WEBVTT - The Infinity Hotel

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, you're welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and um Julie Douglas,

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and this is our second episode on infinity. If you

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>missed the first one, if you recommend you go back

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and listen to that one. But we are going to

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>do a little recap here in case any of the

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>information has fallen out of your head in the time being. Yeah,

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about what infinity is and what it

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is not, because that's our nice little baseline there. It

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is not a real number, because we discussed before. You

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>can't say that infinity is X number. You can't write

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it on a check. You can use a symbol, I guess,

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but good luck cashing it. Uh, why have I never

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>done that? Uh? It cannot be measured. Of course, that

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is tied back to it not being a real number.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that's growing, it's not doing anything. It's

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate Zen concept. It just is yes. And of

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>course this has been an important topic to philosophers, uh, theologians,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>great thinkers throughout time, and that's one of the primary

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>things we discussed in our last episode because Ultimately you

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>get into discussions about the boundless, about the limits of things.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're dealing with everything from the basic human experience.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do I deal with the fact that

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>my life only stretches on until so so long? How

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do I deal with the fact that I can only

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>perceive the universe with a certain bubble of perception. And

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>then you start imagining a god and you're trying to

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out how that works. Is God is God? Infinite?

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Is God physically infinite? Is God infinite in quality as

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>opposed to quantity. It's to say the biggest idea is

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it is the the the infinite idea that the humanity

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has tackled with over the ages. Yeah, and we talked

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about George Tvorski writing for Ion nine, and he used

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the chess board to illustrate this idea, saying that all

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the other pieces having number assigned to it except for

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the king, whose number value is infinite. Yeah, that chess

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is It is interesting because we mentioned before, you have

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a finite number of playable games for chess, and then

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you then you have this king that has an infinite

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.119
<v Speaker 1>importance within the game, So you have two different types

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of infinity going on there. Yeah, you lose, you lose

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the king, You lose the game because zer or some

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>game if you get rid of the king, and so

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>again it ties back to this whole idea about eternity

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>even consciousness uh embedded in there with infinity. So of

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>course it becomes with this great uh media area for

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophers to really tussle with, because it's got the afterlife there,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's got the idea and the question of God, and

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>by its very nature, it's an idea that we cannot

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fully contain and we cannot really completely grasp it, and

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>yet we try to and so did philosophers as we

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>discussed the last episode, and they used to try to

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>prove this out or try to make their arguments even

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>more persuasive. So today we're gonna look at some examples

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>in math and physics to see how well we can

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>contain the idea of infinity and reach some sort of meaning,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which we already talked about as sort of impossible, like

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning is infinite in itself for various reasons. To just

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to recap mathematics and infinity, you voluencountered numbers like twelve

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>point one to nine, eight, seven, six, five, three, two, one, zero, one,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just on on and on forever. You just have to

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>stop counting those numbers. After a while, you have to

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>stop recording them because it becomes a pointless exercise. You

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just round up, right. Is that because humans are finite

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of continue to count infinitely. Yeah, that's

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Uh, that's kind of the big topic of discussion here.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And so you kind of have two schools of thought

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in mathematics, right when when it comes to to struggling

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with the infinite, and it kind of comes down to

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the core arguments with mathematics itself. So is

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is mathematical infinity? Is this a mere human creation, an

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>extrapolation into the world where there's no truth? Or does

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mathematical infinity actually exist? Well, this comes down to the

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>question of God to rite. There are some observable things

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of how infinity works in mathematics, um, and I say observable,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>but you can it's just as we discussed in your example.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>There numbers can go on and on forever, and we

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have finite lives. Uh, we can't see God in Therefore,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>some people would say he or she or it does

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not exist. So you're grappling with some of the same

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>concepts in math and in infinity. So if you were

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask the constructivists or the institutionists, they would say

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that classical mathematics, well, they deal with the sort of

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>math that God would do. An infinite God he can

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>tackle with infinite numbers. Uh, and and and the idea

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a mathematical infinity. But we are humans, we are finite,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and we would rather focus with human mathematics with finite

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers because that ultimately is what relates to what we do.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what I hear with that, my brain hurts.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll just I'll just leave it to God. He or

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>she or it can deal with it. Yeah, I mean,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the idea that infinity is an interesting

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>topic to tackle with as an abstraction, but does it

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really relate to the work that I'm doing here, the

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>work that mathematics needs to do in the world. And

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>then they're the formalist Now. Formalism is a theory that

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>holds that statements of mathematics and logic can be thought

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>of as statements about the consequences of certain certain string

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>manipulation rules. Um systematic formulation of the concept of mathematical

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>formulism arose directly as a reaction to the paradox discovered

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>within set theory, which studies the concept of infinity. According

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to twenty century mathematician Abraham Robinson, infinite totalities do not exist,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 1>either really or ideally. Any mentioned of infinite totalities is meaningless. Still,

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the business of mathematics must continue as if infinite totalities

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually do exist. Right, we said, there are a couple

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of things that we're talking about. A system here in

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you can again capture infinity. You can

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>define it um and then set theory, which is something

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that a man named Georg Cantor came up with. And

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he's sort of the rabble rouser here. According to Natalie

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>while cover writing for Quantum magazine, infinity was boxed and

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sold to the mathematical community in the late night concentury

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>by the German mathematician Georg Cantor, who invented a branch

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>of mathematics dealing with sets collections of elements that ranged

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>from empty the equivalent of the number zero to infinite.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So Cantra stepped in there really and began to define

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>infinity in a much more specific way. Yeah, and uh

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he was he was a one of these individuals who

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was hated as well as love, depending on who you're asking,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>because he was bringing up some really mind blowing, disturbing

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>takes on infinity. Yeah. Natalie Walquiver says that other mathematicians

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>initially despise what they called this mess of infinities. And

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk more about this because it's largely due to

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>his ideas of set theory, and one of his colleagues

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>called them a grave disease. Another called him a corrupter

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of you. Uh. Sadly, he was so vilified that he

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>actually um fill into a lifelong depression after that. Um.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think it tells you how radical some of

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>these ideas were at the time and still are really,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>because what it does is it just sets minds ablaze

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>as to what what reality is and isn't. Essentially, Yeah,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the core concepts to come out

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of it is that there are different kinds of infinity

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and some are bigger than others. Well, that that's thinking

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Yeah, let me let's get into the

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>math sweats here. I'm having the math sweats right now. Uh.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Set theory is essentially a useful language for describing mathematical objects.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And what we're talking about is a nine item list

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of rules that Cantor came up with called Zermelo Frankel

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>set theory with the axiom of choice or the z

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>f C, established and widely adopted in math by the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties. Okay Um. One of the axioms says that

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two sets are equal if they contain the same elements.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Another simply asserts that infinite sets exist. So you can

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have these infinite sets that are one to one equal

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to each other, and you have them going on forever

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and ever and ever and ever. And Cantor showed that

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for any infinite set, forming a new set made of

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>all the subsets of the original sets represents a bigger

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>infinity than that original set. So once you have one infinity,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you can always make a bigger one by creating a

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>subset the original set, and then an even bigger one

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>by making a set of all the subsets, and so

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. And there are an infinite amount

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of infinities in different sizes. And he also proved doubt

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that an infinite set of even numbers like two, four,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or six could be put in that one to one

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>correspondence with all counting numbers like one to three. So

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that came to this idea that there are as many

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>evens as there are odds and evens in an infinite set.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>There's one problem with this, though, real numbers, yes, like

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the one that you talked about earlier. You know that

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for example point zero zero zero one or pie right

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>three point one four or so on and so forth,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah. They go on for an ever

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and they are uncountable, and they don't correspond in a

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one to one fashion with counting numbers. But hold on

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because we will get back to that. If that didn't

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking completely. Will return to the unccountability of real numbers

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, once we have a structure in which

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to house them. All right, I am going to dab

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>at the infinite number of sweat molecules dripping off of

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>me right now. Uh No, it's not too bad actually,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh And let's take a break. When we get back,

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll talk more about the infinite hotel. If you're out

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there and you're thinking, I don't know what they're talking

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about there, they're losing me. I'm sinking beneath the waters

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>here in the It is the in the deep end

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of the mathematical, philosophical, theological, physical pool. I need help,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>while we need help to for the love of infinity,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>give me an example. Yes, we do have, We do

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have an example. We have a flotation device. And it

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is a thought experiment, because the thought of experiments, as

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>always they can take some very difficult to grasp ideas

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and concepts and put them into into a metaphorical form

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that we can latch onto and then and then actually

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>explore the concept a little more easily and sometimes a

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>little a little deeper. Right, And what could be more

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of a form inaccessible than a building, which is essentially

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. Um, this is an infinite building,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an infinite hotel. And this was created by German mathematician

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>David Hilbert who was obsessed with cantors work and and

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>came up with us little ditty to try to explain

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a hotel with an infinite number of rooms. All right,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's a hotel, infinite number of rooms? How

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>many how many rooms? Does it have to like an

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>infinite amount? Oh but accountable infinite amount, which is going

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to turn out to be important. All right, So let's

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>say just to just to roll out the basic entry

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>level portion of the thought experiment. I show up to

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the Infinity Hotel, all right, and and I need a

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>room for the night. I know there's a convention in town. Uh,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the local set theory convention maybe, and uh, and I

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I know that all the hotels are booked, but I

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>really need a room. So the Infinity Hotel sounds like

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a good place to go, all right, So let me

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a my jaunty little manager's bellhop cap here. What I

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>am going to do is, I'm going to ask the

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>guests in room do you have vacancy? Always? We have

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>an infinite amount of rooms. Okay, I see a lot

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of cars in the parking lot. Hold up, okay, just

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>look at a magazine or something. We'll figure this out.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask the guests in room one to

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>move to room two, and then the guests in room

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two to move to room three, and so on and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Every guest moves to room N plus one.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And since there are an infinite amount of rooms here,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>then there's room for every guest to move into a

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>different room. So you're saying that even though they're already

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>infinite guests at the infinity hotel. Occupying the infinite rooms,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you can still make everyone move over one room and

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thus open up a single room for me to stay

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in this evening. You, a whole person, a whole number,

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a natural person, a natural number, may and are into

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this hotel in fact, and if forty other people want

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to join you, they can, I mean not in your room. Obviously,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to sleep with forty other people in

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>your room. But forty other people would like to get

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>forty rooms. Well, hey guess what they can. And all

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to do is have everybody gather their luggage

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and move to room N plus forty. So if you

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are in room two, now you move to room two.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>That sounds reasonable. I'm gonna pick up my bags, I'm

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna move on in and hopeful I'm gonna be a

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sleep in an hour or two. Oh. By the way,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I see a bus coming around the corner. Looks like

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>some more guests are arriving. Thus containing a countardly infinite

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>number of people arriving. No problem. All I have to

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>do is ask each guest to move to room N

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to room number two N. So room one moves room

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to room two to four Room three to six and

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>four to eight, and this fills up all the infinite

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>rooms and empties all the infinite odd rooms. So you're

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>telling me that the Infinity Hotel, which is currently filled

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up with infinite number of guests, has room to take

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>care of the guests the infinite number of guests arriving

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in an infinity bus. That's right, because all it is

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is shifted to everybody to the infinite even number rooms

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate all the infinite amount of people coming off

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the infinite buses. I'm gonna put them all in odd

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>number rooms. And you remember Cantor in his infinite sets.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>This is an example of those one to one matches,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not to mention, underscoring the idea that Cantor had that

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there are an infinite odd and even amount of numbers.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So so, so far, the Infinity Hotel thought experiment is

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>holding up. But of course, one of the the fun

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>things about thought experiments is that you can continue to

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>experience with them in an attempt to break them, to

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>push them to the absolute limits. Break come on, Okay, Well,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so far the Infinity Hotel has been able to deal

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>with one new occupant. It's been able to deal with

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a bus full of infinite new occupants. But what does

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it do of coming around the corner? Are infinite buses

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and each bus has infinite yes, I mean just an

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>infinite line of infinitely filled buses. All right, well, maybe

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember that youklid said that they're an infinite number

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of prime numbers. Yep, I just remembered that. And so

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>current occupants of rooms are assigned the prime number two.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So for instance, the current occupant of room number seven

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>goes to two to the seventh power or room. Then

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the next group they're all assigned to the prime number three,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and they take their bus seat numbers to figure out

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>their room numbers. So seat number seven goes to three

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to the seventh power or room two thousand and seven.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And I want to throw in it. This is important

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you just did them bust by bus, you

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>would never finish onload owning the first bus. Well, yeah,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>first you gotta take uh, you gotta take care of

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your career that's already in in the hotel, right that

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you've given that prime number two, And then yes, you

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have to start referring to bus seat numbers to begin

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>applying all the infinite number of prime numbers, so you

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can do this. Each each new group gets a new

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>prime number, so you know, you go to the you know,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>prime number five, then prime number seven, eleven, and thirteen,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and everybody just has to reference that number on their

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>bus seat. So again, this is just really it's it's messy,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but there's an elegant system to take place or to

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that everybody gets their place, and that ensures

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that there are no overlapping room numbers for the infinite

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of people filing out of the infinite number of buses.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's the thing, though, here's the thing. Okay, here's

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>what I don't want to see coming out of those buses.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to see any irrational numbers. I'm talking

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about you, pie. I don't want to see you tumbling

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>off the bus because this is not going to work.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to see a negative seven a representation

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>human representation of a negative seven. First, you're you're negative, right,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>you're killing the vibe here in the hotel. Second, I

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have negative numbers. I don't have basement number rooms,

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, extending infinitely down into my my building here,

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have half fractional rooms available, because that

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately breaks the hotel, that brings everything crashing down, because

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>there's one infinity that's too big, and that's the infinity

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>contained in a continuous flying, a continuous line of real

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers that goes on forever. If it showed up at

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the hotel, they wouldn't be room for everyone. You wouldn't

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to, uh to take that real number and

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>count it. You wouldn't be able to put it on

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the guest list. Yeah, and that's yeah exactly, that's the problem.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because we can deal with this lowest level

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of infinity, the countable infinity of the natural numbers, but

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, that real number, that continuum that Cantor had

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>described before, that is uncountable, that doesn't behave in that

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>one to one set way. And that's what I love

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Infinity Hotel is that it describes both these

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>different levels of infinity, these larger amounts of infinity, but

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how certain numbers don't work within it or are uncountable.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Plus you've seen being John Makovitch, right, you know what

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>happens when you have a half demension, right, you had

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the half floor of the buildings right where where everything's

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>cut in half and you have to stoop. And what happens,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>people will will use that as a vessel to somehow

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>infiltrate your mind and hijack your body if you're placed

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in a half room or a half floor. Yeah, and

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that nobody wants that. It's gonna hard hard to retain

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>tenants when you have that going on. Exactly, so again

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you have Cantor's continum hype offices. Fit says that there's

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the integers and the real numbers. Can't prove it's true,

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>can't prove it's false, can't measure it, can't hunt for

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a particle or measure anything about it. Yes, those real

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers are uncountable in this scenario of infinity. And then

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>along uh of of and about nine gun named Goodill

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>has a pair of proofs that are just spectacular to

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the math community because essentially he shows that you can

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>never prove that the continuum hypothesis is false. And this

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like, uh, you're like you're moving the needle here

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on infinity just a bit right, Like we think we've

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>grabbed onto something here. The problem is that in nineteen

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>sixty or they're about Paul J. Cohen shows that you

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can never prove that the continuum hypothesis is true. And

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>why does it all of this matter is because it

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>shows that there are unanswerable questions in mathematics, particularly dealing

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with infinity, which just is really a microcosm of the

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>macrocosm problem of the unknowability of life in general. So

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>if your brain is exploding right now, don't worry, because

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to take it back to physics. We're

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take it to discussions of the physical world as

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>complicated and mind blowing is that whole realm can get

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at least we're dealing with observable physical reality, right, Sure,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you say that, And now I have the physics sweats,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>which is an entirely different stench here. And that's understandable. Yes,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but because certainly physics gets very complicated as well. But

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>when but here's the thing. When we see infinities in physics, generally,

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>it means that we have a problem and means that

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>something's really catastrophic wrong unless you get into theoretical physics,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as we will in a second. Yes, but you know

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>basic physics, you're trying to use somebody that's designing. You know,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know a new building and you look at the plans.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>If you see infinity on there, you know that something

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. You do not want to try and stand

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.959
<v Speaker 1>in that building or or or or certainly have an

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>office in it. Um it's never an actual measurement. It

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't correspond to to to reality as as we we

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>deal with it in our lives right today, for instance,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics okay um and and and in such an

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>important area of studies. So many of our greatest technological

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>achievements in recent memory have arisen out of quantum mechanics.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But even here we see this crisis. The crisis being

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that even though we can predict the the light heat

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>power emission of a lamp, it's a finite amount of energy,

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but the various wigglings of waves and atoms creates this

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>answer infinite energy, which which we simply can't deal with.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Right we know that there's not infinite energy coming out

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>of off of a lamp, so we afterwards we have

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to begin applying quantum physics to the forces of our universe.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Quantum field theory, which is of course initially played infinities

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and it takes ends up taking decades to

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>flog through it all. You end up, you know, having

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all these infinities, all of these problems in the in

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the theory that have to be eradicated, like like enemies

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>floating around in a video game, or which becomes incredibly

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>important if you're looking at particle physics, right, because if

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to isolate the Higgs boson, you're taking these

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>finite number of particles that we know and have named

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in seeing how they behave right, you do not need

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>infinity in the mix if you're trying to figure out

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the composition of the universe, both from the time in

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>which it became to now I mean, take the Higgs

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, the search for the Higgs boson, this was

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>such the so called god particle, right. Uh. This uh, this,

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this of course been one of the predominant science stories

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in recent years, because the whole idea was that we

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>had infinities in the theory, we had to remove them,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and the thing that could remove it would be this

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Higgs particle. Right, So the whole quest for the Higgs

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>particle comes out of this, this this necessity, this need

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to eradicate the infinities from the theory, because again, infinite's

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just don't work in the set and the infinities here

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in the theory said said, all right, we have an infinity.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>That means there's something finite in the world that we

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>haven't discovered yet, and if we discover it, then we

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>find our way around that answer. Now, if you sort

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of back up and then begin to take the large

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>view of the universe and not just try to contain

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>it in this this one model, right, you know that

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe is expanding how much infinitely? These are questions

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that come up, and then you begin to say, well,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>how how far does space go? Anyway? And this is

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>where theoretical physicists get into infinity and they really have

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some fun um And it's fascinating because here you see

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some examples of infinity played out in ways that you say,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a possibility, because infinity otherwise we just see

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of you know, the line on the

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper and mathematics that goes on forever. But

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then you've got these ideas like multiverse existing. Now, when

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I think of the multiverse, I always think of Jorey

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Borges the Library of Battle, the library that first

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of all contains all books, all written books, but then

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond that also contains all possible books, and and and

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and and so being is is ultimately kind of a

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>model for a multiverse. Uh, an existence that contains everything

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>that is and everything that could be. Again, you go

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>back to Cantor, and you're talking about larger infinities, right,

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And essentially that's what we're talking about with multiverses. And

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to read this from Brian Green's The Elegant Universe. Um,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about multiverse in its very own episodes.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We won't go too deep here, he says, Imagine that

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what we call the universe is actually only one tiny

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>part of a vastly larger cosmological expanse, one of the

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>nor almost number of island universes scattered across a grand

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>cosmological archipelago. Although this might sound rather far fetched, and

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the end it may well be, Andrei Lynd has

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>suggested a concrete mechanism that might lead to such a

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Gargangan universe. Lynn has found that the brief but crucial

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>burst of inflationary expanse may not have been a unique

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>one time event. Instead, he argues the conditions for inflationary

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>expansion may happen repeatedly in isolated regions and the peppered

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout the cosmos, which then undergo their own inflationary ballooning

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and size, evolving into new separate universes. And each of

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the universes, the process continues, with new universes sprouting from

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>far flung regions in the old, generating a never ending

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>web of ballooning cosmic expanses. And this is what he

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>calls the multiverse. And that's pretty mind blow I mean,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>even if you you shrink back down to are single universe. Um.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>There was an interesting point that was brought up by

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>physicist Raphael Bosso in that World Science Festival talk I

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was mentioning earlier. We will include a link to in

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the landing page for this podcast episode. But he pointed

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>out that that when you start start looking at the

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>way light travels across the universe, when you start looking

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at this expansion of the universe, you end up with

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a universe that's arbitrarily large. Light can never reach you

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from rapidly expanding regions regions, and so any given observer

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is trapped within a finite sphere of observable universe within

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an expanding infinite. So you kind of get this again.

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You get these ideas of here's this, here's the sphere

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the finite within the infinite. You can think about

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the infinite, but you're ultimately trapped within that sphere of

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the finite. Yeah, and this is a similar idea that

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Lee Smollen has in terms of the perception of the

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>infinite at least. Smallen, by the way, is a cosmologist

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at and State, and his idea is that the conditions

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Big Bang and at the centers of black holes,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>each being characterized by a colossal density of crushed matter.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I suggested that every black hole is the seed for

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>a new universe that erupts into existence through a Big

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Bang like explosion, but is forever hidden from our view

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>by the black holes event horizon. And of course, any

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of these discussions of the physical universe are are even

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>more twisted when you when you have coorse draw in

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that time and space are one, and if

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you play with space, you're playing with time, and if

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it were to be flat, then it could stretch out

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for an infinity, right, And then you get all these

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>different ideas of well maybe in this case that supports

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea of some sort of repeating going on because

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you have a finite number of particles that you have

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>infinite space and time, and maybe that repeating pattern creates

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>more universes, right, And then you have ever many worlds

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>interpretation that says that the universe branches off into distinct

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>worlds to accommodate every single possible outcome. And so maybe

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we live in an infinite web of alternate timelines. I mean,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it gets crazy and crazy as you go along. So yes,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't even have to everyone else's mind

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is extrapolating the possibilities on that. I don't have to

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>push you in that direction. And if you guys would

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like some articles to accompany this, uh, we have ever

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>many worlds interpretation on how stuff works, and we also

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>have some good amount of string theory and multiverse um,

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so we definitely have some stuff for you guys to

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>dive into. Yes, on the Internet, which is of course

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a finite world. Even though it is it is a

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>finite world. But yet we we can't even grasp what

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>We can't even put a number on it. We can't

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>say how many pages there actually are on the Internet.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>We can't actually even comprehend it's a finite thing we've created,

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and it is already, at least as far as human

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>perception goes, bordering the infinite. Let's supposed to just fine,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>since we can see its growth and we can put

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a number on it. But it feels infinite at times. Alright,

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna walk you guys out of this um

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna take a little walk into something called

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the infinite monkey theorem to end this section. Yeah good.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This is an you know, a thought experiment that I

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>often forget even really entails infinity, maybe because I just

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>get too caught up on the idea of monkeys banging

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on typewriters and now awful that writing room, let's be,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and I've I've written in some awful rooms before. Uh.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>This states that a monkey hidden keys at random on

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>almost surely type a given text, like say, the complete

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>works of William Shakespeare. Okay, okay, And so in this context,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>almost surely is a mathematical term, alright, and it has

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a precise meaning, And that monkey is not an actual

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>monkey but a metaphor for an abstract device that produces

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a random sequence of letters for an infinity. In the

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>theorem illustrates the perils of reasoning about infinity by imagining

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this vast that finite number, and vice versa. So the

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>probability is really tiny, right, The probability exists that a

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>monkey could eventually write a work as cohesive as say

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare's Hamlet, just by pure dumb accident of banging on

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the keys forever and ever and ever endever, which gives

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my fiction writing some hope. Oh you're you're better than

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a monkey. I don't know. I don't know about that,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fine with that actually, all right, So if

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you're still with us, then hopefully you have you maybe

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a better idea of what infinity is all about.

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you have more nuanced idea, more expansive idea. Maybe

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this is uh forced you to sort rearrange your your

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>contemplation of the infinite and of the boundless, in terms

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of of our human experience, in terms of our cosmos,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our ideas of God. So we'd love

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. We'd love to hear your thoughts

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about infinity, your personal takes on infinity, your favorite uses

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of infinity and fiction. All of that is fair game. Yeah,

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and before you do that, make sure you stopped at

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's right, That's

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where you'll find all the podcast episodes, all the videos,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the blog posts, a finite amount of all

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of those, but certainly plenty of stuff to keep you occupied. Yeah,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So share those thoughts with us, why don't you? And

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you can do that at below the mind house to

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. For more on this and thousands of

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>other topics, visit how stuff works dot com