 1: I can be convinced to you know, to support strategic reasons.
Speaker 1: We've we've sup supported worst governments in Israel for strategic reasons.
Speaker 1: But you know, but the main reason we're behind Israel
Speaker 1: is everyone has the assumption that they are somehow related
Speaker 1: to the biblical Hebrews. They are not. They are comm
Speaker 1: not shrump start a converted converted to Judaism. This is this, this,
Speaker 1: this has been the big fraud. I mean, they call
Speaker 1: you anti Semitic, and Semitic is a class of languages
Speaker 1: and all of them are indigenous to Africa. Arabic is
Speaker 1: a Semitic language, you know. Almanic is a Semitic andy.
Speaker 1: We really got we really got thirty seconds left in
Speaker 1: this uh in this anton ant. They appreciate it. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have to leave there. We're gonna go thirty seconds
Speaker 1: left until hard break. Believe me, if I could take
Speaker 1: us beyond, I would, But they tend to get a
Speaker 1: little bit mad when I cut their advertisers off. But Anthony,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for the call. I do disagree
Speaker 1: in your in your analysis there of why the United
Speaker 1: States has strategically supported the Nation of Israel, the Jewish
Speaker 1: state for all these years. I think there's far more
Speaker 1: to it than just, you know, believing in the descendency
Speaker 1: of certain people. I think it is the only free
Speaker 1: nation in the entire region, and I think that means
Speaker 1: a lot, an awful lot to a lot of people
Speaker 1: in the Western world. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: I'm Aham Kassam We're going to be right back after
Speaker 1: this break. Buck Sexton Remission, decoding the news and disseminating
Speaker 1: information with actionable intelligence. Manor mistake, America, You're a great
Speaker 1: American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Pharma, CIA analysts, No,
Speaker 1: welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. It's the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: My name's Raheim Kausam, global lecterer in chief of Human
Speaker 1: Events dot Com, Reagan's old favorite magazine, filling in for
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton. Here from a very very sweaty Washington DC.
Speaker 1: It's one hundred degrees in the swamp and it's sweltering hot.
Speaker 1: And I took the decision to walk to the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hut today and that was a very very big mistake.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you that you'll probably noticed this if
Speaker 1: you know any English people, any people that were born
Speaker 1: and raised in the United Kingdom. In fact, that we
Speaker 1: really enjoy talking about the weather. We could talk about
Speaker 1: the weather all day long, and I'm very often tempted
Speaker 1: to do just that. But I sha'n't bore you with
Speaker 1: any more details about what it's like here in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. I want to hear from you guys out there,
Speaker 1: not necessarily just about the weather. It's eight four four
Speaker 1: nine two eight two five eight four four nine hundred
Speaker 1: buck is the number here on the show. And if
Speaker 1: you missed any of the last two hours, you're gonna
Speaker 1: want to go and listen back. We've had some great
Speaker 1: calls from you guys out there, some great counterpoints, as
Speaker 1: well as a series of phenomenal guests on the show.
Speaker 1: I hope you agree. If you want to communicate with
Speaker 1: me and you don't fancy calling in, maybe maybe you're
Speaker 1: a little nervous, maybe you haven't called into a radio
Speaker 1: show before, I would encourage you to drop the insecurity
Speaker 1: and give us a call. But if not, I'm on
Speaker 1: all the social media platforms at Rahemcasam, h E, M
Speaker 1: K A, S. Sam. If you've got any good points
Speaker 1: to make, tweet them at me all that stuff. We'll
Speaker 1: read them out as the show goes on. I'm delighted
Speaker 1: to be joined now by one of my great heroes,
Speaker 1: Matthew Peterson from the Claremont Institute, one of my favorite
Speaker 1: think tanks in the entire world, and of course I'm
Speaker 1: a massive nerd, so I would have a favorite think
Speaker 1: tank list. Matt Thanks for joying us here on the show. Grehem,
Speaker 1: it's great to be here and bring word from a
Speaker 1: place where we don't have the amenity and it's not
Speaker 1: a swamp, sunny southern California, which actually does have a
Speaker 1: conservative think tank. I know, it's extraordinary. A lot of
Speaker 1: people don't know about it. And well, hopefully we'll have
Speaker 1: the time in this segment for you to give the
Speaker 1: Claremont Institute and your new website to the American Mind,
Speaker 1: which is an American Mind dot org. We'll give it
Speaker 1: another plug later on. Well, I want to talk to
Speaker 1: you about this fantastic article you've written. It's called Stiffening
Speaker 1: the Backbone of the Right. It was published on American Greatness,
Speaker 1: which is another one of my favorite sites. Matthew, talk
Speaker 1: us through this I guess call to arms that you've issued,
Speaker 1: because it's getting a lot of traction on the conservative interwebs. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so this actually stems from the reaction that I see,
Speaker 1: and I see this reaction all the time in the
Speaker 1: conservative world, especially in the intellectual side of it, where
Speaker 1: people go, oh my gosh, hold on a minute, the
Speaker 1: left can't actually do this, that's terrible. How could they?
Speaker 1: And I just you know, I think anyone who's sensible.
Speaker 1: The people are leading right now, not the intellectuals, thank god,
Speaker 1: the people are out in front. But you know, anyone
Speaker 1: who's sensible on this knows, of course there's no rules
Speaker 1: for the left, That's how they operate. And so I
Speaker 1: wrote this up ed because people were saying, how could
Speaker 1: CNN give a platform to an actual neo Nazi, Richard Spencer,
Speaker 1: who they put on air to call Trump's tweets racist?
Speaker 1: How could they do that? And you saw people on
Speaker 1: the right and the left saying this, and I just
Speaker 1: I just thought, guys, we know they don't care. There
Speaker 1: are no rules for them. They don't have to apologize
Speaker 1: for any of this stuff. They don't operate in the
Speaker 1: in the same you know, universe of physical laws that
Speaker 1: the right has to and it's just three years into
Speaker 1: Trump that we stopped playing by their rules. Let's let's
Speaker 1: put a little bit of context around this for the
Speaker 1: people that don't know out there. The Richard Spencer is
Speaker 1: this guy who is an avowed white nationalist, an avowed
Speaker 1: ethno nationalist. He has almost nothing in common with the
Speaker 1: real right, but he's been held as this flag bearer,
Speaker 1: as this torch bearer for what has become known as
Speaker 1: the alt right for so very many years now that
Speaker 1: we can't stop hearing about him, even though he's got
Speaker 1: really no reach, no pull, no institution, no organization, no
Speaker 1: cardret of individuals, intellectual or otherwise that support him, And
Speaker 1: time and time again the media and the establishment political
Speaker 1: classes have tried to tie him and is very very
Speaker 1: small group of friends to the Trump administration and to conservatism.
Speaker 1: And of course no right wing outlets have ever sought
Speaker 1: to promote Richard Spencer. But the one who did this
Speaker 1: week was not a right wing outlet. It was CNN.
Speaker 1: CNN puts him on television to rebuke Trump and to
Speaker 1: rebuke the Trump administration as if to say, you're losing
Speaker 1: your core support. But this person was never part of
Speaker 1: the core support, never part of one of the one
Speaker 1: of the stools legs of the stools of the of
Speaker 1: the of the Trump base. So it's it's kind of
Speaker 1: a ropodope that's been going on here, And I just
Speaker 1: don't understand. It doesn't really compute to me about how
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy and Chris Cuomo and Jake
Speaker 1: Tapper and all of these guys who waxed lyrical day
Speaker 1: in and day out over the dangers of promoting the
Speaker 1: old right and the ethno nationalists and all these guys.
Speaker 1: They then put him on national television, right and and raheem,
Speaker 1: I mean exactly right. And as you know, well, you know,
Speaker 1: the big tech platforms will cut you off for something
Speaker 1: much less than covorting around with you know, neo Nazis
Speaker 1: or spouting hate. I mean, so so here they are
Speaker 1: flagrant hypocrisy. Did They wanted him on air though, because
Speaker 1: they wanted him to say that Trump's tweets were great
Speaker 1: and they were racist, and he did, but then he
Speaker 1: immediately went on to say to complain that Trump has
Speaker 1: done nothing for white nationalists, and then they kind of
Speaker 1: cut the interview off. But but you know, my point
Speaker 1: is they don't care, right, I mean, they don't have
Speaker 1: to care because they don't have to play by the
Speaker 1: same rules they impose on everybody else. So what's your solution, Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, your rop ed was read out
Speaker 1: this morning, I think by the Great Russia Limbaugh correct
Speaker 1: me if I'm wrong, which gets a whole load of traction.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure you've had a whole lot of eyes
Speaker 1: on this thing. Just condense it down to us. What
Speaker 1: do you say, what are the solutions? Where are you
Speaker 1: going with this? Yeah, well, I think the point is
Speaker 1: I'm just to give some other examples besides race. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: mainstream media outlets, as I say, don't have to apologize
Speaker 1: for wild conspiracy theories that terrify half the country, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, you have to apologize for not believing them
Speaker 1: about Russian college. They don't have to apologize for spreading
Speaker 1: crazy stories about Justice Kavanaugh being a serial gang rapist.
Speaker 1: But you have to believe all women, right, So this
Speaker 1: is the game they play. So the solution is very important.
Speaker 1: I think people have to start to recognize when they're
Speaker 1: playing by the left's rules. They have to stand up
Speaker 1: and be courageous and reject that entire framework. And that's
Speaker 1: going to take some doing. And I think people really
Speaker 1: need to think, they need to study up on the
Speaker 1: problem of identity politics and political correctness. This isn't these
Speaker 1: these phrases are referred to dangerous ideas that are that
Speaker 1: are impacting America in a very serious way. And we
Speaker 1: have to understand what's going on and what this framework
Speaker 1: of the left is. And I mean there's plenty on
Speaker 1: the American mind dot org about the danger of entity
Speaker 1: politics and political correctness, which has become its own religion
Speaker 1: at this point, and there's all kinds of things we
Speaker 1: can do to fight against it, but first we have
Speaker 1: to understand it. And ultimately, I think all Americans should
Speaker 1: rest on the principle that all human beings are created
Speaker 1: equal according to the laws of nature and Nature's God,
Speaker 1: and that means that racism on both sides is a problem.
Speaker 1: But we need to we need to acknowledge when the
Speaker 1: left is playing a double standard, right, And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what's going on. And that's why people are so mad
Speaker 1: and stand with Trump against the squad, because they see
Speaker 1: they see the you know, they see the way the
Speaker 1: squad thinks about America, and it's it's not a matter
Speaker 1: of treating all people equally. I think that's exactly right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I wrote, I wrote I wouldn't say something similar,
Speaker 1: but in a similar sort of thread of thought yesterday
Speaker 1: on human events. Everyone's gone nuts for power and profit
Speaker 1: was that was the name of the article, and it
Speaker 1: sort of goes through I don't know if you see
Speaker 1: this sort of exactly how this new outrage over Chris Pratt,
Speaker 1: this actor wearing a T shirt with the Adsden flag
Speaker 1: on it came about effectively, there were four or five
Speaker 1: people on Twitter who complained about this, obviously not knowing
Speaker 1: the gads and flag's history and any of that. And
Speaker 1: then Yahoo News takes the tweets and says Chris Pratt
Speaker 1: criticized for wearing this racist T shirt or whatever they
Speaker 1: said about it, and then the whole country has to
Speaker 1: work itself into a tizzy in order to play Kate,
Speaker 1: this writer at Yahoo News who's decided to create a
Speaker 1: national ferraria over something that really isn't controversial at all,
Speaker 1: and just time and time again, and to adopt an
Speaker 1: American colloquialism. As you know, I'm not often want to do, Matt.
Speaker 1: They're playing us, yes, yes, And that's the thing I mean.
Speaker 1: I think that it's important for people to realize that
Speaker 1: there's lots of normal people out there who certainly care about,
Speaker 1: you know, opposing racism and making sure that people are
Speaker 1: treated equally. That's the point, to treat people equally under
Speaker 1: the law that is America. But everyone is starting I
Speaker 1: think increasingly, more and more people on the writer are
Speaker 1: starting to realize that in the hands of the left,
Speaker 1: this is just a tool. This is just a tool
Speaker 1: for power. They don't have to abide by the same rules. Right,
Speaker 1: they can stay governor even though they make sick jokes
Speaker 1: about blackface in the KKK. Well they're in medical school.
Speaker 1: But god forbid, you know you're committing microaggressions. You're not
Speaker 1: even aware of an ancestors you never knew. You must
Speaker 1: atoned for, right. I mean, this is ridiculous and so
Speaker 1: so so in what we need our leaders who can
Speaker 1: stand up against it. And this is in large part
Speaker 1: Trump's success because by not backing down, by by sticking
Speaker 1: you know, his his his flag, planning his flag. People
Speaker 1: rally around that because they're looking for someone to call
Speaker 1: the game what it is. Matt, I assure you there
Speaker 1: is nothing micro about my aggressions. Okay, now I know
Speaker 1: this Firsthandpa, I'll just test a fire to that who
Speaker 1: to the audience for him that has macroaggression problems, you know,
Speaker 1: on a daily basis. Matt, tell us the way we
Speaker 1: can find more about your work at the Claremont Institute
Speaker 1: in the American Mind. You can go to American Mind
Speaker 1: dot org and Claremont dot org to learn more about
Speaker 1: the Claremont Institute and full disclosure, I am at Claremont Institute,
Speaker 1: Lincoln Fellow, and therefore I will say subscribe also to
Speaker 1: the Claremont Review of Books. It is one of the
Speaker 1: most magnificent reads you can get in through your mailbox
Speaker 1: every quarter to the point where I have canceled dates
Speaker 1: and it's not a lie because CRB has arrived on
Speaker 1: my doorstep that day. That is how committed I am
Speaker 1: to that. Matt Peterson, thank you so much for joining
Speaker 1: us here on the Buck sex in the show. Oh
Speaker 1: thank you as well. Thanks again anytime, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: make sure you're on the phone lines. It's eight Fri four,
Speaker 1: nine hundred two eight two five eight foot four, nine
Speaker 1: hundred buck going to come to you guys pretty soon.
Speaker 1: Got a couple of more great interviewees for you. In
Speaker 1: the meantime, we're going to be right back with more
Speaker 1: after this short break. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: My name is Rahim Kassam, the editor in chief of
Speaker 1: Human Events dot com, joining you for the last gosh
Speaker 1: half an hour or so the show. Where does the
Speaker 1: time go? Ladies and gentlemen, the phone lines are open
Speaker 1: here eight four four nine hundred two eight two five
Speaker 1: eight four four nine hundred buck. There's breaking news coming
Speaker 1: out of the straight of Alma's, out of the Gulf
Speaker 1: of Alma's, and breaking news coming out of the White House.
Speaker 1: As a result, I've got Adam Credo, one of the
Speaker 1: senior reporters at the Washington Free Beacon and a great
Speaker 1: friend of mine, joining me on the line now to
Speaker 1: help us and pack that. The headline of the Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal right now, Trump says, us ship down to
Speaker 1: Iranian drone in the straight of Almos. Adam, welcome to
Speaker 1: the show. Help us, help us unpack this. Yeah, thanks
Speaker 1: for having me man, So I will pointing up the
Speaker 1: Iranians denied that a drone was lost, so it's kind
Speaker 1: of unclear. I tend to believe the President more than
Speaker 1: I do the Iranians, given their pattern of why all
Speaker 1: of the time, and of course cheating on the nuclear program.
Speaker 1: But this is a little bit of tit for tat.
Speaker 1: I also got to say, I don't see the Iranians
Speaker 1: as doing more in reaction to this than continuing to
Speaker 1: throw temper tantrums, which is what they've been doing, their
Speaker 1: harassment of tankers in the Persian Gulf and the straighter
Speaker 1: her moves like you mentioned, also their downing of our drone.
Speaker 1: These are provocative actions, but actually agreed with the President
Speaker 1: when he called off a military strike. It really didn't
Speaker 1: seem to be worth it for what they were doing.
Speaker 1: This is as always Iran acting poorly in order to
Speaker 1: try to get the Europeans and of course the United
Speaker 1: States to roll back some of these harsh sanctions and
Speaker 1: save their economy right, and it doesn't seem to be working. Actually,
Speaker 1: people seem to be wising up, or is my good
Speaker 1: friend Steve Bannon always says getting the joke. The Europeans
Speaker 1: especially are quite a quite laccadacicle and woolly on this.
Speaker 1: Wanted to stick with the Iran deal when it was
Speaker 1: even abundantly clear that they the Iranians, had no intent
Speaker 1: of following along with it. And now even the Europeans
Speaker 1: seemed to be waking up, The Germans, the French seemed
Speaker 1: to be waking up to what the Iranians really are
Speaker 1: all about. I mean it, It sort of is evident
Speaker 1: to the everyman, but hasn't been evident to the career
Speaker 1: political classes and the career civil service classes across Europe
Speaker 1: for some time now. The Iranians also saying that they
Speaker 1: have seized an an oil tanker and its crew in
Speaker 1: the last couple of hours, which sort of ups the
Speaker 1: anti I suppose, But again, these guys are not used
Speaker 1: to really following through on their threats. There's been a
Speaker 1: lot of threats in the last couple of weeks, but
Speaker 1: no real action as a result. Tell us, Adam, this
Speaker 1: is your beat. You cover this day in and day out.
Speaker 1: You have probably the best source network in Washington, DC
Speaker 1: and beyond. On this topic, do the Iranians actually have
Speaker 1: anything to say but rattle about? Yeah, they do. When
Speaker 1: they don't look, they can cause trouble. They are armed
Speaker 1: to the teeth over there. I mean, it's not necessarily
Speaker 1: a match for the United States in a full on
Speaker 1: military conflict or maybe you would absolutely decimate them. But
Speaker 1: they can do what they've always done, and that's terrorism,
Speaker 1: whether it's through the IRGC they're or military fighting force
Speaker 1: or the terror groups they sponsor like Zabola and Lebanon
Speaker 1: and Hamas and the guys a strip over there, and
Speaker 1: I would certainly expect them to continue this type of stuff,
Speaker 1: but raise an interesting point about the Europeans may be
Speaker 1: kind of finally coming around and realizing that appeasement, stopping
Speaker 1: sanctions doing business with Iran actually did nothing. They continue
Speaker 1: to cheat it to deal. We know now that that
Speaker 1: we're supposed to dismantle the Fordale military bunker that's built
Speaker 1: into the side of a mountain and that housed their
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons program. That never happened. They completely did not
Speaker 1: live up to that portion of the agreement. So as
Speaker 1: this information starts to trickle out, I think the Europeans
Speaker 1: are saying, well, the approach we've been taking has not
Speaker 1: been working. Maybe there's a better way. And from the
Speaker 1: end of the Trump administration they've been pushing the UN
Speaker 1: Security Council now to invoke snapback that's the snapback of
Speaker 1: international sanctions that, in addition to what the administration's doing
Speaker 1: just with the US, would completely cripple the Iranian economy
Speaker 1: more than it already is and potentially spark popular protests
Speaker 1: in the country. And we've we've seen a little bit
Speaker 1: of that already. Some of the reporting that you do,
Speaker 1: I think sometimes can escape the general public. You know,
Speaker 1: you do a lot of in depth reporting on what's
Speaker 1: going on to state in Polman was going on with
Speaker 1: the Iranian nuclear deal and someone and so forth. But
Speaker 1: you know, just going through a litany of your arsicles
Speaker 1: over the course of the last couple of days, out
Speaker 1: of my notes is that there are things that are
Speaker 1: just not talked about outside of experts on the matter,
Speaker 1: like you, For instance, you had the think Iran cult
Speaker 1: smuggling new materials out of the US. What what what
Speaker 1: was that? What's going on there? Yeah, So this is
Speaker 1: something that happened between around two thousand and eight and
Speaker 1: twenty thirteen. Uranian agent Uranian nationals I would call them
Speaker 1: what they are, spies, members of their intelligence service actually
Speaker 1: were involved in a plot to smuggle outcarbon ciber. Now
Speaker 1: that doesn't sound so serious, but it is a controlled
Speaker 1: substance and regulated precisely because it can be used to
Speaker 1: enriched uranium, which we all know the raniums love to do.
Speaker 1: They've blown past caps on the restrictions on the amount
Speaker 1: of moderately to highly enriched uranium making stockpile in the country,
Speaker 1: and all of these efforts are towards that, going towards
Speaker 1: that end of enriching uranium to weapons grade purity. So
Speaker 1: these three individ jewels. Actually we're found during the time
Speaker 1: the Obama administration was on the international stage negotiating this
Speaker 1: deal that Donald Trump removed the US from these Irradian spies,
Speaker 1: we're running around trying to export it. Adam, Adam, hang
Speaker 1: on the line. We've got to jump to a quick break.
Speaker 1: Hang on the line. We're gonna come back to you
Speaker 1: after the quick break and we can finish on this.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show. Welcome back is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. It's Thursday, the eighteenth of July twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: and a whole lot going on today, and a whole
Speaker 1: lot I'm sure we'll continued to go on. It doesn't
Speaker 1: seem like there's any less of the news lately, and
Speaker 1: the breaking news out of the Middle East at the
Speaker 1: moment is the US is claiming to have shot down
Speaker 1: an Iranian drone. We've got Adam Creedo, senior writer at
Speaker 1: the Washington Freebeacon, who's stuck with us on the line.
Speaker 1: Very kindly, Adam, thank you so much, my pleasure. I
Speaker 1: did some level grinding and final fan if you will. Adam,
Speaker 1: a man after my own heart, likes likes the likes
Speaker 1: a video game or two. Adam, we'll we'll talk about
Speaker 1: that more offline, because I have recently been taking to
Speaker 1: World War Z or World War Z as you guys. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's no there's nothing better than watching sort of fifty
Speaker 1: thousand zombies charging at you and you're trying to figure
Speaker 1: out how to stop. But that's good, and you know
Speaker 1: that's a great analogy for the Iranian proper. Adam, you
Speaker 1: were talking to us before about this um more serious
Speaker 1: issue than video games, which is IRN smuggling nuclear materials
Speaker 1: out of the US. But I just want to reiterate
Speaker 1: for the audience here, what do you think when something
Speaker 1: like this happens. Now you've now you've had the drone
Speaker 1: on the US side done, You've also had a retaliator
Speaker 1: reaction from the US in terms of destroying some of
Speaker 1: the cyber commanding control in Iran over the last couple
Speaker 1: of weeks. And now you're seeing this as well, the
Speaker 1: US actually taking action themselves to remove Iranian hardware from
Speaker 1: the skies. For somebody like you who's been in this
Speaker 1: business for a very long time and can kind of
Speaker 1: to some extent predict what happens next, what happens next, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm very cautious about saying there's going to be a war.
Speaker 1: I know that people like to use that rhetoric, particularly
Speaker 1: the old Obama era officials who formed that nuclear deal.
Speaker 1: They say that every heavy of sanctions, every salvo the
Speaker 1: Trump administration makes marches us closer to war. I don't
Speaker 1: think that's true. I don't. I don't believe that rhetoric.
Speaker 1: In fact, I think that they forward that rhetoric for
Speaker 1: lack of a better argument about staying in the deal,
Speaker 1: and the deal should have remained. That it's a distraction
Speaker 1: in a lot of ways. But yeah, look, we are
Speaker 1: marching closer to this coming to a head. How that happens,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. Could it be through diplomacy most likely,
Speaker 1: I would think, Could it be renegotiating the deal, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure at this point. I don't think the Irani
Speaker 1: are open to it, and they certainly at this point
Speaker 1: still has a willing partner in the Europeans, who have
Speaker 1: upheld their commitments under the deal in terms of rolling
Speaker 1: back sanctions, giving them money and of their cash windfall.
Speaker 1: So it truly is hard and I'm very sorry about that,
Speaker 1: by the way. Yeah, and you know, yeah, I do
Speaker 1: blame you. I would also say this was a footnote again,
Speaker 1: something nobody really paid attention to. But I look at
Speaker 1: these things that these States departments just sanctioned again today
Speaker 1: networks and affiliates tied to Iran's weapons of mass destruction programs.
Speaker 1: So let us not forget that they do continue to
Speaker 1: march towards nuclear weapons. They want to know how, and
Speaker 1: the restrictions on their uranium enrichment and work at this
Speaker 1: ford outside I mentioned and other military bunkers has actually
Speaker 1: continued unembedded, and that I don't if itself, really reveals
Speaker 1: what a sham this deal is. But now you see
Speaker 1: this Obama echo chamber, and surprisingly they're Republican allies, these
Speaker 1: libertarians like Rand Paul, who I think they're trying to
Speaker 1: tie the President's hands. I don't think they'll win. I
Speaker 1: think he understands what they're up to, and I should
Speaker 1: actually have some news about that tomorrow. Wow. Well, Adam,
Speaker 1: tell the audience where they can read more of your
Speaker 1: news and follow you absolutely Freebeacon dot com and my
Speaker 1: Twitter credo and the number zero follow me on there
Speaker 1: at yeah k R E D zero. Adam, thank you
Speaker 1: for joining us here on the bucks. I appreciate have
Speaker 1: a good one on Final Fantasy or whatever video game
Speaker 1: you've decided to take. Take a load off with this evening.
Speaker 1: This is the buck sext to share the fanlines. Tore
Speaker 1: open eight four four nine two eight two five eight
Speaker 1: four four nine hundred buck. My name is Rahim because
Speaker 1: I'm filling in here in the Freedom Hunts in Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: and I'm I'm looking out the windows here downtown Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: and I honestly true to form, I'm going to talk
Speaker 1: about the weather again. I'm hoping that when I leave
Speaker 1: here it is lightly cooler, because it was absolutely roasting
Speaker 1: earlier on in the day. I want to pivot now
Speaker 1: to another foreign affairs issue. And it's another foreign affairs
Speaker 1: issue I know is close to a lot of the
Speaker 1: hearts of this audience at least, but brings me on
Speaker 1: to talk about it from time to time. It's Brexit,
Speaker 1: and you'd probably have thought in your mind, or at
Speaker 1: least I hope you have over the past couple of hours. Hey,
Speaker 1: we've got this British guy on here who used to
Speaker 1: work for Nigel Farage. Why isn't he telling us what's
Speaker 1: going on with Brexit? Well, the truth of the matter
Speaker 1: is I have lived and worked the last couple of
Speaker 1: years here in Washington, DC, and I have my theories,
Speaker 1: and I have my sources and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: But there are people with their figure on the pulse
Speaker 1: far more than I in terms of what's going on
Speaker 1: on the ground with Brexit and the Brexit Party and
Speaker 1: how close Britain is to leaving the European Union, getting
Speaker 1: outcasting off the shackles of globalism and the European Union's imperialism.
Speaker 1: And one of those people, funnily enough, is from the
Speaker 1: United States. It's but actually is involved in this brand
Speaker 1: new initiative called World for Brexit. Now. Peggy Grandy is
Speaker 1: a good friend of mine, but also has been a
Speaker 1: great personal friend and ally of one of the greatest
Speaker 1: presidents this country has ever seen. Peggy was the former
Speaker 1: personal assistant to the great Ronald Reagan, and for that
Speaker 1: we thank her and welcome her to the show. Peggy,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us here. Thank you
Speaker 1: Ryan for having me on today. Well, now, Peggy, just
Speaker 1: before we get started on World for Brexit, I want
Speaker 1: you to tell us a little bit about what you've
Speaker 1: been doing the last couple of years, because when we
Speaker 1: first met a couple of years ago, you had just
Speaker 1: released a book I believe called The President Will See
Speaker 1: You Now, Absolutely and thank you for having me on
Speaker 1: your show back then to talk about that. And so
Speaker 1: that's been an exciting and wonderful project to see there's
Speaker 1: still such a fondness, even across both sides of the
Speaker 1: political aisle, for that great man who was an incredible
Speaker 1: leader and hiring man who in many ways let our
Speaker 1: nation and change the world. And so a lot of
Speaker 1: what I have done has been Reagan related, but also
Speaker 1: I like to think that I'm a freedom fighter for democracy,
Speaker 1: and so wherever I see that under attack, those are
Speaker 1: usually causes that I'm likely to be found in the
Speaker 1: middle of. And you have found yourself not just in
Speaker 1: the middle of, but at the head of the World
Speaker 1: for Brexit movement founded by friends of the United Kingdom
Speaker 1: from all around the world. The World for Brexit is
Speaker 1: a global coalition, if I'm not wrong, designed to sustain
Speaker 1: the idea that actually the people decide what they want
Speaker 1: to do, and the people decided in the United Kingdom
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen what they wanted to do. Now what
Speaker 1: we wanted to do because I cast a vote in
Speaker 1: that very election and we wanted to leave. But Peggy,
Speaker 1: we still have not left the European Union. Tell us
Speaker 1: a little bit about what you know about that and
Speaker 1: about World for Brexit and what you guys are going
Speaker 1: to be doing here over the next couple of weeks. Well,
Speaker 1: we're so decided to announce the launch of World for
Speaker 1: Brexit just this week, And like you said, it's a
Speaker 1: global coalition of friends of the UK who want to
Speaker 1: reinforce the idea that votes do count, democracy matters, and
Speaker 1: that the UK is entitled to free and independent self governance.
Speaker 1: And as you know, in twenty sixteen, seventeen point four
Speaker 1: million people, including yourself, nearly fifty two percent of the
Speaker 1: UK voted for Brexit to leave the European Union, and
Speaker 1: three years later that still hasn't happened. And in fact,
Speaker 1: recent polling, as you may know in the UK, shows
Speaker 1: that now fifty seven percent of those in the UK
Speaker 1: want to see Brexit fully implemented, and that hasn't happened yet.
Speaker 1: And so we want to stand as a group coming
Speaker 1: alongside Friends of Brexit and supporting their right to self
Speaker 1: determination and governance. And we believe it's best for them
Speaker 1: and best for the world. Well, I thank you for
Speaker 1: as a British citizen for doing that. I also want
Speaker 1: to get into this look when Reagan was around in office,
Speaker 1: and you'll appreciate my reverence for that man as well.
Speaker 1: I just recently revived his favorite newspaper, Human Events. He
Speaker 1: had the benefit of having a very strong prime minister
Speaker 1: working alongside him in the United Kingdom, Margaret Thatcher, and
Speaker 1: of course you had Pope John Paul the Second as well.
Speaker 1: Now the problem we have is that we have Pope Francis,
Speaker 1: and for the last couple of years under President Trump,
Speaker 1: we've had Theresa May, and we're about to have Boris
Speaker 1: Johnson in the United Kingdom, who is basically a David
Speaker 1: Cameron redux, who is basically a Theresa May, but with
Speaker 1: a bit of a bigger belly and a floppier haircut.
Speaker 1: And nothing really seems to be changing in that regard.
Speaker 1: But the polling in the United Kingdom shows that actually
Speaker 1: the British public may be willing to undertake a very
Speaker 1: Trumpian revolution of their own electorally, not just referendum ly,
Speaker 1: in the form of delivering seats for the Brexit Party,
Speaker 1: the new party led by Nigel Farage in the United Kingdom,
Speaker 1: and some of the recent polling shows that they may
Speaker 1: actually go on to win a parliamentary majority in an
Speaker 1: upcoming general election, which really would change not just the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom, not just Brexit in, not just the European Union,
Speaker 1: but I believe the world as well. Peggy, imagine how
Speaker 1: wonderful it would be to wake up in the morning
Speaker 1: knowing that Donald Trump is president and Nigel Farages prime Minister.
Speaker 1: Have you thought about that? I actually haven't, but that's
Speaker 1: an incredible scenario you just painted. And you know, referencing
Speaker 1: back to my former boss, Ronald Reagan, he always believed that,
Speaker 1: especially in the US, we the people tell the government
Speaker 1: what to do, not the other way around. And I
Speaker 1: think we see that same influence happening there in the UK.
Speaker 1: We see the voters saying, we voted for those we
Speaker 1: want this, We don't care how it gets done, we
Speaker 1: just want it done. And there's this feeling that democracy
Speaker 1: should not suffer at the hands of incompetence, and that's
Speaker 1: what they see right now, and so it would not
Speaker 1: be surprising if they throw everybody else out and put
Speaker 1: into leadership those who are actually listening to the will
Speaker 1: of the people. And there's so many parallels, of course,
Speaker 1: we see between what's happening here in the US and
Speaker 1: what's happening in the UK. The loser's consent is not
Speaker 1: required for the winner to move forward, and we see
Speaker 1: that playing out time and time again with so many
Speaker 1: entities trying to undermine the Trump presidency. And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what we're seeing in the UK as well. And the
Speaker 1: global narrative about Brexit I see is being very negative.
Speaker 1: It portrays it solely as they're leaving something. Rather, it
Speaker 1: wasn't a vote against something. It was actually a vote
Speaker 1: for something. And I think that Nigel Farres does a
Speaker 1: wonderful job of making it a very positive statement of confidence.
Speaker 1: The vote of Brexit was a statement of strength that
Speaker 1: they believed that the UK hey was ready and able
Speaker 1: to self govern, and so they believed in themselves and
Speaker 1: in their fellow countrymen, and that's why they voted to leave.
Speaker 1: And so we should highlight that positive narrative, not all
Speaker 1: the negativity that is currently surrounding the Brexits. I completely agree,
Speaker 1: and you know, I agree as somebody who worked him
Speaker 1: off over the last decade trying to deliver independence for
Speaker 1: my country, and a lot of Americans and some Republicans
Speaker 1: included in fact, say to me off and well, why
Speaker 1: would you want to leave the European Union. It's such
Speaker 1: a wonderful union to be a part of. It's kept
Speaker 1: the peace in Europe. I mean, all of these nonsensical
Speaker 1: phrases and arguments that you get from there. And I
Speaker 1: often say to them, I just turned around and say
Speaker 1: to them, well, you know your country was founded on
Speaker 1: the original Brexit. You know, in seventeen seventy six, the
Speaker 1: American people decided that they did not want to be
Speaker 1: part of an imperial power where power is vested almost
Speaker 1: solely in a singular person that nobody gets to elect,
Speaker 1: that nobody gets to remove. And of course we've seen
Speaker 1: now over the course of the last week in the
Speaker 1: European Parliament the very same thing going on. They are
Speaker 1: supposed to elect out of a group of people who
Speaker 1: is supposed to be the new European Commission President. And
Speaker 1: guess what, Peggy, over the course of the last week,
Speaker 1: we found out there were no candidates but one, and
Speaker 1: so everybody was asked to just vote on a single candidate.
Speaker 1: How do you think that went that single candidate one?
Speaker 1: And this is what we're talking about, isn't it. This
Speaker 1: is about the lack of choice. This is the lack
Speaker 1: of people being able to decide for themselves who governs them. Now, Peggy,
Speaker 1: tell us what you're doing and what you hope to
Speaker 1: achieve with these World for Brexit events. Well, we are
Speaker 1: goals are threefold. We're wanting to educate people, and we're
Speaker 1: wanting to do media, and we're wanting to do research
Speaker 1: and call people to action to support that. We are
Speaker 1: hosting events next week with Nigel Farage, who will be
Speaker 1: attending and speaking at these events. Although he's not an
Speaker 1: officially part of our organization, he certainly has been a
Speaker 1: champion for this issue and we'll be a big draw
Speaker 1: and to getting people to support World for Brexit. We've
Speaker 1: got events in DC, in New York, upcoming internationally, probably
Speaker 1: in Australia and hopefully in the UK as well, and
Speaker 1: weren't hope people will go to the website sign up
Speaker 1: to receive additional information, sign up to donate and contribute
Speaker 1: to be a friend of the UK World for Brexit
Speaker 1: dot com. You can also follow World the number four
Speaker 1: Brexit on Twitter, and we want people to be informed
Speaker 1: of what is happening there and add their voice to
Speaker 1: our friends across the Pond in support of democracy there.
Speaker 1: We would be outraged if this had happened any place
Speaker 1: house in the world, if all these millions of people
Speaker 1: had voted for something that was not implemented, we would
Speaker 1: be crying foul that it was such a breach of democracy.
Speaker 1: And yet somehow we're turning a blind eye to it.
Speaker 1: Happened right there with our friends in the UK and
Speaker 1: World for Brexit stands to change that. Your friends, your ancestors,
Speaker 1: your cousins. We stand side by side with you, and
Speaker 1: we are so grateful that you stand side by side
Speaker 1: with us. Peggy Grandy, World for Brexit dot Com, thank
Speaker 1: you so much for joining us here on the buck
Speaker 1: Sex in the show. Thank you ray Well, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: Of course I had to. I had to get a
Speaker 1: Brexit thing in there. It's been too long.