WEBVTT - Pedagogy of the Oppressed Ft. Andrew

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it could happen here. Which is the podcast that

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this is? I'm Robert Evans with me? Are other people? Hello?

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Other people? Hi? Hello? Uh so this podcast things falling

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>about part putting back Together? YadA, YadA YadA. Today our guest,

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>well not our guest. Our host is uh, the inimitable

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Andrew. Hey, Hey, how's it going? What are we

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about today? What are we learning? I'm good? I'm good?

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Um today open to tackle another book kind of um.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>This one's not fictional like the past two. UM. So

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I do hope to like explore some of those in

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the future because I think some good conversations come on

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to those. This week, we're gonna be talking about Paulo

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Frere and the pedagogy of the oppressed. Oh yes, for

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>those who don't know, Paulo Freire is Brazilian educator and

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the leading advocates of well was a Brazilian

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>educator and leading advocates of critical pedagogy. Pedagogy is basically

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like the study of education philosophy of education. Um. He

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was born in nine and his experiences kind of led

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>him to that path because during his childhood and adolescents

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>he was falling behind in school because he was poor.

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>His poverty and his hunger affected his ability to learn.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And so as he got older and he got opportunities

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and he was able to study and so on, and

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he basically realized he needs to do more to uplift

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the lives of the poor, improved lives of the poor,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>um in order to facilitate better educational outcomes. As he

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>says and went court, I didn't understand anything because of

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>my hunger. I wasn't dumb, it wasn't a lack of interest.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>My social condition just didn't allow me to have an education.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Experience showed me once again the relationship between social class

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and knowledge. So as he progressed in his studies and

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>his writing and stuff, he eventually contributed to a philosophy

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of education which blended classical approaches coming from Plato and

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>modern Marxist and post Marxist and anti clonial thinkers. When

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the book, it really sort of struck me.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of um and a lot of

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>France found on vibes from his work. He died in

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>um r I p um, but his greatest contribution um

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to me at least and to most people. It is

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>his book The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. In the book,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>he sort of explores a detailed Marxist class analysis UM

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship between like the colonize and colonize, the

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>oppressed and the oppressed. And he talks about the banking

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>model of education that traditional pedagogy has spouses because it

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>treats the students as like this bank, this empty vessel

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to be filled with knowledge. Instead, he argues for a

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>form of education of pedagogy that treats the lunar as

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a co creator in knowledge. As far as I'm aware, UM,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and I guess it's kind of is illustrated in the

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>book itself. But as far as I know, Fair wasn't

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>an anarchist or libertarian socialist of any variety. But he

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>still ended up coming to some anarchic conclusions with regard

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to the education system and learning and stuff. I mean

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and I guess have been writing about, you know, like

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>youth liberation and the school system and even experimenting with

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>new more roles of schooling for a long time. UM.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>The Freer movement, for example, experimented with implementing modern schools

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in UM in the US and in Spain. And a

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Goldman was very much involved in that process. And UM,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the experiments were necessarily free of error,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think they did a good job of trying

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>something new, trying something with more liberatory in the sphere

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of education, because I mean, for the past several hundred

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>years now, UM, we've kind of been going with this

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of um Prussian model of education is very strict,

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>very regimented, very divided model of education. The rules um

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of ferment nationalism and division, class divisions and

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff within the populace. So I think that any experimentation

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in the more limitary and direction is a positive. In

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the preface, um Fair sort of goes into why this

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>book came about. He's talking about his experience as a

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>teacher in Brazil the time, the observations he made well

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>in political exile, and so what he realized as a

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>teacher when he was teaching his students is that they

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>had a sort of a fair of freedom. It's not

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like a real fair of freedom, it's more a fair

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the risks associated with freedom because of the experiences

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and stuff that they've had. Um. What he considers the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>most vital, however, to the education system. It's sort of

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just establishing conscientious out or critical consciousness within students, a

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>consciousness that commits to social change and human liberation. According

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to Fair, the educational model can only really be successful

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if people are radicalized through it, if people are able

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to see the issues in their current society, think about them,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>stew upon them, criticize them, compare them, and look at

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>ways to solve them. And if they don't come up

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with that sort of critical consciousness then as well for not. Basically,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>education system is kind of spinning on top of mud.

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I find it especially interesting that I ended up reading

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this when I did, because, as we've seen in the US,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversations are now attacking anything even approaching

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>critical consciousness with this. You know who'll debate going on

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about critical race theory and this sort of even though

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>critical race theories are being taught in primary or secondary education.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>This attack, this full front of attack and anything that

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>resembles critical thinking and critical study of history and of

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the present m hm. So in chapter one for It

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>makes the case for why the patagogy Deppress is necessary.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He says, a human kind central problem is how we

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>affirmor identity as human beings. Everyone is trying to reach

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of affirmation, that sort of human identity, that

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of human nous um. But oppression and systems of

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>oppression interrupt that process. They prevent people from expressing and

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>establishing their full humanity. Where they're talking about racism keeping

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>people from reaching the full potential, or sexism preventing people,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a patriarchy with the whole limitations and

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>such puts upon people's sexuality and gender expression and gender identification.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>One of these systems of oppression are put in place

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to restrict, to confine and bound us below you know,

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>our full potential. And so a lot of that and

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the you know, cultivation and forging of

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one's awareness of you know, the systems around them and

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>how to operate within them takes place in the education system.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the education system is should be one of

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the critical junctures in which we which our fight for

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>oppressed people. There's a sort of dehumanization that it could

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as a result of oppression, whether it be in the

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>form of comparing people to animals, as racists often do,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it be in the form of decreating people too

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's of childlike status which itself is a is a

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>form of oppression because the fact that you know, childlikeness

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and youth is considered to be something less than It's

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just another way they where people are oppressed, and another

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>way in which people are prevented from asserting their autonomy

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and their humanity. Oppressors. They tend to treat people as

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>objects to be possessed, to see freedom as threatening, and

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in turn, oppressed people end are becoming ill neated from

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>each other through oppressure and begin to see their oppressors

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as something to strive towards for. It talks about how

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they oppressed. The whole vision and the whole understanding of

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>what being human is is being like oppressors. And so

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and you see that even today,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, when they strive for freedom, they strive

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to become entrepreneurs. You know, they strive to become business owners.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They strive to become billionaires and CEOs and all these

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of images of what, you know, what being human

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Because people are striving to be free, and

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if the only way you can get a measure of

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>freedom is by becoming an oppress yourself, and it makes

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>sense a lot of oppressive looking to try to do that.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, as Fair himself says, and he oppress says

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves are not fully free either, because by denying the

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>oppressed people their humanity, they robbed themselves of humanity. The

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>fight for liberation, as Fair argues, must consist of two stages,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>reflection on the nature of oppression and the concrete action

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>needed to change it. And that's sort of reading that

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that that line are paraphrasing, but it reminds me of

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the process of prefigurative politics, where not only are you

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing about the consciousness of people to recognize these systems

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of oppression and understand how they operate, but the concrete

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>action to change it is one that is intended to

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>reflect the society that we wish to establish in the future.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Fare does one um that, you know, leaders and stuff

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>must engage in dialogue with oppressed people rather than becoming

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like oppressors. But as the book goes on, I think

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he relies a bit too much on this concept of

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders as well. He wants against them existing above the people,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's still sort of uphold that distinction between the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>leaders and the people. As the book progresses, um he

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>begins to compare the concept of the banking model to

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the problem posing model of education. As

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>he calls it. In the banking model um quote, he

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the teacher talks about reality as if it were motionless, static, compartmentalized,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and predictable. Where Else he expands upon a topic completely

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>alien to the existential experience of the students. His task

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is to fill the students with the contents of his narration,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>contents which are detached from reality, disconnected from the totality

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that engendered them. I could give them significance. Words are

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>emptied of their concreteness and become a hollow, alienated, and

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>alienating verbocity any being that sentence is quite proposed. But

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on the contrary, banking education maintains and even stimulates the

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>contradiction to the following attitudes and practices, which mirror oppressive

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>society as a whole. The teacher teachers, and the students

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are taught. The teacher knows everything, and the student knows nothing.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Teacher thinks and the students are thought about. Teacher talks

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and the students listen meekly. The teacher disciplines, and the

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>students are disciplined. Teacher chooses and enforces his choice, and

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the students comply. The teacher acts, and the students have

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the illusion of acting through the action of the teacher.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Teacher chooses the program content and the students, who were

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not consulted, adapt to it. The teacher confuses the authority

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge with his or her own professional authority, which

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they set in opposition to the freedom of the students.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>The teachers the subjective learning process while the pupils and

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>their objects. I think um Flaire needed to incorporate some

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>more gender neutral language and that so I had to

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of correct him there. Um. But that quote, that

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that quote in full, it really reminds me, um of

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>my schooling experience. UM. As some people they knew I

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was actually home schooled for the majority of my learning experience.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I actually didn't know that. Oh oh now you know, Yeah,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so I was. I was home schooled, um for I woulday,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the majority of my education experience. And then after I

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>went into college and stuff. But before then, I didn't,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>um make it through the school system. And even though

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a really long time ago, my memories are

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>still crystal clear of that process. You know, UM, I

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing students being disciplined, Um I myself was kind

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of a teacher's pet. But that doesn't surprise me, and

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the best possible way I'm not sure I to take it,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it in a good way because me not

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>me also doesn't surprise teachers or cops. Yeah, this is

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>my pre anarchists. I wasn't you know, I didn't. I

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't jumping out the booth canal with a black flag,

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Unfortunately a cab includes the person who tried

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to get me to read Catcher in the Rye was

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a good book. It was a good, perfectly fine book.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just being an asshole. But but like Andrew, what

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are you alluding here? Is that like stoicism is something

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that is weaponized in the education system. Stoicism, stoicism being

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like no emotion delivering like right right, right, because I

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking the philosophy, but because you're like a vessel

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for quote unquote facts and knowledge to be like injected

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>into you for you to like hold as as Yeah,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's we're seeing a resurgence in this type of saying

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all the albeit probably a little bit less eloquently stated

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in some of like the anti schooling anarchist literature. That's

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>been coming out in the past few years, or at

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>least has been gaining more traction the past few years.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>M Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, because this and that's kind

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of that's kind of the funny thing about it, because

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>most people in their school and experience can recall it

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>being in some ways negative, even if they look at

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it in a positive light. We can at least, even

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>if they don't go in that fully radical direction, most

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people can look at some of the elements to their schooling,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of the education and see that that wasn't right. You know,

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something messed up about that, even something as simple

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as having to like ask, you know, the teacher to

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>go on and use the toilet. It's just this is

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of little ways of control, like as I

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was seeing in my school and experience back when I

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was in primary school. I was very adorable. I'm sure

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I could guess, but I remember seeing these students being disciplined.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>They had the bell had rung for um, you know,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the end of break, and he supposed to, you know,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>fire back into class. But I think there was a

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>school next door that was having some kind of events

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and they were playing like music, and so a bunch

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of students in my class. Not me, but a bunch

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of students in my class were you know, um, dancing

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at the side of the school, enjoying the music, having

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a good time or whatever. Um. They heard the bell

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't go because they were, you know, they

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>were having a good time. They were like six seven eight, um.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But then afterwards the teacher, after you know, I sit

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>down and stuff, leacher goes and finds them and brings

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>them in. And this is prior to at least of

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, prior to the corporal punishment being phased out

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of school. So I just remember seeing them having to

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like lay out their hand and receive punishment

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>for daring to have joy after hours, you know, daring

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy themselves. Um, what it was supposed to be

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>class time and they're supposed to be in class. I'm

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sure people have similar experiences, at least of a kind

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of punishment and controul. I mean, this is not the

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>same kind of punishment, but I think to your point

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of being controlled, like even just like not even being

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>aware of it, just like being forced to stand up

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and say the pudge of allegiance. In America, for example,

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it becomes this like repetitive culty thing every morning that

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you're expected to do and if you don't do it,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>um personal experience. If you refuse to do that, you

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the principal's office and explain why

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it happens over and over again. And I think it's

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're questioned and you're punished even for like thinking,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>not like differently, or questioning not even thinking, just questioning reality. Yeah, yeah,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>yeah yeah. And in Syria when I was I went

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to school in Syria when I was really small and

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>me my sister ate really slow and we would get

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>hit with a ruler on our hands because we did

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't finish lunch fast enough. Um. So yeah, mine

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't that intense. But the school I went to when

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I was a little kid in Oklahoma, number one, they

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>paddled us. That was legal as a public school. But

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>my first grade teacher was obsessed with the fact that

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like it was bad to be left handed, and you know,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>she couldn't, she couldn't do the ship that they used

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to do right. They used to like funck kids up

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for using their left hands. But she would every single

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>day like chide me and tell me that I should

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>use my right hand to write and stuff that it

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like proper that it was like bad that I

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>could if you if you if you're not aware, if

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not left handed, when you're like do stuff with

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a pencil and you're left handed, you get a bunch

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of like, yeah, pencil stuff on your on the side

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of your hand. Right. It's just like because of the

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>way that unless you're using like those weird left handed

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>notebooks and ship which no one ever has. UM, and

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>she would like she gave me so much ship for

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>being dirty because like I would get stuff on my hand.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It was just like when I tell people that, it's

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like really, this was like the nineties. Yeah, there's there's

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a few of those folks left. I think she was

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>extremely Catholic, UM, and I know none seems to go

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>on that stuff. I didn't know that Catholic people cared

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about the left handed thing. Catholic Catholic schools. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that, like it's I don't think there's

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything and like the Catechism about not being left handed

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>right right. I mean like in some very strict Muslim culture,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is like phased out but for example,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>your left hand isn't meant to be used as the

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>primary hand because it's like a dirty hand, like the

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>one you wipe yourself with. Ye. Yeah, there's a lot,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but like I know you were handed though. Yikes. Oh yes,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ye yikes, thank you, thank you. You should be concerned.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to makes a number of things frustrating, like

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>shearing sheep anyway, whatever. Mm well, everything is designed for

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>right handed people for sure, Like it has everything it is.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You try to speak, but we are the master, right Okay? Sorry?

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of hands, just out of curiosity, did you all

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have the hand up hand out experience? Hand out? What's

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hand out? Basically? Um, it's just sort of a tool,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you suggest, sort of a sort of repetitive kind of

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>follow instructions kind of thing. So like if the class

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>getting too rowdies, like hands up, hands out, hands up,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>hands out, and the teacher does not stop saying it

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>until everyone is quiet down, and it's just like like

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a robot, just reason. And I don't think i've experienced that,

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you? Um? I wasn't an assistant teacher

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>at one point, and for very very young children, I'm

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>talking like four to five year olds and I understand

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>their frustration of like you're just trying to get something

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>done and everyone's gonna while now they just had snacks

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and everyone's kind of wild out. But I

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think that says more about like the methods we're using

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>than about the shouldering themselves. You know. It's all about,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>like you have to you should adjust more to like

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>their cycles and their needs, their stage, rather than trying

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to force and shove them into this sort of militarbotic Yeah, yeah, totally.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, they're not allowed to actually develop naturally or

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like be themselves in a setting like that. Yeah, exactly.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think what happens like kind of throws me. It's

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like or people have these experiences traumatic and not as

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>dramatic in the education system, a lot of people, but

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>some people they come out radicalized by it, and other

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>people end up being the like most stringent and most

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>passionate advocates of it. Like even like this Catholic school

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>teacher you're talking about, Robert, Like at some point she

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was also in the education system, and it really makes

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>me wonder like what she went through to have to

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with that kind of mindset. Yeah, I mean,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I think she'd grown up in Oklahoma too, so it

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>must have been a nightmare, like everything in that state. Yeah,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like why does it have a panhandle anyway? Um, I

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the there is a reason for that, and it's

0:23:54.240 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not fun, but okay, I'm assuming it's slavery. Any fucked

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>up geographic thing going on in the South, the reason

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is generally slavery. Yeah, right, right, right right. And so

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>she spends a lot of time talking about this banking model,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and we could go on and on about it. I

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time just talking about the education

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>system all my problems with it, and at some point

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I would like to do an episode about differ rare

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>schools and part of how those sort of transpired. But

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what Fair proposes um as an alternative is the problem

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>posing model, which is, basically, through dialogue, the teacher and

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the students ceased to exist. The teacher of the students

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and the students of the teachers ceased to exist. So

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of there being these two separate categories they are

0:24:55.160 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>teacher students and student teachers. There's no operation anymore between

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the one who teaches and the one who has taught. Rather,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a dialogue between the two as they become part

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>of this process where all of them can grow. You know,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you let go of this sort of authoritarian arrangements and

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>allow people to teach and be taught two, learn and

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be learned. Two really draw out what it is that

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to gain from each other. Rather than being

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of docile listeners, the students and the teachers, the

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 1>student teachers teacher students, they become co investigators in dialogue,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they become critics. They become radicals who are able to

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>open up and depathologize the way that reality works with

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>human beings exist in the world. Banking education tends to

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>inhibit creativity and try to domesticate our consciousness. Throw back

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to when I was talking about human investication the other day. Um.

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>But in contrast, in the problem posing model tries to

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it really bases itself on creativity and stimulates rather than domestication,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a full flourishing of what someone could

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be unbound and unshackled. So, in summary, banking theory is immobilizing.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's fixating. It doesn't acknowledge people as people but

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>rather objects, whereas the problem posing model it takes people's historicity,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it takes people's humanity the starting point upon which they

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>can grow and learn from each other. I think that's

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what frustrated me the most about the education system in

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the time that I was in it, and even when

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I got back in it in college, even though it's

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not as bad in some ways, because you know, in

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>college they tend to emphasize dialogue a bit more on

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>certain classes. But I find the issue is that there's

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>this assumption in you know, the earlier sections of schooling,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary school and primary school and even preschool

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that the children, the youth, you know, they're not there

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to have anything to add. They're just there to recogitate,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to to study, and to repeat what they've studied for approval,

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not just something I definitely did back in the day.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>If what's lacking is dialogue, a dialogue that buyers you know,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>hoop and trust and critical thinking, then liberation you would

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>also be lacking. There can't be dialogue without love for

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the world and for people, and for knowledge and for

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bring that knowledge out to people. So as for our says,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, love is at the same time the foundation

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue and dialogue itself. On the other hand, dialogue

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of exists without humility, the naming of the world

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>through which people constantly recreate that world cannot be an

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>act of arrogance. I remember encountering a lot of arrogance

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>teachers and lecturers and stuff in my time to the

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>education system. Um are being condescended to multiple occasions, and

0:28:55.440 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. Nobody likes being condescended to. But condescension

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the default way in which we engage

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>with young people, just sort of there's this projected ignorance

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>upon them, is that they have nothing of value to

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>add or to share. Another contrary, you know, we all

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have something to contribute. If we all closed off, and

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if we are closed off to the contributions of others,

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't engage in dialogue with them. If we are fearful,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>if we are um considering people to be like inferior

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, if we cannot embrace people as equals,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and how can we engage in dialogue with that? I

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's a beauty in the way that he reflects

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on dialogue. He goes on and on about it for

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. At one point, he says that dialogue

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>requires an intense faith in humankind, faith in their power

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to make and rea to create and recreate faith in

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>their vocation to be more fully human, which is not

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the privilege of an elite, but the birthright of all.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And So, finally, when he's talking about action and how

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>um this sort of change is brought about, he divides

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>cultural action into two kinds, dialogical action and anti dieological action.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>While oppressors use antideological action to protect their power and

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to separate people, radicals can use dialogical action to bring

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people together in the struggle for freedom as a different

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>methods of antideological action. Through conquest, through divide and rule,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>through manipulation, through cultural invasion, oppressors were able to put

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the oppressed in the predicament of there in. You know,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the oppressed wouldn't be the oppressed if not for the

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>oppressors oppressing them. That's kind of self explanatory. Um. But

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in contrast, radicals from among the oppressed, using biological action,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>using cooperation, unity, organization, and cultural synthesis are able to

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>rise above and push back against this oppression and to

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>allow education to flourish among all. And So I think

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of the text um, the hope that

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it abuse in people to really bring about these changes,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was a good reading five outs

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of five excellent. And it's not very long, right, it's

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like under two from what I yes, yes, it's like

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>four short chapters reatively. Sure. I know back when you

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>were talking about how um people are sectors of the

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>right specifically are so set on a acting like anything

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>related to like critical theory or critical race theory. Um.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I the the book was was banned like like a

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>decade and like over decade ago from the Arizona Schools

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for teaching students that they are oppressed. Well, uh yeah,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how you know, that's to be expected. It's

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a good book. Yeah, yeah, so that's anyway, just a

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just a fun fun fact there. Yeah, we can't we

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>can't have kids knowing that, uh, they have shared interests

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as a group, um, and that adults are mistreating them comprehensively.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That's good. Yeah. God just reminded me of so many

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just moments that mean teachers like really got into it,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or like the teachers that were condescending that I hated.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I have to really go through the role dex and

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>try to get this out now after we finished recording. Well, listen,

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're a child. Why are you listening to this

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>rise up in rebellion? Uh destroy the adults. Their joints

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are terrible. Hit him in the knees. They won't recover.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>My joints are terrible. Exactly, some fucking nine year old

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>wax you in the knee with like are down. You're

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the game. No, I know. My kids would

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>break embrace the ancient traditions, make les, and go for

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the fucking joints. Yeah, children of the world, you have

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing to lose, which at bed times, that's that's it

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>could Happen here production. For more podcasts on pool Zone Media,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>visit our website pool zone media dot com or check

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>us out on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can find sources

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for It could Happen Here, updated monthly at cool zone

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>media dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.