WEBVTT - Trump, Jamie Dimon, OPEC, and Markets

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's talk. Get some

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>news that's going to take place at downtown Manhattan today

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>really fifteen former President Trump apparently reportedly is going to

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>be indicted. Little team coverage here for bloom We're gonna

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>round table to seeing Bloomberg's pretty Gupta. She is downtown

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>right now as we speak, at Center Street, so we'll

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>get the latest there and plus Boston Bloomberg Washington correspond

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Matthew joins us from DC. So Critty, let's

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>start with you here. What is the scene downtown? Again?

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>The President expected to be arraigned or indicted and arraigned.

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Two fifteen pm, I believe is the time. What are

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you seeing downtown? Yeah, so two pm you are going

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to see a President Trump around two pm. Get a

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>range and basically what that means is he's going to

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>come in to the District Attorney's office, which is where

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we are right outside, and he's reason going to have

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>his charges told to him. Look, it's reported that his

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>team doesn't yet know what the charges actually are. There

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>suspicions the rage anywhere from twenty four to thirty different

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>counts in charges, so really waiting to see what that

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>actually means. He's going to go in. There are no

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>cameras allowed for the arranged actual arrangement, but photographs can

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>be taken beforehand. He's going to go in, He's going

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to submit his plea. The Trump's defense team has said

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to plead not guilty, and then it's

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a quick, quick exit from there. He's

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get fingerprinted, he might have a mug shot potentially,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't actually know because of security reasons, he might not,

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and then he's gonna head very quickly back to Marlago

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to make his comments out of the state about eight

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen pm tonight, So a very quick turnaround. But let

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>me just draw you a picture or paint you a

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>picture if I can. We have this kind of layers

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of people, who's starting with a District Attorney's office have

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of barricades, a massive police presence, a massive press presence,

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and then separated from that in the park a right

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>next door, right across the street from the District Attorney's

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>office are protesters. And you're seeing protesters from both sides,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but largely more pro Trumps than anti Trump. So he's

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>got to get back to give his speech from Mara Lago,

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and I guess Alvin Bragg is going to give a

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>statement afterwards as well. What do you think we're going

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to hear from these two guys. Well, so Alvin Bragg specifically,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear more about perhaps some of the

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>allegations that are being made against him. Remember, he has

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>been at the end of more attacking Congress as well,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not just a Trump's defense team as well the Trump

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>defense teams specifically if that have attacked his character is

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at attack of legitimacy, is the case. But there are

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress who are saying, why is Alvin Bragg

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>taking this on now when this case was presented to

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>him a year ago, So there is a lot of

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>questions about that, how he's actually funding this as the

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>use of federal funds to protecute the form of plesident

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is really justified. It's likely he may comments on that,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, it might be

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a very simple question, do we actually start to hear

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what the charges actually are. That's what we're expecting at

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>least at three thirty pm. The mar Laudo comments, by

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, at eight fifteen PM, could go in any direction.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave it to Joe to speculate on that one. Yeah, Joe,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>let's let's bring you in. Here's what's the feeling in

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>DC as to these events today at two o'clock downtown Manhattan,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and then what we might hear from the former president

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this evening. What's the feeling in DC right now? Look,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's looking to New York, and you've even got Marjorie

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green there now. Is apparently not a big fan

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of your town. I don't know if you've seen some

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the tweets, she says. On my way to my

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hotel in New York City, I've seen many people so

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>drugged up they can't even stand up. They just fall

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>over on the sidewalks from using drugs at mayor Adams

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Free drug use centers. I'm wondering if she's ever walked

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>around the district of Columbia. But wait, where are the

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>free drug use centers? I didn't know about this, just

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>reply to her on Twitter. Actually, well, she's got she's

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>got an event that starts very soon here ten thirty,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen minutes, the rally for Trump with the New

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>York Young Republican Club will begin across the street. She's

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>also suggesting that she will be attacked with a sort

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of audio attack, as the counter protesters are bringing whistles

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and pots and pans to try to drown her out.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The former President's going to be there early though, eleven

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>am is what is being reported now, to surrender leading

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>up to the indictment at two fifteen, at which time

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the indictment will be unsealed and will actually have the charges.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>As far as tonight goes, there actually were questions about

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>whether he would have to navigate a gag order, but

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like that will not be the case. He's

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to return to Marrow Lago and will deliver what

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect will be a fairly carefully written speech. Whether

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he sticks to the script is the big question here.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is, you know, to have this sort

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of administration in waiting the shadow administration. He's back there.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be in a suit and tie, not

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>looking like a criminal in a jumpsuit, acting and a

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>peer presidential. The big question we have is who's going

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to show up. He's invited a lot of lawmakers to

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go there, and it's a real moment here to choose

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you want to be seen tonight at Marlago as

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a loyal supporter of Donald Trump or you have other plans.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it does seem like it would be,

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, beyond ridiculous to take a mug shot of

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the former president, right. I guess fingerprints maybe aren't on record,

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but did they really have to do that? Kind of

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's not going to happen. I was really

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>taken by that reporting because supposedly Donald Trump was hoping

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to use that, you know, as a campaign poster or

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>as a fundraiser. He was mugging in the mirror to

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>try to strike the perfect posture here and expression. I

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>always go back to that Frank Sinatra mug shot. I'm

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>just guessing he was looking at that. But it looks

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like there will not be a mug shot. He will

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be fingerprinted digitally so he will not have ink on

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>his hands, and the Secret Service will be right there

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>with him. The question is what happens between eleven and

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>two fifteen. There's apparently going to be a move following

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the surrender to the internally connected courthouse. He will not

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>likely go outside, but that could be the closest thing

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we see to a perp walk based on reporting. Whether

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they get pictures of it is another question. Some reporters

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>will be allowed in for some still photos during the arraignment,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll be ushered right back outside. There will not be

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>any video, so you know, we might get a glimpse

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of this moment in history, but that's about it. Joe,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>What kind of response do you think we'll get from

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>perhaps individual members of Congress on both sides of the

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>aisle once the indictment is unsealed and we get a

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more clarity, because it seems like his allies

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are remaining pretty staunch here. Yeah, it's suspect that it'll

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be pretty predictable, to be honest with you. You know,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we've we've heard Democrats, at least on the progressive side

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the party celebrating lots of exclamation points. This is

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about time justice finally being served, and then you've got

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans calling this a witch hunt. It's the Center that

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>has been awfully quiet, and the White House has been

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>awfully quiet too. There's been a concerted decision there to

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>not talk about this, to not get bogged down in it,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and President, just like everybody else, is going to be

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>watching this unfold today. Critty, let me ask you about

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what it's like down there right now. I'm sure that

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there are so many thousands of reporters that you can

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>barely breathe. But are there any protesters or supporters? I mean,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 1>yesterday they were like a couple literally two right are

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there were there bus loads of people that are showing

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>up now or is it still just all press. It

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is definitely showing up in full force with protesters, and

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing this again for both pro Trump and anti Trump.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I did have I wouldn't say two scuffles earlier that

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we're broken up by the police. It looks like it's

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly peaceful. You are starting to see more and more

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>people pile in to the parts that are pro Trump.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember, you're also seeing some lawmakers come onto the

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>scene as well. We had George Santos a spotting George

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Santos earlier about an hour ago, and it is reported

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that Representative Marjorie Tayler Green, who is a representative of

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth District of Georgia and a Republicans has says

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>she's point to be right here to protest the arraignment

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the former president. So we are on Wash for

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>more protesters, more politicians who are here too. As Joe said,

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>say are you or are you not with President Trump?

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, as we're speaking right now, we are

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing some more police presidence and actually a motorcade. It

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like this is necessarily President or former President

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump's motorcade just yet, but again a very high profile

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>presence coming from Washing NDC. And just quick cretty the

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>police presidence is it? Is it NYPD primarily and then

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess some secret service when when the president arrives

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>former president define it is definitely NYPD mostly, But you

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>are seeing to Joe's point about kind of that intersection,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the internal intersection between the court and the District Attorney's office,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it is completely walked off and that's where you are

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing some secret service details, so very mostly dominated by

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Police Department, but there is again that

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>presence from the White House as well. All right, great stuff, guys,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate getting the inspectives there. Bloomberg's pretty Gupta. She

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is downtown live at Center Street with the Manhattan District

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's Office, and then down Washington, DC. Bloomberg's Watchington corresponded,

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew, giving us the perspective from this from Washington,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>d C. From the Capitol on this historic day. I mean,

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that's it is in historic day. Well, it'll be I'm

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sort some compelling images and we'll see what the indictment

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>reads when we get that later this afternoon, and then

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll get the reactions from presumably members of Congress and

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>then the former president himself at eight pm tonight from

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Marlago down in Palm Beach, Florida. That's so we'll have

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>continued reporting on that throughout the day. You're listening to

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>am eastering on Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heart Radio app,

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. We're listening on demand wherever

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. I know it's a big deal

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>because there's been so much pain in terms of of

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, losses and both money and jobs. So much

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hurt there domestically, there's such rage, outrage, and then we

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have UBS tomorrow. But I just don't know what difference

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the credit sweets agm makes. I was talking to Oliver

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Crook about this earlier. He's in Zurich, and he says, well,

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, they've got to have the team in

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>place to hand off right bank to UBS. But who

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>can we ask who will who has the best overview?

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I got somebody. I think I got somebody.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Alison Williams, Bloomberg Intelligence. She does this stuff for a living.

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So Alison, let's start there where Matt was kind of

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about this meeting here. I mean, what's going on

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>over in Zurch We've got UBS buying Credit Swiss. But

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess Credit Swiss had to have their annual general

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>meeting today. But it just seems kind of odd timing,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't I mean, it does sound odd timing. And again

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to Matt's point two, I agree, it's it seems almost

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of pointless, right. But we're in a really unusual

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>situation where, um, you know, the government came in and

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to skip shareholder votes and then

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, now we're having this meeting where these shareholders

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are basically not having a say in terms of this

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>coming deal. So I think it's just perhaps, um, you know,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the statements coming out of it are

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>our people, you know, having their say verbally even though

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not able to sort of exercise the rights that

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a typical shareholder would have. So I mean, I guess

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as we got a little bit of hindsight here, Alison.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>For UBS, I mean again, is this a deal with

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hindsight that they wanted to have? It seems like a

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity. I think so Stock You're right in the

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stock won a big time, but they seem to be

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>so wedded to their their their plan of kind of

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>slimming down the bank focusing on wealth management. How do

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you think the bankers are feeling about it these days?

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think for UBS, again, you know it to

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the extent that they have the financial protections based in

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they do get you know, a fair amount of what

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they want right, which is, you know, of course there

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is the cultural issues and the like in terms of

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>bringing these bankers in, but they want more us than

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the investment bank. They want that m and a business

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>so to the extent that they can hire and keep

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>those bankers and clients, that's a good thing. They want.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Latin America and Southeast Asia, those are big ads and

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>their wealth business and the asset management. Again there's some

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>complementary stuff. And the investment bank had pretty much been

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>gutted from a trading standpoint as it was so. And

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>then finally, of course, I mean the position that they

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>now have in Switzerland, which you know, I don't think

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been allowed if it weren't for the government

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>orchestrating it because it is such a sizeable, concentrated position.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The question remains, and I think people go back to

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the playbook of the crisis. You know, what

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>else are they inheriting. One of the things is, you know,

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of legal liabilities that obviously turned out to be

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hugely costly around the deals at the global financial crisis.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is a little bit different. If

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you think about the depth and breadth of mortgage and

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the harm globally and you know, mom and pop consumers there,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there's not I don't think the same stakes and I

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think but I do think that ubs bargain to get

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>what they could and build some protections in and so

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day that that will be

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what what says financially if it was a

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>good deal. I think strategically they are getting sort of

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>what they want and able to you know, sort of

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>run down what they don't want. All right, let's get

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the godfather of big banks, Jamie Diamond,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>puts out his annual letter. Everybody reads it, and he

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even really hold back too much when criticizing regular

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>leaders for the failure of SVB, says kind of, you know,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>you put these banks in this position and then you

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>shut them down after they use these tools to to

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to fail. Um. What do you think about Jamie Diamond's

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>missive here? So I think, you know, Jamie Diamond is

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>always very vocal and you know, certainly he has given

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>their their position and their size and the regulation they

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>face because of those aspects. Um, you know there he's

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>always very vocal about regulation broadly. UM, And I think

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know he is he is making the point

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't by the way he does say you know,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't excuse management, but I think he is you know,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>broadening out the picture in terms of the position that uh,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bags are in in turn and and

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at it, it's a little wonky.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, it comes down to the capital

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>weights and the way the capital regulations are. And he

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>has consistently consistently talked about, you know the fact that

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that a lot of the capital rules it's

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's too complex because there's too overlapping, and that there

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are unintended consequences, and so I think he's using his

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>form to point some of those out. All right, Alison,

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the I think brewing headwinds, if you will,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for banks of all shapes and sizes, is commercial real estate.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing more and more about that. I suspect that

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hear more about it when the banks start

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting earnings in a couple of weeks. I know you

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and your team have done some research on this. How

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>big of a risk is commercial real estate to the

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>banking system. So I think the important thing about commercial

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate is that you know, it's not sort of

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a broad brush. There are there are several different holders,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>there are several different properties. And the focus I think

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>has come, you know, the regional because the regional banks

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>had these issues with securities not being marked market, and

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>then people are thinking about how loans are not marked

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to market and could there be weakness, And the regional

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>banks are the biggest holders of this debt. So in

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the bigger global companies that I cover, it's

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not as critical or the exposures are not as big,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is bigger for the regionals. And the one

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>area that we're watching along with everybody else. I don't

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're unique in this is the office market because

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the weaker cash flows, rising vacancy, and again this

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is sort of another unprecedented time where we have returned

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to office. We still don't know how that's going to

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>shake out. So we think this is an area of

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>focus for the largest banks. It's a smaller exposure, but

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a long term time to

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>play out. It's not going to be like how SVB

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of unwound in a couple of days, especially for

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the larger banks. But I think what investors will focus

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on is for the smaller banks. You know, could there

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>be certain ones that are overexposed and at risk? Alison,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you're running our banks coverage for Bloomberg Intelligence globally? How

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>many humans do you still have on your team? A lot?

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I was thinking you might want to replace some

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of them at least with chat GPT. Well you know

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>chat GBT, as you know, I think people are trying

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to leverage it. I would say that, Um,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I just realized we have a Bloomberg GPT. Did you

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>know that? You know? Yeah, I think we can do

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg intelligence management can be I'm only joking around because

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond mentioned that they have a tony you you are,

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you are, but but I guess I would

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>just point to like, that's that's sort of how when

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you separate the week from the chaff? Right? Is it?

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You know? Is the analysis digging in and giving you

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know and looking past sort of

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the headlines or you know something that you could sub

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>diving beneath the surface if you will. All right, so

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what's when you earnings coming up? About thirty seconds left

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>house and earnings coming up in a couple of weeks.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the number one thing we should be focusing on, well,

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>aside from commercial real estate, what's happening was deposits number

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing deposits, What are the flows at for each

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bank and for the system as a whole, and is

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that just disclosed by the bank. That's not some data

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you get somewhere from the government. We do get data

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>weekly from the government. It does come with a lag,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why the last couple of weeks you've

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>seen you have seen those outflows of those really relate.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>We're hoping that this week well, or we're expecting this

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>week that we'll see some stabilization. The issue with that

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>data though, is you know, there's a couple of different categories.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>One category is the top twenty five banks, So you're

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to see in there if some of the

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>large regionals are seating share to sort of the top

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>six banks. And I think it is going to be

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.239
<v Speaker 1>banked by bank, not just what's happening was deposits, by

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, but what's happening with the rate that people

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are paying on deposits, because that's another side effect that

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we're expecting that that will be going up. All right,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Alison, thank you so much for joining us.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting your perspective. There a lot of ground

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we covered, Alison Williams. She's a senior Banks analyst. She

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is a human. She is not a bot or a GPT.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>She's been doing this for a while, and she's a

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg intelligence. You're listening to the tape. Ken's a our

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Well, yesterday's news in the global

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>energy space was actually Sunday afternoon. Our time was OPEC

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>plus cutting production by one million barrels, and we had

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a nice pop five six percent in global crude yesterday,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>up another half percent here today, Brent crude up sitting

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>here at eighty five bucks. Talk about global energy, the

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel stuff as well as the sustainable energy as well.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And we could do that with Jonathan Maxwell. He's a

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of Sustainable Development Capital. He's based

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in London, Piccadilly, but he's here in our Bloomberg in

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an actor broker studio in New York City. We appreciate

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it your offices aren't Piccadilly, So isn't that like having

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>an office in Times Square? It is whipped just around

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the corner I talpped away, so we can even mind

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>just off Piccadilly. They have some of the best clothing

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>ancestry stores in London, right, I mean that's Hill Ditching

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Keys where I get my shirts. There you go Turnabowl

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and Asser is right up there. They're a number of

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>such companies. So you know what, Jonathan, I'm glad that

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you're here today because I saw something in the Jamie

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Diamond letter that I thought you might find interesting. Now,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>no one's had time to read the whole thing yet

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's forty three pages and it just came out

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours ago, but I did notice he

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>encourages the government to use eminent domain when it comes

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to both sustainable energy and fossil fuel policy. I'm not

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sure exactly how he means it yet, but what do

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>you think of an enlarged government role in you know,

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the industry that you work in. We've spent years subsidizing

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>energy markets. America has a huge three hundred and sixty

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollar program, the Inflation Reduction Act, But it's

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>designed to onshore production of energy, particularly clean energy, as

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a core part of it, and to support energy security.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So those are two critical features. America actually is now

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>energy independent, I've right, it's a huge deal, but energy

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>independent because of shale an oil. So we now have

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity in the America to really promote clean energy

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic production. And it actually puts America in an amazing

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>position internationally. I'm saying that coming from Europe because Europe

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is not in an amazing position internationally. Europe is in

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a very bad position internationally. It's a net energy import

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>prices in Europe for natural gas. People don't often talk

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>about this, so it's some six to ten times higher

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>depending on when we talk about it every day here

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is a huge issue. So what do you

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>do as Europe as you're facing an import issue? And

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of course the NEXTUS now after the Russia Ukrane crisis,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we've now shifted our supply from Russia to America. Well,

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but we have so energy independence in terms of fossil fuels, right,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we have enough oil and gas here in the US

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves. The problem that we have is with the

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sustainable part. So in California, for example. Sometimes you're not

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>allowed to charge your electric cars because the grids are

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>too weak and frail to support it. And now we're

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>asking people to increase their adaption of evs. I was

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>driving in this morning. I'm test driving this BMWi x Oh.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the electric suv, which is a mind blowing piece

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of kit. I mean, it is an incredible vehicle. But

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as I was passing like six or seven gas stations,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I noticed there's nowhere for me to charge it. Well,

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I will come back to that. We're actually a big

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>investor in fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles to solve

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that problem. We're doing it in the UK and we'll

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bring it to the US. But here's the issue, right,

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. Energy supply and particularly intermittent renewable power

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is a challenge to adopt onto the grid. I'll tell

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you a bigger challenge, and this is my gripe. Do

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how much primary energy in the United States

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>actually ends up getting to the user if you look

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>at the actual amount of energy you mean, in terms

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of energy that's wasted, right, not only going through pipelines

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and in ships, but also through generation, expisition, distribution, and extraction.

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I imagine it's very little that we actually put to use.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory produces numbers every year.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They have since the last global energy crisis, really in

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the seventies. It's seventy percent of primary energy is lost.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>That means only thirty percent gets to the end. Wait,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>where's it goal? Right, I'll unpack it. So, first of all,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you take a oil and gas out of the ground,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you lose about nine to thirteen percent on extraction and

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>conversion into pipelines. Most of up eighty two percent of

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the world's energy is all gas and coal, so we

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have to be realistic. Then it goes into an energy machine,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>let's call it a natural gas turbine. Firmodynamic states who

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>put a molecule in one end, only half can turn

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>into electricity. What happens to the other physics? Right, it's physics.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So the other half. If you're generating miles away from

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the point of vieuse, which is generally how we do it,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that energies to get dumped. So straight before the power

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gets out of a power station, you've lost about fifty

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to sixty percent of the energy to start with, depending

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>on the efficiency. You then lose another roughly ten percent

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>getting to the point of view. So that's how you

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get to seventy percent of energy loss before it gets there.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>There is a solution to this, right, and renewables is

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>part of that. But it's a tool in a bigger

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>strategic issue of the US and Europe are going to

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>have to face, which is the decentralized energy. If we

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just simply rely on these decades old centralized grid connect networks,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have the same problem in ten

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years time. What we can do has been

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>much more efficient, cut out many of those extraction, conversion,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>generation losses, transmission, transmission and distribution losses, decentralized energy, and

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>may make sure that we don't waste most of it

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>before it gets to the user. Before I take a breath.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>One last thing, do you know how much energy is

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>lost even when it gets to the point of views? No?

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Another ten twenty percent plus right the wrong I pump

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it into my guest tank. I got the little cap there,

0:25:54.320 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, but you still the internal combined Merry engine

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to use. There's a lot of bleed off there right.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>In transport transports, about thirty percent of energy use. Seventy

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of it's in buildings industry, and it's on that's

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>where we're just facing enormous losses. So here's the thing. Yes,

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we can build renewable power. It will take us ten

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years to start to By the way, on

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that note, if the Inflation and Reduction Act is successful,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of electricity in the America will be green

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty. Do you know how much energy in

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>America comes from electricity? How much energy comes from electric

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty comes from where Well, we're talking about heat, gas, transport, fuels.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>So there was just this massive job to do on

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition. My business case is to say, yes,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>let's build renewable power. Let's make energy as clean as

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>possible on the supply side, but let's look at the

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>demand side. Let's think about attacking that seventy percent last

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>before it gets to the point of views. Then we

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>only got a minute left. Let me hear about the

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>first charging networks that you're building. So how soon will

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>they get here? So we started building them in the

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>UK over the last ten to one or two years.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It's fast charging networks. So if you want to charge

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>your car in five to ten, fifteen, twenty minutes. You

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>can park your car and you can get it completely

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>duced up quickly. We've got a rollout of these sites

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>across the UK. BP Pulse is a big client of ours.

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We've just announced the breaking ground on the largest one

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. It's over maybe two hundred charging points

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>at the n EC in Birmingham in the UK, and

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we will be bringing this to the United States soon.

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>How fast is a fast charger for you? We can

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>get to full eighty percent to full charge in anything

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>between fifteen and twenty minutes. That sounds pretty good. It's great,

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you it's it's difficult, and I don't know.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I've talked. I've talked to all of the last three

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>CEOs of BP about this. Why aren't they already at

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the gas stations? Why doesn't Shell already have these at

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>every gas station. It's been a decade since Tesla started

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>rolling out these vehicles. I think they're dragging their feet.

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>They're dragging the feed all right. Jonathan Maxwell, thank you

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Great discussion. Jonathan Maxwell as

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a CEO and co founder Sustainable Development Capital. Next time,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I are are in London Piccadilly. We're stopping by.

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna say hi, you're gonna buy us some beverage

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of our choice by us the shirt, a turn bowl

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and asser. Oh nice, that's cool. That's even better, a

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>considerably more expensive than a PIMS cop. Okay, very good,

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna have more coming up markets on

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the red here sp off about three tenths of one percent.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program, Bloomberg Markets

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am, easting on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Let's talk

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a little M and A here, specifically some tech MNA.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>How did the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank impact the

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tech m and A market out there in Silicon Valley.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's checking with Ted Smith. He's a co founder and

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>president of Union Square Advisors. So, Ted, we had some turmoil,

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some real unease in the banking space over

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks, with a failure of Silicon Valley

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Bank and a couple of other regional banks. How did

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that impact kind of tech m and A the view

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>towards tech m and A what did you observe? Well,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, guys, thanks for having me back on

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. I think you're right. A lot

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty around the SEB collapse and related effects, and

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so everybody picked up the mantle of being cautious and

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>reassessing their situation. Obviously, there's a whole host of companies

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that were depositors to and lenders, you know, lend these

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to SVB, and they all had to scramble to try

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to figure out sort of what the next step was.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 1>So that put a lot of things on hold. Processes

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that were in flight, processes that were about ready to

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get kicked off in some cases with which I'm familiar,

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>processes that were almost ready to finish. That the pause

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>button got pushed while everybody kind of figured out whether

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they were standing on firm ground or quick. I think

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we're largely through that, or at least the first wave

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. Most people kind of have a plan for

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward. We're seeing renewed activity. Those processes that I

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that we're in flight seemed to be back in

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>flight for the most part, and the ones that I

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>know of that we're almost done, actually completed, So I

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think I think folks quickly moved past the initial shock

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and uncertainty and kind of have Plan B in place

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I wonder what happens to the banks

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that are going to now have to compete though with

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>money market funds and you know, short term treasury ETFs

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the like. I mean, are they going to have

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to start offering four percent five percent on savings accounts?

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Can they do that? It's a good question, and I

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is they are going to have to

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>compete at some level. Obviously there's a broader level of

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>services these banks can provide, and so as a result,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>they may not have to compete sort of basis point

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for basis point, but we do see them needing to

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be competitive in the market. We also think that, you know,

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from away from the savings accounts themselves, that back on

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the lending side, the whole private credit asset class, which

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>has grown to the north of two trillion dollars, is

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ready to push forward and be more a part

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on the lending side rather than just the regional banks

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and the large banks, particularly in tech, and so we

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see that activity picking up as well. So when I

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think about M and A TED, I think about you know,

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess confidence, confidence on the part of a management team,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>confidence on the part of a board of directors. You

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>really have to have confidence in the macro environment, the

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>micro part of your business to go out there and

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 1>spend big money and acquire companies. Is that out there now?

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's anything but confidence out there. I think.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very situationally dependent, of course, and you're

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, and in fact you're right twice, because you

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>have to have confidence in your own business, and you

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have to have confidence that you know enough about the

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>business that you may be acquiring that you can double

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>down on that. And certainly in some cases there are

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we've talked to boards, talk to management teams who are saying, look,

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we're recasting our own view of the market as we

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>go forward. Although I would say a lot of that

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>started happening in twenty twenty two. This was not a

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three event. Yes, the SBB situation was a

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shock to the system, but in many

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cases that didn't really change the plans that it has

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>been put in place from the larger potential acquirers. It

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a It was a side note.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It was an important side note in Silicon Valley, but

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it was, and so most of the large acquirers and

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly the private equity buyers that have confidence to do

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>deals still have that confidence. I think the secondary piece

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned where you have to have confidence in

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the target and do they have the right approach to

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>their business? Are they ready to be acquired and contribute

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to the new combined organization. That's where all the scrutiny

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is going right now, and that may mean that bills

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>take long going to get done. Are there lessons learned

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ted you think in terms of, you know, diversifying your

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>cash you know, or or has the moral hazard proved that?

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, if the FED in the FDIC we're going

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to back up uninsured depositors last time, they're going to

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do it next time too. Yeah. I don't know that

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we can all count on that ladder point, although it

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly feels that way that the FED is prepared to

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>step in and do what they need to do rather

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>than create an awful tail spin, which is what I

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think would have happened had they not done that. I

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>do think diversification is more on the minds of every CFO,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>every CEO, every board member now than it ever has been.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think we will see more of that spreading

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>deposits around a little bit. But I also think it's

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be, as we've seen over the

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>last two or three weeks, it's going to be a

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>flight in some cases to the larger banks who are

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>deemed obviously much safer in this environment, and to other

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>regionals that are deemed to be managing their risk on

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a more conservative basis. So money is going to move around,

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it is going to get more diversified. Um But I

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>also do think to your point that we've learned that

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED is going to step in into a nasty

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>situation and not let even these original banks fail. So ted,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>when you go ahead and talk to your your private

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>equity clients, uh, their cost a capital just got a

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>lot more expensive on the debt side, um Man. That

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>changes the DCF model a little bit. How are what

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are you hearing? Yeah? Well, first of all, absolutely right,

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but they have an enormous amount of equity capital that

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 1>they need to put to work. And what we're hearing

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in some cases is, look, let's just write the equity

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>check and we'll worry about the debt down the road. Now,

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not every every fund is large enough to do that,

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>except you know, some of the some of the largest,

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>but they will do that in certain cases, and I

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think some of the midsize funds will do it as well,

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously for smaller deals. Um. But the reality of it

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is here is they can adjust their models, given you know,

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>buyout level returns to reduce the amount of debt exposure,

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and certain cases amp up the equity check a little

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more and still get terrific returns if they might,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>if they make the right bets. And because there is

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so much of this private equity capital on the sidelines

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>right now waiting to be deployed, and a group of

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>LPs standing behind those funds expecting that capital to deployed,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't put it, you know, in a safe deposit

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>box and say, you know, wait for another sunny day.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>They expect these folks to invest, whether it's raining or

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>sunshiny out. And so we think that capital will get deployed.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We just may see the debt equity mix change a

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit, or we may see people wait until the

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Fed loose you know, loosens a little bit, and we

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>see interest rates come down a little bit before they

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>fully spenanced some of these people. I have to ask,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I've been going to super return for

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, and every year there's more and

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more dry powder. I mean it's it was one trillion,

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then it was two trillion, then it was two point

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>seven trillion. I mean, how much cash is there and

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>when is it going to get spent? Yeah, it's a

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>really good question. I don't know what the total number

0:35:59.920 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is now, it's obviously well into the multiple trillions. As

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you point out, I think the log jam eventually breaks,

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and we think it breaks in the back half of

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this year. Every private equity firm we're talking about, he's

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>gearing up for a very busy back half of twenty

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and on into twenty twenty four. Obviously, it's

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not all going to get to spend in one quarter,

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>two quarters, even in the year. But we really do

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>think it loosens up as we go into the back

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>half of this year, because everybody seems to be poised

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to see a very active second half of the year.

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ted, thanks so much for joining us, Ted Smith,

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a co founder and president of Union Square Advisors

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>based here in Midtown Manhattan. He's been all over the

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>street doing m ANDA, So we're talking a little m

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and A tech m and A in particular, it's been quiet,

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen across the M and A space in general,

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as a buyers and sellers adjust to a new market,

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a new higher cost of capital, and some uncertainty out

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of the geopolitical environment as well. You're

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to the tape cancer our live program Bloomberg Markets

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio to tune

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>in a Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business alf.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's stock bonds here. I mean, you think about twenty

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, there was just no place to hide. Stocks

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>down twenty percent, bonds down, you know, mid teens. You know,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a performance we hadn't really ever seen. I'm looking

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 1>at the US aggregate index so far this year done

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot better, up three point four percent, So that's

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:31.879
<v Speaker 1>helping a little bit offset some of the losses from

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>last year. Let's check in with the professional does this

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>every day, Natalie Trevithick, head of investment grade credit strategy

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>at paid ind Regal. So, Natalie, after that bruising twenty

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, how did you guys approach the beginning here

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three? We approached it as optimistic. I

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>would say we thought we were all cowed up. We

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't quite fulls, but we were expecting to get the

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>que ponds, which would be the milk from the cow.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at probably mid single digit returns and

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you want actually turned out way better than expected. As

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, you know, corporate bonds are up three and

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, and after that March, you know, when

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we went through that banking crisis, March was up two

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent in corporate bonds. So so far, it's

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>been a good year for us. So where in the

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>investment grade space are you guys, you know, kind of

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>traffick again in the shorter end, the longer end, where

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys kind of playing, we're trafficking in all of it.

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I'd say we've been more active in the five and

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ten year part of the curve, and there's been a

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of the man for long duration credit, but the

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>friend end has become dislocated, so there's definitely opportunities there. Well.

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Banks of God and beaten up, so have some of

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the more defensive non financials. Healthcare bonds are doing well.

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at some of the other consumer cyclicals, Audios

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of God and Cheaper, so we're definitely seeing pockets of

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunity within the credit markets. Are you concerned about a

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>credit crunch Natalie upcoming? We are a little bit concerned

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because well, more regulations for banks to actually be positive

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for bondholders, if not equity holders. It also means that

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that could cool down the economy quicker than expected, and

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the potential recession maybe more severe, which would be bad

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for banks. So all in all, we think spreads may

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>trend a little bit wider from here in the aggregate,

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly within the banking sector, and funding costs may go

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>up for them, But we'd say away from financials, most

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of them are well positioned with pretty strong balance sheets

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to weather recession. Yeah. I saw. I mean the world

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>watched as holders of credit Swiss at ones gotten crushed,

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but there were different covenants for the Swiss at ones

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>than there are for others and everyone you know was

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>punished on price. So is there the possibility that you know,

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>many babies were thrown out with the bathwater in that case,

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>You're definitely right about that. There is different laws and

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Swiss that call those at ones to be knocked out fully,

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but there's also going to be a lot of lawsuits.

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It will take years to see if there's any recovery there.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>There is risk in other bonds and that they could

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>still be you not written down completely in this case,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>while equities survive, but they still have that potential to

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be written down in a severe banking environment. So we

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>think some of that punishment is warranted. But there's a

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of places within the banking sector which are still

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>safe for bondholders. So how are you guys thinking about

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>credit quality these days now? Because we really haven't had

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>too much of an issue even during the lockdowns were

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so much liquidity pumped into the marketplace. How are you

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:38.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking about credit quality in what may be a recessionary environment. Yeah,

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we think credit quality isn't going to go down terribly.

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We did see a downgrade from Nissan from investment grade

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to high yield, but we think most companies can weather

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the storm. We're seeing just outside demand for non financial issuance,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's still a lot of capital sitting on the

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sideline waiting to buy these corporate bonds that yields greater

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>than five percent. We think companies have already extended their

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>maturity walls pretty successfully, so we don't expect huge amounts

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of incremental issuance. But we think supply and demand are

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty well balanced at this point. There's more trouble I

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>think within the financial sector, and their cost of funding

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could go up. Our new issuers coming to market here,

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm I've been I'm if I'm a CFO.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm used to issuing paper, you know, treasures near zero,

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>not where they are here. Yeah, we're still seeing an

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>active calendar. We had general motors in the market today yesterday.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Today we have a number more of one off issuers

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like Mass Mutual. But they're definitely taking opportunities to come

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>to market because they aren't refinancing their entire balance sheets

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>at these higher levels. Say, if their funding costs used

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to be three percent, now they you know, refinance about

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>say ten percent. Their total funding costs are only going

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>up marginally, and they want to be active in the

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in the market. I just think, well, a lot of

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people are are believing right now that the Fed could cut,

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that rates could come down. Is that unlikely in your opinion?

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a tough called. Day by day. I

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think the probability of a fat hike and may has

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gone down. Whether they cut by the end of the

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>years yet to be seen. That's not necessarily something we're

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 1>calling for. But even if rights stay up here, bonds

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are still poised to you know, clip that keep on

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and generate decent returns even a spreads wide and a

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit further from here. So we still think we're

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at a nice return, positive returns for corporates in

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty three. Now, either you guys looking at

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>particular sectors of the market here that you like better

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>than some others. Yeah, we do like the healthcare sector.

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Utilities have actually come out with a lot of issuance

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that quite keep levels. Those are a rated. A lot

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of them are first mortgage secured bonds coming with thirty

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>year paper, which we find quite attractive. You know. We

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like certain pockets of the consumer cyclical sector. Some of

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the autos were favorable on really though it comes down

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to bottom up credit selection here, so it's just about

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at the individual credits. You've got to do a lot

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of work in that case. Yes, absolutely, but there's also

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of name avoidance. There's a lot of insurers

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>out there we can just choose not to own in

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>this market, so we really are focused on the ones

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>which we think are going to be able to weather

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>recession and continue to hold in well. There's a lot

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities within technology and communications as well. All Right, Natalie,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much. We really appreciate getting a couple of

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>minutes of your time. Natalie trevith Ak, head of investment

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>grade credit Strategy at Payden and Regal. You're listening to

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the tape cancer our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app,

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Well,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Bloomber terminal user in here looking for

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>some investment ideas, b I go is a good function

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to know that takes you to Bloomberg Intelligence, which Bloomberg

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence is Bloomberg's in house investment research department, four hundred

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>analysts strong all over the world, covering two thousand companies

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred and thirty industries. And they got a

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart analyst They come up with a lot

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of good ideas. Let's get to some of them right now.

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Tim Craighead. He's a research

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>director and European strategists with Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from London. So Tim, I know, you guys,

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got your focus ideas that are out there for people,

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you look at that focus ideas lists, which

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>are some of the most high high conviction ideas of

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence has, and then you whittle it down even

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 1>more and you guys, guys have some focus ideas to

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>watch here. Talk to us about some of these names

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and why you guys are highlighting them some pretty interesting

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for investors. Yeah, sure, thank Paul, thanks for thanks

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. Look, as you said, the focus

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas are those are those are views that combine three things,

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a high conviction point of view on fundamentals. Secondly, that

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>high conviction should be differentiated from the market. It's it's

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>anti consensus. And thirdly, they're catalysts or triggers that we

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 1>see that can change the market's mindset. And this set

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of ten, which is as you said, is a subset

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of the broader list, which, by the way, you can

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>find on bi space focus if you've got a terminal.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>But this this subgroup all have catalysts that are important

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the second quarter. So it is the

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>focus ideas to watch for two Q and there are

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ten ideas. We kept it. We kept it focused US.

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It spans the region. There's five US, three European, two Asian.

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>There's eight that are constructive, there's two that are a

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bit worrisome. So it's a cool bottom up list on

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst calls. All right, let's start with the US. Give

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>us a couple of names that the analysts put pushed

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>up to you and identified as interesting. Yeah. So I

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>think it all revolves in the US by a large degree,

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.919
<v Speaker 1>around the consumer. And it's interesting because we have both

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>positive and negative ideas here. The negative idea is a

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>company called Casey's General Stores. If Paul, do you know

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this company? I do not yeah, so I didn't either

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>until we started talking about this thing with our coverage.

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a Midwest convenience store, and yeah, we see them

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as basically being at risk of the general economic outlook

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and if we see slowing consumers, training down, et cetera,

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that this is a this is a risk to earnings

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>estimates through this year. The other three that play on

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposite side of the consumer one is Alta Beauty,

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which is beauty shops across the US. Another is Gap stores.

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>We all know Gap, and the third is Sketchers those

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>that have very companies exactly company shoes. They all have

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really company specific element to it. So the Gap is

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a restructuring story. They've already proved what they can do

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with Banana Republic, and we think that's a blueprint for

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Gap itself. An old Navy is actually half the

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>business and there they had a merchandise in issue last year.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>It's been corrected, there's a new CEO coming in. There's

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cool stuff happening. Alta Beauty is all

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about going back to the office and getting back out

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic, and people want to look nice and their

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>sales strands, we think are still underestimated, and Sketchers is

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding globally. They've got news distribution centers coming in Canada,

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in India, they've spent money on technology that's travling a

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>loyalty program, and again we think there's upside estimates. So Tim,

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these names, as you mentioned for the

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>US stock picks, are kind of centered on the consumer.

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>What is really that bi's call on the consumer here?

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've got pretty much full employment, but man,

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of headwinds out there for the consumers

0:47:56.080 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>relates to inflation and other things. Yeah, I mean, you're right,

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a there's a I think there's generally a

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>worry that you've got high inflation, negative impact disposable income.

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:17.479
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have something special about your story, you

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 1>are at risk to to discretionary income being impacted over

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year. And how much better can

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it get with employment being as low as it is.

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:33.399
<v Speaker 1>And if housing comes under some stress with higher interest rates,

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that has you know, another sort of different layer of

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>pressure on what could be consumer spending. So you know,

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we look for example like these three, but there's others

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 1>where there's something that's different beyond just simply the economic call. Right,

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's let's go over to Europe here for

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 1>our friends over there. What are some of the names

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of jump out to you guys there? So,

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>so a couple here. One You're gonna think I'm crazy

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at first. I'm going to name him a bank Eba

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Banko bill val. This is one of the big Spanish banks,

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>but importantly a chunk of their businesses in Mexico where

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>loan growth is actually quite healthy. Another chunk is in Spain.

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Didn't that interest margins are improving with higher interest rates,

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>basic bank story, and we think all of that is good.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But everybody seems to be focused on Turkey because they

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.879
<v Speaker 1>do have a Turkish business and there's geopolitical risk there, etc.

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And with that, it's only now sudden percent of their business.

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>It's smaller and smaller. We don't think it's a worry,

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and we think it market's too focused on it and

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>not focused enough on the good part, So that we

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think is underappreciated. Tap Gemini, big global IT service company.

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>It's focused on big strategic transformations. It's not that parculically

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>exposed to troubles and technology and worries there. So we

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's well positioned. And the other is best thoughts,

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>which if you're in to clean it energy, energy transition.

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the leading wind turbine producers globally.

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you think about the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>which is really a energy transition bill. And in Europe

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>there's this similar sort of big government initiative and push

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that's all going to drive business too. We think best

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 1>us it's gotten sorry to say, a tailwind. Ye. So

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, thirty seconds, Tim Asia, what do

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys have from there? It's all about China's reopening,

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think about Hong Kong ex changes, rising, set of IPOs coming.

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You and I have talked plenty about Laili Baba over time,

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>expliting in the sixth repatriation of tech listenings in the

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>US to Hong Kong and China. That's all the Hong

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Kong ex changes favor. And AIA is an insurance company.

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But you have mainland Chinese that are starting to travel,

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>they go to Hong Kong, they buy new insurance policies

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as a as a offshore savings mechanism. Good for AI AIA,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, all right, Tim, you're based in London. You

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>live in London. How are things on the street of

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>London these days? Packed? Busy crazy? You'd never know that

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there's any issue. Yeah, it feels good and it's starting

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to be spring. All right, that's good stuff because it's

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>here in New York, it's it's we're not quite back,

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's a kind of that issue about getting

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people back in your office. But I understand it's a

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit better in London. Tim Craighead joined us. We

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting a couple of minutes of his time. He

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is the research director for Bloomberg Intelligence over in London,

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:39.240
<v Speaker 1>running that business over there with our good friend Sam Fazzelli.

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>He's also a macro strategist, kind of given us some

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>good strategies, some good ideas with some catalysts. Thanks for

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:51:56.960 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Miller nineteen seventy three on Falsewhinee. I'm on Twitter at

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radient