WEBVTT - Needham Funds’ Barr on Hidden Quality Compounders

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inside Active podcast about active managers that goes

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond sound bites and headlines and looks deeper into their processes,

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>challenges and philosophies in security selection. I'm David Cohne, i

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>lead mutual fund and active research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Today

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>my co host is Michael casper, Us, small cap and

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sector strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, thank you for joining

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, David.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So you've recently published a note on the Russell two thousands.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should say not so great December. Can

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you give our listeners a brief overview of just what

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>went wrong last month?

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much everything. So the Russell two thousand and

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>December down about eight percent or so a little bit

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>over eight percent for the month. Every single sector in

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the red, led by declines and materials, healthcare and financials,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>so some behemoths in their healthcare and financials obviously two

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>of the bigger sectors in the in the index, Tech

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>and consumer staples actually fell the least, but still everything down.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>What was interesting though from our standpoint is we have

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a sentiment indicator called the bi Market Pulse Index. It

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>looks at risk taking across equities and bond markets, and

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it actually ticked higher, kind of led by low volatility

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>outperforming high volatility stocks for them, or high volatility stocks

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 2>performing low volatility stocks for the month caused the market

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Pulse index to tick a little bit higher. So we're

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>still watching that it is showing a little bit of concern.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Especially some of these factors that we look at are

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 2>smooth out over a three month timeframe, so picking up

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>some of that November rally, but still moving higher. But

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I think really what wereent wrong under the surface was

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the moving rates. We had highlighted at the end of

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>last year that the Russell two thousand was pretty fairly

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 2>priced on the multiple given where consensus expected rates to

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>go over the next year. And obviously what we're hearing

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>from the FED and what we're seeing from the Tenure

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>is that there's a healthy dose of skepticism that the

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 2>original rate cut intention will actually be followed through in

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. So a lot of that volatility I

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>think was driven on the multiple side from Fed unease

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 2>or unease about where rates might go. Obviously, consensus for

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 2>revenue growth not going to change too much on a

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>month on month basis. So it was really driven a

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>lot by the multiple in sentiment and where rates are

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>expected to go over the next year.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, hopefully the next few months will be a little better.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But on the topic of small caps, I'd like to

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>welcome our guest, John Barr, Managing director and executive vice

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>president of need and Funds, portfolio manager for the Needam

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Aggressive Growth Fund tickern eag X. John, thanks for joining

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Inside Active.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Great. Thank you, David, it's great to be here.

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's start off by talking about your career. You

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>know we've met and so I you know you've got

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting career trajectory. Can you tell our listeners how

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you got your start in the investment business.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're really three parts to my career, And the

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>first is that I had a whole first career in industry,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and it was predominantly in electronic design automation, which is

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>CAD software used to design semiconductors and printed circuit boards.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 3>And so fourteen years in that industry at marketing, sales,

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>sales management, product management. I lived in Japan and set

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>up distribution, so lots of industry experience, and I also

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>worked for or predominantly small companies but been through small

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>venture backed companies, conserving cash through an IPO, through friendly merger,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>hostile takeover, white night layoffs being and then finally being

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the last person out the door. So I've kind of

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>been in the shoes of the companies that I look

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to invest in. So yeah, lots of industry experience, and

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>then just mentioned the second part is other financial industry

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>experience and leaving industry, I had the chance to go

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to the cell side and follow the industry that I

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>came out of for a number of years, so had

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>that additional experience. And then also venture capital has been

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>something that has been a strong interest for a long time.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>And as on the cell side, I worked with sourcing

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>ideas for Needham's Venture Fund at the time, and then

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 3>I was on the board of a private company that

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 3>successfully sold and have maintained that interest and involvement since.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>So significant other financial industry experience too, and now been

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>a portfolio manager slash analyst for over twenty years.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know that brings us to the Aggressive Growth Fund,

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know what we really want to focus

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on for this episode. Can you kind of walk us

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>through the investment process for that fund?

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it we look for I call it hidden

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to quality compounders, and when we look to purchase a company,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 3>it's in a stage that I call a hidden compounder,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and then we look to hold it while it transitions

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>to strong to strong financial performance, and then hold on

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>even more while it becomes a quality compounder. And I

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>like to joke that even the quants can find it

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 3>when it's a quality compounder. But in the early stages,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 3>we're looking for some specific characteristics that aren't readily apparent,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>so that that's the process from a high level. Some

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of the characteristics of it are very long term holding,

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>so turnovers about ten percent, so averaging a ten year

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>holding period. And so we're looking to find those small

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 3>cap companies that the market hasn't yet discovered, hold them

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>through that transition, and then hold them even longer to

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 3>point where some of them become mid and even even

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>large caps and we were able to hold on to them.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>So I might just mention the criteria that we look

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>for when we first purchase one of those companies, and

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>they're four key criteria. The first is that the company

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>has an established business, but then is investing in something

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>new that the market doesn't yet recognize, and it can

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>be a product or a service, and the established business

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe not so exciting, not growing rapidly, but profitable or

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>generating cash to support the new thing. So while we're

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 3>growth investors, we're not growth at any price. We're not

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>looking for companies that just have the new thing. We're

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>looking for companies that have that established business and that

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>helps us with downside protection as well. And we're prepared

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>to look beyond the typical Wall Street model of a

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 3>year or two to give the new thing time to develop,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>and that can be a year or two or even

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>three or four. And so that's the first thing that

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>we look for. And then secondly a big market. Can

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the company grow to be five to ten times its

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>current size, because if we're going to be invested for

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>ten years, the company with success needs to grow. And

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>then third, great management. Every investor says they invest in

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>great managers. To me, the shortcut is founders, family or

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 3>long tenured, because they tend to think long term. Like

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>we want to be invested, we need to be careful

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 3>that they're not just self dealing and controlling management team.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 3>But we've had great success with that class of management

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and then the final criteria is investing in a margin

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 3>of safety price and that can come from the balance sheet,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>it can come from the value of the established business

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>or other areas as well. So ideally it's it's it

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>looks like a boring stock, it's got a flat stock chart,

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the market's not excited about what they're doing. But it's

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 3>also not something that's been cast aside. That's a that's

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>a falling knife. So that's that's what we look for,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and then we look for the for the transition, and

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 3>then then the further transition.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>And what do you think might be in store for

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>small cap stocks as a whole going into twenty twenty five.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you see any catalysts on the horizon that might

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 2>help narrow the gap with the S and P five

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred Michael.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. I tend not to pay much

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>attention to the macro side of things and very focused

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:08.599
<v Speaker 3>on on the companies and a few specific tailwinds sector tailwinds.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I think there's one thing that we can point to,

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 3>which is small companies have have typically benefited from M

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and A and with the change potential change at the FTC,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 3>there may be more opening for small companies to be acquired,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's been even our small companies that really it's

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 3>hard to imagine any kind of market dominance or monopoly

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 3>kind of situations. The M and A has just been tough.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 3>But I think that that's one element that could could

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>help small small caps. But we see lots of opportunity,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 3>plenty of companies that meet our criteria that we think

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 3>will provide great returns over time.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>What did have a follow up? You know, one of

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the things you mentioned was, you know, having kind of

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that margin of safety in terms of valuations. Are there

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>are specific metrics you use when you're looking at valuations.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 3>There are many things that we look at. So we

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>will when we first enter, we'll look at the balance

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>sheet and potentially we can find hidden real estate value

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>or something that's not recognized. I'll look at some of

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the parts because we'll have the established business and then

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>project what we think the new thing can look like.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 3>We will look at enterprise value to EBIT. Enterprise value

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>to revenue, particularly useful for a company that's under earning,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>which many of ours will be. When we first purchase

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>enterprise value to EBITDA. But then as Charlie Munger says

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 3>about EBITDA. It is something bulld ebit DA, and you

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>have to be very careful that it's not all just

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>getting plowed back into to stock comp or cap X.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 3>But a unique thing that I look at is a

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Berkshire Hathaways, a form of Berkshire Hathaways owner's return on

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 3>capital which takes into account capital spending, maintenance capital spending,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 3>and expansion capital spending, and major movements in cash flows.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So we're not so much looking at an annual cash

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>flow as cash flow over the cycle of this investment

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that we're looking at.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Did the election or any of the proposed policies of

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the incoming administration change any of your investment thesies.

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're really looking out longer term, and I

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 3>think this changed in the FTC maybe something, but other

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>than that, not really so much. I might just mention

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 3>though that. So I described the strategy tactically for I've

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 3>managed the fund now for fifteen years, and we've really

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 3>been focused on infrastructure broadly defined. And yes we're growth,

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 3>so we have some elements of physical infrastructure concrete, roads

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and construction companies, small bit of that, but lots of

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 3>technology infrastructure and that has meant data centers and semiconductor

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing going back for fifteen years and even before that

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in my previous experiences, those have been important areas, and

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I just mentioned data centers. It was a good business,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 3>somewhat cyclical, we really liked the business. And then in

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 3>twenty seventeen the hyperscalers started to build out, and then

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one came AI and we think we're

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>still in very early stages of data center build out

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and semiconductor manufacturing has lots of tailwinds and it happened.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>It also somewhat cyclical still but major tailwinds for leading

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>edge and for regionalization and really helping the data center

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>build out too. So infrastructure broadly defined, and then we

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>have some labs and fabs for other industries too, but

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>that's a major area of focus. So it's the companies

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>that are behind the scenes supplying the engineering tools and

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the manufacturing tools and manufacturing services that we're invested in,

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>which means we're going to miss the hot new consumer

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>app but we've found that the cap X and where

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>we invest there's there's more durability to it and it

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 3>matches what Needham is strong at and it also remembering

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>my background for chip design software matches my background too.

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>And what do you see is maybe the biggest risk

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>of stocks or maybe your portfolio and some of the

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>calls that you have in there in the coming year.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 3>We really try to look beyond a year. So uh,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 3>we're currently I mean, what has what what hurt a

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 3>bit last year? Two elements. First, the industrial economy is

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 3>not robust and UH, you know we've we've seen weakness.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>There's housing and autos are two areas that then ripple through. UH.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>And then the other element is consumer and UH in

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>particular killer the lower income consumer has also been suffering.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know that either of those is there's

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>tailwinds in the next six months. So those those are

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>those are probably the biggest concerns. UH. And then if

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you want to if you do want to look at macro,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 3>you probably have to look at the increasing the tenure

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>as it's creeping up at four seven and potentially heading higher.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a lot of depth to to to refinance.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>But I try to look forward now the five to

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>ten years and assume that everything that things will be

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>normal when you look out there.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and are there any sectors you find particularly compelling.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I was looking through a little bit of your portfolio characteristics.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I know you're you're have you into tech, So maybe

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>outside of tech, are there any you know, sectors that

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that you really like at the moment?

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>I like so as I described infrastructure, broadly defined picks

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 3>and shovels that enable the big, high profile industries. An

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>area where we added a few new investments last year

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>relates to skilled labor, and I can highlight a couple

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of companies that were new additions in the last couple

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>of quarters. One is Lincoln Tech and the others Universal

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Technical Institute UTI. And these are the skilled labor trade

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 3>schools and small market penetration, big big need for the

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:51.239
<v Speaker 3>country and strong growth prospects, and they were kind of

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>thrown away in the mid two thousands when with all

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of the for profit institutions. But these companies provide a

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 3>real service and value. They could also benefit from a

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 3>change in administration. So those are a couple. And then

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>we have a small company that provides hazardous gas detection

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 3>companies called black Line Safety that has strong growth, gaining

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 3>market share and provide safety for those for those workers.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's one area, as you earth. Yeah, just briefly,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll mention another that's related to that, which is construction

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>services and a data center of semiconductor manufacturing, life sciences manufacturing.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Lots of we in the country need a lot of

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>new manufacturing facilities. So we have invested in a couple

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>of spinouts from utilities. One is the Everest Construction Group,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>which spun out of the Montana Dakota Utility MDU, and

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>another is Century which spun out of Southwestern Gas. And

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 3>so these these are construction services companies. Jacob's Solutions is

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 3>a third. Matrix Services is another. So I think that

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>construction services are an important area that we've invested in

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 3>the last year.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Earlier, you kind of alluded towards, you know, helping kind

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>of protect the downside, and so I'm just curious if

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you had any processes in place to, you know, in

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of handling risk or volatility.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's really around the companies. When we buy them,

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>we're buying them with that margin of safety and and

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>that that has helped. This leads to the question of

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 3>portfolio construction too. So when we first purchase, we will

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 3>buy a fifty thirty to fifty basis point position, and

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>we can take a year to build a position small cap,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe not so liquid. If they run away from us,

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>it's unfortunate, but oftentimes we have that time to take

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and so we'll get our entry price, and that will

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 3>those entry level those hidden compounders may grow up to

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 3>two hundred basis points, and then in the transition they

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 3>may go up to three to four hundred. And we'll

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 3>be adding purchases in the late hidden and early transition phases,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and once they're into the quality they may be a

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 3>larger market cap, so we're not purchasing anymore, and the

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>market is more recognizing, so we're not purchasing more. So.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>The risk protection comes from the valuation sensitivity at the beginning,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and then the portfolio construction, which keeps those early stage

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 3>companies small in the portfolio so damage is limited. About

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>half of the hidden make it to the next stage,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and then we do have some doozy of losers in

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the tail of those hidden that don't make it, but

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>most of them we're getting our money back or a

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 3>significant portion of it, or making a small game. But

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 3>the real returns from the portfolio come from those half

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 3>that make it to transition and then the twenty five

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 3>to thirty percent of those that make it into the

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>quality stage. And over half of the outperformance has come

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>from about twenty companies that we've invested in over this

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years. It ranged from five to one hundred baggers

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 3>based on the first purchase. So the risk control really

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>comes from that valuation sensitivity, but then letting the real

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 3>winners go and produce outside the returns.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So how do you handle CELL decisions? You know with

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>both you mentioned you know there are some losers, but

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>also when you have a company that hits that quality stage,

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you determine when to sell those?

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and sometimes valuation can seem stretch. But for me,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I've learned its best not to pay that much attention

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to it because sometimes, and in these twenty or so cases,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the fundamentals catch up with that valuation that seems stretched.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 3>So Cell discipline. Once they hit ten percent of the portfolio,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 3>and we've had a few that have, we will we

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 3>will trim and hold it back there. When we're also

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>a diversified industry fund, so we're limited to you can

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>have position. Once a position is over five percent, you

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>really don't buy more of it, so that provides risk

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 3>control as well. And then when we are a small

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>cap fund, categorized as a small cap fund, so when

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 3>they cross eight to ten billion in market cap, we

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>can still hold them, but we're not buying any anymore.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 3>And so that's Those are some of the main elements.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And do you have any major takeaways from the third

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 2>quarter earning season or what are you watching maybe as

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the fourth quarter results roll in? Are there any concerns there,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, anything specifically.

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, as I mentioned before, we're looking for any

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 3>type of turn in industrial economy, specifically autos chemicals, and

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>any relief for the for the lower income consumer. So

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 3>any any green shoots that we see there we're watching

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>for in the portfolio and out of it, of course.

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And we talked a little bit about M and A

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>already and how that might pick up a little bit

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five and beyond. Do you see maybe

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the same happening for I POS or track I POS

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of as a long term Yeah, so flow into.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Russell I love to me so my interest in the

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 3>ventures side. We love to meet private companies. We like

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to get to know them when they're private. So we

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 3>know what to do when they when they go public,

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and it also helps helps you understand what's going on

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 3>in the market if you're actively in interested in private

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>companies and then taking them into the public market. It

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>has been it's been a tough time in particular. We

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>love a great small cap I PO that the big

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>guys aren't focused on and the headlines aren't focused on,

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and doesn't run away from you. We're optimistic that the

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>new year will will bring some Yeah, and you know, Michael,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>just to add further on that, I think we're also

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 3>probably in a good position for some more high profile

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I pos the of the larger caps, and we will

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 3>follow them and be interested in them. But that no,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that's not what we do. But freeing up the mag

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>seven to to do M and A would be a

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>good a good thing for small caps.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So we you know, we still have a little bit

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of time left. So there's one question I wanted to

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ask as well as you know, if we talk about

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>market caps, one of the things I've looked at with

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>small cap funds is there are a lot of companies

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>with larger market caps than we've seen historically. If you

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>go back ten twenty years do you think small cap

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>companies are just generally getting bigger compared to historical market

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>caps or is this kind of, you know, the way

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>things are going to be until there's more m and

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a activity in small caps.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think Socks Sarvey inz Oxley when it was implemented,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 3>put extra expenses which made it hard to go public

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 3>as a smaller company. And then this rise of capital

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>that's available for late stage venture and private equity allows

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:58.479
<v Speaker 3>companies to stay private longer. So it's definitely a trend.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 3>But we still there's plenty of small caps. And the

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 3>other element is that funds have gotten larger. Pools of

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 3>capital are just larger, so they can't afford to spend

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the time to get to know the small and micro

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 3>caps like we can. And so I think there's still

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>great opportunity in small caps, despite the fact it's very

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 3>different than when I started on the buy side over

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty years ago. And you'd have plenty of one hundred

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 3>to two hundred million dollar market cap companies and at

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 3>this point those are considered micro caps. But we'd love

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 3>fishing in that pond because those are the ones where

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>you can get the fifty to one hundred x if

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 3>you get the right ones.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Definitely. Well, we just have one question before we let

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you go. We'd love to know what some of your

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite financial books have been.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Great question. I love that question. Well, so I'll start

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 3>with the Berkshire Hathaway Letters, and I think they're essential

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 3>reading for anyone interested in breaking into this business. And

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>then I'll go with any of the Warren Buffett and

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Charlie Munger biographies, and I'll just highlight a couple of

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 3>amonger ones because there aren't quite so many. One is

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Poor Charlie's Almanac, and then the second is Damn damn right,

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and there is only a third. So I would read

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 3>as much about Charlie as about Warren. I think Seth

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Klarman's margin safety is important. But you can't buy the

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 3>book because it is only an original print and they

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 3>cost a thousand dollars, but you can find the PDF

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>out there. I think Christopher Meyer's one hundred Baggers is

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a good one. And then there's a book called the

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Art of Execution by Lee Freeman Shore which was put

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>out about four or five years ago, and it's developed

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 3>He looks at investors in different archetypes and it's looking

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 3>at performance at underlying and more than just alpha outperformance

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>and attribution coming from allocation and selection. It's looking more

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 3>at decision making within the investment process. I think that's

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 3>an area that is right for research and understanding. And

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>then I just point one more which is not an

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 3>investment book, but I think a great book and it's

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>called Outlive by Peter Attia, and it deals with the

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 3>importance of, well, what we can do to fight the

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 3>four horsemen of disease, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's cancer, and metabolic

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 3>type two diabetes, and what you can do from nutrition

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 3>and exercise perspective to live a long, healthy life. And

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I will add that that helps me helps inform me

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 3>in investing in healthcare companies which are more sick care

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 3>than healthcare, and I really look for things that are

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>on the right side of that nutrition and exercise model.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh this is great, John, Thank you for joining us today.

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 3>David, thank you very much, and thank you, Michael.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you both and Mike thanks for serving as my

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>co host today.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, David.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Un till our next episode. This is David Cohne with

0:30:52.320 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Inside Out It two Stars of the Old Town