1 00:00:03,080 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. 3 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 2: I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Uh, Tracy, It's 4 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: time for our annual AMA episode. 5 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 3: The Annual Call In Show. This is my favorite time 6 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:33,919 Speaker 3: of the year, Joe, totally. 7 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:36,879 Speaker 2: It's a weird time of year. Actually. 8 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 3: The thing is, I feel like we're always answering questions 9 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,199 Speaker 3: that people ask us. Right, maybe we're too accessible. 10 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 2: No, I never feel that way. I feel like all 11 00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:49,240 Speaker 2: we do is ask questions and no one ever answer 12 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 2: asks us question. 13 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:52,120 Speaker 3: I feel like if people want to ask us questions, 14 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 3: it's pretty easy to do so. But we still have 15 00:00:54,760 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 3: this call in show. 16 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 2: It's amazing that your entire job is you ask questions 17 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,280 Speaker 2: people multiple times a week, every week for the entire year, 18 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:05,039 Speaker 2: and your main takeaway from the year is that you 19 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 2: answer too many questions. This is really interesting. 20 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 3: That's very That was not my main takeaway. My main 21 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 3: takeaway was we are question platform agnostic, Like it doesn't 22 00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 3: really matter what format the questions come in, whether they're 23 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:21,760 Speaker 3: called in like in this show, or whether they're typed 24 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,639 Speaker 3: in via the discord or on Blue Sky or Twitter 25 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:25,360 Speaker 3: or something else. 26 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 2: This is fair. I like talking to people, I like 27 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:30,760 Speaker 2: answering questions, but I like the call in format. I 28 00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:32,800 Speaker 2: missed the old days of you know, it'd be fun 29 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:34,479 Speaker 2: to do a live radio show with callin. 30 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 3: I'd be fun to do it. 31 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:37,800 Speaker 2: When I was a kid, I called into sports talk 32 00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 2: radio sometimes and I sort of missed that platform. And 33 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:42,920 Speaker 2: you don't really get that with podcasts. A wait, what. 34 00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 3: Did you say on sports radio? 35 00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:47,319 Speaker 2: I don't remember the you know, I think like I, 36 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,760 Speaker 2: you know, I usually follow baseball really closely, and I 37 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:53,240 Speaker 2: would like say, like, oh, I think the Toronto Blue 38 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 2: Jays have a lot of momentum down the stretch, and 39 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 2: I think they're gonna, you know, win the American League. 40 00:01:57,920 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 2: Or it's just some nonsense like that. 41 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 3: Sports and now tell usis in commentary is just something 42 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:04,440 Speaker 3: I really I struggle to get into because it's like 43 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 3: it's either well, the team played well or I think 44 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:09,640 Speaker 3: the team could play better. That's it. Like that's the 45 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:12,960 Speaker 3: sum totality of what people say on those things. 46 00:02:13,320 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 2: So yes, we are going to be uh. We invited 47 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:18,959 Speaker 2: listeners to record a voice memo and then email that 48 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 2: to Odd Law too. Bloomberg Dot net and let's take 49 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 2: a listen to some and Tracy and I will do 50 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 2: our best to answer them. 51 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 3: We'll pretend that we're live. 52 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:28,959 Speaker 4: Yeah, this is Steve from Northville, New Jersey. I would 53 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 4: like Tracy and Jodas set up a cage match type 54 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 4: hardcore debate on the value of cryptocurrency. Every Saint analyst 55 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 4: says it's a pointless scam which uses tons of energy 56 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:41,040 Speaker 4: to create valueless tokens that have been bid up to 57 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 4: insane prices and at the same time greatly facilitate many 58 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 4: criminal transactions. On the other side, there are a host 59 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 4: of promoter promoters that say it is the future of finance. 60 00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 3: First off, Steve, that's not a question, that's request, But 61 00:02:57,200 --> 00:02:58,880 Speaker 3: you know what, we'll take it. We'll take what we 62 00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 3: can get. I think it's a good request. I would 63 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:02,560 Speaker 3: like to see a cage match on crypto. 64 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:03,280 Speaker 5: Yeah. 65 00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 2: So you know, I've said it before. I have people 66 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 2: from time to time to ask us, you know, we 67 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:10,919 Speaker 2: should do a debate topic, and we may have done 68 00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,320 Speaker 2: one or two of theirs. I the reason I'm skeptical 69 00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:15,960 Speaker 2: about well, I mean, if we're talking about a literal 70 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 2: cage match where people beat people up, that's fine, but 71 00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:20,120 Speaker 2: if we're talking about a figurative one where it's some 72 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 2: sort of debate, Debates, to my mind, are only interesting 73 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 2: if the two sides agree on like ninety nine percent 74 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 2: of premises, where they agree on all definitions, et cetera, 75 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 2: and there is a very specific thing. Most debates on 76 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,400 Speaker 2: crypto you get some sort of mainstream canesy and economist 77 00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 2: and then some sort of you know, crazy laser ezed 78 00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 2: person that don't agree on anything and they just talk 79 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 2: past each other. Not a particularly productive use and I 80 00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 2: think most debates in public forms are like that. But 81 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 2: if we can find the right guests who largely agree 82 00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 2: on and then disagree on something specific, maybe that's a 83 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:52,640 Speaker 2: good twenty twenty five ambition. 84 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 3: I think you're right that that's kind of a difficulty there. 85 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 3: The one other thing I would say when it comes 86 00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 3: to crypto, the use case or the envisioned purpose of 87 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 3: cryptocurrency always seems to be changing, right sure, And I 88 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:08,240 Speaker 3: used to think I've written about this, but I used 89 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 3: to think that was a bad thing. That you know, 90 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 3: one day, bitcoin, for instance, would be like a way 91 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 3: to pay for things, and then the next day it 92 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 3: would be a store of value. And it would just 93 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:21,839 Speaker 3: change every day. But I think as time has gone on, 94 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 3: we've kind of seen that that's turned out to be 95 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:27,680 Speaker 3: a strength rather than a weakness. But it does make 96 00:04:27,760 --> 00:04:31,240 Speaker 3: it incredibly hard to have a resonable discussion over the 97 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 3: use case totally. 98 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 6: You know. 99 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:35,840 Speaker 2: I would say we did that episode a couple of 100 00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:37,560 Speaker 2: months ago with Austin Campbell. I think we're going to 101 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 2: have them back on soon. I'm like coming around to 102 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:43,559 Speaker 2: some of like the stable coin stuff. Maybe anyway, should 103 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 2: we go to the next question? 104 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 3: Next question? 105 00:04:46,760 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 7: Hey, Joe and Tracy. My name is Ryan Ross. I'm 106 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:51,960 Speaker 7: based in New Jersey, and I'm curious what have been 107 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 7: your most favorite industries you've learned about in the past, 108 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 7: and also what are you interested in learning about in 109 00:04:57,279 --> 00:05:02,320 Speaker 7: twenty twenty five. You've had episode on the tractor supply, 110 00:05:02,360 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 7: which is interesting, and wood palettes and how those are 111 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:10,960 Speaker 7: logistically moved around in an episode about how car leather 112 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:14,360 Speaker 7: affects the price of gummy bears. I'm curious what's been 113 00:05:14,480 --> 00:05:16,920 Speaker 7: most interesting to you in the past in terms of 114 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:19,440 Speaker 7: industries and also what are you interested in learning about 115 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 7: in twenty twenty five? 116 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:23,320 Speaker 3: Hi, Ry, and I like this question. There are a 117 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,520 Speaker 3: lot of interesting things that we get to talk about 118 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:27,840 Speaker 3: on the podcast, and at the end of the year 119 00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 3: it kind of becomes hard to remember all of them. 120 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:32,960 Speaker 3: I will say one thing I really enjoyed diving into 121 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,599 Speaker 3: this year was doing a bit more on agriculture. I 122 00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 3: think one of the great things of hosting your own 123 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 3: podcast is that you can sort of to some extent, 124 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 3: tailor the content to your new interests. And you know, 125 00:05:46,560 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 3: I've kind of become interested in gardening and growing my 126 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 3: own food, and I have some latent prepper tendencies, I guess, 127 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 3: is the way I would put it, And so it's 128 00:05:55,920 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 3: been really fun to kind of dive into industrial agriculture 129 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 3: and learn more about that. 130 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:05,479 Speaker 2: There's a good tracy, will you shelter my family in 131 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:07,880 Speaker 2: the event of some disaster? Like do you have enough 132 00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:08,480 Speaker 2: stored away? 133 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 7: You have? 134 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:09,040 Speaker 6: Note? 135 00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 3: Joe, what do you bring to the table other than 136 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,760 Speaker 3: other than sparkling conversation, which is. 137 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 2: Really important you're in for the long haul. I don't know. 138 00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:21,800 Speaker 2: I fear my kids are very cute. 139 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,720 Speaker 3: This is very true. Yeah, all right, you know. 140 00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:30,000 Speaker 2: So I like learning about agriculture too. So I've said 141 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 2: it before, I really want to do more on Defense 142 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:35,560 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty Well, yeah, of course I want defense spending, 143 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 2: the defense industrial base, and if anyone listening to this 144 00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:42,040 Speaker 2: has the perfect guest and anything about how that all works, 145 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:44,240 Speaker 2: which I really know nothing about, shoot me and Tracy 146 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:46,640 Speaker 2: a message, because I would say that's there's a big 147 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:49,640 Speaker 2: that's a big area that it feels wide open and 148 00:06:49,680 --> 00:06:50,279 Speaker 2: interesting for me. 149 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:52,880 Speaker 3: Next year Defense is a really good one that crosses 150 00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 3: over into financial markets quite a bit, but also is 151 00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:00,080 Speaker 3: obviously in the news given the new Trump administration and 152 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 3: Elon Musk and joje and all of that. 153 00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 2: One thing. 154 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:05,920 Speaker 3: One other thing I would say that I'm interested in 155 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:08,839 Speaker 3: in twenty twenty five that touches on agriculture. I really 156 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 3: want to do a fertilizer episode. Oh yeah, like where 157 00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 3: a fertilizer comes from and whether or not all the 158 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:19,080 Speaker 3: headlines you see about the land becoming less fertile, how 159 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 3: serious should we be taking those? So yeah, if anyone 160 00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:25,720 Speaker 3: has fertilizer contact contacts, send them our way as well. 161 00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 2: Let's do it. Should we go to the next Let's 162 00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:28,560 Speaker 2: do it? 163 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 6: Hey, Tracy, Hey Joe, this is Duncan. I am curious, 164 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 6: what is the most embarrassingly wrong take you've had on 165 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 6: something in popular discourse over the last five years. Love 166 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 6: the show. 167 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 3: Thanks Wait, Joe did duncan say the most embarrassing take 168 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 3: or our most embarrassing. 169 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,840 Speaker 2: I think you should the most embarrassingly wrong take that 170 00:07:53,920 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 2: you've had. But I don't know if it was a 171 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:56,280 Speaker 2: collective our. 172 00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 8: Oh. 173 00:07:57,040 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 2: I think it was more specifically, you know, like either 174 00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:04,840 Speaker 2: one of us. Man, I mostly have wrong takes. You know, 175 00:08:04,960 --> 00:08:07,720 Speaker 2: like I wouldn't have expected crypto to bounce as much 176 00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:12,640 Speaker 2: as it had starting in twenty twenty when FTX imploded. 177 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:19,200 Speaker 2: I wouldn't have expected that so quickly, you know. I 178 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 2: remember we did episodes years ago about like China's like 179 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 2: made twenty twenty five stuff, and I wouldn't have expected 180 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 2: it to be as successful as it has. I wouldn't 181 00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:33,200 Speaker 2: have expected inflation to persist and be as elevated as 182 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:37,199 Speaker 2: long as it has. What else I mean? I mostly 183 00:08:37,640 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 2: I mostly get things wrong. I mean, it's harder for 184 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:41,280 Speaker 2: me to think of what I get things right about. 185 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 2: I don't know, Tracy, do you have any Do you 186 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:43,280 Speaker 2: have any. 187 00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:47,200 Speaker 3: I'm trying to think of anything, like really really bad. 188 00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 3: I would say I probably wrote my last bitcoin obituary 189 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 3: in like twenty seventeen, and I've written quite a few 190 00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 3: at this point before I had my big, like come 191 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,760 Speaker 3: to Jesus moment about narrative flexibility and the idea that 192 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,640 Speaker 3: as long as the story's there, it almost doesn't matter 193 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:07,679 Speaker 3: what the story is, and there's always going to be 194 00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:09,959 Speaker 3: a new one. I'm trying to think. 195 00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 2: I will say, there's just no upside right in writing 196 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 2: another obituary. O, No, what are you going to get 197 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:16,199 Speaker 2: from that? 198 00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:16,400 Speaker 6: No? 199 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:19,480 Speaker 3: And I will say the last obituary here's a bit 200 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:24,719 Speaker 3: of inside like journalistic navel gazing. But the last obituary 201 00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:27,199 Speaker 3: that I wrote on Bitcoin, I made sure to end 202 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:30,959 Speaker 3: it with like the possibility that it could come back. 203 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,720 Speaker 3: Having written obituaries before where it did come back, I 204 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,079 Speaker 3: learned a little bit. So it's a constant process where 205 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,680 Speaker 3: you're trying to improve on your own work. And the 206 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 3: one thing I would say is, and I don't think 207 00:09:41,920 --> 00:09:46,480 Speaker 3: people realize this, but journalism everything plays out very publicly, right. 208 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:49,160 Speaker 3: It's like you do your work, you put it in 209 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 3: front of people at the end of every day, and 210 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 3: people get to comment on it and decide if they 211 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 3: like it or not, if they think it's good or not. 212 00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:59,920 Speaker 3: And so you're constantly sort of getting that immediate feedback 213 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:03,839 Speaker 3: and trying to go back and improve yourself based on it. Yeah, 214 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 3: it's an iterative process, let's just put it that way. 215 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 2: I'm trying to just think if there's anything else that 216 00:10:10,679 --> 00:10:14,160 Speaker 2: you've got, I don't know, is it? I you know what, 217 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 2: I don't think. I don't think I've had many like 218 00:10:16,440 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 2: embarrassingly mega wrong takes, in part because I don't have 219 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 2: many like takes where I stick my neck out and 220 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:22,880 Speaker 2: say like this. 221 00:10:23,240 --> 00:10:25,320 Speaker 3: Oh, I know one. I know one that Joe had. 222 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:28,000 Speaker 3: What about the thing about scooters? How scooters are going 223 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:29,560 Speaker 3: to be like the next motive? 224 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 2: You know What's funny though, So this is fair. But 225 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:34,960 Speaker 2: someone then reached out to me and said, you know, 226 00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:38,199 Speaker 2: you're you're wrong about scooters in the US, but that 227 00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:42,079 Speaker 2: in Europe actually they have been highly disruptive. So I'm 228 00:10:42,080 --> 00:10:44,200 Speaker 2: actually giving myself a half point this if someone reached 229 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:47,160 Speaker 2: out to me from Paris actually, So I'm going to 230 00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 2: take a half uh half credit for that. Anyway. Yeah, 231 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,679 Speaker 2: I mostly have like modestly wrong takes rather than anything 232 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 2: incredibly embarrassing. But dun't can thank you for the question. 233 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:02,640 Speaker 3: Duncan I will say, like our takes, we try to 234 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:07,880 Speaker 3: ground them in some like reality with rational analysis and reason, 235 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:10,439 Speaker 3: so hopefully they're never too embarrassing. 236 00:11:10,520 --> 00:11:12,319 Speaker 2: But we sure work right, Yeah, we. 237 00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:14,679 Speaker 3: Show the work. I'm sure we could come up with 238 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 3: some find some if we went back into the archives 239 00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:19,680 Speaker 3: that we wouldn't want anyone to see now. But hey, 240 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:21,160 Speaker 3: they're all there, they're all public. 241 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:26,040 Speaker 9: Next question, Hey, Joe and Tracy, this is Nick or 242 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:29,120 Speaker 9: newsman on Blue Sky. I'd like to know what you 243 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:32,080 Speaker 9: think is the most significant financial story of the year. 244 00:11:32,480 --> 00:11:34,280 Speaker 9: I know there's a lot to consider, but there must 245 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:36,520 Speaker 9: be one thing that bubbles up to the top when 246 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 9: you hear this question. 247 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:38,840 Speaker 8: Thank you for your time. 248 00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:41,800 Speaker 3: I love odd lots, oh man, Nick, there is a 249 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:47,320 Speaker 3: lot to consider. I do think one thing, one thing 250 00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 3: that I find really interesting, and I think you could 251 00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 3: probably connect it to a bunch of different things that 252 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:55,640 Speaker 3: are going on right now, is the episode that we 253 00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 3: did a while back on companies getting smarter about how 254 00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:03,080 Speaker 3: they're ing their respective products. And it sounds like an 255 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:06,959 Speaker 3: incremental thing. It's like, okay, well, companies, they're always trying 256 00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:09,840 Speaker 3: to charge more and make more money, and now they've 257 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:13,240 Speaker 3: figured out some interesting new ways to do it with 258 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 3: new technology, but I think the level of sophistication and 259 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 3: the way that they're doing it is starting to become 260 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:23,480 Speaker 3: a problem. And the more it comes on people's radars, 261 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:26,160 Speaker 3: I think, the more sense of unfairness there is in 262 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:30,240 Speaker 3: the general American population over the practice. And maybe that's 263 00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:32,400 Speaker 3: why you get so much of this anger sort of 264 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 3: boiling up into politics and things like that. So price 265 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:39,120 Speaker 3: pack architecture, I think is a really interesting one. 266 00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:42,160 Speaker 2: I have three stories that I think are the three 267 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 2: biggest stories in the world right now and a varying 268 00:12:46,080 --> 00:12:50,400 Speaker 2: time concerns. One is just the incredible amount to which everyone, 269 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:54,560 Speaker 2: every investor is implicitly who has long risk assets is 270 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 2: long tech and long AI specifically concentration concentration in this one. 271 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:02,679 Speaker 2: Bet anyone who has a diversified portfolio is making a 272 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 2: bit in some way on tech and AI. The incredible 273 00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:08,960 Speaker 2: rise of China is a manufacturing powerhouse, and the sort 274 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:11,600 Speaker 2: of big questions about whether anything is going to get 275 00:13:11,600 --> 00:13:13,959 Speaker 2: built anywhere in the world that's not China, and can 276 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:18,480 Speaker 2: anywhere can anyone be competitive in manufacturing outside of China's borders. 277 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:22,599 Speaker 2: And then the destabilizing effects of mobile technology, which I 278 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:24,559 Speaker 2: think we're sort of you know, social media and how 279 00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 2: that's changing politics everywhere. And I think, you know, you 280 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,320 Speaker 2: look like Romania recently, like you know, Revert canceled an 281 00:13:31,320 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 2: election because they claim that there was interference from Russia 282 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:38,360 Speaker 2: via TikTok and so forth, and the sort of like 283 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 2: ways that new technologies are revertebrating across democracies and we 284 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:48,680 Speaker 2: see change and basically everywhere, numerous shocking developments everywhere. I 285 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 2: think in part due to tech. Those to me are 286 00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:52,760 Speaker 2: the three big stories right now. 287 00:13:52,840 --> 00:13:55,680 Speaker 3: When do we get to do the drone slash UFO episode? 288 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,720 Speaker 2: Joe, I hope. Let's let's go to the next question. 289 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:04,720 Speaker 10: Okay, Hey, Joe and Tracy, This is Daniel in Seattle, Washington. 290 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:08,200 Speaker 10: I was just wondering your opinion on AI models being 291 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:13,320 Speaker 10: trained on journalist content across the web, and I feel 292 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 10: free to elaborate on if what your colleagues might think 293 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:18,800 Speaker 10: or who has a bigger bone to pick is it 294 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 10: you as the journalist or the media company. 295 00:14:22,080 --> 00:14:25,680 Speaker 3: Oh, this is an interesting question. I think if you 296 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:29,720 Speaker 3: had asked me this like ten years ago, before chat, 297 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:33,120 Speaker 3: GPT and all the other variations of it became a 298 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:35,640 Speaker 3: big thing, I think I would have expected to be 299 00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 3: really annoyed at this development, but actually, now that it's happened, 300 00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:44,880 Speaker 3: I feel kind of relaxed about this idea that you know, 301 00:14:44,960 --> 00:14:47,600 Speaker 3: it trained on basically the entirety of the Internet, and 302 00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:49,840 Speaker 3: a big chunk of the Internet is stuff that paid 303 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 3: journalists have been writing for years. I don't know, like, 304 00:14:54,800 --> 00:14:56,320 Speaker 3: I don't really feel that upset about it. 305 00:14:56,360 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 2: To you, no, I don't, And also I don't know. 306 00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:01,880 Speaker 2: Maybe I should like, but I don't. And also I 307 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 2: don't think it's really worth getting upset, Like there are 308 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:06,480 Speaker 2: some things that I think of as the sort of 309 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 2: big historical technological shifts that are happening, and I don't 310 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:14,560 Speaker 2: think our opinions matter very much. So I guess maybe 311 00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:16,720 Speaker 2: in some sense I could be convinced to be upset 312 00:15:16,760 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 2: about it, but in reality, I don't think me being 313 00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 2: upset is going to do very much. 314 00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 3: I think a lot of journalists have also probably given 315 00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:26,240 Speaker 3: up on the notion of making money from like old 316 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:29,680 Speaker 3: fashioned copy, and so the idea of someone else being 317 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:32,520 Speaker 3: able to make money off of it, even if it's 318 00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:37,440 Speaker 3: by training some new generative AI models fair game to them. 319 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 3: Maybe we should all start developing our own AI models. 320 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:41,240 Speaker 3: Maybe that's the way for it. 321 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,400 Speaker 2: We'll try. I actually remind me, Tracy, I have a 322 00:15:44,840 --> 00:15:47,040 Speaker 2: research project I want to do in twenty twenty four 323 00:15:47,160 --> 00:15:48,760 Speaker 2: or twenty twenty five. I'm going to tell you about it. 324 00:15:48,800 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 3: That sounds interesting. Yeah, all right, next question please. 325 00:16:05,600 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 5: Hello Joan Tracy. This is Mois from Karachi, Pakistan. I'm 326 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:11,400 Speaker 5: a big fan of the show. My question to both 327 00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 5: of you is that who are your favorite economists and 328 00:16:14,080 --> 00:16:15,240 Speaker 5: why are they your favorite? 329 00:16:16,120 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 9: Oh? 330 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 3: Interesting? Well, hello moys from Karachi, Pakistan. I spent some 331 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 3: time in Pakistan. I was in Islamabad and Lahore. I 332 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 3: never made it to Karachi, though I would have liked 333 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 3: to go there. Favorite economists do you think he means 334 00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:34,560 Speaker 3: current or like old school economists? 335 00:16:34,560 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 2: Well, you know what we can answer however we want. 336 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:39,000 Speaker 3: Okay, Well, then I'm gonna do like a massive cop 337 00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:42,080 Speaker 3: out and I'm just gonna say Canes. And the reason 338 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:45,320 Speaker 3: is like a he's like, you know, a sort of 339 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:49,640 Speaker 3: granddaddy of a lot of modern economics theory. But also 340 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:51,920 Speaker 3: I think he was a really good writer. Yeah, and 341 00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 3: he has some amazing quotes that I still like. Every 342 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,760 Speaker 3: once in a while when I find myself being very pretentious. 343 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:01,120 Speaker 3: I find myself using like the words are meant to 344 00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:03,960 Speaker 3: be a little wild, for they are the what is 345 00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:07,560 Speaker 3: it for? They are the assault of thoughts on the unthinking. 346 00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:08,360 Speaker 3: I think that's it. 347 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:10,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, those are some good quotes. He's a good writer, 348 00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:15,360 Speaker 2: you know, he wrote, I wasn't recently went back, and 349 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:17,760 Speaker 2: you know, the last few years people have talked about 350 00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 2: the so called vibe session, et cetera. He talked about 351 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:22,760 Speaker 2: that quite a bit, in fact. 352 00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:24,040 Speaker 3: But he didn't call it a vibe session. 353 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:26,960 Speaker 2: He didn't call it the vibe session. But what you said, 354 00:17:27,040 --> 00:17:28,920 Speaker 2: I went back and read something I forget. It might 355 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:31,199 Speaker 2: be like a chapter twelve of the General Theory, for. 356 00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 3: The producer says he did call it a viba. 357 00:17:33,840 --> 00:17:37,800 Speaker 2: He didn't. Our producer is trolling us. 358 00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:44,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, Cale, don't do that. It's Cane's anything that is possible. 359 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:46,880 Speaker 2: But he went back. I was reading something. He went 360 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 2: I think it's like a chapter twelve, one of the 361 00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:52,240 Speaker 2: really good chapters. And he says something about like how 362 00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 2: political shifts can change people's perceptions of the economy, which 363 00:17:56,880 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 2: is sort of intuitive, and we see it in polls 364 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:01,679 Speaker 2: or whatever. But then this thing you said, afterwards is 365 00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:04,680 Speaker 2: like there's sort of no point in being upset about this, 366 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 2: Like it's like people get angry. Are these facts about 367 00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:11,639 Speaker 2: seeming irrationality, that when the preferred party is in power 368 00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:14,760 Speaker 2: out of power, that people shift that then people change 369 00:18:14,800 --> 00:18:18,080 Speaker 2: their view about investment and impulse and all the investment 370 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 2: impulse and that like it sort of bothers people intellectually. 371 00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 2: And he has like some good lines. I forget exactly 372 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:26,200 Speaker 2: what it is every read it recently, which is like, again, 373 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:30,360 Speaker 2: don't work yourself up trying to like get irritated at 374 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 2: the whims of the public, except that the whims of 375 00:18:32,520 --> 00:18:34,280 Speaker 2: the public are the whims of the public, and that 376 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:37,919 Speaker 2: when the political shifts happen, the vibe shift, so to speak. 377 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:40,200 Speaker 2: And this is what it means to sort of understand 378 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 2: the economy, which I thought is really good. 379 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:44,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty good. So you're also in the Canes camp. 380 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:45,760 Speaker 2: I mean, I'll go with Kanes. 381 00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:48,120 Speaker 3: All right, fair enough, Next. 382 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:53,120 Speaker 11: Question, Hi, Tracy and Joe. My name is Rosalind Loubi 383 00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:57,080 Speaker 11: and I live in Westport, Connecticut. My question is whether 384 00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:01,080 Speaker 11: the podcast is going to tackle the state of the 385 00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:04,480 Speaker 11: venture capital industry as a topic in twenty twenty five. 386 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:10,119 Speaker 11: I teach a class on alternative investments to undergraduate college 387 00:19:10,200 --> 00:19:14,040 Speaker 11: kids in an economics department, and I've used your podcast 388 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:17,440 Speaker 11: extensively in my class, and I think this would be 389 00:19:17,480 --> 00:19:20,920 Speaker 11: a great topic for you guys to dig your teeth into. 390 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:21,520 Speaker 5: Thank you. 391 00:19:23,880 --> 00:19:26,080 Speaker 3: I agree this would be a great topic. And I 392 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:28,400 Speaker 3: got to say whenever I hear we have a lot 393 00:19:28,400 --> 00:19:31,000 Speaker 3: of professors who will often reach out and say that 394 00:19:31,040 --> 00:19:34,000 Speaker 3: they use all lots of material to teach their students, 395 00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:36,520 Speaker 3: and I always think that, like, the students are learning 396 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:39,480 Speaker 3: a lot more interesting things than I did at university, 397 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:43,240 Speaker 3: Like you guys are learning about like alternative investments, and 398 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:47,600 Speaker 3: I've learned about neoliberalism versus realism and political theory. 399 00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:52,159 Speaker 2: But oh well, well, always more to do about vcs, 400 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:54,520 Speaker 2: for sure, and we have. So we ended the year 401 00:19:54,520 --> 00:19:57,399 Speaker 2: with some VC episodes recently, so. 402 00:19:57,280 --> 00:20:00,240 Speaker 3: We were back there. We were recently in San francisc, Go, 403 00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:02,960 Speaker 3: and we met with a few vcs while we were 404 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:05,639 Speaker 3: out there. Joe and I enjoyed being in San Francisco. 405 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:08,680 Speaker 3: I think we will probably be back next year. And 406 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,280 Speaker 3: I'm just really intrigued, you know, partially by the whole industry, 407 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 3: but also the sort of job lifestyle. 408 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:16,720 Speaker 2: I guess it seems great. 409 00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:18,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, well the idea of you know, you go out, 410 00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:20,959 Speaker 3: you meet people who are doing cool things, and you 411 00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:23,280 Speaker 3: decide whether or not you want to invest in them 412 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:26,520 Speaker 3: and then kind of take them on as a sort 413 00:20:26,520 --> 00:20:28,159 Speaker 3: of mentee. It seems fun. 414 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:31,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, No, plenty more to do. And you know the 415 00:20:31,560 --> 00:20:33,879 Speaker 2: other thing, we've recently done some episodes, so there's some 416 00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:36,880 Speaker 2: big changes. Interest rates have gone up. It's not zerup 417 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:40,399 Speaker 2: any more, obviously, AI sort of the new dimension. I 418 00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:43,959 Speaker 2: think the other dimension though, is that since especially post COVID, 419 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:46,720 Speaker 2: so many people are in the game, right, so many 420 00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:50,480 Speaker 2: new entrants are trying to get VC, perhaps in part because, 421 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:52,760 Speaker 2: as you say, the lifestyle seems pretty great. You know, 422 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:55,920 Speaker 2: you wear those like sneakers that look very comfortable. 423 00:20:56,040 --> 00:20:57,200 Speaker 3: You just want to wear the hoodies. 424 00:20:57,440 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 2: The hoodies is totally fine, Like you don't really have 425 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,600 Speaker 2: to like get up, and you like meet really interesting 426 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,159 Speaker 2: people in probably a way that you rarely get in 427 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:10,359 Speaker 2: most careers except journalism perhaps, Yeah, who wouldn't want to 428 00:21:10,359 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 2: be into it? But you have all these changes and 429 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:16,159 Speaker 2: all this competitors, so more to do for sure on that. 430 00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:18,080 Speaker 2: And plus you know there's a lot to do on 431 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 2: the fact that there are a lot of tech people 432 00:21:20,320 --> 00:21:22,320 Speaker 2: in the new who are going to be entering the 433 00:21:22,359 --> 00:21:25,119 Speaker 2: new administration, So that should just be really interesting to 434 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:26,640 Speaker 2: see how that plays out policyized. 435 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:30,160 Speaker 3: Absolutely, all right, Next question, what. 436 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:32,479 Speaker 8: Are some of the biggest lessons you've learned from your 437 00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 8: career that you wish you had known earlier. 438 00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:38,439 Speaker 3: That is a very good question. 439 00:21:39,080 --> 00:21:41,600 Speaker 2: Okay, I have an answer. Oh, go ahead, you know 440 00:21:41,640 --> 00:21:43,880 Speaker 2: what I really wish I had learned earlier. Something I've 441 00:21:43,920 --> 00:21:47,399 Speaker 2: found that when Tracy and I interview people, the people 442 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:51,159 Speaker 2: who are the smartest and have the most intelligent ideas 443 00:21:51,200 --> 00:21:54,200 Speaker 2: about things like the sort of best theoreticians, so to speak, 444 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:57,640 Speaker 2: are also the most are frequently among the most detail 445 00:21:57,680 --> 00:22:02,360 Speaker 2: oriented and assiduous with the facts and important names, dates, places, 446 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:04,560 Speaker 2: things like that. And I think I wish I had 447 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 2: learned earlier in my career that there is no substitute 448 00:22:07,320 --> 00:22:10,720 Speaker 2: for names, dates, and places, having them memorized and using 449 00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:12,640 Speaker 2: facts upon which to build ideas. 450 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:14,880 Speaker 3: That's a good one, because I think when you're sort 451 00:22:14,920 --> 00:22:18,280 Speaker 3: of younger, you're you get used to thinking about these 452 00:22:18,280 --> 00:22:21,400 Speaker 3: big things who they have these great ideas, but they're 453 00:22:21,400 --> 00:22:25,720 Speaker 3: not that detail or technically oriented. But actually you find 454 00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:28,200 Speaker 3: that some of the people with the biggest, most interesting 455 00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:31,320 Speaker 3: ideas often they have all the numbers and all the facts, 456 00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:34,520 Speaker 3: and they can walk you through the entire history of 457 00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:35,000 Speaker 3: their path. 458 00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:38,520 Speaker 2: And learning learning facts and history and dates and times 459 00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:41,360 Speaker 2: and places and names and acronyms does not seem as 460 00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:44,960 Speaker 2: sexy as like learning some interesting theory about how the 461 00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:48,840 Speaker 2: world works, et cetera. So when you're young, you're sort 462 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:52,040 Speaker 2: of attracted to the former and or whatever. You know, 463 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:54,479 Speaker 2: you're attracted to the big ideas, But the people who 464 00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:57,840 Speaker 2: actually have really good ideas are frequently and I've seen 465 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:00,280 Speaker 2: this over and over again on the podcast, very well 466 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:01,880 Speaker 2: grounded in actual knowledge. 467 00:23:02,160 --> 00:23:05,880 Speaker 3: So speaking of ideas, my lesson that I wish I'd 468 00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 3: learned earlier. This is a little bit more tied to journalism. 469 00:23:10,760 --> 00:23:13,199 Speaker 3: But you know, when I first went into journalism, it 470 00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:16,280 Speaker 3: was like you should be you always want to be first, 471 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:19,399 Speaker 3: and you always want to be original, and that was 472 00:23:19,480 --> 00:23:22,280 Speaker 3: how you know, that was success in journalism. And I 473 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:25,040 Speaker 3: think as time has gone on, sort of realized like 474 00:23:25,080 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 3: the chances of being first to anything. And I'm talking 475 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 3: like kind of a wave from hard news scoops. I'm 476 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 3: talking like scoops of ideas is what we used to 477 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 3: call them, or analysis or something like that. The chances 478 00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:42,600 Speaker 3: of being truly first and original to anything are extremely, 479 00:23:42,760 --> 00:23:45,639 Speaker 3: extremely low, and so I think as I've gone on, 480 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:49,480 Speaker 3: I've sort of come to appreciate the importance of not 481 00:23:49,520 --> 00:23:54,080 Speaker 3: necessarily being first, although if that happens, absolutely fantastic, but 482 00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 3: being the person to like pull it all together the best, 483 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:01,040 Speaker 3: or explain it the best, or I don't know, write 484 00:24:01,040 --> 00:24:04,480 Speaker 3: it in a new way that like reaches a new audience. 485 00:24:04,600 --> 00:24:06,920 Speaker 3: I guess. I guess I've just become a lot more 486 00:24:07,080 --> 00:24:10,600 Speaker 3: patient with coming up with things and sort of presenting 487 00:24:10,600 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 3: them in new ways and not necessarily thinking that just 488 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 3: because something isn't like one hundred percent new and original, 489 00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 3: that it's not worth writing. 490 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:24,680 Speaker 2: I think there's a really good lesson. And journalists we're 491 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:27,440 Speaker 2: very prideful people, and so the idea that's like, oh, 492 00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 2: someone already said this, or someone sort of said this. 493 00:24:29,760 --> 00:24:32,360 Speaker 3: Someone said it in the eighth paragraph of a story 494 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:34,919 Speaker 3: from six months ago, like that doesn't mean that no 495 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:37,480 Speaker 3: one else in the world can ever talk or write 496 00:24:37,560 --> 00:24:38,440 Speaker 3: or think about it ever. 497 00:24:38,480 --> 00:24:41,359 Speaker 2: Again, there's a really good line in the movie Pulp 498 00:24:41,359 --> 00:24:44,360 Speaker 2: Fiction where you know, I can't say it on there, 499 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,480 Speaker 2: but he tells them not to let pride mess with 500 00:24:46,520 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 2: his head. And I think about that a lot with 501 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:50,119 Speaker 2: respect to journalism. 502 00:24:50,200 --> 00:24:54,080 Speaker 8: All right, Next question, what advice would you give to 503 00:24:54,200 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 8: young professionals looking to make a meaningful impact in the 504 00:24:57,600 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 8: financial industry? 505 00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:07,159 Speaker 3: Looking to make a meaningful impact, Well, decide what that 506 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 3: impact is going to be. Yeah, first of all, because 507 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:12,359 Speaker 3: there are different ways of having an impact. You know, 508 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:15,480 Speaker 3: maybe you think you would like to reform the financial 509 00:25:15,480 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 3: industry from the inside out. That would be a pretty 510 00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 3: big impact, but also a tall order. But maybe you 511 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 3: think that making an impact is generating wealth for yourself 512 00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:27,160 Speaker 3: and your clients. Like I think number one is probably 513 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:29,000 Speaker 3: decide what the goal is exactly. 514 00:25:30,240 --> 00:25:32,199 Speaker 2: You know, Yeah, I would sort of say I might 515 00:25:32,240 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 2: take a slightly different turn, which is, I don't even 516 00:25:34,880 --> 00:25:37,520 Speaker 2: know the idea that any of us, that anyone can 517 00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 2: know what it means to have impact in any field, 518 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:42,520 Speaker 2: let alone the financial field. There's a very tall stretch. 519 00:25:43,160 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 2: The career advice I always sort of give to people, though, 520 00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 2: is do whatever you're doing right now, try to do 521 00:25:50,359 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 2: it well, and that'll the better you're doing at your 522 00:25:52,960 --> 00:25:56,119 Speaker 2: job right now. The more likely doors will open for you. 523 00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:58,359 Speaker 2: And I'm a big believer in the cliche about how 524 00:25:58,440 --> 00:26:00,840 Speaker 2: the best way to make make a plan is to 525 00:26:00,880 --> 00:26:03,080 Speaker 2: make God laugh or sorry, the best way to make 526 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 2: God laugh is to make a plan. You really don't 527 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 2: know how the future is going to turn out. If 528 00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:08,919 Speaker 2: you have a plan, it's probably not going to unfold 529 00:26:08,960 --> 00:26:12,240 Speaker 2: that way, so better to just focus on being good. 530 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:14,760 Speaker 3: That's good advice to thank you. 531 00:26:14,840 --> 00:26:16,000 Speaker 2: We got one more question. 532 00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:20,119 Speaker 12: Hello Joan Tracy. This is Cynthia from Vancouver, Kata. A 533 00:26:20,240 --> 00:26:22,680 Speaker 12: question I have for Tracy is one, if you get 534 00:26:22,680 --> 00:26:25,640 Speaker 12: your chicken, what kind of acid clause in market would 535 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:27,880 Speaker 12: you let your chicken trade? It's not kind of all. 536 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:30,600 Speaker 12: What kind of trading strategy would you let them test out? 537 00:26:30,840 --> 00:26:32,600 Speaker 12: And do you think they're going to beat the benchmark? 538 00:26:32,800 --> 00:26:33,159 Speaker 12: Thank you? 539 00:26:36,359 --> 00:26:39,840 Speaker 3: What kind of asset class would I let my chickens trade? 540 00:26:40,080 --> 00:26:43,600 Speaker 3: Do I need to explain this question or does everyone 541 00:26:43,640 --> 00:26:45,159 Speaker 3: know that I really want to get chickens? 542 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 2: One didn't chicken do some trading? 543 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:51,679 Speaker 3: I'm sure someone has done experiments with chickens trading stuff before. 544 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:54,760 Speaker 3: I'm just gonna go with the coins. I think chickens 545 00:26:54,800 --> 00:26:59,639 Speaker 3: trading a variety of shit coins would be would be 546 00:26:59,640 --> 00:27:02,600 Speaker 3: an intro one, and I think you could probably you 547 00:27:02,640 --> 00:27:06,399 Speaker 3: could probably create some sort of interesting pecking mechanism for 548 00:27:06,480 --> 00:27:09,040 Speaker 3: them to choose things. And I would like to watch 549 00:27:09,080 --> 00:27:10,920 Speaker 3: that on a day to day basis. I think I'd 550 00:27:10,960 --> 00:27:11,679 Speaker 3: find it soothing. 551 00:27:12,680 --> 00:27:13,040 Speaker 6: Was it? There? 552 00:27:13,119 --> 00:27:13,479 Speaker 2: Something? 553 00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:13,720 Speaker 7: Though? 554 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:16,480 Speaker 2: Like, there're some artists taught a chicken how to trade? 555 00:27:16,920 --> 00:27:18,159 Speaker 2: Am I hallucinating this? 556 00:27:20,240 --> 00:27:20,320 Speaker 10: Like? 557 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:22,920 Speaker 2: There was some artists and like the and that they 558 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:25,000 Speaker 2: like trained and then it turned out I think the 559 00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:26,640 Speaker 2: whole thing was a little bit fake, but that they 560 00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:29,320 Speaker 2: I can't I'm like googling it. I'm not seeing it. 561 00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:29,960 Speaker 3: Here's a question. 562 00:27:30,040 --> 00:27:32,160 Speaker 2: Those were like the beat There were some artists who 563 00:27:32,240 --> 00:27:34,520 Speaker 2: tried to see if they could turn it chicken into 564 00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:38,760 Speaker 2: a mastered trader by giving it sort of various Pavlovic 565 00:27:38,800 --> 00:27:40,920 Speaker 2: shocks when it made a good trade or a bad trade, 566 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:42,800 Speaker 2: and then it put its beat down on a green 567 00:27:42,880 --> 00:27:45,720 Speaker 2: or red button. I might be completely hallucinating this. 568 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:50,480 Speaker 3: Uh, maybe Joe, maybe I should stop taking questions. 569 00:27:50,480 --> 00:27:51,880 Speaker 2: All right, that's a good place to end it. 570 00:27:51,920 --> 00:27:54,880 Speaker 3: All right, Well, thank you everyone so much for listening 571 00:27:54,880 --> 00:27:56,919 Speaker 3: to all thoughts. This year. Joe and I had an 572 00:27:56,960 --> 00:28:00,119 Speaker 3: absolute blast as always, and thank you as well to 573 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 3: everyone who sent in questions. And let's do it all 574 00:28:03,520 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 3: again next here shall we leave it there? 575 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:06,160 Speaker 2: Let's leave it there. 576 00:28:06,359 --> 00:28:09,360 Speaker 3: This has been another episode of the Authoughts podcast. I'm 577 00:28:09,400 --> 00:28:12,520 Speaker 3: Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. 578 00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:15,080 Speaker 2: And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart. 579 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:18,679 Speaker 2: Follow our producers Carman Rodriguez at Kerman Ermann Dash, Ol 580 00:28:18,680 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 2: Bennett at Dashbod and kill Brooks at Kilbrooks. And thank 581 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:24,840 Speaker 2: you to our producer Moses Ondem. For more odlogs content, 582 00:28:24,880 --> 00:28:27,199 Speaker 2: go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd lots. We have 583 00:28:27,280 --> 00:28:29,840 Speaker 2: transcripts of blog and a newsletter and you can chat 584 00:28:29,880 --> 00:28:31,840 Speaker 2: about all of these topics twenty four to seven in 585 00:28:31,960 --> 00:28:35,080 Speaker 2: our discord discord dot gg slash od loots. 586 00:28:35,359 --> 00:28:37,560 Speaker 3: And if you enjoy au thoughts, if you like it 587 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 3: when we take your call in questions, then please leave 588 00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:44,680 Speaker 3: us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, 589 00:28:44,760 --> 00:28:47,280 Speaker 3: if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to 590 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 3: all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need 591 00:28:50,480 --> 00:28:53,400 Speaker 3: to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts 592 00:28:53,480 --> 00:29:02,320 Speaker 3: and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening in