WEBVTT - World’s Mega-Rich Bet on US Renters

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, this story definite caught our attention reading in this morning.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It is among the most read on the Bloomberg. It's

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>about the world's mega rich betting on US rentors to

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>grow their billions.

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>More specifically, however, the past decade, ultra wealthy individuals and

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>their firms have more than double their investments and apartments,

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 3>largely in the sector known in the US as multi

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>family housing. This according Carroll to the research firm Night Frank.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's break it all down and get to

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>these findings with us Bloomberg News US commercial real estate

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>reporter Natalie Wan joining us on zoom in New York City,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Natalie Providence, who knew, We'll get to that in just

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a moment. First of all, tell us what's going on

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>exactly right, Thanks.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>For having me on. So it's this really interesting trend

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 4>of period when everyone's shying away from commercial real estate,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the massive institutions like Blackstone or the big

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 4>bank banks who are trying to reduce their exposure. And

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 4>in the meantime, you have these ultra wealthy billionaires that

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 4>are snatching up properties. You know, I think for them

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 4>it's really a diversification play, and they are trying to

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>increase the allocation of their holdings to properties. And in

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the past, whereas it used to be for offices, clearly

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 4>with the glut and drop in values of offices, today

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 4>apartments seem like a much better bet for them.

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Is this also a bet on just the fact that

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>so many Americans with housing prices at a record in

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>many parts of the country, mortgage rates high, that many

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 3>people aren't going to be able to buy a home.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a big part of it. We clearly see

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 4>that there's been a shortage in affordable housing for people.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 4>That's pushed a lot of people into the rental market.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>There's a lack of housing even across the rental space

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 4>across and that's why we've seen rents continue to rise

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>even over the past year. You know, I think that

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 4>for these folks, they're kind of looking at this from

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 4>an extremely long term play. They're less exposed to the

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 4>fluctuations in the debt market, and they can often pay

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>with cash or they have special strong financing relationships with

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 4>banks that are willing to fund them and for them.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 4>They're looking at this as kind of a stable, long

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 4>term play and a bet really on the growth of

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 4>major cities like New York or Chicago that you know,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 4>even if the property market continues to struggle across commercial

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 4>real estate for the foreseeable future, some of the best

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>properties will probably still continue to produce income for these folks.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I kidd it at the top Providence, who knew, but

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about rent growth over the past six months,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and Providence Rhode Island right up about eight percent. So

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of a top the list, even more so

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>than New York City, right.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 4>That's topping the list. We're seeing brand raps also top

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the list. I think Hartford is in that list as well.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think it really goes to the

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 4>boom across maybe cities that you know aren't like New

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 4>York or Chicago. But with the pandemic, we've seen that

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>people might not have to work in the office, they

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>might not necessarily need to do their shopping in retail,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>but they do need homes, and so we've seen kind

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 4>of a boom across some of these secondary cities, some

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 4>of the more suburban areas, and I think that we're

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 4>seeing these billionaires ultra wealthy folk try to get in

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 4>at a time when there's less competition in the space,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>and also the returns look for more attractive than compared

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>to say, two years ago, when we saw double digit

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>rent growth across many of these cities and everyone trying

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 4>to bid for properties. There's been a step back in

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 4>today's market and that kind of provides a perfect buying

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>opportunity for long term investors that have access to capital today.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, speaking of access to capital, Natalie, do we know

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>how these billionaires are financing these these purchases. Are they

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>just paying cash? Are they actually financing them? I mean,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>rates are very very high right now.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>They're extremely high, and a lot of cases they're putting

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>in a lot of cash. I think in some situations

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 4>banks it's not like they don't have liquidity, they're just

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 4>being a lot more cautious as to what they're lending

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>on and who they're lending to. Because you know, we've

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 4>seen even some of the biggest folks to fault on

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 4>their loans. But I think for these billionaires, I mean,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>relationships between a lender and their borrowers one of the

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>most important things for these types of institutions. And I

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 4>think if you're a billionaire, like is there a founder

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Amansia Ortega, you might have less hurdles to across if

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 4>you're looking for a lender for a deal like this.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, I don't know if you've kind of looked

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>into this side of too. I think about what it

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>means though for the renters and stuff with investors getting involved,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>does that mean is it problematic? I mean, I mean

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>rent is often set by you know, the market, right

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>or the geography, if you will. But I do wonder

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>if this is going to mean higher rental cost potentially

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>for renters.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think some of the specific deals that we

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 4>quoted in the story, you know, we're Taga buying that

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and thirty two million dollar luxury apartment building

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 4>in Chicago, and then another billionaire buying a Manhattan Grammarcy apartment.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Those are kind of already luxury apartment buildings where I

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 4>think the clients hele for those buildings are used to

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 4>paying top notch rents. I don't necessarily see a flood

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of interest in rent stabilized or rent controlled properties. Investors

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 4>are definitely shying away from that right now. We're seeing

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of talk about that, even with the Signature

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Bank portfolio, where there is a significant chunk of rent

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>stabilized properties, and sort of the question as to who

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 4>wants to take on that risk that's interesting, I think,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 4>A yeah, I think these folks are largely targeting some

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of the higher end apartments, which you know there's always

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 4>going to be demand for at this time.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Do we know, you know, not necessarily average rents, but

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>when you stay higher end, give us some context for

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 3>our listeners and viewers around the world, like, you know,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 3>three thousand bucks a month for a one bedroomyah.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I think in Manhattan. I haven't looked at the most

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 4>recent numbers, but I think we're topping near like four

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 4>thousand on average for an apartment, right Natalie.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a fascinating story, and I also thought it

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>was interesting how that before the pandemic you had the

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>world's rich really focused on office properties. But we know

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>what's going on there, so they've shifted uh into rental

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 2>properties and residential So really interesting story in terms of

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>what's going on today. Bloomberg News US commercial real estate

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>reporter Natalie, thank you so much. Netlie Wan joining us

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>on zoom in New York City. This is Bloomberg.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>World. All right, yeah, you know, we are waiting really

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 2>for this war in Ukraine to be over. I think

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 2>about Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelinsky in town last week speaking

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>before the UN General Assembly, making his case for pressing

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>on with the war effort. Yet President Biden coming out

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>calling out world leaders to stand by Ukraine, and it

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>struggled to eject Russian troops even as Kiev's all I

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>say that they now expect the war to last for

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>years to come. I was watching coverage and people are saying, Okay,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>we're getting ready for year number three.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's unbelievable to think that that we're there, especially

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 3>given what we thought when Russia first invaded Ukraine almost

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>two years ago. Carol with more on the war and

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>other global risks. It's really great to have back with

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 3>us in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Ed Price Principal

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>for Geopolitical Forecasting at Ergo, a global intelligence consulting and

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>forecasting firm. At also a former British trade official, representing

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>His Majesty's government to Wall Street and the US official

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>sector from twenty seventeen to twenty twenty one. He's advised

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>a number of European and British parliaments, Carol, and worked

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>also in the city of London.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>It just knows a lot and I seeing a lot.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>He also traveled a.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Lot, and he's just back from Ukraine. Good to have

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>you back.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much, Carole.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>How are you?

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 2>But do it okay? Trying to keep up with it

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>all and try to make sense of it all. You

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>are just back from Ukraine. How did you make sense

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of what you saw?

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Well? I think the word evil crept into my mind

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot, so there was a sort of theological reaction

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day. I suppose. I otherwise

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 5>tried to make sense of it by putting it into

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the economics bucket and the military bucket. The economics bucket

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 5>is of course that the Ukrainians are really trying to

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 5>make their economy work. They're trying to just go to

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 5>the shops, drink coffees and go out as much as

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 5>they can, which is to be welcomed. And of course,

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 5>on the other hand, the somewhat disappointing counter offensive. I

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 5>went just before the offensive itself, and I think that's

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 5>probably one thing that we're probably going to have to

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 5>talk about today.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh go ahead, Cairl.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, one thing I wanted to say, and I was

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>talking to our team about this. There was sixty minutes

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>at a piece and it was talking about the American Aid,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the USA, and one component I wasn't aware of was

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>how much was going into the country to support small

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>businesses and the whole idea of you've got to have

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 2>some economy to back to after this is resolved. Otherwise,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have a taxpayer base. Then people are

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, kicking money into the economy, otherwise you have

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 2>everybody leave. So I thought that was an interesting part

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 2>of the aid that I wasn't aware of. I was

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>aware of all the military, but it's an important part.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 5>It's hugely important. And let's not also forget that the

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Ukrainians are still trying to transition out of a Soviet

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 5>economic model. They have a structural deficit essentially, that's a

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 5>social welfare model. They can't really get rid of it.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 5>By their own admission that the older generation is somewhat corrupt,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, they look at governments of.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Scuba and another thing I didn't now, yeah.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I didn't really understand that until I spent

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>some time there. But it's a war on two fronts, right,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 5>It's the military war, as I say, and they're also

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 5>trying to keep the democratic and market institutions not only

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 5>alive but developing as best they can. And so of

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 5>course the aid that we're sending has to do both.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are a great number of people in

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 3>this country who don't want to send aid to the

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainian government. What would you say, after being there and

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>seeing with your own eyes what's going on on the

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>ground in Ukraine to folks here in the US who

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 3>are telling their representatives, and some representatis are indeed very

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 3>vocal about it, especially on the Republican side, that they

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>do not want to send a to Ukraine. What's your

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 3>message to them?

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 5>My message, very respectfully, would be Where do you want

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 5>to fight Pewtin, the Ukraine, Poland Berlin, Paris. Well it's

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 5>that simple, I think. And the small amount of money

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 5>relative to our overall military budget that we have spent

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 5>in Ukraine, it's about say five percent, that has degraded

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the Russian military capacity in a way that I didn't

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 5>think I would see in my lifetime. Honestly, they will

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 5>previously say five days away from a serious attack on NATO.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 5>They must be five years away now given the damage

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 5>we've done to them. So you know, what do you

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 5>want for five percent of your military budget? More trucks,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>more uniforms. I would suggest that killing bad guys for

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 5>pennies on the dollar is probably a good ROI if

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 5>we don't.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Do it, if countries pull back their support, if the

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>US pulls back its support, then what potentially?

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that Putin and the Russians are trying to

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 5>overhaul the Second World Wars settlement. I think they're trying

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 5>to undo a global order. I don't think that they

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 5>want to live in a world of rules. And if

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine goes down, and you know, all bets are off.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 5>I say that in part because the if a new

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 5>US administration leaves NATO, then we've got a bit of

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 5>a problem on our hands because I don't think that

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 5>the Germans are ready themselves to back Europe's independent deterrent yet.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 5>So what happens is carnage.

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like terrifying.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 3>It is terrifying. I'm wondering, should the US be pushing

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>for a cease fire? Should our allies be pushing for

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 3>a ceasefire here? Should that be what they're pushing for

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>in terms of an end to this war?

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 5>I think what we should be pushing for is removing

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Russians from every last inch of Ukrainian territory. That's a

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 5>maximalist position. There are people in my world who disagree

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 5>with that, and so it's too dangerous. But if we

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 5>award aggression with any sort of negotiation or peace agreement,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 5>we're bucking the number one lesson from world history.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>But he's got nukes.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, he's got nukes, and so have we. And I

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 5>think we talked about this before, like if we get

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 5>to that stage, yeah, who you know who has a

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 5>greater faith in the Almighty? I think it's probably us.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 5>But before that stage, and if he is indeed bluffing,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 5>which I would suggest to he is so far we've

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 5>crossed every single redline. This is a case of facing

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 5>down military aggression the same way we should have done

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 5>in the nineteen thirties with Hitler.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So you have a lot to talk about at an

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 2>event you have coming up on Thursday, and I want

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to get into that a little bit. The London Stock

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Exchange Group in the NYU Center for Global Affairs hosting

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a discussion of your political risk with you, which you

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>kindly invited us to. And if I still ended earlier,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I could make it any right, it's Ukraine with love.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about what you want to emphasize there.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's really coind it's essentially the same message, right.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to come in here and repeat myself,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 5>but I'm really trying to push as an analyst for

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 5>the case that the aid that we're sending Ukraine must

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 5>be in place, probably should increase. I think it's rather

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 5>strange that we haven't offered them more in the way

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 5>of air power while suggesting that they can conduct combined

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 5>arms operations and the essentially they are fighting for our

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 5>freedom as well. It's that simple, it's that emotive. So

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm trying to get some powerful, interesting people together, remind

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 5>them of that, tell them a few stories from Ukraine,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 5>because the alternative is pretty.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Grim based on your analysis, ad what you've seen over

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>the last two years, the world's response. How does this end?

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 5>How does the war end?

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 5>I think probably the central case right now is that

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 5>Russia gets to keep a big old chunk of Ukraine.

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 5>It's embedded itself. You've seen the defensive lines, and at

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that point, all bets are offers to what happens the

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 5>decade after that, if they're rewarded. I'm afraid that's the

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 5>central case right now. I don't think we've given them enough.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>To push the can that be prevented it yet?

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I mean, look at this, This is all

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 5>a function of how load you want to go, right, Like,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 5>do you want do you really want to push the

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Russians out with conventional power? And we're creeping towards that.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you'll notice that there is a deep contradiction

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 5>in American thinking because on the one hand, we say,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 5>as I just said, he probably won't use them, don't worry,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 5>so keep on. On the other hand, of course, we

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 5>haven't sent everything we could have, because that in the

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 5>back of your mind you're thinking, well, maybe he might,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 5>but it's not going to end well unless there's there's

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 5>more military intermention.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>And this isn't a European thing, this is a global

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>concern has.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 5>To be I would say, so, Carol, I mean.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm asking kind of the obvious, but I

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>do feel like there are people like that's Europe's problems.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and I think that's wildly dangerous because you know,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Pewtin and Shijenpin do not have the relationship that they claim.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Pewtin is the junior partner. But just imagine if Peutin

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 5>made a feint at the Baltics or you know, at

0:14:53.920 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 5>NATO in conjunction with increased Chinese harassment of Taiwan. These

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 5>guys are smart. They can figure out a way to

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 5>spread our resources more thinly. So for my money, I say,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 5>the more work that we do in Ukraine to hold

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 5>down this autocratic aggressive power, the better.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Does that relationship between China and Russia.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 6>Where are you?

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 5>It worries me deeply. Yes, I'm yeah, I'm up at

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 5>night thinking about that one.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>We're running out of time, But like it's I think

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>about that a lot in terms of that relationship and

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 2>it just do you feel like what we got off

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>of the un last week? Do you feel like there

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was the right support and just got about fifteen seconds?

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely not, No, there needs to be more.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it felt like people were getting tired at the situation,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>which was unfortunate. Good luck with your event Thursday at

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>what time?

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 5>Six pm? I'll say London Suck Exchange Group. If you'd

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 5>like to come, let me.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Know, ad Price. Thank you. As always, this is Bloomberg.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also us

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>A lot going on in the auto world. Continues to

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>be President Biden on the picket line telling striking autoworkers

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to stick with it. And then you had Ford being

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>blasted by its largest labor union for halting construction on

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>that three and a half billion dollar battery plant in Michigan,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>amid scrutiny of its ties to a Chinese battery maker

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>by Republican lawmakers lock going on.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>In today's edition of Bloomberg Plugged In, we're looking at

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the world of evs with us. We got a Bloomberg

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence senior autos analyst, Kevin Tynan from Bloomberg Intelligence headquarters

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in Princeton, Jersey. Also very pleased to have back with us.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Diana Lee, co founder and CEO at Constellation. She's with

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>us in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Constellation a marketing

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 3>platform for the automotive industry. It helps car dealerships reach

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 3>out to customers. Kevin, I want to start with you

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and just just lay it all out there for us

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of historical context here and what it means

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>to have a sitting president actually join a picket line today.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, very interesting. You know, it's been a little bit

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 6>since Friday, since the expansion of the of the walkouts,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 6>it's been a little bit quiet. So I think there's

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 6>real work going on. There's photo ops, you know today

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 6>with the President being on the picket line, But you know,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 6>I think real work is getting done. You know, and

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 6>I've said this all along. I think really for the

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 6>manufacturers it's about flexibility to rationalize capacity, and headcount going forward,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 6>And for the Union, it's about sharing and the the

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 6>profitability that the automakers have had over the past ten years.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Forty percent increase in pay, Kevin President says, yes, I'm

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>not sure that many Americans can relate to it, that

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>forty percent increase in pay. So walk us through the

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 2>changing balance sheets potentially for the big three US automakers

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 2>as we transition to that ev world. I mean, does

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>it that balance sheet change the cost the gains?

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, and I think if it's if it's the

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 6>labor component of cost of goods, it's a little bit

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 6>easier to absorb. Right. So if you look at even

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 6>just transaction prices over the life of the last contract,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, up significantly. So even if there's you know,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 6>eight percent a year over the next four years, which

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 6>comes out to be that thirty six percent, you know,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 6>prices have actually risen faster than that during the last contract. Now,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the automakers forward, specifically are all truck

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 6>in the US, so there's very little additional mix upside

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 6>for companies like that. Electrification isn't quite there yet, so

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 6>it's probably going to be something like software and in

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 6>vehicle content that helps offset some of those costs, But

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 6>where it would really hurt and impact the balance sheet

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 6>would be in you know, a change in sort of

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 6>the pension, the healthcare some of those long term legacy costs,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 6>or being tied into a specific headcount and capacity level

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 6>that just isn't sustainable as volume declines and continues decline

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 6>going forward.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 2>Dana, we talked with you on Friday, so thank you

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>for coming back. You are closely with the dealerships. Remind

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>our audience what you are hearing from them and how

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you are thinking about this in regards to them.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that there's a lot of confusion that's

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 7>going on, and I think the worries that if you

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 7>are a GM Ford or Stilantis dealership right now, you're

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 7>not sure where your parts are coming from, and you

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 7>don't know where your vehicles are going to be coming

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 7>from in the future. Electric vehicles is a really hot

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 7>topic right now, especially because Tesla has stolen the electric

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 7>market from the original traditional automakers.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Stolen or just smart and read the market and first

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>move for advantage, I mean, no offense. Many would argue

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that Tesla woke up the world and said we can

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>do this because I think the traditional automakers were putting

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>out a much longer timeline and Tesla came in and

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of woke everybody.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Yet, well, I think what happened differently was the fact

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 7>that they actually went to court and they decided that

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 7>they were going to actually go direct to consumer. And

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 7>that's a big deal. Yeah, it's a huge deal. All

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 7>of America, twenty five traditional automakers all were set a

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 7>long time ago, and the law basically said that you

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 7>could not sell direct to consumer sales.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 2>But why not, you know, Kevin, come on in on this.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 2>Why can't cars be sold direct to consumers where they

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>are now? I couldn't be like, who was that protecting?

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 6>Well, well, there's a lot to unpack here. First of all,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 6>an automaker is going to book revenue on the sale

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 6>to the dealership, right, So when you have companies like

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Lucid and Rivian and starting to happen to Tesla where

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 6>you can't deliver to the consumer all your vehicles, you

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 6>can't book that revenue. And that's where these price cuts

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 6>are coming from, right. You have to you're paying to

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 6>build the vehicle, so all that cost is in your

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 6>cost of goods. But you're not booking revenue until you

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 6>sell it or deliver it to the consumer and they

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 6>pay for it, where everybody else with a franchise model

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 6>is booking revenue. So your gross margin is consistent because

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 6>your revenue is booked and offsetting your cost of goods

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 6>on the sale to the dealership. The other thing is, look,

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 6>if there's a ten percent haircut in what the manufacturer

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 6>takes in selling the vehicle to the dealership wholesale, there's

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 6>no way, ever, that any automaker at scale is going

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 6>to recreate the franchise model and deliver and support and

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 6>service vehicles at a margin better than ten percent. Ever,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 6>so the direct sales model isn't scalable. I mean, people

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 6>talk about how great it is for TESL, but it's

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 6>not right, and it's not scalable, and it's not sustainable,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 6>and it's not something that the legacy automakers can move to.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But one challenge there, Diana, feel free to just jump

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 3>in here, yeah, is you know, if you're a car dealership,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 3>you're making so much of your money based on servicing

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 3>internal combustion engine vehicles. Absolutely, somebody brings in a car

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to get an oil change. You know you're making money

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 3>on that. Yeah, you know it doesn't need an oil

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>change an EV, right.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 7>But at the end of the day, not all automakers

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 7>are going to make it.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 7>You've got all of the traditional automakers, including the Big

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 7>three now actually coming out with electric vehicles. You have Tesla,

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 7>you have Recent, you have Rivian, you have pull Start,

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 7>you have BYD Chinese automakers coming in. Sony Honda is

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 7>building a vehicle and releasing their car in twenty twenty six. Overall,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 7>not everybody's going to make it, and they're going after

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 7>hard dollars for EV. Now what has happened with Detroit

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 7>Big Three, they won't lose ground right now on EV

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 7>selling EV leasing EV at the end of the day

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 7>if they don't resolve the UAW strike right And that's

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 7>my fear because when someone leases a vehicle for three years,

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 7>you're locked for three years. You cannot make another brand

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 7>decision after that. So I think in the next five years,

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 7>the evs that are gonna make it are all going

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 7>to be We're going to know who they are and

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 7>they are going to be BMW. I believe that. I

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 7>believe there's going to be the Germans the Koreans. I

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 7>think that Japanese brands like Toyota is going to actually

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 7>also that's what I'm fearing, Like, are you what are

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 7>you afraid of? If the UAW strike doesn't get resolved, eventually,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 7>we will not be able to produce these electric vehicles.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 2>So but and what But there's there's resolution, and then

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>there's like, what's the resolution that needs to happen, that

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 2>needs just be done.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 7>We just have to negotiate where it's fair for everybody.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 7>But overall, I want the Detroit three to make it.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 7>These are the only auto makers in the US. Well,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 7>we can't not have the US market.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Apartment of Tesla.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So Kevin come back here. I mean, what is

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the right balance? Does it make sense that workers get

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>more money? I mean, that's the backbone of these automakers,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, you don't want to increase

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>those legacy costs so that I don't know, five years

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>from now, you know, you're looking at an industry that,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, like we saw before the Great Financial Crisis, right,

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that had some real serious problems.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Well, look, you know people talk about Tesla dominating

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 6>EV sales, which are still a very small percentage of

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 6>sales in this country. They did it because they lose

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 6>money on the vehicles for ten years. And it's not

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 6>an issue of if or when legacy automakers can make

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 6>a decent EV, it's when are they profitable. And that's

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 6>why you get slow moving or slow play by the

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 6>domestic manufacturers. They're printing money on full size internal combustion

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 6>pickups and SUVs, and then the market or the media

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 6>or the government wants to move to an unprofitable alternative

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 6>and it's just not ready and that makes it very messy.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 6>And that's where it is right now. So it's not

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 6>a matter of you know, ken GM figure out how

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 6>to make an EV. They made an EV in the

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 6>nineteen nineties and saw what that costs look like that

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 6>it was unsustainable. So what's going to happen with the

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 6>additional costs in this labor contract is that the small cars,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 6>the unprofitable cars, the inexpensive cars are going to get

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 6>lopped off the bottom of the portfolio and prices are

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 6>going to go higher for everybody.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, So glad we got to speak with both

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 2>of you. Kevin Tynan, he is our senior autos and

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 2>analyst for our Bloomberg Intelligence team and Diana Lee, thanks

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming back, co founder and CEO at Constellation.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Brother Mack.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 7>The journal.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Now about you? Let me drive?

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>No, no, who's going to honey?

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to drive.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 7>It's good question.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe. Well don on

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, TikTok, everybody, Just under eighteen minutes left in

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 2>today's trading session. We've got stocks near their lows of

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the session, and this, you know, as we really have

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 2>seen a bit of a market reset when it comes

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to yield expectations. We were just breaking down the markets

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 2>with John Tucker ten year note four fifty four, and

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>you've got that to year note with a yield to

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>five point twelve.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm really interested to hear what our next guest has

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 3>to think. Very pleased to have with us. Nancy Tangler,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 3>chief investment officer at Laffer Tangler Investment. She's here in

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 3>our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Also, her new book, The

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Women's Guide to Successful Investing, is out now. Nancy, good

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>to have you with us. How are you?

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 8>I'm good, Tim thanks so much for having me.

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to start with just the markets today.

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you picked quite a day to come join us. Yeah,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 3>you know you were here to just out Frida day, right, Yeah,

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>John Tucker who said that, You know, you take a

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 3>time machine all the way back to June to see

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, the S and P five hundred looking like this.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 3>What are your thoughts?

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think there's a lot of things going on,

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 8>but effectively, you know, there's been a lot of triggers,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 8>let me put it that way. So we had the FED,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 8>now we've got the potential shutdown. Then we've had you know,

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 8>we've got earnings upcoming, and we had you know, we've

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 8>got uncertainty around how high rates are going to stay

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 8>for how long. But I actually don't think much of

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 8>that matters in the long term. There's also window dressing

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 8>going on and a quarter and then you're going to

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 8>get the mutual funds shoring up their portfolios in October.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 8>I think what really matters, what's going to matter and

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 8>will continue to matter, is earnings. And I'm actually a

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 8>little more optimistic than the street. I've been doing this

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 8>for forty years, I'm sorry to report, and you know, interest

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 8>rates have been at this level much of my career,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 8>and so real rates if you go back to the nineties,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 8>sort of vacillated between two percent and four and a

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 8>half percent, and they're at two percent now on the tenure.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 8>So I don't find any of this super distressing. Not

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 8>nearly as worried about interest rates as it relates to

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 8>technology as I am about a stronger dollar. I think

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 8>that's going to be a challenge to earnings in the

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 8>coming quarter. But mostly I view this as an opportunity

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 8>to step in and pick.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Off some names.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 8>Just like last October, we were adding to technology names

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 8>pretty robustly. We were trimming those names in May, June,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 8>July and adding to industrials. I'll be doing the flip

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 8>if possible in the coming weeks.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>So buying into technology continue to Yep, interesting which technology.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 8>So we're gonna we really like the established tech names.

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to say old economy, some of them

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.239
<v Speaker 8>are old economy, Carol, but in general the names that

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 8>are actually monetizing AI and cloud computing. So take a

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 8>name like in the old economy space Oracle. They reported

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 8>the street thought it was disappointing. I didn't think it

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 8>was that disappointing. They doubled their cloud computing AI cloud

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 8>computing business that they generate, you know, seventy or eighty

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 8>percent of their revenue. Seventy percent is renewable. So this

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 8>is a company. The margins are improving, even with Cerner,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 8>which was the negative, margins are improving, so we've been

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 8>adding to that name. But well, I mean, I'd love

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 8>another chance at Microsoft at two hundred and eleven dollars

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 8>a share, like where it was less faull.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what else? Microsoft, Oracle? What else are you at?

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you? Nvidia?

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Not?

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 7>It is?

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 8>It was it was cheap enough on our valuation work

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 8>for about twenty minutes and we missed it.

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.239
<v Speaker 2>So we're watching it.

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 8>We haven't loaded. We've done all the fundamental work, which

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 8>is not terribly exciting. I mean, you know, it's a

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 8>great company.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Do we have a headline on open Ai in terms

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of evaluation.

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, ninety billion dollars, Carol. This is based on a

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 3>share sale journal sounds like a pretty hefty valuation. Yeah,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 3>for press private company. Where do you stand on the

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 3>AI revolution?

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 8>I actually think that it's going to improve productivity. I

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 8>think there's going to be new startups we don't know

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 8>anything about. But what you're seeing is all the major players, Amazon, Microsoft, Google,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 8>they're all investing in sort of the leading edge innovators.

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 8>And Microsoft for sure has figured out a way to monetize.

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 8>We like the names that are already making money off it.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 8>So a name like Broadcom, they think about twenty five

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 8>percent of their revenues are going to come from AI

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 8>cloud Enterprise CHIPS's that's our largest holding actually across all

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 8>of our strategies.

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you say you see this as a buying opportunity.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there's further to go when it comes

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to declines on the S and P?

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 3>How much further?

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if I don't really do marketingcast for forty years,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't be surprised if we had another five to

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 8>seven percent down. It could be more, but we end

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 8>the year higher from these levels and from whatever level

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 8>we bought them out at, And that I can say

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 8>with I think somewhat certainty.

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Help me out though. With the Treasury trade, we had

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>another two year auction yield stopping at five point zero

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent, highest auction yield in more than seventeen years.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Will we feel I feel like we keep having these

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>superlatives when it comes to the treasury trade. But as

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you say, it was the negative rate cycle that was

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the anomaly. Yes, So why is it that it feels

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>so bad?

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 8>I think, look at the average person in this business

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 8>has not been doing it for forty years. They've been

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 8>doing it for fifteen twenty, where we were in a

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 8>perennial bull market for bonds, and so I think there's

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 8>this consternation if I've never seen this before. I mean,

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 8>my first mortgage was twelve and a half percent, and.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 3>We might be getting close to this.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 8>We made it, We were able to make the payments.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, you make adjustments. But I think but interest

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 8>rates were also at eighteen percent, so I think the

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 8>Fed and well, I'm sorry, the federal government has really

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 8>distorted the short end the treasury, and so I mean,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 8>I'm taking advantage of it. We were out of bonds

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 8>in August to twenty twenty when the ten year yield

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 8>hit fifty bases points. We moved our clients back into

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 8>short ladders a year ago, and we continue to renew

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 8>those ladders.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Many money markets or.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 8>No, no, we're just we buy treasuries or corporates getting

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 8>on their personal preference, and we build short ladders. Some

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 8>have maturities of three years, but many just have the

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 8>maturity under a year. We just keep rolling them.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.479
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just thinking about the book that you've got out,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 2>the Women's gude to Successful Investing. So what would you

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 2>you know women men were really different? John Tucker? Well, well,

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I want to know, Nancy, and I know we've talked

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to you a little bit about your book which is out, Like,

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 2>what is the differences that we need to be thinking

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>about and why a book specifically for women?

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. So I retired from the business for about five

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 8>years and I went and got a master's in creative writing.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 8>Don't ask, but I spent a lot of time meeting

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 8>women at my kids supports.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>In romance novelice. It's really okay, Nancy, we still like you.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 8>I'd love to And I've met these really smart women

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 8>and they'd say to me, well, what did you do?

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 8>And I said, well, I was, you know, chief investment officer,

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 8>and they'd recoil physically. They were not involved with the

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 8>with the decision making in their in their households, they

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 8>didn't know the passwords, they didn't care. And then I

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 8>started to do the research, and I was like, this

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 8>is the book I'd written a memoir, so haha, funny

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 8>wasn't a romance novel. But I decided to write this

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 8>book because women first age of average age of first

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 8>divorce in the US is thirty, average age of a

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 8>widow is fifty nine. That's exactly how I was old

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 8>I was when my husband passed away. There is no

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 8>safety net for women. There isn't any health care if

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 8>they're not working, and if they don't know what's going

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 8>on in the portfolios, it's a bad time to learn.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 8>And so I really wanted to encourage women. Turns out,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 8>research shows live research of real portfolios that women perform

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 8>better than their male counterparts in every study that's been done.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 8>They perform particularly well against single men because they don't

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 8>have that sort of drive for beat the index. And

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 8>we controlled ninety five trillion dollars of wealth globally and

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 8>are adding by trillions.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, all right, we have to run.

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I know we'll talk more about this in the future. Nancy,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. Nancy Tangley, chief investment officer at

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Laffertangler Investments.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple Spotify,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal