WEBVTT - Tech Stocks Bounce Back and Apple's iPhone 16

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard.

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Louvelove.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 4>I met Ludlower Caroline Hide in New York. Welcome to

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a special edition of Bloomberg Technology Live from Kubertina, California.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 4>It's glow time and the emphasis Apple's most important event

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 4>of the year, the tech giant. I'm veiling some major

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 4>changes to its product line up, a big focus on

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence and new generation of iPhones and changes to

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 4>wearables coming out throughout the hour. We're joined by key

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 4>guests Carolina Milanacy of Creative Strategies, plus a conversation with

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Ray Wang of Constellation Research. It's Caro, what are you

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 4>looking at?

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Here's what else is coming up. Ed tech stocks are

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 5>bouncing back following their biggest weekly decline in nearly two

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 5>years last Oracle reporting earnings after the closing belt. Will

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 5>ai compute demand support the stocks out performance this year,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 5>and we discuss AI's potential in biology with the found

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 5>out of Chai Discovery, which just received backing from Open

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 5>ai butt. First, we check in on that so called

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 5>bounce back in the markets because it's dwindling ed. We

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 5>are still up some four tenths of a percent, but

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 5>we're not up to the extent that we were in

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 5>earlier trading. We saw some dip buying most broadly. And look,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 5>this was a painful week that we come off. You

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 5>remember that it was the worst week, worst day that

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 5>we saw for certain numbers, like in video having its

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 5>worst day since twenty twenty. Today we see just a

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 5>little bit of dip by and it's only up a

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 5>percentage point. Remember how much money, more than four hundred

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars lost on this one name alone over the

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>course of what has been some five training days. But

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 5>today it is all about Apple, and I want to

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 5>look at how actually this is the worst performer on

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 5>the nasac inte a points drag on the overall benchmark.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 5>We're off by one and a half percent. Looks so

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 5>much to think about. You've got Webbush, You've got JP

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Morgan still reiterating that overweight, wanting to see dates, times,

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 5>price points, but also what about Huawei's event that comes

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 5>in a few hours time as well. Ed looks as

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 5>though they're managing to get some pre orders locked in

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 5>for their trifold phone. That's what's being reported. But get

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 5>to it. What are we expecting from Apple?

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Apple session lows and it's actually closed down at

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 4>twelve of the last seventeen product events. Here's what you

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>need to know. Let's get to Bloomberg's Mark German, who's

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>reported in detail what we expect, and Mark, I think

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 4>we should start with the next generation iPhone because that's

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>usually the point of emphasis. What have you learned our

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>new iPhones?

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>The big models this year will be the Pro versions.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of new stuff this year.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>So what we're focusing on as a design that essentially

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>looks the same as last year's model. You're getting some

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>camera upgrades. So on the Pro models right now you

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>have a forty eight megapixel standard camera like the y

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>angle camera.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>The other two or twelve megapixels.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Now they're moving a second camera, the ultra wide angle

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>to a forty eight megapixel.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>You're also going to get this new button, a camera

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>button that's going to come across all four models, the

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Pro versions and non pro versions. It's going to be

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>a button on the right side and it's touch sensitive.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>You can swipe on it to zoom in.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>And out.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>You can touch it hard to take a picture, or

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 3>you can lightly touch it to focus in on a subject.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of like a button that you've been seeing

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 3>on standard bslrs for many years now.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The other changes on.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 3>The Pro models are slightly bigger displays and slimmer bezels

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>A eighteen processors across the four.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Models to help with Apple Intelligence. But overall, this is

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a very minor update year over year.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>The bigger changes are going to be coming to the

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>company's other products, including the Apple Watch and the AirPods.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk about the wearable side of the business. Apple

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence is really a focus as well, right, and the

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 4>chronology of events is important because the new handsets will shit.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>What at the end of this month, This month you

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>get iOS eighteen point one. What have you reported about

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 4>the sort of staggered a rollout of Apple Intelligence.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Apple Intelligence is not fully baked. I would

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.279
<v Speaker 3>say it's half baked.

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>At this point, right.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>So the initial version of Apple Intelligence will come with

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 3>things like the ability to summarize incoming notifications, the ability

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to record phone calls and get transcriptions, the ability to

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>use AI to remove people or objects from certain photos.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But over time, there's going to.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Be more functionality coming, right, So the phones will initially

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 3>ship without any Apple Intelligence. You'll get a seftwarepdate in

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>October with those first few features I mentioned. You'll get

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 3>another update in December with chat GPT integration, things like

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>gen Moji's the ability to use AI to create Emoji's

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 3>image playground for generative AI for image creation. And then

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 3>next year, not until about March April, is when you're

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 3>going to get the bigger enhancements to the theory that

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple talked about in June at their developer conference. Right,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So this is a very staggered rollout. Now, let's be

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 3>clear this is not by intention. This is because this

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 3>was something that was mostly rushed together to get out

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 3>for this year in response to the big AI praise

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 3>you've seen from Globle, Meta and others.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 5>This is a global product, mark how much will this

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 5>steady nerves of a sales decline in places such as China.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is a global product, but they're banking heavily

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Intelligence to sell its global products. But Apple

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence is not going to be available in the nearly

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>thirty countries that make up the European Union and It's

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>also not going to be available in China, which is

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>obviously one of their biggest markets and a big sales driver.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I've seen some analysts reports over the last twenty four

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>hours indicating that you're going to see an iPhone supercycle,

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly due to strong sales in China due to Apple Intelligence. Well,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Apple Intelligence has not coming to China at least for

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the foreseeable future, and there's going to be no iPhone supercycle, right.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 3>The things that sell iPhones in big quantities or bigger

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>quantities than usual are major design changes.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not seeing major design changes this year.

0:05:58.800 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>You're also not seeing as much tent of demand as

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>you may have seen one or two years ago. You're

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 3>seeing people hold onto their cash longer. So if you're

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 3>anticipating an iPhone supercycle, I think you should rethink your

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 3>expectations at least for this year. Where I think you

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>will probably see an iPhone supercycle is maybe next year

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>with the iPhone seventeen, which is going to have bigger

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 3>design changes, and it's going to launch by the time

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>that Apple Intelligence is fully rolled out and maybe even

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:24.799
<v Speaker 3>available on you in China.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mark Gunman with the reporting of what we expect.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much. Let's get the analysis with Carolina

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 4>Milianac creative strategies, principle and list, and let's just pick

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 4>up where Mark left off. Do we expect a supercycle

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 4>driven by the sixteen generation and Apple Intelligence?

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 7>We do not, Okay, and exactly love Mark said. There

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 7>are a couple of reasons. One is that normally you

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 7>see a supercycle where there are great design changes that

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 7>how do we're still drive sales of smartphones? The first

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 7>thing that you see soft story, something that you discover afterwards,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 7>but what gets you into the store is the redesign.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 7>And the second part is the fact that right now

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Apple Intelligence is only available in English, and so that

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 7>limits the amount of people that can take advantage of it.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 4>I find that a really interesting point because, for example,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 4>I look at IDC data, an IDC Data forecast that

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>for four year twenty four iPhones basically flat, but next

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 4>year looks a lot better. Is that just because the

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>expectation is the consumer waits and sees how the rollout

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>of Apple Intelligence goes before getting themselves a new iPhone.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a bit of a delayed gratification as

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 7>far as the psychle right the idea of that. In

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 7>my opinion, there's going to be a long tail of

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 7>sales that Apple Intelligence actually enables, but because of a

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 7>rollout from a country perspective, the culture or part of

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 7>Apple Intelligence. It's not just about being half baked or rushed.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 7>Is the fact that it takes a lot to actually

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 7>make Apple Intelligence relevant at a country, language, and cultural level.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 7>Is not just a software feature. It takes up so

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 7>much more that is really linked to the individual user,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 7>and so it's going to take longer.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 5>What about the good old other devices, what about the

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 5>air pods? We are expecting a lot from the watches

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 5>in terms of new innovation. There will that be enough

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 5>to kick off a new buying cycle.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 7>I do think that other devices, there are rumors around

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 7>the watch and also the AirPods will definitely contribute to

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 7>Apple really pushing higher sale and revenue. Apple watches become

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 7>so important to so many people, and not just the

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 7>basic model that we respect redesigned with Apple Watch ten,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 7>but also with the Ultra that obviously has a much

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 7>higher price point. I do think that that is going

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 7>to get some excitement and maybe steal the show from

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 7>a hardware design perspective today.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 4>I still want to understand the simple story. How does

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 4>the consumer and every day technology user actually use Apple Intelligence?

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Do you know have the answer to that?

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 7>For me, generally, AI is about taking more out of

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 7>your device, whether it is you know, your iPhone or

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 7>your Mac or something else. So from a user perspective,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 7>it's making your workload easier. Everything that you're doing should

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 7>be streamlined because of intelligence. And then the other part

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 7>with Apple is the fact that Apple knows me very

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 7>well as a user. You know, they have a lot

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 7>of information about me. So everything that Apple Intelligence is

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 7>going to be able to give me is very contenstualized

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 7>and personal. And I think that's how you get that

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 7>emotional connection from the user to Apple Intelligence versus you know,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 7>we hear a lot from other vendors how you can

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 7>plan your next vacation or you plan the next party.

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 7>And I was jokingly saying I need to upgrade my

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 7>life in order to take advantage of Apple Intelligence or

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 7>any else, right, But no, it is really that is

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 7>making using a phone that has become much more complex easier.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 5>To that point, Krolina, Apple uses are loyal. It is

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 5>what makes the company the most valuable in the world

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 5>from a public perspective. But there is Samsung that already

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 5>has AI integrated. There is Huawei that's likely to follow

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 5>in a few hours time with its trifold innovations and

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 5>already pre selling. Are we ever going to be tempted

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 5>elsewhere by AI innovations from other places other sources?

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 7>I think the more you're going to get value from

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 7>your data and your day to day experience, the harder

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 7>is going to be for you to move. And we know,

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 7>of course that Apple Intelligence is one part of the

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 7>AI that gets delivered through Apple products. GBT is going

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 7>to be another one, and going forward, I'm expecting to

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 7>see Gemini as well on Apple products. So the user

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 7>options to use avers, but then when it comes to

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 7>the most personal experiences, the trust on the brand is

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 7>what is going to keep them with.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Our bare Krolyne a Milanacy, Prince blandalists that create a strategy,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 4>someone that looks at the market, but you're so hands

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 4>on with all of the available technology as well. Thank you.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>Tech talks. Can They rebound from their worst weekly performance

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 5>in nearly two years, and the recent declines have been

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 5>led by the likes of Nvidia, shedding more than four

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion dollars in market cap last week alone. Alex

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Simonova is here to really talk through the pain trade

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 5>of last week and spin it forward. We are raising

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 5>our gains on the day. Why did we see such

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 5>losses last week and Friday?

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, last week's so off really highlighted the perils

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 8>of the high tech concentration that so many people have

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 8>been worried about for much of this year. When you

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 8>have one group comprising s big share of the broader market,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 8>the so called Magnificent seven stocks making up more than

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 8>a third of the S and P five hundred index.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 8>When the momentum is going in the right direction, you know,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 8>it lifts all boats.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Things are good.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 8>But when you have any kind of growth fears emerge,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 8>any kind of disappointing earnings, you know the growth hears

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 8>that we saw from last week's payrolls data, the momentum

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 8>goes pretty rapidly to the downside. You have the systemic

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 8>funds that have been piling into tech, They begin to

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 8>sell and that accentuates the moves to the downside. And

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 8>then you have a lot of investors this year, we're

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 8>chasing the rally, which means that they bought tech stocks

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 8>at very expensive prices, and so when it's time to

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 8>de risk, those losses become pretty extreme. Of course, we

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 8>saw the S and P five hundred post a weekly

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 8>decline of four percent, its worst week since the SEVB

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 8>collapse in March twenty twenty three, and then tech stocks

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 8>their worst week.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 5>In two years. Bespoke saying as well, Ultimately stocks are

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 5>off to their worst September in sixty years. We'll SEEPI

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 5>will inflation data set us in a better fundamental picture

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 5>or not? Do you think?

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 8>You know, it seems to be the case. As you mentioned,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 8>seasonality is playing a big factor here, going back to

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 8>nineteen fifty, September is the worst month of the year

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 8>for stocks, and we're seeing that really play out. But

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 8>the fundamental picture hasn't changed much. Yes, that Job's data

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 8>was disappointing, but we aren't seeing pronounced layoffs at this point.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 8>If you look at the earnings picture, things are still

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 8>looking good. Companies are delivering on earnings. We're supposed to

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 8>see them expand beyond the magnificent seven stocks. We're expecting

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 8>a rate cut, so things should still farewell.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 5>For the rest of the year. Just need Apple to

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 5>deliver today as well. The worst points drag on the

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 5>NASDAC Alex sim and Eva, we love having her. Thank

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 5>you more markets now, Semasha Prinstical Asset Management joins us.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 5>We're hearing about the momentum trade that pulls back last week.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 5>What about this week? Sema, Hey, thanks for having me on.

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a tough environment, to be honest, it

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 9>seems that tech has become a bit of a barometer

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 9>for investor sentiment. As we know, there's a lot of

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 9>question marks a moment around the state of the economy

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 9>where the FED is going to be quick enough to

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 9>move so until maybe you get either sufficient evaluation correction

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 9>improvement fundamentals or you get some really interesting news from

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 9>one of these companies. I think tech is unfortunately going

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 9>to have as somewhat challenging couple of months.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.479
<v Speaker 4>Seema, good morning is ed here at Apple Park in Cupertino.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 4>I think trying to tie today's event to that economic

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 4>picture you outlined the question around. For example, a super

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 4>psychle also is dependent on the economic health of the

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>consumer of the buyer. And one place that I'm looking

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 4>at the moment is the spending power, health of the

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 4>middle and higher income earners. What does that data set

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>tell you at the moment?

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and I think that's so true. I mean, when

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 9>we look at the consumer data as you took, as

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>you're looking at a broad perspective, it looks fairly weak. There's

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 9>a slowing process taking place. But then again, if you

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 9>look towards the actual income levels, you can see that

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 9>most of the strains are really limited to the lower

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 9>income side. The medium to high income simply fairly strong.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 9>That they have not been as impacted by high interest rates.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 9>So you continue to see that purchasing power. But the

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 9>problem is is that a lot of the gains, the

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 9>real wealth gains have been driven by the equity market

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 9>strengthen the acuity market. So if you get any further

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 9>concerns about that, you could see that feeding through to

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 9>middle income hire income households really on to requestion the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 9>kind of purchases that they want to make. Apple, of course,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 9>folds right in those crosshairs.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Sima. We talk a lot to not only institutional investors

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 5>on the show, but retail investors who have been so excited, enamored,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 5>hyped around certain names like in nvidio, double leveraging double

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 5>two x some of these ETF exposures. Are they right

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 5>to at the moment? Should we be still focused so

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 5>much on mag seven?

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 9>But I think you're right that the retail investor base

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 9>has been driven a lot.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 5>By FOMO for what of a better word.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 9>I think FOMA has been a real driver for the

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 9>continued interest in those MAGA seven on the big brand names. Unfortunately,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 9>at the moment that investor's sentiment has deteriorated so that

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 9>Pomo no longer exists at this point in time.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think the.

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Retail investor is taking a look back, say, look, if

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 9>we're worried about the economy, there has to be some

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 9>kind of impact on these big brands, and we need

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 9>to see a point where it starts to look more interesting.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 9>From an institutional base, I think the general thesis around

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 9>tech and THEAI and the impact of Magnificent seven still exists.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 9>We're still looking at the companies and saying they will

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 9>deliver over a five seven year perspective, So it still

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 9>makes sense to have exposure. But your marginal buyer is

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 9>probably questioning at the moment these valuations and whether this

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 9>is the right time to have exposure.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly what we hear. People are trading these names

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, and that's what we see the individual

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 5>volatility on how do you keep the diversification mindset in

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.359
<v Speaker 5>this market? How are you seeing an opportunity?

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 9>So episode, when we look at the large tech space,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 9>we have maintained our exposure, we have pulled back a

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit, We're still quite overweight, and the reason is

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 9>that we're still looking at it as a little bit

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 9>of a defensive play. So these companies they have the quality,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 9>they've got the large balance sheets, the cash flow, which

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 9>means that they shouldn't continue to do well even if

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 9>there isn't a macdanton and we will be looking for

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 9>opportunities to increase exposure. But at this point in time,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 9>a lot of it is around diversifications, so not just

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 9>having exposure to tech, but other parts of the market

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 9>which are a little bit more defensive, so your typical

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 9>defensive place such as utilities, some of those consumer staples

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 9>as well.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 4>I've asked you on Bloomberg Technology before how you use

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 4>generative AI in your professional and daily life, and I

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>think the next extension of that you're seeing any evidence whatsoever,

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 4>that all the investment and capital expenditure into capacity to

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 4>build generative AI tool is translating into productivity gains in

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 4>any of the economies with which you're concerned more response.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 9>So you are hearing news, corporate news really specifically of

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 9>companies saying that they have seen a productivity gain or

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 9>that they're envisaging that if they were to invest further

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 9>into AI, there will be some significant productivity gains. Even

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 9>if you look at the UK government, it's something that

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 9>they talk about repeatedly that if they were to invest

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 9>in those areas that they could see further government savings

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 9>over the coming years.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 5>In terms of if it's.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 9>Coming to fruition, I'm not necessarily seeing so much of

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 9>that news, but there is still that expectation that ALI

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 9>will deliver and it still sits at the frontier of

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 9>all productivity gains and even growth gains over thecoming future.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Seema, we were discussing but a week or so ago,

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 5>if in Video or the FED were more important, what

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 5>is it for you now?

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 9>So I think that you know they still they both

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 9>have a very significant impact on the market, if anything,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 9>on a day by day basis of to actually argue

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 9>that in Vidia does. But as I said, I think

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 9>these companies are almost a barometer of investor sentiment, and

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 9>at the moment, investor sentiment is being driven by what

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 9>the market thinks the FED is going to do. So

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 9>if we were to see the FED coming in with

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 9>a sizeable interest rate cut next week and also downplaying

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 9>the concerns of recession, then I think investor sentiment would

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 9>improve and you could see an and them plicit bounced

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 9>back in a lot of these Max seven. So much

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 9>of it is tied together at this point.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Seema very quickly. What's the biggest headwind that we're not

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 4>talking about the technology investors might face.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 9>I do think that the China story, we all know

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 9>that it's there. I don't think Whate's ignoring it. But

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 9>I think we have got growing concerns about the strength

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 9>of the consumer in China, where the economy is going,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 9>and of course, given the tech cycle, how much that

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 9>feeds into tech demand I think is probably one of

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 9>the areas that we're going to be watching most closely

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 9>over the coming months.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Smasha, Principal Asset Management are joined to have you thank

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 5>you coming up, We're talking tech. The headlines you need

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 5>to know plus much more from Coopertino, counting you down

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 5>to Apple's big launch event one pm Eastern, telling M

0:19:42.960 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 5>local this a blueberg technology time now talking tech first

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 5>up in video backed Skana AI sees potential for more

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 5>strategic partnerships in Japan. This is as rising US China

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 5>tensions spur the country to boost its own AI ecosystem.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Sacana CEO David has spoke with Bloomberg saying his recent

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 5>funding round of over one hundred million dollars was more

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 5>than enough ammunition to develop its tech plus. Japanese chip

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 5>startup Rapidness is seeking to raise nearly seven hundred million

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 5>dollars from a new and existing investors. Now, the company

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 5>plans to issue new shares to finance its chip development

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 5>efforts and the construction of its foundry in Hokkaido. Rapidus

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 5>aims to challenge industry leader t SMC and initially planned

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>to seek a loan before opting for investments. Meanwhile, Google

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 5>heads back to court. The search engine giant is set

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 5>to face allegations from the US Justice Department. Then it

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 5>manipulates that six are seventy seven billion dollar display advertising

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 5>market violating and trust laws. This comes just one month

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 5>after it lost the landmark ruling that illegally dominated online search.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up, we're going to be tall king not

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 5>only about Apple, but Huawei too, and also Apple within China.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Ray Wang from Constellation Research to discuss the big event

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 5>in Kupatino and then the big Huaweih showdown from New York.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 5>From Kubatino, this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to a special edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm Ed Ludlow.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 4>Caroline hides out in New York. But right now we're

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 4>live from Apple Park in Cupertino, California, and it's glow time.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 4>The emphasis on a new generation of iPhone, a refreshed

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 4>wearables offering, and the future of AI. Our live coverage

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 4>continues in just a few moments time a conversation with

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Ray Wang of Consolation Research. But Caro, we got to

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 4>check in on these markets.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 5>We do because last week was brutal and we know

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 5>that we gave up what was more than four one

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion and one name alone over the course of

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 5>five trading days. We had the worst week for the

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 5>NASACK six two thousand, well twenty twenty two. Now NASDAK

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 5>now up six tens percent, not managing to hold on

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 5>to previous gains. The stock six hundred is up three

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 5>quarters percent, So actually we are seeing a risk on

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 5>sentiment worldwide, although we are fading some of those gains.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin up one and a half percent. Fifty five thousand

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 5>eight straight days of net outflows from those Bitcoin ETFs.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Are we going to start to see people treading back

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 5>into putting money in these ets exposed to spot Bitcoin

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 5>move on? Have a look at some of the individual names. Actually,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 5>on Friday, amid the turbulence, we saw Roadblocks give some

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 5>big announcements, the CEO saying their new goal is for

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 5>ten percent of the global video game content revenue. They

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 5>were hire earlier on training We're now falling some eight

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 5>tens percent for that particular name. Armou holds on to

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 5>its gains, up almost four percent. Why well, it's all

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 5>around those reports that its own technology, its own chip designs.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Will We're powering Apple's iPhone sixteen. The Apple will will

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 5>reveal the A eighteen ship we understand on Monday with

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 5>the company embracing Arm's newest V nine chip design. We'll

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 5>see whether that comes to fruition. Meanwhile, Apple off by

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 5>three quarters of percent, and that is the biggest points

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 5>drag across the indexes today. And we want to talk

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 5>more about Apple. Turned to today's big take. It focuses

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 5>on Apple's transition from tech rebel to tech overlord. Liume

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Meg's Max Chafkin Crow wrote this piece which is getting

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 5>a lot of traction on the terminal and online. Max,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 5>this is a company that back in the day was

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 5>the rebel and now it's the most valuable company in

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 5>the world.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and I mean just in that stark way. Of course,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>it's been a reversal, but in the same way that

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, back forty years ago, Apple was arguing that

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>there were these larger competitors IBM, you know, sort of

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 2>most prominently, that we're dominating unfairly. You have, you know,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of a swirl of critics, including regulators around the world,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the DOJ, as well as you know, some of Apple's

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>biggest partners starting to sort of loudly say that, you know,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 2>something needs to be done. And when you even when

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you look at the kind of like the body language,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 2>the language around these launches, you really see just how

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, there is a gravity around Cooper, Tino not

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 2>just today, not just on an announcement day, but in

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the tech industry in general and really in the global

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 2>economy more broadly.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 5>What about Apple's defense? They just say that better Apple's defense.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>And you know this starts to parallel other sort of

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>conversations around other large technology companies. Is essentially that customers

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>love us. That like you're the Department of Justice, which

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 2>dropped a big lawsuit back in March, you know, alleging

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>customer harm. Apple says, this thing that you're attacking, which

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that our stuff works better together than

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>it does with anything else, is exactly the thing that

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>customers care about.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 7>It.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 2>It's the thing that has differentiated us, and it's the

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that will you know, make our products continue to

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>sell well. So that's where the debate really.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Is, Max, what a p to drop on iPhone day

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 4>of all days? I mean, the work counts what four

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 4>thousand words? But I got through it. And what you

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 4>do is you document the history of this company and

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 4>then pose the question, for all the regulatory pressure, the strategy,

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 4>the competition, will it matter. And I think in the

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 4>short term the answer is no.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the answer for sure and the short

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 2>term is no, you know, the Department of Justice is saying, hey,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>it's really bad that you dominate all these markets that

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 2>you have, all the profits that like there are no

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 2>competitors here, and you know, those are exactly the sorts

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 2>of things that Wall Street investors tend to like. You know,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 2>It's why Apple is the most valuable company in the world.

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think when you start to ask, Okay, what is

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the long term what's going to be the long term

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 2>consequence here, that's where the hard questions start.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Do have a sense and this is this is a

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>conversation that's been going on probably for a decade, but

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>has gotten louder that Apple, you know, for all it's

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 2>reputation for innovation and so on, has has maybe you know,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe lost a step, as critics would say. And then

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you do have these sort of very slow moving regulatory actions.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 2>But we're regulatory actions that of course can have consequences.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're seeing this Department of Justice, second Department

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 2>of Justice case against Google, Department of Justice seeking to

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>break up Apple. You know that those are the kinds

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of things that Apple is going to have to contend

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 2>with and perhaps contemplate in the years.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 4>To come Bloomberg's Max Chafkin with that big take, just

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 4>incredible and detailed writing on an important day. But there's

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 4>one area where perhaps Apple isn't as dominant, an area

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 4>where it's still proving the work that it's done, and

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 4>that is in the domain of artificial intelligence or Apple intelligence.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Let's get some analysis with Constellation Research. Is Ray Wang,

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 4>who's in his hometown right next to me. I mean,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 4>we can get to the discussion about a super cycle

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 4>about year on year generations of iPhone, But for me,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 4>the simple question is does the consumer or iOS user

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 4>understand how they're going to use it hospicial intelligence through

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 4>Apple Intelligence in their daily lives, you.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 10>Know, And I think what's been happening all the time

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 10>is the fact that you know they have it in

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 10>the background. It's ambient the ability to write better, the

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 10>ability to take an image and have it actually transform

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 10>into a picture, the ability to actually suggest make suggestions

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 10>for you grammatically. That's all been happening in the background.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 10>And Apple's view on AI is very different than everyone else's.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 10>It's mass personalization at scale, it's privacy, and more important,

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 10>it's the ability to actually do that in the background.

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 10>As an ambient experience. That's what makes it so special,

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 10>and people trust them much more than other AIS.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I find the chronology and timeline of what's to happen interesting.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 4>I have an iPhone fifteen pro. When we were here

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 4>one year ago, I went out and upgrade. Did will

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>I upgrade in the sixteen? I don't know? But Apple

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence will be available to me. Nonetheless, how do you

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 4>interpret that?

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think it's really important. A mass majority of

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 10>subscribers are basically on a subscription model, and so they're

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 10>just going to renew on that cycle. So every three years,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 10>every four years, that's going to be the area that

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 10>you see that. So the move to FI G that

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 10>was actually one of the moves. The move to AI

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 10>is going to be the next set of moves, and

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 10>that's causing the refresh cycle. There's one point three four

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 10>billion iPhones out there, and of course it's going to

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 10>be a two hundred and forty million recycle refresh cycle,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 10>the two hundred fifty million refresh cycle that's going to

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 10>happen every three to four years, and especially if you've

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 10>got to carry a contract where you're paying monthly fee

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 10>and subscription.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Revenue ray that cycle, you talk of those numbers that

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 5>need updating and upgrading. They're not just in America, they're

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 5>in China and they're in the EU. We've just heard

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 5>about the limitations of Apple Intelligence there and also the

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 5>market that's being hoovered up by Huawei. What do you

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 5>make of that competition.

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so Huawei's competition is going to be limited. They

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 10>won't be able to actually sell in the US. So

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 10>even if they have three million orders as they mentioned

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 10>already in v mall, that's going to change the market

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 10>just in the outside markets outside of the US. But

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 10>you also see Apple pushing hard into India and that

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 10>growing market. I mean, it's a status symbol, it's a

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 10>luxury device, it's not just a functional utility. So that's

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 10>a very very different market, and they're pricing it different.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 10>They're coming at it from different price points and market points.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 4>There is something fascinating happening in China, which is very simple.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Apple Intelligence will not be available there, but they're cited nonetheless,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 4>So even if they can't access it now, they might

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 4>upgrade because of the promise that it will come eventually.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 4>What does your research tell you about that phenomenon?

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 10>I guess no, we see that happening everywhere. People are

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 10>looking forward to some of those features. I think at

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 10>the end of the day, Apple's going to have to

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 10>comply to country regulations. They're going to have to do

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 10>it for the EU, They're going to have to do

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 10>it for China. EI regulations are going to be very regional.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 10>You might see that emerge as well in the Middle East.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 10>I'm headed out to the Middle East for the Global

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 10>AI Summit and we're going to be talking about and

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 10>hearing some of those things as well.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Where are you worried? It doesn't sound like you are.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 5>It sounds like even with market no longer being the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 5>top five player in China for Apple, and indeed some

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 5>of these limitations in the EU, it sort of doesn't matter.

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 5>You think there will be a super cycle no matter

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 5>of what.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 10>I definitely believe in that super cycle because all the

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 10>forces of subscription, all the forces in terms of you know,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 10>status symbol, and of course the features that are going

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 10>they might be they might be spec bumps, but the

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 10>bottom line is consumers are going to stick with what

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 10>they have given their ecosystem, given the access to Apple

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 10>services and more importantly the fact that you know that

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 10>is their only access point right now in terms of

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 10>privacy and AI.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Very real quick wearables refresh how important?

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 10>Oh I think the world are important because that's the

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 10>entry point for a lot of folks. So watch refresh.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 10>It's going to be important and maybe we'll see something

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 10>for AirPods, ray.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Rang Constellation research always on it, always star at Caroline,

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 4>what you.

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 5>Got and bullish ed bullish coming up AI startup Chi

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Discovery receiving backing from investors including open Ai. We're discussed

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 5>with the found in next. This is brttly big technology.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Eil Musk is reportedly working on a deal that would

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.719
<v Speaker 5>leverage his XAI startups data in exchange for some of

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Tesla's revenue. Nam most Kurt Wagner joins us some more

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 5>and what is a Wall Street journal piece again about

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 5>the intertwine of his companies. Can you tell us what

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 5>is being reported on? What would get in exchange? What

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 5>would XAI give to Tesla?

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 11>So in this you know proposed deal, Xai would help

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 11>Tesla with some of their full self driving technology, other

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 11>AI projects including you know, the humanoid robot project that

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 11>Tesla is working on, and exchange for a share of

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 11>revenue that's driven by these projects, right, and Caroline, as

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 11>you mentioned, we were just talking about this last week, Right,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 11>this idea of all of the different companies in Elon's

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 11>universe working together and the pros and cons of those.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 11>I think in this case, you know, if you're an

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 11>ex Ai investor, this sounds like a great deal.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 11>Suddenly you have a huge you know, potential revenue stream,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 11>a huge potential client in Tesla. I imagine Tesla investors

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 11>may feel slightly different, But I think this is yet

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 11>another example of the Elon world starting to collide with

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 11>all of his various businesses.

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 5>That has been pushed back from certain Tesla investors about

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 5>the sharing of chips, for example, and video chips. Now

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Elon's own response to this very story has been pushed back,

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 5>and indeed he was saying previously, well, the chips sort

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 5>of laying around in a warehouse unless I put them

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 5>to work for Xai. Will we hear more investor pushback?

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 11>I think you might, because there is this feeling that

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 11>Elon right now is using Tesla sort of the crown

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 11>jewel of this empire. He has to elevate or boost

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 11>his other businesses, right, Xai being one of them. Now again,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 11>I think those two companies probably share a lot of investors,

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 11>So maybe there are some folks who are invested in

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 11>Xai who would say, hey, this is a.

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Great opportunity for us.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 11>But if you are just invested in Tesla's you'd be

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 11>asking yourself, well, why are we giving business to Elon's

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 11>other company that I have nothing to do with? Right,

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 11>So I do imagine there will be some invests here

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 11>are who are at least scratching their heads saying, is

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 11>this really the best option or the best opportunity for us,

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 11>or is this just the best opportunity for Elon and

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 11>his other businesses.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 4>When he responded to that Wall Street Journal report, he

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 4>said he hadn't read it, but that it wasn't accurate,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 4>But he did concede that at a basic level, XAI

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 4>engineers speak to Tesla engineers. And I remember the week

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 4>that Elon Musk walked into what was Twitter headquarters. Now

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 4>x you and I reported. The first thing we reported

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 4>is that Elon brought in Tesla engineers to basically cod

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 4>assess the staff. And this is kind of normal right

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 4>in Elon inc That there's a sort of more casual

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 4>relationship between the companies and its stuff.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 11>One hundred percent normal. This is exactly what Elon you know,

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 11>has done, has shown to do. He shares employees, he

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 11>shares resources among companies. You know, if you work for

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 11>Elon at one company, you kind of work for the

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 11>Elon universe of companies.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have seen this happen.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 11>You know, as you mentioned, Edgie's pushing back on the story,

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 11>but oftentimes you push us back on things that end up.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Being true or at least mostly true.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 11>So it's hard to take that, you know, to me

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 11>and this is not going to happen. And as you

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 11>point out, I do think that there's a relationship here.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 11>It's just, you know, a matter depends what it's going

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 11>to ultimately look like.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 5>Kurt Wagner, we thank you so much. Let's stick with

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 5>artificial intelligence now, but from a biology perspective. A startup

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Chai Discovery, which founded just six months ago and already

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 5>it has raised thirteen million dollars from AI heavyweights Thrive Capital,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 5>Open ai Amy to bring artificial intelligence to drug discovery.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Josh Meyer is the founder of Chi Discovery, joining us now.

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Congratulations on the round. I am so interested in chai

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 5>on and this open source model compared to others. When

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 5>we're thinking of Alpha fold, when you're thinking of evolutionary

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 5>scales model, you say it's better. How on what measurements?

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, thanks so much for having me here.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 6>We're really excited to be putting out this model for

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 6>the community. You're asking a great question, and you know

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 6>one of the properties about this field right now. It's

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 6>actually almost challenging to evaluate these models. Now I cam

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 6>here to one another. A lot of these models are

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 6>available only under non commercial settings, which means it's hard

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 6>for a company like us to actually benchmark against them.

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 6>But we find on one of the benchmarks, for example,

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 6>a benchmark called Postbusters, we find our models about seventy

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 6>seven percent versus the seventy six percent from Alpha fold three.

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 6>The models are really neck and neck, and we're really

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 6>excited to put out a model and make it available

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 6>for everyone, including for companies that want to engage in

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 6>drug discovery.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Josh, Alpha fold has the juggernauts of Google Alphabet behind it.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 5>Behind you sit some empty chairs, and we understand, just

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 5>a team of ten, what will about thirty million go towards?

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Is it about the talent? Is it about the compute,

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 5>where do you want to build?

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, we're going into really exciting times. Drug discovery is

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 6>an extremely hard process. The fact that drug discovery works

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 6>at all with the tools that are available today is

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 6>nothing short of miraculous. So we're really excited to kind

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 6>of participate in this market and build tools that we

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 6>hope will make a difference in the process.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the results speak for themselves.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 6>This is why we were excited, even just a couple

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 6>of months of work to put that out for the community,

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 6>for folks to evaluate themselves and to hopefully find find

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 6>it useful. But there's so much work ahead of us,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 6>and I'm really just grateful for the incredible team we

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 6>have behind us, my co founders, for example, Matt mcparltlan

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 6>and Jack denn and Jacques but Trum among others. It's

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 6>just such a great team to be working with, and

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 6>I think we're just inspired by the possibilities that are

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 6>ahead of us.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 4>There's been a lot of hope and enthusiasm for the

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 4>impact that AI will have on drug discovery for a while.

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 4>But you are showing improvement to success rates. When does

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 4>that sort of manifest itself in the real world. Pushes

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 4>forward the field that one day a consumer or a

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 4>patient gets access to this work.

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 6>We're in the really early innings of AI and drug discovery.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing those first signs of life in CHAI one.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 6>For example, we've shown that you can integrate starting constraints

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 6>into the model, the kinds of things that you might

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 6>derive from white lab experiments, and use those in order

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 6>to get significantly better improvements on understanding how molecules interact

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.959
<v Speaker 6>with one another. Those molecules are the basis of life

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 6>as we know it, so we think with these kinds

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 6>of new capabilities, we can use them to better understand

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 6>how molecules interact and then use that understanding to reprogram

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 6>them and then hopefully come up with better medicines and

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 6>just increase make humanity better for all of us.

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 5>Keep coming back when those discoveries are occurring via your model,

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 5>we appreciate it. Try Discovery founder Josh Meyer, Oracle just

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 5>erasing its earlier gains on the day that's ahead of

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 5>the company reporting earnings today, with investors hopeful that there

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 5>is a continued momentum in this name the cloud business

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 5>fueled by AI demand. Bloomberg's Brodie Ford covers Oracle and

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 5>it's training high. We're now off. There is a lot

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 5>of hope that we can vindicate the thirty percent run

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 5>up this year in this stock totally.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 12>This is one of those funny cases where you have

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 12>a mature company that's known for something, but now a

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 12>business line that's what ten percent of total revenue is

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 12>all folks care about oci Oracle cloud infrastructure. A lot

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 12>of folks didn't take it seriously three years ago, but

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 12>now it's had a lot of wins with companies doing

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 12>generative AI. Elon's Xai is famously a customer, and so

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing a lot of immense month Oracle's cloud infrastructure

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 12>and as you see, yeah, one of the best performing

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 12>software companies of the year. Investors are hopefully it'll continue.

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 5>Some analysts are a little bit nervous. One putting it

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 5>that they wanted to know if Oracle is an AI

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 5>faker that coming from Jordan klin Over at Mazuho, why

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 5>would it be deemed a faker.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 12>It reminds me of the debate around the AI server companies.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 12>The question is is this just something that's needed now

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 12>because the traditional giants like Azure aws don't have the

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 12>capacity or is there really something different about Oracle's cloud

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 12>that all means it will continue lasting. I mean, there's

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 12>spending eight billion dollars a year on Capex building out

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 12>new data centers, so I'm sure they seem pretty confident

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:07.959
<v Speaker 12>that this will continue and demand.

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 5>They being Larry Ellison and team. Absolutely, he's a busy guy.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 5>It seems late like what he's also technically the controller

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 5>of Paramount. That must have given you a chuckle.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I'm expecting some call the question on the earnings

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 12>call tonight about that, because I think Paramount and the

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 12>Ellison team has made some comments about like, oh, we'll

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 12>use Oracle technology to help us make movies. No one's

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 12>clear if that means they don't have filmmaking technology. But

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 12>I imagine we'll see some interesting press releases about how,

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 12>you know, Paramounts using Oracle cloud infrastructure or AI script writing.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 12>There's gonna be some interesting coll mingling here. I imagine.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Let us know what goes on on that call. He always does,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Bradie Ford, we appreciate it. Meanwhile, Ed, we are counting

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 5>down just over one hour from glow time. What's some

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 5>on my view?

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, look, I think We know what the basics are, right,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 4>iPhone sixteen generation four variants Base and then the two

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 4>PC Pro and Pro Max. But it's still the same question,

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 4>which is about Apple Intelligence. How do I use it

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 4>in the course of my daily life? How do I

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 4>use it at work? And, as Mark German has reported

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 4>in detail, this kind of staggered roll out where the

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 4>new generation hands set will ship next month, but iOS

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 4>eighteen point one will be in at the end of

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 4>this month. iOS eighteen point one will be next month.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 4>How does that go down with consumers? And it's not

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 4>available in China in the EU? Refresh Apple Watch Refresh

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 4>on the wearable side of things as well, but it's

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 4>often in the story, right Carol on stage, help me

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 4>understand how I'll be doing this in my daily life.

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 5>We've only got a minute. But the stock is lower

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 5>it usually is on these days though, right we watch?

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>True?

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I just love history and Apple stocks

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 4>closed down and twelve of the last seventeen iPhone events

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 4>sell the news kind of event. But there is a

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 4>feeling this time might be different because if there's not

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 4>a substantive hardware update fifteen to sixteen generation, it is

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the software side that might drive us forward if we

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 4>are to have a so called super cycle.

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 5>It is still a three point three trillion dollar company,

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 5>World's most valuable. We thank you Ed Ludlow for everything

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 5>you're doing right now, everything you're going to do for

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the day as glow time kicks off.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 5>That does it for this addition of Blue mag Technology.

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Do not forget to check out our podcast as well.

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 5>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 5>on Apple, on Spotify, and iHeart so much more to

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 5>come from Ed in Kupertino. This is bloomg Technology.