WEBVTT - An Elon Musk Report Card

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:26.244
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:26.284 --> 0:00:29.044
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:28.724 --> 0:00:31.204
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today in the show, we're going

0:00:31.244 --> 0:00:35.604
<v Speaker 2>to be talking about a certain man whose name rhymes

0:00:35.644 --> 0:00:38.924
<v Speaker 2>with Dilon Tusk. You can probably guess what he is.

0:00:38.964 --> 0:00:40.684
<v Speaker 2>He recently left the Failure. We're going to give a

0:00:40.724 --> 0:00:44.204
<v Speaker 2>grade for Elon Musk's tenure in office. Did he help himself?

0:00:44.524 --> 0:00:47.404
<v Speaker 2>Did he even help Trump? We'll discuss it all and

0:00:47.404 --> 0:00:49.644
<v Speaker 2>what kind of decisions Elon made.

0:00:49.564 --> 0:00:51.844
<v Speaker 1>And then we're going to actually zoom out a little

0:00:51.844 --> 0:00:55.204
<v Speaker 1>bit and address one of our listeners questions about how

0:00:55.244 --> 0:00:57.684
<v Speaker 1>we can change our current system of government to allow

0:00:57.724 --> 0:01:11.684
<v Speaker 1>it to make better decisions. So let's talk about Elon

0:01:11.964 --> 0:01:16.924
<v Speaker 1>Musk and his brief tenure at the top as President

0:01:16.964 --> 0:01:20.164
<v Speaker 1>of the United States as co President of the United States.

0:01:20.484 --> 0:01:24.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, so, first of all, one thing we

0:01:24.364 --> 0:01:28.644
<v Speaker 2>might ask is who comes out looking better in this exchange, right,

0:01:28.764 --> 0:01:31.924
<v Speaker 2>like Trump or Elon? Trump got what was at three

0:01:32.004 --> 0:01:35.324
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars contributed to his campaign in various ways.

0:01:35.404 --> 0:01:39.684
<v Speaker 2>Trump got to brand himself as a more interesting, kind

0:01:39.684 --> 0:01:42.364
<v Speaker 2>of forward looking candidate, gets Elon to be one of

0:01:42.364 --> 0:01:46.124
<v Speaker 2>the ringleaders of this faction of Silicon Valley and business

0:01:46.204 --> 0:01:50.164
<v Speaker 2>leaders that gravitate toward Trump. I think from day one

0:01:50.324 --> 0:01:55.084
<v Speaker 2>in the White House that Elon was not helpful to Trump. Right.

0:01:55.724 --> 0:01:59.444
<v Speaker 2>Although Trump is not popular, his numbers aren't that bad, right,

0:01:59.564 --> 0:02:01.804
<v Speaker 2>especially they were covered a little bit since I mean,

0:02:02.444 --> 0:02:04.484
<v Speaker 2>on any given day you never know what is the

0:02:04.484 --> 0:02:07.724
<v Speaker 2>truth about what terroifts will be in place. But they've

0:02:07.724 --> 0:02:11.204
<v Speaker 2>recovered since that reparations day what was it called? Not

0:02:11.324 --> 0:02:15.484
<v Speaker 2>Independence Day? Either liberation Liberation day? There we go. Yeah,

0:02:15.804 --> 0:02:17.084
<v Speaker 2>reparations Day would not.

0:02:17.004 --> 0:02:19.404
<v Speaker 1>Be a Trump No, no, I think I think if

0:02:19.404 --> 0:02:21.524
<v Speaker 1>we had a reparations Day, it would have been canceled

0:02:21.604 --> 0:02:22.204
<v Speaker 1>under a Trump.

0:02:22.404 --> 0:02:24.884
<v Speaker 2>But his number, says, have recovered, Elons have not. Let

0:02:24.884 --> 0:02:27.484
<v Speaker 2>me look up the how popular is Elon Musk on

0:02:27.524 --> 0:02:32.724
<v Speaker 2>the Silver Bulletin So forty percent favorable rating, fifty four

0:02:32.764 --> 0:02:36.244
<v Speaker 2>percent unfavorable rating. At the start of Trump's term, he

0:02:36.364 --> 0:02:39.764
<v Speaker 2>was a forty two and a forty seven, right, so

0:02:40.684 --> 0:02:42.764
<v Speaker 2>his unfavorables really went up. People who were on the

0:02:42.804 --> 0:02:46.644
<v Speaker 2>fence about Elon Musk now substantially disapprove of him. And

0:02:46.684 --> 0:02:49.404
<v Speaker 2>by the way, this affects his bottom line too, right,

0:02:49.484 --> 0:02:53.364
<v Speaker 2>It's affected Tesla sales in Europe absolutely, quite profoundly, where

0:02:53.364 --> 0:02:57.684
<v Speaker 2>Elon is not forty fifty five but twenty seventy twenty

0:02:57.724 --> 0:03:00.484
<v Speaker 2>eighty unfavorable in these surveys. And then you know, look,

0:03:00.724 --> 0:03:04.684
<v Speaker 2>he does interfere in certain ways with Trump's policy in

0:03:04.764 --> 0:03:08.484
<v Speaker 2>two or three areas, right, one of which is skilled

0:03:08.564 --> 0:03:12.884
<v Speaker 2>immigration and one of which is tariffs. So I think

0:03:12.884 --> 0:03:18.484
<v Speaker 2>Trump exits a little worse for trying this post election day,

0:03:18.284 --> 0:03:21.684
<v Speaker 2>but Elon probably helped him in the campaign and during

0:03:21.724 --> 0:03:24.004
<v Speaker 2>the campaign Eland was more neutral in terms of public

0:03:24.044 --> 0:03:26.524
<v Speaker 2>image and so forth, and like, if you're neutral, but

0:03:26.564 --> 0:03:29.284
<v Speaker 2>you raise three hundred million dollars and allow you can't

0:03:29.324 --> 0:03:31.884
<v Speaker 2>it to rebrand himself and not such a bad deal.

0:03:32.044 --> 0:03:34.764
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's an interesting calculus, right, because Elon

0:03:34.884 --> 0:03:37.964
<v Speaker 1>was definitely helpful in getting Trump elected, but then at

0:03:38.004 --> 0:03:41.964
<v Speaker 1>some point he started being a liability because I think

0:03:42.124 --> 0:03:45.884
<v Speaker 1>with Doje, even people who supported Elon, there were certain

0:03:45.924 --> 0:03:48.604
<v Speaker 1>things where he was starting to get blowback, including from

0:03:48.604 --> 0:03:50.564
<v Speaker 1>Trump who was like, oh, well, we don't really want

0:03:50.604 --> 0:03:52.844
<v Speaker 1>to be cutting all of these things, right, we need

0:03:52.884 --> 0:03:56.764
<v Speaker 1>to win elections and people cutting things isn't popular. I

0:03:56.764 --> 0:03:59.724
<v Speaker 1>think he said something along those lines, so I think

0:03:59.724 --> 0:04:02.324
<v Speaker 1>that that was hurting Trump. And then we have actually

0:04:02.844 --> 0:04:09.684
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of the campaign where Elon donated twenty million dollars, right,

0:04:09.924 --> 0:04:13.644
<v Speaker 1>and it ended up with a huge Democratic victory because

0:04:13.644 --> 0:04:17.484
<v Speaker 1>there was a backlash there was, yeah, exactly, there was

0:04:17.524 --> 0:04:20.564
<v Speaker 1>a huge backlash the fact that he was perceived as

0:04:20.644 --> 0:04:24.564
<v Speaker 1>kind of meddling a little bit too much. And you

0:04:24.644 --> 0:04:28.044
<v Speaker 1>also have these conflicting things right where a lot of

0:04:28.044 --> 0:04:31.084
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs that Trump wants to pass hurt Tesla, right,

0:04:31.164 --> 0:04:34.604
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla currently is losing a lot of the there's

0:04:34.924 --> 0:04:37.524
<v Speaker 1>ev credits that are no longer a part of the

0:04:37.604 --> 0:04:40.244
<v Speaker 1>big beautiful bill. So there are a lot of things

0:04:40.244 --> 0:04:44.524
<v Speaker 1>happening that are hurting Tesla directly. And people at SpaceX

0:04:44.684 --> 0:04:47.924
<v Speaker 1>have been complaining that, you know, they feel neglected, that

0:04:48.004 --> 0:04:51.404
<v Speaker 1>productivity is down, that innovation is down, that people are

0:04:51.444 --> 0:04:54.284
<v Speaker 1>not motivated, that the you know, the work environment has

0:04:54.284 --> 0:04:58.444
<v Speaker 1>been horrible because Elon has completely neglected his duties there,

0:04:58.724 --> 0:05:03.444
<v Speaker 1>and so I think he's definitely suffering on those grounds.

0:05:03.724 --> 0:05:08.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm very, very curious to see whether Trump is going

0:05:08.204 --> 0:05:13.324
<v Speaker 1>to persist with the Doge cuts and like double down,

0:05:13.444 --> 0:05:16.444
<v Speaker 1>or if he's going to now like slowly try to

0:05:16.524 --> 0:05:21.164
<v Speaker 1>walk it back as part of separating himself from elon.

0:05:21.284 --> 0:05:23.164
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Nate, Well, look, if you look

0:05:23.204 --> 0:05:25.524
<v Speaker 2>at bond markets, they're worried that we're going to run

0:05:26.084 --> 0:05:30.844
<v Speaker 2>budget deficits because we'll probably cut taxes on rich people

0:05:30.924 --> 0:05:36.564
<v Speaker 2>like Republicans like to do without cutting spending by enough, right,

0:05:36.724 --> 0:05:39.084
<v Speaker 2>And where we have cut spending are in things like

0:05:39.124 --> 0:05:44.444
<v Speaker 2>foreign aid programs that probably from like a expected DIYU standpoint,

0:05:44.484 --> 0:05:47.604
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of good for the world. Yeah, but

0:05:47.684 --> 0:05:49.604
<v Speaker 2>aren't that large a fraction of the federal budgets. It's

0:05:49.604 --> 0:05:52.924
<v Speaker 2>almost like the you know, it's like the canonical issue

0:05:52.924 --> 0:05:54.604
<v Speaker 2>where if you pull people and say what percentage of

0:05:54.604 --> 0:05:56.804
<v Speaker 2>budget goes to four and aid, they'll say fifteen percent

0:05:56.844 --> 0:05:59.684
<v Speaker 2>instead of one percent or whatever it is, right, And

0:05:59.724 --> 0:06:00.964
<v Speaker 2>so you know, it's where we kind of get a

0:06:01.004 --> 0:06:03.284
<v Speaker 2>lot of bang for your bucket, and that's where where

0:06:03.324 --> 0:06:06.124
<v Speaker 2>there have been more cuts. But like, yeah, look, I

0:06:06.364 --> 0:06:11.764
<v Speaker 2>mean Trump was never a fiscal austerity guy, right, and

0:06:11.804 --> 0:06:16.724
<v Speaker 2>he differed from like the Romney Ryan generation of Republicans

0:06:16.764 --> 0:06:21.324
<v Speaker 2>by doing less to target entitlement programs. Right. I mean,

0:06:21.524 --> 0:06:24.284
<v Speaker 2>in principle he has an isolation a streak, But I

0:06:24.284 --> 0:06:27.684
<v Speaker 2>don't believe we're cutting defense spending or anything like that,

0:06:27.804 --> 0:06:31.324
<v Speaker 2>and you know, with with legitimate reason. I mean, you know,

0:06:31.484 --> 0:06:33.284
<v Speaker 2>things as we you know, you look at t happening

0:06:33.284 --> 0:06:36.364
<v Speaker 2>in Ukraine, right and like how is our drone capabilities

0:06:36.404 --> 0:06:39.844
<v Speaker 2>compared to China? And it could become a very dangerous world.

0:06:39.924 --> 0:06:44.604
<v Speaker 2>But no, yeah, I mean what is Elon's legacy on

0:06:44.644 --> 0:06:46.204
<v Speaker 2>the government. I mean I think it's like you know,

0:06:47.004 --> 0:06:50.324
<v Speaker 2>cutting PEP far and things like that, and not a

0:06:50.324 --> 0:06:54.444
<v Speaker 2>lot of other you know, and maybe maybe restraining Trump

0:06:54.884 --> 0:06:57.244
<v Speaker 2>a little bit on tariffs at the end.

0:06:59.244 --> 0:07:02.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that remains to be seen, right, But yeah, I'm

0:07:02.764 --> 0:07:04.884
<v Speaker 1>looking at some numbers right now, and this is just

0:07:05.244 --> 0:07:09.764
<v Speaker 1>one calculation that said that, you know, his at best,

0:07:09.924 --> 0:07:14.164
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Doach has saved around one hundred and

0:07:14.204 --> 0:07:17.844
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars, but that's probably unlikely to stand, and

0:07:18.084 --> 0:07:23.324
<v Speaker 1>that it the consequences of the cuts, putting the federal

0:07:23.364 --> 0:07:27.644
<v Speaker 1>workers on paid leave, rehiring mistakenly fired employees, and all

0:07:27.684 --> 0:07:30.484
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to cost the government as much

0:07:30.484 --> 0:07:33.924
<v Speaker 1>as one hundred and thirty five billion dollars. So nut

0:07:34.044 --> 0:07:38.044
<v Speaker 1>it seems like very little has been accomplished except for

0:07:38.484 --> 0:07:41.844
<v Speaker 1>things that you know, Elon is very big on innovation,

0:07:42.084 --> 0:07:46.164
<v Speaker 1>right and American you know, American brain power, and he

0:07:46.404 --> 0:07:48.724
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been tweeting about SpaceX and all of

0:07:48.764 --> 0:07:51.204
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And one of the big things of his

0:07:51.284 --> 0:07:54.044
<v Speaker 1>legacy is cutting all of the grounds too, as we've

0:07:54.044 --> 0:07:57.004
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the show multiple times, kind of creating

0:07:57.004 --> 0:07:59.484
<v Speaker 1>this brain drain and this vacuum. You know, where the

0:07:59.484 --> 0:08:02.444
<v Speaker 1>fuck is innovation going to come from if I also

0:08:02.804 --> 0:08:05.804
<v Speaker 1>just leave the United States? And so I think that

0:08:05.964 --> 0:08:10.204
<v Speaker 1>he perversely, it's not I think the associate with Trump.

0:08:10.244 --> 0:08:12.724
<v Speaker 1>I think he has cost himself a hell of a

0:08:12.724 --> 0:08:15.884
<v Speaker 1>lot of money in that sense, because the pipeline is

0:08:15.924 --> 0:08:17.724
<v Speaker 1>going to dry up and this is going to be

0:08:17.804 --> 0:08:20.724
<v Speaker 1>much harder to undo than rehiring federal employees.

0:08:21.244 --> 0:08:23.364
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, I think he was coming from a paradigm where,

0:08:24.964 --> 0:08:29.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the private sector, there's kind of a

0:08:29.644 --> 0:08:34.764
<v Speaker 2>paradigm where like you accumulate fat in a corporation, Right,

0:08:34.924 --> 0:08:39.964
<v Speaker 2>it becomes hard to fire people on a one on

0:08:39.964 --> 0:08:42.524
<v Speaker 2>one basis for various reasons, right, I mean, a it's

0:08:42.564 --> 0:08:46.524
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a challenging thing to let someone off

0:08:46.724 --> 0:08:49.084
<v Speaker 2>of a job, right, And there can be union stuff,

0:08:49.124 --> 0:08:53.524
<v Speaker 2>and there can be legal stuff and wrongful termination stuff

0:08:53.524 --> 0:08:55.364
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. Right, So you know, so so

0:08:55.444 --> 0:08:58.524
<v Speaker 2>much in a corporation be like, Okay, we've been growing, maybe

0:08:58.524 --> 0:09:00.844
<v Speaker 2>we're struggling little bit. Now, let's just take a scalpel

0:09:00.844 --> 0:09:05.244
<v Speaker 2>and shave ten percent or whatever of our budget off. Right.

0:09:05.284 --> 0:09:08.044
<v Speaker 2>It's like much harder to do in a US government sense,

0:09:08.084 --> 0:09:11.564
<v Speaker 2>where like, like, look, I'm sure there is lots of waste, fraud,

0:09:11.724 --> 0:09:14.164
<v Speaker 2>and abuse in the government. If you read the book

0:09:14.204 --> 0:09:16.724
<v Speaker 2>Abundance by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, it talks about

0:09:16.924 --> 0:09:19.364
<v Speaker 2>some of that. There's some state governments too, and seems

0:09:19.364 --> 0:09:22.204
<v Speaker 2>to be worse in blue states than in red states. Right,

0:09:22.244 --> 0:09:24.364
<v Speaker 2>But like, you have a whole bureaucracy and a whole

0:09:24.444 --> 0:09:27.644
<v Speaker 2>legal framework and for both apporporating funds to begin with,

0:09:27.964 --> 0:09:30.724
<v Speaker 2>like and for cutting them, right, So you know, Congress

0:09:30.724 --> 0:09:33.284
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to control the power of the purse. Trump

0:09:33.284 --> 0:09:36.244
<v Speaker 2>has not performed very well in litigation so far in

0:09:36.284 --> 0:09:38.964
<v Speaker 2>a number of areas, and so you know, so that

0:09:39.084 --> 0:09:43.004
<v Speaker 2>paradigm doesn't carry forward, and I think is like, look,

0:09:43.084 --> 0:09:45.924
<v Speaker 2>I mean the basic critique that I find most compelling

0:09:45.964 --> 0:09:48.204
<v Speaker 2>of Elan is not oh, he's a Nazi. It's that

0:09:48.364 --> 0:09:51.404
<v Speaker 2>he's weighing over his head and doesn't seem to have

0:09:51.444 --> 0:09:54.964
<v Speaker 2>this ability to differentiate issues that he knows a lot

0:09:55.004 --> 0:09:57.804
<v Speaker 2>about from ones where he doesn't. Like if Trump had

0:09:57.844 --> 0:10:00.364
<v Speaker 2>appointed him instead of like David Sachs to be like

0:10:01.124 --> 0:10:03.804
<v Speaker 2>the part time ais are. I mean, Elon actually is

0:10:05.964 --> 0:10:08.564
<v Speaker 2>more cautious on AI, more concerned about AI risks than

0:10:08.604 --> 0:10:11.404
<v Speaker 2>some other Silicon Valley leaders, Right, So like Elon, we

0:10:11.444 --> 0:10:15.164
<v Speaker 2>want you to like and do what you can to

0:10:15.364 --> 0:10:18.924
<v Speaker 2>ensure AI leadership in an intelligent way and leadership against

0:10:19.004 --> 0:10:23.364
<v Speaker 2>China and technological leadership. And and now you know, look,

0:10:23.364 --> 0:10:26.084
<v Speaker 2>I think the chance that China wins quote unquote what

0:10:26.124 --> 0:10:30.124
<v Speaker 2>do you want to call it? Porld War two has risen.

0:10:29.884 --> 0:10:33.204
<v Speaker 1>Gone up by a lot. I think that you just absolutely,

0:10:33.364 --> 0:10:36.884
<v Speaker 1>like spot On, nailed the issue here in Nate, which

0:10:36.964 --> 0:10:41.164
<v Speaker 1>is the overconfidence that Elon Musks has exhibited, right, the

0:10:41.604 --> 0:10:45.164
<v Speaker 1>fact that he doesn't seem to grasp like he is

0:10:45.324 --> 0:10:49.604
<v Speaker 1>so he is so enamored of his own intelligence that

0:10:49.644 --> 0:10:52.244
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't seem to grasp that his deep knowledge of

0:10:52.324 --> 0:10:56.204
<v Speaker 1>one sphere doesn't mean that he has qualified to be

0:10:56.244 --> 0:10:58.804
<v Speaker 1>an expert and have deep knowledge of everything else. And

0:10:58.844 --> 0:11:00.204
<v Speaker 1>he's like, well, I can do the same thing to

0:11:00.244 --> 0:11:01.924
<v Speaker 1>the government that I did to Twitter, and look at

0:11:01.924 --> 0:11:05.284
<v Speaker 1>Twitter now, haha, fuck you haters. However, Twitter is not

0:11:05.324 --> 0:11:08.924
<v Speaker 1>the government, right, and you can also like argue that,

0:11:09.404 --> 0:11:11.644
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter is worse off now. We're not gonna

0:11:12.004 --> 0:11:15.044
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making that argument, but you could. However, even

0:11:15.084 --> 0:11:17.804
<v Speaker 1>if you say, okay, Twitter's better off. Now, everything's great.

0:11:18.244 --> 0:11:20.804
<v Speaker 1>You know, he understands business in a way that he

0:11:20.844 --> 0:11:22.204
<v Speaker 1>does not understand government.

0:11:22.284 --> 0:11:22.444
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:22.724 --> 0:11:25.124
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't know what he's doing, he doesn't know what

0:11:25.164 --> 0:11:29.364
<v Speaker 1>he's cutting. He lacks that basic knowledge, and yet the

0:11:29.444 --> 0:11:32.844
<v Speaker 1>confidence doesn't match up right with his knowledge. He's not

0:11:33.244 --> 0:11:36.244
<v Speaker 1>the humility is altogether absent in the way he thinks

0:11:36.284 --> 0:11:39.524
<v Speaker 1>about this. And this is one of the biggest problems

0:11:39.524 --> 0:11:41.804
<v Speaker 1>with people who are very intelligent. It's actually in my

0:11:41.844 --> 0:11:44.444
<v Speaker 1>dissertation for when I was in grad school. This is

0:11:44.484 --> 0:11:46.604
<v Speaker 1>what this is what we discovered, right that this is

0:11:46.644 --> 0:11:50.764
<v Speaker 1>the Achilles heel of high performers, this overconfidence bias where

0:11:51.244 --> 0:11:53.684
<v Speaker 1>they succumb to thinking that they know much more and

0:11:53.724 --> 0:11:55.564
<v Speaker 1>are much more in control than they actually are.

0:11:56.604 --> 0:11:59.964
<v Speaker 2>And especially in his case, if first of all, Silicon

0:12:00.044 --> 0:12:03.644
<v Speaker 2>Valley is kind of a no nagging culture, right, It's

0:12:03.724 --> 0:12:05.684
<v Speaker 2>very self dealing in the sense I don't mean any

0:12:05.684 --> 0:12:07.164
<v Speaker 2>correct way. I mean, like in a kind of little

0:12:07.164 --> 0:12:11.124
<v Speaker 2>way of like everyone's getting in everyone else's different rounds

0:12:11.164 --> 0:12:14.404
<v Speaker 2>of investment. It's a very tight knit community, so you can't,

0:12:14.484 --> 0:12:20.284
<v Speaker 2>like it's considered uncou to like criticize another VC or founder. Right,

0:12:20.324 --> 0:12:23.084
<v Speaker 2>you don't see a lot of that necessarily, That's one

0:12:23.084 --> 0:12:25.364
<v Speaker 2>part of it. But also, look, he is on a

0:12:25.404 --> 0:12:28.764
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing winning streak. I mean, you know, if you

0:12:28.884 --> 0:12:31.364
<v Speaker 2>ask most investors at the time the SpaceX gonna work,

0:12:31.364 --> 0:12:34.924
<v Speaker 2>assess is gonna work, they'd say no, right, probably not.

0:12:35.164 --> 0:12:37.884
<v Speaker 2>You know, I do think that like he deserves some

0:12:38.044 --> 0:12:42.564
<v Speaker 2>credit for like, you know, some of the dire predictions

0:12:42.604 --> 0:12:47.284
<v Speaker 2>about Twitter were grossly exaggerated. Now it's business model isn't

0:12:47.324 --> 0:12:49.324
<v Speaker 2>much good, but like it's remained an important part of

0:12:49.364 --> 0:12:53.284
<v Speaker 2>the discourse. You know, I think that like xai is

0:12:53.444 --> 0:12:58.564
<v Speaker 2>taken somewhat seriously. It's not a category leader like open

0:12:58.604 --> 0:13:03.164
<v Speaker 2>Ai or Nthropic or maybe Google. You know, it might

0:13:03.164 --> 0:13:06.524
<v Speaker 2>be down in that third tier, but like still has

0:13:06.564 --> 0:13:09.724
<v Speaker 2>a lot of interesting data to crunch from Twitter, data

0:13:09.724 --> 0:13:13.404
<v Speaker 2>that is valuable. They're hiring good people, and like it's

0:13:13.444 --> 0:13:15.844
<v Speaker 2>not impossible that that could be a big player, right,

0:13:15.924 --> 0:13:17.964
<v Speaker 2>So like you have to give him credit for what

0:13:17.964 --> 0:13:22.044
<v Speaker 2>he's done in business. And look, are are different types

0:13:22.044 --> 0:13:23.724
<v Speaker 2>of intelligence too. I mean the phrase I've used with

0:13:23.764 --> 0:13:29.964
<v Speaker 2>Elon is spiky intelligence, which is just like very excellent

0:13:30.124 --> 0:13:33.764
<v Speaker 2>in some areas and very deficient in other areas where

0:13:33.764 --> 0:13:37.644
<v Speaker 2>he's like below the average showing some areas like emotional

0:13:37.684 --> 0:13:42.404
<v Speaker 2>IQ probably right, and and that's but he's not like

0:13:42.444 --> 0:13:45.204
<v Speaker 2>a calculating I mean, in my book you talking about

0:13:45.204 --> 0:13:47.884
<v Speaker 2>the river, right, which are at least very competitive anarchical people.

0:13:48.124 --> 0:13:52.084
<v Speaker 2>He's not like the calculating type. He's impulsive. He goes

0:13:52.124 --> 0:13:55.044
<v Speaker 2>all in on things. And yeah, you know, ocou say, it's

0:13:55.044 --> 0:13:57.444
<v Speaker 2>like a pooker player that has a sun run and

0:13:57.484 --> 0:14:00.764
<v Speaker 2>wins like three big tournaments in a year. There's like

0:14:00.804 --> 0:14:03.244
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of that, But then they're playing some

0:14:03.364 --> 0:14:05.924
<v Speaker 2>other game that isn't poker and they bet on themselves

0:14:05.964 --> 0:14:09.004
<v Speaker 2>really heavily, and yeah.

0:14:08.244 --> 0:14:10.604
<v Speaker 1>Or even in poker. But the next year when their

0:14:10.644 --> 0:14:13.644
<v Speaker 1>sun run is over. I'm thinking of someone in particular

0:14:13.724 --> 0:14:17.004
<v Speaker 1>who's on the sun run a lifetime right now, who's

0:14:17.044 --> 0:14:18.684
<v Speaker 1>going to be coming down to Earth at some.

0:14:18.604 --> 0:14:25.764
<v Speaker 2>Point, and we'll be right back after this break.

0:14:34.044 --> 0:14:37.244
<v Speaker 1>I think that spiky intelligence is a really important way

0:14:37.324 --> 0:14:40.724
<v Speaker 1>to look at it because they're people who are generalists, right,

0:14:41.004 --> 0:14:43.644
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, you know, if you think

0:14:43.644 --> 0:14:47.884
<v Speaker 1>of the fox hedgehog type of thinking. Have we talked

0:14:47.884 --> 0:14:48.564
<v Speaker 1>about this on the.

0:14:48.484 --> 0:14:51.444
<v Speaker 2>Show We should's It should be a risky business core concept,

0:14:51.484 --> 0:14:53.644
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, let's talk. Let's remind people what it is.

0:14:53.964 --> 0:14:57.164
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So you have two types of people, the people

0:14:57.204 --> 0:14:59.764
<v Speaker 1>who know who have the broad intelligence, right, who know

0:14:59.844 --> 0:15:01.364
<v Speaker 1>a little about a lot of things, and then the

0:15:01.404 --> 0:15:04.164
<v Speaker 1>people who know a lot about one thing in particular.

0:15:04.604 --> 0:15:08.724
<v Speaker 1>And so those are kind of the two concepts. And

0:15:08.924 --> 0:15:11.884
<v Speaker 1>some perform better in some environments, some perform better in

0:15:11.964 --> 0:15:13.844
<v Speaker 1>other environments. Nat, I think you wrote about this in

0:15:13.884 --> 0:15:18.204
<v Speaker 1>your book, right, And so these are kind of these

0:15:18.204 --> 0:15:23.164
<v Speaker 1>two paradigms for high performers. And both types of people,

0:15:23.204 --> 0:15:25.724
<v Speaker 1>by the way, can be very high performing people. So

0:15:25.884 --> 0:15:28.844
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a dang on any one approach, right, but

0:15:28.964 --> 0:15:32.244
<v Speaker 1>it just depends on what the context is and what

0:15:32.284 --> 0:15:33.764
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to accomplish.

0:15:33.924 --> 0:15:36.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, hedgehog knows one big thing, a fox knows many

0:15:36.964 --> 0:15:40.844
<v Speaker 2>little things, right, And they're both types of intelligence for

0:15:41.004 --> 0:15:47.164
<v Speaker 2>things like poker, or for things like making prediction, right,

0:15:47.284 --> 0:15:53.644
<v Speaker 2>than this fox tendency to kind of calibrate and estimate

0:15:53.924 --> 0:15:57.924
<v Speaker 2>and be pluralistic tends to be helpful, I think, right,

0:15:58.204 --> 0:16:00.804
<v Speaker 2>if you are a founder of a company, then you

0:16:00.884 --> 0:16:02.684
<v Speaker 2>might watch someone who goes all in and is very

0:16:02.684 --> 0:16:04.644
<v Speaker 2>spiky hy variants right.

0:16:04.764 --> 0:16:07.484
<v Speaker 1>You want, you want that hedgehog. But a fox is

0:16:07.524 --> 0:16:10.924
<v Speaker 1>actually less likely to be over confident than a hedgehog

0:16:11.364 --> 0:16:14.564
<v Speaker 1>because the hedgehog is much more likely to fall for

0:16:14.644 --> 0:16:18.884
<v Speaker 1>that bias, because the hedgehog knows so much about that thing.

0:16:18.924 --> 0:16:21.684
<v Speaker 1>And if it's a successful hedgehog, the hedgehog has been

0:16:21.764 --> 0:16:24.604
<v Speaker 1>very good, right, and has been rewarded for knowing a lot,

0:16:25.164 --> 0:16:29.924
<v Speaker 1>And so that then creates this false sense that oh,

0:16:29.964 --> 0:16:33.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm just brilliant, right, I'm like naturally good at knowing things,

0:16:33.724 --> 0:16:36.964
<v Speaker 1>whereas the fox, because the fox kind of knows about

0:16:37.004 --> 0:16:40.524
<v Speaker 1>so many different things and might not be Like if

0:16:40.524 --> 0:16:43.004
<v Speaker 1>the fox squared off against the hedgehog and the hedgehog's

0:16:43.004 --> 0:16:46.844
<v Speaker 1>area of expertise, the fox would lose. But the fox

0:16:47.164 --> 0:16:50.764
<v Speaker 1>kind of knows enough about the world that I think

0:16:50.804 --> 0:16:53.564
<v Speaker 1>the fox is more likely to be humble. It's a

0:16:53.564 --> 0:16:55.964
<v Speaker 1>little you know, it's a little strange to think of

0:16:56.004 --> 0:16:58.164
<v Speaker 1>a humble fox. But that's why the hot fox is

0:16:58.204 --> 0:17:01.444
<v Speaker 1>able to evade traps. Right. If the fox became over confident,

0:17:01.484 --> 0:17:04.164
<v Speaker 1>would be very easy to catch the fox, because you'd

0:17:04.164 --> 0:17:06.524
<v Speaker 1>be like, haha, I know that the fox thinks that

0:17:06.644 --> 0:17:10.164
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, the best in the world, and

0:17:10.204 --> 0:17:11.764
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to be able to catch it. Yeah.

0:17:11.804 --> 0:17:18.684
<v Speaker 2>And Elon also lacks a certain type of worldlyness, right.

0:17:20.764 --> 0:17:22.564
<v Speaker 2>You know, look, say what you want about like Mark

0:17:22.684 --> 0:17:27.764
<v Speaker 2>and Breeson, Repeter Teel, but they can write interesting essays

0:17:28.244 --> 0:17:32.044
<v Speaker 2>about kind of world affairs and political philosophy and things

0:17:32.084 --> 0:17:34.844
<v Speaker 2>like that. Right, you get some founders. You know, Metallic

0:17:34.884 --> 0:17:38.764
<v Speaker 2>Bouterin is the founder of Ethereum, and when I talked

0:17:38.764 --> 0:17:40.044
<v Speaker 2>to him from my book, He's like, yeah, I thought

0:17:40.044 --> 0:17:41.764
<v Speaker 2>there was a ninety percent chance that I'd fail, but

0:17:41.804 --> 0:17:44.964
<v Speaker 2>I thought that the expected value was positive at the

0:17:44.964 --> 0:17:47.804
<v Speaker 2>stage of my life. Right, that's a very risky business

0:17:47.844 --> 0:17:51.044
<v Speaker 2>slash Fox way to think about things, whereas Elon would

0:17:51.084 --> 0:17:53.364
<v Speaker 2>just be like, I'm going to fucking do it. I'm

0:17:53.364 --> 0:17:54.644
<v Speaker 2>going to fucking do it. I don't even want to

0:17:54.644 --> 0:17:56.604
<v Speaker 2>think about the odds. I'm going to fucking do it. Right,

0:17:57.084 --> 0:18:01.364
<v Speaker 2>so he's particularly you know, he lacks that roundedness I think,

0:18:01.484 --> 0:18:06.604
<v Speaker 2>and and the self reflectiveness. And also he is has

0:18:06.644 --> 0:18:08.724
<v Speaker 2>a lot of distractions. I mean, look in terms of

0:18:08.764 --> 0:18:10.644
<v Speaker 2>the number of things things he gets done. I mean

0:18:10.644 --> 0:18:15.964
<v Speaker 2>he's sort of in a half assed way, but maybe

0:18:15.964 --> 0:18:18.844
<v Speaker 2>not completely. You know, he is running like a half

0:18:18.884 --> 0:18:21.484
<v Speaker 2>dozen companies and being a special advisor to the president,

0:18:21.524 --> 0:18:25.844
<v Speaker 2>and like fathering all these children and traveling around the world.

0:18:25.884 --> 0:18:28.724
<v Speaker 1>I love how you just threw that in there, and

0:18:28.764 --> 0:18:31.684
<v Speaker 1>fathering all these children and in lawsuits about all of

0:18:31.684 --> 0:18:34.204
<v Speaker 1>the children he's fathering. So that's actually it's a very

0:18:35.364 --> 0:18:38.244
<v Speaker 1>it's an important point because that does kind of get

0:18:38.284 --> 0:18:39.204
<v Speaker 1>his attention.

0:18:39.724 --> 0:18:43.324
<v Speaker 2>And you know, look, we all know okay, let me

0:18:43.364 --> 0:18:51.244
<v Speaker 2>put this carefully. We all know how achieving defective people.

0:18:51.364 --> 0:18:55.404
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean defective entirely pejoratively, right, but like people

0:18:55.484 --> 0:18:59.964
<v Speaker 2>who have flaws that they're able to overcome because they

0:19:00.044 --> 0:19:05.044
<v Speaker 2>have crafted a life to work around them, and or

0:19:05.124 --> 0:19:07.924
<v Speaker 2>because they have strength that outweigh them, and or because

0:19:07.924 --> 0:19:10.404
<v Speaker 2>they have enough like how our privilege authority and not

0:19:10.484 --> 0:19:12.484
<v Speaker 2>get called on the problems.

0:19:12.564 --> 0:19:12.764
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:14.244 --> 0:19:16.244
<v Speaker 2>You know, my experience with those people is that when

0:19:16.364 --> 0:19:20.724
<v Speaker 2>you add other elements that careful balance can get out

0:19:21.084 --> 0:19:23.444
<v Speaker 2>of whack, right, And with Elon, you're adding too. You're

0:19:23.484 --> 0:19:25.564
<v Speaker 2>not sending the government stuff. You're adding. According to a

0:19:25.564 --> 0:19:29.684
<v Speaker 2>lot of credible reporting, maybe quite a bit of drug use,

0:19:29.724 --> 0:19:33.564
<v Speaker 2>and not just weed, but ketamin in particular seems to

0:19:33.644 --> 0:19:36.084
<v Speaker 2>have been a thing that he was doing, right, And

0:19:36.124 --> 0:19:38.164
<v Speaker 2>when you have these reports there's one recently in the

0:19:38.164 --> 0:19:40.684
<v Speaker 2>New York Times, there was one in the Wall Street Journal.

0:19:40.684 --> 0:19:42.924
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so the reporting on that I'd gather is

0:19:43.164 --> 0:19:47.564
<v Speaker 2>very deep, and like you know, Elon's life has taken

0:19:47.764 --> 0:19:50.564
<v Speaker 2>I think, kind of a turn for the worse in

0:19:50.604 --> 0:19:51.164
<v Speaker 2>this period.

0:19:51.244 --> 0:19:51.364
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:51.404 --> 0:19:53.284
<v Speaker 2>He was at one point one of the most admired

0:19:53.404 --> 0:19:57.844
<v Speaker 2>men or women for that matter, on Earth. Tesla had

0:19:57.844 --> 0:19:59.084
<v Speaker 2>a very good brand. I mean, there are a ton

0:19:59.124 --> 0:20:01.244
<v Speaker 2>of Teslas on the road, right, but like you know,

0:20:01.364 --> 0:20:03.204
<v Speaker 2>part of the preme is like this kind he kind

0:20:03.244 --> 0:20:10.364
<v Speaker 2>of spends neglecting. Tesla is a time when Chinese electric

0:20:10.444 --> 0:20:13.844
<v Speaker 2>vehicles begin to gain a lot of market share, right

0:20:14.124 --> 0:20:19.204
<v Speaker 2>where other American companies like Rivian begin to become more prestige,

0:20:19.284 --> 0:20:23.204
<v Speaker 2>especially in the in the blue areas where ELI used

0:20:23.204 --> 0:20:25.444
<v Speaker 2>to be more propular. By the way using oftentimes like

0:20:25.484 --> 0:20:30.204
<v Speaker 2>the charging network that like Tesla built. Right, Yeah, you know,

0:20:30.204 --> 0:20:32.444
<v Speaker 2>you see a few cyber trucks on the road. I

0:20:32.484 --> 0:20:36.164
<v Speaker 2>think that is largely not seen as a tremendous success

0:20:35.764 --> 0:20:41.764
<v Speaker 2>in in driverless cars. Waimo is a category leader in

0:20:41.804 --> 0:20:43.684
<v Speaker 2>the United States. Right, so all of a sudden, Tesla

0:20:43.804 --> 0:20:48.484
<v Speaker 2>is like second best at a bunch of things. Its

0:20:48.524 --> 0:20:52.844
<v Speaker 2>profit margins are down. Its stock did bounce back after

0:20:52.884 --> 0:20:59.124
<v Speaker 2>Elon downsized himself from the government or was or was downsized.

0:20:59.284 --> 0:21:02.244
<v Speaker 2>But Elon might have concerns that you're playing catch up

0:21:02.764 --> 0:21:04.924
<v Speaker 2>in various ways in this market now, and you kind

0:21:04.924 --> 0:21:06.724
<v Speaker 2>of established the whole category by yourself.

0:21:07.604 --> 0:21:10.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I think that he's he is playing catch up.

0:21:10.764 --> 0:21:13.364
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Nate, I've started noticing, I don't

0:21:13.404 --> 0:21:16.124
<v Speaker 1>know if you have bumper stickers on a lot of

0:21:16.124 --> 0:21:21.044
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's that apologize for driving a Tesla. So people are

0:21:21.204 --> 0:21:23.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are saying things like I wish I didn't,

0:21:23.564 --> 0:21:25.724
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I can't afford a new car. And

0:21:25.884 --> 0:21:28.324
<v Speaker 1>I bet that the secondary, like the resale market for

0:21:28.404 --> 0:21:31.724
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's is going to fall, which has traditionally been actually

0:21:32.004 --> 0:21:35.724
<v Speaker 1>incredibly strong right in the past. If you try to

0:21:35.764 --> 0:21:39.684
<v Speaker 1>buy an old Tesla like the prices were ridiculously high,

0:21:39.884 --> 0:21:42.404
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't be at all surprised if that secondary

0:21:42.684 --> 0:21:46.404
<v Speaker 1>market also kind of absolutely caved in, And so you

0:21:46.484 --> 0:21:48.964
<v Speaker 1>need to think not just right now, but ahead. And

0:21:49.004 --> 0:21:51.804
<v Speaker 1>then you've got the lack of eb subsidies and kind

0:21:51.804 --> 0:21:54.244
<v Speaker 1>of all of those credits that are going away, and

0:21:54.324 --> 0:21:56.804
<v Speaker 1>so all of these things are sobering if you're an

0:21:56.804 --> 0:21:59.604
<v Speaker 1>Elon musk and Tesla's kind of your your baby.

0:21:59.724 --> 0:22:03.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, people are pretty rational about car purchases, right,

0:22:03.444 --> 0:22:06.884
<v Speaker 2>They're often pretty go gageous for overall optimism about economy

0:22:07.324 --> 0:22:11.164
<v Speaker 2>in the near term. Right, according to Google Gemini AI.

0:22:11.804 --> 0:22:14.604
<v Speaker 2>You know, always caveats about this, but there's been a

0:22:14.684 --> 0:22:18.844
<v Speaker 2>ten percent decline in resale values approximately so far instead

0:22:18.884 --> 0:22:21.764
<v Speaker 2>of time when in theory, because of tariffs, you should

0:22:21.764 --> 0:22:26.244
<v Speaker 2>have people moving into used cars, right, if new cars

0:22:26.244 --> 0:22:30.164
<v Speaker 2>get more expensive. Yeah, And it's like no longer like

0:22:31.484 --> 0:22:33.044
<v Speaker 2>a flash. She used to be cool thing ne a

0:22:33.084 --> 0:22:34.844
<v Speaker 2>difriend who would ride a Tesla. It was like a

0:22:34.844 --> 0:22:37.124
<v Speaker 2>little bit like a friend who had a crypto punk

0:22:37.244 --> 0:22:39.324
<v Speaker 2>right flex right, Hey, you want to you want to?

0:22:39.844 --> 0:22:42.044
<v Speaker 2>You want to ride my Tesla to the poker tournament.

0:22:42.084 --> 0:22:45.084
<v Speaker 2>It's like, Okay, Sure, yeah, and and they've lost that

0:22:45.084 --> 0:22:45.884
<v Speaker 2>category leadership.

0:22:45.924 --> 0:22:48.924
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, yeah, I think I think that's absolutely right.

0:22:49.124 --> 0:22:52.164
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder whether something else will step in. I'm

0:22:52.244 --> 0:22:54.244
<v Speaker 1>very curious to see what the next five to ten

0:22:54.324 --> 0:22:58.044
<v Speaker 1>years in the US will look like in terms of EVS,

0:22:58.604 --> 0:23:01.484
<v Speaker 1>whether someone else is going to step in, whether TESLA

0:23:01.564 --> 0:23:04.964
<v Speaker 1>is going to rebound as Trump, you know, leaves office

0:23:05.004 --> 0:23:07.644
<v Speaker 1>and Elanas further distance from it, or whether we're going

0:23:07.684 --> 0:23:10.124
<v Speaker 1>to see just a fall a continue must fall in

0:23:10.204 --> 0:23:12.484
<v Speaker 1>the share of evs, in which case I think it

0:23:12.484 --> 0:23:15.964
<v Speaker 1>would be a lasting harm for for a lot of

0:23:16.724 --> 0:23:19.604
<v Speaker 1>goals that Elon even has stated that he has in

0:23:19.644 --> 0:23:20.084
<v Speaker 1>the past.

0:23:21.204 --> 0:23:23.204
<v Speaker 2>Now, look, I don't think we will. I think that

0:23:23.244 --> 0:23:27.564
<v Speaker 2>will that will rebound, right. You know, look now every

0:23:27.564 --> 0:23:29.684
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing and if you look at like what are Car

0:23:29.724 --> 0:23:32.404
<v Speaker 2>and Driver's best electric cars testas Model three is still

0:23:32.484 --> 0:23:34.484
<v Speaker 2>number one. You have Hundays, and you have Nissans, and

0:23:34.524 --> 0:23:38.404
<v Speaker 2>you have you know, BMW's and American made versions and

0:23:38.444 --> 0:23:41.244
<v Speaker 2>things like that, And like, I think the market demand

0:23:41.284 --> 0:23:43.964
<v Speaker 2>for these cars is proven. And obviously Trump's probably gonna

0:23:44.044 --> 0:23:49.964
<v Speaker 2>roll back fuel efficiency standards in some places. But like,

0:23:50.524 --> 0:23:52.604
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, I don't think I don't think

0:23:52.684 --> 0:23:58.764
<v Speaker 2>Elon's position as a public figure is unrecoverable. I think

0:23:58.764 --> 0:24:02.324
<v Speaker 2>it might have become unrecoverable if he'd remained in office.

0:24:02.724 --> 0:24:04.004
<v Speaker 2>I guess, I guess he was in office. He was

0:24:04.044 --> 0:24:09.204
<v Speaker 2>officially he was office for much longer. But people have

0:24:09.284 --> 0:24:12.244
<v Speaker 2>like people have like short memory.

0:24:11.924 --> 0:24:14.244
<v Speaker 1>People have Oh my god, yes, can we just like

0:24:14.284 --> 0:24:17.124
<v Speaker 1>talk about that for a second. People's memory is non existent,

0:24:17.564 --> 0:24:20.964
<v Speaker 1>like people especially these days, Like I feel like the

0:24:20.964 --> 0:24:26.204
<v Speaker 1>attention span is so incredibly short that like next week,

0:24:26.684 --> 0:24:29.684
<v Speaker 1>if something else happens, you know, you will kind of

0:24:29.724 --> 0:24:33.844
<v Speaker 1>go back to your priors and this will be kind

0:24:33.844 --> 0:24:36.524
<v Speaker 1>of water under the bridge. Even though this kind of

0:24:36.564 --> 0:24:40.524
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances might not have changed that drastically, the repercussions

0:24:40.564 --> 0:24:44.084
<v Speaker 1>might still be felt. I'm always shocked at just how

0:24:44.124 --> 0:24:46.004
<v Speaker 1>short people's memories actually are.

0:24:46.124 --> 0:24:47.684
<v Speaker 2>Look I mean if he I mean part of premise,

0:24:47.724 --> 0:24:49.804
<v Speaker 2>Like Elan I think does not believe in surrounding himself

0:24:49.804 --> 0:24:51.724
<v Speaker 2>with like he has some PR people have tried to

0:24:51.724 --> 0:24:54.804
<v Speaker 2>work with them before, but like not not many relative

0:24:54.804 --> 0:24:56.364
<v Speaker 2>to a person of his stature. But like a good

0:24:57.204 --> 0:25:00.564
<v Speaker 2>PR campaign, you know, you do the right interviews, you

0:25:00.604 --> 0:25:03.124
<v Speaker 2>make sure you're not on Kenneman or something. When you're

0:25:03.124 --> 0:25:06.564
<v Speaker 2>doing the interviews and like and like, and you can say,

0:25:06.644 --> 0:25:10.724
<v Speaker 2>I try to stop Trump from mushrooms are okay? I

0:25:11.004 --> 0:25:13.444
<v Speaker 2>don't know, man, I tried not to. I tried to

0:25:13.444 --> 0:25:16.364
<v Speaker 2>stop Trump from these horrible terrorists and X, Y and Z.

0:25:16.844 --> 0:25:18.924
<v Speaker 2>I mean he has expressed so when we put up

0:25:19.204 --> 0:25:22.364
<v Speaker 2>at silver bulletin the Elon Musk popularity tracker, he actually

0:25:23.604 --> 0:25:27.364
<v Speaker 2>replied to me on Twitter and said, it's because the

0:25:27.404 --> 0:25:30.964
<v Speaker 2>governments or the news media is biased against me. I'm paraphrasing,

0:25:31.364 --> 0:25:34.084
<v Speaker 2>but also, hahaha, I have kind of fucked up some shit, right.

0:25:34.204 --> 0:25:37.884
<v Speaker 2>It was like surprisingly humble. I think it did register

0:25:38.124 --> 0:25:40.604
<v Speaker 2>her to him at some point that like, you've burned

0:25:40.604 --> 0:25:44.564
<v Speaker 2>a lot of credibility, buddy, with with a large mass

0:25:44.604 --> 0:25:47.324
<v Speaker 2>of the American public that once hold you in high regard,

0:25:47.324 --> 0:25:52.204
<v Speaker 2>including friends. And yeah, I mean I hope he has

0:25:53.204 --> 0:25:56.404
<v Speaker 2>people in his life that can point him in the

0:25:56.484 --> 0:25:59.124
<v Speaker 2>right direction. He has found a bunch of amazing companies.

0:25:59.164 --> 0:26:03.244
<v Speaker 2>And I'd rather have good Elon than evil Elon, I

0:26:03.284 --> 0:26:06.044
<v Speaker 2>guess right, without wanting to precisely define what good and

0:26:06.124 --> 0:26:10.924
<v Speaker 2>evil are, but he is like a world historically important figure.

0:26:11.164 --> 0:26:13.004
<v Speaker 2>It'll probably be better if for the world, if you

0:26:13.084 --> 0:26:17.044
<v Speaker 2>were making more I don't mean sober in a literal sense,

0:26:17.044 --> 0:26:19.164
<v Speaker 2>but like more better, making better decisions more to use

0:26:19.164 --> 0:26:20.164
<v Speaker 2>a taglen of the show.

0:26:20.524 --> 0:26:24.724
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, so okay, So summing up Nate, if we

0:26:24.724 --> 0:26:27.804
<v Speaker 1>were to give him a grade on his decision making,

0:26:27.964 --> 0:26:29.084
<v Speaker 1>I don't know do you want to give him a

0:26:29.124 --> 0:26:31.484
<v Speaker 1>letter grade or a number grade, but let's give him

0:26:31.484 --> 0:26:31.924
<v Speaker 1>a grade.

0:26:32.004 --> 0:26:32.804
<v Speaker 2>Let's do a number.

0:26:32.924 --> 0:26:36.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, let's do zero to ten, with zero being

0:26:36.844 --> 0:26:41.124
<v Speaker 1>absolute disaster, ten being you know, brilliant, best decision maker

0:26:41.124 --> 0:26:41.644
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

0:26:41.764 --> 0:26:43.604
<v Speaker 2>And when's the start out? It starts out.

0:26:44.364 --> 0:26:47.084
<v Speaker 1>We're talking just the Trump tenure from from the moment

0:26:47.124 --> 0:26:49.244
<v Speaker 1>he's appointed, and so.

0:26:49.164 --> 0:26:52.724
<v Speaker 2>We don't give him from a pure EVS play. You

0:26:52.764 --> 0:26:56.964
<v Speaker 2>can give him credit for investing in the Trump campaign, right,

0:26:57.084 --> 0:26:58.444
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's give him two grades.

0:26:58.844 --> 0:27:01.484
<v Speaker 1>Let's give him the grade from his decision to kind

0:27:01.484 --> 0:27:05.804
<v Speaker 1>of pivot to Trump, let's call it that. And let's

0:27:05.844 --> 0:27:08.484
<v Speaker 1>give him a grade for his tenure in the not

0:27:09.044 --> 0:27:12.924
<v Speaker 1>his official tenure in the Trump administration. So two grades.

0:27:14.164 --> 0:27:15.884
<v Speaker 2>To pivot to Trump in the first place. And I'm

0:27:15.924 --> 0:27:19.484
<v Speaker 2>going to ignore what my political preferences are personally from

0:27:19.564 --> 0:27:23.924
<v Speaker 2>that kind of Elon's look, I give him a it's

0:27:23.964 --> 0:27:26.004
<v Speaker 2>hard not to be results oriented, right, I give him

0:27:26.084 --> 0:27:28.764
<v Speaker 2>a five, which is a boring grade. I mean, look,

0:27:30.004 --> 0:27:32.004
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, he did recognize that, like Trump

0:27:32.124 --> 0:27:36.844
<v Speaker 2>is the rising ship in this election, right, I can

0:27:36.924 --> 0:27:39.164
<v Speaker 2>have access to like a lot of power and a

0:27:39.164 --> 0:27:41.484
<v Speaker 2>lot of influence. I mean it's like tactically, it's kind

0:27:41.484 --> 0:27:44.844
<v Speaker 2>of smart, right strategically in terms of what it means

0:27:44.884 --> 0:27:47.844
<v Speaker 2>for for his life and his brand. I mean, he

0:27:47.844 --> 0:27:50.844
<v Speaker 2>has a very high opportunity cost, right, he has really

0:27:50.884 --> 0:27:56.484
<v Speaker 2>cool jobs as it is, right, and you know, aspires

0:27:56.524 --> 0:27:59.844
<v Speaker 2>of extending human life spans and traveling to Mars or

0:27:59.884 --> 0:28:03.964
<v Speaker 2>building super indulgent AI and all these things, right, and

0:28:04.004 --> 0:28:07.844
<v Speaker 2>so like you know, and you know, initially Tesla gained

0:28:07.844 --> 0:28:09.684
<v Speaker 2>a lot of value in the stock market when Trump

0:28:09.684 --> 0:28:11.764
<v Speaker 2>one and then Elam was brought in, right, and then

0:28:11.884 --> 0:28:14.964
<v Speaker 2>lost all of that back basically and now has rebounded

0:28:14.964 --> 0:28:19.084
<v Speaker 2>some again. Right, So like, yeah, I don't know, you

0:28:19.084 --> 0:28:21.724
<v Speaker 2>can't give him a high grade because, like I think

0:28:21.764 --> 0:28:24.524
<v Speaker 2>you have to be a little bit results oriented. Right,

0:28:24.564 --> 0:28:25.804
<v Speaker 2>he was not able to do it in a way

0:28:25.804 --> 0:28:30.084
<v Speaker 2>that avoided massive backlash toward him and his products, right,

0:28:30.124 --> 0:28:31.404
<v Speaker 2>and was not able to do it in a way

0:28:31.444 --> 0:28:34.684
<v Speaker 2>that was sustainable really, but they did win an election.

0:28:34.724 --> 0:28:36.524
<v Speaker 2>He was one of the key figures in winning a

0:28:36.684 --> 0:28:40.644
<v Speaker 2>vital election at a vital time in world history. And

0:28:40.684 --> 0:28:42.644
<v Speaker 2>so you can't go too low either, yep.

0:28:42.964 --> 0:28:44.924
<v Speaker 1>And what about during the administration.

0:28:45.164 --> 0:28:48.764
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him a two and a half, which is

0:28:48.964 --> 0:28:51.844
<v Speaker 2>rounding up. I'll give him one point for one point

0:28:51.884 --> 0:28:53.924
<v Speaker 2>for pushing back on skilled demigration, one point for pushing

0:28:53.924 --> 0:28:56.764
<v Speaker 2>back on terras, and I'll give him a two point

0:28:57.364 --> 0:29:01.684
<v Speaker 2>three and three tenths of a point for leaving when

0:29:01.724 --> 0:29:03.444
<v Speaker 2>he did the reason three tenths because I think it

0:29:03.444 --> 0:29:08.324
<v Speaker 2>was probably at least seventy percent Trump's decision. Where are

0:29:08.324 --> 0:29:09.044
<v Speaker 2>your scores?

0:29:09.444 --> 0:29:13.404
<v Speaker 1>So I was actually going back and forth between lower

0:29:13.444 --> 0:29:16.084
<v Speaker 1>and higher than a five on his pivot to Trump,

0:29:16.484 --> 0:29:18.644
<v Speaker 1>And so I think I'll end up at a five,

0:29:18.684 --> 0:29:21.524
<v Speaker 1>which is quite boring, but I'll explain what my thinking was.

0:29:21.724 --> 0:29:24.924
<v Speaker 1>So originally I was going to say lower because he

0:29:25.124 --> 0:29:29.604
<v Speaker 1>was one of the reasons that Trump ended up winning.

0:29:29.604 --> 0:29:32.804
<v Speaker 1>I think like that support actually helped Trump at the beginning,

0:29:32.804 --> 0:29:35.804
<v Speaker 1>and that money helped Trump at the beginning. And I

0:29:35.844 --> 0:29:39.044
<v Speaker 1>don't know, obviously this is speculation but had he thrown

0:29:39.044 --> 0:29:42.444
<v Speaker 1>that support towards the Democrats, I think we might have

0:29:42.484 --> 0:29:45.004
<v Speaker 1>seen a different election result. I don't know, right, this

0:29:45.124 --> 0:29:48.444
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of a lot of maybe's, but so

0:29:48.924 --> 0:29:53.604
<v Speaker 1>so on that sense, like it's very hard to disambiguit

0:29:53.684 --> 0:29:57.004
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect here and figure out like was it

0:29:57.084 --> 0:30:00.004
<v Speaker 1>actually a good decision? Right? Would he have been better

0:30:00.084 --> 0:30:03.924
<v Speaker 1>served if Kamala Harris had come to power and like

0:30:04.004 --> 0:30:06.804
<v Speaker 1>he was able to align himself closely with that government,

0:30:07.084 --> 0:30:09.604
<v Speaker 1>which was not, you know, a shit show, and the

0:30:09.604 --> 0:30:11.924
<v Speaker 1>way that you know, Trump two point zero has been

0:30:12.324 --> 0:30:15.884
<v Speaker 1>that might have actually been strategically smarter. And once again,

0:30:16.044 --> 0:30:19.524
<v Speaker 1>it's really really hard to deal with counterfactuals. So so

0:30:19.724 --> 0:30:22.004
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but that's kind of it's pulling me

0:30:22.324 --> 0:30:25.324
<v Speaker 1>in different directions. The other thing I was thinking about

0:30:26.004 --> 0:30:29.724
<v Speaker 1>was he reminds me of the Russian oligarchs who threw

0:30:29.804 --> 0:30:32.844
<v Speaker 1>in behind Putin right, who helped get Putin in power

0:30:32.884 --> 0:30:35.604
<v Speaker 1>and were like, this is this is what's gonna really

0:30:35.604 --> 0:30:38.484
<v Speaker 1>help my business, and they you know, that was brilliant.

0:30:38.644 --> 0:30:41.324
<v Speaker 1>They made billions of dollars until a lot of them

0:30:41.364 --> 0:30:45.124
<v Speaker 1>started getting killed. And so at the at the end

0:30:45.164 --> 0:30:47.564
<v Speaker 1>of the day, like that wasn't nearly as brilliant. So

0:30:47.644 --> 0:30:49.764
<v Speaker 1>at first, when I was thinking through it, I was like, oh, well,

0:30:49.804 --> 0:30:52.964
<v Speaker 1>that can actually be strategically smart, so higher than a five.

0:30:53.364 --> 0:30:57.764
<v Speaker 1>But most of them died and so so that's actually

0:30:57.764 --> 0:31:01.284
<v Speaker 1>not a very good trade off, And that was the

0:31:01.324 --> 0:31:03.284
<v Speaker 1>other kind of part of what I was thinking about.

0:31:03.444 --> 0:31:05.324
<v Speaker 1>So I ended up at a five. Actually maybe even

0:31:05.364 --> 0:31:07.884
<v Speaker 1>lower than a five, given that both of these end

0:31:07.924 --> 0:31:10.284
<v Speaker 1>up net negatives. So I would give him a four

0:31:10.324 --> 0:31:12.364
<v Speaker 1>on that. Honestly, I'm going to give him a one.

0:31:13.124 --> 0:31:16.644
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that in his time in the administration

0:31:17.204 --> 0:31:20.684
<v Speaker 1>he has accomplished enough to warrant more than a one,

0:31:20.724 --> 0:31:23.804
<v Speaker 1>because even the things that he pushed back on, like tariffs,

0:31:24.124 --> 0:31:27.004
<v Speaker 1>I think that that wasn't him pushing back. I think

0:31:27.044 --> 0:31:30.404
<v Speaker 1>that was popularity ratings and everyone else and Trump just

0:31:30.404 --> 0:31:35.044
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth. And I think that we would

0:31:35.084 --> 0:31:37.364
<v Speaker 1>be in largely the same place we are right now

0:31:37.804 --> 0:31:41.084
<v Speaker 1>even without Elon. So I'm not going to give him

0:31:41.084 --> 0:31:43.084
<v Speaker 1>that much credit for that, And I'm going to give

0:31:43.124 --> 0:31:46.124
<v Speaker 1>him a lot of grief for the chaos that he's

0:31:46.164 --> 0:31:49.164
<v Speaker 1>caused and the brain drain that he's caused, and the

0:31:49.244 --> 0:31:52.044
<v Speaker 1>downstream effects that he's causing for the country. So I

0:31:52.124 --> 0:31:56.884
<v Speaker 1>think his decision making in this particular moment is like

0:31:57.444 --> 0:31:59.804
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm being very positive not to give

0:31:59.844 --> 0:32:00.284
<v Speaker 1>him a zero.

0:32:01.324 --> 0:32:03.164
<v Speaker 2>All right, plus.

0:32:03.724 --> 0:32:09.724
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, we're not failing him, but pretty damn close. All right,

0:32:09.764 --> 0:32:13.204
<v Speaker 1>mister Musk, that's our report card for you. Let's take

0:32:13.244 --> 0:32:24.484
<v Speaker 1>a break and talk about government in general. So we

0:32:24.564 --> 0:32:27.044
<v Speaker 1>have a question this week from a listener whose name

0:32:27.084 --> 0:32:30.644
<v Speaker 1>is Tyler, and he writes, how can we change our

0:32:30.724 --> 0:32:34.724
<v Speaker 1>current system of government to allow it to make better decisions? Now,

0:32:34.724 --> 0:32:36.644
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't coming at it from quite the angle that

0:32:36.684 --> 0:32:39.564
<v Speaker 1>I thought he would, but it is a thought provoking angle.

0:32:39.644 --> 0:32:41.684
<v Speaker 1>So this is what he writes. He says, one thing

0:32:41.724 --> 0:32:45.404
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about recently is the benefits of autocracy.

0:32:45.684 --> 0:32:48.164
<v Speaker 1>I look at Putin and she and I'm jealous of

0:32:48.204 --> 0:32:52.164
<v Speaker 1>their ability to do real long term planning. And so,

0:32:52.564 --> 0:32:55.164
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is something that has caused Tyler to think,

0:32:55.564 --> 0:32:58.604
<v Speaker 1>is there something that America can do to kind of

0:32:59.084 --> 0:33:02.764
<v Speaker 1>go past short term gains and have more of a

0:33:02.884 --> 0:33:04.844
<v Speaker 1>long term strategic mindset.

0:33:06.044 --> 0:33:09.204
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big believer in democracy. Yeah, Look, but this

0:33:09.284 --> 0:33:11.684
<v Speaker 2>is this is a question. I mean, China can.

0:33:11.604 --> 0:33:14.404
<v Speaker 1>Clearly, China can do things we can't do.

0:33:14.604 --> 0:33:17.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they can build. I mean their way ahead on drones, right,

0:33:17.284 --> 0:33:21.204
<v Speaker 2>they're ahead or catching up on electric vehicles, they're behind

0:33:21.284 --> 0:33:26.724
<v Speaker 2>on AI, they're way ahead on robotics. You know, for

0:33:26.724 --> 0:33:28.484
<v Speaker 2>a long time people thought when you have a whole

0:33:28.484 --> 0:33:31.764
<v Speaker 2>country become middle class, invariably you also have democracy go

0:33:31.844 --> 0:33:35.804
<v Speaker 2>along with it. And China's like no, I mean you

0:33:35.804 --> 0:33:38.084
<v Speaker 2>you know, you are getting closer and closer to free

0:33:38.324 --> 0:33:43.324
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurship in China. You are not able to talk about

0:33:43.364 --> 0:33:47.044
<v Speaker 2>Tannemin Square without getting in a lot of trouble. And

0:33:47.084 --> 0:33:50.084
<v Speaker 2>they're and they're managing these issues in like very weird ways,

0:33:50.084 --> 0:33:52.964
<v Speaker 2>are getting more progressive on like gay rights. But you're

0:33:52.964 --> 0:33:55.004
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to You're not going to have a democracy,

0:33:55.164 --> 0:33:57.204
<v Speaker 2>And like, you know, that's not a compromise that I'm

0:33:57.244 --> 0:34:00.284
<v Speaker 2>willing to make it necessarily, right.

0:34:00.204 --> 0:34:02.764
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I completely agree with you, But I do want

0:34:02.804 --> 0:34:07.484
<v Speaker 1>to kind of acknowledge that the question where Tyler's question

0:34:08.004 --> 0:34:10.764
<v Speaker 1>is coming from is the question that people have been

0:34:11.164 --> 0:34:14.044
<v Speaker 1>asking for centuries. So if we go back to Plato,

0:34:14.204 --> 0:34:17.004
<v Speaker 1>right and the Republic, you have the idea of the

0:34:17.004 --> 0:34:21.164
<v Speaker 1>philosopher king. So Plato ended up, you know when he

0:34:21.804 --> 0:34:25.124
<v Speaker 1>tried to interrogate which system of government is best, and

0:34:25.204 --> 0:34:27.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, rule by the few, the many, all of

0:34:27.804 --> 0:34:30.404
<v Speaker 1>these different things. He comes to the conclusion that we

0:34:30.404 --> 0:34:34.204
<v Speaker 1>should have basically one person in power who's a philosopher,

0:34:34.524 --> 0:34:38.724
<v Speaker 1>who has all of these different qualities that make him

0:34:39.244 --> 0:34:42.644
<v Speaker 1>wise and that basically make him the best paternalistic ruler.

0:34:42.764 --> 0:34:46.164
<v Speaker 1>He knows what's best for everyone, And it's kind of

0:34:46.844 --> 0:34:49.684
<v Speaker 1>it's a scary thought if you actually try to think

0:34:49.724 --> 0:34:52.724
<v Speaker 1>through the implications. But this is where Plato came out

0:34:52.804 --> 0:34:55.564
<v Speaker 1>as well, and that was one of the things that

0:34:55.604 --> 0:34:58.564
<v Speaker 1>I thought about when I was thinking about Tyler's question.

0:34:58.844 --> 0:35:01.924
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that there is lots wrong with

0:35:02.164 --> 0:35:06.004
<v Speaker 1>the US government, but not being an autocracy is not

0:35:06.164 --> 0:35:09.124
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I have always believed that we need

0:35:09.164 --> 0:35:12.284
<v Speaker 1>to the two party system right, that we would actually

0:35:12.284 --> 0:35:15.324
<v Speaker 1>be much better served if we had a more pluralistic

0:35:15.364 --> 0:35:20.164
<v Speaker 1>system with more viable third party options and healthier debate,

0:35:20.284 --> 0:35:24.964
<v Speaker 1>less polarization, right where people actually were able to represent

0:35:25.044 --> 0:35:27.284
<v Speaker 1>more more points of view, which is kind of more

0:35:27.324 --> 0:35:30.524
<v Speaker 1>of the parliamentary system that you see in a lot

0:35:30.564 --> 0:35:31.564
<v Speaker 1>of European countries.

0:35:31.924 --> 0:35:35.044
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, our our system was designed in a world

0:35:35.164 --> 0:35:39.284
<v Speaker 2>where you don't have terribly strong parties, what most of

0:35:39.324 --> 0:35:45.484
<v Speaker 2>the founders assumed, because if you didn't, then, like then

0:35:45.484 --> 0:35:47.404
<v Speaker 2>we'd have much more checks and bounces with Trump in

0:35:47.444 --> 0:35:50.204
<v Speaker 2>the name of Congress in particular, the court I think

0:35:50.284 --> 0:35:53.364
<v Speaker 2>largely has played the role that the founders envisioned for it.

0:35:53.404 --> 0:35:56.484
<v Speaker 2>Believe it or not, right, but like, but Congress, you

0:35:56.524 --> 0:35:59.004
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of things Trump was doing. Again, Congress

0:35:59.044 --> 0:36:04.044
<v Speaker 2>has power to restrict Trump on tariffs, which is both

0:36:04.164 --> 0:36:07.004
<v Speaker 2>directly unpopular and indirectly hurting the economach will hurt all of

0:36:07.044 --> 0:36:09.084
<v Speaker 2>their jobs, right, And they're not able to do it

0:36:09.124 --> 0:36:12.924
<v Speaker 2>because there are Republican primaries where where they face far

0:36:12.964 --> 0:36:16.164
<v Speaker 2>more threat. Most Republican members face more threat from losing

0:36:16.204 --> 0:36:20.644
<v Speaker 2>a GOP primary challenge than from losing a general election. Right.

0:36:20.684 --> 0:36:22.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm a little bit unclear kind of what

0:36:22.284 --> 0:36:24.764
<v Speaker 2>we're allowed to fee out or what we're not. I

0:36:24.764 --> 0:36:27.084
<v Speaker 2>will say, sometimes you walk around New York, you know,

0:36:27.204 --> 0:36:28.924
<v Speaker 2>nice spring day or whatever. You're like, I'm in all

0:36:28.964 --> 0:36:31.484
<v Speaker 2>these buildings and parks, and you're like, I'm amazed we

0:36:31.484 --> 0:36:34.044
<v Speaker 2>haven't just all killed each other by now. Right, Even

0:36:34.084 --> 0:36:37.084
<v Speaker 2>being some have a long history of violence, they're able

0:36:37.084 --> 0:36:41.764
<v Speaker 2>to get together and you know, countries have great epics

0:36:41.804 --> 0:36:44.364
<v Speaker 2>and eras. Maybe the United States is out of its

0:36:44.404 --> 0:36:46.324
<v Speaker 2>great era in some ways. The fact that we can't

0:36:46.884 --> 0:36:50.364
<v Speaker 2>build things as fast as we used to do is frustrating,

0:36:50.724 --> 0:36:53.644
<v Speaker 2>I think. But you know, look, the checks and balances

0:36:53.644 --> 0:36:57.604
<v Speaker 2>at the framers design isn't a bad system, but it's

0:36:57.604 --> 0:37:02.404
<v Speaker 2>like deliberately a hard system to change. Right, the threshold

0:37:02.404 --> 0:37:06.644
<v Speaker 2>for many of the constitution is high. And if you

0:37:06.684 --> 0:37:09.444
<v Speaker 2>get into a lock in where you have extra i

0:37:09.484 --> 0:37:12.844
<v Speaker 2>mean partisanship on the one hand, which makes it impossible

0:37:12.844 --> 0:37:19.284
<v Speaker 2>to achieve super majorities on most things, right, then that

0:37:19.324 --> 0:37:21.884
<v Speaker 2>creates lots of problems. You know, I'm starting to sound

0:37:21.924 --> 0:37:23.564
<v Speaker 2>like one of these middle aged guys who's more worried

0:37:23.564 --> 0:37:26.284
<v Speaker 2>about like a debt crisis in the long term, right,

0:37:26.364 --> 0:37:29.964
<v Speaker 2>markets are, and I tend to trust markets on that.

0:37:30.004 --> 0:37:32.764
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's one problem that we face. I think

0:37:32.844 --> 0:37:36.924
<v Speaker 2>the cuts that people are making to the to long

0:37:37.044 --> 0:37:42.884
<v Speaker 2>term research and development and scientific programs right, the deterrent

0:37:43.044 --> 0:37:46.884
<v Speaker 2>to the most talented people coming to the United States.

0:37:46.924 --> 0:37:48.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, all of these things I think

0:37:48.484 --> 0:37:52.404
<v Speaker 2>are going to have long term consequences that reduce our

0:37:53.124 --> 0:37:56.724
<v Speaker 2>leadership a bit. And America gets away with a lot

0:37:56.764 --> 0:37:59.004
<v Speaker 2>because we have the world's most powerful military, at least

0:37:59.124 --> 0:38:02.804
<v Speaker 2>top two and a half. Right, we have a world's

0:38:02.884 --> 0:38:06.884
<v Speaker 2>leading currency, right, and we had a huge head start.

0:38:06.964 --> 0:38:08.604
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everyone else kind of you know, Europe has

0:38:08.644 --> 0:38:12.244
<v Speaker 2>had problem was China starting from a very low baseline.

0:38:12.324 --> 0:38:14.124
<v Speaker 2>So we had a big head start and a lot

0:38:14.124 --> 0:38:17.804
<v Speaker 2>of advantages we have. You know, we're protected from from

0:38:18.084 --> 0:38:21.444
<v Speaker 2>foreign invasions. Who a degree, you aren't if you're in Eurasia. Right,

0:38:22.644 --> 0:38:25.084
<v Speaker 2>Our natural resources are very rich. If we had to

0:38:25.124 --> 0:38:29.124
<v Speaker 2>become self sufficient, then we absolutely could. Right. We have

0:38:29.124 --> 0:38:33.484
<v Speaker 2>a lot of soft power based on our creativity and

0:38:33.524 --> 0:38:37.084
<v Speaker 2>our capitalism and our brands and and things like that. Right,

0:38:37.164 --> 0:38:38.484
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it'd be kind of a shame if

0:38:38.484 --> 0:38:40.324
<v Speaker 2>we've we fucked it up, right.

0:38:40.204 --> 0:38:44.764
<v Speaker 1>But well, we're on our way, rights, as you just said,

0:38:44.804 --> 0:38:46.644
<v Speaker 1>we're on our way to fucking it up because a

0:38:46.684 --> 0:38:49.564
<v Speaker 1>lot of those things that give us our power are

0:38:50.124 --> 0:38:52.364
<v Speaker 1>under threat right now, and that is not going to

0:38:52.404 --> 0:38:55.164
<v Speaker 1>help government. And having a putin in charge is certainly

0:38:55.204 --> 0:39:00.724
<v Speaker 1>not going to help that situation. Because if in some ways,

0:39:00.764 --> 0:39:02.564
<v Speaker 1>you know, what Trump is trying to do right now

0:39:03.084 --> 0:39:06.124
<v Speaker 1>is not dissimilar from what happens in autocracies, right, with

0:39:06.204 --> 0:39:09.004
<v Speaker 1>all of the executive orders, trying to circumvent the checks

0:39:09.004 --> 0:39:12.884
<v Speaker 1>and balance, says, trying to circumvent Congress. It hasn't worked

0:39:12.924 --> 0:39:15.004
<v Speaker 1>as well because we do you know, we're not in

0:39:15.044 --> 0:39:17.964
<v Speaker 1>an autocracy yet. But I'm saying that's what he's kind

0:39:17.964 --> 0:39:19.884
<v Speaker 1>of if you look at what he's trying to do,

0:39:20.764 --> 0:39:23.204
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of the the approach is, let me

0:39:23.284 --> 0:39:25.204
<v Speaker 1>just executive order my way through this.

0:39:25.324 --> 0:39:27.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, IFDR got struck down a lot by the courts, right,

0:39:27.884 --> 0:39:29.924
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Yeah, I think some people would

0:39:29.924 --> 0:39:31.924
<v Speaker 2>say he had autocratic Oh.

0:39:31.964 --> 0:39:35.604
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, FDR was a disaster in that respect. I mean

0:39:35.604 --> 0:39:38.524
<v Speaker 1>he was. He's the reason that we have term limits

0:39:38.724 --> 0:39:42.244
<v Speaker 1>on the presidency. He's the only one who did not

0:39:42.444 --> 0:39:46.924
<v Speaker 1>bow to president. Everyone else willingly left after two terms

0:39:46.964 --> 0:39:49.604
<v Speaker 1>and there was no need for a constitutional amendment. And

0:39:49.644 --> 0:39:53.404
<v Speaker 1>it was because of FDR that we have that constitutional amendment. So, yeah,

0:39:53.564 --> 0:39:57.204
<v Speaker 1>Trump is not the first. So all I mean is that,

0:39:57.564 --> 0:40:01.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're looking admiringly at that sort of approach,

0:40:01.324 --> 0:40:02.804
<v Speaker 1>you can see that there are a lot of issues

0:40:02.804 --> 0:40:04.524
<v Speaker 1>with it. And by the way, you certainly do not

0:40:04.604 --> 0:40:07.844
<v Speaker 1>want to be living in Russia right where right now,

0:40:08.444 --> 0:40:11.004
<v Speaker 1>that is not a good state living and that is

0:40:11.044 --> 0:40:13.324
<v Speaker 1>not a good society to live in. So you see

0:40:13.404 --> 0:40:15.244
<v Speaker 1>kind of what ends up happening. And a lot of

0:40:15.324 --> 0:40:18.444
<v Speaker 1>the things that we take for granted are kind of

0:40:18.524 --> 0:40:21.444
<v Speaker 1>consequences of the fact that we live in a democratic society.

0:40:22.084 --> 0:40:26.124
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, would we be better off if we had

0:40:26.164 --> 0:40:30.324
<v Speaker 1>a more more robust democratic institutions, right if kind of

0:40:30.364 --> 0:40:36.124
<v Speaker 1>we were able to revive the critical thinking that I

0:40:36.164 --> 0:40:40.204
<v Speaker 1>think has largely fallen by the wayside as people have

0:40:40.284 --> 0:40:43.444
<v Speaker 1>become incredibly polarized. You know, we've talked before about how

0:40:43.444 --> 0:40:48.644
<v Speaker 1>both parties are quite broken in different ways, and I

0:40:48.644 --> 0:40:51.204
<v Speaker 1>think that if we're trying to have a better long

0:40:51.284 --> 0:40:54.404
<v Speaker 1>term government strategy, we need to look to that and

0:40:54.404 --> 0:40:57.244
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out, you know, how do we create

0:40:57.324 --> 0:41:00.524
<v Speaker 1>a system that doesn't reward polarization. Because one of the

0:41:00.524 --> 0:41:02.924
<v Speaker 1>things you're talking about, Nate, is that you know, people

0:41:02.964 --> 0:41:05.964
<v Speaker 1>want to win their elections, right, they're afraid to lose.

0:41:06.484 --> 0:41:09.084
<v Speaker 1>They're afraid to kind of do things that will potentially

0:41:09.124 --> 0:41:11.484
<v Speaker 1>make lose and it's a vicious cycle. So how do

0:41:11.524 --> 0:41:14.364
<v Speaker 1>we break that, right, Like, how do we actually give

0:41:14.404 --> 0:41:17.204
<v Speaker 1>them And this happens It's funny this happens in businesses too.

0:41:17.284 --> 0:41:21.124
<v Speaker 1>I just recently was talking to some business leaders who

0:41:21.244 --> 0:41:24.244
<v Speaker 1>kind of asked how they can have kind of better

0:41:24.284 --> 0:41:26.364
<v Speaker 1>innovation in their businesses, and I was like, well, you

0:41:26.444 --> 0:41:29.804
<v Speaker 1>need to actually not just say that you reward creativity,

0:41:29.844 --> 0:41:32.804
<v Speaker 1>but not punish people when they fail. Right, If someone

0:41:32.804 --> 0:41:34.604
<v Speaker 1>who takes a risk and it doesn't work out, you

0:41:34.684 --> 0:41:37.564
<v Speaker 1>fire them, then that tells everyone all they need to

0:41:37.604 --> 0:41:40.844
<v Speaker 1>know about how you value risk taking and creative thinking.

0:41:41.364 --> 0:41:44.124
<v Speaker 1>And here we're kind of seeing the same thing where

0:41:44.444 --> 0:41:48.804
<v Speaker 1>people are afraid of saying something, doing something, and then

0:41:48.844 --> 0:41:51.764
<v Speaker 1>not getting re elected. They're afraid to speak up. They're

0:41:51.884 --> 0:41:55.724
<v Speaker 1>kind of afraid of that sort of environment, and that

0:41:55.844 --> 0:41:58.284
<v Speaker 1>is not a good state of affairs. I think that's

0:41:58.324 --> 0:42:00.484
<v Speaker 1>something that we should work towards fixing.

0:42:00.564 --> 0:42:03.444
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, let me say a couple of things, right, Like,

0:42:03.484 --> 0:42:05.764
<v Speaker 2>you know, one answer is maybe we need a contenst

0:42:05.844 --> 0:42:07.844
<v Speaker 2>that we want to devolve more power to state and

0:42:07.884 --> 0:42:10.124
<v Speaker 2>local governments, which seem to be more functional and are

0:42:10.164 --> 0:42:13.004
<v Speaker 2>often less partisan. Right, they used to be seen as

0:42:13.084 --> 0:42:16.484
<v Speaker 2>like Democrats didn't like that. They liked you know, they

0:42:16.524 --> 0:42:18.884
<v Speaker 2>thought that states would take rights away that were conserus

0:42:18.884 --> 0:42:20.804
<v Speaker 2>to protected, et cetera. But like maybe that just kind

0:42:20.804 --> 0:42:24.924
<v Speaker 2>of the equilibrium that would best serve everyone involved. I mean, look,

0:42:25.244 --> 0:42:27.724
<v Speaker 2>I do want to put the brakes on. You know,

0:42:27.844 --> 0:42:31.804
<v Speaker 2>we still don't know about like the long term future

0:42:31.884 --> 0:42:35.444
<v Speaker 2>of China or the United States. Right, you have countries

0:42:35.484 --> 0:42:37.804
<v Speaker 2>that are quite harmonious wh they're going through this middle

0:42:37.804 --> 0:42:40.404
<v Speaker 2>class stage and then reach like South Korea, right, And

0:42:40.444 --> 0:42:43.724
<v Speaker 2>now South Korea is at a more mature stage where

0:42:43.724 --> 0:42:46.524
<v Speaker 2>they have a GDP per capite's higher than Japan, for example,

0:42:46.604 --> 0:42:50.084
<v Speaker 2>and they're having impeachment and political turmoil and people are

0:42:50.484 --> 0:42:53.044
<v Speaker 2>unhappy there. So we don't know where China ends up,

0:42:53.044 --> 0:42:55.764
<v Speaker 2>and we don't know where the US ends up. I mean,

0:42:55.804 --> 0:43:00.364
<v Speaker 2>you have seen some shifts in coalitions, right, Like, I

0:43:00.404 --> 0:43:04.204
<v Speaker 2>think there are certain ways in which the response to

0:43:04.964 --> 0:43:08.804
<v Speaker 2>Democrats has been a healthy response, right, Where Democrats have

0:43:08.884 --> 0:43:12.844
<v Speaker 2>been complace and lazy about a lot of things. Right,

0:43:13.364 --> 0:43:17.364
<v Speaker 2>Renominating Biden and lighting people about it was really pathetic. Right.

0:43:17.564 --> 0:43:22.164
<v Speaker 2>They have taken for granted certain types of voters like

0:43:22.244 --> 0:43:25.884
<v Speaker 2>African Americans and younger voters and everything else. Right, and men, right,

0:43:26.164 --> 0:43:29.484
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're losing grandival men and like, so they

0:43:29.564 --> 0:43:31.964
<v Speaker 2>kind of deserve it. But maybe maybe there'll be some

0:43:33.604 --> 0:43:38.724
<v Speaker 2>declined from partisanship eventually. I mean, all trends reverse themselves

0:43:38.964 --> 0:43:45.204
<v Speaker 2>over some window. Maybe AI will radically remake the political

0:43:45.244 --> 0:43:48.004
<v Speaker 2>coalitions in different ways. I mean, it certainly feels like

0:43:48.004 --> 0:43:52.084
<v Speaker 2>a dynamic time, and dynamic means Hiberians and Hyberiants includes

0:43:52.324 --> 0:43:55.324
<v Speaker 2>good outcomes. But I don't know, I not feeling.

0:43:55.164 --> 0:43:59.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think, Yeah, Tyler, this was a really

0:43:59.204 --> 0:44:01.884
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. We don't have an easy answer, right, We

0:44:01.884 --> 0:44:02.484
<v Speaker 1>don't really.

0:44:02.284 --> 0:44:06.564
<v Speaker 2>Have like so look, people with the good guver will say, oh,

0:44:06.604 --> 0:44:12.604
<v Speaker 2>you can have like more nonpartisan primaries and ranked choice voting.

0:44:12.604 --> 0:44:15.084
<v Speaker 2>Actually good stuff probably does help. I mean, you know,

0:44:15.164 --> 0:44:16.524
<v Speaker 2>and if we're gonna do like a New York mayoral

0:44:16.564 --> 0:44:18.564
<v Speaker 2>episode ranked choice voting as a factor in the mayor's

0:44:18.644 --> 0:44:23.164
<v Speaker 2>race here, you know, but like it's kind of because

0:44:23.164 --> 0:44:26.564
<v Speaker 2>the constitution's hard to change, then you kind of have

0:44:26.604 --> 0:44:30.164
<v Speaker 2>to change political culture and that's and that's difficult.

0:44:30.564 --> 0:44:32.804
<v Speaker 1>Ranked choice voting, Nate, I think, is a good example

0:44:32.884 --> 0:44:35.924
<v Speaker 1>of things that could on the margin help. And as

0:44:35.964 --> 0:44:39.284
<v Speaker 1>we know as poker players, on the margin is actually important, right,

0:44:39.364 --> 0:44:41.604
<v Speaker 1>Elections can be one or lost on the margin.

0:44:42.004 --> 0:44:45.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the margin matters more when things are approximately

0:44:45.924 --> 0:44:50.284
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty, right, you know, two Senate seats versus

0:44:50.364 --> 0:44:53.484
<v Speaker 2>three next year for Democrats makes a huge difference as

0:44:53.484 --> 0:44:55.444
<v Speaker 2>far as their ability to win a trifecta in twenty

0:44:55.484 --> 0:44:57.964
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, right. I mean it often comes down to

0:44:58.044 --> 0:45:00.924
<v Speaker 2>just like one one seat, yep, yep.

0:45:01.244 --> 0:45:03.444
<v Speaker 1>So I think that this is all really important to remember.

0:45:03.804 --> 0:45:05.964
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the question, Tyler. We wish we had an

0:45:05.964 --> 0:45:11.484
<v Speaker 1>easier answer, but this was a really interesting discussion. Let

0:45:11.564 --> 0:45:13.524
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think of the show. Reach out

0:45:13.524 --> 0:45:17.644
<v Speaker 1>to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm. And

0:45:17.764 --> 0:45:19.884
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you're a Pushkin Plus subscriber, we

0:45:19.964 --> 0:45:22.684
<v Speaker 1>have some bonus content for you that's coming up right

0:45:22.724 --> 0:45:23.644
<v Speaker 1>after the credits.

0:45:23.844 --> 0:45:27.124
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not subscribing yet, consider signing up for

0:45:27.284 --> 0:45:29.484
<v Speaker 2>just six ninety nine a month. What a nice price.

0:45:29.804 --> 0:45:32.604
<v Speaker 2>You get access to all that premium content and ad

0:45:32.644 --> 0:45:35.284
<v Speaker 2>for listening across Pushkin's entire network of shows.

0:45:35.764 --> 0:45:38.804
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanikova.

0:45:38.364 --> 0:45:40.684
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co

0:45:40.764 --> 0:45:44.844
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:45:44.844 --> 0:45:49.084
<v Speaker 2>by Isabelle Carter, our associate producer is Sonya Gerwin. Sally

0:45:49.164 --> 0:45:52.164
<v Speaker 2>Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:45:52.684 --> 0:45:53.884
<v Speaker 2>Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:45:54.284 --> 0:45:56.764
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for tuning in to