WEBVTT - Why Money Launderers Love $100 Bills

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.420
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Odd Lodge listeners. I'm Joe Wiesenthal.

0:00:06.620 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:07.700 --> 0:00:10.270
<v Speaker 1>We're the hosts of the Odd Lodge podcast, and we've

0:00:10.300 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>got something exciting for you.

0:00:11.740 --> 0:00:13.970
<v Speaker 2>That's right. So one of the best parts of hosting

0:00:14.070 --> 0:00:16.830
<v Speaker 2>our podcast is we get to actually meet and interact

0:00:16.950 --> 0:00:19.709
<v Speaker 2>with our listeners. And we know we have some listeners

0:00:19.850 --> 0:00:20.989
<v Speaker 2>over in Los Angeles.

0:00:21.170 --> 0:00:23.709
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So if you're in L.A., we're going to

0:00:23.750 --> 0:00:27.350
<v Speaker 1>be recording a live show, some live recordings at the

0:00:27.370 --> 0:00:29.510
<v Speaker 1>Vermont Theater in Hollywood on September 17th.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.979
<v Speaker 2>We have some really exciting guests lined up, have some

0:00:33.140 --> 0:00:36.450
<v Speaker 2>really great conversations planned. So go ahead and get your tickets.

0:00:36.470 --> 0:00:39.890
<v Speaker 2>You can find those over at Bloomberg.com forward slash oddlots

0:00:40.030 --> 0:00:42.529
<v Speaker 2>or click the link below in the show notes and

0:00:42.690 --> 0:00:43.750
<v Speaker 2>come and say hi when you're there.

0:00:49.490 --> 0:00:52.330
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts.

0:00:52.650 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Radio. News. Music. Hello and welcome to another episode of

0:01:06.580 --> 0:01:08.610
<v Speaker 2>the Odd Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:01:08.770 --> 0:01:09.910
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Weisenthal.

0:01:10.250 --> 0:01:14.110
<v Speaker 2>Joe, everything I know about cash came from that tour

0:01:14.170 --> 0:01:18.950
<v Speaker 2>we took of the Chicago Fed's cash facilities with its president,

0:01:19.010 --> 0:01:19.690
<v Speaker 2>Austin Goolsbee.

0:01:20.050 --> 0:01:22.490
<v Speaker 1>That was really fun. I'm trying to think. What do

0:01:22.510 --> 0:01:25.949
<v Speaker 1>you remember? I remember just seeing lots and lots of cash, ink.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I remember appreciating the smell of the cash. It has

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>a very idiosyncratic smell. smell. I remember the color of

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the cash, which you don't really notice all the different

0:01:37.540 --> 0:01:41.570
<v Speaker 2>shades of dollar bills until you see them stacked up. Right.

0:01:41.590 --> 0:01:42.750
<v Speaker 1>We just think of them as green.

0:01:42.830 --> 0:01:43.069
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:43.090 --> 0:01:45.830
<v Speaker 1>But there's like pinks in there and oranges. Yeah, absolutely.

0:01:45.870 --> 0:01:48.690
<v Speaker 2>Fifty shades of green. And then one thing that I

0:01:48.730 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>remember is Austin actually telling us that 85% of the

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:59.050
<v Speaker 2>$ 2. 4 trillion in circulation is happens to be $ 100 bills.

0:01:59.090 --> 0:02:00.890
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember that? Yeah.

0:02:01.090 --> 0:02:03.510
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of those sort of like facts

0:02:03.590 --> 0:02:06.110
<v Speaker 1>about the world that people seem to know, but don't

0:02:06.270 --> 0:02:09.030
<v Speaker 1>really think through. It just sort of comes up every

0:02:09.110 --> 0:02:12.269
<v Speaker 1>once in a while. This phenomenon that, you know, by

0:02:12.310 --> 0:02:14.630
<v Speaker 1>and large, like two things I think people may know

0:02:14.690 --> 0:02:17.540
<v Speaker 1>about the cash economy, which is by and large, people

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.780
<v Speaker 1>use less and less cash in their daily lives. That

0:02:21.020 --> 0:02:24.100
<v Speaker 1>fact seems to have actually had no effect on the

0:02:24.139 --> 0:02:25.700
<v Speaker 1>amount of cash in circulation.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. It keeps growing.

0:02:27.500 --> 0:02:29.820
<v Speaker 1>And then quite a bit of that cash in circulation

0:02:29.980 --> 0:02:34.380
<v Speaker 1>is in relatively high denomination bills that are even used

0:02:34.500 --> 0:02:36.470
<v Speaker 1>less than, say, the fives or the 20s.

0:02:36.590 --> 0:02:38.609
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know about you, but I do not

0:02:38.650 --> 0:02:41.550
<v Speaker 2>walk around with a lot of $ 100 bills in my pocket.

0:02:41.610 --> 0:02:42.390
<v Speaker 1>No, me neither.

0:02:42.810 --> 0:02:44.489
<v Speaker 2>On the rare occasions when I do go to a

0:02:44.510 --> 0:02:48.609
<v Speaker 2>cash machine, I always choose 20s or even fives and 10s, right?

0:02:49.110 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So the question is... What are people doing with all

0:02:52.090 --> 0:02:54.850
<v Speaker 2>these $ 100 bills, right? And when we talked about it

0:02:54.910 --> 0:02:58.130
<v Speaker 2>with Austin, he described it as a disconnect between the

0:02:58.169 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>stats and the daily use of cash of most Americans.

0:03:02.620 --> 0:03:05.700
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's kind of an obvious answer here, right?

0:03:06.100 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 2>What are people doing with $ 100 bills?

0:03:07.380 --> 0:03:08.980
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have an answer because I can tell you

0:03:09.020 --> 0:03:12.169
<v Speaker 1>the last time I walked around with a significant stack

0:03:12.190 --> 0:03:12.410
<v Speaker 1>of $ 100 bills.

0:03:12.450 --> 0:03:12.549
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:03:12.610 --> 0:03:17.110
<v Speaker 1>Okay. I was playing in a poker game in New

0:03:17.130 --> 0:03:19.590
<v Speaker 1>York City, and it was not a regulated poker game,

0:03:19.630 --> 0:03:21.970
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't lose all my money that night. And

0:03:21.990 --> 0:03:24.109
<v Speaker 1>so I walked home with a lot of $ 100 bills.

0:03:24.169 --> 0:03:25.950
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that is a sort of.

0:03:25.970 --> 0:03:28.530
<v Speaker 2>That's some good, humble bragging, Joe, about winning at poker.

0:03:28.650 --> 0:03:30.460
<v Speaker 1>I didn't win. I said I didn't lose all my money.

0:03:31.590 --> 0:03:34.220
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that's sort of a clue about the types

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of activities that might lend themselves to high-denomination individual bills. Yes.

0:03:39.340 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>So this episode is- perhaps poker adjacent. We're going to

0:03:43.460 --> 0:03:45.580
<v Speaker 2>be talking about money laundering, which we've never done an

0:03:45.660 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>episode specifically devoted to money laundering. And it is in

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.339
<v Speaker 2>fact like a huge business.

0:03:50.780 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of the numbers you read about them and they're

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.420
<v Speaker 1>like staggering. And I almost like don't believe some of

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, but when you figure out it's like, okay,

0:04:00.060 --> 0:04:02.420
<v Speaker 1>drugs are probably a big deal. Fraud is probably a

0:04:02.420 --> 0:04:05.940
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Crime is a big deal. People are trying

0:04:05.980 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to get their money out of countries that have various

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.350
<v Speaker 1>sort of rigid capital controls. China being an obvious example,

0:04:12.830 --> 0:04:13.790
<v Speaker 1>you could see how it adds up.

0:04:14.010 --> 0:04:16.750
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. And of course, money laundering is kind of

0:04:16.770 --> 0:04:19.390
<v Speaker 2>the thing that makes a lot of crime possible, right?

0:04:19.410 --> 0:04:21.430
<v Speaker 2>Like a lot of people wouldn't be in the crime

0:04:21.470 --> 0:04:24.390
<v Speaker 2>business if they couldn't actually use the money they're generating

0:04:24.430 --> 0:04:26.820
<v Speaker 2>from it and money laundering. is the way they're able

0:04:26.860 --> 0:04:29.060
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So I think it's a worthy subject

0:04:29.100 --> 0:04:29.740
<v Speaker 2>to dive into.

0:04:29.860 --> 0:04:31.580
<v Speaker 1>I really want to learn more about how it all works.

0:04:31.700 --> 0:04:33.330
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do it. We do, in fact, have

0:04:33.370 --> 0:04:36.350
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest. We're going to be speaking with Oliver Bullough.

0:04:36.410 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>He is a journalist and author of Everybody Loves Our Dollars.

0:04:40.710 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>So Oliver, thanks so much for coming on All Thoughts.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 3>And thanks for having me on the show. I'm really

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>pleased to be here.

0:04:46.740 --> 0:04:50.100
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about the scale of money laundering, because

0:04:50.140 --> 0:04:53.250
<v Speaker 2>you sometimes hear these statistics thrown out, like bigger than

0:04:53.310 --> 0:04:57.690
<v Speaker 2>the entire GDP of Germany, certainly bigger than a lot

0:04:57.730 --> 0:05:01.170
<v Speaker 2>of big tech companies and things like that. How large

0:05:01.210 --> 0:05:02.130
<v Speaker 2>are we talking about here?

0:05:03.010 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's worth saying in advance that obviously no one

0:05:05.900 --> 0:05:09.260
<v Speaker 3>really knows. The criminals are not filing accurate tax returns.

0:05:09.300 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of supposition going on here. But

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the most widely used estimate is that We're talking about

0:05:16.190 --> 0:05:19.500
<v Speaker 3>between 2% and 5% of global GDP. And since global

0:05:19.540 --> 0:05:24.940
<v Speaker 3>GDP is approximately $ 100 trillion, that means between $ 2 and

0:05:24.940 --> 0:05:29.589
<v Speaker 3>$ 5 trillion being laundered globally. And that's a pretty decent

0:05:29.990 --> 0:05:32.310
<v Speaker 3>amount of money. You could build quite a lot of

0:05:32.350 --> 0:05:35.409
<v Speaker 3>data centers with that. And that's growing all the time.

0:05:35.430 --> 0:05:38.930
<v Speaker 2>I like how we measure everything in data centers now.

0:05:38.990 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>How many data centers can you build?

0:05:40.500 --> 0:05:43.630
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I don't know if the criminals

0:05:43.670 --> 0:05:45.230
<v Speaker 3>are building a lot of data centers. I mean, they

0:05:45.350 --> 0:05:49.210
<v Speaker 3>are choosing almost any avenue they can find to launder

0:05:49.230 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>their money. So perhaps that's the new new thing. But

0:05:52.260 --> 0:05:55.820
<v Speaker 3>the old things are still very much current. We're talking about, obviously,

0:05:56.140 --> 0:05:59.540
<v Speaker 3>cash money earlier. And although we like to focus on

0:05:59.700 --> 0:06:02.850
<v Speaker 3>shiny things, crypto for laundering money, I mean, criminals are

0:06:02.870 --> 0:06:04.909
<v Speaker 3>pretty traditional in a lot of the ways they move

0:06:04.930 --> 0:06:08.090
<v Speaker 3>their cash. So we are often talking about literal banknotes.

0:06:09.150 --> 0:06:11.390
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a sense of how that 2% to 5%

0:06:11.390 --> 0:06:15.550
<v Speaker 1>number is derived? Because yes, we've seen that stat, et cetera.

0:06:15.589 --> 0:06:18.810
<v Speaker 1>But also, as you've said, no one is filing these

0:06:18.870 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>things in any sort of official manner. It's a lot

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of money. Do you have a sense of why people

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's in that ballpark?

0:06:28.339 --> 0:06:30.860
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good question, actually. It derives from an

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 3>estimate given by Michel Candesso, who was the head of

0:06:34.100 --> 0:06:37.220
<v Speaker 3>the International Monetary Fund back in the late 90s, a

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.230
<v Speaker 3>French central banker. And he came up with this idea

0:06:41.290 --> 0:06:43.750
<v Speaker 3>in the late 90s that it was between 2% and 5%

0:06:43.750 --> 0:06:47.570
<v Speaker 3>of global GDP, which was based on a couple of economists'

0:06:47.630 --> 0:06:50.289
<v Speaker 3>work at the time trying to work out the size

0:06:50.330 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 3>of the global economy. And it was very much a

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.660
<v Speaker 3>guesstimate at the time. And it's been attacked from lots

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.700
<v Speaker 3>of different directions, trying to work it out in a

0:06:57.700 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of a macro way, looking at it in micro way,

0:07:00.140 --> 0:07:04.250
<v Speaker 3>trying to work at various dimensions. guesses. And people do

0:07:04.310 --> 0:07:06.750
<v Speaker 3>keep coming back to this kind of a range. So

0:07:06.970 --> 0:07:09.130
<v Speaker 3>the estimate that tends to be given is two to

0:07:09.150 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>five percent. It's the same estimate that was given in

0:07:10.940 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the late 90s, which is it's a kind of uncomfortable

0:07:14.580 --> 0:07:16.980
<v Speaker 3>truth hidden in that estimate, which is that if the

0:07:18.140 --> 0:07:20.300
<v Speaker 3>scale or the share of the global economy that is

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>criminal is the same now as it was in the 1990s,

0:07:22.460 --> 0:07:26.380
<v Speaker 3>it means that everything we've done to try and tackle

0:07:26.420 --> 0:07:31.970
<v Speaker 3>money laundering, which has been an failed to do anything

0:07:32.110 --> 0:07:35.790
<v Speaker 3>except perhaps prevent the criminal economy from getting bigger. Criminals

0:07:35.850 --> 0:07:40.630
<v Speaker 3>have been able to outmanoeuvre regulators and law enforcement agencies

0:07:40.650 --> 0:07:43.900
<v Speaker 3>and governments' attempts to limit them by a sort of

0:07:43.950 --> 0:07:47.820
<v Speaker 3>ceaseless entrepreneurial nature ever since there have been attempts to

0:07:47.860 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>stop them from laundering money. And the fact that their

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>share of the global economy just grows alongside the global

0:07:52.660 --> 0:07:53.860
<v Speaker 3>economy is proof of that.

0:07:54.140 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The fact that it's growing in tandem with like

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>broader economic growth. Absolutely. So, okay, what's going on with

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>our efforts to actually tackle money laundering? Because I used

0:08:04.100 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to cover the banking industry. And one thing you would

0:08:06.100 --> 0:08:10.020
<v Speaker 2>hear from banks all the time is how onerous KYC regulation,

0:08:10.060 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>know your customer regulation was, how terrible it was that

0:08:13.140 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>they had to file thousands and thousands of like suspicious

0:08:16.380 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 2>activity reports, lots and lots of complaints about everything they're

0:08:20.340 --> 0:08:25.330
<v Speaker 2>doing to stamp out suspicious or illegal activity. But at

0:08:25.370 --> 0:08:28.050
<v Speaker 2>the same time, per your commentary, it doesn't seem like

0:08:28.090 --> 0:08:29.050
<v Speaker 2>it's actually been effective.

0:08:30.210 --> 0:08:33.550
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously easy to dismiss what banks say as special pleading,

0:08:33.570 --> 0:08:35.469
<v Speaker 3>but actually they do have a point. We have an

0:08:35.510 --> 0:08:39.829
<v Speaker 3>incredibly intrusive and onerous system put in place to try

0:08:39.890 --> 0:08:43.590
<v Speaker 3>and stop money laundering and terrorist financing, which was, I mean,

0:08:43.630 --> 0:08:47.260
<v Speaker 3>it was created the first AML legislation. The sort of

0:08:47.270 --> 0:08:51.140
<v Speaker 3>rather weirdly named Bank Secrecy Act was passed back in

0:08:51.140 --> 0:08:54.250
<v Speaker 3>1970 in the US, and then it spread in globally

0:08:54.309 --> 0:08:57.170
<v Speaker 3>when it became clear that one country couldn't fight money

0:08:57.210 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>laundering on its own, because it was pretty easy to

0:08:59.340 --> 0:09:02.979
<v Speaker 3>just fly your banknotes to the Bahamas, Cayman Islands or Panama.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.500
<v Speaker 3>And then, so it's pretty important to have their cooperation

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>and then everyone had to cooperate. So we ended up

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.820
<v Speaker 3>from the late 80s, thanks to an institution called the

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.940
<v Speaker 3>Financial Action Task Force with a kind of global approach

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:19.290
<v Speaker 3>to tackling money laundering, which has become incredibly intrusive, incredibly expensive.

0:09:19.710 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>The estimates from LexisNexis is that global compliance with AML legislation,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it costs something like $ 200 billion a year, which is

0:09:28.940 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money. I mean, if you look at

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 3>what you could do with that money if you weren't

0:09:32.210 --> 0:09:34.390
<v Speaker 3>using it for this, that would be enough to solve

0:09:34.429 --> 0:09:37.030
<v Speaker 3>world hunger and to provide clean water and sanitation to

0:09:37.090 --> 0:09:40.209
<v Speaker 3>everyone on Earth with about $ 50 billion left over. So

0:09:40.530 --> 0:09:42.650
<v Speaker 3>it's a huge amount of money which is being spent

0:09:42.830 --> 0:09:45.490
<v Speaker 3>on this issue. And a lot of that money is

0:09:45.550 --> 0:09:48.930
<v Speaker 3>being spent by banks who are expected to check transactions

0:09:49.150 --> 0:09:54.050
<v Speaker 3>to use ever more elaborate AI-powered compliance software, which they

0:09:54.220 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>are doing. They are attempting to do the job being

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.670
<v Speaker 3>asked of them. They face very large fines if they

0:09:59.690 --> 0:10:02.170
<v Speaker 3>don't do that job. So it's fairly easy to see

0:10:02.210 --> 0:10:04.620
<v Speaker 3>why they're doing it, but it's not working. The system

0:10:04.630 --> 0:10:08.780
<v Speaker 3>that we have is incredibly laborious, very bureaucratic. It generates,

0:10:08.820 --> 0:10:12.339
<v Speaker 3>as you say, millions upon millions of suspicious activity reports

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.340
<v Speaker 3>every year, but it is signally failing to stop the

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>money launderers who are always at least one step ahead.

0:10:18.290 --> 0:10:20.810
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, we really want to get into the details

0:10:20.870 --> 0:10:24.190
<v Speaker 1>of the creative ways that criminals and so forth move

0:10:24.250 --> 0:10:27.010
<v Speaker 1>money across borders. But just to sort of set the

0:10:27.110 --> 0:10:31.140
<v Speaker 1>scene a little bit, we started this conversation by talking

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.619
<v Speaker 1>about how much cash there is in circulation and the

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>prevalence of high denomination bills. We're also talking about all

0:10:37.140 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the suspicious sort of incident reports that banks file. Big picture,

0:10:41.820 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I sort of have two questions. One is, what is

0:10:44.780 --> 0:10:47.740
<v Speaker 1>the general sense of the distribution? How much is this

0:10:47.780 --> 0:10:53.390
<v Speaker 1>happening via cash and bearer instruments that are hard to track?

0:10:53.690 --> 0:10:55.850
<v Speaker 1>And how much, you know, we see the headlines from

0:10:55.910 --> 0:10:58.069
<v Speaker 1>time to time, a bank will get into really big trouble.

0:10:58.510 --> 0:11:01.330
<v Speaker 1>HSBC got into trouble years ago. How much do we

0:11:01.370 --> 0:11:06.530
<v Speaker 1>think is happening sort of inside regulated financial institutions that

0:11:06.570 --> 0:11:09.150
<v Speaker 1>didn't identify the illegal movement of money?

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.340
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, it is happening via regulated financial institutions. We know

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 3>this because occasionally they get caught, whether that's Danske Bank

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.940
<v Speaker 3>or Deutsche Bank, HSBC, whoever. But if you look at

0:11:22.100 --> 0:11:26.420
<v Speaker 3>the scale of global cash smuggling, and you compare that

0:11:26.460 --> 0:11:29.900
<v Speaker 3>to the amounts that are even in these gigantic money

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.330
<v Speaker 3>laundering scams, which are accused of going through regulated financial institutions,

0:11:34.390 --> 0:11:37.990
<v Speaker 3>it's just an absolutely different league. Danske Bank was accused

0:11:38.030 --> 0:11:41.500
<v Speaker 3>of moving, if I remember rightly, about 130 billion over

0:11:41.540 --> 0:11:45.479
<v Speaker 3>several years for suspicious Russian clients. Global cash smuggling is

0:11:45.500 --> 0:11:49.270
<v Speaker 3>certainly in the hundreds of billions annually. Cash is a

0:11:49.390 --> 0:11:53.570
<v Speaker 3>hugely significant tool for moving illicit wealth around the world.

0:11:53.630 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 3>And even that is dwarfed by what we refer to

0:11:57.620 --> 0:12:00.900
<v Speaker 3>as trade-based money laundering. It is essentially a way of

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.099
<v Speaker 3>moving value around the world, not in the form of

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.099
<v Speaker 3>money at all, but in the form of stuff. If

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.410
<v Speaker 3>you are moving value out of China, it's far easier

0:12:08.450 --> 0:12:11.030
<v Speaker 3>to do it in the form of essentially misinvoicing a

0:12:11.090 --> 0:12:14.910
<v Speaker 3>shipment of manufactured goods or knock off designer clothes or

0:12:14.950 --> 0:12:16.689
<v Speaker 3>whatever than it is to move it in the form

0:12:16.710 --> 0:12:19.630
<v Speaker 3>of money at all. So there is a focus on

0:12:19.750 --> 0:12:23.819
<v Speaker 3>the regulated sector, banks in particular, when we talk about

0:12:23.860 --> 0:12:26.700
<v Speaker 3>money laundering for obvious reasons, because it's sort of easy

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to look in a spreadsheet and see value moving around.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.739
<v Speaker 3>But actually, it's a far bigger deal if you look

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 3>at how money is moved in the form of cash

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and how money is moved in the form of stuff.

0:12:37.300 --> 0:12:41.410
<v Speaker 3>And that form of money laundering, trade-based money laundering, is

0:12:41.490 --> 0:12:45.290
<v Speaker 3>almost impossible to estimate. I mean, there is an institution

0:12:45.429 --> 0:12:49.189
<v Speaker 3>in Washington, Global Financial Integrity, that estimates that that's about

0:12:49.210 --> 0:12:51.980
<v Speaker 3>a trillion dollars a year is moved via trade-based money laundering.

0:12:52.220 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're talking about amounts of money being laundered

0:12:54.940 --> 0:12:58.740
<v Speaker 3>outside the financial system that completely dwarfs what's happening within

0:12:58.800 --> 0:12:59.620
<v Speaker 3>the financial system.

0:13:00.220 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so one thing I learned from your book is

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.819
<v Speaker 2>there's a connection between drug money and I guess John

0:13:04.860 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Deere tractors and other equipment with the Mexican cartels, like

0:13:09.100 --> 0:13:12.610
<v Speaker 2>essentially trading fentanyl for farming equipment. Can you walk us

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.770
<v Speaker 2>through that particular example? How does this actually work?

0:13:17.309 --> 0:13:20.250
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can see this. It's just logical that if

0:13:20.309 --> 0:13:25.750
<v Speaker 3>there is, let's say, $ 50 billion worth of cocaine arriving

0:13:25.790 --> 0:13:28.050
<v Speaker 3>in the United States every year, I've just invented that number,

0:13:28.090 --> 0:13:29.790
<v Speaker 3>but it's a nice round number. So let's say it

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.870
<v Speaker 3>is that. then there must be $ 50 billion of something

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.790
<v Speaker 3>else flowing in the opposite direction for the books of

0:13:34.809 --> 0:13:37.910
<v Speaker 3>the cartels to balance. They're not in this for charitable reasons.

0:13:37.950 --> 0:13:39.850
<v Speaker 3>They like to make a living out of moving drugs,

0:13:39.890 --> 0:13:43.190
<v Speaker 3>so that follows. Now, obviously, a significant amount of that

0:13:43.250 --> 0:13:46.340
<v Speaker 3>is in the form of money. By best estimates, something

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.700
<v Speaker 3>like $ 25 billion worth of cash is smuggled into Mexico

0:13:49.740 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 3>every year. But there's still a significant hole in the

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 3>books that needs to be filled with something. And it

0:13:54.580 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>has been a traditional practice that essentially a way of

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.380
<v Speaker 3>meeting that hole in the books is just by exporting stuff.

0:14:01.700 --> 0:14:04.940
<v Speaker 3>What does America make particularly well? Well, I mean, Caterpillar tractors,

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.540
<v Speaker 3>John Deere tractors, that's useful. Everyone wants those. You can

0:14:07.580 --> 0:14:11.100
<v Speaker 3>send them south. You can send all kinds of wonderful

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>American financial products. We see this in Europe to a

0:14:14.059 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 3>greater degree with luxury goods. There is a huge demand

0:14:17.100 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in China for European luxury goods, whether that's Gucci handbags

0:14:20.820 --> 0:14:23.220
<v Speaker 3>or Burberry anorex or whatever. And so there is a

0:14:23.420 --> 0:14:26.020
<v Speaker 3>giant off the books, a sort of grey market, of

0:14:26.370 --> 0:14:29.050
<v Speaker 3>designer goods which flow out of Europe into China. And

0:14:29.090 --> 0:14:32.390
<v Speaker 3>in return, we receive criminal goods or drugs in return.

0:14:32.790 --> 0:14:36.570
<v Speaker 3>So essentially anything that is being made well in one place,

0:14:36.710 --> 0:14:39.970
<v Speaker 3>whether that's Caterpillar tractors or Gucci handbags, can just be

0:14:40.010 --> 0:14:43.010
<v Speaker 3>as useful a form of money as anything else. I mean,

0:14:43.030 --> 0:14:46.810
<v Speaker 3>you need to just think about criminals as being endlessly

0:14:46.850 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>looking for ways of finding concentrated value in a way

0:14:49.890 --> 0:14:51.250
<v Speaker 3>that isn't going to be checked so they can move

0:14:51.290 --> 0:14:54.570
<v Speaker 3>it around. Obviously, the most Useful example of that at

0:14:54.730 --> 0:14:57.590
<v Speaker 3>all would be an expensive watch. If you buy a

0:14:57.850 --> 0:15:00.750
<v Speaker 3>million dollar watch, you can fly in from one country

0:15:00.790 --> 0:15:02.190
<v Speaker 3>to another and sell it at the other end. No

0:15:02.230 --> 0:15:05.140
<v Speaker 3>one's going to check it when you fly across the world,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:06.380
<v Speaker 3>sell it at the other end, and you've just moved

0:15:06.420 --> 0:15:08.340
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars without having to move a million dollars.

0:15:08.740 --> 0:15:11.060
<v Speaker 3>It's as simple as that. And it happens all the time,

0:15:11.260 --> 0:15:12.020
<v Speaker 3>absolutely everywhere.

0:15:12.500 --> 0:15:14.350
<v Speaker 2>It is kind of crazy that you have to declare

0:15:14.430 --> 0:15:17.950
<v Speaker 2>like more than $ 10, 000 in cash at the airport, but

0:15:17.990 --> 0:15:20.890
<v Speaker 2>you could easily have a $ 1 million watch on your wrist.

0:15:20.970 --> 0:15:24.750
<v Speaker 1>No one would think anything of that. Talk to us

0:15:24.770 --> 0:15:27.970
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about, all right, so Tracy asked

0:15:28.050 --> 0:15:32.690
<v Speaker 1>about the Mexican trade of cocaine for tractors, which sounds

0:15:33.100 --> 0:15:36.530
<v Speaker 1>reasonable enough. Talk to us about how money is moved

0:15:36.750 --> 0:15:40.310
<v Speaker 1>out of China, the popular ways to move money out

0:15:40.350 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of China at scale. You mentioned sort of watch and handbags,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.220
<v Speaker 1>but what is the shape of this trade?

0:15:46.940 --> 0:15:49.580
<v Speaker 3>The basis of the trade is that there is a

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>restriction on moving money out of China of $ 50, 000 per

0:15:53.740 --> 0:15:57.350
<v Speaker 3>person per year. Now, $ 50, 000 might sound like quite a

0:15:57.390 --> 0:16:00.109
<v Speaker 3>lot to the average Chinese person, but to a wealthy

0:16:00.130 --> 0:16:02.930
<v Speaker 3>Chinese person, that's not nearly enough. So there is a

0:16:03.030 --> 0:16:06.740
<v Speaker 3>constant demand from wealthy Chinese people outside China for money

0:16:06.790 --> 0:16:09.380
<v Speaker 3>that they can't move in a formal way. And so

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>there is a huge appetite, a huge demand for cash,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>for some form of money. And now what they really

0:16:15.860 --> 0:16:17.820
<v Speaker 3>need is a supply of money, which they can meet

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>in coming in the opposite direction. And then brokers can

0:16:20.540 --> 0:16:23.050
<v Speaker 3>put those two together. And fortunately, in the West, we

0:16:23.070 --> 0:16:25.810
<v Speaker 3>have created that supply of money by making drugs illegal.

0:16:26.190 --> 0:16:28.950
<v Speaker 3>So there is a gigantic supply of cash, which is

0:16:28.970 --> 0:16:32.180
<v Speaker 3>being generated in an illegal way. And the Chinese money

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.790
<v Speaker 3>laundering networks, which have become incredibly sophisticated in the last,

0:16:35.910 --> 0:16:38.670
<v Speaker 3>particularly the last 15 years, last 10 years, all over

0:16:38.710 --> 0:16:42.070
<v Speaker 3>the world, essentially have created a business model of putting

0:16:42.110 --> 0:16:45.750
<v Speaker 3>together this demand for cash that comes from wealthy Chinese

0:16:45.770 --> 0:16:47.830
<v Speaker 3>people outside China and the supply of cash that comes

0:16:47.870 --> 0:16:50.780
<v Speaker 3>from the cartels or other drugs gangs in Europe. It's

0:16:50.820 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 3>often the Albanians or the Andrangheta in Italy and in

0:16:53.910 --> 0:16:55.790
<v Speaker 3>In the US, obviously, it'd be more than the Mexicans

0:16:55.830 --> 0:16:58.010
<v Speaker 3>or the Colombians. And they put these two together, the

0:16:58.050 --> 0:17:00.890
<v Speaker 3>Chinese demand and the cartel supply. This is often called

0:17:00.910 --> 0:17:04.230
<v Speaker 3>the Vancouver model, slightly unfairly, because it doesn't only happen

0:17:04.270 --> 0:17:07.150
<v Speaker 3>in Vancouver. But it was first identified in Vancouver, where

0:17:07.570 --> 0:17:11.550
<v Speaker 3>you would get this totally baffled police officers watching this

0:17:11.609 --> 0:17:15.610
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon of wealthy Chinese people being given carrier bags full

0:17:15.630 --> 0:17:18.949
<v Speaker 3>of banknotes outside casinos, going into the casinos, and then

0:17:18.990 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 3>just losing all the money. Because laundering money via casinos

0:17:22.150 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>is something that's been happening ever since the mob took

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.180
<v Speaker 3>over Las Vegas. It's a super easy way of laundering money.

0:17:27.500 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>You bet a little bit, you cash in your chips,

0:17:29.300 --> 0:17:31.340
<v Speaker 3>then you sell the chips and you just have clean money.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And so that's very tightly controlled, but they couldn't really

0:17:33.980 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>understand what was happening because that wasn't what was happening

0:17:35.859 --> 0:17:37.980
<v Speaker 3>in Vancouver. They were just taking in money and then

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.810
<v Speaker 3>losing it. But if you zoomed out, you would see

0:17:40.850 --> 0:17:43.969
<v Speaker 3>that this one transaction of handing over the cash to

0:17:44.109 --> 0:17:46.570
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese gambler was just a small fraction of what

0:17:46.609 --> 0:17:49.050
<v Speaker 3>was really happening in that you had a debt being

0:17:49.109 --> 0:17:52.490
<v Speaker 3>created essentially. from the Chinese gambler to the drugs gang,

0:17:52.770 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>which would be being repaid by supplying drugs to the

0:17:56.100 --> 0:17:58.020
<v Speaker 3>drugs gang that they were able to sell to generate

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 3>more cash, to hand it over to generate more gambling.

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 3>And so you end up with essentially a circular transaction

0:18:03.220 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>where money would change hand in China between a criminal

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.020
<v Speaker 3>gang and a wealthy Chinese person. Money would change hands

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.780
<v Speaker 3>in Canada between a drugs gang giving it to a

0:18:11.820 --> 0:18:15.139
<v Speaker 3>Chinese person. And then essentially that would all net out

0:18:15.180 --> 0:18:17.609
<v Speaker 3>by the movement of drugs between borders, which is how

0:18:17.850 --> 0:18:20.629
<v Speaker 3>the value actually transfers. And you see this now. I mean,

0:18:20.650 --> 0:18:22.820
<v Speaker 3>that's only like a bilateral trade, as it were, between

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Vancouver and China. But you see this now globally. So

0:18:26.380 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>it might be the movement of luxury goods from Europe,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the UK or France to China, then the movement of

0:18:32.300 --> 0:18:35.740
<v Speaker 3>some kind of illicit goods or even totally normal goods

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.630
<v Speaker 3>from China to South America, then the movement of cocaine

0:18:38.950 --> 0:18:43.210
<v Speaker 3>from South America to Europe, which would essentially complete this

0:18:43.270 --> 0:18:46.859
<v Speaker 3>triangular trade. This happens globally on a truly colossal scale.

0:18:46.980 --> 0:18:49.820
<v Speaker 3>And this is essentially how money is moved. You don't

0:18:49.859 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 3>need to move money internationally, because that's where the checks

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.730
<v Speaker 3>are on transactions. You just move value internationally in the

0:18:56.770 --> 0:19:00.449
<v Speaker 3>form of luxury goods, cocaine, or illicit goods of whatever kind.

0:19:00.810 --> 0:19:03.970
<v Speaker 3>And so essentially, wherever you get criminality, there is a

0:19:04.050 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 3>demand for money laundering, because this is how you realise...

0:19:07.630 --> 0:19:10.100
<v Speaker 3>and protect your criminal profits. And this essentially is a

0:19:10.140 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 3>gigantic parallel financial system. And what I find particularly pleasing

0:19:14.340 --> 0:19:16.699
<v Speaker 3>about this, of looking at this, is this is pleasing

0:19:16.740 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 3>is maybe not the word, but I'm kind of a nerd.

0:19:19.140 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Intellectually satisfying.

0:19:21.859 --> 0:19:25.189
<v Speaker 3>Intellectually satisfying. This is exactly how the Medici's used to

0:19:25.230 --> 0:19:29.250
<v Speaker 3>bank in the late medieval, early Renaissance Florence, is that

0:19:29.310 --> 0:19:32.450
<v Speaker 3>they were moving wealth. They had an incredibly sophisticated system

0:19:32.470 --> 0:19:34.870
<v Speaker 3>whereby you could deposit money at a branch of their

0:19:35.460 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 3>bank in Venice or Florence, and then you could collect

0:19:38.260 --> 0:19:41.270
<v Speaker 3>that same money in Bruges or in London and the

0:19:41.290 --> 0:19:43.590
<v Speaker 3>other side of the Alps and the other end of Europe. Essentially,

0:19:43.630 --> 0:19:44.949
<v Speaker 3>as soon as you could get there, the money was

0:19:45.010 --> 0:19:47.609
<v Speaker 3>available for you to pick up. And, how did they

0:19:47.650 --> 0:19:50.350
<v Speaker 3>move the money? They obviously weren't moving bullion from Italy

0:19:50.650 --> 0:19:53.490
<v Speaker 3>to Belgium or Italy to the UK for the same

0:19:53.540 --> 0:19:55.139
<v Speaker 3>reason that ordinary people would want to do that. It

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>wasn't safe. So they were just moving trade. So silk

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.459
<v Speaker 3>going north or spices, wool coming south. And then we're

0:20:01.500 --> 0:20:03.580
<v Speaker 3>just hiding the movement of cash in the paperwork. And,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.109
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the years after World War II, some

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.609
<v Speaker 3>academics found their, what they were called their secret books

0:20:08.900 --> 0:20:11.110
<v Speaker 3>in the state archive in Florence, and you could see

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.909
<v Speaker 3>how they were doing this. Essentially, they were providing banking

0:20:13.950 --> 0:20:18.290
<v Speaker 3>services to politicians, to leading cardinals, other people in the church,

0:20:18.550 --> 0:20:20.970
<v Speaker 3>in exactly the same way that banks might provide secret

0:20:20.990 --> 0:20:24.510
<v Speaker 3>services now to politicians or any powerful people. And we're

0:20:24.530 --> 0:20:27.590
<v Speaker 3>just hiding the transactions in the huge amount of paperwork

0:20:27.650 --> 0:20:30.630
<v Speaker 3>generated by their trading activity. And this is basically now

0:20:30.730 --> 0:20:34.010
<v Speaker 3>what the Chinese money laundering networks do. And you can

0:20:34.090 --> 0:20:36.430
<v Speaker 3>tell that they're important. This is one of these weird

0:20:36.470 --> 0:20:39.369
<v Speaker 3>things in money laundering studies, which is a very niche area,

0:20:39.410 --> 0:20:41.310
<v Speaker 3>which is mainly just consists of me and about three

0:20:41.330 --> 0:20:44.830
<v Speaker 3>other guys. But the money laundering studies, it is infested

0:20:44.869 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>with acronyms, AML, anti-money laundering, CFT, counterfinance of terrorism. But

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.100
<v Speaker 3>if it's a really important one, it's a four-letter acronym,

0:20:52.140 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 3>not a three-letter one. So the fact that Chinese money

0:20:54.619 --> 0:20:57.419
<v Speaker 3>laundering networks are CMLNs, it's a four-letter acronym. You know

0:20:57.460 --> 0:20:58.139
<v Speaker 3>that that's a big deal.

0:21:14.710 --> 0:21:17.530
<v Speaker 2>There does seem to be something very traditionalist about, I guess,

0:21:17.670 --> 0:21:20.709
<v Speaker 2>trade-based money laundering. But on a related note, can you

0:21:20.750 --> 0:21:24.690
<v Speaker 2>talk to us about the carousel fraud that was taking

0:21:24.750 --> 0:21:26.889
<v Speaker 2>place going in and out of the UK? And then

0:21:27.369 --> 0:21:29.170
<v Speaker 2>when the rules were finally changed, I think it just

0:21:29.210 --> 0:21:32.649
<v Speaker 2>shifted over to Europe, which kind of gets at the

0:21:32.710 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 2>point that it seems very hard to fix what is

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 2>like a jurisdictional arbitrage issue unless you have some sort

0:21:39.980 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of harmonization across different countries.

0:21:43.510 --> 0:21:48.420
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the carousel fraud is one of these absolutely fascinating crimes,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.900
<v Speaker 3>which it's so complicated and so extraordinary that you think

0:21:51.940 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 3>that if the criminals had designed it, if instead that

0:21:55.220 --> 0:21:58.580
<v Speaker 3>they decided to set themselves to solving climate change or anything,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.990
<v Speaker 3>then that problem would be solved. The kind of elaborate

0:22:01.050 --> 0:22:03.489
<v Speaker 3>nature of the transactions they were doing, it grows out

0:22:03.510 --> 0:22:05.530
<v Speaker 3>of a flaw in the way that the value added

0:22:05.590 --> 0:22:08.389
<v Speaker 3>tax is designed in the European Union. Back then the

0:22:08.490 --> 0:22:11.390
<v Speaker 3>UK was in the European Union. And essentially, the way

0:22:11.430 --> 0:22:14.510
<v Speaker 3>it works is that if you're moving money, goods within

0:22:14.550 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a country, you charge value added tax. But if you

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>move it between countries, you don't. So that difference had

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.940
<v Speaker 3>to be that way, because otherwise you would end up

0:22:22.980 --> 0:22:25.180
<v Speaker 3>with the UK tax authority having to trust the French

0:22:25.220 --> 0:22:27.290
<v Speaker 3>tax authority. And that's obviously never going to happen. So

0:22:27.850 --> 0:22:31.270
<v Speaker 3>you had to have that zero rated transaction across borders,

0:22:31.550 --> 0:22:33.570
<v Speaker 3>which just meant that you could cycle things in and

0:22:33.630 --> 0:22:36.770
<v Speaker 3>out of one country and another country. and essentially claim

0:22:36.810 --> 0:22:39.050
<v Speaker 3>VAT that you'd never actually paid. And it went round

0:22:39.070 --> 0:22:41.380
<v Speaker 3>and round and round. And that's why it's called carousel fraud.

0:22:41.420 --> 0:22:44.100
<v Speaker 3>It went round like a merry-go-round. And it started off

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.300
<v Speaker 3>as just this very simple transactions. And then as the

0:22:46.660 --> 0:22:48.820
<v Speaker 3>tax authorities picked up on that, they became more and

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>more complicated with different chains of shell companies going in

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.300
<v Speaker 3>all directions and incredibly complicated. But yeah, like you say,

0:22:55.340 --> 0:22:57.419
<v Speaker 3>what's really interesting about it is the UK actually got

0:22:57.460 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>very good at tackling this. And I actually use it

0:22:59.859 --> 0:23:01.460
<v Speaker 3>in the book as an example of how to fight

0:23:01.500 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>financial crime. It was a really fully multi-agency approach, like

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>not just leaving it to the banks like we do

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.939
<v Speaker 3>with money laundering, but really fighting it with everything that

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the state had. And actually got very good at tackling this,

0:23:11.260 --> 0:23:13.940
<v Speaker 3>but it just crossed into the rest of Europe, where

0:23:13.980 --> 0:23:18.369
<v Speaker 3>now it's a 50 billion euro a year problem, carousel fraud.

0:23:18.380 --> 0:23:21.650
<v Speaker 3>And it's so elaborate and so well-developed that you're talking

0:23:21.670 --> 0:23:24.690
<v Speaker 3>about something that spreads from Lithuania down to Portugal, from

0:23:25.090 --> 0:23:27.070
<v Speaker 3>Greece to Sweden.

0:23:27.390 --> 0:23:30.790
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain the mechanics? I get that it's elaborate.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.580
<v Speaker 1>But for the listeners, what is the mechanism?

0:23:34.780 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 3>This may be stretching the tolerance even of the odd

0:23:37.300 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>lots to really explain. So it's called carousel fraud or

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 3>missing trader intercommunity fraud, MTIC, which is a four letter acronym.

0:23:46.940 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 3>So you can tell it's a big deal. But basically

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>what you have is if you import a product, let's

0:23:53.300 --> 0:23:55.810
<v Speaker 3>say from Ireland, if you're in the UK, and then

0:23:55.850 --> 0:23:58.790
<v Speaker 3>you don't pay VAT on that trade because you've imported it, right?

0:23:58.810 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 3>So no taxes paid. you then sell it to another

0:24:02.820 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 3>shell company, which is controlled by you, but it looks

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>like a different company in the UK. You charge VAT

0:24:07.500 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>on that trade. So you add 20% or whatever the

0:24:10.100 --> 0:24:12.550
<v Speaker 3>percentage is of VAT on that trade. And then you

0:24:12.609 --> 0:24:16.210
<v Speaker 3>export the good back to Ireland. Now, if the second

0:24:16.250 --> 0:24:19.230
<v Speaker 3>company exports the good, because they've exported it, they can

0:24:19.310 --> 0:24:22.670
<v Speaker 3>claim from the treasury, they can claim the 20% back again.

0:24:22.710 --> 0:24:25.870
<v Speaker 3>They can claim that 20% because that's what they get

0:24:25.910 --> 0:24:28.990
<v Speaker 3>because they've exported the good. So essentially you export it,

0:24:29.010 --> 0:24:31.300
<v Speaker 3>but without ever having paid paid it in the first place,

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.859
<v Speaker 3>you're essentially claiming back VAT that you never paid. So

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 3>it's called missing trader intercommunity fraud because the trader that

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.850
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to pay the VAT to the treasury just vanishes.

0:24:39.890 --> 0:24:42.129
<v Speaker 3>They go missing and they never pay it. So you

0:24:42.190 --> 0:24:44.889
<v Speaker 3>are claiming back a tax that has never been paid,

0:24:45.170 --> 0:24:49.070
<v Speaker 3>which has this amazing ability, unlike almost all other forms

0:24:49.090 --> 0:24:51.310
<v Speaker 3>of organized crime that I know of. Essentially, there is

0:24:51.350 --> 0:24:53.690
<v Speaker 3>no limit to the amount of money that a criminal

0:24:53.730 --> 0:24:55.590
<v Speaker 3>gang can make out of this. So there is no

0:24:55.670 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 3>reason for criminal gangs to compete. The more they collaborate

0:24:58.580 --> 0:25:00.700
<v Speaker 3>with each other, the more elaborate the schemes can get

0:25:00.740 --> 0:25:02.770
<v Speaker 3>and the more money they can claim. So you ended

0:25:02.830 --> 0:25:05.409
<v Speaker 3>up with this essentially, it seems to have grown to

0:25:05.430 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 3>been discovered by accident by mobile phone vendors in the 1990s,

0:25:08.850 --> 0:25:12.450
<v Speaker 3>who then realized that there was this unbelievable golden goose

0:25:12.470 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>that they could just keep milking, if that's what you

0:25:14.540 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>do with geese, keep egging for golden eggs consistently. And

0:25:17.820 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 3>they kept going for absolutely ages. I mean, you know,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.830
<v Speaker 3>some of them carousel fraudsters became on the British rich

0:25:22.869 --> 0:25:24.550
<v Speaker 3>list of the richest people in the country because they

0:25:24.570 --> 0:25:26.850
<v Speaker 3>made so much money out of it. But essentially that

0:25:26.890 --> 0:25:29.709
<v Speaker 3>the flaw in it is that the fact that you

0:25:29.770 --> 0:25:32.350
<v Speaker 3>can import something without paying VAT and then you can

0:25:32.450 --> 0:25:35.189
<v Speaker 3>claim the VAT back when you export it. And provided

0:25:35.210 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 3>that there is an extra stage in that transaction, the

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 3>missing trader, the person who is supposed to pay the

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.699
<v Speaker 3>VAT never pays it to the treasury. The person who

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.140
<v Speaker 3>claims it back, claims it back. And therefore you've essentially

0:25:45.460 --> 0:25:48.410
<v Speaker 3>conjured up 20% of the value of a shipment from

0:25:48.570 --> 0:25:50.890
<v Speaker 3>thin air. And this is why it became so expensive

0:25:51.130 --> 0:25:53.970
<v Speaker 3>to the Treasury. It is an incredibly elegant form of fraud.

0:25:54.330 --> 0:25:56.910
<v Speaker 3>And talking to some of the insurance adjusters who were

0:25:56.950 --> 0:25:58.830
<v Speaker 3>involved in trying to work out what on earth was

0:25:58.869 --> 0:26:02.730
<v Speaker 3>going on, they described this with the sort of wonder

0:26:02.750 --> 0:26:05.170
<v Speaker 3>that a physicist might talk about what's happening in CERN.

0:26:05.410 --> 0:26:08.670
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm talking about only two shell companies, one selling

0:26:08.690 --> 0:26:11.170
<v Speaker 3>it to another that exports it. In reality, you're talking

0:26:11.230 --> 0:26:15.580
<v Speaker 3>about thousands of shell companies moving that moving goods backwards

0:26:15.619 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and forwards, up and down. And then when it all

0:26:17.740 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 3>nets out, mysteriously 20% of nothing has been created and

0:26:21.260 --> 0:26:22.500
<v Speaker 3>the rest of us are on the hook for it.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.790
<v Speaker 3>It is a gorgeous crime if you like crime, but

0:26:24.810 --> 0:26:27.730
<v Speaker 3>it was incredibly troubling and very, very expensive and really

0:26:27.890 --> 0:26:29.250
<v Speaker 3>made some bad people very wealthy.

0:26:29.750 --> 0:26:33.730
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we've touched on a number of different, I guess,

0:26:33.910 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>vehicles for how money gets laundered. What is the official

0:26:39.180 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>reason for why, given everything that we know, governments... continue

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:49.250
<v Speaker 1>to produce lots of cash and particularly high denomination units

0:26:49.290 --> 0:26:49.730
<v Speaker 1>of currency.

0:26:51.270 --> 0:26:53.950
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I am fascinated by it. This is called the

0:26:54.010 --> 0:26:56.869
<v Speaker 3>paradox of banknotes, what you described at the beginning. It

0:26:56.910 --> 0:27:00.619
<v Speaker 3>was first identified formally by Andrew Bailey, now the governor

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of the Bank of England, back then the chief cashier,

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>so in charge of physical coins and notes back in 2009.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.030
<v Speaker 3>And it is this very strange phenomenon whereby cash is

0:27:10.070 --> 0:27:13.649
<v Speaker 3>an analog technology like videotapes or films and cameras that

0:27:13.690 --> 0:27:17.070
<v Speaker 3>is being out-competed by digital means of payment. Really a

0:27:17.109 --> 0:27:21.030
<v Speaker 3>very small proportion of transactions are now used cash. I

0:27:21.070 --> 0:27:25.170
<v Speaker 3>think it's something like 9% now in the UK, maybe 13%

0:27:25.170 --> 0:27:27.710
<v Speaker 3>in the US. It's very few. So there is very

0:27:27.750 --> 0:27:31.859
<v Speaker 3>little demand for cash from society. So you would expect, therefore,

0:27:32.170 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the supply of cash to be collapsing. And yet at

0:27:34.780 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the same time that the demand is very low, For

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 3>some reason, supply is very, very high and getting higher

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.570
<v Speaker 3>all the time, consistently, almost everywhere. The amount of cash

0:27:45.850 --> 0:27:48.490
<v Speaker 3>in circulation is hitting record highs in the US. It's

0:27:48.530 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>almost 2.5 trillion US dollars in circulation. I was hoping

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.190
<v Speaker 3>it would hit. 2.5 trillion in time for the 250th anniversary,

0:27:56.210 --> 0:27:58.570
<v Speaker 3>because it would have had a sort of nerdy appropriateness,

0:27:58.590 --> 0:28:00.250
<v Speaker 3>but it didn't quite get there. But still, it's not

0:28:00.290 --> 0:28:03.750
<v Speaker 3>far off in the Eurozone. It's something like 1.6 trillion euros.

0:28:03.830 --> 0:28:06.209
<v Speaker 3>In the UK, it's about 100 billion pounds. So, you know,

0:28:06.510 --> 0:28:09.730
<v Speaker 3>huge quantities of banknotes are being printed, and yet very

0:28:09.869 --> 0:28:12.649
<v Speaker 3>few are being used. And there have been a number

0:28:12.690 --> 0:28:16.710
<v Speaker 3>of proposals of suggested explanations for why this is happening.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.870
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Bailey back in 2009 suggested it could be because

0:28:19.910 --> 0:28:22.470
<v Speaker 3>of low inflation, that there was no real opportunity cost

0:28:22.730 --> 0:28:24.929
<v Speaker 3>of holding banknotes, because why bother putting them in the

0:28:24.970 --> 0:28:27.869
<v Speaker 3>bank when interest rates are so low? Another explanation was

0:28:27.890 --> 0:28:30.260
<v Speaker 3>there were just lots of ATMs. So maybe the banknotes

0:28:30.300 --> 0:28:32.020
<v Speaker 3>were just as it were piling up in the ATMs,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.540
<v Speaker 3>and that's where they were. Another explanation was trust in

0:28:34.580 --> 0:28:37.860
<v Speaker 3>financial institutions was very low, because it was immediately after

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the great financial crisis. Yeah, I think we can say certainly,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 3>certainly the number of ATMs is lower now than it

0:28:42.530 --> 0:28:44.930
<v Speaker 3>was back then. And inflation has obviously gone up again.

0:28:44.970 --> 0:28:47.830
<v Speaker 3>And you hope that the trust in financial institutions has

0:28:47.870 --> 0:28:50.930
<v Speaker 3>at least partly returned in the last couple of decades.

0:28:51.250 --> 0:28:54.230
<v Speaker 3>And yet the phenomenon has continued. In fact, it's accelerated,

0:28:54.610 --> 0:28:57.430
<v Speaker 3>if anything, since then. The value of pounds in circulation,

0:28:57.470 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>for example, has doubled since he made that speech. So,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, there is clearly another reason for it. And

0:29:02.980 --> 0:29:05.780
<v Speaker 3>central bankers tend to now just fall back on saying

0:29:06.420 --> 0:29:07.580
<v Speaker 3>that it's a store of value.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>That.

0:29:08.140 --> 0:29:11.170
<v Speaker 3>There are two basic uses for money, really. It's either

0:29:11.190 --> 0:29:13.210
<v Speaker 3>a medium of exchange or it's a store of value.

0:29:13.230 --> 0:29:15.670
<v Speaker 3>Those are the two options. And since it's not being

0:29:15.770 --> 0:29:18.110
<v Speaker 3>used as a medium of exchange, then they said, well,

0:29:18.130 --> 0:29:20.210
<v Speaker 3>it's presumably being used as a store of value. And

0:29:20.230 --> 0:29:22.770
<v Speaker 3>that's what they tend to come up with. And that's

0:29:22.830 --> 0:29:25.150
<v Speaker 3>really frustrating because you can see from the surveys that

0:29:25.610 --> 0:29:28.110
<v Speaker 3>central banks do that it isn't being used as a

0:29:28.130 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 3>store of value. The average American adult has, I think,

0:29:31.380 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 3>something like $ 430 odd either on their person or at

0:29:34.740 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>home at any one time. And yet there's more than

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.690
<v Speaker 3>$ 7, 000 out there for every man, woman, and child in

0:29:40.730 --> 0:29:43.350
<v Speaker 3>the United States. It's an order of magnitude higher than

0:29:43.370 --> 0:29:45.270
<v Speaker 3>the amount that's being used as a store of value.

0:29:45.590 --> 0:29:48.690
<v Speaker 3>And yet there is no attempt really by central bankers

0:29:48.730 --> 0:29:52.050
<v Speaker 3>to explain why that's happening. You know, what's going on?

0:29:52.130 --> 0:29:55.530
<v Speaker 3>Where are all the banknotes? I mean, they do efforts

0:29:55.550 --> 0:29:57.330
<v Speaker 3>to try and work out how many of them are

0:29:57.390 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>outside the country. There's an economist at the Fed called

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.100
<v Speaker 3>Ruth Judson, who's done some really interesting work on this,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and then another colleague at the European Central Bank. And

0:30:05.820 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the European Central Bank reckons about half of Euro banknotes

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>are outside the Eurozone. The Fed reckons sort of something

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.020
<v Speaker 3>like 65%, maybe, of dollar banknotes are outside the United States.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.140
<v Speaker 3>But that's just a kind of a way of kicking

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.350
<v Speaker 3>the problem one step further. If it's a store of

0:30:20.380 --> 0:30:23.830
<v Speaker 3>value outside the United States, it's still must be being

0:30:23.930 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 3>used for something and yet what is it well essentially

0:30:26.340 --> 0:30:28.900
<v Speaker 3>we don't know they never really the central bank has

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:33.420
<v Speaker 3>certainly never really answered that question of where are all

0:30:33.460 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 3>this astonishing quantity of banknotes that they're printing and it

0:30:36.780 --> 0:30:39.310
<v Speaker 3>is a really interesting puzzle i mean if you imagine

0:30:39.330 --> 0:30:41.810
<v Speaker 3>that this was not banknotes that we're talking about but

0:30:41.850 --> 0:30:46.180
<v Speaker 3>was vhs cassettes um that Netflix has boomed, everyone's watching

0:30:46.220 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Disney +, and yet somehow VHS cassette production is hitting

0:30:50.140 --> 0:30:52.459
<v Speaker 3>record highs year after year after year. I think we'd

0:30:52.500 --> 0:30:54.540
<v Speaker 3>be really interested in where they were going. Who's watching

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 3>all these things? And yet just because it's banknotes, everyone's like, oh, well,

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:58.610
<v Speaker 3>it's a store of value. Forget about it.

0:30:59.550 --> 0:31:02.370
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk to us about seniorage? So this is

0:31:02.470 --> 0:31:05.550
<v Speaker 2>one of these concepts where it comes up occasionally and

0:31:05.750 --> 0:31:07.930
<v Speaker 2>I sort of nod my head and I go, yes,

0:31:07.990 --> 0:31:11.410
<v Speaker 2>of course central banks make money by distributing dollars, but

0:31:11.490 --> 0:31:13.030
<v Speaker 2>I don't actually know how it works.

0:31:13.550 --> 0:31:16.830
<v Speaker 3>Well, so seigneurage is one of these really ancient, wonderful

0:31:16.870 --> 0:31:18.790
<v Speaker 3>concepts that, I mean, so you can tell it's old

0:31:18.810 --> 0:31:21.540
<v Speaker 3>because we use an actually Norman French word for it.

0:31:21.630 --> 0:31:25.550
<v Speaker 3>Seigneurage means that which pertains to the seigneur or the lord,

0:31:25.890 --> 0:31:29.130
<v Speaker 3>which essentially is that making money, having a monopoly on

0:31:29.150 --> 0:31:31.810
<v Speaker 3>the production of money is a very profitable thing to have,

0:31:31.850 --> 0:31:34.410
<v Speaker 3>which is why almost as soon as any warlord kind

0:31:34.450 --> 0:31:36.490
<v Speaker 3>of took over a patch of territory and declared himself

0:31:36.510 --> 0:31:38.430
<v Speaker 3>to be king, one of the first things they did

0:31:38.470 --> 0:31:41.220
<v Speaker 3>was have a monopoly on issuing money. And so there's

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot of warlords in Anglo-Saxon England that we

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.300
<v Speaker 3>only know the name of because we found a few

0:31:45.370 --> 0:31:48.510
<v Speaker 3>coins with their names on. Essentially, in those days, it

0:31:48.550 --> 0:31:50.430
<v Speaker 3>was that if you wanted to have your money coined,

0:31:50.450 --> 0:31:52.550
<v Speaker 3>you had to bring it to the mint, where the

0:31:52.590 --> 0:31:54.290
<v Speaker 3>king would put his face on it and take a

0:31:54.310 --> 0:31:56.510
<v Speaker 3>little bit for his trouble. That's the origin of the

0:31:56.550 --> 0:31:59.750
<v Speaker 3>term seigneurage. But in the modern sense, obviously, we don't

0:31:59.830 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>use gold so much anymore. It's just paper. In the

0:32:03.140 --> 0:32:06.420
<v Speaker 3>modern term, it's the profit that is made from issuing

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.740
<v Speaker 3>paper money. And there are two ways of looking at this.

0:32:08.940 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a sort of simple but wrong way and a

0:32:12.060 --> 0:32:14.580
<v Speaker 3>right but complicated way so the simple but wrong way

0:32:14.620 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of looking at this is that it's very cheap to

0:32:17.340 --> 0:32:19.510
<v Speaker 3>print money it costs about nine cents to print a

0:32:19.530 --> 0:32:23.090
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollar bill you know the there's whatever 20 20

0:32:23.090 --> 0:32:25.590
<v Speaker 3>billion us dollar bills out there somewhere so you know

0:32:25.670 --> 0:32:27.750
<v Speaker 3>if you think about that each one costs nine cents

0:32:27.790 --> 0:32:31.860
<v Speaker 3>to print you can see that there's a 99.9 99.91

0:32:31.860 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 3>margin on producing them that's a very profitable thing that's

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:41.670
<v Speaker 3>your seniorage right there the fact that you're making $ 99. 91

0:32:38.410 --> 0:32:41.270
<v Speaker 3>every time you print a $ 100 bill. So that's the

0:32:41.310 --> 0:32:43.230
<v Speaker 3>simple but wrong way of looking at it. And central

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 3>bankers will tell you this is wrong. Because actually, a

0:32:45.540 --> 0:32:49.020
<v Speaker 3>$ 100 bill, if you take a $ 100 bill out the bank,

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 3>you're not actually buying that $ 100 bill because you can

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.340
<v Speaker 3>sell it back at any time for the same amount

0:32:53.380 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that you bought it for. So actually, it's an interest-free

0:32:55.700 --> 0:32:58.270
<v Speaker 3>loan to the government is what it really is. And

0:32:58.290 --> 0:33:00.030
<v Speaker 3>this is where we start getting towards very much the

0:33:00.090 --> 0:33:01.790
<v Speaker 3>end of my maths. And I'm hoping that you guys

0:33:01.810 --> 0:33:04.490
<v Speaker 3>will correct me at this point. So there's $ 2. 5 trillion

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>US dollars out there somewhere. That's an interest-free loan to

0:33:08.940 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the US government, broadly understood, of $ 2. 5 trillion. Now, I

0:33:14.140 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>think the US government debt, outstanding government debt, is something

0:33:16.740 --> 0:33:21.330
<v Speaker 3>like $ 40, almost $ 40 trillion now. So $ 2. 5 trillion on

0:33:21.380 --> 0:33:23.550
<v Speaker 3>top of that is like an additional, what is that,

0:33:23.570 --> 0:33:26.910
<v Speaker 3>sort of 6% or something of US government debt, which

0:33:26.970 --> 0:33:28.970
<v Speaker 3>the US government isn't having to pay any interest on.

0:33:29.290 --> 0:33:33.030
<v Speaker 3>That's quite a significant saving for the US government not

0:33:33.050 --> 0:33:36.390
<v Speaker 3>to have to pay that money. I think that as

0:33:36.450 --> 0:33:38.130
<v Speaker 3>I remember rightly from the last thing I saw, I

0:33:38.170 --> 0:33:41.780
<v Speaker 3>think that debt servicing now is something about 19% of

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.580
<v Speaker 3>the federal budget. If you had to pay interest on

0:33:44.980 --> 0:33:46.740
<v Speaker 3>that extra two and a half trillion, then that's probably

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.940
<v Speaker 3>another percentage point on top of that. So yeah, that's

0:33:48.980 --> 0:33:52.130
<v Speaker 3>quite a decent amount of money which the US government saves,

0:33:52.590 --> 0:33:56.230
<v Speaker 3>essentially by having a chunk of its debt in the

0:33:56.290 --> 0:34:00.270
<v Speaker 3>form of bearer instruments that don't pay interest. So that's,

0:34:00.450 --> 0:34:02.490
<v Speaker 3>as it were, the right but complicated way of looking

0:34:02.530 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 3>at Saini Ridge. But either way that you look at it,

0:34:04.730 --> 0:34:07.470
<v Speaker 3>Saini Ridge is a very profitable thing to have, which

0:34:07.530 --> 0:34:10.750
<v Speaker 3>is why governments tend to like having a monopoly on

0:34:10.770 --> 0:34:14.210
<v Speaker 3>the issuing of money, because it's essentially either it's just

0:34:14.330 --> 0:34:17.180
<v Speaker 3>straightforwardly profitable selling bits of paper, or it's a very

0:34:17.219 --> 0:34:18.470
<v Speaker 3>cheap way of raising a loan.

0:34:18.989 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>So just to repeat Joe's question then, politically, who is

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 2>actually blocking getting rid of, for instance, $ 100 bills? Would

0:34:29.060 --> 0:34:33.299
<v Speaker 2>it be central banks and the Treasury protecting seniorage, or

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:38.580
<v Speaker 2>is it simple inertia or is it maybe tax avoidant industries,

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.740
<v Speaker 2>the powerful nail salon and, I don't know, psychic reader

0:34:43.300 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 2>in New York lobby or something like that?

0:34:46.860 --> 0:34:50.340
<v Speaker 3>I think broadly speaking, this doesn't come up. The system

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>from the perspective of the European Central Bank or the

0:34:53.780 --> 0:34:56.029
<v Speaker 3>Fed or the Bank of England or the Bank of Canada,

0:34:56.630 --> 0:34:58.670
<v Speaker 3>the system is working fine. There's lots and lots of

0:34:58.710 --> 0:35:00.350
<v Speaker 3>demand for their products. Why would you want to get

0:35:00.390 --> 0:35:02.150
<v Speaker 3>rid of them? If you look at it more broadly

0:35:02.210 --> 0:35:04.930
<v Speaker 3>and you work out that essentially the products are enabling

0:35:05.010 --> 0:35:09.090
<v Speaker 3>crime on a geopolitical scale, then you would say, well, actually,

0:35:09.130 --> 0:35:11.509
<v Speaker 3>the harm that's being caused far outweighs the profits that's

0:35:11.530 --> 0:35:13.830
<v Speaker 3>coming from the Seigneur, which we should do something about this.

0:35:13.910 --> 0:35:15.950
<v Speaker 3>But essentially, these are different bits of government, and they

0:35:15.969 --> 0:35:19.370
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily talk to each other. There have been occasions

0:35:19.410 --> 0:35:21.850
<v Speaker 3>in the past when governments have got rid of big

0:35:21.890 --> 0:35:25.510
<v Speaker 3>bills to try and reduce criminality or terrorism. After the

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 3>attacks on Paris in 2016, the Europeans announced that they

0:35:29.219 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>weren't going to produce, they used to have a 500

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 3>euro bill which was referred to colloquially as the Bin Laden,

0:35:34.780 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 3>because everyone had heard of it, but no one had

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 3>seen it. And by the time one of your banknotes

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 3>has been called the Bin Laden, you know that you're

0:35:40.380 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in a degree of trouble. That's not a good nickname

0:35:43.390 --> 0:35:43.930
<v Speaker 3>to have.

0:35:43.950 --> 0:35:44.550
<v Speaker 1>That's the first hint.

0:35:44.650 --> 0:35:46.230
<v Speaker 3>Singapore used to have a big bill as well, I

0:35:46.250 --> 0:35:50.190
<v Speaker 3>think a $ 10, 000 bill, which they got rid of. But

0:35:50.230 --> 0:35:52.950
<v Speaker 3>broadly speaking, you've got a kind of collective action problem,

0:35:53.230 --> 0:35:56.500
<v Speaker 3>which is that if the US stops producing its $ 100 bill,

0:35:56.700 --> 0:35:58.379
<v Speaker 3>and I wish it would, I don't think that there

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 3>is anyone really, who would be inconvenienced by the lack

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:02.779
<v Speaker 3>of $ 100 bills except the bad guys.

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:04.530
<v Speaker 2>Music video producers.

0:36:05.700 --> 0:36:08.570
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, music video producers. I mean, I suppose what

0:36:08.590 --> 0:36:10.730
<v Speaker 3>would hip hop artists wave around in their music videos?

0:36:10.750 --> 0:36:15.570
<v Speaker 3>But leaving that aside, the Europeans would still be producing

0:36:15.570 --> 0:36:19.910
<v Speaker 3>100 euro and 200 euro banknotes. And then the Americans

0:36:19.989 --> 0:36:23.170
<v Speaker 3>would then essentially lose out on the seniorage to the Europeans.

0:36:23.530 --> 0:36:25.950
<v Speaker 3>And the criminal economy would get no smaller because they

0:36:25.989 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 3>would just switch to using euros instead and vice versa.

0:36:29.620 --> 0:36:33.089
<v Speaker 3>There are enough central banks producing big bills, whether that's

0:36:33.130 --> 0:36:35.610
<v Speaker 3>a 50 pound note or a thousand franc note or

0:36:35.610 --> 0:36:37.950
<v Speaker 3>200 euros, a hundred dollar bill, that if one of

0:36:37.969 --> 0:36:40.109
<v Speaker 3>them went out the game, it essentially wouldn't make that

0:36:40.150 --> 0:36:42.870
<v Speaker 3>much difference to the criminals, but would make a substantial

0:36:42.890 --> 0:36:45.549
<v Speaker 3>difference to their own income from this. So what you

0:36:45.630 --> 0:36:49.030
<v Speaker 3>need is an international agreement that everyone could get together

0:36:49.090 --> 0:36:51.140
<v Speaker 3>and say, we're not going to do this. And that's

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 3>what has been eluding humanity. Well, in this, as in

0:36:54.820 --> 0:36:56.660
<v Speaker 3>so many other ways, when it comes to to try

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.030
<v Speaker 3>to tackle financial crime. Because if you are the person,

0:37:00.969 --> 0:37:04.470
<v Speaker 3>jurisdiction that is enabling financial crime is actually quite profitable

0:37:04.530 --> 0:37:06.790
<v Speaker 3>for you personally. The city of London has been doing

0:37:06.830 --> 0:37:09.009
<v Speaker 3>quite well out of this for decades. And most of

0:37:09.050 --> 0:37:11.290
<v Speaker 3>the harm is then spread elsewhere in the world. So

0:37:11.370 --> 0:37:13.750
<v Speaker 3>you get the profit and other people get the harm.

0:37:13.790 --> 0:37:16.029
<v Speaker 3>And the fact that the hundred dollar bills are the

0:37:16.070 --> 0:37:19.370
<v Speaker 3>favorite tool of the cartels in Colombia and Mexico is

0:37:19.410 --> 0:37:22.089
<v Speaker 3>very bad for Colombia and Mexico, but it's also quite

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 3>profitable for the United States. So that's the The essential

0:37:25.620 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>challenge is trying to persuade people that they all need

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.770
<v Speaker 3>to act together. And that's something that, well, no one's

0:37:30.850 --> 0:37:33.549
<v Speaker 3>really tried it, but even the vague suggestions. And some

0:37:33.610 --> 0:37:36.110
<v Speaker 3>economists have talked about this in the past. Kenneth Rogoff

0:37:36.150 --> 0:37:38.430
<v Speaker 3>has talked about this at length and tried to get

0:37:38.750 --> 0:37:41.460
<v Speaker 3>interest for this idea. He's really come up against the

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 3>challenge of trying to get everyone in a room together

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:44.460
<v Speaker 3>to agree.

0:37:44.260 --> 0:37:44.500
<v Speaker 2>To do it.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.530
<v Speaker 1>You know, something I realized, the Chinese currency, the highest

0:38:04.570 --> 0:38:08.410
<v Speaker 1>denomination note there is 100 RMB, so only about $ 15. Also,

0:38:08.570 --> 0:38:12.430
<v Speaker 1>every one of their bills has the exact same design, basically.

0:38:12.489 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the Mao photo, which I think is kind of interesting.

0:38:15.739 --> 0:38:18.330
<v Speaker 1>You look around, it seems like they usually switch it up, etc.,

0:38:18.870 --> 0:38:21.630
<v Speaker 1>One thing I'm curious about, was crypto ever an important

0:38:21.670 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 1>part of this story? I remember back then, people were like, oh,

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.060
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be used for money laundering and stuff.

0:38:26.260 --> 0:38:28.620
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that the crypto people made a good point.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.140
<v Speaker 1>It's like, look at the banks and the cash you're producing.

0:38:31.180 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's where most of the action is happening. Obviously, crypto

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.180
<v Speaker 1>isn't really like what it was, at least a few

0:38:38.219 --> 0:38:42.090
<v Speaker 1>years ago, et cetera. But during that period, did it

0:38:42.130 --> 0:38:44.330
<v Speaker 1>ever really move the dial as a vehicle?

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, crypto is huge for money laundering. Specifically, there

0:38:49.860 --> 0:38:52.420
<v Speaker 3>are many cryptos. You know, it's not just one thing. Specifically,

0:38:52.460 --> 0:38:54.700
<v Speaker 3>we're really talking about stable coins when we talk about

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.509
<v Speaker 3>crypto being big in money laundering. I was talking earlier

0:38:57.570 --> 0:39:01.009
<v Speaker 3>about trade-based money laundering and how essentially you can move

0:39:01.050 --> 0:39:04.989
<v Speaker 3>value via moving stuff, whether that's Caterpillar, earth-moving equipment or

0:39:05.050 --> 0:39:07.509
<v Speaker 3>handbags or drugs or whatever around the world. And you

0:39:07.550 --> 0:39:10.170
<v Speaker 3>move value in that shape like the Medici's used to.

0:39:10.469 --> 0:39:14.260
<v Speaker 3>Crypto allows you to do that instantaneously. So the really

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.779
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurial money laundering gangs now tend to, and this is

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.620
<v Speaker 3>the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians do this too. They

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.210
<v Speaker 3>combine cash and crypto. So cash works at a street

0:39:25.230 --> 0:39:28.110
<v Speaker 3>level and then you collect the cash and you exchange

0:39:28.130 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 3>it for crypto. And then the crypto is useful. for

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 3>moving your wealth around the world, for buying product from

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Colombia or elsewhere. So the two are not exclusive. In fact,

0:39:36.900 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 3>they supercharge each other. Criminals have always liked to stack

0:39:40.820 --> 0:39:43.339
<v Speaker 3>different techniques on top of each other. And so, yeah,

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 3>cash remains the most useful criminal tool at a street level.

0:39:48.060 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's bulky, it's not secure. It's kind of annoying

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.420
<v Speaker 3>and smelly. It's annoying to count and so on. So

0:39:55.460 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 3>if you can get away from using that as quickly

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.180
<v Speaker 3>as possible in order to move it around the world,

0:39:59.460 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 3>that's where crypto comes in and is super useful. The

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:06.509
<v Speaker 3>Russians have created their own cryptocurrency, A7A5, although it's in

0:40:06.550 --> 0:40:08.779
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of trouble at the moment, essentially as

0:40:08.820 --> 0:40:11.469
<v Speaker 3>a way of allowing themselves to do this outside of

0:40:12.090 --> 0:40:16.050
<v Speaker 3>the Western controlled stablecoins. But there are other Western controlled

0:40:16.070 --> 0:40:18.370
<v Speaker 3>stablecoins that are available, which I'm sure you have spoken

0:40:18.390 --> 0:40:19.690
<v Speaker 3>about on the podcast. In fact, I know you.

0:40:21.260 --> 0:40:23.140
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned earlier this idea that if the

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.009
<v Speaker 2>US got rid of $ 100 bills, then maybe everyone would

0:40:26.030 --> 0:40:29.009
<v Speaker 2>just start using 200 euro bills or something like that.

0:40:29.469 --> 0:40:32.930
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious in your discussions, you must have had some

0:40:33.110 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 2>with money launderers or people who investigate money laundering. Do

0:40:38.020 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 2>you hear a lot about, I'm trying to think what

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 2>to say, fraudsters thinking about the actual like value of

0:40:44.820 --> 0:40:48.730
<v Speaker 2>the currency or making currency hedging decisions? So like, I

0:40:48.750 --> 0:40:50.710
<v Speaker 2>don't want dollars because I think the dollar is going

0:40:50.730 --> 0:40:53.290
<v Speaker 2>to go down. I'm going to move into euros instead.

0:40:53.390 --> 0:40:56.230
<v Speaker 2>Or is it just purely about the use case and

0:40:56.890 --> 0:40:59.989
<v Speaker 2>some broader utilitarian diversification kind of thing?

0:41:01.330 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I would love that if there was... I mean, I

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 3>used to live in Russia and it's how I got

0:41:06.380 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 3>into writing about financial crime was living in Russia. I mean,

0:41:09.380 --> 0:41:11.660
<v Speaker 3>the good thing about working in Russia as a journalist

0:41:11.700 --> 0:41:13.660
<v Speaker 3>is you don't really need to look out for financial crime.

0:41:13.700 --> 0:41:16.100
<v Speaker 3>It tends to come and find you. And it was

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that there was a really... deep awareness of the relative

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.339
<v Speaker 3>strengths of the euro and the dollar. And this was

0:41:22.380 --> 0:41:25.049
<v Speaker 3>a time when the euro was looking very strong. And

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:29.270
<v Speaker 3>so there was a movement towards euros by ordinary Russians.

0:41:29.350 --> 0:41:31.710
<v Speaker 3>But you can't get away from the fact that the

0:41:31.770 --> 0:41:35.669
<v Speaker 3>dollar is just much more liquid a market. It's much

0:41:35.730 --> 0:41:38.770
<v Speaker 3>more widely accepted. And it was interesting. It actually used

0:41:38.810 --> 0:41:41.330
<v Speaker 3>to get different exchange rates for different kinds of dollars.

0:41:41.450 --> 0:41:42.950
<v Speaker 3>When I first lived in Russia, I was paid in

0:41:42.969 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 3>cash dollars. And I would always try and be paid

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.500
<v Speaker 3>in $ 100 bills because I knew I could get more rubles.

0:41:47.930 --> 0:41:49.930
<v Speaker 3>for a $ 100 bill than I could for a 20,

0:41:49.930 --> 0:41:53.089
<v Speaker 3>because there's that demand for hundreds. So no, I mean,

0:41:53.330 --> 0:41:56.250
<v Speaker 3>dollars were that the utility of dollars was more about

0:41:56.530 --> 0:42:00.630
<v Speaker 3>the universal application of them, the fact they're accepted everywhere.

0:42:00.969 --> 0:42:04.730
<v Speaker 3>And because as you say, there is a 200 euro banknote,

0:42:04.770 --> 0:42:07.750
<v Speaker 3>you can move twice the value in the same space

0:42:07.790 --> 0:42:10.330
<v Speaker 3>with euros as you can with dollars. But because the

0:42:10.370 --> 0:42:14.410
<v Speaker 3>dollar has got this kind of first mover advantage, and

0:42:14.450 --> 0:42:18.700
<v Speaker 3>it's globally accepted, the dollar remains the lingua franca of

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.219
<v Speaker 3>global criminality, the $ 100 bill, just because it is a

0:42:21.260 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 3>much deeper, more liquid market, which has an interesting, obviously

0:42:25.020 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 3>an interesting parallel to the role of the dollar as

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.660
<v Speaker 3>a global currency in the licit economy, which is that

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.070
<v Speaker 3>it has all of the instruments built up around it.

0:42:32.110 --> 0:42:34.370
<v Speaker 3>Everyone trusts it. Everyone knows it. And it is very

0:42:34.390 --> 0:42:36.210
<v Speaker 3>difficult to dislodge that once it's been established.

0:42:37.330 --> 0:42:40.490
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just a last question for me. You mentioned the

0:42:40.550 --> 0:42:43.529
<v Speaker 1>rise of some of these acts in the 70s and

0:42:44.210 --> 0:42:47.700
<v Speaker 1>80s to clamp down on money laundering, etc., Has the

0:42:47.739 --> 0:42:52.500
<v Speaker 1>political climate changed? What was the political climate then such

0:42:52.540 --> 0:42:54.739
<v Speaker 1>that there was an inspiration to really try to move

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on this? And would you just say we're in an

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:01.529
<v Speaker 1>environment today where there is just, it's just not, most people,

0:43:01.650 --> 0:43:04.310
<v Speaker 1>most countries don't care very much and they have other

0:43:04.350 --> 0:43:08.150
<v Speaker 1>things to worry about. And there isn't really the appetite

0:43:08.210 --> 0:43:11.450
<v Speaker 1>to do another push, even if the reporting says there's

0:43:11.850 --> 0:43:12.710
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of it out there.

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:16.060
<v Speaker 3>I'm really glad you asked that because it gives me

0:43:16.100 --> 0:43:19.350
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to bring up my personal anti-money laundering hero,

0:43:19.390 --> 0:43:21.950
<v Speaker 3>who's a guy called Wright Patman, who was a congressman

0:43:22.030 --> 0:43:26.930
<v Speaker 3>from Northeastern Texas, who represented Texarkana in the area around there.

0:43:27.150 --> 0:43:29.910
<v Speaker 3>From the 1928 up to 1974, he was one of

0:43:29.950 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 3>those imperfect but amazing Southern Democrats. He was, by Southern

0:43:33.660 --> 0:43:36.259
<v Speaker 3>Democrat standards, a really good guy, but not necessarily a

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:39.219
<v Speaker 3>really good guy by everyone's standards today. But he did

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 3>have a very healthy distrust of monopoly power, financial institutions,

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.410
<v Speaker 3>which grew out of this sort of what was called

0:43:46.430 --> 0:43:48.989
<v Speaker 3>the populist movement in Texas and the South and the

0:43:49.010 --> 0:43:51.990
<v Speaker 3>Midwest in the late 19th century. And he really, as

0:43:52.090 --> 0:43:55.430
<v Speaker 3>chair of the House Banking Committee in the 1960s, he

0:43:55.469 --> 0:43:58.900
<v Speaker 3>pushed through some really interesting committee hearings and innovations. And

0:43:58.940 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 3>so the anti-money laundering legislation was called the Bank Secrecy Act,

0:44:03.180 --> 0:44:05.380
<v Speaker 3>even though that's not its proper name, grew out of

0:44:05.460 --> 0:44:09.670
<v Speaker 3>his personal kind of obsession with the wrongdoing of the

0:44:09.690 --> 0:44:12.830
<v Speaker 3>financial institutions. And because of the kind of the way

0:44:12.850 --> 0:44:15.730
<v Speaker 3>that Congress was very hierarchical back then, what the Banking

0:44:15.750 --> 0:44:17.950
<v Speaker 3>Committee did, then Congress tended to go along with. He

0:44:17.989 --> 0:44:20.739
<v Speaker 3>had a huge amount of personal power and prestige that

0:44:20.780 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 3>allowed him to do that. And I'm not sure that

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:27.180
<v Speaker 3>that would be replicatable today. The role that he played, though,

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.540
<v Speaker 3>I think in a way is sort of, in some ways,

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you could see similarities with, say, the role that Elizabeth

0:44:31.780 --> 0:44:35.490
<v Speaker 3>Warren played with consumer finance after the great financial crisis.

0:44:35.530 --> 0:44:38.169
<v Speaker 3>He managed to push through some changes and spearhead that.

0:44:38.230 --> 0:44:41.089
<v Speaker 3>So There was an opportunity back then with the growth

0:44:41.110 --> 0:44:43.330
<v Speaker 3>of offshore finance in the 1960s, and he took that

0:44:43.350 --> 0:44:46.330
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to bring the Bank Secrecy Act onto the books.

0:44:46.670 --> 0:44:49.870
<v Speaker 3>So it is difficult to see who would fill the

0:44:49.910 --> 0:44:52.430
<v Speaker 3>position that he filled now. I mean, that kind of

0:44:52.469 --> 0:44:56.190
<v Speaker 3>politician isn't really present, but who knows? Things move fast.

0:44:56.310 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 3>And I personally would like to see politicians engaging with

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:02.660
<v Speaker 3>the minutiae of money laundering in the same way that

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:04.580
<v Speaker 3>he did, and trying not to just, as it were,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 3>punt responsibility onto the banks and say... that they just

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:12.050
<v Speaker 3>need to produce another 100,000 suspicious transaction reports and instead say, well, actually,

0:45:12.070 --> 0:45:14.150
<v Speaker 3>what does money laundering really look like? How do we

0:45:14.190 --> 0:45:16.890
<v Speaker 3>tackle money laundering using crypto? How do we tackle money

0:45:16.910 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 3>laundering using handbags or earth moving equipment? What is actually

0:45:21.090 --> 0:45:23.940
<v Speaker 3>going on? What's really driving this? Because we have a

0:45:23.980 --> 0:45:27.339
<v Speaker 3>status quo that is incredibly expensive, very intrusive. We haven't

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 3>talked about debanking, but that is a serious issue, both

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.630
<v Speaker 3>in politics, but I think more broadly, globally. that affects

0:45:35.010 --> 0:45:38.010
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of thousands of people, mostly Muslims, but others too,

0:45:38.310 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 3>as a really grotesque side effect of anti-money laundering and

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.420
<v Speaker 3>anti-terrorist financing restrictions. It's very expensive, and it really doesn't work.

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:49.940
<v Speaker 3>So we're putting a lot of expense on financial institutions,

0:45:50.460 --> 0:45:54.420
<v Speaker 3>and therefore on ourselves, and not really inconveniencing criminals to

0:45:54.460 --> 0:45:57.020
<v Speaker 3>any meaningful extent. And one of the reasons why we're

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.860
<v Speaker 3>not inconveniencing them is because while governments are putting these

0:46:00.670 --> 0:46:04.740
<v Speaker 3>very expensive regulations onto financial institutions, they are simultaneously printing

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.580
<v Speaker 3>essentially limitless quantities of banknotes that are allowing criminals to

0:46:08.620 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 3>evade those same restrictions by just using cash. So it

0:46:11.660 --> 0:46:16.469
<v Speaker 3>is an incredibly frustrating situation to look at. And to

0:46:16.550 --> 0:46:19.129
<v Speaker 3>be honest, it just makes me furious most of the time.

0:46:19.690 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 2>How would you actually change the incentive structure for banks?

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.340
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking of like Some poor compliance officer sitting in

0:46:27.380 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a basement somewhere, and he's filing thousands of suspicious activity reports,

0:46:32.180 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 2>knowing that they're probably going to go into some black

0:46:35.460 --> 0:46:37.660
<v Speaker 2>hole that no one is ever going to read. And

0:46:37.700 --> 0:46:39.330
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, it's not like the bank is

0:46:39.350 --> 0:46:43.770
<v Speaker 2>getting rewarded for filing all of those. It's all downside, right?

0:46:44.150 --> 0:46:46.529
<v Speaker 2>If you miss something and you get caught, then you're

0:46:46.590 --> 0:46:50.069
<v Speaker 2>in trouble. So it feels like something could be improved

0:46:50.180 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on that side of things.

0:46:52.460 --> 0:46:56.850
<v Speaker 3>The original idea with Suspicious... activity reports, which grew out

0:46:56.910 --> 0:46:59.390
<v Speaker 3>of the creation of the Financial Action Task Force at

0:46:59.410 --> 0:47:02.670
<v Speaker 3>the Paris G7 in 1989, the original idea would they

0:47:02.690 --> 0:47:04.930
<v Speaker 3>would be a source of real time intelligence for law

0:47:04.950 --> 0:47:07.969
<v Speaker 3>enforcement agencies, that they would receive these reports that would

0:47:07.989 --> 0:47:10.750
<v Speaker 3>allow them to essentially see money laundering as it was happening.

0:47:11.070 --> 0:47:13.290
<v Speaker 3>And for that to work, you need to have enough

0:47:13.390 --> 0:47:16.670
<v Speaker 3>people to read the reports, you need to have essentially

0:47:16.730 --> 0:47:19.390
<v Speaker 3>effective software systems that can take in the reports and

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:22.580
<v Speaker 3>kind of triage them to the places where they need

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 3>to go. And that's what we don't have, that there

0:47:24.860 --> 0:47:29.100
<v Speaker 3>has been this demand on financial institutions to hire tens

0:47:29.140 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 3>of thousands of compliance officers who sit there bashing out

0:47:32.540 --> 0:47:35.989
<v Speaker 3>reports for false negatives endlessly or false positives. And it's

0:47:36.050 --> 0:47:40.469
<v Speaker 3>just incredibly laborious, bureaucratic and tiresome work. But at the

0:47:40.510 --> 0:47:45.250
<v Speaker 3>same time, most countries don't actually, no countries really resource

0:47:45.290 --> 0:47:48.070
<v Speaker 3>their law enforcement agencies sufficiently to actually read the reports

0:47:48.090 --> 0:47:50.669
<v Speaker 3>that are being produced. So you have, like you say,

0:47:51.150 --> 0:47:54.290
<v Speaker 3>huge number of reports that are just going into essentially

0:47:54.330 --> 0:47:56.549
<v Speaker 3>a black hole where they sit there and maybe they'll

0:47:56.570 --> 0:47:58.330
<v Speaker 3>be looked at in the future and maybe they won't.

0:47:58.610 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 3>And the downside of getting it wrong for a financial

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 3>institution is a billion dollar, billion dollar plus fine. And

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.540
<v Speaker 3>the plus side of getting it right is kind of non-existent.

0:48:09.620 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of changing the incentives, it would be

0:48:11.940 --> 0:48:16.760
<v Speaker 3>far better to have fewer suspicious activity reports that were

0:48:16.820 --> 0:48:20.130
<v Speaker 3>actually being read. And then you could have a system

0:48:20.170 --> 0:48:23.299
<v Speaker 3>where financial criminals were actually being prosecuted and you would

0:48:23.340 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 3>get a sort of a kind of feedback loop that

0:48:25.140 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 3>that would then restrict the ability of their financial criminals

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to move their money because the whole idea of an

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.350
<v Speaker 3>anti-money laundering system is to try and take the profit

0:48:34.750 --> 0:48:37.810
<v Speaker 3>out of financial crime or any acquisitive crime that's what

0:48:37.830 --> 0:48:40.310
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to do is to make it expensive to

0:48:40.350 --> 0:48:42.469
<v Speaker 3>launder money that's what we're failing to do at the

0:48:42.489 --> 0:48:45.169
<v Speaker 3>moment yeah so anything that can take away criminals money

0:48:45.570 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and essentially take away their ability to move it so

0:48:48.100 --> 0:48:52.240
<v Speaker 3>easily around the world that would essentially be the purpose.

0:48:52.260 --> 0:48:54.420
<v Speaker 3>And that is supposedly the purpose of the system that

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.620
<v Speaker 3>we have. Instead, we have a system that piles a

0:48:56.660 --> 0:48:59.420
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of paperwork on financial institutions and a huge

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:02.219
<v Speaker 3>amount of expense and occasionally fines them for their trouble,

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.219
<v Speaker 3>but doesn't really do anything to stop financial crime. And

0:49:05.260 --> 0:49:08.150
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of, as we say in Britain, ass backwards.

0:49:08.790 --> 0:49:11.850
<v Speaker 2>All right. I think that's a good place to end it.

0:49:12.030 --> 0:49:14.590
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Bullough, thank you so much for coming on All Thoughts.

0:49:16.050 --> 0:49:16.989
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me on the show.

0:49:17.010 --> 0:49:18.910
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Oliver. That was great.

0:49:21.870 --> 0:49:33.210
<v Speaker 2>Great. So Joe, that was a fun conversation.

0:49:33.250 --> 0:49:36.770
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love reading about the intricacies of all these

0:49:36.830 --> 0:49:38.730
<v Speaker 1>details and the complexity and how.

0:49:38.690 --> 0:49:40.250
<v Speaker 2>Far- There's a lot of creativity in crime.

0:49:40.430 --> 0:49:43.509
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary amount of creativity. And it's like, okay, you come

0:49:43.550 --> 0:49:46.549
<v Speaker 1>up with one idea where you can sort of, it's

0:49:46.570 --> 0:49:49.070
<v Speaker 1>like they found a free money glitch in the tax

0:49:49.090 --> 0:49:53.870
<v Speaker 1>system where you import something, have one transaction, then claim

0:49:53.890 --> 0:49:56.430
<v Speaker 1>the refund, et cetera. And then it's like finding these

0:49:56.489 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it across thousands and thousands of companies

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.470
<v Speaker 1>or fake companies, whatever it is. It's always very impressive

0:50:02.489 --> 0:50:02.740
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:50:02.969 --> 0:50:05.700
<v Speaker 2>With carousel fraud, though, I keep thinking, like, okay, sure,

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 2>it makes you rich, right?

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But your job is basically filing a bunch of paperwork

0:50:11.739 --> 0:50:14.739
<v Speaker 2>and incorporating a bunch of shell companies, which sounds really,

0:50:14.780 --> 0:50:15.240
<v Speaker 2>really boring.

0:50:15.260 --> 0:50:16.930
<v Speaker 1>So you think the problem is, like, it makes you rich,

0:50:16.950 --> 0:50:18.550
<v Speaker 1>but it provides you no meaning in life?

0:50:18.630 --> 0:50:21.330
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think, like, why not just start

0:50:21.370 --> 0:50:24.690
<v Speaker 2>a business, right? Do something interesting. Don't just make money by, like,

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 2>creating shell companies. I don't know.

0:50:26.900 --> 0:50:30.060
<v Speaker 1>I think people can find ways to enjoy themselves with

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.030
<v Speaker 1>just lots and lots of free money. You know, it's interesting.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:35.650
<v Speaker 1>I've thought about this before when he was talking about

0:50:35.790 --> 0:50:39.890
<v Speaker 1>the way criminals, as he called it, stack cash and crypto.

0:50:40.330 --> 0:50:42.469
<v Speaker 1>And something I've thought about, and I think there's a lot,

0:50:42.489 --> 0:50:45.530
<v Speaker 1>there's actually sort of like common, even when he described

0:50:45.570 --> 0:50:49.500
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like classically Medici style banking system or whatever,

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.980
<v Speaker 1>how many transactions that we think of as like being

0:50:53.060 --> 0:50:56.250
<v Speaker 1>somewhat bilateral transactions are actually like very multi-step. So let's

0:50:56.270 --> 0:50:59.070
<v Speaker 1>say you wanted to sell me a painting and I

0:50:59.070 --> 0:51:01.660
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, I'll pay it for you in Bitcoin.

0:51:01.820 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Or like, I don't really see that happening, but it's like,

0:51:04.340 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have to, like that would be three transactions

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 1>because there would be, I would be purchasing Bitcoin from

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:10.420
<v Speaker 1>some entity.

0:51:10.580 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:51:11.500 --> 0:51:14.049
<v Speaker 1>The one Bitcoin exchange would then like move it to

0:51:14.090 --> 0:51:16.410
<v Speaker 1>your wallet. And then presumably you don't want to hold

0:51:16.430 --> 0:51:18.490
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Bitcoin. So then you sell the Bitcoin

0:51:18.510 --> 0:51:20.450
<v Speaker 1>for cash. So what looks like, oh, I'm going to

0:51:20.489 --> 0:51:23.180
<v Speaker 1>pay you in Bitcoin is like really three transactions. three

0:51:23.219 --> 0:51:26.339
<v Speaker 1>distinct movements. And I think that a lot of these

0:51:26.430 --> 0:51:29.910
<v Speaker 1>things that he describes, how can you deposit money in

0:51:29.989 --> 0:51:32.549
<v Speaker 1>Rome and then withdraw it as soon as you get

0:51:32.590 --> 0:51:35.410
<v Speaker 1>there in London, is this nature of the fact that

0:51:35.590 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times what looks like a transaction is

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:42.020
<v Speaker 1>really like this big multi-leg transaction that can sort of

0:51:42.060 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be decompose and rearrange like Lego blocks in multiple ways.

0:51:45.940 --> 0:51:48.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which means there are all these little like vulnerabilities

0:51:48.510 --> 0:51:50.730
<v Speaker 2>and steps that you can end up exploiting. Well, also

0:51:50.870 --> 0:51:53.610
<v Speaker 2>on the crypto thing, it was interesting to hear that

0:51:53.950 --> 0:51:56.450
<v Speaker 2>money laundering is predominantly about stable coins.

0:51:56.469 --> 0:51:57.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was surprised.

0:51:57.790 --> 0:52:00.150
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of gets back to the seniorage point,

0:52:00.190 --> 0:52:02.219
<v Speaker 2>which is if you think of stable coins as something

0:52:02.260 --> 0:52:06.380
<v Speaker 2>that nowadays finances U.S. government debt because a lot of

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:09.370
<v Speaker 2>the money goes into U.S. treasuries. then you're back to

0:52:09.410 --> 0:52:12.810
<v Speaker 2>this idea that, well, maybe people aren't particularly incentivized to

0:52:12.850 --> 0:52:15.950
<v Speaker 2>crack down on what's essentially an interest-free, well, not in

0:52:15.969 --> 0:52:18.129
<v Speaker 2>the case of Treasury, but a loan to the U.S.

0:52:18.150 --> 0:52:18.470
<v Speaker 3>Government.

0:52:18.850 --> 0:52:23.390
<v Speaker 1>It's also interesting just generally that whenever you're talking about

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.940
<v Speaker 1>money laundering or crime, you use a metric that is

0:52:27.020 --> 0:52:31.240
<v Speaker 1>very rarely ever discussed in economics, which is dollar value

0:52:31.300 --> 0:52:34.910
<v Speaker 1>per unit of spatial volume, right? Because that is a

0:52:34.969 --> 0:52:36.969
<v Speaker 1>rare metric. But that's what we're talking about. Like if

0:52:36.989 --> 0:52:40.049
<v Speaker 1>it's like, why is a Rolex a useful vehicle? It's

0:52:40.090 --> 0:52:43.510
<v Speaker 1>because a high dollar value at a small spatial volume.

0:52:43.790 --> 0:52:47.410
<v Speaker 1>And so like, what is the $ 200 bill or $ 100

0:52:46.710 --> 0:52:49.490
<v Speaker 1>bill on a Rolex and other things have in common?

0:52:50.180 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The opposite of get would be like, I don't know,

0:52:54.180 --> 0:52:56.580
<v Speaker 1>a giant couch or something like that. It's probably like

0:52:56.620 --> 0:52:58.100
<v Speaker 1>a pretty inefficient way to do it.

0:52:58.350 --> 0:53:01.350
<v Speaker 2>There's a business opportunity for someone to create, like, lots

0:53:01.410 --> 0:53:03.690
<v Speaker 2>of tiny, tiny, really valuable things.

0:53:03.730 --> 0:53:04.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:53:04.370 --> 0:53:06.250
<v Speaker 2>Which I think gets us back to the beginning of

0:53:06.330 --> 0:53:06.770
<v Speaker 2>money itself.

0:53:06.790 --> 0:53:08.850
<v Speaker 1>Gets us back to the very beginning, jewels and all

0:53:08.870 --> 0:53:09.210
<v Speaker 1>that stuff.

0:53:09.230 --> 0:53:09.410
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:53:09.430 --> 0:53:10.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:53:10.290 --> 0:53:11.009
<v Speaker 2>Shall we leave it there?

0:53:11.090 --> 0:53:11.529
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:16.980
<v Speaker 2>I'm Traci Allaway. You can follow me at Traci Allaway.

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Jill Wiesenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Ehrman, Dashiell Bennett

0:53:23.739 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at Dashbot, Kale Brooks at Kale Brooks, and Kevin Lozano

0:53:27.260 --> 0:53:30.380
<v Speaker 1>at Kevin Lloyd Lozano. And for more OddLots content, go

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.660
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots or the Digley newsletter and all

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes. And you can chat about all these

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>topics 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash OddLots.

0:53:40.910 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it when

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 2>we talk about financial crime, then please leave us a

0:53:45.219 --> 0:53:48.540
<v Speaker 2>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if

0:53:48.580 --> 0:53:51.290
<v Speaker 2>you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all

0:53:51.310 --> 0:53:54.270
<v Speaker 2>of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do

0:53:54.410 --> 0:53:57.210
<v Speaker 2>is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow

0:53:57.230 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the instructions there. Thanks for listening. Thank you.