WEBVTT - Moving Up The Wealth Ladder w/ Nick Maggiulli #1022

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How to Money. I'm Joel and today I'm

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>talking moving up the wealth ladder with Nick Majulie. Yes,

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I am glad to have a friend of the show

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and newly married Nick Majulie back on How to Money.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been given the nickname NICKI Numbers because he has

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a special gift, I would say for conveying wonky money

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>information in a straightforward and digestible way. It's kind of

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a tough task. I've been a fan of his blog

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of Dollars and Data for years now, and if you

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>want to grow your net worth while finding more spending freedom,

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>well that's what we're going to discuss today. So listen up. Nick,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming back on the show,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>my friend. Thanks for having me back on. Joel appreciate

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it of course. Okay, we asked you this question three

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago when you came on the podcast, which is

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you like to splurge on? We ask every

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guest that question. Matt and I spend what some would

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>call or say too much money on craft beer, and

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we say, poppycock, we should spend lots of money on

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>craft beer because it's totally worth it. What, especially as

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you've moved up the wealth out of these past few years,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>what are you splurging on?

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So previously three years ago I said I splurge on restaurants.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I still do that. That hasn't changed. But if I

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>have to pick, like, what are the two things I'm

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>spending a.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Lot more on.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>One is I'm starting We're gonna get into this when

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I talk about the wealth latter. I'm starting to splurge

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit on travel here and there. So I

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>might upgrade my seat to like a emergency row seat

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>versus like I never I would always just take whatever

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is available. I might get more lagroom. I still haven't

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>gotten to the upgrade to first class yet. That's I'm

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>give me a few years and maybe I can afford that,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>But right now I'm not in that spot yet. So

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm upgrading to like the slightly nicer seat on the

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>airplane splurge. The other thing I'm splurging a lot on

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>is health. And it's just like it's the one thing.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm in my mid thirties now, and so I know,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>especially for men after forty, you know, unless you take

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>care of yourself, it can really start to slow down.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>And so I know biology is working against me eventually,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 2>But I'm doing everything I can and I'm splurging on whatever.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh that costs how much?

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't care Like health for me is like I

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>don't even think about the price tag when it comes

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to this stuff because I think it's one of the

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>few things where if you don't have it, you would

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 2>give away all your money to have it, and so

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's that important. I think most people underspend,

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>criminally underspend on health. Unfortunately.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I think you're right entry.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>It's actually when you talk about spending on health, I

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a really smart thing. But also there's a

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things you can do to stay healthy. They

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>don't cost that much money, right, And there's just all

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>these articles about walking ten thousand steps a day or something,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and most people can do that and at least hit

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the bare minimum. But yeah, spend money on the health stuff.

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense. And the exit road seats,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I can sympathize with that. As someone who's six foot six,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting to the point where I'm willing to bury

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>my frugality just to touch so I can get an

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>exit row seat. And you just got married. I mentioned

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that at the top I'm curious how you're thoughts about

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>money have changed as you've been in a long term

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>relationship and now you're tying the financial not has that

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>taught you anything about money that maybe you didn't previously

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>know or appreciate.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Funny enough, I actually wrote about this on the blog

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>my wife and I are then girlfriend. We actually started

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>officially this year. We started like basically pooling our money.

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Even then we weren't technically married yet, and I knew

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 2>we were going to get married within a few months,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and so we kind of created this system, which I

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>called the separate plus joint method. And the idea is,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 2>all of your income goes into one joint account, right,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and then all of your expenses shared expenses go out

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of that account. And then over time, hopefully your income

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>is greater than your expenses, so you're saving money, right.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>And then every let's savey quarter, we take an equal

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>sized distribution out of the account, and then we invest

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that separately, so we have no joint investment account. The

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>only joint property we will ever own is going to

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>be a home. Outside of that, if she wants to

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>go buy a rental property with her own assets, she

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>can do. If I want to go buy something, I'm

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>allowed to do that with my own assets. And so

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the thinking here is like, I want to provide full

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>autonomy for both partners to invest kind of how they want.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>And of course we talk about it, Oh do you

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>think we should be diversified this or that. Like we're

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>very level headed about this and we're very open. We

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>have discussions and I take her input, she takes mind,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>vice versa. But I think the big change here is

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>allowing for autonomy because I know, at least historically, I

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>know this was something This is especially for women who

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't really have any financial resources. It's controlled by one partner,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and then they feel like they might be trapped in

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a relationship or something. And so I'm always like, hey,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 2>we should be splitting our assets over time, and like

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>we each have our own assets, but obviously, you know,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>everything comes into the joint account, and so it's basically

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>a pro ratus. So if I'm making seventy percent of

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 2>the income, I end up paying seventy percent of the expenses,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>and vice versa. If we're making fifty to fifty, it

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>goes both ways. And so this is true of regardless

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of who makes money. So that's it's a very simple system.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And if you want more details, it's on my blog.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>You can search like probably joint method and you'll find

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 2>the separate and joint method.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Not to pry too much, did you guys sign a prenup?

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Because I had like pre existing conceptions of a prenup

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed at least from like my religious upbringing and.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Stuff like why would you why would you do that?

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna stay married for life and so that talking

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to people about that and then realizing that, well, they're

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>already like there's a prenup in place thanks to the

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>state that you basically signed up for, and it varies

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>state by state. I don't know, maybe you should be

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>able to create your own. I'm curious what route you took.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we did sign a prenup, and because I

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>had a significant amount of assets coming and so did she.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>But she also there was another kind of twist here.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So her father's a famous sculptor in Europe, and so

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>technically all that inheritance, all that stuff, like if we're

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>married and she gets that, that's like, you know, that

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>would technically fall under marital property. I'm like, I don't

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>want any claim on that stuff that's from your family, right,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 2>just like I don't want you to have any claim

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>on anything from my parents' side, et cetera. And so

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>everything's joint, it's being pulled and everything. So all that money,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>any money we make from the day we're married, and

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>technically we even backdated it to January first of twenty

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, all that is equally split, right and until

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>we ever get if we ever, god forbid, get a divorce,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>at that point, you know, then things would go back

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 2>to separate. But the nice thing is, like over time,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>we're actually already splitting assets like over time. So in theory,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>if we ever were to get a divorce, financially, the

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>only thing we'd have to really worry about is any

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of alimony. And then if we have a home,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>how do we deal with that? Those are the only

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>real two big questions left. Everything else is going to

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>be split over time. And I just thought it was

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a better method where she can feel like she has

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 2>her assets, I have mine, and everyone feels comfortable with that,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and she loves it. And I've had a lot of

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>people reach out and said this is a great way

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of doing it. Not everyone does it some people love

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>pulling everything. Some like having everything separate where they don't

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>pay for anything. They everyone's but it's up, you know,

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>tease their own.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Last question on this, because some of the data does

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to point to the fact that couples who combine

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>everything seem to be happier, or at least that's what

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they admit to in surveys. So does any part of

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that the siphoning off of finances from each

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other at least like kind of creating some barriers could

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>lead to less intimacy.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, ask me in ten years.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But the thing though, is we track everything as a group,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I have a Google sheet that has all of

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>our assets basically flowing into it, like a rough approximation

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>based on the number of shares we own of different

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, tickers and all this stuff. So I'm tracking

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and we review it basically, you know, once a month

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>or once a quarter at least. We're looking through it together,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 2>so like we're very on the same page. We know

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>about each other's assets. There's nothing that's hidden because when

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>we did the prenup, we had to be very open

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>about everything, so there's no real issue there. I'm not like,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>oh I wish everything was coming like we're working as

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>a unit. This is just like, hey, like, those are

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>your assets, and I want you to know that. So

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>if God forbid, something happens to your mother, you don't

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>have to come ask me for permission to go spend

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand dollars on your mother. And you never should

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>have to do anything of that sort. If you want

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to use your separate assets, you can use them however

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you want.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Basically, I think that working as a unit is key.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think like outlining that and pointing in the same direction.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Even if you do keep something separate, that's what's going

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to make the difference, I think in your ability to

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>care for each other over time, including your finances. All right,

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to some talk about your book. You begin

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the book, you state that we've assumed that more wealth

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is better and then it can solve all our problems.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that there is that assumption, maybe

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly in America more so than other countries, But is

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more wealth and not the answer for a lot of

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people to a better life.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>So more wealth helps when you don't have a lot

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of wealth, and we can talk about where that is.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 2>I have these different levels I come up with when

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>we can go into that in a moment here, But

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the main idea is as you move up the wealth

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 2>ladder and get into these different net worth tiers or

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>wealth levels as I call them, money becomes less and

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>less effective for solving your problems. Right, So, if you're

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>in level one, which I say is that's less than

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand dollars in net worth, most of your problems

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>are likely money problems. Money would literally solve most of

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>your life problems. But by the time you get into

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>let's say level five, which is ten million to one

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred million, or level six one hundred million plus, money

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>is very likely not going to solve most of your problems.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Your problems are like with relationships with people, business partners,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. It's going to be with your health. Maybe

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you weren't taking care of your health, something we discussed earlier. Right,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>you can think start thinking through this. And the reason

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>why is because you can't buy those things. You can't

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 2>write your spouse a check and make her love you. Look, okay,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>here's the ten thousand dollars love me forever. It doesn't

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>work that way, right, And the same thing's true with

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>your health. You can't buy a new cardiovascular system, right.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>So when you start going through the motions of thinking

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>through this, you realize money is very useful until you

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of it, and then it stops becoming

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>as useful. It works very well to a point, and

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>then everything else you've got to kind of have to

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>work for you. There's no shortcut to a great marriage,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>there's no shortcut to being healthy, and you.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Know, at least not yet.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe one day AI will solve all this stuff, but

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I just don't believe we can, you know, out engineer

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 2>biology at this point. We're not at that point. We're

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>getting better with a lot of the stuff, but you

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>can't prevent you know, decay and all the type of

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 2>stuff over time.

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>A good example of that, I think is like celebrities

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have the same cell phone that I have essentially, right, Like, yeah,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe mine's a few generations older because I've I haven't

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>upgraded recently, but we essentially have the same device in

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>our hands that we use fairly regularly. And yeah, maybe

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>they've got a private jet, but I still get to

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>go where I want to go. And so I think

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>here you're talking about gradations of wealth and how how

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that can improve your life, partly in the wealth Ladder.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious too, like, why did you construct the

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wealth ladder the way you did? What made you think that?

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>You don't call them wrungs, you call them levels. What

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>made you? What made you say these are where I

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think the lines are that separate someone from being level one,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>level two, level three, and level four all the way

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>up to level six.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So I created these levels, and I'll walk through them

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>in a second here because they were very easy to memorize.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>But more importantly, the data fit them very well. And

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.599
<v Speaker 2>I had thought of this idea years ago, but the

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>data didn't fit them as well, and now they fit

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot better. And so that's what makes it useful.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But even if we move the numbers, we can debate,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>oh maybe level four stops at eight million and not

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>ten million in level five. We can sit here and

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>if you want to go and hyper analyze it, you can,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day, like it's about

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the general framework and the general direction of the idea

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and not the preciseness of the level. And that's the

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>thing I try and get people to think about. When

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>you're in level four, you're going to think a little

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>differently than when you're in level three, even if the

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>exact number is not there. So let me walk through

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the levels, and I'll also tell you how what percentage

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of US households are in each level. So, by the way,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>this is net worth. So take all your assets minus

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>all your liabilities, right, and now that's gonna be everything

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you own. You know, so your car, your house, your cash,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>your stocks, et cetera, your four one K. Subtract out

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>everything you owe to others. So any sort of mortgage

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>at student loans, credit card, debt, et cetera. That's your

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>net worth. Okay, And we're doing households, so that includes

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>if you have a spouse whatever. That's called household net worth.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Level one is less than ten thousand dollars. That is

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>about twenty percent of US households. Level two is ten

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>thousand to one hundred thousand dollars. That's also about twenty

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 2>percent of US households. Level three is one hundred thousand

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to a million dollars. That's about forty percent of US households.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>That's what I would call the middle class in the

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>United States. Level four is one million to ten million dollars.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what I call the upper middle class in the

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.599
<v Speaker 2>United States, and that's about eighteen percent of households. And

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>when I say upper middle class, that's supposed to be

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>location agnostic. If you've got like five million bucks and

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 2>you're in rural Alabama, you're definitely upper class. Oh, we

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>can get into that a little bit too. Lastly, is

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>level five and level six. Level five is ten million

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred million, and level six is one hundred

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>million plus. Those two represent just the top two percent

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of households, and in level six there's only about eleven

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>thousand of these households, and so they're very there's a

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>very long tail, very small number of individuals in that bucket, right,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>And so from this, you know, just memorize level three.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>That's like one hundred thousand to a million. That's like

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>the middle class. And also once you know level three,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>you can multiple multiply. I tend to go up a level,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 2>or divide by ten to go down a level.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>And so it's a.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Very simple logarithmic scale. And I came up with it

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>because I was like, hey, this actually fits the data

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>very well and it's easy to memorize, and like, there's

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 2>so many people that have done these wealth level ideas before,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and none of them are You can't memorize them because

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>they're so arbitrary. And oh and this is actually it's

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred thousand to eight million, and then this one's

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>eight million to fourteen million. It's like, great, that's very

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>precise and nice, but you're splitting hair so much that

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not as spreadable as an idea. Yeah, and so

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>this is not I'm gonna admit, this is not perfect.

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no way that it's exactly ten million. There's no

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>way it's exactly one to ten, right, everyone knows that.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>But as a framework, it's a much better way of

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the idea and then thinking about, Okay, what

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>do I do in level four, and how is that

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>different from what I would do if I were in

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>level three or level five? And that's kind of the

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>idea here.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Which to your point there, I and I think this

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that you're hitting on in

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>your book is that maybe personal finance education is too

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one size fits all, and the advice that you might

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>give to someone in level on level one of the

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wealth Ladder, you probably wouldn't give that same advice to

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody on level five, like, hey, cut your Netflix subscription back.

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That could be impactful at level one, right level five, Sorry,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not even a drop in the bucket. It doesn't

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't register. So do you see a problem there

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with the advice that people get? And that maybe it

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like hammer and nail and it's the

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing over and over. Like I like to think

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of our audience as probably being either close to level three,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in level three or aiming for level four. Those are

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the kind of people I'm speaking to, so I kind

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of have an idea of what advice to dish out.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if I knew that most of my audience was

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>level five and level six, I well, I probably wouldn't

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>accrue that audience because that's how the kind of person

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I can speak to.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, no exactly, And that's exactly the point.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>It's people get very good, especially personal finance content creators

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>myself included. I fell victim to this as well. My

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>first book, Just Keep Buying, is a great book for

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>people in level three going to level four or level

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>two going to level three. It doesn't work for people

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>on level one because me telling them, oh, hey, all

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is just buy income producing assets

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 2>like they don't have the income to do that. I

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>do talk about raising your income. But if you know

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>most of the books about investing right, so it's like,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>when you think about it in this way, you realize

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that like just keep buying wasn't great for people in

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>level one, it wasn't the right solution for people trying

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to get to.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Level five or level six.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 2>So I needed to zoom out and kind of come

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>up with the higher level framework to view this through.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And so you're exactly right in the advice needs to change.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>You need to think about it differently depending on where

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you are in your life, where your wealth is, et cetera.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's the main idea here, is your financial

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>strategy should change over time. And I think a lot

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>of people just get caught in these habits and they

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>just keep doing the same thing for a long time

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>without reevaluating.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Does this still make sense?

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you say your financial habits need to change,

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>do you mean that you need to invest differently?

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you?

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And also it seems like one of the things that

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you're highlighting is that you need to at least think

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about spending differently, like as your wealth grows. It's okay,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Like that term lifestyle create think gets beaten to pulp,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know in most personal finance circles. It's okay, Like

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole part of growing your net worth is that

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you can enjoy some of the some of the fruits

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of your labor. So how do you think then about

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what needs to change as you are moving up the ladder?

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, exactly, And so on the spending front, I

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>can talk about that in particular. So in chapter one,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>which is about spending, right, the intro just tells you

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>what the wealth latter is, and then chapter one's on spending,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>chapter two's on income, chapter three's on investment. So kind

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>of these three big buckets understanding how the wealth latter

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>fits with this, and on spending, the thing I really

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>tried to come up with was a rule that allowed

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>people to spend more over time without jeopardizing their long

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>term wealth.

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's basically like, how do you solve the problem

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>of lifestyle creep? And so what I did for this

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I create something called the point zero one percent rule.

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And the idea is, if you take your net worth

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and multiply by point zero one percent, so that is

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, point zero zero zero one, or divide by

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand, that could be easier. So if you take

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>your net worth and divide by ten thousand, that is

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>approximately how much your net worth is throwing off daily,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Like your wealth is just creating this daily. And if

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 2>you do that over three hundred and sixty five days

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 2>in a year, that's roughly three point seven percent. So

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>it's even more conservative than the four percent rule, right,

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>And this is an inflation adjusted return I'm assuming, right,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>So if we assume that's true, then periodically you can

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>spend that point zero one percent because it's a trivial amount, right.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>And where this actually came from there was a Jaz lyric.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to repeat the exactly because he curses,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but he says, what's fifty grand to someone like me?

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Can you please remind me? And at the time he

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>hit a net worth of five hundred million dollars, So

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to jay Z when he wrote that lyric, fifty grand

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>was about point zero one percent of his net worth.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's where the idea comes from. And so just

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>apply that to your life. And once you do that

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>on the well ladder, you'll realize that, oh wow, there's

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>different spending categories where I create what I call spending

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 2>freedom right. So in level two, that's a net worth

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 2>of ten thousand to one hundred thousand dollars. By the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 2>end of level two, your wealth is generating about ten

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars a day. And so when you go to the

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>grocery store, you know, go a few times a week,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 2>you will have you know, extra budget in there in

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 2>theory to just buy what you want at the grocery store.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the idea. As you get deeper into level two,

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and once you're past level two, you can buy whatever

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you want at the grocery store, you have grocery freedom.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Level three is what I call a restaurant freedom right.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So the marginal spend there is gonna be ten dollars

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 2>up to one hundred dollars right on a daily basis.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm not saying you need to spend that daily,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>not recommending it. I'm just saying it's like a trivial amount.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So when you're at a restaurant, you're like, oh, should

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I get the burger for twenty bucks or the salmon

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 2>for thirty That difference is ten dollars, right, And that's

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>where we're making the decision. That's where the lifestyle creep

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>comes in, is like that marginal decision. So I'm like

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to attack that and say, hey, that's only a

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>ten dollars difference. So if you're in level three, like

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>who cares, you can spend that ten dollars, No big deal, right,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>And then it goes from their level fours travel freedom,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>level five is house freedom, et cetera. But we can

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>take this idea and apply it across the wealth letterer.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things I read something recently, an article,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and one of the people being interviewed in that article

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>said something along the lines of like, I'm pretty good

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about my budget, but I don't hesitate to drop in

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a thousand bucks on like a concert I really want

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to go see and I'll do that twenty times a year.

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it seems like this person is like really

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>blowing their budget. They're going into debt for these for

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>these shows, and maybe they're on the level two of

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the wealth ladder, but they shouldn't do that until they're

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>level four. So you are big talking, you really think

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that people should focus more on their income even than

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they're spending on those lower rungs. But don't We also

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>see a problem by now pay later as indicative of

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that of people spending more than they should when they

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>are on those early runs.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it definitely happens at the end of the day.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Like if the only thing you enjoy in life is

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>going to concerts and you have to drop one thousand dollars,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and you're doing it twenty times a year,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Like that's your life. I mean, what can I do

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to Oh, don't ever do that. Don't enjoy your life

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 2>at all. I'm not saying that, but I do think

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>if you want to do that, that's fine, but there

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>are consequences to that. And that consequence is you probably

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 2>have to work longer, you may not have as much

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>money in the future. You know, you're not gonna have

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 2>assets to pass on what it's what you want out

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>of your life. So I'm not telling people not to

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>spend money. I'm just saying this is a framework. I

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's actually more helpful for those that are having

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 2>trouble spending money than the opposite. And I've heard more

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>people say, oh my gosh, I don't think about the

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>grocery store anymore. I don't think about the restaurant anymore.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm actually getting more people that have trouble spending money.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to give them the freedom to spend money.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Everyone who spends a lot of money, they don't need

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>this rule. They're not gonna let's be honest, they're not

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna use it.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 3>It's the people that.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Are having trouble spending money find it really useful to

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of free up that mental bandwidth to not worry

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and have anxiety about their spending. That's where I found

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it spend most effective.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think part of that anxiety stems from the

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>fire movement? I don't know. I think at times like

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the more content I consumed in that space, the more

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, but I got to amass this amount

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of money so I can like at least have full

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>financial freedom within seven or eight years or something like that.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It just felt overwhelming and then I was like, why

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>am I doing that? Like what's the point? And sure,

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I still want full financial freedom, but if it comes

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at the cost of some of this spending that will

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>bring joy to my life now, then it's just not

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>worth it. But I see that in some of the

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>How of Money audience, some of the other folks, the

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>personal finance creators around there. It's like save, save, invest, invest,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and then somebody you'll get to enjoy your life.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to blame the fire movement because the

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>fire movement is very large and very broad and different,

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Like there are certain types. I think maybe lean fire

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>would fall under that specific thing where it's like you

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 2>spend as little as possible. But I think it even

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>started before that you can think of, like I don't

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>want to name names, but there have been personal finance

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>commentators out there saying, oh you're and when you drink

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>coffee or peeing away a million dollars, you've heard. I

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 2>don't need you know who these people are, right, So

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to attack them. I just think these

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 2>ideas are out there, like don't buy avocado toast. I

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know who said that, but like all these little

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>things of why millennials don't have wealth is because of

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>these these small like purchases, daily purchases, and I don't

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 2>think that's true at all, And so I think that

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>is where it started. And I think it's just created

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>this anxiety around money and spending that doesn't need to

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>be there. So I definitely don't want to trash the

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Fire movement because I think there's a lot of the

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Fire movement that I like, and a lot of good things,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 2>like telling people, Hey, you shouldn't be spending to some

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 2>crazy amount because that's just more time you have to

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 2>work later. That's a really good idea and that should

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 2>be out there. Of Course, you don't want to take

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that argument to its extreme because it brings up a

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of the issues you've brought up. So I think

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>it's finding that balance. Everything's about balance, right, And so

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>if I have to throw in with one of the

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>fire movements, it's Coast Fire. It's like, hey, get to

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 2>a point where your retirement's probably taking care of and

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>then you can kind of reevaluate your life. And I

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's a far better, far less extreme version of

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>fire that I can get behind and I fully support.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>So I like the way you discuss moving up the

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth ladder and how that can impact your ability and

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of give you a green light to spend in

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>some areas that you care about. What about investing? Do

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel like our approach to investing should change as

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>we move up the wealth ladder? I feel like I

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>see people who move up the wealth lader, and then

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel like they need to invest in more sophisticated ways.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing the index fun thing for a while,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I should put on my monocle and invest

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in like a real estate syndication or something like that.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense?

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I think people do it for a host of different reasons,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and we can kind of get into it if you're

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about like a real estate syndicate versus like a

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>hedge fund investment or a private equity, et cetera. I

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 2>think the investment stuff does need to change, but it

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>really is based on your goals and where you want

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 2>to go. And so there's people I've talked to and

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 2>people that have you know, I've been on other shows

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 2>with like people at my firm and they've asked, like, Hey,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I have six point five million dollars in the queues

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>right all in tech stocks basically, and you know, I

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>feel like I'm great, I'm doing well with everything. I've

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>two kids, all this stuff, and he's like, should I

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>like diversify it all? And it's like, yes, Like you

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.239
<v Speaker 2>need to change if you want to guarantee you're going

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to probably stay in level four. You probably shouldn't have

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>all your money, even though yes, that's been a great

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>strategy for the last five to seven years. I don't

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>know the future, and we've seen what happens when the

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 2>ques turn. We saw twenty twenty twenty two and how

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>bad it was, and I'm not saying that's going to

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>happen again, but if it were to happen, you.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Could see how like it could be pretty disastrous.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can protect yourself by taking your foot

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>off the gas pedals.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's like you're something like this person's won

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the game and they're still like, why are you adding

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>more risks? So I do think it matters where you

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 2>are in the well ladder to think about risk and

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of your also your lifestyle situation. If you're single,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it's very different than if you have a family in

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>terms of how much risk you take, et cetera. So

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 2>I really like to think of it more holistically and

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any harder fast rules, but I do

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 2>think depending on your goals is going to determine how

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>your allocation will change across the wealth ladder.

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think net worth is a great helpful metric,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's also a lot of illiquidity when

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about our net worth, talking about it invests

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>putting money in four oh one case and roth irays

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. Can you tap it well? I

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>want to ask some questions about that and potentially falling

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down the wealth ladder. We'll talk about that, would think matually.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Right after this, we're back still talk with Nick with

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Julie talking about his new book, The Wealth Ladder, And

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick I just mentioned illiquidity, Like, when you think about

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>your net worth growing, so much of it is inaccessible,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>right so and rightly so, Like that's how you grow

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your net worth. The more liquid it is. If if

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you put all your money in high heeled savings accounts,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your net worth is going to grow a heck of

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot slower than if you've been investing in the market,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>if you bought a home and you've seen that increase

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in value. So what's your take then, when we're talking

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>about this freedom to spend and someone's like, yeah, my

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>net worth growing, but it doesn't feel like I'm richer

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the here and now. It feels like I'm building

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>for the future.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is something I did address in the book,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 2>which is for this spending freedoms, I do recommend using

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.719
<v Speaker 2>liquid net worth to be more conservative because, for example,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 2>let's just use an extreme example. Let's say someone has

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, nine hundred thousand dollars in home equity,

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>they have, you know, two hundred thousand dollars in a

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 2>retirement account, and then ten thousand.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Dollars in cash.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Based on the wealth ladder, they're in level four. I

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 2>still agree with that assumption. However, based on just how

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 2>much cash they have, they're kind of in like level

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 2>one or level basically barely level two, and so they

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have a lot of spending freedom like someone who

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe had a very different asset profile. And so it's

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>just something to think about, is like, I spend based

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 2>on liquid networth, and I say that, and so even

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>though I'm talking about networth in general, I think spending

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>based on the liquid networth is a more conservative way

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>of going about this. So what you do is you

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 2>just take your net worth, You take out, you know,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>any sort of home equity that you have, right, so

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you net that out, and then you also subtract retirement

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 2>accounts because that is kind of future spending that's going

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to be used at a future point in time.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I look this up before our conversation. Turns out

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>there are five hundred thousand ladder related injuries each and

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>every year. So don't clean your own gutters, is what

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I learned from that. It's shocking to think that. But

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what about the wealth ladder are there? Their injuries are

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the people falling down off the wrongs and what typically

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>leads to someone and going from a higher rung two

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or level to a lower level.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 2>So I think it depends on which level you start at.

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 2>So for example, if someone's in level two and win

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 2>to level one, or a level three and win to

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>level two. My guess, based on what I've seen in

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 2>terms of data, is the most likely cause of that

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>is job loss, right or a health condition that creates

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 2>job loss. It's interrelated to one of these things. Either

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you're spending, especially the United States, you're spending a lot

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>on health. Maybe you lose a job, you lose your

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>health care, and then you have to spend a lot

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 2>on health. Something like that is like the perfect storm

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 2>for you know, drying down on wealth much earlier than

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 2>you anticipated.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And that can be a perpetual cycle for a lot

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of people. Too, and then hey, you lose that solid

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 1>job and you're bouncing around from inferior job to inferior

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>job after that.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it's that's my guess of where that's going

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to happen as you move up the wealth ladder, though

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it changes completely. And of course, can a job loss

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>still harm you, yes, but it's more likely going to

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>be your investment choice.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And you can think especially like level.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Four level five, Like this is where if someone got

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 2>into level four through like concentration or a level five.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you have your own business and you sold

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the business or even you still own it, and it's

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 2>worth a lot on paper. If something happens to that business,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 2>most of your network's probably in that single business. If

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, a COVID type event happens and it adversely

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 2>impacts your business, I'll ce you own a restaurant group.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Right now, you are being you know.

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>You can fall down the well flatter because of this

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>concentration you have in your portfolio. So if I had

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to pick what's the thing that caused someone to fall

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>down from level four to three or five to four,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be concentration bias, right, And actually, if

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you look at I actually have a mobility matrix was

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of shows, hey, if you started on this level,

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>what's the probability you'd be in this other level, like

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 2>in ten years or twenty years. And you see in

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>level five there actually is a higher probability of falling

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>down the ladder than in like level four for example,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's the concentration issue that people overlook.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 2>They have most of their wealth and that they can't

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>imagine anything going wrong because they obviously have built all

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>their wealth, so they feel pretty successful. They are successful

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, they don't hedge that risk and

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>then if something happens they could fall down the ladder.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're not taking those protectionary measures to say like

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>let's let's like not screw the pooch here and fall

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>down and let's protect what we've got. So and that's

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>where you know, what you're talking about is changing your

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about investing it. It does need

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to change as you as you move up the wealth

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ladder and as you're getting older too, right, you do

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>need to de risk. I'm curious to you talk about

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that we spend our time doing. Not only

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>should moving up the wealth ladder, change how we think

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>about spending, change how we think about investing. But it

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>should also Hey, what opportunities come our way and whether

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we say yes or no to those opportunities that should

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>change as our net worth increases. So what's your advice there?

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And like side hustles, that's like, you know, if I'm

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>going to go drive for Uber on the side to

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>make some extra money, Well, it doesn't really make sense

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're on level five of the wealth ladder, does it?

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it really has to do with you have

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to think about, Okay, where am I on the well ladder?

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>And I so instead of using the point zero one

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>percent rule that was for spending for income, I say

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>use the one percent rule. And of course everything's based

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 2>on you know, how much time it takes to do something,

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 2>But let's just do this approximately.

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>If something's not going to move your.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Net worth by one percent, if the whole project's not

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>really going to lead to something like that, then you

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe shouldn't even be considering it. And once again, of

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>course how much time. If I said clap your hands

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>for one hundred dollars, everyone would do it, even if

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 2>you're in level five, because at the time relative to

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the number of second stakes you have to clap your

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 2>hands is very small, but you get the point. And

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>so it's not a perfect rule. It's just an idea

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of like, Okay, this is just another way of evaluating something.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So if something's like, hey, someone wants to pay me

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>X dollars to do this, or I'm going to work

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 2>on this side hustle and it might be able to

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>get to this one day, like is that going to

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>move your net worth enough? And if not, then you

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>have to really reevaluate.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>And so it's just.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Another tool in your toolkit when you're thinking about taking

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>on different income opportunities, taking on a new client, et cetera.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>And so if it's not going to move the needle,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you're like, yeah, I actually shouldn't spend a lot of

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>time and resources on that. Another way of thinking through

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that decision.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's like when we're talking to listeners

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>who are typically probably in roughly that level three area

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about side hustles. For most people, we

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a bad idea, like it's not a good

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>use of your time, and it's a better idea to

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>increase your skills to up your income at your day job,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>or it's a better use of your time to use

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>those hours towards starting a business that can ultimately progress

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>into something far more meaningful than trading your time for

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>money right now. So, like, do you have similar thoughts

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about education, increasing income and not wasting your time maybe

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on side hustles for trading your time for money in

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it depends. The side hustle depends where you

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 2>are on the wealth ladder. I mean, if you're in

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 2>level three, the side hustle has to get pretty large

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to start competing with your day job. I'm guessing right,

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're in level two or something, And they may

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily be true, but it really depends on like

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>what are your current skills, how much you're currently making

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>if you're already at a job, or like you're making

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a decent income and you're like, even if I work

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>my tail off this year, I may get a you know,

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent racine a five percent raise. Okay, how

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>much is that five percent difference? And then calculate, relative

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to that difference, how much could I possibly make starting

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 2>a side hustle or doing something. And so I recommend

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that everyone just has a project of their own that

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>even if it's not for money, just something they like

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>to do because it's it's very valuable. I personally like

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>writing about personal finance and investing and doing data stuff.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And I did that for three years, didn't get paid

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>anything on it when I was blogging, and now it's

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>become something that is a side hustle that was monetized.

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>But that took a very long time. I've been writing

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 2>for almost nine years online, so I've seen it's a

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 2>very long journey. And I didn't do it for money though,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 2>and so that's another thing too. I think a lot

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of people you just got to follow your interest and

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>if you start doing that, it can really lead to

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great things.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what about real estate investing? How does that impact

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>people's ability to move up the wealth ladder? And did

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you find any correlation between people who you've talked about

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>people who.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Own a business.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that can be one of those things, especially

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's that brings you up to level four, level

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>five more quick. But then again, a lot of small

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses fail, so there's risk and reward in that. But

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what about investing in real estate? Has that did you

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>find any correlation between higher ranks of the wealth ladder

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and real estate ownership.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So not as much as I would have thought. I

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 2>would have thought we would have seen more. And so

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 2>if you actually look at percentage of assets like within

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>each wealth level, like it does increase slightly going into

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like level four, level five, level six, but it didn't

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>like see a massive increase. Most of the increase I

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>saw was in business interests, which is it's roughly defined

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>as like owning some sort of private business that you own,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's kind of how you make your wealth. And

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 2>so people in level six overwhelmingly have way more business

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 2>interests as a percentage of their total assets compared to

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>level five. And then level five is more than level four,

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Right, And so in the book, in chapter three,

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 2>when I talk about investments, I go through all these

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>different assets cash vehicles, your primary residents, real estate, stocks,

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 2>your retirement accounts, et cetera, and I show across the

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>wealth latter how much percentage is in each wealth level.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And the thing with real estate, I didn't see as

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 2>much of an increase as I thought I was going

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to see. But what someone said I showed I had

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>this I tweeted this out and someone said, it's very

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 2>possible that someone owns like a real estate like LLC

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 2>and they hold all the real estate in the LLC,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 2>and so that's being counted as business interest even though

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>it's real estate.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 3>I didn't.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I haven't looked into that, and that's something I need

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to look into eventually. So I think there's probably a

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>little more real estate at the higher end, not just

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 2>obviously an amount that's obviously true, but even on percentage wise.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't see as much as I thought I would,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So that was the thing that was a little bit surprising.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I think in real estate usually almost most of the

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>time to make sense as an investment involves leverage. Do

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you see leverage as a tool that people use to

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>move up the wealth ladder? And how risky is that?

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Because leverage can cut both ways?

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, of course, I mean, if you've been levered up,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the past, let's say, five six years,

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you probably it depends how levered up you were, obviously,

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 2>but like in general, asset prices have gone up, so

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 2>anyone with leverage has has benefited from that. But as

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>soon as it turns like that, can you know it's

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the double edged sword and it comes and gets you

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and right. So I think twenty twenty two is a

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 2>great example of it. I'm just at least in equity

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 2>markets where anyone who was levered up in twenty one

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely crushing it. And then you just saw this

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>dry up so quickly and it just turned so fast,

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 2>and it was really bad.

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of individual names down eighty ninety percent,

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 2>like stuff that you saw like the dot com bubble,

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, exploding. And so I'm not saying that that's

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen now. I don't know, but that's that's the

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.439
<v Speaker 2>risk of leverage. And I don't have as much data

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on Okay, who's using leverage, how much leverage they're using today,

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 2>and then following them ten years from now and seeing

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 2>how they are. You know, so a lot some people

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just get lucky and then they guess what, they take

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>their chips off the table at the right time, and

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the thing collapses it. Oh well, I got lucky, And

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I know people have done that too. So I've seen

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of all sides of that type of stuff over time.

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>When if let's say someone's listening and they're earlier on

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>in their financial journey. When you talk about level one,

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>you talk about people who are on level one of

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the wealth latter, you typically refer to those people as

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>being unlucky. Wouldn't you suggest, though, that some of those

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>people are also just starting their journey off? Right? They

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.959
<v Speaker 1>just graduated, They've got maybe a super low net worth

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't started accumulating assets yet, and they've probably

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>got student loan debt that they're paying off something like that.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And then what would you say to that person who's

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just starting off if they're like, yeah, I don't want

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily get to level six of the wealth ladder,

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but I want to move up, and I want to

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do it in a really efficient way, what would your

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>suggestions be?

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So you bring up a great point, which age

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>is very correlated with all with all the wealth levels.

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>And so in chapter ten of the book, I walk through,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>like what's the median age in each level? For example,

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in level four, which is one to ten million, the

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 2>median age is sixty two, so it is a.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Much older cohort. You start looking.

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Through the data, the age stuff definitely matters. I'm not,

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, downplaying that whatsoever. So you're right, there are

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>people in level one level two right now. They're like, oh,

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I just graduate, I'm in level one, or I just graduate,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm in level two. Like you know, what's the issue.

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>You just need time. Yeah, a lot of these people

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>just need time to move, move the needle, and obviously

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 2>if you have a decent income that helps you can

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 2>start saving, investing, et cetera. For some people, though, they

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>need to build skills and they need so in level one,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I say, hey, just get to safety. Get to some

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>whether that means having an emergency fund that's something we've

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 2>all heard before, or just having a network of a

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>friend's family, whoever that you can rely on in case

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 2>something were to happen, Because the last thing we want

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>is for you to get stuck in level one just

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 2>perpetually because you're just you're feel like you're treading water

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 2>because like, oh, I this bad thing happened, and then

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I got a new credit card debt, and then I

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 2>lost my job, like whatever. It is, like you can

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>imagine just like this financial tail spin happening because you

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>just got a little bit unlucky early on. And that's

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>that's where I think a lot of people in level

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 2>one are in unfortunately, and I'm saying older people in

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 2>lovel one, they just got unlucky early and maybe they

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get themselves out of it.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I've got a few more questions I want to

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>get to with you, Nick, including the how important is

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the wealth ladder? Are we using it to compare ourselves

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to the people around us too much? We'll get to

0:37:56.120 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that and more right after this. Okay, back with Nick

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with Julie talking about the wealth ladder, and I think

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's such a helpful framework for understanding a bunch of

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>things about your financial journey, about how you're growing your

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>net worth and then what that means to you in

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the here and now as you are accruing wealth, which

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is an important part of getting your finances straight. But

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we're just talking Nick about how the you know, in

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>level four, the average person with that one to ten

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollar net worth, they're in their sixties, and so

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes though people listening to this show or

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>other personal finance content, they're like that million dollars. I

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>think I'm supposed to hit that in my thirties, and

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the pressure feels really great. So do you think

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that the comparison that we're doing maybe as we're looking

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>at these different levels of the wealth ladder that we're

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to achieve, can have any negative side effects?

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely can. I mean we don't want people to.

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I think as bad as looking at data is, I

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 2>think social media is actually much worse. So I'm not

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 2>trying to defend the data, but like, if you just

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 2>look at social media, everyone's crushing in has this and

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 2>then all this type of stuff. You can't see someone's

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 2>entire balance sheet. If someone buys a home, you don't

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>know how much they put down the debt any of

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that stuff, right, You have no clue about any of that.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 3>I think the data is very.

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Helpful because you get to see, oh, actually less than

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 2>one percent of individuals in their twenties make it into

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 2>level four, right, and it's only five percent of individuals

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>in their thirties make it into level four or higher.

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's like once you know that, you're like, oh, actually,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 2>like only one in twenty households in the United States

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 2>are going to make it into level four, right, And

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>so you start looking through that, and that's on page

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 2>one fifty and chapter ten in the book, right, and.

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So feel a little more normal yeah.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you start. I actually think it's helpful to see

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>this because then you realize, oh, it's actually not as

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 2>people aren't as wealthy as I originally thought, even when

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you control for age.

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 3>And so that's a big piece of this too.

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Even in the forties, only fifteen percent of households in

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 2>their forties make it into level four or higher. So

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this is not like you, oh, it's five percent in

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the thirties, but by the forti it's got to be

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>what thirty percent, Like, no, it's only fifteen. It's you know,

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>it's still increased quite a bit, but it's still you know,

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a small one in six households are in level four

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>or higher. So keeping that in mind is incredibly important

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.320
<v Speaker 2>while you're doing this stuff and as you're on your journey.

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's like it takes time. It does take a

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of time.

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 3>To do that.

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so give yourself time. How do you think about

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the quest for moving up the wealth ladder and in

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>particular like level five and six we're talking about that

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>those are really small percentages of people that ever achieve

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>those levels of wealth. Is is it even a good

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>goal to have? And maybe for some people it is,

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 1>but I'm curious to hear your take and maybe even

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>your goals, like is that something you want to achieve?

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So in terms of whether it's a good goal,

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a bit much. I think you don't

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>need it to live a great life, especially in the

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 2>United States. And I think in if you're not living

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 2>in because the US is so expensive, I think you

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 2>can get by and level three in a much better situation.

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.959
<v Speaker 2>So it really depends on where you live, your cost

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of living, amongst other things. In terms of my goals,

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I have no inclination to ever get to level five, right.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I will get there nominally one day, but

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 2>in terms of real dollars, I don't think I will

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 2>ever reach out. By the time my net worth is

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>ten million, it won't be what ten million's worth today,

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll say that. So that's my thinking on it.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 2>It's going to take many decades before that happens, and

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 2>by then the real purchasing power won't be there. So

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 2>in terms of actual level five inflation adjusted wealth, I

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think I'm ever going to get there because I

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 2>just don't have the inclination to go and start my

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>own business and do all.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 3>That, like I have a day job. I do the

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 3>books and stuff.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 2>And even if I sold, even if the wealth latter

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 2>sells a million copies right after you know, tax and everything,

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to make enough money to even it's

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna help me, don't get me wrong, But I'm still

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 2>going to.

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Be in level four.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be in level four for a very long time, right,

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 2>So it is going to take a very and what's

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 2>going to happen, I'm telling you already is I'm gonna

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 2>get to a point where I'm like, Okay, do I

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 2>need to keep doing all this stuff or can I

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>take my foot off the gas a little bit and

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>like enjoy more time and liked spend more time with

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 2>my family, traveling all this other stuff. I'm going to

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 2>now start spending down my wealth a little bit and

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 2>it won't be growing. And so I think that is

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen at some point. I just don't

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 2>know when. And I need to kind of approach that

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 2>within the next probably decade or so. I'm hoping all

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>else equal, right, no crazy, you know, worldwide depression or something.

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would expect. And you have to count

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the costs ahead of time. Like, my uncle tells my

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 1>daughter all the time she's twelve, that he wants her

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to be president of the United States someday. And we've

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about it, like at length now because he tells

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>her that all the time, and she's like, Dad, I

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know, is that a good goal? And I'm like,

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if that's what she really want, But you

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have to count the cost ahead of time, because if

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to be president of the United States, you

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>were going to have to dedicate so much of your

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>life to.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 3>Getting that goal.

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>And even if you do, there's like the chances of

0:42:55.760 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>actually succeeding in getting that one job it's unlikely. So yeah,

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it might be the goal that you have someday, but

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it also you might realize that it's not even worth pursuing.

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>But you got to think about that stuff ahead of time,

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think you can get stuck on this treadmill

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of Okay, wealth Ladder, next level, let's go up, I

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta I gotta keep moving and realize that you're playing

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the wrong game. You've maybe won the wrong game at

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's and that is one of the there's

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>three parts of the book the first part is just

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of telling you about the wealth lat or the

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>second part I talk about each level and kind of

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 2>different strategies to move up to burn from falling down,

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 3>And then the.

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Third part I talk about kind of that bigger picture

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 2>like why are you climbing? Should you be climbing? I

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of get into all these issues because you're right,

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 2>like most people are never going to make it to

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 2>level five or six, myself included, And so when you

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 2>think about that, like what are the things that really matter?

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And I really try and address that in a in

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a very different way. So that's not just keep climbing,

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 2>that's not the that's not the.

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Goal of the book.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, and you even you even talk about the downsides

0:43:56.760 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>of having megawealth, and you hear from some people in

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that rarefied air who say, yeah, most of the people

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that are the unhappiest or some of these

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>folks in these upper echelons of the wealth ladder. So

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for people I think in level one and two who

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>aspire to have greater levels of wealth, it kind of

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't compute. How is it that having more money leads

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to less happiness? But it's possible it does, right.

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so actually there's a whole chapter in the

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>book where I talk about money and happiness and so

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 2>in general. So if I would say, if you're in

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 2>level one or two, more money will probably make you happier.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Beyond that, I can't make any guarantees, but what the

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 2>research shows is if you're already happy, more money is

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>going to make you happier. Right, So, if you're in

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 2>level three or four, you're enjoying life, you're not even

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 2>asking yourself, will more money make me happier? You're probably

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be happier if you had more money, which

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 2>is kind of an ironic thing. If you're in level

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 2>three or four and you're like, oh, I don't I

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 2>just don't feel as happy if I had more money

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 2>than I'd be happy. It's not the money. The money's

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 2>actually not going to do it, and the data shows that.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's kind of the big takeaway. I mean,

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the big like somemo. How I summarize it in the

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.720
<v Speaker 2>book is if you're happy, more money will make you happier.

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 2>If your poor, more money will make you happier. But

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 2>if you're not poor and you're not happy. More money's

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:08.479
<v Speaker 2>not going.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 3>To do a thing.

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of the big takeaway from what the

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 2>research shows. And this is the newest research.

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Trust me. They looked at that.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's heard that study about well, I heard, I thought

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 2>happiness doesn't increase beyond seventy five thousand dollars in income.

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I look at that research. Someone else addressed it. They

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 2>got together, looked at all the data and they had

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a very different conclusion out there now. So it's

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 2>been updated and I discuss it in the book.

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's an amplifier, right, and so yeah, I can't amplify

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that happiness and offer you more freedom and the ability

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to live the life you want. But it can also

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>drag you down, and it can it really can feel

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like more money, more problems.

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Nick.

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Where can our listeners find out more about you and

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more about your new book, The Wealth Letter.

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 2>So my websites of Dollars and Data dot com. I

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 2>blogged there once a week. You can find me on

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 2>LinkedIn at Nick Majulie x, slash, Twitter at Dollars in

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Data or on Instagram at Nick Madoulie and I answer.

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So please send me a DM as long as it's

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 2>not unhinged spam. Like I swear, I answer every DM. Ladies,

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 2>he's married, so not that kind. It's either not that

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>type of DM. But no, any sort of no, seriously,

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 2>any sort of financial question. I will try my best

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:13.959
<v Speaker 2>to answer it. And if not, I've probably written about

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 2>or I know someone's written about. I can just send

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you a blog post you can read and that hopefully

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>can help you in some way.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Love it awesome, Nick, Thanks so much for joining us, tod.

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Thanks for having me back on Joel,

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Okay, that was a fun conversation with Nick Mejulie.

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the way he thinks and writes about money,

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that this concept of the wealth

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>ladder can help you as an individual as you are

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to grow your wealth and trying to think about

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>preserving your wealth, but also how you can change your

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>life as your net worth increases. I think Nick's framework

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>is super helpful for that. You'll notice by the way

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that my co host and best friend Matt was not

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>on this episode with me and just trying something new,

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to the interview episodes to two

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 1>people need to be asking questions. I don't know. We

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>figure we give it a shot at least on this

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>one and see if maybe it was better with a

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>singular host. But of course he will be back with

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>me on Friday. I wanted to give my big takeaway

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for this episode, and you know it just I think

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.479
<v Speaker 1>what Nick is saying. Essentially, it's different structure, different folks,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and it takes different attributes and attitudes to succeed at

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 1>different levels of the wealth ladder. And so what serves

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you well in rung one and Rong two doesn't serve

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you nearly as well once you move up further. And so,

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like Charlie Munger said at one point, who

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was Warren Buffett's sidekick who recently passed away, He said, basically,

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to walk everywhere you can and to use coupons every

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>time you got to eat in order to reach your

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>first one hundred thousand dollars. So he was saying, do

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes to get to that point. Were even

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>master first hundred k And he basically makes it sound

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>like that's the hardest one hundred thousand dollars to get

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in your life, that the second, third, and fourth they

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>get subsequently easier. And I think it's true. I think

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it's very true given my experience is that the first

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred K is so much harder to a mass,

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and then really time and the markets, like compounding returns,

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>start to work in your favor. So should you stop

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>walking and stop using coupons? I don't know. I'm the

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy who's still prone and to doing those things.

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's just because I want to be efficient

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>with what's been placed into my life. But do I

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.959
<v Speaker 1>do it less than I used to? And have I

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>opened the purse strings more than I did when I

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was in my early mid twenties, really just trying to

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>get past wrung one and two? Yes, yes I have,

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And so my life does look different. I think about

0:48:56.480 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>even just Nick's concept of being grocery store, being able

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to spend what you want at the grocery store, and

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:04.720
<v Speaker 1>then being able to spend what you want at a restaurant.

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Those are just different levels of financial freedom. And I

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think about staying at hostels. Would I not stay at

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I used to stay at hostels? Like would I stay

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>at a hostel again? Maybe? But I'm not inclined to

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much as these days. So but there are

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>also things I could learn from this book about being

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to spend all the things that matter to me,

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe as I continue to move up, being

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>more generous with what I've been given to. So I

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>just appreciate Nick's take, and I hope it was helpful

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. And unlike Nick, I don't see level five

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or six in my future, but I'm okay avoiding those

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 1>upper rungs and live in a mostly normal life where

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I still have a lot of financial freedom and choice

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>over what my days look like. But that's going to

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do it for this episode. You can always find more

0:49:57.560 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>money saving information up on our website at how to Money,

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can sign up for the how to Money

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>newsletter at howdomoney dot com slash newsletter. I guess I

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>can't really do best friends out says my best friends

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out here with me, but I will say thanks for listening.