WEBVTT - Interview With Tom Dorsey: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey this week on the podcast, I have a special guest,

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and I should say that less often, but I have

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a special guest. He's somebody who I have been reading

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. Very early in my career,

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I started out reading Tom Dorsey. He's the co founder

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Dorsey Wright, which runs a few billions

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in ETFs and was recently bought by NASDAC

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of hundred million dollars. If you are

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>technically oriented, if you are a technician, chartist, plant anything

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, you will find this conversation quite fascinating.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Wright is not the sort of technical newsletter that's

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>read by the lay person or the investing public. It

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really has been a how to guide for some of

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the savvier people in the brokerage world and sells ID.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I recall visiting other people's offices and laughing saying, hey,

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>this Dorsey right on the desk. Anyway, we spoke to

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>almost two hours. Uh. It ranged far and wide. If

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>you're at all interested in in relative strength, portfolio management,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>technical analysis, port and figure charting, you will find this

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>UH conversation to be a tour to force. So, without

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>any further delay, my conversation with Tom Dorsey. This is

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio this week.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>My guest is Tom Dorsey. He is the founder and

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of Dorsey Wright and Associates, a technical research

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and advisory daily read that I recall spending lots and

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of time with the early part of my career.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It pretty much was a regular on my desk. Last

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>year this was sold to the NASDAC for almost a

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterbillion dollars. Dorsey Wright is based on an idea called

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>point and figure charting, which will get into but the

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>underlying concept is you must have a clear strategy based

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on objective, unemotional data. Welcome to bloom Bark. It's pleasure

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to have you, Thanks Barry. So I want to start

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out with a quote of yours and and have you

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>respond to that. Strict modern portfolio theory has driven a

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>commoditization of financial analysis to the detriment of analysts and investors.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, when you're thinking about modern

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>portfolio theory, it's something that goes back. UH. Probably thirty

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago, and it's it's it's it's fundamental buy

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and hold. A person comes into an office, takes a test,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>determines that he's a moderate investor, immediate goes into a

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>into a moderate pie and uh, that's rebalanced twice a

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>year and you stay that way as long as your

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>risk level doesn't change. So you've got to come in

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and retake a test to make your risk level change

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>before anything will change there. So it can miss a

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of changes in the overall market. But it's something

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that you'll probably find that nine percent of advisors use.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Makes a lot of sense. So we talked earlier. I

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned objective on emotional data is key to a strategy,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but you have noted that a lot of people don't

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>really have much of a strategy. No, that's the thing.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>People are human, you know. Well, it's like Mike Tyson said,

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you walk into a ring with it with all all

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of plans and a strategy until you get hit

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>one time. Right, everybody has a plan until the're hit

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the face, until they're hit in the phase it

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what happens here. The strategy is great

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>until all of a sudden you feel sick to your stomach.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.119
<v Speaker 1>The market is going down and it's let's get out,

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's getting out exactly at the wrong time. So

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the hard part. Is what we have done at

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey right is we've taken the emotion out of it

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and made everything rules based. So when it feels the

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>feels the worst, you have to understand that the systematic

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>approach is going to do it job. Sometimes it doesn't

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>feel so good, like right now, but most of the

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>time it works fine. So one of the things you

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>would send along these lines, um studies have shown investors

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>tend to achieve subpart performance when they allow those emotions

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to take over and when they fail to adhere to

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>a consistent said a rules. So if you have these

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>rules that will prevent you from engaging in emotional behavior,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how does an investor find the discipline to stick to

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those rules. Well, that's a good question, Barry. How do

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, because again, like I said, you're dealing with

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>human emotion. When you embrace. When you sit down with

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>your advisor and he's using a rules based system and

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>explains the rules to you and you embrace those rules,

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where you need to step back and just let

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it happen. When things feel bad, that's the time typically

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in that type of a program, to add money to

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the to the portfolio, not take money out. Take for instance,

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what we do is probably gonna underperform maybe once every

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>four quarters somewhere in that nature. You'll feel bad. You're

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna a position one way in the market's going the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>other way, precisely exactly, And typically what happens there Really,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at a rules based program like ours,

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>which is relative strength, the it's like shifting a car.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's trying to find traction. So you go from first

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gear to second gear, you let off the gas, you

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>push in the clutch, you change it from first to

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>second gear, you put let the clutch back out, you

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>put the gas back on. You've lost momentum. And then

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>once you catch second gear, that's when you found the direction.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But when nothing's when there's no direction whatsoever, like like

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lately exactly, that's when it underperforms. So how did you

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>become a technician? How did you find your way to

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at price as opposed to looking at the fundamentals? Well, Barry,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it was absolutely accidental because I was a stockbroker Maryland's

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>first back in the mid seventies. Um had to be

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a rough period. Oh it wasn't rough because I started

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>exactly at the boy him of the market when people

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>had been wiped out. Between nineteen seventy four. I got

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the distinct pleasure of graduating from Maryland Sales School, coming

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>back to to mary Lynch and Richmond, Virginia, picking up

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone and now I'm on the white Horse and

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna help everyone, and they've just been lost. They

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just lost about six point market was more than sm

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was more than cut and half over that period exactly,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>So no one was really interested in the twenty some

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>year old kid coming in to help them. But I

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>realized if I'm going to be successful, I had to

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>become an expert at something. So I chose the option market,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which had just debuted the year before in April of

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy four. So I became an expert in options

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>by studying weekends and whatnot. Ultimately that led to Wheat

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>First Securities, which was a large regional firm, hiring me

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to come across and develop and manage their first option

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy department. That's funny, I mentioned I read you when

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I was early in my career. Similarly, from Wheat first,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I read Don Hayes. His office was right next to mine.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So in the last minute, we have and we're gonna

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot more time on point and figure next segment.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>What makes point and figure different from traditional charting, Well,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>because point and figure charts are not updated every day. Uh,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things that have to happen before chart

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is updated. It's made out of xs and o's and

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of funny to people, but there is a

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>learning process that you have to go through when you

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand the buy signals and sell signals in in uh,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in point and figure. What has to happen for a

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>point and figure chart to be updated, Well, what has

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen is the stock either has to reverse columns

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>by three boxes or more, meaning the price has to

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.119
<v Speaker 1>come down to come down by three typically a certain

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>amount exactly. So it's really that doesn't happen, it's not

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be updated. I'm Barry rid Helts. You're listening to

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My guest this week

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is Tom Dorsey. He is the founder of Dorsey Wright Associates,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a research and newsletter firm that was sold

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to the nast Act for a couple hundred million dollars

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. Before we get into the specific of point

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and figure charting, you come out of the Mary Merrill

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Lynch sales program, uh, which I know is a fairly

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental approach to looking at stocks. How did somebody like

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you in the early seventies find your way into technical analysts? Well,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it was totally by accident, Barry, because when Wheat First

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Security hired me to to leave Mery Lynch and come

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>across and develop and manage their first option department, I

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>realized I need to hire somebody who really understood the markets.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And I hired this guy from Charlotte, North Carolina. Name

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was Steve Kane, and he brought with him a little

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>book written in nineteen forty seven called the three point

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Reversal Method of Point and Figure Stock Market Trading by A. W. Cohen.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And he said, would you read this so you'll understand

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the operating system in my mind when I come to

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you with a stock or the sector, or the market

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or that type of thing. I said, I do it,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and I took it to a Virginia beach that weekend

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with my wife. Read the first paragraph of the introduction

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>brought me back to my economics education in the university,

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and I had the epiphany right then that I knew

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I had to teach this to my brothers and sisters

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of my life because it brought me

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>back to econ one on one, which was the most

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>important course I ever had in the university. Supply and demand. Absolutely,

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the key to all of the irrefutable law of

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand. And this methodology was created simply as

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a logical, organized way of recording the imbalance between supply

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and demand. So we we talked earlier about xs and o's.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you know, it's not so much that

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a line chartum on a screen, but

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially looking at x's when the stock is rising,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>oh's when the stock is falling. Um. Why didn't this

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>method ever go mainstream? If it's if it's so successful, well,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually glad it never did go mainstream because it's

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>because for you, it takes it takes uh an education

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this. You've got to want to learn point

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and figure charge. Anyone could look at a regular charge

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg or yeah, but this real. You need to

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have some background. You've got you need to have some background,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and not that much background. I mean, I'm not selling

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a book, but you could read my book in your

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and you've got enough. So the one of the key

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>questions anytime I mentioned point and figure charting to people,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>well why should I use that method as opposed to

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>regular technical analysis. Well, one of the things is it's

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>number one easily programmable because the computer already understands ones

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and zeros, It understands xs and ohs like you can't imagine. Um,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>there are relative strength things that we can do with

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the point and figure charting that you really can't do

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with bar charts. Bar charts are updated every day, no

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>matter how inconsequential, the more minute by minute, as often

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>as you want to be in the thick of it,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so they only whisper when a particular signal is given

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ers or something should be done with a point and

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>figure charts yells at you. You see a stock rise

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to a particular point four times and it can't get

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>through that level, and the fifth time it finally gets

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>through that level, it's yelling at you and says, you know,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that supply that was at that level all this time

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>could be even a few years. In the case of

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola, back could be a few years. And finally

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's sopped up all that selling pressure and

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this breakout suggests is going much much higher. I like,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I like that explanation. Regular charts whisper point and figures. Yeah,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they shout that that's that's really quite quite interesting. So

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things, and again I was a reader

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of Dorsey Wright for many many people should realize that

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>for those of those folks who might not have been

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on the cell side, on the brokeren side at any

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>part of their career, this was pretty much a staple

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>across broker's desks and strategist desks all over Wall Street.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Lots and lots of people were reading Dorsey Wright. And

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I very vividly remember was

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>your concept of is the offensive team or the decent

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive team on the field, Please explain that for for

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the average lay person, that's a concept that day's back

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to nineteen and Earnest Staby began thinking about what we

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>needed in the market, and he's basically said, we need

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a soulless barometer that will begin becoming negative when the

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>markets at at the top, and positive when the markets

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom. Something totally confounding two investors that when

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>things look the best, we need to start getting negative.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So in N. W. Cohen created what's called the bullish

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>percent index. Now, the beauty about a point in figure

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>chart is a buy or sells signal by singing will

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>simply a column of excess that exceeds the previous column

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of excess. That's simple. Just think in your mind, that's

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>all excess that exceed a previous contents. So a a

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>higher price right on a certain range, that's right, and

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you can see it's it's so visual, it's unbelievable. The

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>computer can see this easily. When you look at the

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange, which has about two thousand stocks

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on it somewhere in that area, and we calculate the

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage of stocks that are on by signals, that that

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>means if we went through, if I gave a seventh

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>grader every chart on the New York Stock Exchange and

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>said look to the far right hand side, and every

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stock you see that has a column of excess that

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>exceeded a previous column of excess counted as counted over here.

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Set it in a pile. Then we'll divide by the

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>total and we get a percentage from zero to a hundred.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So there are different risk levels, but in general, when

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's in a column of x's and rising, you have

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the football. So when you have the football, you should

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>be playing offense. Now, field position is a different story.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're near the seventy level, that would suggest that

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone is in that wants to be in, and you

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>may have the football, but your field position is terrible.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That tells you what plays you probably should run. If

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you're down at the line level and you have the football,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>then you can be gonna run much more aggressive plays. Conversely,

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>when it's in a column of OS and declining, in

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>other words, more stocks going on cell signals, which is

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a column of OS exceeding a previous column of OS,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it suggests to you that the defensive team is on

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the field. Play it that way, play defense. And that's

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>probably the most important market indicator that we have ever

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>had created back in and I could effectively manage the

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>market just with that. So you mentioned that's your favorite indicator.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>What other indicators do you pay attention to, and perhaps

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, what other indicators do you completely ignore? Well,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the other ones that we pay attention to, our bullish

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>percents on other types of indexes, like the NASTAC. We

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do bullish percents on all the sectors. We look at

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of stocks that have positive relative strength in

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a particular industry, sector or the market, and it's the

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>same zero to a hundred grid. You look at that

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like a football field zero to a hundred uh hundred

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>yards exactly, and when you're above seventy you have bad

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>field position. Below you have good field position column of X,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as you have the ball column of o's you don't

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have the ball. And then we look at all kinds

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of things like that relative percent of stocks. So in

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last minute we have define what relative strength is.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And again for the lay person who may not be

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>familiar with this, relative strength is like an arm wrestling contest.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You might have two people and everyone's see an arm

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>wrestling contest, and you see two people on television arm wrestling,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and one guy summarily beats the other guy. He has

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>better relative strength than the person. He just two strong guys,

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one of them is just a little stronger than the

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>precisely and you can do that for different stocks in

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>different sectors. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean it's something that we did,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we did nine years ago. We should do that by

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hand because we didn't have computer systems to do it.

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My guest this week is Tom Dorsey. He

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and FORMACYEO of a technical research firm.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Wright sold last year to the NASDAC for two

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and something million dollars uh and now Tom is

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and c i O of his own family office,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>running money for his own account and and the family's account.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about power shares,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>e t F and some of the strategies you developed.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into that, not technicals, but let's

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about technology. How has technology changed what you do

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>every day? Barry. That's a great question because you know,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>technology has had such a major effect on our whole industry.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Anything that can be automated will be automated. And you've

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>got to understand that with technology, our relative strength work

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that we do for our E t F and and

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the comparisons and contrast we do. We used to do

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>by hand. Back twenty eight years ago, I started charting.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm early in my career. I worked with a gentleman

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>named Guy Ortmann, who introduced me to both Don Hayes

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and you. He's now I believe that um Scarsdale Equities,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but at the time it was Prime Charter, which was

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately sold to Oppenheimer. Hard to keep track of, remember

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>account and easy. He used to do charting by hand.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>He would show me here's where this was, and you

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>could look at the screen, and you can look at

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a computer, but it's not the same thing as actually

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>writing it down by hands. That's exactly right. We used

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to day before we had the computer capacity to do it.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>So many people And do you do five hundred stocks

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a day past the book to the next person? They

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>did that by the by the end of the week,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>each persons seen. That's unbelievable. It's amazing. But boy, you like,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just like you said, how do you get a better

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>feel than doing it that way? But you can't do there.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's only a certain amount of things you

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>can do. Take for instance, if we wanted to create

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a matrix on the standard pours five. In other words,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to create the way we do a relative

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>strength charters, divide one thing by another. If I wanted

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to compare coca cola to pepsi, I would divide the

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>price of coke by pepsi. That gives me a number.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I take that number. I plotted on a chart. It

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like a regular trend chart, but it's not. It's

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a relative strength chart between the two. When it's rising,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the first one is doing better what it fall Precisely,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just spread between the two exactly. And if I

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>did that on the SMP five hundred, we have to

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>create two fifty charts. In other words, each one relative

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to a number, two, relative to the number three, relative

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to all five hundred. So two fifty charts. You've gotta

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of employees or good computer exactly. Now,

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we do overnight seven and a half million relative strength

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>charts every single night, comparing the world, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indonesia

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to France, France to the United States, everything you can

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think of. That that's an incredible number of permutations, which

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>actually leads me to my next question. So you run

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different strategies. How do you develop these

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>new strategies? How do you come up with these ideas? Well,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>you come up with the ideas. We sat in a

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>circle for twenty eight years. Nobody's ever had an office

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>at Dorsey Wright. I never had an office of doors. Right,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we sit together. So there's a constant hum in the

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>office of discussing things and talking about different things. And

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they all come from that type of thing. Person will

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a company will call us and say, hey, we're interested

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in X, y Z, can you create that forest? Then

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the ideas start to float around, and and they come

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>in the most unusual ways. I was looking at I

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was looking one day out the window and I saw

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a guy cutting the grass with one of these big moors,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>And I thought to myself, who helps him? Does he

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>go to a major wirehouse and open an account with

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars? No, they don't let him in the door.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So who helps him? So I created a model called

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the People's Portfolio, and I compared in contrasted three things

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on a relative strength basis, the standard ports cap weight

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>against the standard ports equal weight. Both trade. They trade

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>totally differently against cash. Cash was in there as the

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>risk management tool of the piece, and whichever one won

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the arm wrestling contest against the three of the portfolio

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>went in over what time period is that just continuous?

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>How often does that readjust maybe once every three years?

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, I was gonna say, that's a longer term cycle,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>very long term cycle. But I define many money managers

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to outperform it. It's a challenge because sim typically the

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>cap weighted does great at the end of his cycle, right,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and then when it rolls over, it's the eagle weight

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that does much precisely. But instead of trying to call

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the point that that you're at the end of the cycle,

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>let the work do it. Let the relative strain do it.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And when that changes and it points to another direction,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where you go. And So instead of sitting back saying, gee, whiz,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've got all I've I've got a PhD

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in and this and that and mathematics, and I'm going

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out when that end is No, wait for

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the wait for the rules based program to do it.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry rid Halts. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Tom Dorsey.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>He is the founder of Technical analyst firm Dorsey Wright

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and basically a fixture on Wall Street for many years.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Wright is now part of NASDAC, having been sold

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>last year. Let's talk a little bit about momentum and

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what it means. What's the significant momentum to either a market,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a sector, or a specific stock. Simply this berry. Everyone

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>understands things in motion and to stay in motion until

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>acted upon by an opposite force. That's the same thing

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that happens in the market. People are trying to catch

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a knife, so often they want to buy things that

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>are down or going down, and they think that the

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>lower I buy it, the better I'm going to be

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>getting nice bounce back up. That's not the case. Things

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in motion tend to stay in motion. That's where you

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 1>want to be and what acts upon it. It's all

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand. If you have demand for a particular stock,

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>there are more buyers and sellers willing to sell. Prices

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna rise until all of a sudden supply comes in.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where that opposite force comes in and supply overtakes

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the amount of demand available. The up move stops and

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it begins to down move. So that's really all it is.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So One of the things that early in my career

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I had explained to me was that when institutions buy something,

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they just don't go out and buy a million shares

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>today and that's it. Typically it's in response to some

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>portfolio change. They're buying it. For larger institutions, pension funds,

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts, and money just flows in on a regular basis.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So as long as that four oh one k or

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>institutional money keeps flowing in, they're going to continue to

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>buy more or less the same names over and over again.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And as long as there's a limited amount of supply

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at various prices, that stock is just gonna keep marching

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>higher until more supply comes in or the buying slows down.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair way to describe. Yeah. Absolutely, And

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't go in and just buy today, and they

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>buy until they've they've got enough in that sitt and

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>then he go do something else. They have more accounts

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>coming in, more money coming in, they're gonna buy in

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the right places. Take for instance, back in the year

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand October two thousand, an interesting thing happened all

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, after a number of years where large

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cap was the place to be uh a large cap

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and cap weight it was the place to be. It

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>switched to small cap and equal weight. And not only

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it went from growth which was the place to be,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to value and that was a major change. All you

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>had to do at that point in time with that

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>major change is by a value stock equal weighted small

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cap and leave your customer alone for the next thirteen years,

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go play golf every day. Precisely you did extremely well.

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So these things are not overnight phenomenons that happened, and

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there was buying pressure in that for probably thirteen years

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>until this begins to change. So put that into context.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>You have throughout the nineties, technology, especially big cap, is

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just running away. You had some especially on the NASTAC,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you had some thirty years. People forget the young guns

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>out there, don't remember what it was like in the

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>late nineties. It was insane. It was like the Roaring

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>twenties had to be pretty close. And and at least

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it historically, I not that old,

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 1>so I don't remember, but I do remember. I do

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the nineties, and I do remember that was astonishing.

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That peak them around March of that year, and you're

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>saying it took another six months or so for the

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>money to start flowing in a different direction. It clearly

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was flowing out of the big cap. You know, you

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>had only a certain number of horsemen in the SMP

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. I think it was something like ten or

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty stocks were responsible for almost all of the games.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>And absolutely because towards the end of the what do

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you want that that's a point in time where when

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it switches to cap waited saying, you know what you

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>should own an index just only SMP five hundred. Don't

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>worry about diversifying. That's what you should own. And that's

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>where it was at the end of into the year

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand UM. Most of the time from there it's

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been a market of stocks where you want to own

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>individual stocks, but that was the point in time you

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>want to own the index. So let's go back to

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>October two thousand. What was it in point and figure

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>charting that would have given you an indication, Hey, go

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>from big cap too small cap, from cap weighted to

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>equal weighted, and go from growth to vale. You it's

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that relative strength calculations that we do. When they're done

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>every night, they don't change every night. I mean this

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>was five years coming, and all of a sudden, you're

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>watching these two guys aren't wrestling, and the guy who

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>loses every single time for five years, all of a

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sudden beats the other guy. Why he's in the gym

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>working out. He's getting stronger. You don't realize it, but

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, that day comes that he wins.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you're watching it and you have alert set,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they it can't escape you. So I do recall from

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>March two thousand, two October there was a pretty hefty

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sell off. But I also noticed, from having been in

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the industry for as long as I have, that when

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you reverse yourself and say, I know, we've been talking

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>about big cap and growth and and momentum uh for

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but now it's time to switch. What

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of pushback do you get from clients and investors

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.479
<v Speaker 1>when you've basically trained them, Hey, you get rewarded by

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this over and over again, and now a new it's

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a new game. Yeah, it's not so much the push

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>back that there's a new game. It's a pushback that

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when you say there's a new game and they don't

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>see the new game yet, we're experiencing it right now,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, we have where there's a major change taking

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>place in this market. When you think back to two

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>October of two thousand and eleven, that was a tough year.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of two thousand eleven, all of

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, for US to six asset classes, US equities

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>became number one that you should overweight in your portfolio,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and that stayed from two thousand and eleven to two

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen. Just recently it moved out of number

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one place, number two, went to number three, slid back

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to number two marginally. But it's saying something is wrong here.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But what's happened is you have healthcare, biotechnology, drugs and

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>whatnot that that helped carry this the whole way have

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>totally fallen out of bed. So they had positive relative

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>strength when they came out. I mean it was like

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the snap of a finger bingo. Now all the things

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that you were doing that were positive relative strengths for

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>those years. You find this year in two thousand and

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen year at a loss relative to the SMP five.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That's when people begin to get upset. They think everything

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>has to be perfect. We're speaking with Tom Dorsey, formerly

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of Dorsey Wright and now c I O of his

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>own family office. So if the US as a market

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was leading the train and now is two or three,

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>what has risen to the four? What parts of the

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>world are are starting to look more attractive. It's interesting

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because what went to what number one and number two

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and then six asset classes that we have. We look

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at international equities, US equities, cash, fixed income, commodity commodities,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and foreign currencies. What moved into number one place? Fixed

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>income to place was held for a few weeks and

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still marginally there. Uh is cash now that was interesting.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Cash has moved up, not to US Cash has a

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>simple m N Y m k T, so we look

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at it just like money, regular money market. We look

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at that symbol like it's like it's IBM or General

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Motors or whatever, and it has moved up to number

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>two spot. Um, something is going on here and there's

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a major change taking place. I see commodities began to

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>move up from number six level to number five level,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So they were the bottom of the barrel. Now they're

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>beginning to come off of the bottom of the barrel.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>What about international which is emerging? Internationals at is at

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, but I'm finding some international some some emerging markets.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I trade Indonesia direct doing extremely well. They're in Indonesia's

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So going back to the original concept of waiting for

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a momentum to develop, if you're looking at emerging markets,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you're probably if you're long emerging markets, you're probably not

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see a whole lot of positive gains anytime soon.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you're looking at something that's ranked six out

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of six, does that mean there's a lot of potential

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>upside down the road. Yeah, but where's down the road?

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It might be down the road. That's

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollar question. That could be. That's the thing,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a trillion dollar question. You don't know how long

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that road is. So you have to wait until the

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.239
<v Speaker 1>actual change your relative strength charts begin to change and

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>begin to win the arm wrestling contest, you'll find I

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think if if commodities is is one of the ones

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna move up to number one, like two thousand

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and eight, commodities held number one rank for what sure

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that's going to be the case, then

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you probably find international move up to during the during

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the decade of two thousand and two, thousand and ten,

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the last place you'd want to invest in equities was

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States. International was the play that whole time.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll think of all the emerging markets are big commodity exporters.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Is at the time, China was one of the big

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>drivers of that. In China's in the Emerging Market index.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So that that makes perfect sense. So you had mentioned

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier you don't have an issue with cap weighted indices.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I know some people do. You're just suggesting there are

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>times when cap weighted is desirable or more desirable, and

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>there are other times when equal weighted is more. That's

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, you know. And and when I explained cap

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>weighted to people, it's like Congress. In the Senate, Congress

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is um cap weighted. If you look at look at California,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>state state, the more and more more representatives the Senate

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is equal weighted gets to and that's a great, great

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it. So sometimes it's the Senate,

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's the Congress. You just wait to see what

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>happens because this it's that they both sit down their

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>arm wrestle every single day and you watch and see

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be winning. It's you don't change on a

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. Signals on on relative strength and point and

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Figure can last two or two and a half years.

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So if people want to find your writings or your perspective,

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the best place for them to track you down. Well,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you can go to Dorsey Right dot com www dot

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Right dot com. We do a podcast every week

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that's free to anybody. If you just go to that site,

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Right dot com you can see it. And we're

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the oldest podcasters in the country. We're on

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and some weekly podcasts. And you also you

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have a number of books, but the big one important

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>figure is called it's called Point and Figure Charting exactly

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that and you'll see my picture on the cover. Um

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the fourth edition Point and Figure Charting. It's pretty

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>much all you need to know. You know, we've been

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hiding in the open for twenty eight years. We you

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>really read that book, you see exactly what we do.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We tell you exactly how to do it, but nobody

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to do it. You know. Harvard professor once said, uh,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people don't want the quarter inch drill, they want the

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter inch hole. And that's what we try to give

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a manefits or teach the same thing. If you enjoy

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, be sure and stick around for a podcast

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>extras where we keep the tape rolling and continue chatting.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and check out my daily column on Bloomberg

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>View dot com or follow me on Twitter at Riolts.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You've been listening to Masters in Business

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Tom. Thank you so much for doing this.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to have you here. I've been looking

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>forward to this for a while, Barry. Anytime, I love it,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy it. I said this earlier when we first met.

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading your stuff, no exaggeration, for so many years. Um,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I know you personally. And it's funny

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because people say that to me and I have a

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>hard time understanding that. And now it's like, oh, I

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of get that you read somebody for a decade.

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like I kind of not understand what he thinks.

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I understand the philosophy, and like I mentioned earlier, I

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>started as a trader. I went into the research side.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I worked with some people where that were religious Dorothy

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Right adherents, if only because it was clear the fundamental

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>side of things wasn't getting it done, and they wanted

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a structure, they wanted a model. You're really popular, or

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>at least in my experience in the nineties and the

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, Dorothy Doroth c right was really popular amongst

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain contingent of the brokerage community. Right. Exactly, it's

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>always been professional for us. We don't have any real

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>uh any, any real large clientele and individual investors, not

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>not a retail audience, no, not retail at all, only

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>professional oriented. And now that business is changing, are you

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>still finding the same reception to what you guys do

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>or how has that morphed over the years. Well, back

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in back in the beginning, advisors needed something desperately to

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 1>help them manage portfolios, and the technical side was just

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>never there at the firm was always fundamental. So the

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>technical side resonated with them an in particular point and

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>figure because it's easy for anyone to understand. In fact,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Tammy was my right hand. Remember Tammy, We've been into

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Gates Elementary school teaching this to seventh graders and and

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and they catch on in about forty minutes. Adults take

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot longer to d program. But it's so simple

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that kids can understand it, and it's it's professionals need

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the help to stay in the business where individual investors

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>will do it for a while, all of a sudden

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock goes down. They thought it would go up

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>there going on vacation, they canceled. So we're professional and

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we and our portfolio and charting system for what we

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do in portfolio charting because it's probably the largest in

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the world on the internet for portfolio and charting. So

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm We talked about relative strength, we talked about some

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of your favorite indicators. What what are some of your

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>least favorite indicators? And I went to Twitter and asked

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>people and these are the suggestions they had given me

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask you. Um, Elliott Wave, everything rings in here.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy Elliott Wave. Your fan of Elliot Wave at all? No,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it. That's my five waves, three waves,

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>two up, seven down down, two thousands something like that.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't Barry, I don't get it. You know, that's

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>my problem. I've I'm not even a member of the

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Market Technicians Association. That's interesting, and that's because I am.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a member of the Egyptian Technical as Society. Why

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is that well, because I've been to Egypt so much

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and I like these like them they're great people. Do

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:50.479
<v Speaker 1>they use point and figure in Egypt practically a bunch

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of X is. You're exactly right. I've been there, uh

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so numerous times. There are some people to do. But

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>um I'm remember the International Technical and Society, but only

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because I like to go internationally and meet all the

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>different technicians. I don't understand a lot of the types

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of things like Fibonacci, retracements, gan angles. You know, it's

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the thing, the sixties seven percent or whatever the

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>heck it is. I don't get it always looks good

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, but never perspectively. My problem is I'm not

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>smart enough to understand that. I think that a lot

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of these things have a degree of randomness in it,

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're easily fooled by our pattern recognition subroutines. Um.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So people sort of impose what they you know, it's

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a roth Chack test. People impose order on on that

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>disorder and see things that I don't know if it's there.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Fibonacci is a fascinating concept. I love the

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of him as a mathematician and what he's done.

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But UM, if you read this defense fascinating book called

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Um Against the Gods, where there's a whole discussion on

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>on Fibonacci as a mathematician, as an early person who

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>identified how to deal with risk, how to mathematically determined risk.

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But it had nothing to do with stock patterns or

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>anything like that exactly. And that's the problem. That's why

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with me. If it doesn't apply to UM, if it

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't apply to portfolio management, doesn't mean anything to you.

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how it can because people don't trade anymore.

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>The regulation that's come on us since has been incredible,

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the new regulation that's coming from the Department of Labor.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Now you have to be a portfolio manager. You've got

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 1>to be a retirement portfolio manager. These things don't necessarily

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fit in that vernacular, so to me, I don't use them.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about some other technicians who who

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>are out there. Are there any technicians that stand out

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to you, anybody you particularly like? Follow? No or you? Yeah,

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, like UM. Number one would be Ralph Akapor,

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>great friend of mine. He's the founder of the Market

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Technicians Association. He's just a wonderful, wonderful person. He's retired

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>now and I would love to go on the road

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with him and do some talks. That would be fun.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>We had him here as a guest. He was terrific.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I took the course with him. I don't know, twenty

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>years yeah, absolutely, it was really it was really i

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>opening and fascinating. And even though I'm no longer an

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>active trader I was twenty years ago. Understanding what he

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>taught me is just helped my understanding of what's going on.

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't trade day to day, but it's nice to

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>understand what people are thinking about day to day as

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>someone in the business as I, but but as I

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>go a little further. If I go to go to

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the far East, let's go to the other Let's go

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>halfway around America, I would say, Mohammed al faith In

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia, Jakarta, Uh, Gideon Lapian in Chicago. In Jakarta,

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I go to Malaysia. Qualit. I'm poor. Fred tam one

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest in the world. So you think technicians

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>are everywhere, are around the world, in every country. It's

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the United States. People think, oh, technicians are here,

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>They're everywhere. You mentioned three countries in the Pacific, rim Indonesia.

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>What are those folks trading, Well, they trade Indonesia. They're

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>trading the Indonesian market and the Far East market, which

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>would be Malaysia. In Malaysia, each each one of the

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>technicians in his own country will trade that his own

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>country mostly. But um, those markets deep and broad enough

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and liquid enough that these guys can trade. That's a

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>great question because I've been trading now probably for fourteen

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>years direct in Indonesia, and I have an account at

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>east Samuel dot com. And you could trade the Indonesian

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>market from the US directly through a third party broker. Yeah,

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely online. I mean, the world is open for business.

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyone that wants to do this can do it. And

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I love trading Indonesia because it's there's a lot of

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>anomalies there that can be It's still not perfectly efficient

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. So I don't can't pronounce the

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>name of the company, But is that is that important

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the chart? You know? So we

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>run models on all these countries too, So you you

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned models is a question I've always wondered about. Maybe

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you can help me with this, So when you have

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a model, how could you tell the difference between a

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>model that's temporarily out of favor and something that no

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>longer works well for us? It's always gonna be temporarily

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out of favor, because I know relative strength works absolutely

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for us. That's the direction we have. Relative strength has

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>been working since before I was born. And that's a

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>long long time ago, Barry. Let me tell you. And Uh,

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of being out of favor for a while.

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, relative strength will be out of favor

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one quarter out of four or five. It's going to

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 1>happen while it's trying to find attraction, you know, because

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>some years you have, Barry, some years when you look

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>at the disparity between the best performing asset class and

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst performing asset class, there's not much in the

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>middle there. My favorite graphic is that quilt the chart

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of all the boxes representing and and they more than six.

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>They'll break it into twelve or fourteen asset classes. And

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>here the returns for each asset class year by year,

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and some years the best performing one is worst is

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>flat or negative. Exactly. That's a huge spread. Exactly, that's

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge spread, but a lot of times you don't

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>find a huge spread in these, so a lot of

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>times the spread is pretty narrow. And when the spread

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is narrow, picture of car spinning its wheels and it's

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to find traction. It just can't. It just keeps

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 1>throwing the dirt behind it, and once it finds traction,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>something breaks out. Like um, let's let's say back in

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, you had the healthcare drugs biotechnologies break out.

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, those wheels catch and that and

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the car shoots forward. You know, until then it's spinning

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>its wheels, So that will happen with relative strength when

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 1>there's no real dispersion between best and worst. Around that time,

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny. I'm fond of reminding people to not

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>allow their personal politics to influence their investing. And around

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>that time you had the Supreme Court say, uh, what

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>we call Obamacare was not going to be overturned. And

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we looked at each other and said, well, hospitals, pharmaceuticals,

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole health care sector just got another ten million

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>people courtesy of the taxpayer, are going to be consumers.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That's probably good for the sector. And we got huge

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pushback from people saying, well, you know, I don't know.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like opomacare or this or that. I'm

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not asking you how you're going to vote. I'm asking

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you what sectors are gonna do well relatives. That's exactly right.

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And you have to be agnostic totally. I mean you've

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>got to walk down. You know, people will ask me,

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I don't. I don't have the

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>luxury of doing that, because if I could figure these

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>things out, if I was clairvoyant, we'll be doing this

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>talk from Verona, Italy on my shipping fleet. It's an

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 1>expensive indulgence to allow your politics and to on either side,

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>left or right. It should really be kept separate, it

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>asked me. Politics are for the voting booth, but when

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to investing, you have to be an object

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>like we're we're right here in a room that's self contained. Here,

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no noise outside, double glass and that type of thing.

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>That's where you need to operate with your portfolio. Double glass,

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>no noise, and that's it. Objective evidence bets right and

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>keep it separate. So let me ask you another question.

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And again I asked people on Twitter, Hey, what should

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I ask Tom Dorsey, and one of the questions came

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>up was this, what's the problem with buy and hold? Well,

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem with buy and hold and and and there,

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and there is no problem with that if a person

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to do that, because there may be it may

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be an investor who says, you know what, I'm gonna

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>make a bet on the five largest companies of America.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. And exactly I'm done. And I don't

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to have a broker, I don't have to pay fees.

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I buy it one time. I'm making a bet on America.

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic if you did that hundred years ago, Man, you

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>made a great bet. I mean it's been it's been

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a great ride. But what will happen, though, two, is

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>when you when you put your foot in that stirrup

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and you're just you're just a buy and hold, you

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>miss things that are happening. Let's say you were buying

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hold back in October of two thousand and all of

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, what happened was the market went to small

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cap uh equal weight and value. You missed it. So

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for you're you're sitting there in a in a in

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a cap weighted SMP five hundred the next thirteen years

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you wander performed. I want everyone let's listen to this.

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Go just go on on Yahoo finance and look at

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the difference in performance between the RSP which is the

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>equal weighted standard, and the SPX, which is the cap

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>weighted Look at the difference. Go back twenty years and

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>say which one would I have preferred to be in,

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see that they traded totally different. Right in

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, you want the cap weighted. In the two thousands,

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you want the equal weighted exactly. And then after when

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.919
<v Speaker 1>when has now we're now we're at cap weight. It's

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>been cap weight here recently, but if you look at

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the long term picture, it's long term picture is still

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>equal weight, but more recently cap weighting has been been

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to play and large cap has given way to small

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>cap or small cap has given way to large cap. Now.

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So so now your e t F that looks at

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:37.439
<v Speaker 1>both of these variations, it's always in either cap weight

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or equal weight. That that's the option. No, it's not.

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not the option. We could be in some of each.

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it doesn't how how how doesn't have Well

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what we look at as as a general As a

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>general rule, we don't cap weight any of our e

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>t f s. They're all equal weighted. Take for instance,

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>our PDP, our technical leaders. We look through stocks one

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a quarter, and we do that arm wrestling calculation,

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>massive number of charts we have to create. We pick

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>out the one hundred strongest out of and that goes

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>into the portfolio and that's gonna be your your PDP

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>for the next quarter. And that's done pretty well, that's

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>been out right. What what's the track record of that

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>e t S? Oh god, I couldn't begin to performed.

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It has um But here's the thing. Very when you

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>look at that, it's almost like a sector rotation kind

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of model, because when you look at the things in

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that universe and it says, gee, we're gonna push you

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>into the one hundred, it's pushing into the one hundred strongest.

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So pushing you into the one strongest is going to

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>put you into the sectors that are doing the best.

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And you you mentioned earlier the strategy that shifted back

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and forth. Is that an e t F or is

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that state? Well, we have probably eighty five different models

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that run on on our system, on our portfolio excuse me.

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>On our website, those are like unwrapped ETF. So that's

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. Take for instance, our F v. Frank Victor.

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that E t F garnered the most sponsorship in

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in buying any E t F in a shorter period time.

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Came out in two thousand and fourteen. In one year,

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we had about four billion dollars in a snow four billion.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Now f E stands for it's set first trust five. Okay,

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>so we look at the first trust twenty sectors. We

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>do the arm wrestling contest on a rollatives train basis,

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pick the top five and that is basically it. We

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>let the top five wiggle back and forth until it's

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>until they cross a particular level. So that's not readjusted

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on a on a set timeline. It's based on price exactly,

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean based on relative straight as long as they

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stay in that, you know, which is like a picture,

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like a baseball game. You watch your picture and your

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>picture starts out and he's doing really well until the

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>fifth inning. Then all of a sudden he's sarting to

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>hit people with the ball and they're hitting home runs

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on him, and and boy, all of a sudden, the coaches,

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>something's wrong with his relative strength. I gotta I gotta

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>take him out of the portfolio. In other words, I

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta call over to the bullpen. He calls over the

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bullpen and says, who's throwing the heat? He means, who's

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>got the best relative strength? Because I gotta take this

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>guy off the mound, because he's starting to get weak.

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I put him in the dugout. I bring the guy

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>who has the best relative strength out of the dugout,

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and he becomes the picture. So that's how things come

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the portfolio like that. The f

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 1>V the First Trust five has been has gone years

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>without without a change until recently all of a sudden

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen in First Trust five. The things that carried

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it over the last five years, which was we were

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in the healthcare drugs, we were in um technology big

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>time we had and also we had no oil. It

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>would not let a relative strength portfolio a sector that's

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>been in free falls, right. But if you were a

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>fundamental portfolio, you'd have you'd have to have part of it.

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't be able to be out of oil, which

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 1>we were out of oil. We wouldn't let it in.

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of times it's what you don't that

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really makes the difference. So the first Trust five was

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a model. Those were the five E t fs and

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and what you did is you bought those five E

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>t f s as a professional, and whenever a change

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>took place, we emailed you if you're running that as

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a separate model and a separate model, and probably about

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars was in that model because it's available

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to our professionals. Now, the interesting thing there is the

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>wirehouse broker who needs Q SIPs. He has to satisfy compliance,

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he has to satisfy branch manager, customers want to see

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>things in the portfolio and whatnot. He buys the model.

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We took that model and wrapped it up into an

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 1>E t F which was symbol f V Frank Victor

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing, except one Q SIP over here,

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>which service the individual investor UH managers who pay a

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>fee whenever they buy a stock, they have to pay

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a commission. So this worked perfectly for them to have

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>one symbol that wrapped up that model. But on the

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>other side you had the wirehouse broker who wanted the

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 1>QUE SIPs. So they both trade side by side. We

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>have eighty five different models that could be wrapped up

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>into an A t F. And and how many A

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 1>t F do you have? I'm actually trying to pull

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that up. Probably about seventeen, uh well totally total, maybe twenty.

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure exactly how many of them, um And

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the U M of all those I'm trying to do.

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:36.240
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at the E t s themselves,

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say probably after this last decline. Maybe that's

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not an insubstantial amount of money. No, it was higher

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>before the market market took them away. But we've been

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at this game for a long time. I worked with

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the first d t F that ever came out with

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which Joseph Rosello was head of marketing at the Philadelphia Exchange.

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That was the first E T F that ever came out,

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which was what the cash index participation unit symbol BUS

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>participation right. This was back in the mid eighties. Joseph

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Rizzello was the head of marketing at the Philly Exchange.

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>They brought this this, uh we called it the SIP.

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It was simple b I G which was dal Jones

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and simple SNP, which was standard in ports, and they

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>traded on the Exchange. So it was the first e

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>t F that traded, but they ran into trouble and

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>got sued by the Futures Exchange in Chicago because that

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>e t F was backed by futures not stocks. And

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so now you have the Dale Diamonds and the SMP Spiders.

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing, except they're backed by stocks not futures.

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder why they used futures and stead guess it

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was just it was it was cheaper to do it

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that way. You had the same thing, but it was cheaper.

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>What happened then then the next e t F that

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.439
<v Speaker 1>came was the Toronto Stock Exchange came down and used

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the same template and created the Toronto Index Participation units

0:50:55.440 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>backed by stock, and that still trades. That's amazing, that's

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>still trades to this day. I'm looking for this. Look

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at that list. That's impressive. Um. So we went over

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold. We went over a number of different strategies,

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about your love of Fibonacci and Elliott wave,

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is always it's just it's just that I don't

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>understand them. So it's not I'm not slamming them. I

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say anything against them in the right hands, every

0:51:26.040 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>every every bit of technical analysis works. But it's just

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in my hands. The only thing I've ever looked at

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>or used or anyone a d w A has ever

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>done this point in figure charting. So let me get

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to my last two questions that we skipped during the

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>main part, and then I'll get to my favorite questions. Um, So,

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years, we've seen the rise of high

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>frequency trading. We've seen all these ztfs, we've seen a

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 1>shift towards index thing. What has any of this stuff

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>done to the strategies that you employ? Nothing? Nothing, nothing,

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing in fact, In fact, the point in figure charts,

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look back to the old guys who wrote

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, A. W. Cohen and Ernest Staby, they always

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>said the faster chart forms, the better it is because

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the same players are still there. It's not like a

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>chart pattern forms today and two and a half years

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still the same chart pattern everybody's going. So you say, wow,

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the market has moved got more volatile, things have gone faster. Okay,

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that's great, it's even better for us. And um, the

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>other question we I skipped, so smart beta has been

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>getting quite popular is there a risk that becomes too popular. Well,

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>now you have to understand, Barry, that smart beta really

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 1>is a marketing term. You're not the first person who

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>said that. You know, it really is because to me,

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>smart the way they look at smart beta is anything

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not capitalization weighted. But the way I look at

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.839
<v Speaker 1>smart beta is things that are rules based that if

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be smart about it. You know, let's

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>say with the kale. We talked about the kale before

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on the radio. If you want to make kale taste good,

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a thing you need to do to it.

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to create a portfolio of of exchange

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.439
<v Speaker 1>trader funds, there are some things that fit together well,

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 1>some things that don't fit together well. So with the

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:12.280
<v Speaker 1>rules based program, that's how you're gonna create your portfolio.

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I always look at you. You ever watch the Master

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Chef on TV show all right now? Whenever they go

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>into the Master Chef pantry, everyone runs in with their basket,

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>same ingredients or different ingredients, right, different ingredients they got

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the same They have to make the same thing, but

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna pick different things. When I look at that

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Master Jef pantry, I see E T. F s. That's

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>all I see. And they're assembling things out of exactly

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>they're picking the protein to picking everything. And with with

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a money manager like yourself, you have all those things

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>available to you. It's your job to create a fantastic

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>meal for your customers. So you have the selection of

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 1>everything in that master chef pantry, and that's how you

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>create your your your portfolio for e t f S.

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting, you know. I always thought it was

0:53:55.640 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating coincidence that the standard for an index is

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cap waited when we know there are so many problems

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with cap waiting towards the end of the sectors, at

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the cycle especially. But that said, I

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.919
<v Speaker 1>don't really see so much of a difference between cap

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:16.319
<v Speaker 1>waiting profitability rating. If you look at some of the

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>things that UM Research Affiliates does rob or not, instead

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of doing it cap waiting, they do it by profitability

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>dived and yield. All these different metrics, you still end

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>up with an index that isn't actively traded. You're just

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>using a different basis for assembling it, like the relative

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>strength First, I'm sorry, you hit on it perfectly very

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>when you said a different way of assembling it. So

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you come to me and you say, Tom, I'm going

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to use astrology to pick my stocks. And I'm gonna

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>come to you with a hunter stocks and and and

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>this is like when Jupiter's line with Mars. We're gonna

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do this sector and when you bring to me the

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks will organize it. We'll do We'll put our relative

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>strength on it. Organize it. If it's junk that you

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>give me, I'm gonna give you the best junk. I

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>put the best junk precisely, precisely, so it's two hands.

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 1>What's the name of the et F by the way,

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the astrologer relative is that one that's out there. No,

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:14.239
<v Speaker 1>there's not one out there, but you never you never

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can't tell when that will happen, you know. But but

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea that you play with piano with both hands.

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You could give me. I love to have a fundamental

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>report saying, hey, these stocks are truly right and just

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a fundamentally sound et cetera. Can you deal with these

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>beautiful I love it first trust does the alphabex way

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of fundamental rea alpha dex. I'm not sure exactly how

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they haven't never come to me and told me how

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>they do it, but they do a great job at it.

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 1>They give us the list. Everything that First Trust does

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is alphabex fundamentally organized. Then we take that fundamentally organized

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and create the portfolio and manage the portfolio. And so

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we play with the piano with both hands. They play

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental side, we play the the technical side. I've

0:55:56.360 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>worked with a friend years ago. He used to call

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that technamentals is the technical side. He is the fundamental side.

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You marry the two together. Ralph at Kempor you mentioned earlier,

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was fond of saying, fundamentals tell you what to buy,

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Technicals tell you when when exactly precisely. All right, so

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 1>let's jump to some of my favorite questions. These are

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what I asked all my guests, and and usually we

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>get some we get some some interesting questions. You mentioned

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you were an economics major at university. What did you

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:31.759
<v Speaker 1>do before you found your way to merrow lynch Well,

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I spent four years in the Navy, first and a

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>couple in Vietnam off the coast, and they so I

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was in from nineteen nineteen sixty seven, beginning of nineteen

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>saw some submction of it. I didn't see that I

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was on an aircraft carrier. Okay, the planes we shot

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>off the action, so you were relatively safe work on

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the ship. Absolutely so, so how did you get from

0:56:57.840 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you're in the South Pacific Sea to Maryland. That's when

0:57:00.440 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I went back to college, and so I did the

0:57:02.600 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Navy first college. Second, I went on the g I

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bill and going to school. And g I bill was, well,

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I could, I could pay my tuition, but you know,

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>much money left. And by the end of the By

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of that, I was driving a car with

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>no reverse, and you know, so by the time it

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was it was time to graduate, I said, I'm tired

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of being poor. Wait, you're driving a car with no reverse.

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Reverse you wherever you parked it, you had to make

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sure you're coming straight out of it. That's hilarious. I

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a VW bug that there were periods of

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>time where I had no battery, but it was a stick.

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So as long as I parked on a hill, that's right.

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It was the same thing I could pop it into.

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's the stuff we did back then. You know,

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>when hey, your college, you're broke, you're putting it working

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 1>away through school. No way I could pay to get

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a reverse put in that thing. So I just kept

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on going forward. That hilarious. But by the way, that's

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>where the momentum strategy came from. As long as you're

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>facing in the right direction, exactly there you go. That's uh.

0:57:55.000 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go where there's money. And a friend of

0:57:57.520 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>mine said, well, i'd be Wall Street and said what

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 1>do they do. He said, well, it's like Merrill Lynch

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know stock market. So I applied to Merrill Lynch.

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I applied exactly at the end of the terrible bear

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>market that customers have gone through. They were not hiring

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone and most of their customers had left them. So

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I went to Richard's Wine Cellars, which is part of

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Canadagua Industries, one of the largest wineries in the country.

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 1>This was in Petersburg and I was a production supervisor

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>until and this is the way paths happened to you

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in life. Certain things happened. You can take the path

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or not to take the path that leads you somewhere else.

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:32.919
<v Speaker 1>And this came to me and he said, you know what,

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I was at um a career counseling meeting up in Washington,

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>d C. He said, Merrill Lynches is now hiring, and

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, you're kidding me. So I reapplied to Merrill Lynch.

0:58:43.160 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I badgered them to the point they couldn't take it anymore.

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Gave me an interview. They figured, hey, this guy's a

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>good sales Yeah, he won't give The secretary of the

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>manager finally called me and says, you've gotta stop this.

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He can't you know you kill see you Tuesday, I

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>knew I was in. I still didn't know what a

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>stockbroker did. It didn't matter, No, it didn't matter. It

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was like, I'm in the best company, the biggest company

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in Wall Street, Wall Streets kind of cool. I don't

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>know what they do yet, but I'm going to study.

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And when I passed the series seven, in one second,

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:14.360
<v Speaker 1>when I saw that on one Liberty Plaza down here,

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw that posted up there, I went from a

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody to a somebody in one second. How long did

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you stay at Mery Lynch for Well, I stayed to

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch about five years, close to that, and then

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>went to Wheat for Securities to develop and manage their

0:59:25.680 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 1>option department. All right, and you were with Wheat first

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for how long? Nine years? And nine years? Because I

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had set the age of forty to start my own company.

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 1>That was the last forty was to cut off day.

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And at thirty nine I gave my resonation, so I

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had to go on Target. I didn't do that until fifty.

0:59:44.200 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's okay, you did it worked out. Um, that's

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of fascinating. So you were at at two

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>well regarded places. Wheat First, which eventually became First was

0:59:58.120 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bought by First Union First Union First, and then there

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>might have been one or two other steps before that

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>became Well. I think there were two other steps before

1:00:06.480 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a while Fargo Fani took him and you were at

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you were at Meryl. So who were your mentors at

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>these places? Well, I had no mentors at those places.

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>The two mentors I had in my in my business

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>life was one the late Jim Yates, I know the

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>name Jim Yates of d y R and Associates, Dalton

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yates and Revco. Jim was I think the most premier

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:32.439
<v Speaker 1>option expert in the world. To me, he was He

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to teach me and understanding of options that

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I have rarely ever seen in anyone else and rarely

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ever utilize his way of thinking, which brought me back

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to statistics one on one, the second most important course

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in college and the normal distribution, and Jim was very

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>important in that. Next was um was that Chartcraft and

1:00:56.040 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>um oh my thinking about his name art Craft. Art

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Craft was been around for a while. It had been

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time. Chart Craft and Investor Intelligence,

1:01:09.280 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and the late Mike Burke was the president, not president,

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but he was the editor the chart Craft in and

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>um Um Investor Intelligence. They came together and chart Craft

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was that was the company that sent you the monthly

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>books on point and figure charting. You've got the big

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>thick books and they updated you once a month and

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that type of thing. Mike Burke was one of my mentors.

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>He was a great guy. He was almost like he

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was almost like Einstein. He would get up in the

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>morning and he would walk out in one sleeve would

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be buttoned down the other sleep we rolled up and

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he would figure out why why not do that? You know?

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But he was the very clear thinker. And one of

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the things I'll never forget about Mike. He came to

1:01:47.280 --> 1:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>me when didn't come to me, but we were talking

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one day and he said, Tom, he says, let me

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you something. I said, what's that, Mike? He said,

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the market will do what it wants to do, and

1:01:57.000 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that was it didn't anymore. And that's so profound owned

1:02:00.920 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that when you sit back and think about it, why

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>watch TV, Why get ideas from all these different places?

1:02:07.360 --> 1:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>When the market will do what it wants to do.

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Then listen to the market, which you have to listen

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the market. Don't listen to something else, the things

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that you think the market should do because of X,

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>y Z, because of Janet. Yellen did this and and

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Greenspan did that. The market will do what it wants

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. I started as a trader, and I used

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to have those discussions with people, and I would get

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>these long, convoluted explanations as to why this should happen.

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Or I love hearing people say, well, you know, if

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the market wasn't interfered with, here's what would happen. How

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>do you know? How do you know what the market

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>would do? And how do you how do you know

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that every time the market you know, you look at history,

1:02:46.360 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>every time the market is cut in half, there's always

1:02:49.440 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of response from the powers that be. You

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>could pretend it doesn't exist, but the market tends to

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that, and it tends to respond regardless of whatever

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our narratives on. That's exactly right. It's gonna do what

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it wants to do, and you could either be along

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for the ride or not. That's right, exactly, we'll be

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>going in the opposite direction. It's it's and that's always

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>been summed up with don't fight the tape, but some

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>people never seem to uh learn that message. Well, today,

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with news blogs, all kinds of different things, you can

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>get news and information about the markets twenty four hours

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a day everywhere you go, and there's always an ax

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to grind. There's always uh no, there are no disinterested parties,

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you've got to be disinterested yourself. You've

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>got to look at the rules and regulations that you

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>set up, you know. It's it's also fascinating you mentioned

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that I always hear from various people about, well, I'm

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this as opposed to that because I've read

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all this research and I think this is what's going

1:03:52.240 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to happen. My answer is always yeah, but everybody's read

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that research. It's out there, it's public. You're trying to

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>forecast based on on on a some public information. If

1:04:05.320 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody has access to the same info and you're if

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you're using to use your your chef metaphor, if you're

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>using the same ingredients as everybody else, you can't really

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do anything special. Everybody is is cooking more or less

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. If you want to do something special,

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you need some special ingredient or special approach. And either

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a disaster or a home run.

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But if everybody's cooking the same things and reading the

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>same things, everybody is going to be part of the crowd,

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be so so performance. Yeah, and people today,

1:04:38.400 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, money managers today, I implore anyone I talked to,

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, whatever you do, get it computerized. Anything that

1:04:45.120 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can be computerized, anything it can be, will be. And

1:04:49.240 --> 1:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you've got to understand that a lot of people out

1:04:51.960 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there that thought they were going to get by with

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a particular investment approach is now out there for everybody.

1:04:57.720 --> 1:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about other investors might have influenced

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>your approach to point and fear who who else has

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>been If not a mentor, but who else has influenced

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>your thought process? Well, it's gonna sound like a strange answer, Verry,

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But no one, no one. Those two were the most

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>important to me, and for what I learned from them

1:05:18.240 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and how they opened my mind in the way they

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lifetime. I can continue on down those

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>two lines. Yeah, I and I and I try to

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>put the blinders on, because, um, these things are distractions.

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of noise relative to the signal, and

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the noise, you know, I have to block the noise out.

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of things, to me, you know, is simple, straightforward. Economics,

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, is the most important and icon one on one,

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the most important course I ever had. I was going

1:05:50.080 --> 1:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask you if statistics was the second most stat

1:05:52.480 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>one on one, because it taught me the normal distribution.

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Those two things right there, the irrefutable off supply and

1:05:58.560 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>demand and the normal distribution. My god, you have a

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>lifetime of thinking about strategies and things like if I

1:06:06.160 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned to you said, you know, if you look at

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a normal distribution, I'm looking at men's heights in the world.

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Some some men are too hot to all, some of

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the men are too short. Most of us are in

1:06:16.000 --> 1:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Middlebury were one standard deviation above or below trend

1:06:19.280 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at every trade you made in the market,

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've done this with our models, sixty eight percent

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of US men's heights are in the middle. Sixty percent

1:06:29.000 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of everything you do with will be one standard deviation

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>above trend goes up, a little down, a little bit

1:06:33.120 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>down up. So it says, if sixty eight percent of

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the time everything is middle, and what's the right strategy

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that will be a neutral strategy. So for most investors,

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what's that neutral strategy that makes the most sense? Covered writing? Oh,

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really absolutely, because you're dealing with something that's sixty eight

1:06:50.720 --> 1:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time is going to be hanging around

1:06:52.960 --> 1:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the center. You can't do naked straddles, you can't do nate,

1:06:56.120 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't do naked anything. You're gonna be in court.

1:06:59.160 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean as an there's a ton of risk relative

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to reward with that. But the covered right is the

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>one strategy that's a neutral strategy. That's right sixty. You

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>own an index or you own a group of specific stocks.

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You're writing call options on this, so you're taking in

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that that income stream from that, and the only major

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>shift is going to be either when you get the

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>stock gets called away to the upside or if there's

1:07:25.720 --> 1:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a downside move which ultimately either leads to new covered

1:07:30.520 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>writing or using a stop blow strategy to get out

1:07:33.080 --> 1:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly do you understand it completely? But also to for

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>someone like yourself, where you run a tremendous amount of money,

1:07:38.720 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you could look a little bit of money. You could

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>look at you run a tremendous amount. I'm I'm running

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a smidgeon. You could create an index that, let's say,

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>looked like the standard and Pours five looked like the

1:07:50.840 --> 1:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand, and there's index options that trade, so

1:07:54.800 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you could sell these index options against that portfolio where

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing is kept off. So two out of so it's

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more than two out of three times. This is going

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to be an outperforming strategy. Absolutely absolutely and that and

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that takes you to stat one on one. Anybody should

1:08:11.240 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just go google normal distribution, learn it, love it, embrace it,

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh. It just gives you an idea of what

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. So whenever you look at you might buy

1:08:21.800 --> 1:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a particular stock. On our charts, we have a normal

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>distribution on the side of each chart. So if you

1:08:28.080 --> 1:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>see it move up to where it says top your

1:08:31.000 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>three standard deviations above trend, that's telling you the stock

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>has done well, but the probability is it wants to

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>go back to the middle reversion coming back being reversion.

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the point you sell a call against the position.

1:08:42.920 --> 1:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of simple stuff that you can

1:08:44.680 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do with stat one on one, any con one on one. Fascinating.

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about books. What are some of your

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite books out there? Well, you said books in general, right,

1:08:56.640 --> 1:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>any from any any live that you can walk in

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or Amazon or whatever. My favorite book that when I

1:09:04.320 --> 1:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>finished reading it, I said, what do I read now?

1:09:07.840 --> 1:09:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Is Shanta Ram Shanta Ram. I can't think of it now,

1:09:13.479 --> 1:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>who um? But it's about a guy who breaks out

1:09:16.840 --> 1:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of um a maximum security prison in Australia, goes to Bombay,

1:09:21.439 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>India and it begins there. Oh my lord, you're not

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna put this book down. This book, and I suggest

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you listen to it rather than read it, because the

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>book is so thick. Listening to it you get all

1:09:33.240 --> 1:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of the accents and things that are involved in the

1:09:35.320 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Indian accents. It's wonderful for me. I listened to books

1:09:38.200 --> 1:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>because I'm dyslexic, uh, and I easier than read it. Yeah.

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't read books because it's too hard for me.

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It was hard for me all my life to In fact,

1:09:46.000 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I wrote my first book before I read my first book.

1:09:49.560 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But when books on tape came out, then I found

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>out I was a bookworm and I didn't even know it,

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>you know. So whenever I get in the car, I'm

1:09:55.600 --> 1:09:57.479
<v Speaker 1>pressing the button. If I'm on the treadmill and press

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to books constantly. So Anti ram I would say,

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to the book that sounds interesting. What else do

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you like? Another one I like is the four hour

1:10:06.520 --> 1:10:10.759
<v Speaker 1>work week. Excuse me, yeah, four, it's four our workwek exactly.

1:10:10.760 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna be about to say day, but it's weak.

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>The reason this is important one of the guys in

1:10:15.920 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>my office is a huge fan of his. The reason

1:10:18.360 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that's important, Barry, is I believe that through technology, if

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you have things that are computerized, everything that can be

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>computerized is going to be. You should be able to

1:10:28.600 --> 1:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>run a billion dollar portfolio from a cruise ship with

1:10:30.600 --> 1:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone. We we've been talking about this pretty consistently,

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and again I've been finding that running a small office,

1:10:40.920 --> 1:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're capable of doing with fourteen thirteen people. Twenty

1:10:46.160 --> 1:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>years ago would take fifty people to do just simple

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>things like the portfolio rebalancing once or twice a year,

1:10:53.320 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>and things like tax lost harvesting. It used to take

1:10:56.560 --> 1:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>three or four Green visored accountants a week to do

1:11:01.320 --> 1:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>this for a portfolio of a few hundred families. Now

1:11:04.720 --> 1:11:07.479
<v Speaker 1>you push your button as a software called i reboll

1:11:08.040 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that's integrated into the custodian and you could set it up,

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>go find me some tax losses to offset the tax games,

1:11:15.280 --> 1:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's astonished. That's a great example. Back in

1:11:18.479 --> 1:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the day you said you needed all these people with

1:11:20.439 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the green shades or a week, but exactly for a week.

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Now it's been automated. What will be automated, can be,

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>will be. So now it's automated. So why couldn't you

1:11:29.800 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 1>do that from Thailand? You certainly could. Why then why

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>aren't you on the beach in Thailand because I'm here

1:11:35.520 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. But the concept is you can, and

1:11:39.240 --> 1:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that's why the four hour work week. What's cool about

1:11:41.479 --> 1:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the four hour work week is it's got all kinds

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of websites and things you can go to. Yeah, that

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>will help you become more efficient yourself. Like if you

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have an assistant in India. You can do that.

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>There are places you can go in India there will

1:11:55.960 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be your assistant, just like she's with you now, except

1:11:58.439 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're asleep. She's working. He's sleeping. When you're working.

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>You want to get get me reservations for dinner to night.

1:12:04.479 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 1>So and so I also need flowers from my wife.

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I need you to do this whatever it's there available.

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So The Four Hour work Week is a great book

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to make you think about more things that you can

1:12:16.680 --> 1:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>do become more competent in less time. Alright, that's book

1:12:20.040 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>number two. Give me one last book. I love this

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>broad selection of stuff because normally it's the Intelligent Investor

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and and things like that. This is really fascinating. Yeah,

1:12:31.160 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm you know, all of a sudden you start

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to go blank. You think about all of the books

1:12:34.840 --> 1:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that that that. What are you reading right now? Right now?

1:12:37.240 --> 1:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>What am I reading? That's a great question. The Great Deformation, Um,

1:12:42.479 --> 1:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that was trying to remember who wrote it? That was

1:12:45.080 --> 1:12:48.519
<v Speaker 1>by um, oh god, what's his name? He worked for

1:12:48.600 --> 1:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan, got taken out to the wood stock stockman,

1:12:51.520 --> 1:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly stockman. This is the phrase the wood shed too.

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember exactly. Remember that taken out to the see

1:12:57.240 --> 1:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm all dough to appreciate that. Remember that. Well. The

1:12:59.680 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>answer thing thing about this book is if you really

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:07.519
<v Speaker 1>want to understand the deformation or the desecration of our

1:13:07.640 --> 1:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>free market system within with interest rates in the and

1:13:11.200 --> 1:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial system, this is going to give you a

1:13:13.720 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>great understanding going back to FDR days. It's not an

1:13:17.080 --> 1:13:19.479
<v Speaker 1>easy thing. That's why I think you should listen to

1:13:19.520 --> 1:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this book too, because, yeah, if you sit down and

1:13:22.080 --> 1:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>start reading it in five minutes, you might fall asleep.

1:13:24.400 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you're driving the car and you know, I

1:13:29.040 --> 1:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna stay awake. But it's a pretty meaningful book.

1:13:32.880 --> 1:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>And I find myself going back over and re listening

1:13:35.439 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and re listening. He's a fascinating guy. He really I

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>saw him. I think it was Stephanie Rue. I think

1:13:40.840 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it was on Bloomberg. I saw him describe how the

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>way he described it was. Stockman described it was the

1:13:48.280 --> 1:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>financialization of the US economy took fifty years to slowly

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>develop and then blew up in the crisis, and we've

1:13:56.320 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we've basically the tail is wagging the dog. He used

1:13:59.400 --> 1:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, finance in Wall Street. That's where he came from.

1:14:02.760 --> 1:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>He came from finance, went into politics, went back to finance.

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Finance used to serve industry and now finances just another industry.

1:14:11.000 --> 1:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And that was a major shift. If I'm not not

1:14:14.040 --> 1:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>misquoting him at all, you're right, and which you and

1:14:16.479 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>things you learned in this book is like in N. Two,

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the Thomas Amendment, you wouldn't even think about this, but

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>gave FDR the right to cut the gold backing on

1:14:26.400 --> 1:14:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar by fift gave him the right to

1:14:29.600 --> 1:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>back at not in gold, but in silver to create

1:14:32.160 --> 1:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>money if he wanted. And that was the beginning of

1:14:35.520 --> 1:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the financial system getting totally out of hand. And every administration,

1:14:39.320 --> 1:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>bar none, from there forward has carried it even further.

1:14:42.120 --> 1:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And the Obama administration now he carried even further. Every

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:47.519
<v Speaker 1>one of them have whether you're Republican or Democrat or whatever.

1:14:47.680 --> 1:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But you think back to two when this happened with

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 1>a Thomas Accord, that was the point at which that

1:14:52.880 --> 1:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ball started rolling. The fear was that you were constrained

1:14:56.479 --> 1:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with what the the uh Traasury up could do by

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:04.599
<v Speaker 1>the gold standard, which had its own problems. And now

1:15:04.640 --> 1:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's unconstrained and you have a whole different set of exactly,

1:15:08.040 --> 1:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's damned if you do, and Dan, if

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't, let me give you one more. Okay, this

1:15:14.160 --> 1:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this is great. Uh. The author is Martin Truce t

1:15:17.280 --> 1:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>R o O S. T. And his are travel books.

1:15:21.080 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's not the kind of travel book that you

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>would think, Okay, let's go to Hawaii and here's you

1:15:25.200 --> 1:15:27.559
<v Speaker 1>need where he needs. He actually goes to these places

1:15:27.600 --> 1:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and talks about what it was like for him to

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>live there, and um, all series of books he's done.

1:15:35.560 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>One was Sex and Drugs with the Cannibals or something

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. It sounds I mean, it's he is so funny.

1:15:43.400 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a great wordsmith. That would be dangerous, Yeah, it

1:15:47.320 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>could be. It could be very dangerous. But he talks

1:15:49.960 --> 1:15:52.559
<v Speaker 1>about living in Vana Wattu and what it's like to

1:15:52.600 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>live there. And but it's not a travel book where

1:15:55.400 --> 1:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna, oh gee, I'm gonna go to this hotel

1:15:57.040 --> 1:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and stay there. No way. Then he does one of them.

1:15:59.800 --> 1:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>My favorite was, um, it was about China and it's

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>called Lost on Planet China, which is a total riot.

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>His books are all as funny as you could possibly get.

1:16:10.400 --> 1:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a great words Smith and um t R O

1:16:14.600 --> 1:16:17.439
<v Speaker 1>double O S T Yeah, Truce Martin, Trust Martin, Truce,

1:16:17.479 --> 1:16:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I take, and I would listen to his books because

1:16:19.800 --> 1:16:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Cyrus Vance who reads the books, really does. That's who

1:16:24.520 --> 1:16:27.479
<v Speaker 1>you would expect would be reading books on tape, you know,

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Cyrus Vans. Yeah, yeah, well he's a big reader of

1:16:31.400 --> 1:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>on tape. Maybe there's two Cyrus Vances, the former political

1:16:35.520 --> 1:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>guy and and is then am I thinking about the

1:16:38.000 --> 1:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>right person? Maybe there's two of them because this he

1:16:40.320 --> 1:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I have searched for books that are read by Cyrus Van. Yeah,

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so I would read the book because he read it.

1:16:48.240 --> 1:16:50.639
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating, all right. When I, by the way, when

1:16:50.640 --> 1:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I post this on on the blog and on on Bloomberg,

1:16:54.479 --> 1:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll include the list of recommended books that people want

1:16:57.080 --> 1:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to want to find that they'll be able to get it. So,

1:17:00.200 --> 1:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>last couple of questions I normally have you for a

1:17:02.160 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>little lore time. Um, so what's changed since you've joined

1:17:06.160 --> 1:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the industry? And is it a good thing, a bad

1:17:08.680 --> 1:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>thing or does it not even matter? What's changed is regulation.

1:17:14.520 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the big thing that's changed, because if you think

1:17:16.960 --> 1:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>back to nineteen seventy five, Arier, were you in business.

1:17:20.560 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school and next high school. But

1:17:23.080 --> 1:17:27.599
<v Speaker 1>I do recall when when the commission ceiling was removed.

1:17:27.640 --> 1:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the early seventies, exactly a huge chance exactly

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>where I'm coming from right now. That's put us on

1:17:33.880 --> 1:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the path of where we are now with feedbase, because

1:17:36.720 --> 1:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that was May day. May one, nineteen seventy five is

1:17:39.600 --> 1:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>when commission deregulation happened. And we used to charge massive

1:17:43.400 --> 1:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>commissions uh to customers, all the same thing, but they

1:17:46.439 --> 1:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>were massive. Nineteen seventy five when deregulation came in Charles

1:17:50.320 --> 1:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wap started, was the first year of charsh wab And

1:17:54.120 --> 1:17:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you right now we laughed at Charles Wapson.

1:17:56.680 --> 1:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Who would ever deal at a discounter? I mean that

1:17:59.160 --> 1:18:02.559
<v Speaker 1>would do now? I mean we used to wear three

1:18:02.560 --> 1:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>piece suits and if you needed a standard poor sheet,

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we could mail it to you. That was technology. Then

1:18:08.720 --> 1:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know we've got the technology. It's the post office

1:18:11.360 --> 1:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and Joshua began. That was what began the move toward

1:18:18.400 --> 1:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>discount and lower fees and and and for us, this

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was the beginning of a change from commission to fee base.

1:18:29.240 --> 1:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Because what happened is I think the um the firms

1:18:32.880 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like Marrilynch, Pierce, Fentner and Smith. The partnerships look at

1:18:35.800 --> 1:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this and said, you know, this is not for us

1:18:37.720 --> 1:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any longer. Let's sell out to banks. And all of

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>them did. Pain Webber, Jackson, Curtis Smith, Barney Harris up them.

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:45.599
<v Speaker 1>They all sold out to banks. Banks became the owners.

1:18:45.880 --> 1:18:48.599
<v Speaker 1>And what do banks understand? They understand fee, They don't

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>understand commissions and fee, and they understand risk. You're all

1:18:51.400 --> 1:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned about defaults and whatever. Precisely they don't get commissions.

1:18:55.320 --> 1:18:58.519
<v Speaker 1>So everyone began to move more towards the fee basis. Well,

1:18:58.560 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey Wrighting Associates, I looked at I looked at us

1:19:01.200 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as a pilot fist. You ever look at a pilot

1:19:03.360 --> 1:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>pilot fish s little fishing falls. The shark he didn't

1:19:05.880 --> 1:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get close enough to the sharks amiel to

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>get eaten. But he stays back and no no other

1:19:10.320 --> 1:19:14.759
<v Speaker 1>fish bottles, lots of crumbs and exactly a little protection.

1:19:15.040 --> 1:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's us. We were pilot fish, and and

1:19:17.960 --> 1:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the shark was merrill lynching and all the rest of

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the big guys. So whatever direction they went, we had

1:19:22.800 --> 1:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to go. So that's why we began creating models and

1:19:25.920 --> 1:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>feed base models way before anyone else because we knew

1:19:29.320 --> 1:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't follow that shark and I kept doing

1:19:31.840 --> 1:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>commission business and trading business, that's where they were going

1:19:34.800 --> 1:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>away from and we had to go with it. So

1:19:37.360 --> 1:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that began the move towards fee base, which is which

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is where we clearly are now. The last data point

1:19:44.080 --> 1:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I saw on this, between Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch,

1:19:47.280 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they twenty years ago they were less than ten percent

1:19:50.400 --> 1:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>fee based, and now about two thirds about you know,

1:19:56.000 --> 1:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going to cover the other third is this new

1:19:58.000 --> 1:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>regulation now from UM Department of Labor that's on four

1:20:03.000 --> 1:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>oh one K that's on retirement accounts, on retirem accounts exactly.

1:20:06.080 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Is not an insubstantial amount of It's not. I would

1:20:09.000 --> 1:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bet a huge chunk of their fee based stuff is

1:20:11.400 --> 1:20:18.759
<v Speaker 1>already accounting stuff. And and that's active is probably although

1:20:18.800 --> 1:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you would think the tax are qualified standard would would

1:20:21.840 --> 1:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be better for active than UH than the fee based

1:20:25.400 --> 1:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>strictly from a tax perspective, Well, it's going to change

1:20:27.880 --> 1:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>things totally where the guy that typically doesn't think about

1:20:30.920 --> 1:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the fiduciary and operating in the in the right exactly

1:20:35.120 --> 1:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for the customers on the same side of table. But

1:20:36.880 --> 1:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>here's something also. If I come to you and I say, Barry,

1:20:39.320 --> 1:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I want you to take your your IRA or your

1:20:42.120 --> 1:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>your your corporate retirement account and roll it over to

1:20:44.800 --> 1:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>an IRA and I'll manage it. Boy, I better be

1:20:48.120 --> 1:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>right in telling you that, and I better give you

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all the reasons, and I better document this. And when

1:20:53.000 --> 1:20:54.559
<v Speaker 1>we do this, you and I are going to sign

1:20:54.560 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a contract. That's what's different now, the three changes that

1:20:59.200 --> 1:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>have become really really significant. When that happens, you have

1:21:03.560 --> 1:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, Okay, I'm gonna be like a lawyer or

1:21:06.120 --> 1:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an accountant, and I'm gonna be a fiduciary. In second,

1:21:09.479 --> 1:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I have all these transparency rules. Anything that I need

1:21:12.200 --> 1:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to disclose, I'm gonna disclose. In third, if there are

1:21:15.680 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>any conflict of interest. There was just a huge article

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York Post today about daily News of the Post,

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one of them about one of the big firms I

1:21:26.000 --> 1:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>don't remember which is running these sales contests sell X

1:21:29.400 --> 1:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>y Z, when a when a vacation trip. If you're

1:21:34.080 --> 1:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>getting paid outs and therefore it's not necessarily the client's

1:21:38.400 --> 1:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>best interest, but you want to win a contest, you

1:21:41.479 --> 1:21:44.519
<v Speaker 1>better disclose that and if there's a conflict, you better

1:21:44.960 --> 1:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>be up for it. I think that for the long

1:21:48.720 --> 1:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>haul it's gonna be good for investors, but over the

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>short term there's going to be an adjustment process. There is.

1:21:54.160 --> 1:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>There really is, because a lot of a lot of

1:21:55.520 --> 1:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>advisors who deal in ira A type accounts and rollovers

1:21:59.400 --> 1:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's leader business. I'm going to find that theory

1:22:01.680 --> 1:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>incomes probably gonna be cutting cut in half. You know,

1:22:04.000 --> 1:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing that started this whole process way back when

1:22:07.720 --> 1:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of four oh one K and the

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit version of it is four oh three B. There

1:22:13.320 --> 1:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>were studies that were showing that they were jammed full

1:22:16.120 --> 1:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of high cost annuities that were running like you complained

1:22:19.960 --> 1:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about two and twenty, these guys were charging six and

1:22:22.880 --> 1:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>eight percent in retirement accounts and that was just so egregious.

1:22:27.800 --> 1:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That started the ball rolling downhill. Um. So, you know,

1:22:32.080 --> 1:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's always unintended consequences regardless of who's doing So back

1:22:35.960 --> 1:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to your question, regulation, I mean, that's that's that's the

1:22:38.240 --> 1:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>big that's the main thing that has happened along the way.

1:22:40.760 --> 1:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in back in if you came in

1:22:43.360 --> 1:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and you want to do an option trade. Barry, I

1:22:45.479 --> 1:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>would do the option trade. No documents needed, No, we

1:22:47.800 --> 1:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>send those out two months later. Oh man, you can't

1:22:51.400 --> 1:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>options by the end of you want to discuss options.

1:22:55.479 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You have a whole bunch of paperwork to send, You

1:22:57.439 --> 1:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have things signed that you need backed. It's uh, there

1:23:00.720 --> 1:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of eyes to dot and tees to cross.

1:23:03.000 --> 1:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Not that it's necessarily again on the on the UM edges,

1:23:08.320 --> 1:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>there was some really bad behavior and that's what led

1:23:11.520 --> 1:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to a whole lot more regulations too. It's always that way.

1:23:15.000 --> 1:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to stop the bad actors. In order to uh,

1:23:19.960 --> 1:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to be overbroad. You're gonna bring up a

1:23:22.400 --> 1:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of um, You're gonna bring up a whole

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of of good actors when you're trying to stop

1:23:29.280 --> 1:23:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the bad actor. Absolutely no doubt about that. So what

1:23:32.560 --> 1:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do you see if regulation has been what's changed over

1:23:35.080 --> 1:23:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty or thirty years, what do you see

1:23:37.880 --> 1:23:42.519
<v Speaker 1>as the next major shift that's coming. Uh, let's let's

1:23:42.560 --> 1:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>look at e t F s. The next major shift

1:23:45.320 --> 1:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're already doing this at Dorsey right, is embedding

1:23:49.280 --> 1:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>risk and risk management in the e t F itself.

1:23:52.360 --> 1:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that with cash So remember we

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>said I said money market m N Y m k

1:23:57.120 --> 1:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>T is a symbol to us. So take for since

1:24:00.320 --> 1:24:03.599
<v Speaker 1>our first Trust five. The first Trust five operates by

1:24:03.640 --> 1:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>itself and it keeps the strongest five out of twenties sectors.

1:24:07.120 --> 1:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>For first trust done extremely well over time, the returns

1:24:10.280 --> 1:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have been been very very good. It's not because we

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>have a first Trust five plus cash. So now cash

1:24:17.080 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>has already moved up the level and overtaken of the portfolio.

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:27.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's done on a relative strength basis, not relative strength.

1:24:27.800 --> 1:24:31.559
<v Speaker 1>This rules about this Trump guy, I'm gonna move to cash. No,

1:24:31.560 --> 1:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>none of that has to be rules based. So there's

1:24:34.040 --> 1:24:38.559
<v Speaker 1>no gut feeling involved here, no emotion involved. It moves

1:24:38.560 --> 1:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in so it's moved to cash with it. So these

1:24:41.360 --> 1:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are this is what's gonna happen. Now, there's uh UM

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Horizons has a has a good covered writing program. We

1:24:48.360 --> 1:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>have a model that has our PDP, which our technical

1:24:51.760 --> 1:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>leaders who plus the horizon covered right. The horizon covered

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>right acts as that um that buffer that acts as

1:24:58.320 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that the breaks of the portfolio. So it'll bring that

1:25:00.960 --> 1:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>piece of the equation down to a point five delta

1:25:03.240 --> 1:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>point being is we're creating products now with risk management

1:25:07.640 --> 1:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>embedded in it. That's fascinating. You don't really hear a

1:25:11.080 --> 1:25:14.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of that sort of of strategies that developed that

1:25:14.720 --> 1:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's really fascinating, and you see this as the next

1:25:17.400 --> 1:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>phase of ET. Absolutely, we're gonna have to do that

1:25:20.120 --> 1:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>because again, it takes that human emotion out and a

1:25:23.320 --> 1:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that you have. You say, you know,

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we have the first trust five that stays, it's always

1:25:28.200 --> 1:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a percent invested, even in markets that

1:25:32.000 --> 1:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be. But that's a that's a market call

1:25:36.320 --> 1:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on on our part. So we can't go in and say, gee,

1:25:38.920 --> 1:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we think the market is going to go down. Now

1:25:40.640 --> 1:25:42.839
<v Speaker 1>let's take the first trust. So someone who's an allocator

1:25:42.880 --> 1:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>who says I have a slot for equities, Hey, I'm

1:25:45.320 --> 1:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to Tom Dorsseton and say give me the

1:25:47.000 --> 1:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>five best sectors and I'll build it into this and

1:25:49.680 --> 1:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll deal with and you'll risk with your bond and

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll deal with it exactly in this case. It's embedded

1:25:57.120 --> 1:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in the E T F. And And now I'm down

1:25:59.560 --> 1:26:02.559
<v Speaker 1>to my asked two questions, which I are my favorite

1:26:02.560 --> 1:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>too when I ask everybody. So imagine a a recent

1:26:06.360 --> 1:26:09.599
<v Speaker 1>college graduate or a millennial comes to you and seeking

1:26:09.720 --> 1:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>career advice. What sort of advice would you give them?

1:26:13.400 --> 1:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>For somebody who's interested in in going into finance, Okay,

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I would give them and I and I operate this way.

1:26:18.840 --> 1:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>When I when I bought the building that has my

1:26:21.439 --> 1:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>family office, it's right across the parking lot from the

1:26:23.880 --> 1:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>building from the Business School of Virginia Kamal University. So

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>my office is open for any VCU business people to

1:26:29.880 --> 1:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>come by and talk to me. I'm always open to

1:26:32.040 --> 1:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>mentor them and talk to them. So they do. And

1:26:34.800 --> 1:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things I tell them, I say,

1:26:36.439 --> 1:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what should I do now when I when I graduate,

1:26:39.720 --> 1:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>go to China and teach English? I said, go to China.

1:26:44.000 --> 1:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And one of we I had an intern named Jesse,

1:26:47.160 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and he came to me said I'm going into business.

1:26:49.040 --> 1:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, I said what Why? How old are you Jesse?

1:26:51.800 --> 1:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He said twenty two? I said, why do you want

1:26:53.680 --> 1:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to bother with that? Right now? I said, go to

1:26:55.320 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>China and teach English? Would do that right now? He

1:26:58.640 --> 1:27:01.599
<v Speaker 1>exactly went online, got high, went to China, taught English,

1:27:01.880 --> 1:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and then stayed there another year, built a business helping

1:27:05.400 --> 1:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>us companies come across and do the paperwork, and now

1:27:08.240 --> 1:27:10.719
<v Speaker 1>he's back in the US working. But my point being

1:27:10.880 --> 1:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is when you're twenty one and twenty two years old,

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>why do you want to get into business? Now, go

1:27:15.880 --> 1:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to China for a year, then go to Australia and

1:27:20.160 --> 1:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>bartend for a year, then then backpack for Europe around

1:27:24.160 --> 1:27:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Europe for a year. Now you'll be all of twenty

1:27:26.760 --> 1:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>four and a half years old, and now you get

1:27:29.040 --> 1:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a resume. I want to see and on three contents,

1:27:32.240 --> 1:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the world. You might speak a little Chinese,

1:27:35.360 --> 1:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna become essential, and you know the Chinese

1:27:38.320 --> 1:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>culture that's important. So that's what I tell these people

1:27:41.040 --> 1:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is go to China to begin with and teach English. Secondly,

1:27:44.560 --> 1:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>if they want to get into this business man, it's

1:27:47.360 --> 1:27:49.599
<v Speaker 1>not the same as when I got into it. When

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the day it was so romantic. I mean,

1:27:52.160 --> 1:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you went to a cocktail party and you said

1:27:53.880 --> 1:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you were a stockbroker, that was the coolest thing in

1:27:56.200 --> 1:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. Because nobody could buy stocks themselves, they had

1:27:59.160 --> 1:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it through you. You were registered with the

1:28:01.000 --> 1:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Stocking Change. Today, anybody can do anything they

1:28:03.640 --> 1:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do. It's not even it's not even eight bucks.

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It's free. That's it's a site called robin Hood. You

1:28:09.720 --> 1:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>could buy stocks for free, absolutely no cost whatsoever. Folio Advisor,

1:28:14.760 --> 1:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing. You know. So the world has changed, and

1:28:19.040 --> 1:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I would say get into this business.

1:28:21.320 --> 1:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But if they really wanted to learn something that you

1:28:24.840 --> 1:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>will become the best at it. Be the go to

1:28:27.640 --> 1:28:30.519
<v Speaker 1>person for whatever it is that you want to do.

1:28:30.520 --> 1:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't just learn in a cursory way because you're gonna

1:28:33.320 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>end up at the call center. If you're truly great

1:28:36.000 --> 1:28:40.599
<v Speaker 1>at something, then you won't. That's fascinating. And my final question.

1:28:41.680 --> 1:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You began in nine seventy five. You said, say four

1:28:46.080 --> 1:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>right at the end of that, so that was forty

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:53.559
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. What do you know about investing today

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that you wish you knew when you started forty two

1:28:56.439 --> 1:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Well, I'll tell you what. It takes a

1:29:02.080 --> 1:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of whiskers in this business. And you know, you

1:29:04.360 --> 1:29:06.519
<v Speaker 1>gotta walk around the block a lot of times to

1:29:06.600 --> 1:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where you have a general good

1:29:09.160 --> 1:29:11.559
<v Speaker 1>understanding about what's going on in Wall Street. But I

1:29:11.560 --> 1:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>would say the point in figure charting. You know, if

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I could have been serious about it at that age,

1:29:16.439 --> 1:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in my twenties. Then it would have gotten me on

1:29:19.080 --> 1:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this road a lot sooner. You know, I had to

1:29:21.080 --> 1:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>learn through the school of hard knocks. If if that,

1:29:23.520 --> 1:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if that guy didn't bring that point and figure charting

1:29:25.800 --> 1:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>book to me that day as he walked in, What's

1:29:28.200 --> 1:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the probability that the first guy I hired my

1:29:31.080 --> 1:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>option department brings me this book? This one book, it's

1:29:36.240 --> 1:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot and it was a lost art. Why this

1:29:39.280 --> 1:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>one book? And then the two of us look at

1:29:41.200 --> 1:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this book. He looks at it as a way of trading.

1:29:43.479 --> 1:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I look at it as a way of changing the

1:29:44.880 --> 1:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>whole industry. And these things that happened to you along

1:29:49.240 --> 1:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the way. Sometimes you've got to have a little age

1:29:51.800 --> 1:29:54.519
<v Speaker 1>on you to have that perception and understanding, you know.

1:29:54.640 --> 1:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So I guess it all was exactly right. At age

1:29:57.840 --> 1:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine, I had to start the company. By forty

1:30:00.479 --> 1:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I did at them. I was ready. Then I'd learned enough.

1:30:03.040 --> 1:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>If I tried before that, maybe maybe maybe I wasn't ready,

1:30:06.240 --> 1:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it would have failed. I don't know, Tom. This

1:30:08.800 --> 1:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>has been absolutely fascinating for me personally. Like I said,

1:30:13.040 --> 1:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading your work for early since early early

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in my career. I mentioned, I uh was introduced to

1:30:21.720 --> 1:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you at a place called Prime Charter, which is now

1:30:24.600 --> 1:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>part of Oppenheimer and it has been um absolutely a

1:30:29.400 --> 1:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>privilege and pleasure to chat with you. Thank you so

1:30:32.320 --> 1:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>much for for doing this. I want to say one

1:30:34.680 --> 1:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>more thing, Mary hit me. You know how we got together.

1:30:37.840 --> 1:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been a reader of you. I read your blog.

1:30:40.280 --> 1:30:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Remember I loved what you had written, and I emailed

1:30:44.880 --> 1:30:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you tell you that the the Mutual Admiration Admiration Society

1:30:48.880 --> 1:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>will it's you guys used to quote me. I used

1:30:52.760 --> 1:30:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to pull stuff out that I had done in quote

1:30:54.680 --> 1:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly and it was always a thrill from me. It's

1:30:56.800 --> 1:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like God, I was in a green newbie when I

1:30:59.080 --> 1:31:01.639
<v Speaker 1>started reading to us, see right, and now I'm occasionally

1:31:01.680 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>quoting in there, and I was just thrilled to death. Well,

1:31:04.400 --> 1:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>well it's a pleasure me in absolutely. For those of

1:31:07.760 --> 1:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you who enjoyed this conversation, please be sure to look

1:31:10.960 --> 1:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>up an Inch or down an inch on Apple iTunes

1:31:13.400 --> 1:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and you could see the other eighty five or so

1:31:15.760 --> 1:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of these. Be sure and check out my daily column

1:31:19.120 --> 1:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg View dot com. The blog Tom was talking

1:31:22.280 --> 1:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about is the big picture. It's at Ridholtz dot com.

1:31:25.600 --> 1:31:29.519
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not mention Taylor

1:31:29.600 --> 1:31:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Riggs and Charlie Volmer, the producer and booker of the show.

1:31:32.680 --> 1:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark is my recording engineer, and Michael bat Nick is

1:31:36.760 --> 1:31:40.719
<v Speaker 1>my research assistant. You've been listening research assistant. He's actually

1:31:40.720 --> 1:31:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the director of research and helps me put all these

1:31:43.840 --> 1:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>questions together every week, and I wouldn't be able to

1:31:46.320 --> 1:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>do these shows without him. You've been listening to Masters

1:31:49.400 --> 1:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio.