WEBVTT - A Week to Forget for the White Sox | Episode 117

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Socks on thirty fifth is next doors open on the left?

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 2>What is going on?

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 3>White Sox fans, and Welcome to episode one and seventeen

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>of These Socks on thirty fifth podcast. I am your

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 3>host for the evening, Jordan Leazaski. I am joined as

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 3>always by Nick Auer and friend of the show, Minor

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>League managing editor, who has had less and less to

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about at times on this show than usual. Michael

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>swearro also joining us this evening. Gentlemen, how are you

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>both doing or how are you both? I guess holding up.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I will say first though, to the father on the show,

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 3>Michael swear Happy Father's Day, sir.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jordan, I appreciate that I had a good Father's

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Day today, holding up pretty well. I wish we could

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have gotten a win on Father's Day, but that was

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a rough one to witness. Both me and my grandpa

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>were together, just yelling at the TV, yelling at Sir

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Dominga's and the fielding and everything that just went

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong at the end of that game. But otherwise we're

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty good. Luckily, I got my my five month

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>old to cheer me up, so that's that's as good

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as I could be at the moment.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's nice that you and your grandpa got to

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 4>watch the game together at least. And I'm yeah, I

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't get to watch today's game. I mean, obviously know

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 4>what happened, but I'm kind of happy based on what

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 4>I've read about that I wasn't watching.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>That.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Being said, it does feel good that we're kind of

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 4>like ripping through these episodes now. The Jordan's Saga is

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 4>one seventeen. Like I remember the big deal, like all

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>the hoopla around Upside one hundred and it said, Okay,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 4>we're we're doing these so consistently. Now we're doing more

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 4>than one per week in a lot of cases because

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 4>the team is so interesting right now. And yes, I

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 4>know they're one in five this week, but you know,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the vibes are still good. We got Charity's Day coming

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 4>up Tuesday. We've got a big home series against Cleveland,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know, it's a different team on the

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>home at home that it is on the road, I

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 4>should say. So, I'm still trying to be optimistic heading

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 4>into this week.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Say this.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Because I know I've gone back and forth on this

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 3>throughout the start of the year. It's good news and

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 3>bad news. The good news is I now have expectations

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>for this team, and I've gotten mad at games. The

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>bad news is I now have expectation for this team,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and I get mad at games. I realized it on

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Sunday when the game end of the way it did,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 3>and we we're having just trying to do a family

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>dinner for father's sake. My mom goes, why are you

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 3>so quiet? I'm like, no reason. I'm sorting like, oh

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>my god, it's because of that stupid baseball team. And

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I have my rule, like a thirty minutes after a

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>game is the longeside allow myself to be mad at

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 3>a sporting event. But I was mad and I didn't

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>realize it, and then.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I did, and I was like, ah damn.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I've held out as long as I could on this team,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:11.839
<v Speaker 3>and unfortunately I am now expecting things from them. So Nick,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess I've caught up with you. Michael, I'm not

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>sure where you ever felt on that, but I'm here.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Look, part of the reason why I got into prospects

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>was because I was just I got to a point

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>where I got used to the White Sox disappointing me,

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so like just getting into prospects, like giving myself something

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to look forward to in the future. Like that's what

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>kept me being like an avid White Sox fan. But

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>just like you, now they're starting to give me hope.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm expecting them to actually be competitive and win

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these games. So like when they lose a game like that,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it does get to me. Man, I was just upset

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as you were. Luckily, I grew up in a very

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sports centric family, so you know, I was just saying,

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I was yelling at the TV with my grandpa, also

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>yelling at the TV with my mom, who's a big

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>White Sox fan, So like it something that we're all

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of used to. The White we're just like saying

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the same old White Sox, or at least they were.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to keep a positive attitude here, but like

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it is frustrating when they're losing games that they should

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be winning now. But also at the same time, that

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tells you that this team is at a different spot

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>than we're used to seeing them. So on one end,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy we're at this spot, but like it's just

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>frustrating when they're not playing up to what they should

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be playing at. And I've got some thoughts that I'm

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>sure we're going to get too later in the show

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about why that's happening and why maybe we are overacting

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But I digress. It's a great spot,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but man, it can be frustrating sometimes.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we'll jump right into that point, but

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 3>before we get too far into the show, be sure

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 3>to subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, wherever

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 3>you get your podcasts. We've been slowly building this YouTube

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>channel up, so continue to please support. We love seeing

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>guys in the chat. So guys who are listening right

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>now dropping out in the chat, I always love reading

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 3>them as we're going. So also be sure to follow

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 3>us on social media at socks on thirty fifth, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 3>every social media platform.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>We're there.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 3>Socks on thirty fifth dot com is the website continuing

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 3>to put out great content there, so make sure you're

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>following along and as always, we appreciate the support.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's actually start.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>At your point, Michael, I don't need to rehash everything here.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>One in five this week they won one game, five

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to one. Four of the runs that happened in that

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>victory came on one swing. It was a dormant offense,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's the politest.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Term I will use for it.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>But then you started to see whether it's me finally

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 3>getting angry or some of the fan reactions on social media.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>People are pissed after a one and five week.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess your thoughts on why that is, or I

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 3>let's just start there, like where do we feel like

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the feelings are valid? Valid's not the right word, but

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like realistic is maybe the right word of I am

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>mad because.

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Of X, Y and Z reasons over the past week

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>or so of games.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it really starts with we've just seen

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this team play better, Like we know that they have

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that in them. We just saw them take serieses against

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the Braves and the Dodgers, and we saw them be

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at least competitive with the Yankees. We know that this

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>team has more in it than they just showed in

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this series, Like getting swept by the Tigers, the last

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>place Tigers should be unacceptable. And sure, they're starting to

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>get a little more healthy, they have school all back,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably better than what their record says. But

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we've just a couple of weeks ago, we were on

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this high watching this team play such good baseball and

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>then it just looked like it all went down the drain.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's what the first trading part is, is, like,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>we know that this team completely better than they've shown

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>these last six games, where it's hard to get too upset,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at least for me, and where I'm maybe trying to

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>take a step back and see the bigger picture here,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is part of me being that prospect

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>guy and always kind of looking more towards the future.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>This is still a very young team and they're learning

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how to win games still. They've cleared a massive hurdle

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this season by just playing competitively. Now they have to

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>learn how to win on the road. Now they have

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to overcome some of these slumps that

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>players are going through. You know, the pitching we all

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know needs to be improved overall. The hitting hasn't been

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that big of an issue until recently. Now we're starting

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to see them slump a little more. How can they

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get over that? What adjustments can they make? Who's going

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to step up to kind of fill that void? Now?

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, we do have Kyle Teal maybe coming back

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as soon as tomorrow, that's kind of what it sounds like.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But when you're seeing Colson Montgomery slump when you're not

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>getting the production from Urracami because he's on the shelf.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>When you're just getting no production from the catcher position whatsoever,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to rely on other people to step up,

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen it happen throughout the season, but recently

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like that's happening. Part of that is

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just we have a really young team that's still learning

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>how to win some of these games. So it is

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of growing pains. You are going to see some

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of those peaks and valleys, and I do think we

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>need to take a bit of a step back and

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>realize that that's where we're at and we are still

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>very much ahead of where we're supposed to be right now.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It is still frustrating because we've seen them play better.

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>We know that they should be playing better and they

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>need to get more consistent in that manner. But I

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>am trying to still take that holistic picture here and

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>be like, this is just part of how that incredibly

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>young team and they just have to learn how to

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do to get past it. They're

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to start to get healthier. It could just be

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a very short lived thing. We'll wait and see what happens.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still optimistic about this team. I'm not gonna

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>sit here and say that the sky's falling because I

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>really just don't think it is. Yeah.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 4>No, those are all really good points by MICHAELA. I

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I agree with everything you said. I also would take

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 4>it a bit further and say that the way they've

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>been losing is maybe it's more frustrating to me than

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they're losing, because you said it well,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 4>you said that we've been complaining about the pitching all year,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 4>and the offense has done pretty good. But this week,

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 4>at least the Detroit series, it was the offense that

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 4>was failing more than the pitching. And I that's what's

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 4>frustrating to me, is because the starting pitching in particular

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 4>is what everyone myself included, has had a lot more

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>concerned with for the rest of the season, the second

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>half of the season, what's that going to look like?

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>But this week in Detroit, the starters, I mean, I

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 4>know one game was a bullpenne game, so it's hard

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to quantify that, but you know, Fetti and Davis Martin

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 4>did their jobs, and the bullpen that opener Newcomb did

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 4>his job on Saturday, and the offens just couldn't score runs.

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And what makes me.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Feel a little bit better about it is that when

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Murakami first got injured, you know whatever, it was like

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>three weeks ago, what I told myself is, this is

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>what we're going to see. We're going to see a

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of you know, low scoring games that we probably

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have been in without the injuries. To about him

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 4>and Teal, I even said to my dad today, like,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that the White Sofe would have won at

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 4>least one of these last two games against the Tigers

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>if Murakani were present. Instead of getting pretty much nothing

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 4>out of you know, Jacob Gonzales or Ben and Tende,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 4>whoever you could argue was starting in his place that

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 4>particular day, Murakami probably at least gets on base a

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 4>couple of times, if not hit a home run or two.

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's where you're really missing him. It's

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 4>still impressive with to me that they played as well

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 4>as they did without him for so long. The offense,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>I should say, but you know, hopefully Teal is back

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 4>this week at some point, and you start to kind

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 4>of get get those guys back in the lineup because unfortunately,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 4>it's like one phase of the team gets better in

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 4>this case is starting pitching, but their face steps back

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 4>and you just really want to see it all clicking

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 4>at the same time. And I think we still could

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 4>get that, especially as the team gets healthier.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, with them coming back home, I'm hoping there's a

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit we continue to harp on the same things,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 3>like you have to do some roster churning, right, you

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 3>have to continue to cycle through arms. They did it

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 3>with Tyler Davis. I'm glad they finally flipped the switch

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 3>like that. That was that was a ticking time bomb

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 3>for a little bit there, and it finally blew up

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>in their faces at the worst possible moment.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It is what it is.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Newcom is a guy that he's become incredibly valuable in

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 3>like that two three inning roll.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if they even stretch them ount a little

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>bit further. They don't have.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 3>The problem is they don't have the luxury to do that,

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>which is frustrating at this point, and I hope at

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 3>some point they do find the luxury to do it.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Those are just my initial thoughts, My most frustrating thing.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And Nick, you tweeted about it. Why is Grant Taylor

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>pitching once this week? I get there were some blow

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 3>up games, right, like there was no expectation to pitch

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the first couple of games in New York, and even

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the third game was borderline. But you walked into a

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>bullpen game against Detroit on Saturday that you said was

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 3>a bullpen game and you didn't use your best reliever

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 3>during that game. It's an insane oversight on my opinion,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 3>from my opinion, without knowing obviously who's available who's not.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>But then where you back yourself into a corner. And

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how either of you feel on this.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to Taylor's usuage on Sunday with one

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>inning versus two innings, I feel like that that came

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 3>off to me as you know, we've got to play Cleveland.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I might need him tomorrow, demingez can finish this game

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 3>off versus winning the game that's right in front of

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 3>you against the division rival. That's where I go back

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 3>and forth on this week, because like, yes, we're gonna

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>have weeks. As fans were like, these guys couldn't hit

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the broad side of a barn. And that's that's part

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of having the youngest team, one of the youngest teams

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in baseball. I what age twenty six average in the

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>starting lineup. But Nick, to your point, it's how they're

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>doing it at the same time, like that grand Taylor alone,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>it's inexcusable for how he was used the past couple

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>of games in Detroit. I don't know that that's what

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I walked away most frustrated by. And Venville's postgen comments

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday didn't give much insight into it other than yeah,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>we felt good about Domingas in that spot. I don't

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>know why you would, to be honest with you, given

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the recent track record.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the tailor thing. I mean, the only way I

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 4>can think about irrationally is they must just not be

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 4>prioritizing him being a starting pressure next season the way

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 4>that they claimed they would, you know, heading into the season,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>because otherwise they would be using a lot more from

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 4>multiple innings. And you could argue with today's a game

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>that you know I started. I didn't watch the game,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>but at least was tracking pitch by pitch in the

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 4>eighth and ninth and he was missing a lot, like

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 4>he was falling behind hitters. Obviously keep up the home run,

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 4>so he wasn't his normal self. But I look at

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 4>that and I think, well, whose fault is that he

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 4>hasn't pitched in a week. He's probably rusty, and he

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 4>seemed to figure things out toward the end of that inning.

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I think more likely than not, do you

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 4>send him out for that ninth, then you probably win

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>that game. He probably gets to save. So that's what's

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 4>frustrating to me, especially Saturday. I was watching Saturday, and

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 4>as soon as Newcome left the game after the third inning,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I was taking great, go to Taylor for four and five,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe four five, six if you really want to get

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 4>innings out of him, and then seven eight nine can

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 4>be some combo of like Bryan Hudson, Domingaz, somebody else here.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 4>The bullpenp was pretty rested honestly heading into that game.

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>The important guys, I should say, but they just didn't

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 4>use them, And yeah, it's frustrating. It reminds me a

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of the way Kopek was handled. It was onently

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty one where he got innings out of the bullpen,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 4>but not nearly enough. There would be these long stretches

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 4>where he just wouldn't pitch. The saving grace for him

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 4>is he actually got a spot start here and there

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 4>where he would throw five or six innings, and actually

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 4>he was pretty good as a starter that year, just

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>a limited run. The White's notn't really doing that with Taylor.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if they will, but you know, we

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>talk all the time about how this team needs to have,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, someone step up in the starting rotation. You

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of have a perfect guy right there in Taylor

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 4>who should maybe shouldn't be a start of the whole

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 4>season because he doesn't have the you know, the staminar

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. But late in the season and dare I

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 4>say playoffs, that's someone I want starting game. I just

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know if that's feasible at this point.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 2>But two things on that.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Number One, they need to do it with somebody, and

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 3>if they're not willing to do it with Taylor, Davis

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>or not. Davis Newcome came into this season and they

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>said he was going to compete for the starting or

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 3>for the starting rotation. So you have a guy that

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>has a history of being stretched out. Obviously was moved

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 3>to the bullpen because the stuff played up better.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I totally get it.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But someone's got to do it right, Like, you have

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to be creative at some point, and that's been we've

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about that.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>That's my frustration. If you're going to overachieve.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 3>And you're going to do it in a way that

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>is very Milwaukee esque or Tampa Bay esque or even

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Guardians ask you have to be willing to do things

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>differently and do things that are a little created and

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>they haven't done that yet. And it's this is where

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>it comes back to bite them and the tailor thing. Yes,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and probably part of the logic was, well,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it didn't look good that first sitting. The devil you know,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>is still better than the one you don't, Right, you

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 3>don't know what Dimingas has on any given day, but

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, hey, Taylor, even if he doesn't have his

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>best stuff, I'll still take him against the bottom of

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>that order, right Like that's I don't know. For me,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>it is so frustrating to have so few arms and

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>such limited ways in which they're deploying them at the

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>same time, and and it's the creativity element to me

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>that I still still feel is lacking.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I very much agree with that. I do wonder

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so I was just talking about how you know this

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a young team. There's going to be growing pains.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they were scene there with the manager too.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Will Bendable is still very an experienced manager.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still kind of learning how to navigate

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a bullpen, and I think that is something that he

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really does need to work on. If not mid season,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>he's going to need to take a long look at

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>how he managed this bullpen over the offseason and adjusts

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>from there, because some of the decision making there is

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just head scratching, Like not pitching Grand Taylor let alone

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in an bullpen day when he is your best bullpen arm,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but not pitching him for a full week. I just

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand that. And sure some of those games

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>are out of reach anyways, but some of them were

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>still up for the taking and the game just got

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>blown wide open. So not using him at all and

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then coming back to only give him the eighth inning

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this game when he very easily could have taken the

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>eighth and ninth ending. In my opinion, he was well rested,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he was getting to nick your point, he was getting

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>better throughout that inning, and yeah, it's going to happen

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you don't pitch for a week straight, you're going

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a little there. So yeah, you're gonna make

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a few mistakes early on in that outing. But he

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>adjusted he should have stayed out there for that night.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm very firm on that. I don't know with Newcome.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that they feel like they have to

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>keep him in the bullpen right now because they have

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so few reliable bullpen arms. I am curious if they

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do get in the position where they're adding, do they

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>prioritize adding a starter or do they want to prioritize

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>adding maybe relievers and then entertain stretching new Come out

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to get some more starts. I do wonder if, since

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm the prospect, I have to bring this up. I

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>do wonder if the injuries to guys like Hagen Smith

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and Tanner McDougall maybe through a wrench in some of

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>their plans. I feel like both of them were probably

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be up by now in the rotations, So

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like they just don't quite have the

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>pitching depth that they thought they were going to have. Now,

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe that can turn into one or both of those

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>guys being the bullpen depth down the road. I've thought

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of maybe moving Tanner McDougal into the

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>bullpen arm, but that's a discussion you can have later.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But it just seems like something's off right now. I

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what it is. Is it Will Benable

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>learning how to manage his bullpen, Is it they don't

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have faith in the arms they have. It might honestly

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>just be both, but it just it just doesn't look

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>great right now.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Here's my first hot take for the Evening and the

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 3>little behind the scenes here. When we knew Duke wasn't

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 3>being able to join because a Father's day, I told Michael,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, you know what, I want you to join,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>regardless of Duke can join, because I got a hot take.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to go at here, and my hot take

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 3>is and it's not even a hot take. Maybe it's

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 3>like there's been so little criticism of Banister right now

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>when this team needs reinforcements, there's just nobody coming.

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna blame injuries on him, right like that. McDougall,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Schultz Smith, fine, but like your three horses get hurt

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden you can't pull anything like

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 3>think of the guys who have contributed. Taylor, okay, fine,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Davis, you picked him up and maybe you get

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>something there. Hicks is the bullpen, but he was signed.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Your best guys are veterans, Hudson and Newcome. Where's the

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 3>rookie that comes and really lights it up. I know

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Ben Peebles isn't here. We talked about it. He's walking

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the ballpark, so that's probably part of it. Or Winkelming

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 3>and Zalez has been hurt. I get that, but like,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it still feels like there should be

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 3>another arm or two somewhere, right, Like, what's the issue

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>that they can't find a little bit of reinforcements to

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 3>churn it? Why is any sort of churning of this

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>roster have to be God, I hope somebody dropped Joe

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>Rock on the waivers and we can pick him up

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 3>like that seems like it should be a concern for me,

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 3>not not the top end guys, because those guys take

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>a while. We're the random twenty five twenty six year

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>olds to come out of nowhere because you've you've done

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 3>well on the development side. That that's a current concern

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>of mine personally.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That that's a great question. And I do think that

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Banister does this or some criticism on that, because we

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>really haven't seen any sort of depth develop. To your point,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one guy can think of as maybe

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that could be that guy is David Sandlin. You know,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe I've always kind of thought that his arm would

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>play up better in the bullpen. Anyways, I do kind

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of wonder maybe he's that guy. Well, see, I don't

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it is. It is frustrating. You know, we don't

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have the depth that we just thought we were going

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to have, and it is it's noticeable now we're not

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just not getting the level production that we should be

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>from these guys and we're just Banister. I don't know

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>if it's identifying talent or if it's developing talent, but

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>either way, we have to find something to keep us

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>afloat for now.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean with Banister, like, I listened to him

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 4>talk about pitching for three minutes and I feel like

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 4>an absolute more on So I don't want to come

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 4>off as like some just some idiot's criticism and banished,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 4>but he knows so much more than I ever will

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 4>about pitching. That being said, ever since I heard his

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 4>justification for not letting Grant Taylor start last year. That's

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 4>when I started thinking, Okay, like I understand that you're

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 4>afraid he might get injured, Like that's a that's a

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>valid concern, But he would have, you know, three to

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 4>four times more value as a good starter then as

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 4>a great closer. So why not at least let him

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 4>start and then if he gets injured then you could say, Okay,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 4>you're a reliever now. Like it just feels like they're

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 4>doing it backwards to me, and that's kind of I

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 4>don't want to blame it all on Banister. I'm sure

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 4>there's more than just just that going on, but yeah,

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fair to say that Ryan Fuller he's

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 4>been doing on the hitting side is definitely a lot

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 4>more impressive because we're seeing it at the major league level.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing the results of it, whether it with Colson

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 4>Montgomery or is somebody who might not be playing as

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 4>well but has totally reinvented himself from Jacob Gonzalez and

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>is actually a true like a real player now and

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 4>not just you know, a bust from the draft like

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 4>we thought what he was going to be. So I

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 4>hope that this turns, and I think part of it

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 4>is injuries, Like I do think that Gonzales being injured

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 4>and McDougal being injured, I think they would both have

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 4>been in the majors by now for sure had they

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 4>not gotten hurt. But we'll still probably see them at

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 4>some point this year, so hopefully sooner than later.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and again it's a I don't know nothing about

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>baseball compared to the guys in the organization.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I get that.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's frustrating to see this happening. And then

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it would be nice to hear more

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 3>from the pitching side of things in general. I feel like,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, I felt like I heard more or from

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Cats than I hear from both. Maybe it's just because

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>he's new and things like that. I don't know, it's

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 3>all new. It's all I don't want to distract from

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the major league team, which is still you got to

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>play with. Like, there are games in this week that

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 3>were winnable with the talent on both sides of the

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>ball that are here.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>That's not the development problem.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I personally think though, too, Like if I'm being objective

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 3>about I and there might be some recency biases. I

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 3>think today Sunday's game was objectively Will Venable's worst game

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>as a manager, between not having Taylor for a second inning.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 3>One thing I don't think it's getting talked about enough

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>is Edgar or not Edgar Luisan Helakunya still playing shortstop

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 3>in the ninth inning when you had Vargas come in

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 3>and pinch hit later in the game so he was available.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 3>So why isn't your best shortstop playing shortstop in the

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>last inning. I feel like for someone who makes a

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>ton of defensive replacements, that felt like an easy one,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and I feel like it came back to bite him.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 3>Just Acuni's arm isn't as good as Montgomery's and that

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 3>mattered on that last play straight up and the bullpen

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>management in general. I didn't love his answer about why

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Martin only threw seventy five pitches. It was kind of

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 3>like we had a conversation. We agreed it was for

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the best, but like, why was the stuff right there?

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>We like the matchups better? Fine, just I didn't love

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the answer, but I'm not gonna blame him for pulling

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Martin early. It's whatever.

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 3>It just didn't feel like a good end to a

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>seat where it's like, hey, you're heading home to Cleveland.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 3>You've had a huge series coming up. It would have

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 3>been nice to grab this one salvage the week, and

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 3>they just didn't.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And I meant too.

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Like the bunt of a Kunya Acunya falls off a

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>butnt and then hits a two run bomb, like it's

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>all those things.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like you're overmanaging it.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 3>At some point is how I feel, And the bunting

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>is where I feel that, and just stick with who

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 3>you know and Taylor. I know you wouldn't have Taylor

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>for Monday against the Guardians, but my tax might be

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 3>up fifteen to nothing at this point tomorrow night, and

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 3>you're not gonna use Taylor anyway. You plan for what

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 3>you've got in front of you. And I felt like

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that game was so winnable. Obviously it was winnable, but

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 3>it was so important to win it, and it was

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 3>not coached that way. It was coach like, whatever, we

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 3>lose this one. I think there's a general vibe. I

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 3>feel like this show would have been different if they

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 3>won this game and they were two and four, because like,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 3>all right, at least salvaged it. Listen shitty week, those

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>are going to happen. You salvaged it, you didn't get swept.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Move on.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Now it's like you had the chance to do it,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 3>and I felt like the decisions directly influence the outcome.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>That's frustrating to me.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, I definitely agree with that. And it's nice

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to be able. As we've said, it's not able to

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 4>even have these I'm super frustrated by the manager's decisions

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 4>instead of frustrated by, you know, some all time loss

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 4>record or something stupid. But with Venable, I mean I

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 4>will give him credit and that I think he's actually

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 4>quite good when it comes to his strategy for the

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 4>opener this year, as well as his strategy for changing

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 4>the lineup based on handedness. I will say, though he's

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 4>good with that, but sometimes he like doesn't read or

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 4>doesn't care if the opposing picture has reversed splits and

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 4>we'll just do the lefty ready stuff anyway. But other

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 4>than that, like, it's still better than what we've seen

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 4>in the past from Socks manager. So I do think

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 4>that he to an extent, he gets it, and he

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 4>puts his team in good positions before the game starts

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 4>to win the game. It's once the game starts that

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 4>I start, you know, with the bunting and the weird

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 4>bullpun usage.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Like, And I don't like harping too much on bullpun

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 4>usage because it's like half of the bullpen or hardly

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 4>MLB arms in my opinion.

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you can't really blame.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Him for everything. But at the same time, I do

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 4>think that there are things that could be improved, right,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's fair to say were saying, so, Yeah.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I think one thing that I also want to touch on,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's something actually row Dog three one two in

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the chat mentioned was Montgomery kind of the way he

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 3>looks maybe he had just come back from sort of

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that back tweak or back ache whatever, and he had

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 3>a brutal series, and he's had a couple of brutal

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 3>series outside of that one game in New York with

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>two homers. He's sitting like under two hundred in June.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know any lingering concerns for either of you

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 3>about just injury potential or is it more so just hey,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 3>did you knew this was the type of player he

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 3>was when you saw him posting those thirty percent strikeout rates.

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I tend that way to be honest with you, like

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 3>you knew you were getting this type of player some weeks.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know any potential concern about the lingering back.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I could see why it might be a concern,

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there is something to it. I think he's just

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's always going to be a streaky hitter. I think

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just who he is. There's gonna be stretches where

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's just hitting bombs every other day, and there's gonna

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>be stretches where he's striking out every other at bat

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's frustrating to watch. I think that's just who

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he is as a player, and I think he's good

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>enough overall that you live with that, because he does

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>add a lot offensively, especially when he's on, Plus the

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's such a good defensive shortstop that really

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people came out of nowhere. I

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's just something you gotta live with. He is

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just going to go through these peaks and valleys, and

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>when he's on, he is gonna look like a superstar shortstop,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna have to suffer through some of these stretches.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He has had some back injuries that date back to

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his minor league career. So again, maybe there is something there,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but I tend to agree with you, Jordan, I'm not

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>too concerned. I just think that's more he's gonna have.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He's just never going to be that consistent bet that

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>some people want him to be.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree with you both. He's relying a lot

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 4>more on guessing what the pitch is going to be,

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot more than some of his teammates might, at

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 4>least based on what I've read from his approach. So

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that's why he might look it might look

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 4>ugly when he's swinging and missing a lots. He's just

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 4>getting out guessed a lot of the time. But the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 4>back injuries, I mean, somebody of his height, they're probably

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 4>not going to ever fully go away. Like probably something

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 4>has to manage throughout his career. But it doesn't mean

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 4>that his career is going to end abruptly or anything

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 4>like that, or doesn't have to mean that. And if

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 4>you look at any at bat Montgomery's had in the

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>majors since he came up, and you just like watch

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 4>his mannerisms in between pitches, I feel like he's always

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 4>has been kind of like you know, twitchy for lack

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 4>of a better word, like kind of like Joey Gallo Escalmos.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 4>She's always like configuring things and like moving his back

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 4>and rud ways. I don't know think it means he's

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 4>injured necessarily, just kind of who he is. But yeah,

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's I've kind of just accepted this as

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the player that he is, and it's a very good player.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying like a bad thing. I think on

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 4>an ideal version of this White Sox team that we

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 4>talked about in the last episode or two, he's probably

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 4>more of like the six hitter and you have TiO

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Murakami or both of them batting ahead of viments that

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 4>have behind. But with all the injuries, he's kind of

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 4>forced to be the guy right now along with Vargas,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 4>and it's just it's a lot when he's not, you know,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 4>on one of his hot streaks.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just we talked about this before the season.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 3>You need to understand the type of player you are

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>are they are, each of them individually. I have two

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 3>other things I want to discuss. One I want to

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 3>throw out one more downer and then we'll throw some positives.

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>We'll preview the week and then we'll talk through Socks charities.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to try a new feature on this live stream.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 3>If I crash everything, I apologize in advance. I've been

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>on this soapbox pretty much the entire year. I'm going

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 3>to stay on it. With the Kyle Teal potential return,

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 3>I honestly might be in a place where I would

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>just complete change out the catching position. Romo gon Caro,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 3>gone bring up a Michael Turner. Michael, you and I

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 3>actually talked about it. Maybe just bringing someone else from

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>outside the org. Here's me getting on my.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Soapbox real fast.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Look at this For those who are viewing this after

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 3>the Factor listening to it more so, I'm pulling up

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Edgar Carrow's abs challenges and the fact that he is

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the worst by a long shot in baseball at this

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 3>There are pitches on here, and it came up, I

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 3>think in the New York series, but it happened again

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday where he is just challenging pitches.

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, what did you think you saw when you

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 2>challenge that?

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 3>And it's kind of driving me nuts to the point

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>where that Socks should have to rein it back in

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>on him. If they're going to keep him around. Personally,

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I think he's really bad at knowing his own personally.

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 3>There are a couple of these here I want to

0:32:55.360 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 3>pull up. Particularly in three ball counts, are a few

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 3>interesting ones. I'm like, all right, this ball here is

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 3>almost three inches out of the zone. Okay, it's in

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 3>the eighth inning. That one kind of makes sense, right,

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 3>it's three to two, two nothing, game, kind of makes sense.

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 3>You're in the eighth inning of a game. Sure, there's

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 3>this one here in the second inning of a game.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 3>You're blowing a challenge in the second inning. You have

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just changed the trajectory of the next couple innings for

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 3>this team. We saw it in New York with a

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Miguel Vargas strikeout. Felt like you couldn't challenge something that

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 3>was three inches below the zone because the Socks only

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 3>had one challenge left and it was like a fourth inning.

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Same thing here.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>The team's up six nothing, so it probably doesn't matter

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 3>as much. But like some of these, and you can

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 3>see all the black ones around here, I'll try and

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:43.959
<v Speaker 3>zoom it in a little bit for folks who are watching.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 3>All of the black ones are ones that were incorrect

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>challenges essentially.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing on some of these dude?

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Like some of these are so bad and it drives

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 3>me nuts when I watch it on the game games.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 3>The frustrating thing Romo is the opposite. I'm like, dude,

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 3>would you challenge a couple pitches? I do either of

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 3>you know the strike zone? And it's kind of frustrating

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 3>to me. The funny thing is on the flip side

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of it, Caro has challenged. Let me actually see, if

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 3>you guys know this, how many challenges do you think

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Caro's had as a hitter this year?

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Not many. I don't recall seeing him challenge much at

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all as a hitter, so I don't know the number,

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but I imagine it's pretty small.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 2>One.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 3>He has challenged one all year. So it's like, do

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>you not trust yourself? Do the socks not trust.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 2>You to challenge?

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>What is the issue?

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to figure that out.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to get on a guy who's

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 3>already struggling offensively. But if you're not providing offensive value,

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 3>you've got to provide defense value. And if you're doing neither,

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 3>let's go let him figure it out. Charlotte Teal's gonna

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 3>play five out of six games a week. Even if

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 3>you leave Romo at the big league level, he can

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 3>figure that out. Or you can bring up a Michael

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Turner who's i know, twenty seven years old, so it's

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 3>not really a prospect, but you can have someone just

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>catch or you can cycle through it. I don't know,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 3>it's it's frustrating to me. And if we're gonna be

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 3>venting a little bit on this show, I'm gonna add

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that to my list before we get into the positives.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 3>That's just another one of the recent frustrations of mind

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 3>watching these games and seeing more so not not the

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 3>call itself, but the downstream effects of it. For fifth, sixth,

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>eighth inning on when it's like there are just some

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 3>things that happened because of a second inning, dumb challenge,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's starting to frustrate me personally.

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm so. It's hard for me because I was

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a big Caro fan coming up in the minors. I

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>still think there's a lot to like about his game.

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really seen it this year, but I think

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he showed a lot of flashes last year and I

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's still a starting caliber catcher in there. Somewhere

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>with him. It has been so frustrating to watch him

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>manage to strike something from behind the plate some of

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>those challenges, Like you didn't even need to bring up

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the visuals, like we all know, like it's been so frustrating,

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>but like just seeing how bad it's been just makes

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it so much worse. And it is to the point

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>where he's not I mean, he's a negative warplayer right now.

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he does need to reset in minors in somewhere

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in or go down to Charlotte work on some things.

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I was actually when the Blue Jays dfa Tyler Heineman,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping that they put an a claim there

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just because, I mean, god awful at the plate. I

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think he has like a fifteen WRC plus this year,

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>which is atrocious. But despite being so bad at the plate,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he still was had a positive f war That shows

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you how good he's been defensively. That's the type of

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>guy I wouldn't mind bringing in, especially with Teal coming back,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just someone that you know can manage things behind the plate,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>especially with the young pitching staff, and just with the

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>issues we've had with Balden strike challenges this year. It

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>would have been nice to bring someone like that in.

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate the idea of Michael Turner either. He's

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been hitting pretty well on triple A. I think he's

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>got around a nine hundred ops. I don't know if

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a real emobig player in there, but maybe it's

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>worth finding out. But I do think that a reset

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>could do Caro some good. I'm personally not too sold

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>on Romo sticking around much either. I think he's got

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>some options to so you could send him down as well.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of agree with you. I wouldn't mind

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing a complete reset at that position because we've just

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>gotten nothing at that position this year.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah, it's not a bad idea. The frustrating thing

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 4>for me with Caro is I'm seeing, even if the

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 4>numbers aren't good, I'm seeing some growth on offense that

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I feel like because that quality of his that bats

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 4>have gotten better since April. He's hitting them all harder.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 4>He's had a lot of tough luck outs in the

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 4>last few weeks. I can see some growth, even if

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 4>it's not a lot. But on defense, I agree that

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 4>I've seen no growth. I've seen you know, the challengesu

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 4>as you've seen, and it's Also, I don't want to

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 4>throw everything at Venable's feet, but it might be aventable

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 4>issue or a coaching staff issue too, where the team

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 4>will have one challenge left. It'll be at the sixth

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 4>or seven of the name, and there'll be a strike

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 4>called on like a Vargas or of Montgomery that's like

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 4>four inches out of the zone and sometimes for strike three,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 4>and they won't challenge it because they only have one left.

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 4>And it's like, that's why you saved the one, Like, sure,

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 4>it's not the ninth inning yet, but that's such an

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 4>egregiously bad call.

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to use it.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 4>There and they don't. I don't know why, And yes,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 4>part of its Carrol's fault for wasting it in the

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 4>second mean, but also it's like it's not like you

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 4>have zero left, Like if you're wrong about a pitch

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 4>that you think is four inches outside the zone, then

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 4>you got to recalibrate as a hitter because you really

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 4>don't know the zone.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a valid point too there. I don't know

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 3>what the strategy is behind the scenes for who's using

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the sacs.

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't challenge a ton.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 3>There are a few hitters who challenge it, but they

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:05.479
<v Speaker 3>don't spread it out. I think for me, the only

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 3>benefit to Romo is like if you just you are

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 3>swinging for the fences every single time, and that's it.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 3>That's the benefit for him and Caro. I agree Nick,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 3>like the bats are better, but are they gonna stay

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>good if you're hitting twice a week once Teal comes back,

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I think some sort of reset with

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe Fuller more directly might be helpful for him, because

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 3>You're right, Michael, there's talent there. This isn't a bad

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 3>baseball player. It's just it's not working right now, and

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to work any better once

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 3>he becomes more of a part time player than he

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 3>already is. I did say would get to some positives,

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 3>so I will name the two. Duke's not here to

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 3>talk about how good Andrew ben and Tendi has been

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>since Markami went down, specifically that's been a huge boost

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 3>to this team.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 2>And Louis an Helico. This is Duke just.

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Missing the chance. His two big guy Andrew Benintendi and

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Luis aan Helakunya. I have positive things to say about

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 3>how they've both been doing. I think Akunya is like

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 3>over four hundred in June right now, there have been

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 3>some positive things from the two of them that have

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 3>really helped keep this afloat, and I thought it was

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 3>worth at least mentioning both of those guys. I don't

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 3>know if you have any specific thoughts either of you,

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 3>but at least two guys who get a lot of

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 3>crap for me specifically that earned their flowers.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I think it's funny. You look at Ben

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 4>and Tendi's stats since Murakami got hurt, and it's basically

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Murakami's stats, like he's basically became Munataka for three weeks

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. And I think the Detroit series is a

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 4>bit more rough for Ben and Tendi as well as

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 4>the whole offense, to be fair, So I'm hoping that

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 4>he's able to continue, you know, impersonating Murakami. But it

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 4>is funny, like the correlation. I mean, he was he

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.399
<v Speaker 4>was decent in May two, to be fair, but he's

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 4>really stepped up when the team meeting him. So I

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 4>do agree with you.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Every time Ben Intendi it's a bomb, mel I have

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to tag Duke Gnox and you'll play that damn video

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because I just know he's thrilled. It is great to

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>see him. I know, the dumbest thing. It's the dumbest thing.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>But it is good to see some of the turnaround

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 3>there and it'll be things we look at as we

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 3>head into next week. Which is one of the other

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 3>things I want to talk about before we talk about

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 3>SOX charities. Is the likely matchups for this Guardian series

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Anthony k Versus Gavin Williams, Sean Burke, Parker Messic, Eric Fetti,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Tanner Biby as the matchups.

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I will just say this, is it a must win series?

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Six out of the next thirteen games I think are

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 3>with Cleveland, so you've got two series with them in

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the next four series. Is it a must win series

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 3>or do you feel like they're still going to be like, hey,

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 3>if you drop one or if you drop two and

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 3>only get one fine. Again, it comes back to our

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 3>initial thing of like where our expectations still, like where

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 3>do you fall on what people will say is the

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 3>biggest series so far this year for the Socks.

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm not going to say this series is

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>must win, but I think over the next two series,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they at least have to go three and

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>three with them. I think they have to stay afloat

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland. That's my personal opinion. I think obviously winning

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the series would be a huge boost, and I think

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that would carry some momentum. I don't think in June

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the end all be all for this team. I

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>would say it's more important to at least be competitive

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>with them right now and again just overall try to

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>win three of those next six games against them, because

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you just want to make sure that you're not giving

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:54.280
<v Speaker 1>them an insurmountable lead at this point. So just stay

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in there for now and get healthy. Maybe add at

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the deadline and you can really just make sure that

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's within reach. That way, you can make up some

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ground later.

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if the White Sox go five hundred against the

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Guardians this year, I'll feel fairly good about their playoff

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 4>chances because I have more faith in the White Sox

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 4>beating non Guardians teams and the Guardians the beating non

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 4>White Sox teams solely because of the injuries that have

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 4>been piling up for the Guardians. I mean, they've just

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 4>lost basically or three other four best hitters with you know,

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 4>decently serious injuries, like you know, four plus weeks At

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the same time, the White Socks are waiting teal back.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 4>They're hopefully getting more coming back soon. So like for

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 4>the next month or two, I feel that the White

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Sox are in a decent position, especially with the schedule

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 4>now getting easier. Although clearly it didn't matter this weekend.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 4>So to me, what's more important is not the results

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 4>of these next three games, but how they play. Kind

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 4>of similar to what we were talking about. Are they

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 4>losing a one run game where Venable's decisions seem fine,

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 4>just getting out played and it's like a four to

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 4>three loss, Like I can probably live with that. Are

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 4>they getting blown out at home by Fleeveland like they

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 4>did in twenty twenty two when we were in a

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 4>division race. Okay, then I'm probably out on this team.

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 4>So it's gonna depend like how they play.

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure Chris gets is probably in there thinking the

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 3>same thing, like how much am I willing to invest

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 3>in this team? Like it's not gonna be a lot

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 3>either way, but are you getting anything or are we

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 3>moving on from guys? Like It's not a must win

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 3>series by any stretch in my mind, but you're gonna

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 3>learn a lot about this team over the next thirteen

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 3>games when you got to play them six of them, Like,

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 3>can you hang with the way they play? The style

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 3>they play because they're hurt too, Like you can't blame

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 3>injuries when they're best hitter or their top three hitters

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 3>are gonna be out for at least part of this series,

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 3>if not the full series, Like, you can't blame that.

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 2>You're they're dealing with it too, So I don't know.

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not must win for me, but you're gonna learn

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot about this team. In my mind, the good

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 3>news is they're starting at home and you can hopefully

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 3>get a reset. The bad news is and you're still

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out whither fifteen and twenty five on

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 3>the road, Like that's a prop and they're going to

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 3>need to figure that out fast, especially once you got

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 3>to start going to Cleveland before those games, because you

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about the Cleveland Devil magic. That place

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 3>is full of it. So we'll see how it goes.

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 3>But yea, I think we're all kind of on the

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 3>same page with not must win, But you're getting there

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 3>if you want to, if you want this team to

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 3>add at the deadline, you're getting close to that sort

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 3>of magical mark, so we'll see what happens. Probably, in

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 3>my opinion, the most important thing that's going to come

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 3>out of this series with Cleveland is White Sox Charity's

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Day on Tuesday, June twenty third. For those of you

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 3>that are watching either live or afterwards, here is the

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 3>shirt as part of that competition. Your live model right

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 3>here and my like I'm trying to make sure my

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 3>low name doesn't cover it. We've got so for those

0:45:57.680 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 3>who don't know kind of the story behind it. The

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 3>White Sox designed shirts for from the one to eight

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 3>locked on socks and us, and we'll be competing in

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that competition of who can sell the most shirts on Tuesday.

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Ours is obviously much more of an homage to the

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 3>name of our our blog, just the thirty fifth and

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 3>shield sign, things like that coolpin stripes in the background,

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and of course our logo. I do want to announce

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 3>that we will be as part of it. We are

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 3>allowed to pick a charity of our choice to if

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 3>we sell the most T shirts, the White Sox will

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 3>make and White Sox Chaeres will make a five thousand

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 3>dollars donation to the charity of our choice. We have

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 3>chosen the Pierce Foundation. It's it's a Southside Chicago based

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 3>foundation that supports pediatric cancer and families going through our

0:46:55.239 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 3>families with children facing childhood cancer. They have been in

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 3>business for over twenty years now, doing a lot of

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 3>great work. I was actually just at their charity golf

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 3>outing over this weekend and got to talk with Peggy Pierce,

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 3>who is their executive director, and we will have kind

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 3>of a short interview piece coming out this week, so

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 3>look out for that for more information on them. I

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 3>have a saft spot for this foundation in general. I

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 3>know the folks there very very well, and I've gotten

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 3>to know them more. I help out with a lot

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of their marketing tools as well. They're great people. They

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 3>do a lot of great work for kids who are

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 3>experiencing cancer. They work very closely with with with what's

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 3>called Camp One Step, who helps to put together a

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 3>camp for kids who are experiencing cancer that they can

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 3>just feel like a kid for a weekend or a

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 3>week and I think it's a really really cool thing

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that everyone part that is a part of it does.

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 3>You can find out more at the Peersfoundation dot org.

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 3>We will have a lot more information in the next

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 3>couple of days to come, but wanted to announce that

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 3>wanted to model the shirt for everyone. I think it's

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a cool shirt just for White Sox fan in general

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 3>to wear on a day to day basis with the

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 3>street signs and everything. But again, that's Tuesday, the twenty

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 3>third against the Guardians. It's a six forty game. I

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:31.240
<v Speaker 3>believe once the game starts, t shirt sales are opened

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 3>throughout the course of the game. So you can go

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 3>to the White Sox Charity's Day website and click to

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 3>go through and purchase one of our shirts. They are

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty five dollars each. All proceeds go towards White Sox Charities.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 3>And then, excuse me, if we sell the most shirts

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 3>among us from the one oh eight and Lockdown socks,

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 3>five thousand dollars would go from White Sox Charities to

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the Peers Foundation. So we're very grateful to Peggy and

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:04.720
<v Speaker 3>everyone at the Peers Foundation for allowing us to support

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 3>them in this way. I know they're very, very excited

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 3>about this, and we're all really hoping it works out.

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 3>So for those of you tuning in, like I said,

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 3>we would really appreciate your support here and We're looking

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 3>forward to the competition. No matter what, it's going to

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 3>be a fun day at the ballpark for us.

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, yeah, we're really looking forward to it. I

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 4>agree with Jordan that, you know, that's such a great cause,

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 4>and I really do, like I try to be objective

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 4>as possible about it, but I really do think our

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 4>T shirt is like the best looking one. Like, no

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 4>disrespect to the other pages that are involved in this,

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 4>of course, but I just like our T shirt with

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 4>the most so I hope you all agree. But either way,

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 4>it's all going to a good cause. If you want

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 4>to buy any T shirt you want, ultimately we just

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 4>would prefer it be ours. So yeah, I'm really looking

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 4>forward to Tuesday.

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, Jordan Nick already hit on it. But

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>this is such a good cause, and I agree. I

0:49:55.840 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>think our T shirts are freaking awesome. No disrespect to

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the one O eight guys and to Lockdown Socks, I

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think they did a great job as well. Ours are

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely better, but that's just me. But no, this is

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>such a great opportunity to be working with the socks

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for such a good cause, So regardless of whose shirts

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you're buying, should be ours. But regardless of whose shirt

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're buying, it's it's all for a great cause and

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>just please please donate and help out where you can.

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, make sure to buy a shirt.

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day.

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, everything goes towards White Snacks, Sherry's.

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 3>But if you're gonna buy a shirt, might as well

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 3>make it ours, right Like again, definitely thirty.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Fifth and shield sign.

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 3>You got our logo, says Socks on thirty fifth again

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to an average fan who might just ask you what

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 3>it all is, like, Hey, Socks thirty fifth, the ones

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 3>that play on the South. It's very easy to talk about.

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 3>But we really appreciate any and all support that we

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 3>get for this. But it goes towards a good cause

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's what's most important. But with that, I think

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that's everything for this episode, Episode to one seventeen of

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the Socks on thirty fifth podcast. Thanks to everyone who

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 3>tuned in live on YouTube. Nick and Michael, Thank you

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 3>to you both, and Michael once again, Happy Father's Day

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 3>to you.

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 2>So thank you again to everyone for listening.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Be sure to subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 3>especially YouTube, wherever you get your podcasts. Socks at saxs

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 3>on thirty fifth is social media handle for Twitter, Facebook,

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 3>and Instagram, and sachs on thirty fifth dot com is

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the website. I also dropped in the chat the website

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 3>for the Peers Foundation if you'd like to check out

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 3>more before Tuesday. But once again, very very excited for

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 3>all of that. So for Nick Owain, Michael Sparrow, this

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 3>is joining zastly signing off, Take care of everyone, enjoy

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 3>your week. We'll talk with you at Tuesday on the

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 3>ball on Tuesday at the Ballpark if you're there, or

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 3>next week when we have another podcast episode.

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So until then, thanks a is always for your support

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and go White Sox

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Ghost ups, Happy Father's Day and go Socks.