WEBVTT - HSBC's Maher Shorts Sterling

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. Investing in

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of global connections, Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg WI Kick things off though,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with Brian Belski, the chief investment Strategies at BMO Capital Markets.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And Brian, let's start with the news. How is the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>market interpreting what we've seen here? I guess it's just

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>another layer of uncertainty out of Washington. You know what is?

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The hits just keep coming here on the radio, by

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, so glad to be on. Yeah, thank you. Um.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>You know we are set into this reactive uh type

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of mood where we're only looking at short term things.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we would continue to tell investors three words.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Be an investor, you can only control what you can control,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think what you can control in this environment clearly,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>clearly has to be what you own as an investor.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And so at the end of the day, you want

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue to own good assets. And the market goes down,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you buy a little bit. More market goes up, you

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you sell a little bit. So I think we've entered

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>an air of fundamental investing again. We're picking stocks, were

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>playing themes, were owning management. We're buying earnings and sales

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and cash flow, and we are trying as best we

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>can to ignore all the noise. And today is just

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>another day of noise. It's noisy. My ears are hurting,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>My ears are hurting, my my fingers are hurting. In

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of trying to type out it's with respect to

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>my BlackBerry. Yes, I work for Canadian banks have standard

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>issues and so you know, at the end of the day,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're entering into this old guy market. We're

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of old guys were we actually understand the

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>cycles of the seventies and eighties. Uh, And I think

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going back to good old fashioned investing. You talk

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about themes and stocks, what what in specific are you

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at right now? Well, you know, you think about

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at stocks from a from a broader perspective on

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>think about this. We want you to own stocks within industries,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>industries and sectors. I think sector positioning is gonna be

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>less important. It's gonna be more about picking stocks and

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>playing specific themes. So, for instance, within financials, we love

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>scalable business models like the big banks in Canada, the

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>big banks in the US, those areas that have several

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>different types of divisions that are able to grow through time,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and not just the regional banks are not just the

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies. Clearly you should own some regional banks with

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>respect to your financial portfolio, but we think the major

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>play with respect of the secular drive and de regulation

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the financial services industry, it's gonna be all about

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the big banks. Brianski with this, Female Capital Markets will

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ask him about the falcons here in a moment. So

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I look, Ryan, within your bullmarket, call Dana her out

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>today with ours. I'm just picking on DHR. You know,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>great company. We all know that over the last ten

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.119
<v Speaker 1>years they've made twelve point eight percent per year, which

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't make money in stocks. But but

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>within that, in down the income statement, help our audience

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>revenues Trump operating income, Trump the fact is it's about

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>making cash flow. What part of the dynamic of cash

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>flow generation are you most focused on now? Free cash

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>flow yields are are and will continue to be. We

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think the key, the key key metric in terms of

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>how companies are going to grow and you know the

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>management of cash and what they do with that cash,

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're going to spend that on on capex.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We've seen so much cash flow go into things like

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>paying an increasing dividend ends. We think that's a major

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>major secular trend in terms of dividend growth on the

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>equity side. But cash flow, remember, generates earnings tom and

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, we're entering a period

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>where the denominator is going to be the most important

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>part of of valuation, going to way too much math thing.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And you've got a price and and earnings. You know,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the cash earning, sales, cash flow book value, that's what matters.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed you're having a coffee and a diamon mountain

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>diamond near the Gods. Before I go to Europe, which

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I was two weeks ago. I literally before I jump

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on the plane, grabbed like three or four diamonntain news

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and import them, import them. I'm glad you bring up Europe.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You've just been there, as you said, and in your

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>most recent note, you write, most investors in Europe believe

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>little or nothing in terms of legislation will get done.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're in Washington, help us understand that perspective. Should

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we be more in tune with it? No? No, you

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think you think we will see some developments? Yeah, we do.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the end of the day, UH, much

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of the get nothing done mantras. What's happened to government

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the last fifteen to twenty years where you've had split

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>governments and you hear this whole notion gridlock is good

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. You know, at the UH, the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>European Investor and we have been seeing and visiting our

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>European clients on the institutional site for almost twenty years.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And the takeaway that I would give you over all,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the overarching takeaway is that disillusioned. I mean, this is

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the most negative I've ever heard them and seeing them

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>in interactions with respective meetings in almost twenty years. They

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like America, they don't like our policies, they don't

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>like our president. And we think that they are basing

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>their investment decisions more on a motion versus analysis, and

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna miss the boat again. They're gonna miss the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>boat again. John Michols wait, will be in conversation with

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey mL tomorrow. That's good. Is a much bigger dinner

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if you would a hundred eighty billion ge capital a

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>million years ago, they're now down to a much lesser revenue.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They go from one eight billion down to a hundred

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen billion. That's a big drop in revenue over

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>five six seven years. Operating income didn't drop nearly as much.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And again this goes back to free cash flow generation. Yeah,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean full disclosure. We own both dana Her and

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>g and the products that we manage for a great

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>demo brokers up in Canada. But at the end of

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the day, GEES is reinventing themselves as an industrial machine.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a big conglomerate. We know what

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>happened in the eighties and nineties with respect to what

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>their strategy was. Now Mr Emilt is clearly redefining the country.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And when I talked to people about think about the

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>turbines and things like that. They've got single digit high

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>single digit divdend growth five year divd and growth with

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>all the turmoil up nine. I believe that's four hundred

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>basis points above nominal g d P. I mean, that's

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what Mr Emilt is supposed to do right correct. He's

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>doing his job. He's doing his job, and we think

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>that's the mantra for corporate America. I mean, Jeff's Mr

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Emil has been a survivor through what we've seen a

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of turnover on the CEO side and from a

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate perspective in terms of how he's trying to grow

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this company and how he's trying to redefine the company.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's fundamental investing. That's the kind of management that

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to see. In back with respect to an

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>investment longer term, what is what you see tell you

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>or what could portend for industrials as a whole. It's

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a great question. You know, we've been bullish industrial work.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I never have a great question. That's because I like

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. Yeah, I gotta anyway, we'll talk about that hopefully. Um.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the end of the day, you want

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy industrials when when the operating performance

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of the sector is beginning to accelerate, and that's what

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing with respective return on assets, free cash flow yields,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>return on equity, and so if you look at the

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>industrial sector from a longer term perspective like fifty years,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly a neutral sector. You want to try to

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>buy on a relative performance basis. You want to try

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy the sector when fundamentals are accelerating, and where

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals are accelerating most are those areas that are

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more focused on domestic domestic issues, domestic girl so those

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>companies with tht or less avenue from international sources is

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>where we're seeing a massive acceleration and return on next

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>where you return on assets PEG ratios are much more

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>attractive as the Super Bowl. Now town, I'm ignorant about

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the ATLANTAFL. They have a chance. You're you're one of

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>our big football guys. I would tell you that every

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>game you know, they suffered, they suffered. Falcon suffered last

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>year through a lot of of of injuries and things

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. They're very well coached. Um Matt Ryan had

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful year at the quarterback side. You know, uh,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>my my team member that works for me here in

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>New York City huge Jets fans. So I'm sorry he's

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a contrarian investor. No, um, you know, I think you know,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, if Tom Brady and

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Belichick win the Super Bowl, let's kind of push it

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>all aside, saying they are the greatest team that we've

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>seen in the history of the NFL. Let's just move

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>past that and find another team. After David Harrows in

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Chicago medicated over the Packers, thank you for that Super

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl update. We'll do a little bit of fun with

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the folks into the game this week. If you ordered

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>your platter yet, David, girl, you did some klaced holistic

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>artisanal platter and Brooklyn free range chicken wing Buffalo. Why

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>did I know that? Darnm are with us with it,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just to see darl Let's rip up the script here.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's define for our audience. I'll get it out. What

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is a currency manipulator? And is exploitation different than manipulation? Uh?

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Not very different. I mean I think the easiest way

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to think of a currency manipulator is someone who's actively

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>changing the price of their currency to extract some kind

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of economic advantage. Print generally to be honest. Of course,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the expectation is is to get your currency weaker, have

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to to get extra competitiveness. But you know, we've had

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>other types of manipulation. Plenty of central banks intervened to

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>reduce volatility in their currency to prevent excessive depreciations you've

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>seen in Mexico. So there's lots of forms. But obviously

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the one that the Trump administration is fixated on is

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there is this underlying miss pricing of

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the big currencies in the world that is

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>putting the US at a disadvantage because it's making the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger or the dollar too strong, as he said, Trump said,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's killing us. I mean, that's his characterization, at least

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on that note, Tom alludes to this interview with Peter

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Navarro in the FT. Peter Navar the head of the

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>New Trade Council, Donald Trump's Trade Council. There's a line

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of that article in the FT he

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>says he's not concerned about the possibility of a stronger

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar and its impact on US exports. I worry about

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual impact America's trade deficit and goods is having

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>on our rates of economic growth and income growth. How

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do you navigate the lack of unanimity in this administration?

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>You have Stephen Manuchon on Capitol Hill saying that he

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't share Donald Trump's concern with the strong dollar, Donald

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump saying he wants a weaker dollar. Now you have

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Peer Navari making this commentary on the strong dollar as well.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Is the lack of unanimity problematic to you in the

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>f X space? It is in a way because well,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fostering. Is in a world of a headline

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>reaction kind of mentality is well, who speaks next? Because

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>really that's what's going to color your reaction. You know that,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know Tom described this is a relatively small move

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're a dollar, but of course you're obliged to

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>react to the latest headline. And the difficulty you have

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is do you want to hold that position? Do you

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have any conviction and being long euro dollar? No, you've

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely known because you don't know the next guy is

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going to stand up and say the very opposite kind

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of sentiments. So this is a difficulty. And also to

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest to say that you know, we're worried about

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what the existing trade deficit means for growth, growth is

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>determined by the shift in the trade deficit. You know,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is it a drag? Is that change gonna be a

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>drag or a boost? But look, it is a talking point.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>And what's unusual about this administration is the president is

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the dollar. Used to be the treasuries game,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>stream about everything, but you know, you know, for it

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to come in on the doll alright, that's pretty unprecedent.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Obama talked about it reportedly, very briefly. I remember the

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>summit back in France, and then the White House has commands.

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, he didn't talk about the dollar. He's talking

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about something entirely different. You said you could see recovering

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the euro in the second quarter. What leads you to

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that conclusion, Well, that is a function of European politics,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>which of course slightly sidelined at the moment amid all

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the US politics. But I think it will get renew

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>traction if you get through the Dutch election, if the

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>French elections as well again in the in in that

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, if they deliver mainstream results, which I think

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is still the most likely outcome, then some of the

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>political discount I think it's going to creep into the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>price over the next couple of months, we'll have to

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>come back at im and we can go as low

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as your dollar one oh one, you know, before we

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get the true revival higher than euro dollar. Politics still

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the driver very much. So it sounds like in Europe

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>walks through what happened at the Bank of Japan last

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>night and an expected outcome here. Yeah, but what is that?

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>What is that portend? Well, they must be pretty happy,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say, on on some levels, because you know,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this time last year it was a fight for their

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>credibility in terms of are they impotent in terms of

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>policy delivery? Are they making the right choices and move

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to negative interest rates? This time around it's like, well, okay,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the yield curvet stills seems to be working. Last week

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they up their bond purchases to try and reinforce the

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>idea they want to cup yells on the tenure. So

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>you know they've arrived today. Reason me happy about credibility,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, what they're not happy about his inflation, which

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>still remains very far off target. And I remember seeing

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a report last week that said, what little inflation there

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is is the wrong type, you know, not even getting

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the right type of inflation. That's a concern. Twenty seconds

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is all we got. We'll get you back there. Do

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you still reaffirm a weaker pound sterling? Yeah, we actually

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>just put a trade on yesterday to sell okay, but

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got a short term target one twenty and we've

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>got a year end target of one ten, so you're

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in one ten two thousand seventy. That, Folks, is one

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the great outlier cause I think are Anthony from

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>spar To, I think he just loaded up on that trade.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>He did it like in the triple He's got a

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.599
<v Speaker 1>triple LEVERAGEX fund with his farroh wink. I think he

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just loaded the dark go out you think you know,

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get out of here. That's an outlier called darwiner where

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>HSBC thank you so much. Brought you by Bank of America,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our clients insights and solutions

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to meet the challenges of a transforming world. That's the

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>power of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce Federan Smith Incorporated

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Member s I P C. James Travitiz, who's appeared with

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this uh many times, Admiral, good morning. How are you

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>doing today? Job? Well, I think I'm Okay, Mike Allen

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>as a must read note out of Washington, and it's

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the first reporting I've seen. Secretary Tillerson is baffled and

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>General Maddie is quote unquote incensed over what we've observed.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how an admiral or a general steamed in

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the academic path of stravitas or Maddest responds to mere

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>civilians playing at government. Well, you know, when I was

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Alley Commander at NATO, Tom occasionally things would

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>happen back in Washington that would kind of light you up,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and you would go back and discuss it and push

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit. But I'll tell you the general

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really concerned about is General John Kelly. Is that

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Department of Homeland Security because he was evidently cut out

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of the pattern on this executive order. It came out

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with almost no notice to his department. It's his responsibility

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to implement it. Those are his Border and t s

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>A agents who are dealing with the public and no

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>early consultation, no voice in the process. If I were

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>General Kelly, I'd be calling the Chief of Staff in

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the White House and saying, if you ever do that again,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of here. General Maddis is incensed because of

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the impact it has on brave Iraqi translators who are

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>now banned from coming to this country, as well as

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the effect it has on jihadis. So I think kind

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the same reaction out of General Maddis. Yeah. Fascinating

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>story by Damian Pelletta in the Wall Street Journal today

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at that tension between the White House and John

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelly at the Department of Homeland Security. Just want to

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>read one line from that piece if I could. This

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is all centering on the pick of who is going

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to be his deputy. The White House pushing for Chris Koback,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>who's the Secretary of State. I believe in Kansas. Ultimately

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they picked a Lane Duke. But an incredible line here.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The White House tried to persuade Mr Kelly to accept

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr Koback is his deputy secretary, but Mr Kelly wanted

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to go a different route, picking someone with a background

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in Homeland security. People's what I thought. It begs a

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>question here, Admiral, that being what's happening here with picking

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>deputies in these departments. We look at the State Department,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so many vacancies. This has got to be worrisome

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for a guy like you, it's totally worrisome. And I am,

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as I've said before, I'm encouraged by the high level

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>PIS General Kelly, General Maddis, Rex Tillerson, Dan Senator Dan

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Coates at d NA. These are good choices, but the

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>second and third tier is where the rubber meets the road,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and so far we're not getting good visibility. And I

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>suspect there's a lot of what you saw at DHS,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>which is a political filter being put on these folks.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's understandable up to a point. But in these

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>departments that deal with their national security, we have got

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to choose competence over political bonafides. We've talked to you

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about the State Department job. By all accounts, you talked

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to the President about the State Department job if you

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>were Rex Taylorson right now, watching all of this unfold,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the retirement of these career civil servants, forced retirements of

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>these these career civil servants, you see this disarray. What's

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing At this point, I got to imagine that

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a guy who had a huge multinational corporation probably wanted

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to come in and make changes of his own accord.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>What's happening here exactly that he is going to want

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to select uh deputy and under secretaries the next tier

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>down who have serious diplomatic experience. I think he'd be

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>very well served to select a career diplomat as his

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>deputy and not simply take whatever the White House is

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pushing on him at this point. And I would suggest

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>someone like Ambassador Bill Burns, Ambassador Nick Burns. We've got

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>a a raft of these outstanding folks who could come

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in and help Secretary Tillerson learn this new culture. Um Admiral,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's General Languel, General Goldfine, some lightweight admiral named Richardson,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>General Kneller, General Milley, General Selva, and a guy named

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Dunford on top of the food chain and joint chiefs

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of staff. You and I go back to eighties six

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and the monum mental Goldwater Nichols reorganization of the competency

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of our military. How do you take Dunford and what

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>he represents with Selva, Millie, Kneller, Richardson, Goldfine, et cetera.

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you take him off the NSC. It's inconceivable

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to me. And by the way, I have to point

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out for you, Tom, since you love the academic pedigrees,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Joe Dunford, is

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a graduate of the Fletcher School of Law Diplomacy. Take

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a lap while you're making note he's down to midshipment. Okay,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that he would be taken off the Principles Committee or

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>not invited all the meetings. I suspect that General Maddis,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Defense, had a very short and sharp

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the White House Chief of Staff after that

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>announcement and said General Dunford will be attending all Principal

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Committee meetings with me. And you might have noticed Sean

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Spicer at the podium yesterday saying, oh, of course, General

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Dunford is invited to every meeting. Madis will make sure

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he comes. He's got to be there. You need that

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>voice of unbiased, unpolitical experience in that Principle's Committee. A

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>question that didn't come up in that press briefing yesterday

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was a basic one, that is, why is Steve Bannon

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be at these meetings? And maybe you can

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>help us understand what these meetings. Therefore, we look back

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on George W. Bush's presidency. He would not allow Karl

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Rove in the room. Exactly what these meetings are not

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about is, gee, let's think about this decision through the

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>prism of domestic politics, and so to bring folks with

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that bent into the room, Uh kind of shapes the

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>discussion in ways that I think are deleterious to our

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>national security. These are to be meetings of experts to

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>lay out options in front of the president and have

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a discussion without fear or favor as to the politics

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of the day. So I don't think it's appropriate to

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have someone like Steve Bannon uh in that room. I'm

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like to switch gears here and we're gonna we're very

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>generous of the arable will be with us for two

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>blocks today. It is a small number, five thousand, eight

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred nineties six self identified Muslims out of two point

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>two million active and reserve duty members. It's a minority.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>How did you as a command officer in the Middle

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>East with NATO and with your other duties including the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know the tug about your first commission out of Annapolis?

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>How how do you deal with religion on a day

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to day basis in the Navy? Well, first and foremost,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at those Muslims who are serving

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>on active duty as assets. They have a feel for

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the culture, they have a feel often for the languages

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>given their individual backgrounds, and you have to be not

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>only respectful of their religious freedom, because that's part of

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're fighting for, but also you have to think

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about how can I leverage their connectivity. And I'll tell

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you where we did this very effectively under my command

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan was with UH Turkish NATO troops who are

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously overwhelmingly Muslim. We found that they were capable of

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>moving and operating in that Afghan Muslim society very effectively.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We can do the same with our US Muslim population,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but we can't do it if we alienate them through

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>ill thought out travel bands like we saw brought forward

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days. Now. I know a

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have spoken out about this, reporters as

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>well as folks in the Armed Service, that this has

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>taken a long time to get translators visas to come

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to to the U S. Are you disappointed with that

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>how long it's taken? I am. We have not kept

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>faith with the terrific people, and every time I went

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>both to Iraq and Afghanistan. I had outstanding translators and

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they had been promised at the end of the day

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that they would come to the United States, and I

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>think some have, but it's been a long uh bureacratic process. Hey,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Having said all that, I want to stipulate, we want

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to protect the country. We want to conduct serious fetting.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, we don't want to just slam

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the door arbitrarily. And that's how this travel band felt.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back here, but I have a quick question

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>for you here. I learned that the the pick to

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be Navy Secretary is a former Army captain. You've got

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to react to that. Well, maybe it'll help West Point

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in the football games. I know, uh, I know Secretary

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Desert Nit Philip Building very well. He's an excellent choice,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>deep experience in Asia, understands the world business. And by

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, he has two sons who are at the

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>US Naval Academy. For that, I thought you were gonna

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>say the Fletchers School. Another busy day at the White

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>House here the second week in the White House for

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. Admiral and at twelve thirty pm today in

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the Presidential dining room, the President will sit down with

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Rudy Giuliani his cyber security advice. Right now, you've

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>thought a lot about care, a lot about cyber security.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>What do you suggest should be at the top of

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the agenda for these two gentlemen today. I'll give you

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>three things they should try and focus on immediately. One

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is UH dividing US Cyber Security Command from the National

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Security Agency. Those two are combined at the moment, so

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you have the military need intel function together. That's inefficient,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a quick win and it ought to happen. Number Two,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>we are to work on the inter agency and bring

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>together all the disparate cyber voices today, DHS, FBI, D O, J, D, O, D,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a soup of acronyms. Are all working at cross

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>purposes on cyber And Number three, and most importantly, they

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are to sketch out a plan. And here's a businessman

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>UH there to sketch out a plan for business private

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>public cooperation. Government will not solve this. So there's a

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tactical and operational and a strategic thing they should think

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>about today. How hard is it going to be for

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this administration to move forward on cybersecurity, while there's still

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the whirl of activity surrounding what happened in the election

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill going to be very, very difficult and

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>cyber broadly, this is the classic case of building the

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>airplane while you're flying it. You don't want to do

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>anything that crashes the system. But at the same time

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got to deal with this political overlay that came

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>into it because of the Russian activity there frankly their

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>attack on our democratic process. So somehow we've got to

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 1>separate that issue investigated, understand it, from the larger strategic

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>imperative of securing our networks. Atmost, see to the tour

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. You're ahead of an US Southern Command. You

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>know the border. Well, we've had this conversation, uh, much

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>more loudly over the past week than we have in

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the past. By building a wall on the US Mexico border.

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>How much of a difference would a fortification like that make.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It will not change the general flow of migration, which,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as I'm sure you know, these days,

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>more people are going south than are coming north to Mexico.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Um that look, does that include graduates of the Liberal

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>University of Boston right, they're all moving, you know, they're

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>mostly time. They're going to Canada, but at that going

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to Mexico. Um, listen, here's a news flash. You can

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>build a hundred foot wall, and you look at it

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>from Mexico and right to the left of it, I'm

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>an admiral, there's an ocean. So if people really want

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to go, they'll go around it. At see, they'll tunnel

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>under it the way that cartels are doing, or they'll

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fly drones over it to move products. So, yes, we

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>have to control our border. But a simple solution like

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>build a big wall is not it. It's got to

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be a combination. There are portions where you do need

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a wall. Other places fences are fine, other places surveillance

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>is good, can be on foot, can be drone. You

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>need a combination of things to secure the border, and

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>then long term, you need a strong relationship with Mexico.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>That's in the end how we'll secure that border. So

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>simply building a wall, both symbolically, tactically and strategically, I

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think we'll succeed. We're running out of time. Would

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you please explain the stravitas approach that this administration should

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>take With Mr Putin of Russia. I was flabbergasted in

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone call Saturday. I don't believe Ukraine came up,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which should I be shocking. I think they defaulted to

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the lowest common denominator of cooperation, which I guess is

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>okay for an initial call, and that is the fight

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Islamic State. We can both agree on that.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Broadly speaking, Tom, what we should say to Mr Putin is, look,

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have areas of significant disagreement with you where

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we will confront you. Ukraine is one of them, Syria,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>where he supports a war criminal is another. Cyber attacks

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is a third. But we ought to also say to Putin,

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>will confront you where we must. But let it find

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>some zone where we can cooperate, and there are plenty,

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's got to be a mixed message. Dian and Aari, Well,

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciated than most venus, of course,

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>decades of service with the United States. Maybe David Gurr

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Keen, New York not joining us. A gentleman

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>who has had a profound influence on the immigration dialogue

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten days, David Beer of Cato Institute.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>David Beer I want David Gurr to speak to you,

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but very quickly here. What will you presume to see

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in the appeals court process, the appeals court process, um,

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>after these lesser courts act, Well, you're gonna see it

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>probably uh split decision on some of these issues, but

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them are now mute because of the

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>releases and the changes in policy that we've seen from

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. UM, so you know, we might might

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have all of these cases resolved by the time h

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>uh an appeals court gets to hear them. What do

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you think is is the strongest legal argument against what

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw put in place here over the weekend? You

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>cite the Immigration Act of nineteen sixty five. Is that

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the strongest case? Does it rest on that? I think so?

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the constitutional challenges are going to be very

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult because the uh state of constitutional law. The Supreme

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Court has held that really the Bill of Rights does

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not apply to most immigration decisions, and so the question

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>will really depend on whether the president has the legal

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>authority to carry out these actions via executive order. And

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I I cite the Immigration Act of

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five, which amended the nineteen fifty two law

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>that gives the present discretion to ban certain groups of

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign born people, and that law says pretty equivocally that

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you cannot discriminate based on national origin against immigrants who

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are coming to the Hind States to live in it permanently.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It's been interesting to watch the fallout from this executive action,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the protests at the airports over the weekend, the response UH,

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>slowly but surely from from members of Congress. What's this

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>say broadly about immigration reform in Washington? D see? A

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of years back, there was a robust conversation about

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what immigration reform would look like it was being driven

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>by the Congress. Here you have the executive branch taking

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the lead, rightly or wrongly in the courts. I guess

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll weigh in on that shortly. What does it

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>say about where immigration reform is head? Where that conversation

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is headed? You know, I think it really shows even

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>broader than just uh, immigration reform, that we're seeing this

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>trend towards executive power that is just so expansive that

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's making Congress almost irrelevant. All of these dramatic policy

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>changes being implemented both by President Obama. What he attempted

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to do, of course, and shut him down on that,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>which was a positive development in my from my view.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But now we're seeing the Trump administration go the same direction,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, we've seen it in almost every

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>other area. President Obama and President Trump both doing expansive

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>executive orders in action. David, My amateur take and please

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>inform us, is that this reads like history. There were

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>previous immigration themes. There was nineteen fifty two or whatever

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it was. Then there was nineteen sixty five was Senator

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Heart and Representative Emmanuel Seller, and basically they said, excluding

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Asia and Africa is not the calculus we're going to

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>use in immigration. So then we moved forward this this well,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's two thousand seventeen. Do you presume that a legislature

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>can move immigration back to nineteen fifty two? A legislature

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>meaning Congress. Congress could certainly do that if they if

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to go back to that type of discriminatory system,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they could. Um. But I contend that it's it's illegal

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for the president to override that ninety five Act, which

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was all about it was full it's only intent was

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to create an unbiased immigration system where every country has

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>an equal shot at the immigration This is a critical question.

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any indication from a Republican Senate and

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a Republican House that what they would like to turn

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the clock from nineteen back to nineteen fifty two. There

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have been disturbing signs that a significant portion of the

0:32:53.280 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican conference is on board with this band. Now, the

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ban itself is uh is stated to be at least

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety days long. Now, if that remains true and he

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>reopens immigration to these countries after ninety days, then it

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>will not be seen as as big of a deal.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But you have to understand that this executive order also

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>claims the authority to make this permanent, and so we'll

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>see what happens after ninety days, but it certainly would

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be turning the clock back if it remains in effect. Davier,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining. I appreciate he is an

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute and Thomas will

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>be just fascinating to see play out of their protest

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>last night. I mean, it shows no signs of stopping

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:48.719
<v Speaker 1>here people who were opposed to this measure by by

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the President. I'm in the gird time out chair. I

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>cut in there with that final question. But I thought

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it was really I mean, that's he framed that beautifully. Yeah,

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like LBJ and do you want to go back

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to Eisenhower? Two are almost Truman. I don't. I don't

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have any wisdom on this. That was great. Yeah, I

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot and we'll do this sure. Thanks for

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura is

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 1>at David Gura. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio, brought you by Bank of

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>America Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our clients insights and

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>solutions to meet the challenges of a transforming world. That's

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the power of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Smith Incorporated Member s I p C.