WEBVTT - How Forgiveness Works

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you, welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Some philosophical waxing is going to

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>happen in this one. I think it's inevitable. Chuck's right,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and Don Henley songs, Oh yeah, that's a good one too.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Heart of the Matter. M hm, you like it? Sure

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>all right? That part where it's like I'm learning to

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>live with that June Now, it stirs my soul every

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>time forgiveness you'd have to be dead inside did not

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>be stirred by that part. It's good, good song. But

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he really kind of nails it in that because he's

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about forgiveness in the Heart of the Matter. Sure um,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's he wants forgiveness, he needs forgiveness even if

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's the end of the relationship, even if she

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't love him anymore. Sure so. On the one hand,

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a certain kind of forgiveness that an individual

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>or person can that's a path someone can set down.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's been a lot of research starting starting in

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning um stages at the middle of the

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, but really picking up in the nineties. UM

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>research into forgiveness like legitimate scientific research, and it's a

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>multidisciplinary thing because there's a lot of different fields disciplines

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that have said, hey, this actually, this is something

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we can study and measure and produce articles in in

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and work on UM. And they have. They've produced some

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>really good legitimate work. But what most of them have

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>been focused on is not the Don Henley position of

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody who needs to be redeemed, who needs redemption to

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>feel better, who needs forgiveness, but rather the person doing

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the forgiving, the person who is originally trans transgressed against,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>not the offender, but the offendee. That's where most of

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the research has been done on forgiveness. Right, Don Henley,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a rock star, so he's he's writing a song

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to be forgiven for a foursome he had

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in St. Paul backstage. Sure, even if you don't love

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>me anymore, can you forgive me that? You know? Can

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you blame a guy? Is what he's saying. So yeah,

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably exactly what that song is about,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>now that you mentioned so UM, I think we should

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>start by um pointing out something about forgiveness, is that

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, Um, there's a lot of stories

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about people not forgiving. We call it revenge, and people

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>love revenge, you know, Like think about the revenge movie

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>genre and how many entries there are pretty great, Like

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen I Saw the Devil? Yeah? Have

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen Old Boy? Yeah? Have you ever seen

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Death Becomes Her? Yeah? Have you ever seen She Devil? Nope?

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh you haven't. With Rosanne Barr and um Ed Bigley

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and and was that a revenge movie? Yes? All of

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>them great revenge movies. Can I shout out one of

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorites? Yeah? Please do like legitimately, Uh, it's kind

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of a smaller indie movie called Blue Ruin. Oh yeah,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw that one great great revenge movie. If you're

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>into revenge movies, and I am, I enjoy it. There's

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a catharcist involved. Because I'm a I'm a big forgiver,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think I like seeing movies where revenge happens. Yeah,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk a lot about, you know, revenge, because

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're virtually two sides of the same coin, and they

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>really interact in some surprising ways that are sensible when

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you see it laid out, but you might not necessarily

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be walking around thinking about But on the other side,

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look up movies about forgiveness, almost all of

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>them were produced by a megachurch somewhere in the South.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Or you've got Magnolia and then the Fisher King are

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>like the two like legitimate contenders for movies about forgiveness. Well,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I think there's a fine line

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes between redemption stories and forgiveness stories. They can kind

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of go hand in hand. There are plenty of redemption stories. Okay,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what what redemption stories? Yeah, let's hear it. Oh,

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Hoosiers one of the great sports redemption movies. Okay,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty loose definition of redemption. Former

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic coach who who was not working because of some

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>bad deeds gets redeemed by looking a team to a championship.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Hopper gets redeemed as the alcoholic father. Wait a minute,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was was um Gene Hackman on the road to redemption?

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought he came in and basically got Dennis Hopper

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>redeemed himself a double redemption. He was getting redeemed as well. Alright, Okay, Okay, Okay,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>so plenty of redemption stories, and I think there's a

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of movies that wrestle with the idea of forgiveness

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and really weighty, heavy ways. Uh like these true stories

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that you hear about these awful things that happened, whether

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a family member is accidentally killed by someone or murdered

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>by someone. Like, there's a lot of that stuff in movies. Okay,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So my thesis was this, and this is strictly me

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>editorializing here, but I think there's some validity too, and

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that is that the reason why it's much easier to

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>name revenge movies is because revenge appeals to our baser instincts.

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense, it's it's universally understood. Um, And like

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, you even consider yourself a big time forgiver,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet you enjoy revenge movies. It's cathartic for you.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>There's something to be delivered by a revenge movie, a

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>movie about forgiveness. It's just more complicated, it's harder. We're

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>not as good and and and um, we're not as

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>automatically adept at forgiveness as we may be with revenge.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think there's fewer forgiveness movies. But that's

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not to say that we're not moved by it, because

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think if you hear whenever you hear real life

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>stories of forgiveness, they just bowl you over. Even when

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you step back and think about like what the person

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually doing, you're like, yes, legitimately, anybody could do

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what they just did. It's it's akin to hearing somebody's

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>solo climbing Mount Everest or something like that. It's just

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes the news literally when somebody forgives in a

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in a like a really deep way that the average

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>person might not, yeah, like a big time transgression. A

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of times you'll hear of a courtroom seen where

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>someone has forgiven the person who like murdered their their

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>relative or loved one or something, and that man, that

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff is powerful. You're right every time you see these stories. Uh,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you dug up this one story from Berkeley, the Greater

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Good magazine, Uh, science based insights for a meaningful life.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you see Berkeley of this woman who was

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a nurses aid who hit a guy. She had been drinking,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hit a guy in her car. He went through the windshield,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and was stuck there and she was so impaired,

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>she didn't realize it for a while. Uh eventually realized

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that got out of the car, could not get the

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>guy out, who was still alive, mind you, and so

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>drove home and parked your car in the garage to

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>let this guy slowly die in her garage over the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>course of a couple of days, and like she sobered up,

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>would go out and check on him once in a while,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but refused to call for help because she was too

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about getting in trouble. So instead she let him die,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of friends come help her hide the body,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>moved the body, and then actually got found out later

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on because four months later she was at a party

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and she joked about it to an acquaintance who went

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and told the cops, and this woman ended up getting

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty years in prison. That's a horrible story. Like, that's

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst things that a human being could

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>possibly do. There were so many opportunities for this woman

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to save this man's life. And by the way, everyone

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in that court case who had a medical degree

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>said that had she called the cops, the fire department

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>taken the guy to the hospital, he almost certainly would

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have survived. Those injuries, but given that she didn't for

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>days get him medical aid, he finally did succumb to them,

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but he probably would have survived, almost certainly would have survived.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Like what she did was about as horrific as as

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what what a person could do. It is so irresponsible

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>with human life. And she rightfully got a fifty year

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>prison sentence um for that crime. And yet despite how

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>horrific that was, what made news just as much as

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that is that a short time later, that man's son,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the man who was hit and killed, publicly forgave that

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>woman for for killing his father. Yes, at the sentencing

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>said quote, there's there's no winners in a case like this.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Just as we all lost Greg, you all will be

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>losing your daughter to her family. I still want to

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>extend my forgiveness to Shante Mallard was her name, and

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>let her know that the Mallard family is in my prayers.

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is the kind of stuff, like you said,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that makes the news where I think it hits everybody

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because it makes everybody stop for a second and say,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>could I do that? Yes? Could I reach that point

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of forgiveness? And that's a big, weighty question because there's

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of forgiveness. There's uh, you know, a couple

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>partners together who getting a fight and someone says they're

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry for doing a certain thing and they're forgiven or not.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>There are uh situations at work where people are forgiven.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>There are friends who maybe betray you by like cheating

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on on somebody with someone. I had a situation like

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that where I had a former friend I felt like

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>cheated with my barely ex girlfriend and I spent quite

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a few years being upset about that and then forgave him.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's a powerful thing. So there's there's like levels,

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but when you get to this kind of thing where

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>someone caused the death of a loved one and then

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>even laughed about it, like to be able to forgive

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like that is just uh, that's next level. It is.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It is so much so chuck that a group of

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>convicted murderers who were serving sentences in prison heard about this,

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and I guess got in touch with one another and

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>raised funds and and got a ten tho dollars scholarship

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>together for Brandon Biggs Um to go to college. Um,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the convicted murderer sent the kid to college. Because this

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this very generous act of public forgiveness of his own

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>father's murderer. UM. So yeah, it is. It's an astounding thing.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet everything that, like the research that really, like

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, started to take off in earnest in the nineties, UM,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>has shown us is that we're all perfectly capable of

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that. The answer is, yes, yes, you can do that,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You totally could do that, but that we don't necessarily

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fully understand how to. Uh. And yet there's a lot

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of evidence also that it's evolutionarily wired into us to

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah. And you know, we'll get into religiosity

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of it a bit more in detail later, but all

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>religions talk a lot about forgiveness. Uh. There's you know,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty famous story in the Bible where Peter said

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to Jesus, Lord, how many times shall I forgive my

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>brother or sister who sends against me? Up to seven times?

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And Jesus said, I tell you, not seven times, but

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy times seven. And Peter said, so four times, and

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Jesus said, oh, Peter, always so literal. Yeah, that one's

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. But you know, you can read Hindu, you

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can read the Buddhists talk about it, like everyone, every

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>religion talks about forgiveness is kind of a maybe a

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>cornerstone of of the religion in some cases, so much

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>so that Um, when science started looking into forgiveness and

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and and just trying to figure it out. Um, generally

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>people is just presumed forgiveness was under the realm and

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the domain of religion, that that's where that's where you

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>went for answers about forgiveness, and science said, oh ho ho,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>we can we can top that. Well, surely we can

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>beat that four ninety number. And that's what they've said

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>about doing Yeah, I mean Jesus forgave his crucifiers. It's

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>like one of the few things Jesus said on the cross.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>According to the Bible, they know not what they do,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>like forgive them for they know not what they do. Right. Uh.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, it's not just Christianity, although Christianity

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>gets all the all the accolades for forgiveness, Um, Jainism

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is a big one. There's a there's a kind of

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a mantra from Jainism that says, I grant forgiveness to

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all living beings. The all living beings grant me forgiveness.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>My friendship is with all living beings. My enmity is

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>totally non existent. And um, that's I mean when you

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>look at that, especially if you're not a janist, um,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you're you're like, wow, how would you ever? How would

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you ever reach that level? And I think that the

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>point is like you never reach that level. It's an ideal,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a goal that you try to achieve, probably on a

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>daily basis if you're a janist, but it's certainly over

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime, you know. Yeah. And I'd like to read this,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>uh again not to pile on the religious stuff, but

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Hindu and really spoke to me. Uh. This one

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>part in the middle says what can a wicked person do?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And to him or into one who carries the saber

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of forgiveness in his hand? And that one really speaks

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, and that it's the it's a powerful tool

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to forgive, and it's for you as the forgiver. I

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of times people think it's can clear

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the conscious of someone who's done something wrong. I guess

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that certainly happens, But to me, it's it's really about

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a powerful weapon. You have to regain

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>your own strength as a human. Yes, that seems to

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>be the bulk of what psychology is is coming up

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with as far as studying forgiveness goes that it's really

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the person who is who has been wronged. That's what

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness is more about. That's the psychological aspect of it.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we said, there's um, it's a multidisciplinary investigation, and

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so you've got evolutionary biologists whore like, that's really great psychology,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But we found a different reason for forgiveness and it

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite fit that mold um and then um, like

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the medical field says, no, it's even better than that.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You can actually like improve your health by genuinely forgiving somebody.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's all these different inputs that are coming together

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to create this really like complex, contextualized picture of what

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness is and what it does for us and why

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we have it. That's right. I think it's a great

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>set up. I agree, you want to take a break,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I might just not come back, and that feels so

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>good about that. No, we have to finish. We got

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to complete, all right, We'll be back in a minute

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what I think it is. Probably the

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>most interesting part of this is the evolutionary aspect. Right

0:15:50.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>after this, So this was this, Uh this is Libya correct?

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh forgiveness was the Dave Ruse joint. Okay, I thought

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>this was Olivia. So yeah, thanks to Day for this.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He did a great job with this research. But the

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary aspect of forgiveness is super interesting to me because

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of people assume that it's

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what Dave calls a higher virtue, like you know is

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>took took in the gang were so base as uh,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know kind of primitive thinkers, is that they didn't

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have the capacity forgive. They would they would smite somebody

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>if if someone punched, took, took in the face, took,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>took punch back, or someone attack took, took, took, took

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>attack back, maybe even harder. And there is a quite

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit of evidence that um, they're not mutually exclusive,

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and that that that fighting back and forgiving both have

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a big evolutionary advantage. Yeah. So the big evolutionary advantage

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of revenge is if you live in a social group

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and somebody takes advantage of you, or they hit you,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or they steal your food or whatever, if you don't

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>do something to right that wrong, you're broadcasting to the

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the group that you're open for exploitation, and

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not good for you. It's also not good for

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the chances that you're going to pass along your genes,

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and so under the under the auspices of natural selection,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense for you to hit that person that

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>steals your food or who hits you. And that's revenge,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and revenge forms that function in a social group. It

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>says to everybody, signals to the rest of the group,

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not to be messed with. This guy tried it,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and look what happened to him. Nobody else should try that.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Go pick on somebody else. And there's actually been studies

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that have showed that not just among apes and primates, um,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but among human cultures. Revenge is found pretty much universally.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And I saw a study Chuck that said that, um,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the mere presence of a person, a third party who's

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>witnessing an argument increases the chances that the argument is

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>going to come to blows because you're signaling to the

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of the group, and in this case, just that

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>third person you are not to be messed with. That

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the purpose of revenge is to is to broadcast

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that signal. Yeah, I mean, I would say that any

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of dumb, drunk bar fight. Half of it is

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that someone didn't want to back down in

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>front of other people. Sure, you know more than and

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that if those two guys were just in a alley somewhere,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>they may just hug it out. Yeah, probably not, but

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you never know that's possible, or they talk it out

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>at least or disagree that it's dumb and leave. Yes,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but you talked about studies in the animal world. Uh,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a primatologist named Franz Daval who looked at wild

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>chimps recorded three and fifty encounters aggressive encounters between these

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>chimps and then what happened afterward. And in of these encounters, Uh,

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the chimps would literally kind of kiss and make up

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and touch each other and embrace each other after a fight.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the same thing in bona bows and great apes. Um,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there's sheep, there's dolphins, there's goats. Even hyenas have shown

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>traits of forgiveness. So it's it's not ubiquitous, but it

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is all over the animal kingdom. Animals fighting and then

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>animals making up with one another, Right, So I mean

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the revenge once pretty easy to understand. But then you're like, Okay,

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>well why why would there be the making up part?

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But that also ties into the fact that these same

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>animals are also um living in social tight knit social groups,

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>and so you have a limited amount of people that

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you can possibly have a dispute or a feud with,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and if you're not working together cooperatively in that sense,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>also your your chances of survival are decreased. So what

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense is what's called the valuable relationship hYP hypothesis,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>which says, if somebody hits you, you should hit them back,

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>but then after that you should make up with them.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So you're sending that signal you're not to be messed with.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>But then you're repairing that relationship, that valuable relationship that

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>you depend on to help your survival in the in

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the um social group UM, you're appairing it and then you,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>guys can move forward. And that that is the how um.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Revenge and forgiveness are basically two sides of the same coin,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least work in conjunction with one another to

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>keep the group um functioning at its best. Uh. And

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of dovetails with a second part of that

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>UM thing, which is called negative reciprocity, which is if

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>someone hits took took and took took goes crazy and

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>just starts whaling on the other person who just slapped

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>him in the face. That's not good either, because everyone's

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna go, whoa uh, took took. I'm not sure I

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>trust him now. Um, he has definitely burned that bridge

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>forever between him and the other guy. And none of

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>this is very good. So what they found is negative reciprocity.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>If you if someone smites you, you smite them back

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the same amount and then forgive them. Like if someone

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>takes off their glove and slaps you across the face,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't you don't kick him between the legs and

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>then wail on their face. You slap them back with

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>your glove. And then you talk about forgiving one another,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and everyone sees that you can work with people. You

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>can you can stand your ground, but you can also

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>forgive and work with people, which means you're valuable to

0:21:59.920 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the group and you're valuable to have around. Yeah, and

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so kind of tie it into what you were saying

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier about you know how there's this idea that you know,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>revenge is a base instinct and forgiveness as a higher instinct,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than realizing that they're both pretty basic instincts. For

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for um, among the animal kingdom is there's this idea

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that in human society, UM, we have created like these

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>social institutions in these contexts so that the individual doesn't

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have to to carry out revenge and then forgiveness, that

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they can just focus on forgiveness as long as those

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>social institutions are doing what they're supposed to do, as

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>long as there is like a pursuit of justice, and

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you can rely on the idea that the person who

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>transgressed against you by killing your father is going to

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be caught and punished and sentenced to jail. You don't

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about revenge. It's being it's being conducted

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for you, and then you, the individual in this well

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>functioning society, can just focus on whether you want to

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>forgive or not. And that that's that kind of higher

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and lower echelon. Because in the in the opposite situation

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>where there isn't like a good sense of justice, where

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like if you want justice you have

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to go seek it out yourself, revenge is going to

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be much more UM exercise much more frequently than forgiveness

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>will Yeah, which says a lot about the United States

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these days, you know. Yeah, I mean I'm not trying

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be cynical even, I mean, that's just sort of

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>what we see around us. I think a lot of

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>people feel like the sense of justice in this country

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>is pretty skewed, and that's why you might see the

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>increases and things like vigilanism or revenge. And um, I

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know what society is you look to do a

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>study like that. I'm kind of curious on the ones

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that are very well policed and the justice is um

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of fair and equal, but um, I think that's

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems in the in the States these

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>days for sure. Yeah, without getting too far down the

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, but also even you know, it's it's kind

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of eye opening to me because I've never really thought

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about the courts and the justice system is um set

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>up to help individuals move along? Yeah, it should. You

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just think of it as punishment, as a system for punishment,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>not for redemption necessarily, but um, but it's also to

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>help the victims. I just never saw it that way before. Yeah,

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when you talk about that guy in court,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times you'll hear the courtroom forgiveness. Um,

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you will also hear the opposite, and you hear

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom like, I will never forgive you for what

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you did to me, And I think not always, but

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be a lot of time tied to

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>whether the transgressor has really acknowledged what they've done and

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sought forgiveness and said, that's the worst thing I've ever

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>done in my life, and I don't I don't think

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you should ever forgive me. Like It's an interesting sort

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of dance that happens there because it's not a one

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to one thing. It's not like every time a bad

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>criminal that does something really asked for forgiveness and says

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a terrible thing, the other person forgives. So

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the person could laugh it off like this lady

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>did and not ask for forgiveness, in any other person

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>could forgive, which I think goes back to the notion

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that forgiveness comes from the forgiver, right, that that's that

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's really about the person who's been wrong, that's

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who it's about. And so yeah, now we've reached the

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of psychology's domain over the concept of forgiveness, which

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is that it's about you, the individual who suffered a

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong um releasing the pain and the anger and the

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>resentment and all the negative feelings that you're experiencing so

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that you can feel better, and that it doesn't matter

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>whether the other person is asking for forgiveness, and that

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even matter if the other person deserves forgiveness

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>or not. That genuine forgiveness psychologically speaking, according to some

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>psychologists will hear that some to agree, but that genuine,

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>true forgiveness is unconditional, that you you forgive the person

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>whether they deserve it or not. Yeah, And this is

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>where the language to me is a little I could

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>see people debating this because it is forgiveness in a way,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but to me, it's almost more of just a letting go. Yeah,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, of an anger, So it's not

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's so tricky with the definition because when

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you think of forgiveness, you think I'm saying and it's

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>really not what it is. What you're not saying is

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, what you did, okay, So yeah, you know

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. That's not what That's not a key

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>component of forgiveness. No, No, it's not your that's and

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a very confusing thing for a lot of people too.

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that the idea that if you forgive somebody, you're

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you're you're condoning their behavior. You're saying it's okay what

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they do. That's not the point of forgiveness, um from

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from what psychologists who researched this are coming up with.

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Their saying, you know, what you're doing when you forgive

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody is to say, I know what you did, you

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>wronged me. I can live with that. It doesn't make

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it any better. Yeah, it doesn't make it any better.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't excuse what you did, and it does it

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't excuse future repeated um instances of what you

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>just did. But it's saying like, I'm willing to let

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go of the pain I have associated with this act

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you you you did against me, that you this wrong,

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to move forward with my life and

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in doing that, I'm willing to let you move forward

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well. Or I think sometimes in a case

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like this, that kind of forgiveness can make the transgressor

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>suffer worse sometimes, Yeah, just out of guilt. Yeah, and

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>they want to be admonished and hated as part of

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a punishment. But you know it's t s, you know,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>because again, forgiveness is not for you, it's for the person.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Dave even makes a great point the person being forgiven

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>uh is secondary or even unnecessary to the process. And

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the key. You don't even have to

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>tell that person necessarily. We'll we'll get to later some

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how to forgive. Some people say that

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you should tell someone out loud, like literally tell someone,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But you don't necessarily have to tell that person if

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a situation like this, or even if it's like

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a close personal friend like I think usually you do

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>when it's someone you know, because that's a part of

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>communicating with one another in a healthy way. But if

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the person who who killed your family, uh, you

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have to tell them to forgive them, and you

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can still forgive them. Yes, So some psychologists define forgiveness,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like a full forgiveness as including you actually seeking out

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>contact with that person, and that if you forgive them

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>but don't tell them, or you still avoid them afterward,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, hey, I forgive you, but good luck

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of your life, you're not in my

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>life anymore. That to to some psychologists, not all. Some

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>psychologists say that's that's not genuine forgiveness. That's akin to

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like what you were saying, which is letting go of

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>anger and moving on, but not really actually forgiving. I

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>still say it's forgiving. I'm not one of the psychologists. Sure,

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's very much debated, for sure. But then

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that also leads to another point too that if you

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>forgive somebody, it doesn't necessarily mean you forget, and and

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not part and parcel to it. Forgiving doesn't mean forgetting.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You can forget. Um, I'm actually really good at that

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Where like I I forgive because it

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just unless it was a really huge wrong, it just

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of phase from my memory fairly easily. And I

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm not, I don't dwell on it. Um. So

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>so it can they can go hand in hand. But

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've been deeply wrong by somebody where you're actually

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going through the process of forgiving, which we'll talk about,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is a it's a deliberate step that you're

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>taking towards finding peace with your self in your life again,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>then um, you know very well what that wrong was,

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're not going to forget it, but eventually the

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>aim is that you will have divorced the emotional attachment

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>from that memory too, of that wrong, to where it

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes akin to like a movie you saw once or

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>trip you took once, Like it's not it's just a

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened in your life, rather than this, this

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this crisis that is sucking up your attention and emotions. Yeah,

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like this definition from Fred Luskin, who is

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a psychologist and forgiveness expert for what It's worth, director

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Stanford University Forgiveness Projects. And Fred's definition is

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to forgive is to give up all hope for a

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>better past. And that's that really lays it out there

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in this in a very practical sense, that what what

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has happened has happened. You may not be there yet

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in your journey to forgiveness or or the letting go,

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot change what happened, no matter how angry

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you are, or how much you want someone to pay

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for it or suffer, or how much revenge you want.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So there is no better past. That's impossible. So giving

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>up hope for a better past it's sort of oblique definition,

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but one that I think is pretty instructive. Yeah, but

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's also a realistic definition too if you think about it.

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Because you can't change the past one way or another.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You can only alter how you let the past continue

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to affect you or not. And the the other thing

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I really want to say here right now, because it

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>can be confusing for me to um when I when

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think about forgiveness and anger and stuff like that

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is like, this is not No one is talking about

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a something like throwing a switch or like, rather than

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling anger, you feel forgiveness. That's actually counterproductive, as we'll see.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you you like, you can't replace anger with forgiveness.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Forgiveness is meant to um after anger because you use

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>anger or hurt or resentment or whatever. Your version of

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that is um to to um to protecting guard your

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>own boundaries. So it's unnatural for you to not have

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some sort of negative emotion or negative response to being wronged.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But um you don't want to replace that or try

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to replace it with forgiveness because you may accidentally trip

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>up the process and you you're not really legitimately feeling forgiveness.

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You're basically just setting yourself up to be wronged again. Yeah.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>My deal personally is, uh, Emily has always talks about

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>what a forgiving person I am because I really crave,

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>uh to forgive. I don't know, I was about to

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>say crave forgiveness. I crave forgiving. I guess it sounds funny,

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but I just, uh, all all I need is for

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>someone to say they're sorry for something and then it's done.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh nine times out of ten that's done for me.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And as far as forgetting, like, I'm a pretty good

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>forget or too. I don't know about like literally forgetting something.

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely look back on a lot of relationships,

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>especially with like ex girlfriends that were terrible, and go,

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what was so bad in there? In that relationship? We

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>were pretty good? Right? Sure, No, we weren't pretty good

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. I just have rose colored glasses. And I

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think you and I are both like as as podcasting

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>partners and family and team good about when we had

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>little dust ups forgiving one another, if the other person

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like says they're sorry, like you and I both get

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>over that stuff pretty quickly, yeah, which is it's very

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>key though, you know, like, oh yeah, you can't forgiveness

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is like from the heart if you really, if you're

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>hanging onto something, then you're not done with it yet. No,

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but so and that's so important, Chuck. That's important for

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the individual to remember that if you if you are

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>unable to forgive, that me that you're you're still hanging

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>onto it. That doesn't mean you'll never forgive. And that

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't mean you have to hurry up and forgive.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>It means you're still in the process of reaching the

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>point where you can forgive. It's a deliberate choice. From

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>everything I've seen in the research, you're making a deliberate

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>choice to forgive somebody. But it's not throwing a switch.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>It's part of a process. And during that process, while

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you're on the road to forgiving the person, you're still

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be kind of angry at them. Maybe not the

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>whole time, but every once in a while it might

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>hit you before you've fully forgiven them, and then you're

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be mad about it all over again. That's okay,

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's normal, that's natural. You can't really rush it. You can,

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna be detrimental. What you want to do

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of let it play out. And have

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>faith that if you're on the path of forgiveness, you'll

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately will forgive the person and things will be good again. Yeah,

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and depending on your your life and your childhood, like

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you probably have an inclination or an instinct to forgive

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or not based on what you saw, what was modeled there.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>There's both nature and nurture involved, But I think people

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>generally have an instinct of revenge or forgiveness, and to

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do one of the other that is against that instinct

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>requires great effort, especially in the case of forgiveness, because

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you may not be inclined to be a forgive at all.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean something's wrong with you. That just means

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that's probably what you saw growing up, or maybe something

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>happened to you when you were young that makes it

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>harder for you. But it's still possible to get there.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It just might be tougher. Well. What's neat is another

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.479
<v Speaker 1>thing that the field of psychology is telling us about

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness is that it can be taught. You can learn

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to forgive. Even if you were raised in an unforgiving

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>um uh environment where you never learned how to do that,

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you can learn how to do it um and Uh,

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I say, we kind of jumped to those um too,

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>how to forgive um before we go into physical health,

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like we're kind of there right now. Yeah, well,

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break. Okay, let's take our final break,

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and uh we'll talk about that when you get back,

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>as well as this one sort of interesting study I'd

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>like to hit real quick too. Okay, learn stuff with Joshua.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there's this study that Dave dug up

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was interesting. I think it's flawed. But

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in social psychology, they took forty six people. They invited

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>them into two groups. One wrote about a time when

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they had something, uh, some wrong committed against them, but

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>they forgave. The other wrote about a time when they

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>had something wrong committed against them, but they did not forgive.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And then they told those people to stay in at

0:36:59.920 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of a hill to estimate how steep it was,

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and also in a separate part of the city to

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>jump as high as they could. The unforgiving group guests

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that the incline was five degrees steeper on average than

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the forgiving, and the forgivers jumped seven centimeters higher. So

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway here is is you literally it's more difficult

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for you. You see the world as being more difficult

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>and steeper, and you can't jump as high and you

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>can't accomplish as much if you're holding onto that. All

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of red flags here to study, especially when it

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the jumping part. But uh, I thought it

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>was interesting the guessing the incline of the hill. There

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>may be something to that. Well, yeah, and I mean

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it is backed up chucked by the physical the physiological

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>UM studies of how UM, how stress and anger affect you,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and how releasing those can actually help you. UM. There's

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research that shows that you can suffer

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>from chronic stress when you're angry all the time, and

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's tied to everything from high blood pressure to

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:13.479
<v Speaker 1>UM diabetes to poor cardiovascular outcomes. UM, just a whole

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>host of chronic conditions can be traced back to chronic stress,

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and chronic stress can be traced back to chronic anger.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And what they've what they're discovering is that forgiveness can

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>actually undo that can actually reverse that. There was a

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>study that UM that that rated people based on the

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>life stresses they had had, and they apparently recruited UM

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>participants for the study who had been through a lot

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of stress, so much so that they were basically always

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>chronically stressed because they have had so many terrible events

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in their life. And there was one group that actually,

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>um did not have poor health compared to the rest

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of the group. And they found that when they gave

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>them a test of forgiveness of how how forgiving they

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were generally, they've on that this subset was actually overall

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a very forgiving group and that that somehow was battling

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>back the chronic stress or the effects of chronic stress

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on their health in life. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that makes complete sense. If you are someone who really

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>has a problem with forgiving and just holds on to

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>these deep, deep resentments against people, usually against people very

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>close to you in your family, even um that that

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just that can't be good for you physically. I've seen

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>it happen. I don't want to get too personal, but

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 1>there are people in my family who haven't spoken for

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus years over dumb stuff that it's like, you

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>see that kind of like stubbornness coupled with resentment, and

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just hand that's just no way to live, Yeah,

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>no way to live. Yeah, so there was another one

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that another study that Dave turned up that UM shows

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that even like in a very short term UH, thinking

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>about holding a grudge can actually affect you physiologically by

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>activating your sympathetic nervous system, as they put the battle

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>or scitattle impulse. And they found that this UM these

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they cut these two groups into um or. They cut

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the participants in the two groups. All of the people

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>had to think about some time when they were deeply

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wronged in the past, and then one group was taken

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>through an exercise where they learned to forgive the person.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>The other group this is so mean, was encouraged to

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hold the grudge. They were basically taught they went through

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>an exercise to hold a grudge and be angry in

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>resentment or resentful about that. And they found that the

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>people who were taught to hold the grudge had elevated

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 1>skin conductance, which meant their nervous system was aroused, higher

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>arterial blood pressure not good UM. They also had muscle

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>tension in the brow area you know when your brows

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>furrowed when you're stressed out or match, and that they

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they the symptoms even after they went through an exercise

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to basically de escalate everything. The symptoms persisted, and this

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was just an exercise where you were just thinking about

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>being wronged and then holding a grudge about just just

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like probably this is like an hour out of their lives.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's that was the effects. That was the findings

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. So it's pretty clear that that yes, anger

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can can affect you, um physically, and what they haven't

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the reams of data that we have

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>supporting it like we do that anger hurts you physically,

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's there seems to be the opposite of that

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>holds true, which is releasing that anger, which is forgiveness

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and whatever form it takes can actually improve your health

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right earlier in the episode, we were talking

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>about religion. All religions talk extensively about forgiveness and when

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>they do studies these days, usually like questionnaires and stuff. Um.

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Depending on the studies you look at, you would think

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>religiosity does play a role and that people who describe

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>themselves as religious, um supposedly in some studies are two

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half times more likely to say that others

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>should be forgiven unconditionally. But I know you found some

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>studies that found that religiosity does not play as big

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a role as a lot of people think it does,

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and that, uh, sometimes religious people may be more inclined

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to say that they are forgiving when they aren't because

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the right thing to do. Yeah. The study found

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that when when you ask basically when you survey them,

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are religious tend to come off as more forgiving.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They self report is forgiving, But then if you ask

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>them other certain questions, UM, I guess in the in

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 1>real world situations, they're no more forgiving than other people.

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But so that would be an interpretation that they they

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 1>think they're more forgiving or tell people they're more forgiving

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>than they actually are. But there's a um another way

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at it too. And they went back and

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>followed up on that study and they found that over

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a longer term, people who are religious actually do tend

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to be more forgiving in their lives. It wasn't like

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the most set in stone study, but I found it

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting that they were They had harder The religious people

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in this study, um had more difficulty in um relating

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>grudges that they're carrying around compared to the control group

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of people who weren't religious. Yeah, makes sense. There was

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>some redemption there. Yeah. Uh. As far as how to forgive,

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>like we said, hopefully we've gotten it through that, it's

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>something you can learn if you are not an inherent forgiver,

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you can learn how to through practice. Uh. There's a

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>psychologist named Worthington, Worthington, Edward Everett Everett Worthington. There should

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>be a third after that if you totally should be uh.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And Worthington has developed the reach model, which will go

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>through it's um. It's an acronym. Of course. Recall is

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the first step, and that's to really recall the event

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in detail, but in that's sort of an objective way

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily something that was done to you, but

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 1>just to look at the detail of it and try

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not to judge yourself or the other person, just simply

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bring that back to your mind. Yeah. And the point

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of that is to feel the feelings like we have.

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>We humans have such a tendency to try to get

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>away from negative feelings and run towards positive feelings. And UM,

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Worthington's position is that we have to feel

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever feelings are associated with it, and that's a huge

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it. That's we have to go through that

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>experience as part of the recall. Right, the E stands

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.439
<v Speaker 1>for empathy. UM. This is one that is I don't

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>know about controversial, but it's it's not everyone agrees at

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all and whether or not you need to actually have

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>empathy to forgive, um, but empathy can certainly help you forgive.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>If someone has broken into your home and stolen from you, Uh,

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it might help to forgive them to empathize and think

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about where they may be in their life to feel

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>like they needed to do something like that, Uh, is

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>one example. Yeah. And he points out also like you're

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not excusing their behavior, but you're just thinking about something

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>beyond just a villain or criminal or person who wronged you.

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 1>For sure. And actually we should say Everett Worthington had

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to put his money where his mouth was because his

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>mother UM was actually murdered by a burglar. I think back,

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and he put himself through this UM the reached method,

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and he said he came out on the other side

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>better off than he had been. And I think he

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was already doing this. Right. That didn't inspire his career,

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>did it? No? No, I think he was already doing it.

0:45:56.120 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Concidentally the ironies. So the A stands for altruistic gift.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And the point of this is that you realize that

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you are actually um giving a gift by forgiving somebody,

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>even I guess if you don't tell them, even if

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily empathize with them. But the way you

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do this, the way you UM you you recognize that

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>your forgiveness is an altruistic gift is to think about

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>times where you've wronged somebody and that they've been forgiven

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or forgiving, and and even if you didn't necessarily deserve it,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and what a gift that that was, you're kind of

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing it to mind, which I think is really suspiciously

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of tied in with empathizing if you ask me, yeah,

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was trying to make the word reach sure,

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 1>uh commit to This is what I mentioned earlier about

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>telling someone else doesn't necessarily have to be the person

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you're forgiving, although that could help, uh if you want

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to go that route. But telling someone else, at least

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in Worthington's mind, makes it, gives it a degree of

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>permanence and basically makes it part of your story, like

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you're changing the story essentially exactly and then hold and

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this is very important too that we said earlier you

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you can forgive, and it doesn't necessarily mean you're going

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to forget. So when you do remember that kind of thing,

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you're still going through the process and you're still angered

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>by you're still hurt by it, but you're on the

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>path of forgiveness. You have to hold on to the

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that you're you're working on forgiving them.

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>That it's not an instantaneous thing. So you have to

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>hold the fact that you're forgiving them even in the

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>face of, you know, being triggered by or flooded by

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this again when you think about the memory of it. Right.

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Luskin has a nine step process, which we weren't we're

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna really get into, but step eight is interesting. Uh,

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>just like R. E. M. Says living well is the

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>best revenge, is the sort of the nuts and bolts

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of number eight, and uh, there's something to be said

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for that, but I think it also makes it much

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>harder to forgive and move on if you're not able

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to live well. And that doesn't mean you know, money

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and riches and stuff that that means just living a

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 1>full life. But if you're not able to forgive and

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get past that. I mean, there are plenty of movies

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of people that have been have some awful thing from

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>their past that they're just wallowing in all these years later,

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's the central plot of the film. You know,

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:22.959
<v Speaker 1>she devil Hoosiers. That's right, but that's I mean, that's

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the that's the point of forgiveness is too, is to

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>free yourself, to find peace within yourself. And yes, it's

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>great for the person who wronged you if you overtly

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>forgive them and let them know, but you don't have to.

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And then also, Chuck, there's a whole school thought in

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>psychology that says, not only do you not have to

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>tell the person that you're forgiving them, you don't have

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to forgive them at all, and that there's this this

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>whole almost kind of um, not culti, but really kind

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of dogmatic idea that if you don't follow these steps

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and you don't, like, genuinely fully forgive somebody, you really

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't worked out of the process. There's something wrong with you.

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're an unforgiving person and that makes you tacky.

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what psychologists call it um. And there's a whole

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:15.919
<v Speaker 1>group of psychologists say no, no, no, there's a there's

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>way more to this process than just you know, nine

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>steps or the reach method like there, there's it's more

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>nuanced than that, and that you can be a fully functioning,

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>emotionally developed person who says, you know what, I don't

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>forgive you. I may never forgive you, but I'm still

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>going on with my life. And if the point of

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness is to achieve peace in yourself, If you can

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>achieve peace in yourself and you do it without forgiving

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody because you don't want to forgive them or you

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like you should forgive them, then that's okay too.

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>As long as you're you're getting inner peace, that's the point. Yeah,

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And there there's a school of thought saying that in

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>cases where like it's harm has been committed to you,

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that could happen again. Uh, you may be more likely

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to have that harm committed to you again if you

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>do forgive too much. Yeah, there is research about spousal

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>abuse that when you are too or when you're quick

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to forgive the abuser, then you are victimized more regularly

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 1>than spouses who aren't. Is forgiving and uh, that's that's

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>based on operant learning. Basically, you're less likely to engage

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>in a behavior that has a negative consequence. So they've

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>done plenty of research on that, and a lot of

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>psychologists uh say, like, yeah, forgiveness is great, but while

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be bitter, there are a lot of times

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>when you should not forgive somebody, and that's okay, Yeah,

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole um. There's an article from on Psychology

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Today called Must We Forgive? And it is really interesting,

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. It's this psychologist writes about probably half a

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>dozen or more people and they're different individual circumstances and

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they chose not to forgive, and um, she

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of pigeonholes them into like three general categories, but

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>because psychologists love doing that. But it's a really compelling

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>article and it's definitely worth reading, and it provides this

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of alternative idea that like, no, there's definitely situations

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 1>where some people don't deserve your forgiveness. One of the

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:23.800
<v Speaker 1>chief among them is if you say, like a sibling

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or a family member of some sort um you have

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of falling out with or they've wronged

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you and you choose not to forgive them. You might

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>feel tremendous pressure from the rest of your family to

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead and forgive them. That's a terrible reason

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to forgive somebody. And if you do forgive them under

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:45.240
<v Speaker 1>those circumstances, or say because your religion decrees it, um,

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like, that's not full forgiveness, and it may actually

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>harm you because you may suffer um from from a

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>distorted self image or or lowered self respect because you

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:59.919
<v Speaker 1>basically went back to this person who not only wrong

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 1>do in the past, is unrepentant about it, but as

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he was going to continue the behavior again in the future.

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's definitely instances that where like you probably shouldn't forgive,

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that you should be stuck in

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>resentment and anger and letting that person have power over

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>your life. You might just need to move on without

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>them and without forgiving them, and you can make that

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>work as well. Yeah, I mean, there was that one

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>terrible story that you said about the woman who as

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a child had this terribly bullying and abusive older brother.

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And we won't even talk about the awful things this

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>guy did, but the parents were really put always pushing like, Oh,

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't. He doesn't know how to say he

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>loves you, he doesn't know how to talk to you.

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So he does these things and you really need to

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>forgive him. And that's just that's bonkers. You know that

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that is a situation where you're doing such great harm

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>as a parent to teach your daughter to accept this

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:59.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of behavior and not only accept it but forgive it.

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like just setting her up for unless she really

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>therapies through that stuff later in life of just a

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>series of terrible relationships. So exactly, yes, yes he can't. Uh,

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Forgiveness isn't always the thing. Um My. I have a

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>friend who had a terrible thing happened to him when

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he was younger, and he we talked a lot about

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:24.479
<v Speaker 1>this and he has forgiven that person in his heart

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, well I haven't. And I was

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like I'm still angry about it, and he was like thanks,

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that helps, Like I'm angry and have not forgiven

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on his behalf. And I thought he was going to

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>say like, no, man, you need to do the same.

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.399
<v Speaker 1>And he was like he was like, thank you, man,

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Yeah, And I think that's another another

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thing worth pointing out too, is we have this concept

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of people who forgive others being saintly and and it's

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily that kind of a thing. It's not necessarily

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a process. Sometimes it is just it

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:03.399
<v Speaker 1>up self preservation. Like you are, that's the way that

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get to put a point where you

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>can feel peace again in your life. And that doesn't

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>mean you're a saying or you're even feeling saintly. You're

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you're conducting yourself in a saintly manner, and that doesn't

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>matter as long as you're feeling inner peace in your

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 1>life is no longer in turmoil, and this person who

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>wronged you doesn't have power over you any longer. That's

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the point of forgiveness. Yeah, and that that was totally

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal in his cases. That was his only way

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to to healing himself. But since this wasn't something

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that happened to me, I was able to not forgive

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>right and and remain upset about it. And uh he

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>he was okay with that. Yeah. And still to this day,

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you won't buy that guy beers man. So um, there's

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one other thing that has started to kind of come

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the shadows. That's just getting picked up by

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>psychology as far as forgiveness goes, and it's self forgiveness

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really have room to talk about that here,

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's worth exploring sometime, maybe into short stuff. Yeah,

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. Just uh a of times when

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm beating up on myself, Emily says, you need to

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be nicer to my friend. Oh, I know you've you've

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>told that before. I was just think, one of the

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>sweetest things I've ever heard. What a kind thing to say.

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It works, you know, who needs to hear that? Don Henley,

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else on forgiveness and nothing else? It's

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>this is a good way to eat philosophical discussion. I

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like these, agreed. Thanks a lot to Dave Ruce for

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:28.399
<v Speaker 1>helping us out with this one. Uh. And if you

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about forgiveness, you should seriously go

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:34.720
<v Speaker 1>out and do some reading, especially if you have something

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to forgive. It's not something you necessarily can understand, just instinctively.

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It helps to see what the experts say. So maybe

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>go explore that and free yourself. Says I said, free yourself.

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:47.879
<v Speaker 1>That of course means it's time for a listener. Now

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this dental art. Hey, guys, been a

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>listener for a while. We've nearly finished with the sandwiching method.

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Before I knew it was even cool. Uh, we were

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>talking a few shows. You were talking a few shows

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>back before the Holidays about um putting a kidney stone

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in Chuck's replacement tooth. This would be unusual, but people

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>actually get custom inlays and artwork made for their crowns

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in laser, generally gold or gemstone with a custom artwork,

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's referred to as a tooth tattoo, which is

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:20.959
<v Speaker 1>hand painted onto the crown before it gets a final

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>quote of glaze. The most common request here in the

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Land area are sports logos, like a little Chicago

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Cubs logo, but I've seen names, company logos, even a

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny version of Starry Night on a tooth. While a

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of modern Crown and Bridge manufacturing has gone digital,

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>highly leveraging cam a CAD in three D printing for

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>most restorations, tooth tattoos are unique manifestation of the relatively

0:56:47.200 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>unknown artistry of a subset of dental technicians. While I

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 1>recognize the dentistry as a whole is widely disliked and

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a pain to endure. I appreciate you guys probably unknowingly

0:56:56.400 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>helped to destigmatized restorative dental work by openly talking about

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>your dealings with it. Toothwaar and decay is part of

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. No need for shame. After all, we'll

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>keep me and my CADRA employed and happily listening to

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Many regards. That is from Eric

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Crowley or Crowley, probably Crowley. I'm going with Crowley in

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>park Ridge, Illinois. Very nice. Thanks a lot, Eric, that's awesome.

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine seeing starry night on a tooth? I

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta look that up. Be wonderful. I'd have this scream, well,

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one, and then you could scream whenever

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you reveal it to Yeah, just freak people up. Um

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of sports teams, Chuck, I feel like we

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>should congratulate our Georgia Bulldogs for winning the national championship. Yes,

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I never thought I would see the day. Uh what

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a great, great game. Uh just unbelievable feeling too. Championships

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in three months for this long suffering Atlanta slash Georgia

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ban I know it's amazing. I don't even know how

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to reconcile these feelings that I'm having lately, and they'll

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be robbed from you next year. Don't worry. We're back

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to normal. But that is pretty great to go out

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on a highlight. Probably that was great. Go dogs, Go dogs, indeed.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to get in touch with Chuck

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I and Jerry or Frank the Chair or Harry

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Dog even we can probably pass along emails you send.

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You can wrap your emails up, spend them on the bottom,

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and send them off to Stuff podcast at i heart

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>radio dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio,

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.