1 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:06,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to blow your mind from how Stuff 2 00:00:06,040 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Works dot com. Hey, we're going to stuff about your 3 00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:16,000 Speaker 1: my My My name is Robert lamp and my name is 4 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:18,720 Speaker 1: Julie Douglas. And it's the fall, and a lot of 5 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,960 Speaker 1: things happen every fall. There Halloween, there's pumpkins. Hey, hey rides, 6 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: leaves fall from the trees. Nobel Prizes. Yes, that's a 7 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: big one, especially for anyone who has, uh, who follows science, 8 00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:34,000 Speaker 1: either as a hobby, as a as a passion, as 9 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,200 Speaker 1: a as a job, or all three. If you're us, Uh, 10 00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: Ignoble Prize is always a big deal because the Ignoble 11 00:00:40,240 --> 00:00:46,680 Speaker 1: Prizes highlight the absurd, the comical, the the strange within 12 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 1: the world of legitimate scientific research, generally generally pure reviewed 13 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 1: scientific research. Sometimes in the world of patents. But it's 14 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:57,240 Speaker 1: always about let's look at the the individuals who are 15 00:00:57,280 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: just really dedicated to study and one in scientific study 16 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: in one shaper or another, and some of the strange 17 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,319 Speaker 1: corners they work themselves into. Yeah, it is a play 18 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:12,839 Speaker 1: on the Nobel Prize. And uh, the it's from Improbable Research, 19 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: which publishes the magazine called the Annals of Improbable Research, 20 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 1: and the whole point of that, they say, is it's 21 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:21,119 Speaker 1: there to make you laugh and then make you think 22 00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:25,080 Speaker 1: with as you say, some of these bizarre turns and science. Yeah, 23 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 1: Mark Abrams the main dude there. You know, some people 24 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,160 Speaker 1: don't catch the humor of it. They think that it's 25 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 1: making fun of scientists. But I think most people understand 26 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 1: that it's it's a celebration of the of the necessary 27 00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 1: absurdity of science. Because you think of science like a 28 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: slime mold. We talked about how slime mold solves a maze. 29 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:46,400 Speaker 1: It sends out all these tendrils through the maze and 30 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:48,760 Speaker 1: then just figures out what is the best route, and 31 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:51,200 Speaker 1: then it goes that way. Uh, And in doing so 32 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:56,480 Speaker 1: it can you know, decipher the best trade roots across 33 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,560 Speaker 1: the face of the globe. Science is kind of like that. 34 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,360 Speaker 1: Science is all about finding out how things work, how 35 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,360 Speaker 1: things work the best, and and what the world and 36 00:02:05,400 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 1: what the universally consists of. But that also means that 37 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 1: the kindrels of science must sometimes creep into strange areas, 38 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 1: into sometimes strange dead ends, and sometimes into very important 39 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:20,919 Speaker 1: areas of study that we are childish about and still 40 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,919 Speaker 1: snicker at. It's true, it does appeal to that, and um, 41 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:27,880 Speaker 1: I think with the Ignoble, what's interesting about that is 42 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:31,240 Speaker 1: you see so much creativity and imagination from the researchers 43 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:33,639 Speaker 1: and the scientists who are working in their respective fields, 44 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 1: and which you might think is really wrote. They have 45 00:02:36,520 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 1: actually sort of peeled back and found very interesting and 46 00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:44,000 Speaker 1: contextualizing it in ways that you might not have ever 47 00:02:44,120 --> 00:02:46,440 Speaker 1: thought of. And what we're talking about here when we 48 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 1: talk about these prizes is each year Ignoble will honor 49 00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:52,640 Speaker 1: the achievements that of course make you laugh and then 50 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,519 Speaker 1: make you think. In the award tend people these prizes. 51 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,560 Speaker 1: The winners trouble from all over the world at their 52 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:03,640 Speaker 1: own expense to a gallus ceremony at Harvard where actual 53 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:08,280 Speaker 1: noble laureates present them with the prize um. This year's 54 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 1: opera was The Bolonsky Device, a tribute to George and 55 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: Charlotte Blonsky, who in the early sixties invented a machine 56 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 1: for quote, facilitating the birth of a child by centrifugal force. 57 00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 1: Oh wow, so just sling the kid right out? Is 58 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 1: that a great visual of what an Ignoble prize can 59 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: be because it's a it's a perfectly logical idea perfectly 60 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 1: logical theory that doesn't really sit well with people outside 61 00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:40,560 Speaker 1: of the lab. I think, you know, which, we've discussed 62 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 1: that before, Like it's some of the often the amazing 63 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: thing about scientists is that sometimes the scientific answer just 64 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: is not going to sit well with anybody outside of 65 00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 1: the scientific world, such as, say, uh, creating a spaceship 66 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:55,440 Speaker 1: that is itself edible, or just figuring out a way 67 00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 1: that astronauts can eat their own poop on a return 68 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 1: trip from Mars on a very you know, economic scientific level, Yes, 69 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 1: that makes absolute sense, but then the astro not saying, no, 70 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 1: we're not doing that well. And in some ways these 71 00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: are thought experiments, right, especially the childbirth is probably not 72 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:13,680 Speaker 1: very pragmatic to be shooting out, you know, a child 73 00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: by a centrifugal force. But what kind of proof do 74 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:18,240 Speaker 1: we have? Do we have scientific proof that it's not 75 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 1: a good idea? One day that might be the thing, right, 76 00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 1: you have to build on that research, alright, So let's 77 00:04:24,200 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 1: highlight a couple of the prizes here, alright. First up, 78 00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: the psychology prize. This one went to a team of 79 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:38,080 Speaker 1: French researchers including Laurette Bague Alman Zaruni, Baptiste Subra, and 80 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 1: Nidhi or Ba as well as Brad Bushman. And that 81 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 1: was the I think the USA contingent there. Uh. And 82 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:49,720 Speaker 1: that was for confirming that people who think that they 83 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:53,360 Speaker 1: are drunk also think that they are more attractive. And 84 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 1: of course this is great because if you just ask 85 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:57,920 Speaker 1: somebody that, hey, do you think drunk people think they're 86 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:00,160 Speaker 1: more attractive? Of course they do. It's it's a no brainer, right, 87 00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 1: But has it been scientifically proven? Do we know for sure? 88 00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: And there are a lot of more important questions in 89 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 1: the history of of the human race that have come 90 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:10,760 Speaker 1: up where someone says, of course, this is the way 91 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:12,880 Speaker 1: it works. Of course, the Earth is the center of 92 00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:14,720 Speaker 1: the universe. Of course the Sun is the center of 93 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:17,600 Speaker 1: the universe. But when you apply the light of science 94 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:20,279 Speaker 1: to it, then you get the real answer, um or 95 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: you get the evolution of a real answer. So in 96 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:24,040 Speaker 1: the first study carried out in the bar, they found 97 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: that the more alcoholic drinks customers consumed, the more attractive 98 00:05:27,480 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 1: they thought they were. Okay, that's but in Steady too, 99 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:34,560 Speaker 1: they took ninety four non student participants and they put 100 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: them in a bogus taste test study they were given 101 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 1: either an alcoholic beverage or a nonalcoholic beverage, with half 102 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 1: of each group believing they had consumed alcohol alcohol and 103 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:47,200 Speaker 1: half believing that they had not, so they had a 104 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:52,000 Speaker 1: balanced pacebo effect. So, after consuming the beverages, they delivered 105 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: a speech and rated how attractive, bright, original, and funny 106 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 1: they thought they were. And they videotape these speeches and 107 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:01,000 Speaker 1: they were rated by a team of twenty two independent judges. 108 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:04,920 Speaker 1: Would they find those people thought they were brilliant and 109 00:06:05,279 --> 00:06:07,599 Speaker 1: even if they weren't drunk, is all they had to 110 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:10,840 Speaker 1: do was think that they were drunk, and they instantly 111 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 1: thought that they were, uh like greater than they actually are. 112 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,640 Speaker 1: I think this is important information, right for everybody who 113 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:20,599 Speaker 1: is going out there and going to have a couple 114 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:23,960 Speaker 1: of drinks and then perhaps do something that is important 115 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 1: to their livelihood. Perhaps maybe you should reconsider the drinks. 116 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 1: Maybe what you're about to do isn't quite as great 117 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:34,520 Speaker 1: as you think. It's also interesting, um, you know, bringing 118 00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:37,440 Speaker 1: up the idea that even a non alcoholic beverage one 119 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 1: have the same effect. Um, And perhaps you can shed 120 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 1: some light in this from your own experience, since you 121 00:06:42,320 --> 00:06:45,240 Speaker 1: you gave up drinking. Uh, but I assume you still 122 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 1: find yourselves having a drink, a non alcoholic drink, maybe 123 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,920 Speaker 1: in the in the the company of individuals who are drinking, 124 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:55,719 Speaker 1: or or sort of fill that space in the in 125 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,880 Speaker 1: the ritual. Because I can think of a time or 126 00:06:58,920 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: two where I've had something non alcoholic and that either 127 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 1: the setting was right or or the company was right, 128 00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 1: that I really kind of felt as if I had 129 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 1: been drinking alcohol. Well, I think it boils down to 130 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 1: mirror neurons, because if someone is sitting across from you 131 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 1: and and they're feeling a little bit loosened up, they've 132 00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 1: had a drink or two and they began to laugh 133 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: a lot, then of course you're going to engage in 134 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 1: the same activity. So it's very easy, I think, to 135 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 1: take on those sort of physical things for yourself. You 136 00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:29,560 Speaker 1: begin to fall into the cultural script that has been 137 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:33,200 Speaker 1: provided to you. Yea. What I love about this study 138 00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: is the title, which is called Beauty is in the 139 00:07:36,600 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 1: Eye of the Beer Holder. Oh that's great. Yeah, It's 140 00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:42,840 Speaker 1: almost like they knew they were going to get ignoble. Yeah. Yeah. 141 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 1: Some I I tend to prefer the ones that are 142 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 1: just really like rigidly scientific and you get the idea 143 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:53,400 Speaker 1: that they're completely oblivious to how ridiculous it might sound 144 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: to an outsider. It's got like five prepositions and words long. 145 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 1: All right, let's talk about the Joint Prize in Biology 146 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:09,440 Speaker 1: and Astronomy now. Marie Dack, Emily Baird, Eric Warrant, Marcus Byrne, 147 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:13,760 Speaker 1: and Clark Schultz received this prize for discovering that when 148 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 1: dung beaetles get lost, that they can navigate their way 149 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 1: home by looking at the milky Way. This at first glance, 150 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 1: doesn't seem like I mean, it seems like a sort 151 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 1: of amazing boy. Yeah, okay, what are you talking about here? 152 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: It is very cool. Yeah, I mean, obviously the moon 153 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: is big money when it comes to night time navigation 154 00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:33,600 Speaker 1: out there in the animal world. It's just that everything, 155 00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 1: it seems can can use the moon for some form 156 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,719 Speaker 1: of navigation. But previously only birds, seals, and humans were 157 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 1: known to use the stars to navigate, I mean that 158 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: were to orient themselves. So that's privileged territory. So the 159 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:51,440 Speaker 1: idea that hey, the lowly dung beetle is using this 160 00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:55,600 Speaker 1: technique as well, it's amazing. What I like to imagine 161 00:08:55,679 --> 00:08:58,200 Speaker 1: is that you know, these dung beetles, they actually like 162 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 1: to run straight lines, by the way, And what I 163 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:02,760 Speaker 1: like to imagine is that when they find a pile 164 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 1: of droppings, which they then roll into a small ball, 165 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:09,679 Speaker 1: and they start pushing it away from the other dung 166 00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:12,400 Speaker 1: beetles that might try to eat it, I like to 167 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:14,719 Speaker 1: measure them just getting on top of that ball and 168 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:19,319 Speaker 1: staring up at the milky Way. I'll dowy eyed, and 169 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 1: I want that to be a Pixar movie and it 170 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:23,959 Speaker 1: should be right um. But I think it's very cool 171 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:26,559 Speaker 1: because it was thought that they were taking cues from 172 00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 1: from the sun and the moon um. But it was 173 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:34,400 Speaker 1: their capacity to maintain course even on clear moonless nights 174 00:09:34,480 --> 00:09:38,600 Speaker 1: that got researchers thinking that it perhaps was something else 175 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:42,080 Speaker 1: that could have been the stars. So lead researcher Marie 176 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:46,680 Speaker 1: doc She took the insects into the Johannesburg Planetarium, where 177 00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:49,960 Speaker 1: she could control the type of star fields beetle might 178 00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:53,680 Speaker 1: see overhead so they get their own little planetarium show. 179 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: She put them in a container with blackened walls to 180 00:09:57,080 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: make sure the animals were not using other information from 181 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 1: and marks on the horizon, which in the wild might 182 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:06,000 Speaker 1: be trees, for example, and she found that the Beatles 183 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,920 Speaker 1: performed best when confronted with a perfect starry sky projected 184 00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:14,240 Speaker 1: onto the planetarium dome, although even in other conditions they 185 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: could still find their way. Pretty cool, Yeah, yeah, and 186 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:22,800 Speaker 1: it's the finding represents the first convincing demonstration for the 187 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:27,200 Speaker 1: use of starry sky orientation in insects um and and 188 00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:29,440 Speaker 1: provides the first documented use of the Milky Way for 189 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 1: orientation in the animal kingdom. So that's pretty amazing. I 190 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:35,360 Speaker 1: actually was pretty I thought it was amazing because we've 191 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:38,560 Speaker 1: talked about navigation so much in how mysterious it is, 192 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:41,320 Speaker 1: particularly when we talk about birds or butterflies, and now 193 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 1: you've got dune deals and on the game give a 194 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:47,959 Speaker 1: Give a dune beetle is due. Indeed, all right, we're 195 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:49,720 Speaker 1: gonna take a quick break, and when we come back, 196 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:52,400 Speaker 1: we're gonna roll through three more of our favorites from 197 00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:56,439 Speaker 1: the two thousand thirteen Ignoble Prizes, all sorts of Google 198 00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 1: and amazing things are gonna happen in those studies. All right, 199 00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:09,720 Speaker 1: we're back by the way micro cosmas Um. When that 200 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:13,120 Speaker 1: film first came out, all the DVD or VHS covers 201 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 1: for it had this praying man it's wearing sunglasses on it, 202 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:19,840 Speaker 1: which totally misrepresented the entire picture. Like they were trying 203 00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:22,679 Speaker 1: to play up the like like it was a bug's 204 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 1: life or something like it's some sort of cute insects story, 205 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:27,839 Speaker 1: and it's not. It's a It's just a beautifully shot 206 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:31,800 Speaker 1: insight into the world, the violent, the weird, and beautiful 207 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:36,679 Speaker 1: world of insects. Praying man says, do wear right? Not 208 00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 1: at all? Oh I don't. You should probably check into that, Okay, 209 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:43,640 Speaker 1: I'll fact check this, all right, all right, now we're back. 210 00:11:43,679 --> 00:11:47,360 Speaker 1: We're talking about the two thousand thirteen Ignoble Prize winners, 211 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 1: and we're we're not going through all of them. We're 212 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:50,959 Speaker 1: just covering some of our favorites. You can check out 213 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:54,400 Speaker 1: the rest at the Improbable Research website and we highly 214 00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:56,959 Speaker 1: suggest to do that. The next prize, we're going to 215 00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:00,079 Speaker 1: discuss Safety Engineering Prize, and this one went to the 216 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:04,439 Speaker 1: late Gustano Pizzo Um from the US for a nineteen 217 00:12:04,559 --> 00:12:08,880 Speaker 1: seventy two patent for an amazing invention that I'm just 218 00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:11,320 Speaker 1: floored that we haven't used that we have that we 219 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:15,960 Speaker 1: don't see in every airplane. I love this invention because 220 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:18,160 Speaker 1: on some level I think it appeals to the eight 221 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:20,440 Speaker 1: year olds and all of us as well as the 222 00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:23,719 Speaker 1: Bond fans. Yes, there's a little James Bond at this 223 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: and a little like it's like an ACME invention from 224 00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:30,200 Speaker 1: the road Runner car. Yes. Yes, um. It is actually 225 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:35,320 Speaker 1: an electro mechanical system to trap airplane hijackers. The system 226 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:39,719 Speaker 1: drops a hijacker through trap doors, seals him into a package, 227 00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 1: then drops the hijacker through the airplane specially installed bomb 228 00:12:43,840 --> 00:12:47,480 Speaker 1: bay doors, through which he is parachuted to the ground, where, 229 00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:52,680 Speaker 1: of course police, having been alerted by radio, await his arrival. Yeah, 230 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 1: on ski jets, I think yeah. And there was an 231 00:12:56,360 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 1: illustration with the patent. I mean the patents you know, 232 00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:03,120 Speaker 1: public the public domain, you can you can find it online. Uh. 233 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:05,360 Speaker 1: And and the the illustrations are wonderful because you see 234 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:07,440 Speaker 1: the individual, you see him jettison, you see him in 235 00:13:07,440 --> 00:13:10,760 Speaker 1: the little package with the with the parachute, and and 236 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:13,319 Speaker 1: you're totally right. On one hand, it's it's very James Bond. 237 00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:16,520 Speaker 1: And I think it reminds me of of you to 238 00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: a kill where Christopher Walkin was the was the villain 239 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:21,439 Speaker 1: and he was in a blimp and I'm pretty sure 240 00:13:21,520 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 1: there's a trap door in that blimp for jettison um 241 00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:27,720 Speaker 1: members of his team that we're falling out of line. 242 00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:30,280 Speaker 1: But you know, this is we're talking about a commercial 243 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 1: flight here. We don't want people to just fall to 244 00:13:32,040 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 1: their death and want them to fall safely on a 245 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 1: parachute so that the police can apprehend them. Well, and 246 00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 1: you know, in theory, it is a great idea, Yeah, 247 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 1: and it makes a kind of like simple sense. You know, 248 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:48,319 Speaker 1: that's just in the execution, right, because you have to 249 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:50,079 Speaker 1: make sure that the person is standing in the right 250 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:53,640 Speaker 1: area and that you know, he doesn't inadvertently or she 251 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: you never know, uh tossed you down and you who 252 00:13:57,520 --> 00:13:59,800 Speaker 1: are not the person who's trying the hijack the plane 253 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: or in you know, jettison down to the police. So 254 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:07,839 Speaker 1: again it's just a matter of logistics here. But I 255 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:11,040 Speaker 1: do really like this, Yeah, I wish on some level 256 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:13,760 Speaker 1: that it would be pragmatic enough that you can actually 257 00:14:13,840 --> 00:14:18,120 Speaker 1: use all Right. Up next the Archaeology Prize, and this 258 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 1: one went to Brian Crandall and Peter Stall the Forum 259 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 1: from us the Ladder from Kennedy, us UH for observing 260 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: how the bones of swallowed dead shrews dissolved inside the 261 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:36,520 Speaker 1: human digestive system. Now, the the the answer is in 262 00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:39,880 Speaker 1: the in the study there because obviously this is a 263 00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 1: study about um humans swallowing the bones of a dead 264 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: shrew and then later fishing through the fecal matter to 265 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:52,239 Speaker 1: see how it turned out. Yeah, the shrew was parboiled 266 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 1: and then of course swallowed whole without any sort of chewing, 267 00:14:56,200 --> 00:15:00,920 Speaker 1: and then carefully examined during the ex script ory period 268 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 1: in which would have correlated from when it would arrive 269 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:08,240 Speaker 1: in that excretion. Uh so, Yeah, they wanted to see 270 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 1: how the bones would dissolve inside the human digesticism. But 271 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:16,560 Speaker 1: why you ask why, because they wanted to see how, 272 00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 1: or rather help archaeologist to turn whether small animal bones 273 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:23,200 Speaker 1: found a historic sites signified that the animals have been 274 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 1: eaten or died naturally, So that the question is important, 275 00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:29,200 Speaker 1: like having the answer to this helps us make sense 276 00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:32,920 Speaker 1: of so many archaeological sites and finds around the world. 277 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 1: But the in order to answer it, they took a 278 00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:40,240 Speaker 1: very straightforward approach and to the outside viewer perhaps an 279 00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 1: undignified um investigation. But that's just the way it is. 280 00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:47,440 Speaker 1: Sometimes you want to you want an answer to a 281 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:50,720 Speaker 1: question that sometimes there was a very simple, straightforward way 282 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:53,240 Speaker 1: to do it. Yeah, you could go through some sort 283 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:56,200 Speaker 1: of complex chemical process that mimic the digestion of the 284 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:59,080 Speaker 1: human body. You could essentially build a cloaca bot to 285 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 1: digest this, uh, this tiny rodent for you, or you 286 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:05,040 Speaker 1: could just do what makes sense. You could just you 287 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:08,400 Speaker 1: could just say, screw it, I'm going to swallow this 288 00:16:08,520 --> 00:16:10,360 Speaker 1: creature and then I'm going to poop it out, and 289 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:12,000 Speaker 1: then I'm gonna see and I'm gonna have my answer, 290 00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:14,600 Speaker 1: and and I'm not gonna need all this ridiculous funding 291 00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: to do it. Now, if I remember correctly, this was 292 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:21,920 Speaker 1: featured in Mary Richard's Gulp and Um. At the time 293 00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:24,640 Speaker 1: of her writing that, I believed that it wasn't revealed 294 00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:28,200 Speaker 1: whether it was Crandell or Stall who actually swallowed the 295 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:30,880 Speaker 1: shrew because they didn't want people to focus on who 296 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 1: was combing through their poo to try to find the bones. 297 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 1: They wanted people to focus on how it was actually digested. 298 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:43,120 Speaker 1: And in case you're wondering, uh, the digestive action of 299 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:47,600 Speaker 1: either Crandell or Stall obliterated everything but twenty eight bones 300 00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 1: out of one d and thirty one, Way to go, 301 00:16:51,280 --> 00:16:54,280 Speaker 1: Way to Go digestive stem. All right, and we're gonna 302 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 1: look at one last study here, and this one is 303 00:16:57,040 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 1: the Public Health Prize, and this one comes to us 304 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,320 Speaker 1: from high Land. And I have said we we left 305 00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:06,120 Speaker 1: this one because you have to leave the penis for last. Really, yes, 306 00:17:06,840 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 1: because this study had to do with medical techniques for 307 00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 1: penile reattachment after amputations, often by jealous lives um techniques 308 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 1: which they recommended except in cases where the amputated penis 309 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:24,760 Speaker 1: had been partially eaten by a duck. Now, yeah, I 310 00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:27,160 Speaker 1: need to explain this, and I'm I'm just gonna pull 311 00:17:27,280 --> 00:17:30,399 Speaker 1: directly from Mark Abrams article that came out in The 312 00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: Guardian last year titled why Thai women cut off their 313 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:37,840 Speaker 1: husband's penises. He points out that quote it became fashionable 314 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:40,680 Speaker 1: in the decade after nineteen seventy for the humiliated Thai 315 00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:43,960 Speaker 1: wife to wait until her philandering husband fell asleep so 316 00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 1: that she could quickly sever his penis with a kitchen knife. 317 00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:49,359 Speaker 1: A traditional tie home is elevated on pilings and the 318 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 1: windows are open to allow for ventilation. The area under 319 00:17:52,840 --> 00:17:55,439 Speaker 1: the houses home is the home of the family, pigs, chickens, 320 00:17:55,440 --> 00:17:58,440 Speaker 1: and ducks. Thus it is quite usual that an amputated 321 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:01,119 Speaker 1: penis is tossed out of an open window where it 322 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:04,200 Speaker 1: may be captured by a duck. Then Abrams goes on 323 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:07,040 Speaker 1: to say, the report explains for readers in other countries. 324 00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 1: Quote the Tai saying I better get home or the 325 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:12,920 Speaker 1: ducks will have something to eat is therefore a common 326 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 1: joke and immediately understood at all levels of society. So 327 00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:22,600 Speaker 1: in case anybody is visiting Thailand and you happen to 328 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:24,919 Speaker 1: be able to hear this phrase, now you have a 329 00:18:24,960 --> 00:18:28,440 Speaker 1: context for it. Yes, So, yeah, I guess there was 330 00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: a prominent nineteen seventy three case in which a woman 331 00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:35,000 Speaker 1: sliced off her husband's penis, and then during the seventies 332 00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:37,640 Speaker 1: so were like something like a hundred other Yeah. Basically, 333 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:40,080 Speaker 1: it sounds like it got a tremendous amount of coverage 334 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 1: at the time because it is it's you know, as 335 00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 1: we know in the West, um, case like this happens, 336 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:48,000 Speaker 1: the media is just gonna eat it up. Um, no 337 00:18:48,119 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: pun intended, and uh, and so it's it's in the 338 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:54,080 Speaker 1: public mindset, and and so you begin to see other 339 00:18:54,160 --> 00:18:57,080 Speaker 1: cases popping up. That's right. That was the great bob 340 00:18:57,119 --> 00:18:59,760 Speaker 1: at Escapade in the US. And I believe that penis 341 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 1: was flung out a car window, yes, but was apprehended 342 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:08,000 Speaker 1: before a duck could inter s and it also was reattached. 343 00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 1: It was so basically this whole, the whole stuff. I mean, 344 00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:13,439 Speaker 1: the study makes it in because on one hand, it 345 00:19:13,520 --> 00:19:16,480 Speaker 1: involves the penis and therefore is inherently funny. Uh. And 346 00:19:16,520 --> 00:19:21,359 Speaker 1: then it also is weird and uh and and ties 347 00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:25,720 Speaker 1: in this uh, this epidemic of of of peno amputation, 348 00:19:26,160 --> 00:19:28,920 Speaker 1: and it involves ducks, and ducks are inherently funny as well. 349 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:35,440 Speaker 1: Even though at the bottom line, even bad philandering husbands 350 00:19:35,960 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 1: uh probably don't deserve to have their their penises cut off. 351 00:19:39,760 --> 00:19:44,679 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna. And I imagine too that um, I 352 00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:48,000 Speaker 1: don't have obviously the plumbing, but I would want there 353 00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:50,520 Speaker 1: to be quite a bit of study where a man 354 00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:52,760 Speaker 1: who's whose penis was cut off and had to be 355 00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:55,360 Speaker 1: reattached to make sure that it was done properly. Yes, 356 00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:58,000 Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's an injury that is going to 357 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:01,920 Speaker 1: occur in the course of of human events, and it's 358 00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:05,080 Speaker 1: better that we do have techniques on hand, that we 359 00:20:05,119 --> 00:20:07,760 Speaker 1: do know the best means by which to reattach it 360 00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:11,560 Speaker 1: if possible. So it's it's a study that at once 361 00:20:11,800 --> 00:20:14,200 Speaker 1: is highly helpful and great and it's wonderful that the 362 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:18,879 Speaker 1: research has contributed to our scientific understanding with it. But 363 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:21,440 Speaker 1: on the other hand, there are a number of inherently 364 00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 1: giggle inducing qualities to it. And that's why we love Ignoble, right, 365 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:29,959 Speaker 1: because you get pretty much everything, yeah, from dung beetles 366 00:20:29,960 --> 00:20:33,040 Speaker 1: to penises. Yeah, from studies that are that just seem 367 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,439 Speaker 1: to sort of fill in one tiny corner of our 368 00:20:35,440 --> 00:20:38,919 Speaker 1: scientific understanding or things that or studies that are they 369 00:20:38,920 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 1: are actually highly important but still induced snickers. So there 370 00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:46,200 Speaker 1: you have another Ignable Price ceremony has come and gone. 371 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:48,119 Speaker 1: We've highlighted some of the ones we like. You can 372 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 1: check out the rest online at the Improbable Research website. 373 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:53,159 Speaker 1: And uh yeah, all of those guys that put that 374 00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:56,040 Speaker 1: the magazine out of the PDF and it's always tremendous 375 00:20:56,040 --> 00:20:58,919 Speaker 1: fund to leave through it. In the meantime, if you 376 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:00,720 Speaker 1: want to chat without about it, if you want to 377 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:04,520 Speaker 1: share your favorites from this year's of award winners, or 378 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:07,320 Speaker 1: you have some past favorites that you still snicker about, 379 00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:09,000 Speaker 1: let us know about it. You can find us in 380 00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:10,960 Speaker 1: all the usual places. Our mothership is stuff to Blow 381 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:13,159 Speaker 1: your Mind dot com, where you'll find all our videos, 382 00:21:13,160 --> 00:21:16,520 Speaker 1: all our blog posts, our podcasts. Yes, even the episodes 383 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:19,399 Speaker 1: of the podcast that are not available on iTunes or 384 00:21:19,480 --> 00:21:22,040 Speaker 1: wherever you like to get your podcast, you will find 385 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:25,320 Speaker 1: them on the website, and you can always drop us 386 00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 1: a line with your thoughts that blow the mind at 387 00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:35,760 Speaker 1: discovery dot com for more on this and thousands of 388 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:43,639 Speaker 1: other topics, does it, How stuff Works dot com