WEBVTT - May Says Brexit Bill Will Become Law Soon (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg's store in Washington with June Grasso in New York.

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Brexit is now poised to happen. Britain's Parliament yesterday voted

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>to let the government invoke Article fifty of the Lisbon

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Treaty and begin two years of withdrawal talks with the

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>European Union. The measure gives Prime Minister Theresa May unrestricted

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>authority to negotiate the terms of the UK's departure. May

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>plans to trigger Article fifty in the last week of March,

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>according to officials familiar with her plans. With us to

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>discuss the latest Brexit developments and what might happen next.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Is Stephen Pierce, a professor at the University of Essex

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>School of Law. Steve, thanks for joining us. Tell us

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about what exactly it was that

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Parliament voted on yesterday. Well, what Parliament had to do

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>in order for Article fifty to be triggered was to

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>pass a putty slide actor Parliament saying that the government

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>could go ahead and do it. And this is a

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>very very short ultimately one of the shortest stack to

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Parliament I imagine, which says basic the government can go

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead and do it and decided not to attach any

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>conditions that some members upon them I wanted to attach.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So the government can now add to its own discretion,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and send the Article fifty notice and start

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>everything running. Now there's been a little complication. The Scottish

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Parliament is getting involved with the the the Head of

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Scotland saying that they would like to leave the EU

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and saying that the Scottish Parliament is going to vote

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on second independence referendum next Wednesday. How does that complicate matters? Well, yes,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. The idea is that Scotland would have a

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>referenum on learning the UK and then seeking to stay

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in the EU, will probably leading along with the UK

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and then ending up applying to go back in. So

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I might have shot gap when Scotland is out. But

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if all this goes ahead with that plan, So what

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that would mean if an independence referendum goes ahead, and

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of course it the independent side winds is that Scotland

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>could end up being back in the EU fairly soon

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or it may not. Actually what they might just have

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to win the referendum they have to get back in

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the EU and the several things that have to take

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>place and the British government probably arguably have to say

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>yes to the referendum going ahead anyway, and it's not

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>quite clear if they'll do that yet. Steve, how important

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is it that Theresa May goes into these discussions without

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>any restrictions on her as a practical matter? Uh? Does it?

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Does it improve her leverage in those talks? Well, there's

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>different points of view, and there's certainly the government and

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who back Prexit felt that it was very

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>important not to have any kind of conditions in the

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Article fifty bills. But a lot of people argued that

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the can claus as they wanted

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to add it to the bill would have really have

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>restricted her, but they would have done other things like

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>guaranteeing EU citizens rights to stay, and that would have

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>been separate from other things that you I want to

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>negotiate or coming back to Parliament with reports and things

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. They wouldn't really have necessarily restricted term. But

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously the government got its way and said there's nothing

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in the law so far that's an actual legal restriction.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There might be political problems, and of course this whole

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>prospect of a Scottish independence referendum is a sort of

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>parallel political complication to the talks, because it's going to

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>intersect in a way if the referenducers ahead with the

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Blexit talks. Steve Lawmakers published a report on Sunday which

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>warned that the government's failure to prepare for a scenario

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in which no deal is reached with the EU over

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Brexit would be a serious dereliction of duty. Is there

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a real prospect that this two year negotiation period might

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>end in a deadlock? Well, I think it's a growing possibility.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, six months ago would have said you know

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about a one present possibility. Now I would say more

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like hurty or forty percenting getting bigger. I think some

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>people on the Brexit support in side would quite like

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that to be no deal because they had to think

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it would have no impact, or they really quite dislike

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to EU so strong and ters of ideologically that they

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>really don't want anything to do with it, even as

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>a contracting party to a treat you with it. The

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>majority of think the government and certainly in the country

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, would like that to be a deal

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's still Britain's biggest trading conner by thought, and

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>there will be a big impact if we left without

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal on a bigger fact as a proportion of

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy, a bigger impact on the UK. And it might,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>for instance, the reason why scottlan will be more likely

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to lead the in the UK um if there if

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no good deal, for instance. So it's one of

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the ways it was this Scottish independence referendum put intersect

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Brexit talks. Steve, we only have about thirty

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. But in any other big issues that you

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>see going forward forward, what do you think is going

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the biggest pivot point in the next few months. Well,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting for the elections in various countries. Once, you know,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I was in charge in France and Germany and the Netherlands.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow we'll have a pretty good idea of who the

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>UK's negotiating partners are and some people are going to

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>be used going to collapse. We should know within a

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>few months if that's realistic or or a fairly ridiculous suggestion. Okay,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thank thank you so much. Steven Pierce, professor at the

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>University of Essex School of Law, talking about the latest

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>developments in Brexit