WEBVTT - Day One, Part Two from Future Proof Festival

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, this is Bloomberg Business Week of Carol Masser

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>along with Barry Ridholts, who just said, did you smell that?

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>What was that?

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>That's hamburger, some sort of Meatia is grilling. It's delicious.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Somebody has not had right.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm late for my noon feeding.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts. He's chairman and chief investment officer Ridthelt's Wealth Management.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser, of course of Bloomberg Business Week. Barry

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of course hosts of Masters in Business and at the Money.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We're here at future Proof at Huntington Beach, California, and

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got an incredible sixty minutes coming up. Sarah Malik

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>join us a little bit later on. Right now, we

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get to our first guest, and that is

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Pria Misra who's with us. She's a portfolio manager of

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 1>global fixed income currency and Commodities at JP Morgan Asset

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Management joining us here at future Proof. How are you.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm great, this is beautiful. Thanks for having me.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for being here. I know, I just we

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>always talk about taking the show outside, you know, when

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in college, You're like, let's take on this is

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>what we are.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Doing today from your outside.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you about the elections because

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we have some reporting and it noted that a Kamala

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Harris victory in the elections is seen as better for

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>treasuries worse for stocks than a win for Donald Trump.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>This was a Bloomberg Terminal subscriber survey. Are you thinking

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about the elections and what it means for the investment

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>universe and what does it mean in your view?

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 4>So we are all we're all definitely thinking about the elections.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a big election. It's a very close election. But

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I'll make a couple of points. You know, the presidency

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is clearly extremely important, but Congress is very important to

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 4>get a lot of things done, you know, or not done,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>because the twenty seventeen cuts are likely to expire if

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Congress doesn't do anything. So beyond the presidency, we're looking

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>at the Senate races, the House races, so the entirety

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 4>of the election is going to be important. Secondly, there's

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of policies that are up in the air,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 4>right from tariff, immigration, you know, regulation, I talked about taxes, spending.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it may be a little simplistic to say

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 4>that one outcome is necessarily good for the economy or

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 4>good for markets. I think we also have this deficit

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>issue which is out there the other of them. For

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 4>either of them exactly, whether it's spending or it's taxes

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 4>or tariffs, they all have fiscal implications. I mean, what

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll say is, as I manage our portfolio, is one

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>our position for one way or the other. It really

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 4>from a risk awards standpoint, Given that the election is

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 4>won by not a lot of forty thousand votes or

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 4>one hundred thousand votes, we're talking not about, you know,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 4>a very clear dividea. So I would say it's best

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 4>not to position before the election, to see the election

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 4>outcome and then to see what, you know, what policies

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 4>are prioritized. Is it going to be taxes first? Is

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>it tariffs first, which is going to have a very

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>different implication. There's also so I would say when we

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>look at the election and the outcome on markets, I

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 4>look at the impact on growth and inflation. I look

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 4>at the impact on the deficit. And then what I

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 4>really hope is FED independence, you know, remains, But that

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>is I don't think we should take that for granted.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 4>Is there any impact there, because that's going to have

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 4>an impact on treasuries as a safe haven, the dollar

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 4>is a safe have and these are all things which

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 4>require an independent center bank. So there's a lot. But

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Sad for independence. You really are concerned.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I am a little concerned. I mean, we've seen this

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>little bit before. And I think now with the fact

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 4>that you know the FED was late in hiking rates,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 4>are they going to be late in cutting rates? They're

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>about to embark on a cutting cycle. And if we

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 4>have the President or Congress talk too much about what

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 4>about FED policy, it's not great to inspire confidence in

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the US capital markets, and we need we need foreign investments.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>And as the FED cut rates, I actually think for

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>will look at US fixed income, they'll look at the

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>US equity market. So I do hope that that FED

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>independence remains. I think it's something we should keep at

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the back of our mind as we think about market

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>implications of the election.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So the Fed has taken rates high enough that money

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 3>market funds are yielding over five percent. They now stand

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>over six trillion dollars. That's a lot of money. What

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>happens as the FED begins to cut rates, where does

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that capital go looking for yield?

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Sure And that's the question I would say every asset

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 4>management person, every wealth manager salivating at the thought of

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 4>that six trillion. Historically, that money does move once the

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>FED starts to cut rates, starts to move first into

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 4>fixed income and then into risky assets. But here's the catch.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 4>We're in a soft landing, and soft landing rate cuts

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 4>are rare. So can we apply the Historically the Fed

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 4>is cutting in a recession, so the money moves into

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 4>fixed income because well, equities might look a little scary

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 4>this time round. If the soft linding is maintain, and

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 4>that's a that's an if. I think there's a case

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>we're in a good spot. If the Fed was to

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 4>cut rates quickly enough, we might stay in that soft landing.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 4>We have a chance. It's a narrow path, but I

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 4>think there's a chance we stay there. I think that

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 4>money moves into different asset classes, not all of it.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 4>There is a reason people own cash, liquidity, cash management,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>but a certain portion of it, especially as you realize

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 4>that there's reinvestment risk. That money is not going to

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 4>stay at five percent. As the Fed cut rates and

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>forwards are arguing for a little below three percent, that

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 4>cash is going to give you three percent. As people

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 4>start to internalize that, and I think the FED cutting

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 4>starts that, that money then in a soft landing, moves

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 4>into equities, credit and government bonds. If the economy slows down,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>I think you're going to see more into fixed incomes.

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 4>So there's a bit of a bifurcated outlook for that

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 4>money depending on how the economy evolves from here.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting when the FED was raising so a

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>longer duration bonds get a little with punished. Twenty twenty

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>two is a tough year if the Fed is starting

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>on a longer cycle of rate cuts, and some people

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 3>have talked about high three low four percent is where

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>they end up. What do you do with your duration?

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Where do you want to have your bonds? What sort

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 3>of longevity you're looking for in the whole things.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I think bonds finally give you income. So I

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 4>joke that fixed income finally has income in it, which

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 4>is good real income. You know, not only are you

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.559
<v Speaker 4>getting that nominal income, but net of inflation, you're actually

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 4>earning real returns. The other thing bonds are giving us diversification,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 4>which you talked about twenty two, is the opposite of

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 4>diversification because risk assets struggled and bond struggled. That's changed.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 4>And actually you don't have to take my word for it.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 4>Look at the last couple of months, just the last

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 4>two payroll reports that come in a little weaker than before,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>and this fear of a hard landing or a recession

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 4>starts to come up. Risk assets struggle and bonds do

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 4>really well. So you talk about longer term perspective, I

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 4>think there's a lot of TALC that has happened. That

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 4>sixty forty is dead. No, sixty forty is back, because

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 4>that fixed income component is giving you that diversification. So

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 4>we've actually been adding to it. Because we're in a

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 4>soft landing. We have risk assets in the form of spread,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>high quality, investment grade, high yield spread, securitized spread. Owning

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>some duration is a good hedge if the economy starts

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 4>to slow down, our spread products will underperform. But then

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 4>that treasury long and we're long intermediate. I think the

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 4>two year doesn't give you that much. You start to

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 4>go long fives and tens. We should not worry that

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 4>much about whether they go twenty five or fifty. Let's

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 4>look at the totality of cuts. Exactly where they end

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 4>up is right around three percent. We're not pricing in

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 4>a recession. So if we do get into a recession

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 4>at that point the Fed's cutting to two percent one percent,

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of room from in terms of price

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 4>appreciation for that duration. So I like adding duration. We're

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 4>buying any backups any election related You talked about elections,

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 4>I bring up any election related volatility, supply and auction

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't go well. Anytime interstrates rise, I think it

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 4>should be viewed as a buying opportunity to add that duration,

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 4>especially if you've got risk assets on the other side

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of your portfolio.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're going to leave it on that note. Pria,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really enjoyed having you. Pria Mizra

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Of course, Global fixed income, Currency and Commodities

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at JP Morgan Asset Management. Thank you so much.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Prank you. Hey, folks, I just want to bring you

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>some headlines from Intel. We do have just crossing the

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. It looks like Intel, specifically the company CEO

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has landed Amazon as an AWS customer for the company's

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing business, potentially bringing work to new plants under construction

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, boosting his efforts to turn around

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the embattled chip maker. So we're seeing some headlines there.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought I saw one other headline also to pause

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Poland Germany factory projects by about two years. So we

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>know the woes. We've talked about it a lot. I

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend that you check out some of the reporting

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that's being done by Ian King that really talks about

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>how this has been long and coming. Intel shares though

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>on these headlines, folks, in the aftermarket, we're seeing the

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>stock pop around eleven percent here, so we'll continue to

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>watch that, all right. Want to get back to future

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Proof Carol Masser along with Barry Ridtholtz here and want

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to get to an interesting guest, Christian Phase.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Kristin, Hi, thanks for having me.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for being here. He's founder and CEO Faz

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and Company. I can describe the company, but I'm going

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to let you describe it. Tell us what you guys

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are up to.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, thank you very much.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 6>It's great to be here, great sort of venue to

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 6>have a conference.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 5>So we were a private credit fund.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 6>We run a private credit fund that gives accredited investors

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 6>the opportunity to get exposure to what we think is

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 6>a really interesting asset class, and that's real estate bridging

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 6>finance against residential.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Property, something you know a little bit about.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I do know a little bit about.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I've been involved in the sector for almost

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty years. Originally was a lawyer. Grew up in Australia,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 6>which you might be able to tell from my accent.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Spend time over in London.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 6>Spend time in London. Yeah, so recovering lawyer as well,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Barry so happy to be a lawyer.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 3>That's half of the lawyers aren't practicing seven years after graduation.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that? Because another podcast that's.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>A whole nother conversation. So what sort of real estate

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>you guys focus on? Is it just residential or is

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>it a variety of sectors?

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 6>No, it's residential. So we're very careful to explain that

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 6>to to investors. Obviously, there's parts of the real estate

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 6>market that are quite troubled and instead of making headlines

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 6>like commercial and different parts. But we're small, balanced, single

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 6>family residential. Our average loan size is four hundred and

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 6>fifty thousand dollars, So it is kind of really targeting

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 6>what we describe as property entrepreneurs buying the worst house

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 6>on a nice street, replacing the bathrooms, kitchen, and then

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 6>selling for the flip. Right, Yeah, it's fix and flip.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 6>It is fix and flip finance, and you know, it's

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 6>a big market in the US. It's a big opportunity.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.599
<v Speaker 6>Like you're saying, I've done it, built a business in

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 6>the UK, there was very active in the fixed and

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>flip market. That's now the largest non bank mortgage lender

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 6>in the UK and now being active in the US

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 6>for the last two years.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 5>And it's a huge market here.

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I did the investors who are like constantly sending me

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>texts and saying I want to buy your house? Are

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>these the people that you like are dealing no.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 7>All the time?

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, I get those on houses I don't even know them.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, yes, send me, you definitely want to sell

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.119
<v Speaker 3>that one, right, here's.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>My price, and it's like you know some crazy number,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you want it, it's yours, but no, tell me, like

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're dealing with.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 6>We describe them as property entrepreneurs. I mean, I think

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 6>that it's a bit of a misnomer because a lot

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 6>of people turn on the TV and see the glamorous couple,

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, flipping houses making lots of money, and it

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 6>all looks quite easy. It's not that. In reality, it

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 6>is kind of they're real hustlers. They have to work hard,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 6>and we target property professionals. They're they're doing this full time,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 6>and they do it multiple times a year, so five,

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 6>ten times a year, and so they're good customers for us.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 6>Once we acquire them, we can be their funding partner

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 6>of choice. They keep coming back to us and so yeah,

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 6>so it's a very entrepreneurial boro but product.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So my brother has been doing this for years, right,

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of a side hustle, but he does four or

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>five houses a year, and the conversation has always been, hey,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm funding this primarily with my own money. I asked him,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>have you thought about getting venture funding or any sort

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of credit for this? Because you could turn this into

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 3>eight or ten houses a year if you really want to.

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>And it's some of these houses are fairly it's not

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 3>always the worst house in a nice block. Sometimes it's

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a very nice house on a really nice block.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Yeah, well, I'll have to give you my number.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 6>You can give to your brother for afterwards.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 5>We see the ideal happening.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 6>I proved people that are not trying to sort of

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 6>maximize leverage. So the average LTV across our books less

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 6>than sixty percent, so they're pretty conservative. But with a

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 6>bit of leverage, they can do a couple of projects

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 6>as opposed to being exposed to just a few, you know,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 6>the lesser number, and there's a lot of tailwinds for

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 6>the asset class. You know, there's just fundamentally not enough

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 6>houses being built here in the US, the same as

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 6>in many arts of the world.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's a whole other story because it's in

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, acquisition of land and you've got

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to get neighborhoods to sign on. It's not just a

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>case of here's the money, and it's not.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Just a funding issue.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 6>But then the other sort of addition to that is

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 6>that over sixty percent of housing stock in the US

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 6>is over forty years old, so you do have a

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 6>lot of aging stock that does need to be referbed.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 6>And so with not enough housing stock and a lot

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 6>of older stock in the market, you know, refirbing is

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of is something that's very much needed.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Something I've got to ask you though, and I'm curious

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>about what your brother says, is that you know, there

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are people who want to do projects. There aren't plumbers,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there aren't electricians, there aren't contractors. There isn't a younger generation.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I have two contractors in the family too, and but

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>there is not a younger generation who wants to do

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, definitely, and I think through COVID that's been a

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 6>difficult time as well. You know, costs even crease, yeah

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 6>even still, Yeah, it's tough. And also you don't have

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 6>a lot of end borrowers that want to take a

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 6>seven percent mortgage to buy the end product. So it's

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 6>kind of a time of disruption. I kind of see

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 6>that as a time of opportunity in many respects. You know,

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 6>banks aren't active in this market. They're just not really

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 6>equipped to provide the quick sort of streamline finance that

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 6>we provide, and so you know, so I think it's

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 6>a great opportunity for investors to get a superior risk

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 6>adjusted return against what is a relatively liquid underlying asset class.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 3>So you're talking about the age of the housing stuff.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Did I get this right? Sixty percent of the homes

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>for forty years old or older. Yeah, So we're talking

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 3>about referbs. I see a lot of knockdowns in some

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of the neighborhoods, either by my house or out by

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the beach or anywhere else. It seems like a lot

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>of contractors are just, hey, let's not fix this, let's

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 3>just build a bigger one.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that a space you work in?

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Also?

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 5>So we don't.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 6>So we think that a ground up construction is quite

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 6>a significantly higher risk proposition to be investing in. So

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 6>we try and focus just on fix and flip where

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 6>it's not sort of it's not sort of changing the

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 6>construction of the bill. It's really just a tartup and

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 6>then an opportunity to sell because we want it to

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 6>be quick. You know, it's twelve months or less in

0:14:58.560 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 6>duration our funding.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's quick.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 5>It is quick. Yeah, but you know the typical borrow

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 5>a little bit.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but it's it's quick, and that's that helps the

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 6>underlying investors because it's it's there's a lot of volume

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 6>of loans underlying.

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So what's the relationship between you and the fixer flipper?

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Is it just a credit relationship? Do you do anything

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>with them? How do how does a participation work?

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 6>So it's a direct relationship. So I think that's one

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 6>of the advantages of our fund as well. We're not

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 6>sort of buying loans originated by other originators. We have

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 6>a direct borol relationship. That means we're very close to

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 6>the underlying credit. You know, we can sort of understand

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 6>what that borrow's true circumstances.

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Are, Like, you want to make sure this works.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 6>We want to make sure it works. Yeah, And it's

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 6>a relationship lend. You know, we ideally want to be

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 6>the preferred funding provider. They come to us, once they

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 6>have a good experience, we get to know them. Once

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>a borrow repays us, the risks around fraud and the

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 6>things that sort of keep you up at night are

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 6>significantly diminished. So we want to sort of be you know,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 6>finding good customers, lend to them again and again.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I missed this, did you say,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what a typical loan, like, what the rate is? And

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious about the returns on these investments for

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, sure, So I'm not sure if I'm alowed to

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 6>talk about our investment returns and our fund but we

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 6>offer investors a fixed return of ten percent and we're

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 6>lending out at about twelve percent per random so there's

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 6>a bit of a margin there for us, but it's

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 6>a good sort of risk adjusted return for our investors.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 6>We say to our investors it's one percent a month.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 6>So the typical borrow does come to say I only

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 6>need it for three months. Maybe it ends up being

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 6>six months, but it's six percent. Is the cost of

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 6>the funding for them. And what we say to the

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 6>borrow is if they're too tight on the margin, then

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 6>they shouldn't be doing the project. You know, that's kind

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 6>of just a cost of doing business for them.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Traditionally in on the property the usual mortgage stuff.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Firstly, in yeah, so we I mean, our head of

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 6>underwriting comes from a bank.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 5>We sort of experienced team.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 6>We say, we do everything that a bank does, you know,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 6>we fi COO score the borrowers.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 5>We look to make sure that we're only.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Lending to corporates, but we look through to the individuals

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 6>and make sure that they're credit worthy individuals. It's full

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 6>recourse against those individuals and it's firstly security against the property.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Just fifteen seconds. Is there any area in the United

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>States that's particularly hot that you're working in or is

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it all over?

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 6>It's we're quite selective in the States. Florida is a

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 6>very strong smack of frost. But it's been on the

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 6>op so I guess you watch closely.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a great interview, and you still have like a

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>million press rights, right, Christian, such great stay.

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 5>I love you to match you. Thank you, Thank you.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian Phase. He is founder in CEO Phase and Company.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We're headed for a break, folks, for from future Proof

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with Barry and myself. This is Bloomberg.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser along with Barry Redholts, were live at future

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Proof having some fun Huntington Beach, California. How could you not?

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to set this up a little bit, Okay.

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg news story that was recently out just last month

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about the one point seven trillion dollar private credit industry.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>You talk about it a lot. We talk about it

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot, how it's grown so much as higher rates

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are basically forced byout firms to look further afield for

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>funding while traditional lenders pull back. We know the story.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is banks have now become more competitive in

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>recent months trying to regain the leverage loan markets, so

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to get a little upset in response. We've

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about credit funds starting to push their pricing down,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>raising concerns about a potential race to the bottom. So

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that's my setup because I want to ask our next

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>guest whether that's what's going on. Alona Gornick is managing

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>director senior investment strategist at Churchill Asset Management, which, as

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to remind everybody, is the fifty billion dollars

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>private capital affiliate of NEU ven.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 8>Welcome, Welcome, Thank you so much for having me, Carol Berry.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we know so much about Churchill. You

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do in particular, but I've also talked with Ken consel

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So a lot about what's going on. He often talks

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about just being the golden era of private credit, but

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing a little bit of a race to

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom as banks are getting more involved. Tell me

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in terms of the deals that are going

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on right now.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 8>Sure, it's been a really interesting competitive landscape. As we

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 8>think about the different segments of the middle market, I

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 8>feel like they are individually each facing this sort of

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 8>bank pressure in a very different way. I think a

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 8>lot of the activity you're talking about is largely hitting

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 8>that upper middle market segment, which makes a lot of

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 8>sense for corporate barers of the size that banks really

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 8>want to attract. In the core middle market, where Churchill's focus,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 8>we generally see a little bit less of that bank

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 8>interaction or bank threat if you will, in that same

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 8>traditional sense. But generally what we are seeing is a

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 8>little bit more competition for the most part, with some

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 8>upper middle market direct lenders somewhat coming down market. Given

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 8>there isn't as much activity that they can pursue in

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 8>that upper middle market or a little bit more of

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 8>a competitive threat, they might want to expand their wings,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 8>if you will. But there are ways in the core

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 8>middle market where we can really expand and stay disciplined

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 8>and avoid some of that race to the bottom, which

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 8>can come in the form of maybe tighter spreads, looser

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 8>covenants to no covenants, coming down in market in terms

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 8>of the size of the business, which is really where

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 8>we want to stay away from.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 3>So private credit private credit really seems to navigate the

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 3>rising rate environment pretty well. Most of the most of

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 3>the various fun and deals form of sofur A plus

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>some upgrade. So as rates go up, SOFA rises replacement

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>of libor, and you guys seem to maintain a fairly

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>robust spread and pretty good returns over time. Who are

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 3>you targeting with your products? These tend to be locked

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>up a little longer than I think. A lot of

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 3>rias are used to tell us a little bit about

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>who you're marketing to and why you're at this event.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 8>Sure, so private credit has generally been very focused on

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 8>the institutional market. It really makes a lot of sense

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 8>to have committed capital locked up where you can draw

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 8>it down over time as a manager. But what be

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 8>seeen has been incredible opportunity set in the wealth market

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 8>that is just tapping the surface right of starting to

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 8>explore private markets, private equity, private credit. But in size

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 8>the wealth market is equal in terms of the institutional market,

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 8>so think about going from zero percent effectively up to

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 8>five percent. When you think about institutions and their exposure

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 8>private credit, they're generally anywhere between five to fifteen percent.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean Kelper's was out I think last week talking

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 8>about targeting five going to eight percent massive institution. Think

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 8>about the wealth channel getting from zero to even five.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 8>That's a huge untapped opportunity that we would like to meet.

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 8>But to do that, we need more accessible products. It

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 8>has been very difficult to think about wealth coming into

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 8>a product that has a five million dollar minimum that

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 8>is nowhere near what a wealth manager or an advisor

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 8>can touch. So we're really focused on this market. This

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 8>is a great conference to do it. There's about two

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 8>thousand advisors here, but when I think about the wealth channel,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 8>I think there's about three hundred thousand advisors. It's so fragmented.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.479
<v Speaker 8>How is Churchill going to access this market? So we

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 8>absolutely need education, We need resources, We need distribution folks

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 8>on the ground all over the country. We need specialists

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 8>to help with that education. And we need partners, you know,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 8>like technology platforms like Case and I Capital help us

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 8>create funds and ultimately product development that have lower minimums.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 8>These non traded perpetually non traded BDCs that allow you

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 8>to come in for twenty five hundred dollars instead of

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 8>five million and ten ninety nine's much more easy to access,

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 8>really simple, really interesting.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think investors are ready for the possibility of

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it having higher risk as an investment or also having

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their money maybe locked up and not as liquid in

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of deals.

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 8>I'd say the top three concerns or at least hesitation

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 8>points that advisors have when I'm on the road are

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 8>number one, the liquidity risk, Number two default risk in

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 8>the asset class that they're not very familiar with, and

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 8>number three it would generally be accessibility, like how am

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 8>I going to get access to this product and comfortably

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 8>get it if in fact we are in a rate

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 8>declining environment? How will that impact my return picture. With liquidity,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 8>you have to really educate folks that these are ultimately

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 8>not traded assets.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 8>We're putting it in a wrapper that affords you potentially

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 8>some liquidity and a quarterly redemption, but underneath it, the

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 8>assets aren't really meant to trade. So you really have

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 8>to educate the client and thinking if this is something

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 8>your portfolio that you will not touch for a very

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 8>long time, enjoy current income along the way. That's what

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 8>you want to really think about, and diversify the portfolio

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 8>with an enhanced return. I think that's what's really resonating.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 3>What's the typical lock up period.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 8>So we don't have one in these funds and a

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 8>non traded BBC, you're actually first twelve months you'll have

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 8>a soft lock at ninety eight. But then after that

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 8>you can really redeem your entire amount up to a

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.239
<v Speaker 8>cap where we as a manager would cap it at

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 8>five percent of the enemy of the fund.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 3>So really that window and we saw this craziness with

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 3>a B credit and be read earlier this last year.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 3>I've always thought of that as I call it the

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 3>widows and orphans redemption if yours And my favorite story

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>is surgeon forty seven years old, wife, two young kids,

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>suddenly passes away. They don't want to be in an

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I liquid thing, and so that's what that five percent

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 3>is really for. So for the typical line who's not

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>they expect to hold this for three years, five years,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>seven years, what sort of expectation do you have.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 8>I think what's great with advisors is really trying to

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 8>help them educate their clients about a very long term

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 8>hold here. I think what's really resonating in terms of

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 8>benefits about private credit are one that income generation. It's

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 8>incredible to think about income generation in terms of a

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 8>predictable path to retirement. So if it's on your way

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 8>or when you're in retirement, that is a multi year

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 8>potential investment addition to your portfolio. But if you think

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 8>about the income component of that, it's very similar to

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 8>fixed income and public credit, but with a really nice

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 8>yield premium to it. And you were talking about this earlier. Historically,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 8>the yield premium for private credit, particularly direct lending versus

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 8>the upper kind of large corporate credit, has been anywhere

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 8>between one hundred and fifty to two hundred and fifty

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 8>basis points. That's pretty historically kind of where the average

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 8>has been around two hundred. Right now, we're actually seeing

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 8>it widen out to about two fifty two sixty five,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 8>which has been because of that really that comeback in

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 8>the bank market. When things come back, activity picks up,

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 8>spreads tighten out, but not as much in that middle market.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 8>So our premium is actually increasing, So current income is

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 8>really going to be really attractive for advisors when they

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 8>think about multi year in terms of at three, is

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 8>it five, is it seven?

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it for the long haul? Is there any stress

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are seeing? I mean, I do think

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that there was, you know, milk in the last couple

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of years and milk in this year. Like the concerns

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about stresses in the private credit area because we feel

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like that there isn't enough transparency. You know, you know

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the arguments, but I'm just curious, you know, re renegotiating

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the terms of deals to make sure that you know

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no defaults and that you can kind of see

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the deal through. What are you seeing on that front?

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 8>I think that there are pockets of stress or distress

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 8>happening in the market, and I think it's going to

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 8>be vintage specific still, yes, and actually showing it. It's

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 8>ugly head a little bit more so when you think

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 8>about the most aggressive deals were generally done in and

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 8>around the time where we saw massive recovery post COVID.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 8>At twenty twenty one, valuations were really high, really fantastic

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 8>software healthcare services businesses were getting bought from double digit multiples,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 8>and along with that came a pretty heavy dose of leverage,

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 8>pretty easy kind of money, very low to no covenants.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 8>It's that which we're seeing. If you had any issue

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 8>before COVID and now in an interest rate environment that's

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 8>been twice as high as it was two years ago,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 8>you're going to feel a little bit of pain right now.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 8>So we're starting to see a little bit of that

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 8>unfold so that stress that those cracks. But I'd say

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 8>it isn't broad based across all of private credit. I'd

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 8>say it's sort of isolated to vintages and then even

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 8>certain parts of the market where you took a little

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 8>too much leverage, then the business should be able to handle.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk a little bit about the industry itself.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 3>We've seen broad adoption of private credit when rates were

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>really low and double digit growth every year. How much

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 3>longer can this sector continue to grow at such a

0:26:59.400 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>rapid rate?

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 8>So we get this question a lot on the road

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 8>in terms of is this growth a bubble? How much

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 8>of this is sustainable? And it's important to think about this,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 8>and I know you've talked a few of my colleagues

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 8>or we think look back at the growth so far,

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 8>if you really unpack that, a lot of it has

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 8>been really more secular driven rather than fad driven. Right,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 8>These are changes that are evolutionary nature that had to

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 8>happen at some point or you had for the first

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 8>time a commensurate demand in both investors' interest in the

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 8>asset class with that search for a yield in the

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 8>low rate environment and borrowers who are really looking for

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 8>a more efficient, customized speed to certainty of execution type

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 8>of solution. And both of those happened in lockstep. But

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 8>now where are we. We're not in a low rate

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 8>environment anymore. Right, Borrowers already know that this is a

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 8>fantastic customized solution. They can avoid going to S and

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 8>PN moodies. But what's going to push it to the

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 8>next level? And I think what we've got is looking

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 8>at dry powder that's on the side for equity, massive

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 8>amounts of dry powder that still needs to be put

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 8>to work. And if you think about every dollar private

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 8>equity that's put to work, there's typically another private credit

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 8>dollar put to work if you think about a fifty

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 8>to fifty debt to equity structure. So I do think

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 8>that they'll be sustainable demand going forward.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>A great overview, certainly of something that has become hot,

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like year after year after year we

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>talked so much about what's going on in private credit. Alona,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 8>Yes, definitely, thank you for having me.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Ellen and Gornick, senior investment strategist at Churchill Asset Management.

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week from future Proof.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Carol mass Long Barry Redholts. We're live at

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Futureproof in Huntington Beach, California, and I was going to

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>do an introduction, but I just want to get right

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to her because we have so much to talk about.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Great to have back with a Sarah Mallock. She's Chief

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer, head of Equities and fixed income over at

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>new Van Asset Management. There are one of the world's

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>largest investment managers one point two trillion dollars in assets

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>under management, not just shack real mind, right, that is

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>real money. How are you great?

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 7>It's great to be here. It's a sunny day in

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 7>Huntington Beach. How can I complain?

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree?

0:28:58.000 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 7>I agree.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be the consensus, like let's go out

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 3>side and play.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, so here we've just it's not it's not

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed's doing. It's just the consensus is it's beautiful, right,

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>This is not going to be bad the investment environment.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about today. I feel like we've seen some

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 1>of the megacaps continue to be pulling back. How are

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about, first of all, the equity side of

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>things right now, Well, let's start with technology. I think

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>July tenth was was an important day for tech stocks.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where in second quarter earnings, people decided they weren't

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>good enough. So even with Nvidia and there are one

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty two percent revenue growth in the second quarter,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>these socks had gotten crowded and it just wasn't good enough,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and stock started sounding crazy in your view, Well, it's just,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's tough to say what's really priced in

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of artificial intelligence. And I think what people

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are really waiting for, though, is some signs of return

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on investment or monetization from all these huge AI investments

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that companies have made. And in any cycle where we're

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in this ultra growth cycle, you're not just going to

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>see that immediately. So a bit of a pause here

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as we wait to see that these socks are even

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>though they're growing gangbusters, still there's there's so much crowding

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in them and the valuations and everything just I think,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they roll over for a bit until we

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get the next catalyst, which, by the way, Jensen's on

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the road in early October that could be a catalyst.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 7>No more delays from Blackwell.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 9>And also, you know, the stock is not incredibly expensive,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 9>so I think that could also be another reason why

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia does eventually bounce off the bottom and go up.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 9>But in the meantime probably training range of one hundred

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 9>and one hundred and forty okay.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 3>So but but you know, we're almost done with September.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 3>We're coming up on you know, Q three earnings. By

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 3>every estimate, that looks like we're going to be at

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 3>or near record earnings. Isn't that what's going to drive

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 3>stock prices high?

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, before we get to those third quarter earnings, let's

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 9>talk about being almost done with September, because it is

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 9>the middle of September. For the past four years in

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 9>a row, the second half of September has seasonally been

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 9>the worst two weeks of the year for the stock market.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 9>So we have a little bit in front of us

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 9>beyond retail sales, and that fed meeting in a couple

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 9>of days. Earnings have been strong, and even if a

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 9>recession is coming, and we are in that camp, but

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 9>the recession east to camp, as Bob was talking about

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 9>earlier today on my panel, you know, the earnings are

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 9>not showing that yet. Employment markets are so reasonably strong,

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 9>consumers showing some signs of cracking. So I think we're

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 9>okay for now. But we do have the last two

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 9>weeks of September to contend with.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Didn't we kind of pull that September trouble back to

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of September. That's when the mess really was

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's almost like September's in the rear view mirror,

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>even though we're only in the first day of the

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 3>second half.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 9>What's tough to say, because first of all, retail sales cut,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 9>you know important this month consensus is one point two

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 9>percent growth, but remember if we go back to last month,

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 9>consensus was point three percent. They retail sales printed at

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 9>one percent in markets. That's what caused the markets to remount.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 9>I don't think that's going to happen tomorrow because of

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 9>what's in front of us on Wednesday. I think if

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 9>the FED cuts by twenty five basis points, which is

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 9>our expectation markets might sell up on that news because

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 9>they've already priced that in.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 7>Now the FED cuts by fifty.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 9>Or even more, we have to wonder are the markets

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 9>going to get concerned that the FED knows too much

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 9>and they're too worried?

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 7>Basically, I don't know how they can can.

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I I got to ask a question because every time

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 3>someone says the FED knows something, we don't know. The

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 3>FED didn't know inflation was coming, they were late. The

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 3>FED didn't know inflation was peaked, they were late. What

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 3>do you say, I didn't know the inflation had bottom.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying they're a large, cautious institution that tends to

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 3>move very deliberately, and so the FED knowing what we

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know is less of a concern than hey, when

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 3>are these guys going to figure out what we've already

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 3>figured out. I look at it differently than you.

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, I agree with you on the FED being cautious,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 9>and that's why we think they only cut by twenty

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 9>five is first of all, economy is slowing, but it's

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 9>not on the precipice of a recession.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 9>But on the second part of you know, I guess

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 9>it has a little bit more to do with if

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 9>the FED sneezes of the rest of us catch a cold.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 9>So if they come in at this higher rate cut,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 9>it's not necessarily do they know a recession is coming.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 9>It's that if they're so concerned about it, should the

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 9>rest of the world be concerned about it. You have

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 9>an SMP that's trading around fifty six hundred. Obviously the

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 9>S and P five hundred is not concerned about a

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 9>recession at this point, so that would be I think

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 9>what would get people unnerved.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>So my favorite question anytime we're talking about the FED

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 3>is not whether it's twenty five or fifty, what's the

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>terminal rate? Where did they end up when everything is

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 3>said and done.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 9>I think that's the challenge. So, first of all, this year,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 9>so in antelection, your FED tends to do more rather

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 9>than less, So that's another reason I think they start slowly.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 9>You might get one or two more rate cuts by

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 9>the end of this year.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Then it just.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 9>Depends on are we going to get that recession that

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 9>we've now talked about for two years straight or not.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 7>I think that we are.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 9>If we get to that, then I think we get

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 9>multiple rate cuts next year.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 7>So our view is they start.

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 9>Off a little bit slow, maybe more slowly than the

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 9>market expects, but then they start to accelerate as employment

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 9>markets really crack and the consumer continues to slow, and

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 9>then you know, we get to a level where, you know,

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 9>depending on the level of the recession, you know, then

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 9>we'll sort of see where the FED finally ends up

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 9>in terms of its terminal rate.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there a trade that we should be talking about?

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 9>I think we should first of all, Okay, so fixed

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 9>income tends to outperform equities into twelve months after rate cuts,

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 9>so we should be talking about fixed income. Secondarily, I

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 9>think we should be talking about quality overall. If we

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 9>are going into this recession, companies with strong balance sheet,

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 9>companies with the ability to continue to grow their dividends.

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 7>And provide income for investors.

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 9>Also rate sensitive sectors like reats, which tend to have

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 9>lagged for the two years. As a FED raise rates,

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 9>we should outperform as a FED cuts rate. So looking

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 9>for this is a little different than what we've been

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 9>thinking about last years has been about who can survive

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 9>rate hikes, who can survive ultra high inflation. Now we're

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 9>thinking about who performs well during rate cuts, which companies

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 9>might will be able to survive some form of a recession.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned some consumers are showing signs of cracking.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the bottom half of the economy is

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 3>reliant on credit cards. If we see rate cuts, does

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 3>that start to alleviate some of that pain?

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 7>I think it could.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 9>Already we're seeing we are seeing consumer delinquencies pick up.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 9>Second quarter earnings companies were not super optimistic on the consumer.

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 9>Rate cuts I think will help, But the question will

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 9>be will it be enough? Is it too little, too late?

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 9>I think given what already, what we've experienced in terms

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 9>of rate hikes for the last couple of years, and

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 9>the fact that we think the FED starts slowly, I'm

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 9>not sure that a couple of rate cuts is enough

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 9>to get us into the soft landing camp that we

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 9>all hope for.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I was going to ask you what's the

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>big risk that we have to worry about? Five seconds?

0:34:59.080 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>What's the big risk?

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 9>Probably geopolitics, one that we're not talking about as much anymore,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 9>and you know, will that bubble up in any of

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 9>the you know, unfortunately where it's happening. I think you know,

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 9>non US markets are something that people aren't talking that

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 9>much about right now, All.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, good stuff as always, Sarah Mallick, Chief investment Officer,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>head of Equities and fixed Income over at new Van

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio and television.

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, we are back at future Proof Carol

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Masser along with Barry Ridholtz and our next guest, participating

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>in a panel here at future Proof about capturing the

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>next generation of investors. It's something we've talked about a theme,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>right are you on?

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 3>No there, I am. It's a theme because we've been

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 3>talking to there's so many young young people here, tell

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 3>so many young advisors. It's a place if you want

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to look into where this industry is going. We're better

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>right exactly, and Betterment is one of the companies that

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 3>has been looking into where this business is going.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And we've got the CEO sour Levy. How are you.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 8>I'm doing well, Thank you for having me.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>So what are you doing with the younger folks and

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>how do you get them and how do you get

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>them to come onto the platform.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 10>So Betterment Advisor Solutions is really our ria platform that

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 10>helps this next generation of advisors reach the next generation

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 10>of investors, right, and so so one step removed, if

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 10>you will, and what we offer is really a seamless

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 10>platform to move between investing and cash and retirement. And

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 10>I think the key to this generation. There's a lot

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 10>that is the same with this generation as the prior generation, right,

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 10>a long term outlook. I want to be better off

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 10>down the road than I am today. I want to

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 10>pay low taxes. But what's different is their expectation of technology.

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 10>Fundamentally, they have grown up in a world where everything

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 10>from e commerce to streaming is delightful and easy, and

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 10>they expect the same of the platform they use for

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 10>financial advice. And I can access on my phone, I

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 10>can access on my phone whenever I want.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, So late iss use of technology friction free. What

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 3>else are they looking for? Are they different than their

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 3>parents in terms of what they want in terms of

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 3>their portfolios?

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 10>I don't think they're different. We don't see them being

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 10>different in terms of their portfolios. I mean, I think

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of theory around how the sixty forty

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 10>portfolio has evolved because.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We've done stories about gen Z kind of shunning the

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty and more interested in, you know, investing things

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 1>like sneakers and you know, rather than stock. So help

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>us understand, Well, can't you say that they kind of

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have the same goals.

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think ultimately their goals are to retire comfortably.

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 10>And when you think about social security and the challenges that,

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, they're unlike their predecessors, you know, in the

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 10>prior generations, they're not as comfortable with the role government

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 10>is going to play, and they're fearful about what's going

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 10>to happen in social security. They don't have the luxury

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 10>of a pension right which their predecessors had. And so

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 10>I think the idea that personal investing and a defined

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 10>contribution plan is their future means they have to take

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 10>more control. And I think what's challenging about taking more

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 10>control is that there's tons of information out there, and

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 10>there's disinformation, there's misinformation, right, So how do you make

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 10>sense of it all? I think is the biggest struggle

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 10>for them. And so they're seeking advice, and the ones

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 10>who get great advice from advisors are the ones who

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 10>are more confident that they will be able to retire comfortably.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Huh. Really interesting. So technology, we've been talking about AI

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 3>constantly this whole week. You guys have been embracing AI.

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Explain how you use AI to deliver a better product

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and better performance for your clients and their clients.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 10>So I think of AI really as a continuum from automation.

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 10>We've been delivering fantastic automation for advisors and for retail

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 10>customers for a decade and a half, and AI really

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 10>supercharges what we've been doing right. You know, there's a

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 10>lot of fear around which I think is unnecessary around

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, is AI going to take over the jobs?

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:05.959
<v Speaker 10>And I think the better way to think about it

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 10>is AI. People who don't understand AI, those are the

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 10>ones who are whose jobs are going to be threatened

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 10>because you need to harness the power of AI to

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 10>basically accelerate and supercharge everything the humans are doing right.

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 10>And so whether that's paraplanning, whether that's marketing, collateral customer service,

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 10>there are all sorts of ways where generative AI can

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 10>basically strengthen the advisor's relationship with their customer by freeing

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 10>up time and money, which is ultimately what they're after.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's all about making things easier, right and.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 8>Seamless, easier, faster, cheaper.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I am curious too in terms of the younger generation.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are they feeling like it is going to

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be largely you talked about four one ks and that

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the financial markets, because I think

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I have you know, I had a dat who had

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a pension and VA benefits and k and like just

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 1>multiple things. And there's a generation that isn't going to

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have it. Is it going to be all about the markets?

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And they've got to figure this out?

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, you're exactly right, and I think that is the

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 10>fear that they have, right, is that I'm not going

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 10>to have the same kind of social safety net that

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 10>my parents had, and so I'm going to need defend

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.760
<v Speaker 10>for myself. And then to the sort of asset class

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 10>question they're wondering also, some of them have a different

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 10>set of beliefs or you know, a social frame that

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 10>they want to put around their investing, and so they

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 10>want to make choices, whether that's at the margin or

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 10>completely about where is that money going ultimately in service

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 10>of a comfortable retirement.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 3>So you'd mentioned there's not that different goal, but a

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 3>different method to get there. If you're a twenty something

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 3>or a thirty something, does a sixty forty really make sense?

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 3>You have decades before you retire. How do you feel

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 3>about the people who advocate just straight equity, no bonds.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 10>So we think about diversification. We believe from a long

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 10>term perspective, you want to be diversified domestic, international, equity, bonds,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 10>some alternatives as a part of that portfolio. And I

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 10>think where you are in your life stage that that

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 10>affects the mix.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So not necessarily sixty forty, seventy thirty eighty twenty. Correct.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 10>The mix is about your risk tolerance and your timeline.

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Last question, and just got about ten to fifteen seconds.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Does a younger generation want investment advice or do they

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do more on their own or is it

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a combination. The smart ones want investment advice, they do

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 1>so they just go.

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 10>Back absolutely, particularly as their lives get more complicated.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense, do you see that? Ring? Sarah, Thank

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Thanks for having what a great way

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for us to wrap up day one of our coverage. Share.

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Sarah Levy. She's the CEO of

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Betterment All right, that's it for day one.

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>You're ready for take it absolutely. Hopefully the weather stays

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 3>like this. Another Burger Nashville Chicken slider.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been eating it all right, everybody gonna do it

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for Barry Retolts and myself. This is Bloomberg BusinessWeek.