WEBVTT - Ig Nobel Science of 2013

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to blow your mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, we're going to stuff about your

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>my My My name is Robert lamp and my name is

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Julie Douglas. And it's the fall, and a lot of

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>things happen every fall. There Halloween, there's pumpkins. Hey, hey rides,

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>leaves fall from the trees. Nobel Prizes. Yes, that's a

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>big one, especially for anyone who has, uh, who follows science,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>either as a hobby, as a as a passion, as

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a as a job, or all three. If you're us, Uh,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prize is always a big deal because the Ignoble

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Prizes highlight the absurd, the comical, the the strange within

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the world of legitimate scientific research, generally generally pure reviewed

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific research. Sometimes in the world of patents. But it's

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>always about let's look at the the individuals who are

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just really dedicated to study and one in scientific study

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in one shaper or another, and some of the strange

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>corners they work themselves into. Yeah, it is a play

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>on the Nobel Prize. And uh, the it's from Improbable Research,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>which publishes the magazine called the Annals of Improbable Research,

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and the whole point of that, they say, is it's

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there to make you laugh and then make you think

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with as you say, some of these bizarre turns and science. Yeah,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Abrams the main dude there. You know, some people

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>don't catch the humor of it. They think that it's

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>making fun of scientists. But I think most people understand

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's a celebration of the of the necessary

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>absurdity of science. Because you think of science like a

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>slime mold. We talked about how slime mold solves a maze.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It sends out all these tendrils through the maze and

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then just figures out what is the best route, and

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>then it goes that way. Uh, And in doing so

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it can you know, decipher the best trade roots across

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the face of the globe. Science is kind of like that.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Science is all about finding out how things work, how

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>things work the best, and and what the world and

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what the universally consists of. But that also means that

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the kindrels of science must sometimes creep into strange areas,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>into sometimes strange dead ends, and sometimes into very important

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>areas of study that we are childish about and still

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>snicker at. It's true, it does appeal to that, and um,

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I think with the Ignoble, what's interesting about that is

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you see so much creativity and imagination from the researchers

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and the scientists who are working in their respective fields,

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and which you might think is really wrote. They have

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>actually sort of peeled back and found very interesting and

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>contextualizing it in ways that you might not have ever

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>thought of. And what we're talking about here when we

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about these prizes is each year Ignoble will honor

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the achievements that of course make you laugh and then

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>make you think. In the award tend people these prizes.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The winners trouble from all over the world at their

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>own expense to a gallus ceremony at Harvard where actual

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>noble laureates present them with the prize um. This year's

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>opera was The Bolonsky Device, a tribute to George and

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte Blonsky, who in the early sixties invented a machine

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>for quote, facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, so just sling the kid right out? Is

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that a great visual of what an Ignoble prize can

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be because it's a it's a perfectly logical idea perfectly

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>logical theory that doesn't really sit well with people outside

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the lab. I think, you know, which, we've discussed

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that before, Like it's some of the often the amazing

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about scientists is that sometimes the scientific answer just

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is not going to sit well with anybody outside of

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the scientific world, such as, say, uh, creating a spaceship

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that is itself edible, or just figuring out a way

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that astronauts can eat their own poop on a return

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>trip from Mars on a very you know, economic scientific level, Yes,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that makes absolute sense, but then the astro not saying, no,

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing that well. And in some ways these

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are thought experiments, right, especially the childbirth is probably not

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>very pragmatic to be shooting out, you know, a child

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>by a centrifugal force. But what kind of proof do

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we have? Do we have scientific proof that it's not

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a good idea? One day that might be the thing, right,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to build on that research, alright, So let's

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>highlight a couple of the prizes here, alright. First up,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the psychology prize. This one went to a team of

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>French researchers including Laurette Bague Alman Zaruni, Baptiste Subra, and

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Nidhi or Ba as well as Brad Bushman. And that

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>was the I think the USA contingent there. Uh. And

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that was for confirming that people who think that they

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are drunk also think that they are more attractive. And

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>of course this is great because if you just ask

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody that, hey, do you think drunk people think they're

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>more attractive? Of course they do. It's it's a no brainer, right,

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But has it been scientifically proven? Do we know for sure?

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of more important questions in

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the history of of the human race that have come

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>up where someone says, of course, this is the way

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it works. Of course, the Earth is the center of

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Of course the Sun is the center of

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe. But when you apply the light of science

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to it, then you get the real answer, um or

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you get the evolution of a real answer. So in

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the first study carried out in the bar, they found

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that the more alcoholic drinks customers consumed, the more attractive

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were. Okay, that's but in Steady too,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they took ninety four non student participants and they put

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>them in a bogus taste test study they were given

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>either an alcoholic beverage or a nonalcoholic beverage, with half

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of each group believing they had consumed alcohol alcohol and

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>half believing that they had not, so they had a

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>balanced pacebo effect. So, after consuming the beverages, they delivered

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a speech and rated how attractive, bright, original, and funny

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were. And they videotape these speeches and

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they were rated by a team of twenty two independent judges.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Would they find those people thought they were brilliant and

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>even if they weren't drunk, is all they had to

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>do was think that they were drunk, and they instantly

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that they were, uh like greater than they actually are.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is important information, right for everybody who

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>is going out there and going to have a couple

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of drinks and then perhaps do something that is important

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to their livelihood. Perhaps maybe you should reconsider the drinks.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe what you're about to do isn't quite as great

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as you think. It's also interesting, um, you know, bringing

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>up the idea that even a non alcoholic beverage one

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have the same effect. Um, And perhaps you can shed

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>some light in this from your own experience, since you

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you gave up drinking. Uh, but I assume you still

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>find yourselves having a drink, a non alcoholic drink, maybe

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in the in the the company of individuals who are drinking,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>or or sort of fill that space in the in

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the ritual. Because I can think of a time or

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>two where I've had something non alcoholic and that either

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the setting was right or or the company was right,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that I really kind of felt as if I had

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>been drinking alcohol. Well, I think it boils down to

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>mirror neurons, because if someone is sitting across from you

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and and they're feeling a little bit loosened up, they've

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>had a drink or two and they began to laugh

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot, then of course you're going to engage in

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the same activity. So it's very easy, I think, to

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>take on those sort of physical things for yourself. You

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>begin to fall into the cultural script that has been

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>provided to you. Yea. What I love about this study

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is the title, which is called Beauty is in the

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Eye of the Beer Holder. Oh that's great. Yeah, It's

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>almost like they knew they were going to get ignoble. Yeah. Yeah.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Some I I tend to prefer the ones that are

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just really like rigidly scientific and you get the idea

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're completely oblivious to how ridiculous it might sound

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to an outsider. It's got like five prepositions and words long.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the Joint Prize in Biology

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and Astronomy now. Marie Dack, Emily Baird, Eric Warrant, Marcus Byrne,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Clark Schultz received this prize for discovering that when

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>dung beaetles get lost, that they can navigate their way

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>home by looking at the milky Way. This at first glance,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like I mean, it seems like a sort

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of amazing boy. Yeah, okay, what are you talking about here?

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It is very cool. Yeah, I mean, obviously the moon

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is big money when it comes to night time navigation

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>out there in the animal world. It's just that everything,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems can can use the moon for some form

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of navigation. But previously only birds, seals, and humans were

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>known to use the stars to navigate, I mean that

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>were to orient themselves. So that's privileged territory. So the

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>idea that hey, the lowly dung beetle is using this

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>technique as well, it's amazing. What I like to imagine

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, these dung beetles, they actually like

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to run straight lines, by the way, And what I

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like to imagine is that when they find a pile

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of droppings, which they then roll into a small ball,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and they start pushing it away from the other dung

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>beetles that might try to eat it, I like to

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>measure them just getting on top of that ball and

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>staring up at the milky Way. I'll dowy eyed, and

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I want that to be a Pixar movie and it

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>should be right um. But I think it's very cool

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>because it was thought that they were taking cues from

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from the sun and the moon um. But it was

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>their capacity to maintain course even on clear moonless nights

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that got researchers thinking that it perhaps was something else

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that could have been the stars. So lead researcher Marie

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>doc She took the insects into the Johannesburg Planetarium, where

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>she could control the type of star fields beetle might

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>see overhead so they get their own little planetarium show.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>She put them in a container with blackened walls to

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure the animals were not using other information from

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and marks on the horizon, which in the wild might

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be trees, for example, and she found that the Beatles

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>performed best when confronted with a perfect starry sky projected

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>onto the planetarium dome, although even in other conditions they

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>could still find their way. Pretty cool, Yeah, yeah, and

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the finding represents the first convincing demonstration for the

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>use of starry sky orientation in insects um and and

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>provides the first documented use of the Milky Way for

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>orientation in the animal kingdom. So that's pretty amazing. I

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>actually was pretty I thought it was amazing because we've

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about navigation so much in how mysterious it is,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly when we talk about birds or butterflies, and now

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got dune deals and on the game give a

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Give a dune beetle is due. Indeed, all right, we're

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna roll through three more of our favorites from

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand thirteen Ignoble Prizes, all sorts of Google

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and amazing things are gonna happen in those studies. All right,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we're back by the way micro cosmas Um. When that

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>film first came out, all the DVD or VHS covers

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for it had this praying man it's wearing sunglasses on it,

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>which totally misrepresented the entire picture. Like they were trying

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to play up the like like it was a bug's

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>life or something like it's some sort of cute insects story,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's not. It's a It's just a beautifully shot

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>insight into the world, the violent, the weird, and beautiful

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>world of insects. Praying man says, do wear right? Not

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>at all? Oh I don't. You should probably check into that, Okay,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll fact check this, all right, all right, now we're back.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the two thousand thirteen Ignoble Prize winners,

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're we're not going through all of them. We're

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>just covering some of our favorites. You can check out

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest at the Improbable Research website and we highly

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>suggest to do that. The next prize, we're going to

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 1>discuss Safety Engineering Prize, and this one went to the

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>late Gustano Pizzo Um from the US for a nineteen

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy two patent for an amazing invention that I'm just

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>floored that we haven't used that we have that we

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>don't see in every airplane. I love this invention because

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on some level I think it appeals to the eight

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>year olds and all of us as well as the

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Bond fans. Yes, there's a little James Bond at this

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and a little like it's like an ACME invention from

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the road Runner car. Yes. Yes, um. It is actually

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>an electro mechanical system to trap airplane hijackers. The system

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>drops a hijacker through trap doors, seals him into a package,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>then drops the hijacker through the airplane specially installed bomb

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bay doors, through which he is parachuted to the ground, where,

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of course police, having been alerted by radio, await his arrival. Yeah,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on ski jets, I think yeah. And there was an

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>illustration with the patent. I mean the patents you know,

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>public the public domain, you can you can find it online. Uh.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And and the the illustrations are wonderful because you see

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the individual, you see him jettison, you see him in

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the little package with the with the parachute, and and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you're totally right. On one hand, it's it's very James Bond.

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think it reminds me of of you to

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a kill where Christopher Walkin was the was the villain

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and he was in a blimp and I'm pretty sure

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a trap door in that blimp for jettison um

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>members of his team that we're falling out of line.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this is we're talking about a commercial

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>flight here. We don't want people to just fall to

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>their death and want them to fall safely on a

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>parachute so that the police can apprehend them. Well, and

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in theory, it is a great idea, Yeah,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and it makes a kind of like simple sense. You know,

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that's just in the execution, right, because you have to

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the person is standing in the right

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>area and that you know, he doesn't inadvertently or she

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you never know, uh tossed you down and you who

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are not the person who's trying the hijack the plane

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or in you know, jettison down to the police. So

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>again it's just a matter of logistics here. But I

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>do really like this, Yeah, I wish on some level

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that it would be pragmatic enough that you can actually

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>use all Right. Up next the Archaeology Prize, and this

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one went to Brian Crandall and Peter Stall the Forum

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>from us the Ladder from Kennedy, us UH for observing

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how the bones of swallowed dead shrews dissolved inside the

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>human digestive system. Now, the the the answer is in

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the in the study there because obviously this is a

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>study about um humans swallowing the bones of a dead

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>shrew and then later fishing through the fecal matter to

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.239
<v Speaker 1>see how it turned out. Yeah, the shrew was parboiled

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and then of course swallowed whole without any sort of chewing,

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and then carefully examined during the ex script ory period

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in which would have correlated from when it would arrive

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in that excretion. Uh so, Yeah, they wanted to see

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>how the bones would dissolve inside the human digesticism. But

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>why you ask why, because they wanted to see how,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or rather help archaeologist to turn whether small animal bones

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>found a historic sites signified that the animals have been

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>eaten or died naturally, So that the question is important,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like having the answer to this helps us make sense

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of so many archaeological sites and finds around the world.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But the in order to answer it, they took a

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward approach and to the outside viewer perhaps an

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>undignified um investigation. But that's just the way it is.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you want to you want an answer to a

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>question that sometimes there was a very simple, straightforward way

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Yeah, you could go through some sort

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of complex chemical process that mimic the digestion of the

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>human body. You could essentially build a cloaca bot to

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>digest this, uh, this tiny rodent for you, or you

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>could just do what makes sense. You could just you

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>could just say, screw it, I'm going to swallow this

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>creature and then I'm going to poop it out, and

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then I'm gonna see and I'm gonna have my answer,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and and I'm not gonna need all this ridiculous funding

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Now, if I remember correctly, this was

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>featured in Mary Richard's Gulp and Um. At the time

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of her writing that, I believed that it wasn't revealed

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it was Crandell or Stall who actually swallowed the

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>shrew because they didn't want people to focus on who

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was combing through their poo to try to find the bones.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>They wanted people to focus on how it was actually digested.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And in case you're wondering, uh, the digestive action of

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>either Crandell or Stall obliterated everything but twenty eight bones

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out of one d and thirty one, Way to go,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Way to Go digestive stem. All right, and we're gonna

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>look at one last study here, and this one is

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Public Health Prize, and this one comes to us

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>from high Land. And I have said we we left

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this one because you have to leave the penis for last. Really, yes,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because this study had to do with medical techniques for

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>penile reattachment after amputations, often by jealous lives um techniques

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>which they recommended except in cases where the amputated penis

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>had been partially eaten by a duck. Now, yeah, I

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>need to explain this, and I'm I'm just gonna pull

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>directly from Mark Abrams article that came out in The

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Guardian last year titled why Thai women cut off their

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>husband's penises. He points out that quote it became fashionable

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the decade after nineteen seventy for the humiliated Thai

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>wife to wait until her philandering husband fell asleep so

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>that she could quickly sever his penis with a kitchen knife.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>A traditional tie home is elevated on pilings and the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>windows are open to allow for ventilation. The area under

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the houses home is the home of the family, pigs, chickens,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and ducks. Thus it is quite usual that an amputated

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>penis is tossed out of an open window where it

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>may be captured by a duck. Then Abrams goes on

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, the report explains for readers in other countries.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Quote the Tai saying I better get home or the

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ducks will have something to eat is therefore a common

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>joke and immediately understood at all levels of society. So

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in case anybody is visiting Thailand and you happen to

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>be able to hear this phrase, now you have a

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>context for it. Yes, So, yeah, I guess there was

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a prominent nineteen seventy three case in which a woman

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sliced off her husband's penis, and then during the seventies

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>so were like something like a hundred other Yeah. Basically,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it got a tremendous amount of coverage

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time because it is it's you know, as

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we know in the West, um, case like this happens,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the media is just gonna eat it up. Um, no

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pun intended, and uh, and so it's it's in the

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>public mindset, and and so you begin to see other

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cases popping up. That's right. That was the great bob

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at Escapade in the US. And I believe that penis

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was flung out a car window, yes, but was apprehended

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>before a duck could inter s and it also was reattached.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It was so basically this whole, the whole stuff. I mean,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the study makes it in because on one hand, it

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>involves the penis and therefore is inherently funny. Uh. And

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>then it also is weird and uh and and ties

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in this uh, this epidemic of of of peno amputation,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and it involves ducks, and ducks are inherently funny as well.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Even though at the bottom line, even bad philandering husbands

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>uh probably don't deserve to have their their penises cut off.

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna. And I imagine too that um, I

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have obviously the plumbing, but I would want there

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to be quite a bit of study where a man

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>who's whose penis was cut off and had to be

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>reattached to make sure that it was done properly. Yes,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's an injury that is going to

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>occur in the course of of human events, and it's

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>better that we do have techniques on hand, that we

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do know the best means by which to reattach it

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if possible. So it's it's a study that at once

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is highly helpful and great and it's wonderful that the

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>research has contributed to our scientific understanding with it. But

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, there are a number of inherently

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>giggle inducing qualities to it. And that's why we love Ignoble, right,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 1>because you get pretty much everything, yeah, from dung beetles

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to penises. Yeah, from studies that are that just seem

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to sort of fill in one tiny corner of our

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>scientific understanding or things that or studies that are they

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are actually highly important but still induced snickers. So there

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you have another Ignable Price ceremony has come and gone.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>We've highlighted some of the ones we like. You can

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>check out the rest online at the Improbable Research website.

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, all of those guys that put that

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the magazine out of the PDF and it's always tremendous

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>fund to leave through it. In the meantime, if you

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>want to chat without about it, if you want to

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>share your favorites from this year's of award winners, or

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you have some past favorites that you still snicker about,

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>let us know about it. You can find us in

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all the usual places. Our mothership is stuff to Blow

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com, where you'll find all our videos,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all our blog posts, our podcasts. Yes, even the episodes

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast that are not available on iTunes or

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you like to get your podcast, you will find

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>them on the website, and you can always drop us

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a line with your thoughts that blow the mind at

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>discovery dot com for more on this and thousands of

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>other topics, does it, How stuff Works dot com