WEBVTT - Fed's Half-Point Hike, Hospitality Continues Recovery

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week at iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well you all know our

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>next guest. He's an executive producer and the star of

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Bar Rescue, where he helps transform struggling small businesses. He's

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>also a New York Times bestselling author. He's also got

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a new book out. It's called The Power of Conflict.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Speak your mind and get the results you want. John Taffer,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it is good to have you with us in the

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. How are you. I'm doing great, guys,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you. Yeah, it's good to see you.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. I want to start with with with the

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>economy because given what you do, you have such a

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>good look at small businesses. You talk to so many

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>small business owners. You have a good understanding of their sentiment,

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>how they're feeling, how they're doing. You've talked to us

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that. But I want to start with J.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Powell and the fedhairs comments earlier today. The economy is

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>resiling at the economy is strong, uh. Inflation is high, yes,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but the labor market is so tight that the economy

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can withstand higher interest rates. How do you see things? Well,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that those are fine public relations statements,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>but I think the lives that people are living in

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the worlds that I travel are telling them otherwise. You know,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing day to day differences in their economics, day

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to day differences and their perceived security, day to day

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>differences in in so many areas of their lives that

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>cause fear and concern that there isn't unsettling, if you will,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>disruption to too moving in positive ways. And I say

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that in a very very broad sense. I see that

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>investors are holding back right, They're concerned the corporate tax

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>rates might go up. There's a lot of things going

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on around us that is causing a predictability. You know,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I see employees being concerned with their workplace. I see

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>them reassessing their careers and their jobs. We see people

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>quitting their jobs at higher rates than ever before. But

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>yet a huge percentage of American workers don't have more

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>than a thousand dollars in the bank, but yet they're

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>quitting jobs. Something has happened that I think has struck

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the nerve of our country, which is changing the behavior

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of our workforce. And I think it's a very powerful

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>dynamic that we have to overcome the next two years.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not spoken about enough. You know, John, I'm

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>curious you read on sort of the bar and restaurant

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>industry writ large. I mean, one of the saddest things. Obviously,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the sickness and the loss of life was the saddest

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>thing of the pandemic. But to see all these really

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hard working bar and restaurant owners, you know, the small

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>mom and pop shops, really struggle with the lockdowns and

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the closure. Where where is the industry right now? Is

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>it almost back to where it should be or is

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>there still a lot of room to go? Well, you

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know it's interesting is when you say that I think

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the restaurants to existed for seventy eight years that

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>went down in a pandemic. Four generations of ownership and

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't make it through the pandemic. You know, generally speaking,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the industry is up twenty revenues above pre pandemic levels.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, look at the quarter Las Vegas head,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I live in Las Vegas. The casinos had a great quarter.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about that pent up demand and how

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>long would it take people to came back. They came back.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So from a top line standpoint, the industry is looking great.

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the issue. We're losing brand equity because we can't

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>get employees to serve people properly. Obviously, the inflationary impact

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is huge upon our prime costs, food costs, and beverage costs.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So we see the revenue opportunity is greater than we've

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>experienced in years, but seizing those revenues is really a challenge.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So companies that are so service oriented now are not

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>achieving their own standards of service that are so important

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to their brand equity. That's scary, John, What would you

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>say to somebody who said, wait a second, people in

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the service industry low way workers have been left behind

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for so many years. It's about time that they saw

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>better conditions or wage increases. You know better than anyone.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>This is really really tough work and they deserve higher

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>pay now, of course they do. And you know, I'm

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all for increasing their wage, but I'm in a supportive

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of doing it in steps. You know, I don't think that,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, states that have employeed tip credit, you bring

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>them up to fifteen dollars an hour, that's a six

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent increase in pay overnight. No business can sustain that.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's bring it up in three or four steps.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get it there over two years. Let's allow the

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>industry to adjust as we go. But I completely agree

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to retain employees and turn my industry

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>back into a career based industry, we need to get

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it to that level. But I also want to highlight

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you're a waiter in a good steakhouse, you're

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>making yourself well over a thousand dollars a week in

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>many steakhouses, So there are those in the industry who

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>make an awful out of money as well. So some

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>are do well, some we're not doing as well. I

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think as an industry. We need to step up. You

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>made a really interesting comment, um, you know, saying that

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we live in interesting times these days. Um, what brings

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you to that? I mean, I don't think anyone would

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>argue with that, but what's top of mind for you?

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm one Look, I took cultural anthropology in college,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so I've always been one who studied behavior, human behavior.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>As a business person, I'm one who tries to change

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 1>human behavior, right, I want to market you to buy things,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm a real student of human behavior. And

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the past two years I see, you know, decisive changes

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in our behavior as a society. The way we interact

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with each other, the way we interact with businesses, the

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>way we can complete transactions, the traffic discycles. There are

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>so many changes around us that it creates a certain unpredictability.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Are people being more respectful? There was this moment where

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a sense of unity early on

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic, where you know, here in New York City,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>we would go out on our you know, open our

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>windows and bang pots and pans at seven pm for

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers each night. There was this idea that we

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>were all in it together. Do you see that in

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>your industry. I do. I certainly, because we're also seeing

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>videos of you know, people getting kicked off of airplanes, dragging,

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, dragging, kicking, and screaming. I think that togetherness

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of eroded a little bit, that we sort

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of experienced the earlier middle part of the pandemic. And

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons why I wrote the book.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, people today engage in conflict without dignity, and

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's the loss of dignity that has really destroyed

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>our political landscape and destroyed our professional landscape in very

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>many ways. So when I wrote the book, I realized,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've done two hundred and thirty episodes of

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Our Rescue, the last hundred and fifty or so. I

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't been angry. When you see me angry, I'm being deliberate.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm being manipulative. I have a purpose, and I'm using

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>conflict as a tool to achieve an objective. And I

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>started to realize, Wow, conflict is a dirty word that

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be tim I'm trying to speed read this here,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but I can I open up the page one thirteen.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I can tell I like this book already. Let me

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just read the line here. There's never a show where

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't yell John. I mean, people know that, right.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He's referring to the show Bar Rescue, the Big Hits show.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>There's always that moment when I need to shock and

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>owner into changing an unhealthy pattern, you know, John, and

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong. But I get the impression

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that the bar and restaurant industry is one where there

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of you know, sort of heated moments

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and yelling and conflicts that everyone seems to go home

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and forget about it, have a drink, come back the

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>next day and their friends again. I don't know if

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a I think that's a safe and you know

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what it is, we get packed, right, if there's this

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>high energy, we're in the weeds, we're fighting, we're fighting.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Then finally it mellows out at the end of the

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>night and everybody comes back to war again the next time.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Because you know what's incredible about the bar industry. For example,

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the average bar will do sevent of its revenue sixteen

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>hours a week. Wow, just that. So it's a crunch.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's high pressure. But I wonder, and

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I know you've looked at sort of not just the

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bar and restaurant industry, you sort of looked at conflicts

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in other business I mean, does conflict translate into all

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>businesses or is it sort of you know, taboo to

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to sort of engage conflict and and and sort of

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, is the risk greater than the reward in

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>other industries? You know? I think, I think the conflict

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is a critical aspect to every industry. But but what

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is conflict? It's perceived as a dirty word. You see,

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to win in conflict in business, in

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>professional relationships, in any aspect of your life with another

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>human being, we succeed when we pulled them in, not

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>when we pushed them away. Success always comes, whether it's

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>pulling an employee and pulling your boss in, pulling your

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>spouse in. So conflict can't push people away, it needs

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to pull them in. So that's what the book is about,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is engaging in meaningful conflict, positive conflict. I love the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney story that's in the book. You know, tell us

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about that Roy had the checkbook, Walt had the ideas.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Walt's ideas would have made him go broke if Roy

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the check book, and they would talk about

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it all the time. There's a famous story where Walt

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>went out of town on a business trip for two days.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>He had spent all the money in the company. When

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he came home, Royce sold his car. But the greatest

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>story of all was snow White, the movie and new

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>with flickers in snow White a defect in the film.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So Walt goes to Roy and says, I gotta fix

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the film. It's a hundred and fifty thousand hours. Roy says, no,

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not fixing the film. Well, they never fix the film,

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you watch snow White to this day, those

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>flickers are still in it. If budget doesn't manage creativity,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there'll be no money for creativity. It's the conflict between

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>those two elements of the business that create that success,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that governance on either side, the big

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>idea that creates the budget allocation, and the budget realities

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that limits the creative exercises. That's a conflict that drives

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>every business China. Unlike you, I think Tim's gone about

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>one million TV and radio shows without yelling at anyone.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We gotta get them what we do.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to do to get tim to

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>yell at me. Yeah, that's that's the trip. Well, it's

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's true. Though. It actually makes me think about, you know,

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>my own management style or or my own style of

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>being managed. I wonder about the idea of the squeaky mouse,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting the cheese, or the squeaky wheel getting

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the grease. How do you do this in a way

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that isn't alienating to people, Because when people hear conflict,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a dirty word, especially in an environment where people

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be liked. Yeah, you know, I think that

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the shame. And that's exactly why I wrote the book.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It's completely non political, takes no sides on any political

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>issues whatsoever. But I put forth the following premise, we

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as a society have forgotten how to engage in positive conflict,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the disrespect online, the taking of people's dignity. Even in

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the political world. They're saying things to each other years

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ago they would have never said to each other. So,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>if in fact, we hold our beliefs to ourselves, I'm

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>concerned our beliefs are going to disappear. So we can't

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be silent. We need to stick off of the things

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that are meaningful to us. So I want to empower people,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to teach them how to engage in meaningful conflict that

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't disruptive but is constructive. So it's all the premise

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of opening up people's minds, fighting for the values that

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you believe. In bar Rescues not really the model because

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in bar Rescue, at these sixty or ninety days working

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>four days, I'm a raving maniac. There's a clock ticking

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in my head every minute. I don't have time for

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you to get on a bust him. You gotta get

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on the bus right now, you know. So, So these

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are the things that that create a difference in the

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>real world. No, you don't scream at people that way

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that alienates them. You pull them in. You do things

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like put your hand on your chin, on your chin

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're talking to you, so they see you engaged.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Great conflict creates great engagement, and great engagement is never bad.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, John, There's there's sort of a power dynamic

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>involved though. Two you know, I imagine, um, you know,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a manager of a restaurant or a bar can get

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>away with yelling at the bus boy. The bus boy

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can't get away as much with yelling at the boss.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Am I reading that wrong, is it? I wonder least

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the word yelling, because if I was that bus boy,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I would pull the manager over and say, boy, we

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>both want to have a great restaurant, don't we. I

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of ideas that I think would make

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant better, and suddenly they're engaged in meaningful dialogue

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>about something that the manager might not agree with. So again,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>conflict isn't yelling. Conflict is communicative. But conflict always should

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have a purpose. You know, I used to fight with

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the politicians during the last presidential elections. Think of how

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>many arguments and conflicts to our over trivial things Nascar

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and crazy things that why are we fighting about things

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that don't mean it? But John, it's it doesn't seem

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's getting any better. No, That's why I felt

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I really how to write this book. I'm trying to

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>bring dignity to the premise of conflict and respect. You know,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. One of the I think it's the biggest

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>headphone in the world. Bridgewater Associates is famous for exactly

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. They have a culture where they

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really try to knock each other down a peg, and

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that might be a harsh way of saying it, but

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>constructive criticism is very much part of the transparency. Transparency

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>part of their culture, part of their culture. So is

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends to some degree what the culture

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in your company is to you know, if if it

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>should more companies sort of embrace that benefits of conflict

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and debating. Uh. You know, it seems to be what

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the messages you're trying to get through here.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting you can have a company where

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that type of high energy engagement is a part of

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the company, and then you hire somebody who's quiet, who's submissive,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't engage in those kind of ways, and they

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get fired because they don't fit in that culture. It

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>goes both ways. But I would tell you the most

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>innovative companies in the world have elements of conflict, you know,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is push and pull. And look at a

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>great coach of a sports team. If he's a great coach,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll get you to perform better than you even thought

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you could, right, and he does that forcefully. It is

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>so great to have you joined us, and especially in

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>person here really feels like returning your corner with these

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in person guests. It's fun to have everyone back in

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the studio. John Taffer is the host and executive producer

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bar Rescue with Us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>His new book is called The Power of Conflict. Speak

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>your mind and get the results that you want. You're

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get a

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>view on the macro environment, specifically when it comes to travel.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna speak to Axel He for the CEO of

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>tree Vago. He joins us on the phone via Zoom

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from Germany, shares the hotel search and travel search platform,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting a fifty two week low today after the company

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>reported a lost per share for the first quarter that

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>missed the average analyst estimate. Axel, good to have you

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>back with us. Was today's miss Was that all about

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>concern in Europe? And was that related to Russia's invasion

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine? Not really, to be honest, I mean from

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>our prospective, we didn't miss the numbers. I guess it's

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to to predict from the outside what the

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>trend is looking like and there is one one one

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the facts that is in the numbers, which is UM.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It's basically a fine from a very old investigation that

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for many years in Australia. Well accellent.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your read on the traveler? The health of the traveler?

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Writ large these days? Has that demand to take vacations,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to take air travel recovered to sort of the pre

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic level. There's a sense that it's even stronger. That

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a big bottleneck of demand for vacation and

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>travel and that we're seeing even perhaps stronger, stronger impulse

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to travel. Is that Do your numbers suggest that as well?

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Or is that off? Yeah, it's it's UM. It depends

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very much to which segment of the travel market you're

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at. I mean, generally speaking, we've seen it as

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the last two summers as well. There is a huge

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>desire to together rest and to to break out of

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the daily routine, even stronger coming out of a time

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of restrictions and lockdown. So the classical family vacation, going

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to the beach, going to the mountains UM sees hugely

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mount UM and if you're strong in that business, you

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>see numbers that are at or above levels. Um. The

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional city trips where you go to I don't know,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Broadway, music, etcetera. Are now slowly coming back, and

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for that, obviously we needed the restrictions to to be lifted.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the last segment, the business travel is obviously lagging,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and depending on your business makes you you see more

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>or less recovery. But what what we see as very

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>positive that we think that we are now in a

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where we really see fundamental recovery and

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>really a gradual improvement, whereas the last two years were

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>very much an up and down. It does not feel

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like the business traveler here in the United States axel

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is struggling. I perhaps it's just because I just got

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>back from the Milk and Institute Global Conference and it

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was truly back to nineteen levels, uh, you know, for

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time since the pandemic. But everyone I talked

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to you had trouble finding flights to and from and

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we booked some travel in the upcoming months and we're

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>having trouble even finding flights. And I'm wondering if it's

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because flights are being uh managing a different way. They're

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they're reducing the number of them, or if it's because

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a different level of business travel here in

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the US than you are in Europe. Yeah, I think

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at a very interesting point. I mean there there

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is is now with the demand coming back, we do

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>experience supply shortages and there are a couple of factors. Um.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>There there are labor shortages everywhere, um, and I'm sure

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it in hotels, at the airport, security checks,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>ground handling, all of the above everything and so so

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that is reducing the capacity that that is on offer. Um.

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is that depending on the routes that

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you're you're taking by by air, there is also less capacity.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the airlines are to a certain extent

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>more disciplines to put in particularly longhold routes again back

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to service and have also decommissioned quite quite a few planes.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So again it depends very much on on the destination

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the specific trip. But but overall in Europe, I

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>would say that that that business travel is definitely not

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>back to where it used to be, and and given

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what we are seeing in the US, it is neither um.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But obviously it is coming back. Actcell Trovaco had a

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>nice string of several quarters of profitability before the pandemic,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously the pandemic UH in two when it

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>really started affecting travel UH sent company back to a loss,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then another couple of quarters last year at the end

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year back to profitability. Is any sense of

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>when sort of we can see consistent positive earnings from Trivago? Yeah,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, I guess we we were. We were

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fortunate in a way that we realized that the pandemic

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>would not be a temporary problem, but really a problem

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that would stay with us for multiple years. So we

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>um we cut our costs very early, already April twenty

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic and as a result managed to come

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>out of it with a positive cash flow. So the

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>lower cost base has helped us a lot to really

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>manage and navigate through the very very tough times in

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. And and now we and and also most

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of the other online players are obviously investing into into

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>winning back the customers, into giving travelers confidence to travel.

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So there are investment quarters ahead of us, and you

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>can really see that with many companies, and I guess

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it will take it will take a few quarters and

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even a few years to get to a market

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that is truly stable. Um. But yeah, but we will,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we will. We will invest into marketing this summer for sure.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Actual last minute that we have with you, getting getting

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>back to what we learned from executives from around the

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>world at milk in just a couple of days ago,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to be there was cautious optimism here in

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the US, but there was some serious concern about Europe,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>specifically about the health of the European consumer. What's your take, Yeah,

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult question. I think the biggest concern that

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I would have is it's really it's global, which is

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is the skyrocketing inflation and and like I said, that's

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>where where you you're starting before we start the discussion.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That is is obviously a concern and it puts pressure

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on on people around the globe. But but other than that, yeah,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I I do believe that there is not that much

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of a difference, um, in terms of economic outlook. All right,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to leave it there. Actual, we always

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>love it when you join us on Bloomberg Business Week.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>That's actual here for the CEO of the travel platform

0:20:51.560 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>tree Vago, joining us live from Germany the Journal. Yeah,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>who's home? Honey? Please, I'll do the ride, Revels. Let me.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's the question that drive. This

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the Globekay, we'll drive up down

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bluebird Radio. Mike, let's get right into it with

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Brad McMillan. He's chief investment officer at Commonwealth Financial Network.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Waltham, Massachusetts. He's

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>got approximately two and two point five billion dollars in

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>assets under management. Brad, give us your takeaways from what

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>we just heard from FED Chair J Powell, because I

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you the equity market is loving it, and

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they should. I mean, I'm sorry. The real message here

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>from Chair Pale is we've got this. The FED is

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>under control, you know, and we see the economy growing,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>we see the inflation. We're doing what we need to

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>do and we're going to continue with the path. And

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a plan and the market loves the plan, you know. Brad.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's Mike Reagan. There seemed to be just uh

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>spike higher in equities and risk assets right around is

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like two forty two. There are were a few remarks

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of pals right around that time. I'm curious, what do

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you think really lit that fire? There was some remarks

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>where he basically said we can still attain a soft landing,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but he also said they've pretty much ruled out a

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis point hike. Was it sort of the

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one who punch? Do you think or do you think

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it was one or the other? I guess some people

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really were worried about the chance of a seventy five

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>basis point hike. What do you think really is driving

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this rally? We're looking at three percent now up in

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, just eye popping gains. Well, as I said,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I really think it comes down to does the FED

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have a handle on this and how rightly or wrongly

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>conveyed a strong sense that they see another couple of

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point hikes, you know, which is in line

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>with yes, we're going to get inflation under control, but

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not so far out of control that they need

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to get crazy. I mean, the real message from a

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>pipe would have been, Wow, this is a crisis. We've

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>really got to do something. So I think that sweet spot,

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, between doing enough and not having to do

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>too much is what the market sees right here, Go ahead, Mike, Yeah, Brat,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>where do you think this sort of embracive risk today

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Is it kind of counterproductive to the

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed's goal to tighten financial conditions a little bit too,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a way to tamp down the inflation.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this kind of maybe not the outcome power Power

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would have hoped for. We're going instance, what I do

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you think. I actually think that makes a certain amount

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>of sense. But given the amount of decline we've seen Gassett,

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the past couple of months, I don't

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to worry them too much. I also

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think that this kind of a relief rally, you know,

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>after the worries we've seen, is probably the evaluations start

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to move back up. That's what I think that that

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to start to worry about the market. I

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think today I think the Fed's reaction is going to

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>let them have their fun. They've learned it at this point.

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really remarkable, Brad, the way that

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Powell opened his press conference speaking to the American people

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that he understands that inflation is too high that

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he understands the pain associated with rising prices. Brad, What

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>did you make of that? I think there's two things here.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I think that um, the FED is

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult place politically, you know, they're they've been

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>seen as perhaps not being as sensitive to the needs

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of the average person. And I thought Powell made a

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>very good case that what we're doing actually is aimed

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>at helping the average person, and he came back to

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that again and again throughout the press conference. You know,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED is trying to build the political

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>base for what might actually turn out to be a

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>difficult campaign against inflation. As an example that one of

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the people asked, you know, what does this mean? You know,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are you willing to create a recession like Volker did?

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And Pal's answer was interesting. He basically said, yeah, we'll

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>do what's necessary, but you can't do that and you

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.959
<v Speaker 1>can't hold onto it without that political backing. And so

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I read that as kind of a preemptive strike on

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED doesn't understand the little guy, you know, Brad.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>In addition of stocks, just an eye popping move in

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market too. I'm looking at the two year

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>yield it's down almost fifteen basis points. UH tenure yield

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is down a lot. Do you think we've seen the

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>worst of this UH steady march higher in interest rates?

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Where is there really more room to go for for

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>rates to go higher? Do you think? I think we've

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about topped out. And the reason I say that is

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the last time we saw a rate hiking cycle was

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in you know, obviously pre pandemic, and things topped out

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about three out right now, obviously we have much higher inflation,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's also signs that's starting to top out as well,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's still a tremendous amount of demand for long

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>duration US Treasury assets. So I'd be surprised if we

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't start to see things back off. Maybe as the

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>number of expected hikes goes back, we see rates start

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to roll over a little bit as well as we

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>start to price in more rate cuts in the next

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I can't see if pushing too much

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>higher than where we are. Brad. I did think that

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>FED share Powell's comments regarding the blunt instruments that the

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>FED has and that they're not precision tools were pretty remarkable,

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Specifically the part about him not being able to control

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>supply side elements, supply chain issues, uh, effects of war

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on commodities. He specifically said that the FED can't do

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>anything about commodity prices or snarled supply chains. Um, what

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can the FED do to bring down prices there? Well,

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think once again this is kind of a combination

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of educating the public and laying the political groundwork for

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what could be a difficult campaign. I mean, what the

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>FED can control is how much it costs to buy

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff here in the US, cars, houses, and that's going

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to hit the average person. But that's not going to

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>show up in the price of gas. So the question

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes that you're an average person, what am I suffering

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this paying for? And to be able to

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>do that To make the PET that as little of

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a punching bag as he can, he needs to get

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the average person to think, yes, I understand where this

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is coming from, and part of that is acknowledging what

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>he can't do. Again, I think it's a preemptive strike

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>against what's sure to be political attacks as we get

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into the midterms. You know, Brad, speaking of those commodity

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and energy markets, the other big story today is just

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge rally in oil. This is coming as the

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>EU is threatening to come pletely banned Russian supplies. Some

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of the US regional fuel inventory data show drops to

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>two record lows in some cases, looking at West Texas

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>intermediate oil up five and a half percent to over

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars of barrel. To bring it back to that

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>equity market, obviously, energy shares have just been far and

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>away the best performing style sector among the main ones

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP really the only one with with a

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>steady positive gain this year thirty some percent for the group.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that play still in place? Do you

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think his energy poised to really continue that out performance? Uh?

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think as long as this Russian Ukraine situation continues.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's poised to continue the apt performance

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for two reasons. First of all, the supply situation the

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>world has changed. It's different this time, and I never

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 1>say that it really is. You know, you have you

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have a very significant exporter off in the market, and

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>depending on whether or not that does damage to their infrastructure,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's reason to believe it will, that might be

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>off for years. So the supply situation has changed significantly.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And the other significant thing that I don't think is

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>getting enough attention is us drillers especially, are showing a

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>lot more capital discipline than they've done in the past.

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they're not just going out and going

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy and drilling. They're actually managing their capital expenditure. So

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to see the kind of explosion of

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So we gotta we gotta leave it there. Brad McMillan,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at Commonwealth Financial Network, joining us on

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Waltham, Massachusetts. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. Sara to Bloomberg Global News.