WEBVTT - Is China's Xi the New Mao?

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all parnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. It's the video watched around

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the world. I watched it many times, feeling the gravity

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. And this was watching former General Secretary Hu

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Jintao ushered off stage, watching President g for an unprecedented

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>third term as China's top leader, really come in and

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>really cement his position going forward and really what China

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be about in the future. We've got

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a great voice with us to give us an idea

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of what China is going to be like in the future.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We got Andy Brown with us. He's a partner at

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Brunswick Group. He's with us right now in the

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, and folks will hear a familiar

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>voice because Andy joined us many many times while he

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>was here at Bloomberg on the program. He's good to

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. How are you great to be back,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me. Yeah, it's really great

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to have you back. So a victory for she. But

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>look how the markets are reacting right now. Just give

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>us your overview of what you've seen transpire over the

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. So victory for Sea, absolute triumph.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Gets his third term basically if he wants it, rule

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of a life, packs the polit bureau standing committee with

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>his own people. People say he's the new Mao, not

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that he's about to unleash chaos on China.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he wants order, but in the sense of power,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of prestige, in the sense of his

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>place and history. In fact, he may actually have more

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>leeway than Mao. Mao, after all, had to launch the

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cultural revolution to get control of the party. She has

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>no rivals, no peers, and no success it. He's alone

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top. Now, what the markets are reacting to

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that This wasn't just a personal victory.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a victory for his policies, the policies that

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have so alarmed investors, portfolio investors as well as global

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>companies investing in China over the last several years. And

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>we saw that certainly play out in the market. We

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about the NaSTA Golden Dragon China Index on

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>track for probably its biggest drop ever. It's down about

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>fift here. So how do how should investors after decades

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of thinking this is where companies wanted to be, to

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>tap into um their citizen base, what a billion plus people?

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>How should investors think about the Chinese market going forward?

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's so interesting. I I talked to I

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>talked to business leaders now investing in China all the time.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Just about everything they knew or thought they knew about

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>China has turned outside down. They thought that the Chinese

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>system was optimized for growth and development. In fact, it's

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>now optimized for security. China is looking inwards. They thought

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that Don chall Ping's open door, open reform and opening

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>policies would continue indefinitely. She's Don Chalping's open door has

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>turned into Si jim Ping's fortress. China. They thought that

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>policy making would be pragmatic and predictable. It's become ideological,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>almost random. They thought businesses thought that China would do

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>everything it could to ensure a benign global environment that

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would facilitate China's economic rise. Wolf warrior diplomacy, ballistic missiles

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over Taiwan, uh An alignment with Putin's Russia ahead of

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the invasion of Ukraine has reversed all of that kind

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. It's a very very different China. I do

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think about do we look back I don't know any

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>year from how five years or not years this was

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the division of the world, or maybe

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that was starting already, Like how do we think about

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this in a world where globalization was supposed to be

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it all that we've seen a tremendous pushback. We have

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to recognize that She Jimping is building a very different China.

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>He has a very different vision. It's a vision that

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>prioritizes security over growth, and it comes from a fundamental

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>place of insecurity. He believes that Chinese government believes the

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Party believes that they're in the early stages of a

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>decades long struggle for supremacy against the United States that

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>may actually lead to conflict. And so all of these

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>policies that you see rolled out from you know, uh,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the advance of the state, the assault on the private

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>sector UM, COVID zero, populist policies aimed at wealth redistribution,

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>forcing billionaires to disgorge the money, UM, a more assertive

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. UM. So much of this has to do

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with hardening the economy for the for the for for

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the struggle that they feel is coming. So what does

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it mean for American companies that want to do business there, Apple, Nike, Disney, Tesla,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just to name a few. I mean, they want access

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to this growing consumer base and this what well, what

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>could end up being a wealthier consumer base. Right, So,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>so they have a dilemma. They're not they're not going

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to leave. I mean a few are leaving, right. We

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>saw linked in Airbnb, UM, a couple of a few

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>companies that weren't doing much in China, had big reputational risk,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't weren't earning many much much much money. They've they've

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>abandoned ship, they bailed. Most companies are staying, uh and

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>they're hedging. Uh. You know, every CEO is being leaned

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>on now by by their boards. What is your plan B?

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>What is your plans? C? What you do if it

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>all goes wrong? What do you do if if the

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese invade uh, Taiwan. We saw this just the other

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>day in the congressional hearings. You had politicians grilling you know,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>uh Jamie, Jamie Dimond, you know, uh, all of the

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the the you know, Brian Brian Moyne, Jane Phrase. It's like, okay, what,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your plan? What would you do? You know, well,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of course we would salute the flag and do what

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're told to do. Right. And then somebody said to

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Jane Phraser, No, no, no, what what if you weren't

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>told what you had to do? She said, well, we

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>would probably still we would probably still pull out. Now

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a very different situation from Russia, right.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean these companies that some of them are getting

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>forty fifties six of their global revenues out of China.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to get right back to Andy Brown, former

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg colleague. He was editorial director of Bloomberg New Economy.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>He has partnered Brunswick Group and uh, you know, really

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's going on in the China space. He

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>spent thirty years I think it was actually thirty five

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>over in Asia. He was both China editor and columnist

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Wall Street Journal, UM and and he's here

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in our interactive broker studio. So I do wonder about

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>President g with everything that happened over the weekend, Andy,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who's there to question him? We always talk about it's

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>important for our leaders to be questioned. So who's there?

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And as a result, if there is no one, what

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>happens in terms of China and the Chinese economy? Carol,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to be a sinologist to figure out

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>where all this goes. Uh. You know, the longer he

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lingers in office, the more he's going to face this

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>autocrat's dilemma. Right. So as the autocrat ages he or she,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>usually he becomes more isolated, more paranoid, doesn't know where

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the next threat is going to come from. And as

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a consequence of that, the tendency is to pack themselves

0:07:55.320 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>around with yes men, with sickophants. He and these are

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not the people who are going to challenge the great leader.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And as a result, course correction becomes quite a bit

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>more difficult. Right, and for all its faults. For all

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>its faults, democracy does have within it this capacity to shift. Course,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it very very dramatical, right, ask Liz Trust Okay, uh,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that does not that is not going to

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>happen in in China. Ask ask you know global business

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people operating over there about COVID zero. It is absolutely

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>clear that COVID zero doesn't survive O Macron, or it

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>can survive O Macron, but at the expense of destroying

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Course correction is needed when not getting it,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's one of the reasons why you're

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>seeing the markets collapsing, the China markets collapsing today. Give

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>us an understanding andy of surveillance in China and how

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the country he uses it to essentially stifle this cent

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because like you said, this is not the UK, This

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a prime minister who could last, you know,

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>forty six days and then end up leaving because of

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the will of the people. The will of the people

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in many cases is not necessarily heard because it's cut

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>off from the rest of the world. Well, high tech

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>surveillance is a central feature of the security state that

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Shijimping is building, and we we've we've seen the extreme

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>example of that in Shin John. Everybody is profiled facial recognition,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>gate recognition, you know apps, building the into the telephones

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and so on. What's kind of freaky about these COVID

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>zero restrictions is this new additional layer of control and

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>surveillance UH and border control that they've built into the system.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't believe this is going away. Maybe they won't,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they won't practice it quite quite as extreme way.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Didn't everybody have to sign up because of COVID Essentially

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>beyond this app everybody everything, everybody has to I mean

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was in as you know I was.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I was earlier this year in Beijing for the two

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Winter Olympics. I was in something called a closed loop bubble,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>essentially a series of protected corridors running through the whole city.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>This was an extraordinary arrangement. I can't imagine any other

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>city in the world, let alone any capital city in

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, pulling this off. But they did. But what

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was what was what was so unnerving about it was

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>how effortless this all seemed. This is the Chinese operating model,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, an immense institutional capacity, unlimited numbers of people,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>huge I mean virtually bottomless sums of money, and all

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>animated by this sort of mass mobilization, whole of government effort.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the system that China operates on and which, by

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>the way, it presents to the world as the efficient

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>model for economic development. Now you point that in the

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>right direction, alleviating poverty, and you get a great answer.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>You've got a great result, right, extreme poverty eliminated. You

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>pointed in the wrong direction, for instance COVID zero or

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in sin jong uh, and you create a whole set

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of a whole set of problems. In a sense, our

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>problems in the West is a lack of institutional capacity,

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lack of will, lack of ability to get things done.

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>In China, one might say it's the opposite. The state

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has too much power and control. So what do you

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of watch out for over the next I don't know,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>six months, twelve months, as this, as we move away

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>from what we got from over the last couple of

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks in terms of the news flow, what is it

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be keeping an eye on. You know, they

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to tank the economy. I mean, let's let's

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be let's be serious, right, I mean and and having

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, dictators packed themselves around with sycophants,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and yes, man, I do have a lot of faith

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>in the institutional, technical, technocratic capacity of the China. These

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>states they've been the bureaucratic state has as has been

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a feature of the efficient bureaucratic state, has been the

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>feature of Chinese governance for thousands of years, right, So

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do believe that they're going to hold

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>things together. Um, A figure like Lee Chang, who could

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>well be the next premier, is actually very well thought

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of by the foreign business community, by the international business community.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>He's run Drajiang province basically size of a small country

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the economy, ran Shanghai best city, best

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>city in China. So I would be looking for signs

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that a they're going to try to figure out some

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>endgame for COVID zero. It's not going to happen overnight.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>People are terrified and be something about property, and I

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think that is very much a problem that they could

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>get under control. Andy Brown, thank you so much. Great

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Thank you so much, Carol. Thanks to him.

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown Partner Brunswick Group and as we said, a

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>former editorial director of Bloomberg New Economy. This is Bloomberg

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Master and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So we don't want to get

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to a Bloomberg Business Week's story found online and on

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg about the implosion of instant delivery startups that

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>soared during the pandemic. We're going to actually zero in

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on one in life after Peak Pandemic. We got Jackie

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>de Vallo's technology reporter for Bloomberg New She wrote the

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>piece along with Brad Stone. She's joining from running studio

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. We also got the editor of

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with us, Joel Webber. He's in the

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Joel counted one to three, only

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>four paragraphs until I find a reference to the nineteen

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>nineties and Cosmo dot com in here, Because when I

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think of delivery implosion, I say, wait a second. We've

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>seen this story before. Yeah, Um, we have, and but

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we haven't quite seen it like this. And you know

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the story that UM Brad and Jackie um. The company

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that Bread and Jackie focused on. UM it's called Go Puff,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which finally I know why it's called Go Puff, you do. Um,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll let Jackie kind of stick with one. We'll come

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back to what I'm sure. Um, but Go Buff has

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>been sort of the example. Um and with the stories

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately about of like this instant delivery thing that became

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>supercharged with VC dollars. Um. And now as the economy

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is starting to you know, not do not go up

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and up and up, um, some places like instant delivery

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe feel uh like a lot of money went in there,

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe there are owas not exactly what people had

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>hoped um. And there are some echoes of some yesterday's

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in including a dot com era flame out called Cosmo

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Um. But but Jackie talked to us about

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Go Puff because that company, um I've used if you

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>need to get cop styrup for your kid in the

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>middle of the night, turns out to be a pretty

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>effective way to do that. But but maybe not to

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>scale and go global, right, you know that's exactly it.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what Puff really shows is that there was

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely a demand for these kinds of service. Is when

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck at home, you're on the couch, you want

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some last minute ice cream or chips, even beer. Uh.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They've been around for quite a while now since UH

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and they really kind of came off the off the

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>ground after e commerce had started to become much more

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>widely adopted. Amazon was kind of known for, you know,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>being the delivery giant back in the day, and when

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>these two founders started the company, it was on the

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>back of you know what about you know, in college

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>campuses when you want you know, last minute packas a

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>beer before a game or your tailgating, and it was

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really uh, you know, in a place where it made sense.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You have a dense pocket of uh students who are

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay a dollar ninety five to get extra

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>snacks delivered. And this was absolutely super charged once we

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>got into the pandemic and delivery across the board was

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>turno charged. And when you add in all of those

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars of venture capital, becomes very easy to

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>accept the reality that, you know what, maybe we can

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>expand at rapid pace. But what we're seeing now and

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not just with go Puff, but a lot of the

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>rapid delivery companies that sprouted during the pandemic, is that

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a sustainable business in an inflationary environment. And

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when the economy is also starting to take a turn.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about the co founders and co c

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>e O s of Go Puff and you know what

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>their story was, because this is not their first attempt

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at a delivery company, even though they're not even thirty

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>yet exactly and there they really are a fascinating pair.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They're you know, very hard working in the sense that

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, they kind of started this in a really

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>scrappy way. They didn't know a whole time about venture capital.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>They it was really a bootstraps kind of attempt at

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, building a company. They ran this themselves, bought

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the warehouse by themselves. They hired someone to you know,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>off Google to help them negotiate their first liquor license. UM.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So their work ethic, I really, I think really speaks

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to um you know, coming out of an era where

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a delivery giant, you know, as the aspirational

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>company that they were hoping to be one day and

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>um but they also had a lot to learn. You know,

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>they started doing these deliveries, um, you know, by themselves,

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>with their own minivan, off their own money. And once

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you add in, you know, all the billions of venture

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>capital cash. Um, it got a little bit out of control,

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and whether it was just expanding into too many cities

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, international expansion, just the exuberance overall that

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>permeated the company. UM. You know, it also shows that

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>there's um, there's ways to kind of rein it back

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>in and this was kind of a tough um bringing

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it back down to reality given the tech route just

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, came out of nowhere earlier this spring,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can see them trying to navigate the turbulence

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>with the layoffs and you know, pivoting out of certain sectors.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see where that takes them. You know, it's funny, Jackie.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're going to spend a lot of time

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about valuation because of big tech earnings that are

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out and what's the reality And I feel like

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they had to have kind of a reality moment when

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>they thought about their valuation yet the tech company, but

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not like some other tech companies that demand higher valuations.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely right. At the end of the day, they're

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>more like a retail company. They're not different and you

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>know than um a convenience store just online, you're buying

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>things at warehouse prices and selling them for a markup.

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, you have a

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of overhead. This is a very asset heavy business.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, many Amazon type warehouses everywhere, and those

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>leases cost money, especially when you're expanding at the pace

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that that they were, and add in competition who's also

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>buying to scoop up leases. Think about New York City.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>How many companies we had running around here. Um, and

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>now that they've had to shut a few of those down, Um,

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that's still something that's they have to foot

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the bill for. Are okay? So we talked about some

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>things that they've gotten into, like alcohol. Um, we talked

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>about some things that they've gotten out of. Um, what

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have they not gotten into that they might yet? Jackie, Well,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of the kicker, you know. It's uh

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it harkens back to uh, their start and it's called

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>go Puff because they used to deliver hookah's and like

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hooka accessories to college students and it was exactly And

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is, you know they claim that to

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>be smokers themselves. Um. But you know, kind of bringing

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it back to where we are now, you're seeing Uber

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and door Dash facilitating orders for cannabis deliverate. It's a

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a touchy thing here is still because it's

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level that hasn't been legalized obviously, but

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing many states kind of take steps to embrace

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>weed and UM for companies that want to capture the

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery component. It's going to be a little tricky and

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>door dash and uper still kind of inching around it

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but in Canada, you know, they're the

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ones that are offering it on their apps, and you know,

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's someone else delivering or people can go pick

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it up, that app is now kind of like the

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>center point for um, you know, transacting this kind of

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>product that was kind of thought to be you know,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>off the off the radar for a long time. For

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a company like go Puff, it could actually uh you know,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>propose a poses a new opportunity to kind of tap

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>into a much higher margin line of business. I mean,

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what a weed order would

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>go for it, but certainly seems to be a little

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more lucrative than you know, uh chips and you know, sodas.

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got the rest of everything exact, uh you know,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>giving way the goods here, but um, we're go puff

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one director said that we quoted it's our birthrate to

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sell it, right, Like it's so good. So we'll see

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if they go there or not, you know like DBD.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna leave with their great story. Um, Jackie,

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Jackie Deavlos. She is technology reporter

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News from our nine one studio in Washington, DC.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>A story she wrote with our Bradstone and of course

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>our thanks to Jill Weber, editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Here in our Interactive Broker studio, you're listening to Bloomberg

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. I'm just gonna tell you we're

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>getting a reality check big time, courtesy of our Gina

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams. We want to talk about a lot of things,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and in particular, we want to talk about what's been

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really key growth engines for the S and P five hundred.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about those megacap technology stocks which are entering

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the earning season. I love this story with diminished stature,

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so let's get into it with our Gina Martin Adams.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>She's Chief Equity Strategies at Bloomberg Intelligence here in our

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>interactive broker studio. So we want to talk about everything, Um,

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to do you want to touch on

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the broader macro or do you want to go Let's

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>let's touch on broader macro for a second. Because of work.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're going to hear about broader macro from Apple,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft, from Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta platforms this week.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean Meta is going to talk about it a lot.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I bet afee what we saw with Snap. But Gina,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>just bring us up to speed on how you and

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the team are thinking about macro right now. Because we

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about rates. Well, we heard from you know

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier a little earlier during the program, and um, you're

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that the era of low rates is over, at

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>least in the short term. Yeah. I think that we

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>need to put the pandemic in the past, right and

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the just the activity levels that

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we've experienced in recovery will also be over. Will not

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>see that extraordinary surge and activity reflecting the shutdown that

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>would happened just prior, but we'll probably normalize into a

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 1>pace of growth and inflation that looks very different than

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the pace of growth and inflame inflation that we all

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have become accustomed to. This is not the Great Financial

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Crisis recovery. This is the pandemic recovery. And every recovery

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is very different, Every economic cycle is very different. If

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you think about the period of time just after the

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis where rates were abnormally low of central

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>banks were infusing all the capital they could and with

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>helicopter money on the economies around the world, that really

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>reflected an environment of massive deleveraging in the financial sector.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That environment is not necessary anymore. We've gone through massive

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>deleveraging and financials. We've gone through massive deleveraging among US

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>households and most global households frankly over the course of

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>ten years. So we're set up very differently for a

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>different type of cycle this time around. I actually think

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>demand will remain significantly higher, will have faster growth in

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>general GDP in economies ex China over the course of

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the next decade, will also have much greater supply constraints

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>due to a combination of deglobalization as well as decarbonization efforts.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>The result of that is going to be faster inflation,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>which means to me, faster higher interest rates than what

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we became accustomed to in an environment where we were

0:23:54.480 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>deleveraging really trying to combat or fight against deflation or

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>disinflation for more than a decade. You know, you've been

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about this for a while, and something struck me

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on a conversation too on surveillance last week that just

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>someone to who said, is going to be the norm

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>because globalization, like that's a change, the federal funds rate

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the norm. I think that's what

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about, yes, And then they said part

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of it was the prospectivegainst globalization, the demographics that we're seeing,

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the aging demographics and developed societies, and also climate change,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the cost of that. These are things that are structurally

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>changing within our society. All right, So we covered macro.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We've got about two now that it's talked to me

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about the big tech that are reporting what our expectations

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to get kind of evaluation reset this week,

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe to the upside and maybe the downside, and we

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>could have it could go either way. Honestly, Carol, this

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is a really tricky one this season because expectations for

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>these companies are very very low for the season itself.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>A third quarter beat seems very easy, yet expectations are

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>very high for these companies going into three. So I

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>think it really is a matter of what the market

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>is going to focus on. Is the market going to

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on Okay, thank god, they didn't do as bad

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as we hoped they would that we thought they might

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>do in third quarter, or is it going to be

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about the outlook? I think the companies are pretty savvy, frankly,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so they'll probably not guide us in and maybe gut

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>us for quarter ahead and keep the same beat third quarter,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we have a little bit of relief. That

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to be basically what most of the companies are doing.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>They're not really touching the long term outlook. They're not

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>giving us a ton of guidance into the long term

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have a lot of visibility into the

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>long term. Instead, they're focused on the beat and then

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe what's what they see happening in the fourth quarter. Generally,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what companies tend to be seeing is less bad than anticipated.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not all great. There's no rosy commentary out there.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just okay, you know what, it's we're kind of

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>surviving here, and that seems to be okay after the

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>market is corrected as much as it has. We've been

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>talking throughout the program about what's going on in China,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think of one company reporting this week that

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a huge stake in China. That's Apple from

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a production standpoint and also from a manufacturer, from manufacturing

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>standpoint and from a sales standpoint. Um, what should we

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be listening for from Apple, not just when it comes

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to China, but when it comes to macro because they've

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>got things everywhere. Yeah, I'm much more focused from them

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the supplied side of things and how they're navigating

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical relationship, the deterioration and the geopolitical relationship between

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the US and China. What do they see as the

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>long term source of supply? Are they going to move

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>away from in the world. Can they diversify their supply chain?

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>This is an increasing risk to Apple specifically. Uh, there's

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>plenty of other tech companies who have diversified out of

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Asia or started that process. Apple has actually been a

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit slow and a little bit reticent because they've

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>had such good relationships in China. For so long. But

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>there does appear to be some pretty big wind shifts

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at the geopolitical level, at the at the governmental level

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>between the US and China that are going to force

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>some change there. So how are they navigating that? Just

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds? Is there one, you know, are all big

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>tech created equal or is there one that could report

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this week that could really change kind of sentiment or

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms that you think about strategy just quickly, all

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of them are really really equal. Microsoft, though, is very

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>much on my radar. Microsoft is the one company that

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody has said, nobody's touching it. It's great, it's fantastic,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>everything's fantastic for Microsoft. So everybody else has had some

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>bullets thrown out, then Microsoft has not. All right, Jina

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams, thank you so much of Bloomberg Intelligence, BROC Journal. Yeah,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive, no no leaves. I want

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to drive. It's a good question, which is the drive

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to the closed for music radio? All right? Just about

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not in a half minutes left in today's trading session,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've got quite a rally underway, as you heard

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from Charlie. We're just coming off our highs of the

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>session that we are up by more than one percent

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about the SMP and the Dow Jones Industrial Average and

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>tim we're seeing some pretty broad based buying when it

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>comes to the SMP five we are, But what does

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it look like bigger picture? That's what we've been talking

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about for most of the day. For that, we turned

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Kirby, co head of investments in the managing

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>director at Thornburg Investment Management. They've got about thirty eight

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management. Ben joins us this

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>afternoon on the phone from Santa Fe, New Mexico. Ben,

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you. I'm great, Thanks for having me on

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the show. Yeah, thanks for joining us. Okay, So we

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>talked a little earlier about trying to understand whether or

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not we see the start of some sort of new rally,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's a bear market rally, or if it's the

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>start of a new bowl market. Um, what's your assessment. Yeah,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of a lot of factors going in

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>both directions. So I think on the one hand, we're

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>probably near peak hawkishness. You know, inflation is likely to

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>uh to have been uh decelerating over you know, over

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>these next few months. Um, And you know, there's there's

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>been so many Google searches on on inflation has become

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, a topic that that everyone is

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is focused on, so probably near peak hawkishness. That being said,

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the other topic that's that's trending out there is recession.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, even as even as we're looking to

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>probably be near near peak rates or at least peak

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>expectation of rates, slowing, economic growth is kind of the

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>offsetting force. So it'll be interesting to see how those

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>those two forces interplay over the next few months. Are

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>those indicators of the top when everybody's searching on inflation

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and recession? Can we read that as maybe, okay, yeah,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody's worried. Everybody's nervous, and that's a sign of a top.

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an interesting of the bottom both actually right, So,

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, sentiment, it usually makes sense to h to

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lean a bit the opposite away from sentiment when it

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:03.479
<v Speaker 1>get extremes. So at this point, sentiment is it's pretty extreme.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, when you look at the surveys

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of bulls versus bears, um, there's way more bears than

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there have been in a in a long time relative

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to bowls, So that at least augurs. I think for

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the potential for for a snap back. How sustainable that

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is as the economy slows again, That's that's kind of

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>big question. How does the FED regain credibility? I think

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they've I think they've mostly done at this point. You know,

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been tough on the inflation uh rhetoric. The

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>concern is that they're tightening into and already slowing economy.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think they do risk um, you know, being

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>behind the curve and and sort of you know, fighting

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 1>fighting the battle that was really important you know, in

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the in the past six to twelve months. But as

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 1>we look forward, you know, the war is the war

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>changing a little bit? All right, Let's talk names because

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are a few funds that you actually

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are involved in terms of managing, and I one thing

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you before we get to start,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what strategies are out performing right now? What makes sense? Yeah,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So we we have a lot of strategies are performing

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at Thornberg, you know over um you know, overall we

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have probably of our portfolios or four and five star

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>um on on Morning Star. So you know that means

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of top quartzile performance. I think what's

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>outperforming broadly UM value investing is doing is doing a

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>bit better. So you know, after a fifteen year hiatus

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of value investing really kind of being in being in hiding,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're seeing a lot of the rotation out

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of higher growth sectors and into into more value sensitive

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sector So, you know, one of the portfolios that I

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>co manages, the Thormburg Investment Income Builder, there's a global

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>multi asset income oriented portfolio. It has more of a

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>value bias. So you know, average stock is yielding five

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, the bondary yielding about nine um,

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and the p on that portfolio is about eight times

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>next year, that portfolio is out performing the vast majority

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of peers this year, but also over you know, three

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>or five and ten year period. So I think it

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense right now, as as we

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are in this tightening phase, as we are in this

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>slowing economic environment, to be to be pretty pretty cautious

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and this this portfolio with you know, high dividend yield,

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, is it really a pretty good place to

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be positioned? Is that because I'm going back to the

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>value versus growth debate here I mean, Carol forgiving. But

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>every year we've heard that values coming back, right, But

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is this time different then? Because of the high rate

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>environment that we're in. What we just talked about with

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Tina Martin Adams a few minutes ago, that we're kind

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of going back to the nineties when it comes to rates.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think every environment is a little bit different. But

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that for the last decade, company that we're

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>losing money have been able to continue accessing capital markets,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>either dead or equity capital markets. You know, you can

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you can have a product that sells at a negative

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>growth growth margin and you can just isisue new shares

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and sort of keep that keep engine going until the

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Kassa capital gets expensive and the Cossa capital has gotten

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more expensive, which means a lot of those

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>those high flyers who are able to you know, live

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on on very cheap funding for a decade. Uh, they're

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not now having to come to cash. They now actually

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>have to find a way to make a profit. And

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we're discovering that some of those business models might not

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>hold up in a higher rate environment. Hey, I want

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, and I know you have a couple

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of names that you're interested in, but time on semi

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>conductor manufacturing has been a big position for you guys

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with all the news out of China, are you are

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you having a rethink, kind of come to Jesus moment

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe on on semi or not yet just curious, you know,

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not not yet. In a holistic way, we have reduced

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the position size just because they have been such an

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>now performer. You know, it got to be kind of

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a mid single digit percent of the portfolio, so we

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we reduced it down to kind of a

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>low single digit percent. It's it's a really tough tough

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>question because I want Sammy is one of the most

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>important companies in the world. They have majing, amazing competitive

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>mantages um but the geopolitical definitely has the ability to

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>keep that multiple down and and to kind of create

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that left tail risk that we have a hard time

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gauging if you had to pick. I know, you've got

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some energy names that you like. We just have about

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds left here, Chesapeake Energy, Total Energies. You still

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>like the energy sector just quickly we do. Capex has

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>been low for a long time. There's there there's been

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of under investment in energy, infrastructure and energy development.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So we think having some exposure to that is interesting.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>These companies, especially a company like Total, is going to

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>generate a lot of cash flow over the next two

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>years and they're going to pay it back as dividends.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a good place to uh to hide out. We think, Yeah,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like this applied demand metrics will certainly

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>be in the favor for Big Energy, which has been

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an out performer Pimisle for the last couple of years. Hey,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Kirby Um really appreciate this and really enjoyed it,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>co head of investments and managing director at Thornburg Investment Management,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirty eight billion in ass it's under management, and

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>he was joining us on the phone from Santa Fe,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico. That was interesting. I'm gonna talk about value.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That was really interesting, right, Like, is that conversation different

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>now for this for years? Maybe? Right? Everything. Thanks for

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News