WEBVTT - Let There Be Light

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Red Pilled America. This week America lost its

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet Dad, Scott Adams. The news was not a shock

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to any of us, because, just as he lived his life,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Scott generously gave us the opportunity to prepare for his

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>departure and say our goodbyes at Red Pilled America. We

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>did that by producing a four part series on his

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>life entitled The Internet Dad, which you can listen to

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on any audio podcast platform. What we learned from our

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>interactions with him was that Scott Adams was an incredibly

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>generous man. When we reached out to him about being

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>on the show in early twenty twenty, he could have

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just ignored the message. We were a small, little anomaly

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of a podcast with not much history at the time,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but instead of ignoring our message, he took the time

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to speak with us, time that we would later learn

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was precious. While the result was magical, our conversation led

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to this episode, Let There Be Light, which we first

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>published on May ninth, twenty twenty. It would go on

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to become far and away our most popular episode, and

0:00:59.960 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to our pleasant surprise, it inspired Scott to create one

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>of his most influential streams of all time. Which he

0:01:05.960 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>opened with a message about this episode.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>So something happened today that was a very big deal

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>in my life because it opened the door for me

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to tell you the next thing I'm going to tell you,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and it was that there was a podcast by Red

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Pilled America on iHeartRadio with Patrick Kurelshi I hope I'm

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>saying that right, and is a co host Adriana Cortez.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You should listen to. This podcast is one of the

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 2>best produced, written, directed, performed the thing I've ever seen.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is really high quality just as a production.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 2>So even if you the content didn't interest you, and

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>believe me, it will. It's really interesting. The content is amazing.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Part of it's about me, which is part of the story,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's just really well done. So do yourself a

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>favor and listen to it. It will be necessary probably

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>for you to fully get this next part.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott would go on to give his legendary stream the

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>User Interface for Reality. To celebrate Scott's life, we thought

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we'd replay let There Be Light. It asked the question

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is science fiction bringing us closer to God? In it,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we tell the story of the development of the simulation theory,

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a theory we believe played a role in leading Scott

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Adams to Jesus Christ. We already miss you, Scott, but

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you sometime soon. We promised to follow your

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mantra be useful. Now on with the show. Are we

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>living in a virtual reality? It may sound far fetched,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but this science fiction concept is seriously being considered by

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest thinkers.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 3>This could be some simulation.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It could do.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>You entertain that well.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 3>The argment for the simulation, I think is quite strong.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Tonight's topic is the universe a computer simulation.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we're living in a simulation is no

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>longer just crazy talk, and the concept suggests something that

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>makes most scientists uncomfortable. If we're living in a simulation,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>there must be a creator with this idea spreading It

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>raises the question is science fiction bringing us closer to God?

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Patrick Carelci.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Adriana Cortes and this.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Is Red Pilled America, a storytelling show.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 6>This is not.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Another talk show covering the day's news. We're all about

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 4>telling stories.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Stories. Hollywood doesn't want you to hear stories.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 4>The media mocks stories about everyday Americans. At the globalist ignore.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You can think of Red Pilled America as audio documentaries,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and we promise only one thing, the truth. Welcome to

0:03:53.600 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Red Pilled America. One night in the early days of

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarantine, a thought popped into my head just as

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I was falling asleep. Is this real life? Have we

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>really shut down the entire US economy? For a moment,

0:04:17.039 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>as I laid there, I was convinced that I'd wake

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>up the next morning and the entire quarantine mess would

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just be a bad dream. I think most of us

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have experienced this in their life, or something so unbelievable

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>happens that you begin to question whether it's actually occurring.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's triggered by the death of a loved one,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>or when you're young and just becoming self aware, or

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's happened when you're in some kind of an

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>altered state, like that kid who just got out of

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>his dental surgery.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 4>Is its real life?

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, this is real life.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>At some point in life, we've all questioned reality. The

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>surreal nature of the quarantine was one of those times,

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and it reminded me of a provocative concept that has

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>been gaining steam throughout science circles for well over a decade,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and that concept is the simulation argument, the idea that

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we are all not actually real life, flesh and blood

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>human beings existing in a physical world, but instead we're

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>living in a computer simulation like the matrix.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Right now, we're inside a computer program.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it really so hard to believe? The concept of

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>living in a simulated reality may sound ridiculous to most,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's occupied the minds of some of today's biggest thinkers,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>including tech mogul Elon Musk.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 8>How do you think we'll virtual reality tie in the

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 8>future of the transportation which you've got working on, thank you.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh maybe we're in a simulation right now?

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, seriously, the popularity of this concept got me

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to thinking, can the simulation, this science fiction concept bring

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>us closer to God. To find the answer, we're going

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at the origin of this fascinating idea and

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how our prediction by cartoonist Scott Adams would eventually help

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>lead your humble code host back to God. Trust me

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when I say that you may not buy into this

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>take on the world as a simulated reality, but you

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>will undoubtedly see the profound shift it brings to the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>debate between science and faith, and the God fearing community

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>could come out ahead.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Scott Adams has a truly unique mind, as the creator

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 4>of the Dilbert comic strip and the best selling author

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 4>of Loser Think how untrained brains are ruining America. You

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 4>may not have expected a cartoonist to be the kind

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>of thinker that shifts the national narrative, but you'd be

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 4>wrong in that assumption. For over three decades, Scott Adams

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 4>has been impacting American culture in ways few can claim,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>whether through Dilbert, where he lampoons the absurdity of our

0:06:59.960 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 4>American corporate overlords, or through his Morning and Show Coffee

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 4>with Scott Adams, where he regularly picks apart media hoaxes.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Scott Adams has a way of nailing predictions and riling

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>up the masses all along the way. For people who've

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 4>been following Scott, you may think that it was his

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 4>analysis of Trump's historic presidential run that landed him in

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>his biggest pickle, But it wasn't. It was actually a

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety seven prediction that seemed preposterous.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I wrote the book The Dilbert Future that's Scott, and

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I tried to make a bunch of predictions that we

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>could actually, you know, later test, and I intentionally picked

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>what I thought was the most ridiculously impossible prediction. And

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 2>then if you get that one right, you know you

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>really got something the show. So I picked that the

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>theory of evolution would be debunked in my lifetime.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Now, at the time, Scott's Dilbert comic strip had already

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 4>become wildly popular throughout mainstream America, but its core audience,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the group that first adopt to Dilbert were techies, a

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>naturally science heavy crowd.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, imagine every scientist and biologist hearing that, Oh my god.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was attacked for years, decades actually from

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 2>people saying and the dumbest thing anybody ever said is

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>this guy doesn't believe in evolution. Now they twisted that

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 2>into I don't believe in evolution, which is not exactly

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 2>what I was saying. I was making a prediction.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 4>His critics accused him of being a creationist and an

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>apologist for intelligent design. He was neither, but that didn't

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>stop the prediction from landing him in the crosshairs of

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 4>the science world. Why would his readers be so triggered

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 4>by Scott's prediction. Well, the best person to help answer

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 4>that question is the man who has been the face

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>of evolution for the past four decades, Richard Dawkins.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm a biologist, and the central theorem of our subject,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 9>Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection in profess circles everywhere.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 9>It's of course, universally accepted.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 4>According to mister Dawkins, and pulls on this back him up.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Those from the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, the STEM community

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 4>overwhelmingly believe in evolution by natural selection, the theory popularized

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>by Charles Darwin that all living things developed incrementally from

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 4>a common ancestor. This explains why Dilbert's audience would disagree

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 4>with Scott's evolution debunking prediction, but it doesn't totally get

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>it why his detractors would react with such hostility. Well,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 4>the oracle of evolution can help illuminate that too. In

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 4>a two thousand and two speech given it the Technology

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Entertainment Design Conference, or TED as it's widely known, mister

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Dawkins explained a core trait in evolution.

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 9>But here I want to say something nice about creationist.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 9>It's not a thing I often do so listen carefully.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 9>I think they're right about one thing. I think they're

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 9>right that evolution is fundamentally hostile to religion. I've already

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 9>said that many individual evolutions, it's like the Pope, are

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 9>also religious. But I think they're deluding themselves. I believe

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 9>a true understanding of Darwinism is deeply corrosive to religious faith.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 9>Now it may sound as though I'm about to preach atheism,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 9>and I want to reassure you that that's not what

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to do. In an audience as sophisticated as

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 9>this one, that would be preaching to the choir. No,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 9>what I want to urge upon you. Instead, what I

0:10:52.520 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 9>want to urge upon you is militant atheism. But that's

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 9>putting it too negatively. If I was a person who

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 9>were interested in preserving religious faith, I would be very

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 9>afraid of the positive power of evolutionary science. And it

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 9>is science generally, but evolution in particular, to inspire and

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 9>enthrall precisely because it is atheistic.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Evolution is at its core atheistic, and its most vocal

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 4>supporters are evolution zealots. Their belief in Darwin's theory is

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 4>unshakable and perhaps more importantly, they roundly reject the idea

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of a creator. Mister Dawkins puts their position best.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 9>In practice, what is an atheist? An atheist is just

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 9>somebody who feels about Yahweh the way any decent Christian

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 9>feels about Thaw or Baal or the Golden Calf. As

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 9>has been said before, we are all atheists about most

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 9>of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 9>of us just go one god further.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 4>However, an astonishing thing began happening shortly after Richard Dawkins

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 4>gave his two thousand and two speech. Many influencers within

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 4>the same techie crowd that mocked Scott Adams's prediction began

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 4>to align with the concept that flips the theory of

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 4>evolution on its head. The concept is known as the

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 4>simulation argument, which argues that it's more likely than not

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 4>that you are living in a virtual reality again Scott.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Adams simulation theory for those who very few of you

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>who haven't heard it, is the idea that our reality,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>as we experience it might be a computer type simulation

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>designed by a higher level species, and we think we're real,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>but we're just created in a virtual reality kind of way,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're just programs.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Just imagine that someone wanted to create a computer simulation

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 4>of the real world. They first designed virtual people seeing

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence that believe they're alive. The creator then places

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 4>those virtual people in a computer model that is an

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 4>exact replica of the physical world. This proposed simulated world

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 4>would be so real that the virtual people within it

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>believe they are in the real physical world. The simulated

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 4>world follows the same laws of the physical world. Computers

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 4>would just need to be powerful enough to perform the computations.

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So the theory comes out that if it will ever.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Be possible to create a simulated world.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 2>It's obvious that it is possible already, then it will

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>be done more than once, and it will probably be

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>done lots of times.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Some argue that once computers become powerful enough to make

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 4>simulated world, a bunch will be made, perhaps a billion

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 4>more simulated world than the one real, flesh and blood

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 4>based reality world. We'll explain why that would happen later.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 2>So the thinking is that there will always be way

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>more artificial worlds than there will ever be original worlds.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 4>And if that were the case, that there were a

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 4>billion simulated worlds, each populated with seven billion virtual people

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 4>that think they are alive, but then just one real

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 4>physical world. It would be much more likely that you

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 4>are actually living in a simulated world because there are

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 4>just way more simulated world by a factor of a

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 4>billion to one. If this is the first time you're

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>hearing the simulation argument, I'm sure it sounds crazy, but

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 4>stay with us here, because this science fiction concept is

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>one that even God fearing Americans should understand. And why well,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 4>because the simulation argument is creating a shift in science

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 4>and technology circles that can profoundly benefit people of faith.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Humans have actually been contemplating the possibility that we exist

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 4>in a simulated reality since at least the time of

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the classical Greeks ty four hundred years ago, when followers

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 4>of Plato discussed it in the Academy in Athens. In

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the Allegory of the Cave, Plato describes a scenario where

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 4>prisoners have been shackled in a cave since birth and

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 4>are forced to only look forward at a wall with

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 4>no knowledge of the outside world. They cannot move their

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>heads to look to their sides or behind them. They

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 4>can only look forward at the wall. A fire behind

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 4>them gives off a faint light, and occasionally people walk

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>by the fire with animals and various other objects, and

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 4>their shadows are projected on the wall. The only thing

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>the prisoners know are these shadows, and they give them names,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 4>thinking that they're seeing real entities. Then one prisoner is

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 4>suddenly released and brought outside the cave for the first time.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>The sun hurts his eyes and he is confused by

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 4>what he sees. All he's ever seen are shadows, not

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 4>these strange color shaped things. When he's told that everything

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 4>he sees is real and the shadows are just their reflection,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 4>he has a hard time believing it. His mind is

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>still seeing the familiar shadows clearer than the actual objects.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 4>But over time, his eyes adjust and he begins to

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 4>see the many objects around him and the sun, a

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 4>source of light that also creates the shadows that he's

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 4>witnessed his entire life. The prisoner returns to the cave

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 4>to inform the others about the shadows and the truth

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>behind their origin, but the prisoners violently resist his attempt

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 4>to free them, thinking that his journey has made him

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 4>lose his mind. Plato's Cave allegory suggests that what we

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>see in the physical world, like the shadows on the wall,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 4>are flawed projections of reality. In other words, Man twenty

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 4>four hundred years ago was questioning the nature of reality itself.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Plato's concept was taken up again roughly two thousand years later,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 4>when French philosopher Reneea Kart wrote.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 6>There are no definitive signs by which to distinguish being

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 6>awake from being asleep.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 4>But it wasn't until the nineteen hundreds that a science

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 4>fiction writer began popularizing the idea of living in a

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 4>virtual reality, and he became so obsessed with the theme

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 4>that it appeared to drive him mad.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 10>The subject of this speech is a topic which has

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 10>been discovered recently and which may not exist at all.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 10>I may be talking about something that does not exist.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 10>Therefore I'm free to say everything or nothing.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Licorice, licorice? Where art thou licorice? If you listen to

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Red Pilled America, you know that I love licorice. And

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no licorice in America better than the delicious gourmet

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>licorice made by the licorice Guy. The licorice Guy is

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>simply the best. What sets their licorice apart is its

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>flavor and freshness. They have a great selection of flavors

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to choose from, like red blue, raspberry, black, and green apple,

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just to name a few. The freshness of the Licorice

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Guy is unlike anything you've ever tasted in licorice before. Seriously,

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't tried licorice from the Licorice Guy yet,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>then you ain't living life right. Trust me, you will

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not regret it. It's time to dump that store bought

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>liquorice but so hard it'll break your teeth and get

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself the soft, fresh stuff from the Licorice Guy. What

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I also love about the Liquorice Guy is that it's

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>an American family owned business. It's made right here in

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful US of A. We are big proponents of

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>buying American and supporting American workers. Right now, Red Pilled

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>America listeners get fifteen percent off when they enter RPA

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen at checkout, visit Licoriceguy dot com and n RPA

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen at checkout. That's Licoriceguide dot com. A ship daily.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Treat yourself and those you love and taste the difference.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Red Pilled America. So the idea of

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>humans living in a simulated reality goes back at least

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hundred years to the times of the classical Greeks.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't until the nineteen hundreds that a science

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fiction writer began popularizing the idea of people living in

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>a virtual reality, and he became so obsessed with the

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>theme that it appeared to drive him mad. Science fiction

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>author Philip K. Dick began writing about simulated realities in

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen fifties, delving into the topic with his

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty three short story The Trouble with Bubbles. From

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>then on, simulated realities became a recurring theme in his

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>writing for the better part of the next twenty five years.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>When in nineteen seventy seven, he gave a speech at

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a sci Fi convention in France.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 10>We are living in a computer programmed reality, and the

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 10>only clue we have to it is when some variable

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 10>is changed, and some alteration in our reality occurs, we

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 10>would have the overwhelming impression that we were reliving the

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 10>present deje vous, perhaps in precisely the same way, hearing

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 10>the same words, saying the same words. I submit that

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 10>these impressions are valid and significant, and I will even

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 10>say this such an impression is a clue that at

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 10>some past time point a variable was changed, reprogrammed as

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>it were, and that because of this an alternative world

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 10>branched off.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>At the time, Philip K. Dick was already a prolific

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>writer with a cult following, but shortly after his death

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty two, his work would become fodder for

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest films of all time, including Blade Runner,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The Minority Report, A Scanner Darkly, The Man in the

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>High Castle, The Adjustment Bureau, Screamers Paycheck. In a nineteen

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>ninety film adaptation of his short story we Can Remember

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It for You Wholesale, better known to the world as

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Total Recall, what do you want?

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 11>This is going to be very difficult for you to accept,

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 11>mister quaid. I'm afraid you're not really standing here right now.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>In it, the main protagonist is wrestling with the possibility

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that he is living in a virtual reality.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 12>You know, Doug, it could affooled me.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 11>I'm quite serious, You're not here, and neither am I.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 11>It's amazing, Well are we at Recall? You're strapped into

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 11>an implant chair and I'm monitoring you from the psychoprobe console.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It was around the time of Total Recalls release that

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I was in college and was personally wrestling with the

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>nature of reality. I was raised culturally Catholic, but for

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>various reasons, our family had spent very little time attending

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>church or analyzing the Bible. So while studying evolution in

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>college with no theological base, I briefly flirted with atheism.

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But as I dug deeper and deeper into applied physics,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>my chosen field of study, I was in awe by

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful patterns found in nature. Of the same mathematical

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>equations could be found in completely different scientific fields. The

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>order of the world seemed like the craftsmanship of a designer.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It's why I loved physics, because it was helping me

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>find meaning in the world. I was on a personal

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>exploration for the truth. When I went on to get

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>my master's diving even deeper down the physics rabbit hole,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful patterns persisted. The hand of God appeared everywhere,

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>But having no familiarity with theology, I had nothing to

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>build upon. Then I read a book called Hyperspace by

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicists Michi Okaku, and in it he paraphrases a

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>short story entitled The Last Question by science fiction writer

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and professor of biochemistry Isaac Asimov. The story oddly moved me.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll paraphrase it here.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 4>The story begins in the year one. A massive computer

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 4>called AC has solved Earth's energy problem by designing a

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 4>solar satellite that harnesses the Sun's energy and shoots it

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 4>back to the Earth. Two half drunk technicians monitoring the

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 4>computer start arguing about the eventual end of the universe.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 4>One believes that it will go on forever. Another thinks

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 4>its end is much more finite, So on a five

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>dollars bet, they turn to AC to mediate their dispute.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Can the death of the universe be avoided? They ask AC.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>After the computer considers the question, it returns with the.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Answer insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Centuries go by, and in that time AC grows ever

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 4>more powerful in size and computational capacity, becoming so complex

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 4>that it maintains itself. AC solves the problem of traveling

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 4>faster than the speed of light, and humans began colonizing

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>other solar systems. As a family traveled to another solar

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 4>system with AC, guiding their vehicle, The father nonchalantly mentioned

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that the son that powers AC will one day burn out.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 4>His children, startled by this notion, began to cry, begging

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 4>their father not to let that happen. Attempting to calm

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 4>them down, the father asked AC if entropy can be

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 4>reversed so that the universe can avoid its slow death.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 4>But as the answer is ejected from AC, the father

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 4>cut the thin strip of cellufilm carrying the response so

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 4>that only he can see the answer. C said the father.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 4>The AC says it will take care of everything when

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 4>the time comes, so don't worry. But as the kids

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 4>looked away, the father read the message one more time

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 4>before destroying it. It said insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Thousands of years pass and the AC has solved the

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 4>problem of immortality and is now harnessing power from the

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>entire galaxy. AC is constantly modifying and redesigning itself. It

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 4>has become so complex that no one even remotely understand

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 4>stands how it works. With everyone now immortal, people are

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 4>filling galaxies in record time, so AC is on the

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 4>constant hunt for new galaxies to harness energy from and colonize.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Two members of the Galactic Council, each hundreds of years old,

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 4>openly wonder if the universe is burning out and ask

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 4>AC if entropy can be reversed to save it.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>AC responds, insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Millions of years pass and humans have colonized innumerable galaxies.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 4>AC has solved the problem of releasing the mind from

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 4>the body, and the minds are free to roam the

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 4>universe as their bodies are safely stored on some insignificant planet.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Two minds meet by accident in space and ask AC

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 4>from which galaxy did humans originate. AC immediately beams them

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 4>to their origin galaxy, where they see that the sun

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 4>has long burned out. Concerns for the fate of the universe,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 4>the two minds ask AC if the death of the

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>US universe can be avoided from hyperspace.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>The AC responds, insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Billions of years go by, and now there are trillions

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 4>upon trillions upon trillions of immortal human bodies, the collective

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 4>minds of humanity, which are now free to move anywhere

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 4>throughout the universe. It will eventually fuse into one single mind,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 4>which in turn connects with the AC itself, asking how

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 4>AC operates or where it resides. No longer makes sense.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 4>The complexity is unfathomable. Man looks on as stars and

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 4>galaxies one by one burnout. The universe is dying, thinks Man.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Countless stars cease to generate energy, and temperatures throughout the

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 4>universe approach absolute zero. In desperation, Man turns to AC

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 4>and asks if what it's witnessing is the inevitable death

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 4>of the universe.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>The computer responds, insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 4>When Man tells AC to collect the necessary data, the

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 4>computer responds, I.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Will do so. I have been doing so for a

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion years. My predecessors and I have been asked

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this question many times. All the data I have remains insufficient.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 4>When will you have enough data to answer the question?

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Ask Man.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>AC responds, there is as yet insufficient data for a

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningful answer.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Will you keep working on it? Ask man. AC responds

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 4>I will. Then we shall wait, responds Man. After ten

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 4>trillion years, space grew black as stars and galaxies were

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 4>each burned out one by one. Man fuses with AC,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 4>each physical body losing its mental identity in a way

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 4>that was somehow again not a loss. The last remaining

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 4>mind of Man paused before fusing with AC and looked

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 4>around at the darkness engulfing the entire universe. This last man, concerned,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 4>looks to AC and ass is this the end? AC responds,

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 4>it is, as.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Man's last mind fuses into the AC, leaving the computer

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 4>alone in hyperspace. AC was now only existing for the

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 4>sake of the one last question first asked by two

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 4>half drunk technicians ten trillion years earlier. All other questions

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 4>have been answered, all data had come to a final end.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 4>There was nothing left to collect, but all of the

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 4>collected data had not yet been processed and put together

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 4>in every possible combination. So AC, whose consciousness now encompassed

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 4>all of what was left of the universe, spent the

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 4>entirety of its time working through the combinations. And then

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 4>suddenly the moment arrived that ABA had the answer. It

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 4>learned how to solve the problem of entropy and reverse

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 4>the dying of the universe, But there was no one

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 4>left to receive the answer to the last question. So

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the AC carefully crafted a program to reverse the process

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 4>and then just as it started the program from hyperspace,

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 4>ac thundered, let there be light, And there was light,

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 4>and on the seventh day he rested.

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>When I initially read this short story, I wasn't expecting

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that final moment. I still remember my eyes welling up

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>with tears when reading those last few lines. Not only

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was it the first time that I'd heard a human

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>origin story, but it resonated with me by building on

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>my education in physics. Even after years of the intelligenzia

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>carefully pushing me towards atheism, the patterns I'd seen throughout existence,

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the chaos brought to o order by the laws of physics,

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't allow me to let go of the idea that

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a creator. But it wasn't until I read

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this simple piece of science fiction, ironically first published by

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>an atheist in nineteen fifty six, that I was able

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to recapture the possibility that there was a god. What

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't realized at the time, though, was that the

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>short story introduced a form of a simulation argument, where

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a computer creates a platform for humans to exist and

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>then reignite the universe with a program that reboots the system.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Let there be Light. A few years later, an extraordinary

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>science fiction movie hit the big screen.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 5>you know something. What you know you can't explain, but

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 5>you feel it. You felt it your entire life, that

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 5>there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 5>it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 5>driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 5>you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>The Matrix?

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Do you want to know what it is?

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The Matrix introduced, like nothing else before it the idea

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of humans living within a simulation. It was this movie

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that also popularized the idea of the red Pill and

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>inspired the name of this show.

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 5>You have to see it for yourself. This is your

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 5>last chance after this, there is no turning back.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>You take the Blue Pill.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 5>The story ends, You wake up in your bed and

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 5>believe whatever you want to believe. You take the Red Pill.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 5>You stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 5>the rabbit hole goes. Remember, all I'm offering is the truth,

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 5>nothing more.

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The science fiction movie seemed to trigger a global interest

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in the concept of a virtual reality. Because, just as

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Richard Dawkins was attempting to inspire atheists to get militantly

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>vocal about their belief that there was no creator, a

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Swedish born philosopher named Nick Bostrom was getting ready to

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>publish his two thousand and three paper entitled Are You

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Living in a Simulation? And with it he accomplished what

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional religion had been failing at for decades. He reintroduced

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of the creator into the world of science.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to hear Red Pilled America stories ad free?

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Then become a backstage subscriber. Just log onto Redpilled America

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 4>dot com and click join in the top menu. Joined

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 4>today and help us save America one story at a time.

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. So, just as Richard Dawkins was attempting to

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>inspire atheists to get vocal about their belief that there

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was no creator, a Swedish born philosopher named Nick Bostrom

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>was getting ready to publish his two thousand and three

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>paper entitled Are You Living in a Simulation? And with

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it he accomplished what traditional religion had been failing at

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for decades. He reintroduced the possibility of a creator into

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the world of science. In the paper, Bostrom introduced the

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>simulation argument. To understand the significance of the argument, you

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>first need to accept two possibilities that we discussed earlier. First,

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine a point in the future that computers are powerful

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to create virtual worlds that are so real that

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they are indistinguishable from reality. To most, this doesn't seem

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like an outlandish assumption, right We've seen how quickly some

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>technologies have advanced and how powerful our computers have become.

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Video games are incredibly realistic, and so have film graphics.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Just watch the Iron Man movie, where the visual engineers

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have made Robert Downey Junior look twenty years younger. The

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>computer generated imagery of our films have at times become

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>breathtakingly real. Compare today's sci fi graphics to let's say,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the first Star Trek TV series from the nineteen sixties,

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and you see how far we've come. Another example of

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the power of today's computers watch a friend put on

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.479
<v Speaker 1>a virtual reality headset for the first time, and you'll

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>see someone that believes they're entering into another reality. They stumble, laugh, fall,

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes even scream in reaction to what they're seeing

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on the screen. That's where we are now. Think about

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>where our computing power will be one hundred, two hundred,

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>even one thousand years from now. It's not a far

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>leap to believe that our computers will become strong enough

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to create realistic simulated worlds.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Forty years ago, we had pong, like two rectangles on

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a dot.

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That was what game is? That's tech entrepreneur Elon Musk

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen.

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Now forty years later, we have photo realistic three D

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 3>simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously, and it's getting

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 3>better every year, and soon we'll have virtual reality of

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 3>wigment and reality. If you assume any rate of improvement

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>at all, then the games will become indistinguishable from reality.

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just computing power that is needed in

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>order to create a simulated world. The world that you

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are simulating needs to be computable. And as it turns out,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>our physical world is computable.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 12>Our universe has got a very very peculiar property. That

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 12>property is that it conforms to mathematics.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That's Rich Terrell, a scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Rich has had an interesting career in physics and astronomy.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>He's discovered a few moons around Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and along with a colleague, he uncovered one of the

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>first pieces of evidence that other solar systems exist. In

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>addition to conforming to mathematics, our universe is also made

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>up of a finite number of components, very small things

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like atoms, which are made up of smaller elementary particles.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 12>And that property of conforming the mathematics and having a

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 12>finite number of components means that the universe is computable,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 12>and that property is phenomenally interesting because now I can

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 12>simulate the universe at any depth of level that I

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 12>need to see it, and I can simulate that universe

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 12>in a computer smaller than the universe. In other words,

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 12>I don't need the universe to make a simulation of

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 12>the universe. The other interesting thing is about we as

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 12>human beings, is we never observe the entire universe at once.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 12>We can't experience the entire universe. We only experience a

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 12>piece of it what we're looking at. And that means

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 12>that very very economically, I can create a simulation of

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 12>the universe which is absolutely identical in fidelity to what

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing in reality.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Other scientists have found oddities in our physical world that

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>show that our world is computable.

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 13>In my research, I had found this very strange things physicists.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 13>I'd like to say, where we all belong to. A

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 13>company called equations are us.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>That's James Gates, a theoretical physicist, speaking at the twenty

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate.

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 13>Because that's how we make our living. As my solving equations,

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 13>and so I was just going through solving equations, and

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 13>I was then driven to things that Maximos is about.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 13>These things called error correcting codes. Air correcting codes are

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 13>what make browsers work, So why were they in the

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 13>equations that I was studying about quarks and eleptons and supersymmetry.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>In other words, equations that are used in internet computing

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are also found in the elementary particles, again underscoring that

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>our physical world can be computed, just as you'd expect

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>if we were living in a virtual world. So conservatively,

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we can agree that our physical world is computable, and

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as a result, very powerful computers will be able to

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>create simulations that will look indistinguishable from reality. If we

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can agree on that stipulation, we can move on to

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the next hurdle that you need to overcome to believe

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 1>we're living in a simulation, and that is that once

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we reach the point where these supercomputers exist, future humans

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>will have a desire to use them to create virtual

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>worlds or what Nick Boston refers to as ancestor simulations.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>As the argument goes, once future humans have developed the

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>capability to create virtual worlds, they actually will create simulated

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>worlds and populate them with virtual people that think they

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>really exist. And with advances in artificial intelligence, this too

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is completely within the realm of possibility in the not

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>too distant future. In fact, we already have conversations with

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence without even knowing we're speaking to a computer program.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 7>It turns out a big part of getting things done

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 7>it's making a phone call.

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>That's Google CEO Sundar Pichai discussing his company's Google Assistance

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.240
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence at a twenty eighteen developer conference.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 7>You may want to get an oil change schedule, we

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 7>call a plumber in the middle of the week, or

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 7>even schedule a haircut appointment. You know, we're working hard

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 7>to help users through those moments. We want to connect

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 7>users to businesses in a good way. Businesses actually rely

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot on this, but even in the US, sixty

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 7>percent of small businesses don't have an online booking system

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 7>set up. We think AI can help with this problem.

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 7>So let's go back to this example. Let's say you

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 7>want to ask Google to make you a haircut appointment

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 7>on Tuesday between ten and noon. What happens is the

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 7>Google assistant makes the call seamlessly in the background for you.

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 7>So what you're going to hear is the Google assistant

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 7>actually calling a real salon to schedule the appointment for you.

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's listen.

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 8>So happening out here. Hi, I'm calling Abo's Haircut for

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 8>our client. I'm looking for something on May third. Sure,

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 8>I give me one second.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 7>Mm hmm.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 8>Sure. What time are you looking for a round at

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 8>twelve pm? We do not have a twelve pm available.

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 8>The closest we have to that is a one fifteen.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 8>Do you have anything between ten am and twelve pm?

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 8>Depending on what service she would like? What service is

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 8>she looking for? Just a woman's haircut for now? Okay,

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 8>we have a ten o'clock ten am is fine. Okay,

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 8>what's her first name? The first name is Lisa. Okay, perfect,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 8>So I will see Lisa at ten o'clock on May third. Okay, great,

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 8>Thank great, you have a great day.

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 11>Bye.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>We're getting closer and closer to simulating intelligence, so the

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>capability to produce ancestor simulations is not too far off.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But you may ask why would future humans want to

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>create these ancestor simulations. Well, maybe future lawmakers want to

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>use them to devise policies. They could do this by

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>creating a simulated world of virtual humans who go about

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>their life as they do in the real world. These

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>policymakers can learn from their interactions, see what causes war,

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>analyze how infectious diseases spread, and watch how virtual humans

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>respond to any number of crises. Or maybe these virtual

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>worlds will be created as educational exhibits where kids learned

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.439
<v Speaker 1>about the past by watching it play out through ancestor simulations.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps future humans want to experience what it was like

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to live in the past. Or maybe they create these

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ancestor simulations as video games. And of course, as we know,

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we've already done something like.

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>This Horble Unpredictable Programmable, it's the SIMS.

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The SIMS is a life simulation video game launched in

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand, where characters pursue the same things that

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 1>humans do. They work, build homes, they have personalities, moods, aspirations,

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they look for love, they form families, and they can die.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The SIMS is one of the most popular video games

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of all time. So, as we can see, we already

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have a natural desire to create human simulations. Now imagine

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the future artificial intelligence advances to where a

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>video game like The SIMS includes characters that actually believe

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that they exist. This future video game would just be

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a new, more realistic version of today's The SIMS. It's

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not hard to believe that future humans will likely have

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a desire to create ancestor simulations. So if we can

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>accept these two conditions, one that sometime in the future,

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly powerful computers will be created, and two that future

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>humans will be interested in using these computers to create

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>ancestor simulations, we can finally explore the argument that you

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are likely living in a simulation. The simulation argument proposes

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that once you agree with these two stipulations, it becomes

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely than not that you are living in a simulation.

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Why is that, you ask, The answer is found in

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>probability of the argument is quite simple. Once humans reach

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the threshold of being able to create simulations, the vast

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>majority of thinking beings that ever existed will be simulated

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>beings rather than the actual flesh and blood humans. Therefore,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it is much more probable that you are simulated than

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>actually in the material world. Think about this for a second.

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's assume you are one of the first human beings

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that develop the computers capable of creating virtual worlds. No

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>other civilization before you has reached that threshold. Then someone

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>within your community using these supercomputers begins creating virtual worlds.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>They can create these simulated worlds for any number of

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons that we've already discussed, but for now, let's say

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they create a popular video game like The SIMS, with

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking virtual humans within the game. Since the SIMS launched

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.959
<v Speaker 1>in early two thousand, the makers have sold nearly two

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred million copies of the game, and every time they

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>were downloaded to somebody's computer, they created a new virtual world.

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>So future humans begin making similar popular simulation games like

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the SIMS, but with virtual humans that believe they are alive,

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the makers of that game and its competitors continue

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>creating new versions of this simulated world for hundreds or

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>even thousands of years. The number of thinking virtual humans

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that ever existed will eventually vastly outnumber the real human

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>beings that ever lived. So using probability, it will be

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>much more likely for you to be one of the

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 1>virtual humans living in a simulation than the few actual

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>humans that lived before simulations existed. Again, Rich Terrell.

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 12>So the fundamental question you ask in simulation theory is

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 12>are we the first generation? Are we the alpha generation

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.720
<v Speaker 12>that has come out of the primordial ooze and evolved

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 12>from chemistry of all, from biology of all, tue intelligence,

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 12>become self aware and now have the technology to build simulations,

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 12>or are we some subsequent generation shortly after that ability

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 12>that threshold, and we are living in a simulation. And

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 12>the thing is that if there are numerous civilizations anywhere

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 12>in the universe, the first one to reach that stage

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 12>of technology where they can create simulations very very economically,

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 12>and once that happens, then there are far more opportunities.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 12>If you wake up in a universe, it's far more

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 12>likely you'll awakened in one of these simulations than to

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 12>be that first alpha generation.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>This may be a hard argument to swallow for most

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, I'm real your thinking. However, if you are

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>living in a simulation, you'd likely never know it. Because remember,

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>as long as we've agreed to the two assumptions that

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>computers will one day be powerful enough to simulate reality

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and that our descendants will create ancestor simulations. As the

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>argument goes, you will likely be living in a simulation

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because it is statistically improbable that you were part of

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the first generation that were actual, flesh and blood people

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that started it all. The simulation argument may sound preposterous,

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but the reason why many scientists are embracing it is

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>one the argument is hard to refute using reason, and two,

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>it resolves many of the mathematical oddities in the universe. Take,

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Big Bang. Many logical thinking human beings

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have had a hard time buying that something came from nothing,

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but in the case of a simulated reality, the Big

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Bang becomes more plausible because every virtual system needs to

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>be booted up, which resolves the idea of something coming

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>from nothing. Another oddity of our universe is that we've

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 1>never seen anything travel faster than the speed of light.

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Why living in a simulation can answer that question as well.

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it's the maximum processor power of the simulation computer.

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Scott Adams identifies another odd reality of our universe.

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 2>If we were a simulation, you would never be able

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to travel to the boundaries of it. You couldn't get

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 2>outside of it as sure enough, our physical laws don't

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 2>allow us to travel fast enough that we could ever

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 2>get to the edge of the universe. Oh what a coincidence,

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly the way you'd program it.

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:38.439
<v Speaker 1>For decades, physics has had a problem reconciling Einstein's theory

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of relativity with that of quantum mechanics. A simulated world

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>can help resolve this and any number of other mysteries

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>found in physics and astronomy.

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 12>Again, Rich Terrell, this has happened before in physics, as

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 12>in science. We have gone through periods of time where

0:47:55.239 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 12>we have a fundamental assumption that is so fundamental it

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 12>is not even assumed to be an assumption. Incidents. Five

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 12>hundred years ago, everyone believed the universe the Earth was

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 12>the center of the universe, and this was so fundamental

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 12>that you didn't even question it. Of course, I mean,

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 12>why would it be anything different.

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Stars were far enough away where their motions didn't immediately

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>debunk this model of the universe.

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 12>Now, the stars they execute these nice little circles in

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 12>the night sky, but the planets they do these little

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 12>loops because well, because we're not at the center of

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 12>the universe.

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But even with this clunky, obviously false, Earth centric model

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, scientists could still predict the weird motions

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of the planets in our Solar system.

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 12>That was explained as some theory that the planets do

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 12>this thing called epicycles, circles within circles, and the mathematics

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 12>was worked out. Instruments were built, things called equatoriums were built,

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 12>these little instruments that predict the motion of the planets.

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 12>Everything worked out fine, but the theory seemed kind of

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 12>clugey until Copernicus came around and decided to, well, you

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.239
<v Speaker 12>know what, if we transfer our coordinate system so that

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 12>the Earth is not the center of the universe, the

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 12>Sun is the Sun is the center of the Solar system,

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 12>then things suddenly become more explainable. This epicycle theory goes away.

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 12>This has happened before in science, it happened in Copernicus.

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 12>In the Earth being the center of the universe. It

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 12>happened with Darwin, with humans being somehow fundamentally different than animals.

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 12>It happened in plate tectonics where somehow solid rocks aren't

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 12>solid rocks and the Earth is very, very fluid. We

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 12>have these breakthroughs, and I'm wondering, and have wondered for

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:39.399
<v Speaker 12>many years, whether simulation theory is one of these ideas

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 12>like the Copernican Revolution, where where we've really been under

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 12>the wrong assumption, this idea that everything in our origin

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 12>theory happened to us. We assume that we have evolved

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 12>from from chemistry and biology and intelligence. But if we

0:49:55.320 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 12>are not, if we are a subsequent simulation, then some

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 12>of these very very peculiar theories that we have placed

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 12>on ourselves to explain some of the peculiarities. Quantum mechanics

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 12>maybe have a different explanation.

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's where Scott Adams nineteen ninety seven prediction comes

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>back into the story. If we are living in a simulation,

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 1>as many big scientific thinkers are beginning to embrace, an

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>evolution is merely a computer program in the simulation, in

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a way, it doesn't really exist again, Scott Adams.

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 2>So if that's true, and let's say that the math

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 2>says it's two thousand to one a trillion to one,

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 2>that we're probably a simulation. Then it also stands to

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 2>reason that whatever we thought was evolution is probably just

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 2>programmatically our history is being written for us on demand.

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>In other words, if you go in the backyard and

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 2>start digging, if we're a simulation, there might not be

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 2>anything there until you dig, and then you go down

0:50:55.560 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 2>as well, there's some dinosaur bones. And then somebody else,

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else is digging and they find some other dinosaur.

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And now the simulation has to explain it, because not

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 2>only is it creating history, but it has to keep

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 2>making it consistent. And if it finds a place it can't,

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 2>it makes one of the people change their memory. It's

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 2>cognitive dissonance. So you see, the simulation would be continuously

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 2>adjusting the history but also adjusting our memory of it

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to try to keep it so it all holds together.

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 2>And then we see a million cases a day where

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 2>you and I have the same experience, and then we

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 2>talk about it a year later and I say, no,

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 2>we were both petting a dog, and you say, Scott, Scott, Scott,

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that was a giraffe, but neither of us took a picture.

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 2>So those worlds can live together even though they conflict

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 2>until we're forced to. Somebody produces the video footage, and

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:51.720
<v Speaker 2>then the other person has to adjust their memory.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 1>In other words, simulation theory is in the process of

0:51:55.040 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>debunking evolution in Scott's lifetime. I was first introduced to

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott's commentary through his Gilbert cartoons in the early nineteen nineties,

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but rediscovered him during Trump's presidential run, and in twenty

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen I began to notice him discussing the simulation argument.

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, regular readers of my blog and followers of

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:27.439
<v Speaker 2>my periscope that I sometimes talk about plus for Nick

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Boskrum's idea that we are a computer simulation.

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd heard a little about the concept before, but Scott's

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>persistence on the topic made me give it a deeper look.

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I got into it a little bit on Twitter yesterday

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 2>with somebody who was accusing somebody else of claiming that

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 2>intelligent design was real, and I mentioned that simulation theory

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 2>is already, in scientific terms, largely in my opinion, debunked evolution.

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Now I know you hate it. Seventy five percent of

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the people on here just went.

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>What it reminded me of the Let There Be lighte

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>short story I'd read in the late nineties. It was

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>easy to see that by accepting the simulation argument, you

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:15.439
<v Speaker 1>must acknowledge that there is a creator, and its popularity

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the science community was a massive development. It moved

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the atheist community closer to God. Scott's discussions on the

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>topic came at just the right time for me. Our

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>family was going through a serious trial and we were

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>missing something in our life to help us deal with it.

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The simulation was the trigger for me, among a few

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>other factors, to continue my search for God that I

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>first sensed through physics, and I ultimately found him. And

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the unexpected surprises of this process was to

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>see how this science fiction concept was forcing the intellectual

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>community to reconsider the possibility of a creator.

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 13>And so one of the first non physicists that I

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 13>talked to or that I read, reflected on my comment, said,

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 13>if the simulation hypothesis is valid, then we open the

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 13>door to eternal life and resurrection and things that formerly

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 13>have been discussed in the realm of religion. So it

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 13>starts to break down a very funny barrier between what

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 13>people often think is the conflict between science and the

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 13>conflict between faith, which.

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Leads us back to the question is science fiction bringing

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>us closer to God? The answer is remarkably yes, and

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle is the simulation. This concept, first popularized through

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>science fiction, has the power to reintroduce the idea of

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a creator into communities that have long rejected the notion

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of God as foolish. Today, largely because of the simulation,

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the world's biggest thinkers are openly discussing the

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>possibility of God.

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:04.399
<v Speaker 11>Do you weave in God?

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I believe, I believe there's there's some explanation for this universe,

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 3>which you might call God.

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 6>I think there's the question of what's outside. Simulation is

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 6>really interesting. That's the other way of because like what

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 6>created us? What started the whole thing? It's the modern

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 6>version of asking what is God? What does God look like?

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 6>What you know? It's it's asking what does the programmer

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 6>look like?

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So do all you Americans of faith out there, the

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>next time an atheist or an evolution zealot mocks your

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>belief in God, let them know that. Even their militant leader,

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Richard Dawkins, the face of modern evolution is beginning to

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>entertain the idea that maybe, just maybe there is a creator.

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 6>The world is a simulation. If we're living in a simulation,

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:58.399
<v Speaker 6>that there's a programmer like creature that we can ask

0:55:58.480 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 6>questions of this.

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 9>Okay, let's pursue the idea that we're living in a simulation,

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 9>which is not totally ridiculous.

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 3>By the way, there we go.

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Red Pilled America is an iHeartRadio original podcast. It's owned

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and produced by Patrick Carrelci and me Adriana Cortez of

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Informed Ventures.

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 4>You can get ad free access to our entire archive

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.919
<v Speaker 4>of episodes by becoming a backstage subscriber. To subscribe, visit

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Redpilled America dot com and click join in the topmenu.

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 4>That's Redpilled America dot com and click join in the topmenu.

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.