WEBVTT - Trump Threatens Canada with Tariffs Over Wildfires; Moonshot Roils Markets

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>This Weekend Podcast with David Gura, Christina Raffini, and Elisa Matteo.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us for today's selection of conversations from

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 3>You can listen to our favorite discussions right here on

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the podcast, but also make sure to join us live

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>every Saturday and Sunday morning, starting at seven am Eastern.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>We're on Bloomberg Television, Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>lifestyle and culture.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 4>This morning, Aron says the United States struck a desalination

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 4>plant in the southern part of the country, leaving twenty

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>villages without water. As Alexis mentioned, the intensification comes on

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>the seventh night of attacks.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Bridges and tunnels also targeted.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg White House correspondent Josh wein Grove is in New

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Jersey where the President is waking up this morning. Josh,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>where is the President's head on all this? What have

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you heard from White House officials? Is there a plan

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 2>or is this the new normal for the foreseeable future?

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're keeping ambiguous. You know, there's some reporting that

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 6>he's considering ramping up options axios, for instance, reporting that

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 6>they've moved tankers air tankers back into the region to

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 6>prepare for a potential escalation of bear strikes. So he

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 6>seems to be keeping options on the table. But where

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 6>we'll see that go, we don't know. As you know,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 6>we've always been on guard on weekends in particular, it

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 6>seems like that's really when the American attacks seem to

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 6>peek up. So you know, we'll see if we see

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 6>something later today, it's too soon to say. I think,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 6>more broadly, as we've discussed before, the President sort of

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 6>has been deemphasizing this in his remarks and kind of appears, frankly,

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, focus on other things right now. And we've

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 6>seen this before of course with Ukraine as well. He's

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 6>sort of got bored of talking about that and has

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 6>has focused on other things. And so right now, we

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 6>just continue to watching this day by day, and there's

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 6>no kind of end in sight, and it's unclear when,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 6>if at all, talks may presume, or talks for talks

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 6>may resume. We just start continuing to watch it bit

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 6>by bit.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 7>I'm thinking about the talks.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 4>That's talking about the talks under the category of other

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>things the President is watching or cares about. There is

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>the run Darlene run matter, his embrace of Lindsay Graham's sister,

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 4>now the interim senator from the state of South Carolina.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 4>The President and a post on truth social encouraging her

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 4>to put her hat in the ring for the primary

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 4>to get the seat permanently.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of this?

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I confess I didn't know much about Lindsay Graham's sister

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 4>before she was elevated to this position. But the President

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 4>emphasizing his long relationship with her, his confidence in her.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>How is the President looking at her prospects and the

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>importance of this race in particular.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 6>Josh President likes loyalty in senators, and in her speech

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 6>when she became the senator, she talked about the importance

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 6>of upholding his agenda. So if she's a trusted ally,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 6>perhaps not the surprise of the President, who is of

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 6>course primaried or supported the primaries against a couple members

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 6>of this current Senate conference, would value that. And so

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 6>if he's with his endorsement, I think he is sort

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 6>of taking a burden hand approach with taking backing her

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 6>and his endorsements have, of course, been very influentially, if

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 6>not decisive, across you know, basically every state over the

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 6>course of this cycle. And I think that's important to

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 6>remember it too, because you know, in other countries, maybe

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 6>ones that are having trade tensions or whatnot, you're starting

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 6>to see people talk look over the horizon, right, Oh, well,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, Trump will be gone in two and a

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 6>half years and weather the storm until then, and this

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 6>and that, and maybe the Republican Party will shift. President

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Trump will continue to have a very very strong influence

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 6>over the party, over its primaries, over the actions its

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 6>leaders take, whether he's president or not, for quite some time.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 6>And so I think we're seeing that with this. And

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 6>there's some reporting that other major candidates are now sort

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 6>of considering or still considering, whether they will jump into

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 6>the race, because running against the Trump endors candidate would

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 6>be a significantly uphill battle.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Josh, since you are our senior Canadian correspondent, I do

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>want to go back.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 6>To sorry, sorry about them.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Of course, of.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 5>Course you just did that.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, are you you know, even though I'm

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>still upset that David went to Aspen without me, he

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>did talk to James and grew there talking about.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 7>The trade policies.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>In the last hour, we were talking about kind of

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the incrementalism of having to negotiate one on one with

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>all these countries the way they're trying to do this

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>next round of tariffs. And the President is now threatening

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 2>new tariffs on Canada because of the wildfires. He posted

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Canada has refused to engage in basic forge management and

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>debris removal. Sounds familiar to what he said with California

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>last year, knowing that such refusal will lead to exactly

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>this result. This is willful negligence that's capitalized and becoming

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a yearly occurrence cost the United States billions of dollars.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Which cost of this pollution must of necessity be added

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to the tariffs Canada is currently paying.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Does a complicated clause by the way, Yes.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 7>That's not easy to read.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>That's my second time, and I did no better this

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 2>second time.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 7>Josh, what is going on here?

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Does the President really need another foreign policy fight, especially

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 2>one that could impact how much Americans pay for things,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>including cars and other items that come across the border.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean the notion of Canada, you know, vacuuming the

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 6>floor of its boreal forest or whatever. I mean obviously,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 6>like that's always that much you can do to take

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 6>this seriously though, I mean a Canadian national died sighting

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 6>a forest fire this month in Colorado. Is long standing

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 6>cooperation between these two countries. In the those infamous California fires,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 6>it was Canadian water bombers. You saw some of the stuff.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Trump says, it sort of goes off the back of

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 6>Canada and Canadians other stuff they find particularly insulting. And

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 6>I think this risks being in that second bucket because

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 6>the country has been so much time helping America fight

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 6>its forest fires that you know, the notion that this

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 6>is sort of like their fault. No one wants to

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 6>smoke over it. It's over Canada too, of course, is

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 6>I think going to prompt and blowback. Frankly is already

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 6>prompting blowback from Canadian officials. And so whether we see

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 6>this factor into these negotiations or whatever is unclear. Just

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 6>to remember where we are on this, much most of

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the trade between Canada and US right now is terror

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 6>free because it's exempted under KUSMA, or as the Canadians

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 6>call it in USMC after the Americans call it. And

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 6>so Trump could adjust that exemption. That's a big fear

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 6>of industries in the US and in Canada. He could

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 6>raise the baseline tariff through these three oh one investigations,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 6>one of which is done, one of which is still

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 6>in the hopper, or you could try to adjust the

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 6>sectoral tariffs to crank up tariffs on autos or steel,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 6>which are the two ones that are biting the Canadian

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 6>economy in particular. So he does have avenues here if

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 6>he wants. But it's also true that Canada has one

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 6>of the lowest effective terraf rates in the world right

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 6>now when it comes to accessing the US market, and

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 6>so if the price of that is looking the other

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 6>way when the President gives upset every now and then,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 6>maybe that's.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 5>What the Cheenians are going to do. Kusma kusma is

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 5>what they call it. Did use usmc A, I.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 6>Bet I bet he did. Yeah, I'm mad you did.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 6>But you made a lot of news in that interview,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 6>complicated my evenings.

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry for that.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 7>We're all mad at him.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, these Canadians and Americans are getting along well,

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and all right, our bitterness about your ospin trip.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Thanks grow At the beginning of cool duty in New Jersey,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for the time.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, the announcement of a powerful new AI model

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>from Chinese startup Moonshot Royal Markets.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>On Friday, Textok specifically semiconductors finished lower over concerns at

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 4>the US maybe losing ground in the global AI race.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Earlier today, we spoke with Bloomberg's Mike Shephard and mindm

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in Low about China's push to become the new AI leader.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 8>It's definitely an important priority for the Chinese government. In fact,

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 8>they are grooming this entire AI sector as the next

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 8>big export engine for China as the country transitions away

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 8>from older industries like property, which is really in a

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 8>big slum for several years now. So they're pouring a

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 8>lot of investments to provide the patient capital to groom

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 8>all these startups in this sector. And it's all part

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 8>of the five year plan that China had laid out

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 8>early this year, right in March at the two sessions.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 8>They have an AI plus plan where they want to

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 8>encourage adoption of AI across all sectors of the economy

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 8>over the next decade or so. And just to give

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 8>you a sense of how important AI is, this World

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 8>AI Conference in Shanghai is in the ninth edition. And

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 8>I remember in the early years not many journalists would

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 8>even bother attending, but now it's a completely different story.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 8>Even President c himself came to Town to graze the

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 8>event personally, and this really represents an upgrade to the

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 8>status of this event which in previous in the last

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 8>two years, it was attended by Premier Lee Lee Town,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 8>who is the number two leader in China, and Presidency

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 8>gave this big speech this year. A lot of it

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 8>was of course also a veiled message to the US

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 8>as well, because he talked about how when it comes

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 8>to AI governance, the world needs to take a multi

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 8>electoral approach. The world needs to learn from one another,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 8>and AI development shouldn't be a solo development of one country.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 8>And all over Chinese state media, you look at the

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 8>Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily, they have been publishing editorials

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 8>about how tech and AI should not become a monopoly,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 8>it should really be treated as a global public good

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 8>that is shared with the rest of the world. So

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 8>again Presidency positioning himself as this leader of the global South,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 8>advocating for bridging the digital divide. So he announced a

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 8>few key initiatives including offering at least five thousand training

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 8>opportunities in AI for people in the developed countries and

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 8>allowing them some thirty countries to tap into this AI

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 8>powered meteorological system to safeguard their homes for example. So really,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 8>and also yes, a couple of days ago there were

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 8>some twenty nine was signed up to be part of

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 8>this China led group called the Wollai Cooperation Organization, and

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 8>it's just yet another platform that could give China more

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 8>sway in shaping global AI norms.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 7>Mike, how does this impact American companies?

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously they're already down the road with a

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of these investments. Is there they can't claw them

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>back at this point, but they have to be looking

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>at this and being very concerned.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 7>Is there a way for them to pivot?

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you also have the Trump administration starting to

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about having a new regulatory agency specifically for AA.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Does that compound the difficulties American AI companies could now face.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, take the second part first, there, Christina, because it's

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 9>the latest and there was a scoop from last night

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 9>from our team here in DC, and the companies actually

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 9>would welcome some sort of a coherent approach to AI

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 9>safety reviews, and at issue is, you know, they did

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 9>not like the way that Anthropics fable five and with

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 9>those five were essentially ordered off THET via export controls

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 9>over concerns that the guardrails on.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Them weren't adequate.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 9>And we saw the same sort of pressure put on

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 9>Open AI. But the companies had felt that it was

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 9>overboard and also kind of ad hoc in the approach,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 9>and they would like to see a more coherent framework.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 9>And what's taking shape is a Finroom like model, one

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 9>that would resemble what the broker dealer industry on Wall

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 9>Street face is that it's an industry funded and not

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 9>industry run, but industry certainly has a lot of input

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 9>to how the rules of the road are set, and

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 9>in this case it would be the safety testing, and that.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 10>Would give them a little bit more of, I guess,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 10>a clear path forward when it comes to dealing with

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 10>the government, how far they can take their models as

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 10>they develop them. More broadly, though, the question of how

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 10>companies are reading this moment, look, many of them are

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 10>playing the long game, and all this week we heard

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 10>from TSMC they were reporting, look, we are seeing demand

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 10>for AI chips and ar hardware going through twenty thirty,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 10>it is going to be hard to meet. And that

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 10>is a message that was echoed by sk Heinez during

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 10>Ed Ludlow's interview with the CEO just last just a

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 10>little more than a week ago, as they were making

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 10>their public market debut here in the US. And then

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 10>it's a message that's been reinforced by Nvidia Chief executive

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 10>Officer Jensen Wong. They just see the demand from hyperscalers

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 10>here in the US and even elsewhere as being off

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 10>the charts. And Vidia also caught a bit of a break,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 10>and some of the other American companies caught a break

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 10>too with the declassification of the United Arab Emirates, which

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 10>is trying to establish itself as a real center of

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 10>development for AI and they see that as a new

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 10>market that they can break into and try to export

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 10>the American tech stack. But really, do you see this

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 10>contrasted vision so Xhijinping laying out something that is very

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 10>multilateral and President Donald Trump arguing one that is very

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 10>much America first, and it really doesn't have all the

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 10>pieces together in the same way that you do see

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 10>China putting on the table.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm just looking at that sell off you saw in video.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Lose a lot of ground yesterday and Apple gaining a

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 4>lot of ground. These two companies with huge market caps

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 4>really vying for top spot there in the middle of

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 4>are Yeah. Goodh Rning's coming up here, So we'll see

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 4>what happens.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Here in the weeks ahead.

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend. Right

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>after this, all right, A.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Russia sanctions bill to honor the late Senator Lindsay Graham

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 2>now has eighty four co sponsors. It was one of

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>Graham's last efforts to find a compromise aimed at trying

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to help end the war in Ukraine, imposing more tariffs

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>on injuries that buy Russian oil and gas, and widening

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>those mandatory sanctions.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 5>President Trump appears to be on board with that legislation.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Seriously, this is in honor of Lindsey.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 8>This was his thing.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He wanted this more than any other thing, you know,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know how he fell, And there's a good chance

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that he gets done.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 4>I talked about this with US Trade Representative Jameison Greer

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 4>at the ASK and Security Forum earlier this week.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 11>There are a lot of elements to this bill. There's

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 11>a teriff element, there's a sanctions element, all of which

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 11>are designed to give the President discretion to deploy pressure

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 11>on Russia and those who are supporting Russia. So we've

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 11>worked very constructively with the Senate on this. There are

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 11>a lot of good things to be said about it.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 11>I just spoke with the President about it as well,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 11>so I think there's an openness there. I think we'll

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 11>see within the next couple of days, you know, final

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 11>views from the President on whether he wants to be supportive.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 11>I think that we have it in a pretty good place.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 11>I think it's meaningful that this is something that Senator

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 11>Graham and I and Senator Blumenthal and others were working

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 11>on up until his last days, and that's meaningful as well.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>It would give the present the latitude to impose tariff

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>of up to one hundred percent, as I understand it,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 4>on the largest imports of Russian oil. Any indication from

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 4>him if he's prepared to do that, should this be pasted.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, I think you know, when I talk

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 11>to the President about this kind of issue, he wants

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 11>to be careful about the way he deploys this kind

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 11>of leverage. Geopolitics are very fragile, and this is something

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 11>whether it's a terrif action or sanctions action or anything,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 11>it's something that the present thinks about very carefully. He

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 11>certainly talks to me, He talks to Secretary Best and

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 11>Secretary Rubio, Secretary Lonik, he talks to everybody. He talks

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 11>to people outside the government wants to He wants to

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 11>hit the right spot of putting pressure on countries and

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 11>putting pressure on Russia without creating more conflict or reducing

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 11>the likelihood of a peace deal.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>The Section one twenty two tariff's set to expire in

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 4>just a couple of days, really few days from now

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 4>July twenty fourth, all but certain that the three one

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 4>tariffs will in effect after that, or we looking at

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 4>perhaps a lapse kind of in coverage.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 11>Is the Section three oh one investigations I'm doing, where

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 11>we've proposed some tariffs, they're on their own track. We're

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 11>moving quickly, deliberately because we want to resolve the unfair

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 11>trading practices that we're targeting with these investigations. So we're

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 11>going to do them as soon as we can to

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 11>get at these practices. You know, whether they're you know

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 11>day before, a day of day after. That's less important

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 11>to us than making sure we're addressing these unfair trading

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 11>practices and getting the leverage in place we need to resolve.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a timetable for one, you're going to

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 4>bring that report to the President when you might see

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>them enacted?

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, well, we have a couple right, So we have

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 11>a section three oh one on forced labor, targeting countries

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 11>who don't ban the import of forced labor goods. We

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 11>do in America, other countries don't. Some have a law,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 11>but they don't necessarily enforce it. So we already have

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 11>our report out on that, and so we can take

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 11>action I think fairly quickly on that within the next

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 11>few weeks. We have another investigations targeting a more compact

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 11>group of countries on structural xcess capacity. These are countries

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 11>who have a typically have a big trade deficit with

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 11>the world, or a big sorry big tree surplus with

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 11>the world, or a big trade surplus with US. Or

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 11>even if they don't, they may have practices that generate

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 11>factories or production that are totally out of whack with

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 11>global demand. So this is a quite intense project. I

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 11>have dozens and dozens of attorneys and policy makers working

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 11>on this to really examine all of these practices. So

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 11>it takes a little longer time than doing this forced

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 11>labor one, which is a little bit of a binary

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 11>where you're looking at what do they have in place

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 11>and are they enforcing it? This is more complex.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Does that explain the delay entirely or how long it's

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 4>taking or there's been reports that maybe China, that China

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 4>issue is complicating it more than it is with the others.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 11>No, No, I don't think that's the case at all, right,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, China is included in this structural Excess Capacity

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 11>Section three oh one. The reality is it's a more

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 11>complex investigation and we have to make sure that we

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 11>are hitting our milestones. We've received a lot of comments

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 11>from the public. We have to analyze those, we have

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 11>to incorporate them into any responsive action we might take.

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 11>So we're trying to make sure that we're we're actually

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 11>living up to the letter of the law and the

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 11>spirit of the law. We want to make sure that

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 11>we're targeting these these unfair trading practices that have led

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 11>to frankly offshoring in the US and an inability to

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 11>build new factories at times when you have other countries

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 11>that are building factories or they're depressing demand in their

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 11>own country. This is not how market economics are supposed

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 11>to work. And it creates a situation where there's not

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 11>enough incentive to build a new factory in America or

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 11>to employ American workers because we have overcapacity elsewhere. So

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 11>we want to make sure that that capacity is restrained, restricted,

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 11>or that we mitigate it somehow in our own economy

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 11>so we can have market incentives to build here and

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 11>to make here.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask you about rare earth's and I

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 4>wonder how you would assess China's performance when it comes

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to rare earths And as we get close through October,

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 4>do you anticipate that agreement will be renewed in due course?

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 11>So China's compliance with the rare earth elements of our agreements,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 11>it's not perfect. I think everyone knows that. You can

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 11>read that in the paper that being said, we are

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 11>getting a flow of rare earth. We don't have factories

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 11>shutting down because they don't have it. But again, we

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 11>really want to be in a position where we were,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 11>you know, in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty three

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 11>in President Trump's first term, where we had a regular

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 11>flow of rare earths. We also know that the Chinese

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 11>they use rare earth for economic coercion. They did it

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 11>in twenty ten and twenty eleven, they're doing it now,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 11>so it's not necessarily surprising. But we're continuing to, you know,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 11>to have some flow and where we have gaps, where

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 11>we have problems the sector of the treasury and I

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 11>you know, we work with our counterpart in China to

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 11>try to loosen that flow up. Sometimes we're more successful

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 11>than others. One important thing is we're moving forward in

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 11>the US on rare earth production. One of the things

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 11>I'm doing on my trip out west here, I'm going

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 11>to Utah to visit a facility where we've already they've

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 11>discovered rare earths in the Utah Desert and they're refining

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 11>them and further manufacturing them at a facility in Utah,

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 11>which is a great development for US national and economic security.

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 4>You've got rare earths, there's huge from receutical dependence as well,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 4>and I wonder how you're thinking about that, the way

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 4>that you can kind of curb our reliance on Chinese

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 4>pharmaceuticals and ingredients.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we think about this a lot. This is this

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 11>is really critical because at the end of the day,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 11>if somehow you lose access to Chinese inputs, it can

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 11>be a huge challenge for our own manufacturing base. And

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 11>some people will say, well, what about India, Fine, but

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the inputs that India uses also come

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 11>from China. One great thing that we're seeing as we

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 11>try to encourage companies to reshore is we actually have

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 11>commitments from seventeen pharmaceutical companies, most the largest and the

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 11>most major pharmaceutical companies, not only to lower prices of

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 11>medication here in the US, pharmaceutical prices have gone down

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 11>by two point five percent, but they've also agreed to

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 11>reshore here and to manufacture here. And so we have

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 11>companies like Eli Lilly and Novardes and others actually pouring

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 11>concrete and superstructures going up in new facilities in North

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 11>Carolina and Indiana and southern California. So this actually, for me,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 11>has been a really bright spot of our efforts to

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 11>reshort critical production in America.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 4>In the trade reps, glossary transhipments is a word. Yes,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering how you are thinking about monitoring and blocking

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 4>transhipment when it comes to China.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 11>So it is a gloss it is a word in

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 11>our glossary, but it can mean different things.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 11>There's kind of like your pure illegal transhipment where something's

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 11>made in China, they send it to Vietnam and they

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 11>put a made in Vietnam sticker and send it over.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 11>It's just illegal, right, And that's on Customs and Border

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 11>Protection to enforce that right, to do investigations, to identify

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 11>areas of fraud and go after it. And we're doing that.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 11>A day or two ago we had a big announcement

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 11>with DOJ teaming up with CPP. They've already found a

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars in customs fraud and some of that is transhipment.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 11>And then you have another issue where you have, you

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 11>know country it's often Asian inputs, China, Vietnam. They go

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 11>to a third country, maybe Mexico, and they do just

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 11>enough work where they can legally say this is actually

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 11>from Mexico, So maybe we should get a better terror

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 11>fright than if it were from China. That's an issue,

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 11>and that's a problem with Mexico right now. For example,

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 11>and some of more discussions. We're talking about rules of

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 11>origin and saying, if you want to get a better

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 11>deal bringing something in from Mexico or name your country,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 11>you have to make sure it's actually has US content.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 11>You have to make sure it actually has Mexican content

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 11>or whatever it is, and you have to have that

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 11>as high as possible to protect against this other type

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 11>of transhipment, which is a little more difficult to detect.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a long way to go until this meeting in

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>September when the Chinese president comes to the United States.

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.239
<v Speaker 4>But let me ask you lastly sort of how you're

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>thinking about that. You were so integral to the conversations

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 4>that took place in Beijing. What are you expecting deliverables

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 4>wise to come out of that meeting in Washington in

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 4>a couple months.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 11>Well, the number one deliverable we always have between President

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 11>Trump and President she is to continue the stability of

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 11>the relationship. Both of these leaders are very committed to

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 11>having a strong and solid personal relationship. Now that doesn't

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 11>mean we don't have issues in the broader relationship. Obviously

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 11>we do. China is a big challenge for the US

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 11>in a lot of ways, but we want to make

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 11>sure we're delivering stability. There's never been a situation where

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 11>the US side or even the Chinese side, has gone

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 11>out and said everyone should expect a comprehensive agreement that

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.239
<v Speaker 11>resolves all issues. Like no one's ever promised that, so

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 11>that's not what we expect. We will have an opportunity

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 11>to take stock of Chinese commitments with respective purchases of

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 11>soybeans and.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Other agricultural products.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 11>Will take stock on the rare of issues we decided,

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 11>so I think it'll be a moment for stock taking,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 11>you know, confirming the relationship, making sure that China is

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.239
<v Speaker 11>complying with what it's agreed to do. That's really what

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 11>we're looking forward to.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 6>In this meeting.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Right after this, later today in Miami, England, we'll take

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 4>on France in the World Cup bronze medal match, but

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 4>throughout the tournament, the president of FIFA's ron scrutiny for

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 4>his relationship with Preston Trump and potential rule bending for

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 4>Team USA.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 2>We spoke with sports calmist Jonathan Wilson, the author of

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>The Power and the Glory and New History of the

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>World cup about Johnny Infantino's legacy and his impact on FIFA.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 12>Febry twenty sixteen, he takes over and he says, right,

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 12>we're going to clean everything up. He ostentatiously flies on

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 12>a budget carrier to his first fef for Congress. You'll

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 12>have noted that to change.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 5>To the product.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that did last long, but.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 12>And he said, look, we've got far too many committees.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 12>We need to clear these out. It's massively inefficient. Then

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty four, a vote was taken to increase

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 12>the number of standing committee's FIFA from seven to thirty five. Now,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 12>the reason this is significant is that if you are

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 12>one of if you're a delegate representing one of the

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 12>two hundred and eleven FIFA members you have, you will

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 12>be appointed to various committees. Each committee brings with it

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 12>a stipend and very generous twenty yes, and that's where

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 12>the money goes. And of course if you're the delegate

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 12>from Country X, this doesn't matter of people in Country

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 12>X think oh, your thiefus is just great Infantino's and idiots,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 12>oh we've got to get rid of him. The ticket

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 12>prices are too high. He just thinks I'm getting this

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 12>lovely bunch of money, and why am I going to

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 12>vot against president who brings up to me?

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 7>This is very strategic explaining this committee.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 12>It's basic clentleism. I mean the other thing that the

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 12>money does, and this is slightly more complex. There are

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 12>two schemes, the Goal Project, which is introduced by Blatter

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 12>in nineteen ninety eight, and the Forward Project, which is

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 12>Infantino's great plan. And this redistributes money from FIFA two federvations.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 12>So for instance, say you're I don't know the FA

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 12>of Gabon and you say, look we need a new

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 12>national stadium and Dame is falling down. I actually be

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 12>covering these Asidames quite nice, but just for sake of argument,

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 12>Gabon and if you've got okay, we get you can't

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 12>afford that, but it'd be useful if you had a

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 12>nice new stadium. You can generate revenue through that. And

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 12>so we'll give some of these great profits from from

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 12>the World Cup. And the World Cup is by far.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>The biggest level of playing field kind of literally some places.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 2>But that seems like a nice mission.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 12>But of course none of these are properly audited, so

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 12>there hasn't been a review since twenty sixteen, which is

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 12>probably itself significant, But the review in twenty sixteen said

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 12>eighty one percent of those two and eleven member nations

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 12>are not properly audited, So so that money is going well,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 12>who knows, but I think we can guess.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>On that note, there's also in fifteen that has been

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 2>catching a lot of flak for this thing that happened

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>with the US player revoking the red card after.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 12>Well technically he didn't revoke the red card, he suspended

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 12>the suspension, so the suspension was suspended for a year,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 12>exactly the same as he's done with Cristiano Ronaldo, who

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 12>was sent off from the nultimate qualifier, so he was

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 12>giving a three game ban for that he served one

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 12>game in the final two games was suspended also three

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 12>other players, basically to make it obvious, I don't know,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 12>to make it less obvious that Menaldo was getting dispensation

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 12>because they want Manaldo at the World Cup. And I

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 12>think you can say this follows from a situation with

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 12>the Club World Cup last year where I don't know

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 12>if you remember, but essentially two Mexican teams who qualified

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 12>had the same owner. You can't have that one of

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 12>them had to step down.

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, Okay, so it should.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 12>Have meant the MLS champions got in, but instead it

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 12>went to into Miami because that gets you messy in

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 12>because they finished top of the regular season.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>It does seem to be a little waiting towards these

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>more popular players.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 12>Is jerrymandering to get the most famous people involved. Now

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 12>you might say the tennis tournament's golf tournaments do this

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 12>kind of thing all the time with wild cards. Let's

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 12>get somebody famous, somebody popular. It drives revenue. Where's the problem. Well,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 12>the problem is it's one thing to do it if

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 12>your tournament has one hundred and twenty eight parties.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 7>Right, and there's a slot specifically for those Shenanigans.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, it's it's quite another when there was a

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 12>qualification process or if you're overriding a disciplinary process. So

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 12>with Bunigan, that the fact that he could play against Belgium.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 12>He is the first player since Gavincia in nineteen sixty

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 12>two to be sent off at the World Cup and

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 12>not be suspended for the next game. And the reason

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 12>that's so damaging it's not just that it sort of

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 12>it feels unfair. It's that it casts into doubt the

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 12>integrity of the entire petition. So if you are, for instance, Egypt,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 12>who are very uhappy with some of the refereeing in Argentina,

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 12>and I think you can understand a couple of fifty

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 12>fifty calls, key, fifty fifty calls went against them, and

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 12>then I think we'll hang on. Is that just because

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 12>we were a bit unlucky, or is that because there

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 12>is someone directed from on high that Lionel Messius's famous

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 12>because he generates revenue has to be kept in the tournament.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>This decision with the red card is quite controversial. You

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think that'll hurt him in the elections? Do you

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>think he has enough committees and other friends that he

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 2>will he will get to stay.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 12>There's already two hundred and two and eleven members have

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 12>said they're back in, so it will be by acclamation.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 12>So I mean, I think it has damaged him, And

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 12>I think there's there's two aspects of this world couple

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 12>damaged him. So so firstly that I mean, I think

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 12>they probably are good delegates who recognize this as a

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 12>problem of integrity. There may even be quite cynical delegates

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 12>who think, actually, if the integrity of the competitions undermined,

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 12>is it going to carry on general revenies?

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It does?

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Is the world right?

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 7>At some point?

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 12>If the world loses faith, then you know, sport doesn't

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 12>work without faivor but dramatic twists at the end. If

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 12>you think that might have been scripted, well, then you're

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 12>watching pay.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Absurd ticket price, not real. So we had that sport

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>here it's called wrestling. Yeah, totally different audience.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So that's one element of the other is I

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 12>think to do with Infantina has made this big point

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 12>of this is the most inclusive World Cup ever, which

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 12>I'm afraid is clearly nonsense when even one of his

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 12>own referees and our time from Somalia can't get into

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 12>the country. Plus I mean, I think it depends on

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 12>the individual country, but roughly eighty percent of applicants, applications

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 12>by fans and journalists from Africa to come to the

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 12>tournament were turned down by the US and by Canada.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 12>That is my definition not inclusive. And given in Pantino

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 12>likes to portray himself as his champion of the global South,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 12>that is a position that's much harder to maintain. So

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 12>I don't think it's going to have an immediate impact,

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 12>but it has slightly weakened him. What it might mean

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 12>is if you were planning to change Figus Constitution to

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 12>understand again in twenty twenty seven, maybe he'll be a

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 12>little more overlooked in to do lost time.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend right after.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 2>This, Welcome back to Bloomberg this weekend or b T dubs.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Christiner Finney with David Gera. Alexis is going to

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 2>run us through some of the stories you might have

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 2>mixed this week Now, Alexis, there is an ongoing debate

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>on this show.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 7>I say BT.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Dubs, I see BTW. What do you think I have

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 5>to go? BT wh Welcome back anytime, Alexi.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 7>Okay, we agree to disagree.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Why you go?

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 7>It's okay.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 13>There's a little movie out this weekend.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>In case you yes, I accidentally stumbled on the premieres.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I was going to a workout.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 5>The other day.

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>They closed down all of Broadway, all of Lincoln Square,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing was shut down for.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 13>'s Live in New York City Girl, two hundred and

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 13>fifty million dollar budget. It's an epic to watch. It

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 13>almost three hours long, so get your popcorn and get ready.

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 13>The only movie ever short shot completely on Imax, and

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 13>there's a lot, a lot of talk about it. It's

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 13>doing pretty well here on Rotten Tomatoes. Already was out

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 13>yesterday and the critics seem to like it. But people

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 13>cannot stop talking about the fact that these actors, Matt

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 13>Damon and Hathaway, Charlie's There on, you name it, are

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 13>all having American accents in British accents, which we're used

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 13>to for these big epicid Yes.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but that's not any more accurate. I do think

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 7>it's weird.

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Like British TV a lot of times they'll have them

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>playing Russians but they just have like a British accent,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 2>or they'll like me in France, but they just have

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>a British accent. And somebody pointed out to me it's

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 2>not even more accurate if they do a Russian accent.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 2>They're not speaking Russian. But for my brain, I want

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to hear the acts.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 13>If you want to be accurate, you'd speak ancient Greek. Yes,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 13>so you know what English is fine, but it's pretty funny.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 13>Tom Holland and Robert Pattinson, who are both in it,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 13>who are both British, have to put on American accent.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 13>Interesting and then calling you know, Odysseus my dad like

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 13>American colloquialism.

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 5>It is funny, father. Have you seen this yet?

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 7>I haven't. I will go see.

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you will. I've been very excited about it.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 4>You would to get a classicist on here and like

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 4>do a deep dive.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 13>You're on, I have to go to see here. Matt

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 13>Damon use his Boston ACX and he leans in on

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 13>it on the dramatic scene. So we're going to be

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 13>But Chris Nolan, who's the director, said it was a

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 13>very intentional decision to have the actors speak in English

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 13>and not have sort of a Stagy approach.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 4>And he is like the biggest proponent of these Imax movies.

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean he he loves an Imax film and I

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 4>do like his movies generally.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>And they figured out a way, as we've talked about,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to do the dialogue on Imax, which you usually don't

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 2>usually shoot the big scenes on it, and it can

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 2>only roll for I think seven.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Minutes at a time.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's what it is.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Really arduous and I appreciate trying to do a school

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>filmmaking in a world.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 13>Of digital cinematic feat And I'll report back on the

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 13>accident horror turn and move to the Wall Street Journal.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 13>Wealthy older Americans, they are ripping up the traditional script

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 13>and instead of down sizing, Oh, they are moving up

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 13>big time. They are buying bigger homes, or they are

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 13>adding additions to the homes. They are adding guesthouses for

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 13>them kids, exactly, basically, and so empty nest boomers now

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 13>own more than twenty eight percent of US homes with

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 13>three or more bedrooms, which ding, ding, ding, one of

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 13>the reasons why first time home buyers are having such

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 13>a hard time getting into the market.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, it is a good point.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I will rent until I die. I've missed my vote. Yeah,

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I just there's no well, especially in New York, but

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>even in DC. To your point, getting into the market

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>was just getting harder and hard. That's every Yeah, that's

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>so many people struggle. So just quick stats for you.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 13>They account Older Americans now account for forty two percent

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 13>of the home buyers, the largest share of any generation.

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 13>Why you ask, well, they bought their homes and their

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 13>stocks decades ago, and those assets have appreciated. Yeah, sounds

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 13>pretty nice if you can get pretty nice.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, there to dream, there to dream birding?

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Do you look at the birds go by?

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, speaking of older Americans, what happens to people when

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>they hit a certain age?

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 7>Both my parents have gotten into this.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Young people, well, guess what.

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 13>Birding is not just for your parents, It's not for

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 13>your grandparents anymore. Oh no, No, birding has gone cool,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 13>so now the cool kids are doing it, becoming more

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 13>popular among younger people in their twenties and thirties. Some

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 13>of them were saying, hey, look, we're taking our binoculars

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 13>with us on vacation because we want to go birding.

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 13>They say the shift really started during the pandemic, when

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 13>we were all stuck at home solitary activity. They were like, hey, wow,

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 13>look at the birds. You sort of the equivalent of,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, take a moment and smell the flowers. Huh,

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 13>that's what we're doing. Where our birds? And also, the

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 13>National Audubon Society had ten college chapters in twenty nineteen.

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 13>You know how many they have today? No, one hundred

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 13>and seventeen.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 7>That's hysterical, it's crazy. And Sam are you a birder

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 7>in college.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 5>You can have a family of birders.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 9>You do.

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 5>My sister's a professional ornithologist.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 6>Oh my what?

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 4>And when my mom came to town shipping binoculars, who

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 4>went to the Jamaica Bay Wildlife Reserved and looked for

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of preserve and looked for a bunch of

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 4>birds living.

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm living it. But my sister studies the great raywel

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 5>all right, well we.

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Have the show.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 7>I already like her better than.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Exception, super impressed, super impressed with that.

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 7>This is lovely and wholesome. I support this dren feel hearted.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 13>Let's do south by Southwest even has a whole like

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 13>bird watching thing. So it's been I mean, it's happening

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 13>amongst the young folks. All right, Finally a habit that's

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 13>actually good for us. A new study found that people

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 13>who drink coffee on a daily basis, both caffeated and decaffeinated,

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 13>have a lower likelihood of developing liver ailments compared to

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 13>non coffee drinkers.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm gonna live forever, but this stat kind of scared me.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 13>Scientists at Cedars Sinai Health University found drinking five or

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 13>more cups of coffee a day with a forty seven

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 13>percent lower risk of developing liver cancer.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh fine, wow, cos I drink a lot of coffee,

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 4>mostly just out of habit like we walk by the

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 4>machine and all pick them up.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 5>But I'm a real well.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 13>Because it's so at the ready here for us. Why

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 13>why is this, though you might ask acquiring want to

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 13>note due to chemical compounds and coffee that reduce inflammation, chlorogenic.

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 5>Acid, chlorogenic acid.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 13>So I say, here's the chlorogenic having a tea today.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 5>But still there's.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 13>Oh I'm the only one with the fancy mug right now.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 2>But we put our water and people are wondering about

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the proliferation of cups.

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 7>For our TV viewers, we have to have multi liquid.

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 13>You have to stay hydrated.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 4>I do feel like there's always a study that says

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 4>something's good about coffee or bad about coffee.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And just like with wine, yes, why I only believe

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the studies that say wine and coffee are good to

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 2>be clear and chocolate too, wine coffee.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 5>You're doing studies exactly.

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 7>I like, I like to not fact check that at all.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 5>No need to Alexiri Stoppers, thank you very much, my

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 5>pleasure debut here time.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Doing bt W.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 7>We got new info out of David. We didn't know

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 7>this well done profile.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Will Okay got it on the show talk about birds. Seriously.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us on today's Bloomberg This Weekend podcast.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to tune in live for the show every

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Saturday and Sunday morning, starting at seven am Eastern.

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>We're on Bloomberg Television Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 3>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>lifestyle and culture.