1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,880 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 2: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,080 Speaker 2: it just means the absolute world to have your support. 8 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 2: But enough with that, let's get to the show. Good morning, everybody, 9 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:39,920 Speaker 2: Happy Tuesday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 10 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 2: What do we have, Crystal. 11 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:43,240 Speaker 1: Indeed, we do lots of news breaking. Just this morning, 12 00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 1: we have drone strikes that have been reported in residential 13 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:49,839 Speaker 1: areas inside of Moscow. This is obviously dramatic new development 14 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 1: in the Ukraine War, so we will tell you about 15 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:54,800 Speaker 1: the fallout from that. We also have more conservatives going 16 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 1: on the record trashing the debt deal, but Trump remaining 17 00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: conspiculously silent, which is kind of interesting of itself. 18 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:02,360 Speaker 3: You all might have followed this. 19 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:06,600 Speaker 1: There's a big situation political situation unfolding down in Texas 20 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:09,559 Speaker 1: where the attorney general has been impeached in the houses. 21 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 3: We'll go to the Senate. 22 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 1: Where his wife is a senator and maybe voting on 23 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: whether or not he is convicted there for a host 24 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 1: of alleged violations and crimes. So we'll break that down 25 00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:22,000 Speaker 1: for you. We also have more updates for you on 26 00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:25,640 Speaker 1: that commercial real estate potential debt bomb looming over America 27 00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 1: cities and the country at large. 28 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:29,759 Speaker 3: DeSantis and Trump go into war. 29 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:32,680 Speaker 1: On a few more things Disney, and also Trump's connections 30 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:36,480 Speaker 1: to Saudi Arabia and MSBC really doing their thing with 31 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: regard to backing up establishment democrats on full display in 32 00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:43,560 Speaker 1: a new interview between Mehdi Hassan and Mary and Williamson. 33 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:45,160 Speaker 3: So we will bring you that as. 34 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:47,320 Speaker 1: Well before we get to any of that, though, thank 35 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:49,160 Speaker 1: you so much to everybody who's been signing up as 36 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 1: premium subscribers helping us get that new set built, and 37 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 1: it is imminently arriving eminently. 38 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:57,760 Speaker 2: We're looking at these gigantic televisions, we are looking at 39 00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:00,200 Speaker 2: all of the equipment that's arriving to the scene. Last 40 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:01,640 Speaker 2: week here at the desk, which we're a little bit 41 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:03,880 Speaker 2: it's sad about it's sad. It's sad to say goodbye 42 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:06,040 Speaker 2: to something that meant so much, but it makes it 43 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 2: easier because we have so many new and beautiful things 44 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 2: to look forward to. Not only that, we've got new 45 00:02:11,040 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 2: merchandise and so many other things that are all being planned. 46 00:02:13,919 --> 00:02:16,360 Speaker 2: Our team has been doing such an incredible job, so 47 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:17,920 Speaker 2: much work behind the scenes. 48 00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 4: All of it is made entirely possible by you. 49 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:21,640 Speaker 2: So once again, if you are able to help us 50 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 2: out Breakingpoints dot Com, becoming a premium member dramatically helps 51 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 2: at a time like this, and also to convene a 52 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:30,840 Speaker 2: lot of big interviews which we already have scheduled, and 53 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:33,080 Speaker 2: continue to work on some of the things that I 54 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 2: know people have missed a lot, like panels and other 55 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:38,640 Speaker 2: things like some pretty high impact stuff you're all going 56 00:02:38,680 --> 00:02:40,880 Speaker 2: to see on the new set the new studio. 57 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 4: So I think it's a reason to be excited. 58 00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:44,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, one thing we're psyched about is getting a Trump 59 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 1: person in and sant this person in so. 60 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:46,839 Speaker 4: They can be fay. 61 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a lot obviously to look forward to with that. 62 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:51,040 Speaker 1: And so the way that it's going to work is 63 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: they're going to start installing the set in the studio 64 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,080 Speaker 1: starting this Thursday, So next week we'll be doing the 65 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 1: show all remotely while they build out the set. Here 66 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:01,560 Speaker 1: and then the weekend after that we will we will debut. 67 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:02,680 Speaker 3: Everything goes smoothly. 68 00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:05,040 Speaker 2: Don't forget that it will be revealed to the premium 69 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:07,520 Speaker 2: subscribers first. So maybe another reason to go ahead and 70 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:10,000 Speaker 2: to sign up, so breakingpoints dot com. Anyway, let's start 71 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 2: with the major news that happened overnight. Let's go and 72 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 2: put this up there on the screen. We had a 73 00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:19,560 Speaker 2: drone strike attack all across the city of Moscow early 74 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:23,079 Speaker 2: this morning or I guess early Tuesday, Moscow time. According 75 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:26,720 Speaker 2: to Russian authorities, the first attacks hit civilian areas in 76 00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 2: Moscow and it is quote a potent sign that the 77 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 2: war is increasingly reaching the heart of Russia. It's not 78 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 2: exactly a mystery as to who is responsible for this, 79 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 2: especially Crystal, because the Ukrainian Intelligence Service released a statement 80 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 2: yesterday saying we will retaliate for the missile attacks that 81 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 2: are currently happening on Kiev. And of course this is 82 00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 2: a terrible development because it's not just Moscow. 83 00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 4: It comes after Moscow. 84 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 2: Which this is the first time is raining missiles and 85 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 2: drones down upon Kiev and actually killed somebody. 86 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 4: Just yesterday. 87 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,839 Speaker 2: This was the resumption of two straight days of miss 88 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 2: and drone attacks on the Ukrainian capital, and you know, 89 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 2: I just think it underscores the real death spiral about 90 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 2: what's happening here. 91 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 5: Now. 92 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 4: Luckily nobody was killed in the Moscow attack. 93 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 2: What I guess, depending on which you take, nobody was 94 00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:17,120 Speaker 2: killed in the Moscow attack. So but I mean, you 95 00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:19,560 Speaker 2: can only imagine, like it's one thing, I think, to 96 00:04:19,839 --> 00:04:23,599 Speaker 2: target the Kremlin building to hit a flag, once you 97 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 2: start hitting civilian buildings, which once again you have to 98 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 2: be fair, It's not like Russians haven't been killing Ukrainian 99 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:32,560 Speaker 2: civilians left and right, all across parking lots, shopping malls 100 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 2: and all that other stuff. So they're getting a little 101 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:36,880 Speaker 2: bit of a taste of their own medicine. But there 102 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 2: is no question that this is almost certainly going to 103 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 2: harden and increased support inside of Russia. I mean, can 104 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 2: you only imagine if war ever came to the doorstep 105 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:49,160 Speaker 2: of the United States of America like that. I mean, 106 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 2: we have not tasted anything like this, and ever so 107 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 2: it's almost difficult to even wrap your head around what 108 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,920 Speaker 2: this is going to feel like for the average Russian civilian. 109 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:00,720 Speaker 2: The populace, the way that the media putin and all 110 00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:03,159 Speaker 2: of them are going to run with this and unfortunately 111 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:05,840 Speaker 2: only likely lead to even more of an escalation spiral 112 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 2: where you can continue to count on even more drone 113 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,159 Speaker 2: and missile attacks on the city of Kief. We tried 114 00:05:11,200 --> 00:05:13,400 Speaker 2: to vet some video and stuff coming out of it, 115 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:16,160 Speaker 2: but we don't want to be responsible for showing anything 116 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:18,480 Speaker 2: that's not right. You know, some things that we're floating 117 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,120 Speaker 2: around out there. But this is the best of what 118 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:21,800 Speaker 2: we have right now. We know that some of the 119 00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:25,160 Speaker 2: drones were shot down by Russian authorities, but not all 120 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 2: of them, and they ultimately did target residential buildings. 121 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:28,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. 122 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 1: I talked to our friend Yegor, who lives in Moscow 123 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 1: about what his experience is there on the ground. As 124 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,880 Speaker 1: best as he knows, there were no deaths and no 125 00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:40,400 Speaker 1: one even sent to the hospital. The impact here appears 126 00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 1: to be purely psychological, and I think it could be 127 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,640 Speaker 1: a really significant impact. I mean, imagine you living in 128 00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 1: a city that was being bombed by drone strikes from 129 00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 1: an adversary. And this is remember at the start of 130 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:53,479 Speaker 1: this war, Putin went out of his way to try 131 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,440 Speaker 1: to shield the population from any impact. Obviously, we're in 132 00:05:56,480 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: a very very different place now. According to yegg Or 133 00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: at a peer, again, this is all unvetted based on 134 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,200 Speaker 1: the account and the reporting that he's able to take 135 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 1: in there. On the ground, it appears that wealthier areas 136 00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:11,880 Speaker 1: of the city were targeted. Those drones appear to be 137 00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 1: the ones that were largely shot down successfully, But there 138 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: was a drone strike that did hit a residential apartment 139 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:22,400 Speaker 1: block of you know more sort of like middle class 140 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:27,240 Speaker 1: or working class people. And again fortunately there were no deaths. 141 00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:30,719 Speaker 1: I think, just to be really clear, whether your cause 142 00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:34,039 Speaker 1: is just or whether your cause is unjust, Targeting residential 143 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:36,720 Speaker 1: civilian areas is wrong, period, end of story. 144 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:39,160 Speaker 3: And you know, so you could look at it and say, okay, 145 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 3: but you know Russia did it to them. 146 00:06:40,440 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, no one is justifying that either, Like the toll 147 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 1: on civilians in this war is horrific. So what does 148 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 1: this mean? I mean, I think you're probably right. The 149 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: most likely outcome in terms of the Russian populace is 150 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:56,280 Speaker 1: that it hardens their position. It makes them more supportive 151 00:06:56,400 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 1: of Putin's war effort. It sort of strengthens his hand 152 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:00,919 Speaker 1: in terms of the popular if he needs to do 153 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 1: another draft or if there's additional sort of economic suffering 154 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: that the population has to endure. 155 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 3: It probably strengthens in sand. 156 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,000 Speaker 1: There is a chance that it goes in the other direction, 157 00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 1: and people say, you know, this is insane. I didn't 158 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:14,480 Speaker 1: sign up for this, and now my apartment building is 159 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 1: being potentially under attack from Ukraine. It could theoretically go 160 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:21,280 Speaker 1: in either direction. But I think you're probably right Zager 161 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 1: about the way people are going to respond to this. 162 00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:28,120 Speaker 2: People have thought that ever since World War Two, and 163 00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 2: guess what happened. It's like Hitler was like, I will 164 00:07:30,120 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 2: break the back of the British. 165 00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:33,320 Speaker 4: By bombing London. What ended up happening. 166 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:35,560 Speaker 2: They were like, oh, screw you, every single one of 167 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 2: us will go and hide in a tunnel and then 168 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 2: we will fight this war until the bitter end. By 169 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 2: the way, the same thing happened whenever the Allies also 170 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 2: bombed Germany. Didn't actually do all that much to weaken 171 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 2: the Nazi regime, at least in terms of their political support. 172 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:52,120 Speaker 4: And if you go and you take. 173 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 2: It further, what we dropped more bombs in a single 174 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:57,240 Speaker 2: mission on North Vietnam than we did in all of 175 00:07:57,320 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 2: World War Two? 176 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 4: Did it break the back of the communists? Resolve? 177 00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 2: No, actually to harden the civilian populace. So and this 178 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 2: is a message to both sides really because it's you 179 00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:08,760 Speaker 2: know that the Russians, they're the ones who take an 180 00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:12,640 Speaker 2: indiscriminate bombing and have mastered the practice basically in this war. 181 00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:13,840 Speaker 2: And it's like, well, what do you think is going 182 00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 2: to happen? Yet, of course the Ukrainians aren't going to buckle. 183 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:19,320 Speaker 2: If anything, they're probably a more strengthened polity than they 184 00:08:19,360 --> 00:08:20,120 Speaker 2: were before the war. 185 00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 4: So congratulations to. 186 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: That urged the Ukrainian national identity, you know, like made 187 00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:26,200 Speaker 1: it stronger than ever. 188 00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:27,320 Speaker 3: So congratulations. 189 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:28,960 Speaker 2: Then you know, you got to do the other counter, 190 00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:32,000 Speaker 2: which is, hey, just so you know, every time somebody 191 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 2: thinks they could take on Russia and they bomb them, 192 00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 2: they're like, oh, they're. 193 00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 4: Just about to fold and all that. What do they do? 194 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 2: They they bunckle down, They crack down on their entire 195 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 2: civilian populace, They criminalize any dissent, and then they throw 196 00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:48,680 Speaker 2: everything they possibly can at you. And this is a 197 00:08:48,880 --> 00:08:52,480 Speaker 2: great power nation with millions of people, with a major 198 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 2: industrial base, a real economy, and the consequences of that 199 00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 2: can be much much more dire than what we have 200 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:04,560 Speaker 2: already seen in Ukraine, which is already a human catastrophe 201 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:07,520 Speaker 2: with tens of thousands of people who are now dead. 202 00:09:07,559 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 2: So none of there's no cheerleading here, only to just 203 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,679 Speaker 2: say like this is this is bad, you know, and 204 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 2: anytime you see any escalation in terms of the terms, 205 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:18,080 Speaker 2: you can only expect. 206 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 4: Just more death. 207 00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:21,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's possibly even more risk to us also, which 208 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:21,920 Speaker 2: is scarce. 209 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:23,920 Speaker 1: A really key point, especially at a time when we've 210 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:27,079 Speaker 1: just s greenlt F sixteen's and you know, Zelenski promise. 211 00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:27,760 Speaker 4: You said he won't use them. 212 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, okay, you know you can take that for what 213 00:09:30,520 --> 00:09:30,960 Speaker 3: it's worth. 214 00:09:31,240 --> 00:09:33,520 Speaker 1: I'm sure there will be and already are people on 215 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:35,760 Speaker 1: Twitter who are saying, maybe this is a false like listen, 216 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: I mean, you never know. But every single time we've 217 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:41,800 Speaker 1: had one of these events, you know, the bombings of 218 00:09:42,280 --> 00:09:45,480 Speaker 1: various activists, bloggers on the ground, the during strikes on 219 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 1: the Kremlin like the or stream two y line and 220 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:51,640 Speaker 1: bombing at the end of the day after a little while, 221 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,360 Speaker 1: we get the news oh guess what it was actually Ukraine. 222 00:09:54,400 --> 00:09:56,120 Speaker 1: But as far as I know, they haven't actually taken 223 00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 1: responsibility for the attacks yet. So I do want to 224 00:09:58,520 --> 00:09:59,319 Speaker 1: put that out there is. 225 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:01,679 Speaker 2: They're not going to take responsibility. They lie every single Look, 226 00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:03,240 Speaker 2: this is where I get annoyed. I'm not even gonna 227 00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:07,000 Speaker 2: qualify it. It's obviously Ukraine. What Russia bombed its own populace, 228 00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 2: no way, its own residential its own residential buildings. After 229 00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:15,760 Speaker 2: the our own intelligence committee is secretly like, oh yeah, 230 00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:18,839 Speaker 2: actually it was the Ukrainians. 231 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:21,000 Speaker 4: Such a shocker that bombed the Kremlin. 232 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 2: In an every way, it's very obvious who is behind 233 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 2: the attack. They're not going to take responsibility because they 234 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:30,760 Speaker 2: never officially acknowledge that they were the ones that were 235 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 2: behind the attack. It's actually Ukrainian policy at this point. 236 00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:36,080 Speaker 2: And you can also take that one to the bank. 237 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 2: Whenever they come out and say, oh, we had nothing 238 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:39,320 Speaker 2: to do with it and it wasn't us, it's like, well, 239 00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:40,760 Speaker 2: why should we believe you? You say you're not going 240 00:10:40,840 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 2: to use our F sixteens or our made F sixteens 241 00:10:44,559 --> 00:10:47,560 Speaker 2: on Russian territory. There's absolutely no reason to believe you, 242 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:50,319 Speaker 2: especially when the stakes get higher and higher for the 243 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 2: Ukrainians as they're continually waiting for this spring offensive to 244 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 2: shake up. From what I've been reading, it looks like 245 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 2: the ground is beginning to get dryer, or we're getting 246 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:00,760 Speaker 2: to that period where they will be able to launch 247 00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:03,040 Speaker 2: without having to worry as much about the mud. 248 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:04,679 Speaker 4: So this is it. This is the put up or 249 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:05,600 Speaker 4: shut up moment, you know. 250 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:08,000 Speaker 2: Depending on the result of this, it could basically swing 251 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 2: the war in either direction. 252 00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:14,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, and the danger of broader conflagration, of a larger 253 00:11:14,760 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: escalation continues to exist, and that's why these actions are 254 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:21,160 Speaker 1: really dangerous from our perspective as well. But also again, 255 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,640 Speaker 1: whether your cause is just or unjust, don't target civilian 256 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:25,840 Speaker 1: residential areas. 257 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 3: It's just wrong. 258 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:30,040 Speaker 1: Okay, let's go to the very latest we know about 259 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: the debt sealing. As you guys know, McCarthy and Biden 260 00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 1: had this worked out. 261 00:11:33,640 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 3: This deal. 262 00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:37,040 Speaker 1: I think it's very likely the Democratic side is more 263 00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:39,839 Speaker 1: or less going to accept it because it is less bad. 264 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 1: It is, in my opinion, still bad that they negotiate 265 00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:44,640 Speaker 1: on this at all, but it is less bad than 266 00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:48,120 Speaker 1: what I think a lot of Democrats were expecting. Republicans 267 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:50,760 Speaker 1: on the other side not too happy. We did get 268 00:11:50,760 --> 00:11:53,840 Speaker 1: some comments from President Biden about how he sees this 269 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: all shaking out. Let's take a listen a little bit 270 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 1: of what he had to say Democrats. 271 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:04,960 Speaker 5: I oh, yes, no question. 272 00:12:05,360 --> 00:12:08,480 Speaker 3: Well you guys are you guys? 273 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 6: Will you realize you're not in a real world? No question. 274 00:12:11,960 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 6: There is no reason why I shouldn't get done by 275 00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:17,240 Speaker 6: the fifth. I'm confident that we'll get a vote in 276 00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:21,760 Speaker 6: boat houses and we'll see and look, one of the things. 277 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:23,880 Speaker 5: That I here some of. 278 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 6: You guys saying, is why didn't Biden say what a 279 00:12:26,520 --> 00:12:29,320 Speaker 6: good dealer is? Why would Biden to say what a 280 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:32,360 Speaker 6: good dealer before the vote? Think that's going to help 281 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,360 Speaker 6: me get a pass? Oh that's why you guys, don't 282 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 6: Bartner very well? 283 00:12:36,360 --> 00:12:37,720 Speaker 3: So two pieces there. 284 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 1: Number one, June fifth is the new x state that 285 00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: Treasure Secretary Janet Yellen says that is when the Treasury 286 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:46,680 Speaker 1: is likely to run out of money. It's actually amazing 287 00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:48,719 Speaker 1: people have crunched the numbers of like there are a 288 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:50,760 Speaker 1: lot of billionaires in the world right now that actually 289 00:12:50,800 --> 00:12:53,040 Speaker 1: have more money than the United States Treasure, which is 290 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:56,120 Speaker 1: kind of crazy. So June fifth is the appears to 291 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:59,200 Speaker 1: be the drop dead date. So the reporters are asking, like, 292 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:01,640 Speaker 1: you know, with legislation maneuvering in the seventy two hour 293 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 1: waiting period, are you going to be able to get 294 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:05,680 Speaker 1: it done by June fifth, and he's like, get real, 295 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: you all do only in the real world. Of course, 296 00:13:07,640 --> 00:13:09,720 Speaker 1: we're going to get it done, which is probably true 297 00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:13,040 Speaker 1: in terms of they can always find shortcuts when they 298 00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:15,040 Speaker 1: ultimately need to get something through quickly. 299 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 3: So that's that piece. 300 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: The other one saga I want to get your thoughts on. 301 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 1: There's been some discussion of like Biden's strategy in all 302 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:23,559 Speaker 1: of this, and he's been very sort of non communicative 303 00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 1: during this whole process of the negotiations. I was critical 304 00:13:27,880 --> 00:13:31,200 Speaker 1: of him previously because it led to Republicans really getting 305 00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 1: the upper hand in terms of messaging where the public 306 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:36,079 Speaker 1: was very divided about who would be to blame if 307 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:39,439 Speaker 1: the country did go over that fiscal cliff, which I 308 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:41,199 Speaker 1: think is a real loss given that clearly it was 309 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 1: the Republicans who forced this whole crisis situation. But he 310 00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:47,640 Speaker 1: lays out there very plainly what his strategy is. He's like, 311 00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:49,640 Speaker 1: it would not be helpful to getting this thing through 312 00:13:49,679 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: a Republican house if I were to go out and 313 00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 1: talk about what a great deal it is, so I'm 314 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 1: just going to keep my mouth shut, which you know 315 00:13:55,920 --> 00:13:56,679 Speaker 1: is probably the. 316 00:13:56,640 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 2: Right strategy, yes and no, So it actually requires kind 317 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 2: of thinking about it on a strategic level and then 318 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 2: like on an operational level. So operationally I think he 319 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 2: was correct because he did get a better deal, especially 320 00:14:07,640 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 2: if you compare his deal to President Obama's deals back 321 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:14,240 Speaker 2: in two thousand and eleven. But rhetorically, who won in 322 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 2: that fight, Well, we actually have a lot of polling 323 00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,160 Speaker 2: to compare ten years ago. President Obama one hundred percent 324 00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:23,280 Speaker 2: was on the upside of public opinion. Public opinion was like, no, 325 00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 2: we blame the Republicans, we are pro with the president. 326 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 2: He messaged relentlessly around it, although he did on substance 327 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:31,760 Speaker 2: get a worse deal. President Biden, on the other hand, 328 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:34,480 Speaker 2: I guess on substance did get a better deal. But rhetorically, 329 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 2: if anything, he probably normalized his behavior. And beyond that, 330 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,320 Speaker 2: let's remember and think about this, he has now said 331 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,840 Speaker 2: it so that the politics of this are an equal 332 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 2: playing field. Now it may be to his immediate political 333 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:51,800 Speaker 2: benefit for his reelection, but in the long run he 334 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 2: might have actually just signed away any real bargaining power. 335 00:14:55,080 --> 00:14:57,240 Speaker 4: That he has in two years if he is to 336 00:14:57,280 --> 00:14:57,800 Speaker 4: be elected. 337 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 2: And we shouldn't forget like you can put the shoe 338 00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:02,960 Speaker 2: on the other foot. I mean, now at this point, 339 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,440 Speaker 2: what is stopping the Democrats from doing anything like this? 340 00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 4: They basically did. There was a. 341 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,080 Speaker 1: Shutdown because and they never used their power that stops it. 342 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,840 Speaker 3: But there was their own reticence to do anything. 343 00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 2: But don't forget about the government shutdown. It was like 344 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:19,200 Speaker 2: a three week shutdown under President Trump whenever he wanted 345 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:22,520 Speaker 2: to do border wall funding. President Chuck Schumer and Nancy 346 00:15:22,520 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 2: Pelosi basically stared Trump down in the eyes, and he 347 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,880 Speaker 2: Trump is ultimately the one that buckled. Anyway, My point 348 00:15:27,920 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 2: is that these these tactics have now become so normalized, 349 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:34,120 Speaker 2: and I think Biden may have had an opportunity to 350 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:37,280 Speaker 2: try to get around it, which is ultimately just really 351 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 2: weakens the chief executive. So I'm of two minds in 352 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 2: terms of his suff like what he thinks. 353 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 1: As you know, I think this whole thing has been 354 00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:46,880 Speaker 1: a disaster. I think it played it wrong. He played 355 00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 1: it wrong from the jump. I think the point you 356 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:51,920 Speaker 1: made is the most important one outside of the details 357 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:55,280 Speaker 1: of this specific deal, which is that it has normalized 358 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 1: this type of behavior. You can take it to the 359 00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:58,920 Speaker 1: bank that the Republicans are going to do this again 360 00:15:58,960 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 1: in two years of Biden as the White House. There 361 00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: is no doubt about it. And there also are real 362 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 1: consequences even with this kind of showdown that you know 363 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:10,360 Speaker 1: they are, Even if they are able to pass the deal, 364 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:13,680 Speaker 1: just having this kind of kind of brinksmanship is really 365 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:16,840 Speaker 1: damaging to the economy, let alone the very real threat 366 00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 1: of actually going over the edge and the potential chaos 367 00:16:20,120 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 1: that could be unleashed for that. I mean, in some ways, 368 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:25,320 Speaker 1: the fact that the deal doesn't have a whole lot 369 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:28,280 Speaker 1: for Republicans. Probably the biggest win they got with significant 370 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 1: cuts in terms of the IRS budget, but the fact 371 00:16:31,280 --> 00:16:33,800 Speaker 1: that it was actually things that they buy and large 372 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 1: could have achieved through a normal appropriations process in a 373 00:16:36,640 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: sense that even more normalizes this kind of behavior because 374 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 1: they're willing to throw this tantrum and throw the whole 375 00:16:42,920 --> 00:16:47,200 Speaker 1: global financial system into turmoil over very very little. So 376 00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:51,440 Speaker 1: I definitely agree with you there on where we are 377 00:16:51,720 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 1: with a potential vote. We've seen hardening opposition from not 378 00:16:57,080 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 1: even like the far right of the Republican Party but 379 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:02,720 Speaker 1: opposite is sort of spreading to more mainstream corners of 380 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:04,280 Speaker 1: the Republican Party as well. 381 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:05,480 Speaker 3: Put this up on the screen. 382 00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:10,160 Speaker 1: This was the whip count of the House Freedom Caucus 383 00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:14,159 Speaker 1: members who as of yesterday had come out as in 384 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:17,879 Speaker 1: opposition to this deal, and not like, you know, tepid opposition, 385 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:22,720 Speaker 1: but quite strident to opposition. You've got Dan Bishop, Keith Self, 386 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,480 Speaker 1: Chip Roy, Ken Buck, Rolf Norman, Bob Good, Matt Rosendale, 387 00:17:26,520 --> 00:17:29,359 Speaker 1: Andy Biggs, Andrew Clyde, and Lauren Bobert. So that is 388 00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:32,680 Speaker 1: ten members who are on the record saying that they 389 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:37,000 Speaker 1: will not vote for this thing now. And like McCarthy 390 00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: can easily afford to lose ten members because Democrats look 391 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:43,280 Speaker 1: like they are going to vote for this in overwhelming numbers. 392 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:46,520 Speaker 1: But there are a couple of procedural hurdles that make 393 00:17:46,560 --> 00:17:48,240 Speaker 1: this a little bit trickier. 394 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 3: Than you might think. Because I think there's no. 395 00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:52,919 Speaker 1: Doubt at this point they have a majority of members 396 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:54,600 Speaker 1: of the House who would vote for it. That seems 397 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 1: very very likely, because all you would actually need is 398 00:17:56,680 --> 00:18:00,200 Speaker 1: all the Democrats and five Republicans. But McCarthy has said 399 00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 1: not bringing this to the floor unless I have a 400 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 1: majority support within the Republican caucus. 401 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 3: He probably has that it's a little bit of a 402 00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:08,639 Speaker 3: question mark. So there's that piece. 403 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,800 Speaker 1: But even more critically, this has to go through I 404 00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 1: mentioned this yesterday. 405 00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 3: This has to go through the Rules Committee. 406 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:17,840 Speaker 1: Okay, this sounds very archaic, but it becomes highly relevant 407 00:18:17,920 --> 00:18:21,480 Speaker 1: because during the negotiations between McCarthy and the House Freedom 408 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 1: Caucus for him to become Speaker, one of the things 409 00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:25,920 Speaker 1: they demanded is we are going to have some key 410 00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:29,399 Speaker 1: seats on that Rules Committee because it effectively controls what 411 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:32,439 Speaker 1: can come to the floor. So put this up on 412 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:35,679 Speaker 1: the screen. This is from Chip Roy, who is on 413 00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:38,200 Speaker 1: the Rules Committee and who is a House Freedom Caucus member. 414 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:41,359 Speaker 1: He says a reminder that during speaker negotiations to build 415 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:44,720 Speaker 1: the coalition that it was explicit both that nothing would 416 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:48,880 Speaker 1: pass Rules Committee without at least seven Republican votes and 417 00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 1: that the committee would not allow reporting out rules without 418 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:56,800 Speaker 1: unanimous Republican votes. So he's saying that they made some agreement, 419 00:18:56,840 --> 00:18:59,000 Speaker 1: which is possible. I don't think we heard about. 420 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:01,320 Speaker 4: This at the time. I don't think this is true. 421 00:19:01,320 --> 00:19:03,680 Speaker 1: Really, because well, remember so much of this was behind 422 00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:06,439 Speaker 1: closed doors. It's impossible to know what they actually agreed to. 423 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:09,720 Speaker 2: McCarthy and them have come out. Not Macarthy himself, but 424 00:19:09,760 --> 00:19:11,840 Speaker 2: his allies are like that's not true. We didn't agree 425 00:19:11,840 --> 00:19:13,640 Speaker 2: to that. And then Trip Roy was actually pressed about 426 00:19:13,640 --> 00:19:16,600 Speaker 2: it last night in an interview and he was like, well, 427 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:18,199 Speaker 2: you know, we agreed to a lot of things. It 428 00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:20,080 Speaker 2: was a handshake deal and none of it is written 429 00:19:20,080 --> 00:19:22,560 Speaker 2: down anywhere. I'm like, look, dude, as anybody who's ever 430 00:19:22,560 --> 00:19:26,679 Speaker 2: done anything in terms of contracts, especially if you're striking 431 00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:29,280 Speaker 2: a deal with somebody who you don't trust ostensibly that's 432 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:32,280 Speaker 2: these people and McCarthy, if you don't get it in writing, 433 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 2: then you didn't have anything. And of course, like, look, 434 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 2: maybe it was dishonorable, but also maybe he didn't say it, 435 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:41,360 Speaker 2: and he kind of hinted at it, and you took 436 00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:44,560 Speaker 2: it away something very different, and now you're getting upset 437 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:47,520 Speaker 2: and you're coming out in public and saying something which 438 00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 2: is not written down and which is not confirmed. 439 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,080 Speaker 4: So anyway, I'm not calling him a liar. 440 00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:55,120 Speaker 2: I'm just like, maybe they misunderstood miscommunicator. 441 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:56,840 Speaker 4: I think it's a music miscommunication. 442 00:19:57,480 --> 00:19:58,639 Speaker 3: That's sort of theoretical. 443 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:01,560 Speaker 1: Yes, in principle, I there has to be seven votes, 444 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:04,520 Speaker 1: but in reality, now that he needs this done, he's 445 00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:06,560 Speaker 1: going to toss that to the side. Washington Post had 446 00:20:06,600 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 1: some reporting about this rules committee and the numbers in 447 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:12,159 Speaker 1: the way that they break down, can go ahead and 448 00:20:12,160 --> 00:20:13,160 Speaker 1: put this up on the screen. 449 00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 3: They say. 450 00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 1: This often called the Speaker's Committee because it's made up 451 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:17,200 Speaker 1: entirely of appointees from the House. 452 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:18,680 Speaker 3: Speaker and the Minority leader. 453 00:20:18,720 --> 00:20:21,240 Speaker 1: It's tilted in such an extreme way nine members of 454 00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:23,840 Speaker 1: the majority party just four from the minority that the 455 00:20:23,880 --> 00:20:28,120 Speaker 1: speakers always get their way here. Traditionally, the four members 456 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:32,000 Speaker 1: of the minority always vote against whatever the majority wants. 457 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:34,320 Speaker 1: Now that also is not written and drone. It's just 458 00:20:34,359 --> 00:20:37,720 Speaker 1: sort of like convention for whatever reason. But that also 459 00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:40,879 Speaker 1: could be changed. But you already have a number of 460 00:20:40,960 --> 00:20:43,159 Speaker 1: members here from the right who have said they are 461 00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:46,960 Speaker 1: opposed to the deal. So in all likelihood it could 462 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:52,840 Speaker 1: be Thomas Massey, who is ideologically aligned with the deficit 463 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:56,800 Speaker 1: hawk House Freedom Caucus, but he has been personally relatively 464 00:20:56,840 --> 00:21:00,439 Speaker 1: loyal to McCarthy. McCarthy also gave him some good in 465 00:21:00,480 --> 00:21:02,880 Speaker 1: this deal, things that he had pert like his own 466 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 1: personal preferences in terms of how appropriations work. 467 00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:07,440 Speaker 3: I won't get into all the. 468 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:10,840 Speaker 1: Gory details here, but McCarthy specifically mentioned Massy. I think 469 00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:12,639 Speaker 1: because he knows he is such a key vote. 470 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:16,640 Speaker 3: Massey hasn't said one hundred percent. 471 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:18,600 Speaker 1: Which way he will go on the deal, but he 472 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,680 Speaker 1: posted something on Twitter that indicated he was like, well, 473 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:23,280 Speaker 1: doing this kind of deal is one way to get 474 00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:26,359 Speaker 1: things done. Another way is through the appropriations process, seeming 475 00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: to indicate that he was kind of willing to accept 476 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:31,920 Speaker 1: this direction with the idea that he would be able 477 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:35,520 Speaker 1: to achieve more through that appropriations process modified to suit 478 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 1: his whims and what he has been pushing for. 479 00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:40,200 Speaker 3: So I think where. 480 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 1: We are is it's more likely than not that it 481 00:21:42,600 --> 00:21:45,480 Speaker 1: is going to pass. Even as you have sort of 482 00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:51,680 Speaker 1: hardening Republican opposition, you also have Ronda Santis coming out 483 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,960 Speaker 1: and in opposition to the deal as well, which gives 484 00:21:55,000 --> 00:21:56,880 Speaker 1: you a sense of where the winds are blowing from 485 00:21:56,880 --> 00:22:00,520 Speaker 1: a grassroots conservative perspective. Let's take listen to what he 486 00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:01,080 Speaker 1: has to say. 487 00:22:01,320 --> 00:22:04,440 Speaker 7: Well, prior to this deal, Kaylee, our country was careening 488 00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:08,879 Speaker 7: towards bankruptcy, and after this deal, our country will still 489 00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:12,000 Speaker 7: be careening towards bankruptcy. And to say you can do 490 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:16,320 Speaker 7: four trillion of increases in the next year and a half, 491 00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:19,800 Speaker 7: I mean that's a massive amount of spending. I think 492 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:22,520 Speaker 7: that We've gotten ourselves on a trajectory here really since 493 00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:25,760 Speaker 7: March of twenty twenty with some of the COVID spending. 494 00:22:25,800 --> 00:22:29,040 Speaker 7: It totally reset the budget and they're sticking with that, 495 00:22:29,680 --> 00:22:31,400 Speaker 7: and I think that that's just going to be totally 496 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:33,200 Speaker 7: inadequate to get us in a better spot. 497 00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:34,520 Speaker 3: So would you make of that soccer? 498 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:37,199 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean smart, because obviously the base is going 499 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:38,960 Speaker 2: to be again, the base doesn't They want to see 500 00:22:38,960 --> 00:22:41,920 Speaker 2: Biden crushed and fail. They don't care about the substance 501 00:22:41,920 --> 00:22:43,680 Speaker 2: of it, literally at all. This goes all the way 502 00:22:43,720 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 2: back to twenty eleven politics. This is when the Freedom 503 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:50,400 Speaker 2: Caucus guys were all over Fox News and Bayner actually 504 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:52,679 Speaker 2: went to Roger Ayls and pleaded with him. 505 00:22:52,720 --> 00:22:54,960 Speaker 4: He said, please take these guys off the air. 506 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:57,640 Speaker 2: You are destroying me. And Roger was like, hey man, 507 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:01,600 Speaker 2: that's what the people want, and I mean he's right. Like, really, 508 00:23:01,600 --> 00:23:04,119 Speaker 2: what it is is that you have an undercurrent of 509 00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 2: a lot of the Republican base who not interested. They 510 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 2: don't they wanted no wins for Obama, they want no 511 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,640 Speaker 2: wins for President Biden. There's no reasons to suspect why 512 00:23:13,680 --> 00:23:17,160 Speaker 2: the dynamics have changed. Vivike Ramaswami also put out something 513 00:23:17,200 --> 00:23:18,840 Speaker 2: against it. Let's put this up there on the screen. 514 00:23:19,119 --> 00:23:21,920 Speaker 2: He's calling out quote other GOP candidates stand on the 515 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:25,439 Speaker 2: debt ceiling. Jumping on the anti woke bandwagon is easy, true, 516 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 2: It is harder to take a real stand on the 517 00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:30,160 Speaker 2: hard stuff debt deal, bank bailouts, pardoning, peaceful Jan six 518 00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:33,640 Speaker 2: protesters criticizing the Trump indictment exiting Ukraine. If you can't 519 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:35,600 Speaker 2: speak candidly here at home, you're not ready to sit 520 00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:37,280 Speaker 2: across the table from shishingping. 521 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:38,440 Speaker 4: So that's where we're at. 522 00:23:38,480 --> 00:23:42,200 Speaker 2: You know, right now we have the vivid Ramaswami and 523 00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 2: Governor DeSantis out against it. 524 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:44,800 Speaker 4: Crystal Our show. 525 00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:48,399 Speaker 2: We waited and held out for a Trump's statement, and 526 00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 2: we have not yet received anything. President Trump has not 527 00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:54,160 Speaker 2: put out anything about this. Haven't seen Nicki Haley Way 528 00:23:54,160 --> 00:23:55,920 Speaker 2: and haven't seen Tim Scott Way in either. 529 00:23:56,080 --> 00:23:58,040 Speaker 4: Interesting because Scott actually. 530 00:23:57,680 --> 00:23:59,679 Speaker 2: Does have to vote them out on it, So that 531 00:23:59,760 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 2: will will be very very interesting to see which way 532 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:05,960 Speaker 2: he decides to go, because that will be an indicator 533 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:07,679 Speaker 2: of presidential politics overall. 534 00:24:07,720 --> 00:24:10,080 Speaker 4: I actually thought it was a smart move for DeSantis. 535 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:13,760 Speaker 2: I increasingly and viewing him as the Ted Cruz of 536 00:24:13,800 --> 00:24:17,520 Speaker 2: the race. He is running against Trump from the right, 537 00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:22,199 Speaker 2: from a true conservative, kind of a true conservative like 538 00:24:22,320 --> 00:24:25,400 Speaker 2: ideological lens. People shouldn't confuse this with political talent because 539 00:24:25,400 --> 00:24:27,919 Speaker 2: it's not the same thing. So his attacks on Trump 540 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:30,880 Speaker 2: are very much Cruz esque. And don't forget this either. 541 00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 2: Ted Cruz came in second in the GOP primary one 542 00:24:33,600 --> 00:24:35,639 Speaker 2: the second and most amount of votes, and frankly was 543 00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:39,760 Speaker 2: probably the single most credible candidate other than Trump in 544 00:24:39,800 --> 00:24:43,000 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, So it's not a bad play considering how 545 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:45,240 Speaker 2: it went down. Also, he did lose, though, so you 546 00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 2: know it's corre gets complicated. 547 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:50,680 Speaker 1: Correct, he did lose. Ted Cruz notably also has come 548 00:24:50,680 --> 00:24:53,320 Speaker 1: out against the deal. So to your point about DeSantis 549 00:24:53,320 --> 00:24:55,639 Speaker 1: being in the Ted Cruise lane, I think that is true. 550 00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:59,679 Speaker 1: DeSantis's attacks on Trump have a twenty sixteen Ted Cruz 551 00:24:59,800 --> 00:25:02,399 Speaker 1: sc echo. The other comparison that's been made is like 552 00:25:02,440 --> 00:25:04,639 Speaker 1: to Elizabeth Warren with the wine track, like I got 553 00:25:04,680 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 1: a plan for that kind of vibe. There's a little 554 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:10,520 Speaker 1: bit of that going on too. But I think with Trump, 555 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:15,080 Speaker 1: you'll recall a little while ago he was sounding very 556 00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:17,600 Speaker 1: you know, tough about the debt ceiling, deal, he said, 557 00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:20,400 Speaker 1: I say to the Republicans out there, Congressman, senators, if 558 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:22,439 Speaker 1: they don't give you massive cuts, you're going to have 559 00:25:22,560 --> 00:25:24,880 Speaker 1: to do a default. And I don't believe they're going 560 00:25:24,920 --> 00:25:28,320 Speaker 1: to do default because sorry, an ad popped up, because 561 00:25:28,320 --> 00:25:30,680 Speaker 1: I think the Democrats will absolutely cave. Will absolutely kay, 562 00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:32,320 Speaker 1: because you don't want to have that happen. But it's 563 00:25:32,359 --> 00:25:34,160 Speaker 1: better than what we're doing right now because we're spending 564 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:36,440 Speaker 1: money like druggon sailors. I mean, put aside the fact 565 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:38,800 Speaker 1: that this man blew up the deficit like crazy with 566 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:41,439 Speaker 1: his virgin tax cuts for the rich. But you know, 567 00:25:41,520 --> 00:25:44,480 Speaker 1: he was sounding really like Hawka, Sean, we're willing to 568 00:25:45,080 --> 00:25:46,680 Speaker 1: we're willing to go over the cliff and we got 569 00:25:46,720 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 1: to do it, and we're spending too much. So it's 570 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,199 Speaker 1: very notable that now that a deal is struck, not 571 00:25:51,400 --> 00:25:52,360 Speaker 1: a word from him. 572 00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:53,640 Speaker 3: And it's not an accident. 573 00:25:53,720 --> 00:25:56,639 Speaker 1: I mean, he's in this tough political mind because he, 574 00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:58,600 Speaker 1: better than anyone, has his finger on. 575 00:25:58,560 --> 00:25:59,920 Speaker 3: The pulse of the Republican base. 576 00:26:00,240 --> 00:26:02,560 Speaker 1: He knows the popular thing to do would be to 577 00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:05,280 Speaker 1: say this is a bad deal and we shouldn't accept it, 578 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:07,800 Speaker 1: and it's a disaster. And we're gonna you know, et cetera, 579 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:12,200 Speaker 1: et cetera. But he also has backed Kevin McCarthy and 580 00:26:12,280 --> 00:26:14,760 Speaker 1: you know, calls him by Kevin and helped him get 581 00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:17,440 Speaker 1: over the finish line in terms of the speaker's race. 582 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 1: So he doesn't necessarily want to go against someone who 583 00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:22,920 Speaker 1: has turned into a key ally for him and who 584 00:26:22,960 --> 00:26:25,880 Speaker 1: he is bolstered. So he has calculated that the safest 585 00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:27,760 Speaker 1: move for him is just to zip it and keep 586 00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:30,600 Speaker 1: his mouth shut. Uncharacteristic wisdom there from President. 587 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:34,159 Speaker 2: My suspicion is that Trump desperately wants a tweet against it, 588 00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:36,520 Speaker 2: and that McCarthy called him and begged him not to that. 589 00:26:36,840 --> 00:26:38,399 Speaker 4: If I had to bet money, I bet you that 590 00:26:38,760 --> 00:26:39,840 Speaker 4: that is what has happened. 591 00:26:39,880 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 1: My expectation as well, because that is the one thing. 592 00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:47,240 Speaker 1: If Trump came out really strongly against this deal could 593 00:26:47,240 --> 00:26:50,600 Speaker 1: be dead, could actually sink it, and it could really 594 00:26:50,640 --> 00:26:54,040 Speaker 1: put the speaker's gavel on the line for McCarthy as 595 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:57,480 Speaker 1: well if he continued to push forward. So yeah, I 596 00:26:57,520 --> 00:27:02,080 Speaker 1: think it's a giant gift to Kevin McCarthy and massively 597 00:27:02,119 --> 00:27:05,320 Speaker 1: increases the likelihood that this deal will get through. That 598 00:27:05,359 --> 00:27:08,000 Speaker 1: Trump has remained silent, which also shows you the pull 599 00:27:08,080 --> 00:27:10,240 Speaker 1: that he has with the Republican base and the Republican 600 00:27:10,280 --> 00:27:13,720 Speaker 1: caucus continuing versus Ron DeSantis, who can come out and 601 00:27:13,760 --> 00:27:16,040 Speaker 1: say this and you're still likely to have a bulk 602 00:27:16,040 --> 00:27:17,600 Speaker 1: of the caucus be like yeah, but we're going to 603 00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:18,359 Speaker 1: go along with it. 604 00:27:18,440 --> 00:27:21,600 Speaker 3: So wanted to flag this. This is kind of interesting. 605 00:27:21,680 --> 00:27:24,440 Speaker 1: So obviously we've been focused a lot on AI, on 606 00:27:24,560 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: chat GPT, on these large language models. We talked yesterday 607 00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:33,359 Speaker 1: about these couple of instances where you had a professor 608 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:37,400 Speaker 1: assigned to his students, this assignment where they were supposed 609 00:27:37,440 --> 00:27:40,960 Speaker 1: to generate an essay from chat gpt and then fact 610 00:27:41,040 --> 00:27:43,639 Speaker 1: check it, and every single one of the students was 611 00:27:43,640 --> 00:27:47,840 Speaker 1: like sixty papers found glaring just they call them hallucinations. 612 00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:49,719 Speaker 3: Chat GPT just made stuff up. 613 00:27:50,320 --> 00:27:54,440 Speaker 1: And there was a lawyer that foolishly relied on chat 614 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:58,320 Speaker 1: GPT to create a legal brief and chat GPT just 615 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:02,719 Speaker 1: invented like a dozen different cases to back up whatever 616 00:28:02,840 --> 00:28:06,160 Speaker 1: claim this lawyer was trying to make all completely fake, 617 00:28:06,560 --> 00:28:10,199 Speaker 1: you know, completely fabricated. So there are a lot of 618 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:13,919 Speaker 1: problems still with chat GPT, the LMS in general, AI, 619 00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:16,320 Speaker 1: et cetera. So we've been talking about, Okay, what it 620 00:28:16,320 --> 00:28:18,199 Speaker 1: would look like to regulate this stuff and what are 621 00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:21,440 Speaker 1: the dangers, et cetera. And our general view has been, 622 00:28:21,520 --> 00:28:23,639 Speaker 1: all right, lawmakers don't really have their heads wrapped out 623 00:28:23,680 --> 00:28:25,439 Speaker 1: on this. They don't really understand it, and they're not 624 00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:28,200 Speaker 1: really taking actions that they need to figure out how 625 00:28:28,240 --> 00:28:29,800 Speaker 1: to have AI. 626 00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:32,080 Speaker 3: That is actually beneficial for humanity. 627 00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:36,480 Speaker 1: Well tucked into this debt sealing deal, there actually was 628 00:28:36,800 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: some language about AI, but rather than being like, let's 629 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:43,600 Speaker 1: curtail it AI, it was like, let's see how it 630 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 1: goes to incorporate this more into government and to try 631 00:28:46,640 --> 00:28:49,800 Speaker 1: to quote unquote streamline the process for these environmental impact 632 00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:53,520 Speaker 1: assessments by using AI. So David Day and Flagg this, 633 00:28:53,680 --> 00:28:55,800 Speaker 1: take a look at what we've got here. So he says, 634 00:28:55,800 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 1: you could certainly read this part of the permitting section 635 00:28:57,920 --> 00:28:59,880 Speaker 1: of the debt ceiling bill as studying the fees of 636 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 1: ability of AI reviews for this National Environmental Policy Act, 637 00:29:04,080 --> 00:29:07,200 Speaker 1: which based on current technology, probably goes well as AI 638 00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:10,120 Speaker 1: legal briefs, which is what I just refer to keep 639 00:29:10,160 --> 00:29:11,880 Speaker 1: this up on the screen. I'll just read the language 640 00:29:11,880 --> 00:29:13,720 Speaker 1: here and that it's a little bit technical. They say 641 00:29:13,720 --> 00:29:17,200 Speaker 1: permitting Portal study that counts on environmental quality shall conduct 642 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:19,239 Speaker 1: a study and submit a report to Congress within one 643 00:29:19,320 --> 00:29:21,760 Speaker 1: year of the enactment of this Act on the potential 644 00:29:21,760 --> 00:29:24,920 Speaker 1: for online and digital technologies to address delays and reviews 645 00:29:24,960 --> 00:29:28,520 Speaker 1: and improve public accessibility and transparency under Section one or 646 00:29:28,560 --> 00:29:31,720 Speaker 1: two to see of the National Environmental Policy Act, including 647 00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:35,360 Speaker 1: but not limited to a unified permitting portal. 648 00:29:35,640 --> 00:29:37,280 Speaker 3: And then it goes on from there. So what do 649 00:29:37,280 --> 00:29:38,200 Speaker 3: you make of this saga? 650 00:29:38,280 --> 00:29:39,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's pretty interesting. 651 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,200 Speaker 2: I mean, at the same one the hand, it's not 652 00:29:42,320 --> 00:29:44,800 Speaker 2: like a definitive we're going to use AI, but it's 653 00:29:44,840 --> 00:29:48,160 Speaker 2: more about appropriating government funds and saying that we will 654 00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:54,000 Speaker 2: conductudy a study for the potential for online and digital technologies. Now, 655 00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:56,400 Speaker 2: once again, the reason why we should all be just 656 00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 2: a little bit suspect on this is that it means 657 00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:02,520 Speaker 2: like we will see a total fusion of AI and 658 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:06,160 Speaker 2: government in the future, which if possible. If it's good, 659 00:30:06,240 --> 00:30:09,320 Speaker 2: like maybe that will make it more effective. If it's bad, 660 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:11,960 Speaker 2: it will be just as bad as the lawyer brief. 661 00:30:12,000 --> 00:30:13,719 Speaker 2: Given the history of the government here, I'm just going 662 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:16,480 Speaker 2: to go ahead and say I'm a bit skeptical as 663 00:30:16,520 --> 00:30:18,760 Speaker 2: to how this is going to go. And also in 664 00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:21,040 Speaker 2: terms of the content. I mean, we've already gottene over 665 00:30:21,080 --> 00:30:22,920 Speaker 2: this so many times. But you know, when you think 666 00:30:22,960 --> 00:30:25,080 Speaker 2: about the tax system, it's like, what if the IRS 667 00:30:25,160 --> 00:30:27,600 Speaker 2: sends you a bill and like you owe five you know, you. 668 00:30:27,600 --> 00:30:29,320 Speaker 4: Have no ability to contest that. 669 00:30:29,520 --> 00:30:32,160 Speaker 2: Or for example, we live in the state of Virginia 670 00:30:32,240 --> 00:30:34,120 Speaker 2: where they you know, this is one of those insane 671 00:30:34,120 --> 00:30:36,080 Speaker 2: states where they decide to tax your car like the 672 00:30:36,120 --> 00:30:38,240 Speaker 2: property of your car, and they send you a bill 673 00:30:38,280 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 2: based on the assessed value. 674 00:30:39,880 --> 00:30:41,760 Speaker 4: You have no ability to contest that. 675 00:30:41,840 --> 00:30:44,440 Speaker 2: You're like, well, actually the market is different, or oh 676 00:30:44,520 --> 00:30:46,760 Speaker 2: actually it has there's like no, They're like, this is 677 00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:49,760 Speaker 2: what you owe us. And that seems very likely to 678 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:52,800 Speaker 2: be the type of scenario where the environmental impact review, 679 00:30:52,960 --> 00:30:55,760 Speaker 2: for example, I think environmental impact of views can be important. 680 00:30:55,760 --> 00:30:57,920 Speaker 2: I also think they even dramatically misused. There's a recent 681 00:30:57,920 --> 00:31:01,000 Speaker 2: Supreme Court case that was around this, around the couple 682 00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:03,760 Speaker 2: that want to build something on their properties. Complicated, But 683 00:31:03,800 --> 00:31:05,520 Speaker 2: my point is that you could see in the future 684 00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:08,880 Speaker 2: where AI or some government program just looks at input 685 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:11,440 Speaker 2: output variables are like Nope, that's actually just not we're 686 00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:13,240 Speaker 2: going to do, and then you have to spend years 687 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:15,320 Speaker 2: of your life, as this one couple did, having to 688 00:31:15,360 --> 00:31:17,880 Speaker 2: fight it in the Supreme Court and they spend sixteen 689 00:31:17,920 --> 00:31:20,160 Speaker 2: years in court and they won nine oh you know, 690 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 2: but they had to wait sixteen years to try and 691 00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:24,400 Speaker 2: build something on their own property. Yes, that's an example 692 00:31:24,480 --> 00:31:27,320 Speaker 2: of like, that's how the STEM already is with humans 693 00:31:27,320 --> 00:31:28,960 Speaker 2: involved with technology. 694 00:31:29,040 --> 00:31:29,800 Speaker 4: Like who knows what. 695 00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:32,160 Speaker 1: You're pointing to here is that you already have a 696 00:31:32,240 --> 00:31:38,480 Speaker 1: problem with faceless, unaccountable bureaucracy within the government, and adding 697 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:42,720 Speaker 1: a layer of even more mysterious and unaccountable tech is 698 00:31:42,920 --> 00:31:46,520 Speaker 1: unlikely to improve that viguaction. I think the other piece 699 00:31:46,560 --> 00:31:49,280 Speaker 1: here that it makes me think about is just you know, 700 00:31:49,840 --> 00:31:53,480 Speaker 1: they Washington is stacked with lobbyists who are all advocating 701 00:31:53,480 --> 00:31:56,360 Speaker 1: for the interest of companies like Microsoft, for example, which 702 00:31:56,400 --> 00:32:00,360 Speaker 1: obviously is placing a big bet on AI, and they're 703 00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:04,160 Speaker 1: constantly working to get these little provisions stuck in that 704 00:32:04,240 --> 00:32:07,160 Speaker 1: almost no one notices. And so at the same time 705 00:32:07,200 --> 00:32:09,360 Speaker 1: that we're going, all right, what are lawmakers, like, how 706 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:10,880 Speaker 1: are they going to grapple with AI? And what are 707 00:32:10,880 --> 00:32:14,320 Speaker 1: they going to do while we are having that public conversation. 708 00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:18,560 Speaker 1: Behind the scenes, Microsoft or whatever other companies have an 709 00:32:18,640 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: interest in plugging AI into federal government as this new 710 00:32:22,200 --> 00:32:26,400 Speaker 1: giant customer. They are working to get their provisions in 711 00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:28,560 Speaker 1: like their thing is very effective. 712 00:32:28,640 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 3: So, you know, is this like the end of the world. 713 00:32:32,080 --> 00:32:34,960 Speaker 1: Is it a huge deal to have this study into 714 00:32:35,240 --> 00:32:39,360 Speaker 1: using AI within the permitting process? Probably not, although again, 715 00:32:39,360 --> 00:32:42,640 Speaker 1: as David Dan points out, it's not just explicitly limited 716 00:32:42,720 --> 00:32:44,360 Speaker 1: to that. They said that, you know, it could go 717 00:32:44,480 --> 00:32:47,120 Speaker 1: beyond that. But I do think it's very telling about 718 00:32:47,160 --> 00:32:49,200 Speaker 1: some of the dangers here, some of the ways that 719 00:32:49,240 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 1: this could become omnipresent without any of us even intending 720 00:32:53,160 --> 00:32:56,000 Speaker 1: to or noticing, and also just the way that Washington 721 00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:56,680 Speaker 1: works in general. 722 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:02,360 Speaker 4: Absolutely well said. Okay, let's go to the next part here. 723 00:33:02,680 --> 00:33:06,080 Speaker 2: My own home state of Texas, lots of stuff going on. 724 00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:09,880 Speaker 2: A historic event, the Texas a Journey Attorney General has 725 00:33:09,920 --> 00:33:14,720 Speaker 2: been impeached by the Texas House of Representatives, of which 726 00:33:14,760 --> 00:33:16,880 Speaker 2: a trial will now take place in the Senate. The 727 00:33:16,920 --> 00:33:19,680 Speaker 2: impeachment process is very much like our own for the 728 00:33:19,680 --> 00:33:22,120 Speaker 2: President of the United States, and he will be put 729 00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:24,800 Speaker 2: on trial before the Senate and be tried the jurors 730 00:33:24,840 --> 00:33:27,640 Speaker 2: will be the Senators themselves who will eventually go ahead 731 00:33:27,680 --> 00:33:30,040 Speaker 2: and vote. So let's actually get into the details. What 732 00:33:30,200 --> 00:33:32,840 Speaker 2: she covered this quite a long time ago on rising 733 00:33:32,880 --> 00:33:38,280 Speaker 2: whenever the FBI launched investigation into Ken Paxton. This one 734 00:33:38,400 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 2: is actually more consequential and important because not only is 735 00:33:42,240 --> 00:33:45,000 Speaker 2: it taking place in the state of Texas, but is 736 00:33:45,040 --> 00:33:49,160 Speaker 2: directly being led by investigators attached to the House of 737 00:33:49,240 --> 00:33:53,480 Speaker 2: which they launched their own investigation and impeach Paxston based 738 00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:57,040 Speaker 2: upon the findings of that investigation, not the FBI investigation. 739 00:33:57,120 --> 00:33:59,200 Speaker 4: Let's put the details up here on the screen. This 740 00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:00,720 Speaker 4: is from the Texas Tribune. 741 00:34:00,800 --> 00:34:04,000 Speaker 2: So the Texas Tribune lays out there are over twenty 742 00:34:04,080 --> 00:34:08,600 Speaker 2: impeachment articles that were actually filed against Ken Paxson. Almost 743 00:34:08,640 --> 00:34:12,120 Speaker 2: all of it goes back to a gentleman by the name. 744 00:34:12,040 --> 00:34:13,040 Speaker 4: Of Nate Paul. 745 00:34:13,200 --> 00:34:17,080 Speaker 2: So Paul is an Austin real estate investor, as a 746 00:34:17,120 --> 00:34:20,160 Speaker 2: friend and a political donor to Paxson. What the Texas 747 00:34:20,200 --> 00:34:24,560 Speaker 2: House alleges is that Paxton, in his capacity as the 748 00:34:24,560 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 2: Attorney General of the State of Texas, basically pursued actions 749 00:34:28,680 --> 00:34:33,719 Speaker 2: that were beneficial to Paul abused his official capacity, including 750 00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:37,560 Speaker 2: diverting senior employees to perform work that benefited Paul some 751 00:34:37,600 --> 00:34:41,160 Speaker 2: seventy two thousand dollars in taxpayer funded labor costs, misuse 752 00:34:41,160 --> 00:34:45,520 Speaker 2: of public information allegedly providing Paul with an internal FBI 753 00:34:45,560 --> 00:34:49,960 Speaker 2: file related to an investigation into that developer, misapplication of 754 00:34:50,040 --> 00:34:54,239 Speaker 2: fit fiduciary property for allegedly hiring an outside lore of 755 00:34:54,280 --> 00:34:57,680 Speaker 2: twenty five thousand dollars to work inside the Attorney General's 756 00:34:57,680 --> 00:34:59,960 Speaker 2: office without the knowledge or the consent of senior staff, 757 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:04,560 Speaker 2: to perform work that principally benefited Paul himself. They also 758 00:35:04,719 --> 00:35:11,840 Speaker 2: allege that Paul, as return for favors, helped basically helped 759 00:35:12,120 --> 00:35:15,319 Speaker 2: update the house of Ken Paxon that he was living in, 760 00:35:15,680 --> 00:35:18,800 Speaker 2: and in some of the salacious details, it also hired 761 00:35:18,840 --> 00:35:21,200 Speaker 2: a woman who Packson allegedly had. 762 00:35:21,200 --> 00:35:24,240 Speaker 1: Not alleged think it's acknowledged. I don't even think it's allegedly. 763 00:35:24,080 --> 00:35:27,320 Speaker 4: Had an extra extra marital affair with. So it's messy. 764 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:30,319 Speaker 2: I guess, as the kid say about what's happening here 765 00:35:30,400 --> 00:35:33,160 Speaker 2: with this situation. Like I said, the charges that I 766 00:35:33,239 --> 00:35:35,200 Speaker 2: laid out, those are just the felony charges. They don't 767 00:35:35,200 --> 00:35:37,560 Speaker 2: include everything, but they're probably the most serious. 768 00:35:37,840 --> 00:35:40,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, the other piece of this is so you know, 769 00:35:41,080 --> 00:35:43,560 Speaker 1: allegedly he was engaging and all of this just like 770 00:35:43,680 --> 00:35:47,120 Speaker 1: over the top favoritism and giving out of government favors 771 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:49,400 Speaker 1: and even using his own staff to do work for 772 00:35:49,480 --> 00:35:52,960 Speaker 1: this developer, etc. And getting things in return like having 773 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:55,560 Speaker 1: him hire this woman that he was sleeping with and 774 00:35:55,600 --> 00:35:59,000 Speaker 1: bringing her to Austin and doing a flori to ceiling 775 00:35:59,040 --> 00:36:02,600 Speaker 1: renovation of his home. Okay, so very clear like favor 776 00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:07,040 Speaker 1: trading here. And there were whistleblowers within his own office. 777 00:36:07,520 --> 00:36:11,239 Speaker 1: These are not like liberals, These are conservative Texas Republicans 778 00:36:11,719 --> 00:36:16,040 Speaker 1: who were whistleblowers about this misconduct and he fired them, 779 00:36:16,080 --> 00:36:19,120 Speaker 1: which is also illegal under Texas law. So it's both 780 00:36:19,160 --> 00:36:21,600 Speaker 1: the crime and it's the cover up and the retaliation 781 00:36:21,800 --> 00:36:25,799 Speaker 1: against these whistleblowers. That is that is you know, at 782 00:36:25,840 --> 00:36:27,960 Speaker 1: stake here and at issue here. It really is a 783 00:36:27,960 --> 00:36:33,480 Speaker 1: pretty grotesque alleged pattern of misbehavior and just incredibly brazen 784 00:36:34,360 --> 00:36:37,279 Speaker 1: the level of favors and you know trading that he 785 00:36:37,400 --> 00:36:39,880 Speaker 1: was willing to do with this Austin based developer. I 786 00:36:39,920 --> 00:36:42,640 Speaker 1: feel like the developers oftentimes like these are these you know, 787 00:36:42,680 --> 00:36:46,000 Speaker 1: the Cuoma there was stuff with the developers too, Like 788 00:36:46,480 --> 00:36:50,120 Speaker 1: it does show you how much financially you can gain 789 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:53,879 Speaker 1: from having someone who's on the inside, like clear the 790 00:36:53,920 --> 00:36:56,279 Speaker 1: red tape for you and give you a leg up 791 00:36:56,320 --> 00:36:58,920 Speaker 1: in terms of the bidding process, and all of that 792 00:36:58,960 --> 00:36:59,839 Speaker 1: stuff go on. 793 00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:03,600 Speaker 2: Wherever you live, Go look at who donates to the 794 00:37:03,640 --> 00:37:07,560 Speaker 2: local politicians, people like comptroller, mayor and all that. Nine 795 00:37:07,600 --> 00:37:08,759 Speaker 2: out of ten of them are going to be the 796 00:37:08,800 --> 00:37:11,680 Speaker 2: biggest city contractors almost every single where I'm from. 797 00:37:11,719 --> 00:37:13,600 Speaker 4: That's the case, especially in Texas. 798 00:37:13,840 --> 00:37:16,200 Speaker 1: That's the matter if it's Democrats or Republicans. So they'll 799 00:37:16,239 --> 00:37:18,880 Speaker 1: donate both sides of the aisles to believe people opportunity. 800 00:37:18,960 --> 00:37:19,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, they don't care. 801 00:37:19,600 --> 00:37:21,560 Speaker 2: You think they build those houses you know, for free, 802 00:37:21,719 --> 00:37:23,839 Speaker 2: or those roads or any of those other infrastructure, those 803 00:37:23,880 --> 00:37:26,760 Speaker 2: no big contracts or those sweet deals, all the kickbacks. 804 00:37:26,800 --> 00:37:28,439 Speaker 4: It's like in the shosh Ank redemption. Man. 805 00:37:28,560 --> 00:37:30,239 Speaker 2: Let's go to the next part here, just about the 806 00:37:30,280 --> 00:37:32,959 Speaker 2: actual vote, because the vote itself was stunning. The House 807 00:37:32,960 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 2: actually voted one hundred and twenty one to twenty three 808 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:37,960 Speaker 2: to suspend the Attorney General and refer to him to 809 00:37:38,000 --> 00:37:41,040 Speaker 2: the Senate for trial. The first impeachment in the Texas 810 00:37:41,080 --> 00:37:46,640 Speaker 2: House since nineteen seventy five, you know, and this shows 811 00:37:46,680 --> 00:37:51,120 Speaker 2: you that impeachment was also supported by sixty Republicans. It 812 00:37:51,239 --> 00:37:55,040 Speaker 2: wasn't all just Democrats, including the speaker of the Texas House, 813 00:37:55,320 --> 00:37:58,440 Speaker 2: who himself was involved in a spate with packs and 814 00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:00,520 Speaker 2: packs and accused him of being drunk and actually called 815 00:38:00,520 --> 00:38:02,960 Speaker 2: for him to be impeached. So obviously this has all 816 00:38:02,960 --> 00:38:05,040 Speaker 2: been you know, behind the scenes. This has been building 817 00:38:05,280 --> 00:38:08,520 Speaker 2: now for quite a period of time. Eventually we will 818 00:38:08,560 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 2: see how the vote falls in the Senate. But I mean, 819 00:38:11,640 --> 00:38:14,880 Speaker 2: I'm not quite sure yet that he's done. And I 820 00:38:14,920 --> 00:38:19,200 Speaker 2: think the reason is that he obviously beat he was 821 00:38:19,440 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 2: the ability to beat the FBI investigation once the Senate 822 00:38:24,239 --> 00:38:26,600 Speaker 2: may not have as I understand, and I asked some 823 00:38:26,640 --> 00:38:28,759 Speaker 2: people back in Texas and they were like, well, it's 824 00:38:28,800 --> 00:38:30,839 Speaker 2: not going to be necessarily as much of a slam, donk. 825 00:38:30,880 --> 00:38:32,839 Speaker 4: It'll be closer in terms of a vote. 826 00:38:32,880 --> 00:38:34,920 Speaker 2: At least that's where things currently stand, you know, with 827 00:38:35,040 --> 00:38:37,759 Speaker 2: the information that we have right now, he still does 828 00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:40,000 Speaker 2: have a lot of political support. 829 00:38:39,760 --> 00:38:40,440 Speaker 4: In the state. 830 00:38:40,880 --> 00:38:44,640 Speaker 2: And the reason why is because Trump loves Ken Paxson 831 00:38:44,680 --> 00:38:47,640 Speaker 2: put this up there. He has actually slammed Texas quote 832 00:38:47,719 --> 00:38:51,719 Speaker 2: Rhinos over the impeachment effort. He went ahead and actually 833 00:38:51,760 --> 00:38:55,879 Speaker 2: praised Ken Paxton and condemned the quote radical left Democrats 834 00:38:56,080 --> 00:38:58,839 Speaker 2: and the Rhinos for voting against him. As he says, 835 00:38:58,880 --> 00:39:00,960 Speaker 2: I love Texas, I want it to twice watched as 836 00:39:01,000 --> 00:39:04,600 Speaker 2: many other friends, including Ken Paxson, one came alongside me. 837 00:39:04,840 --> 00:39:07,360 Speaker 2: Hopefully Republicans in the Texas House will agree this is 838 00:39:07,360 --> 00:39:09,520 Speaker 2: an unfair process that should not be allowed to happen 839 00:39:09,760 --> 00:39:10,280 Speaker 2: or proceed. 840 00:39:10,360 --> 00:39:12,080 Speaker 4: I will fight you if it does. 841 00:39:12,200 --> 00:39:14,279 Speaker 2: That's part of the reason why some people think things 842 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:15,880 Speaker 2: could happen or change in the Senate. 843 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:16,520 Speaker 4: Yeah. 844 00:39:16,560 --> 00:39:20,640 Speaker 2: Also, Paxon has the support of Senator Ted Cruz. He says, 845 00:39:20,680 --> 00:39:22,960 Speaker 2: quote what is happening to Ken Paxson as a travesty. 846 00:39:23,280 --> 00:39:25,160 Speaker 2: For the last nine years, Ken has been the strongest 847 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:28,040 Speaker 2: conservative ag in the country, bar none. No attorney general 848 00:39:28,040 --> 00:39:30,880 Speaker 2: has battled the abuses of the Biden administration more ferociously 849 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:34,040 Speaker 2: than Ken Paxson. Virtually all the informations in articles were 850 00:39:34,040 --> 00:39:36,759 Speaker 2: public before election day. Voters chose to re elect Ken 851 00:39:36,800 --> 00:39:39,160 Speaker 2: Paxson by a large margin. In my view, the Texas 852 00:39:39,239 --> 00:39:42,520 Speaker 2: Legislature should then respect the House of the Texas voters. 853 00:39:42,560 --> 00:39:45,440 Speaker 2: So there you go, he's got support from Ted Cruz, 854 00:39:45,440 --> 00:39:46,640 Speaker 2: he's got support from Trump. 855 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:49,319 Speaker 4: I still think he might he might survive. I really do. 856 00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:51,960 Speaker 1: I actually think you probably will survive. You need a 857 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:55,920 Speaker 1: two thirds vote in the Senate to convict. And apparently 858 00:39:55,920 --> 00:39:57,520 Speaker 1: I did some digging, and so I was like, what's 859 00:39:57,600 --> 00:39:59,759 Speaker 1: going on here? Why did they turn on this guy? 860 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:03,840 Speaker 1: Apparently this is symbolic of a broader split within the 861 00:40:03,880 --> 00:40:07,960 Speaker 1: Texas GOP almost between like the old Bush wing of 862 00:40:08,040 --> 00:40:11,520 Speaker 1: the party that's like, you know, sort of like classically conservative, 863 00:40:12,239 --> 00:40:15,480 Speaker 1: very cozy with business, very cozy with the oil industry, 864 00:40:15,600 --> 00:40:18,120 Speaker 1: you know, in favor of low taxes, like that vein 865 00:40:18,239 --> 00:40:23,040 Speaker 1: of conservatism, versus the more sort of like performative culture 866 00:40:23,080 --> 00:40:26,040 Speaker 1: war Trump wing of the Republican Party, which also will 867 00:40:26,040 --> 00:40:29,000 Speaker 1: go after corporation they considered to be woke. So there's 868 00:40:29,040 --> 00:40:32,160 Speaker 1: a different There aren't a lot of real hard policy 869 00:40:32,200 --> 00:40:35,760 Speaker 1: ideological differences, but there's very different like vibe and esthetic 870 00:40:36,280 --> 00:40:39,400 Speaker 1: and these. Obviously, Texas is dominated by Republicans both in 871 00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:41,120 Speaker 1: the House and in the Senate, even as it has 872 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:43,120 Speaker 1: shifted some, you know, and made. 873 00:40:42,920 --> 00:40:44,200 Speaker 3: It a little bit more purple. 874 00:40:44,200 --> 00:40:46,400 Speaker 1: But this is still a state legislature that's very dominated 875 00:40:46,440 --> 00:40:49,600 Speaker 1: by Republicans, and you have this real divide between these 876 00:40:49,640 --> 00:40:52,879 Speaker 1: two wings of the party. And one of the sort 877 00:40:52,880 --> 00:40:58,040 Speaker 1: of representatives of that more traditional conservative wing of the 878 00:40:58,080 --> 00:41:00,920 Speaker 1: party is this guy who Speaker of House, Dade Failin, 879 00:41:01,360 --> 00:41:04,640 Speaker 1: and he's the one that Trump was like ripping to shreds. 880 00:41:04,800 --> 00:41:09,200 Speaker 1: And in general, in Texas, it's considered the House is 881 00:41:09,239 --> 00:41:12,840 Speaker 1: more populated with those type of conservatives, and the Senate, 882 00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:14,920 Speaker 1: where he would have to be convicted, where his wife 883 00:41:14,960 --> 00:41:18,520 Speaker 1: also sits, is more populated with the sort of new 884 00:41:18,680 --> 00:41:22,920 Speaker 1: Trumpier conservatives. So that's why you shouldn't be surprised to 885 00:41:22,920 --> 00:41:25,719 Speaker 1: see Trump and Ted Cruz, who's just you know, goes 886 00:41:25,760 --> 00:41:29,760 Speaker 1: wherever he thinks the winds are blowing, backing Ken Paxton 887 00:41:29,840 --> 00:41:31,640 Speaker 1: and all of this, And also why I wouldn't be 888 00:41:31,640 --> 00:41:34,319 Speaker 1: surprised to see him acquitted in the Senate, even though 889 00:41:34,360 --> 00:41:36,560 Speaker 1: the details here are really damning. I mean, you'll not 890 00:41:36,680 --> 00:41:39,600 Speaker 1: with both Trump and Ted Cruz, neither one of them 891 00:41:39,680 --> 00:41:42,319 Speaker 1: is actually defending him on the merits and saying like, oh, 892 00:41:42,360 --> 00:41:44,600 Speaker 1: there's nothing he did nothing wrong and this. 893 00:41:44,640 --> 00:41:46,560 Speaker 3: Was all above board, et cetera, et cetera. 894 00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:50,200 Speaker 1: The best they can muster is well voters already knew 895 00:41:50,239 --> 00:41:50,839 Speaker 1: that he was. 896 00:41:50,880 --> 00:41:53,879 Speaker 3: A corrupt SOB before they re. 897 00:41:53,880 --> 00:41:56,279 Speaker 1: Elected him, which is probably the strongest case that you 898 00:41:56,280 --> 00:41:59,200 Speaker 1: could possibly make for him. And he did win reelection 899 00:42:00,160 --> 00:42:02,719 Speaker 1: quite overwhelmingly. I think it was actually up against. 900 00:42:02,360 --> 00:42:02,840 Speaker 3: Like George P. 901 00:42:03,000 --> 00:42:05,319 Speaker 1: Bush or somebody in that ree elect So he's sort 902 00:42:05,320 --> 00:42:10,160 Speaker 1: of soundly defeated personally that more traditional Bush wing of 903 00:42:10,200 --> 00:42:13,279 Speaker 1: the Texas Republican Party. But that's why you're seeing the 904 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:16,680 Speaker 1: schism right now, and that's why I don't know, but 905 00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:19,960 Speaker 1: I think it is less likely that he will actually 906 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:23,040 Speaker 1: be convicted in the Senate because there are more of 907 00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:26,239 Speaker 1: his ideological allies in the Senate, including his wife, who 908 00:42:26,239 --> 00:42:29,279 Speaker 1: may or may not recuse herself apparently with regard to 909 00:42:29,320 --> 00:42:32,680 Speaker 1: the affair. It was a few years ago. She found 910 00:42:32,719 --> 00:42:35,160 Speaker 1: out in twenty nineteen. They were apart for a while. 911 00:42:35,200 --> 00:42:39,720 Speaker 1: They've since reconciled, so theoretically, you know, water under the bridge, 912 00:42:39,760 --> 00:42:41,640 Speaker 1: I guess, and she may be that team. 913 00:42:41,719 --> 00:42:42,520 Speaker 3: I don't know, all. 914 00:42:42,480 --> 00:42:45,640 Speaker 2: Right, So I wish him Lucky's trump Y's to say, 915 00:42:47,320 --> 00:42:49,560 Speaker 2: all right, let's talk about commercial real estate. This is 916 00:42:49,560 --> 00:42:52,399 Speaker 2: actually a fascinating one. Crystal, you flagged this. Let's go ahead. 917 00:42:52,400 --> 00:42:54,400 Speaker 4: Put this up there on the screen and even diving 918 00:42:54,400 --> 00:42:55,040 Speaker 4: into this a lot. 919 00:42:55,200 --> 00:42:59,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, LA's office towers have on average two hundred and 920 00:42:59,520 --> 00:43:03,680 Speaker 2: thirty dollars in debt per square foot. The only building 921 00:43:03,840 --> 00:43:07,640 Speaker 2: that actually sold this year went for one hundred and fifty. 922 00:43:07,400 --> 00:43:11,000 Speaker 4: Dollars four dollars per square foot, so that's obviously a 923 00:43:11,080 --> 00:43:11,720 Speaker 4: huge delta. 924 00:43:12,080 --> 00:43:15,279 Speaker 2: The biggest landlord in Los Angeles, which is called the 925 00:43:15,320 --> 00:43:19,520 Speaker 2: Canadian Giant, Brookfield, has actually defaulted on more than a 926 00:43:19,600 --> 00:43:23,560 Speaker 2: billion dollars worth of loans already this year. And so 927 00:43:23,960 --> 00:43:28,640 Speaker 2: really what they're appointing to is that this massive, massive 928 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:32,320 Speaker 2: debt bubble in commercial real estate and the lack of people, 929 00:43:32,520 --> 00:43:36,600 Speaker 2: especially in cities Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, New York, 930 00:43:36,640 --> 00:43:40,240 Speaker 2: and Washington, DC, could absolutely blow up. 931 00:43:40,160 --> 00:43:41,400 Speaker 4: In all of our faces. 932 00:43:41,680 --> 00:43:44,640 Speaker 2: And really the time that it would start is now, 933 00:43:44,800 --> 00:43:47,640 Speaker 2: because they've had they've used a lot of their cash, 934 00:43:48,480 --> 00:43:51,640 Speaker 2: they've tried to weather the storms. Leases they're starting to 935 00:43:51,680 --> 00:43:53,759 Speaker 2: go up, and a lot of people are like, yeah, 936 00:43:53,800 --> 00:43:56,240 Speaker 2: I'm not signing or I'm not paying. Sorry, my employees 937 00:43:56,239 --> 00:43:58,120 Speaker 2: aren't coming back to the office, and they don't have 938 00:43:58,200 --> 00:44:01,040 Speaker 2: the same level of cash flow or of future value 939 00:44:01,320 --> 00:44:04,319 Speaker 2: that they once had, and the dramatic drop in all 940 00:44:04,360 --> 00:44:08,320 Speaker 2: of that backstops a lot of loans and then commodities 941 00:44:08,440 --> 00:44:11,479 Speaker 2: on Wall Street. So Los Angeles is a ticking time 942 00:44:11,520 --> 00:44:15,040 Speaker 2: bomb with their decline in the downtown Washington, d C. 943 00:44:15,160 --> 00:44:17,239 Speaker 2: Where you and I are crystal right now. I mean, 944 00:44:17,280 --> 00:44:19,759 Speaker 2: I don't think people understand that Washington, d C. Is 945 00:44:20,080 --> 00:44:22,640 Speaker 2: a ghost town compared to what it wants. I spent 946 00:44:22,680 --> 00:44:26,160 Speaker 2: my whole professional life here, especially in the downtown area, 947 00:44:26,280 --> 00:44:28,680 Speaker 2: and when I go now, it is at best one 948 00:44:28,800 --> 00:44:31,279 Speaker 2: tenth of what it once was like. And really, I 949 00:44:31,280 --> 00:44:34,440 Speaker 2: mean in anybody who commutes or takes the metro or 950 00:44:34,480 --> 00:44:36,200 Speaker 2: any of these can tell you that. And you know 951 00:44:36,239 --> 00:44:38,520 Speaker 2: the city has changed to even the traffic patterns rush 952 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:40,920 Speaker 2: hours at three thirty now, which is crazy. It's like 953 00:44:41,000 --> 00:44:43,080 Speaker 2: everybody's leaving the office at three thirty, even on the 954 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:46,000 Speaker 2: three days or whatever that they do happen to come in. 955 00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:49,200 Speaker 2: New York is a little bit different. Commerce apparently demands 956 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:51,760 Speaker 2: people to come into the office more often, but flexible 957 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:55,000 Speaker 2: work has still dropped things by forty percent. San Francisco 958 00:44:55,280 --> 00:44:59,480 Speaker 2: is donzo like from what from my family. I've been 959 00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:02,520 Speaker 2: to many of those neighborhoods in San Francisco, which were 960 00:45:02,520 --> 00:45:05,600 Speaker 2: once like thriving business districts or at the very least. 961 00:45:05,360 --> 00:45:07,520 Speaker 4: Had a lot going on. From everybody I. 962 00:45:07,520 --> 00:45:10,640 Speaker 2: Know who's visited since has completely either abandoned or they've 963 00:45:10,640 --> 00:45:12,080 Speaker 2: moved to different parts of the city. 964 00:45:12,080 --> 00:45:14,120 Speaker 4: And it's not a surprise. I was in downtown La 965 00:45:14,239 --> 00:45:14,879 Speaker 4: not that long ago. 966 00:45:14,920 --> 00:45:16,439 Speaker 2: It was basically me and a bunch of other people 967 00:45:16,440 --> 00:45:18,640 Speaker 2: who were there for a conference, and nobody was actually 968 00:45:18,719 --> 00:45:20,080 Speaker 2: there for any other reason. 969 00:45:20,200 --> 00:45:23,279 Speaker 1: Well, the hardest hit in the most likely to be 970 00:45:23,360 --> 00:45:26,480 Speaker 1: hit very soon are the West coast cities because on 971 00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:30,399 Speaker 1: top of the pandemic trends of people working remote or 972 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:33,359 Speaker 1: having hybrid work schedules, they also are dealing with this 973 00:45:33,480 --> 00:45:37,680 Speaker 1: massive tech session which impacts them more than any other 974 00:45:37,719 --> 00:45:40,799 Speaker 1: cities in the country. So in San Francisco, put this 975 00:45:40,800 --> 00:45:42,719 Speaker 1: next piece up on the screen, I mean, this is 976 00:45:42,800 --> 00:45:43,680 Speaker 1: really ground zero. 977 00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:44,400 Speaker 3: They say. 978 00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:47,240 Speaker 1: This is from the Guardian. They say, vacant skyscrapers, empty trains. 979 00:45:47,239 --> 00:45:51,560 Speaker 1: Can San Francisco once again reinvent itself? They cite and 980 00:45:51,600 --> 00:45:54,759 Speaker 1: hear a study on if UC Berkeley comparing mobile phone 981 00:45:54,800 --> 00:45:58,000 Speaker 1: data across sixty two downtowns in North America. They found 982 00:45:58,000 --> 00:46:02,440 Speaker 1: that San Francisco's recovery is dead last, with only thirty 983 00:46:02,440 --> 00:46:05,560 Speaker 1: one percent of the activity that it had pre pandemic. 984 00:46:06,000 --> 00:46:09,600 Speaker 1: Some of these major tech companies are leaving downtown they 985 00:46:09,680 --> 00:46:13,520 Speaker 1: don't need the office space anymore. This has obvious massive 986 00:46:13,600 --> 00:46:17,000 Speaker 1: ripple effects in terms of local businesses. You know, the 987 00:46:17,040 --> 00:46:20,560 Speaker 1: shops and restaurants that rely on office workers coming in 988 00:46:20,920 --> 00:46:24,040 Speaker 1: and spending their money while they are working downtown. All 989 00:46:24,080 --> 00:46:27,160 Speaker 1: of those places are really really struggling, and so the 990 00:46:27,200 --> 00:46:29,520 Speaker 1: city is trying to figure out how they avoid the 991 00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:33,560 Speaker 1: so called doom loop of you know, once these office 992 00:46:33,560 --> 00:46:35,840 Speaker 1: buildings go vacant and you have a lot less business 993 00:46:35,840 --> 00:46:38,240 Speaker 1: in the city, then you have a lot less tax revenue, 994 00:46:38,560 --> 00:46:41,200 Speaker 1: and then you can't keep up you know, public transportation 995 00:46:41,320 --> 00:46:44,560 Speaker 1: and infrastructure spend, and the whole thing starts to decay 996 00:46:44,600 --> 00:46:47,520 Speaker 1: and decline. So they are frantically trying to figure out 997 00:46:47,719 --> 00:46:49,839 Speaker 1: what they can do. I mean, one thing in San 998 00:46:49,880 --> 00:46:52,879 Speaker 1: Francisco that's really obvious is they have, perhaps worse than 999 00:46:52,880 --> 00:46:56,080 Speaker 1: any other place in the country, this massive housing crisis 1000 00:46:56,120 --> 00:47:00,400 Speaker 1: of wild unaffordability and a lack of They need way. 1001 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:02,120 Speaker 3: More affordable housing as the bottom line. 1002 00:47:02,320 --> 00:47:04,839 Speaker 1: So there has been this thought of Okay, we'll take 1003 00:47:04,880 --> 00:47:07,879 Speaker 1: all these giant office towers that are now vacant and 1004 00:47:08,120 --> 00:47:12,319 Speaker 1: transform them into residential apartments so that you can deal 1005 00:47:12,360 --> 00:47:13,920 Speaker 1: with your house and costs. You can bring people back 1006 00:47:13,920 --> 00:47:18,160 Speaker 1: to the downtown, you can maintain vitality. That is theoretically possible, 1007 00:47:18,360 --> 00:47:20,759 Speaker 1: but there are a lot of obstacles in the way 1008 00:47:20,800 --> 00:47:22,600 Speaker 1: of that happening. And first of all, conversion like that 1009 00:47:22,680 --> 00:47:25,520 Speaker 1: is not simple and straightford. It's a complex like just 1010 00:47:25,560 --> 00:47:29,239 Speaker 1: you know, development and like architectural perspective. Dean Baker, who's 1011 00:47:29,239 --> 00:47:31,760 Speaker 1: the co director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, 1012 00:47:32,440 --> 00:47:33,960 Speaker 1: he said, the city is set up to serve a 1013 00:47:34,040 --> 00:47:37,160 Speaker 1: large commuting population. That population is gone and not coming back. 1014 00:47:37,239 --> 00:47:39,279 Speaker 1: It will be a doom loop if the city doesn't 1015 00:47:39,320 --> 00:47:42,799 Speaker 1: make it a top priority to convert commercial or residential. California, 1016 00:47:42,800 --> 00:47:45,400 Speaker 1: and I think San Francisco in particular is also notorious 1017 00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:46,280 Speaker 1: for making it very. 1018 00:47:46,120 --> 00:47:47,640 Speaker 3: Hard to do construction. 1019 00:47:47,719 --> 00:47:50,720 Speaker 1: There's like a long permitting process zoning all this stuff. 1020 00:47:51,080 --> 00:47:56,000 Speaker 1: So they need now to aggressively rethink what the city 1021 00:47:56,040 --> 00:47:58,319 Speaker 1: is going to look like before they get behind the 1022 00:47:58,320 --> 00:48:01,799 Speaker 1: eight ball and have They already have big budget deficits 1023 00:48:01,800 --> 00:48:03,719 Speaker 1: that are looming in that are only going to get 1024 00:48:03,719 --> 00:48:06,400 Speaker 1: worse with time. So it is quite a dire circumstance 1025 00:48:06,440 --> 00:48:07,840 Speaker 1: for that budget crime. 1026 00:48:08,480 --> 00:48:12,120 Speaker 2: Like they have everything that could possibly going against them. 1027 00:48:12,120 --> 00:48:14,239 Speaker 4: It's expensive and it's not a nice place to live. 1028 00:48:14,320 --> 00:48:16,120 Speaker 3: That's basically because I love San Oh. 1029 00:48:16,120 --> 00:48:16,719 Speaker 4: It's a great city. 1030 00:48:16,800 --> 00:48:20,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, look, vibrant and interesting and you know 1031 00:48:20,200 --> 00:48:23,280 Speaker 1: culture there, restaurants like, it's beautiful, wonderful. 1032 00:48:23,440 --> 00:48:25,800 Speaker 2: People get mad and I say this, but California wins 1033 00:48:25,800 --> 00:48:26,799 Speaker 2: on all the fundamentals. 1034 00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:28,640 Speaker 4: Look, I like Texas, That's where I grew up. 1035 00:48:28,640 --> 00:48:31,000 Speaker 2: But listen, the ocean is nice, and so is weather 1036 00:48:31,120 --> 00:48:33,440 Speaker 2: where it's hot, but it was also not crazy amounts 1037 00:48:33,440 --> 00:48:34,960 Speaker 2: of humidity, and also the sunshines. 1038 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:38,040 Speaker 4: I mean, look it does you can actually go. Look. 1039 00:48:38,120 --> 00:48:38,960 Speaker 4: I'm obsessed with these. 1040 00:48:38,960 --> 00:48:42,040 Speaker 2: There's like temperate charts which shows you the only real 1041 00:48:42,160 --> 00:48:44,600 Speaker 2: zones in the US with the best weather, and the 1042 00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:46,480 Speaker 2: way that they define that is like X amount of 1043 00:48:46,520 --> 00:48:48,800 Speaker 2: days without clouds, X amount of days without rain, x 1044 00:48:48,880 --> 00:48:49,960 Speaker 2: amount of days with sunshine. 1045 00:48:49,960 --> 00:48:50,920 Speaker 4: Almost all of them. 1046 00:48:50,760 --> 00:48:53,840 Speaker 2: Are in Hawaii and in California. The Bay Area is 1047 00:48:53,840 --> 00:48:56,640 Speaker 2: one of them, Los Angeles, San Diego. There are certain 1048 00:48:56,680 --> 00:48:59,040 Speaker 2: areas on the East coast. I think it's like Georgia, 1049 00:48:59,080 --> 00:49:02,080 Speaker 2: South Carolina, Cape cod and others. 1050 00:49:02,080 --> 00:49:03,120 Speaker 4: But they really only. 1051 00:49:02,960 --> 00:49:06,160 Speaker 2: Qualified because they're super nice in the summer, but during 1052 00:49:06,480 --> 00:49:10,360 Speaker 2: year round, there's no beaten California weather. Sorry everybody, Yeah, 1053 00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:12,239 Speaker 2: but you know, part of the issue is that that's 1054 00:49:12,280 --> 00:49:13,920 Speaker 2: why they are the biggest state in the country, and 1055 00:49:13,920 --> 00:49:15,480 Speaker 2: there's a lot of people who live there. Now there's 1056 00:49:15,520 --> 00:49:18,640 Speaker 2: a disaster of governance, taxation, and so much more. The 1057 00:49:18,719 --> 00:49:21,520 Speaker 2: downtown areas, as you were pointing to, is a real problem. 1058 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:24,160 Speaker 2: And the other issue is that they have net or 1059 00:49:24,239 --> 00:49:27,239 Speaker 2: they have net population declined. So a lot of the 1060 00:49:27,280 --> 00:49:30,240 Speaker 2: people who did leave are exactly the type of folks 1061 00:49:30,400 --> 00:49:33,640 Speaker 2: who would be in these office buildings, you know, in 1062 00:49:34,400 --> 00:49:37,120 Speaker 2: another world. And they moved to Texas, they moved to Austin. 1063 00:49:37,440 --> 00:49:39,279 Speaker 2: Most of them who even moved there aren't even going 1064 00:49:39,280 --> 00:49:41,480 Speaker 2: to the office. A lot of those people are working 1065 00:49:41,600 --> 00:49:44,720 Speaker 2: either fully remote or in some sort of hybrid situation. 1066 00:49:44,840 --> 00:49:47,279 Speaker 2: So overall, I think it's a very bad time to 1067 00:49:47,360 --> 00:49:50,760 Speaker 2: be a commercial real estate developer or a community commercial 1068 00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:53,239 Speaker 2: real estate landowner because another thing that they point to 1069 00:49:53,400 --> 00:49:56,719 Speaker 2: is this entire industry floats on debt. None of these 1070 00:49:56,719 --> 00:50:00,160 Speaker 2: people have large reserves of cash. It's literally the aim 1071 00:50:00,200 --> 00:50:03,000 Speaker 2: of the game is you price your rent like right here, 1072 00:50:03,400 --> 00:50:05,719 Speaker 2: like a little bit above where your debt servicing is. 1073 00:50:05,760 --> 00:50:07,279 Speaker 2: I mean, you just hope and pray, and then over 1074 00:50:07,360 --> 00:50:09,520 Speaker 2: years you become a billionaire and you use a bunch 1075 00:50:09,520 --> 00:50:11,680 Speaker 2: of depreciation on their nonsense in order to write all 1076 00:50:11,680 --> 00:50:12,960 Speaker 2: of this yea, on your taxi. 1077 00:50:13,000 --> 00:50:15,439 Speaker 3: It's a crazy because I gave you more of that too. 1078 00:50:15,560 --> 00:50:16,759 Speaker 4: I don't understand how I can. 1079 00:50:16,840 --> 00:50:18,839 Speaker 2: I don't understand you can even breathe when you're that, 1080 00:50:18,960 --> 00:50:20,200 Speaker 2: you know, close to bankruptcy. 1081 00:50:20,360 --> 00:50:22,160 Speaker 4: We constantly, I guess they do. 1082 00:50:22,239 --> 00:50:23,959 Speaker 3: When people live for that, good for them. 1083 00:50:24,320 --> 00:50:27,919 Speaker 1: One thing that's an important note just on the economics 1084 00:50:27,960 --> 00:50:30,839 Speaker 1: of this is you're probably thinking, for those of you 1085 00:50:30,880 --> 00:50:33,720 Speaker 1: have knowledge of like the local rental and real estate market, 1086 00:50:33,800 --> 00:50:37,320 Speaker 1: like rents haven't really come down. So there are estimates 1087 00:50:37,360 --> 00:50:40,640 Speaker 1: that these buildings valuations are going to crash by something 1088 00:50:40,760 --> 00:50:44,399 Speaker 1: like forty percent, which is I mean, that's an astonishing 1089 00:50:44,840 --> 00:50:46,000 Speaker 1: fall in value. 1090 00:50:46,640 --> 00:50:48,560 Speaker 3: But so far rents have it come down that much? 1091 00:50:48,600 --> 00:50:49,359 Speaker 3: Well why is that? 1092 00:50:49,840 --> 00:50:53,640 Speaker 1: It's because if you drop the rent to reflect with 1093 00:50:53,680 --> 00:50:56,279 Speaker 1: the actual valuations and what you might actually be able 1094 00:50:56,280 --> 00:50:59,160 Speaker 1: to get tenants in well that's going to immediately crash 1095 00:50:59,239 --> 00:51:02,960 Speaker 1: your appraisal. So when you are then up to to 1096 00:51:03,480 --> 00:51:07,440 Speaker 1: you know, renegotiate your loan and try to you know, 1097 00:51:07,480 --> 00:51:09,200 Speaker 1: take out stros or try to be able to roll 1098 00:51:09,200 --> 00:51:11,880 Speaker 1: this thing over, your appraisal is going to come in 1099 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:16,319 Speaker 1: way lower. You're just dramatically underwater then, and so it's 1100 00:51:16,320 --> 00:51:20,480 Speaker 1: a disaster for you. So a lot of developers calculate, 1101 00:51:20,600 --> 00:51:23,680 Speaker 1: you know, understandably so that it's better to keep rents 1102 00:51:23,719 --> 00:51:25,960 Speaker 1: where they are and take the hit in terms of 1103 00:51:26,000 --> 00:51:28,960 Speaker 1: a lost tenant for the time being in hopes that 1104 00:51:29,000 --> 00:51:31,640 Speaker 1: they'll be able to roll over those loans. Now that 1105 00:51:31,680 --> 00:51:35,799 Speaker 1: also becomes much more difficult because of the mortgage rate increases, 1106 00:51:35,880 --> 00:51:39,000 Speaker 1: which you know, not only impact residential loans, but also 1107 00:51:39,160 --> 00:51:43,880 Speaker 1: impact these gigantic you know, loans for skyscrapers that become 1108 00:51:44,040 --> 00:51:46,120 Speaker 1: wildly more unaffordable as well. 1109 00:51:46,400 --> 00:51:47,800 Speaker 3: Not to mention, the banks aren't stupid. 1110 00:51:47,840 --> 00:51:50,479 Speaker 1: They're looking at this and potential you know, massive drop 1111 00:51:50,480 --> 00:51:54,000 Speaker 1: in valuation and they're not feeling too excited about renegotiating 1112 00:51:54,000 --> 00:51:56,840 Speaker 1: a lot of these loans as well. So that's why 1113 00:51:57,040 --> 00:51:59,360 Speaker 1: there were sort of in this you know, in between 1114 00:51:59,520 --> 00:52:03,040 Speaker 1: zone where everybody's just holding their breath and hoping that 1115 00:52:03,040 --> 00:52:06,360 Speaker 1: conditions improve for them by some sort of unforeseen magic. 1116 00:52:06,880 --> 00:52:09,799 Speaker 1: And it feels a little bit static, even though there's 1117 00:52:09,880 --> 00:52:14,160 Speaker 1: a ton of pain and collapse and potential devastation just 1118 00:52:14,239 --> 00:52:16,759 Speaker 1: underneath the surface. So that's part of what is going 1119 00:52:16,800 --> 00:52:19,960 Speaker 1: on here as well. But you know, this story of 1120 00:52:20,160 --> 00:52:23,160 Speaker 1: how downtowns will reinvent themselves in a new era with 1121 00:52:23,280 --> 00:52:25,480 Speaker 1: less office workers is going to be one of the 1122 00:52:25,520 --> 00:52:27,040 Speaker 1: things that you know, this is going to be a 1123 00:52:27,040 --> 00:52:30,120 Speaker 1: major trend over the coming decades. Cities that are able 1124 00:52:30,160 --> 00:52:31,800 Speaker 1: to figure this out, that are able to get ahead 1125 00:52:31,800 --> 00:52:34,000 Speaker 1: of it, that are able to you know, I think 1126 00:52:34,040 --> 00:52:36,200 Speaker 1: the key is going to be building out affordable housing 1127 00:52:36,200 --> 00:52:38,960 Speaker 1: to bring people back to the downtowns so that that 1128 00:52:39,040 --> 00:52:41,040 Speaker 1: while they're working from home, they're working from home in 1129 00:52:41,080 --> 00:52:42,280 Speaker 1: their apartments, in their. 1130 00:52:42,160 --> 00:52:44,240 Speaker 3: Condos, in their houses in your city. 1131 00:52:45,120 --> 00:52:47,800 Speaker 1: And the cities that get on top of that fastest 1132 00:52:47,840 --> 00:52:50,080 Speaker 1: and anticipate the need the soonest, I think, are going 1133 00:52:50,120 --> 00:52:51,000 Speaker 1: to be the ones that succeed. 1134 00:52:51,160 --> 00:52:51,839 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right. 1135 00:52:55,360 --> 00:52:59,760 Speaker 2: Twenty twenty four, we can't miss any of the election news. 1136 00:53:00,080 --> 00:53:03,840 Speaker 2: There is fascinating stuff going on between DeSantis and Trump 1137 00:53:04,160 --> 00:53:07,520 Speaker 2: around the Disney issue. Some people switching sides, but it 1138 00:53:07,560 --> 00:53:09,880 Speaker 2: also kind of shows you how central this is I 1139 00:53:10,239 --> 00:53:12,600 Speaker 2: think to some of the GOP primary. I saw some 1140 00:53:12,640 --> 00:53:16,920 Speaker 2: polling very recently that the ability to combat wokeness is 1141 00:53:17,320 --> 00:53:21,680 Speaker 2: literally number one for some GOP primary voters and especially 1142 00:53:21,680 --> 00:53:24,800 Speaker 2: for people who are on the fence between Ron DeSantis 1143 00:53:24,840 --> 00:53:27,480 Speaker 2: and Trump. So DeSantis once again got to give the 1144 00:53:27,520 --> 00:53:31,279 Speaker 2: man respect, actually hitting back against Trump, especially on the 1145 00:53:31,320 --> 00:53:33,799 Speaker 2: Disney issue. During his Fox and Friends interview, Here's what 1146 00:53:33,840 --> 00:53:34,439 Speaker 2: he had to say. 1147 00:53:34,680 --> 00:53:36,840 Speaker 7: We obviously have a lot in common with Iowa in 1148 00:53:36,880 --> 00:53:38,759 Speaker 7: terms of what Florida has done and what they've done 1149 00:53:38,840 --> 00:53:41,759 Speaker 7: under Governor Kim Reynolds, and I think the groundswell of 1150 00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:44,319 Speaker 7: support has been really, really strong, and you know, we're 1151 00:53:44,320 --> 00:53:46,040 Speaker 7: going to press the case. I mean, you know, they 1152 00:53:46,120 --> 00:53:48,920 Speaker 7: had mentioned there may be some differences with me and 1153 00:53:48,960 --> 00:53:51,960 Speaker 7: Donald Trump, and I think that those differences were doown 1154 00:53:52,040 --> 00:53:54,040 Speaker 7: to my benefit in a place like Iowa. I mean, 1155 00:53:54,040 --> 00:53:56,719 Speaker 7: for example, you know, he's taken the side of Disney 1156 00:53:57,160 --> 00:54:00,000 Speaker 7: in our fight down here in Florida. I'm standing for parents, 1157 00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:02,760 Speaker 7: I'm standing for children, and I think a multi billion 1158 00:54:02,800 --> 00:54:06,640 Speaker 7: dollar company that sexualizes children is not consistent with the 1159 00:54:06,719 --> 00:54:10,520 Speaker 7: values of Florida. Or the values of a place like Iowa. 1160 00:54:10,640 --> 00:54:12,960 Speaker 2: Hey, you got to give the guy credit because what 1161 00:54:13,000 --> 00:54:13,560 Speaker 2: did he say? 1162 00:54:13,600 --> 00:54:16,600 Speaker 4: First? He shouts out Kim Reynolds, who is the governor 1163 00:54:16,640 --> 00:54:17,080 Speaker 4: of Iowa. 1164 00:54:17,080 --> 00:54:18,920 Speaker 2: He said the Iowa said the word Iowa, I think 1165 00:54:18,960 --> 00:54:22,520 Speaker 2: three times during that short clip, making it clear that 1166 00:54:22,600 --> 00:54:25,880 Speaker 2: he's trying to contrast himself directly with Trump in that state. 1167 00:54:26,040 --> 00:54:28,640 Speaker 2: The news also just broke this morning, Crystal he will 1168 00:54:28,640 --> 00:54:34,680 Speaker 2: be attending the Joni Earnst like Summer Iowa event. Jony Ernst, 1169 00:54:34,960 --> 00:54:37,840 Speaker 2: for those who don't know, is the She's the senator 1170 00:54:37,840 --> 00:54:38,400 Speaker 2: from Iowa. 1171 00:54:38,560 --> 00:54:40,240 Speaker 4: It's called the Roast and Ride. 1172 00:54:40,360 --> 00:54:43,600 Speaker 2: It's a kickoff for the twenty twenty four campaign in Iowa. 1173 00:54:43,640 --> 00:54:46,080 Speaker 2: And obviously she's very important in somebody that they have 1174 00:54:46,160 --> 00:54:49,160 Speaker 2: to woo. Everybody tries to if they are hopeful to 1175 00:54:49,239 --> 00:54:52,440 Speaker 2: attend some of her events. Trump right now is unconfirmed 1176 00:54:52,719 --> 00:54:56,160 Speaker 2: for the event, but Dessantas says he absolutely will be there. 1177 00:54:56,200 --> 00:55:00,000 Speaker 2: This underscores his early state strategy. 1178 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:02,520 Speaker 4: Tromp has actually changed his tune. 1179 00:55:02,560 --> 00:55:05,919 Speaker 2: At first, he took Disney's side, and he said, oh, well, 1180 00:55:05,960 --> 00:55:07,640 Speaker 2: why is DeSantis going after Disney? 1181 00:55:07,880 --> 00:55:09,920 Speaker 3: Now he's getting humiliated by Disney. 1182 00:55:10,440 --> 00:55:13,600 Speaker 2: He said, humiliated by Disney, but he also basically implied 1183 00:55:13,600 --> 00:55:15,960 Speaker 2: that he shouldn't be going after Disney at all, and 1184 00:55:16,120 --> 00:55:18,399 Speaker 2: also hit him on the job case now though he's 1185 00:55:18,400 --> 00:55:21,040 Speaker 2: actually changing his tune. Put this up there on truth Socially, 1186 00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:23,640 Speaker 2: he says, Ron de Sanctimonious just stated without correction on 1187 00:55:23,680 --> 00:55:26,920 Speaker 2: Fox and Friends that I was backing Disney wrong. Fox 1188 00:55:26,960 --> 00:55:29,319 Speaker 2: should have read my post in Truth on Disney, but 1189 00:55:29,360 --> 00:55:31,760 Speaker 2: that's not the game they play. Also, in the polls, 1190 00:55:31,800 --> 00:55:34,000 Speaker 2: I am beating Biden by a lot. Rob is not 1191 00:55:34,280 --> 00:55:37,200 Speaker 2: also way up on Ron. Check out the dysanctist speech. 1192 00:55:37,280 --> 00:55:42,799 Speaker 2: So he obviously live tweeted yanctus Rob all of that. 1193 00:55:42,880 --> 00:55:45,960 Speaker 2: But actually what was even more interesting is that the 1194 00:55:46,000 --> 00:55:49,520 Speaker 2: same truth that after came before was that he said 1195 00:55:49,560 --> 00:55:52,360 Speaker 2: that Disney has become a woke, in disgusting shadow of 1196 00:55:52,360 --> 00:55:54,960 Speaker 2: its former self, people actually hating it. It must go 1197 00:55:55,080 --> 00:55:57,319 Speaker 2: back to what it once was or the market will 1198 00:55:57,320 --> 00:56:00,400 Speaker 2: do damage. This all happened during the governor ship of 1199 00:56:00,480 --> 00:56:04,520 Speaker 2: Rob Dysanctimonious. Instead of complaining now for publicity reasons only, 1200 00:56:04,800 --> 00:56:06,120 Speaker 2: he should have stopped it long ago. 1201 00:56:06,239 --> 00:56:08,440 Speaker 4: Would have been easy to do still is. 1202 00:56:08,520 --> 00:56:13,719 Speaker 2: So now he's like, well it happened under Desanta's governorship, 1203 00:56:13,719 --> 00:56:16,239 Speaker 2: as if he somehow controls Disney and he's like, no, 1204 00:56:16,400 --> 00:56:19,279 Speaker 2: actually it should be stopped. But DeSantis is ineffective. I 1205 00:56:19,280 --> 00:56:22,200 Speaker 2: actually think that's more of an effective attack on the 1206 00:56:22,239 --> 00:56:23,840 Speaker 2: Disney issue is that he tried to do and he 1207 00:56:23,880 --> 00:56:26,200 Speaker 2: failed after Disney was able to outsmart him on the 1208 00:56:26,239 --> 00:56:27,600 Speaker 2: Reedy Creek Governorship board. 1209 00:56:27,800 --> 00:56:30,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean on the merits, you know, the Disney 1210 00:56:30,160 --> 00:56:32,520 Speaker 1: fight I sort of hate because there's there's no one 1211 00:56:32,520 --> 00:56:33,400 Speaker 1: to share for here. 1212 00:56:33,440 --> 00:56:34,280 Speaker 3: Like it is true. 1213 00:56:34,320 --> 00:56:37,800 Speaker 1: Disney is this like gigantic, unaccountable corporation that's been gifted 1214 00:56:38,200 --> 00:56:42,600 Speaker 1: massive tax breaks and benefits in Florida for decades now. 1215 00:56:43,160 --> 00:56:45,520 Speaker 1: I think the reason that DeSantis is going after them 1216 00:56:45,600 --> 00:56:47,759 Speaker 1: is stupid. It's just political posturing. You can see my 1217 00:56:47,800 --> 00:56:50,720 Speaker 1: monologue yesterday about the giveaway that he's giving to gifting 1218 00:56:50,760 --> 00:56:52,880 Speaker 1: to Elon Musk to see that this is not a 1219 00:56:52,920 --> 00:56:55,320 Speaker 1: critique of corporate power. It's just a war on certain 1220 00:56:55,360 --> 00:56:57,239 Speaker 1: corporations doing things that he doesn't like. 1221 00:56:57,280 --> 00:56:58,040 Speaker 3: Ideologically. 1222 00:56:58,440 --> 00:57:00,560 Speaker 1: On the other hand, like the arguments that Disney is 1223 00:57:00,640 --> 00:57:03,080 Speaker 1: using in court are kind of insane and not anything 1224 00:57:03,120 --> 00:57:05,319 Speaker 1: that anyone who has a critique of corporate power should 1225 00:57:05,360 --> 00:57:07,640 Speaker 1: be cheering on. So that's on the merits of this. 1226 00:57:07,960 --> 00:57:11,040 Speaker 1: I mean with regard to Trump, like this is again 1227 00:57:11,280 --> 00:57:13,320 Speaker 1: one of the ways Trump is graded on a curve. 1228 00:57:13,640 --> 00:57:16,280 Speaker 1: He can say one thing one day, workshop that see 1229 00:57:16,280 --> 00:57:18,640 Speaker 1: how it goes for him, and totally changes tune and 1230 00:57:18,680 --> 00:57:22,040 Speaker 1: say something completely different called the other day, and even 1231 00:57:22,080 --> 00:57:24,040 Speaker 1: if he does get called out for it, you know, 1232 00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:26,640 Speaker 1: ultimately people just kind of go along with it and 1233 00:57:26,760 --> 00:57:29,280 Speaker 1: buy into whatever the latest line of attack is. I 1234 00:57:29,360 --> 00:57:33,120 Speaker 1: think for Ron DeSantis with the Disney fight, the risk 1235 00:57:33,240 --> 00:57:36,960 Speaker 1: is not among Republican base voters, who I think generally 1236 00:57:37,200 --> 00:57:40,000 Speaker 1: like the idea of like you said, they're into fighting 1237 00:57:40,000 --> 00:57:43,400 Speaker 1: against wokeness, whatever that means, and they like the specter 1238 00:57:43,560 --> 00:57:46,360 Speaker 1: of him like taking on this quote unquote quote corporation. 1239 00:57:46,920 --> 00:57:49,120 Speaker 1: The issue for him is more with the donor set 1240 00:57:49,480 --> 00:57:52,680 Speaker 1: that do not like this. And Disney has already said they're, 1241 00:57:52,760 --> 00:57:55,360 Speaker 1: you know, pulling out some investment in the state. How 1242 00:57:55,400 --> 00:57:57,840 Speaker 1: will that impact the state of Florida, et cetera. But 1243 00:57:58,240 --> 00:58:00,960 Speaker 1: the donor class is very uncomfortable with this fight, and 1244 00:58:01,040 --> 00:58:03,560 Speaker 1: that is a key part of the DeSantis constituency. 1245 00:58:04,000 --> 00:58:05,400 Speaker 3: So that's where I think. 1246 00:58:05,200 --> 00:58:07,560 Speaker 1: This is the trickiest for him, not as much with 1247 00:58:07,720 --> 00:58:11,400 Speaker 1: the Republican base. However, to the extent that Trump has 1248 00:58:11,400 --> 00:58:16,160 Speaker 1: an effective attack here, the idea that DeSantis is losing 1249 00:58:16,320 --> 00:58:19,560 Speaker 1: and getting humiliated by Disney, I think that is the 1250 00:58:19,560 --> 00:58:21,280 Speaker 1: strongest line that's definitely strung. 1251 00:58:21,520 --> 00:58:24,040 Speaker 2: One that said DeSantis also sticking Trump in the eye. 1252 00:58:24,080 --> 00:58:26,000 Speaker 2: Put this up there on the screen, and I actually 1253 00:58:26,080 --> 00:58:28,960 Speaker 2: love this. Meets DeSantis meets with nine to eleven families 1254 00:58:28,960 --> 00:58:31,960 Speaker 2: who had bashed Trump for the Saudi funded golf tournament. 1255 00:58:32,400 --> 00:58:35,360 Speaker 2: He spent Memorial Day with the families of nine to 1256 00:58:35,400 --> 00:58:39,360 Speaker 2: eleven victims who had bashed President Trump for hosting the 1257 00:58:39,400 --> 00:58:43,520 Speaker 2: live golf tournament at the Trump property, hosted five hundred veterans, 1258 00:58:43,640 --> 00:58:46,040 Speaker 2: gold star families and relatives who had lost loved ones 1259 00:58:46,160 --> 00:58:49,440 Speaker 2: on September eleventh at the Florida governor Mansion, and then 1260 00:58:49,480 --> 00:58:52,280 Speaker 2: specifically went out of his way to meet with eight 1261 00:58:52,320 --> 00:58:54,680 Speaker 2: of the nine to eleven families who had talked to 1262 00:58:54,760 --> 00:58:57,200 Speaker 2: him about this issue. All those families came out and 1263 00:58:57,240 --> 00:58:59,720 Speaker 2: were singing his praises, saying how happy they were with 1264 00:59:00,160 --> 00:59:02,640 Speaker 2: to be able to meet and to have their concerns voiced. 1265 00:59:02,680 --> 00:59:06,440 Speaker 4: After Trump went ahead and had that tournament. 1266 00:59:06,080 --> 00:59:09,320 Speaker 2: And obviously had a very close relationship with Saudi Arabia, 1267 00:59:09,400 --> 00:59:11,480 Speaker 2: and they also did it as more of a stick 1268 00:59:11,520 --> 00:59:13,919 Speaker 2: in the eye, not just politically, but put this up there. 1269 00:59:14,080 --> 00:59:17,000 Speaker 2: We also know that there currently is a part of 1270 00:59:17,040 --> 00:59:21,040 Speaker 2: the DOJ investigation into one of the myriad of investigations 1271 00:59:21,280 --> 00:59:25,240 Speaker 2: is actually specifically looking into Trump's ties to Live Golf 1272 00:59:25,560 --> 00:59:29,080 Speaker 2: around foreign influence and Saudi Arabia and financial ties. So 1273 00:59:29,560 --> 00:59:32,440 Speaker 2: it was a dual pronged attack and it was a 1274 00:59:32,440 --> 00:59:35,000 Speaker 2: smart play. It was a good headline for Desantas, no 1275 00:59:35,120 --> 00:59:35,760 Speaker 2: question about it. 1276 00:59:36,160 --> 00:59:39,920 Speaker 1: Listen, if you actually care about government corruption foreign influence, 1277 00:59:40,000 --> 00:59:42,640 Speaker 1: like if you're worried about Hunter Biden's ties. For example, 1278 00:59:43,160 --> 00:59:46,160 Speaker 1: this is so recent we Live Golf is funded directly 1279 00:59:46,200 --> 00:59:49,400 Speaker 1: by the Saudi government. Trump is getting an undisclosed amount 1280 00:59:49,440 --> 00:59:52,760 Speaker 1: of cash directly from them, not to mention Kushner's deals 1281 00:59:52,800 --> 00:59:57,280 Speaker 1: over there, etc. So yeah, this should be investigated. And yeah, 1282 00:59:57,360 --> 01:00:00,480 Speaker 1: if you actually care about government corruption and wanting to 1283 01:00:00,520 --> 01:00:02,200 Speaker 1: make sure that the president of the United States is 1284 01:00:02,240 --> 01:00:05,080 Speaker 1: actually serving US interests and not doing the bidding of 1285 01:00:05,160 --> 01:00:08,800 Speaker 1: whoever is like lining his pockets, this is definitely a 1286 01:00:08,840 --> 01:00:11,560 Speaker 1: big deal and something that should be looked into as 1287 01:00:11,640 --> 01:00:14,640 Speaker 1: part of the myriad of investigations that are going on here. 1288 01:00:15,040 --> 01:00:16,480 Speaker 3: I thought it was funny. 1289 01:00:16,520 --> 01:00:19,200 Speaker 1: In the letter that those families of nine to eleven 1290 01:00:19,240 --> 01:00:23,880 Speaker 1: victims sent condemning Trump for hosting these live golf Saudi 1291 01:00:23,920 --> 01:00:28,680 Speaker 1: funded golf events. In addition to expressing their extreme pain, frustration, 1292 01:00:28,840 --> 01:00:29,919 Speaker 1: and anger, they. 1293 01:00:29,840 --> 01:00:31,959 Speaker 3: Actually included a quote. 1294 01:00:31,600 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: From Trump's twenty sixteen comments on the nine to eleven 1295 01:00:34,960 --> 01:00:37,520 Speaker 1: terrorist attack, from a segment that he did on Fox 1296 01:00:37,520 --> 01:00:40,600 Speaker 1: and Friends. He said, at that time, who blow up 1297 01:00:40,640 --> 01:00:43,520 Speaker 1: the World Trade Center? It wasn't the Iraqis, It was Saudi. 1298 01:00:43,800 --> 01:00:46,480 Speaker 1: Take a look at Saudi Arabia. Open the documents. We 1299 01:00:46,520 --> 01:00:49,120 Speaker 1: ought to get Bush or somebody to have the documents open, 1300 01:00:49,160 --> 01:00:51,640 Speaker 1: because frankly, if you open the documents, I think you 1301 01:00:51,720 --> 01:00:54,680 Speaker 1: were going to see it was Saudi Arabia. Obviously saying 1302 01:00:54,680 --> 01:00:57,080 Speaker 1: a different tune once he was in office, and continues 1303 01:00:57,120 --> 01:00:58,960 Speaker 1: to sing a very different tune now that he is 1304 01:00:59,000 --> 01:01:03,120 Speaker 1: getting closed large amount of cash directly from the Saudi government. 1305 01:01:03,240 --> 01:01:03,439 Speaker 4: Yep. 1306 01:01:03,560 --> 01:01:06,960 Speaker 2: Well, I think it's an issue, and I despise all 1307 01:01:07,000 --> 01:01:09,600 Speaker 2: of them. There's so many live golf defenders like normal, 1308 01:01:10,000 --> 01:01:12,320 Speaker 2: I had never I'm not a golf guy. I went 1309 01:01:12,360 --> 01:01:14,520 Speaker 2: to a driving range recently and that was fun. But 1310 01:01:14,960 --> 01:01:18,920 Speaker 2: I've encountered golf bros who love live golf because players 1311 01:01:18,920 --> 01:01:21,120 Speaker 2: should get in their bag and all that. I'm like, Okay, look, 1312 01:01:21,200 --> 01:01:24,240 Speaker 2: it's not about the players. It's about like disgusting foreign corruption. 1313 01:01:24,360 --> 01:01:27,520 Speaker 2: And this isn't even a defensive PGA. From what I understand, 1314 01:01:27,560 --> 01:01:29,960 Speaker 2: it sounds like the PGA actually do suck and do 1315 01:01:30,040 --> 01:01:32,400 Speaker 2: not treat the people well. There are many reasons for 1316 01:01:32,440 --> 01:01:35,320 Speaker 2: why they should be dissatisfied shockers, just like every other 1317 01:01:35,400 --> 01:01:38,120 Speaker 2: league and big business maybe, and I absolutely think it 1318 01:01:38,160 --> 01:01:39,760 Speaker 2: should be reformed. Do I think you should be reformed 1319 01:01:39,760 --> 01:01:41,440 Speaker 2: by the Saudi Arabian government? 1320 01:01:41,600 --> 01:01:42,120 Speaker 4: Right? No? 1321 01:01:42,520 --> 01:01:45,080 Speaker 2: And like that is where it's like, I don't understand 1322 01:01:45,240 --> 01:01:47,520 Speaker 2: how you could possibly defend. 1323 01:01:47,160 --> 01:01:48,800 Speaker 4: It unless you are a midwin moron. 1324 01:01:48,880 --> 01:01:51,560 Speaker 2: So anybody just putting that out there, I already know 1325 01:01:51,680 --> 01:01:54,040 Speaker 2: the amount of golf bros who are going to be 1326 01:01:54,080 --> 01:01:56,200 Speaker 2: in the comments on this one is going to drive. 1327 01:01:58,400 --> 01:02:00,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, but learn more about golf. 1328 01:02:01,160 --> 01:02:03,400 Speaker 2: But I will tell you we are absolutely the minor. 1329 01:02:03,520 --> 01:02:05,640 Speaker 2: I mean, he's an actual golfer. Again, I only a 1330 01:02:05,840 --> 01:02:08,360 Speaker 2: peripherally connected to the golf world. But what I'm saying 1331 01:02:08,360 --> 01:02:11,160 Speaker 2: apparently is very controversial in the golf. 1332 01:02:10,880 --> 01:02:12,040 Speaker 3: There's a real device. 1333 01:02:12,080 --> 01:02:14,400 Speaker 1: I actually think a majority is more on the side 1334 01:02:14,440 --> 01:02:15,880 Speaker 1: of PGA and his leg. 1335 01:02:16,520 --> 01:02:18,680 Speaker 4: That's maybe the silent majority. 1336 01:02:18,280 --> 01:02:20,360 Speaker 3: Is with Yes, I think they are, but I don't 1337 01:02:20,400 --> 01:02:20,720 Speaker 3: really know. 1338 01:02:20,800 --> 01:02:23,480 Speaker 4: I'm personally I just like Tiger. Anyway, let's go. 1339 01:02:23,600 --> 01:02:24,960 Speaker 2: Let's go to the next one here and put it 1340 01:02:25,040 --> 01:02:27,760 Speaker 2: up there on the screen, because this is also important 1341 01:02:28,000 --> 01:02:31,520 Speaker 2: for the twenty twenty four race and actually possibly might 1342 01:02:31,560 --> 01:02:34,360 Speaker 2: have the most impact on everything. If we got a 1343 01:02:34,480 --> 01:02:37,160 Speaker 2: chance to not have a Biden Trump rematch, it won't 1344 01:02:37,160 --> 01:02:38,920 Speaker 2: be because democracy wants it. 1345 01:02:38,920 --> 01:02:40,000 Speaker 4: It's this headline. 1346 01:02:40,160 --> 01:02:45,000 Speaker 2: Wall Street dreads Biden Trump rematch Damie Jamie Diamond, Joe Mansion. 1347 01:02:45,240 --> 01:02:48,080 Speaker 2: The finance set is casting about for a more business 1348 01:02:48,080 --> 01:02:51,760 Speaker 2: friendly challenger, so, according to the Wall Street Journal, on 1349 01:02:51,800 --> 01:02:54,960 Speaker 2: a farm in upstate New York, Wall Street types groused 1350 01:02:55,040 --> 01:02:58,520 Speaker 2: about the upcoming presidential election in between rights. 1351 01:02:58,240 --> 01:02:59,520 Speaker 4: Of roast pig. 1352 01:03:00,080 --> 01:03:04,840 Speaker 2: Billionaire money manager Mario Gabelli and banker Ralph Schlostein were 1353 01:03:04,840 --> 01:03:08,480 Speaker 2: among the guests at a Chief Executive carnivores ball, a 1354 01:03:08,560 --> 01:03:10,720 Speaker 2: celebration of all things meet that. 1355 01:03:10,760 --> 01:03:11,440 Speaker 4: Featured a lot. 1356 01:03:11,560 --> 01:03:14,600 Speaker 2: This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard featuring lively 1357 01:03:14,680 --> 01:03:18,440 Speaker 2: discussions of potential business friendly candidates who can shake up 1358 01:03:18,480 --> 01:03:23,000 Speaker 2: the twenty twenty four race. They floated people like Secretary 1359 01:03:23,120 --> 01:03:27,240 Speaker 2: Gina Raymondo, who's the cabinet secretary. They said that they 1360 01:03:27,240 --> 01:03:30,480 Speaker 2: were dreading a Biden and a Trump rematch and that 1361 01:03:30,600 --> 01:03:34,440 Speaker 2: neither were quote business friendly enough for them. 1362 01:03:34,480 --> 01:03:35,760 Speaker 3: So insane. 1363 01:03:35,840 --> 01:03:38,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, it is insane considering how much a handout so 1364 01:03:38,240 --> 01:03:41,360 Speaker 2: they've gotten from both of them. Were They liked Ron 1365 01:03:41,600 --> 01:03:44,720 Speaker 2: at first, but now that he's chosen the side against Disney, 1366 01:03:44,720 --> 01:03:47,560 Speaker 2: there against him. You have people like Bill Ackman, who's 1367 01:03:47,560 --> 01:03:51,040 Speaker 2: tweeted his support of Vivek Ramaswami, who himself is a 1368 01:03:51,160 --> 01:03:54,040 Speaker 2: multi one hundred millionaire after the sale of his company. 1369 01:03:54,040 --> 01:03:56,919 Speaker 2: Tim Scott and South Carolina of South Carolina and Nikki 1370 01:03:56,960 --> 01:04:00,560 Speaker 2: Haley are also absolutely beloved by this donor said, people 1371 01:04:00,640 --> 01:04:03,080 Speaker 2: like Steve Schwartzman and others. 1372 01:04:03,360 --> 01:04:04,760 Speaker 4: You'll don't forget. 1373 01:04:04,800 --> 01:04:07,160 Speaker 2: You weren't here for this, but Larry Ellison was very 1374 01:04:07,160 --> 01:04:10,800 Speaker 2: prominently at Tim Scott's announcement as the VIP Guest of honor, 1375 01:04:10,880 --> 01:04:13,480 Speaker 2: the multi billionaire obviously going to underwrite the entire Yeah, 1376 01:04:13,480 --> 01:04:16,120 Speaker 2: the donors loved Tim Scott there's nobody that they love 1377 01:04:16,200 --> 01:04:20,160 Speaker 2: more in my opinion, so they've also considered this no 1378 01:04:20,320 --> 01:04:24,080 Speaker 2: labels attempt at maybe launching Joe Manchin. But I saw 1379 01:04:24,120 --> 01:04:26,040 Speaker 2: this and I was like, man, this is the only 1380 01:04:26,160 --> 01:04:30,280 Speaker 2: actual threat to the Biden Trump rematch that probably exists 1381 01:04:30,360 --> 01:04:33,360 Speaker 2: is if these Wall Street billionaires don't like it, well, 1382 01:04:33,400 --> 01:04:35,120 Speaker 2: that actually might have some impact. 1383 01:04:35,160 --> 01:04:37,160 Speaker 1: Well this was I mean, this was the play for 1384 01:04:37,280 --> 01:04:40,360 Speaker 1: Rondo Santa Is for all of capital to get behind him. 1385 01:04:40,840 --> 01:04:44,720 Speaker 1: But now both with his comments on Ukraine and also 1386 01:04:45,560 --> 01:04:48,240 Speaker 1: his war with Disney that he's sort of fallen out 1387 01:04:48,280 --> 01:04:51,920 Speaker 1: of favor and so they're casting about for some I mean, 1388 01:04:51,920 --> 01:04:54,320 Speaker 1: this is just insane to me, Like, think of how 1389 01:04:54,400 --> 01:04:57,800 Speaker 1: much these people got from the Trump presidency, Like he 1390 01:04:57,960 --> 01:05:01,000 Speaker 1: rewrote the whole tax code on their didn't close the 1391 01:05:01,000 --> 01:05:03,280 Speaker 1: Carried Interest show, didn't do any of that sort of stuff. 1392 01:05:03,640 --> 01:05:08,160 Speaker 1: Just giant gift after giant gift. Joe Biden was known 1393 01:05:08,240 --> 01:05:10,840 Speaker 1: as like the you know senator from the credit card 1394 01:05:10,880 --> 01:05:14,400 Speaker 1: capital of the country for his entire career. This is 1395 01:05:14,480 --> 01:05:18,320 Speaker 1: hardly someone who's some like radical renegade from the left. 1396 01:05:18,440 --> 01:05:22,080 Speaker 1: This is a corporate friendly democrat as much as you 1397 01:05:22,120 --> 01:05:24,880 Speaker 1: could possibly get. But the thing they don't like about 1398 01:05:24,920 --> 01:05:28,960 Speaker 1: Biden is they say his aggressive stance on anti trust 1399 01:05:29,080 --> 01:05:32,760 Speaker 1: enforcement has turned off potential backers whose profits depend on 1400 01:05:32,800 --> 01:05:34,280 Speaker 1: a healthy supply of corporate deals. 1401 01:05:34,960 --> 01:05:36,080 Speaker 3: Do you understand what that means. 1402 01:05:36,360 --> 01:05:40,439 Speaker 1: They're admitting up front they basically need monopolies, Like they're 1403 01:05:40,440 --> 01:05:43,760 Speaker 1: not looking for some free market competition. They're like, he's 1404 01:05:43,760 --> 01:05:46,240 Speaker 1: not letting us rig the market to the extent that 1405 01:05:46,280 --> 01:05:48,560 Speaker 1: we want, So we're mad at him. That's their beef 1406 01:05:48,600 --> 01:05:50,680 Speaker 1: with Joe Biden, which is astonishing. And by the way, 1407 01:05:51,280 --> 01:05:54,200 Speaker 1: just follow Matt Stoller on the number of Wall Street 1408 01:05:54,240 --> 01:05:59,160 Speaker 1: Journal editorials trashing Lena Khan over her anti trust stance. 1409 01:05:59,240 --> 01:06:02,120 Speaker 1: It's like for already one. I mean, it's an insane number. 1410 01:06:02,200 --> 01:06:04,800 Speaker 1: They have a complete jihad against this woman because they 1411 01:06:04,880 --> 01:06:07,800 Speaker 1: hate the fact that they might have some semblance of 1412 01:06:07,880 --> 01:06:11,320 Speaker 1: actual competition in the marketplace and not just a series 1413 01:06:11,360 --> 01:06:14,520 Speaker 1: of gigantic monopolies who were able to price gouge all 1414 01:06:14,520 --> 01:06:15,680 Speaker 1: of us and etc. 1415 01:06:16,160 --> 01:06:19,160 Speaker 3: So it is incredible to me that if. 1416 01:06:19,040 --> 01:06:22,560 Speaker 1: These people don't get every single thing they want at 1417 01:06:22,640 --> 01:06:25,720 Speaker 1: every single second of the day, they pitch a complete 1418 01:06:25,720 --> 01:06:29,640 Speaker 1: fit and you know, go desperately searching for some more 1419 01:06:29,680 --> 01:06:32,640 Speaker 1: friendly alternative who's actually going to literally give them everything 1420 01:06:32,640 --> 01:06:35,920 Speaker 1: they want. It reminds me of during the Obama administration, 1421 01:06:36,080 --> 01:06:41,439 Speaker 1: another very Wall Street, very corporate friendly government. He made 1422 01:06:41,520 --> 01:06:46,120 Speaker 1: some one speech that was like mildly critical of Wall 1423 01:06:46,160 --> 01:06:48,480 Speaker 1: Street at a time when they had just crashed the 1424 01:06:48,680 --> 01:06:54,080 Speaker 1: entire global financial economy and destroyed and they were so oh, 1425 01:06:54,120 --> 01:06:57,080 Speaker 1: they were so in their feelings about how could you 1426 01:06:57,160 --> 01:07:00,400 Speaker 1: criticize us? And they were, you know, openly weeping about 1427 01:07:00,400 --> 01:07:03,320 Speaker 1: how hurt they were over his mild critique of them. 1428 01:07:03,520 --> 01:07:07,320 Speaker 1: There are the most fragile, egotistical people in the entire planet. 1429 01:07:07,480 --> 01:07:09,360 Speaker 1: So if you're wondering, I don't know if you've seen. 1430 01:07:09,400 --> 01:07:10,960 Speaker 1: We haven't covered a lot of this because I don't 1431 01:07:11,000 --> 01:07:12,320 Speaker 1: think there's a lot of legs behind it. 1432 01:07:12,360 --> 01:07:16,320 Speaker 3: But there's been all this chatter about no labels. 1433 01:07:16,480 --> 01:07:19,760 Speaker 1: Fielding a presidential candidate, and Joe Manchit appears to be 1434 01:07:19,800 --> 01:07:21,919 Speaker 1: the person they would most likely to put in there 1435 01:07:21,960 --> 01:07:25,320 Speaker 1: because he is, if anything, just completely beholden to corporate America. 1436 01:07:25,360 --> 01:07:27,680 Speaker 1: Over and over again, he's proven his bona fides there. 1437 01:07:28,320 --> 01:07:30,840 Speaker 1: They actually have been working on. This is well funded 1438 01:07:30,840 --> 01:07:32,840 Speaker 1: because it's backed by these type of people. They've been 1439 01:07:32,840 --> 01:07:36,480 Speaker 1: working on getting ballot access. Democrats are very worried that 1440 01:07:36,560 --> 01:07:38,920 Speaker 1: if they do field some sort of third party candidate 1441 01:07:38,960 --> 01:07:41,000 Speaker 1: on the no label's ballot line, that this could hand 1442 01:07:41,000 --> 01:07:45,080 Speaker 1: the election to Trump. This type of maneuvering is where 1443 01:07:45,120 --> 01:07:47,760 Speaker 1: all the energy from that comes from. There is no 1444 01:07:48,000 --> 01:07:51,080 Speaker 1: organic interest in the country out there for someone to 1445 01:07:51,120 --> 01:07:54,600 Speaker 1: be even more pro Wall Street and even more pro corporate. 1446 01:07:54,960 --> 01:07:58,720 Speaker 1: But they delude themselves consistently into thinking that they represent 1447 01:07:58,800 --> 01:08:01,000 Speaker 1: some sort of silent majority to which is also just 1448 01:08:01,080 --> 01:08:02,720 Speaker 1: incredible and shows you the bubble they live in. 1449 01:08:04,160 --> 01:08:07,120 Speaker 2: It's certainly a majority of their peers, but that's the 1450 01:08:07,160 --> 01:08:09,440 Speaker 2: only yes indeed. 1451 01:08:09,480 --> 01:08:11,160 Speaker 1: All right, all right, So we got a little update 1452 01:08:11,200 --> 01:08:13,640 Speaker 1: for you on what's going on over there on MSNBC, 1453 01:08:13,840 --> 01:08:15,920 Speaker 1: which is struggling to grapple with the fact that, yes, 1454 01:08:16,000 --> 01:08:18,959 Speaker 1: Joe Biden has a healthy lead in the Democratic primary, 1455 01:08:19,120 --> 01:08:23,439 Speaker 1: but the contenders against him, Marian and RFK Junior, have 1456 01:08:23,600 --> 01:08:26,000 Speaker 1: been a little bit stronger in the polls than probably 1457 01:08:26,120 --> 01:08:27,240 Speaker 1: they're comfortable with. 1458 01:08:27,520 --> 01:08:28,720 Speaker 3: They've gone out of their way. 1459 01:08:28,800 --> 01:08:30,840 Speaker 1: All of media has to say they're not serious, and 1460 01:08:30,880 --> 01:08:33,040 Speaker 1: Biden doesn't have a real contender and he's just going 1461 01:08:33,080 --> 01:08:34,880 Speaker 1: to be anointed, and all the action is on the 1462 01:08:34,960 --> 01:08:40,400 Speaker 1: Republican side. So MSNBC's Mehdi Hassan had Marian Williamson on 1463 01:08:40,439 --> 01:08:44,800 Speaker 1: his show, presumably to talk about her campaign. Just take 1464 01:08:44,840 --> 01:08:48,360 Speaker 1: a listen to the way that Mehdi, who is supposedly 1465 01:08:48,479 --> 01:08:49,479 Speaker 1: like a progressive and a. 1466 01:08:49,520 --> 01:08:52,880 Speaker 3: Leftist, the way that he sets this up on MSNBC. 1467 01:08:53,040 --> 01:08:53,479 Speaker 3: Listen to this. 1468 01:08:53,840 --> 01:08:56,519 Speaker 8: So what do you say to those who point out that, yes, 1469 01:08:56,640 --> 01:08:59,800 Speaker 8: you are popular with younger voters and on TikTok, but 1470 01:09:00,120 --> 01:09:03,040 Speaker 8: you can't win a Democratic presidential primary. You're essentially a 1471 01:09:03,080 --> 01:09:06,719 Speaker 8: spoiler candidate, and so by primary ing Biden, all you're 1472 01:09:06,720 --> 01:09:09,439 Speaker 8: doing is weakening him in the general and making it 1473 01:09:09,520 --> 01:09:12,160 Speaker 8: easier for a Republican to beat him in twenty twenty 1474 01:09:12,200 --> 01:09:14,320 Speaker 8: four in what will be a very tight election. 1475 01:09:15,400 --> 01:09:17,000 Speaker 5: Well, there are two things about what you said. First 1476 01:09:17,040 --> 01:09:19,000 Speaker 5: of all, you said I'm a spoiler candidate. I'm not 1477 01:09:19,040 --> 01:09:22,000 Speaker 5: a spoiler candidate. I'm running in a primary, So you 1478 01:09:22,040 --> 01:09:24,040 Speaker 5: can't be a spoiler if you're running in the primary. 1479 01:09:24,200 --> 01:09:26,559 Speaker 5: The second thing you said was this narrative you can't win. 1480 01:09:26,680 --> 01:09:30,240 Speaker 5: Isn't that what people said about Donald Trump? I will 1481 01:09:30,240 --> 01:09:33,519 Speaker 5: win if people vote for me. I believe that in 1482 01:09:33,560 --> 01:09:36,479 Speaker 5: a democracy, people should have as wide an array of 1483 01:09:36,520 --> 01:09:40,360 Speaker 5: options before them as there are candidates running on agendas. 1484 01:09:41,080 --> 01:09:43,680 Speaker 5: That's what a democracy is. We need to protect our 1485 01:09:43,720 --> 01:09:46,760 Speaker 5: democracy right now, that's obvious to everyone. The way you 1486 01:09:46,800 --> 01:09:51,040 Speaker 5: protect your democracy is by using your democracy. Candidate suppression 1487 01:09:51,080 --> 01:09:53,519 Speaker 5: is a form of voter suppression. So this idea that 1488 01:09:53,560 --> 01:09:55,720 Speaker 5: I'm a spoiler, No, I'm not a spoiler. I'm a 1489 01:09:55,760 --> 01:09:59,160 Speaker 5: candidate in a primary, and it's very important. I believe 1490 01:09:59,200 --> 01:10:02,080 Speaker 5: that the president debate me, that the President debate any 1491 01:10:02,120 --> 01:10:05,360 Speaker 5: other people who are challenging him. At a time like this, 1492 01:10:05,439 --> 01:10:08,559 Speaker 5: when the fashions are clearly at the door, we should 1493 01:10:08,600 --> 01:10:11,400 Speaker 5: be having a very serious conversation about what it will 1494 01:10:11,439 --> 01:10:13,880 Speaker 5: take to defeat them, and not just accepting what the 1495 01:10:13,960 --> 01:10:16,639 Speaker 5: DNC has to say because a few elites have decided 1496 01:10:16,680 --> 01:10:17,840 Speaker 5: it's going to be Joe Biden. 1497 01:10:17,920 --> 01:10:21,919 Speaker 1: So he says you can't win and you're a spoiler, 1498 01:10:22,120 --> 01:10:24,960 Speaker 1: which she rightly is very confused by, because the previous 1499 01:10:25,000 --> 01:10:27,599 Speaker 1: definition of spoiler was a third party candidate. Like we're 1500 01:10:27,600 --> 01:10:30,400 Speaker 1: just talking about the noble labels thing, which I dispute. 1501 01:10:30,000 --> 01:10:32,320 Speaker 3: Even that right. If people want to run third party, 1502 01:10:32,479 --> 01:10:34,360 Speaker 3: is your job to feel the voters they have the 1503 01:10:34,439 --> 01:10:34,920 Speaker 3: right to do it. 1504 01:10:34,960 --> 01:10:37,280 Speaker 1: Okay, but at least with a third party thing, you 1505 01:10:37,280 --> 01:10:39,080 Speaker 1: can at least see the case that they're making here. 1506 01:10:39,479 --> 01:10:42,120 Speaker 1: She is running an RFK junior, are running in a 1507 01:10:42,160 --> 01:10:43,280 Speaker 1: democratic primary. 1508 01:10:43,840 --> 01:10:44,719 Speaker 3: These are the same. 1509 01:10:44,520 --> 01:10:48,280 Speaker 1: People who spend all day every day say democracy is 1510 01:10:48,320 --> 01:10:51,680 Speaker 1: at stake and democracy is on vote, like democracy is 1511 01:10:51,720 --> 01:10:52,600 Speaker 1: on the line. 1512 01:10:52,320 --> 01:10:54,080 Speaker 3: Because it is in the minute. 1513 01:10:54,080 --> 01:10:56,400 Speaker 1: You're like, okay, I'm here for the democratic process through 1514 01:10:56,600 --> 01:10:57,439 Speaker 1: How could you? 1515 01:10:57,840 --> 01:11:00,840 Speaker 3: How dare you? You can't win and you're spoiler? Et cetera, 1516 01:11:00,880 --> 01:11:01,280 Speaker 3: et cetera. 1517 01:11:01,760 --> 01:11:04,360 Speaker 1: Now, specifically, the role that Mehdi is playing here I 1518 01:11:04,360 --> 01:11:07,439 Speaker 1: think is particularly gross because he acknowledges Sager at another 1519 01:11:07,439 --> 01:11:09,720 Speaker 1: point in the interview, like I actually agree with you 1520 01:11:09,840 --> 01:11:11,160 Speaker 1: on policy. 1521 01:11:11,240 --> 01:11:13,640 Speaker 3: All of his objections are Number one, I don't think 1522 01:11:13,640 --> 01:11:15,840 Speaker 3: you're qualifying serious. Well, guess what. It's not up to 1523 01:11:15,880 --> 01:11:16,559 Speaker 3: you to determine. 1524 01:11:16,760 --> 01:11:19,400 Speaker 1: Voters should get the chance to determine that through a 1525 01:11:19,400 --> 01:11:22,559 Speaker 1: democratic process. So he says he agrees with her on 1526 01:11:22,600 --> 01:11:26,160 Speaker 1: the policy, but then he's giving cover and permission for 1527 01:11:26,479 --> 01:11:29,519 Speaker 1: people who are ideologically aligned with her to come up 1528 01:11:29,560 --> 01:11:32,599 Speaker 1: with some excuse for voting for some corporate back candidate 1529 01:11:32,680 --> 01:11:35,320 Speaker 1: that has been you know, failing from a progressive perspective 1530 01:11:35,320 --> 01:11:38,479 Speaker 1: and from just a like general American perspective. So I 1531 01:11:38,479 --> 01:11:42,040 Speaker 1: think it was really gross and unfair, and he didn't 1532 01:11:42,040 --> 01:11:44,439 Speaker 1: give her any chance to like discuss like what she 1533 01:11:44,520 --> 01:11:46,439 Speaker 1: actually thinks in the campaign. It was all this stuff 1534 01:11:46,479 --> 01:11:48,559 Speaker 1: about like, oh, you're not serious and you're not qualified 1535 01:11:48,560 --> 01:11:49,120 Speaker 1: and you can't win. 1536 01:11:49,280 --> 01:11:51,160 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean I thought it was really bad. And 1537 01:11:51,280 --> 01:11:52,519 Speaker 4: also it's just not the problem. 1538 01:11:52,560 --> 01:11:55,360 Speaker 2: It's also Look with MSNBC especially, they have very little 1539 01:11:55,360 --> 01:11:58,200 Speaker 2: time I actually interview, So why would you waste your 1540 01:11:58,280 --> 01:12:02,040 Speaker 2: time actually asking a question like this about being a spoiler. 1541 01:12:02,080 --> 01:12:04,960 Speaker 2: Why don't you actually just delve into You can ask strategy, 1542 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:07,720 Speaker 2: You could ask differences, you could ask many other things. 1543 01:12:07,720 --> 01:12:09,120 Speaker 2: I mean, you could even ask it in a different way, 1544 01:12:09,200 --> 01:12:10,840 Speaker 2: be like, look, one of the criticisms against you is 1545 01:12:10,880 --> 01:12:12,240 Speaker 2: your spoiler. What do you say to that? I mean, 1546 01:12:12,320 --> 01:12:14,920 Speaker 2: that's that's actually a more neutral way of saying it, 1547 01:12:14,960 --> 01:12:17,519 Speaker 2: instead of coming in and over the top and saying 1548 01:12:17,920 --> 01:12:20,639 Speaker 2: you are a spoiler, like you don't get to determine it. 1549 01:12:20,600 --> 01:12:22,680 Speaker 1: As right, It doesn't even make sense to society. Is 1550 01:12:23,160 --> 01:12:25,480 Speaker 1: she or Rfcare Junior are spoilers? 1551 01:12:25,520 --> 01:12:25,640 Speaker 4: Right? 1552 01:12:25,720 --> 01:12:29,280 Speaker 1: They're running in a democratic primary. So I mean this 1553 01:12:29,439 --> 01:12:32,360 Speaker 1: is to me just like does not compute. It's utter 1554 01:12:32,680 --> 01:12:36,360 Speaker 1: invented nonsense, and to waste your time on it instead 1555 01:12:36,360 --> 01:12:38,320 Speaker 1: of talking about I mean, this should be very simple, 1556 01:12:38,479 --> 01:12:42,759 Speaker 1: like if you ideologically align with Canada other than Joe Biden, 1557 01:12:42,800 --> 01:12:45,439 Speaker 1: then you should support that candidate. You know, it shouldn't 1558 01:12:45,479 --> 01:12:49,599 Speaker 1: be all of the like, but clearly like he's allowed 1559 01:12:49,600 --> 01:12:53,800 Speaker 1: at MSNBC to break with the line on things like 1560 01:12:53,880 --> 01:12:56,519 Speaker 1: you know, Israel, Palestine, and he's good on other Florid 1561 01:12:56,520 --> 01:12:57,280 Speaker 1: affairs issues. 1562 01:12:57,280 --> 01:12:58,679 Speaker 3: I don't want to take that away from him. 1563 01:12:59,160 --> 01:13:01,280 Speaker 1: But the end of the day, if you're going to 1564 01:13:01,320 --> 01:13:05,000 Speaker 1: be on MSMEC, you're going to freaking back democratic leadership. 1565 01:13:05,080 --> 01:13:07,240 Speaker 1: You're going to back Joe Biden, You're going to carry 1566 01:13:07,240 --> 01:13:09,000 Speaker 1: water for him. You're going to be in service of that. 1567 01:13:09,120 --> 01:13:11,640 Speaker 1: And in fact, it makes him a more effective propagandist 1568 01:13:11,640 --> 01:13:13,800 Speaker 1: that he does break the line occasionally on these other 1569 01:13:13,880 --> 01:13:17,080 Speaker 1: issues because he gains credibility as being this like honest 1570 01:13:17,080 --> 01:13:19,840 Speaker 1: broker and a true representative of the left. So then 1571 01:13:19,880 --> 01:13:21,760 Speaker 1: when you do something like this and it's like, well 1572 01:13:21,800 --> 01:13:26,960 Speaker 1: even leftists don't support Marianne, then you are you know, 1573 01:13:27,040 --> 01:13:30,240 Speaker 1: providing cover, providing a justification for people who should be 1574 01:13:30,280 --> 01:13:32,960 Speaker 1: her ideological allies to just get you know, sucked up 1575 01:13:32,960 --> 01:13:34,960 Speaker 1: into the whatever the DNC wants him to do. 1576 01:13:35,240 --> 01:13:39,080 Speaker 4: Quote Blue, No matter who, it's a it's a mind disease. Yeah, 1577 01:13:39,080 --> 01:13:43,560 Speaker 4: I guess that's the one I say it result, what 1578 01:13:43,600 --> 01:13:44,479 Speaker 4: are you taking a look at? 1579 01:13:44,600 --> 01:13:44,960 Speaker 3: Well? 1580 01:13:45,120 --> 01:13:47,400 Speaker 1: As you know, Donald Trump has been relentlessly hitting round 1581 01:13:47,439 --> 01:13:50,080 Speaker 1: de Santis with every attack possible, throwing it all against 1582 01:13:50,080 --> 01:13:52,320 Speaker 1: the wall to just see what sticks. But somewhere between 1583 01:13:52,360 --> 01:13:54,880 Speaker 1: slamming his lack of loyalty and alleging that he's a grumer, 1584 01:13:55,160 --> 01:13:57,479 Speaker 1: Trump's are an interesting critique into the mix. In a 1585 01:13:57,479 --> 01:13:59,759 Speaker 1: post a while ago on True Social Trump wrote, quote 1586 01:14:00,160 --> 01:14:04,240 Speaker 1: Ron the sanctimonious is delivering the biggest insurance company bailout 1587 01:14:04,280 --> 01:14:08,200 Speaker 1: to globalist insurance companies in history. He's also crushed Florida 1588 01:14:08,200 --> 01:14:11,400 Speaker 1: homeowners whose houses were destroyed in the hurricane. They're getting 1589 01:14:11,400 --> 01:14:14,439 Speaker 1: pennies on the dollar. This is the worst insurance scam 1590 01:14:14,520 --> 01:14:17,320 Speaker 1: in the entire country. Now, if you don't live in 1591 01:14:17,320 --> 01:14:19,720 Speaker 1: Florida or work in the insurance industry, you could be 1592 01:14:19,760 --> 01:14:22,439 Speaker 1: forgiven for having no idea what Trump is talking about here. 1593 01:14:22,800 --> 01:14:25,479 Speaker 1: Whether or not this particular attack undo Santis sticks. There 1594 01:14:25,560 --> 01:14:28,160 Speaker 1: is actually a lot to say about the underlying problem 1595 01:14:28,200 --> 01:14:30,800 Speaker 1: that Trump is wildly gesturing at. It's an issue that 1596 01:14:30,880 --> 01:14:33,559 Speaker 1: is increasingly relevant not only of Florida, but in states 1597 01:14:33,560 --> 01:14:37,519 Speaker 1: across the country due to climate fuel disasters. Vast swaws 1598 01:14:37,560 --> 01:14:42,040 Speaker 1: of America are becoming essentially uninsurable. Homeowners are getting gouged, 1599 01:14:42,439 --> 01:14:46,360 Speaker 1: state insurance funds are collapsing, and private insurers are demanding 1600 01:14:46,400 --> 01:14:49,040 Speaker 1: bailounce and engaging in some instances. 1601 01:14:48,520 --> 01:14:49,559 Speaker 3: In outright fraud. 1602 01:14:50,040 --> 01:14:53,120 Speaker 1: It is a mess with huge implications for homeowners and 1603 01:14:53,200 --> 01:14:56,200 Speaker 1: looming costs for the entire economy. Just take a look 1604 01:14:56,240 --> 01:14:59,360 Speaker 1: at these headlines. You've got Some insurance companies pull out 1605 01:14:59,400 --> 01:15:03,280 Speaker 1: of Luisiana in Florida in hurricane season. State Farms stops 1606 01:15:03,280 --> 01:15:07,639 Speaker 1: home insurance sales in California citing wildfire risks. Colorado's wildfire 1607 01:15:07,720 --> 01:15:10,839 Speaker 1: risk is so high some homeowners cannot get in short, 1608 01:15:11,240 --> 01:15:14,439 Speaker 1: whether it's wildfire's, hurricanes, or floods. The increased threat of 1609 01:15:14,479 --> 01:15:16,920 Speaker 1: extreme weather, especially in states along the Gulf Coast and 1610 01:15:16,920 --> 01:15:20,240 Speaker 1: in the western US, has made homeowners insurance a losing 1611 01:15:20,320 --> 01:15:23,479 Speaker 1: proposition for a lot of actors in the private market. 1612 01:15:23,840 --> 01:15:26,719 Speaker 1: In fact, the CEO of one of the largest insurance 1613 01:15:26,720 --> 01:15:29,680 Speaker 1: companies in the world, recently issued a dire warning to 1614 01:15:29,720 --> 01:15:33,160 Speaker 1: a US Senate committee that these disasters have completely destabilized 1615 01:15:33,200 --> 01:15:35,400 Speaker 1: the insurance and reinsurance industries. 1616 01:15:35,640 --> 01:15:36,439 Speaker 3: For those who don't know. 1617 01:15:36,400 --> 01:15:39,960 Speaker 1: Reinsurance is basically insurance for the insurers and backstops the 1618 01:15:40,000 --> 01:15:44,880 Speaker 1: losses from particularly catastrophic events. PLC president Eric Anderson testified 1619 01:15:44,880 --> 01:15:48,160 Speaker 1: that reinsurance companies quote have been withdrawing from high risk 1620 01:15:48,200 --> 01:15:52,040 Speaker 1: areas around wildfire and flood. In particular, he continued, just 1621 01:15:52,080 --> 01:15:54,920 Speaker 1: as the US economy was overexposed to mortgage risk in 1622 01:15:54,920 --> 01:15:58,040 Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, the economy today is overexposed to 1623 01:15:58,160 --> 01:16:01,519 Speaker 1: climate risk. Anyone with a mortgage is required by banks 1624 01:16:01,560 --> 01:16:04,439 Speaker 1: to have an active homeowners insurance policy, So what happens 1625 01:16:04,479 --> 01:16:07,200 Speaker 1: in this very un sexy sounding market can have huge 1626 01:16:07,240 --> 01:16:11,479 Speaker 1: implications for housing affordability. In high risk areas, premiums have 1627 01:16:11,560 --> 01:16:16,400 Speaker 1: been absolutely skyrocketing. In fact, after Hurricane Ian slammed into 1628 01:16:16,400 --> 01:16:18,960 Speaker 1: Florida as one of the most expensive extreme weather events 1629 01:16:18,960 --> 01:16:22,320 Speaker 1: in history, Florida homeowners have watched with horror as their 1630 01:16:22,320 --> 01:16:26,160 Speaker 1: premiums have gone up an astonishing amount. One analysis projected 1631 01:16:26,160 --> 01:16:29,439 Speaker 1: that Florida homeowners can expect a forty percent rate hike 1632 01:16:29,840 --> 01:16:32,240 Speaker 1: this year alone, and that is if you can get 1633 01:16:32,240 --> 01:16:33,120 Speaker 1: insurance at all. 1634 01:16:33,400 --> 01:16:34,680 Speaker 3: Many states, including. 1635 01:16:34,320 --> 01:16:37,720 Speaker 1: Florida, have watched as large insurers abandon the market altogether, 1636 01:16:37,880 --> 01:16:41,720 Speaker 1: leaving taxpayers as the insurer of last resort. In Colorado, 1637 01:16:42,120 --> 01:16:45,480 Speaker 1: desperate homeowners and would be homeowners have been begging legislators 1638 01:16:45,520 --> 01:16:47,960 Speaker 1: to intervene in order to establish one of those state 1639 01:16:48,040 --> 01:16:51,160 Speaker 1: insurance funds. Up until now they didn't need one, but 1640 01:16:51,240 --> 01:16:54,160 Speaker 1: wildfire risk has made areas close to forests in particular 1641 01:16:54,280 --> 01:16:58,519 Speaker 1: difficult or impossible to ensure. California's state insurance plan has 1642 01:16:58,560 --> 01:17:01,639 Speaker 1: a massive three hundred and thirty to million dollar deficit 1643 01:17:01,840 --> 01:17:04,519 Speaker 1: thanks to an influx of new policyholders due in part 1644 01:17:04,520 --> 01:17:07,679 Speaker 1: to an increase in wildfires. Now every year that state 1645 01:17:07,680 --> 01:17:09,960 Speaker 1: seems to set a new record for the expense and 1646 01:17:10,000 --> 01:17:14,120 Speaker 1: the damage of those wildfires. Overall, state sponsored plans across 1647 01:17:14,120 --> 01:17:17,080 Speaker 1: the country have seen a twenty nine percent increase in 1648 01:17:17,120 --> 01:17:20,559 Speaker 1: policies in just a three year period. It is an 1649 01:17:20,640 --> 01:17:23,479 Speaker 1: unsustainable situation and something has got a gif. And to 1650 01:17:23,479 --> 01:17:25,920 Speaker 1: bring it back around to Florida, the Sunshine State might 1651 01:17:25,960 --> 01:17:28,280 Speaker 1: be the best cautionary tale of what it looks like 1652 01:17:28,479 --> 01:17:31,679 Speaker 1: when the whole thing starts to give. According to Washington 1653 01:17:31,720 --> 01:17:35,200 Speaker 1: Post investigation, Florida's insurance market began its descent into chaos 1654 01:17:35,280 --> 01:17:38,360 Speaker 1: in two thousand and five, when devastating storms caused several 1655 01:17:38,439 --> 01:17:41,479 Speaker 1: large insurers like State Farm to flee the state. This 1656 01:17:41,640 --> 01:17:44,840 Speaker 1: left smaller, less financially stable firms to come in to 1657 01:17:44,920 --> 01:17:47,360 Speaker 1: try to fill the gap. The next big blow came 1658 01:17:47,400 --> 01:17:50,360 Speaker 1: in twenty seventeen, one of the most expensive storm seasons 1659 01:17:50,360 --> 01:17:54,040 Speaker 1: in history, most recently the destruction and cleanup of Hurricane Ian, 1660 01:17:54,080 --> 01:17:58,080 Speaker 1: which I mentioned before, tipped that system from crisis to catastrophe. 1661 01:17:58,439 --> 01:18:00,439 Speaker 1: Left in the wreckage, of course, have been home owners 1662 01:18:00,640 --> 01:18:04,360 Speaker 1: desperately trying to rebuild their lives after intense storm damage. 1663 01:18:04,560 --> 01:18:07,479 Speaker 1: Insurers have been caught engaging have been caught engaging in 1664 01:18:07,560 --> 01:18:11,400 Speaker 1: outright fraud, denying legitimate claims or paying out a tiny 1665 01:18:11,479 --> 01:18:15,360 Speaker 1: fraction of the actual incurred damages. The Washington Post uncovered 1666 01:18:15,360 --> 01:18:20,480 Speaker 1: a scheme among insurers to systematically delay and underpay policyholders 1667 01:18:20,479 --> 01:18:23,599 Speaker 1: in the state. Meanwhile, insurance lobbyists ran to the Republican 1668 01:18:23,680 --> 01:18:27,040 Speaker 1: led state legislature to demand additional protections and the bailoutfit. 1669 01:18:27,080 --> 01:18:29,599 Speaker 1: Trump referenced in his attack on DeSantis, and you know 1670 01:18:29,680 --> 01:18:33,000 Speaker 1: the man does actually have a point. Florida legislature decided 1671 01:18:33,040 --> 01:18:36,840 Speaker 1: to create a taxpayer funded one billion dollar bailout fund 1672 01:18:36,880 --> 01:18:40,200 Speaker 1: for the insurers to tap if their losses were too great. 1673 01:18:40,479 --> 01:18:43,479 Speaker 1: They also made it more difficult for stiffed and frauded 1674 01:18:43,520 --> 01:18:46,120 Speaker 1: homeowners to soothe scam insurers who are ripping them off 1675 01:18:46,160 --> 01:18:49,640 Speaker 1: on mass and the legislature limited who can get policies 1676 01:18:49,680 --> 01:18:52,519 Speaker 1: through the state run insurer, forcing more customers into the 1677 01:18:52,560 --> 01:18:56,080 Speaker 1: hands of these price gouging criminals. Hurricane Ian made landfall 1678 01:18:56,080 --> 01:18:59,200 Speaker 1: in September of last year. As of March of this year, 1679 01:18:59,520 --> 01:19:03,360 Speaker 1: thirty three three thousand Flora homeowners still have open claims 1680 01:19:03,400 --> 01:19:06,439 Speaker 1: linked to Ian that have received no payment. Another one 1681 01:19:06,479 --> 01:19:09,400 Speaker 1: hundred and twenty five thousand were closed without ever receiving 1682 01:19:09,520 --> 01:19:13,000 Speaker 1: any payment. The unmitigated March of climate crisis has forced 1683 01:19:13,040 --> 01:19:16,720 Speaker 1: a series of terrible choices on state governments and on taxpayers. 1684 01:19:16,960 --> 01:19:19,920 Speaker 1: You could have taxpayers subsidized the cost of insuring homes 1685 01:19:19,920 --> 01:19:23,000 Speaker 1: and disaster prone areas. You could continue trying to muddle 1686 01:19:23,040 --> 01:19:26,040 Speaker 1: through with a mix of private insurers, rising premiums for everyone, 1687 01:19:26,040 --> 01:19:29,200 Speaker 1: and occasional industry balance and rampant fraud. Or you can 1688 01:19:29,280 --> 01:19:33,040 Speaker 1: basically abandon the large and growing regions which are uninsurable 1689 01:19:33,160 --> 01:19:36,599 Speaker 1: due to extreme weather risk without dealing with the underlying crisis, 1690 01:19:36,600 --> 01:19:40,080 Speaker 1: our options are only set to become more painful. This 1691 01:19:40,160 --> 01:19:41,960 Speaker 1: is a huge deal in Florida, it's a huge deal 1692 01:19:41,960 --> 01:19:42,439 Speaker 1: in Texas. 1693 01:19:42,479 --> 01:19:45,280 Speaker 2: And if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1694 01:19:45,280 --> 01:19:51,400 Speaker 2: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot Com. 1695 01:19:51,439 --> 01:19:52,599 Speaker 3: All right, Sager, what are you looking at? 1696 01:19:52,720 --> 01:19:52,920 Speaker 6: Well? 1697 01:19:53,200 --> 01:19:56,160 Speaker 2: While it's certainly downside to live in interesting times, one 1698 01:19:56,200 --> 01:19:59,000 Speaker 2: of the more exciting things about the last few years 1699 01:19:59,360 --> 01:20:02,479 Speaker 2: is the feeling that just anything is possible. I especially 1700 01:20:02,479 --> 01:20:04,759 Speaker 2: felt that way when Trump was elected in twenty sixteen 1701 01:20:04,880 --> 01:20:06,960 Speaker 2: against all odds. I felt that way as I watched 1702 01:20:07,000 --> 01:20:08,880 Speaker 2: millions of people pick up and move in the middle 1703 01:20:08,880 --> 01:20:09,519 Speaker 2: of the pandemic. 1704 01:20:09,760 --> 01:20:10,439 Speaker 4: I feel it now. 1705 01:20:10,520 --> 01:20:13,360 Speaker 2: People are asking questions, making decisions they never would have 1706 01:20:13,560 --> 01:20:16,559 Speaker 2: dreamed of before, out of fear of not doing quote, 1707 01:20:16,640 --> 01:20:20,519 Speaker 2: what you're supposed to do. College attendance has for years 1708 01:20:20,560 --> 01:20:23,000 Speaker 2: now been in the category of what you're supposed to do. 1709 01:20:23,400 --> 01:20:26,320 Speaker 2: Millions of Americans a generation ago, who never would have 1710 01:20:26,360 --> 01:20:28,960 Speaker 2: considered college decided to go even if they didn't have 1711 01:20:29,000 --> 01:20:30,599 Speaker 2: the money, or even if they didn't have a clear 1712 01:20:30,640 --> 01:20:33,920 Speaker 2: idea of what they wanted to do. They spent tens 1713 01:20:33,960 --> 01:20:36,920 Speaker 2: of thousands of dollars, They went into debt on average, 1714 01:20:37,000 --> 01:20:39,679 Speaker 2: and in many cases they did not see the once 1715 01:20:39,720 --> 01:20:43,200 Speaker 2: promised wage premium. By and large, despite decades of the 1716 01:20:43,240 --> 01:20:46,080 Speaker 2: same behavior and an entire generation of people who were 1717 01:20:46,080 --> 01:20:50,200 Speaker 2: going broke, this trend still continued right up until COVID, 1718 01:20:50,400 --> 01:20:53,879 Speaker 2: when suddenly a few things became very clear. One, schools 1719 01:20:53,920 --> 01:20:58,000 Speaker 2: really were not charging you for the quote unquote college experience. 1720 01:20:58,360 --> 01:21:00,800 Speaker 2: They not only did not cut tuition but actually raised 1721 01:21:00,800 --> 01:21:03,479 Speaker 2: it during literal zoom school from home, showing that the 1722 01:21:03,479 --> 01:21:06,919 Speaker 2: only thing you're paying for is that credential. Two, despite 1723 01:21:06,920 --> 01:21:10,639 Speaker 2: the fact that demand remained relatively stable, an entire generation 1724 01:21:10,800 --> 01:21:13,360 Speaker 2: of young men just decided, you know what, screw this. 1725 01:21:13,720 --> 01:21:14,960 Speaker 4: The number of new young. 1726 01:21:14,840 --> 01:21:18,479 Speaker 2: Males entering college drop dramatically in twenty twenty one, even 1727 01:21:18,479 --> 01:21:20,519 Speaker 2: as campus is reopened, and they put us on track 1728 01:21:20,720 --> 01:21:23,719 Speaker 2: for a troubling trend. Sometime in the near future, women 1729 01:21:23,760 --> 01:21:26,760 Speaker 2: will outnumber men on college campus, and not only that, 1730 01:21:26,800 --> 01:21:29,360 Speaker 2: but outnumber them two to one. Given the way that 1731 01:21:29,400 --> 01:21:32,400 Speaker 2: our current higher elite is largely composed of the college educated. 1732 01:21:32,640 --> 01:21:35,599 Speaker 2: It will mean a dramatic misalignment of women and men, 1733 01:21:35,840 --> 01:21:37,840 Speaker 2: and will have profound social effects on. 1734 01:21:37,800 --> 01:21:39,840 Speaker 4: Our dating culture and future marriage rates. 1735 01:21:40,080 --> 01:21:42,920 Speaker 2: Despite all this data on collapsing male interest in college, 1736 01:21:43,040 --> 01:21:45,960 Speaker 2: elites have refused to stop their tune. They still insist 1737 01:21:46,000 --> 01:21:48,880 Speaker 2: student debt cancelation is the only answer, not holding the 1738 01:21:48,920 --> 01:21:52,679 Speaker 2: colleges criminally liable for lying to people. They still insest 1739 01:21:52,720 --> 01:21:55,679 Speaker 2: our broader culture doesn't have a bias against men, especially 1740 01:21:55,680 --> 01:21:58,120 Speaker 2: at the higher elite circles, and they continue to insist 1741 01:21:58,200 --> 01:22:00,400 Speaker 2: a college degree is the only way to get ahead 1742 01:22:00,439 --> 01:22:03,200 Speaker 2: in this country. Unfortunately for them, men are just not 1743 01:22:03,360 --> 01:22:06,920 Speaker 2: listening to them anymore. College enrollment rates for high school 1744 01:22:06,920 --> 01:22:09,639 Speaker 2: graduates between the ages of sixteen and twenty four dropped 1745 01:22:09,680 --> 01:22:12,960 Speaker 2: a stunning four percent overall in the last four years. 1746 01:22:13,160 --> 01:22:14,839 Speaker 4: New Labor Department data reveals. 1747 01:22:15,080 --> 01:22:19,320 Speaker 2: Unsurprisingly, this coincided with the lowest teenage unemployment rate in 1748 01:22:19,400 --> 01:22:23,280 Speaker 2: seventy years on record, a massive increase in wages paid 1749 01:22:23,280 --> 01:22:26,160 Speaker 2: in the hospitality sector and across the lower skilled economy. 1750 01:22:26,320 --> 01:22:28,880 Speaker 2: The tight labor market has made college a worse trade 1751 01:22:28,960 --> 01:22:32,120 Speaker 2: than ever for millions of people, especially men. This puts 1752 01:22:32,160 --> 01:22:34,519 Speaker 2: the current college enrollment rate at a place it has 1753 01:22:34,600 --> 01:22:38,080 Speaker 2: not been at for more than two decades. The vast 1754 01:22:38,120 --> 01:22:41,760 Speaker 2: majority of this decline is distributed to is attributed to 1755 01:22:41,800 --> 01:22:45,759 Speaker 2: male matriculation. Female college matriculation remains at sixty six percent, 1756 01:22:45,920 --> 01:22:49,200 Speaker 2: the male college rate is ten percent lower. It is 1757 01:22:49,240 --> 01:22:51,200 Speaker 2: not like these guys are just sitting on the couch either. 1758 01:22:51,439 --> 01:22:53,960 Speaker 2: Many of them have taken up apprenticeships, which are up 1759 01:22:53,960 --> 01:22:56,479 Speaker 2: fifty percent or more year over year. They're filling the 1760 01:22:56,560 --> 01:22:58,600 Speaker 2: huge shortage of roles that we have in trades and 1761 01:22:58,640 --> 01:23:00,200 Speaker 2: skilled labor positions. 1762 01:22:59,800 --> 01:23:00,879 Speaker 4: Across the economy. 1763 01:23:01,120 --> 01:23:04,200 Speaker 2: Now, across the board, the entire US population is losing 1764 01:23:04,200 --> 01:23:07,080 Speaker 2: faith in college too. Only fifty two percent of respondents 1765 01:23:07,080 --> 01:23:09,600 Speaker 2: in a recent Wall Street Journal poll said college was 1766 01:23:09,640 --> 01:23:12,320 Speaker 2: worth the cost, and a record fifty six percent said 1767 01:23:12,320 --> 01:23:15,719 Speaker 2: it's not. Again, the male female differential here is worth noting. 1768 01:23:16,000 --> 01:23:18,680 Speaker 2: Men are much much more likely than women to say 1769 01:23:18,720 --> 01:23:21,160 Speaker 2: college is not worth it and express a delight at 1770 01:23:21,160 --> 01:23:23,920 Speaker 2: the ability to make a better wage than before whether 1771 01:23:24,000 --> 01:23:25,920 Speaker 2: having to go to the trouble of going to college. 1772 01:23:26,120 --> 01:23:26,839 Speaker 4: Make no mistake. 1773 01:23:26,920 --> 01:23:29,440 Speaker 2: On a long enough timeline, this is going to dramatically 1774 01:23:29,479 --> 01:23:32,479 Speaker 2: reshape the face of America. College is not just about 1775 01:23:32,560 --> 01:23:35,920 Speaker 2: education more and more, it's really about ideology and lifestyle. 1776 01:23:36,160 --> 01:23:38,080 Speaker 4: Whether you have a four year college. 1777 01:23:37,760 --> 01:23:40,920 Speaker 2: Degree or not is the best single approximator today for 1778 01:23:41,040 --> 01:23:43,519 Speaker 2: how you vote. If you attended college, you are likely 1779 01:23:43,560 --> 01:23:46,559 Speaker 2: a Democratic voter, and vice versa. Of course, there are 1780 01:23:46,640 --> 01:23:50,200 Speaker 2: many important exceptions, and I am talking about averages, but 1781 01:23:50,240 --> 01:23:53,160 Speaker 2: the point remains clear. If you went to college, you 1782 01:23:53,240 --> 01:23:56,879 Speaker 2: are much much more likely to have very different cultural 1783 01:23:56,920 --> 01:23:59,599 Speaker 2: tastes than if you did not, including but not limited 1784 01:23:59,600 --> 01:24:02,479 Speaker 2: to type of music that you like, the TV shows 1785 01:24:02,479 --> 01:24:04,960 Speaker 2: you watch, where you go on vacation, where you shop 1786 01:24:04,960 --> 01:24:08,559 Speaker 2: for groceries, what you consider a societal problem, whether you 1787 01:24:08,600 --> 01:24:11,280 Speaker 2: know anyone in the military, so many things like this. 1788 01:24:11,640 --> 01:24:13,519 Speaker 2: If you don't go to college, you will be very 1789 01:24:13,520 --> 01:24:16,479 Speaker 2: different in your preferences and your desires in almost every 1790 01:24:16,520 --> 01:24:19,519 Speaker 2: single one of those categories. Personally, I don't think there's 1791 01:24:19,560 --> 01:24:22,120 Speaker 2: anything wrong with that now, as long as both sides 1792 01:24:22,120 --> 01:24:24,639 Speaker 2: are not trying to police the other. But the issue 1793 01:24:24,840 --> 01:24:28,200 Speaker 2: is what happens when those separate dramatically by gender and 1794 01:24:28,400 --> 01:24:31,599 Speaker 2: class lines. We already have lots of data to show 1795 01:24:31,640 --> 01:24:34,120 Speaker 2: that the mismatch between men and women in college is 1796 01:24:34,160 --> 01:24:37,200 Speaker 2: having a huge effect already on the potential dating pool 1797 01:24:37,320 --> 01:24:40,240 Speaker 2: for college graduate females especially. It is leading to a 1798 01:24:40,360 --> 01:24:42,920 Speaker 2: major loneliness crisis for a number of men who are 1799 01:24:42,920 --> 01:24:46,880 Speaker 2: having very very hard times finding a female mate. Young 1800 01:24:47,040 --> 01:24:49,840 Speaker 2: female depression gets all the headlines, but as I've laid 1801 01:24:49,840 --> 01:24:52,599 Speaker 2: out here before, it's really young men who are in crisis. 1802 01:24:52,880 --> 01:24:55,200 Speaker 2: Young men commit suicide at four times the rate of 1803 01:24:55,240 --> 01:24:58,040 Speaker 2: young women. They make up eighty percent of all suicide 1804 01:24:58,120 --> 01:25:01,559 Speaker 2: debts of male versus female. Young Men who remain single 1805 01:25:01,600 --> 01:25:04,599 Speaker 2: for prolonged periods of their life suffer worse health outcomes. 1806 01:25:04,600 --> 01:25:08,599 Speaker 2: They achieve lower wages, they report lower satisfaction. Generally, they 1807 01:25:08,640 --> 01:25:12,200 Speaker 2: are not thriving structurally. You're in a tough place right now. 1808 01:25:12,439 --> 01:25:15,160 Speaker 2: Men understand that they are mostly not wanted at college, 1809 01:25:15,280 --> 01:25:16,760 Speaker 2: or that it is not a good deal for them, 1810 01:25:16,960 --> 01:25:19,559 Speaker 2: But the working class wages that they are seeking are 1811 01:25:19,600 --> 01:25:22,599 Speaker 2: not high enough in the long run or show enough 1812 01:25:22,640 --> 01:25:25,080 Speaker 2: promise to actually set them up for middle class or 1813 01:25:25,120 --> 01:25:27,960 Speaker 2: upper middle class life in the future. Thus they remain 1814 01:25:28,040 --> 01:25:31,200 Speaker 2: in this odd middle ground gray area. They're not thriving 1815 01:25:31,280 --> 01:25:33,839 Speaker 2: enough to attract many women who are themselves college graduates 1816 01:25:33,920 --> 01:25:36,240 Speaker 2: who also find themselves lonely and miserable. 1817 01:25:36,439 --> 01:25:39,479 Speaker 4: What you need is a total reset of this whole system. 1818 01:25:39,640 --> 01:25:43,160 Speaker 2: The college education expectation needs to drop, Our working class 1819 01:25:43,200 --> 01:25:46,000 Speaker 2: wages need to rise even more than they currently have. 1820 01:25:46,280 --> 01:25:48,760 Speaker 2: Trades need to be seen in the same level that 1821 01:25:48,800 --> 01:25:51,720 Speaker 2: we see a bachelor's of accounting, for example, and the 1822 01:25:51,880 --> 01:25:54,880 Speaker 2: entire idea of what you should be doing needs to 1823 01:25:54,920 --> 01:25:58,240 Speaker 2: be redefined in every high school in the country until 1824 01:25:58,240 --> 01:26:01,639 Speaker 2: that time. Unfortunately, we are in it in for it socially, 1825 01:26:01,880 --> 01:26:04,880 Speaker 2: despite how predictable the doom spiral of all of this 1826 01:26:04,960 --> 01:26:05,439 Speaker 2: really is. 1827 01:26:05,720 --> 01:26:08,320 Speaker 4: We cover a lot of this stuff here and if you. 1828 01:26:08,320 --> 01:26:11,120 Speaker 1: Want to hear my reaction to Sager's monologue, become a 1829 01:26:11,160 --> 01:26:16,640 Speaker 1: premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot Com. 1830 01:26:16,880 --> 01:26:19,080 Speaker 4: Great show for everybody. Thank you all so much for 1831 01:26:19,160 --> 01:26:19,639 Speaker 4: joining us. 1832 01:26:19,800 --> 01:26:22,320 Speaker 2: We really appreciate it and for helping us out become 1833 01:26:22,360 --> 01:26:24,800 Speaker 2: premium members and help build out this new set. We're 1834 01:26:24,800 --> 01:26:26,720 Speaker 2: really excited to show it to all of you. We're 1835 01:26:26,760 --> 01:26:28,720 Speaker 2: going to have fun debuts. Make sure you guys are 1836 01:26:28,760 --> 01:26:30,840 Speaker 2: checking your emails. We're going to be sending instructions and 1837 01:26:31,640 --> 01:26:33,479 Speaker 2: like outlays in terms of how we're doing it. As 1838 01:26:33,520 --> 01:26:36,000 Speaker 2: Chrystal mentioned, we will be remote next week while the 1839 01:26:36,040 --> 01:26:39,040 Speaker 2: studio is completely redone here with all the renovations that 1840 01:26:39,120 --> 01:26:39,559 Speaker 2: take place. 1841 01:26:39,680 --> 01:26:40,880 Speaker 4: You're the ones who are funding it. 1842 01:26:40,920 --> 01:26:43,240 Speaker 2: You're the ones who are helping us out breakingpoints dot 1843 01:26:43,240 --> 01:26:45,839 Speaker 2: com if you're able otherwise, we'll see you all on Thursday. 1844 01:26:45,840 --> 01:26:47,640 Speaker 4: We've got a great counterporn show. 1845 01:26:47,680 --> 01:26:49,400 Speaker 3: And actually I'm in for Ryan tomorrow. 1846 01:26:49,439 --> 01:26:51,280 Speaker 4: Oh I didn't know though, cool while they're stuck. 1847 01:26:51,080 --> 01:26:53,439 Speaker 1: With me, and tomorrow too, it'll be a lady's shown. 1848 01:26:53,479 --> 01:26:55,400 Speaker 1: We can talk about men in crisis. Emily, yeah you 1849 01:26:55,400 --> 01:26:58,320 Speaker 1: should have it. But yeah, so I'll be in for 1850 01:26:58,400 --> 01:27:01,599 Speaker 1: Ryan tomorrow and I'll be here on Thursday. So I'm, 1851 01:27:01,800 --> 01:27:03,479 Speaker 1: you know, pulling over to It's just like kind of 1852 01:27:03,479 --> 01:27:05,280 Speaker 1: making up for Ryan, filling in for me while I 1853 01:27:05,320 --> 01:27:05,720 Speaker 1: was on Honey. 1854 01:27:06,960 --> 01:27:08,280 Speaker 2: It's nice for you to do that, but I don't 1855 01:27:08,280 --> 01:27:10,000 Speaker 2: think you have to, all right, you guys there, so 1856 01:27:10,160 --> 01:27:11,519 Speaker 2: fun ladies show for everyone there. 1857 01:27:11,520 --> 01:27:12,280 Speaker 3: You go, see you then,