WEBVTT - NFL Week 14 Picks & Best Bets + Against the Spread Selections (Ep. 401)

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your bets. This b Joey paid Joe Pi Zapia, and

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time to look at the Week fourteen lines and

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the sides and see which games that we think are

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna go our way this week in the NFL. To

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>help me do it, of course, is my boy Scott Bogman,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the host of the College Football podcast right here on

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros, and Andrew Anderson. That's right, because it's all

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about the undersun We're gonna talk about some of the

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>games that we like in Week fourteen before we get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to all that. Guys, it's the holiday season, and you

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. Free stuff. So for a limited time,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>when you purchase any Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros Bundles subscription,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>we'll double the length of your subscription at no cost.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I know we're crazy, but we're doing it anyway. That

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>means you can get a full year for free of

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all of our premium tools across Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros,

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on top of the thirty percent discount, and you're getting

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for bundling them together in the first place. So Betting

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros premium offers you exclusive picks and content, personalized performance analysis,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and advanced profitability metrics, and I love a good profit

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>ability metric. Boy, oh boy, do I ever Head over

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to bettingpros dot com slash promo. That's Bettingpros dot com

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>slash promo and treat yourself this holiday season and double

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>your subscription for free to start winning more bets today. So, Boggs,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as my buddy, as my pal, as my friend, can

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you give us the first pick of the week that

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you are high on in Week fourteen?

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, give me Denver plus two and a half at

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers. And this for me is really that I

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>hate the Chargers. I mean what they put together on

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>offense recently has been bad. Over the last three games,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>they scored six ten twenty points. The Broncos defense is

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>not good, but they have been winning close games. They

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>beat the Packers by two, the Bills by two, the

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Vikings by one, and even in a loss last week

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 2>against the Texans that came down to the last play

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of the game. If singlely doesn't make that one of

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the best picks I've ever seen. That's a score and

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>they win going away. Certain has only really gotten torched

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>by Tyreek Hill, but who hasn't so Keenan Allen should

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>be locked up.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I certain.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know if anybody locks up Keenan

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Allen either, but if he does have a bad game,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>they don't have anything on offense because Eckler hasn't had

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>room to run. He's look slow. I think the Chargers

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>are one of the worst coach teams in the NFL.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I have the Broncos sneaking this one out outright, so

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>I just really hate what the Chargers are doing right now.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Me too, my friend. I already bet Denver plus one

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty over on Caesars on betting Pros on the money line.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the best number you can get. And by the way,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I still keep talking about this, it's available still, and

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's better than it was even last week when I thought, hey,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they beat the Texans, all of a sudden,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this number really shrinks. Well, they didn't beat the Texans,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they almost beat the Texans. But now it's plus three

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty for the Denver Broncos to make the playoffs. You

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>get that at bet MGM. You can get it at

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>it's a plus three hundred over on DK so different

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sites having at different spots here, but the best number

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is at bet MGM right now. And they still play

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers twice. They play the Raiders one more time

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they play. I believe the Patriots are on their schedule too.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>They've they've got a really open path potentially to control

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>their own destiny to get to double digit wins. So

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we are feeling Denver this week. Andrew Erickson, are you

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with us?

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 4>I do like Denver, but I do just prefer the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 4>total in this game. And you know, no surprises here

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 4>under forty four points, not you, yes, me coming out

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 4>strong with the undertakes. I get that they're playing in

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Los Angeles, a home field advantage that doesn't really exist.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 4>It's a dome, but there really haven't been that many

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>shootouts in Los Angeles this year to between the Rams

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 4>and the Chargers. When you just look at the Broncos defense,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 4>how they've improved since the start of the season. Six

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 4>of their last seven games have gone under the points total.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>The Chargers, oh my god, Chargers, nine of last ten

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 4>games have all gone under again. They scored six points

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>last week against the worst team in the NFL, worst

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>than the NFL has scored six points. I think the

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Chargers are still getting credit for an offense that was

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be good like heading into the year, but

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 4>that has hardly been the case. So the fact that

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 4>this number is not closer to like thirty nine to forty,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 4>which I think is where it should be just on

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen from these teams this year.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 5>At forty four.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Points, I think that this is a really good value

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 4>to take. The under last ten games for these two

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 4>teams two and eight towards the under. I Russell Wilson's

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>run for two hundred and few yards and seven of

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 4>his last eight games, and they both have above above

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 4>average red zone defenses. So all signs to me are

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 4>pointing towards a blackluster game in the Chargers.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Blackluster game potentially. What do you make out of Brandon

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Staley's comments about shaking up the backfield a little bit

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like that's gonna make a difference somehow more Josh Kelly

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Carries is gonna be the difference maker for the Chargers.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it was a really interesting comment that

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 4>he brought up, but I almost feel like it's more

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 4>of a hey, Austin Ecker, like you have to play better,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Like it's really more of a shot at Eckler than

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 4>just Okay, we're gonna give the like you're really gonna

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 4>give the ball to Josh Kelly Isaiah Speller.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 5>You're really good. You think that's gonna help.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Like Eckros obviously had not been playing great, but maybe

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 4>this is just like, hey, I have to play better.

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 4>And it is Denver who has been able to be

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>beaten in the run this year, So maybe this is

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 4>the last stand for Eckler to really help about his

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 4>fantasy managers.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>If you guys, if you guys like the way that

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Eckler's been running, wait till you see how slow.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Spiller is.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Bog in Week fourteen, what do you have for the people?

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Give me the under forty on the Rams at Baltimore.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Both of these teams have played more unders five and seven,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 2>both of them playing to the over. I think Baltimore

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 2>being gassed up off the buy really can make some

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>problems for the Rams offensive line, especially if Rob Havenstein

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>has to miss this game because Joe Noteboom has been rough.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>The Ravens are still adjusting to life without Mark Andrews.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>They only put up twenty against the Chargers defense. That

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>was bad before the break. This one it really though,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>even all that stuff I just said, it's really about

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the nasty weather that is projected for this game. It's

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be rainy and windy for most of this game.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw one meteorologists say that if this is just

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, if the system moved, it was a

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 2>little bit faster than we think, we're gonna get big

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>gusts constantly up to thirty miles forty miles per hour.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 2>So nasty weather in this game. For you know, the

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 2>rams work through the pass passing production goes down with wind.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The Ravens are going to be able to run, for sure,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>but that bleeds the clock. So give me the under

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>forty with some ugly weather. Wind and rain is bad

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>for special teams as well. So I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 2>take the under in this Ravens game and hope that

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens don't put all of it up by themselves.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the running game for the Ravens, do you

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think Keaton Mitchell has taken over that backfield or do

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you think because of the weather both he and Edwards

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>will work substantially in this contest? Yeah?

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I think both of them will work.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 2>But I think you know, they went to Mitchell last

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 2>week or two weeks ago before the bye, and it worked.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 2>He had more snaps by like eleven than any of

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the other non fullbacks, and they have said they want

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to get him the ball more. He's the explosive playmaker

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>on this team now that Zay Flowers is to catching

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>footballs for whatever reason, he is their explosive play and

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Mark Andrews is gone, so they're missing a big piece

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 2>of that. So there's just a lot of adjusting to

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>be made for missing pieces. For the Rams, potentially with

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Haven's sign, they got to get rid of that ball quicker.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>For Matt Safford, he's going to get murdered. And for

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens with no Mark Andrews, plus the weather, so

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>there's just a lot of obstacles for both these offenses

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to overcome in my opinion, So I'm gonna take the

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>under in this game.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, back to you, Undertaker, Do you have something

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>different for us this time around? Erickson?

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I have something fun is an over, guys, Because

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 4>the Colts there are over saviors this season eight and

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 4>four towards the over this year. One of the best

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>teams towards the over and a team in a season

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>where all we can get is unders, and we have

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 4>stadiums that are literally the anti anti Corus field of

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. The Colts are saving us. So they pushed

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 4>the Titans last week, another one of these teams that

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 4>always goes under. They went over against the Titans. Like

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 4>if they can do that, they can get over against

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>any team. So I like this spot here against the

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Cincinnati Bengals, even on the road. The Bengals defense is

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 4>absolutely horrible. Six worth of points per game, thirty three

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>yards allowed per game over the last three weeks, allowing

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 4>over four hundred yards of offense per game. What Shane

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Steichen is doing with Garter Minshew and these Colts pieces,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I think is absolutely fascinating. This offense is cooking on

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 4>all levels. They didn't have all their guys, Like I

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 4>can't wait to see what's gonna be with Richardson and

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan Taylor healthy next year. But for now, Garter Minshew,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Zach Moss, these guys are getting it done and I think

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 4>it's going to continue against Cincinnati Bengals.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 5>So I like the over overall in this game.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 4>When you look at the Colts specifically, or excuse me,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals for the last seven games hit the over.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Their last five of six games have all past forty

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 4>one and a half points. So that's what this line

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 4>opened year. Forty one and a half, went down a

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>little bit to forty and a half. Now it's back

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 4>up to forty three and a half.

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 5>It's just the.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Colts are a team you want to bet the overs on.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 4>So and the Bengals showed me enough, maybe not to

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 4>back them as I think there's some I think they're

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 4>favorite now in some spots, enough to back me or

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 4>back them as a favorite with Jake Browning, but enough

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>to show, hey, this offense can score the points against

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 4>the defense like the Colts that you know has a

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 4>leaky secondary, So I like the over.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I hate when my secondary leaks. It's the worst box.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the worst. It happens when you get older. You know,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just the part of life. But I'll tell you

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this too, this is one of my favorite bets of

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the week too. I already put this on the over

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on my best Bets video here in the channel on YouTube,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and if you haven't, go subscribe to the channel. Go

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>check that out. And of course drop your comments below

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>any of the video because we're giving away free premium

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>upgrades the Betting Pros when you comment and subscribe, We'll

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>just keep giving them away. Every single week we're giving

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>them away. And remember to ring that bell for notifications

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>to let goes ding so you know if you're the

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>big winner of this week's free giveaway of the Betting

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Pros premium upgrade. And if you haven't already downloaded the

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros app too, because on iOS you get three

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>free days of premium when you download it, so you

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>can see exactly the tools that we see when we're

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>making our picks and going through everything. So check out

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the top ten video. Go bet the Over with me

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and Ericson because I can't. I can't pick a side

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of this game. Ericson, this is like a basically, it's

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a pl plus one over at Caesars. It's a plus

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>one and a half at Cincinnati over our FanDuel so

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Ibi Vegas is like, hey, go choose your adventure. But

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for me, I think the adventure is the over.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 2>How could anyone know what the hell to expect from

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Jake Browning? He looks like a non NFL quarterback Tommy

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>DeVito style one week and then he looks like Tom

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Brady on Monday Night Football. Who knows what to expect

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>from that guy?

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Right now?

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>It made me look like an idiot last week, and

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>right now I hate everything University of Washington, So I hate.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Me man. I'm loving the Washington all right. Let's go

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to see about Miami. How much you love them this week? Box?

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Look.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>First of all, it's thirteen and a half. It's the

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>biggest bread of the week. I understand people don't like

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>laying this many points. But against the spread, Miami's eight

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>and four while the Titans are five and seven. The

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Titans are also two and four against spread since well

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Levis took over. They beat Atlanta and Carolina straight up

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>in those games they covered. They're not gonna beat Miami

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>straight up in this one. They couldn't win a close

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>one against Indy at home last week, and they haven't

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 2>covered this total in two of the last three weeks.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>They lost twenty to six was their loss of the

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Bucks thirty four to fourteen against the Jaguars. They are

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one in five against the spread on the road this season,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 2>and the one win coming against the Saints. And wink one.

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins are clicking on all cylinders. They just put

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>up forty five points against Washington and over four hundred

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>yards The week before on Black Friday they put up

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and ninety five and beat the Jets going away.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the Titans are one of those teams that's

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 2>on the same level as the Jets. They're just not

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that good. Their roster is bad. They're well coached, but

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>the product on the field cannot stop this Miami team.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this spread is big enough at

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 2>thirteen and a half. I think Miami wins this one

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>going away. I don't think it's close at all. Titans

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>about to get really smoked. Tyreek Hill might have five

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Woah. I like the sound of that.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's go.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So I assume you like the over for the Tyreek

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Hill props. I mean, look, I'm going.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 3>To take all the overs for Tireek for the rest

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 3>of the year.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I put a big chunk of money on him for

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Offensive Player of the Year and then it was a

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I got it an eight and a half

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to one at the time. So I am I'm loving

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>life right now. I love with this tour. Just they say, healthy, Tyree,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking out for you, brother. All right, let's go

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to the next one here on the slate for week fourteen, Erickson,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you have?

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Atlanta Falcons? Where are they playing at home? In Atlanta?

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 4>They're playing at home, So we're gonna do it again.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna go back despen Ritter at home. The line

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 4>has already moved from minus two and a half Atlanta

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 4>to now minus one because people don't believe he doesn't Ridter.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 4>They've seen him playquarterback, But have you seen him play

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 4>quarterback at home? Guys, Like, that's the thing, that's the

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 4>key selling point here. The Dirty Birds are four and

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 4>one at home with Dismon Ritter as their starting quarterback.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 4>They already beat the Buccaneers this year on the road.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't Ritter turned the ball over three times in the

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>red zone and they still won the game. More importantly,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 4>they rushed the ball effectively against a strong Tampa Bay

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>run defense. Second most rushing yards the Bucks have allowed

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 4>were against the Atlanta Falcons. You know didn't play in

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>that game, or I should say played on the final

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>play of the game was b Jhon Robinson. This was

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the game that we were all over the receiving yardage

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 4>props and then he didn't play like the entire game

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 4>because of the Migraine. So they beat the Buccaneers. They

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 4>ran all over the Buccaneers on the road without their

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 4>best running back. They're at home. They have Bejon back.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 4>They're starting to ramp up his volume as they head

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 4>into the They're trying to make a playoff run. They're

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 4>in the driver's seat to win the NSC South. So

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 4>I think that the Atlanta Falcons, I'm just going to

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 4>continue to backtis't ritter at home because this is where

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 4>he plays better. He's more comfortable playing at home. And

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I think the Buccaneers are an overrated opponent. I don't

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 4>think they should be getting as much credit as you know,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 4>close road dogs, and who knows if they'll even open

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 4>up maybe as the favorite.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 5>Maybe we see this line flip.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>If it ain't broke, don't fix it, ericson. You've been

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it all year, so he just keep doing it.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>A little disappointing last week for Bej in terms of productivity,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of volume, still going in the right

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>direction consistently for the last three weeks.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Box Ericson, why are you so mad when you're

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>explaining this, uh, Atlanta minus one?

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 3>You seem so angry. You're like, you gotta take minus.

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Adam. I think.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 5>I see because two and a half.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, oh, this is great, like a great value,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 4>and that's none. The value's gone. It's like, oh, go.

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>On to the other directge Age, I saw it. I

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>knew it was in that. I recognize it. All right,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 3>thank you, Ericson.

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Going forward, we've all got feelings about this next game,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So Boggs, why don't you kick us off with this one?

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean we've already talked about it a little bit.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>How about the over in Detroit and Chicago? This one

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to me and piece of p and I and Erickson

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>in our thread about the Lions last week have been

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>complaining about this Lion secondary and has been playing absolutely putrid.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>That they let the Saints come back on them, and

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they ended up putting up twenty eight points. Uh Jordan

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Love carved them up to the tune of two sixty

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>eight and three touchdowns. So Chargers put up a season

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>high thirty eight on them. The last time these two

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>teams met and the last time last time these two

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>teams met Detroit and Chicago, the score was thirty one

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to twenty six, with the Lions winning. In The Bears

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>defense might be rested, but that's not gonna make the players,

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, very good just because the arrested. The Bears

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>are still dead last in pass rush grade bottom twelve

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and coverage and rundy.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I like the over.

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Even with this game being outdoors for the indoor cat

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 2>as Joe likes to call him in Jared Goff, So,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think this game goes over because the Lions

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>secondary is playing terribly right now and the Bear secondary

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is bad. So I just think even outdoors, even it's

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit of weather, this game is going

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to sailway past this over all.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, So Boggs is looking for the over. He's pretty

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>confident there ericson same game, What are you confident in?

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm just confident the Bears.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, the Bears are one of these few teams

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 4>that can actually cover the spread against the Lions. The

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Lions have been one of the teams that have been

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 4>super profitable, but over the last couple of weeks they've

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, given given backers some sweats when it comes

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 4>to lines futures three and three against the spread overall,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 4>and their last two covers have come by extremely slim margins,

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Like we got lucky last week that the Lions came

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 4>out with the cover against the Saints because they only

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 4>are remote. They were rolling boxes messages to Chad Be

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 4>like the Lions are gonna blow this, yeah. And when

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I looked at this line when it first open up,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I was like, really, the Lion's are only like four

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 4>and a half point favorites. They're playing the Bears, and

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 4>they're like, Oh, it's outside in Chicago. This is a

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 4>cold weather where Jared Goff's small hands are gonna get

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 4>tight and is you gonna not know what to do

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 4>with them? And he's gonna throw interceptions? Like for me,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 4>if the Lions have been playing better up to this point,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>I would give them the benefit of the doubt. But

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 4>the fact that I could not bring myself to bet

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 4>on the Lions on the road, even though they are

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 4>the better team, I just that's why I wanted to

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 4>bet on the Bears, because I think that their defense

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>actually played much better over the last couple of weeks.

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Last three home games, they've limited their opponents to under

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and forty passing yards. Jared Goff didn't even

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 4>throw it for that many yards when he faced the

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Bears in Detroit. You know he was held under tow

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>hundred fifty passing yards. So look, justin fields doesn't cover

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 4>the spread gainst many teams. He should have beaten the

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 4>lines outright the last time, I think gets job done.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 5>This time at home.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it a step further. Give me the Chicago

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Bears on the money line to win this game. Let's go, baby,

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm in. I keep watching the Lions give up points

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at an alarming rate last few weeks, and I mean.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll find someone that loves you. Like Joe Pisa hates

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Jared Goff outdoor.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Look man again, if it ain't broke, if it ain't broke,

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Bakers hates him outdoor. I mean like he's getting disrespected

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 4>because they know the game's outside.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, like even even to that point, like

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>right now, when you look at the money line, you're

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>getting it at a pretty good spot on the plus side,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Like why not just go for it here? Why not

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>go forher broke? The best place you can get it

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>right now is Chicago on plus one sixty over a

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>points bet. I saw it at one fifty in a

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>couple other spots, but I'm betting Broser. Now you can

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get in a points bet at plus one sixty, So

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that because if this is close, and

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying, you know, you guys, you think it's

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna be close enough obviously there Bogs, you think it's

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an over that means anything can happen, And

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's very important to acknowledge that maybe

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right now Detroit is hitting a weird patch where they've

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>got to kind of, you know, reconfigure itself a little bit.

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But Davis Well depends only they have not played well.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, I feel like the

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Bears are starting to play better. And I'm just saying

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are great, But what I'm saying is the

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Bears and Justin Fields all kind of know they're all

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>playing for their future in Chicago, and for whatever that's worth,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this is an evaluation period and I'm fascinating to see

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if we get a little of Roshawn Johnson in this

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>game too. Coming off the buy, I'm I think the

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bears have a real shot and I like the Yeah,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the hook Horns, Baby, I think they have a real

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>shot to win this game outright, So give me the

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>plus money on that side. I want to make some

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>money on the Chicago Bears this week. Again, things I

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>don't say very often this year, but I'm gonna say

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it here. All right, Bobs, let's close things out here.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Give me one more game that you're high on for

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen.

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 3>How about another road favorite here.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's take the Packers minus six and a half at

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the Giants. And this one is about the heater that

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love is on. I talked all the smack about

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love. I watched him for like five straight weeks,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and I go, he ain't it. This is not the guy.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And then the Steelers played Jordan Love and the Packers

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 2>and he looked good.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 3>He made some really good throws.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>In that game, and I was like, Okay, maybe he's

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>a little better than I thought, or at least maybe

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>he's coming around now. And in that game he is

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty of twenty six two hundred twenty eight yards in

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown fine line, but he made some big throws.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Then against the Chargers, it's the Chargers twenty seven and

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>forty three, twenty two and two, he had two sixty

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 2>eight and three versus Detroit, and then against a good

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs defense last week. He won them that game him

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 2>in the refs two hundred and sixty seven and three.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 2>And I understand the Giants won two in a row

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>before the bye week, but de Vito is still there.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust him at all.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>The Packers defense is middling, but they're slightly above average

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>on almost all PFF grades, and they're on a nice

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 2>little winning streak here three in a row.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 3>The Giants still rank.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Last or close in pretty much every offensive category. And

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that a bye week is going to

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>be a savior for a team like the Giants. I

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>just may they play a little bit better, But I

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 2>just think the Packers run away with this one at

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 3>So the Giants are a bad team.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 2>The Packers are on a nice winning streak, So I

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 2>just I'll lay the points and take the Packers, even

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>on the road.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And the Packers have been getting to Breshre on the

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback lately too, which is a big difference maker for them.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm curious, you know, with the Watson injury, you

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know how that affects love. But look, you can't deny

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the last three games box eight touchdowns, no picks. I

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the special sauce right there. If you not

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>turn the on a heater playing well, yeah, Erickson, give

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>me one more big deal. You're in on four week fourteen,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's another game in New York or New Jersey.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Really, yeah, it's the other game that's playing in New

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Jersey because we get we get so much New Jersey action.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 4>It's absolutely great. Houston and the Jets. I'm gonna go

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 4>with the under thirty three and a half points. I

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 4>teased it earlier, but MetLife Stadium is the Anti Courus

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 4>field of the NFL too, and ten towards the over.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 4>There have been two overs and what have happened on

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Black Friday? Because there were two pick sixes? Like that's

0:20:58.320 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 4>what we're.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Doing, Yard, don't forget, never forgetail Mary.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Nonetheless, regardless Hail Mary picked six.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It happens all the time outside of Maddon, right, yeah.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Bogmin's done it to me, I'm sure more

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>than once on that.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 4>So we know that the Jets aren't going to score

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of points. Zack Wilson is going to start

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 4>this game. Six of the Jets last seven games have

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 4>gone under the projected points total. They're starting Zach Wilson.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 4>The line move from five and a half to three

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 4>and a half because people are backing Zach Wilson.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 5>I guess I won't be one of those people.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 4>And when it comes to the Houston side, because that's

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the concern of betting the under in this game.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh what a CJ. Stroud balls out like we've seen

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 5>him do well. CJ.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Shroud's passing yards have decreased in five straight games. He

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 4>just lost Tank Dell, who had been his number one

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver. I mean, look at how you attack this

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Jets defense. They're a team that teams want to run

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 4>the football on. They know that the weaker part of

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 4>their defense is their in tier defensive line not attacking

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 4>these strong cornerbacks or their secondary. And when Houston has

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 4>played bad run defenses, they have attacked it through the

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>run game. Posting pass rate overexpects in terms of zero percent,

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 4>minus two, minus five and minus ten percent. So I

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>think that with their healthy running backs between Damian Pierce

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 4>and Devin Singletary, I think the Texas will game plan

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 4>to like Hey, we're gonna try to run the ball,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 4>attack the weakness of this defense like a smart team would.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 4>But that doesn't necessarily translate to them lighting up the

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>scoreboard because they know the Jets aren't going to score

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 4>more than ten points on their side, so they don't

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>necessarily need to be super aggressive attacking downfield.

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 5>They can grind out a win here on the road,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 5>come away.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>With the victory, and I think it's gonna be under

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 4>three to three and a half points altogether.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So not a lot of what you did go ahead.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>You didn't even mention rain and wind yep. Yeah, in

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the forecast for this game too.

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So do you guys not have a lot of confidence in,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the return of Zach Wilson, the triumphant return,

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>just like the playing hard to get Zach Wilson. Yeah,

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I don't know if I want to be

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback anymore. Maybe I don't. Maybe I want

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to go do something else with my life. I don't know,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe start a crochet business or something. Who

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>knows what. Zach Wilson maybe's gonna open up a bar

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I don't know. I don't know

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>what he might do. Uh, here's a question for you guys.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Have the Jets quit, Like, do you think this is

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>like this is done? Have they It's like he is

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>dead inside in every single I don't know he does.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he is miserable and it's hard not to be.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think the defense hasn't quit. I don't think.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 2>I think they get gassed at the end of games.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're on the field too much because the

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 2>offense is three and out, punt, three and out, punt,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 2>three and out punt. It is just gross on offense. So, uh,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>they have good pieces, they have good weapons, they have

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>no line, no quarterback.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 3>You can't win like that.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 2>So even if your defense is how good it is,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 2>it is a they have a super Bowl caliber defense

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and just nothing on offense. So I don't think they've quit,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 2>But I think they get gassed at the end of games.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 2>I think once we see them get blown out in

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>like a thirty five to three or something, that's when

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 2>you know it's a it's a rap.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 3>So and that maybe that's coming this week. We'll see.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Well see all right, just a recap what the boys

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>are in on this week. Boggs is in the two

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half for the Denver Broncos at the Chargers.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Ericson's in the under for that same game, the Rams

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and Baltimore under for Bogman at forty. You've got Bogs

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>also in on Miami covering that thirteen and a half

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>against Tennessee. He likes the over in Chicago Detroit and

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay six and a half against the Giants.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Ericson's also in on indecency forty three and a half

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>over Atlanta minus one Bears plus three and a half.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the money line because I like to live dangerously.

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what Uncle Joey likes to do. And Houston and

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Jets under thirty three and a half, want want wah.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens when you get the kind of quarterback

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>play that you're getting crazy to think about some of

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks we're getting this weekend too, if you're looking

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>up and down the slate. So maybe, just maybe, unders

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>yet again will be the theme of Week fourteen, just

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like it was thirteen and twelve and some other weeks.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how things go.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 2>We need some new quarterbacks in the NFL. Joe, Let's

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>get ready for that.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Draft, you know, Trevor Lawrence did do some limited practicing today.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens. Although I would not put him

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>out there with Miles Garrett Chase, and I think that's

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a terrible idea. I think you have to play the

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>long game. If you're in the Jacksonville Jaguars here, be smart.

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see what they do at the end of

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the day. We want to hear from you though. Drop

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>your comments below in the YouTube channel. You just might

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>win a one year free premium upgrade to Betting Pros,

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but we'd like to hear what you're in on, so

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>give us your picks to you. We're all part of

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a community. Download the Betting Pros app if you haven't already,

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget make your picks count even if you're

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>not betting. If you if betting's not even the legal

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in your state, go check out the Betting proscontest bettingpros

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash NFL contest. We're giving away weekly prizes,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>monthly prizes, upgrades to Fantasy Pros to Betting Pros for free.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>We're also going to wait swag from our Betting Pros

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and and Fantasy Pro shop, so you like hatsy like

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>t shirts. Come on, just make some picks, have some fun.

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a good time to start betting in the NFL,

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and that'll do it for us. But the story of

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the game goes on for the Undertaker, Andrew Erickson and

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogman. I'm Joey p We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 6>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 6>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 6>Channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.