WEBVTT - Fantasy Football Weekly week 5

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on k f a

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>N presented by Devani's, your weekly source for the nation's

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>best fantasy speculation and advice. Fantasy Football Weekly is also

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Green Belt Premium, No Name Butcher

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Quality meets Honda, town Hall Family, Luther Hunt and by

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the part taverns Now Now along with fan Ball and

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>League Saves, Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Here's Paul Charchy

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in good morning. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charching my coast. Matt Harrison, Bryan Johnson,

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello guys, good morning, Yeah, na oh man? Do you start?

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Why did Coakes start that? Did How many cokes have

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sold because of jinks By? Got by me a coke?

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't I don't know this as a marketing campaign,

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they really should like they put the

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>names on the side of the Coke bottles. Just put Jakes,

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>um I it's it's been, by the way, brilliant marketing plan.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Then Snickers, Snickers ran with that deal. I mean it

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was whoever thought of it? You know, go by an island.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Coke should just pay you enough to go buy your island.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Go retire for the rest of your life. We have

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of We've got four teams on buy, so

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got a little extra breathing room into the show,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>which I think is great. We'll get to all of

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the matchups fantasy style, take a chance on me, the

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>five Tough Questions, premature speculation, and which should be a

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>little longer lightning round at the end of the show

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, plenty to get to. We begin diving right

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>into our matchups with the Jaguars at the Pittsburgh Steelers.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt for the Jaguars. Last time we saw them, it

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was UM a less than ideal scenario with UM with

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a loss to the Jets. What do you think this

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>week is they travel to Pittsburgh. Well, if you, sir

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles, and you're not playing in London, you suck.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>That's just it. In his last eight games played in

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States, he's averaging two five yards and is

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>only thrown for six touchdown passes. If he's not in London,

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not worth playing. And he's on the bench this week.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Lee is also hurt, and and that means Alan

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Hearns is on the bench as well. Lee hasn't practiced

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this week with a rib injury. He's more doubtful than

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>questionable to play, and the Steelers have allowed the second

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>fewest receptions and yards to wide receivers this season. That

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>leaves Hearns on the bench as well. I'm not chasing

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Marcedes Lewis three touchdown game from a couple of

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. So the only guy on the Jaguars that

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to talk about is Leonard four nett. I

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>gave him a B grade this week. Over the last

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, the Ravens and Bears running backs average six

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>point oh yards per carry against the Steelers. Four Nets

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>had at least six team carries in every game this

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>season and a scored in every game. He's an every

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>week starter now. But I think we'll talk more about

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>him later in the show. Uh another running back to

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about, Levan Bell. We really don't need to talk

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about him. He's an easy in this game. Ben Roethlisberger.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a B grade. And I know Jacksonville's

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>defenses look legit, especially against the past, but let's remember

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it is legit against the past. They've faced Tom Savage,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh McCown, Ryan Mallett and Joe Flacco in ten of

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen quarters they've played so far. Okay, not exactly

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a murderers row of quarterbacks there, But if you rewind

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the clock all the way to week five of last year,

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so one calendar year from this week, week five, the

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars on average allowing zero point eight touchdown passes per game.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's if a full sixteen sixteen quarterbacks

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in there. Okay, alright, so I mean I don't think

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all fluke. Okay, would you like to wait? But um,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I still got Roethlisberger as a B. He's got great

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>home road splits in there at home this week, Antonio Brown.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually giving an a to Brown's chirping a little

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit, and he's frustrated on the sidelines, and I

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>don't care that the Jaguars are currently the top defense

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers. DeAndre Hopkins was the only really good

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver they faced this year. Even with Tom Savage

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>soft tossing him the ball for the first two quarters,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 1>he still managed fifty five yards in a touchdown. Antonio

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown's a head and shoulders get above and squeaky wheel

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>gets the grease if you're good enough player. Yeah Squeaky

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Wheels get the grease and and Antonio Brown frustrated, mouth

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and off. He needs more action than he got last

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>week and he's gonna get it. So at the same time,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster and Martevis Bryant I got them on

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench. A. J. Bouyer and Jalen Ramsey are very

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>very good. They're two shut down corners and if you're

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>not Antonio Brown, you're just not going to beat them. Um.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a bonus take a chance on me player

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is Jesse James, who I'm giving a C grade to.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>The Jags have allowed the ninth most yards and the

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tenth most receptions to tight ends this season. That's kind

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of their weakness in the passing game. Uh, he's gonna

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be a touchdown scorer to be relevant, so

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to be pretty desperate to play him. But

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of a take a chance on me C

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>grade tight end. Green Bay takes on Dallas Brian and

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Time Montgomery doubtful. Uh of doubtful players do not play

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in the game, so we'll assume he's not going to

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>go in this one. What do you think of the

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay backup running backs here, well, it's Aaron Jones

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jamal Williams. Jamal Williams who was the guy who

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>came in first when Montgomery went down last week and

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was ahead of him on the head of Jones on

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart all preseason. When Montgomery was hurt got

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>injured on like his first carry, right, But he's been

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>practicing all week and full, so he will play. But

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones looks like the starter for now, so he's

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy to own. Uh. Dallas is rank against the

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>run according to Football Outsiders d v O a UH.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Beluga and I dated back to your are both

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>questionable for Green Bay. That don't you say? Brian Beluga?

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I like that, what is it whatever? But Beluga is

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>way better. I'm sure. I'm sure he never heard never

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has a big guy growing up and everything. I'm sure

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he never heard nobody ever saying Offe's baby at him.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm I don't know, but I think you gotta have

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a four year old to know that. I'm guessing. And

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>probably Blaga and are both questionable. That'll hurt the running

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>game if they don't play. I think they're they're both

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>slated to play, which would be the first time they've

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>played together since like Week one or something. All right, well,

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that will certainly help Aaron Jones and Jamal Williams. Jones

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is the better play this week, but don't give up

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on Jamal Williams just yet. He was a hit on

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart all along, so he definitely could. He'll

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>be probably the likely goal line back in this game,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jones getting more work between the twenties, but both

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>get to see start against the Cowboys. Over the passing game,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers is an easy a. By the way, this

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is a rematch of the divisional playoff game last year. Well,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>these teams have played each other three times in the

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>last two years, so we got a lot of track

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>record between Packers and Cowboys. Ye, going for it. Tony

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Baby has an injured knee. I think yeah, that was

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a good one. That was good. Poet, don't even know it?

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>All right? Where was I I am very very long?

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you were. Yeah. Let's focus on the most

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>recent matchup. Rogers had three five yards and two touchdowns

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 1>against Dallas and the playoffs. The Cowboys have allowed multiple

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns and three straight three straight games. Their whole

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>defense is questionable. Right now, you're starting Aaron Rodgers. Duh,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're also starting Jordy Nelson. He gets an A. He

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>missed the playoff game last year. But Dallas has allowed

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>five wide receiver touchdowns already, so you probably should start

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver leader in touchdowns in this game. Nelson.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb and give him a B borderline A start.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Slot receivers have fared well against Dallas. Cooper Cup had

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>five catches for sixty yards and a touchdown, Larry Fitzgerald

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>went nuclear with thirteen for one, nine in a touchdown,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and Sterling Shepard caught seven passes against Dallas. So Cobbs

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and easy A or I'm sorry B almost an A.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams not so easy here hasn't been ruled out yet,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been ruled in yet. Yeah, we should know today,

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>should not today. It has to happen before he gets

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on the plane. And that which is if if it's

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a typical team flight that the teams usually fly around

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>lunchtime on Saturday. So yeah, we're gonna I think we'll

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>know about Adams if he plays. Where are you great amount?

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a B if he plays kind of plane

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if he plays, if he sits Toronomo, Allison borderline B

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, probably a C plus. Allison hasn't gotten a

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of run in his career, but he has ten

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>plus PPR points in the four of the five games

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he's seen at least four targets, So he gets four targets.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a PPR helper. So if you're an Adams owner,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a certainly trying squat on Allison. If you can. Martella

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bennett, I'm going to give him a C. Revenge game.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a revenge game. It is uh. Jared Cook

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and Richard Rogers combined for seven catches, a hundred thirty

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>seven yards and two touchdowns in that playoff game. Dallas

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been tested by tight ends at all this year,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>but Bennett has underwhelmed. But he's sixth among tight ends

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and catches, so he's startable in this one. And Lemit

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention this about Bennett. Aaron Rodgers this week came

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>out and said they got to get it more involved early.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the most targeted packer. He's been too involved. He's

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>been terrible. And I was the guy who went to

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>war for Bennett throughout the preseason. I'd like I think

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he can be a top five tight end. I think

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he finishes my number four tight end. In the preseason,

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's been a wreck. They've thrown plenty of passes to him.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got to catch a ball. If you follow Martellis

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Bennett on Twitter, you'll know he's a guy who would

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>totally be into the revenge angle too. Yeah, well, that's

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>probably totally his style. I don't know. I'm worried about

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that bomb. He loves to hear about how you how

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he affects your fantasy football team exact. I'm sure he

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>would love that everybody tweet him. Baltimore takes on the

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go to the Cowboys still. Oh sorry, jeez,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Love of God, So Chop chop man, you're the one

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who's in again. We started singing, baby Blua. That coldn't

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>help me at all. Ezekiel Elliott is an a. We

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't need to go further into that one does. Briant

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>also in a des leads all wide receivers and targets

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>from inside the ten yard line. He had nine for

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you and two in the playoffs last year. Julio Jones

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and aj Green are both top the hundred yards against

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>green Bay, so Deads could do the same benching the

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>other wide receivers. I'm gonna bench Jason Witten. He could

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>be a desperation see play. He's cooled off significantly. Um

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>green Bay has just allowed twelve catches in a hundred

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and six yards at tight ends all season, so he's

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm put them on the bench. And Dak Prescott gets

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be multiple touchdowns and three straight games had three

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus yards and three touchdowns in the playoff game,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of crazy. Green Bay hasn't seen more than

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty pass attempts from an imposing quarterback this year. Well

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in one of four games. I'm sorry, one of four games,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but Dac might not breach that watermark. This feels one

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the gaze game. But I'm still giving him a B.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I love z I love Zeke, my number two running

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>back this week. You've loved Zeke from the loved him

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. Now Baltimore taking on the Oakland Raiders.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>There's only one Ravens player with a starting grade, and

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's Alex Collins averaging eight yards per carry. Probably gets

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a chance here to be the true workhorse back. But

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore, the workhorse back it's maybe a dozen carries

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and not the hand in the ball more care. One

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of the problems he fumbles too much so and that

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he's least like one fumble away from hitting the hitting

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Oakland is a mediocre run defense, are giving

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>up four point two yards per carry. No opposing runners

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>rushed for a touchdown against Oakland, but Collins has done

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>enough to earn the opportunity to get a bunch of carries.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>He won't stay at eight yards per carry, but he's

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>worthy of a start. Here. Let's talk about the other

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Terence West goes on the bench four carries

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>last week, which he turned into negative seven yards. So

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Terence West, I think the only question is you know

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna play him. The only question is are

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you gonna drop him out right? Which I would understand

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you did. Buck Allen is your past catching specialist,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Thompson did kill the Raiders one fifty receiving yards.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But every other team is averaging just thirty two receiving yards,

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's almost exactly what Buck Allen is giving you

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on averages thirty two receiving yards, and that's not good enough.

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>There's also no possible way that Church will give Buck

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen a starting grade for the rest of his career.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not. Uh, we have a bad we have a

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bad history. Uh. Joe Flacco on the bench. In the

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty games since the start of last year, he's managed

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>more than one touchdown pass six times. That's it. He's

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>averaging one hundred fifty passing yards per game this year.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Oakland's the middle of the pack, right in

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the pack for past defense. But Flacco

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is only startable against the dregs of the league, and

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that is not Oakland right now. Jeremy Macklin isn't getting

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>enough targets. Mike Wallace also not getting enough targets. Finally

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>put up a good game last week, but his previous

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>three games were awful, single digit yardage games. So they're

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all out. Let's go to the Oakland side. Quarterback is

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be David carl though they haven't

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ruled him out of this game, but the original diagnosis

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>on his fractured back was a month so I even

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>though we practiced all week, I can't imagine him playing

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Will assume it's EJ Manuel for the

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>purpose of our rankings here. His last one is a

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>starter for EJ Manual three years ago. He hasn't thrown

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in two years. Um, this isn't a great

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>rape in secondary. But they just handled Trevor Simeon on

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the road last week, so there's that, and and maybe

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some opportunity here, But for EJ Manuel it's it's

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>desperate desperation plays Only Michael Crabtree returns and Marie Cooper

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is back as well. Crabtree missed a game of the

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>chest injury coverages for Baltimore is competent, not spectacular. They've

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>got Brandon Carr and Jimmy Smith. Those guys will take

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Crabtree and Cooper respectively. Baltimore has allowed the fifth fewest

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>yards to wide receivers. They just held in Antonio Brown

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to thirty or four yards and one tantrum. I've got

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>C grades on Michael Crabtree and Marie Cooper. It would

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be B grades if if David Carr Derek Carr actually

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>played in this one, but I don't think you will.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook startable four dump offs from e J Manuel

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>He's gotten six, six and eight targets the past three games.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're in a pinch at tight end, maybe you

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>deactivated Gronk and now you're trying to find somebody to

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>go with. Jared Cook would be your starter here. Baltimore

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>only one game removed from letting Marcedes Lewis get the

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns against them, so maybe there's an opportunity for

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook here. And lastly, Marshall Lynch. After facing the

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks the number one team against the run

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and the number four team against the run, he now

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>gets number twenty seven and number thirty two the next

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. This is number twenty seven and Baltimo has

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been especially filmthropic at the goal line, giving up three

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns in the last two weeks, and rushing touchdowns

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>should go to Marshawn Lynch. E j Manuel obviously doesn't

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>help matters any but Lynch is still run hard. They

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just haven't given him the ball enough and the Raiders

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have inexplicably been way behind in a couple of games,

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's been frustrating as well. I feel like they

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>were trying to save him for the playoffs. Yeah, already

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs are now now now they need to start working.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some truth to that. Um, this should

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be a tighter game. You know, Ravens don't blow anybody out,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's I think for those that are

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>giving up on Marshawn Lynch, don't do it yet. I've

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>got a B grade on him for this game. Do

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you think David Carr should have gotten the start over

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jay Manuel. I would rather have David Carr. I

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's his work on the NFL network has been

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very good. Uh, he is a he's let's just say

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's got a face for TV for David Carr. M

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, take a chance on me. Nine

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting lineup will tell you

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>who they are when we come back. Change your mine

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the first th line, honey, steal free, take a chance

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on me if you need me, let me know, let

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>me all round. If you got no Welcome back to

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly and especially disturbing version of take a

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>chance on me in the background. Those are some screeching vocals.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Those really are. It's the antithesis of the original. I

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>believe take a chance to me. Nine players not normally

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in your starting lineup will begin at the quarterback position. Matt,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got Jacoby Brissette. In the last two weeks, Jared

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>goff torch the Niners for two yards and three touchdowns,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palmer through for three fifty seven yards and a touchdown.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The Niners defense has faced a league high twenty one

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts by quarterbacks this season, and Brissette is averaging

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just under five yards per carry. And the last time

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Brissette was at home facing a winless team, that was

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago against the Browns, where he had two

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty nine yards and a touchdown through the air

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and added two rushing scores. And I believe that was

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>year take a chance on me that week. I think

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Brian. It was last week. I

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>only called four touchdowns for Deshaun Watson. Yeah, you got

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. I'm sorry, you should have said five. I apologize.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm on a bit of a hot streaker quarterback here. Uh,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it could come to an end the Josh McCown at

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. Now, technically McCown can seek revenge on about

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That's seven seven teams for the record. But

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he spent a lot of time in Cleveland. He did,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so this is the ripest untapped revenge on Josh mccount's docket.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, and Cleveland just sucks. They've allowed nine passing

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four games, eleven total touchdowns to quarterbacks. McCown

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>has a rushing touchdown already this year, so he is

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>all but guaranteed to get you two fifty total yards

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and at least two touchdowns on Sunday. All right, where's

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>your where's your five touchdown predictions? Now not from McGown.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You stop Bryan Hoyer's upside against a bad defense. Two

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, he exploded against the Rams. Here comes an

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>even worse past defense Indianapolis, a team that's allowed the

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>third most passing yards. The Colts allow passing averages of

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>almost three hundred yards one and a half touchdowns. This

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>has the makings of a get right game for Brian Hoyer,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least to perform better game for Brian Hoyer.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>He is might take a chance in the quarterback. Let's

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position. Matt I got J

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>D mckissic am I pronouncing that I said, I'm glad

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I am c J. Procis is trending towards out this week,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and the team already lost Chris Carson for the season. Yeah.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This leaves Thomas Rawls, who's done almost nothing in two years,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>who is also injured, and Eddie Lacey, who is well

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Lacey, that's the only other running back. Both Rawles

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and Lacey have been healthy scratches this year at various times. Yeah,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so I entered mckissic, who ran for a touchdown and

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>caught a touchdown past last week on only five touches.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He easily slides into the third down back role. And

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>if Lacey and Rawls looked like Lacey and Rawls, he

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>could end up with even more touches. And the Rams

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have given up seven touchdowns the running backs this season.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>That's two more than any team in the league. So

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I like mckissic this week. All right, I've got Geovanni

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Bernard at home versus the Bills. Um, have you heard

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want to be called Geo by the way,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>too bad? Anyways, geove Vanni has caught touchdowns and back

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to back weeks, Buffalo allowed eight catches two Jets backs

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and seven to the Ravens backfield. Both backfield saw double

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>digit targets and change of pace. Backs have fared well

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills over the last two weeks. Stevin Coleman

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>had nine for seventy nine rushing and caught four passes

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for sixty five yards. Before that, Jamal Charles had nine

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>carries for fifty six yards and a touchdown. I think

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Bernard does well this week. I've got Wayne Gallman going

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>up against the Chargers and essentially one half of work.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Last week, Gallman set a giant season high in attempts

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and yards and that's all it took was a half.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>He also scored a touchdown and lead all backs and

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week, again only playing a half. Paul Perkins

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>already ruled out of this one, dark was hurt. This

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>week's opponents, the Chargers, the team allowing the most rushing

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>yards per game and the fifth most rushing yards per carry.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Four point eight. Wayne Gallman wide receiver. We got I'm

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>going to the John two Vey special right here and

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>going to Marvin Jones. Remember from a four touchdown you

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>got the four touchdown game from Marvin Jones. That was awesome.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>H Kenny Golladay looks like he's gonna miss this game

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with a hamstring injury, and so Marvin Jones gets to

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>be the main outside receiver. And outside receivers have had

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of success against the Panthers. H Michael Thomas,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Pierre Garson, Chris Hogan, and Ted Ginn each either top

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to eight yards or scored against the Panthers. And free

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.239
<v Speaker 1>safety Kurt Coleman is out with a knee injury, so

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the over the top play goes to Jones, and I

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think that the Hill score. It's a nice sneaky angle,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>all right. Bryan's got Kenny Stills at home versus the Titans.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee has allowed seven top twenty wide receiver performances in

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>PPR so far this year, which is three more than

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>any other team, and according to Football Outsiders, the Titans

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ranked thirty first against number two wide receivers, allowing more

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>than seventy yards per game. Stills is basically a Boom

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>er Bus play, but I'm calling Boom in this matchup.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>He has scored in ten of his last eighteen games

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and in four of his last five in Miami. I'm

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>calling one on Sunday. Geron Brown is my guy. Since

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson went out the Cardinals have been forced to

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>pass and pass a ton. Carson Palmer leads the league

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in pass attempts by a mile, and Giron Brown averaging

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ten targets per game, the same as Larry Fitzgerald. Here's

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles the defense. They've allowed nine different receivers to

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>hit at least fifty five yards, So I feel safe

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as that is your minimum for Jeron Brown and the

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Eagles ranked thirty first in passing yards allowed to receivers

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and dead last in receptions to receivers. Geron Brown is

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>our final take a chance on me, guy. Let's go

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>right into the Yeah, let's go right into that game.

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Arizona takeing on Philadelphia. You know you were talking about

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>how the Eagles have just been torched by a wide

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>receivers this year. It's been slot right wide receivers that

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>have been just absolutely killing him though, So why that's

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>why Larry FitzGeralds and a um Sterling Shepherd at seven

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>catches a hundred and thirty three yards in a touchdown

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen at five forty eight just the last couple

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Fitz ranks third in the league and targets

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and catches so he's an easy A. UM, you already

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about Jeron Brown. I have J. J. Nelson and

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>John Brown probably on the bench because when John Brown returned,

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it just J J. Nelson's up snap percentage. So I

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think I'm leaving both of those guys on the bench.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But Carson Palmer I have a C grade on um. Also,

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the first game in NFL history where the

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>two starting quarterbacks are named Carson, and the second time

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history where two guys named Carson have played

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on the same field at the same time. Wow, we

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>did not know that, Thank you. UM. Why would I have?

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And now who knows why the Cardinals line is Why

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>do you know that? Maybe that's the better. That's the

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>extensive deep research that we do here. Me and Tuve

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>had some fun with some Pro Football Reference yesterday. The

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals line is still missing tackle d J. Humphries and

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>guard Mike au Potty. Former Viking Alex Boone is also

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>nicked up. But Palmer is second in the NFL and

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>passing yards. Each game since David Johnson went down, Palmer's

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thrown for at least three five yards. The problem is

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that they can't score touchdowns. They've only mustered sixteen, seventeen,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen points in the last three weeks, but I

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think they beat that this week against an Eagles defense

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that's not very good against the past. Andre Ellington, I

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta see for him in PPR. Ellington's had twenty two

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>targets in the last two weeks. That alone means he's

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a viable PPR option. They've basically taken what David Johnson

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>did through the air, compartmentalized what he did as a receiver,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and just given that work to Andre Ellington and Larry

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald to some degree to just keep throwing it short.

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Um he's He's leading the Arizona running backs and snaps

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>over the last two week with a fifty seven percent clips.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>So we're leaving Kerwin Williams and Chris Johnson on the bench.

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the name straight, the undead corpse of the

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>tap dancing Nancy. Is that the name? Not? That is

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>then on in a few weeks. I'm sorry you've missed it.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I got Carson Wentz with a

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Stafford had a huge day against Arizona in

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Week one, but since then, the Cardinals have given up

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>two hundred eleven yards per game and only two total

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes to the other quarterbacks they faced. Wentz has

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>still never thrown for more than two touchdown passes in

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a game, making him a very high priced Mike Glennon.

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I have Alshon Jeffrey on the bench. Patrick Peterson Pat Pete,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as Brian likes to call him, will lock down Alshon

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey for this entire game. He has held each wide

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver that he shadowed this season to under fifty yards,

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>although Marvin Jones and Des Bryant each scored a short

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown on Peterson's watch. We're not going Nelson Aghilar Tory Smith,

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but we are going zach Ertz, who he gets a

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>B grade. He's leading the league in tight end targets

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and receptions, averaging nine targets per game. He's on pace

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>for over a hundred catches this season. We're only two

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks removed from Jack Doyle torching the Cardinals for eight

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>catches and seventy nine yards. I think that's the low

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>water mark for It's this week and la Garrett Blunt.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a S grade on Wendells. Smallwood is expected

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to miss this game with a knee injury, which should

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>leave Blunt as at bell Cow this week, Corey Clement

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and ken John Barner are expected to fill Smallwood's role.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott's the only back to top sixty eight yards

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals this season. One of the two scored,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so La Garrett blunts just to see, just because he's

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a heavy workload when we come back. The

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Chargers take on the Giants, and we'll tell you if

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you can start Keenan Allen with confidence against one of

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the better secondaries in the NFL. Stay tuned your distinctive

0:24:47.359 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football weekly on the fan. Love that John Fantasy

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly as a fan. As always, many thanks to

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>our decade Laurence sponsored grain Belt Premium, the official beer

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football. Do not forget to play the Crushed Church

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Challenge at grain Belt dot com. It is totally free

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to play. You can put in a lineup to beat

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>mine lineup, and every point by which your team beats

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>my team, you have a chance to win a trip

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to our Big Manny's Winners Banquet in January and your

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>chance at the two thousand dollar grand prize go to

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>green Belt dot com. Many thanks for friends at the Brewery,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Sean Ryan, Ted Marty, Jody Marty among others that have

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>been longtime supporters, which we always appreciate. And our winner

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>from last week, hold on here it is Bruce Gullikson.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Gullikson will be joining me at Manny's for the

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>winners banquet. That could be calling out your name. That's

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>early us next week. Do you think his friends call

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>him the B goal? The B goal? I Ope not,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I really really hope that's charge Will at the winners

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>banquet now I will. Now Chargers take on the Giants.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian and Chargers wide receivers have been pretty frustrating outside

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of Keenan Allen to a degree, But even then there's

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of balls to go around, and now

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we we also have headaches at tight end position. Help

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>us make some some sense out of the passing game

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers. Yeah, it's it's a tough matchup for

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. As bad as the Giants look, the

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>secondary is still the most legit thing on that disgusting team.

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But how do you really feel, Giants fan? I'm giving

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen to be uh be generous. Jenkins has only

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>taken seven snaps and slot coverage this season, so Alan

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and Dominique Rogers Camarady will be mixing it up. It's

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a slightly better matchup for Alan, who is top eight

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>among wide receivers and target percentage and is basically a

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>C start at worst when healthy like he is now,

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so enjoy it while he's healthy. I am benching Tyrone

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Travis Benjamin though my guy Tyrrell went off

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>last week and Benjamin has had some early success, but

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Giants having a loudy wide receiver to top seventy

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>yards this season, so both of those guys are on

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the bench. For me, it is about the Eli Apple matchup,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>which is always exploitable. It is, but there's good, good

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>safeties in New York too, So it's just I don't

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>know why I would give Williams a desperation see in

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues. If you need to start him, he would

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>be the guy would lean to obviously over Benjamin, but

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he is He is startable as a C C level grade,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but um tight ends more stortable. In this one, Hunter

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Henry and Antonio Gates. I didn't give Henry a C

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and Gates C plus B minus. Uh. Giants have been

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>torched by tight ends this year, five tight end touchdowns

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in four games, touchdown in every game, five total. Gates

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>has three targets inside the ten yard line as opposed

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to Henry's one. Gates has also seen five targets and

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>back to back games, which equals ten targets, which equals

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry's target total for the season ten. So Gates

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is the stronger play. But either have a chance to

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>score here and I'll get Philip Rivers the Sea in

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the revenge games in their revenge game, but the Giants

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't allowed more than two passing touchdowns at home since

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Week fifteen of when Cam Newton had five touchdowns, and

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>since that game, New York has allowed up to passing

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>up to two passing touchdowns only five times overall. But uh,

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth worth, Rivers has three plus yards

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>and going multiple touchdowns and three of his last four starts,

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so I will give him a C in this game,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and then Melvin Gordon gets to b. The Giants run

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>defense has not been as good as they were last year.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>They ranked thirty first in Football Outsiders d v o

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>A against the run, so he was a squeaky will

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this week as well, so he should get some grease

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Over to the Giants, I'll start with

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. He'll get an A. His finger got fed

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>up last week, but he's going to play. Uh. He

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>honestly might be better catching the ball one handed, I think.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And there is that right. If there's ever a player

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who who doesn't need a hand at wide receiver, it's

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>usually he usually drops him with two hands. Without Jason Vrette,

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers have allowed at least one wide receiver touched

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on in every game. So you're given Beckham and easy

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a grade here, or I am I should say, I'm

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with Sterling Shepherd over Brandon Marshall. Here, Albert Wilson,

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills, and Benny Fowler, all slot receivers have scored

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Chargers. Faaler scored twice. Shepherd, among wider wide

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>receivers with at least twenty five targets, is seventh in

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>yards per target. He's also fourth in red zone targets

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>among wide receivers. So he gets a B. I like it,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'll still give Marshall a B here. Target totals

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of ten and eleven with catch totals of six and

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>eight in his last two games. He needs Odell Beckham

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on the field. When Odell's on the field, Marshall's not

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>half bad. He's showing signs of life and touchdowns will

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>come eventually. I also give Evan and Gram starting grade

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just to see though he's second in targets among tight

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>ends behind zach Ertz, and his catch totals have gone

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>up from four to four to five to six. This

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much a neutral matchup. But tight end is

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>such a waste land that you can consider starting Ingram

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. I kind of my number four tight end overall. Ram. Yeah, alright,

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I like I like him. I gonna like him better. Obviously,

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end is a waste Lam this week. Alright, alright,

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>let's give him a B for that? Why not Eli

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Manning to give him a B. He's almost a borderline

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>A as well. He's been an elite fantasy option the

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, with two passing yards and three total

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last week three sixty six and three through the

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>air the week before starting center West and rich Burke

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is out, which doesn't help his cause. But l A's

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>secondary has been brutal with allowing a completion percentage north

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of sixty five, and then they have a six to

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown to interception ratio. And then finally the running

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>game chart. Wayne Galman was gonna take a chance of

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>me running back. He's a solid play this week. Shane

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Vereen still is not. I can't go there. No Jets

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>take on the Cleveland Browns and the most disgusting matchup

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe of the year. You already mentioned Josh McCown as

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you take a chance, I mean quarterback and so and

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I had I had a starting grade on him as well.

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>His of his receivers, like Austin Safarian Jenkins the best.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have allowed the most receptions to tight ends

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and the second most touchdowns of tight ends. Safarian Jenkins,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>now available after his three game suspension, comes into the

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>week averaging five targets per game. Robbie Anderson startable. He's

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna draw Jamaar Taylor, who ranks nine five among cornerbacks

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus. Anderson's put up solid numbers the

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks, while Jermaine Curse has receded badly

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of good games at the beginning of

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the year, We'll take Robby Anderson as a starting grade

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade B grade on Bellew Paul coming

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>off a career best one d sixty three yards grand

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five of those one sixty three. We're a

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>little on the cheap side, but you should see close

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five touches, the same number he had last

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>week with Matt Forte out again, and that is now official.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have had a stout run defense this year.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Surprisingly stout. They're only give you a three yards per carry.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>No posing back his top sixty six yards. Paul might

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>need to cobble together sixty is rushing yards and fourty

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty receiving yards, which is a possibility for Paul, who

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is a capable receiver. Elijah McGuire splashed a little bit

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, but I just don't think there's enough scraps

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>left over for McGuire to do much, and not against

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a shockingly good Brown's run defense. Let's flip over to

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland side. Not a lot to talk about here.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson gets a B grade, clearly the efety valve

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for rookie quarterback Deshaun Kaiser with a whopping fifteen catches

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks, nearly all his values tied up

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>into his PPR production, So know you're scoring system here,

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but Duke has scored a rushing touchdown surprisingly each of

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two games, which is infuriating to Isaiah Crowell owners.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The Jets allow the fifth most receptions to running backs

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and giving a fifty five receiving yards per game to

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs, and Duke will get nearly all of that

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns. Isaiah Crowell also will be He's been

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a non factor in way too many games because the

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Browns are always playing from this big deficits or defense

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>has been terrible, but that should change this week. The

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets should not get way up on the Browns, and

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Karl should see his first game as a real workhorse.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Some optimistic you will. The Jets are allowing the seventh

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>most rushing yards four and a half yards per carry,

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so Kroll, I know he's been frustrating, but I think

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you give him another chance here. And the entire Browns

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>passing game is on the bench, and we're not going

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend a lot of time on this. But Kaiser

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was benched last week and the Jets passing defense is

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty good. They allowing the seventh fewest passing yards

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and only Derek Carr was able to crack two hundred

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five yards. Kenny Britt's out in this game. You're

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>starting receivers, and bonus points to you if you know

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>who the Browns starting receivers are for this game, Richard

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Higgins and Ricardo Lewis Gross. Yes, the forty Niners and

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts have already talked about a bunch of

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>players from this game in our take a chance on

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Me segment Matt Who's left? Well, we did talk about

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Hoyer and Brissette does take a chance of any quarterbacks

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the On the Niner side, Pierre Garson Merritt's a

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Garsona has almost as many targets as the

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>next two wide receivers on the depth chart combined. Uh

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and according to Evan Silva, Garson run of his routes

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at slot and left corners. Vante Davis plays right corner

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, so he gets to avoid the

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Vante Davis coverage. And I'm not even sure Vante Davis

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is that good anymore. He might not. Three years ago

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he was really good, But I'm with you, Carl those

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hide him giving a se even though he's questionable the

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hip injury, but all signs point him he'll play laying uh.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>We we think that Matt Brito will probably get more

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>work than you think, though he had ten touches last

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>week and it's a good matchup. But the injury is

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>concerning enough for me that maybe he's taken out of

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the game for a myriad of reasons and Brita just

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>gets more work. So I'll give. I'll give hide to

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>see even though it should be a B or an

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>A in this game just because of the injury. Consider

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Matt Brita tout right there a little bit

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of premature, premature speculation. Wow. Um, let's go to the

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>other side where Frank Gore gets the long awaited the

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>revenge game. It's a big revenge game week. Um. There's

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>basically no one left in the San Francisco organization that

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was there when Frank was still there. Though the Niners

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have allowed only rushing yards to opposing running backs in

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>three or four games, and the only team that's that

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>they stopped was the post David Johnson Cardinals. So Frank

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Gore only gets a seed. It's it's his every week

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>see for Frank Gore just because of the volume. Uh

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton and Dante Moncrief. I'm giving a c

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Sammy Watkins, Robert Woods, and Jared Jeron Brown

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>each top two hundred yards against the Niners defense so far,

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but Moncrief hasn't topped to forty four yards and sets

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>three starts. I still think he's a little sneaky maybe

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown here, and it's always been his bed.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not volume, its scores, yes, and Jack Doyle, Oh

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Doyle has been rude out down so that many more

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>passes go to the receivers in theory exactly. Final matchup

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of this segment Tennessee Titans taking on the Miami Dolphins. Um,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't think Marcus Mariota is gonna play, but maybe

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>on the bad hamstring. But if he doesn't go, it's

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a disaster scenario with Matt Castle at the helm. Yeah,

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and even if Mariota goes with the hamstring, you don't

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>really want a one dimensional Marcus Mariotta on your fantasy team.

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh passing touchdown totals on the season of zero one,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.479
<v Speaker 1>two and zeros Miami has ranked thirty first against the past.

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>For football outsiders, it's a tough call. If he goes,

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it really depends who you have on your team. Is

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a backup, but you don't wanna be handcuffing matt Castle

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the markets Marita, So let's go under the assumption that

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Mariotta plays. If he does, I'll give Richard Matthews a B.

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging eight targets per game, while Eric Decker has

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>totaled seven targets over the last two weeks and one

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>number one wide receivers have done very well against Miami.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen had nine catches for a hundred yards and

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas had eight for eighty nine and one touchdown.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give Matthews a B. I'll keep him at

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a sea level of Castle goes, but he might be

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the only starter of Castles under the under center. Eric

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Decker is on the bench. He's just been a non factor.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis is out. I got that right this week.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He's he's oot uh, So he's on your bench as well.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker, I'll give him a CE. His numbers are

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>down this year, but he is one of eight tight

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>ends with more than twenty five targets on the season. Uh.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>The Jets and Saints tight ends understandably didn't do much

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>against Miami, but Antonio Gates and Hunter Henry combined for

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>nine catches ninety one yards in a touchdown, So Walker

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is startable. Uh. Despite who starts a quarterback for the Titans,

0:36:58.000 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and for the running backs, look get de Marco Murray

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>b and Derrick Henry see here. They should be leaned

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on in this game. Miami is only allowing three point

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carrying three games, but they have allowed

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a running back touchdown in each game and Melvin Gordon

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>had seven catches against the Dolphins. Alvin Kamara had ten,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>so uh. Both can do some damage out through the

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>year as well. Over to Miami, Let's start with j J.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I who It's been brutal start for him. I was

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>high on him, high the most, I must admit, but

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping the faith. I'm gonna give him a b Uh.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's a great stat from Adam Spinks at the RB

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Scout on Twitter. Um the g I E is one

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of nine running backs averaging more than two point five

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry after after the potential tackle point where

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he could first be tackled, so the skills are still there. Um,

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping the faith with the gy in a somewhat

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. Tennessee hasn't allowed more than seventy six rushing

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>yards are running back this year, but they've surrendered four

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns at the position over the last three games.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is a gis first real home game of

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the season where he scored seven of his eight touchdowns

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh. To the wide receivers Jervis Landry Vante Parker,

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving them both an A mentioned it before, but

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee has allowed seven top twenty wide receiver perform wide

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver performances in PPR, so they're an easy start. Kenny

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Stills was might take a chance to me wide receiver

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for the same reason. Basically, Julius Thomas is just not

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting yet, so he is on the bench. They're not

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>using him at all. And with that poorous secondary, Jake

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Cutler does get a B. Tennessee secondary has surrendered four

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in two straight games. Uh. They only managed

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick off Blake Bortles twice. Should have been like

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>five interceptions. So they're just really bad here here. I

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I used to Jake Keutler's might take a chance for

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback last week, and that a little bit in

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my face. I liked him the week before that in

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>an easy matchup that blew up in my face. Here's

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>another easy matchup for ja. Everybody's gonna jump off this.

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's off at Jake Cutler right now. You just gave

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade, So now you know it'll be

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be the ball game finally gonna happen.

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out we're actually gonna talk more Dolphins in

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, Tom, thank you for your patience. Hello Tom,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I hate to hang up that long. Sorry Tom Ryan. Hello,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>yes hi, UM, I have thanks for taking my call. Um.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I played Cooks, I'm the standard two quarterbacks and PPR

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>week UM. I played Cooks and Gillis Lee in UH

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Nights game, UM and the other guy who playing Gaskowski.

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm now losing to a kicker with anyway because

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you're but I have three players UH running back in

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a flex position. I have de Marco Murray, Carlos Hide

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and Pierre Garson. I'm playing Stefon Dames and my other

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>UM receiving spot and UM not quite sure whould played

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>between DeMarco and uh and Pierre Garson. We just talked

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about Pierre. Sounds like you're you're benching one of those

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 1>three guys. He said, it sounds like, yeah, uh, so

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I would bench high just because of the injury factor

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>here if he if he gets Nick dup at all,

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna lean heavily on you trust Murray. I don't

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>trust Murray. Brian gave him a B grade. I don't know.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not you. You guys like him a little more

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>than I do in this one. Maybe you would rather

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>put an injured Carlos hide in over Murray, easy matchup.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He's not that injured. I don't any question about him going. Yeah,

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I would. Yeah, that's just me. So we

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>have which we have a different we have different we

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>both like. We all like Pierre Garson though. So there's that.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Garson, Let's go Garzone. I think that's your

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's your sure play. See a more call here, see

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>if Aaron Jones is available. Ben Hello, hey guys again,

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the call. Um. I'll be really quick. I got

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>crab Tree and the Riddick PPR. Riddick is currently in

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>my starting position. If if the guys side more towards

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a crab tree, Um, there's a people on the waiver

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wire right now, then I could easily drop Riddick for

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys mentioned crow l. I got McKinnon. Yeah, there's

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a good matchup for crow Well. I gotta b guy

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>would be grade on him? Uh, I have Riddeck in

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a later matchup, and I'm giving him a bench grade.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He's only had nine total touches in the last two weeks.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That's bad. He's just not getting the ball enough. So

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Riddick is worthy of a bench spot.

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Even right now, you might be droppable. What would you guys?

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Kind of just ask really quick would what would you

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>guys rather pick up mckinning, Collins or crow or like? Sure?

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's a lead back. He's effectively a workhorse

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>running back on an NFL team instead of a spot starter.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that's the clear angle. What's better a

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>workhorse or a bell cow? Allow me to answer that fish.

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go, that's her. That's the answer. When we

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>come back, your chance for five answers? Can you go five? And? Oh?

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>When we do, we throw out your chance for five answers, Well,

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make five. You're gonna you are going to

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have five of your own answers to the Devani's five

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hot questions. So close one of these weeks, I'm gonna

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get it perfect. This is like a seven AM show

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, it really I know the way this is,

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>guy does feel like a seven am show. All that

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>five hot questions. When we come back, You're distinctive Fantasy

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the fan Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan. If you have not yet tried daily

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports at Fanball, we encourage you to do that.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You get the Fanball number. We evaluate your play and

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you get a number between zero and one that represents

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>your personal skill level. And then we make sure that

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you play against people like yourself, so you don't if

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you are if your skill levels at a thirty five,

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about playing against people in

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>their eighties and nineties that are gonna scoop all your chips.

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We want you to have fun, and the best way

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to have fun with daily fantasy sports is giving yourself

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win against players like yourself. We encourage

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you to do that if you go to fanball dot

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash chart what happens, Brian, They will take you

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on in a free contest this week where they can

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>win uh a hundred and fifty dollars I believe for first. Yeah,

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's first thing to price pools five dollars. You'd be

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>remissed to not join. And then if they beat your

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>score chart, they get a ticket to the week seventeen

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Championship with a fifteen thousand dollar prize pool. So, uh,

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go to fanball dot com slash charch and uh, let's

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>get it on question number one. Well, Cam Newton's off

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the field transgression affect him on the field enough to

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>harm his fantasy value, Matt, So he said something stupid

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in front of a whole bunch of media members, and

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>many people in this country say stupid things, usually using

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty characters. Uh well, and usually on

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this show. This will literally blow over by next week

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>when a ruling on the Zeke suspension comes down and

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody looks the other way at the new, shining new thing. No,

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this isn't going to affect him at all. Yeah, if anything,

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps him because it would make football

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is only escape and at least in the short term.

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Like Mass said, this will be old news eventually, so

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I will say no this. Uh. But he has a

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup in Detroit this week, so I don't think

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna help him that much. Correct answers, Yes, it

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>will affect him. His play a quarterback was already so wobbly.

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>He entered last week with a passer rating lower than

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>brock Osweiler's last year. Does does Cam Newton care more

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about winning football games? Or does he care more about

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>his popularity, his style, his pinage, his status as a performer. Remember,

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be a performer, not a football player.

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Now he's been publicly shamed and it's bad. Nobody is

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on his side, nobody. He lost his biggest national sponsor distractions.

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You would think at the NFL level the distractions wouldn't matter,

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 1>but they do. They matter all the time. Here will

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Even if they won't admit it when

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's happening, they'll admit it after it happened. The reality

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is Cam Newton is a human being who cares about

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>how he's perceived, and he's been perceived badly, and it

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>will affect him on the field question number two. Will

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller finished the season as a wide receiver, one

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to flex or bench player, Brian, this is

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the first Will Will Will Will. I don't think I've

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>ever don't. When I typed it, I'm like, that's weird.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Will Many of do dues and stuff like that. We

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have that bats every now and again. Can we just

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>cue the peacock real quick? From my premature speculation, Will

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Will follow a mon? Was that sweet sound? That's the

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>sweet sound of of a premature speculation? Ringing the bank

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>twice in one week? So Fuller exploded bank ring the

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>bell anyway? All right? Uh, Fuller exploded out of the

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>gates as a rookie. His three of his first four games,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he had uh five catches for a hundred seventy yards,

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred seven yards in a touchdown, four for one

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>oh four, seven for eighty one and one. Then he

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>got banged up in os Wiler settled in or settled out?

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I should say so. Deshaun Watson is a much better

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback than Brock Osweiler. He will give the speedy Fuller

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time to separate because Watson is so mobile.

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But that'll give Fuller a high ceiling in a lot

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of games, but a very low floor, especially because Houston

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a pass eavy team. They ranked twenty eight

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and pass play percentage at so I don't see Fuller

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>being consistent enough to be anything better than a flex

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>play this year. Okay, yeah, I was gonna try to

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>put him as a wide receiver V but I don't

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna work out for a lot of the

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>things that Brian mentioned. I think he's a flex player

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. He had over ninety targets last season with

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible quarterbacks. His injury this year was a collar bone

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that's not very likely to reoccur, so I think he's

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a flex player. He's a wide receiver too. We think

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of Will Fuller is a low volume guy because he

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>only caught forty seven passes all of last year, But

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as you correctly mentioned, Matt ninety two targets, so they

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>threw his way plenty of times, just a brock Osweiler

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>was his quarterback, obviously far better quarterbacking this year, and

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Fullers a year older, presumably a better receiver. And Jandre

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is on page for one targets. That's not sustainable.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be a regression in Hopkins targets, and

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the only place for those targets to regress too is

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller, and so he's going to be dramatically more

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in this offense than people think who are replaying

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>last season. Davanni's hot question number three, Miami's low scoring

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>team in the league. Are you buying low on Dolphins?

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt To steal a page from Dosek's Jake Butler looks

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like the most disinterested man in the world. He doesn't

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>always put his hands on his hips when lining up

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Wildcat, but when he does, he does so

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with a potty lift. Uh. They'd be O N three

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>right now if it weren't for the recently released Chargers

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>kicker missing a field goal in their first game of

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. But still, Jarvis Landry is usually a good

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>PPR helper. Davantae Adams was a guy that we were

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>all looking at as a breakout campaign this year. J

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Gi simply isn't as bad as Brian mentioned in the matchup,

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Moore might be starting before this game is over,

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's time to buy low on the Dolphins. Okay,

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because Matt Moore is gonna because Matt Moore is gonna

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be starting. Say yeah, I'm I'm really just buying low

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>on a Ji. Here one more stat from the at

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the RB scout um among running backs when it comes

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to percentage of carries where they face an extra unaccounted

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for defender in the box, um among when running backs

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>face an extra defender in the boxers, I mean, I

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>should rephrase, Jilly has the third highest percentage of runs

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>where he sees an extra unaccounted for defender in the box,

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So he's going up against stacked boxes most of the time.

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Got a couple that with the fact that we talked

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about how he's among the leaders and yards per carry

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>after the potential tackle point. It's very talented running back.

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Still I'm buying this week and hopes he has a

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>good game, and then next week at the very least

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he should rip the Falcons and you can flip him

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then if you really want to. But Bilow and a

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>GI's what I'm saying. Yep, Bilow, they played three road

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>games because their Week one was going to be their

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>home game, and this third road game was in London

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for Pete's sake. Now, the home games start to kick

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in two of the next three at home, five three

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the next five are at home. The biggest problem for

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Miami has been their offensive line. And while it's not good,

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>remember the Dolphins are a week behind everybody else. And

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:30.839
<v Speaker 1>remember when the Giants, the Bengals and the Seattle offensive line.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So those first few weeks of the season were so

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bad they couldn't score. But the offensive lines got better,

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as they tend to do, and now those teams are

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>putting up points. That's the same situation Miami finds itself in.

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And of course, remember j Cutler came in off the

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>couch in the middle of training camp. He can get better,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and he probably will. Devanny's hot question number four. The

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:54.800
<v Speaker 1>only running back with a touchdown in every week of

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the season is Leo four Net. Now, nobody's suggesting he's

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a touch out in all sixteen weeks. But

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>do you believe it's current level of fantasy output is sustainable?

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Man, He is working hard this year so far.

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about how a Ji is third as

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the third highest percentage of carries with an extra defender

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in the box. Four Net is second, So he's working

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>even harder than a gy is and he's doing it

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>behind a mediocre line at best. He does have modest

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>catch totals, which has helped him out a little bit,

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm worried he hits the wall eventually for net only.

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>At a hundred and twenty nine carries last year at

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 1>l s U, he's currently on pace for three d

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty right now. He is he is a freak,

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think he falls off just a little bit.

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think this output is sustainable. Tokay, with

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>all the injuries that the wide receivers in Jacksonville, plus

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles being Blake Bortles, that team is solely reliant

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:49.479
<v Speaker 1>on handing the ball off the four net and playing

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>good defense. And it kind of reminded me of the

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>year a few years back where Christian Ponder was at

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the helm for the Vikings and they handed the ball

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>off to Adrian Peterson over and over again and he

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>tallied two thousand yards. That team was about running the

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>ball and playing defense. The Jaguars about are about running

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball and playing defense. So I think he can

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sustain it. You are correct, you can also, I'll note this,

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and you hit many of my talking points. But also

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this the schedule super favorable on the ground, only three

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>remaining games against teams that rank in the top half

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>against the run. All the others are bottom half. And

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of those three remaining games with teams that rank in

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the top half against the run, none are in the

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>top five. So there are like, you know, really tough

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>stoppers necessarily. And then in November and December, you know

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>those cold weather, bad weather games that seems perfect potentially

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for him, and he's the big body against warned down

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 1>defenses that have played a dozen games or four teen games.

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Those things all seem to favor for net as well.

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>He will sustain this level of fantasy output. Hot question

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>number five. The bye weeks are upon us, particularly particularly

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty and Empire leagues. Are you okay with owners

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of leagues who don't start a kicker

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>or a defense or a tight end because they don't

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:09.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make a difficult drop to fill that spot

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:13.479
<v Speaker 1>with a backup. Hopefully that makes sense. Dynasty and Empire league,

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is it okay to go to war in your starting

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lineup without a kicker or but with a bye week kicker, defense,

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or tight end Matt. You know, if you have a bench,

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to plan for these things. But

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm okay. I have a middle of the

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>road answer. I'm okay with it for a tight end

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to drop a tight end, but

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not okay with it for a kicker in defense.

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 1>And furthermore, I like kicker in defense for re draft leagues,

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>but I don't like them for Empire dynasty. I think

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we should get rid of them an empire and dynasty.

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't do anything for empire and DYNA. What answer

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:47.839
<v Speaker 1>your question, I'm going Brian Johnson on this five tough

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>question and just saying whatever I want to say on

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the radio. All right, Brian, please do not go Brian

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson on this question. Is hot, it's not tough. Um, Yeah,

0:52:58.000 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with it if I'm playing the person who's

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is leaving a starter with a zero. But ultimately, at

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, no, it is wrong. It

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>messes with the competitive balance of the league and the

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>integrity because if someone's basically giving up against you, they

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>could affect the standings in a multitude of ways. So no,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you should be forced to have a full compliant roster

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>every week. So what if you're in like one of

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>those weird six team by weeks and like your entire

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>team for some weird scheduling purposes on by what do

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you do in that situation? Taxi squad? Then you can

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>employ the taxi squad, which I feel like charge is

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about to talk about. No, I'm not because in every

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>league's kind of taxi squad most well, okay, I don't

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think they should. If your dynasty league and and or

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Empire league is set up correctly, you don't have that

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>many bench spots because dynasty leagues with big bench spots

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>takes all the strategy out of it. And if you

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of bench spots, then you don't

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have anywhere to go. And we don't want you

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:53.359
<v Speaker 1>dropping great players to change defenses in one week. So yes,

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we it's okay. We can live with it. We don't

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like it, but in a small roster league, we can

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>live with it. Let's go to our final match up

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of this segment, which is, oh hey, it's me the

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings taking on the Chicago Bears. The sound of

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>flipping papers me getting to that page. Let's start with

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the Viking side of this one, and we'll begin at

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the running game with Ottavias Murray, who gets a C

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>grade here. Chicago is the seventh ranked run defense in

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the league. They're giving up eighties six yards per game

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and average of just three point five yards per carry,

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and they've seen good runners better runners in Ottavias Murray,

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Freeman, Leavy On Bell, Tie Montgomery. H. Murray is

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty much a straight ahead plotting runner without a

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of moves. He'll only give it the Vikings offensive

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>line can give them, and let's just hope that that's

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown plunge. He's startable in a pinch. I got it.

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I got a starting grade on him, but I love

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it here. I think this split is maybe sixty forty

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with Jerick McKinnon. Let's go to the passing game. It appears,

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not knowing who the quarterback is going to be, I'm

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming for our purposes it's going to be Kates Keenum.

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You can bump everybody up a little bit if it

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:57.240
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be Sam Bradford, only let's sell it Digs.

0:54:57.680 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>He's gotta be grade and he's my favorite of the

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of the options for the Vikings. Only one team has

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed more than Chicago's six wide receiver touchdowns already this year,

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and since his moved to the outside, Diggs has become

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings goal line target when passing as well, Diggs

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>will primarily line up against cornerback Marcus Cooper, who ranks

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty among cornerbacks by Pro Football Focus. What about Adam Theland.

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>He leads the Vikings and targets and receptions and has

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>had at least one twenty four yard play in every game,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>which is great, but he draws a tough match up

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago slot cornerback Bryce Callahan, who's probably their best

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>cornerback overall. To this point, Callahan has seen Mohamed Sanu,

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphreys, Juju Smith, Schuster, and Randall Cobb and held

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>those guys to an average of three receptions in thirty

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per game. Only Cob managed to score. I

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think your best angle here is that last year the

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Vikings scored from the slot in both matchups with the Bears.

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.479
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Adam Theland can can do a little something

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>more than than the matchup would suggest. And then Kyle Rudolph,

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kay Keendom killing Kyle Rudolph basically in a nutshell under case,

0:56:03.960 --> 0:56:07.399
<v Speaker 1>He's getting about half of the targets that Rudolph used

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to get when Sam Bradford was under Helm. The average

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Keendom game for Rudolph is three catches, thirty six yards,

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 1>no touchdowns, and no red zone targets. But the Bears

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are without three linebackers. Danny Trevathan suspended, Nick Watkowski is

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out with a peck injury. Deral Freeman went on, I

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>r without three starting linebackers, there's a chance that Kyle

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph's gonna get free in the middle, and they may

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>target him more here. So he's c grade on Kyle Rudolph.

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Bear side, where I've only got

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>two starting grades and nothing in the passing game. I'm

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a hard pass on the Mitch Traubinsky lad offense

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>until I see proof that he's ready for this level

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of competition, particularly against Mike Zimmer, who requires opposing quarterbacks

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to decipher. Byzantine looks at the line of scrimmage and

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's not like he's got this great stable of

0:56:55.880 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>receivers who are gonna bail him out. Trabisky has got

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>no help. The whole passing games on the bench. Ord

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and Howard demolished the Vikings last year with a two

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>game total of three hundred thirty seven yards. That's crazy.

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But the Vikings run defense is a lot better this year.

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Their top five against the run and virtually every statistical category.

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Opposing running backs as a group are averaging just seventy

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one yards per game. And you don't have to respect

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the past with Mitch Robinsky. So I think the Vikings

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>game plan to stop Howard, and so I've just got

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Jordan Howard. Tarik Cohen gets a

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:32.919
<v Speaker 1>C grade. I don't think he takes a big step

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>backwards for with Travisky will probably a safety valve option,

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'll need to do something special with the ball

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and a tough matchup. Vikings have been are a top

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>five defense against pass catching running backs. They're only averaging

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven receiving yards per game two running backs, and

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this despite the fact that they've seen Theoretic and Levan

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bell to the best pass catching running backs in the

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:55.000
<v Speaker 1>legal already and they're still only giving up twenty seven

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. So Tarik Cohen is a only a

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 1>C grade. When we come back our final set of matchups,

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:07.120
<v Speaker 1>including the Seattle Seahawks taking on the Los Angeles Rams.

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you if you dare start Eddie Lazier Thomas

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Rawls when we return. You're distinctive Fantasy Football weekly on

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the fan. I don't want to make any promises, but

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this is shaping up as a big lightning round. I

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we you know, we've only had like two and three

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>minutes for lightning round the past couple of weeks. I

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:37.919
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have a nice, juicy lightning I'm gonna

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>talk and don't do it, everybody, don't do it. You'll

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to talk right now. Seattle takes on

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Rams. Chris Carson goes on I R.

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Now they go to Thomas Rawls and or Eddie Lacey

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams is a bad run defense? What do

0:58:51.360 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you think of those two guys? I got them both

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. As I kind of mentioned in to

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me segment, Mkissic is the guy

0:58:57.320 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that that I want out of this out of this team,

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't trust either Eddie Lacy or Thomas

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Rawles to get it done. What's your thought? I think

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Rawls is a lot better. I don't trust Lacy Rawls

0:59:07.640 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is one season removed from being awesome, and I think

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he's just got more talent than Lacey does. So I

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>would roll the dice on Ralls. I think both are

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>startable in a pinch, because the Rams run defense is

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that bad. It's what do you prefer, fat or fragile?

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your preference? Yeah, I mean I I can't overcome fat,

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but if you're healthy, you're not fragile. So you know

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of my it's kind of my you're healthy

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or not fragile. It's like it's it's not good. Rams

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 1>run defense is bad. They rank in running back running

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 1>back yards allowed. You know, their past defense isn't that

0:59:40.840 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 1>good either. So that's why I'm giving Russell Wilson an

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>A grade. This week and his first two weeks of

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this season, Wilson did basically nothing less than two hundred

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:49.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in each game recorded one total touchdown. In the

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, Wilson's caught fire six passing touchdowns one

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing score while averaging three thirty four past yards per game.

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The Rams at the same time almost did the I

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>identical thing to Russell Wilson. They gave up exactly a

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy nine passing yards in each of the

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks and allowed only one passing score, but

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks, Brian Hoyer and Dak Prescott

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>each roasted them for three total touchdowns apiece. One of

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>those was a rushing score. Both those guys averaged two

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety two against them. So I like Russell Wilson a

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lot this week. Given Doug Baldwin a B as well

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>miss practice earlier this week with the groin injury. They

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of had him as a a a decoy last week,

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but this week I think that he's better, uh and

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. The Rams have been fairly good against

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>slot wide receivers so far this year, but Cole Beasley

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jamison Crowder were the best two they've seen, so

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Doug Baldwin's up at a B. I even got a

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Paul Richardson and Tyler Lockett. The Rams

1:00:42.000 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have been giving up the farm to outside wide receivers.

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed fourteen completions of twenty yards or more

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this season. Richardson leads the team in twenty plus yard

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>targets with five. Lockett has three and Jimmy Graham has four,

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so there's gonna be a lot of downfield throws. Jimmy

1:00:57.520 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Graham I gave a C grade two as well. Uh,

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he's taking a day off of practice every week for

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three so he's shown up questionable on your

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on your software for your for your fantasy league. But

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he's recorded at least sixty yards and back to back

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks the Rams held Jordan Read to six catches and

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>forty eight yards, but he's the only good tight end

1:01:14.800 --> 1:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they faced all year, So I think that's kind of

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the downside for Jimmy Graham. Over on the Ram side,

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley gets an A. He leads the NFL and

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>yards from scrimmage and touchdowns. How about that? And the

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks are not your father's Seahawks run defense, Carlos Hyde

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and DeMarco Murray each top two hundred and fifteen yards time.

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery had ninety three total yards in a score. The

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>only the only person that could really stop was the

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>eight year old Frank Gore. But the passing game I'm

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>putting on the bench. Jared Goff, this matchup looks like

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a girly one. Seattle has been more stout against the

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>passing game. If you take out Aaron Rodgers three eleven

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>yard game in Week one, the Seahaks have only allowed

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty passing yards per game in the

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, three total touchdowns. I'm not going Sammy Watkins,

1:01:56.360 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods, or Cooper Cup, but if you're going to

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>spot start one of them, Cup is the one that

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I like the most. He has the best matchup against

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Jeremy Lane, who's also dinged up, and he

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>should play. But only three wide receivers have topped fifty

1:02:10.680 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Seahawks this year, and two of those

1:02:12.800 --> 1:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>were Packers. I cannot wait until Girly scores two touchdowns

1:02:16.800 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the game and Cup has one, So it would

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be two girls, two girls, two girls, one Cup. That

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would be That would be perfect. Yeah. Cooper Cup has

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>been that guy who's been everybody rushed to get him

1:02:27.760 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>after Week one and then he did nothing for every

1:02:29.640 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped him, and then he scored again. Last week, he

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>go get him again and now he's gonna do nothing.

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna drop him again because you know every year

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>there's that guy who just cycles through a dozen teams

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I get the feeling Cooper Cup is going to be

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy. I agree. Buffalo takes on Cincinnati Brian Lashawn

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>McCoy has been dreadful for a couple of weeks. Now

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>does he break out of the slump against the temp

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals. He's gonna He's gonna have to work

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>hard for it. I'm still gonna give him a B

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>based on a volume alone, but no running back has

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>topped eighty yards on the ground against the Bengals, who

1:02:57.720 --> 1:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have also only allowed two rushing touchdown running back so

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>far this year. They have been generous to backs through

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the air, though, as they've allowed eight catches per game

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to the position over the last three weeks. So there's

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some hope for Shady here. Not a whole lot more

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to talk about for Buffalo. I will give Charles Clay

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a desperation CEE. It's a bad matchup on paper. The

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have allowed ten catches the tight ends total this year,

1:03:19.440 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but they've also faced the Baltimore tight ends, the Texans

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and the Browns tight ends, so not a

1:03:24.120 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition in that regard. So he gets the desperation.

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>See because he's the only past catcher on that team

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:31.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's worth talking about. And then I'm putting

1:03:31.520 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor on the bench this week. Cincinnati's ranked eighth

1:03:35.120 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>against the past according to Football Outsiders d v o A.

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers had three thirteen yards and three touchdowns against

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, but Joe Flacco, Deshaun Watson and the combo

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Deshon Kaiser and Kevin Hogan combined for just four d

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine yards and one passing touchdown between the three

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback sets there Over to the Bengals, AJ Green gets

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a B. Damarius Thomas is the only wide receiver to

1:03:56.840 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>top eighty yards against Buffalo, but Green is easily the

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>same caliber as to Maryus Thomas's and Green has five

1:04:05.040 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to six inches under Dabus White and E J. Gaines

1:04:07.520 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he started cornerbacks for Buffalo. I'm putting the other wide

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers on the bench, though it is a tough matchup.

1:04:12.560 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Croft, Yeah, he blew up last week, uh tight

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>end for the Bengals in in place of Tyler Eifer,

1:04:18.560 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But that was against the Browns. Uh. This is the Bills,

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and only one tight end has topped three catches against Buffalo.

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And not one tight end has top fifty yards all year.

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton is also on the bench. Buffalo was ranked

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>third against the past according to Football Outsiders, and they've

1:04:33.080 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one passing touchdown all season. That was to

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan Joe Mixon. He gets the starting grade, but

1:04:39.520 --> 1:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the lowest level one at a C. He has average

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty one touches over the last two weeks, but he's

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>averaging just two point six yards per carry behind a

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>very wobbly line and the Bills have only allowed two

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns running backs this year. They are far more

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>generous through the year, and that is why Giovanni bernard

1:04:55.080 --> 1:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on the running back nicely

1:04:57.160 --> 1:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>done in Kansas City takes on Houston in probably the

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>toughest matchup for the Chiefs this year. Karee Munt is

1:05:04.640 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>an A grade, but let's note that this is this

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is his hardest This is his hardest matchup. He leads

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the league in rushing yards by one hundred forty yards,

1:05:12.760 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a ton uh. He also shined in the

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs passing game. He's caught all thirteen of his thirteen targets,

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but Texans have held back saverages of just fifty two

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, seventeen receiving yards, and no touchdowns over the

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. For what it's worth, last year when

1:05:28.800 --> 1:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>these teams played, Kansas City's Runners West and Ware combined

1:05:31.480 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for hundred six a total yards. So there's your glimmer

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of hope for Karee Hunt. He remains an a start

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's just that good also from the passing game,

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and a start for Travis Kelsey. He leads the team

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and targets. He's at one hundred yards and scored in

1:05:44.440 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>two of the last three games. Kelsey takes on a

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Texans defense that's given up averages of six sketches, seventy

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>yards and one touchdown to Gronk and de Laney Walker,

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>which are relative comparables to Travis Kelsey. The last couple

1:05:56.960 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of weeks be great for Tyreek Hill. Like a lot

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of home run threat wideouts. Its feast or famine with Hill,

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and so far he's eaten well on the road and

1:06:06.840 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he's starved at home. This is a road game. He

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>goes up against the Houston dec its secondary that's been

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to big plays, giving up over fifteen yards per completion,

1:06:17.280 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and Hell's gonna see a lot of lousy cornerback Jonathan Banks,

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who ranks at the position by Pro Football Focus. So

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Tyreek Hill in this one. Alex Smith is

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. You know, more and more it looks

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like Alex Smith's monster Week one was a bit of

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a mirage. He's settled back into more of a game manager,

1:06:35.240 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>although a stronger armed game manager than what we had

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>seen in the past. Um Meanwhile, when he's not, Houston's

1:06:41.680 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>defense has been very good for everybody else except Tom Brady.

1:06:45.240 --> 1:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up averages of just one passing yards and

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>zero point three touchdowns per game. So what Brady did

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>rip him apart. Everybody else has been humbled by this

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Houston secondary, and that probably includes Smith here C grade only.

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's flip over to the Houston's d. Deshaun Watson's turned

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>into a guy that you can put an A grade

1:07:03.960 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on and feel okay about. He's turned to do a

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>bona fi duel threat. We always knew the legs would

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be good, but he's actually and he by the way

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>leading all quarterbacks and rushing yards. The arm has been

1:07:13.040 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good too. Kansas City's rebuilt secondary has allowed the

1:07:16.240 --> 1:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>seventh most yards through the air, but they've also been

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to quarterbacks who can run. They're allowing an additional

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty three rushing yards per game to quarterbacks, which is

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>second to last in the NFL. Deshaun Watson's and A starts.

1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like DeAndre Hopkins. He's gonna remain the

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>primary focus of Houston's offensive attack as he goes up

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City secondary that has allowed one hundred

1:07:38.560 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>yards and are a touchdown to opposing receivers in every

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>game this year. Hopkins will line up all over the

1:07:44.280 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>field and that's gonna be a huge advantage for him

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>when he's not on Marcus Peters and he is on

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Mitchell or slack cornerback Philip Gaines. Although we saw

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>last week on Monday Night Football, Marcus Peters gave up

1:07:55.680 --> 1:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on a really a nice play to Terrell Prior,

1:07:58.080 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so you can still you can still can get something

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>done when you're on that side of the field. Will

1:08:02.280 --> 1:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Filler gets a B grade because the absence of safety

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Eric Berry from the Kansas City secondary means that they're

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to pure speed deep receivers like Fuller, Fuller's volume

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is always a bit of a question, but as we

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about last segment, it's better than most people think.

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of a boomer bus guy and that will

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>probably remain here. But I like him against the Kansas

1:08:23.120 --> 1:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>City secondary. And then there's Lamar Miller C grade. He

1:08:27.000 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>consistently touches the ball fifteen to twenty times. He's probably

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna need all of those because the Kansas City run

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:34.479
<v Speaker 1>defense is very good. They've yet to allow eighty rushing

1:08:34.560 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>yards to any runner they faced. They are, though, giving

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up four point three yards per carry, which is kind

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of a lot, and they've allowed the second fewest receiving

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>yards running back. So Miller's not gonna help you there.

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Suggest a C grade for Miller. We'll take a break

1:08:48.520 --> 1:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Our final matchup Carolina Panthers at

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions. Do you trust Cam Newton Devin Funches to

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bounce back and have well have back to back strong games,

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I should say, and then premature spect elation and lightning

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>round all of that coming in the final segment after

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this your distinct of Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan.

1:09:21.520 --> 1:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the shell of Fantasy Football Weekly on

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fan, Paul Arch, Brian Johnson, Matt Harrison with you

1:09:31.800 --> 1:09:35.639
<v Speaker 1>final matchup. He's coming up in a moment that will

1:09:35.680 --> 1:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be the Panthers at the Lions. But first premature speculation.

1:09:39.000 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>These are three players generally available on the waiver wire

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you can pick up now, one week of ahead of

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is looking to do. So, Matt, who you got?

1:09:48.800 --> 1:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying Homer with it and going Michael Floyd, wide receiver,

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings. He's back from his four game suspension. Lakwan

1:09:55.920 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Treadwell has been getting play at the outside wide receiver position,

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>but he's not good. He's just not good, and he's

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna suit up anymore. Now that Michael Floyd's back,

1:10:04.120 --> 1:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>plus the loss of Dalvin Cook and the hopeful return

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Bradford, means I think that this Viking offense

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to rely on a vertical passing game, which

1:10:12.880 --> 1:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think means three wide receivers are on the field

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and I think Floyd gets a lot of play.

1:10:16.520 --> 1:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, I am going Trent Taylor, rookie slot

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:25.719
<v Speaker 1>receiver for the San Francis ten targets last week, caught

1:10:25.720 --> 1:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown the week before Aldrick Robbins had twelve targets

1:10:29.120 --> 1:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, bringing on the targets for the Niners. But

1:10:31.240 --> 1:10:33.479
<v Speaker 1>let me finish here, all right, Taylor is actually a

1:10:33.479 --> 1:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>bonus take on this week, potentially against the Colts, who's

1:10:35.840 --> 1:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>starting a slot corner Nate Harrison is out, leaving rookie

1:10:39.040 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Quincy Wilson to man the seam. So the good matchup

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, But then the yellow brick road continues down

1:10:44.000 --> 1:10:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the schedule for Taylor. The following week he has Washington,

1:10:47.120 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>were slot receivers Nelson Aglar scored and even Albert Wilson

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>tops sixty yards against the Redskins. Following that is Dallas.

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned that was a very plus matchup for slot

1:10:56.200 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>receiver Randall Cobb this week, and other slot receivers had

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fared well against the Cowboys, Cooper Cup, Larry Fitzgerald, Sterling

1:11:02.120 --> 1:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd all with the the PPR points. The following week

1:11:05.280 --> 1:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they have Philly who has also been flamed by slot receivers.

1:11:08.320 --> 1:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd had seven catches for a hundred thirty three

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown. Keenan Allen had five for over

1:11:13.880 --> 1:11:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, and then after that game they

1:11:16.520 --> 1:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>had the Cardinals. Remember I mentioned that Taylor was just

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>targeted ten times. That was against the Cardinals. Alright, So

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:25.639
<v Speaker 1>there you go, Trent Taylor, honey badger, not scaring anybody

1:11:25.680 --> 1:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in the slot anymore. That's that's the thing in the past,

1:11:28.040 --> 1:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Trent Taylor. I like it super deep. Mike Williams is mine.

1:11:32.040 --> 1:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>This was the first round draft choice by I think

1:11:34.520 --> 1:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>seventh overall picked by the Chargers UH this past draft

1:11:38.040 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and hasn't been available until recently practicing now and maybe

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>active in this week's game. I think he's still listed

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>as doubtful for this week, but it's there's a chance.

1:11:48.640 --> 1:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll just say this chance he's coming around. This is

1:11:50.720 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>your time to get him before he starts making waves

1:11:53.520 --> 1:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as a as a player who is returning and big

1:11:56.160 --> 1:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>body is ideally suited for red zone use the downside

1:11:58.880 --> 1:12:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Williams, So I think it's fair to mention

1:12:01.600 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is just all the depths and the number of targets

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that they've got to go around Keenan Allen, Travis, Benjamin

1:12:06.560 --> 1:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyrrell Williams and Hunter Henry Antonio Gates and throwing in

1:12:08.920 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon. There's a lot of you know, there's only

1:12:11.160 --> 1:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so much ball to go around. I like Mike Williams

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as I like Meg Williams the athlete. I love the

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>big body for goal line use. I I still think

1:12:18.920 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in bigger leagues he belongs on a roster, and I've

1:12:21.479 --> 1:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>rostered him in like my twenty team league. Um, but

1:12:24.479 --> 1:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I do worry about that. That component of his game

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is all the different players that San Diego has to

1:12:29.760 --> 1:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>throw too. Let's go to this final matchup, Carolina Panthers

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Detroit Lions. We finally got a good

1:12:35.680 --> 1:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>game from Cam Newton. Does he do it back to back? Yeah? Well,

1:12:39.560 --> 1:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempering my expectations there. It's also worth noting that

1:12:42.439 --> 1:12:45.639
<v Speaker 1>center Ryan Khalil, who is the best Khalil on roster

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>for the Panthers. Uh, He's missed the last three games

1:12:48.479 --> 1:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the neck injury and he's believed to be out

1:12:50.360 --> 1:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>again this week. Um. It's not the Patriots epically bad

1:12:54.320 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>defense in front of Cam Newton either. Before that game,

1:12:57.479 --> 1:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Cam was averaging a hundred and eighty nine passing yards.

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Her game against such blazingly awesome past defense is known

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as the forty Niners, Saints and Bills. That's not scary

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's not doing well, so the Lin's defense is

1:13:10.360 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not allowed a three yard passer this year. They've only

1:13:12.800 --> 1:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>given up four touchdown passes while tallying seven interceptions, So

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I only have a C grade on Newton. The wide

1:13:19.040 --> 1:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>receivers Devin Funchius and Kelvin Benjamin, giving them both very

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>tepid SEA grades as well. Funcius is leading all wide

1:13:25.360 --> 1:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>receivers on the tight on the team with twenty five

1:13:28.640 --> 1:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>targets this season. He's averaging an additional five targets per

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>game in the two weeks since Greg Olsen went down,

1:13:34.880 --> 1:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so they've really turned to him in the last two weeks.

1:13:37.280 --> 1:13:39.759
<v Speaker 1>It's likely both he and Benjamin get a little taste

1:13:39.800 --> 1:13:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Darius Slay ride this week. Benjamin was sidelined

1:13:42.920 --> 1:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week with the knee injury, but returned

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to practice on Thursday. But whoever you consider the wide

1:13:47.360 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver one, that guy, Yeah, that guy might look forward

1:13:51.400 --> 1:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to a ninety plus yard game like us Stefon Diggs

1:13:54.880 --> 1:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>or Julio Jones have done in the last two weeks

1:13:56.439 --> 1:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit. UH. The running backs, though, Christian McCaffrey, I'm

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>giving a B. Jonathan Stewart, I'm giving a C the

1:14:02.479 --> 1:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Lion's last week side linebacker Paul Whirlo to an mc

1:14:05.439 --> 1:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>l last week, and they were already bad against the run.

1:14:07.920 --> 1:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The saving grace for the Lions run stats has been

1:14:10.439 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that David Johnson and Dalvin Cook both went down with

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>injury during during the game. Yeah, it's a great point.

1:14:15.640 --> 1:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh, the other the only running back they've really

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>stopped as Paul Perkins, and we all know about Paul

1:14:20.160 --> 1:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Perkins Detroit his bottom ten in the league and running

1:14:22.200 --> 1:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>back receptions and receiving yards, which is why I like

1:14:24.880 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey a little bit better over on the Lions side.

1:14:28.360 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Amir Abdula, I'm giving a C grade. He had a

1:14:30.439 --> 1:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>mild mild ankle injury last week against Minnesota, but he's

1:14:33.320 --> 1:14:35.519
<v Speaker 1>expected to play. He's coming off the best game of

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>his career. Looked better than he looked against the Vikings.

1:14:38.400 --> 1:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Twenty three touches last week against the Vikings, where he

1:14:40.800 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>logged a hundred and nine total yards and scored no

1:14:43.520 --> 1:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>running back his top to fifty six rushing yards against

1:14:46.000 --> 1:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers this year. Only Dion Lewis and Alvin Kamara

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:51.639
<v Speaker 1>have recorded rushing touchdowns against them this year. That's why

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Abdula is only getting the C grade. THEO Rittic I

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>affirmly on the bench. We talked about how he's just

1:14:56.920 --> 1:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not getting play right now. Matthew Stafford I got a

1:15:00.360 --> 1:15:02.479
<v Speaker 1>C grade on him. The stats are kind of expected

1:15:02.520 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Panthers defense. They held Brian Hoyer and Tyrod

1:15:05.400 --> 1:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Taylor to under two under passing yards and no scores

1:15:09.120 --> 1:15:11.599
<v Speaker 1>three total points in each of those games given up

1:15:11.640 --> 1:15:14.519
<v Speaker 1>for the Panthers defense, But Drew Brees and Tom Brady

1:15:14.640 --> 1:15:16.639
<v Speaker 1>were the the guys that they played the last two weeks.

1:15:16.960 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Both of those teams scored thirty points. Drew Brees had

1:15:19.720 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>three touchdown passes. Tom Brady had three or seven and two.

1:15:22.880 --> 1:15:25.439
<v Speaker 1>What kind of quarterback is Stafford? I think he's somewhere

1:15:25.439 --> 1:15:27.519
<v Speaker 1>in the middle here. He probably he's probably like a

1:15:27.600 --> 1:15:29.479
<v Speaker 1>two fifty and two kind of a game here. That's

1:15:29.479 --> 1:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>why he gets the C grade. That's that's B numbers

1:15:32.320 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>two fifty and two. That's a good game, thank you well.

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think one of those touchdowns goes to the Marvin Jones,

1:15:38.120 --> 1:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>who I talked about is might take a chance of

1:15:39.680 --> 1:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver like it. Golden Tate gets a B grade.

1:15:42.439 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Tate ran seventy of his routes out of the slot

1:15:44.960 --> 1:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>last week, and the Panthers have allowed a slot wide

1:15:47.200 --> 1:15:49.639
<v Speaker 1>receiver to score a touchdown in each of the last

1:15:49.680 --> 1:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Brandon Coleman and Danny Amondola did that, So

1:15:53.240 --> 1:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he gets the B grade. Eric Ebron's on the bench.

1:15:56.000 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>He was only on the field for of the snaps

1:15:58.640 --> 1:16:00.559
<v Speaker 1>last week. He can be dropped. I think he can

1:16:00.600 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be dropped out right. One touchdown in his last year

1:16:03.560 --> 1:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of football. For Eric Ebron. It is time for our

1:16:08.720 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>by far, our longest lightning round of the year. You know,

1:16:13.000 --> 1:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all the times that we're gonna play a C D

1:16:14.720 --> 1:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>C S we might get through this like three times,

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen minutes of thirteen minutes of lightning round. That's amazing,

1:16:21.640 --> 1:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>three and a half times. We're told by Tony Um,

1:16:25.400 --> 1:16:28.479
<v Speaker 1>here's the rules. You know, this works toughest question between

1:16:28.640 --> 1:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>two players, and only two players. We hang up on you.

1:16:32.120 --> 1:16:35.639
<v Speaker 1>You listen to the response via the delay that comes

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>through your radio. But we also will hear trades trades.

1:16:40.120 --> 1:16:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, we'd prefer that, actually prefer to hear your

1:16:43.439 --> 1:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>trade talk to be perfectly honest. All right, our first

1:16:46.800 --> 1:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>caller Eric Hello, half point PPRR, Grammar Rudolph, all right,

1:16:54.240 --> 1:16:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I got Jimmy Graham this week. I'm I'm just afraid

1:16:56.680 --> 1:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if if Keenum goes, then Rudolph's just not a player.

1:17:00.640 --> 1:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Although if Bradford does go, it's a money in that game,

1:17:03.680 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>money that game. You know he does go. I love

1:17:05.360 --> 1:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>him against those banged up line backers. The Chicago's got

1:17:08.080 --> 1:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Michael your next, Michael Michael. I can't hear you, Michael Michael.

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put you on hold. We'll go, We'll spin

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:21.559
<v Speaker 1>back around to Michael. Me'll take us off. Speaker. Eric Hello,

1:17:23.360 --> 1:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Google PPR. Thomas Brown from Arizona Rawls or Jeron Brown. Yeah,

1:17:32.320 --> 1:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with charges. Take a chance on me, Guy,

1:17:34.720 --> 1:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Geron Brown, I don't know yet. Howard Hello, Hi guys

1:17:39.320 --> 1:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Um Marchwn Lynch or Marshawn Lynch. It's a great After

1:17:45.400 --> 1:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>two punishingly difficult matchups, this one's much easier. In Baltimore.

1:17:48.800 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Mikey Hello, Hi, nonrn Or I'm sorry Cohen or who

1:17:57.400 --> 1:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was? Will Fuller, Okay, I'd go will

1:18:00.000 --> 1:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Holler if it's not in PPR. Yeah, I agreed, Tom Hello,

1:18:04.280 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I have PPR Blacklijah McGuire, Eric Decker. Boy, we have

1:18:13.000 --> 1:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>bench grades on both guys. I would say McGuire if

1:18:15.479 --> 1:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Forte sits, but I think he's playing, So I would

1:18:18.120 --> 1:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>roll the dice with Decker, with Corey Davis, how about

1:18:19.920 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if you drop Decker outright, pick up your guy Taylor,

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor or Kenny Still Yeah, Jones, Marvin Jones, Right, and

1:18:28.720 --> 1:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you can do better? Mark Hello, Yeah, PPR League, Mark Davis,

1:18:33.960 --> 1:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Bryan or Marvin Jones. I'm sorry, who's the Mark Tavis,

1:18:37.800 --> 1:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark Tavis, mar Jones. I'm going to Matt's guy. I

1:18:40.960 --> 1:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>had Bryant on the bench too, So yeah, there you go. Um,

1:18:44.280 --> 1:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael will try you again. Let's see how it goes

1:18:46.280 --> 1:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this time. Well, now Michael's just given up altogether. I

1:18:50.880 --> 1:18:55.519
<v Speaker 1>think Brad you are next. Hello. That was offered Odell

1:18:55.600 --> 1:19:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Beckham for Chris Holgans. Odell Beckham or what do you think,

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian Chris Hogan. He's totally legit. I would say, if

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you need a running back, if you're really probably for

1:19:09.760 --> 1:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>running back, do that deal. He was offered Odell though,

1:19:13.600 --> 1:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so he would be losing Logan and Miller. Yeah, if

1:19:16.800 --> 1:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you can spare the I don't know it's a question, man,

1:19:19.840 --> 1:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>if you if you got to deep up running back bench,

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd do the deal. Yeah, if just an upgrade to Odell,

1:19:25.200 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would do again if you had a

1:19:26.920 --> 1:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>competent running back to fill that spot. Yep, Mike, Hello,

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>digs are hill? Digs? Which which hill? Tyreek Hill? Tyreek Hill? Probably? Okay?

1:19:39.160 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? I think I like Tyreek Hill better in

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this matchup I gave him. Would be great. John, you're next.

1:19:45.680 --> 1:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>If we knew Bradford was gonna go, but it's Monday night.

1:19:48.040 --> 1:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna go back. I don't think

1:19:49.360 --> 1:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you're an old. It's tough to play any Vikings this week. Really, John,

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>your next? Hi? Uh? Both PPR Melvin Benjamin or Richard Man?

1:20:00.320 --> 1:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Okay? Oh Man? Mary? Yeah, it's you can't

1:20:06.920 --> 1:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just start any of the receivers with Castle Town. If

1:20:09.320 --> 1:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Mariota goes, I would go Matthews. But if he doesn't,

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Benjamin. Paul, You're next. Hi, straight up, trade

1:20:16.080 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton for Marcus Mariota. I'd rather have Mariota in

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a landslide. As discussed earlier, I really think he the

1:20:23.920 --> 1:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>potential for him to unravel psychologically is here. I advised

1:20:28.280 --> 1:20:30.519
<v Speaker 1>somebody on Twitter to watch Cam blow up against the

1:20:30.560 --> 1:20:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and then trade him. Now is the time to

1:20:32.560 --> 1:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>trade Camp and I think it is too rob. Your

1:20:34.800 --> 1:20:40.759
<v Speaker 1>next guys, bull PPR, Kemmy Watkins or Kelvin Benjamin Watkins

1:20:40.880 --> 1:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or Benjamin I had Benjamin with a start grade and

1:20:43.840 --> 1:20:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Watkins with a bench grade. We'll go there. Jesse, You're

1:20:46.520 --> 1:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>next battle of the take a chance on me, guys,

1:20:50.960 --> 1:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>full PPR. I've got n Detroit or I've got Jern

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Brown from Arizona. Who Brian gets to be the deciding

1:20:59.520 --> 1:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>factor Old PPR Jones isn't a high volume catch. John

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown is the ten targets a game. I would go

1:21:06.240 --> 1:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lean Gern Brown and full PPR. I can agree, Dan

1:21:08.960 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>your next half pay PPR uh either Richard Matthews or

1:21:16.640 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Mary Cooper Cooper again, I just you know until even

1:21:21.200 --> 1:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>if Mariota with a hamstring, I just too much, way

1:21:23.400 --> 1:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>too much risk there. And if it's matt Castle then

1:21:25.720 --> 1:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all bets are off. Gosh, you're next, Yeah, Eli or

1:21:29.240 --> 1:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>bign okay Man. Ben's got the number one past defense going. Yeah,

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll go Eli and Elis I I do

1:21:39.240 --> 1:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like Big Ben this week, though he's got He's gonna

1:21:41.800 --> 1:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pop off and have a big game, I think. But

1:21:44.120 --> 1:21:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I think Eli is the safer play. His average home

1:21:46.560 --> 1:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>game over the last three years three hundred thirty five

1:21:49.439 --> 1:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, two point eight passing touchdowns. You're arguing against

1:21:53.200 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>your own advice. I'm pretty sure right now. But he

1:21:55.400 --> 1:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>faces the number one past defense in the NFL. It's

1:21:58.720 --> 1:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a big Bill day that's allowed the number.

1:22:01.240 --> 1:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. Jackson was terrible against the run, the

1:22:03.240 --> 1:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>great against the pastor just gonna run Bell all day.

1:22:05.080 --> 1:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>That's my worry. Chad, you next Ellington or Joe? All right?

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>What Jellington or Marvin? I'm assuming Marvin Jones, Yeah, Marvin Jones. Yeah.

1:22:15.479 --> 1:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We love the concise questions, but you can't. You are

1:22:17.680 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>allowed to give first names with your players. Rob your

1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>next uh PPR Arizona's Ellington or Jerk McKinnon. Ellington are

1:22:29.200 --> 1:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>full PPR. Especially again, they've carved out what David Johnson

1:22:32.840 --> 1:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>was doing through the air and they're giving all of

1:22:35.520 --> 1:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that to Andre Ellington. He's averaging margets per game the

1:22:39.280 --> 1:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. Brett, You're next, Jarvis Landry or Mark Davis,

1:22:45.439 --> 1:22:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Brian PPR, Jarvis Landry and it's not close. Jim, you're next. Yeah, Hi,

1:22:51.840 --> 1:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm really frustrated with Brandon Marshall. Should I dropped him

1:22:54.520 --> 1:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and pick up Sterling Shepard? Oh? This is the Giants

1:22:58.600 --> 1:23:01.839
<v Speaker 1>question right here? Why do you think? Yes, Shepherd, Surgeon

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Marshalls not? I would Michael your next, mcclown. I'm sorry,

1:23:13.439 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>what was again, Michael? I know you're trying. We just

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>can't hear you. Cutler or McCown. I think you told

1:23:21.479 --> 1:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>him mcclown, which I like as well. That's that's a

1:23:24.320 --> 1:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>long standing bid here on the show. Yes, uh, if

1:23:27.439 --> 1:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that is it, we'll take. We'll take mc take Cutler.

1:23:33.040 --> 1:23:35.479
<v Speaker 1>We like, we like Coulor. We had as and Beesa

1:23:35.560 --> 1:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for all his receivers. We're gonna take Cutler on this one. Brody, Hello, Hi, Hi,

1:23:43.960 --> 1:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Dog Carton, h Jnan Adelman and Keenan Allen. That's the

1:23:48.120 --> 1:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>trade in a Dynasty League or Um, I'm sorry, Doug Martin,

1:23:53.200 --> 1:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman and Um Marvin Jones for Keenan Allen in

1:23:58.760 --> 1:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a Dynasty League trade. I like the Keenan Allen side

1:24:01.880 --> 1:24:08.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. Okay, Matt, you are next hip full point,

1:24:08.560 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 1>GPR or anything. I think that was Cohen Man. We're

1:24:12.560 --> 1:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time hearing people. I think that was

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Cohen or Ellington. Oh, that's a coin flip. If I've

1:24:18.120 --> 1:24:21.839
<v Speaker 1>ever heard one, I would go Cohen, I'd go Ellington.

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd go Ellington too. There's a chance that Travisky is

1:24:25.120 --> 1:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna just destroy that whole offense. I see a lot

1:24:27.960 --> 1:24:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of dump offs coing in that game, but I don't know. Billy.

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You're on the fan. Marshall or mixing PPR mix and

1:24:38.960 --> 1:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>had some wiggle the last couple of weeks. I'm I'm

1:24:41.000 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of down with it wiggling to two point six cards.

1:24:43.600 --> 1:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it. I'm I'm going Marshall, who's been targeted a

1:24:45.880 --> 1:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more lately in a PPR league. I'll take Marshall.

1:24:48.320 --> 1:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's your next standard league, Will Fuller or Brandon Marshall. Okay,

1:24:53.240 --> 1:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Will Fuller. Yeah, Darryl, you're on the

1:24:56.680 --> 1:25:04.559
<v Speaker 1>fan cor the full point. It would be a slam

1:25:04.680 --> 1:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>dunk Duke. I'm still going Duke, though you'll see a

1:25:06.800 --> 1:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>ton of a ton of volume here. Tom, you're on

1:25:09.200 --> 1:25:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the fan. Um, I'm very much in the first place,

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm probably gonna stay there for at least in

1:25:15.200 --> 1:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this a couple of weeks. Do I spend money on

1:25:18.080 --> 1:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Luck and hold onto him, or do I stream quarterbacks

1:25:21.280 --> 1:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year. That's a great question.

1:25:24.280 --> 1:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I would um, if you can, I would take I

1:25:27.080 --> 1:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>would take Luck. I mean, yeah, if you're telling me

1:25:28.760 --> 1:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't need wins for the next couple of weeks,

1:25:30.360 --> 1:25:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the roster spot's not gonna kill you. Yeah, I would

1:25:32.479 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>take Luck and but but wouldn't you be doing both.

1:25:35.360 --> 1:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He would be stashing Luck and then stream roster spot.

1:25:38.600 --> 1:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>He's using up the roster spot on Luck that he

1:25:40.520 --> 1:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would have used to stream quarterbacks in and out of

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what he said. So you're gonna take a zero for

1:25:45.760 --> 1:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Luck the next few weeks, Well, yeah, he's not gonna

1:25:47.960 --> 1:25:50.519
<v Speaker 1>start Luck. You canna start somebody else. It's just he

1:25:50.600 --> 1:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that spot I think available. But I don't

1:25:53.520 --> 1:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think it means if you're gonna take a zero from

1:25:55.920 --> 1:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Luck from several weeks that would change my answer. I

1:25:58.000 --> 1:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do. I think they're not I think they're not

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>utually exclusive. I think you take Luck and then you

1:26:02.680 --> 1:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>stream quarter right, Well, ideally, yes, Andrew Luck you guys

1:26:06.160 --> 1:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are talking, uh, Confederate or General Mark, You're next Standard

1:26:13.000 --> 1:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>League mccaffy or Alex Collins, Ryan Standard, McCaffrey or Collins.

1:26:19.800 --> 1:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Collins is the most carries for the Ravens

1:26:22.080 --> 1:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and this one McCaffrey doesn't get any carries, especially in

1:26:24.200 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. I'm going to Collins Standard, Lee, Collins, Dan,

1:26:27.160 --> 1:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you're next William Gollum or sure his last name is

1:26:34.160 --> 1:26:38.559
<v Speaker 1>like Gollum. It's gonna have a precious game. No, we're

1:26:38.600 --> 1:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna start, We're gonna stay, We're gonna start. Golman, He's

1:26:40.840 --> 1:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance to me running back, he will

1:26:42.479 --> 1:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>get the vast majority of the work against the bottom

1:26:45.600 --> 1:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ranked run defense in the NFL. Uh my, my college screener,

1:26:50.080 --> 1:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>says Doroth. I don't know if that's Dorothy or what

1:26:52.360 --> 1:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that is. It sure is all right, Doroth high love

1:26:56.040 --> 1:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the show, guys. Running back question touchdown heavy Jane for

1:27:00.360 --> 1:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay or Balman for the Giants. All right, I'm

1:27:03.200 --> 1:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>going Jones this week. Really Yeah, I even split time

1:27:06.400 --> 1:27:08.799
<v Speaker 1>with Williams. I'm saying that he's gonna split time with Williams.

1:27:08.840 --> 1:27:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Colman is going to get all the world. I'm liking Jones. Alright,

1:27:12.760 --> 1:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's Jesse you are next. Yeah, another question for you,

1:27:17.560 --> 1:27:19.479
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Do I go with Witten or do I

1:27:19.520 --> 1:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>go with Jesse James from Pittsburgh? Thank you. I put

1:27:24.360 --> 1:27:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Whitten on the bench. It's just a tough matchup for

1:27:26.600 --> 1:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, and Matt gave James a C grade. I

1:27:32.240 --> 1:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just can't believe we talked to doroth No, Michael Hello

1:27:37.320 --> 1:27:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Howell or for net non ppr um. I gotta keep

1:27:42.520 --> 1:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>starting for Net. Yeah, you never know what. The Jets

1:27:45.040 --> 1:27:48.559
<v Speaker 1>they always find some way to frustrate the Powell owners

1:27:48.640 --> 1:27:52.559
<v Speaker 1>out there. I believe that there's a chance come Sunday

1:27:52.800 --> 1:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna pull a side galal Pole and say we

1:27:54.960 --> 1:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>want you to instead of playing football, we want you

1:27:56.800 --> 1:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend today waxing Woody Johnson's dirigible. That could that

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:03.519
<v Speaker 1>could be a thing with the Jets. Tom, you are next.

1:28:03.600 --> 1:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>What just happened? Tom? Well, you got me on instead.

1:28:08.400 --> 1:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason. Sorry it says Tom here, but okay, Jason.

1:28:11.880 --> 1:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, First of all, I like the show. I

1:28:13.400 --> 1:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>listened a lot of fancy podcasting. You guys are one

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most enjoyable shows. Thank you very much. Anyways, Um,

1:28:18.360 --> 1:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams if he goes or Golden Tape. I like

1:28:23.280 --> 1:28:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tates in this matchup. I like the slot matchup

1:28:26.560 --> 1:28:29.519
<v Speaker 1>for tape. Okay, thank you, scores Todd, you are next,

1:28:30.439 --> 1:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Cam or a warrior, Okay, you better match up he does.

1:28:38.760 --> 1:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm all the way I'm nervous about. I'm nearly nervous

1:28:41.080 --> 1:28:46.719
<v Speaker 1>about Cam. David. You're next, uh full point PPR Carlos

1:28:46.840 --> 1:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Hide or Makistics Carlos Hide. Good? Look this, Now, look

1:28:50.880 --> 1:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what you've done. Mad mckissic is a changeup pace heiny

1:28:55.520 --> 1:28:58.439
<v Speaker 1>runner who will if he's at best, He's a c. J.

1:28:58.640 --> 1:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Procise replacement. That's it. I got a dollar bet with

1:29:02.000 --> 1:29:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you that in fanball scoring mckissic will outscore Carlos Hyde.

1:29:06.479 --> 1:29:11.799
<v Speaker 1>The Hid taken Eric, You're next, assuming Sam Bradford plays

1:29:11.840 --> 1:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bradford or Andy Dalton. But you're not gonna know on.

1:29:15.080 --> 1:29:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're gonna know on Bradford when you're

1:29:17.439 --> 1:29:20.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to set Dalton lineup at noon? Going to

1:29:20.520 --> 1:29:23.559
<v Speaker 1>start Andy Dalton this week? Find any almost virtually almost

1:29:23.560 --> 1:29:27.599
<v Speaker 1>anybody else than Andy Dalton, Jacobe Burssette, Brian Hoyer, John

1:29:27.760 --> 1:29:33.479
<v Speaker 1>McCown Josh mccow Cutler right, chat your next uh standard

1:29:33.520 --> 1:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>PPR PPR league looking for a black position Gallman or

1:29:37.880 --> 1:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson, seem my Goldman again. I mean, you know

1:29:41.760 --> 1:29:43.839
<v Speaker 1>what to Johnson is gonna give you, and it's not trivial,

1:29:44.000 --> 1:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not to me. It's PPR. I think he

1:29:47.439 --> 1:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>did say PPR in Yeah, I'm gall in on Golman.

1:29:51.439 --> 1:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But if it's PPR, then just take to Johnson. Take

1:29:54.560 --> 1:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>anything less than full PPR will go Goldman. Dave, you're next.

1:30:00.040 --> 1:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Two eyes dropped, Corey David to take up my growing No, No,

1:30:07.040 --> 1:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis will be back sooner. Caleb, Caleb, you're on

1:30:12.320 --> 1:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the fan here you guys. How are you doing today? Good?

1:30:15.040 --> 1:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Um, I'm gonna looking for a flax flexo

1:30:19.640 --> 1:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for this week. Warring ABU should go with Matthew. They're

1:30:21.880 --> 1:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>blood Richard Matthews like Eric blont I think that's easy. Yeah,

1:30:28.320 --> 1:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess you go blunt at home against Arizona. Get

1:30:30.720 --> 1:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your touchdown to be happy. DJ You'll be our final

1:30:32.920 --> 1:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>call of one of our longest lightning rounds ever. Uh

1:30:36.760 --> 1:30:41.599
<v Speaker 1>full point r Ron Drown or Wayne Goldman Child both

1:30:41.640 --> 1:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of Mike take a chance of me. Guys, how are

1:30:43.520 --> 1:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you going to choose? I'm gonna take Jern Brown with

1:30:45.840 --> 1:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the consistency that he's given us. I'm gonna I'm gonna

1:30:48.320 --> 1:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>take Jern Brown. I like him a lot in this one. Um.

1:30:51.160 --> 1:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>As many of you know, our podcast through iTunes changed

1:30:55.240 --> 1:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and now we've got a whole new feed, and that

1:30:57.360 --> 1:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>feed needs your votes and it needs your review is

1:31:00.560 --> 1:31:02.679
<v Speaker 1>please spend some time if you would, If you listen

1:31:02.720 --> 1:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to the show and you love it, especially if you

1:31:04.200 --> 1:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like it, please go to iTunes rate and review the

1:31:06.680 --> 1:31:10.599
<v Speaker 1>show because our old show, which have like sixteen hundred reviews,

1:31:11.000 --> 1:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>got torpedoed in this change. So for those of you,

1:31:13.880 --> 1:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if you would take a moment to do that, we

1:31:15.360 --> 1:31:17.679
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. And then you can hear the podcast

1:31:17.760 --> 1:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there Tony posting the podcast like right now as soon

1:31:20.920 --> 1:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as we are done. Thank you, Tony, appreciate all your work. Matt, Brian,

1:31:24.400 --> 1:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>good luck. Everybody will talk to you next week. I

1:31:26.880 --> 1:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think ten o'clock start next week as well. Go for

1:31:30.120 --> 1:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>football at two thirty