WEBVTT - I'm the Boss and I Messed Up

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>My colleagues. We'll stop commenting on everything I get at

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>people and meeting. Why does my coworker keep taking credit

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>for all my ideas? Have any wisdom for me? Hi,

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alison Green. Welcome to the Aska Manager Podcast, where

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I answer questions from listeners about life at work. Everything

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>from what to say if you're allergic to your coworkers

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>perfume to what to do if you drink too much

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>at the company party. Let's get started, Hi, and welcome

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to the show. You might have noticed that the show

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>did not come out on Monday this week. We're switching

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Wednesdays only, but we're keeping both formats, so

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll still have the format where I have a guest

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>come on the show and spend the whole show talking

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>through their problem, and we'll also still have the format

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>where I answer a bunch of shorter questions from different people.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>People seem to like both formats, so we're going to

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>stick with both of them. Today's show is a bunch

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of shorter questions from people, and our first question is

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from a manager who messed up at work and is

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>wondering how to handle it. Hi. There, Allison. So the

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>basic gist of My question today is that I am

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the manager and I screwed up, So now what do

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I do h For a little bit of background, I

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>supervise a small team before at a software company, and

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my team is amazing. They're reliable, fast, accurate, amiable, everything

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>good under the sun. I couldn't ask to manage better people,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really proud of the work we get done

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>every day. So that is why I am particularly embarrassed

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because I made a noticeable mistake at work earlier in

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the week. So to explain that, we have a task

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that requires each member of the team to show up

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to work early. We rotate through all members of the

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>team and that includes me, and I didn't arrive to

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>get this test done, and that meant a few of

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>my subordinates covered for me when they arrived at their

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>normal start time. So this didn't ultimately affect our software stability,

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly could have. Of course, I did three things,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so I immediately notified our work chat um that I

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was mortified about the oversight. I took someone else's early

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>start that week to make up for the early start

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that I missed, and I verbally addressed it during the

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>team meeting with my direct reports, and I reasserted that

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm held to the same expectations and standards as everyone else,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not different because I'm their supervisor. And of course,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, I'm going to do everything in my power

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to ensure this doesn't happen again. But generally, this got

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>me to thinking, how do managers hold themselves accountable to

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>their subordinates when they make a mistake. And I was

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you thought my response was sufficient or if

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>there's something more that I should do to make sure

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>my team can trust me. And there's one other sticky

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>part of this, and that's that I have a chronic

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>mental health issue that contributed to me failing at this task.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And I discussed that health issue with my own supervisor,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but it seemed inappropriate to bring it up with my

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>direct reports. I was wondering, if you agreed, um, and

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if I continue to struggle despite my best efforts here,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>what would be the best way to address that matter professionally.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much for considering this question. Um.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful for your website. I'm so grateful for

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. It's made such an impact on my professional life.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for answering. Well. First, as far as how

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you handled this, it sounds like you have done everything right.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You immediately acknowledged the mistake, you apologized for it, you

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.839
<v Speaker 1>took someone else's early start, and you've been explicit that

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you believe in holding yourself accountable to the same expectations

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as everyone else. So if you were my boss, I

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty delighted with the way that you handled it. Really.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>If anything, it's possible that you air it a little

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>bit on the side of going just a bit overboard.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you even really needed to do

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that last piece about addressing it in a team meeting,

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>since you had already addressed it in the group chat.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with having done that, But I want

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you're not flagellating yourself over this, because,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>at least based on what you shared here, this doesn't

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sound like it deserves flagellation. So I mean, yes, you

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>messed up, but you're human, and humans mess up sometimes

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do. I'm curious about how you would

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>react if one of your employees did the exact same thing,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>immediately acknowledged it and made it clear that they knew

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake and that it wouldn't happen again.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know all the details about what happened, of course,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or what the ramifications could have been of you not

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>being there on time, but my hunch is that if

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>one of your employees did the same thing and had

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the same reaction toward it that you had, you would

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.799
<v Speaker 1>tell them that it was okay. You know, of course,

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not let it happen again. But people are human. So

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about holding yourself to the same standards

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that you hold your staff, to make sure that you're

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not being harder on yourself than you would be on

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>your staff. Because when you talk about worrying that they

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>won't trust you just because you made one mistake, one

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that you quickly took responsibility for, I think you are

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>probably being a little bit too hard on yourself and

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>harder than you would be on an employee who did

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. You asked, more broadly, how should managers

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>handle it when they make mistake? And the first thing

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to know is you will make mistakes. But this isn't

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like something that oh my gosh, you did this and

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>your a terrible manager for doing it. Other managers are

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out there working flawlessly every day and never messing up.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Managers mess up all the time, because again we're human.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That is what humans do. What is important is that

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>when you do get it wrong, you acknowledge it. And

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have to be a huge thing. It can

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>be a simple as hey, I realized that I made

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>their on call here, I apologize about that. Going forward,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>let's do X instead. Sometimes it doesn't even require that,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's a pretty routine mistake that doesn't have a

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>huge impact on other people, it can just be H,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mess this up, can you help me do X

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. It is true that because you're a manager,

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>your actions do carry more weight, and sometimes your mistakes

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>can be ones that have more impact on other people,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's good to factor that into how you handle mistakes.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want you to feel like just because

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you're the boss, they're very act of making a mistake,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>no matter how big or small, is somehow worse because

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not expected to be perfect just because you're the boss.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If that were the expectation, no manager could be successful.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And I do hear a little bit of that belief

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>running through the language that you're using. So watch out

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for that. Let's talk about what you don't want to do.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>If you make a mistake when you're the boss. You

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't want to double down and pretend that you

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are right all along. You don't want to shift the

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>blame to other people. But you also don't want to

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>seem so mortified by it that you signal to other

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>people that you don't have any tolerance for mistakes in general,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because if you handle your own medium sized mistakes like

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>their giant sized mistakes, people are going to assume that

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you will do the same thing when they are the

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ones who messed up. So you're modeling for your staff

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>how you want them handling their own mistakes as well.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So yes, acknowledge it, work to fix it, work to

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure it doesn't happen again, but don't blow it

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>out of proportion either. Now, let's talk about the mental

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>health piece of this, because frankly, I suspect that the

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reason that you are being so hard in yourself is

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know that it is tied to this chronic

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>mental health issue, and maybe you are embarrassed about that

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>because we are still super weird about mental health and

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they're still stigma around it in a way, that there

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be with a physical health issue. And in fact,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I am curious if you had missed this task because

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you were physically sick, would you be beating yourself up

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as much? I am willing to bet a pretty significant

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that you wouldn't be, and that is

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>worth thinking about. You also asked if I agreed that

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it would be inappropriate to bring up the mental health

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>issue with your staff. I think there's just no need to.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>If you continue to struggle with it and you're concerned

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's noticeable at work, you can give them some context,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's enough to just say that you're dealing with

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a medical issue that's affecting you in X and Y ways.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to specify that it's a mental health issue.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you'll actually be modeling good boundaries for

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>your staff if you just keep it to a medical issue,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want them to feel like they are

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>obligated to disclose their own personal medical details when they

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>need time off or when they need a health accommodation,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and so you will be mode all in good boundaries

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>by demonstrating this is what it looks like. It's okay

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to just say, I'm dealing with a medical issue that's

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>making me very tired, or whatever relevant piece of context

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want to share, but go easier on yourself

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>because you are human, and that is perfectly okay. We'll

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>go to a short break here and come back with

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>more questions. Hi, Alten, I have a job. There's a question.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a relatively new grad applying for jobs that are

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>out of state, and I've read a lot of advice

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and listen to podcasts and recently come across the advice

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to shoot out a blind email to a company manager

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or lead asking for either an informational interview or twenty

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes over coffee to quote unquote pick their brain when

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're visiting in their town. Being according to their stories,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's worked in their favorite each time, and they blamed

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at the job. I've never done this, and I feel

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>it tad awkward asking out of the blue for these

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of things rather than applying for a job on

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>their website. But is this the new and recommended way

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to find jobs out of state or jobs in general?

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for your helping. This is a piece of advice

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that keeps getting passed around and it is not very effective.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So First of all, managers tend to be busy, and

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>managers who have been managing for a while and hiring

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for a while know that informational interview is often code

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for I want you to hire me, but I am

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>not being upfront about my intentions. And the same thing

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>goes for I want to pick your brain. It's annoying

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>when people aren't upfront about what they actually want, and

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this advice is basically telling you to waste the time

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of strangers who may not even have a job open

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be appropriate for you. And if they do

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have job openings and that's why you're targeting them, it's

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be even more obvious what you're doing. And

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>increasingly managers are likely to tell you to apply through

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>their normal application process, and definitely when you're dealing with

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>non small companies, they're going to want you to apply

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that way regardless. Now, there are some exceptions to this,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like very small businesses that are more likely to sort

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of wing it when it comes to hiring. As a

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>side note, I don't know that I would encourage you

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to work for small businesses that wing it when it

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>comes to hiring. They tend to be fraught with dysfunction,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes this approach can work with them, or if

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a very specialized, very in demand skill set.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But for most people this approach is does not that

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>effective or efficient. Definitely not more than actually applying for

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs that are open through the stated application process. I

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>think people give this advice because they want to be

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>able to sell you on the idea that there's some

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>trick to job searching, there's something that will let you

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get around having to grate cover letters and resumes and

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>apply the normal way, because is telling you to do

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it like that is pretty boring advice. But really, this

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of blind emailing strangers for most people just is

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not very effective. It doesn't mean that it never works,

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but it does mean that for most people it's not

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to work most of the time. But it's one

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of those things where because it occasionally works in rare cases,

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it gets passed around as some kind of trick to

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>getting a job, but it's really not the best way

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to spend your job searching energy. Now, it is true

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that there is real value in building your network, especially

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to find work in another state, but

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the way you do that is to build genuine relationships,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>not to ask for coffee for a fake reason that

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually what you're looking for from the other person.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The things that will really help you find a job

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in another state are things like making your move sound

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like a done deal, like putting on your resume and

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in your cover letter that you're moving to their area

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in January or whatever month that you pick, not just

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping to move there at some more this point

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future, or in some cases using a local

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>address if you're going to be able to get there

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly for an interview. I wouldn't recommend doing that if

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't, because if you put down a local address

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, great, can you come in in two days,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're suddenly stuck explaining, actually, I live across the country,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to look deceptive. But if you can be

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there quickly and there is a local address that you

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>can use, that is an option. Other things like offering

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay for your own interview travel expenses, and definitely

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really leaning on your network to help you develop contacts

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the area that you're moving to. And that last

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one does not mean blind email people. It means get

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the person in your network to introduce you to their

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>old boss who works in the city you're moving to,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or so forth, so that you're using real connections from

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your network. Okay, next question, Hi, Alison, when I listen

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to your episodes about getting your tone right and made

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>me think of a question that it's plagued me for

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a while. I am a pretty rational person. I have

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a master's degree and have worked in scientific research. However,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>if I ever do experience any strong emotions, either positive

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>or negative, I tend to reaspect crying. If an emotional

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>skill was one to ten, if I am below with

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>three or above a seven, I tend to cry and

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to stop myself. This can be very difficult

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to seem unprofessional, weak, or unable

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to handle my workload. Another factor that compounds this issue

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is that I am currently a teacher who works in

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the middle school that serves very low income kits. This

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can cause a lot of emotional stress on top of

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what one might experience at a normal job. Is there

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>any wisdom you can share about how to avoid this

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or alternatively, is there anything I can say in the

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>moment to assure my coworkers that I am not a

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy over emotional wreck, but rather a professional, smart, strong,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>frequent crier. Thank you so much. I hope you have

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a great day. So I am someone who tears up

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>easily too. I think a lot of us are. It's true, though,

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that will crying once or twice that work will usually

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be excused. If it's happening a lot, people are going

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to worry about what's going on. They might worry that

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't handle the stress of the job, or that

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're too sensitive for getting feedback or so forth, and

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't want that, so I think the first thing is,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if it is happening a lot, look for other ways

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to get that under control. There's some physical tricks that

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you can try that are supposed to help people, say

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pinching the bridge of your nose or pressing your tongue

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>against the roof of your mouth, or even just making

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>yourself think about something totally unrelated like what time it

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes can cut off the tears. Or if that

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, you can physically remove yourself from the situation

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>until you've regained your composure, Like you can say that

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to go get a glass of water, or

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>excuse yourself to go to the bathroom, and often that's

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the break that you need to

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>get it under control. But if you do tear up

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of a colleague, most people will take their

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>used from you. So if you're a really matter of

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fact about it and you just say something like, please

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>excuse me my tear ducks have a mind of their own,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or don't mind me. I'm an easy crier, but I

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>want to hear what you're saying, so please go on

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>something that signals, hey, this isn't a big deal. Yeah,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there's water coming from my eyes, but it's not getting

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way of me hearing and processing what you're saying. So,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in other words, don't let it be disruptive, Assure the

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>person you're talking to you that you're hearing them and

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to stop and comfort you, and so forth.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And the more matter of fact that you can be

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about it, the better. Let's do a quick break and

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>come right back. Okay, here is our next question. I

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have a complicated situation. I am the manager of a

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>department in a public library. I have an employee who

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was very kind and helpful, but she doesn't take feedback

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>very well. Um, the person perceives back and some conversations

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive towards her, and she inflates the way

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>people respond to her, which then leads to her feeling

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>insecure about her relationships with co workers in a really

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>irrational way. She has also overreacted in the past and

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>has tried to quit because she thought she submitted some

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>cardinal work sin which turned out to be a mynor inconvenience.

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I and my director had to talk her back from

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the edge in that case. In the past several months,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>she has been dealing with difficult matters at home. Her

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>husband found work in a neighboring state about three hours

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>away and has been unfful during his travels. Rather than

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>leaving him, she decided that she would follow him to

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>his new job and resigned from the library. We posted

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>her position and received more than a dozen applicants, a

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>few of which are very promising. As I was about

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>to schedule interviews, she informed me that she is not

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>moving and would like to keep her job. Do I

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>keep on or pushed her to resign she had planned.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>She has been in this position for about teen months

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and generally does a good job with with minor adjustments

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that need to be made in her performance. What should

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I do? Thank you so much? So you say she

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>generally does a good job, that she sounds exhausting, she

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>takes feedback badly, and she gets weird about her relationships

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>with her coworkers, and she's tried to quit before for

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>strange reasons and you've had to talk her down. It

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>all sounds like a lot of drama and distraction. I

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>am curious when she resigned this time, did you feel relief,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>because if you did, that is a sign that you

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>have probably been accommodating behavior that you should not have

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>been accommodating, and that it might actually be better for

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>your organization to take this opportunity to part ways with her.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's the right move in this case,

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>but I do want you to know that in theory,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you're certainly entitled to say, you know, you resigned, and

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we accepted that resignation, and we're now moving forward word

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with other applicants who we recruited in good faith, and

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stick with the path that we're on

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and keep your last day as whatever date was set.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And that is what I would recommend doing with someone

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who was a different sort of problem, Like if she

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had had a terrible attitude and been a jerk to people,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I would go with that plan. But you say she's

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually very kind and helpful, So I am betting that

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>will not feel like the right thing to do, especially

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when you throw in the situation with her marriage, which

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty awful. So there is a middle ground here.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You could say to her, you know, we took you

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>out your word when you resigned, and we put a

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of work into recruiting good candidates, and we have

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>some promising people in the candidate pool now, but we

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>also value you and I don't want to put you

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult spot. But if we short circuit the

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>search now and you stay, I want to be transparent

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>with you that we're going to need you to make

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>some changes. You do excellent work, but you also bring

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of drama into your relationships here, and I

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>need you to read that because it can be distracting.

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I need you to work on not responding defensively when

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you get feedback, and on dealing with colleagues in a calm,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>drama freeway. And you could give a couple of examples

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there so that she's clear about what you're talking about,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and you could say, if you can commit to doing that,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we can move forward. But if you can't or you

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, we'd want to stick with the ending

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>date that you set. And you should also say you

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>know you've resigned in the past and then rescinded it,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so I need you to be really clear that if

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you tell me again that you're quitting after this, I

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>am going to take you at your word and we

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to reverse it again. You might feel like, oh,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of harsh for someone who does good work,

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but what you've described is actually really disruptive. And you've

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>got to think about her coworkers too, because if they

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>see her being this disruptive and then they had the

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>relief I'm betting of her resigning and then they see

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>her reverse and course and coming back and you being

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>okay with it, the message that you will take a

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>way is that you're either fine with all of the

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>drama or you're not fine with it, but you aren't

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>being a strong leader and addressing it. So if you

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do let her rescind the resignation, it's got to be

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>with these conditions on it and a commitment from her

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to really get that behavior under control. Let's take another question. Hi,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk to Alison and figure out a

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>way how to ask my brod to go from working

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>sides eights two, three solved or four tunes. When I

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>approached her a few days ago, um, she told me

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>she put me on the list because other employees were

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be asking the same thing because we're moving

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>from Kansas City, Missouri, to ln next to Kansas and

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the drive now is going to be about an hour

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one way and that just might not work for me

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>every day. So I need to figure out a way

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask my boss again and kind of make sure

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that she knows that I'm serious, and then I want

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to be taken serious to have a different schedule coming

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>up in November because Kansas City and Kansas can get

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>very bad with traffic and weather. Alison, I listened to

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>your show every week. I look forward to it. I just,

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one person that I want to give

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>my advice, and I actually want to get my advice

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>more from you than from my mom, who was a

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>project manager for a teen chief for thirty five years. Okay,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>so first, for people who don't know this lingo when

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the color is saying she wants to go from working

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>five eighths to four tenths. That means that right now

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>she's working five eight hour days every week, and she

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to switch to four ten hour days, so same

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>number of hours each week that spread out over four

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>days instead of five. It is potentially tricky because it

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds like your US as saying other people are asking

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for this as well, and she doesn't necessarily want to

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>say yes to it for everyone. And there might be

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>good reasons for that, like maybe it'll affect coverage in

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a way that won't be workable, or maybe there are

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not good reasons for that, and she just hasn't fully

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>thought it through. Who knows. I think you need to

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out is this a deal breaker for you? If

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>she says no, you definitely can't make this change, would

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you leave the job over it. If you would, that

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>will affect the way you approach it. You could say

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to her, you know, I really love my job and

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to stay in it, but I am very

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>concerned about my community after the move. I could make

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it work if I can switch my schedule to four

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>tens so that I'm still working the same number of hours,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>but doing the drive one day less. I want to

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>emphasize that I really love the company and I love

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>my work, and I want to find a way to

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>make this work if we can. But the drive is

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be doable for me five days a week.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And if she resists, you could say something like I

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>really want to see if we can try to make

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this work because I don't want to have to leave

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the job. Would you be open to trying it as

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a short term experiment, maybe for one month, and then

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we can see how it goes and revisit it after

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a month to see if it's doable. Sometimes it's easier

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>for managers to say yes to something that is just

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a short term experiment rather than a permanent change, and

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then that gives you the chance to show that it

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is workable. The other thing is, you've probably thought of this,

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but is it an option for you to work from

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>home at all? Because if it is, you could also

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>propose working from home one day a week, which would

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>also get you that break from commuting. But ultimately, if

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>she does say no, you probably need to decide if

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you still want the job under these new conditions, with

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the longer drive and I know that sucks, but it

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>may end up coming down to that. But have the

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation first, show that you really want to make it

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>work and see what happens. I will say, if you

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have a really short commute now and you're going up

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to an hour each way, even just going to four

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>tens might not be enough to make that work for

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you in the long term. I mean, I'm in the

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>DC area. A lot of people have one hour commutes.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's seen as not that unusual here. But if you

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are somewhere where it's it's normal to have a ten

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>minute or fifteen minute commute, this might be a major

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>quality of life compromise that you don't want to make.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Even if you do get the four tents, that still

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>means you're spending two hours a day sitting in traffic,

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you might not want to do that. So give

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that some thought too. Good luck. That is our show

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>for today. If you would like to hear your question

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>answered on an upcoming episode recorded on the show voicemail

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at eight five five six work that is eight five

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>five f T six nine five, or if you have

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a longer question where you want to actually come on

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the show and talk to me email podcast at ask

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a manager dot org. That's it for today. I will

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be back next time with more questions and