WEBVTT - End

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>This is not a hoax, This is not a joke.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>It is becoming clear that we hold in our hands

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the fate of the entire human race. Those of us

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>alive today are part of a very small group, including

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>us and perhaps a few generations to follow, who are

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the future of humanity. And if it turns

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>out that we are alone in the universe, then even

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the fate of intelligent life may hang in the balance.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>No other humans have ever been in the unenviable position

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that we are. No humans who lived before were actually

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of wiping the human race from existence. No other

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>humans were capable of screwing things up so badly and permanently.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And those future humans to come won't be in this

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>position either. If we fail and the worst happens, there

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>won't be any future humans. And if we succeed and

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>deliver the human race to a safe future, those future

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>humans will have arrived at a place where they can

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>easily deal with any risks that may come. We will

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>have made existential risks extinct. Taking all of this together,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>everything seems to point to the coming century or two

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>as the most dangerous period in human history. It's an

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>extremely odd thing to say but together, you, me, and

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone we know appear to be the most vitally important

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>humans who have ever lived, and as much as is

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>riding on us, we have a lot going against us.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We are our own worst enemies when it comes to

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>existential risks. We come preloaded with a lot of biases

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that keep us from thinking rationally. We prefer not to

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>think about unpleasant things like the sudden extinction of our species.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Our brains aren't wired think ahead to the degree that

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>existential risks require us too, And really, very little of

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>our hundred thousand years or so of accumulated human experience

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>has prepared us to take on the challenge that we

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are coming to face, and a lot of the experience

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that we do have can actually steer us wrong. It's

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>almost like we were dropped into a point in history

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't yet become equipped to deal with. Yet, despite

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how utterly unbelievable the position that we find ourselves in is,

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the evidence points to this as our reality. The cosmic

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>silence that creates the family paradox tells us that we

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are either alone and always have been where that we

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>are alone because no other civilization has managed to survive

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if the latter is true. If the Gray Filter has

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>killed off every other civilization in the universe before they

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.399
<v Speaker 1>could spread out from their home planets, then we will

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>face the same impossible step that everyone else has before

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as we attempt to move off of Earth. And if

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the Great Filter is real, then it appears to be

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>coming our way in the form of the powerful technology

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that we are beginning to create right now. But even

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>granting that the Great Filter hypothesis may be faulty, that

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we aren't alone, that there really is intelligent life elsewhere,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we still find ourselves in the same position. We are

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in grave danger of wiping ourselves out. There doesn't appear

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to be anyone coming to guide us through the treacherous

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>times ahead. Whether we're alone in the universe or not,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we appear to be on our own in facing our

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>existential risks, all of our shortcomings and flaws. Notwithstanding, there

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is hope. We humans are smart, widely ingenious creatures, and

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as we like to think of ourselves as

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>something higher than animals, those hundreds of millions of years

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of animal evolution is still very much in our nature.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And when we're backed into a corner that animal ancestry

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>comes rising to the surface. We fight, We rail against

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>our demise. We survive. If we can manage to join

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that creature habit to the intelligence we've evolved that really

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>does make us different from other animals, then we have

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a chance of making it through the existential risks that

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lie waiting ahead. If we can do that, we will

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>deliver the entire human race to a safe place where

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it can thrive and flourish for billions of years. It's

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in our ability to do this. We can do this.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Some of us are already trying, and we've already shown

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>that we can face down existential risks. We've done it before.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We encountered the first potential human made existential risk we've

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ever faced, in New Mexico, of all places. On July six,

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>at just before am, the desert outside of Alama Gordo

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was the site of the first detonation of a nuclear

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bomb in human history. They called it the Trinity Test.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>At the moment the bomb detonated, the pre dawned sky

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>lit up brighter than the sun, and the landscape was

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>eerie and beautiful in gold and gray and violet, purple

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and blue. The explosion was so bright that one of

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the bomb's designers went blind for nearly half a minute

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>from looking directly at it. By the blast sight, the

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>sandy ground instantly turned into a green glass of a

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>type that had never existed on Earth before that moment.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They called it trinotite to mark the occasion, and then

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they buried it so no one would find it on

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this day. At this moment, the world was brought into

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the atomic age, an age of paranoia among everyday people

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that the world could end at any moment. In less

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>than a month, America would explode an atomic bomb over

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Hiroshima in Japan, and sixty five thousand people would die

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in an instant. Another fifty five thousand people would die

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>from the bomb's effects over the next year, and three

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>days after Hiroshima, America would drop a second bomb over

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Nagasaki and another fifty thousand people would die. But even

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>before all of the death and destruction that America reaked

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on Japan in August of even before the trinity tests

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that day in July, nuclear weapons became our first potential

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>human made existential threat when the scientists building the bomb

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>wondered if it might accidentally ignite the atmosphere. Edward Teller

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of the leading physicists working on the Manhattan Project,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the secret program to build America's first nuclear weapons. By chance,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Teller was also one of the physicists that Enrico Fermi

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was having lunch with when Faremi asked where is everybody,

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Faremi paradox was born. Teller was also pivotal

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in the nuclear arms race that characterized the Cold War

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by pushing for America to create a massive nuclear arsenal

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in three years before the Trinity Test, Edward Teller raised

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the concern that perhaps the sudden release of energy that

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the bomb would dump into the air might also set

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>off a chain reaction among the nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>spreading the explosion from its source in New Mexico across

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of Earth. A catastrophe like that would burn

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere completely off of our plan, and that would

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of course lead to these sudden and immediate extinction of

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>virtually all life, humans included. Almost immediately, a disagreement over

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>whether such a thing was even physically possible grew among

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the physicists on the project. Some like Enrico Fermi, were

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>positive that it was not possible, but others, like Teller

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future head of the project, J. Robert Oppenheimer,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>weren't so sure. Eventually, Oppenheimer mentioned the idea to Arthur H. Compton,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>who was the physicist that was the head of the

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>project at the time. Compton found the idea grave enough

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to assign Teller and a few others to figure out

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>just how serious the threat of accidentally burning off the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere really was. The group that worked on the calculations

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote a paper on the possibility that the bomb could

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>set off a nuclear chain reaction in Earth's atmosphere, igniting it.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Even using assumptions of energy that far exceeded what they

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>expected their tests to produce, the group found that it

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was highly unlikely that the bomb would ignite the atmosphere.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Two years later, when the bomb was ready, they detonated

0:08:54.960 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it the morning of the Trinity test. Enrico Fermi took

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bets on whether the atmosphere would ignite after all. It

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is to his credit that Arthur Compton took the possibility

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>of the nuclear test igniting the atmosphere seriously. The scientists

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and military people working on the secret atomic bomb project

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>had every incentive to keep pushing forward at any cost.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>At the time, it was widely believed that Hitler and

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Third Reich were closing in on creating an atomic

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>bomb of their own, and when they completed it, they

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>would surely savagely unlea should across Europe, Africa, the Pacific,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and eventually the United States. In two when the idea

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the bomb might ignite the atmosphere was first raised,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it was far from clear who would be left standing

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>when the Second World War was over. And yet Compton

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>decided that the potential existential threat the nuclear test may

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pose would be the worst of any possible outcomes. He

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't call it an existential threat, but he knew one

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>when he saw one, even the first one. Better to

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>accept the slavery of the Nazis than to run the

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>chance of drawing the final curtain on mankind, Compton said

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in an interview with the writer Pearl Buck years after

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the test in nineteen fifty nine. And so it would

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>appear that the first human made existential risk we ever

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>faced was handled just about perfectly. But there's still a

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>lot left to unpack here. Buck reported that Compton had

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>drawn a line in the sand, as it were, He

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>established a threshold of acceptable risk. He told the physicists

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>working under him that if there was a greater than

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a three in a million chance the bomb would ignite

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's atmosphere, they wouldn't go through with testing it.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>It's not entirely clear what Compton based that threshold on.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not even clear if the threshold was a three

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and a million chance or a one in a million,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and some of the Manhattan Project physicists later protested that

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't any chance that either Compton had misspoken or

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Buck had misunderstood. Regardless, the group that wrote the safety

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>paper found that there was a non zero possibility that

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the test could ignite the atmosphere, meaning there was a chance,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>however slight, that it could. It was possible for such

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a chain reaction to occur. After all, the atmosphere is

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>made of energetic vibrations that we call particles, and those

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>particles do transfer energy among themselves, but the energies involved

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nuclear bomb should be far too small. The

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>paper writers concluded it would take perhaps a million times

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more energy than their plutonium core was expected to release.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>For some of the scientists, the chance was so small

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that it became transmuted in their minds to an impossibility.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>They rounded that figure down for convenience's sake. The chance

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was so small that to them there might as well

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have been no chance at all. But as we've learned

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in previous episodes, deciding what level of risk is an

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>acceptable level of risk is subjective. There are lots of

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>things that have much less of a chance of happening

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>than three in a million odds of accidentally igniting the atmosphere.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>If you live in America, you have a little less

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>than a one in a million chance of being struck

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>by lightning. This year. You have a roughly one and

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and ninety million chance of winning the Powerball.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Each person living around the world has something like a

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one and twenty seven million chance of dying from a

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>charchitect during their lifetime. Depending on your perspective, a three

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and a million chance of bringing about these sudden demise

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of life on Earth from a nuclear test isn't necessarily

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a small chance at all, especially considering the stakes. And

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>yet it was up to Compton to decide for the

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>rest of us that the test was worth the risk.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Holly kh Upton, aged sixty, living in Chicago, Illinois,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a Nobel Prize winning physicist, father of two and tennis enthusiasts,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was put in a position to decide for the rest

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the two point three billion humans alive at the

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>time that three chances in a million their project might

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>blow up the atmosphere was an acceptable level of risk.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The idea that a single person can make a decision

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that affects the entire world is a hallmark of existential risks.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Not only the existential risk poses a threat, but the

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>very fact that a single human being is making the decision,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>with all of their biases and flaws and stresses, puts

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>us all at risk as well. There were a number

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of different pressure points that the people involved in the

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan Project would have felt pushing them towards the decision

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to carry out the test. There were the Nazis, for one,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and the pressure from the U. S. Miller terry to

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>save the world from the Nazis. Their careers and reputations

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>were at stake. There was also the allure of a

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>scientific challenge. No one had ever done what the people

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>working on the Manhattan Project did up to the moment

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the trinity test. No one was entirely sure that

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear explosion was even possible. Consciously or not, these

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>things influenced the decisions of the people working on the project.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>This is not to say that there was any cavalier

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>disregard for the safety of humanity. They took the time

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to study the issue rather than just brushing it off

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as impossible after all. But the point is that just

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a handful of people working in secret were responsible for

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>making that momentous decision, and those people were only human.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also worth pointing out that a lot of the

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>science that the safety paper writers used was very new

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time. The nuclear theory they were working off

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of is less than forty years old, the data they

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>had on fission reactions was less than twenty years old,

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and the first sustained nuclear fission reaction wasn't carried out

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>until when Fairmi held the first test on that squash

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>court at the University of Chicago. And don't forget there

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>had never been a nuclear explosion on Earth before. All

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of that newness, by the way, showed up during the

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Trinity test, when the bomb produced an explosive force about

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>four times larger than what the project scientists had expected.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>All of this is to say that the data and

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what they were attempting with the trinity test

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was still young enough that they could have gotten it wrong,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and we find ourselves in that same situation today. We

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>see it in the types of experiments that are carried

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out in particle colliders and bio safety labs around the world.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We see it in the endless release of self improving

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>neural nets. Our understanding of the unprecedented risks these things

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>pose is lacking to a dangerous degree. Depending on how

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the chances of a risk changes, the threat it poses

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>can get larger or smaller, but really the reality of

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the threat stays the same. It's our awareness of it

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that changes. Awareness is the way we will survive becoming

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>existential threats m M. There are two ways of looking

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at our prospects for making it to a state of

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>technological maturity for humanity where we have safely mastered our

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>technology and can survive beyond the next century or two.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Gloom and doom and optimism. The gloom and doom camp

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>makes a pretty good case for why humans won't make

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it through this pastly the greatest challenge our species will

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ever face. There's the issue of global coordination, the kind

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of like mindedness that will have to create among every

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>country in the world to successfully navigate the coming risks.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Like we talked about in the last episode, we will

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly run into problems with global coordination. Some nations

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>may decide that they'd be better off going it alone

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and continuing to pursue research and development that the rest

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of the world has deemed too risky. This raises all

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>sorts of prickly questions that we may not have the

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wherewithal to address. Does the rest of the world agree

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that we should invade non complying countries and take over

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>their government? In a strictly rational sense, that's the most

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>logical thing to do. Rationally speaking, Toppling a single government,

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>even a democratically elected one, is a small price to

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>pay to prevent an existential risk that can drive humanity

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as a whole to permanent extinction. But we humans aren't

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>strictly rational, and something is dire as Invading a country

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and toppling its government comes with major costs, like the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>deaths of the people who live in that country and

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>widespread disruptions to their social structures. If the chips are down,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>would we go to such an extreme to prevent our extinction.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also the issue of money. Money itself is not

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the problem. It is what fund scientific endeavors. It's

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what scientists are paid with. Money is what we will

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>pay the future researchers who will steer us away from

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>existential risks. The Future of Humanity Institute is funded by money.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>The problem money poses where existential risks are concerned is

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that humanity has shown that we are willing to sell

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>out our own best interests and the interests of others

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for money and market share, or more commonly, that we're

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to stand by and let others do it, and

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with existential risks, greed would be a fatal flaw. Everything

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>from the tobacco industry to the fossil fuel industry, the

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>anti freeze industry, to the infant formula industry, all of

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>them have a history of avarice, of frequently and consistently

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>putting money before well being and on a massive and

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>global scale. How can we expect change when money is

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just as tied to the experiments and technology that carry

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>an existential risk. Also stacked against us is the bare

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that thinking about existential risks is really really hard.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Analyzing existential threats demands that we trace all of the

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>possible outcomes that thread from any action we might take,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and look for unconsidered dangerous lurking there. They require us

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about technology that hasn't even been invented yet,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to look a few more moves ahead on the cosmic

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>chessboard than we're typically capable of seeing. To put it mildly,

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not really equipped to easily think about existential risks

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>at this point. We also have a history of overreliance

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on techno optimism, that idea that technology can save us

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>from any crisis that comes our way. Perhaps even thinking

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that reaching the point of technological maturity will protect us

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>from existential risks is nothing more than an example of

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>techno optimism, And as we add more existential risks to

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>our world, the chances increase that one of them may

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>bring about our extinction. It's easy to forget since it's

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a new way of living for us, But the technology

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we're developing is powerful enough and the world is connected

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>enough that all it will take is one single existential

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe to permanently end humanity. If you take the accumulated

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>risk from all of the biological experiments in the unknown

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>number of containment labs around the globe, and you add

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>it to the accumulated risks from all of the runs

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and particle colliders online today and to come, and you

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>add the risks from the vast number of neural nets

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>capable of recursive self improvement that we create and deploy

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>every day. When you take into account emerging technologies I

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite made it to reality yet, like nanobots and

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>geoengineering projects, and the many more technologies that will pose

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a risk that we haven't even thought of yet. When

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you add all of those things together, it becomes clear

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what a precarious spot humanity is truly in. So you

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>can understand how a person might look at just how

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>intractable the problem seems and decide that our doom is complete.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It just hasn't happened yet. I think we can be

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit more optimistic than that. This is Toby Ord again,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest members of the Future of Humanity Institute. Yeah,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is actually a clear and obvious

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>enough idea that people will wake up to it and

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>embrace it. Uh much more slowly than we should. But

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that uh we will realize that this is

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a central moral issue of our time and rise to

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. But to begin to rise to the challenge,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to talk about existential risks seriously. The way

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that anything changes, the way an idea or an issue

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to be debated and its merits examined, is that

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>people start talking about it. If this series has had

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>any impact on you, and if you have, like I have,

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>come to believe that humanity is facing threats to our

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>existence that are unprecedented, with consequences that, on the whole

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>we are dangerously ignorant of, then it is imperative that

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>we start talking about those things. You can start reading

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the articles and papers that are already being written about them,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>start following people on social media who are already talking

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>about existential risks, like David Pierce and Elie as A

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yukowski and Sebastian Farquhar. Started asking questions about existential risks

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>from the people we elect to represent us. I think

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>we often feel that the powers that be must already

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>have these things in hand. But when I've talked with

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>government about existential risk, even a major national government like

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom, they tend to think that these issues

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>saving civilization and humanity itself are above their pay grade. Uh,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and not really something they can deal with in a

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>five year election cycle. Um. But then it turns out

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no one else above them dealing with them either.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's more of a threat from

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>complacency in thinking that someone must have this managed. In

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a rational world, someone would. It's up to the rest

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of us, then, to start a movement. The idea of

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a movement to get humanity to pay attention to existential

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>risks sounds amorphous and far off, but we've founded movements

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on far off ideas before. If enough people start talking,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>others will listen. Just a handful of books got the

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>environmental movement started, like the ones written by the Club

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of Rome and Paul Airlick, but especially Rachel Carson's nineteen

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty two book Silent Spring, which warned of the widespread

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ecological destruction from the pesticide d d T. Carson's book

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is credited with showing the public how fragile the ecosystems

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the natural world can be and how much of

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>an effect we humans have on them. Awareness of things

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>like fertilizer runoff, deforestation, indicator species concepts that you can

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>find being taught in middle schools today. We're unheard of.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>At the beginning of the nineteen sixties, most people just

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't think about things like that. But when the environmental

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>movement began to gain steam, awareness of environmental issues started

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to spread. Within a decade of silent springs release, nations

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world started opening government agencies that were responsible

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for defending the environment. The world went from ignorance about

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>environmental issues to establishing policy agencies in less than ten years.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that we could do some of that,

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and it really shows that it is possible to take

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>something which is not really part of common sense morality,

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and then within a generation, uh children are being raised

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>everywhere with this as part of just a background of

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about ethics that that they live with. So I

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really think that we could achieve them. There is much

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>work to be done with environmental policy that is definitely

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>grant but we are working on it. Nations around the

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>world on their own and together are spending money to

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>pay scientists and researchers to study environmental issues, come up

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with an up to the moment understanding of them, and

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>established best practices how to protect Earth from ourselves. The

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trouble comes when we decide not to listen to the

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists that we've asked to study these problems. Existential risks

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>call for this same kind of initiative. We have to

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>establish a foundation, provide a beginning that others to follow

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>can build upon. Just like Eric Drexler posed the rather

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>unpopular gray goose scenario regarding nanobot design, just like Eliezer

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yukowski and Nick Bostrom identified the AI should have friendliness

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 1>designed into it. Just like others have raised the alarm

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about risks from biotech and physics, if we examine the

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>problems we face, we can understand the risks that they pose.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And if we understand the risks that they pose, then

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we can make an informed decision about whether they're worth pursuing.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The scientists working on the Manhattan Project did the same

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>thing when they took the possibility seriously that they might

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>accidentally ignite the atmosphere, so they investigated the problem to

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>see if they would. We don't at this point have

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a clue as to what the possible outcomes for our

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>future technology. Maybe, and trying to guess at something like

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that today would be like guessing back in the nineteen

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fifties about what affects clear cutting old growth forests and

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon Basin would have on global cloud formation. It's

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just too our kane a question for a time when

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't have enough of the information we need to

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>respond in any kind of informed way. We don't even

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>know all of the questions to ask at this point,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's up to us alive now to start figuring

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>out what those questions are. Working on space flight is

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>another good example of where we can start. Among people

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>who study existential risks, it is largely agreed on that

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we should begin working on a project to get humanity

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>off of Earth and into space as soon as possible.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Working on space colonization does a couple of things that

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit humanity. First, it gets a few of our eggs

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the single basket of Earth, so should an

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>existential risk befall our planet, there will still be humans

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>living elsewhere to carry on. And Second, the sooner we

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>get ourselves into space, the larger our cosmic endowment will be.

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we found from studying the universe

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is that it appears to be expanding outward and apart

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>over deep time scales, the kind of time scales we

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>humans will hopefully live for. That could be an issue

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because eventually all of the matter in the universe will

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>spread out of our reach forever. So the sooner we

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get off Earth and out into the universe, the more

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of that material we will have for our use to

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do with whatever we can dream up. We are not

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going to call anized space tomorrow. It may take us

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years of effort, maybe longer, but that's exactly

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the point. A project that is so vital to our

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>future shouldn't be put off because it seems far off.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>The best time to begin working on a space colonization

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>program was twenty years ago. The second best time is today.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We are working on getting to space. True, but there's

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a world of difference between the piecemeal efforts going on

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>across Earth now and the kind of project we could

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>come up with if we decided to put a coordinated

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>global human effort behind spreading out into space. Imagine what

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we could achieve if humanity work together on what would

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>probably be our greatest human project. Imagine the effect that

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it would have on people across the globe. If we

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>work together to get not a nation, not a hemisphere,

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but the human race itself into space. The same holds

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>true with virtually every project for taking on existential risks.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We should begin working on them as soon as possible

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to build a foundation for the future, and we should

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>make tackling them a global effort. I hope by now

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I've made it abundantly clear that subverting scientific progress won't

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>protect us from existential threats. The opposite is true. We

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>need a scientific understanding of the coming existential threats we

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>face to get past them. The trick is making sure

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that science is done with the best interests of the

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>human race in mind. It's not something we commonly think

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of ourselves as, but you and I and everyone else

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world is a stakeholder in science. And this

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is truer than ever before with the rise of existential threats,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>since the whole world can be affected by a single experiment. Now.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>In the article in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, physicist H. C.

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Dudley criticized Arthur Compton and the Manhattan Project for their

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>decision that a three and a million chance was an

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>acceptable risk for detonating the first nuclear bomb. They were

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all rolling dice for high stakes, and the rest of

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>us did not even know we were sitting in the game.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Dudley wrote, the same is true today in making assumptions

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether cosmic rays make an acceptable model for proton

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>collisions in the Large Hadron collider, or that forcing a

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mutation that makes an extremely deadly virus easier to pass

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>among humans is a good way forward in virology. Those

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.479
<v Speaker 1>scientists are making decisions that have consequences that may affect

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all of us, So we should have a say in

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>how science is done. Science is meant to further human

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>understanding and to improve the human condition, not to further

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the prestige of a particular scientist's career. When those two conflict,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>humanity should come first. But to say that the public

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>has and how science is done has to be an

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>informed say, no pitchforks and torches. This is why a

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>movement that takes existential risks seriously requires trustworthy, skilled, trained

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>scientists to make our say an informed one. We rely

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on them for that. Science isn't the enemy. If we

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>abandon science, we are doomed. If we continue to take

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of science casually, we are doomed. The only

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>route through the near future is to do science right,

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and scientists aren't the enemy either. They have often been

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the ones who have sounded the alarm when science was

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>being done recklessly or when a threat emerged that had

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>been overlooked. Those physicists who decided that three and a

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>million was an acceptable chance of burning off Earth's atmosphere

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>were the same ones who figured out that there was

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>something to be concerned with in the first place. It

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was microbiologists who called for a moratorium and gain a

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>function research after the H five and one experiments. It

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>was particle physicists who wrote papers questioning the safety of

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the large hadron collider. If you're a scientist, start looking

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seriously at the consequences of your field, and if work

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>within it poses an existential risk, start writing papers about it.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Start analyzing how it can be made safe. Take custody

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the consequences of your work. The people who are

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to thinking about existential risks are waiting for you

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that. This is Sebastian Farquhar. To a certain extent,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>organizations like the FHI, the Future of Humanity Institute UM

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>their job is just to poke the rest of the

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>community and sort of say by the way this this

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is a thing, and then for AI researchers or biology

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>researchers to take that on and to make it their

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>own projects. Um and the sooner and the more FHI

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>can step out of that game and leave it to

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>those communities, the better. Many of these solutions are already

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>being worked on. Scientists around the world are researching large

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>problems and raising alarms. But since we have a limited

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of time, since we're racing the clock, we have

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we don't waste time working on

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>risks that seem big but don't qualify as genuine existential threats,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and we can't tell one type from the other until

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>we start studying them. The biggest sea change, though, has

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to come from society in general. We have to come

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>together like we never have before. We have to put

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>scientists in a position to understand existential risks, and we

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>have to listen to what they come back and tell us.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It is astoundingly coincidental that at the moment in our

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>history when we become aware just how brief our time

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>here has been and just how long it could last,

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we also realize that our history could come to an

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>early permanent end, very soon. At the beginning of the series,

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I said that if we go extinct in the near future,

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be particularly tragic, and that is true. Human

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>civilization has been around only ten thousand years. And remember

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people who think humanity could have

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a long future ahead of us believe that there could

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be at least a billion years left in the lifetime

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of our species. If we've created almost every bit of

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>our shared human culture over just the last ten thousand

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>years or so, developed everything it means to be a

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 1>human alive today in that short time span, think about

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what we could become and what we could do with

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>another nine and ninety thousand years. It is not our

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>time to go, yet, there is something we have to consider.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>The great filter has to this point been total. It

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is possible that even if we come together, even if

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>humanity takes our existential risks head on, that it won't

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>be enough. That there will be something we miss, some

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>detail we hadn't considered, some new thing that grabs us

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>by our ankle just as we are making it through

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and plux us right out of existence. If we go,

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>then so many unique and valuable things go with us.

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>The whole beautiful pageant of humanity will come to an end.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>There will be no one to sing songs anymore, no

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>one to write books and no one to read them.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>There will be no one to cry, no one to

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>hug them when they do. There will be no one

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell jokes and no one to laugh. There will

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be no friends to share evenings with, and no quiet

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>moments alone at sunrise, good or bad. Everything we've ever

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>done will die with us. There will be no one

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to build new things, and the things that we have

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>built will eventually crumble into dust. Those energetic vibrations that

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>make up us and everything we've ever made will disentangle

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and go their separate ways along their quantum fields, to

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be taken up into new forms down the line, in

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a universe where humans no longer exist. If we go,

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems that intelligence dies with us, there will be

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing left to wonder at the profound vastness of existence

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and appreciate the extraordinary gift that life is. There will

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>be no one with the curiosity to seek out answers

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to the mysteries of the universe, no one to even

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>know that the mysteries exist. There will be no one

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>to reciprocate when the universe looks in on itself, there

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>will be nothing looking back at it. But as genuinely

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sad as the idea of humanity going extinct forever is,

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we can still take some comfort in the future for

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe. We can take heart that if we die,

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>life will almost certainly continue on without us. Remember, life

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 1>is resilient. Over the course of its tenure on Earth,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>life has managed to survive at least five mass extinctions

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that killed off the vast majority of the creatures alive

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on Earth at the time. The life on Earth today

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is descended from just that fraction of a fraction of

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of life

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that managed to hang on through each of the times

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Death visited Earth, and every time after Death left, life

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>poked its head back, came back up to the surface,

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and began to flourish again. If we humans called death

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>back to our planet, life will retreat to its burrows

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and to the bottom of the sea to hide until

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to re emerge. And perhaps when it does

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>emerge again, one of the members of that community of

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>life that survives us will rise to take our place,

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>to fill the void that we've left behind, just like

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we filled the void left after the last mass extinction.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps some other animal we share the Earth with now

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>will evolve to become the only intelligent life in the

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>universe and take their chance and making it through the

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Great Filter. Perhaps someday they will build their own ships

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that will break their bonds to Earth and take them

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>into space in search of new worlds to explore, just

0:39:54.120 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like we humans tried so long before. M M. The

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>End of the World with Josh Clark is a production

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>from How Stuff Works and I Heart Media. It was

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>written and presented by Me Josh Clark. The original score

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was composed, produced and recorded by Point Lobo. The head

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sound designer and audio engineer was Kevin Senzaki. Additional sound

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 1>designed by Paul Funera. The supervising producer was Paul Deckan.

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>A very special thanks to you, Me Clark for her

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>assistance and support throughout the series production and to MOMO

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to thank you to everyone at the Future of Humanity Institute,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to everyone at How Stuff Works for their

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>support and especially Sherry Larson, Jerry Rowland, Connal Burne, Pam Peacock,

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Natoski, Tary Harrison, Ben Bolden, Tamika Campbell, Noel Brown,

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Powers, Chuck Bryant, Christopher Hastosis, Eve's, Jeff Cote, Matt Frederick,

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Tom Boutera, Chris Blake, Lyle Sweet, Ben Juster, John go Forth,

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark fresh Hour, Britney Bernardo and Keith Goldstein. Thank you

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to the interviewees, research assistants and vocal contributors Dana Backman,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Barr, Nick Bostrom, Donald Brownlee, Philip Butler, Coral Clark,

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Farquhar, Toby Halbrook, Robin Hansen, Eric Johnson, Don Lincoln,

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>michel Angelo Mangano, David Madison, Matt McTaggart, Ian O'Neill, Toby Ord, Casey, Pegrham,

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Ander Sandberg, Kyle Scott, Ben Schlayer, Seth Shostack, Tanya Singh,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Ignacio Taboada, Beth Willis, Adam Wilson, cat Sebis, Michael Wilson,

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>cat Sebas, and Brett Wood And thank you for listening.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>W