WEBVTT - 48: The Lost History of Financial Market Modernization

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But knowledge to work and grow your business with c

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>T dot com put Knowledge to Work. Welcome to another

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>edition of Odd Lots. I'm Tracy Alloway, executive editor at

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets, and I'm Joe wi Isn'tal, Managing editor of

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets. So, Joe, when you think about a modern

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>market place, what makes it modern? I think about a

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people around computers and data flashing in their eyes.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe maybe there's not even a person from the computer,

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe just some software making decisions, but lots of screens

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and blinking data. Basically, so you're actually thinking about some

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>very specific markets, probably the stock market, maybe the currency market.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It because there is actually one very large market that

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>has stubbornly resisted all attempts to electronify itself and to modernize. Yeah,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I am. I guess I'm probably stocks and currencies, probably,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that's all right. The one that's been left out is

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>basically the bond market. This is the place where people

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>trade corporate debt. Uh, securities issued by companies, and a

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is still taking place over the phone,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even by facts, which is kind of insane when

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about where we are today in terms of technology,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that is sort of pretty hard to believe. I mean,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this before, and of course you can

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>look up prices of a corporate bond on a terminal

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and you'd think that why not just be able to

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>enter in that you want to buy or sell? But

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of blows my mind. It's not that

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the case that it's not that easy. All right,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So today we are going to delve into the mystery

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of bond market modernization or lack thereof why it hasn't

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>happened before, And I'm pleased to say that we have

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a recurring guest with us today. It's Chris White from Well.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>He's now at Viable Markets, used to be at Goldman

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and was very involved in the bond trading platform they

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>built there called g Sessions. And to make things extra special,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris has brought along his former boss, it's les sef.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>He has a very long history not only in bond

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>market structure but also in stocks and he's currently at

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a software firm called a pass. I'm really excited about

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this because the last time we talked about market structure

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with Chris, I think was one of my favorite episodes.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad we're returning to the well and going

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>deeper on this subject, which is fascinating. So let's let's

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>get gone, let's dig deep. Chris and Lez thank you

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today. Uh, my pleasure to

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be back, Tracy. Um, you know, just having listened to

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other odd lots podcasts, I'm just

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>happy to be a part of some of the original. Uh.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>The exact thing to say to get you on again, Well, no,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I really do enjoy it. That's that's an honest statement.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you're in for a really special

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>treat today because um less CEF can talk about an

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>area of equity market structure history that I think is

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really pertinent today. It was the formation of a piece

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of architecture that if you look through history, um, the

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Nasadack system is something that's been mimicked throughout other market

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>systems in terms of being a critical piece of architecture

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on their way to modernization. So I think it's going

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to be very interesting to hear what Less has to

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>say about the before and after picture in the equity markets. UM.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen one, that's when Nasdaq was introduced, and that's

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>when Less arrived on the scene. Well, Less, why don't

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we start with you then? UM, you've said you've been

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in trading in some way or another. Is the nineteen seventies?

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what the stock market was like back then? Sure, Well,

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>let's start with nineteen seventy one, which is when I started. UM.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>At that time, not only was the more the market

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not connected by computer, or the equity market not connected

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>by computer, but the people that comprised the trading departments

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>were very different as well. Uh, today you've got m

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>B a's from M I T sitting on the desk.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Then basically we were a bunch of street fighters, UM.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And the connection between UH one firm and another, or

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the connection was something called the pink sheets. If you

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know the price of a stock in those

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>years pre NASDAC, that is, UH, if you wanted to

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know the price of an over the counter stock was

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>called over the counter at that time, you would get

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a copy of the pink she eats, open it up

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to the alphabetical listing of the stock, and there'd be

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a list of five or any number of market makers

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>that traded the stock with their name and their phone number,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and you would simply call them up and ask them

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for the market in X, y z, and you you

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>were obligated to make three phone calls that may have

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>been ten market makers. You were obligated if you were

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>executing a client order, you were obligated to get three quotes,

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>which left seven out potentially. So even with pink sheets,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you had best execution requirements. Best execution was really if

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a fuzzy concept now, it was even fuzzier than

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>because the markets were very, very thin, so an execution

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of a thousand shares could have been at multiple markets,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and the uh, the guy on the desk who was

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>executing getting on behalf of the client would basically stay

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with one firm MHM. So obviously, these days with electronic trading,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>there's so much talk about collapsing margins of trading and

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, people making fractions of a penny here and there,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but this sounds like, you know, the extreme opposite end

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, where lots of lots of opportunity to make

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>money in the human interaction and the fact you only

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>had to call three out of ten people and so forth,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>spreads that you could drive a bus, Yes, exactly. Yeah,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>well that was that was very true. I mean markets

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have collapsed, uh in recent years, primarily as a result

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of increased volument as a result of decimalization back you know,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>almost fifteen sixteen years ago. But in those years there

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was no such thing as decimalization. Stocks are traded with

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>very often a point spread. Uh, a half a point

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>spread was not unusual, and stocks under a dollar was

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes traded with three eighths to a half a point

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>spread as well. So the difference between the bidden offer

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was you know, as you said, you could drive a

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>truck through it. So market makers could essentially pocket the

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>difference between the spreads on the buy and sell orders.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What made that change, Like, what was the impetus for

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock market to start modernizing and to head towards

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>things like decimalization. Well, uh, there were a number of reasons. Firstly, Um,

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>while the spreads were substantial and the likelihood of making

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>money on a trade was pretty substantial, Um, the volume

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't there. I remember a big trader in NT

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>which is before I'm thankful to say, before I started,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>UM was making somewhere around a hundred thousand dollars UM

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and his profitability was there for like maybe two fifty

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was huge at that time. UM.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.559
<v Speaker 1>But as I said, the volume was just wasn't there. Uh.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Subsequent to that, uh that period uh in nineteen seventy

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>late seventy yearly seventy one, I believe it was NASDAK

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>started and NASDAK was a more transparent view of of

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Now during the pain sheet environment, as I said,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>prior to NASDAK, the client or the trader at another

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>firm would call up the market maker and asked for

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a quote. As a result, market makers would give different

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>quotes to different folks. UM. If they sense that you

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>were a buyer, you might have gotten one quote. If

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they sensed you were a seller, you might have gotten

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>another quote. And if they sensed that you were calling

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of a competitor competitor, then you've got a

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>really strange quote. So actually less This is one of

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the things that I think is most fascinating is that

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a period in time that was almost

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago, but in terms of the cultural practices

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and the infrastructure, it's not that far away from where

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we are in terms of the modern day corporate bond

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>market UM today. There there really isn't a facility that

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>organizes all of the quotes the way that NASDAC organized

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the quotes UM. And also what you describe in terms

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of different prices for different people is absolutely function of

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the market. UM. What sort of drove the idea that

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to get out of the pink sheets and

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>into UM something that was a bit more centralized and

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>focused around pricing, Well, it was it was driven uh

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>partially by the retail firms. I don't remember now the

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>name of the guy who started uh NASDAK, but I

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>believe that it was sponsored by the n s D

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and UH I believe that Reynolds, which was one of

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the larger retail firms. One of the executives at Reynolds

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who was tasked with, uh, you know,

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>starting the NASDACK UH the NASTAC system and basically it

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was kind of rolled out over time and the functionality

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>changed over time. Initially it was simply a presentation of

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the median market, which is the most repeated market. UH

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so if they were make an easy example, if there

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>were four traders trading stock. One was ten eleven, another

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one tenant a quarter eleven and a quarter, third one

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was tenant a quarter eleven a quarter, and the fourth

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>one was nine and three quarters tenant three quarters. The

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>inside market was tenant a quarter a three quarters. The

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>market that was visible UH to level one was tenant

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>a quarter, eleven and a quarter. It was the most

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>repeated market. So they didn't see the inside market. The salesman,

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, at Merrill Lynch didn't see you know, just

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not not to single them out, but the salesman at

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>UH the brokerage firms didn't see the inside market at

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the time, and they weren't aware of what the volume

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>was day one. So how did the market makers actually

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>feel about those changes? That was exactly what I was

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask, Like who, yeah, like who who fought it?

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Or these changes happened? And so how do they feel?

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>And were there any people right from the beginning resisting

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the changes? Try? Everyone was resisting the changes. Um, the

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>market makers were shaking in their boots because they were

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in their minds making a living and this was going

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to destroy their living because you didn't want your competition

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to know your market. And this was going to making

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>market very transparent. Uh. Plus you had to honor your market,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>which prior to actually divulging what your market was. Um.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, in a NASDAC environment, you had to honor

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what the market said you were on NASDAC. And that

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a new concept to say, try to

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>stop it or yeah, all the soldiers tried to stop it.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The generals thought it was a good idea and and

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>basically it was an amazing idea. It was it was

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right for the client. Being right for the client, uh

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>meant that a volume exploded over time, but really just exploded.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>And and uh from seventy one to you know today,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, volume is just so different than it was then.

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And um, in addition to the volume exploding, the profitability

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the market maker exploded with it may not have

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>made as much money her trade, but but the spreads

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately tightened a little bit. They didn't really change until

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>years later when uh, in in the mid nineties, when

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the dealers were accused of collusion. So were they eventually

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>able to make up the tighter spreads and volume? In

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:35.239
<v Speaker 1>other words, yes, by far? Okay, well, let's fast forward

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>many decades to the bond market, because Chris, as we've

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all discussed before, in many ways, the bond market is

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>where the stock market was many years ago. In fact,

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking to one bond dealer who said it

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was like the last ages of the Roman Empire, and

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the dealers are essentially trying to protect the profits that

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>they can make from bond trading. Well, I think that

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>similar to the fall of the Roman Empire, when finally

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the it was the Goths or

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>some tribe of barbarians that stormed the walls. Um there

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was deterioration for some time, and I think if you

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just look at even how the top five dealers have

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>been performing in market making for corporate bonds. Uh Ever,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and nine, they've seen declining results year

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>over year. So I think a lot of people are

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to question the efficacy of the traditional model. One

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's fascinating about the way Less talks

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>about the fears of the market makers in unlisted stocks

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>prior in Nazdac as they say sound very similar to

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the fears that we're hearing when we

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about transparency in the bond market, we're having issues

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>around secondary trading, and yet there are some people in

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the market who are actually saying that less information in

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the form of delaying the post trade tape would bring

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>market makers back into the market, which I think that

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at all the other markets that have modernized,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and they've done so by actually adding more information, not less.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that culturally we're at the same inflection

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>point that the equity market was in almost forty six

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So how do we get over that hump then,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like it's it's not only a business

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>model change, it's also a cultural change, and there are

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people who will fight it every step of the way. Well,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really good to understand history and really

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens. I mean, what Less is telling you is true.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who was trading NASDACK stocks and who went through

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the change of the actual NASDAC platform, which is stands

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for National Association Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System, at first

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they were afraid, but then they found that it was

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficial not only to the customers but to the market

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>makers as well. So I think that if you look

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at the history of other markets. For example, UM the

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>FX market started with a consolidated quote board and something

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>called the Reuter's Market Data service. In the listed market

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had to organize into its consolidated quote service. In four

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market, after recovering from the Solomon Brothers government

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>bond scandal, had to produce a consolidated quote system something

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>called gov picks. So it seems to me and the

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>more I talked to Less and other people who have

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>worked in those markets, that organization around pre trade information

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is a key piece of architecture for UM modernizing market.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break for work from a sponsor,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but knowledge to work and grow your business with c

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>T dot com put knowledge to Work. We're talking to

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris White and Liz Sef about mark a structure and

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>how the bond market is arguably decades behind where the

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>stock market is in terms of getting into the modern era.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>So Chris, I want to return to the point that

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you made before the break. Your basic argument is that

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>sure bond market participants, like stock market participants decades ago,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>are resistant to change. But that from your perspective, the

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>current model is already broken. It's sort of already Um,

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it's already not working for them as it was several

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>years ago, So they should see the benefit to modernizing. Essentially. Well,

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that there there's universal acceptance within the institutional

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>market that something needs to change. I think the way

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to change the market is missing a step.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Just to to ask you less, when the NASTAC board

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was put into place in seventy one, was it a

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>trading system or a bulletin board? Like could you actually

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>complete a trade by pressing a button on the screen. No, no,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't interactive. It wasn't until after the eight seven

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>crash that there was any electronic interface where you could

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>press a button and get an execution through the NASDACK

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>system that was called the SOL system Small Order Execution System.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So explain how the process of trade worked. You then

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you got your quote through the NASTAC system, but then

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>went back directly to the market maker for the actual

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>call in the trade. You were back to uh calling

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>him up on his phone. Um. And if you were

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you were lucky, you had a direct wire

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to him, in which case you flicked the switch and

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you were into him, and and you saved five seconds.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So I bring this up because let's just told you

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that there was a sixteen year gap between the introduction

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of NASDAC and actual robust electronic trading in the equity markets.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at a lot of the unstructured

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets, people are trying to fix them or

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>reform them using modern electronic trading protocols and ideas. But

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've missed something um And I think that

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>what illustrates the fact that we've missed this piece of

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>architecture is a lot of the attempts to fix the

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>market with electronic trading have failed. In the corporate bond

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>market and myself, the G session system for Goldman Sachs

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>had some fundamental flaws with it, and it's only seeing

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>those flaws that I started to think that maybe there

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>was something missing. And then when you look back in history,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>there is something missing. Every other market that we consider

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>modernized today had to organize their pre trade quote information

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>before they started trading electronically. Well, how come we made

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>that leap? Then? Why did we avoid the step of

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of centralized pricing and just jump straight off to

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>pure electronic trading in corporate bonds, which, as you point out,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to necessarily be working. I think it's a

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>combination of two things. One, I think it's a misunderstanding

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of in market struck sure, believing that electronic trading is

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not market structure, it's it's really the result of having

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a good foundation of market structure. And then, quite frankly,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the people who saw this history in

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets, uh, are either no longer on this

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>earth or you know, just not available to to help

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>people in the bond market. Um. That's why I think

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that you Know Less is a treasure because he can

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>actually speak to the before and after of a of

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a key part of the equity market structure history that

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I think just a lot of people are not aware of.

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at some point in time, equity markets

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>traded out of a magazine, and if you look at

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>old newspapers, you'll see if you wanted to understand what

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>your stock was worth, you were just looking through the

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>quote page. Um. Which sounds funny to us now that

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you could pull up anything on a Bloomberg screen and

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>see information around it. But it really did function as

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a market back then, but eventually they had to change it,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like the path that they created was

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>mimicked by other markets. But what about the argument that

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the bond mark kit is in some way fundamentally different

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market because stocks, you know, you buy

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a share of Apple, it's a share of Apple, but

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if you buy an Apple bond, it could have a

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>different maturity, different coupon, whatever. And that's what people say

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is often holding back the bond market from becoming standardized

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 1>in some way. Well, yes, I mean it is different,

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is a solid argument. But um,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about the sequence to market modernization, it's

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in different products but the same way. Meaning that

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't see robust electronic trading in the SPOTFX market

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>until they organized their quotes. You certainly did not see

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>electronic trading in the U. S. Treasury market before they

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>organized their quotes. So I think what we're really arguing

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about is semantics. Nobody is saying that the corporate bond

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>market is going to trade in an order book and

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have high frequency trading coming anytime soon.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But we do have an issue that those other markets

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>faced in which those markets had reached an inflection point

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the size and pop pularity of the

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>market that now necessitated people knowing what something was worth

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on a screen. UM. I think that what we're um

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>really looking at is any market that's modernized has done

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so by decreasing ambiguity around the trading process and seeing

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>best bid best offer is something that just doesn't exist

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of the unstructured fixed income markets that

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are now begging to be reformed. Less. When the NAZAC

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>first took off and there was this sort of bulletin

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>board where you could see all the prices everywhere, was

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it clear that that was a first step towards um

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a new way of trading, or at the time the

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>dad seemed like, Okay, this is the new reality, because

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the telling of history it's a first step.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But at the time you don't really know which way

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>things are going to evolve. We thought that that was

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about as far as things could go, and uh uh,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>months or years later, I don't remember exactly when when

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they started talking about reporting volume. That was another seismic

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>shift in the in the marketplace, the fact that now

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your competition could deduct what your volume was was offensive

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to the trader and and scary and ultimately real time reporting.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh that you know, that was also an evolution that

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>occurred years later. There was no price reporting at the

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>time that the trades were done in the early Nazdak environment. Chris,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been about a year since we last had you on.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the chances that have been almost Yeah, I

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>know it's scary, right, What are the chances if we

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>had you on again in a year, which I'm sure

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we will, But if we have you on again in

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a year, what are the chances that something will actually

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have changed in the corporate ball market? Because I feel

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like we have this conversation continuously and we're all always

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about the inflection point that's coming, and we're inevitably

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>left disappointed. Well, I think conversations like this are a

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the change. Um. A lot of the times, uh,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the exception of of the people that

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I read at Bloomberg and a couple of the other

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>publications I read people telling a story about markets, it's

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>not exactly exactly accurate in terms of the history and

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sequence of things. UM. So, I think first there there's

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of knowledge that needs to be built up

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>around how do markets reform? Um number one, uh, number two.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to place a bet that people are going

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to push forward with ideas that that may start to

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>change the way we're thinking about markets. I think one

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of the main reasons why I feel so confident about

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this is you're seeing a lot of people who have

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>been sitting in traditional seats at Wall Street firms UM

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>now on the street and trying to become UM innovators

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and entrepreneurs. Most of the people leading new initiatives right

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>now are people who are actually were sitting in the seats,

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's a step in the right

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>direction because obviously they have some experience as to what

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the actual problems are, and therefore they know what solutions

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>would be most helpful. All right, well, Chris, we'll have

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to have you on again in a year, hopefully, hopefully

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I will have cash in my bet at that time

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and we can talk about how the bond market is

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually changing, and I look forward to it. All right,

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris and Lez, thank you so much for what's really

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating dig into the lost history of financial market modernization.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you for having well Tracy. I'm really uh.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the idea of doing this episode once a

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>year and sort of watching our our annual bond market,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>our annual look to see if anything's changed in the

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bond market. I'm excited about having to be a recurring future.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like people are as much hopeful

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about reforming that market as they are also wary. Like

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you talk to the guys on the street, and there's

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>still this huge, huge resistance to any form of change,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which again is kind of amazing because we have seen

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the corporate ball market explode in size. It's something like

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight trillion dollars now, it's really one of

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the hot areas on Wall Street. Yeah, I get. I mean, ultimately,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of understandable that nobody wants change in an industry,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly if they're making money in that industry, though given

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the direction of a lot of things, maybe the lack

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of making money will be an impetus. I thought that

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was just this sort of timeline point that Chris made

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and hearing, let's talk about it, the idea that you

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>can't just say all right, we're gonna make it all

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>digital now, and everyone put up your bids and asks

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and start trading. And how important it is to first

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>um in the history of the stock market. First just

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>established that there's a singular place to go and get

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a quote from securities is a fascinating point. Yeah, all right,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of change, shall we change the topic and say goodbye?

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. I'm Tracy Alloway, Executive editor of Bloomberg Markets.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe wi isn't All, Managing editor of Bloomberg Markets.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Put

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to work and grow your business with c i

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i T

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for small

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i T

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Put Knowledge to Work.