WEBVTT - CPI, Cruises, Industrials, ETFs, and Cannabis

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news on the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Let's get back to

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the inflation print we had today. It's high, but it's

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>coming down, but maybe not coming down as fast as

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>people would like. Alice Andrews joins us. She's US Interest

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Rates and FX reporter with Bloomberg News. Alice, what was

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your takeaway from the print we had today on CPI. Yeah,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I really thought that the market reaction, especially on the

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>treasury side, was just really wrong footed this morning. I

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was very uncomfortable with the bull flattening that we saw

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>after the CPI number. I think that the market really

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on that lower headline number and that drop in

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>year over year and inflation. But I think that the

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that the market was really missing was that big

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>shelter component. And I really think that the whole thing

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was about shelter. I mean, I think that either way

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you slice or dice it, if you take shelter out

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of your analysis or put it back in. I think

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is still rising. So for example, if I mean,

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it, inflation is coming down whether

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the headline, core or supercore. But the

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fact of the matter is is that the FED really

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>targets the super core that excludes the shelter component of CPI.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you take a look at it, it's running

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at five point seven percent year over year, and that

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>surpasses core CPI at five point six percent, And to me,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just an indicator that inflation is going to stay

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty sticky. Yeah, And I mean, so the core was

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>higher than the headline, and you're saying the supercore is

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>even higher than the core. That's right. And we're hearing

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more and more people Alice voice concerns about the stickiness

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of inflation at these levels black Rock. I heard Wailey

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning on Bloomberg Radio talking about that. But the

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ECB is also concerned about the stickiness. The Bank of

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>England is also concerned about the stickiness. So is inflation

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 1>at these levels, you know, five percent here to stay? Oh?

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it could stay there. Easily, if not go higher.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the indicators that things that I really like

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to look at is something like housing and cars. So

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what I'm seeing in the housing market is that you know,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a spring market, right, so that's supposed to

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bring a lot of supply, but it's not. And the

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>fact of the matter is low supply people still out

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there wanting to buy houses. It just artificially keeps housing

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>prices strong because there's still so much competition to get

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the few houses that are coming on the market. The

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that rents, because housing market is staying high,

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that rents are going to stay high. And

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the big, you know, component that wants to take

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>out or put back in of their of their analysis

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. And I think, again, anyway you slice it

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>or dice it, with or without shelter, inflation is staying high.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that I've been looking at is transportation,

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually this month, transportation contributed positively to CPI. And

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing is is that autos I think are going

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to actually stay high as well. I've noticed that I've

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>noticed a big bag I've noticed resilience in used car

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>prices and carback said that yesterday. Yeah, and you haven't

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, Tesla's price cuts. Notwithstanding you haven't seen

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>new car prices come down at all, they continue to rise.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's gonna be a problem as well. And

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>what is really happening is that incentives are picking up.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're noticing this, but you know,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>watching TV. I actually saw an ad last night on

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>TV and I thought, oh, yeah, no, I haven't seen

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that in a while. But in doing a little bit analysis,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>incentives have and about five percent, we're starting to see

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>zero percent financing, three percent financing, and huge double digit

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>cash back, double digit cash back. Think about that. Those

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>are on like more expensive cars, but still that's just

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. And so I think that because the

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer is so savvy, right prices start to come down,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>people that are working with cash on hand, boom, they're

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>going in and buying like you know, kind of pouncing

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like they're doing on housing. It something comes on the

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>market on the right block that you like, Boom, you're

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>going to buy it. Car prices showing some incentives, cash back, boom,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers are pouncing. They're very you know, price sensitive and savvy.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that new car prices can stay firm

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with these incentives. But the thing is is that cars

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>new cars are still really expensive, so that shifts a

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>subsector into the used car market, which I think can

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>stay strong. Yep. Absolutely kind of heard that from CarMax yesterday.

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, Alice, why does a FEDS like to strip

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out for this super core data point. Yeah, but doesn't everybody?

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It affects everybody, doesn't it everybody's got to pay rent

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>or mortgage. Yeah, but I think that you know, it's

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just an indicator that the FED is targeting. They had

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about, you know, housing prices remaining elevated

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and rents remaining elevated, and how they think that rents

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to reset lower once these liss come up.

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't really get that logic, because if you're

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a landlord and you know that housing prices are high

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and you missed an opportunity to raise rents in the

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, I don't understand why you would think that

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lises are going to reset lower. I don't think that

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really going to happen. In terms of the wrong

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>footed move in the markets, especially in rates, Alice, we

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>saw a drop. I mean, I mean, looking ten year,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw a drop in ten year yields. Now it's

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>coming back to unchanged around three forty three forty one.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you see this reaction and what does that

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>mean the market expects from the Fed? Well, right after

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the data of the market priced in four percent that's

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>funds rate in January. I mean that's a full point

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>below where we're at right now. I thought that that

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was just crazy. And I think that you know what

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>happens on these big numbers, right you know, you get

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emotional trading and position trading. And I

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think that what you're seeing right now is a market

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>coming back a little bit to life. We're pairing some

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of that steepening that we saw and we're backing off

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of that rally. Rates are rising a little bit. I

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the right move, And you know,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>do you have to kind of remember sometimes it takes

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a day or two for you know, big numbers to

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>get digested by the markets. And also participation isn't exactly

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that high. The other thing I wanted to mention us,

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to we'll get that next time because

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we gotta short on time. We'll get the We're gonna

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>get you at Gang. Yeah, we want you back for sure.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Talking about Rachel, you know, she's a former floor clark

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at bear Stern says she knows all that trading stuff.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Alice Andre's US interest rate reporter for Bloomberg News. You're

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to the team ken'ser Line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at ten amis daring on Bloomberg dot Com, the I

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App. We're listening

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcast. Story that caught

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>my attention yesterday, Carnivals chief financial This is the cruise business.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Carnivals chief financial officer David Bernstein isn't worried about rising

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, unlike other finance executives, as the cruise line

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>operator looks to pay down debt rather than finance. And

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I was when I was reading that, I was saying, boy,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>their creditors are happy. Credit analysts must be happy that

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they're paying down debt. So I figured, let's check in

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>with Jody Lori. She covers. She's a credit analyst for

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence covers this industry. Jody joins us here via

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>zoom on her vacation day. Oh, we really appreciate Jody

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>making some time there. Jody talked to us about Carnival

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Cruise Lines. Here. This is a company that's focused. I mean,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these cruise operators right at the biding

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>again pandemic mandate, rushed into the market, raised cash, sensing

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that this could be really bad for their business, and

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they were. Some of them had to pay like eleven

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve zack percent, right, I mean, some of them sold

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>debt for way too much interest and the sign of

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. So what's Carnival doing now? Sure, so Carnival

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is certainly one of the more interesting companies under our

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>coverage these days. I mean, let's let's take a little

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>look back, right, So, the company added about twenty four

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>billion or more to its balance sheet during the pandemic.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's about twenty four billion above where it was at

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty nineteen. So you're talking about thirty

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars sitting on the balance sheet that they

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with. Management is targeting it's going to

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>get down to about thirty three thirty three and a

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>half by the end of the year, which is music

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to our years, of course, But how they're going to do.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That is always key. They're just getting to the precipice

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of generating free cash flow, and with that, obviously they're

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going to put it towards paying down debt. But I

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of finessing that needs to go on,

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot that's dependent on the ability for

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>them to get customers on their ships. I look at

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way DDIS, Paul, Okay, if you if you

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>put in Carnival Cruise Lines, which I think is CCL

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>equity and look at DDIS, you can see the debt

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>distribution when these things are coming due, and you can

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>see the average coupon is seven percent. So is that

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>high with a weighted average of five years? How does

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>their debt profile look to you? It's definitely a horse

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of a different color or a ship of a different

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>color these days than it was at the beginning of

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. They were investment grade rated previously, and so

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they commanded very good rates at that point. Now you

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think about this company a year ago, they tapped the

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>debt markets and they actually got a lot of plaque

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>or issuing double di issues, right, So similar coupon to

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>what they issued in June of twenty twenty, during the

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>depths of the pandemic. And so I think management is

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>being very cautious about how and when they tapped the

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>debt markets and why because even this past fall when

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they did issue debt, they issued about two billion dollars.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They've got a little creative in how they did it.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>They created a new subsidiary where they put some of

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their vessels, and they made it a little bit more

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>attractive to keep rates lower. That complicated their balance sheet.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>So if you're an average bond holder, you don't really

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>understand which vessels are backing your bonds. You know, you're

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>an insecured holder, so you're really just general company ability

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to pay. But the complicating factor of it is, Okay,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in a theoretical bankruptcy, where would I be in line

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to receive any sort of money. Yeah, especially if it's

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in Panama. Yeah, I see, like twenty billion of their

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>dead is at a Panama. Yeah, the Hamas and Caymans

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are usually generally the place that they go to for

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the issuing subsidiaries. But yeah, I mean, if you're saying, okay,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I have these bonds, and even even if it's not

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, bankruptcy. If you're a high yield company, you

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>always have to think about liquidation, right if you're a

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>credit autai as you say, okay, what would this be

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in a theoretical liquidation standpoint, because it's high yield, and

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so that will dictate how the bonds trade. Now that said,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you have higher risk, higher rewards. So there are some

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>investors who say, oh, then it's worthwhile to sort of

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>nibble at those There's other investors who say, you know what,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of factors at play that could

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>dictate how these bonds behave and and the you know,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the forecast of this company. I think there's still very

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>much in a turnaround phase, and I think there's still

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on the earlier side, although we're starting

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to get to the point that we're seeing the light

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the tunnel. So Jody, just give

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>us a sensure. I'm just looking at the stocks of

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Carnival and it's peers and they're all down between twenty

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and forty percent, So the market's really skittish there. I'm

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of there's similar concerns in the credit markets as well.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of thought once this pandemic you know, they

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>started lifting on the mass mandates and all that stuff,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that this industry would just explode with demand and occupancies

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>would be like sky high for years in pent up demand.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>That really hasn't happened, or has it. It's starting to happen.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>We actually wrote a note that specifically spoke to occupancy

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>rates as well as to cash flow. So one thing

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that they have is advanced bookings, which is basically the

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>cash they take in when people book their cruises. They

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>can't book that as revenue until the person actually goes

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on a cruise, but they can take it in as cash,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so that actually helps their business. It's an alternative form

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of cash compared to say raising debt. The piece when

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you think about it from an occupancy standpoint that's difficult

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for these companies is the cruise lines were unique and

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that they got a moratorium, meaning they were unable to

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>actually cruise. They were unable to operate. You compare that

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to the theme parks, which I know you and I

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have talked about it before. Um and and the theme

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>parks they were able to sort of get creative and

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>how they operated. So you take someone like Cedar Fair,

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they were able to have a wine and cheese festival

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at Nottsbury Farm, you know, and and and six Flags.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We actually my family actually went to Great Adventure and

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>did the Safari tour in our own car. And you

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get out of the car, nor do

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to get out of the car, you know, Okay,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And it is a little fun to have drafts like it, Yeah,

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely out of draft actually in the yes, the baboons

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>used to do that. I think they've been a little

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>bit better about how they let you interact with them.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But I was there one time as a kid where

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they did rip off our antenna from the Now I

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have something on my list that this weekend that sounds awesome.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, but but your point is that the very

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>good time. Your point is that the cruise lines were

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>sincerely disadvantaged these every other industries, right exactly. So getting

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the cruise lines, you compare that to the

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>theme parks, and the cruise lines were literally unable to cruise.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>They had these massive vessels that were either sitting dormant

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>or they had to staff it up so that they

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>had a minimal amount of staff to just keep the

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>basically keep the ships from getting stale. They also postponed

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some of their capex right, so that just the maintenance

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>caffex that's required, and it just takes a lot of

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>time to ramp up from zero. So even though these

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>companies are seeing tremendous demand, I mean I'm hearing anecdotally

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because people hear that I you know, I'm a cruise analysts,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they'd go, oh, actually, I just went on my first cruise.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And you're definitely hearing that more and more, which is

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>music to the cruise company's ears, because the challenge that

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with isn't so much the diehard cruiser fans

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like my parents, but the people who have never stepped

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>foot on a cruise ship before, the people who are

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>skittish around cruises or it's just not within their generational appeal.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where the cruise companies are trying to

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>jump over. The hurdle is saying, Okay, let's get these

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>new to cruise people on the ships and then grow

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our our pool of potential customers. Then they'll they'll see benefits.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>They'll see it as beneficial. That's it. I mean, there

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is only so much they can cruise. There's only so

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>many days in the year. There's only so many rooms

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in a ship, and it takes a lot of time

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to get them from zero to one hundred percent operational.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they these companies still investing in ships. I mean,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's to me is the sign of optimus. If you're

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>bullish on you know, your future, five to ten years,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll build a billion dollars ship or whatever they cost.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>These days. Yes, I mean the companies are still very

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>much investing in ships. Carnival has a little bit of

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a gap in terms of when they're planning to take

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery of ships, which I think they're a little bit

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>relieved by. It's less so indicative of what they've been

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>planning more so of the hold up in the shipbuilders side.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So obviously the shipbuilders, just like every other industry, dealt

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic where they had shutdowns, they were unable

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to get parts. You know, everything you're hearing about the autos,

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>similar sort of things we're going on with the shipbuilding.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the cruise ships had ships that

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>were scheduled to be delivered that they got postponed, which

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was actually fortuitous for the cruise ships because it gave

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit more time to deal with the

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that they had all these ships that were just

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not being operating. Yep, all right, Jody, thank you so

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your thoughts here

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on Carnival and on the cruise industry as it ramps

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>back up a post pandemic. Jody Lorie, she's a credit

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's on her day off, but

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>she took time out to give us the update on

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the cruise business. We appreciate that. Two gold stars for Jody.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the tape. Ken's a our live program

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the tuning app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Jo Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring the all star to the microphone

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>over here. Karen Uberhart, she's in Bloomberg Intelligence. She covers

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the industrial space. I mean talk about these are real companies.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Met These are like dear Caterpillar, Emerson Electric. I mean,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going hardcore industrial America. This is General Electric. Back

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in the day. I guess you could say, I mean

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, General Electric is still bigger than Emerson, right,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean big. Emerson's just a forty seven billion dollar company.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It will put up a I'm sure ge right now

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and two billion, so it's still bigger. It's

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not the world's biggest maker of earth moving equipment. No,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>this is they have all right. Karen Buberhart, Senior Industrial

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Annals Bloomberg Intelligen just joins us here in our Bloomberg

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Brokers studio because Emerson Electrics out there with a

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>deal to buy National Instruments. Karen, thanks so much for

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in studio. What is Emerson Electric buying?

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>What is National Instruments? It's one of the larger test

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and measurement companies, you know, like when you're in the

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>R and D lab and you know, developing product etc.

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That is a platform that Emerson wants to develop. It's

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a higher growth platform. It fits with their automation focus

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>now and they'd been looking. They did say they'd have

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to do a meaningful deal to get a footprint rather

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>than their own, and they did it rather quickly. So

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what does Emerson's core business I mean, what do I

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Emerson for factory automation process, you know, plant

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>automation like chemical plants, etc. Software They're getting involved. They

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>took one of the biggest bets on software with buying

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Aspen Technologies to get them into industrial software. This is

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a new CEO about two and a half years. He's

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>really trying to make the make the company into less cyclical,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>higher growth. Lots of companies are doing, but he's moving quickly.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw Fordive was the biggest gainer in the S

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>ANDP for not buying. And sometimes you know, you just

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>feel good when you don't spend a ton of money. Well,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you thought you were going to get I get the

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a shareholder reaction, but does it lead them in

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a disadvantaged position for not getting it? That was a

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>financial stretch for Fortive. You know, it is a twenty

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar company. They would have had to issue

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>stock or some nearer stock to get it done. Leverage

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>would have been very high. People were nervous about that.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It did lead Emerson to pay sixty bucks, which is

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>more than you know, some of us would have liked.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>The numbers still can work, but you know it was

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>higher than So it's interesting here. So Emerson Electric paying

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>eight point two billion dollars sixty dollars to share. The

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>stock was at like fifty three before trading today, so

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a premium. Emerson's people know this. People must have known

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this is going on. Well, you know, it's funny. The

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>CEO drew a line in the sand and said, if

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a sixty dollars bid, it's not ours. And so

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I was in the possive writing, this is a competitive bid.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's gonna be sixty bucks. And it is sixty bucks.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>You can still make the numbers work. The synergies are

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about one hundred and sixty f million and five

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>years out. That's a stretch to get it all the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>way five years. But Emerson is a very good operating company.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>They're going to do better than the numbers they say

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>on synergies and it is a creed of even at

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty bucks. I'm just saying for NATTY shareholders, right the

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>ticker for National Instruments NATI, those shares were trading at

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, thirty six thirty seven dollars at the end

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two, beginning of twenty three, and then I'm

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>guessing just by looking at the chart that shareholders became

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>aware that they had something others wanted to buy, because

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock just shoots up in the beginning of January

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Well, that's when they announced a hostile bid.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't Emerson was trying to get a deal done.

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They went into forty eight, they couldn't get it done.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>They went into fifty three, they couldn't get it done.

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of communication going back and forth.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So Emerson broke the news, we're trying to buy this thing,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they published all the letters and communications to get

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.959
<v Speaker 1>them off. You get them moving, right. So then they

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>went into a strategic planning situation and got other bidders

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is where it fell out and Emerson had

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to fight to sixty to get it from Fordive is

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or how is Emerson paying for this cash? They're selling

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>their climate business, and that is part of that's probably

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what they want. They're going to have nine point nine

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars in cash from selling their refrigeration

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and climate you know, air conditioning components. That gets them

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>out of a residential oriented cyclical business, gives them money

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to put into a higher growth that these businesses they

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>say will grow ford to selling the name from that's

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>where I know the name. I see it at my

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>house in the basement all the time. They're a market

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>leader in that business, but they wanted out of that

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend money on these higher growth, higher margin businesses.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So if everybody's talking about a recession, your companies,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>long lead times make big stuff. How are you thinking

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about or how are your companies telling you that they're

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>preparing for a recession? You know, Um, the backlogs are

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at record levels. It doesn't mean some of that can't dissipate,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's a lot of pent up demand. A

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>company like Emerson's pretty long lead time, So maybe some

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of their large projects might get pushed out a little bit.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think they're going to see you know,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like residential construction goes down thirty percent. They're not going

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to see that kind of exposure. But they all are

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>still you know, supply constrained. Um, their costs are still

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they still have getting that supply chain stuff is still

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue for still going on. Yeah, and in this

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in this case, automation is a growth business. Companies are

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>investing a lot in you know, EV and semiconductors, et cetera.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of money going into the automation business.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where there, there they are, and where they're going

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in a bigger way, drawing on the same track as AI,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really right, I mean automation and software is happening at

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the same time as we're seeing these big leaps forward

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and manufacturing. What about consolidation we were talking about, you

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>know the string of M and A we've seen this week,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously not in industrials but mostly in UH in materials commodities.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Now we see this deal. Is there a consolidation way happening?

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Is this a one off? It's I think it's a

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>strategic move. There's like four or five people in that business. Um.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the other big one in the US is

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Key Site. They were talked about as maybe buying them,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they were serious contenders. And you

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>don't see a lot of other deals on the horizon

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the companies you cover not But what's happening is they're

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>breaking up. I mean all the multis have are becoming

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>more focused and more so. But a lot of that

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is happening in spinoffs. They're creating new companies um like

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the HVAC companies are mostly pure plays now. They came

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out of larger companies. So that's the biggest wave in

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the large industrials is breaking up being more focused. And

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what Emerson did with this move selling climate,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into more It's so funny they go

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>through these. When I first started working at Bloomberg and Frankfurt,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was covering Seemans at the time, and they were

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>breaking up, and then they got together, and then they're

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>breaking up. I mean, it's it's it's good to be

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an investment banker covering industrial America. Absolutely a wave and

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and and you know it had I'm here a long

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>time too, and I've seen them put them all together

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to lower the cick locality, to be in different businesses,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be more diverse. Then you see them breaking up to

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>be more focused. My feeling is, you know, once we

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>get in a bad cycle and some of these focused companies,

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, get whacked by a bad recession, maybe they're

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going to want a little balance again. I mean, this

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>thing comes and goes and comes and goes, as you know,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>over long periods of time. Twenty seconds GEED stocks up

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent the traillion twelve months. Are they done?

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 1>They fixed everything? Well, you know, there's a lot a

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of legs in aerospace that's going to be a

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>great standalone business. And I think what changed is people

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>start to get confidence on the energy business, which has

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>been the dog for a while, and you know it's

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.239
<v Speaker 1>been going up for a while. But then they had

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an investor day and pitched the long term story for

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the energy business, the IRA etc. There's a

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of money flowing into that business there and wind

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>power etc. So now the two pieces look like they're

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be okay and the stock is taken off.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, good news finally for our friends at General Electric.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Karen Uberhard. She's industrial anallyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, the absolute

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>expert on all that industrial stuff coming out of Middle America.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>She's the best. You're listening to the team Ken'serline program

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am, easting on Bloomberg dot com,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We're listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Want

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to get to right next guest Johann Gron He's a

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>vice president and head of ETF strategy at Alliance Investment Management. Johan,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I'm just looking

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>through the notes here and Matt and I talk a

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>lot about the volatility, particularly in the treasury market, but

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>there's been some volatility in the equities, although it's been

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of low recently. But you've got a product called

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bufferd ETFs. What is a bufferd ETF. Oh, hey, yeah,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. It's good good to talk

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to you. Buffery ETFs and all their simplicity, effectively are

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>four investors that care about having some downside risk committigation

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolios. So effectively, all of this is exposure

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to the SMP five hundred, and you can participate in

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred up to a cap. That's the catch,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>if you will. So in the case of our two products,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we have one with a ten percent buffer, we have

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>one with a twenty percent buffer. In the case of

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the ten percent buffer, if you were to invest this month,

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, you can gain up to about eighteen percent

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>if the SMP five hundred goes up in the next

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, and if the SMP five hundred is down

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>by ten percent or less than you're flat with the

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>market or flat in your portfolio. So that's at a

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>very high level. That's kind of how they work. What

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's down ten percent or more so, in the

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>case of the ten percent buffer, if it's down by eleven,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you lose one. If it's down by twelve, you lose two.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If it's down by twenty, you lose ten. So basically,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>whatever the market is down, mine is that ten So

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>so sorry, the ten percent buffer, you can get eighteen

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>percent upside, but you're protected from ten percent of the

0:26:55.720 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>down side, that's right. And the twenty percent buffer, it's

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>your upside cap. The April found that we have. The

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>upside is almost twelve percent netal fees, I see, and

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the downside would be then you get downside protection to

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent, that's right. Yeah, So if the market is

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>down by twenty percent or less, you're still flat. So

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if you put the million dollars in on day one

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>here on let's say April first, or even today, actually

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's trading at about the same place. It's been relatively

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>flat so far in April, then you have you have

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to twelve percent up and then you're still

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you have twenty percent of the buffer if the market

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>swings down. How many ETFs are do you guys have

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right now? And kind of where are you seeing the demand?

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>What types of products? Yeah, so a lot of a

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of the demand we've seen our twenty percent product

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and part of that stems from the volatility and the

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>rate tiking, if you will. In the battle market. There

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of advisors and investors out there that

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they'd rather take put their put theirs on the equity side,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on the equity risk premia. When you have a twenty

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>percent cushion's um it's rare to see or you don't

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of predictions speaking to a market decline

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of twenty percent or more in the next twelve months.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty good trade off for a lot

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of advices and investors. And that's where

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>we see the most the most traction. Well, if you

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>look across the the ETF spectrum, though, um, you know,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>where do you see I mean, the most demand in

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks has certainly been ultra short

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>treasury ETFs. Right, So if you look, if you look

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at the ETF universe, where do you see the biggest holes. Well,

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.239
<v Speaker 1>more broadly speaking, that's just a reflection of you know,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>where where the places are being bets at the moment. Right,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So we still see some more slightly more aggressive behaviors,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in terms of putting money into equity ETFs.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So you see a little bit a little bit less

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>risk one and a little bit more risk on generally speaking,

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is what we've been seeing. Now. I happen to believe

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that that might be a little bit premature, but that's

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the market economous conversation that I'm happy to get into

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if you'd like. So all right, let's kind of go there, John,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>because we had the big CPI print today PPI coming up,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course inflation's job one for this Federal Reserve

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and for the ETF I'm sorry, the ECB as well.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you guys at Alliance? Would would you make

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the inflation print today? And how do you think our

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is going to respond? I actually think it's

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. We still see pressure in the service sector.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, goods have come down for natural reasons, but

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the service sector inflation and you still

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have some wage inflation. And even if there are not

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers that you might see in you know, other other

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world. They're still very high. Given the

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>target that the FED has and the fact that FED

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>shairman John Paul was talking about fifty basis points just

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>before we had a couple of banking issues, I think

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that speaks to the that there is still more quote

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote work for the FED to do, and what that

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>implies is that, yes, they're going to continue with this

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ray tike cycle twenty five basis points in a couple

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of weeks here that I think that's pretty much baked

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in right now. You have a seventy five percent chance

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of that happening according to the statistics today. But I

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's more a function of time. The closer we

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>get to the meeting, that those numbers are going to

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>go up and we're going to see the twenty five

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>basis point hike. So I think that's pretty much more

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>or less a dumb deal, pending any any strange behaviors

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in the market in the next couple of weeks here, Yeah,

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the markets pricing in some cuts after that. Do you

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see any this year? I don't.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the camp of no. I just have a look,

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the FED consists of

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>human beings, right, and like it or not, they they

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>can be as data dependent as they want. But I

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to have enough data points to

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>place what I would consider a very bold pivot already

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in July. I see some the consensus is that they're

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>going to start cutting in July already and then at

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>every meeting for the rest of the year after that.

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that will happen. I think they will

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have much more staying power than that. The decision to

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pause is somewhat difficult. We might see it in May,

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but I can also very easily see the rate hiking

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>cycle continuing another meeting or two. But it's an easier

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>decision to make. To make a decision after a pause

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is much much more difficult, because either you have to say, well, crap,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we have more inflation that we thought. I guess the

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>disinflation we've been seeing it wasn't after all unintended transitory.

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to be very cautious with that. That

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>part of it, right, So they'd rather go higher for

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>longer than pausing or cutting earlier. And then on the

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>flip side, if you if you say you're going you're

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>going to actually start cutting rates, then the question immediately becomes,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what is it that the FED is seeing that hasn't

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>been baked into the market over the past, you know,

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>two months so, and that it'd been a self will

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>create some some reelings, and I don't I don't think

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's anything that they want to trigger. So Johanna

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>over the lines, talk to us about just the fun

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>flows in and out of ETFs. Are you seeing continued

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>net inflows here, because it's just been you know, in

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>my investing lifetime, well north of thirty years, it's just

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>been one of the most fascinating phenomena to watch the

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>growth of the ETF business. Yeah, I mean, it is fascinating,

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's fascinating for good reasons, as I'm sure you've

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>covered in previous episodes, you know, in terms of why

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the ETF rapper is so attractive. But even even in March,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw thirty billion coming into the overall ETF industry

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, and it's now back up

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to like almost seven trillion six point nine to be

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more precise, six point nine trillion dollars in market size

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and the predictions over the next couple of decades is

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to easily double triple or maybe quadruple,

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so that that flow of capital, if you will, from

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the mutual fund industry primarily into the ETF industry is

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>US that's basically tied away. That that's not going to

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stop anytime soon. Yeah. I was talking to Brian Lake

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>from JP Morgan on on Monday and he said he

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sees fifteen billion that's for the US market. If you

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>look at, you know, the global ETF industry, it's more

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like ten trillion dollars in UH. It's a huge it's

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge market and growing. Where do you think the

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>most growth is going to be. We've seen a lot

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of for a while we saw factors and

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>then now thematic I'd say probably actively managed ETFs are

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the hottest thing right now. What's your take? Well, I

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>guess it depends on the where the question is coming from,

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>right But in terms of growth, it's going to continue

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in the in the passive endses, in the

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>broad market exposure that is by by far the most

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>dominant part of the world, if you will. But in

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of where UH etf issuers are going to see

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting opportunity for growth and also on opportunities

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to to h to generate some revenue is from the

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>active ETF actively managed ETF space and then more specifically

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the space that Alian's Investment Management is in is to

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>define the outcome ETF space. It's a relatively new space

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. An innovation has just barely begun in this

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>space and that is already over. It's been around for

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>almost what is an a three and a half years

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe and as of last year it grew by ten

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>billion alone and that growth is just continuing as well.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Johan, thank you so much for joining us.

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Johann Gron he is the vice president ahead of ETF

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>strategy to Alligan's Investment Management and just falling up on them.

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just the growth of ETFs is just extraordinary. You know,

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about we grew up when is all about

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds, you know, but these ETFs have just there's

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>such a superior product in terms of cost for and

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>other attributes as well for so many investors. And the buffer,

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>i mean the space that Johan and Alliance Investment Management

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are in buffer ETFs is just about to break out.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're doing I assume very well with their business.

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I know black Rock, which is an ETF Beheemoth has

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>filed plans to break into the booming buff Buffer ETF

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>market as well. So it's a tremendous space. Yeah, we'll

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stay on top of that. You're listening to the tape

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.479
<v Speaker 1>cancer our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business alf. You can also listen live

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Our Brad case Joints

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>his chief economist, director of Research for Middleburg Communities, talk

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about a guy who's just way over educated. All right,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he keep economists there, chief economists. That's the key part

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of his title todays. Yeah, all right, Burke, where would

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you go? Undergrad Williams? Okay, not bad. They're the EPs.

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>We cleared that up, masters in something from Berkeley, then

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a PhD from Yale. Then he goes out and gets

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 1>his CFA. On top of that and the CIA, which

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what that is, but while you're

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>working at the Federal Reserve. I would guess, yeah, absolutely, Yeah,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's alternative investments. Alternative Sure, why not? So I'm

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>guessing he's got everything covered here. Brad talked us about

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation out there. You guys are in the real estate

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>business at middle BIRG communities. What's going on with the

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>cost of housing? Is that really the driver here for

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the inflation that is still probably a lot stickier than

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>people would like to see. Yeah, I mean you have

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to remember that there are two very different parts of

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the of the housing market. That the prices of houses

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that are bought by owners who expect to live in

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the houses, those are still so expensive and prices have

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>already started to decline, um, and so it's it's harder

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.919
<v Speaker 1>to buy those properties, and people are worried that once

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they buy the the price will come down. Um. But

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but the but that's much more expensive than the rental

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>housing part of the market, which is I've actually got

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of attention last year because

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>rents had increased so dramatically all across the country. That

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 1>has gone away, but uh, you know, but that's not

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>yet mayasured in things like the CPI, because what they're

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>measuring is essentially leases that people signed last year. This

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is what I wanted to ask about. And you you

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>worked at the Federal Reserve Board. Doesn't somebody at the

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>FED know somebody at the BLS who can set that straight?

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems to be a measurement a metrics problem

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>more than it is a rent problem. It's not really

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a problem. What the CPI is for is measuring it properly. Okay,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The FED, when they set interest rate policy is looking

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at something a little bit different. So the FED is

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>worried about inflation, not about the CPI. Now for a

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of those people, for a lot of people, those

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>are the same thing. But if you're a FED decision maker,

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>they're not. And so the people have a FED Yes

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>they are aware, yea, and they're paying close attention to

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and they like, if I'm not mistaken. They prefer the

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>core PC right, yes, the personal consumption expenditures expenditures exactly

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I was looking for the E. Yeah, so they look

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at a different measure than we kind of main Street

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>follows the CPI. There's a very little difference between the

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>CPI and the PC deflator, all right, So put it

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>all together here, what's our Fed going to do? So?

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the Fed is going to continue raising interest rates.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I expect them to raise them at the next meeting.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't. That may end up being the last one, okay.

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But the reason that they're doing that is is that

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>getting inflation down is very important, and they have finished

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that job. Inflation, when you measure it properly is back

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>down under two percent. But that's not their only job.

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I explain that one because you know what, I used

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>my sandwich ham and cheese sandwich at the La Delhi

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>forever was six dollars and seventy cents. It's now nine

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars and twenty cents. That's inflation for me. Is that

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>going to go down? I mean it's not. No, the

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Fed doesn't. They're generally not not looking to get prices

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>back down to where they were sometime in the past. Okay.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>They they're trying to say, we don't want the rate

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of increase in prices to be much above two percent.

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>They don't want it to go down either, and they're

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>actually there are economic problems that are caused when when

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>prices are actually declining. So that's not something everybody waits.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to buy anything right because you think you'll

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>get a cheaper price in the future. You look at

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>something like the Japanese economy, which has had trouble for

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty years, and a lot of that trouble

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>came because they were in that disinflationary situation. So the

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>price here's hand which is not going down back down

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to five bucks. What we want is for it to

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>stop going up so aggressively. And that, as I say,

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>really has been accomplished in spite of what we saw

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning when the CPI came out. Years hoping to

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>find that because all I look at my ECO screens,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I at CPI, CPI X, food and Energy and the

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Supercore whatever that is, that's all got a five handle

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>on it. So what should I be looking at or

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what is the FED looking at to say, all right,

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of done our job. So so thirty five

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of the CPI comes from the way they measure

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 1>housing costs. Okay, and that's not just rent, but rents

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>are the main piece of information that they're using to

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 1>do that. But as they say, to a great extent,

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they're measuring the rents that were signed a year. Okay. Um.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So so what they're doing in practice is saying, all right,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to new rents, and new rents are not

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 1>showing that that strong growth that they're still measuring, um

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and and so when you take into account the new rents,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>then the overall CPI is down in the two percent range. Okay,

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the government doesn't publish that number, that's right. What's right

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>because because they accomplish their main purpose by publishing the

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>CPI or the or the pc deflator, Okay, that is

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>measuring something different. I'm just saying that the FED is

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 1>their job is not to get the CPI to two percent.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Their job is to is to fight inflation. Those are

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly different. Now, one of the things that that that

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're that they're that they need to accomplish is

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they need to make sure people don't expect inflation to

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>stay high. And since people are paying attention to the CPI,

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's important to get the CPI down. But

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the job that is not yet expectations

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>or the problem. Let me quickly, we only have a

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>minute and a half left, but I want to ask

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you about housing because I think there's an affordability issue

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>now for a lot of people, both in terms of

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>price and in terms of rates. How does that get solved?

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So it gets all fundamentally, but just more supply. And

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's everywhere in the country, but it's especially in

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the country where people are moving to

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and so houses housing prices are just outrageous in places

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like San Francisco. But people are moving out of San Francisco,

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>partly because of that, but partly because their jobs are

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>moving out. Their jobs are moving two places where it

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat easier to build housing. And so you know,

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>my company's situation is, you know, we're in that part

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the country where the people are moving to because

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the jobs are moving there. And you know, it's a

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>long term story there is it will take years for

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>us to build enough housing for everybody. But over those years,

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those people will move out of the

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>high house parts of the country and to the places

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where the jobs are moving to. Middleburg, Virginia. Is that

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys are we are not located there. We're named

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>after that town. Okay, where were you guys located? And

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>just outside of Washington, DC in Virginia? Okay, all right,

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>good stuff from Middleburg Communities. Next time you're back in

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>New York, we'll get you back in here. You've got

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good stuff to talk about. I'm just

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:15.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at Middleburg, Virginia. Looks like a very nice little

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>town there. I've never been there. I was more Inston

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Williams it is. I googled Williams versus Amherst to see

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was going to see football scores, but

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>everything I got was like, Williams has more access to nature.

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Apparently Williams has better food and dorm situations. But Amherst

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is closed to Northampton, which has a lively arts town,

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's not really the same kind of thing you'd

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get if you googled Ohio State versus. It's a big rivalry.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge rivalry. Yeah, the biggest little game in America.

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Rad Case, thanks so much for joining us chief economist

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at Middleburg Communities. You're listening to the tape cans Are

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, Tuna app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty to weed? Why not? Morgan Paxy, a

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>co founder managing partner Beside Investment Management, joins us they

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have a Poseidon Dynamic, a cannabis etf the tickers ps DN.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Morgan takes so much for taking the time to join

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>us here. We want to get a state of the

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>cannabis business these especially after till Ray's disappointing revenue in

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>neverse came in yesterday. What's what's the weed market look like? Sure, well,

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. It's good to be with

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>you all here in Rainy, Miami for the Benzinga Cannabis Conference. UM.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a really interesting time in our industry. UM. Companies

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like Tilray, as as you know, had a pretty lousy quarter,

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>not their first, not their last. UM. There are several

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>companies in our space that really won't make it through

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this period. There was too much capacity built regulations and

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>really keep up, and so you know, the weaker companies

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are falling by the wayside and the good companies are

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>managing through m So that's what we're seeing right now.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that here live at the conference. I'm at

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this week great attendance mood is pretty somber because it

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>feels like people don't want to celebrate if they're doing

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>well because they see others struggling in this time. So,

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, through a tight capital market like we're in, though,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's brought a lot of focus on fundamentals and

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>companies are really being very stupid their cash They need

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to get to an a point of cash flow positive

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and really thinking about their roys, how they're deploying capital,

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing on their cost side. So as the

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>demand continues to grow, we're seeing, you know, we're seeing

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that translate to the bottom. All when I get into

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a somber mood, I just look for a little sativa

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of boost you up a little bit, you know,

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gives you a little energy boost. Why aren't we seeing

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 1>explosive sales figures from these cannabis companies. I went down

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to the grand opening of the first legal weed shop

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York a couple of months ago, and the

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>line was apped around the block four days. How come

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not coming through in the numbers. Sure? Well, Remember

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>cannabis is still as a state by state market, and

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>New York is an abject failure from a legal standpoint

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because the regulators have not opened up legal doors, right,

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>so there's very few legal retail. Even though there's retail

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>all over New York, most of that or of that

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is completely illegal, so which is actually very scary. There

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 1>was a there was a guy actually shot and killed

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in was in the Bronx. Yes, we prefer the term unregulated, Morgan. Sure, Okay,

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not helping the regulated market so much. So

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the problem why New York is not

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>doing well. But if you go to like New Jersey

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>or Connecticut, those are states that are doing great or Missouri.

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Missouri just in the month of March at one hundred

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six million dollars of legal sales. So it

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>really depends on where you are, all right. Just New

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>York's got a lot of work to do, all right, Morgan,

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We'll get you back

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 1>on again and get the update here made the next

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>time you're in New York tomorrow maye. We can get

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>them right back on tomorrow because that wasn't enough time

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and I want to hear more about the conference down there,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna ask Eric Mallow, our producer. We can

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>do that if we can, and we'll ask Morgan obviously

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if yeah, if he's got time, he's down in Miami.

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Paxy a co founder and managing partner Poseide the

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Investment Management. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and I'm

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio