WEBVTT - Could Notre Dame's season really be canceled?

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal home that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for it.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>be happy. You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Edith state is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 3>And Dan and Tye welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 3>boys and girls. My name is ty Hildebrandt, joining me

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 3>as always way over there, though not as far as before.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>The one and only Dan Rubinstein, sir, how you doing? Man?

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Good?

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 2>I am unsure about when I will actually have all

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>of my normal goods and wares because I have now

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>been away from Brooklyn for going on almost four months.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 2>But no, I am now on Central time. I am

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>now on Central time. We have made our way to

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the suburbs of Chicago. Would not have gotten on a

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>plane if there weren't family circumstances to attend to. So

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>everything is cool. I will just say we're out here

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and we're comfortable, and everybody's good, and I would say

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>we'll be here for Do you know what a ray is?

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>In geometry?

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Tie? Hooray.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I've heard ray, but geometry was not my strongest. Strongest

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>math line is point to point, ray is open ended

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>point to something else. So not exactly sure how long

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>we'll be in the suburbs of Chicago, but here we are,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>and everybody's cool. So I'm dealing with some family circumstances

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that you know, everybody, everybody deals with.

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not uncommon. Hopefully everything turns out all right. But

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>this is where I and Jody with and I and

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the solid toddler are now residing tie. So what better day,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>what better change, than to hop on a show to

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>discuss north central Indiana private parochial football, Right.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's correct.

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So, as you might have gathered from the title of

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the show, we are talking a little bit of Notre

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Dame with our good friend Pete Sampson, longtime friend of

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the show.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, gold standard, best of the best, love Pete.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Pete's over at the Athletic. He does a great job

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 3>keeping track of the Irish or read him all the time,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>and he actually, as luck would have it, you know,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>like this week where we're having news breaking, important news breaking.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Right before we hit record, right before I connect it

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 3>up with Pete, he drops an article a one on

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>one interview he did with Brian Kelly, so we had

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>a chance to get into that talk about some of

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the scheduling conundrum, stuff going on with Notre Dame, and

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>more specifically the internet memes about Notre Dame being canceled

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>this coming fall semester. So we'll get into all that

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>and much much more in the meantime.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Daniel, it is good to hear your voice. I hope

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>all this well.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for hopping on with me to

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 3>help lay the groundwork for the show with Pete. If

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>you like the show, don't forget to subscribe. You can

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>find us out there on Apple Podcasts, on Google Podcasts,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and of course on Spotify. There are also plenty of

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 3>other ways that you can get in touch and follow

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 3>along with our madness. Chief among those is our Instagram feed,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 3>as well as Twitter and Facebook, as well as soliverble

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>dot reddit dot com that's our subreddit. The conversation, as

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 3>I say, continues long after the final bell of the podcast,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and if you're still looking for ways to introduce more

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>verbal into your life, going out to soliverbal dot com

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 3>sign up for the newsletter. Been teasing it for a while,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>but we got big plans for it. We're excited to

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 3>do more with it. So if you haven't subscribed already,

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>it's easy. Just give us your email or not going

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>to spam me. It's just going to be the newsletter

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 3>of intent pending some you know, some things on our

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>end that we're still working through.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And also we should mention if if you think Tai

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is a good guy, you're you're totally wrong.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a great guy.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>If you send him one hundred dollars, he's going to

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>send you back two hundred dollars via bitcoin.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? That's exactly correct?

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that what happened yesterday? I was traveling and I

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>saw that Twitter was shut down or not Twitter, but

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess confirmed verified accounts because they were hacked and

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>asked people to send them bitcoin. Is that what happened?

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>That is what happened.

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Oh god, the world's ending. Okay, the world is ending.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It's possible. It is possible. It's always possible. Don' want

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to rule anything out? Shall we get to news I

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>would love to.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Break? I guess it's not so breaking news yes time.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, not that voice again, davorit. It killed me,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 3>killed me on the last show.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>The NCAA has issued extended guidelines to help navigate the

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 3>return to fall sports amid the pandemic. The guidelines released

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 3>on Thursday, testing strategies for all athletics activities including preseason,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>regular season, and postseason, along with daily self health checks,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the use of phase coverings, and social distancing during training, competition,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 3>and outside of athletics. Mark Emmert releases that document, but

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>at the same time acknowledges that the virus is trending

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>in the wrong direction. Some of the data points we've seen,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 3>especially in some of our most football crazed states, they're

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>having a hard time with it right now. So nice

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of the NCAA to send this out. No doubt, there

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>are still many challenges ahead.

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've talked about the fact that they're just we

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>need to get as close to universal protocols as possible,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>be it on the conference level, be it on some

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of Power five agreement level FBS agreement level NCAA

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>which does not necessarily govern competition with FBS football. Rather

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 2>than enforce some basic rules, there needs to be some

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of protocol guidance. The problem, as always is nobody

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>fully knows what's best. So it's good that the nc

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>DOUBLEA is sort of figuring out the best they can do,

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and the best that they can think of that makes

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 2>sense for their member institutions. But at the same time,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 2>everything needs to be taken with a bit of a

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>shrug because every day we learn more and have to

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>adjust to different things. So good to hear. I remain

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>confident that this season is not going to be anything

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>if at all. If it happens, but it's not gonna

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 2>be anything like we're used to. If it's even attempted.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>There will be a huge quirk, as we said time

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 3>and again, and furthermore, if and when this system changes,

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>at least if it's you know, if only for one season,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to be the NCUBLEA that decides to

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 3>change it. It's going to be the member institutions. It's

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be the challenges that local municipalities are facing.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be driven by local, state and our

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>leadership at the federal level. That's what it's going to

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>amount to. So a lot remains to be seen. It

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 3>is nice, as you said, that they took the step,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>but I think there are huge challenges ahead. I did

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>see that the AAC, the American Athletic Conference, they're going

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>to require mandatory coronavirus testing for all football teams at

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>least seventy two hours before each game. They also announced

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>that on Thursday you go on to read the article

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 3>here their commissioner basically saying, we know this is coming.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>We want to try and get out in front of

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the power five before maybe they make similar announcements. We

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of want to be on the level and establish

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that protocol. The protocol, as we'll talk about in my

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 3>interview with Pete a little bit later, and as we've

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>alluded to time and again on this show, that protocol.

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>The closer we can get to some standardized version of that,

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>there's never going to be a bubble like there is

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA in college football, but if we can

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>get some standard guys protocol related to testing, that would

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>that that would solve at least a long way some

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of the problem.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, sure?

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Can I can I put you totally on the spot

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>for a question that you there is no right answer

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that you're definitely not gonna be able to answer correctly,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>but I'm still gonna ask it, please, Okay. One of

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the terms you mentioned was it's not going to come

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 2>down to like the NCAA mandating yes or no. It's

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be sort of a member institution than conference.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be on a bunch of different levels

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that that's going to affect change.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there a.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Specific school or a level of school in terms of

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>college football hierarchy if that matters, or importance or cachet whatever.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Is there a school that if they say, we're just

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 2>not doing this, like we had the Ivy League, we

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>had the Patriot League. I know you're gonna mention that.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the MEAC, the Mid Eastern Athletic Conference.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>We've had conferences sort of cancel fall sports and say, well,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 2>see what happens in the spring. We'll see what the

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>world looks like in the spring. Is there a level

0:08:55.040 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of school that's that if they say, you know, this

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>testing that we're doing, it's just not enough. We're not

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 2>getting good results. We're not putting our student athletes, you know,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>at risk because we know we can't really control things

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 2>to a level that we can. Is it is it

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Texas saying it? Or Georgia saying or Alabama or USC

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is it? You know if a is it Houston? Is

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>it Memphis? Is it Boise State? If Boise State says

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>this ain't it? This just ain't it we're not it's

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 2>not worth the risk. What level of school carries that

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>weight that you're going to see immediate dominoes across the sport.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, Benny, what's interesting about this is that I think

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>there's both a trickle down and trickle up effect. We

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>talked about the trickle up effect with the IVY League,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>and as the IVY League made some of its announcements,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>as Nicole and Bruce and others at the Athletic wisely

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>noted there there were dominoes that fell after that IVY

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 3>League announcement.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that we brought up in the.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Interview, and we'll talk about this more with with Pete

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Sampson again from the Athletic, But.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>That's dominoes of non conference dominoes a non conference, but

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>just dominoes in general. Right for sure.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, Pete and I talk about the size of

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame and Notre Dame by comparisons a small school.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 3>If they can't do it, clearly they are a notable institution,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 3>a blue blood institution, and if they're unable to get

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>it controlled within their smaller space, that that could be

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 3>a harbinger of things to come for bigger schools. Totally

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to your direct question, though, I think if an Ohio

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 3>state or Texas rule it out, that's a big deal.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Those are very very rich athletic.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Because they have but they have the resources, is what

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>you're saying. They have the resources, yeah, right to enact

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>harsh safety protocols. They can basically afford to do whatever

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they want. And if they can't get it under control

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>at bigger state institutions, that's a problem.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem. I think that would be the worst

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>sign that this is not going to go off, either

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 3>in the fall or in the spring whenever. I you know,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, but certainly a school of that magnitude

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 3>that has deep pockets, if they can't pull it off,

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a real problem.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 2>What about And I know that they're sort of in

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the news as well. The American Conference, the AAC says,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>we don't have a unifying confidence that we can get

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>things together to keep our kids safe enough. We know

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take an enormous financial hit, but morally

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>we just we can't do it. We just can't do it.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>And you know, all the ads and whoever else presidents

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of these schools all agree. What does that do you

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have a correct answer, because nobody does. But do

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>you think that it obviously has to carry significantly more

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>weight than the IVY or Patriot League share Patriot League,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>who we love. I think it's probably inevitable at this point.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 2>I think they're trying to put it off as long

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 2>as they can m M. And I do think it

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 2>would have an effect. These are more games that teams

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 2>who haven't already called off non conference games can't play, right,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>So eventually you run out of teams.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and if the challenges are just too great to overcome,

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and if you're stuck playing your own conference, not always

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>bad thing.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Stuck Wow. I don't know who that comment was directed at.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but LIKECC, that's a significant challenge, especially if you

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 3>have schools within your conference that may be unable to

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>field a team for one reason or another. So I

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 3>just for sure the pool of available teams is growing

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 3>shallow we'er by the second and the more announcements that

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 3>come out. Now the AAC is not there yet, they

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>could get there soon. For now, it's just a mandatory

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 3>seventy two hour testing protocol. But now I think each

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 3>one of these contributes and eventually will probably get to

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 3>a point where someone serves as a strawbreaking the Campbell's back.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, I can't even Oh, I can't even imagine

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>what sort of that that scenario playing out looks like.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm thinking about college football teams in a

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>bubble like what the NBA MLS to a lesser degree,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>MLB is doing. Yeah, how much it must cost to

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>put one hundred, one hundred and twenty one hundred and

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 2>fifty people in a bubble, even if they're a few

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>read different regional bubbles. The NBA is spending what one

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty million or something crazy like that in Orlando,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and there they have positive tests and complications things like that.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't even imagine what it would cost to do

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that with football, and I don't I don't know. Does

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the NFL's not doing that right? No, they're just already

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>hoping for the best. That's their best mechanism. Yeah, I

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 2>there's just there's no good answer. As much as member

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>institutions and the NCAA and conferences are trying, I feel

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>for them, and I feel for you Ti.

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks. Yeah.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>The Mid Eastern Athletic Conference has suspended all fall sports

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>indefinitely because of the pandemic. They have yet to determine

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>whether or not they're going to try and move the

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 3>season to the twenty twenty one spring semester.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the MEAC.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 3>That's teams like North Carolina A and T. Bethune, Cookman

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Florida A, and M. Howard Morgan State. There's a whole

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 3>bunch of historically black institutions part of the BAX, So

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>hopefully they get to play football at some point in

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the academic year. Would love to see them play in

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the spring if at all possible, but for now they've

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 3>made the decision that not going to try and give

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>it a go in the fall.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, always crazy bum to hear about things like this,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 2>but glad they're enough out in front of this that

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>hopefully they're figuring out contingency plans for a potential delayed

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>season in late winter spring with with safety protocols in place.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>If the world and the country isn't a better place.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Other news here, Dan, Perhaps we should have expected this,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>but the NCAA has ruled that Bowl eligibility for this

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>season only can be a little bit different. They approved

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>a blanket waiver request for only this season. It allows

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>all FBS teams to count two games, count them one

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>two against FCS opponents that average at least eighty percent

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>of the maximum amount of football scholarships during a two

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>year periods.

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of words there.

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 3>All you need to know is that previously they only

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>allowed FBS teams to count one game against an FCS opponent,

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and that opponent had to average ninety percent of the

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>maximum allowable football scholarships during a two year span. So again,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 3>more words, but one versus two and eighty percent versus

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>All I need to know.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not right now in mid July anticipating a twenty

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty Mayo Bowl.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not the male bull takes the brunt man. They

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 3>are taking the brunt here on this show.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Well for a season, hopeful for some sort of season

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever it looks like. Not anticipating a male Bowl.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Finally, the Senate Judiciary Committee going to hold a hearing

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday to focus on integrity of college sports and athletes.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Nil rights, nil of course standing for a name, image,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and likeness.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been in the news.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 3>We haven't had a lot to talk about around that topic,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 3>simply because the news has been so inundated with coronavirus

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>and pandemic stuff.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is a big deal.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a huge.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Red blinking light staring down the NCAA, staring down college

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 3>athletics as we know it. At some point we'll probably

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>put a show together and talk a lot more about

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 3>it with people who actually know the subject matter through

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>and through. But for the time being, this is definitely

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 3>going to get some prominence on the federal level. It

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 3>will not be the last that you hear of it,

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 3>as some states like Florida and California have already passed

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>legislation that would allow college athletes to profit off of

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 3>their likeness as early as next summer in some cases.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So keep your eyes on this subject. It is not

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 3>going away, and it's a big deal.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Ty.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I just have a few words for any student athlete

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 2>potentially trying to monetize his or her name, image, or likeness,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 2>and that is stay away from our sweet, sweet bombus

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>sock cash.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Those are all ours, all hours, All the socks belong

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 3>to us.

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't you touch it. Don't touch it.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>That's all we got for news today. We'll be back

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 3>again next week and talk about anything that happens over

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the weekend. If there is anything pertinent, please feel free

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 3>again to send it to us out there on email

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>soliverble at email dot com, or any one of the

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 3>social channels I mentioned at the top of the show. Okay,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So I did an interview while you were in transit

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 3>yesterday with our good friend Pete Sampson. As I said

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>at the top, he had just conducted an interview with

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Brian Kelly. Really good interview with Brian Kelly covered a

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of ground. It was good to catch up and

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 3>talk Notre Dame. How Notre Dame fits into this current

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 3>jigsaw puzzle we find ourselves in trying to understand how

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>college football may work this fall and beyond.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And you counted down all of your favorite Notre Dame

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 2>playoff touchdowns, right.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I did all of them.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, oh, I can't wait.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, joining us now.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 3>It's been a while since we talked to him, but

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 3>always a pleasure to welcome back Pete Sampson, the Notre

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Dame beat writer for the Athletic. Back to the show,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 3>mister Sampson, how you doing.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great, Like everyone else, just sort of hoping

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and praying the college football actually happens.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 2>What's your level of confidence that it does happen.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This fall? Really low? This fall? Yeah? Yeah, I think

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be a spring season. And you know,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand if you're a head coach that you're not

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>talking up that possibility. I mean, you may say, yeah,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we can make it work, but if you've got a

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>roster that's training and working out, I don't think your

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>first move is going to be like, yeah, guys, let's

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>keep working hard. So we played this game in March,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I get that, and I get if

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you're an ad you're not pushing for it. But man,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>it just you read sort of the Peak Family column

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 1>from earlier this week, and that's it just seems like

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>it once you get people to tell the truth, it

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>gets pretty dark pretty fast.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 3>We've seen this very pessimistic shift in mindset over the

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>last couple of weeks. And you know, like just a

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>month ago, Dan and I were game planning how we

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>were going to do our conference previews this year, and

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 3>now I'm not sure if we're going to.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Do them at all.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't don't we don't know if it makes any

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 3>danse to do them. I know you talked to Brian

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Kelly earlier today, and we'll get into that, I'm sure,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 3>But I know you also talked to a lot of

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>folks around the Notre Dame program in college football, just

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>being at the athletic But like, are you detecting any

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of optimistic swing in the other direction.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard it. And I think it's interesting because

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Notre Dame, and Notre Dame's not

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>alone in this, but they've done about two hundred and

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty COVID nineteen tests and they've had one positive. Like,

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if that was this, if that was sort of the

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>normal everywhere, I think we'd have college football for sure.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's not. And that doesn't even get to students

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>getting it back on campus and what that's going to

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>look like. So I everyone that sort of talks to

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you on background you feel that pessimism. There's a little

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more optimism when people are on the record and

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>have their name attached to the quote. But I do

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a movement. Brian Kelly, I touched on

0:20:58.080 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this with him when I talked to him, is just

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like season, how would it work? And he talked about

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>how in the ACC it's like Dave class and a

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wake for us was somehow in charge of modeling what

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a spring schedule was.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 3>How did Dave Cossa get that job.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean a pretty smart guy. I mean,

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't And Kelly was like, yeah, I

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>like it. I can see how this could work, you know.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Chuck Martin. He was at Notre Dame

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a while ago. It was at Miami, Ohio now, and

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he was he was just, I want to play in

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the spring. It was almost like, I don't want to

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>play in the fall at all because things are so uncertain.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think it would definitely work. And I think

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>my sense is we're getting to the point where the

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>question is becoming less do you want to play in

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the fall or do you want to play in the spring,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and more, do you want to play in the spring

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you not want to play at all? In

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that scenario, you know everyone's going to choose spring conferences.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Don't want to over commit and say that they are

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 3>going to play in the spring, because if they make

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a commitment to playing in the spring and then there's

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 3>no season and they feel like maybe they left a

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 3>little meat on the bone. Like maybe they could have

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 3>gotten a few games in in the fall and instead

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of pushing it off to spring so early, there there

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>was still a chance. I mean, like, how do you

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 3>feel about the spring season? You talk to a lot

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 3>of these guys, Dan and I we've been talking about

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 3>that possibility for months, and certainly from a fans perspective,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>it's unique, it's interesting. It probably means a lot of

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>downloads for us, Like I want this to be conducted

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 3>responsibly and safely, mind you, but it's interesting. I haven't

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 3>read much of anyone, maybe outside of Lincoln Riley, and

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, a couple anecdotal quotes here and there from

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 3>people who seem to be embracing the idea. Where where

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>do you come down on it?

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we all would prefer the fall, right,

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that's a as realistic an option

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as people want to make it out to be. You know,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the spring drawback is the drawbacks that are advertised by

0:22:58.560 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>people who don't want it, is you're going to have

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of players go pro I think that's just

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a cost of doing business in a spring season. That's

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're making the best of a bad situation.

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>But I don't. I'm not in line at all with

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this notion that, oh, the players can't play two seasons

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in one calendar year, because I mean, we're talking about

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>what a nine to ten game schedule. Is there really

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be two Duke's Male Bowls and one calendar year?

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? Yeah.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, since when do the ones and

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 3>needs of the player really matter in the college.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Football There's that too, right, I mean, suddenly it's very important. Yeah.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean not to be overly skeptical here, but since

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 3>when is that a thing?

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I just think that the players want to play.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing twenty five games in a calendar year,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you can do that. These guys ultimately

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>are going to go pro and play twenty games, twenty

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>four games in one fall. So to me, I feel

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's realistic that you could play a two thirds

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>three quarter season in the spring in a full regular

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>season in the fall and not come. Ay, think in

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>ban we really grown those players into the ground. Especially

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've got your early en rollies, you

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe you get some relief on that in the spring

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>season where you're going to have seven eight extra players

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on your roster. The n CAA gives you some leeway

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on the eighty five man limbit. I just think there's

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways to work around it if that's

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>your only option.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 3>I saw our friend Bruce Fellman wrote about the possibility

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 3>of guys sitting out of spring season for fear of

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 3>hurting their draft stock, and I know you've written about

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 3>it too. Now you use ian Book as an example,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 3>which we could talk about that later, but it's a

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 3>valid point, and from the Notre Dame perspective, I know

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of guys, especially along the lines

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 3>where I think you discussed the potential issue for the Irish,

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>But how do you see it affecting a team like

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Notre Dame.

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, think it would be a negative most games,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but a positive in games against Clemson or USC if

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you got to play that one. You know, the idea

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of Ian Book not playing would be pretty devastating. Whether

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you think he's a fifth round pick or a first

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>round pick or an undrafted free agent. But that has

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more to do with what's not behind him. Would Leam

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Mikenberg their left tackle, or Robert Haynesy the right tackle

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>not play? I don't know. That's that's kind of a

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a question I would like to ask them, but

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think like not Rames roster as

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's currently engineered, is it does not have a lot

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of high draft picks on it after this After this year,

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if this was a year from now, woul

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Hamilton play, absolutely not. But he's got two years Togo.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So your Notre Dame is their names stuck with him?

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Does he in book think he's higher than like a

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 3>fifth round pick.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. I I don't think. I think

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that he does. That doesn't mean that he will be.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's like his decision to come back was

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>roughly forty eight hours after the bowl game last year.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a situation where I think that he

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 1>sweated it out and was waiting on draft feedback. I mean,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's got to get a lot better. So he's one

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of those guys where playing and showing that you've improved

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback I think would be worth significant dollars

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to him to come back.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Shortly before we connected up, you did post a one

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 3>on one interview with Brian Kelly out on the Athletic

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>A really wide ranging interview. You covered a lot of ground,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>from testing protocols to flex scheduling to this notion of

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 3>spring football, et cetera, et cetera. I'm most encouraged by

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>what seems like an upbeat tone there. Now you touched

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 3>on that a little bit. Was that palpable that upbeat tone?

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 3>Or was I reading a little too much into it?

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it was real? Is it just because

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 3>his name was associated with these quotes like where what?

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Where's your BS meter? On? That? He is? He is

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>an optimist in PR terms in most of those media settings,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think you adjust the dial a little bit

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on that. However, if they've done two hundred and fifty

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>tests and had one positive, I think they do the

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>next round. Their next round of results probably will come

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out this weekend. If they're still sitting there at one

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>or two positives and they survived the July fourth weekend,

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>when players maybe are getting a little bit more loose,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll fill rocop it. Then you just got

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to survive what happens when students come back, and you

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>know how Notre name manages that. I mean, overall, if

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame can't manage it, this I don't think anybody

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can manage it because we're talking about a campus of

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand, not fifty thousand. I think as Notreame's administration

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>would help, likeme's doing spying by and large, with their

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>their Catholic up bringing, they follow the rules. So if they,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if Notreame cannot make this work, it's uh, we're in

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>dire streets. I think on a national level.

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Were there any surprises for you in talking to Brian Kelly,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 3>any of his answers surprise you.

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if anything really took me back. Just

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>based on having covered him for now going on eleven years,

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought that he is one to put himself out there,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't think that he's necessarly going to tell

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>me about the acc Springs scheduling model. I sort of

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>floated the idea of Notarame playing Alabama somehow, and his

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes got real big when I said that. But I

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that, you know, his quote about our phones

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ringing off the hook with scheduling was significant because that

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was that was one of those storylines as soon as

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve and Big ten one conference, only who's

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna play? They're gonna get left out. I think they would.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>They could find thirty teams to play them and not

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>break a sweat. So I don't think that that that

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>fear that a lot of interne fans had maybe a

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>week ago, is all that justified or has a whole

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of weight to it.

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, that that was actually gonna be my next question.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So we're recording this, it's mid July. As of now,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the games against Wisconsin, Stanford, and USC have been canceled,

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 3>and it does seem like a bit of a foregone

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 3>conclusion that other conferences are going to go the same direction.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 3>The internet has had a lot of fun with this,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 3>right and you've seen the memes. I appreciate the what

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 3>is it the confused John travolt To meme around Notre

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Dame and they're gonna be left out and the season

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 3>is going to be canceled for them and all that.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 3>But you seem to indicate, and I'm with you, that

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>this is not at all grounded in reality. It's a

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>fun internet storyline. Ultimately, if they've got to fill out

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 3>a schedule, they're going to find a way to figure

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 3>out a schedule.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, at the end, for how much posturing there is

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in college football, and we love that the dramatic effect

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that the ads and coaches have. There's a lot of

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>money to be made off Notre Dame if you're playing them,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and right now, you really want to make that money.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So I just think that, you know, whether it's an

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ACC or it's another SEC school, or maybe it's a

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Big twelve school, they're going to find a way to

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>get Notre Dame in there, and because it just is

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>good for their bottom line. I think if Notre Dame

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is if Notre Dame gets word from the ACC, is

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that says, hey, we're going to give you Miami Florida

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>State and let's start Boston College in there for a

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>filled your COVID narrative story. Yeah, let's do it. Not name,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be like, okay, cool, we'll take

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>those extra three. We've still got Arkansas, Navy, and Western Michigan.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>That's our schedule. Let's let's make it work. So I

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ain't going to names in a fine spot. But yeah,

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's when those Pack twelve and the Big ten start

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling out like, oh, who are you going to play?

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh right, everyone wants to play Notre Dame.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Sure, Yeah, is there like a target that they've got

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 3>in mind, like ten games and that that would be

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 3>okay financially, or is it six games just an acc schedule?

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it as many as possible because this is football

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and obviously, like, where have you heard any numbers like

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 3>that thrown out?

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe the target's going to be something closer to ten.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they have any intention to play

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve because whether it's conference only or they're mixing and matching,

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the same principles apply that are working with the Big,

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Big ten, the PAC twelve is you want some flexibility,

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to start and stop that the entire season

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get wrecked by that. So I my hunches they're

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>shooting for about a ten game schedule based on people

0:31:59.360 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 3>One interesting angle that Dan and I have talked about

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>on the show is it would seemingly benefit a situation

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 3>like Notre Dame has, frankly, where you've got a lot

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>of veteran leadership, and I wonder if you've had a

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 3>chance to talk to Brian Kelly or anyone around the

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 3>program around how Notre Dame might come out of this

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>if they do end up playing any football. Do you

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>think there is any kind of tangible benefit just with

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the way the roster is constructed, knowing they've got that leadership.

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's there could be a lot worse situations than

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the one Notre Dame is in. You got five starters

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>back on your offensive line, third year starting quarterback, defensive

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>coordinator in year three Reese Tommy Reese the new OC

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but has been here for a while, knows the personnel.

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You know on Brian Kelly the year eleven. It's I'm

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sure there are some teams that have come out better

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>than this. Like I would prefer to be Clemson because

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you'd have Trevor Lawrence. But maybe yeah, just I'm gonna

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>say definitely, ty Okay, I just think that if you're

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame, you feel like, all right, we've got a

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>puncher's chance in this, Like we don't have a major

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hurdle to overcome it. I mean, even the starters that

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they're replacing on defense, there's a good chance they're going

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to replace them with two grad transfers, one from Menci State,

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one from Ohio State. So if you're plugging in new

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>starters who actually have started twenty thirty games, somewhere else.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not a bad place to be either. So I

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think Notre Dame's roster is very, very old, and it's

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff is stable. That would be good any season,

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but particularly with this offseason.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Two the areas that I know I've looked at, just

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in checking out the roster and the way it's constructed

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and certainly reading smart people such as yourself. The secondary

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of a concern. Kyle Hamilton can't play

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 3>all the positions, so that's top of mind, and also

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 3>the skill positions. They lose a lot at the receiving position.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>A little bit of question around who's running the rock

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>this year. What does Reese do on offense that looks different,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 3>if at all, from what we saw under chip Long.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be all that different.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think Chip Loong's offense was a lot more

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>boom or bust like they and he was sort of

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>content to take stuffs, you know, get the read option stuff,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's Tony Jones for one yard, Jeff Armstrong for

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>two yards, and then it would be Brad Lindsay for

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards on a jet sweep. So they're I think

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to be a lot more consistent than that.

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>How Reese manages that, you know, does he do less

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>read option stuff or is it? Is it different? I'm

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>not really sure because we've only seen one game of it.

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can have your line back and your quarterback back.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're running back talent is pretty low

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>compared to other playoff contenders, and they turn over basically

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>their entire receiver depth chart, so's there's a bit of

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding on the outside. How that impacts how we judge

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>him Book, I don't know. I could see im Book

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>being an improved player, but the statistics taking a step

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>back because he's got receivers who have never really played before.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Did it surprise you that they decided to ultimately go

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 3>with Tommy Reese as offensive coordinator because there was a

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of scuttle butt there, there were names thrown about.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately he was the guy. It felt a little bit

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 3>like they were afraid of losing him. What's your sense there, Pete.

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that surprised about it. I'm not sure I

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>would describe the higher as like all that inspired. It

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was kind of much more comfortable with Reese. I mean,

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Kelly coached him he's been on staff for a couple

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of years. The roster loves him, and I do think

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to prove to be a good higher. But

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>his personality is so different from Chip Long. I mean,

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Chiplong was sort of Brian Kelly circa twenty eleven in

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of the way he dealt with players. Reese is

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot more even keel about it, and he has

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>no real experience calling plays other than the Camping World Bowl.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it was kind of one of those hires

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>where I don't know if the player. I would say

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the players had a say in it, but the players

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>definitely would have voted for recently if they did.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>As we wind this down here, Pete, let's circle back

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to the top. Give me, on a scale of one

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to ten, your level of confidence that we're going to

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 3>see more than six games.

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>In the fall, like three? Pretty low?

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, And your level of optimism just personally around

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 3>going to Notre Dame Stadium maybe for a game in April.

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll go seven and a half. It's a little warmer, right, Yeah.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I've covered spring games and blizzards before here. I

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>just think that the spring makes too much sense, and

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess I sort of view it as

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the national trend lines is Jack Swarbrick and Greg Sank

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and all the commissioners they seem to be pointing out

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>now are like, are not good to give yourself another

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>six months to turn this around? I think guy, and

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I've sort of said to other people, it's like, if

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>things aren't in a better spot six months from now

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>than they are today, Like whether college football is being

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>played or not, is maybe the least of our work. Yeah,

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're all dead at that point. Yes, Like,

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>let's I'd be happy to cover Notre Dame Clemson on

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>April seventh or whatever day of the week that would be.

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>That would be fine, And I think you'd say, hey,

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>sign this piece of paper, you will be guaranteed a

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>spring football season. I would do it. Yeah. I think

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the sport can manage it, and it would give us

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>something to look forward to.

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll see, you know, whatever happens, it will. It

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>will absolutely be fascinating and interesting to watch, not as

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 3>people who cover, but as people who watch the sport

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and appreciate it as well. Come back soon, Pete. We

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 3>need to talk more about Notre Dame and obviously once

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 3>we get this whole scheduling thing figured out and know

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to play football or not, we'll have

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to talk more. But hope you're doing well out there

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and we'll talk soon.

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Thanks, I appreciate it. All right, Dan again.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Pete Sampson the Athletic check him out. One of my

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 3>favorite Notre Dame be writers. There are many, yeah, there

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 3>are many, but Pete's been in front of the show

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. Good catch up with him. The

0:38:55.440 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 3>most interesting thing that he said in that interview talk

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 3>about Brian Kelly and his media chops.

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I tend to think optimism publicly is real. I don't

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 2>think people are sort of scripting what they're saying as

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 2>much as people think. I know a lot of people

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>are under the impression that college football coaches are full

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of I don't know if we have families listening to this,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 2>but full of crap kind of stuff. But I imagine

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:24.919
<v Speaker 2>you have to be able to get to a point

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 2>as a college football coach where you're projecting positive energy

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 2>and optimism because so much of the secret sauce of

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 2>college football is culture and buy in, where I think

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 2>you have to rewire your brain to project that sort

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of positivity even somebody who appears to be sort of

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 2>a downer, I guess like Nick Saban. Nick Saban might

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>sort of appear like a downer, but he has earned

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of the doubt with the results of both

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 2>his players individually and with team success that there is

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 2>a certain amount of positivity just wrapped up in the

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Alabama program. And even if Nick Saban specifically isn't coming

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>off as warm and cheery, I think he rubs his

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 2>players in a pretty positive way. And that's unfortunate framing

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and praising as I just hear myself say it out loud,

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 2>But no, that's all a long winded way of saying

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I think on a very real level, it's genuine.

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why I asked him about it. I thought

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 3>it was an interesting tidbit that I took away from

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 3>his interview going out to the athletic and read it.

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that a dog barking?

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I hear he's a dog barking in the background.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Is she happy? Is she hungry? What does she she's

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 2>angry about?

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 3>She's angry that neither Kate nor I are downstairs with

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 3>her at the moment.

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Bitches be wanting attention ty.

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I've always been saying that I have some sweet potatoes

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to take out of the oven myself, so we can

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 2>we can wrap this up if you'd like.

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's wrap this up.

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I gotta go see what's going on downstairs.

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 3>For that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 3>for myself, Tie Hildebrand. Big thanks to our guest of

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 3>honor today, our good friend Pete Sampson from the Athletic.

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back in about a week. Hope everyone enjoys

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 3>their weekends. Stay safe, stay solid in the meantime.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>No wait, I screwed that up.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 2>I screwed up my own outroup. Now I'll just leave

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 2>this in here.

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Peace.