WEBVTT - FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson Talks Enforcement and Big Tech

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. The FDC is not

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>taking its foot off the gas when it comes to

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>enforcement action.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That's according to its chairman, Andrew Ferguson. We sat down

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with them earlier today to discuss the FDC's mission under

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the second Trump administration and how he will approach dealing

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with big tech.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Just take a listen.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 3>I think if you are a big tech company, you

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 3>should be getting your lawyers to give you great advice

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>on complying with our competition and consumer protection laws. Look,

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a particular acts to grind within the industry,

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>but I do think it's very important that the FTC

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>devote its resources to the markets that Americans most frequently

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 3>engage with. It's not just big tech, although that's definitely

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 3>one of them. It's also healthcare, and it's protecting American

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>as laborers. But no matter who you are, I think

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>it's important to proceed like the FTC is a vigilant

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>cop on the beat.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>We're surveying them markets.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 3>We're looking for competition problems, we're looking for violation of

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the consumer protection laws, and if we.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Think they're there, we're going to go to court.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 3>But most importantly, if we don't think that there are problems,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>it's really important for the FTC to get out of

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the way. Again, one of the most consistent complaints that

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 3>I've heard about the previous administration was a lack of

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>certainty and a tendency to want to do a lot

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 3>of regulating the FTC.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>We're not regulators. We're cops on the beat.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>We police for competition problems and consumer protection problems, but we're.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Not trying to regulate the economy.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>We want to create economic conditions that allow companies to innovate,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 3>to grow, and to help lift the whole country out

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of this debt crisis and bring about the golden age

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>that President Trump has promised the American people talk.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>About striking that balance because many would say, if I

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>look at Europe, they regulate too much. There's too much enforcement.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But in many ways they're being a strict coup on

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the beat. Some would say, so from your perspective, are

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you seeing overregulation and you Europe And is there a

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>worry about stifling innovation in the United States by the

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of focus you have on big tech right now?

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I do think that Europe has a real regulatory problem.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>It has an innovation problem, and we definitely don't want

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 3>to create conditions here in the United States that suppress innovation.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's important to bear in mind monopoly

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 3>suppresses innovation. Monopoly makes it very difficult for little companies

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 3>with the next.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Great idea to sort of rise.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's very important if we want to

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of preserve the American innovating spirit, that we create

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>conditions in our economy that allow little tech who have

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the next great ideas, the next life changing ideas for

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>all Americans to thrive. President Trump has been pretty emphatic

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>on the importance of making sure that our economics system

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>allows little tech to bring its ideas to market. And

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>that's what antitrust really does, is it prevents monopoly, and

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 3>monopoly stifles innovation. So if the antitrust cops are vigilant

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>and are making sure that they're protecting us from competition problems,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>it allows the innovation that has made America and our

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>economy sort of the driving engine of the whole world.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>What deals do you think can get done? Is there

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>any prescription you can give us to this MNA will

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>look good if you are a big tech ying a

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little tech.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that the deals that can get done are

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>the deals that are lawful. And I think the most

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>important thing I want to take away from this is

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 3>I see it as my job to scrutinize deals consistently

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>with the timeline Congress created.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 2>And our antitrust laws.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>And if we think that they are illegal and we

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 3>think that we can win in court, we're going to

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>go to court. But if we don't think that they

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>are illegal or we don't think we can win in court,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the FTC is going to get out of the way again.

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I've heard this complain a.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Lot from the business community that in the previous administration,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>a deal would enter the FTC and it would sort

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>of disappear, and sometimes it could disappear for months while

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, novel ideas were loaded, different theories, and sometimes

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>it sort of seemed like the FTC was hoping that

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>deals would die on the vine while they waited for

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>regulatory clearance.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I want nothing to do with that.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>If a deal is illegal and I think we can

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>win in court, I'm going to go to court. But

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 3>if it's not, we're going to get out of the

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 3>way and we're going to let deals go forward.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 2>M and A is part of how the economy grows.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>It's an important part of fostering a system that allows

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>for innovation and dynamism. But we have to make sure

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that we don't create monopoly, and I see that as

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>my job. If we think there's a monopoly problem, then

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the government's going to intervene. But if not, we've got

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to get out of the way as quickly as possible

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>and let the economy grow.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Does the AI space look like it's thriving or do

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you worry about monopolistic behavior there?

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it is extremely important that we protect

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 3>competition in the AI space, But I think it is

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>equally important that the government not race to regulate AI.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Vice President Vance's speech in Europe on AI, I think

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is about the perfect way to thread this needle. We've

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 3>got to ensure that there's competition. We got to ensure

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 3>there's competition because competition promotes promotes innovation. But we can't

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 3>have the government come in with a heavy regulatory hand

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>and stifle innovation. Again, we don't want monopoly stifling innovation.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>We don't want big government stifling innovation. And admittedly that's

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>not an easy needle to thread, but That's how I

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>think about it, is protect competition, but don't over regulate AI,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>because that's exactly how we're going to kill the innovated

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>prospects of AI.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You started all of this by talking about the very

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>close look you're going to take at every enforcement action

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that's out there at the moment, whether you pursue it

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or not. But just that assessment takes a lot of labor.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You've also said you've got the resources. I know everyone's

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>been to asking you about what this lawyer said in

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>court yet last week regarding the Amazon Prime deal, and

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you've been saying he was wrong, and they came

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>out and said that, no, we do have enough resources,

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>even though he said there's an extremely severe reasils shortfall

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of money and personnel at the FTC. Have

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you got the right amount to people and how are

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you living up to Doge's necessities to slim.

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Down Well, I didn't say that the lawyer was wrong.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.559
<v Speaker 2>The lawyer said the lawyer was wrong.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>He filed something almost immediately after his statements to the

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 3>court explaining we don't have the resource constraints that he thought.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 2>We don't have resource constraints. I've said from day one.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>We've got the resources to litigate these cases.

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That remains true. But I also want to be clear.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that the President's efficiency agenda is one of

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the most important things going in government right now. Government

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>should not be any larger than necessary to deliver the

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>services and protections that the American people deserve and that

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the FTC.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Look, we're a lean operation.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Our budget is less than half a billion dollars, we've

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>only got around thirteen hundred employees, and we deliver a

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of value for the American people. But we have

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>got the resources we need to deliver on our competition mandate,

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 3>our consumer protection mandate. But we're all always looking to

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>be as efficient as possible.