WEBVTT - Tech News: Proposed Laws to Protect Consumers

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff production from I Heart Radio. Hey there,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and a love

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of all things tech. And this is the tech news

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for Thursday, June one. And following up on antitrust news,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>proposed piece of legislation here in the United States would

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>make it illegal for tech companies to prevent users from

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>removing pre installed apps on devices. So at the heart

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the matter here would be competitive advantage. And we'll

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>use Apple as an example. So currently Apple can and

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>does pre install its own apps on iPhones. Apple also

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>prevents users from being able to uninstall some of those apps.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So even if some other developer makes an iPhone app

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that gets approved, goes into the iPhone App Store and

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it does the same thing as a native Apple app,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't just swap them out. You can't uninstall the

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Apple app and replace it with this new one. They

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>would have to sit side by side, so you could

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>install the new third party app, but the Apple app

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>would stay on your phone, mocking you, judging you. But

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if this legislation becomes law, Apple would be required to

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>make its own apps removable so that people could choose

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to go with a competitor if they wanted to. The

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>argument is that by making it impossible to remove the apps,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple is discouraging competition, and since Apple is the source

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of both those apps and the hardware that those apps

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>run on, this is a big problem. There are currently

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a few different pieces of proposed antitrust legislation in the

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>US that could have an enormous impact on the tech

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>industry should they actually be passed into law. So will

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>keep pace with the story as it develops. Meanwhile, in

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate, a proposed bill would require companies to

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>make it easier for customers to cancel a service at

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>the end of a free trial, and it's being called

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the Unsubscribed Act, And this would address situations in which

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a company entices new customers with a free trial and

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then switches those customers to a paid subscription service without

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, much notice or an easy way to cancel out.

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>They would also affect companies that break out the monthly

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>rate of a service but they charge in larger increments,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like they'll say, oh, you'll get you know charged a month,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but then they actually make you pay for half a

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>year or a year all at once, which is not great, right,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because what if you change your mind about the service

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you've already paid for, you know, six months you don't

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have to pay for half a year or more,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and then a week in you realize this service isn't

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for me. I think it's interesting to see more moves

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to address consumer rights. We've seen that kind of a

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>few times in recent months, and I think this also

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>points to how more politicians have been on the receiving

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>end of these corporate policies. Typically here in the United States,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we see politics lag behind tech quite a bit because,

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's face it, a lot of politicians tend

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be old people who are perhaps not quite as

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in touch with technology and tech services as younger people.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty general statement. I get it, uh, And

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to say that all old people are

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>clueless when it comes to tech. I am rapidly becoming

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>an old person, and I like to think that, you know,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I got a clue or two. But politicians in particular

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>traditionally have not been on that bleeding edge of technology scale. Now,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>while we're past the initial n f T craze, we've

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>got another one to talk about. Tim berners Lee, the

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>man who has since really invented the World Wide Web,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is now going to auction off and n f T

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>representing the original files used to create the first web pages.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Now again we need to talk about what an n

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>f T actually is. That initialism stands for non fungible token,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and that means it's a thing that represents something that

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>itself is not interchangeable. So a US dollar is interchangeable

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>with any other US dollar, or U S dollars interchangeable

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with four U S quarters or twenty U S nickels,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and you get the point. But an n f T

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>represents a unique instance of something. However, that being said,

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>an n f T doesn't give the owner the right to,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, do anything with whatever it is that n

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>f T represents. It's more like you have a certificate

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of ownership of that thing. Like if you've ever seen

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ads for a company that will let you quote, purchase

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and name a star, end quote. It's kind of like that,

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>except it's a token that sits on top a blockchain

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can buy and you can sell n f

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>t s, so you can make them a commodity. But

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they really just represent the idea of ownership in a

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>way that's so nebulous that it makes me grouchy. Thanks

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot in f T s over in China, the

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese military is training AI combat pilots and using those

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pilots to train human pilots. So human pilots have been

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>training with and against, depending upon how you view it,

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>AI controlled simulated aircraft. So this is all computer simulations.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So according to the military, the AI displays an incredible

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to learn and apply knowledge and rapidly gain a

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>level of expertise similar to that of China's Golden Helmet squadron,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and the Golden Helmet is an elite group of human pilots.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The humans participating in the sessions say that the AI

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>pilots are able to adapt quickly, so you might defeat

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>them once using certain tactics, and then they would turn

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>around and use those exact same tactics in the next

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>matchup and defeat the human pilots. The project is really, again,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>more about training up human pilots. It's not really about

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>creating autonomous fighter jets down the line, at least not yet.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Guy Snodgrass, a former U. S. Navy commander, expressed some

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>skepticism about the usefulness of this project. His point of

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>view is that the Chinese pilots might just be learning

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>how to fight against AI opponents rather than how to

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>engage with actual human pilots who may display very different

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tactics and behaviors, and since we're not in a world

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with robot jet fighters, that could end up being useless

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in a real combat situation. Amazon appears to be removing

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>certain tech brands and online storefronts from the Amazon service,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and the reason behind this ties into the issue of

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fake reviews, something that Amazon has really been struggling with recently.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Several brands have made it a practice to include a

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>card or a slip of paper inside the box of

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>various gadgets stuff like you know, charging cables or computer

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>mice or something like that, and those cards give you

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an offer to get a like gift card usually or

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>credit in a store in return for posting a favorable

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>review on Amazon. Typically, the card has some instructions on

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it to guide the consumer through that process of posting

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the review and then sending it to the vendor in

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>order to verify that the review was posted, and in return,

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the consumer gets a gift card or credit, so it's

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like bribing for a good review. This practice

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>does drive up reviews that might not actually reflect the

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>quality or reliability of a product, and Amazon has become

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty sensitive to this problem of fake reviews recently, so

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>now Amazon appears to be removing entire brands from the store.

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>On a related note, Amazon has called social media platforms

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to task, saying that they are helping perpetuate the fake

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>review problem. Amazon says that companies that deal in fake

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>reviews either as a vendor that's trying to get people

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to positively review it's stuff or as kind of a

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>middleman service provider that allows other vendors to purchase good reviews,

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they often turn to social media to recruit folks in

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>those efforts, and Amazon says that Amazon's alerted various social

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>media platforms about this problem and that the platforms have

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>traditionally been pretty slow to do anything about it. Now,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that Amazon's structure is what ultimately enables

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the practice of fake reviews to flourish, but there is

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that using social media to recruit more folks

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to the effort is a problem. I don't think it's

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>fair to place all or even most of the blame

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on social media. But I do think that a lot

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of social media platforms, notably Facebook, have traditionally moved very

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>slowly to address problems with fraudulent, misleading, or deceptive practices

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. Twitter is not much better. It's honestly

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a really big mess. General Motors, the number one auto

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>brand in the United States, announced yesterday that the company

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will invest thirty five billion dollars in electric vehicle technologies

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>through five That marks a significant increase in investment, and

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it coincides with a general trend across the world that

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sees auto companies moving away from producing fossil fuel powered

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and moving more toward electric ones. According to Reuters,

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a consulting firm called Alex Partners projects that by electric

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicles will make up nearly of our all car sales,

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and today it's more like two. We're definitely headed toward

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a future in which all new vehicles will be electric vehicles.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And I should also add that while electric vehicles could

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to a decrease in carbon emissions, though that also

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>depends upon where the electricity to power those vehicles has

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>come from. Evs are also the source of some pretty

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>serious environmental concerns. The lithium used in lithium ion batteries

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is a substance that you know, people mind, and some

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of those mining operations can have a catastrophic effect on

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the environment, at least in the immediate area around the mines. Plus,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there are some serious concerns about worker welfare and safety

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because many of these minds are in places where workforces

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>can be heavily exploited by companies that run the minds.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the moral of that story is that

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>these issues are really complicated and there are no simple solutions.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is facing some tough questions from Texas law enforcement. Allegedly,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>private security guards working for SpaceX denied people access to

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a county road, a public road, in other words, a

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>road that SpaceX doesn't own, and the local government says

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that it never gave SpaceX authorization to close down the

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>public roads, so by denying citizens the use of those roads,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>those employees, the security guards, and potentially the company itself,

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>has broken the law. In addition, there are questions as

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to whether the security personnel had the required licenses to

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>serve as security or to carry a weapon, though at

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the time of the reporting, it was unclear as to

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>whether the security personnel in question were armed or not.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this year, the japan Supersonic Research Organization got off

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground figuratively speaking, in an effort to develop supersonic

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>passenger jets. The organization now includes several Japanese aerospace and

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing companies. There hasn't been a supersonic passenger jet since

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Concord, which operated for several years before some high

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>profile disasters and the harsh reality of economics forced the

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>company out of business. Creating a fuel efficient supersonic jet

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is one of several challenges that One of the reasons

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that was so expensive with the Concorde is just jet

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fuel prices were really dragging down the company figuratively speaking, again,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's just too expensive to operate. You had to

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>charge higher and higher prices for for flights and eventually

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where you kind of price yourself

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the market. But another big challenge is to

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>limit the effects of sonic booms. When you travel faster

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of sound, you create a sonic boom

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and that travels with you. So if an aircraft is

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>flying faster than the speed of sound, there's a boom

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of trails behind the aircraft, and it does

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>so consistently as long as that aircraft is going faster

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>than speed of sounds. So anything the aircraft passes over

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>will experience a sonic boom shortly afterward. For that reason,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Concords supersonic flight paths were restricted to being over

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic. Once they got to the point where they

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>were going to pass over land, they had to slow

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>down below supersonic speeds because nobody wants these enormously allowed

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>booms to pass over their their area, like it could

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be strong enough to shatter glass in some cases. There's

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>no word yet if the Japanese are planning on restricting

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>their supersonic aircraft to flying just over the oceans when

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they're in supersonic mode um and we probably won't see

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>these aircraft until about twenty thirty or so. However, the

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>engineers do say that the design of the aircraft they

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have created should mean that it will produce a sonic

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>boom that's only half as loud as the Concords, so

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that's some progress. There are a lot of other companies

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and organizations around the world working on supersonic and hypersonic aircraft,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them are working on ways to

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>try and minimize that sonic boom so that these aircraft

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>could travel not just over the ocean, but over land

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>as well at supersonic speeds. But that's something that's still

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in development, and I mean there are big challenges like

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>how do you make something like that fuel efficient so

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that it makes economic sense to operate it. If it's

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>too expensive to operate for anyone to ever bother flying

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on it, well then there's doesn't too much of use,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>does it. And that's it. That's all the news that

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I have for you today, Thursday, June one. If you

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for topics I should cover in future

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, let me know on Twitter. The

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>handle is tech stuff hs W and I'll talk to

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.