WEBVTT - Meghan Markle: Inside the Racist, Sexist Online Hate Campaign Targeting the Royals

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Internet Hate Machine. As always,

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by my producer, Sophie. Sophie, how are you?

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's three? How are you? I can't believe he made

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>a girl. It did not seem likely, but alas, we

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>did it. I'm proud of us. We did it. But Sophie,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask, what is your connection to the royals? Listen?

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Not much except that I really liked Princess Diana when

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like in the seventh and the eighth grade,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>super into Princess Diana. And then now it's like you

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have no choice because the Harry and Megan's story is everywhere.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You cannot scroll. There is no peace. It feels like

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's everywhere, especially like the Netflix special Harry's memoir Spare Drafts.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>This week, He's speaking to Anderson Cooper in like two

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>days too for like an hour long interview thing. I'm

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like my guys out there, so I'm kind of like you,

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I am a casual. I have a very casual

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>interest in the Royals, and that's why I'm really really

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>excited to be joined by Ellie Hall. Ellie It's a

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>senior reporter at BuzzFeed and just an overall very cool

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>human and she knows so much about the Royals from

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>covering them immensely. Ellie, thank you so much for being here.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. I'm really excited. I remember

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the first we were just talking about this off Mike.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The first time that I met you in person was

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>at a Digital Void event here in d C. And

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I was a little drunk, but I was also like

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>mildly star struck. I was like, oh my god, that's

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Hall. I remember heaping like effusive praise on you

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and your work, to the point where I was like,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>she probably thinks I'm very drunk, but it was very sincere.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I just sounded like it was. It was drunk talk.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It was like very sincere talk. To be fair. I

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>was a little drunk too, I record, but no, because

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like I were mutuals on Twitter. So I was like,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's you. That's great, and um, you know,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud of all the rolpoling that I've done,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was very nice of you. Just generally, how

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>did you come to be someone who covered the Royals?

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really start following it a whole bunch until

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>William Kay got married. I feel like that was the

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>big sort of thing in two thousand and eleven, that

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was a reset of the Royal family, and we're in

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a new era. So um, I followed it since then

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and when I started at BuzzFeed in and I cannot

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>believe I have been there ten years now. Congratulations. First

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, a long time. Yeah, it's a long time.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Um. Nobody else care about the Royal family,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>so it was sort of like, who's reporting on the

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Royal family this girl, And it's just sort of I've

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>continued reporting on it for all these years since, and

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten When I said, when you know what I started,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea how to even contact the palace

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for comment and stuff like that. And you know, now

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm like in, I get the press releases and everything,

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know of the spokespeople, but it took a

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>while to get to like royal reporter level. I'm sure

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>some people listening are like, oh, the Royal family, that's

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just fluff, Like who cares celebrity gossip whatever, But it

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really does tell us a lot about gender, class, race,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these things that are so deeply embedded our

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in our society. I think that coverage of the royal

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>family and kind of coverage of the coverage, How is

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the media framing them? What does it tell us? Can

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really say so much about these deeper, thornier issues that

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we all grapple with every day. Oh yeah, and that's

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what makes following the royal family particularly now really interesting

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>because you can tell a whole lot about society. Like there,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so there was this, this just happened. A UK columnist

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>named Jeremy Clarkson wrote a column about Megan Markle or

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>she's Megan the Duchessess Megan the Duchess's Essex, and he

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was criticizing her because of Harry Megan's recent Netflix show,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and he said some horrible things. He said like he

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted her to walk naked through a screaming crowd and

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have people throwing excrements like the right, that's that guy. Yeah,

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what he said. But at the same time,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like who was your editor, my dude, Like let that

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>get into the paper. Yeah, And watching people watching people

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>who defended it saying like oh, it's a Game of

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Thrones reference, and then watching other people be like are

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we on the same page? Here? Happens as appropriate, So

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>like watching The reaction to that was really interesting because

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you see the different levels of culture and you can

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>in it aligns by class a lot of the time. So, yeah,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Royal family can show us so much about almost

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>any issue, including politics, Like that's going to be a

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>big one now that Charles is king, because he has

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>been politically active all of his life, you know, not

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in not in like I'm gonna go on vote way

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because he can't. But he's advocated for climate change. There

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 1>was a scandal, I think it was in the nineties.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a scandal where papers that he had written,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>they were called the Spider Papers, like he had written

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>like two politicians and expressed opinions about political things, and

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>they hit the newspapers. So what is his role going

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to be and what's his role with the government gonna be?

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Like is it going to be awkward? Is it not? So? Yeah,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going on and on about this, but

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's classism, racism, xenophobia, all all of these things you

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>can see and through the lens of the Royal family,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And that is honestly exactly what I want to be

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about in this episode. Megan Markel and the gendered,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>racialized hate harassment and disinformation campaigns that we know surround her.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And again, it's not really about Megan Markle. To me,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really about how easy it is for a relatively

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>small number of people. Um. I would usually call them

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>bad actors, but somebody left a review on the podcast

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>saying that this podcast could be a drinking game every

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>time I used the term bad actors, and that reviewer

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was correct. I do say it a lot. It's like

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you would be are you would be blackout drunk if

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you took a shot every time I say it, But

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just because it's like the term that we use

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this information. But these people are able to completely hijack

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the conversation around this specific person. And like, as someone

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>who is just a casual observer of the royals, like

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm not a hyper focused person who was

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like obsessed with them. You know, I liked it when

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Megan Merkele was introduced, Like I like the idea of like, oh,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>black princess, even though you know, Duchess not a princess.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, I do think it's a I know, right,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's still technically technically even if she lost Duchess

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of Sussex her title would be Princess Henry. Oh ship,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Yeah, And for those who don't know,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Henry is Prince Harry. That's his actual name. Um, it's confusing. Yeah,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Princess Henry. Yeah, Prince Prince Henry. Princess Henry would be

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>her name, black princess. There we go. Uh so yeah,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really it's a great sample of the

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>way that these the small dedicated number of people is

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>able to completely dominate and hijack the conversation and traffic

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in racism, sexism and have that be like a relatively

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lucrative enterprise, right, and then we see this sort of

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like take off with different targets. And so I've actually

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>heard that's referred to as an anti fandom, which I

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>had never heard before doing the research for this episode.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think like exactly what you think of it as, right,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like people who are really really dedicated the same way

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that a fandom is, but in the opposite direction, and

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>anti fandom, they are really really dedicated to hating a

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>single person. Can I Can I jump in right quick

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and saying please, I see that article. It's a Refinery article.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You really, everybody if this makes it into the podcast.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You really should read it. It's one of the best

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pieces about the anti Meg and Markle uh just sort

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of campaign on the internet out there. It's great piece. Well,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely link in the show notes it really it really

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of opened my eyes to the way that this

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is not just people. Like everybody has a celebrity or

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>someone that they don't like that like rubs them the

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong way, not everybody dedicates so much of their time,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>energy and effort into their hatred of that person, bonding,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like forming these social bonds through that hatred of other people,

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinating with other people who hate that person. Like there's

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big difference between you know, I don't really

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>care for such and such and the level of dedicated

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>commitment that this anti fandom has to hating this one person.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Like that article really makes it clear what we're dealing with,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So will definitely link it in the show notes. Yeah,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's not so. The thing that is a little

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>weird about this is some of these people are only

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they're only paying lip service to being Reyal Family fans.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Like there are some people who like I call them

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>royalist accounts Sussex people who do not like the Royal

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Family called him derangers. Like there's some people who really

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Royal family and will make I would say,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like reasonable criticism of Harry and Megan. But then there

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are some of these anti Megan accounts don't care about

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the Royal family. They just they just care about trashing Megan.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, maybe they'll post a picture of the Queen

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>um a few times, you know, a picture from our funeral,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but their main thing is posting negative stuff about Megan,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which is weird. It's so weird, and I think it

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really a points something else out that I'm always saying

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on this show, which is that you talked about how

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some people maybe are interested in, you know, reasonable criticism

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or conversation about the Royals, but that when when you

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>have these hate campaigns, the people who are interested in thoughtful,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>reasonable criticism and conversation are completely drowned out, and you

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have these people who like don't even really care about

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the Royals dominating the conversation, who are only interested in

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>traffic again, hate, like that's what they're interested in. So

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that I that's that's really really funny you said that, um,

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>because that that's my line. And for a while there

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was a time when I would interact with some of

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>these accounts because, like, my thing is engaging in good faith.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe in good faith journalism. I think that the

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>world is better when you can go to somebody who

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>disagrees with you and both of you enter into that

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>disagreement in good faith, coming from a place of I

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>believe one thing, you believe the other. Let's let's try

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out if there's common ground. Not coming from

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a place of I'm never going to change my mind.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sea lioning, i am, but actually I'm you know,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I am never ever ever going to even attempt to

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>see your point of view. And that's what these people do,

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and hilariously that has gotten me a nickname in the

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>anti Megan community. I am hashtag good faith Ellie. First

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of all hot, Second of all hot. Ask someone who

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>covers this for a living, what is it like the

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>way that people who are so entrenched and so dug

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>into like nothing will ever convince me that Megan Markle

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a narcissist liar this that what is it

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like to have them personally come after you? Really it's

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>reporting the truth and like wanting to amplify good faith

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>conversations based in honesty, I'm not gonna lie. When it

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>first started getting pretty pretty bad, like my therapist and

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I had to talk about it. But the main thing

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>here is that it's not about me. I am an

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>extension of how they feel about certain people. Because like

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just uh, you know, you write about Megan

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or oh, you write about the Royal family. It's like

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>people genuinely believe or say they believe it, Like I'm

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>being paid by Harry and Megan for the work that

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I do, and it's like no buzz BuzzFeed, busky news

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>with only people who who write my paychecks. But at

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain point, you you do start feeling like you're

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>going a little bit insane because you're have you I

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have people in my inbox who are telling me that

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Megan wore a moon bump to fake both of her

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>pregnancies and she had a surrogate. I have people, uh,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying that she was associated with Jeffrey Epstein

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and like she was on Epstein's island, or that she

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was a yacht girl. And these people believe either they don't.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't only believe it, they're posting online so that

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they can get other people to believe it, and you know,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it feels Trumpian in a way that when all that

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>started happening, that was a very it was sort of

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like looking into a mirror of you know, the politics

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>side of it instead of the world side of it,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>because you can't reason with some of these people. They

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are they are convinced that it's true. Yeah, I definitely

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>see the Q and On influence in in in that

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>type of rhetoric, in the I'm gonna take something, I'm

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna run with it and I'm gonna try to force

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it on people, and then that and and and like

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to something where you say it to somebody who's not

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fully involved with the topic and you say to them

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, what are you a moon bob? What

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about? But they believe it. They believe it.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>They really believe it. That's the thing. That's the thing

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that that I'm like, No, they wholeheartedly believe what they're

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>saying is true. And the thing that makes it difficult

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and is that that poisons all of the discourse when

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you have that group of people, It poisons all of

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversations about the royal family online and this even

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>includes within you know, Megan's online supporters who call themselves

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Sussex Squad because there's so much horrible nous coming

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and an irrational and crazy and conspiracy theory, irrational nous

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>coming from the anti Megan's side, their need jerk responses

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to be defensive to everything, and and you know, not

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>accept any criticism of Megan. Harry like every you can

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>criticize everybody, and even like Megan said this in an

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in uh the interview she did in South Africa, she said,

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as the criticism is fair, Harry

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care about it, but it has to

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>be fair. And when you're at a point where certain

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>people are defending Megan from allegations that are racist in

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>our sexist, you can't have discourse because no one, no

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one's ever gonna no one will ever meet in the

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>middle about this because there's just too much nonsense flying

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>around the internet and there's so much bad faith. You

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>say bad actors, I say bad faith. I can understand

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and have gotten and caught up in it myself. The

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the feeling like you need to take a side to

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>defend somebody who is being unfairly attacked against criticisms that

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are nonsense, right Like, I feel it a lot with

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris. I'm no big fan of Kamala Harris. I

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that she deserves to be like facing racist,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sexist swipes or things like that, and so you feel

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like you need to take a side because you see

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody being so unfairly attacked that you're like, well, obviously

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to defend them. And that's not good discourse.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't that doesn't create the conditions for people to

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have actual truth based criticisms. And actually, somebody who didn't

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like Megan Merkle or didn't like Kamala Harris should actually

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>want to have a climate where we people can have

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>substitutive critical conversations about their issues with that person. Right

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Like when you have a dynamic where one side is

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>drumming up false racist, conspiracy theory laden nonsense and another

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>side is just like defending them, nobody is actually having

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the like, actual thoughtful conversation based in reality about the

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pros and cons of this person or how they present

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or what they do, and say no, and it's also

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like you attacked me, so I'll attack back if you.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This is I hate how Twitter sent tells you like

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that it thinks you're interested in that are trending.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's helpful for me because I follow royal stuff.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you will see people on SUSI side like amplifying

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>rumors about William and Kate. There has long been a uh,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll say conspiracy theory, um, but who really knows. There's

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>long been a theory out there that William cheated on Kate,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is like there's there's we haven't seen any

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>real evidence of the of this, but like that is

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>accepted as truth by the other side. So when you

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have these things that our conspiracy theories and that are

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>accepted as truth, it goes both hats and no one,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Like like we just said, no one can meet in

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the middle, yeah and correct me if I'm wrong? Is

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.239
<v Speaker 1>it Prince Andrew like a known sexual abuser? Like yeah,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't we all just like join forces and be like,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>let's if we're gonna call anybody something that like like

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who has you know, covered that side of

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it and like really learned a lot about It's like,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>why is that not the conversation every single day? Why

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is that not the thing that the that the like

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that that is going on. Why do they not why

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>do they not care? Why is that not the thing?

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Why are they focusing on this this this woman from

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>l A who wears tall uggs, Like why do they

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>give a fuck? Like that's the thing that blows my mind.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you have somebody who was involved with Jeffrey Epstein,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>who is a prince. Ellie helped me. So as far

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as far as that goes, I think that, you know,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one part of it off the bat that um everyone

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>would say is just that like he's done, especially since

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Charles is came now like he is done. Um he

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, he still had an office in Buckingham

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Palace for the past few years. As soon as the

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Queen died, Charles shut that ship down. It's you know,

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's very clear, like he's never gonna come

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>back to public life and he's just going to be

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a family member for the rest of his life. And

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's a closed book now for some

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>people because like what else are you're gonna do? Like

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there are no there are no new lawsuits coming forth.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is the comparisons that start happening because

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at Harry and you look at Andrew. They

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>both stepped back to public life for two very different reasons.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear that I'm not in this episode.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to make anyone feel any kind of

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>way about Megan and Harry. Right. People can think whenever

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they want to think about them, Totally fine. But there's

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a very clear difference in being like, oh, I don't

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>care for her podcast or whatever, and a engaging in

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a sophisticated, coordinated disinformation campaign against her that it really

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>traffics in the sexist, racist stereotypes and conspiracy theories and

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>profiting off of it. So I want to get into

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how we know that this these

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>campaigns work, which I know we saw a little bit

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of on their recent Netflix documentary. Yeah, Bridget, I do

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you remember like in I think it was in December

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>where I text you and I was like I was like, uh, yeah,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to talk about this, and they're like,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>do I have to watch it? And I was like,

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I was, it seems like really boring,

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, there's an entire episode that focuses

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on like single use hate accounts and like goes into

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the targeted and like that side of it, Like they

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>could have done an entire series on that. Like everything

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>everything else is not relevant really to this podcast, but

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that thing. I have said this publicly yet so that

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys will you know, don't don't breaking breaking a

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>little news if this makes if this makes it in,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they won't kill me. UM. I was

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>interviewed for the documentary and didn't make it into the

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>final cut. What what? What was your spicy commentary? Tell

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>us it was the only reason I'm saying this was

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>because it was about this. It was about this, this

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of internet thing. So I was, yeah, that was

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That was last February, UM, And I didn't know it

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was for their documentary until like October. So I know

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that you've done a lot of great coverage on Christopher

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Boozy's report. If you don't know who Christopher Boozy is,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he runs Bought Sentinel, which is an organization that analyzes

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Twitter data, and his analysis shows that a lot of

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this hate that's been thrown at Megan has been driven

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>by I would say a lot you were accounts than

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>folks might suspect. In fact, just a few accounts have

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>been able to artificially influence the conversation around Megan on

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>social media. He found that only eighty three accounts generate

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy of Megan Markle hate content on Twitter, and they

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>estimate that a combined they have a combined unique potential

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>reach of seventeen million users, which again, like to me,

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that only a handful of accounts would be able to

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>so effectively dominate and shape the conversation about one person

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is kind of wild to me. This is probably like

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the it's one of the few day driven

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>stories that I've reported on in my career, but the

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers shocked me. So what happened here was I had

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>been following Bought Sentinel for a while because um, I've

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>done misinformation reporting and my I know some of my

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>colleagues had quoted from them before, for for about a

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>climate change story or something like that. So like Christopher

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Boozy and Boston and all known in the misinformation industry,

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and he tweeted something about I can't even remember what

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it was. He made some comment about Megan and Harry,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden his replies were swarmed with

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>these people. Because that's what happens if you say something

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>nice about Megan and Harry. At some point, people will

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 1>come and start swarming your replies, particularly if you're verified

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>at cat out and it got nasty, like somebody made

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>some comment about his mother who had died of COVID.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. Yeah, and you know because of that,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>He's like, what's going on here? Like what is this? This?

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Who are these people who have all of a sudden

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>started coming for me? I'm going to look into them.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>So he ran hashtag analysis, well, he in Boughton all

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ran the hashtag analyzes with uh different I could pull

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>it up, but I don't know where it is on

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>my computer, with different um like hashtags and words in there,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for all of the tweets about Harry and Megan

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, in one period of time. And then

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>they went through those numbers and started looking at the

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>accounts that tweeted the most, the accounts that were the

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>most influential, like uh, he sent all of the data

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>to me so that I could check it myself, and

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>our data reporters looked at and they're like, yeah, that's cool,

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this is this is obviously legit. But um, part of

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're active on Royal Twitter, you start seeing the

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>same accounts in your mentions. For me, I see them

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and that I mute them. And I had always suspected

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that there were there were people who were very, very

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>active and basically like doing this with all of their

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>free time, but seeing that small number was really shocking

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. And I remember a Royal commentator who I

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>actually I respect her a whole bunch. I don't agree

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with her all the time, but I really respect her.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>She's a pr person who does really good analysis of

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Harry and Megan and the Royal family from her point

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of view in media relations. But she said, like, why

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is this a big deal? You'll always find haters for

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for people online, And it was like, the big deal

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is because that's not organic. You can't just say that

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there are all these people on Twitter who hate Megan

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Harry And yeah, I'm sure I follow some people who

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like Megan and Harry, who you know are our

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>other reporters, you know, people in the industry, or you

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>know a few people I fall from college are tired

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of Harry and Megan. But they'll do one tweet and

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>then they will go back to their lives. Right, They

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>will not just keep going with the stream of negativity

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know every everything, like peeps, there's there's someone

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>who's thing is posting racist cartoons with Megan and Harry

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and perpetuating all of these conspiracy theories and stereotypes and

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just trying to get them out to as many people

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Like that's the thing I would actually you

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>should try this out bridget um as an experiment, like

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>tweets something paused about Megan Harry and see what happens

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>here mentions because I got it. Yeah, yeah, I think

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a podcaster. I think what even as

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Kate Kennedy, she hosts the podcast be There in five,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>she has this a huge, thriving Facebook community, and that

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>she said like I have to go private because I've

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>made an episode about Megan and Harry and I know

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be bought Botswarm City, and so

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>she has to go private when she does that, Like,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that like something that you said about

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when how they give you cruel nicknames and like are

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>shitty to you personally, I think it's a silencing tactic.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So that like everyone who has something positive or even

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>not even positive just accurate to say about about this

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>person that they hate will know that doing so will

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>come at a personal cost. Like, if you're gonna treat

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>something positive about Megan and Harry, is it worth the

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that the kind of folks are gonna

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>be in your mentions, you know, getting on you for it. Like,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very clear silencing tactic to shut

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.239
<v Speaker 1>down the discourse that they don't want to happen. So

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>two things there. You said that your friend was talking

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about bots. That's the thing. The people here and the

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>people who drives, they're not bucks, They're not This isn't

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a situation where some PR firm in Los Angeles or

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>London has bought up a bunch of accounts just you

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know to share stories about the royal family or say

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a few things. These are people. These are people who

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>devote ton to posting this negative content. Christopher Boozy coined

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the term single purpose hate account for this for this

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, and I think it's a great phrase

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and it can be applied, you know, in in any

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>fandom you see. But like, they're not bots, these are

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>actual people. You can really see the silencing aspect um

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in everything that happens to a UK reporter who is

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I would I would call him an internet friends. We've

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>met in person a few times. But Omen Scobe he

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book Finding Freedom, which we now know Harry

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and Megan like told their press person to send him

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>information and stuff. So but I I know that other

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Royal reporters, Omen Scoby and a few others have gotten

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>death threats, and I've gotten I've gotten death threats. Our

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>security team had to check into that for me. But

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>people don't want anything to disrupt their narrative and it

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>has like it's like nothing to do with you. But

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're out there and you are trying to spread

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the truth which is not what they believe, you know,

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it can get dicey. Jesus, should we get into some

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of Christopher Boozy, who who runs the Bots Sentinels research,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of that report, you know, the

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>ellis covered in a bunch too. The data is really

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me. So to break it down, of those

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>eight three accounts, they identified fifty five single purpose anti

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Megan marcle hate accounts that he says they sort of

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>function as the primary hate accounts, and then twenty eight

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary hate accounts that basically amplified anti Megan markle content

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>from those earlier fifty five accounts. So basically, once a

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>primary account tweets something, those twenty eight secondary accounts would

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then quickly boost that content i e. Coordination and have

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to be clear like, as you said, these are these

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are not bots, these are like real people, and these

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>tactics violate Twitter's rules. Twitter has rules against coordination and

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So how are are they able to

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>avoid detection? Well, his report found that things like pairing

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>negative comments about Megan and Harry with positive contents about

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>other royals and in an attempt to sort of evade detection.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, oh, we're not a hate account, We're

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just a Royalis account, but it's all going to be

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly anti Megan Markel suprinkle in a few other other

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>tweets for for plausible deniability, um temporarily deactivating their accounts

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so that they won't be suspended, only to reactivate later,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty clever, I would say, putting parity in

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 1>their profiles even though their account like really is not

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a parody account, and then using coded or like coded

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or dog whistle racist and sexist language. And so this

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>is something that as someone who has got a lot

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of work in the myths and disinformation space really just

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>burns my beans. How people will it's so obvious what

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, and what the what the like, what the

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to say, but they'll thinly veil it

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way that you know is meant to avoid

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>detection and to have that plausible deniability. So it's like, like,

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what did I say that was racist or sexist? I

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just evoked some really common racist or sexist trope. An

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>example of the sort of things that people say that

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that is encoded language but definitely is based in racism.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Massage Noir is that Megan is a violent person with

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a bad temper, so whenever anything happens that's good, mostly

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like good for William and Kate. You'll see all of

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 1>these tweets and YouTube videos being like Megan must be

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>throwing dishes in Monacito, or like we can hear the

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>angry screams from that they live in Monatito's, Like we

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>can hear the angry screams from Monacito. Now, like Harry

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>better duck, Megan's throwing punches because she's so angry, and

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like that's the angry black woman trope that

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not You're not even trying that hard, like barely

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a dog with all. Yeah, so you mentioned Twitter. This

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is the this is the thing, and this is why

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like people who hate Megan Harry always like this report

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is an accurate No, sorry, it is. Twitter has very

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they have their earn standards about what they considered to

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be coordination. And an interesting thing that is in another

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>later report done by Bot Sentinel and Christopher Boozy is

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence from like the early days of anti Megan Twitter

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>where people were organizing in a chat from a program

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>called me we, which I had never heard of until

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>like all all of the investigation to this started going on.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But I've spent about like five hours going through their

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>archives and you can see people in there talking about

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like I'm going to tweet this or oh, Paris Hilton

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>retweeted me guys, let's try to get this hashtag trending.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure they haven't a new way that's not

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>me we that U that they know use now for

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. But what what you said burns

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my beans? I like that phrase. What what what really

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>burns my beans about? Twitter's response to this was they

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>put out a statement like we only got rid of

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like three of the accounts that we saw for violations,

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and then like in the next week, they started just

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>shutting all of them down, and they and I asked them, like, hey,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>can I get you save it from you please, because

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you've shut down like ten of these accounts and you

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>told other media outlets that our report wasn't correct. So

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that's been super fun. But if you look at the

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>accounts they were in, they were labeled in that first report.

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>For a while, a lot of them went away, and

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>then Elon must bought Twitter and now many of them

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are back again with their same handles, so they basically

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>were banned by Twitter. Ellen came brought them back because

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the kind of discourse that will

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>make Twitter a better place, a more thoughtful place, a

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>place where it's like I hate that and I think

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like Something that I also want to mention is that

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's algorithm eventually was amplifying this hateful content. According to

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the report, researchers use Twitter accounts without friends or followers

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>during the research, and after viewing two hate accounts, and

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>then Twitter's algorithm began suggesting numerous hate accounts for them

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to follow. On multiple occasions, Twitter recommended that they follow

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these hate accounts. Oh it still it still happens to me,

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it still happens to me. I, Um, they're always

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>new accounts popping up, but I don't. I don't want

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to block because then it gives people the satisfaction of

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>knowing that they've been blocked me. So, yeah, I'm mute.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But if a new account pops up in my mentions,

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like trashing on me, and I'll look at it, I'll go, oh, yeah, yeah,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm muting you. It will recommend to me

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to follow other accounts of people who are attacking me

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and my mentions. And it's like that the algorithm shouldn't

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>work that way. You shouldn't try to be encouraging abuse. Yeah,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's like what you said about

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter do like getting rid of those accounts quietly, like

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>denying your report publicly and then quietly being like, Okay,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>actually this is a problem. We need to do something.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it really speaks to I don't know, I

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>guess sometimes I I don't want to use the term

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>bad actor, but sometimes I think that the people running

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>platforms are not running platforms in a way that I

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>think encourages It's not responsible, Like that's not like somebody

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>who was interested in having a platform that foster's thoughtful

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation and discourse would not behave that way. I'll put

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it that way. Yeah, yeah, no, And uh, Twitter is

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely the platform where I don't like to use the

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>word powerful, but Twitter is definitely the platform where these

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>accounts and uh, you know the crazy anti Harry and

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Megan people have these power because and this was this

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was another publication by Bought Sentinel looking at these accounts.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>What that looked at was official. I say official, but

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like this means they write for a paper, they get

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on TV as royal commentators, like royal reporters and commentators,

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some of them interact with these accounts. But what's more,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these accounts purposefully target these people and and

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like one of I remember when when this

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>came out, like one of the ladies who was listed

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in it was like, what's like, I don't believe these

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories. I'm like no, no, no no, no, no, it's

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying that. We're just saying, like, look at

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all the people who are tweeting at you trying to

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>get you to believe this thing, and in one particular

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>case that that this person is still on the air.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Angela Levin. But the report like showed

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with screenshots how a conspiracy theory started on Twitter from

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these accounts, and she said it on TV

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like while she was commenting, you know, that's the sort

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing if they're all talking to each other on Tumbler,

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Okay, not great, but it's at least it's

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>insulated on Twitter. Anyone can see it. It It can go

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere and anyone can believe it. I think that's exactly

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>why we see Twitter being this battleground for power and

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like quote culture wars and ideology, because so many journalists

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and media makers and editors are on Twitter every day.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Like we're probably way too fucking much to be honest

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with you, but you can. Really it's like a dedicated

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>dedicated people on Twitter can make things into news, and

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that happen for good with things like Black

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter and Me Too. But that power for good

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>could also be weaponized and used for evil and used

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to legitimize things that are just not true, like harmful

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories and it sounds like that's exactly what happened here. Yeah,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it is. The word battleground is is

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely what it is because there are two very distinct,

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>separate sides, and everyone is trying to control the narrative,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>control the hashtags. And I, you know, since I spend

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time in that Twitter world because of

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 1>my reporting, it's always funny to me when it breaks

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>out and like, real people are seeing these things. I

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you how many of my colleagues have read

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some of my stories about all this and they've just

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gone like, Ellie, how's this real? Like how do people

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>care this much? Like what what is? What's what's going

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on here? And I have no answer for them because

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I've been in the world too much that like, okay, yeah,

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know it. It makes sense that Megan Markle's has sister,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Samantha Markle, is engaging with these Twitter accounts and she's

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>been feeding information to the worst anti Megan YouTube channel

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for years. You know, everyone knows this. I've just you know,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I finally laid it all out and then the story

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>goes up and people are like, this is bat shit insane.

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's one of those things where when I

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, the reality of what's happening, I feel

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like I sound like um Charlie from Always Sunday, Like

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the corkboard, like there is no pepe st Like how

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>deep this thing goes, how coordinated it is. It is

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are not as online as we probably are.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It would it would sound like the rantings of somebody

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>who is not well, but it's true. Can I tell

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you things I was interviewed for. I was interviewed on

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the BBC this second like, because Harry Megan's definitely stually

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>dropped in two parts. They had like one part one

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>week and then another part of the second week second

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>week of BBC World reached out and there like, can

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 1>we interview you get an American perspective on Harry Megan?

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I woke up at two thirty so I could

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>watch it when I came out, so I was ready

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and rare in to go if anybody wanted to talk

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to me. And my mom wanted to see it, so

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>she went to YouTube and search my name, and you

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>know what happens. If you search my name, you see

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>videos from these people. You see videos attacking you, attacking me,

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>And she was she was. She called me. She's like,

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know it was this bad. I didn't know

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>that there are people who care this much that they're

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>making YouTube videos attacking you. So my mom's eyes were

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>open to this world recently. I'm so sorry. And you're

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just doing your job. It's not like it's not like

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just doing your job. Yeah, but um, as any

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>royal reporter will tell you, it's not this is part

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the job. Now it's become so fierce, it's become

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so divided that if you write about the royal family

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like this is what you are getting yourself into. Now

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>do you see this as a relatively new phenomenon Like

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>when Trump got into office. I do think that conspiracy

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>theories and this kind of dedicated online disinformation and harassment

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>campaigns became much more commonplace and our discourse. Do you

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>see this as a new phenomenon where being a royal

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>reporter in the nineties, death threats and hate videos about

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>yourself perhaps would not have been part of the job

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the same way it is now. So no one can

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>believe me when I say this, but Royal Twitter used

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a kind of weird but overall nice place

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this was back in I remember, because I started I

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>first got into Royal Twitter when Prince George was born,

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there there would be some some people

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't like Kate Middleton. There have always been people who

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>don't like her, and you know that that's cool, you

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do you, but there wouldn't be this overwhelming tide of negativity.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I never saw any accounts that their sole purpose was

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to dinner grate Kate. I saw a few people say

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>somethings about her, but nothing, you know, nothing like what

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you see for Megan. And it stayed that way for

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a long time. And honestly, it was when Megan entered

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the scene that this became more and more and more divisive.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And I said this when we were talking earlier Bridget,

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, some of these accounts started posting

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Megan stuff before the wedding, like the seeds were

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there and they were so, you know, before Megan had

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>really even entered the public life, the public sphere. In

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>those early days of her being on the scene, so

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 1>much of it was kind of reaching like, oh, she's

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>an actor, that means that she is a phony or

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a narcissist, like some of them were really really reaching

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just to have a reason to hate this person that

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we really didn't even know that much about yet. Yeah,

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and obviously a lot of it was racialized. You know,

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we we had everyone knows is we had the Daily

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Mail headline of Harry's girls straight out of Compton. We

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 1>had we had a columnist writing about her exotic d NA,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>just a lot lots of stuff like that, And Prince

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Harry even issued a statement about that, saying that like

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the racist abused on social media and the racist like

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>vibes is the wrong word, but like the the undertones

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of some of the coverage, like every we all, we

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all need to stop that it does seem very racialized.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>That like as Suon as she came on the scene,

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>people were really reaching to find any reason to hate her.

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think to your point about how it's so

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>racially coded, that's one of the things that I really

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>struggle with because you know, you just know, like that

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>headline straight out of Compton, or when she was pregnant, like, oh,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what what's archie skin tone gonna be? Like? Sometimes you know,

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>as a black woman, you know when someone is saying

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is racialized, they might not be there. They

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>might not be coming out and calling you a slur

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or like you know, doing it in such an explicit way,

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but you can you can feel when someone is trafficking

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in massage, noir or racism against you. And I think

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what's hard is that we have been so trained as

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a society to not talk about it openly, to ignore

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it and not speak up about it, and so you

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>just have to kind of I think it creates a

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>climate where it becomes normalized at normalized as discourse, as

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>legitimate discourse when it really shouldn't be. Yeah, I mean

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you can Megan, Megan marrying into the royal family and

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened afterwards really prompted I think a can

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we say long overdue but to a discussion about race

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>in in the UK in particular, but also just across

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the board, because you know, what is the difference between

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>two women who married into the royal family. You have

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Megan and you have Kate, and you in many cases

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>just like don't even look at their behavior. Just look

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>at what they're wearing or you know that that that

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they're pregnant, and you will see, you know, these these

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>little differences that don't make sense. You wrote that that

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>viral piece about the like comparing the way that the

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>press covers when Megan does something and when another royal

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>does the exact same thing, like holding hands, for instance,

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>in public, when Megan and Harry held hands, people who

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, they can't even keep their hands off

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of each other. It's disgusting, it's so disrespectful this and that,

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and then another royal doing the exact same thing, and

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it gives and and not having that kind of corporage.

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, Okay, they're holding hands, and it makes

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it clear that this kind of hyper focus that Megan

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is under right, that it's just only seemingly reserved for her.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, like, as I said, as a person of color,

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that when that kind of extra scrutiny on

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>every little thing, every little move you make, is reserved

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just for you. You know, it's racialized. You couldn't feel it.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not supposed to talk about it openly, but you

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>know it, and they're not talking about it openly and

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>not talking about it publicly, Like that's been the real

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>thing because you have all of these people, um, you know,

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>all these people online, people who recognize what's going on,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like you Bridget and you're talking to a bunch of people,

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and in this case a lot of people in the

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>media who are writing these headlines and are talking to

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>these people in the palace and perpet you know, getting

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>these headlines and getting these stories out. They they don't

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>see it. And not only that people who write the headlines,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>but the people who are making decisions at tech platforms

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like Twitter and YouTube. One of the things that I

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you have reported on that still just kind

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of blows my mind is that we've talked a lot

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter in this episode. But but TEMs it will

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>also looked at YouTube accounts and found that this is

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>big business, right. Trashing Megan Markle and lying about her

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is lucrative. They found that twenty five YouTube channels earned

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>around three point five million from ad revenue according to

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Data Analysis Agency, and that three of the most successful

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>anti Megan marco had accounts generated almost half a million

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars during their existence. And basically they just filmed these

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>low quality racist videos full of inaccuracies and baseless conspiracies

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>about how she you know, faked her pregnancy or used

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a bait, a moon bump or whatever to like fake

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.280
<v Speaker 1>our pregnancy. What does it tell you about our media

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that you can make half a million dollars just

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>spreading low quality, not even high quality sophisticated racist lives,

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but low quality racist lies about one person. I mean,

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so we saw and obviously this is a very very

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>different case, but we saw with Johnny Depp and an

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Amber Heard how content you know, either micro analyzing Amber

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Heard and trashing her like and this is like, we

0:43:57.520 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can just let's keep this a judgment free zone. Like

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there weren't videos looking at what Johnny said that went viral.

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>There weren't people like analyzing his test videos where people

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>were analyzing his testimony that went viral. It was Amber

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like on TikTok, on YouTube videos attacking her, making fun

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of her. They did really, really well. And the thing

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with Megan is that you know, and obviously similar to Amber,

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but when it comes to YouTube videos about Megan, there

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is an audience. And that's that's the thing that was

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy to me when I first started looking into this,

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because I actually, well, the biggest YouTube account that had

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>been around for a long time, Yankee Wally, was a

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Welsh pensioner who literally would pull up her phone and

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to her phone and scroll through and like find

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>pictures and and talk about that and then upload everything.

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>For years, she was spreading these conspiracy theories. She was

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>attacking the Royal family, attacking Harry and Megan and making money,

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like making serious money. Like she she is come back

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>online and like she's very unhappy that her YouTube channel

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is no more. It got it got shut down. But

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing was, I believe it didn't get shut

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>down because of anything she said about Harry and Megan.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to YouTube's rules. I believe the reason it got

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>shut down was because of attacks she made on open Scope,

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the reporter that I mentioned earlier. Because and this is

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this is why YouTube kid get away with it. YouTube

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is very specific rules about what counts is harassment and

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what counts is hate speech. If you in order for

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it to count as that, in order for it to

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, get you either kicked off or get your

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>videos taken down, you need to attack an intrinsic attribute

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of someone. So like there are there is a specific

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there are specific things that you have to attack. And

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if you attack anything else, okay, that's fine, like or

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>or you spread conspiracy theories, that's fine. So some of

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>these are like race, gender, sexual orientation, but a lot

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of it is racialized. But it's not someone saying out loud,

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know Megan, we don't like Megan because she's black.

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It is Megan is super angry, or Megan is classless,

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Megan is Magan is very low class or

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I've heard. You haven't lived until you've heard, you know,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>like a British person say Ratchett to describe Megan like.

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know they had that word in the UK. Yeah.

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>The commentary to in terms of her dad online has

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>been yeah, it's it's it's deeply disturbing to me. One

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things I learned from watching the Netflix thing,

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that she had like a good relationship

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with her dad before all this happened. I just I

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't think. I mean, I guess I didn't look into

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it hard enf but I didn't realize until I watched

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this documentary that it's like, no, they had like a

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>really good relationship when she was growing up. They had

0:46:56.920 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a good relationship up until he was approached by the press. Yes,

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>l to Philip. Philip said, I can answer that because

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a big story about this so specifically they

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>had they were talking to each other, had a good relationship.

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He even talked to Harry on the phone after they

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>were engaged, and everything was good until a paparazzi photographer

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>approached him at his home in Mexico is like little

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>little house he was living in a Mexico and said, hey,

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>why don't I take some photos of you getting ready

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for the wedding that we can get out there because

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>there had been a lot of bad press about you know,

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so what happens when anybody famous pops up, they go

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>look at your family. They're gonna find absolutely everything, any

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>black sheep and and all this stuff. So the photographer

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of convinced him to get some good press. So

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>these photos were published, like him being measured for a suit,

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>or him looking at a picture of Harry and Megan

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on a computer and just stuff like that. In the documentary, Yeah,

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy, and those photos when were like, I people

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>don't talk to me about before doing royal stuff on BuzzFeed,

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but I really wish they would, Like bus needed a

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>story about that, like featuring those photos and if you

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>people accepted as legit. And then the week before the wedding,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mail on Sunday, which is British media is so weird.

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's a Daily Mail. The Sunday edition is a

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>completely different staff, like the Mail on Sunday is different

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Daily Mail, and it's a little more it's

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more prestigious. But right before the wedding, the

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Mail on Sunday published a story showing that Thomas Markle

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>had been working with the paparazzi, and I believe it

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>alluded that he had shared the profits the paparazzi and

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Markel had split the profits for that. That was

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where the relationship broke down, but it didn't even like

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 1>completely breakdown. Then Megan and Harry were still trying to

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get him over for the wedding, and then he had

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a heart attack and he said confusing things about that period,

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>so like no one was it a heart attack? Was

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>he too embarrassed to go? Was it a little bit

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of both? Maybe? Um, But the fact he lied to

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Megan initially about collaborating with the paparazzi destroyed their relationship.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But before that they like they were good, they were close.

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Megan used to have a lifestyle blog called The Tig

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and she she She's wrote like very beautiful Father's Day

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>posts about him and all the support that he'd given

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>her throughout his life, and even with you know, her

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.879
<v Speaker 1>half sister smant the Markle. That's something that she says

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time when someone puts a microphone in her face,

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that like, Megan was their father's favorite, she was his

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>little baby. And watching the public, watching the public narrative

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about this, you know when it comes Tomas Markel, if

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you like Megan and Harry, you're like, no, this is

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>classic abusive behavior. Like you are speaking to the media

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and you are saying all of this because you want

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>attention from the person. You want money acknowledged and money.

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But everybody else is like, how dare Megan a band?

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And her father likes he's so ill, he just had

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a stroke, he hasn't met his grandchildren. And you know,

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't see any of the logical reasons why she

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to do this based on whether or not

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you like Harry or Megan, And that's what most of

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to. And I also think, like I

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think that for people of color, women of color, I

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>think the subtext is that we are not allowed to

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have complex relationships with our families. Even though every family

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is complicated. People have complicated relationships, like layered complicated, complex

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>relationships with their parents all the time. That is commonplace.

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But when Megan has it, it's something you know, she

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>abandoned her dad this and that. Like you know, as

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't really follow the royals that closely.

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I dip into the news here and there. And I

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good example of how they target

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are perhaps low information on the issue, you know,

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>casual observers, to effectively create a narrative because I assumed

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that that media narrative that we hear is correct. You

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>know that Megan cut off her poor sick father, But

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>had I read your reporting a little more closely, I

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>would know that's not really the case. And I think

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>this is really meant to target folks who are just

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 1>casual observers because they know that they can get those

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:12.359
<v Speaker 1>folks to believe something about Megan Markle that just isn't true. Yeah,

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that you see not done so much anymore.

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But like Thomas Markele has made appearances on uk TV,

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>like he he was interviewed by Pierce Morgan more than

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 1>once that I don't even don't even get me started. Yeah, sorry,

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sorry for bringing up that name, but yeah, and you

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know that's Morning TV. And if you you're you are

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>taking this person who is obviously a toxic figure in

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Megan's life and and let's just use the word problematic

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and amplifying everything that he's saying. Well, some people who

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 1>don't follow the world is very you know that closely,

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that's the narrative they're going to start believing instead of

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>looking to see like, well, wait, what did he do?

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Like there has to be a reason here, right, there

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>are valid reasons to not like Harry and Megan. But no,

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's like we're not talking about that in this

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast because that's such as minority of people who behave rationally.

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>But anyway to think that that came out here was

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that her press secretary at the time had coordinated with

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the authors of the book Finding Freedom to give information

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to him. Like Harry and Megan knew that their press

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>person was going to go talk to the reporters who

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are writing this long book, and everyone always knew that,

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like Finding Freedom was going to be Harry and Megan's

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>side of the story. But no one, I think ever

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>expected to see how how much of their their hands

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't like that there were emails exchanged about what to

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>tell these reporters. So Megan ended up like basically apologizing

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to the court saying, like, I completely forgot about this

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>one email exchange. And if you saw in the documentary,

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know that part of the documentary where

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Megan goes, he's your brother. That that's that's that's this,

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're talking about. Because the press person who

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>submitted during the appeal, the press person, former press person

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for Harry and Megan, gave them like all these emails,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>gave the daily emails, gave the court, let's just say,

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>gave the court. Gave the court all of these emails.

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And um, you see the fall from that in the

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>documentary because Harry and Megan are talking and they're talking

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that their former press person you know,

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is like currently working for William and that's your brother. Yeah.

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>That was like Megan's her most authentic moment in the

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 1>documentary for me, just like very obviously not in front

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of the cameras, just like having having a movement. Yeah,

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, your point is such a

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>good one. Of like, I think that people can have

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>people can have legitimate criticisms or takes or opinions about

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the coordination that they that their team had with this book.

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But so like when you said, oh, there's all these

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>legitimate reasons to dislike them, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I know. I could not even begin to talk about

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like what those are, like, I don't know because of

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what I what dominates the conversation are the conspiracy theories,

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the lies, the racism, the nonsense, And it just creates

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this dynamic where we don't actually get to have the

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation that we perhaps should. It's just wanted with ridiculous stuff.

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Laney Gossip Lane Louis. She has a blog called Laney Sip.

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:25.400
<v Speaker 1>She made an excellent point when um, the edition of

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Vogue that Megan guests edited came out that I think about.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think about her point all the time. She said, like,

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about the fact that Megan is using

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>really flowery language, and like some of the stuff you're

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>saying about I think it's like a Children of the

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Moon or something. She was using what we considered to

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>be like hippie California language. Laney said, you know, I

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>would love to talk about this, like, but you can't

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>because of all of the racist, sexist, xenophobic stuff that's

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dominating the conversation. Like there there's no room for you know,

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>making fun of her gently you for this little thing. Yeah,

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's by design. It disinformation. It's like

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a classic thing. It sucks. It sucks all the oxygen

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the room when it comes to conversations. And

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, like it shuts down discourse, and so

0:55:13.320 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone's all concerned about free speech this and that, Like

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it creates a climate where people can't talk about what

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>they want to talk about because there's no room for it.

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:23.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no room for it, and you will be dealing

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>with people who believe their own version of the truth,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, yeah, you compared to Q and on

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the show. And really that's sort of what

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a large portion of the Royal Internet has become. Like

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there are some people you never be able to convince

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>them that you know, Megan was pregnant there despite all

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>all of the evidence of the country. There are some

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 1>people who believe that wholeheartedly. And if you say anything

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet like oh, like look at this picture

0:55:54.280 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know it doesn't. This picture Megan's bump that

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>she showed in the documentary look cute. They will all

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>jump in and but actually you and say no, no no, no,

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>she she she thinked it's a moon bump, like the

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>idea of like what is the true royal story? No

0:56:09.320 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 1>one can agree on it anymore. And Ellie, you were

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:14.439
<v Speaker 1>telling me how a lot of content creators who made

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 1>content about the Amber Heard Johnny Depp defamation trial have

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>now jumped to making content about Megan Markle, people who

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, started making a name for themselves during the

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Amber Heard trial by making these videos attacking Amber Heard. Well,

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, trials over officially. Now I think like she

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just abandoned her appeal. If i'm yeah, I think I

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's I know, yeah, yeah, cool. Who are you gonna?

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Who are you gonna? You need to find another woman

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can attack? And you know that sounds a

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>little facetious, but you look at um Megan the Stallion,

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how she was covered, and you kind of wonder at

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>least that was a lawsuit. It makes sort of sense

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that people who covered Amber Heard would pivot to Megan

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the Stallion and then somehow they found out that if

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you make a video belt Megan Marco, you are going

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to get views. Don't don't know how they tripped and

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 1>fell into that, but you now see people who made

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>videos like even in some cases like lawyers YouTube lawyers

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>who made videos analyzing the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>court case are making videos analyzing Harry Megan's documentary, Like

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what what what? What? What qualifies you for that? But

0:57:27.440 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>also like you're kind of pull on a bait and

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>switch here, my dude, right, And I think it just

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>really shows like it's misogyny the whole way down, like

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>misogyny cells. There will always our internet landscape. In our

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 1>internet landscape, there will always be a soft place for

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>misogyny to land and be amplified. And the one the

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like do you think that this is gonna be kind

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of going forward the new way to sort of sway

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>public opinion and like manipulate public opinion going forward? Where

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole cottage industry, tree of quote, body language experts

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and legal experts like is the thing? So like I'm

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 1>really glad you brought up the body language experts because

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to me, you're asking like, what's what's the direction that

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you can see this sort of hate going in. I

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the rise of body language experts, um that's

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's probably over the past year. I've

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>seen a few of them, like get bigger and bigger.

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see a lot of that

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because you can make it up like I don't think

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your body language expert. I think you're looking at a

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>video of somebody and you you think Megan is a narcissist.

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to find something in her eyebrow or

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in the curve of her lip that is proof that

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>she's a narcissist. And guess what, people who don't like

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>her are gonna believe you. I think we're going to

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be seeing a lot more of that with just the

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>public figures in general, with and you know, so far,

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like people are really really happy to do

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it to famous women and women of color. So I

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:03.919
<v Speaker 1>think things like that where the facts don't matter, where

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you can set yourself up as an expert. You can

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>set yourself up as someone who knows all of this

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>background knowledge, and there will be a place on the

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet where people believe you. And if there are enough

0:59:13.680 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>people in that little place where people believe you, it's

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna get out into the it's gonna get into the

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 1>broader sphere. There will be a time when they will

0:59:22.640 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>want to push their narrative in a very public way.

0:59:26.560 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the tiniest, tiniest step in the right direction.

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that last year YouTube made a change that

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they d ranked anti Megan Markel results from their search

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:39.959
<v Speaker 1>for me. That's, like, I guess, the smallest step because

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if I was running a platform like YouTube, if you

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>type in Megan Merkel or really any subject, people, the

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 1>first thing that the results that are prioritized should not

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 1>be from single youth hate accounts. They should not be

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from accounts that that are making money from lying about

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this thing for any topic. And so for me, I

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>happy to see it, will champion it. But it is

0:59:59.760 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>like the smallest step that they could actually take in

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in responsibly managing the platform. And you know that, I'm

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sure you this is an old old song to sing

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for you, But they didn't make that change until I

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>reach out for comment. And that's true of so many

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>tech companies, is that the onus is on reporters to

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>find something that's bad, to find a feature that's not great,

1:00:23.760 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to find, you know, a community of hate accounts to

1:00:26.440 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>find uh, you know, like members of the KKK and

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>other hate groups, and the tech companies are reactive. So

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I hate reach out being like, why do I see

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a video claiming Megan Markel is a narcissist? When when

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I do a search, and then like a few days later,

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it was, oh, look, all of the videos when you

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>search Megan Markel are by verified accounts, and they're all

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>by major news sites. And you know that's not the

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>way for tech companies to operate either. You know, if

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep your platforms free of hate, you

1:00:55.440 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>need to look for the hate. It will definitely be there. Yeah,

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>any time, like we've been in this game for a while,

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, any time a tech company does something that's

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>even the slightest step in the right direction, they didn't

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just like grow a heart overnight like in The Grinch.

1:01:13.120 --> 1:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>They it was because someone like you, or like an

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>organizer or someone pushed them to do that. They are

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so reactive it never occurs to them that you don't

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>have to wait until you get negative pr or until

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a crisis, or until you know someone is asking

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you something to make a responsible ethical decision about how

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>your platform is run. Yeah, I mean the same thing

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the I I have attacked YouTube's current policy for harassment

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and hate speech, but they only instituted that because a

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>right wing YouTuber was attacking um, a l g B

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>t q uh YouTuber and I think, like the example

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that he always uses that he called him a list

1:01:53.800 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be queer. And this guy made a video compilation of

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like all of the things that this right wing and

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>has said about him, and was like, YouTube, what's going

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on attacking He's obviously attacking me because I am a

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>gay man. And YouTube was like that, that's fine, and

1:02:09.000 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>then like media backlash three days later, Oh hey we

1:02:11.560 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have a new policy. Yeah. I believe in a world

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>where it doesn't take somebody, it doesn't take the harm

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to make a change in the right direction. You know,

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the word I want to believe in. Yeah. And well,

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just another another thing with YouTube is even like one

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that happens before your account goes away

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is it gets demonetized. So yes, YouTube can can stop

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you from making money off your hate, but until you

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>cross a certain line, like, you can still spew your

1:02:41.160 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hate all over you can still spread these conspiracy theories,

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You can talk about people so that your your viewers,

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>your listeners will then go attack them on social media.

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And if I learned, like the biggest thing I've learned

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from my work in the past year looking at you know,

1:02:57.200 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hate groups online against Megan and Harry, it's that YouTube

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is just a festering pool for so many different things

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like it, and it's even a community like people people

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to each other in the comments, and people like

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>YouTuber encourages the company almost seems to encourage this, and

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>people can make money for hate and it's yeah, I

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it was seeing some of these accounts that have

1:03:25.800 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>monetized their antemtical content. I know one British person who

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>runs a channel like let's say what a quitter job,

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like literally quit her job in order to make these

1:03:36.800 --> 1:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>videos every few days because of the amount of money

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>she was getting from YouTube. Something is broken. Like when

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that is when that is a possibility, something is very

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>very wrong. Elie. I have to ask like, like what

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is at steak here? Like like what is at steak?

1:03:53.080 --> 1:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And do you think there's any hope for the truth,

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, being something that's prioritized going forward? I think

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that he you can't agree on what is the truth.

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And you can't have a conversation about what is the truth,

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can't have a conversation in good faith, then

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>just the the the Internet dialogue, everything is going to

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>stay broken. And the thing that these tech companies do

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is they let us stay in our own little groups

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and falls through this kind of hatred and these kind

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theories, and people begin to believe that, Like

1:04:32.080 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>when I tell you that there are people on Twitter

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>who hate Megan, who genuinely believe that she was a

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>prostitute before she met Harry. Some people even believe that

1:04:41.240 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>she was Prince Andrew's prostitute before she met Prince Harry.

1:04:44.360 --> 1:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And people who believe that she faked her pregnancies. Some

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>people who believe that she, you know, like her children

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>when she's done press appearances with her children, those children

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are not hers. There's no latter conspiracy theory showing how

1:04:55.960 --> 1:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like I say showing, I'm doing air quotation marks when

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I say show, but that you know, the child of

1:05:03.480 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like a TV anchor is actually Archie and they only

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>bring him out for certain occasions, or when Megan was

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>carrying Archie in a like a front a front BabyCare carrier, like, no,

1:05:13.520 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that was a doll. There are people who believe this.

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They are not kidding. And how can you have a

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation about things like, Okay, Harry, Harry's biography just came out.

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, what's about to come out. Harry's biography will

1:05:27.080 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>be coming out. We know what some of the headlines are. Wow,

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he's really saying a lot of stuff here. Let's have

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about that. You can't because the people who

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be entering into that conversation are coming

1:05:40.120 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>from their own world. And you know, everyone saw this

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>play out when it was you know, Trump and Q

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and on and everything like that. And when people have

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>their own belief systems, and when the internet and tech

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>companies encourage them not to branch out and actually like

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>help them stay in their own little bubble, it makes

1:06:03.440 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the online experience worse. It makes discourse worse. And you know,

1:06:07.840 --> 1:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is me because I'm a reporter,

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but it makes the news worse because people don't agree

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on the truth. And that should be the basic starting

1:06:18.240 --> 1:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>point here. Everyone agrees on the truth. If we can't

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>even establish that, like Megan gave birth to a child,

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to have any conversation about the

1:06:27.680 --> 1:06:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Royal family. It was Megan entering the Royal family when

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all of this started. And you know, was there some

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>hate of Kate, yes, But it didn't start getting this

1:06:37.000 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>nasty until Megan dating Harry became public knowledge. And when

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you have that fact, and that is a fact, you

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have to ask yourself what is it about Megan? What

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was it about Megan before the world even knew her,

1:06:49.840 --> 1:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>before she had even you know, before I think it

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was this was like even before the engagement interview that

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>she and Harry did. What is it about Megan? What

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>makes her different? That is school we to start this

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>festering and ever growing, you know, bubble of hatred. Well

1:07:08.240 --> 1:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>draw your own conclusions. That is a great place to

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>leave it. Ellie, Where can folks follow? I know you're

1:07:15.320 --> 1:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have lots of takes and opinions when the memoir

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>drops this week. Where can folks follow you? I am

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at least for now at Ellie, Ellie v Hall,

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Vias and Victor and I report for BuzzFeed News, So

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can go to BuzzFeed News and search my name

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and see all of my stuff. And I have a

1:07:39.440 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Royal family newsletter called The Royalty Um. And if you're

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>super into all of this stuff and just want to

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>keep following, keeping up with it with the windsor family,

1:07:49.840 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>then you can subscribe to me there. Fantastic. I guess

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so bad at ending the podcast and what else

1:07:55.920 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have I hope to say? I mean, you're solid there.

1:08:00.760 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Good night and good luck, good night and good luck.

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be leave it there. Internet Hate Machine is a

1:08:07.840 --> 1:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>production of cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from cool

1:08:10.760 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media, check out our website cool zone media dot com,

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>or find us on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts.