WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2023 Week 1 NFL MegaPod Betting Preview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man, Tuesday morning, September fifth, twenty twenty three.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>It is the Beating the Book podcast Megapod week number

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the NFL season. Our thirteenth year doing the megapod.

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen we were podcasting before podcasting was cool. Thank you

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for all your loyalty through the years doing this. It's

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Gil Alexander. Let me introduce the two staples of the show.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the D Bar Canada, at the D here

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas. Two staples of the show this year.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>One from his mom's cork Attic you know him well,

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>star of the showtime Docuseriies Action. And this here podcast

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's Todd wishing them. How you doing, DoD?

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great because of this?

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Todd? Do you want to This is Todd?

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not This is not a video to Odd.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>This is this is actual audio four on fourth.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And twenty to give Todd the championship last year with

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a thirty twenty two and one record, beating Gilly thirty

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty three by a half a game. And I bring

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>it up only because Fess here with us, and he

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>told me that the Texans would tank in the last week.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't wait a minute. Wasn't there controversy surrounding that? Last?

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Last year you did not win, there was controversy surrounding it.

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Could you explain.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Why you created punt? No?

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't create any controversy. There was controversy. You didn't

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>win it out right, stop it already.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I went thirty twenty two and one to thirty and

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty three.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>No, there was controversy. I have to go back and

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>listen now because you're not being forthright about it. Wasn't

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there controversial actor?

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>No, you can go back and listen. I won on

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that play on the fourth and twenty play. If you remember,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm want.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>To say, no, but whatever I'm going to say, you didn't.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Remember I did that. Remember I did the announcers boys

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>that you guys were making fun of me because it

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>was ridiculous.

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>She did it because you did. Andre. Where is an

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>old Southern gentleman? That's right. I forgot the other staple

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the show this year, new to the Meg Pod.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been a guest before. It is Fox Sports is

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Will Hill. Everybody? How you doing Will.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Boys? I'm honored, I'm excited to be on.

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 4>I just hope Gil let's Todd talk I mean, you

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 4>could say Todd interrupts, but Gill just doesn't give him

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the opportunity to talk.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully that happens this year. I'm excited football is back.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's go.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh man tell us so, by the way, on Fox,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing exactly with the Bear?

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's gonna be part of Bear Bets podcast. First

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>episode aired last Thursday. I'm part of a roundtable with

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 4>the Bear, Jeff Schwartz, former NFL offensive lineman who you've

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 4>had on this podcast, and Sammy p and of course myself.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 4>So it should be fun. They drop usually Thursday morning sometimes,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>so look for that this week.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Schwartz big fan of Todd's as well. We established

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that what he was on here and we always have,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of course the the makeabout for met as we always

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have a rotating guest each and every year.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that, I challenged him on the Steelers offensive line.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, rotating guess Week one is the only back to

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>back champion of the Hilton Super Contest back in the day.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the smartest betters we know, a former actuary

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>who uses his math prowess to aggressively get the best

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of every number. Steve Zick everybody.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, man? You forgot that you buried the league.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Todd, We'll get there. Could you just stop? Really, this

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is a bad start.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 5>Really, well not for those who bet over six and

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 5>a half interruptions, because those guys are off to a

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 5>good start here on the prop betting market.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, for undred to be here, thank you,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you for doing it. We'll have you

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on again later this year as well. But you went

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how much? How much do you weigh right now?

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Two oh two? But good news.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 5>When I weighed myself this morning, I was above two hundred. Yeah,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 5>and that means I'm not allowed to eat until the

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 5>sun goes down.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like you really hold to that. You just fast.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's like it's like the stop gap. I cannot

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 5>go above two hundred. Todd ridiculed the method.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculed it. Todd. The the ozempic or whatever Todd is

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>taking is it's not working for him. Well, he's doing

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>well the last week though.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not no empic. After I gained back all

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the weight like a loser, I went on Monjaro and

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>it's slowed. I've lost about fifteen twenty pounds, but I'm

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>not doing well?

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, could you tell the people what text you

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>received before this show?

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I got text from our panel.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 5>This is from Todd give me two or three week

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 5>one NFL points. No, please, no, thank you, just give

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 5>up to me.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Ye oh okay, Stevie, if that's the game, we're gonna

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>pay ahead it.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Will it Will say, I'm just answering the questions you

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>just answered. The question.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Will said, what is your first Megapod pick? Mike, I

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 6>need to know?

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 5>I responded, like in the Wonka movie, that would be

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 5>cheating well, to which he responded, Oh, it's not cheating.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 6>Can you give me your picks?

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>This is serious business, people, Come on, this.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Is time like hearing what Steve has to say, so

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>then I can shoot it down. Like last year he said,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the Texans are gonna the Textans are going to uh,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna tank in the last game of the season.

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>But I said, no, they're not fourth and twenty. It's

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown thirty two, thirty one. Thank you?

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Can we can we we establish one thing before

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we start the show, because there's a lot of people

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>who are on gambling Twitter. Are you and Brad Power's friends?

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you enemies. What's the story with that?

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 5>It kind of depends upon the day, okay, and who

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 5>and who got them the best of the other, you know,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 5>on the last game. By the way, powers like lean

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 5>to Clemson last night. I didn't see it myself.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 6>I was on Duke.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Clemson should have had twenty more points.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 5>If you cashed with the under, you probably were a

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 5>little bit four to Todd. Todd and I like the

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 5>third quarter under. That was an easy one.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I had the second half under, which is ridiculous that

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that got home, But so did I. But I will

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>say this about Steve Feszick, who not only is a

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>is a really good better. And I hope you don't

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>take this and I said this to you before. I

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hope you don't take this with a fence. I say

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it with such envy. You are also the luckiest better

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I've ever And I mean this, if something has a

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>chance to go your way, Todd, back me up on

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>this somehow. What's the word you use? Luckbox? Stevie, luckbox,

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Steve Stevie.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I call him Stevie luckbox. He is he is the

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>lucky I mean, now, maybe it hasn't been his whole life,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>but he's on a run right now, where his fortuitiveness.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>For example, last night the third quarter under which we

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>had absolutely no chance of covering and somehow did okay.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So people know the format of this show and I

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>want to get into it. The format is, by the way,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>just to remind myself while I remind everybody, three best

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>bets of the week. Sides are totals teaser of the week.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about a two team six pointer. If you

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>want to give us or five or play you can,

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's optional. And then of course at the end, which

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>big favor is most likely lose? Out right? Which game

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you want no part of in terms of the spread?

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, Since it is week one, Steve,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is there anything you would like to impart on the audience,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>either from an opinion standpoint or just a macro betting standpoint.

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, any one season, there's a whole lot of

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 5>luck involved with all this. So if you tell me,

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 5>like a major contest and there's ten thousand people in it, well,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 5>whoever wins, that's gotta be like one of the best

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 5>betters in the world. Well not so much. You know,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Jamie gold won. You know, the main event and Dodge

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 5>rain drops for seven days. You know Moneymaker, who's a

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 5>baker who's a pretty good poker player. Actually, yeah, but

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 5>you got you got the aggression part, right, But he's

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 5>not going to be confused with a top fifty player

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 5>in the world, So don't overreact. I ran better than

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 5>God in two thousand and eight and two thousand and

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 5>nine when I won the four contests. And the thing

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 5>about that I had four first place finishes. You know

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 5>how many top twenties I had?

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>How many?

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 6>Four?

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 6>That's uh, that's that's running good.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, running good. By the way, about that poker thing,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this is true story. My dad's cousin's kid finished third

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>once year one year in World Series. Wow, so it is.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And he's completely not a poker player, right and finish third?

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Look it up, ben VENISTI was the last Ben VENISTI

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay. So Will Todd's same question to you. Is

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there anything you all want to say before week one

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>or you just want to dive into the format. What

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? Will?

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would say Division dogs week one. I mean,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 4>first of all, I just hate laying a number really

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 4>anytime in the NFL. But week one, you made the

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 4>point yeah, we think we know stuff, but Colorado TC

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 4>you perfect example. We don't know as much as we

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 4>think we know. So be careful laying points, which is

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna get contradicted by some of my picks. But Week

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 4>one traditionally good for the dog, especially division dogs at home.

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>God, I mean.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 2>To that end, I would have had the second place

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>pick in the brackets tortament NCAA Tournament challenge over with

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 2>thousands of people for a million dollars in the DraftKings.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 2>So you know you called my picks for KACTA when

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I said San Diego State versus Yukon, and that's what

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 2>ended up happening in I will say, Will, if you

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>guys don't listen to this, guys, if you guys don't

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>listen to the NCAA Tournament podcast that Gilly does, you

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 2>should start doing this. Will Hill had FAU in the

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>final four, and I had San Diego State Yukon, and

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>so you should listen to that.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That NCAA podcast might have been the most accurate insane

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>betting and display ever. Will did have FAU in the

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>final four. Todd had San Diego State, and I know

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Todd tells stories a certain way, which always cast dispersions

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on others, particularly me. But what did I say to

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you multiple times during that podcast? Multiple times?

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And your entry put in your damn entry the big

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>fool and you didn't and it almost cost you a

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollar?

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 5>Would you say big? Or you're referring to how how

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 5>large a folly is or how large he is as

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 5>a person.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave that up to the listener.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, all right, you know what's funny. I live

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>in Connecticut.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Fau was a split second away from winning the national

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 4>championship in Connectic because Connecticut teams don't count in that pool.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 4>So a tenth of a second left, San Diego State

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 4>hit a shot which I didn't bet him win a

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 4>national title. So if they won that game, I probably

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 4>would have been uh, would have been kicking myself. But

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a little little uh nugget there, just based on the rules,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Fau was that close to being declared the champion, at

0:09:58.720 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 4>least for Connecticut.

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Pon. How often do you go back and watch the

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Elite eight game where Fau gets into the final four?

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, don't I don't relive the past? Maybe three four

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>times a week?

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Time? Sure, all right, let's do this week one of

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and again this is the caveat of Look,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>even survivor pools are hard. Week one. We know stuff

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to a degree, but there's some stuff we always learn

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>every Week one. Oh my god, we had it so

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>wrong about this team, but these all count. Still A

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd is still bragging about, apparently as half game win

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>over me last year, which apparently is under protest.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>First of all, fifty three games is a gigantic sample size.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like thousands of games, thirty twenty two one.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable, not quite, but.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, in order to tell whether someone's actually a winner,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 5>and this is like just fooled by randomness type of things,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 5>you really need like five thousand trials, right, It is

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 5>remarkable how like like Don Schwstner wrote a book Blackjack Attack,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>and he like shows players ABC and D and they

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 5>play for like three months in their like one hundred

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 5>thousand hands they played and player as getting burnt, cared, crunched,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>and player Sea's kicking butt and he's like, it explains

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 5>why player's struggling so much, to the mistakes he's making them,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 5>player seeing why he's doing so well, and he says,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm just lying.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>They both played perfectly play Arry got unlucky. It really

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>is true though, and even even someonely yourself he won

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>back to back. But we've had others like James Salinas

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, Chris who does well in multiple contests. Two

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>years is not enough, not even close to the number

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you decided, right, So it's someone's good. Someone is gonna

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>run good in these contests. Hopefully it's you listening right now.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>But boy, it's just going to be you know, the

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>normal grind of millions or of the Westgate contest five

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>picks a week and you're a contest that way, survivor

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is in play as well. Those are so much fun

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as we do this and try to make money on

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>actual bets. So let's start with our our actual best

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bets of the week. Will rotate these. Steve will start

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with you, what's your favorite side? Are total?

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, let's go with the total. And this is

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 5>more of a gut field than anything else. That Eagles

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 5>at Patriots. We're gonna go under forty five. I don't

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 5>want to get in trouble with the accountants. Todd, you're

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 5>the numbers guy. That's that's readily available, right.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>That was already one of my picks.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, shocker, I share. I want to disclose. I share

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>my plays with Todd.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know before I guess it's not I don't know, Stevie,

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's not written down right here before you

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>said anything thing.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I sent it to you and chewing the court stenographer

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Megapod also court thief of the.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 5>This is guy like in the movie Oh God, like

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 5>like that. The stenographer is like nothing George Burne said,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 5>is like it is recorded here.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 6>He said he couldn't be hurt. He couldn't be recorded.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 6>I just think that.

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll forget to send my in game college basketball.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 6>That's two for those counting on interruptions.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 5>So so, I just think Patriots aren't going to score

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 5>much against the Eagles. The Eagles had the super Bowl hangover.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 5>They didn't play their starters in preseason, which depressed scoring

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 5>for the offense. There was a tweet by Cleve Ta

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 5>that was outstanding about teams that don't play their their

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 5>starting quarterback. Yeah, the offenses like struggle there in terms

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 5>of I think like five points less than what their

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 5>team total is.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 6>So if the Eagles are going to score lesson they're

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 6>supposed to do.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think the Patriots are going to score

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot, and we've got a toll that's still above

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 5>average at forty five. This has a twenty three to

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty scrum look to it.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 6>I'll go under the forty five, all right.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Under forty five on the Patriots and the Eagles, William Wilson, Hillson, everybody.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 4>The reason I asked Fez for his first pick, I

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 4>was very certain he was going to take this wht.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 4>I'm happy he didn't give me Miami plus three. If

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna tell me, just hey, out of the thirty

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 4>two teams, pick two teams that are as even as

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 4>it gets. I would pick offensive Charger. I think they're

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 4>just dead even teams. Chargers have a very slight uh

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 4>snim to none home field advantage, travel you don't worry

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 4>about this time of the year. So I just don't

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 4>know how you get to three with this number. There's

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 4>starting to be some three and a half minus one

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty to me again, dead even teams.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna give me the three, I'll take it.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 4>This open Chargers pick at Chargers pick. Look, I think

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 4>I have some Chargers pick in my account. I lean

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to that side, but three points in terms of the adjustment,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand. I know Miami's got some injuries and

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Ramsey and the offensive lineman, but I will take the

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 4>points here and let me let me put fes to

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 4>work here just quickly, Fez, if you can get three

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 4>and a half minus one twenty, what is a profit?

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Will middle the other the f side on the Chargers

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 4>money line, I'm curious what your thoughts are on that.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, So the line is currently a three, So

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 5>if you can get three and a half, you're gonna

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 5>cast fifty five percent because literally, if three is the

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 5>correct line, which I'm gonna do for this middling, it's

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 5>gonna you're gonna go forty five to ten and forty

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 5>five if you lay three or take three. So if

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 5>you take three and a half, you win with that

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 5>if it lands on three, so you're gonna win fifty

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 5>five percent of the time. If you're playing plus three

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 5>and a half LA dollar twenty, that's a break even

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 5>bet on thet. So now we need a positive ev

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 5>on the money line in order to turn a profit.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 5>I think at no big money line on a three

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 5>point favorite is minus one forty seven plus one forty

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 5>seven minus one forty five. Well, from off the top

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 5>of my head would be penny with the plus three

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 5>minus one twenty, you're freeing Hamburgers.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 6>It's like a point five percent edge on the middle.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what you wanted, will.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was just curious because I'm seeing, like again,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 4>there's some three and a half minus twenty popping up,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 4>and there's some minus one sixty charges on the money line.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 4>That's not quite close enough, but I mean there's there

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 4>comes a point here where if you can just shop

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>around and be good at chopping.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>It's intriguing to.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Just play the middle because to me, this has like

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven to twenty four charges written all over.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 5>The problem with the minus one sixty is that you

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 5>can play the minus three minus one ten even and

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 5>that's and that's superior bet. So so trying to get

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 5>at the money line is going to be an inferior bet.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, laying three and taking three and

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 5>a half is approximately break even. But you know you're

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 5>paying extra big on the three and a half, so

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 5>that won't that won't fly.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So you took the dolphins there will plus three? Is

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that the bet?

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Dolph Dolphins plus three.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins plus three, all right, Todd Todd is the official

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lines keeper as well. What do you got, Todd?

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>What's your first By the way, that's an interesting conversation,

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you guys just having. Now, let's say there was nine

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>minutes left in the game and you could get the

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>three and a half versus a three and the game

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>was like right near those numbers or the minus one

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>sixty at that point, would you have would it be

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>more worthwhile because there's so many less outcomes that could happen,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and landing you know where it you know, in the middle,

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>there is obviously a lot more likely Steve, your thoughts.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 5>It all depends, but in general, yes, So, I mean,

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 5>if the game's tied, honor off, the three is probably

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 5>gonna be worth sixty five cents at least, if not more.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 5>If if the Chargers are head by two, it's pretty worthless. Well,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 5>it's not worthless, but it depends. But yes, direction with

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 5>your spot on right.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that was just a question. Okay, my first pick

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>was also, Even though Steve's going to say that I

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>stole it from I didn't. I just I had this

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>written down. I didn't know you even gave it to

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>me in June. But the point is is I'll take

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. Not for the reasons that he stated about,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, teams that don't play the first string and

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>all that nonsense, but great job, cleeve Ta. I'm gonna

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>take it just base done. One thing I think the

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Patriots know, and Bill Belichick seems to be a decent coach.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>They cannot score with the Philadelphia Eagles. There is no

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>chance in hell that if this game was some kind

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 2>of shootout. Bill Belichick knows he can stay close. He

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 2>knows he can, he knows he has to slow this

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>game down to an absolute crawl and make it a scrum.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I like the under forty five too.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think there's there. You know, Bill Belichick at

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>home is going to do everything in his power to

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 2>make this a scrum, low scoring game. And that's why

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the under forty five as well for my

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>first pick.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, I am going into that game

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and I am countering what my friend doctor Bob has.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Bob's one NFL play that he has, he's on

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. I'm going opo ooh, I'm taking the Eagles

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm laying before. I don't quite get it. I

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>really don't. I have a feeling that by the second quarter,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone in their heads will say to themselves, oh my god,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this team's the fucking greatest team in the whole league.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And what have we been talking ourselves out of offseason? Now?

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I could be terribly wrong. I could be terribly wrong,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and apparently the analytics community to know something that I

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>don't on the Patriots. But I will take this all

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>day long. And one of the things, certainly, the coordinators

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are a highlight here where the Eagles have lost both

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of theirs, and in the Patriots case, they've gotten rid

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the facacto way that they did it last year.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So I concede that. But I'm gonna lay the points

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>here week one where I don't want to overthink it

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>too much. I'm gonna be okay losing this, but I

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly if the Eagles roll them, I don't want to

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not be a part of that. So I'm taking the Eagles.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I am laying the points, just trying not to outthink

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>myself here, just gonna make it simple. Eagles. Mine is

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the points. My verse. Do we snake this or do

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we keep going around. Let's keep going wrong.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>You know we do that, we do the round raw

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and you go second? Do you go first? Oh?

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I do go second. Okay, I'm gonna go with the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys on this is awful that I'm doing road

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>favorites here. It's not the way to riches. But again,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>week one, I'm not gonna help think myself here Sunday

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>night taking the Cowboys. What is that three three consensus?

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd see it leaking, but I would say there's a

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of threes left. Steve, what do you think?

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's a lot of threes.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 5>It's three point two five. You could go, you could

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 5>take you three or take three and a half, which

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 5>is great game.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll give you the minus three.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then I'm laying the three. My opinion on the Giants,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>My one of my big season long bets is the

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Giants alternate season win total under. I know Brian Dable

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>got the Coach of the Year, I think I think

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it was a fagazy coach of the year where he

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>got the credit for a lot of really timely, high

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>leverage performance by the Giants, both offensively and defensively, and

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at third and fourth downs versus

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>first and second downs. They sustained that for a long time.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And there might be some people out there are like, oh,

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that's all coaching. I mean, they just step it up

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with it. That's not how this works. And I think

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they're a team by the way they were eight and

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>four and one score games. I think this is the

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>year where it where it changes dramatically for them, and

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it starts right here on Sunday Night football.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they get beat at home by the Cowboys.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll lay the three unsustainable unsustainable. That's what I'm doing,

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, Steve.

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>If somebody takes a pick, is that off the board?

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>No? No, no, no, no no. Todd makes a living. Todd

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>makes a living duplicating everybody.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>That's hysterical is then show you all? And I do

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>not have many of other people's picks. In fact, many

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>people have.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I really Is that right? Well, maybe you shouldn't tell

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>stories and make other people seem to be dumb in

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>your stories when they're trying to help you out. All right, Todd,

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your pick?

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>My second pick is going to be Look, obviously these

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 2>numbers have been hammered into submit over many months by

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>people like Fezik and all that stuff's in there. Now

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you have to find some gut, you know, feel kind

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of thing where you can say, look, maybe the experts

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 2>are wrong, similar to what Gilly just said, where he

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>thought that, you know, maybe there's just too much you know, talking.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, by the way, taking the road favorite Gilly

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 2>there when everybody else is on the other side is

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 2>probably a good idea at this point when all the

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 2>smarty pants can go into group think.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, fans, yeah, all.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 2>The smarty Pants like to go into group thing. But

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>so what I'm going to do is here, I'm just

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 2>going to do something based on feel, and that is

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to take the Chicago Bears. I believe they're

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>laying one point. I actually have them plus nine in

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 2>my pocket from when they first came out, you know,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>all those I'm being like one of those touts on

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Twitter where there's oh I got that line when it

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 2>first came out at plus nine and now they're down

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the minus one. So I've got ten points of value there.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, yes, I'll take the Bears minus one point.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 2>The reason being is the Bears have been tortured by

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>mister Aaron Rodgers for many, many years. I believe that

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that the receivers on the Packers were not very good

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>last year, and Rogers was really strong with him. So

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>now I get the former Utah State quarterback, which I

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>never liked at Utahs data. I know they all love,

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh Jordan Love. He's the greatest things in sliced bread.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I never liked them in college. I don't believe in him.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he'll turn, you know, say that I'm totally wrong,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>But remember I was right about Ryan's Fitzpatrick as you

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 2>were as well Gilly when he came in and covered

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 2>all those games for an zero to seven Miami team.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love is not the answer in Green Bay. So

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 2>now the Bears get an opportunity to spank the Packers

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>after they've been spanked year after year after year. They're

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>at home. They've got a guy who can go back

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to pass from the from his own thirty and he's

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>gone seventy yards touchdown. I want the Bears. I want

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>minus one. I don't believe Jordan Loves is ready for

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>road divisional football in the National Football League.

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Not Bears.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, will number two.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Usually the worst team is not as bad as we think.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I think the Cardinals break that rule. I will go Washington.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll lay the seven renewed optimism with that home field.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 4>You might get a little bit of a home field

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>that's been a sort of a you know, disinterested crowd

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 4>in recent years. Now with Snyder gone a little more enthusiasm.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I think this Arizona team is just not a professional team.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 3>They're bad on both sides of the ball.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Whoever starts at quarterback, whether it's Dobbs or Claytonton, is

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 4>probably gonna get hurt behind that offensive line. I'll lay

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 4>it with Washington. Usually don't like laying a touchdown, especially

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 4>in Week one.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll break the.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Rules here la with the Commanders.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>If ever there was a must win situation, it's the

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Commodes going up against the Cardinals. And let me just

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>say this, also because it's September, become normalized to it,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but the single greatest story of the offseason Daniel Snyder

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer the owner of this team. I cannot express

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you how much this means to so many of us,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ding dong, which is dead absolutely. In fact, I'll tell

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you how much it is. I beat Todd WISHNEVN tennis.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a true story. He had beaten me roughly

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and thirty four times in a row. I

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>beat him in tennis, and I acted like I won Wimbledon.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I was just a washing glory. And we go to

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Chipotle and the news that Daniel Snyder was no longer

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the owner of the Skins comes down and

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I completely for it. Was like when Farah Fawcett died

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and then Michael Jackson had the audacity diet. She died,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and then Michael Jackson died right after it, and no

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>one cared about Farah Fawcett diet anymore. That's how I felt.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 5>I want to know what the two teamer gil Anti correlated,

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 5>parlay gil beating Todd and then Todd beating Ben Wilson.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Paid it's got to be on the straps. You didn't

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>beat Todd, You didn't beat Ben Wilson, did you?

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I beat him, Yeah, we played. Yeah, I beat

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>him in a set last year. And when I was

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 2>real thin.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 6>Oh okay, wow, he limped off with an injury right after.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, but.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It was it was very very competitive when I was thin.

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>It was very very competitive to me. He was still

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>better than me.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ben versus Todd at two fifteen is like me

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>versus Todd at three hundred.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean I would have laid ninety nine.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 5>I would have laid eighty to make a dollar, just

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 5>like Purdue with But thanks Ben Wilson. Another Purdue game

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 5>for me.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's by the way, Billy did get that the

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 2>word book. Hilly got the win after three hundred and

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>forty consecutive losses. But since then he's oh and eleven.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 6>Lewis humiliating loss.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, let me just say this.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>We then we win, even though he's St. Louis.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>We went to Saint in.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Saint Louis, Jeff Jeff Pearl's wedding, he was very close

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 2>again to get in his second wish.

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I believe, which is nineteen. He's going to

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>stop talking at some point, which is why I told

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd that it wasn't the victory that gave me coffie.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It was in Saint Louis where I stared into his

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>eyes and I knew it was like Ali after the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>thrill in Manila, he beat Frasier, but he knew if

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you look into his eyes, he knew it was over

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that's wish nip ever, the same after ever, the same man. Yeah, yeah, Stevie,

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you're number two.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 6>I'm number two.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to go or two end your three, all right,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go oppo with Todd. I'm gonna take the

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Green Bay Packers plus one. Uh, you know, the pack

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 5>you go. You know it's interesting Todd keeps talking about

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 5>a home field advantage, and he's right. You know, the

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Packers are going to have one in Chicago. Anyone who's

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 5>attended this game. I know the population is a lot

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 5>bigger in Chicago that is in Green Bay. But I

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 5>think it's easier for the Packers fans to get like

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 5>seats in Chicago than it is in Green Bay. And

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 5>if you just look at recent history for whatever reason,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 5>let's see, the Bears lost ten to three in twenty nineteen. Okay,

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 5>COVID year they got drilled by nineteen. No fans there,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 5>but no Green Bay fans, so maybe that should have

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 5>helped the Bears. Bears lost twenty twenty one twenty four

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 5>to fourteen. They lost last year twenty eight to nineteen.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 5>The Bears are not owned by Aaron Rodgers. They are

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 5>owned by the Green Bay Packers, and if Todd had

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 5>checked his injury reports, he would have seen that the

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Bears have had cluster injuries throughout the preseason where not one,

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 5>not two, not three, but four of their offensive linemen

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 5>have been juggled back and forth, all with nagging injuries

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 5>and the like. And that's why money's been coming on

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Green Bay. Bold prediction, Todd, don't lay one on the Bears.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 5>You can take points with the Bears right before they

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 5>kick off, It's still not gonna help you because the

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Packers are going to kick their ass green Bay Plus.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I have the Bears plus nine, Steve, you weren't listening.

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I have the Bears plus nine in the bucket.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I said this on this show.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I did in the preview with the NFL preview

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with Matt and Kelly from last week, but I've said

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it a million times on a numbers game. Why are

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you so convinced Jordan Love's gonna suck, Todd? He's been

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>under the same coordinator, in the same coach for like

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>three years under tutelage. He may be good. You don't know.

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 6>Maybe does he need to be good? Does he needs

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 6>to be capable?

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Just needs to be capable. Just don't turn the all over.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>He could be very good.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 2>We last time, last time we were off Oh it

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 2>was thirty two thirty one Texans on fourth and twenty.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>When they were.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Thinking, that's that's a high yeah, a high probability of

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 5>success fourth and twenty with that offense.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 6>So you were you had the right side there?

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>What's your number three?

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 6>Number three?

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to go and Todd's going to break into

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 5>cheering the Pittsburgh Steelers catching two?

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 6>What What the heck am I doing?

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 5>I had all summer to play Pittsburgh plus three and

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 5>now am I trying to donk off my money?

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Taken two and a bad number? No, because I.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Think half, Stevie, you deserve it.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 5>Could have half, all right, I'll take it. I tell

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 5>you what, Grab the two and a half now because

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 5>it won't be there come Sunday. What's changed during the summer? Well, Bosa,

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 5>he's kind of important. Is he going to play? Just

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 5>you know they they're about to sign him again, still

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 5>haven't signed him?

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 6>Is he going to be ready?

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 5>He's worth a point on defense and non quarterbacks are

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 5>rarely worth a point, but he truly is their best

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 5>defender and Kittles banged up, you know, so one of

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 5>the most important offensive guys. He's not as import because

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 5>they've got so many different weapons, you know, with Debo

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 5>and with Semac and the like.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 6>But I mean he's still important to the line.

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 5>And you look at no team has looked better in

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 5>pre season than the Pittsburgh Steelers. Clicking in all cylinders.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 5>They're not just beaten up on second stringers either, like

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 5>in the Buffalo game. Yeah, blankets fourteen to nothing. Steelers

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 5>have just drilled three straight teams. I think it should

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 5>be pick them. San France starts slow last year when

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 5>they lost in the Monsoon to the Bears, one of

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 5>three wins for the Bears, so you give me the points.

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure that San France should even be favored.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Steelers plus two.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I like it. William.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 2>My first question is if you're gonna take the Stillers

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>don at Akroscher Stadium. Dean's got a parking pass into

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the casino, because there's no way in hell you're gonna

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>be able to park within fourteen miles of that stadium

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 2>down there in Week one with Canny Pickett. So if

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yen's better not check your email right now you don

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 2>at a Rivers casino and find out whether you got

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a card. That'll a lie YenS to park in a

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>normal fashion. Otherwise, I don't know how you're getting to

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the game.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 6>If you're seven stars, you can park right at the

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 6>seven Stars. Ballet Todd down Air, Caesars.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The best is down Air.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 2>There's no doubt when we're in Perman he's we're not

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>thinking about Caesar's palless and that that's some Vegas nonsense.

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Will what do you get from a competitive standpoint, I

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 4>would like to take Dallas minus the three. I feel

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 4>like from a content standpoint it's a little boring because

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 4>I had the same picks and handicaps. So I will

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>go in a different direction here. I'll take Cleveland plus

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 4>two and a half. If you look at Cincy, it's interesting.

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 4>There's a perception that they're this dominant team because you

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 4>went to a Super Bowl a couple of years ago,

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 4>a play away from going to Super Bowl last year. Now,

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 4>yards per play is in everything, but yards per play

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 4>on offense five point four, yards per play a lout

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 4>on defense five point four, both middle of the pack.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland gets Watson without the rust. They get a decentl

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 4>I think it is going to be improved a lot

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 4>with Schwartz, who's one of the few defensive coordinators that matters.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland destroyed them on Halloween last night in Cleveland. That

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 4>was with what prostic quarterback Burrows had no training camp.

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Who knows how healthy it is. I love the three,

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 4>but at two and a half year, I will take

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland plus the points that.

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go to the New York Giants football game

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and I am gonna go under the forty seven in

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that ball game. The games last year were not high

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>scoring games. The final score in one of them was

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight to twenty. One of them was with a

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 2>total backdoor touchdown after the Cowboys scored with like two

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>minutes to go in a ridiculous game that gives should

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 2>never run would.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 4>You say on Thanksgiving? I remember it all too well.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 4>That was Yeah, what effect that game should have?

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Totals? That game should have never gone over. The first

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 2>game I believe was twenty three sixteenth. Look the Dallas

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys and the reason they were good last year. The

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 2>defense was very good. It wasn't about that. It was

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>about those crazy rushers coming off the edge. And just

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>dominating people from a defensive from the defensive side of

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the football, and I think they're going to be smart

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>enough to realize we've got to play defense. It's not

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 2>like the New York Giants have a strong offense. Tame

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 2>ha'f the time. It's Danny running, going back to pass

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and somehow he gets away and scrambles for a first down.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 2>This is not a great I think Saquon Barkley had

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine yards rushing in one of the games. It's

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 2>not like the Giants are going to move to the football

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>in Dallas. Dallas is going to play a grinding style.

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Forty seven is a high number in a National Football

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 2>League game. Both games should have gone under last year.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Give me that under forty seven in that Dallas game,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and come on, under forty seven should be reserved for

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the for the crazy games, you know, Charger games, Miami games,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Dallas against a Giants in a divisional game, this is

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be smack me in the mouth football under

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>forty seven.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is the first time I think I've

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 5>ever heard somebody like cite a twenty eight to twenty

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 5>prior from the year before as evidence that the game

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 5>is going to go under forty seven.

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Kudos Tode the back there was a touchdown with two

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>minutes to go, and then at backdoor touchdown, Stevie, thank

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you very much. You have to read inside the box score. Well,

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not just about the final score, it's how they

0:32:59.240 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>get to that.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Thank you that well that the audience wants to know.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 5>You need to explain that to them. He just cited

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 5>the final score.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 4>I will here that that back door touchdown was enhanced

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 4>because of I think it was a bogus roughing the

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 4>passer call.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Giants never would have scored too, So that was Todd's wright.

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Excellent Todd, I forgot about bogus roughing the passer penalties.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Oh terrible, tackling the defense fifty.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>If Stevie had the over luck box, Stevie would have

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 2>won that one. He probably did have the over in

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 2>that game with some back door.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 6>Do you think you and I are lucky? You should

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 6>see what I do.

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>With crack Man. But by the way, let me just

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>praise Todd Wishneff for his for his amazing memory and

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>recall on some of these things. So last last night

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we were betting a few things. Obviously we all had

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like different variations of the under in that Clemson game,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>which we luck boxed our way to victory. But one

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the plays in that game was this dead ball

0:33:56.440 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>penalty called on Duke on a fourth down for Clemson

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.719
<v Speaker 1>where club Nick slid right before the sticks and then

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he was just absolutely drilled. But it was ruled because

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the slide had already started that it was a dead

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>ball foul and because it was fourth down and he

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was short that the ball then went to Duke. And

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I immediately because I get it, that's the rule, and

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I know people are outraged about it, but that's exactly

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>how you call that. And I was like, wow, is

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there a precedent for this? I can't think of any

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>time this was ever called this way. And Todd immediately

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about it on a Numbers game this morning,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>immediately called him. He goes, yeah, there was an Eric

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Weddle play in that playoff game. And I was like,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, how do you remember that? And it

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sure was Tampa Bay the Rams. The year that the

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Rams won the Super Bowl. They were up two touchdowns.

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay was driving that pass to Evans from Brady

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and remember Evans batted it down, and because it hit

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the ground the ball before Weddell drilled him on a

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth down, he got the penalty, but the ball went

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Rams. If Evans had tipped the ball up

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Weddle had drilled him, the Bucks would have

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>maintained possession. So it's it was very consistent.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 5>But I just you know, they say if you watch

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 5>a football game or a baseball game closely enough. My

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 5>father told me this, Yeah, you will see something that

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 5>you had never seen your entire life. Dead And my

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 5>dad said this, So example, one time in Cleveland, there's

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 5>a high fly ball to deep left and it bounced

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 5>over the Green Monster. So it's a ground rule double

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 5>over a twenty one foot high fence because.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It had just enough. Really, yes, do you think it

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>would be impossible? Yeah?

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 5>And I saw like a throw to the plate and

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 5>hit the rosen bag on the pitching mound, you know.

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 5>So just things like if you watch it, Craig like,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen that before.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 5>And when we were I was at the game with

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 5>my father, Wendell Statt was like observing and there's two

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 5>guys in the in the on deck circle and one

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 5>of the crowd one of the fans said, hey, Wendell.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 6>Statt, they're not allowed to do that.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 5>They got two guys in the on deck circle and

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 5>he walked over and he said, you got to go

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 5>to the dugout.

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 5>So if you look closely enough, you'll see you'll see

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 5>something never happened.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Before the Do you remember the Giants game? I saw

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday where the one where but where Jake Peev

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>was on the mound and he wasn't paying attention, and

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Buster Posey didn't see that he wasn't paying attention and

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>threw the ball back to him and Peevee just happened

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to have his glove here though. Yeah, that was awesome.

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome. It's like Chris Parley, can I just say.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 2>That that rule needs to be changed because if you're

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the play, granted, the guy's knee

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 2>was down in a split second later the guy blasted

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 2>his head open. Same thing with the Eric Weddo play.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>It's part of the play. It's not a dead ballfoul

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>dead ball means it's really a dead ball. We're running

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 2>back to the huddle. When somebody smashes somebody, you know

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>in the in the seats or something, or takes a

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 2>shot at somebody. That's what a dead ball foul should be.

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.479
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't be a dead ball because a guy's knee

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>hits the ground and literally a split second later a

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 2>guy blasts him in the head. That's still part of

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the play in my humble opinion.

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 5>So after you have a pick six and the guy

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 5>scores a nanosecond after he crosses the goal line, if

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 5>you have someone like what like clothesline on defense the

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 5>offensive guy, the touchdown doesn't count them because it's close enough.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 6>Seems inconsistent to me.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. Actually, that's a great point by Stevie.

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 2>What happens if that happens now, if a guy, Yeah,

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 2>if a guy gets a touchdown and a guy blast

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 2>them a half a second, what that's not That's not

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna that's gonna be a touchdown.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 6>I believe.

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's not gonna be a touchdown.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 5>It is might be the same this same concept that

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 5>basically the play, the play is over, point one seconds

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 5>goes by, and now it's got to be an after

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:25.959
<v Speaker 5>the place.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the inconsistency.

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 5>I'm trying to figure out what Todd's rationale saying it

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 5>should still count.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 6>What point do we draw the line?

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 5>Is it like one point one seconds, is it zero

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 5>point six seconds, or is it zero point one second?

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think there's an inconsistency. So what you're saying,

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Todd makes sense on the service where it's like it's

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>dead as far as the play is concerned, But the

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>actions in the play and the position at the time

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the of the hit are very much live basically, right.

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the distinction to me. The better they make judgment,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to me that they make judgment. Yeah, the better argument

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>is what are you trying to do with targeting penalties

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to begin with? You're trying to protect the players, right,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he trys a safety thing. In that respect, it's wholly

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with the with the punishment and the lack thereof

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>doled out, right, that's the real argument. I think like

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it goes counter to the spirit of what they're trying

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with that stuff. But I don't see it

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with the dead ball if somebody goes out of bounds, Right,

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's say somebody goes out of bounds and then they

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get popped. That's a dead ball foul if it happens

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on third down that the team that got popped still

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>maintains possession and they get the penalty. But if it's

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down, they don't keep the ball. It goes

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the other team. And when that happens, we'll all

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be up in arms. We'll be like, what do you

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a personal foul? He was out of bit

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>or fourth down? Play was done, the possession change already happened.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Great. I just think the dead ball should be defined

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 2>as after the action of the play is over and

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 2>the refs can make a judgment calle, just like they

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>make a judgment call on holding what it needs to

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>have the play being over. Now, Okay, everyone jumps up

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and they start punching each other. That's a dead file.

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But okay, whatever.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, I was just trying to Praisey for remembering that

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that was awesome.

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you anyway, I appreciate it.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Can I give my baseball.

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 4>You'll never see it again the anniversary today, I think

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 4>twenty five years ago, so you never see this again.

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>With the rules, I.

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Think it was Astro's padres two outs, two strikes, ninth inning.

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 4>The catcher signals for an intentional walk sneaks back behind

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 4>the plate and the pitcher buzzes in a fastball for

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 4>a strike three game over.

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I retweeted it, Oh wow, that's amazing. Yeah, I never

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>see that again.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 6>Where are we?

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 2>It is my last over seven and over seven and

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 2>a half and have six homers head and it goes under.

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Will never happen?

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was that was amazing. That was the worst

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>beat ever in baseball? Yeah? What was it? Eight to seven?

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And how it was? All?

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 2>The overrunder was seven and a half? I had the

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 2>over six home runs were oh.

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then four to three. That's right, all solo

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Jackson, Okay, I am. I am with Steve. I

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>hate to duplicate, but I thought I was gonna be

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the smarty pants and he beat me to it. I

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Steelers, and this is more of a Malcolm

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Gladwell blink thing or how many times do we remember

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>steal the Steelers as dogs winning an opening game on

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like some special teams nonsense, or just the fact that TJ.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Watt made an amazing play. That's the thing with the Steelers.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>They still have big playmakers on defense. And you're right

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 1>about everything about the preseason Kenny Pickett looked as good

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as anybody in the entire preseason. I think the Brock

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Purty thing is the other thing I would add to this.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Rock Purdy had a magic carpet ride last year, winning

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>seven straight games before the whole injury game in the

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 1>playoffs against the Eagles, him and Josh Johnson going out.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He had a lot of babbit should have been interceptions

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that weren't. Todd calls them itches, interceptions that should that

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>should have happened. Was that what we call it interceptions

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that should have that should have had poor football focus

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>actually has a stout for this, which is called, like

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I think, turnover world worthy plays. This is different now

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's no longer the mystery relevant coming in as

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the backup and everybody loves him and there's you know,

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>no pressure. You're the starter now. Not only are the starter,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they traded that other dude, and so this is your team.

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Sam Darnold's lurking. Apparently he had a great

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>off season two. So I think the dynamics a little

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>different as well, a little more pressure. I like the Steelers.

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the points. I'll take the two and a half.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>That's my third which brings.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, we didn't do we didn't do our

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>last year. In the beginning, we talked a little bit

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>about in game Do we want to just maybe talk

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 2>about some general in game strategy maybe for a minute

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 2>or two.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it sounds like you'd like to what would you

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like to say? Share with her?

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Or we don't have to it's your show.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Well no, usually, you know, I know that is usually

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what we do is we talk about something that happened

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the previous week.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 2>But it's week one, right, But I want to talk

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 2>about a gentle thing, please do, please do. So here's

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a little general thing. A generalisiming in the National Football

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>League very often late in football games and a fourteen

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 2>point game, a team is losing by fourteen, they're coming

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 2>down for the back door. So let's say the score,

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 2>for instance, is twenty eight to fourteen. That's forty two.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 2>And often the books will put up a forty eight

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and a half or a forty nine and a half

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>if they you know, if they think, you know, a

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 2>touchdown versus a touchdown and more so, here's something that

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I think people need to pay attention to. And if

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 2>it's twenty eight fourteen in my example, and they get

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown, you're thinking, okay, they'll kick the extra point.

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>That's forty nine. Twenty eight to twenty one is forty nine.

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Not so fast, my friend. Everyone is going for two

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 2>now down eight and now they're even doing it in

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>other scenarios when they're down you know, seventeen and get

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown, or they're down in you know, they're doing

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 2>it in all kinds of different wacky scenarios. So if

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you're betting in game and you see that there's six

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and a half more points on the line and you're thinking, oh,

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I think this team can get a backdoor touchdown and

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 2>I'll win my over bet, wait just a second. You

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 2>also have to consider if the team is going to

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>go for two point conversion, which is about a fifty

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 2>percent play, and that has to be figured also into

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 2>your handicap. Steve, I'm sure you have opinions.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 5>On this, sure, And obviously the jet the dead Nuts

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 5>play is to bet that the game will land, even

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 5>dead nuts, because whether they score the touchdown or not,

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 5>it's going to land even because the word is out

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 5>your union buddies are talking when you're down fourteen to

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 5>score a touchdown, and go for two. The Eagles pioneered this.

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 5>It's amazing. It took the NFL thirty years to figure

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 5>this out. The quick math that take me to ten seconds.

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 5>The assumptions are, you're down fourteen, you're going to get

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 5>two touchdowns, and your opponent's not going to score. All right,

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 5>you can just kick the extra point twice. You got

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 5>a fifty to fifty chance to win if you go

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 5>for two, and we're gonna assume they you get a

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 5>fifty percent of the time, might be a little aggressive.

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.439
<v Speaker 5>If you go for two after getting it the first

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 5>time the first touchdown, you win sixty two and a

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 5>half percent. You can map out all the permutations. It's

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 5>pretty straightforward, and sixty two and a half percents bigger

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 5>than fifty percent, so it's not even close. And yet

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 5>for years a lot what a lot of teams, bad

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 5>coaches would do is they kick after the first one

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 5>and they go for two after the second one, which

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 5>is totally oppo because if you if you if if

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 5>you missed the sec the two point compre you'll lose.

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 5>But if you miss it after your first touchdown, well

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 5>then you know, okay, Now I go to the second time.

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a very easy mathematical tree, and inevitably, when it

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>happens again, people will go crazy on Twitter. But let

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>me just ask you, because you just what you said

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of gave the indication that you assume most of

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>these teams are on board with this. What percentage of

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>teams do you actually think are on board with this?

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 5>Eighty percent of the NFL forty forty percent of the

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 5>College for yeah, the word the words gone.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>You think it's gonna Wait a minute, hold on, you

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>guys think eighty percent of NFL teams eighty percent? So

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>what's that twenty six teams out of thirty two whatever

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it is that they would down fourteen would score and

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>go for two. I don't buy that.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 5>The entire analytics team should be fired immediately if they don't,

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 5>because it's already been solved.

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, but I do not for one

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>second believe it's eighty percent. So will you at least?

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I bet I'll go ahead and lay minus three fifty

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 5>that that that on every occurrence that happens in the

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 5>with with eight minutes to go or less, that that

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 5>the teams will go for two in that situation.

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Will do you see it that way as well. Do

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you think it's that many would have too? I would

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have set old school that.

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that was Deely. It's interesting.

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Florida did it twenty one Florida Thursday night against you

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 4>tak down twenty one, scored a touchdown, went for two

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 4>and got it, which that's an unusual one.

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember seeing that one.

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 5>That is the proper call. Also, by the way, yeah,

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 5>same same concept.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's I'm shocked that you guys are so sure

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's eighty percent. I don't buy that at all.

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Like for me, it's not eighty, but it's definitely over.

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Four and a half. If I could be wrong, it

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 6>could be seventy.

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 2>The word is out, the word is out of this,

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and they're all doing it and they don't want to

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>look dumb because the other smart teams are doing it.

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Are they all doing it? Like? I must have missed this.

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 5>This is a line from from Wall Street the movie

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 5>where we're I don't know what to make of it, Gordon,

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 5>everybody's going for two when they're down eight.

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I I mean usually when we talk. I mean what

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember is when I come in and do guessing

0:45:56.880 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>lines on Monday morning. Usually My line is is, now

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we have coaches who don't even know what is analytically

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:08.919
<v Speaker 1>correct or not, and they do or they do they

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:12.439
<v Speaker 1>do stuff that only is when it doesn't work. Oh

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that was analytics. When it does work, Oh it wasn't analytics.

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 5>By the way, the Steelers are the team that I

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 5>don't think is going to go for two down eight,

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 5>despite the fact that oftentimes they go for two after

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 5>their first touchdowns.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right, Washington. I don't believe Ron Rivera is going

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for two. There's no chance unless he.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't riverboat down fourteen. He only riverboats down ten.

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 3>Is Belichick a go for two guy? Because I don't

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 3>even know if he I don't even know if he is.

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Scenarios, But this is the great We should chart this.

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 2>We should chart this.

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>We should win the meg Yeah, we.

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Should say Okay, last week it happened, you know, five times,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 2>here's what to happen. I think it's very very interesting,

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's definitely over fifty percent.

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:51.919
<v Speaker 6>Now to be fair.

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 5>To be fair, if you're a ten point favorite, you

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't go for two because your chance of winning an

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 5>overtime is greater than sixty two and a half percent.

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So now you're asking for them to compete.

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 5>To understand, I understand, so put put everything in, But

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to disclube it doesn't make sense.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting, but the original point, Steve, do you agree

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 2>that people have to be more aware of the end

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 2>game of permutations there? Because you know you're gonna have

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>that scenario with the six and a half A lot

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of times those books will hang the.

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Forty eight a half eight, and then you inevitably you'll

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 5>hear the light bears like why are they going for two?

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 5>Like they haven't watched a football game. And you know,

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.320
<v Speaker 5>I will say this about the coaches, like we watch

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 5>way more you know, football than they do. We watch

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 5>the end game of every game. They have no idea.

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they got like one hundred thousand things.

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 6>On their plate. They don't have time to watch any

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 6>of these other games.

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, guessing lines is nothing, but like I mean,

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 1>besides the guessing of the lines, those recaps are nothing

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but one of these coaches doing like over and over again.

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I'm.

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 5>Shocked at announcers. Oh, I can't believe they're going for

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 5>it here fourth and eight. It's like they're not going

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 5>for it. It's the end of the first half. They're

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 5>pretending to get the clock to run before they punt.

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, Will and I were talking about I mean, Chris

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Valor usually does the stuff, but we were watching the

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>first college football game and there was a fumble forward

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and he was just he seemed incredulous, like he was like, oh,

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they get the first down. I was like, you know,

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball goes back to where he was like his

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>simple stuff. You're like, Wow, everybody's not in mid season forms.

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 2>So I don't about argue that people. I'm sorry, go ahead.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 4>Well no, I was gonna say about you masked New

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Mexico that opening week zero Saturday. New Mexico scores to

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 4>make it a ten point game four and a half

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 4>minutes left the on site kick, and I forget who

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the announcer was, Oh, this is way too early.

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 3>You can't do that. I mean, its way too early. It's

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 3>four minutes after the game, you're down by ten points.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 6>You need the ball, jeezy when it went in doubt.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 6>Whenever it's a close call, always be aggressive if you

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 6>don't know what to do.

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 5>It's rarely wrong to go for it on fourth down

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 5>and it's rarely wrong to go for two when in doubt.

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under on eighty percent. But that but

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a great it's a great in game point

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that you make, Todd. And the other one that I

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>would bring up is, you know, the most basic of

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all is the whole two for one thing, right, Like

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if we gave just one one in game

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>point that would be obvious to men, right, but maybe

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>not to others. Is know who's getting the ball first

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, and if there is.

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Especially for the end of third QUARTERBT, the end of

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 2>third QUARTERBT, that's available with books now if you know

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 2>who's sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you, Gilly, but

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm very second about that a third QUARTERBT, if there's

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 2>three minutes to go and one team has the ball.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the NFL teams are much smarter about

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 2>making sure they get the last possession. In the old days,

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 2>they would rush down score with forty seven seconds off,

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the other team would get a field goal. Teams are

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 2>getting smarter now. They're not rushing when they're at the

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 2>plus forty five with forty five seconds. They slow it

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 2>down and they make sure they get that last possession.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 2>So now the end of third quarter bet that you

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can have in a lot of books is huge. If

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 2>you know who's getting the ball first to start the

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 2>second half and you have the ball with two minutes

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 2>to go, that has to be a gigantic, huge thing

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 2>for the end of third bet. And I do not

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>believe the algorithms have caught that yet.

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 5>And pursuit to what Gilly said though, right after the

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 5>games kickoff, the first thing I do is I take

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 5>bike a green highlighter and I green every NFL the

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 5>get starts with the ball because that way, I know gets.

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 6>In the second half.

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 5>And if you're betting live NBA, and I know this

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 5>is difficult. Whoever wins the tip gets the ball to

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 5>start the fourth quarter, they start with the first and

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 5>the fourth quarter. And you could say that's trivial. No,

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 5>it's worth half a point, half a points a lot.

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, be betting live late in the third quarter.

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>See now, I do agree with you guys that that

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 1>thing about the end of the first half and figuring

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>out the timing that eighty percent of teams get that. Now,

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Belichick was the master at that right maximizing

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 1>possessions and minimizing the opponents. I do agree that most

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>of the league is on board with that, but that

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to eight to six thing, I don't believe it's

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent yet. I think I think it will really closer.

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 2>You believe it's over fifty.

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's fifty. I'm not even gonna say over.

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 6>It's past the tipping point.

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:45.359
<v Speaker 5>It's kind of like when when you win the coin toss,

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 5>you're supposed to defer, And for years Belichick was like

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 5>the first guy to do it every time, and then

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 5>word got out where half the half the league started

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 5>to defer, and then like two years later, everybody deferred

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 5>because the memo got out. And I believe the memo

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 5>has gotten out on the fourteen to eight to say.

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay, can we remember it more when peams go for

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 4>two because it didn't happen for so long that it

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 4>sticks in our brain, like when keeams kick the extra point.

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't really register when teams go for it.

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 3>What we notice it more? That's what I think. I

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think it's fifty to fifty.

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, teaser of the week. Is that what we

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>do next? I believe it's teaser of the week two

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:20.919
<v Speaker 1>we're two teams six point teaser. Long teaser legs are

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not plentiful, but there are a few. Pittsburgh obviously leaps

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 1>off the page as a possible long teaser leg two

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half through the three and the seven. There

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are others as well, including the Cleveland Browns, who are

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point dogs against the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two most glaring ones right off the top.

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sort of scanning away. The Jets will also

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be a long teaser leg on Monday night home against

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. I think I'm forgetting one obvious wound in

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:56.240
<v Speaker 1>here somewhere. Yeah, So anyway, and the Packers I suppose

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>would be well Packers not quite don't.

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Quite qualify that mostly ones mostly.

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah again, wong teaser legs, and I know Stevie will

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>back me up on this. Totals matter here on long legs.

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Long real name John Ferguson, lived in San Diego,

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book on Sports Betting so many years ago.

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>He identified the three most positive ev teaser legs home

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and road dogs of between one and a half and

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half that you would tease through the

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>three and the seven. And a home favorite of between

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half eight and a half that we

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>would tease down through the seven and the three. It

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is total dependent, right, A total of let's just be crazy,

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty ain't the same as a total of forty. On this,

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the fewer points you have in a total, the more

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>valuable each point is. It's the same reason why we

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't recommend teasers, say in a sport like the NBA

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or college football, where intuitively you know those sports and

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the scoring to be more volatile.

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Good summary, good good summing.

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Check your rules at the books, because yeah, a lot

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:52.839
<v Speaker 5>of them have changed to some well like circle Now

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 5>is mius one thirty?

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 5>South points mius one thirty. God can't win playing teasers

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 5>mius one thirty. So let me do the math here. So,

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 5>if you're laying minus one twenty on a six point

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:07.919
<v Speaker 5>teaser each leg, you're essentially laying minus two eighty, all right,

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 5>I know that sounds like that's crazy. So if you

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.319
<v Speaker 5>took if you took two eighty and you wagered it

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 5>on your first leg of the teaser and it covers,

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 5>that's like winning one hundred. Now you're taking three eighty

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 5>and you're laying you know, two eighty again. So because

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 5>of that, you know recognize there's a whole lot of

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 5>extra veig and once it goes above minus one twenty,

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:27.800
<v Speaker 5>it really is not going to be viable.

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 6>The math isn't going to work out.

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Vegas did this for us on a numbers game

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this morning. This is the Vegas Books stations in South

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Point minus one twenty five on six point teasers, bet

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>MGM and Circum minus one thirty, Westgate and Boyd minus

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:42.799
<v Speaker 1>one forty Caesars who by the way, if you can

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 1>get into the app in the first place, you're doing

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>something special. Uh, they're They're not offering six point teasers

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. They're offering minus one thirty on six and

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a half, which is good, Which is good. Yeah, yeah.

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:59.320
<v Speaker 5>And Caesar's Nevada. If you have a tie and a winner,

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 5>or a tie and a loss, it gets greater to push.

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 5>But if you do Caesar's in New Jersey, you lose.

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh it's a different rule at the same company.

0:54:07.000 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>BETMGM Nevada is also a refund on a tie and

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a loss, which again blows people's minds.

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 5>And so if you get the bad rules on the

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:17.280
<v Speaker 5>ties you have to always pick your number of points

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 5>such that you can't land on an ineture to avoid

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 5>that nasty rule.

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>And the theory behind the refund is because you can't

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>drop a teaser to a one team tease.

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 6>That's right, right.

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, by the way, just let me just say this

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Caesars Nevada app. I'm not I said this

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game this morning. I'm not trying to

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be an ass but if anybody from Caesar's Eric Bigiot

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Will Hill, somebody is listening, fix the app.

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 5>My god, it shouldn't be mandatory that every executive yes

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 5>making six figures are higher.

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh, this is so true.

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:45.320
<v Speaker 5>It has to have an assignment where they have to

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 5>be able to make ten basic bets. They have to

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 5>be able to bet a teaser. They have to be

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 5>able to bet a prop a season win. Right, you

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 5>get where I'm going. Have to be able to buy

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:55.879
<v Speaker 5>try to buy app point and put each weight bet

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:57.959
<v Speaker 5>in for ten dollars each and make it a live bet.

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh and you have to do it with like a

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>game star arts in five minutes.

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Go right, and believe me, if these executives actually bet

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 5>on that app, they'd they'd be having some meetings with

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 5>their IT people on it, which not be pretty one.

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Stevie, two team six point teasers.

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 5>All right, I'm going to vary a little bit from

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 5>Wang and I very rarely do. And here's why. I

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:19.839
<v Speaker 5>feel strongly that the Washington Arizona line will either stay

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 5>at seven or go up.

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:22.720
<v Speaker 6>All right. It's also a low total.

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 5>I like that with teasing, So I am gonna use

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 5>the Washington commander, the much despised Washington Commanders against an

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 5>Arizona team. People are already talking about this team's gonna

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 5>go winless. Well, if they go winless, probably gonna win

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 5>that leg.

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Of the teasers.

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna obviously put it in with Pittsburgh because if

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:39.240
<v Speaker 5>I like them plus two and a half, I'm gonna

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 5>like them plus eight and a half. One caveat I

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 5>want to give to everyone. I firmly believe with Survivor,

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 5>your optimal play week one is to play Washington. All right,

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.440
<v Speaker 5>So if you're gonna play Washington and your Survivor picks

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 5>recognize you're already got some exposure on the same bet

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 5>basically here. So if you're gonna enter Survivor five times,

0:55:58.440 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe don't go crazy teasing.

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that this morning on the show, which is like,

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have so many we forget about the NFLCAS.

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>You have so many competing interests at the same time,

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>or they're all so aligned you're terrified that they're all

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna blow up.

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 5>And it probably doesn't matter that much we have one.

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 5>But as you go deeper, if you're in Survivor by

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 5>the time you get the week ten, you know, don't

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 5>shove all in with with If you have fifty thousand

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 5>in Survivor equity, you don't have to tease that same

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:24.920
<v Speaker 5>team across the board like.

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 6>In your normal Wong teasers. But in this case, yeah,

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 6>I'm going.

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 5>And the reason I shied away from the Jets and

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.399
<v Speaker 5>Science shied away from Cleveland I'm worried those games could

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 5>go to three, so they'll no longer qualify me too.

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Will I'm gonna go. I'll use Pittsburgh.

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:41.840
<v Speaker 4>That game will probably be twenty three twenty somebody who wins,

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 4>who knows who cares.

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the eight and a half.

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 4>With Pittsburgh, and I'll use the j E. T S Jets, Jets,

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Jets my second leg up to eight.

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 3>And a half.

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 4>I just think this team is boy. Everyone says they're

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 4>over hyped. I kind of think they're underrated. You look

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 4>at their team last year. I mean, they were just

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 4>so good in so many different spots, with really probably

0:56:57.960 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 4>the worst quarterback play in the entire leagues. To give

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 4>me the eight and half of the Jets, the eight

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 4>and half with the stillers.

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, will you're a Jets guy? First three first

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:10.439
<v Speaker 1>six games before the buye Home Buffalo act? But oh yeah,

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that's right you are. I'm sorry, home Buffalo at Dallas home,

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>New England home, Kansas City at Denver home Philly. You're

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a Mets fan or a Yankees fan. You're a Yankees fan.

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, a Yankees fan, but a disgruntled different Yankees.

0:57:26.000 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And at this point, okay, those six games I just

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned for the Jets. You're the Jets front office, and

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I gave you truth. Serum. If I said, would you

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:37.959
<v Speaker 1>if I gave you three and three right now, would

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you take it? Your answer would be.

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, have too.

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 6>That's probably you know I'm gonna disagree.

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Really all right, And here's why I think directionally, you're

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 5>right that their expectations only two point eight wins so

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:50.959
<v Speaker 5>that this would be better than expectation. But it's kind

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 5>of like trying to win a sports betting contest right

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 5>where you hit we did take sixty percent through the

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 5>first five weeks.

0:57:57.440 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, and it's like yeah.

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Of course, no, no, no, you actually have negative equity

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:05.320
<v Speaker 5>because you're because now your chance of winning and making

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 5>the final table, making the top ten, that's gone down.

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:09.479
<v Speaker 5>So your chance of getting home field and actually playing

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 5>for a championship as the Jets goes down. If you

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 5>if you start the year even you know, six and four,

0:58:16.000 --> 0:58:17.280
<v Speaker 5>three and three, very.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>True, It's very true, Todd.

0:58:20.080 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just looking at those six games. Three and three

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a little rough, don't you think?

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. That's why I asked the question, like,

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>well that take three and three.

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, three and three exceeds expectations. But but but but

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 5>but their chance of winning the super Bowl would go

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 5>down if they're three and three.

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You understand, Yeah, I know.

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I was just looking at the games and

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, who are the who they could for sure win.

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Nathaniel Hackett's no longer in Denver to not be able

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 2>to get the play in before the play clock goes.

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Try a ninety yard field goal with their field goal

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 6>kicking mule.

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We will never have we been? Have we been? Through

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the worst two pitches?

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Here's my analytics question. Yeah, is it good to get

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the play in so that you don't get the the

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 2>delay of game penalty before the play click goes out?

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me check on that. Hold on, I'm told it

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is good to get to play in.

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Oh, okay, because Nathaniel Hackett I think he's the

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator for some other team. So maybe you could

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 2>look for a prop most delay of game penalties, I

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think they have that profit it would be a

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 2>good one to get any Why.

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't everyone just copy Belichick every time you have a

0:59:22.640 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 5>fourth and one all right past midfield, immediately the quarterback

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't even check what the coach. The coach just goes zebra,

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 5>and zebra means everyone rushed the line of scrimmage and

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 5>quarterbacks sneak and you get it every time. Yeah, you

0:59:35.000 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 5>know when Now, if you hem a hall On line

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 5>up for twenty five second and then do it, you

0:59:39.680 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 5>get stacked.

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the the the How about going in the shotgun?

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 2>The best is to go in the shotgun on fourth

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and inches and blow it.

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we love that. The home crowd derisive countdown

0:59:50.360 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the play clock with Hackett is still the greatest

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>thing ever, like never again, never before. When we see

0:59:56.640 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that that was so great.

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 2>My season is going to be uh. The the uh

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>commanders too. I just think that that the commander, well,

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Sam Howe is going to be good. I

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>remember him from North Carolina and I really, I really

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna be pretty good. And I'm gonna go

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 2>with the insurs. I mean Injurs plus eight and a

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>half in that, Yan's gotta think that our guy Tolman.

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, everybody does the same teaser, Steve, before

1:00:24.400 --> 1:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>you you go crazy.

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 6>I can show you the sheet.

1:00:27.080 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>We're week after week. Everybody has the same teasers. So

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>let's not go and create a federal case out of

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it in forty two indictments because I picked the same

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>teasers you. If I would have gone first, you would

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>have picked the same teaser for Okay, So so bottom

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>lying here is the doors. They're good there. It's a

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>home game. I already told you how how it's gonna

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>be really hard to park down there, So don't even

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>think you're getting home in time for the second game.

1:00:54.880 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Forget about that. You in's better just go down on

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Mike's and watch the games there to you know, the

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>bar next BNC Park or what whatever. You're you're not

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>getting home in time for the second games. I could

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>just forget it. Forget that.

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 5>People are getting very nervous that laid miss one to

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 5>eighty on the Miami Dolphins song the pot is almost

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 5>over and.

1:01:12.200 --> 1:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Getting no Dolphins song.

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's getting dicey.

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I haven't done that. I haven't done that. I haven't

1:01:20.320 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>done that song in a while.

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, no second verse there, Will Will's and I

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>will okay, Well, in Will's head right now, the thought

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>bubble and Will's like, oh my god, I signed up

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for a year of this. I have the same exact team.

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Is what I got? You got? No?

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 4>I just want because it's on my mind, so it's

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 4>probably on some of the listeners minds. I just want,

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 4>like thirty seconds from everybody. Have you guys gotten your

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 4>YouTube TV situation straight out? Because I haven't? And how

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 4>does that affect the why betting?

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh Will?

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I have a great point on this, Gilly, Can I

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>make my point about this, about this YouTube thing.

1:01:50.760 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, tod go ahead.

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Here's my thing. I am not buying the damn YouTube

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>to be four thousand minutes behind the clock. So how

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>am I going to bet in game when the commercials

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>over and I haven't even seen the end of what

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>happened on the YouTube. It's ridiculous. However, however, I did

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 2>find out that Direct TV is still going to be

1:02:12.200 --> 1:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>doing the games for restaurants and for casinos, So the

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the feeds in casinos and restaurants are still going to

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>be on the old direct which is only maybe like

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty five second find I think that's gonna make a big,

1:02:24.880 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>big difference, especially if you like endgame. So I am

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>already mapping out which restaurants I'm going to, and I

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>may go down to the Rivers and try to watch

1:02:33.840 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>down there. Of course, you have to pay eight thousand

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars for a seat, but I know somebody bu bah bah.

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a whole nother problem. But of course you can't

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>use the apps. You can't use the apps in the

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>River's Casino. You cannot use the bet Rivers app in

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the River's Casino. Tell me why. You'll never explain it

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>to me. It's ridiculous. You're the only one you can

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:53.240
<v Speaker 2>use down there, standal, you can't even use half the

1:02:53.280 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>other one. It's really the whole thing is It just

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>drives me absolutely mind boggling crazies. These causers making eight

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion on this damn National Football League. They need

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>more money and they got to stick us with fifty

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>second delay with YouTube. Give me a break.

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Cocoa Golf for the match six love, five to two

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>her ad against Elena Ostapenko.

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 5>Oh, Ostapenko just Withdrew. If I was on golf, That's

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 5>exactly what would happen.

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Ostapenko, who beat the world, the former world number one.

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>That was very nice, Todd. I just want to say

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this because Stevie was looking. I wonder he was going

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to say the same thing as I was. Believe it

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>or not, And I know you won't believe this. YouTube

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>TV is closer to real time than Cox Cable is

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>here in Las Vegas.

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:39.040
<v Speaker 6>It's like fifty seconds.

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It's two.

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 6>It's two players that I'm behind, not one, it's two.

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like YouTube TV. I was like, oh my god,

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm only one point behind in this tennis match, not

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half.

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 5>And I'm meeting with these these providers are saying, well,

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 5>we should be able to better whether the next play

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 5>is going to be a passer or run. And it's like,

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:58.880
<v Speaker 5>how could the consumer ever be able to bet on

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 5>the only time you can bet during TV timeouts, you're

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>too far behind.

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>And even then, Steve, if you don't hurry on the

1:04:06.360 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>TV timeout, if you're a minute behind, that's right, that

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>means you only have a minute during the commercial. You

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.720
<v Speaker 2>don't even know that the game has already started again.

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's tough, you know. It's almost like they

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want us betting.

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:22.200
<v Speaker 5>That is the goal I firmly believe of a lot

1:04:22.200 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 5>of people with their apps on live betting, the number

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 5>one goal is don't allow the square ball that wants

1:04:26.960 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 5>to just lose his money to you. It's right, do

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 5>everything possible. The line changes, like from minus one ten

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 5>to minus one to fifteen and he's betting five dollars

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 5>a line has changed. It's like, well, every time the

1:04:38.640 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 5>line changes and line has changed, like, you can't take

1:04:41.280 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 5>a ten dollars bet, you know, within some to Lawrence,

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:44.920
<v Speaker 5>come on, that's.

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite Steve Fezik thing is the is

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like our number one rule is to not take money

1:04:49.320 --> 1:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from these people, just like you were talking about like

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the cardinal rules on special teams that all these players

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't abide by anymore.

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 5>So the other rules real quickly are that that I,

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:00.920
<v Speaker 5>if you're punting the ball, all right, the defense is

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 5>attempting to rough the kicker and jump off side.

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the first rule.

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, all right, But should the punter get the ball off.

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Now the punting team their return team. Their goal is

1:05:09.240 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 5>to knock the ball into the end zone. But the

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 5>returning team the kicker. His job is to attempt to

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:17.880
<v Speaker 5>field the ball inside the five yard line and fumble it.

1:05:17.880 --> 1:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Always while while his teammates hold. If there is a return.

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>The inside the five, the inside the five catching the ball.

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It drives me so crazy. The guys standing on the

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>ten yard line, what you moved backwards and don't catch it?

1:05:34.160 --> 1:05:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and don't start on your own twenty five on

1:05:36.600 --> 1:05:39.520
<v Speaker 5>a kickoff, go ahead and try to field it right

1:05:39.560 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 5>on your goal line, kind of like be unclear whether

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 5>you're in or out, and then return it to the

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 5>twelve and then have cut back at the last second

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 5>so you get a holding call.

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 6>So you can start on your sixth.

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You're right too, that is the most egregious of all

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of them, because from the beginning, from the dawn of

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>football time, that's been a fundamental right. You plant yourself

1:05:57.640 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ten and if the ball goes over your head,

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you let it go. How difficult is that? Apparently it's

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>very doe.

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 5>And the other team's just gonna knock it into the

1:06:05.280 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 5>end zone. Even if the punter a dead digging mortar,

1:06:07.800 --> 1:06:09.840
<v Speaker 5>kicks it to the two. They'll do your job for you.

1:06:11.600 --> 1:06:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Because those guys, the Navy Seal team is running down

1:06:14.440 --> 1:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>on the pond coverage. They're going to run at the

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>ball at five hundred miles an hour, and somehow.

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>My teasers the same. It's the Steelers up to the

1:06:25.920 --> 1:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. It is the Skinnies down to

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>basically just having to beat the Commandos. Excellent than you

1:06:36.080 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it.

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:39.120
<v Speaker 2>When Guild does it, he says, oh, great work. When

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I do it, oh you coughing? Well, fine, Stevie. And

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>then don't copy any in game college basketball. In fact,

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll just give you the opposite side. How do you

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>like them? Apples?

1:06:48.320 --> 1:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if there was ever a must win

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>situation in week one. This is it if Washington Camp

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>beat Arizona the tanking Cardinals. Good God about Survivor, because

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna if you want to give a Survivor play,

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you can a couple points about this one. I've said

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this on a numbers game many times. I believe there's

1:07:03.880 --> 1:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a point of redundancy in entries. So I only got

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>five because I think if you go more than that,

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just playing it the same way, just doubled, just multiplied,

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna lose picks at this at just a

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>higher rate. The object is to get multiple entries by

1:07:21.320 --> 1:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving in circa. But I don't believe it's a function

1:07:24.480 --> 1:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of how many entries you start with. I believe it's

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a function of how you play the game. So I

1:07:29.240 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>stayed at five. You brought up the fact that Washington

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is the optimal play week one. I think that's true

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because not only is it against Arizona, which is a

1:07:36.640 --> 1:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>strategy in and of itself to just fade the Cardinals

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>every week, but there's probably not a natural place to

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>play the Commanders later either, the question becomes what percentage

1:07:46.640 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of a pool of a Survivor pool do you believe

1:07:49.720 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>will be on the Commanders. I'll give you forty percent

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:53.439
<v Speaker 1>over or under.

1:07:54.240 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 5>My first number was forty percent because more people will

1:07:57.920 --> 1:07:59.280
<v Speaker 5>inevitably take Baltimore.

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They're just because it's ten.

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Survive in advance.

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 5>You know that's like, well, no one wants you know

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:07.720
<v Speaker 5>what you don't want to get you have if you

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:09.600
<v Speaker 5>have five entries, you don't want to shove with a

1:08:09.600 --> 1:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>seven point favorite and not put and not put that

1:08:12.080 --> 1:08:14.000
<v Speaker 5>ten point You want to have some advance.

1:08:13.720 --> 1:08:19.479
<v Speaker 1>One should be in there. The game theory of it being, well,

1:08:19.520 --> 1:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if you know forty are going to be on this

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one team, you certainly don't want to have all of

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>yours on it.

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Though, And there is the funky rule that I brought

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 5>up with you about that you can you can enter

1:08:29.439 --> 1:08:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Survivor up to Sunday, yeah, or Saturday night and the

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:35.120
<v Speaker 5>but you can.

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Play the Thursday games.

1:08:36.160 --> 1:08:38.840
<v Speaker 5>So if should Kansas City, some people in heavily would

1:08:38.840 --> 1:08:40.800
<v Speaker 5>just I'll just shove with Kansas City and put my

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 5>ten entries in invite Lewis, I'll re enter like talking

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:45.439
<v Speaker 5>about the week one, yeah, Daniel and the Grano style

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:49.439
<v Speaker 5>I read buy so because that normally there wouldn't be

1:08:49.479 --> 1:08:51.759
<v Speaker 5>that many people taking Kansas City is not an optimal

1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:53.760
<v Speaker 5>player or anything close to. But because it's Thursday night,

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 5>you're going to see that. So should Kansas City lose

1:08:56.439 --> 1:08:59.960
<v Speaker 5>to Detroit, yeah, I am compelled to immediately enter two

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 5>at times because now I'm getting a ten percent overlaly,

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 5>not from Circa, there's not gonna be an overlay, but

1:09:04.960 --> 1:09:07.120
<v Speaker 5>from all the people that dunked off their chips with

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:07.839
<v Speaker 5>the strategy.

1:09:07.880 --> 1:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So you if Kansasity wins, you will not play Survivor

1:09:10.160 --> 1:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>at all.

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:12.760
<v Speaker 5>If I play, I have to recognize I'm paying like

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.160
<v Speaker 5>a three percent rake. I say, abe, I'll still play,

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 5>but I'm playing. But I'm playing with.

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:18.840
<v Speaker 6>The rake because it's because they're one notes.

1:09:18.840 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 5>It's almost like a free throw shooting contest where we

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:23.479
<v Speaker 5>all shoot like seventy five percent and I'm gonna have

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:25.240
<v Speaker 5>to play against ten percent of the group that made

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:26.040
<v Speaker 5>their first free throw.

1:09:26.120 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, it is the way I would put it.

1:09:27.280 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 1>That's your mathematical brain kicking in. I think there's a

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who are going to play Detroit right

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>hoping for the Detroit win and if they lose. If

1:09:35.080 --> 1:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City wins, they're just going to re up and buy.

1:09:38.680 --> 1:09:41.120
<v Speaker 5>I'll put the over under and how many people played Detroit.

1:09:41.200 --> 1:09:44.599
<v Speaker 5>If there's I would I would say six. You think

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 5>it's that few that will play it down.

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:47.559
<v Speaker 6>I'll go six. You want to go over under?

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Go over?

1:09:48.479 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 6>Really?

1:09:48.920 --> 1:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Dinner?

1:09:49.200 --> 1:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, dinner, dinner, dinner? How many is like dinner?

1:09:52.680 --> 1:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just use my points, I'll just the other way.

1:09:55.000 --> 1:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>There isn't there is. There is an example though, with

1:09:57.400 --> 1:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>when you play Horse against stevezi Gill and you're standing

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>at about eighteen feet out and just banking endless bankers

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>off of them. You can give them any advantage possible.

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:09.439
<v Speaker 2>You can give him a twenty five percent overlay. They're

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>never going to beat you in Horse if you can

1:10:11.439 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 2>endlessly hit bank shots from eighteen feet.

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 5>So for like two years I heard Todd tell me

1:10:16.479 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>about what a star he was and how he was

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 5>the Jewish Jordan. Yeah, And you know, for all this talk,

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't see it. So we play Horse and I

1:10:23.840 --> 1:10:27.559
<v Speaker 5>don't like. I don't own a basketball, so I haven't

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:29.240
<v Speaker 5>shot like in twenty years, And I got an ho

1:10:29.439 --> 1:10:31.559
<v Speaker 5>r on him, and I can see the like beads

1:10:31.560 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 5>of perspiration he has to go to is like, and

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:36.320
<v Speaker 5>he knows I'm an analytics guy. So it's like, I'll

1:10:36.360 --> 1:10:39.840
<v Speaker 5>just shoot the sixteen eighteen foot Jumperveesig never shoots that

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 5>because he only shot threes, so he rolled me.

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Then let me just ask you one. I won't hold

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you all to a Survivor pick because some of us

1:10:46.200 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have multiple entries. But if I said to you, you

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't take any of the top four dog any of

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the top four favorites in Survivor. So not the Ravens,

1:10:55.040 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>not the Commanders, not the Vikings. And what's the fourth one?

1:10:59.360 --> 1:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Not the not the uh there's one other that's like six, oh,

1:11:02.800 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. If what would be what would be the

1:11:07.280 --> 1:11:10.479
<v Speaker 1>team besides those four that you might play on a

1:11:10.520 --> 1:11:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Survivor entry. I said the Broncos, but the Eagles.

1:11:14.800 --> 1:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I know you need the Eagles probably, I said the Broncos.

1:11:18.720 --> 1:11:21.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't have one. I'll say this, yeah, a bold prediction.

1:11:22.320 --> 1:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Tampa could could be Minnesota Tampa easily.

1:11:25.280 --> 1:11:26.160
<v Speaker 6>That's that's your favorite.

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That might be the next question that's at the end

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of the show. But yeah, aren't it. That's okay, Well,

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get to those final two questions.

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Shout Seattle, by the way, that would be my pick.

1:11:35.120 --> 1:11:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Seattle all right. So then the final two questions, as

1:11:38.479 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>always with the end of every megapod, which Stevie just

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just sort of give a portend of, which is which

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>big big favorite is the most likely to lose out right?

1:11:45.880 --> 1:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Which game do you want no part of? Which is

1:11:48.000 --> 1:11:50.519
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question on week one more than any because

1:11:50.520 --> 1:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a ton of them. But which big

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite most legally lose out right? You say THEA to

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay because you think we're underrating Tampa Bay in

1:11:57.320 --> 1:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>some way.

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:00.400
<v Speaker 5>I know, I think I just think Minnesoa it could

1:12:00.479 --> 1:12:02.599
<v Speaker 5>it was a blow a slightly below average team by

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 5>and and and and I think they didn't get any better.

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:08.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so the wheels could come off this year.

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:10.759
<v Speaker 1>The wheels could come off, doesn't mean they'll come off.

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:14.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Gus, they're a high variance team. They're they're They're

1:12:14.560 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>the kind of team where Kirk Cousins can throw you

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>two pick sixes or fumble the ball when he's back

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in the in the in the pocket, and of course

1:12:21.760 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>turnovers are what make NFL upsets. So you've got mister

1:12:27.560 --> 1:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Cousins in the pocket, they striped, sack them two times,

1:12:30.200 --> 1:12:33.519
<v Speaker 2>and you win the game. That's how an NFL upset happens,

1:12:33.600 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and they're a high variance team for that. Sure they

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>can look great, but they can also make all kinds

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of mistakes. With mister Curtis's Cousins discuss did you.

1:12:41.920 --> 1:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>See quarterbacks on Netflix? Outstanding? Yeah, that was It's so

1:12:46.680 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>much better than hard knock.

1:12:48.000 --> 1:12:50.519
<v Speaker 5>So analytical. I had no idea these guys had to

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:54.439
<v Speaker 5>study so much. No wonder like these these quarterbacks like

1:12:54.840 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 5>fail miserably. You know that, don't put in the hours

1:12:57.320 --> 1:12:57.959
<v Speaker 5>with the playbook.

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so that's it, right, it's it was soot.

1:13:00.080 --> 1:13:00.799
<v Speaker 3>I disagree.

1:13:00.880 --> 1:13:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Cousins takes Tuesdays off to go to the library in

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the season. Tuesdays, I do no football.

1:13:05.320 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 4>I just go to the library and I read books

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:07.880
<v Speaker 4>during the season.

1:13:07.880 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>What is this? That's true? He did, and he was

1:13:10.280 --> 1:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>so nice in the libraries.

1:13:11.439 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 6>What he wasn't out clubbing until three am?

1:13:13.520 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was so polite. But the point I was

1:13:15.360 --> 1:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to make about that is, like the fight, they

1:13:17.520 --> 1:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>do a great job of going through all these guys seasons, right,

1:13:19.920 --> 1:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Mary Odor Mahomes. But in the case of Cousins,

1:13:23.080 --> 1:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like we forget maybe we don't, but I forgot how

1:13:26.800 --> 1:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable that Viking season was, like the nature of something

1:13:31.080 --> 1:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that that Buffalo game will will endure forever.

1:13:35.080 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>How about thirty three? Nothing?

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>How about thirty and the comeback and the greatest comeback

1:13:39.040 --> 1:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the NFL.

1:13:40.080 --> 1:13:42.439
<v Speaker 5>Oh cool was the Vikings coach? He's you know, I

1:13:42.680 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 5>didn't call that quarterback sneak?

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 6>You fumbled? Yeah, you might want to. He was so controlled.

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 5>I was like you could just see me like like

1:13:50.720 --> 1:13:53.000
<v Speaker 5>internet fasick would have like benched him for the rest

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:53.479
<v Speaker 5>of the year.

1:13:53.520 --> 1:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Therenet pick I should really ask that question. Well, just

1:13:56.080 --> 1:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>want because I asked you about Brad Powers earlier. You

1:13:58.360 --> 1:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are such a knife said this to you before. You're

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>such a nice guy in real life, such a smart guy.

1:14:03.320 --> 1:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What happens to you on the Internet? Do you have

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>this inside of you? What is this DNA strain that

1:14:09.880 --> 1:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>makes you want to police the gambling world and become

1:14:13.280 --> 1:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that hate able on Twitter?

1:14:15.280 --> 1:14:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Why I gave my brother Andy access, so it's him,

1:14:19.120 --> 1:14:22.840
<v Speaker 5>it's him bright No, no, no, no, it's just a

1:14:22.920 --> 1:14:25.840
<v Speaker 5>it's a flaw. It's a flaw. I got improved. I'm

1:14:26.560 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 5>this is this is what.

1:14:28.000 --> 1:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Todd has always said is about this is what we

1:14:29.439 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like about you, that you're able to be.

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>It goes back to dungeons and dragons, the dungeons and

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Dragons from the eighties. Yeah, and you know, touching boobies.

1:14:38.400 --> 1:14:41.479
<v Speaker 2>That's what all this stuff goes back to. And if

1:14:41.479 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>we want to get into a deep psychological discussion, we

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>all have our weaknesses. I obviously have more than most,

1:14:47.160 --> 1:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>but my friend Stevie probably was, you know, very into

1:14:50.040 --> 1:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the dungeons and dragons and maybe not getting that touches

1:14:53.000 --> 1:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>my boobies as possible. So he has to he has

1:14:55.400 --> 1:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to tell everyone he's the greatest of all.

1:14:57.360 --> 1:14:59.679
<v Speaker 5>You know, people say I got rejected in high school,

1:14:59.680 --> 1:15:02.600
<v Speaker 5>like like, that's like you have you have to like

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:04.680
<v Speaker 5>get to the plate, you have to swing, you know,

1:15:04.720 --> 1:15:05.560
<v Speaker 5>to get rejected.

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Not even that far, so, Todd, you're saying that the

1:15:09.640 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that the less so touching of boobies is inversely functional

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to gambling, brash gambling Twitter.

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 2>This is not really about Steve. I'm just kidding. I'm

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>kidding about Stevie. I love Stevie, but I do think

1:15:21.160 --> 1:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>there is definitely a strain of you know, guy on

1:15:25.280 --> 1:15:28.519
<v Speaker 2>the internet who who has figured out that you know,

1:15:28.680 --> 1:15:31.559
<v Speaker 2>fourth and nine is better than fourth and three, and

1:15:31.600 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 2>he has to try to tell everybody. And the reasoning

1:15:34.240 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>behind that is not that he just needs the information himself.

1:15:37.160 --> 1:15:39.400
<v Speaker 2>But it comes back to what happened, you know, as

1:15:39.439 --> 1:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>a sixteen year old when there was a girl he

1:15:41.320 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>liked and he was too scared to go up to her.

1:15:43.320 --> 1:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>But that's just a armchair psychology.

1:15:46.840 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Who was self aware to go after her.

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:50.759
<v Speaker 5>By the way, I seem to get everybody in trouble,

1:15:50.760 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, like Will Hill comes with this beautiful family.

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:53.559
<v Speaker 6>To Las Vegas.

1:15:53.560 --> 1:15:55.240
<v Speaker 5>I get him kicked out of it because you know,

1:15:55.280 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 5>it's a problem I have.

1:15:57.400 --> 1:16:01.519
<v Speaker 1>That is awesome. Uh think before we conclude this, get

1:16:01.520 --> 1:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the last two questions together wrapped up. You just said

1:16:03.760 --> 1:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>something there are also that trigger something todd which you

1:16:05.800 --> 1:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>said fourth and nine or whatever, first and goal at

1:16:08.479 --> 1:16:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the ten? Do we agree that there is some sort

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of in game opportunity if you can get it right

1:16:13.840 --> 1:16:15.679
<v Speaker 1>there that it is much more difficult?

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I said that that was yours. My favorite thing. That

1:16:19.120 --> 1:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>was the first and goal at the nine or ten

1:16:21.760 --> 1:16:24.479
<v Speaker 2>is extremely difficult to get the ball in in college,

1:16:24.520 --> 1:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>but even more so in the NFL. And I think

1:16:26.960 --> 1:16:29.559
<v Speaker 2>that for end game, you know now, And that's a

1:16:29.600 --> 1:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>situation where you can't really do it at commercial unless

1:16:31.800 --> 1:16:33.559
<v Speaker 2>the commercial happened right when it was first and goal

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>right ten. Right, But if you can rush and get

1:16:36.200 --> 1:16:39.439
<v Speaker 2>that in somehow first and you like the other side anyways,

1:16:39.479 --> 1:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>first and goal at the ten is very difficult to

1:16:42.320 --> 1:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>get it in.

1:16:42.840 --> 1:16:44.880
<v Speaker 5>And if the other team has this is a high

1:16:44.920 --> 1:16:47.240
<v Speaker 5>level analytics. And I hope some NFL team is listening.

1:16:47.280 --> 1:16:50.479
<v Speaker 5>If another team is like second and three from the fifteen,

1:16:50.800 --> 1:16:53.280
<v Speaker 5>you should jump off sides automatically. You should let them

1:16:53.280 --> 1:16:53.840
<v Speaker 5>go to the ten.

1:16:54.000 --> 1:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh now that now, what are the chances of a

1:16:57.240 --> 1:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>team you'll never get ever getting there?

1:16:59.360 --> 1:17:03.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh, they'll do it, Yeah, eventually, it'll it'll they'll do it.

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you said this.

1:17:05.160 --> 1:17:08.240
<v Speaker 3>He made jump off sides on purpose.

1:17:08.320 --> 1:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Will.

1:17:10.479 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 5>In the four minute drill, when the team has the

1:17:12.360 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 5>ball second and two, like the team recognized that they're

1:17:15.439 --> 1:17:18.400
<v Speaker 5>just gonna run off another ninety seconds, just just jump

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:20.599
<v Speaker 5>off side, give them the first down and now we'll

1:17:20.600 --> 1:17:21.080
<v Speaker 5>stop them.

1:17:21.000 --> 1:17:21.479
<v Speaker 6>When they run.

1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Will is right right. But Ravens did do

1:17:23.400 --> 1:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it one time, I.

1:17:24.160 --> 1:17:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Believe, Yeah, Gebe when I brought this first and goal

1:17:27.160 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>thing up at the ten Last year you said, I

1:17:28.840 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>said teams should try to get the other team at

1:17:31.240 --> 1:17:33.519
<v Speaker 2>first and ten, and you said they're going to start

1:17:33.520 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>doing it just and you didn't say the thing about

1:17:35.280 --> 1:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the off sides. Of the off sides, that's a brilliant idea,

1:17:37.600 --> 1:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>actually to jump off side from the fifteen or the

1:17:40.000 --> 1:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>fourteen on second and.

1:17:41.000 --> 1:17:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Three, just like on the first down play update, you

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:45.280
<v Speaker 5>don't want to gain eleven yards, you want to gain

1:17:45.400 --> 1:17:47.640
<v Speaker 5>seven or eight. It's better to gain seven or eight

1:17:47.680 --> 1:17:49.040
<v Speaker 5>yards on first down than eleven.

1:17:49.120 --> 1:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It is so much better as an optimal strategy to

1:17:52.640 --> 1:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>jump off sides there. It's it's almost like, as you

1:17:54.760 --> 1:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>say it, it's like such a no brainer. And yet

1:17:56.760 --> 1:17:59.559
<v Speaker 1>we've been locked into this way of thinking forever. It's

1:17:59.600 --> 1:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>always done this way, so it's always gonna be this way.

1:18:02.200 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's so true established the run, but big established it.

1:18:05.000 --> 1:18:06.840
<v Speaker 4>If that becomes a thing that the offense can just

1:18:06.840 --> 1:18:08.760
<v Speaker 4>be smart enough to decline the penalties, which I mean,

1:18:08.800 --> 1:18:10.160
<v Speaker 4>you're getting to another level of things.

1:18:10.160 --> 1:18:11.479
<v Speaker 5>Why you need a good you need to be a

1:18:11.520 --> 1:18:14.800
<v Speaker 5>good actor, and you ahead that's always going like like

1:18:15.080 --> 1:18:16.880
<v Speaker 5>you're jumping outside to do it again.

1:18:17.040 --> 1:18:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what Steve said, This is the point I wanted

1:18:20.560 --> 1:18:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to do where And Steve's right. We watched so many

1:18:23.200 --> 1:18:26.439
<v Speaker 2>more games than these guys. These guys are busy doing

1:18:26.680 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 2>X and O, and they're thinking about, Hey, Jim, did

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you get the technique on the defensive end. You know

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>he's not getting down in the stands good enough. We

1:18:34.000 --> 1:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>gotta do that or else he's gonna get killed by

1:18:35.720 --> 1:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the left tackle. You know, that's what they're working about.

1:18:38.160 --> 1:18:42.080
<v Speaker 2>That we watch eight billion games. Fact, I would be

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:44.519
<v Speaker 2>so far as to tell you if I never saw

1:18:44.560 --> 1:18:47.519
<v Speaker 2>a team play, I don't know anything about the teams.

1:18:47.680 --> 1:18:50.679
<v Speaker 2>But I've watched two hundred college football games, and now

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 2>this is the two hundred and first I know nothing

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>about the teams. I would have a better chance of

1:18:55.439 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>in game winning than a person who knows everything about

1:18:58.360 --> 1:19:00.080
<v Speaker 2>those teams, but both watching.

1:18:59.800 --> 1:19:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Those the most extreme example, in a high total game,

1:19:02.400 --> 1:19:03.640
<v Speaker 5>I know this is ridiculous.

1:19:03.680 --> 1:19:05.040
<v Speaker 6>There's two minutes to play, you're tied.

1:19:05.080 --> 1:19:07.719
<v Speaker 5>You got fourth and goal from the one I would

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:10.479
<v Speaker 5>almost rather take a knee to kick a field goal.

1:19:11.479 --> 1:19:12.160
<v Speaker 6>So think about it.

1:19:12.160 --> 1:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait, say again, So.

1:19:15.160 --> 1:19:15.960
<v Speaker 6>It's twenty seven.

1:19:16.040 --> 1:19:18.599
<v Speaker 5>All I have fourth and goal on the one yard line,

1:19:18.600 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 5>there's two minutes to play. I have two choices. I

1:19:21.200 --> 1:19:23.559
<v Speaker 5>can take a knee or kick a field goal. I

1:19:23.600 --> 1:19:26.120
<v Speaker 5>don't know which is right. So obviously what I'm saying

1:19:26.200 --> 1:19:27.839
<v Speaker 5>is you clear, we have to go for the touchdown

1:19:27.920 --> 1:19:30.920
<v Speaker 5>because you couldn't get the touchdown sixty you know, percent

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:32.880
<v Speaker 5>of the time. But even if you don't make it,

1:19:33.439 --> 1:19:35.200
<v Speaker 5>kicking the field goal is worthless. If I'm up three

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:36.280
<v Speaker 5>and the other team is the ball.

1:19:36.800 --> 1:19:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying.

1:19:37.600 --> 1:19:39.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm close to fifty to fifty. If I stick you

1:19:39.720 --> 1:19:42.000
<v Speaker 6>on the one, I'm winning, right, I am?

1:19:42.320 --> 1:19:42.599
<v Speaker 1>I am?

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:43.360
<v Speaker 6>I had at that.

1:19:43.439 --> 1:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not saying it's logical. What you're saying is that

1:19:46.240 --> 1:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>that that percentage wise, it's almost like keep taking a

1:19:50.560 --> 1:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>knee is almost as good. Yeah.

1:19:53.760 --> 1:19:55.519
<v Speaker 6>It just shows what a donk move it is to

1:19:55.600 --> 1:19:56.280
<v Speaker 6>kick the field goal.

1:19:56.360 --> 1:19:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm talking about this one.

1:19:57.920 --> 1:19:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Faz.

1:19:58.640 --> 1:20:00.800
<v Speaker 4>You're down three with four men to go, you score

1:20:00.800 --> 1:20:02.800
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown, you kick the extra point to go up four,

1:20:02.880 --> 1:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>or was you rather take a knee and be up three?

1:20:04.320 --> 1:20:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I know it's crazy, but is that a reasonable question?

1:20:07.240 --> 1:20:09.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's actually a reasonable question because when you

1:20:09.120 --> 1:20:10.840
<v Speaker 5>go up four, then the other team knows exactly what

1:20:10.880 --> 1:20:13.080
<v Speaker 5>they need. If you're only up three, how often do

1:20:13.120 --> 1:20:15.080
<v Speaker 5>you see that, Like a team's a team's down three

1:20:15.200 --> 1:20:17.479
<v Speaker 5>or two months to go, and they matriculate down trying

1:20:17.479 --> 1:20:19.439
<v Speaker 5>to get in the field goal range, right, and so

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:22.000
<v Speaker 5>they're either going to tie you or they're gonna lose

1:20:22.040 --> 1:20:24.000
<v Speaker 5>to you. But if you're up four, uh oh, here

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:26.519
<v Speaker 5>comes the hook and lateral and everything, the four downs

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:29.559
<v Speaker 5>and all that crap, and then ultimately they wind up winning.

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. Yeah, we were solving all the football's problems here.

1:20:36.360 --> 1:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>If only I would love to see some team do that.

1:20:40.280 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We talk about what people's heads would explode, but it

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Well, well, same question, he said. Fez said,

1:20:46.400 --> 1:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota biggest favorite, likely lose out right, You say.

1:20:50.400 --> 1:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Biggest favorite, like I'm gonna go. I'll throw a little

1:20:53.000 --> 1:20:54.400
<v Speaker 3>curveball at the Kansasy.

1:20:54.439 --> 1:20:58.080
<v Speaker 4>They have all sorts of issues on defense now, cluster injuries, holdouts.

1:20:59.000 --> 1:21:01.000
<v Speaker 4>These first games, they it's a mixed bag. They can

1:21:01.040 --> 1:21:02.519
<v Speaker 4>be a little wonky. Where the team is tight, they

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>get their rings. Maybe they're distracted, I'll say, Detroit, you.

1:21:05.640 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 5>Know these teams getting the rings though have kicked. But

1:21:08.200 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 5>like the past twenty fifth every time, every time, like

1:21:11.000 --> 1:21:13.639
<v Speaker 5>the money comes against them. Yeah, and it's coming against

1:21:13.760 --> 1:21:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Kansas City or and then they just whack.

1:21:15.479 --> 1:21:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Didn't used to be that Wams got killed last year,

1:21:17.560 --> 1:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>though that's true. Rams did get killed. So he says

1:21:20.000 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Todd.

1:21:21.760 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just to be a contrarian here, I don't

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>know if you'll count this as a big favorite, but

1:21:26.200 --> 1:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>they're five and a half. The Jaguars are five and

1:21:28.600 --> 1:21:31.679
<v Speaker 2>a half against the Colts, and I wouldn't be super

1:21:31.840 --> 1:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>duper duper shocked to see the Colts at home. You know,

1:21:35.400 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>this new offensive coordinator worked with Jalen Hurts and now

1:21:38.280 --> 1:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>he's got another running quarterback. Maybe they could, you know,

1:21:41.720 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 2>stir something up and figure something out.

1:21:45.240 --> 1:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I am going to say the Minnesota Vikings, just for

1:21:49.479 --> 1:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the reasons we stated like that'd be the one where

1:21:52.200 --> 1:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>would you be like completely shocked at the Vikings Layden

1:21:55.200 --> 1:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>egg and then it was a tight game at the end,

1:21:57.400 --> 1:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they need to score Laden Cousin does something bad.

1:22:00.880 --> 1:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I really wouldn't. It wouldn't shock anybody, I don't think.

1:22:03.960 --> 1:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Last question, and there's a lot of answers to this.

1:22:06.120 --> 1:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think this week, if you lived in a bizarre world,

1:22:08.640 --> 1:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and you had to bet a side on each and

1:22:10.320 --> 1:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>every one of these games in week one, all sixteen

1:22:13.200 --> 1:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but one. You get a free pass. You don't have

1:22:15.320 --> 1:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to touch one of them. What's the game? You want

1:22:17.400 --> 1:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>no part of whatsoever on the side.

1:22:18.880 --> 1:22:20.519
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give you two of them, Okay, all right,

1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:22.640
<v Speaker 5>And this is gonna be a different answer than you're

1:22:22.640 --> 1:22:23.719
<v Speaker 5>gonna get all year long.

1:22:23.800 --> 1:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:27.240
<v Speaker 5>As a professional, better, I focus on spreads that matter,

1:22:27.320 --> 1:22:29.320
<v Speaker 5>all right. So when the spread is like around one

1:22:29.400 --> 1:22:31.920
<v Speaker 5>or two, I'm teasing right. If it seems like an

1:22:31.920 --> 1:22:34.040
<v Speaker 5>eight point favorite, I'm teasing it down. If it's around

1:22:34.080 --> 1:22:35.800
<v Speaker 5>the three or the seven, I'm trying to get the

1:22:35.800 --> 1:22:37.280
<v Speaker 5>best of the number. And like a lot of these

1:22:37.280 --> 1:22:39.880
<v Speaker 5>games qualify across the board where there's like there's no

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:42.400
<v Speaker 5>way I cannot bet the Buffalo Jets game because I'm

1:22:42.400 --> 1:22:44.200
<v Speaker 5>either looking to late two and a half or take three.

1:22:44.600 --> 1:22:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Same with Cincinnati Cleveland. However, there's two games lined on five.

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Who cares if I get miss four and a half

1:22:51.320 --> 1:22:53.280
<v Speaker 5>or miss four even or plus five and a half

1:22:53.360 --> 1:22:55.960
<v Speaker 5>or even plus six. None of those numbers are really

1:22:56.000 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 5>worth very much. And so because of that, Jacksonville, Indy

1:22:59.320 --> 1:23:02.080
<v Speaker 5>and the Rams. Eh, you know I'm not gonna I'm

1:23:02.080 --> 1:23:04.240
<v Speaker 5>not gonna be able to steal. It's very unlike I'm

1:23:04.240 --> 1:23:07.160
<v Speaker 5>gonna be able to steal win with good rogue shopping.

1:23:07.640 --> 1:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>That You're right, that is a answer we will not

1:23:09.760 --> 1:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get all year Loan, Will, Will Hill, everybody from Fox.

1:23:13.240 --> 1:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I love saying that.

1:23:14.040 --> 1:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Now I will go Ravens Texans.

1:23:17.000 --> 1:23:18.559
<v Speaker 4>I want no part of Stroud on the road in

1:23:18.600 --> 1:23:20.599
<v Speaker 4>Baltimore or Baltimore team that might be improved, but I'm

1:23:20.600 --> 1:23:22.959
<v Speaker 4>not looking away double digits, especially a team that's retinkered

1:23:22.960 --> 1:23:25.839
<v Speaker 4>their offense. Maybe there's certa adjustment period. So Ravens Texans

1:23:25.840 --> 1:23:26.720
<v Speaker 4>pretty easy pass for me.

1:23:26.800 --> 1:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. By the way, with the Ravens and Survivor like

1:23:28.760 --> 1:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>it just because it's the top favorite, I think there's

1:23:30.640 --> 1:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a justification if you don't think the Ravens, like

1:23:33.200 --> 1:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Will just said, if you don't think the Ravens are

1:23:35.080 --> 1:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be all that spectacular, maybe you do just play

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>them also as a as a team you just don't

1:23:40.439 --> 1:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>want to have to deal with later against the Texans.

1:23:42.920 --> 1:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Todd, I don't know about this Rams Seahawks game. I mean,

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>last time we checked in with the Rams. They were

1:23:50.000 --> 1:23:52.680
<v Speaker 2>just in complete disarray. And what's going to be down

1:23:52.720 --> 1:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to the new thing? Does Cooper Cup have ham strings?

1:23:55.080 --> 1:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Does he not have ham strings? We're not really sure.

1:23:58.280 --> 1:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Pretty sure, I'm pretty sure he has.

1:24:00.360 --> 1:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>He still, Yeah, I've had some bad hamstring before. That's

1:24:03.400 --> 1:24:05.559
<v Speaker 2>some bad stuff. But no, I don't. I don't. I'm

1:24:05.600 --> 1:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>not sure about what this Rams team is at all.

1:24:08.200 --> 1:24:09.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's a lot of variants of what

1:24:09.880 --> 1:24:11.040
<v Speaker 2>they could theoretically be.

1:24:11.360 --> 1:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I could pick a bunch here, I could pick Dolphins, Chargers,

1:24:14.200 --> 1:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I could pick Bengals, Browns. Ultimately, I'm gonna go Packers Bears.

1:24:18.760 --> 1:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one where there is no outcome.

1:24:21.320 --> 1:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised by none. Packers blowout, Packers close

1:24:24.680 --> 1:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to wind, Bears blow.

1:24:25.479 --> 1:24:26.960
<v Speaker 6>Out, but the Bears still suck Hill.

1:24:27.200 --> 1:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>They all could suck.

1:24:29.160 --> 1:24:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Bears fourteen to ten. It's fourth and two twenty two

1:24:32.760 --> 1:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>seconds left. Here, Jordan Love inside the Bear's ten yard line,

1:24:36.400 --> 1:24:38.840
<v Speaker 2>at the eight yard line, back to pass. He rolls

1:24:38.880 --> 1:24:42.439
<v Speaker 2>to the He's inside the five. What football the Bears

1:24:42.479 --> 1:24:45.120
<v Speaker 2>have it? The Bears cover and Stevie goes down.

1:24:45.280 --> 1:24:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Wait, wait, there's a flag on the.

1:24:48.160 --> 1:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a flag. I think that's the appropriate way to

1:24:50.479 --> 1:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>end this. Appreciated guys. Week one always fun. The megapot

1:24:55.520 --> 1:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is back Steve Feszick only back to back, Hilton Super

1:24:58.800 --> 1:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Contest Champion. Thank you for doing this. We'll do it again, honored.

1:25:01.439 --> 1:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you my man. Uh and uh first time on

1:25:04.720 --> 1:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. Will Hill from Fox Sports, How good does

1:25:07.680 --> 1:25:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that sound? Will you like that? Fox Sports? Will Hill?

1:25:10.800 --> 1:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I get used to it. I like it all right.

1:25:12.280 --> 1:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>The Bear Podcast, that's what it is, The Bear.

1:25:16.800 --> 1:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Podcast, Bear Bets Podcast.

1:25:19.479 --> 1:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Thursdays, the Bear Bets Podcast. And yeah, Will, by

1:25:23.520 --> 1:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, for those who didn't get it, because I

1:25:24.880 --> 1:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it out of him. He's like the funniest

1:25:27.080 --> 1:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>human being alive. So we promise to get more funny

1:25:29.040 --> 1:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>out of him. Coming up, Todd wish to have everybody

1:25:31.080 --> 1:25:33.519
<v Speaker 1>from his mom's cork attic. Thank you Todd? Or do

1:25:33.600 --> 1:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we cut off his mic? He's doing the mouth thing

1:25:36.640 --> 1:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like he doesn't want to talk to I wish Dev,

1:25:40.000 --> 1:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>who could be found on on Twitter at t wish Dev,

1:25:43.080 --> 1:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Staru show Times, docu series Action for which he still

1:25:45.880 --> 1:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>gets recognized. By the way, everywhere we go buffet, there's

1:25:49.920 --> 1:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>like two women that are like, ain't you the guy

1:25:51.720 --> 1:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>from Action? And Todd's like, I sure am, thanks for noticing.

1:25:56.680 --> 1:25:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Would you like my autogram? Thank you? Todd.

1:25:59.760 --> 1:26:01.679
<v Speaker 2>Lady was telling me I should be dating Diana.

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you were with Deanna. They noticed them. Are you

1:26:04.280 --> 1:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>guys still together? It's a beautiful thing. Thank you all

1:26:07.439 --> 1:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Good luck with all your bets. Week one

1:26:09.760 --> 1:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of the National Football League