Speaker 1: All Media.
Speaker 2: Welcome to It Could Happen here, the podcast that tells
Speaker 2: you what's going to happen before it's happening. I'm Garrison Davis.
Speaker 2: Joined with me is Mia Wong Glue. So today we're
Speaker 2: gonna be talking about predictive programming, something that I assume
Speaker 2: some conspiracy theorist has accused of the show of doing,
Speaker 2: specifically Robert, But we're not gonna talk about us too much. Instead,
Speaker 2: we're going to talk about the origin of this conspiracy
Speaker 2: theory and some famous use cases throughout history of how
Speaker 2: you might have been affected by predictive programming the listener.
Speaker 2: So let's start by defining our terms here. Predictive programming
Speaker 2: is a conspiracy theory that future events are seeded within
Speaker 2: fictional media like film, TV, video games, and books to
Speaker 2: subliminally influence the public perception of real world events. But
Speaker 2: this isn't simply about movies like just predicting the future.
Speaker 2: It's an intentional method of large scale social conditioning used
Speaker 2: by a conspiracy of deep state government agents and the
Speaker 2: entertainment industry. This term was coined by a conspiracy theorist
Speaker 2: named Alan Watt, different from the like pop Zen writer
Speaker 2: Alan Watts. Different guy. There's a one letter difference. I'm
Speaker 2: sure they share some amount of audience crossover, but they
Speaker 2: are different people. He kind of coined this concept around
Speaker 2: the early two thousands. From what I can tell, he's
Speaker 2: a Scottish Canadian conspiracy theorist. Oddly enough, he's kind of
Speaker 2: one of the least problematic conspiracy theorists that I've run into,
Speaker 2: Like he's openly pushed back on on like anti semitism
Speaker 2: from David Ike and Alex Jones, Like he just seems
Speaker 2: to kind of be a silly guy. He died a
Speaker 2: few years ago. From what I can tell, at least
Speaker 2: on like a cursory search, he's like not the most problematic.
Speaker 2: I mean, obviously still a conspiracy theorist, but like kind
Speaker 2: of like the token good conspiracy theorists. I don't know,
Speaker 2: but he defined predictive programming as the power of suggestion
Speaker 2: using the media of fiction to create a desired outcome.
Speaker 2: A more expansive definition that he gave is quote, predictive
Speaker 2: programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by
Speaker 2: the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes
Speaker 2: to implemented by the elites. If and when these changes
Speaker 2: are put through the public will already be familiarized with
Speaker 2: them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening
Speaker 2: any possible public resistance and commotion. Predictive programming, therefore may
Speaker 2: be considered a veiled form of preemptive mass manipulation or
Speaker 2: mind control courtesy of our puppet masters. So that's Alan Watt,
Speaker 2: that is that is his definition. Like I said, he
Speaker 2: kind of came up with this idea in the early
Speaker 2: two thousands, and it spread like wildfire throughout his competitors
Speaker 2: and his contemporaries in the conspiratorial milieu. Yeah, it's really recent.
Speaker 2: I thought it was older than that. Yeah, No, it
Speaker 2: is a new one.
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 2: It is a relatively new conspiracy theory. Like it doesn't
Speaker 2: it doesn't go all the way back to like well,
Speaker 2: some of like the rough ideas were kind of used
Speaker 2: by stuff, you know, going all the way back to
Speaker 2: the John Birch Society. But the actual term predictive programming
Speaker 2: and the modern understanding of that term are much more recent.
Speaker 2: An Ohio State University article on the topic said, quote,
Speaker 2: Predictive programming, at its core is a tactic to reduce
Speaker 2: resistance by introducing concepts that seem far fetched and continuously
Speaker 2: reintroducing them to make these concepts appear more likely or
Speaker 2: at the very least acceptable. So that's more of like
Speaker 2: an outside in definition from from researchers. So let's let's
Speaker 2: go back to Alan watch a little bit, because he's
Speaker 2: kind of been largely forgotten in the conspiratorial milieu, replaced
Speaker 2: by a whole bunch of more like bombastic and troubling
Speaker 2: figures like Jones and Ike and many many smaller, smaller
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorists. But I listened to what I believe to
Speaker 2: be the first kind of broadcast where where he coined
Speaker 2: this idea as opposed to Alex Jones. Alan Watt is
Speaker 2: like a very like calm speaker, like he's he's actually
Speaker 2: kind of just like pleasant to listen to because he's
Speaker 2: just so like like calm, methodical. He's not like bombastic.
Speaker 2: He just sounds like a regular, like chill guy. His
Speaker 2: his website is amazing. It looks like a nineteen ninety
Speaker 2: five website that has never been updated. It is. It
Speaker 2: is fantastic. I love that the website has stayed up
Speaker 2: after his death because it is just a joy to
Speaker 2: look at. But Alan Watt describes predictive programming as a
Speaker 2: quote unquote ancient science. He thought that quote families of
Speaker 2: actors go back thousands of years. They're a specialized section
Speaker 2: of society that intermarries within their own ranks unquote. So
Speaker 2: like he thinks all actors come from like this one
Speaker 2: large like intergenerational family that have been that have been
Speaker 2: like in the profession of acting, which like is kind
Speaker 2: of true for like the Coppolas, but like, eh, you know,
Speaker 2: it's like, yes, there's a massive like inepotism problem, but
Speaker 2: like no, yeah, actors art like a single family that
Speaker 2: goes back like millennia. But that is that that is
Speaker 2: one of his beliefs he calls he calls producers magicians.
Speaker 2: Quote they know what messages must be imprinted into the
Speaker 2: minds of the audience, they know the techniques, a perfect
Speaker 2: science unquote. He also talks about how Shakespeare was involved
Speaker 2: in predictive programming. Quote Shakespeare was the magician that brought
Speaker 2: the English language into being unquote. So he said, like
Speaker 2: Shakespeare is like the person who developed like the modern
Speaker 2: the modern English language. Like obviously English like pre dates Shakespeare,
Speaker 2: but like he thinks that through Shakespeare's writing, he was
Speaker 2: able to like popularize the modern form of English, which
Speaker 2: just isn't true, but it's a it's a it's a
Speaker 2: funny thing to believe. And he thinks all people are
Speaker 2: like literal magicians, like like wizards, like you know, like
Speaker 2: like wands, pointy hats, like they're all like doing actual
Speaker 2: like magic. This seems like such a roundabout way of
Speaker 2: doing this, like you can just absolutely magic. So so true,
Speaker 2: so true ya. So, Alan Watt talks about that in
Speaker 2: the late sixties there was a big, weeks long international
Speaker 2: meeting to decide that Hollywood would be the place to
Speaker 2: create the culture of the future. He then discusses how
Speaker 2: like Hollywood controls people through like war movies, and how
Speaker 2: like the DoD helps Hollywood with equipment for war movies,
Speaker 2: but they have to approve the messaging, which like that
Speaker 2: has like a little grain of truth in there, Like yes,
Speaker 2: to use military equipment, you do need to get like
Speaker 2: approval from people in the government. And yeah, there is
Speaker 2: a form of Hollywood that is like just war propaganda
Speaker 2: like that there is there's there's a kernel of truth here,
Speaker 2: but not exactly in the way. Alan Watt talks about it.
Speaker 2: Do you know what else has a kernel of truth
Speaker 2: all of these ads, there's one single kernel in all
Speaker 2: of these ads that is revealing a divine truth of existence.
Speaker 2: So watch out and listen for this one kernel of truth. Okay,
Speaker 2: we are back to talk about Alan Watt and his
Speaker 2: predictive programming idea which has spread through the conspiratorial milieu
Speaker 2: like wildfire. So probably the funniest thing he gets to
Speaker 2: on this whole Hollywood as magician's rant is quote, if
Speaker 2: you look at the word Hollywood, it means holy wood,
Speaker 2: which of course is the staff of the magi, the
Speaker 2: grand magus of the occult. He waves a wand and
Speaker 2: everything is changed. He casts the spell. So so he
Speaker 2: thinks that Hollywood literally refers to like a magic wand,
Speaker 2: like a holy a holywood. He then he then also
Speaker 2: talks about Hollywood as like as like a grove, like
Speaker 2: like Hollywood, like the place is is is a grove
Speaker 2: quote similar to Jewish holy groves and folklore. Moses's staff
Speaker 2: was placed in a grove and that was a special
Speaker 2: place for higher magi to meet. Unquote. And I don't
Speaker 2: think he means this anti semitically, It just kind of
Speaker 2: sounds anti Semitic, but he talks about anyway. You can't
Speaker 2: even blame the US of this. So those guy's Canadian
Speaker 2: Scottish Canadian. Yeah, yeah, literally literally me, literally me. I'll
Speaker 2: read one more Alan Watt quote here, which is just
Speaker 2: just a banger. Hollywood is the magician's wand Holy Holly,
Speaker 2: which has been used to hast a spell on the
Speaker 2: unsuspecting public. Things or ideas that would otherwise be seen
Speaker 2: as bizarre, vulgar, undesirable, or impossible are inserted into films
Speaker 2: in the realm of fantasy. When the viewer watches these films,
Speaker 2: his or her mind is left open to suggestion and
Speaker 2: the conditioning process begins. These same movies, which are designed
Speaker 2: to program the average person, can give the discerning viewer
Speaker 2: a better understanding of the workings and the plan of
Speaker 2: the world agenda unquote. So Unlike a lot of modern
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorists who like refuse to watch movies because of
Speaker 2: predicting programming, Alan Watt thinks it's actually useful to watch
Speaker 2: movies because you can get like a future like glimpse
Speaker 2: of what is gonna happen in the world, which is
Speaker 2: like a neat little difference compared to some of his
Speaker 2: modern contemporaries. Yeah you can. You can. You can watch
Speaker 2: Batman realize and occupy Wall Street's happening, yes one year ago, Yeah, totally.
Speaker 2: It's predictive programming in the past, in the past, Yeah, yeah, preemptive.
Speaker 2: So let's talk about some examples of predictive programming.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: One thing that people often point to when discussing this
Speaker 2: is the television show The Simpsons. Now. A writer and
Speaker 2: producer of The Simpsons from back in the nineties, Bill Oakley,
Speaker 2: gave a statement to Reuters a few years ago about
Speaker 2: the concept of The Simpsons being able to predict real
Speaker 2: world events. Quote. I would say in general, when people
Speaker 2: say The Simpsons has predicted something, it's that we were
Speaker 2: really just satirizing real life events from years before, and
Speaker 2: because history keeps repeating itself, it just seems like we're
Speaker 2: predicting things unquote. So I think is actually a really
Speaker 2: great observation. The show actually hasn't made very many predictions.
Speaker 2: It is often just satirizing actual events from around the
Speaker 2: time of the show's production, and lots of those events
Speaker 2: we've just now forgotten in the present, and similar events
Speaker 2: keep happening in the present, like viruses or Donald Trump
Speaker 2: running for president just like he did in the two thousands.
Speaker 2: So it's easy to kind of see these things as
Speaker 2: predictions when in fact we've just forgotten the events that
Speaker 2: they were a rich satirizing. Now, many of the kind
Speaker 2: of vigral quote unquote predictions you see online associated with
Speaker 2: The Simpsons actually just have a vastly different context within
Speaker 2: the show, and in many cases are actually just altered
Speaker 2: images fan art, photoshops or memes with mislabeled timestamps, or
Speaker 2: genuine images satirizing current events, making it appear as if
Speaker 2: the Simpsons version happened beforehand, when really it was like
Speaker 2: something satirizing an event a month ago, made to look
Speaker 2: like it was actually produced in like two thousand and
Speaker 2: seven or something, Right, So it's just a whole bunch
Speaker 2: of manipulated media. One instance of something that appears to
Speaker 2: be an impressive prediction but is actually just showing how
Speaker 2: the creators of the show pay attention to politics is
Speaker 2: the purple suit that President Lisa wears, bearing similarity to
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris's get up on an inauguration day, but purple
Speaker 2: was also worn by Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton during
Speaker 2: previous inauguration days. It's the color of the Suffagette movement,
Speaker 2: and it tends to symbolize unity between red and blue states.
Speaker 2: It's a very common thing that women wear at inauguration day,
Speaker 2: so like it's just a good guess. So there's a
Speaker 2: lot of stuff like that. Now, probably the most famous
Speaker 2: example of the Simpsons predictive power is probably the nine
Speaker 2: to eleven poster from the New York episode. Now, there
Speaker 2: is a wealth of eerie nine to eleven imagery from
Speaker 2: years before the attack, either associated with the date itself,
Speaker 2: destruction of the Twin Towers, or in the case of
Speaker 2: the Simpsons, both Now as for the others, nine to
Speaker 2: one one is just a common number in the US,
Speaker 2: so you see a pop up in a lot of stuff.
Speaker 2: And the Twin Towers, as well as the Statue of Liberty,
Speaker 2: the Empire State, and the Chrysler Building are all often
Speaker 2: used in like post apocalyptic or like societal collapse destructive artwork.
Speaker 2: Of course, there was the bombing at the World Trade
Speaker 2: Center like a decade prior, and it's really easy now
Speaker 2: just to focus on instances of art depicting the Twin Towers. Right,
Speaker 2: we have Michael Keaton's The Squeeze from nineteen eighty seven,
Speaker 2: Cookie Monster eating the Twin Towers in nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 2: The Towers disintegrating in the nineteen ninety three Mario movie,
Speaker 2: The Infamous Illuminati Card Game, The Coup's Party music album cover,
Speaker 2: and my personal favorite instance, the pilot episode of the
Speaker 2: X Files of spinoff show The Lone Gunmen, in which
Speaker 2: members of the US government deep State remotely hijack a
Speaker 2: commercial airliner to crash it into the world tranessetter, to
Speaker 2: blame it on terrorists and start a new war in
Speaker 2: the Middle East. This episode aired six months before nine
Speaker 2: to eleven. It is the funniest thing. It's wild, it's
Speaker 2: like specifically being like an X Files a spin off.
Speaker 2: It's just gold hilarious stuff. And obviously for another predictive
Speaker 2: programming type thing. In the wake of COVID nineteen, many
Speaker 2: have pointed out that movies like Contagion or even zombie
Speaker 2: media are instances of predictive programming to get the public
Speaker 2: to accept a massive global pandemic, when in most cases
Speaker 2: it's actually just like scientists being like, hey, a pandemic
Speaker 2: could probably be a big problem, and then screenwriters being like, oh,
Speaker 2: let's write a movie about a pandemic, right, very easy.
Speaker 2: Do you know what else contains very important subliminal messaging?
Speaker 2: Maya cars two? Well, the products and services that support
Speaker 2: this podcast. Listen to these to get a glimpse into
Speaker 2: the future. All right, we are back and we are
Speaker 2: joined by Robert Evans to give his thoughts on the
Speaker 2: predictive power of the Simpsons.
Speaker 3: Hello Robert, Hey, you know Garrison. Once upon a time
Speaker 3: I watched the Simpsons episode where Homer decides not to
Speaker 3: go to church instead to stay asleep on Sunday all day,
Speaker 3: and that really kind of predicted me sleeping in this
Speaker 3: morning after getting in on a late night flight last
Speaker 3: night and missing the start of this recording. So the
Speaker 3: power of predictive programming simply cannot be denied. Because there's
Speaker 3: a scene in that where Homer like closes his eyes
Speaker 3: and curls his to and pulls his cover cepo for
Speaker 3: himself when he's avoiding church. That really predicted me at
Speaker 3: about eleven am this morning.
Speaker 2: Well that's great. Do you know who else is good
Speaker 2: at predictive programming? Batman? Okay, so we've already talked a
Speaker 2: little bit about some of the predictive programming conspiracies based
Speaker 2: on The Dark Knight Rises. In the first segment of
Speaker 2: our Occupy Gotham City episode, you know how the Aurora
Speaker 2: Colorado shooter was a modern MK Ultra victim program to
Speaker 2: distract from the software leaks that'll expose the corrupt elites
Speaker 2: because his father worked on predictive algorithms for the financial sector,
Speaker 2: just like the plot of The Dark Knight Rises. It's
Speaker 2: not the plot of the Darkness, not at all. But
Speaker 2: let's not forget that the movie also conditioned us to
Speaker 2: accept a major attack on a big sporting event, something
Speaker 2: which has also not really happened. So I'll actually be
Speaker 2: seeing Clyde Lewis again next week, so I will try
Speaker 2: to get his thoughts on his Dark Nights it Rises
Speaker 2: failed predictions. We'll see, We'll see how. We'll see how
Speaker 2: that goes for me. But those are not the only
Speaker 2: conspiracy theories around this movie. For the next one, we
Speaker 2: will turn to the King of the Lizard People, David
Speaker 2: ike Ah, there we go. He claims that when the
Speaker 2: GCPD are trying to track down the location of Bain's
Speaker 2: nuclear reactor, there's a shot of a map on which
Speaker 2: there is a location marked as Sandy Hook. And you'll
Speaker 2: never guess what happened after the Dark came out. God
Speaker 2: yeah yeah so then so yeah, now I've I've I've
Speaker 2: looked into this a decent bit, because yes, there is
Speaker 2: there is a location on the map of Gotham City
Speaker 2: marked Sandy Hook. Now this is probably named after Sandy Hook,
Speaker 2: New Jersey, just south of New York City, as on
Speaker 2: the Batman map it is, uh, it is an island
Speaker 2: that is just south of Gotham City. In the comics,
Speaker 2: it's called Tri Corner Island for like, the specific map
Speaker 2: of Gotham they used is from like the nineteen nineties,
Speaker 2: and it's called Tri Corner Island. I think they renamed
Speaker 2: it to Sandy Hook in The Dark Knet rises. So
Speaker 2: a similar map in the movie was used for marketing
Speaker 2: materials that labeled Sandy Hook as a neighborhood in Gotham,
Speaker 2: and this map also contained a neighborhood called the Narrows,
Speaker 2: a common Gotham borough in Batman lore. The Sandy Hook shooting.
Speaker 2: This led schools in Narrows, Virginia to delay their returnive
Speaker 2: students for winter break to install additional security precautions, and
Speaker 2: this was all based on a conspiracy article titled is
Speaker 2: Narrows the site of the next school massacred? Of course
Speaker 2: it wasn't, but clear, folks.
Speaker 3: There are Sandy hooks towns named Sandy Hooks in Connecticut, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi,
Speaker 3: and Missouri, Yes, Virginia, Wisconsin. Like it's it's there's a
Speaker 3: lot of them. We've made a lot of them. There's
Speaker 3: a lot of places that are sandy and look like
Speaker 3: a hook.
Speaker 2: And the secondary problem with this is that we have
Speaker 2: school shootings in so many places that if you just
Speaker 2: have a map in any movie, there's like a one
Speaker 2: in twelve chance that there's going to be a shooting there. Now,
Speaker 2: so great, great society we've built.
Speaker 3: I do kind of wonder is this something that we've
Speaker 3: like inoculated ourselves against by having so many school shootings,
Speaker 3: like because you could never Sandy Hook got so much
Speaker 3: attention because like we didn't have as many shootings back
Speaker 3: then and it was so terrible, and like maybe now
Speaker 3: we move on to because it's like what you're talking
Speaker 3: about elements of this, but like people obsessed are still
Speaker 3: obsessed over the Sandy Hook shooting today in a way
Speaker 3: that like, I don't think most mass shooting victims have
Speaker 3: to deal with, like it becoming the center of this
Speaker 3: national mania campaign.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and many pointed out that this, this Batman conspiracy
Speaker 2: theory is kind of incongruent with other Sandy Hook conspiracy theories,
Speaker 2: being like it's supposed to be a big shocking incident
Speaker 2: to get people to start to start like wanting gun
Speaker 2: control versus why would they try to warn us about it,
Speaker 2: about it happening, if it was, if the point of
Speaker 2: it is to be shocking, like, it doesn't quite make
Speaker 2: sense as most conspiracy theories do. But David Ike said,
Speaker 2: quote the Dark Knight rises is classic Saturn symbolism, and
Speaker 2: Satanists worship Saturn. So there you go. Now, curiously, do
Speaker 2: you know who else lives in Sandy Hook? Suzanne Collins,
Speaker 2: the author of The Hunger Games, which leads us to
Speaker 2: our next topic, the Hunger Games. I found this amazing
Speaker 2: blog called Through Ancient Eyes by this British guy named Neil,
Speaker 2: who's obsessed with the occult and is like a David
Speaker 2: Ike fanboy. This this blog is glorious, So I will
Speaker 2: I'll start by by by reading the The opening opening
Speaker 2: paragraph from this blog quote, don't think for a minute
Speaker 2: that the script for the Hunger Games books is purely fiction.
Speaker 2: Here we have predictive programming at its finest. What I
Speaker 2: saw was the second part of a three part narrative
Speaker 2: that clearly plants ideas of acceptance, sacrifice, and revolution in
Speaker 2: the minds of youth. The books are awash with symbols
Speaker 2: and archetypes that seem to be classic programming devices, and
Speaker 2: more alarmingly, the books seem to project a very viable
Speaker 2: future for not only America, but for the world.
Speaker 3: I mean, look, he's not entirely wrong. Because of all
Speaker 3: of the pieces of revolutionary literature and nonfiction of that
Speaker 3: have come out during our lifetimes, the Hunger Games has
Speaker 3: inspired a lot more revolutions.
Speaker 4: Absolutely else, Absolutely, That's why this one is so fun.
Speaker 4: It's because, no, like twenty twenty was, like, a not
Speaker 4: insignificant part of twenty twenty was due to a whole
Speaker 4: bunch of kids growing up with The Hunger Games.
Speaker 3: No, No, I know people who are still fighting in
Speaker 3: the jungle. So in part because of that book.
Speaker 2: Yes, exactly, So we will get into that in a
Speaker 2: bit now. Neil believes that the country of PanAm is
Speaker 2: quote clearly a reference to both Arcadia and the Greek
Speaker 2: god Pan unquote.
Speaker 3: It's an author who was up late at night looking
Speaker 3: for country names and remember it in an old airline
Speaker 3: like that's.
Speaker 2: What was going on. The region of Arcadia was home
Speaker 2: to pan and characterized by a vast wilderness with its
Speaker 2: lavish parties for the god of the wild and his nymphs. Quote.
Speaker 2: The Hunger Game's capital is an urban forest of the gods.
Speaker 2: In its classic symbolic reversal of the true meaning, it
Speaker 2: becomes a city dedicated to all that would be the
Speaker 2: opposite of true freedom unquote. Now Neil loves symbolic reversal.
Speaker 2: How you will see something depicted that is like, you know,
Speaker 2: like being against tautalitarian governments. This is actually symbolic reversal
Speaker 2: where it's actually pro authoritarian governments. Because this is this
Speaker 2: is how he talks about the entire the entirety of
Speaker 2: the movie and how it's actually trying to like seed
Speaker 2: acceptance for a one world order, a military police estate
Speaker 2: similar to David Ike. Neil also notes the Saturnian symbolism
Speaker 2: with the goat imagery of the astral signed Capricorn, linking
Speaker 2: to pan as well as the composite representation of the
Speaker 2: devil image Baphomet. Now I'm not a planetary magic guy
Speaker 2: in general, but Saturn is often linked to like the harvest, destruction, chaos.
Speaker 2: It's it's a whole thing. But Neil says, quote both
Speaker 2: Capricorn and Aquarius are ruled by Saturn and it's hidden
Speaker 2: vibrationality effect on the powers that be banking, law, education. Therefore,
Speaker 2: PanAm is the ultimate Saturn city of the future. PanAm
Speaker 2: is very much the typical totalitarian future, not Sea Lake City.
Speaker 2: It is also where that links to pandemonium in the
Speaker 2: form of a pandemic. Is the Hunger Games preparing the
Speaker 2: youth of today for some kind of tyrannical future born
Speaker 2: out of the events of the next decade that will
Speaker 2: lead to global pandemonium, which is unfortunately a pretty good
Speaker 2: prediction coming from like coming from like the early twenty tens. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they kind of were talking about a pandemic that leads
Speaker 2: to global unrest repelling against a tyrannical future. So pretty
Speaker 2: pretty good analysis by Neil there. Now, Neil also notes,
Speaker 2: you know, curious linkages between the segregated twelve districts of PanAm,
Speaker 2: just as our perception of time is governed by twelve
Speaker 2: hours and months. Oh my god. He breaks down PanAm
Speaker 2: even further, claiming that the letter E and the letter
Speaker 2: M are like numerology references, the E linking to the
Speaker 2: intel and Saturn like explorer logos, and Neil says quote
Speaker 2: according to some researchers, which is a great way to
Speaker 2: start a sentence. According to some researchers, the letter E
Speaker 2: is a very important letter number because it represents the
Speaker 2: fifth essence or element, the power of trends. No as
Speaker 2: the Jermatria stortage. Oh yeah, absolutely absolutely. He goes all
Speaker 2: out on the letter M. The letter m's a very
Speaker 2: important letter in the mystery schools of antiquity, uh huh,
Speaker 2: being the numerology equivalent of thirteen. This of course relates
Speaker 2: to the thirteen original districts, or the twelve secretors around
Speaker 2: the one capitol. Oh yeah, sure, there are of course
Speaker 2: twelve jurors and one judge. The M or the thirteenth letter,
Speaker 2: is the master with twelve disciples, and esoterically speaking, thirteen
Speaker 2: is the experiencer of the twelve signs of the zodiac.
Speaker 2: There are twelve months in the Gregorian sun calendar and
Speaker 2: thirteen months in the lunar calendar. There were thirteen districts,
Speaker 2: but now only twelve remains. There were thirteen colonies. The
Speaker 2: US is Satanism, So true, so true. Mia.
Speaker 3: There's a lot of talk about how like kids can't
Speaker 3: read anymore because how we fucked up like reading education,
Speaker 3: you know, around like the early aughts and shit, and
Speaker 3: like some the damage that that's done. But this is
Speaker 3: showing that, Like you've got a bunch of boomers who
Speaker 3: are going through these books, who are reading them very carefully,
Speaker 3: who are googling every word in them to see if
Speaker 3: there's different things. Yeah, and they catch all of this,
Speaker 3: like put all this weird maniaction together, But they don't
Speaker 3: just get that, like, yeah, if you tell kids a
Speaker 3: simple story about another young person overthrowing a tyrannical government,
Speaker 3: maybe they'll burn down their capital building. Absolutely, it's happened before,
Speaker 3: and it'll happen again.
Speaker 2: Neil gets obsessed with all these little, tiny, tiny rabbit
Speaker 2: holes that are ultimately meaningless, and like misses the very
Speaker 2: glaring obvious thing right before his eyes. He says, numbers
Speaker 2: and letters are vibrational codes that affect the subconscious. The
Speaker 2: more I look at Saturn symbolism, the more I see
Speaker 2: a thought form, waveform, or a vibrational pattern that permeates
Speaker 2: the collective thinking of humanity.
Speaker 3: Now you miss the obvious and more like there's all
Speaker 3: this obsession with like numerology, and it's like, well, no,
Speaker 3: A big part of why the Hunger Games caught on
Speaker 3: to people and was like so easy to like meme
Speaker 3: and spread as part of these revolutionary actions is they
Speaker 3: had like a thing, a hand thing that you did.
Speaker 3: They had a little salute and like kids could do
Speaker 3: it to each other.
Speaker 2: It's the Neil is not a fan of the salute,
Speaker 2: by the way, Well that's good.
Speaker 3: I'm sure he's got some fascinating opinions on that shit.
Speaker 2: Oh he sure does, and we will hear his extremely
Speaker 2: fascinating opinions on the three finger salute, as well as
Speaker 2: other Hunger Games conspiracies and new upcoming predictive programming conspiracies
Speaker 2: based around the Civil War movie in the next episode.
Speaker 2: So stay tuned tomorrow for even more exciting news on
Speaker 2: how you can predict the future by watching movies.
Speaker 1: See tomorrow, It could happen here as a production of
Speaker 1: cool Zone Media.
Speaker 2: For more podcasts from cool Zone.
Speaker 1: Media, visit our website, cool Zone Media, or check us
Speaker 1: out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
Speaker 1: listen to podcasts, you can find sources for It could
Speaker 1: happen here, updated monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening.