WEBVTT - De-Dollarization – What It Means for the Region

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>US President Trump's tariff policies have had a profound impact

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on global financial markets, but one of the most surprising

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>has been the sell off in the US dollar. Since

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the president's inauguration, the US dollar has weakened by over

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>nine percent versus a basket of major currencies, as measured

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>by the DXY Index. What's also unique is that this

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>sell off has occurred during times of financial stress in

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>US equity and bond markets, leading some analyst to question

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>whether the currency is losing its safe haven status. This

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fear was further exacerbated when Moody's downgraded the US credit

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>rating from triple A to double A one. Are we

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>entering into a period of d dollarization? What does this

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>mean for Asia's currencies? And what about the region's central banks,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>companies and financial institutions, many of whom are the biggest

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>holders of US treasuries and are heavily exposed to FX risks.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Listening to Aga Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm John Lee

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>here in Hong Kong. Today we have a regular on

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the show. He's my colleague Stephen Chu, Chief Asia FX

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and Great Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence. Stephen, welcome to.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>The show Hi, John, thanks for having me. Stephen.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we entering into a period of d dollarization, Well,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I would.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Say yes and no, because this period actually has started

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 2>up over ten years ago in twenty fourteen when Thursday's

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Russia and Cremer incident, and apparently Russia has start to

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>offload their US treasuries and then followed by of course

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>China also start to reduce their holdings. So it has

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>started just at a very gradual pace. And what happened

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>this year, especially in April, I would say, is just

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>acceleration of it. And if you ask me, it's still

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 2>somewhat orderly. Of course, it's very rare that we saw

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>US dollar, US treasury, and US equities all setting off

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. So it's very clear that market

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>had enough of the TI riff game. So they don't

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>want to care about the reciprocal tariff. They don't want

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to wait for any trade trials or trade deal. They

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 2>just vote by action that they're questioning the credibility of

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 2>the US, the credibility of the dollar, and of course

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 2>the US Treasury. So I would say that's why, yes,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I know it has started before, it's accelerating, and whether

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 2>it's going to continue to accelerate really depends on what

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 2>the US administration does, so we're going to look forward

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to that going forward.

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to just repeat what you said, and you

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>refer to the events in April. Now, when the US

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>announced reciprocal tariffs, the S and P five hundred sort

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>off by more than twelve percent. In the next few days,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>blond yuods were also rising, but we had surprisingly the

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>US dollar sell off. Now has these things happened before.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at least memory search. I've been the futual about

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years. I've probably never seen that. It's quite interesting

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>because if we drill down into the performances, so the

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 2>dollar weakness was very apparent against the major currencies, especially

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the Euro and the end. So that tells you that

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the market theme is about changing the view of which

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>currency is more credible as a reserve currency. So we

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 2>know when we look at the reserve currencies, there's the dollar,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a euro, Yen Stirling. Of course, Chinese un is

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>a very interesting one and market always lost to talk

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>about it, but practically speaking, the UN didn't really rally

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>right away, meaning that market at the end of the

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 2>day is still more comfortable with the uro and the yen,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the major currencies, and in fact Asian currencies didn't already

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 2>against the dollar. Some actually when weaker, especially the un

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>before really rallying towards the end of April and early May.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So are we starting to see a change in the

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>paradigm of FX investing now? I know a lot of

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>FX strategists talk about this smile theory for the US.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us like an FX one O one?

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>What does this smile theory mean?

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Sure, So it's a very that's very well known

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>in the fics community. So it's proposed by Stephen Lee

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Jen in two thousand and one. It's a relationship between

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the US dollar and the US economy, so very simple.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>When the US economy is super strong or super weak,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>we see a strong dollar. When it's super strong, we

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>have the fat hiking rates them from an interest rate

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>or carry perspective. So we saw a few years ago

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 2>after COVID, so the US dollar was super strong. However,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 2>in the extreme end, when we have say a US recession,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a global recession, everybody cutting rates. It's a risk of

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>scenario and the dollar, of course, we all know that

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 2>it's really the top most credible reserve currency, at least

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 2>before this year. So we have a very strong dollar

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>at the extreme ends, and only in the middle, in

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the smell, we have a weaker US

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>dollar because when the world is peaceful, then everybody used

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the dollar as a funding currency to buy something else.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's the dollar smile. Now, what's happening now.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would propose, of course, there are some people

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>talking about it already, and we were one of the

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>early ones proposing this so called dollar frown theory. So

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just the extreme opposite compared to a smell. So

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>what happens is when the US economy is super strong

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>or super weak, we'll see a weaker US dollar. The

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>rationale it's because of fiscal concerns. So when we look

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>at the extremements, when the US economy is super strong

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and the fact cannot cut rates, just like what's happening now,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 2>market will actually dealt whether the US government can refine

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>them as the debt at such a high cost, given

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that the US really funded spending with foreign flows. When

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that's in doubt, we saw what happened. US treasury is

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>selling off really since April to now, it's still going on. However,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>in the other end, when we saw say a global recession,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>a completely risk of scenario, the dollar is no longer

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the top choice for safe haven. People will go to

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>eurog to yen, and go to gold, and gold will

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 2>be more sort of currency. Like during this juncture in

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the middle, when everything is fine, when we have no

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>trade will the world is peaceful, then market may actually

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>step back a little bit in questioning the US dollar,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and we saw US dollar strengthening, which is why, as

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>an example, we saw when the news about the US

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>China trade tariff delay for ninety days came out, the

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 2>dollar did rebound for a bit.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence, where more than

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around the clock

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to bring you timely, world class research. Our coverage spans

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred market industries, currencies, commodities and industries, as well

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as over two thousand equities and credits. To learn more

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about Bloomberg Intelligence, visit bi go on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>If you like what you hear, don't forget to subscribe

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and share. We had Moodies downgrade the US credit rating.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Was this a big issue in your view, not.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Really, of course everybody talk about so it's no longer

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the highest rating government dat but it doesn't matter because

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>eventually this is going to happen. And even if all

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>these rating agencies don't address the concern, every single market

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>player knows about the structural slash fiscal vulnerabilities in the US,

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>so it's just a matter of time to see a

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>proper reflection of that. So that's why after that move,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not really in use. But we saw the dollar

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 2>selling off again and the US treasuries as well.

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so it sounds like the US is slowly starting

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to lose its safe haven asset status.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Would you say, yes, definitely start losing, but from a

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>very high base and at a very gradual pace, because

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>if you ask me as an X trader, as a practitioner,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I know everybody want to get out of the US dollar,

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>but the reality is there not much to go to really,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>like there's as much gold as you can buy, there's

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>only as much safe government assets out there beyond the

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 2>US treasuries. So I would say it will still be

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a very gradual process, but at least it will continue

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 2>going forward.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you mentioned gold. Now, is that why

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gold price is a continuing to go up.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially we know gold is priced in the US dollars,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of like a mirror image. As long

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>as the dollar continues to weaken, we'll see record goal

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>price every now and then. And central banks are really

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the ones that we want to follow. They are the

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>smart people, and they have been buying really since twenty

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, or buying at a quicker pace right after

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>COVID because they saw what's coming. We saw a more

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>bivocated world with all inflation anchoring. The fat had to

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>rate to higher levels, but still not really dealing with

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the inflation issue. So that's why emerging Markeuess central banks,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>leading really by China, India and Turkey for example, they're

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>all buying gold because they see this dollar era coming

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>to be questions.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know you don't cover it, but I know

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you get this question all the time as well. Does

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that same theory apply to cryptocurrencies.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit different because when we look back

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in history, usually when gold play a currency role, it's before, during,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and after a major geopolitical incident, so namely the World

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 2>War was so the gold being a unit and accounts

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 2>storage of value and transaction. Being a transaction unit, it's

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>more credible like these days, like you still can't really

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 2>transact with cryptocurrency, So I would say cryptocurrency might be

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>a good choice if you have a portfolio that you

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>want to exploit a weaker used dollar, But I would

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>say goal to still play a larger role in this

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 2>D dollarization trend, at least a larger share, because, after all,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>crypto it's also a price in US dollar. So if

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you ask me, like, I'm no expert in crypto, but

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's just a dollar derivative or dollar assets,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>unlike gold.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we've talked about the US the D dollarization.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>What does this all mean in terms of your forecards

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for the US dollar as well as against Asian currencies.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so simply put, we're going to see a broad

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>weekending in the US dollar. But of course there are

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 2>different performances across major currencies, let alone Asian currencies, so

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>we have to look at fundamentals. When we look at Asia,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>one reason why they didn't really rally before the majors

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 2>until later in April was that we saw that their

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 2>macro fundamentals were still quite vulnerable to the trade tar

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>riff because we know trade tar riff target China, targets

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Vietnam like a lot of the Asian partners. So at

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, if we don't have a

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>trade deal and if the effective tarret still end up

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.599
<v Speaker 2>higher than before the trade will, then that's going to

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>hurt their economies. And we know they are very growth

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>sensitive and capital flows into Asia. Really it's betting on

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 2>their growth. Therefore, even though in a weaker dollar backdrop,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>even if Asian currencies rally, it's going to be more

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>gradual compared to the g tens. Now when we look

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>at little podcasts the risk of larger appreciation. We saw

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>what happened to the Taiwan dollar in early May, and

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>possibly to Korean one and even Japanese yen. But that's

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>for different matter. That's because of the nature of those

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>economy and also with other players like the life insurance

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 2>companies and pensions.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to talk about the Taiwan dollar in

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes, but I wanted to draw back to

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this year. Now, I remember a lot

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of FX strategists were saying that US tarists was supposed

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to support the US dollar, and these developments are surprised.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Not really now it did happen because market always priced

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>in development before it happened. And when we look at

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the efics market pricing, it really started since late last year,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>before the US presential election in November, and then all

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the way until really early January, so that has been

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>priced in by the market. We saw stronger dollar across

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the board across Asian currencies, and not until earlier this year,

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and markets start to question whether that policy could really

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>work to the US. And also to a point also

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the US President Donald Trump being so hardworking

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and posting about new policies every day, especially on tariff.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So market, as we said earlier, might really be fed

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>up with that. So they just decide, Okay, we're going

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to exploit your structural factors for the US. Usually it's

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>more a medium to the longer term, but market decided

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>they're going to bring it forward and treat it as

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>a short term driver. Therefore the dollar stopped strengthening and

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>start to weaken.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's talk about the tow one dollar, because it

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>had a big move was it in May? Its strengthened

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>by over seven percent over a few days. Now I

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think it was up by over nine percent versus the

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>US dollar for the whole month. Tell us what happened

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Taiwan dollar and why was the move so abrupt?

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it was about over ten percent at

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>one point for the first two days until the central

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>banks step in. So what happened was quite clear. So

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we know most of the Asian economies exporters, they are

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the big players. But also we have to at least

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 2>from now on market we have to pay a lot

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of attention to and other big players, which are the livers.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>So livers are most prominent or dominant in Taiwan of

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>course Taiwan, and then we have self current japen Asulla.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about life insurance life insurance companies.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they have a lot of overseas investments just

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>because the local market weren't big enough to absorb, so

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>they don't have really a big logo born market. So

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>in Taiwan's case, given the amount of the life insurance policies,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>they have to look for investments overseas, and clearly the

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>US market is really their major destination. So whether it's

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>US treasuries, and to some extent, of course, it's actually

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>they're more interested in the dollar credit with high yield,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>so they have a lot of dollar assets holding overseas.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 2>What happened was now we have no proof and we

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether they have started selling the assets, but

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>if they sold market really starting to question about the

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>US status or the US dollar status, US treasury status,

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>then it makes sense for them to at least either

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>increase hatching or to sell the assets. So that was

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>what happened. They probably just try to hatch a little

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>bit of their dollar holding by they usually do it

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>through NDF so selling Dollar Tower and DF but probably

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>given that the market was so feen, especially I remember

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it was a mainland China holiday, price actions got exaggerated

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 2>and then we saw a huge appreciation in the Taiwan dollars.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 2>So that's what happened until the central bands step in.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Of course, now the tides has come a little bit,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't change the fact that at least for Taiwan,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>they're holding over seven hundred billion US dollar or foreign assets,

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>mostly in the US dollar. At some point they will

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with it either they have to hatch

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>more of it, or they'll have to out it. In

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>either case, it's going to hurt the US dollar. Also,

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>one very popular ethics theme is market or at least

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 2>a taiwan Is players, they're trying to hash through other currencies.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>It makes sense because everybody hashing dollar Taiwan has made

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the hedge and cost so expensive. And now when we

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the NDF, say three months or one month NDF,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the implied annualized hatching cost is double digit over ten percent.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 2>That's crazy. So you pay ten percent to hash an

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>appreciation and as you suspension, it's not easy to have

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent appreciation, So it's that expensive. So what

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>happened at least hearing from market people, some people hash

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>it through the current one. And also going forward, we

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>may look at other Asian currencies. A lot of the

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Asian currencies will be looked in to be used as

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a proxy to hatch. So oh in all, the end

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>game is pretty straforred. We're going to see stronger Asian

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 2>currencies as a whole against the US dollar.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And do you think what happened to the Taiwan dollar

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that rapid appreciation, do you think that could be a precursor.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Could this happen again to other currencies.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a precursor. Actually, what makes things

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 2>interesting is now it had the Taiwanese authorities attention, so

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>they're going to stop that from happening again, at least

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 2>in the near term. So everybody, whether it's on shore

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Taiwanese players or even offshore players betting them to go

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>for more hedging. We will look for other Asian currencies.

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 2>The Korean one is one of the obvious one that

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 2>people like because of course we have the news about

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>US and South Korea talking about ethics during the trade negotiation.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So even from that perspective, the kourent one could have

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 2>some room for appreciation, and both economies export a lot

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of tech products. We know about the smartphones, we know

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>about other semiconductors, so therefore kourent one is really one

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of the no brainer as a proxy hetch. We also

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 2>had a look at other currencies. We go through the

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>correlation some of the interesting ones, including the taigbart and

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the Malaysian ring its, so we'll look after those currencies

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and what about the japan currency the yen. Now

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I noticed like Japan CPI rose by I think over

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>three point five percent in April, and I saw the

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>headline news it was highest amongst G seven countries. This

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is quite unbelievable. See inflation's returning back to Japan. What

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for the currency.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, this is just a continuation of what

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>has happened over the last two years ore and a

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>half years. So Japan inflation, as you have mentioned, if

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>you look at it, say the headline inflation or the

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>core inflation, both of them on a year and year basis,

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>remains about three percent. And even the so called core inflation,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>which is inflation excluding food and energy prices, it's also

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>about two percent. So we talk about the last decades,

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>we talk about Japan in deflation mode for many decades.

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Now they're getting two to three percent inflation. So now

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>is the best window for them to normalize policy, which

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>is why we think they're going to keep hiking rates

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>at least till policy rates reach one percent. And more importantly,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>they're going to keep doing quilty so quantitative tightening by

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>slowing their purchase of the jgbs. We know jgb's have

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>been a hot topic these days because of the yields,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>especially in the longer end yells has risen quite a lot.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at what the Bank of Japan

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>has said, not the government, the Bank of Japan, they

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 2>are not really concerned. They said they will keep doing QT,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe with a little bit of a tweak, but the

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 2>direction will be the same. That tells you how committed

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>they are in terms of walking away from the JGB market,

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>because one problem or one development over the decades is

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>that BOJ now owns over half of the JGB market

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and going forward that's not healthy. If they want to

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>have a healthier private investor driven JGB market, kind of

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>like the US Treasury, then they will have to lower

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>their dominance in the JGB market. And now, as we said,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>it's really the best window for them to normalize.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So you see higher JGB yields going forward.

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Higher, so even steeper curve bear stripening we think is

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be the normal.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now, Stephen, you're one of our most popular analysts

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg Intelligence. You always have been, but recently, you know,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been even more interesting in e fics currencies. You

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have been on overseas trips recently. What are

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>clients worried about right now.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, kind of like what you ask about the Taiwan dollar. Well,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of course we talk to Taiwanese clients. We talked too

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 2>many clients, and most of them they're concerned about a

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>very strong local currency. Because we mentioned about exporters in particular,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and livers and a lot of the other investors, they

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of dollar exposure, whether their trades are

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>denominated in the dollars or they have a lot of

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 2>dollar assets. So now we're really talking about US crisis

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>in the making in terms of dollar assets. When we

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Asian financial crisis many many years ago,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 2>it's always about dollar liabilities because of FX mismatch. The

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>risk was on the Asian economies back then, But now

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the risk really lies with the US because it's a

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>dollar asset crisis. And yeah, as you said, we have

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>a lot of questions this year, and that's why we

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 2>are cading it, at least internally the year of the EFFCS.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we know EFX matters every day every year,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>but going forward for the next year, for the next

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 2>few years, in the next decade, we think effects will

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 2>be increasingly important given what happened to the US dollar, and.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>This is particularly worrisome for a lot of especially North

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Asian companies and countries, because they rely on exports.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean like because we are really one of

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the major funders of the US deficit over the years.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, novice Asian economies especially has been accused of

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>undervaluing their currency, which is why the US administration always

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>goes after say South Korea for example. But however, the

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 2>fact is that we do fund their deficit. So at

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, we are the savers with

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>the current accountcor plus player. So now the risk is

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>really on us to sort of manage a soft lending

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, for this dollar weakness.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Stephen, before I let you go, like you've

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>already sort of hinted about some of these currencies. But

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in your story of Asian currencies appreciating, do you have

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like one of two favorites of the next say, six

0:19:58.640 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to twelve months.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you ask me, Because the largest risk of

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 2>appreciation that the central bank will find it hard to oppose,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 2>it's really Taiwan. So if you ask me, twan dollar

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>will always be there in your little bit of course,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>one reason being like in my view, it's not going

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to operate from over the next three to foremanths is

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that central banks will try their best to control to

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>contain the appreciation, so therefore the proxy currencies will be

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>my favorite. I mentioned a little bit earlier, so South

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Koreina one type out and Malaysian ring kits are probably

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the ones that I like the most, being a Talwan

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>dollar proxy and also from their own perspective, we think

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>they could appreciate as well.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Steven, I think that's a great way to finish the show.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for coming on the Asia Centric Podcast.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to the Asia Centric Podcast from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Lee in Hong Kong. You can find all

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>our episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or where you listen

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and this podcast was also produced and edited by Clara Chen.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening and see you next week.