1
00:00:01,360 --> 00:00:01,760
Speaker 1: Welcome.

2
00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:04,480
Speaker 2: It is vertical Center, Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you

3
00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:06,240
Speaker 2: and center. I hate it when I mean, we have

4
00:00:06,280 --> 00:00:09,399
Speaker 2: to admit so often that we were just absolutely right

5
00:00:09,440 --> 00:00:12,160
Speaker 2: in predicting something. And sure enough, now the White House

6
00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:16,720
Speaker 2: is hunkered down going through long lists of pardons and

7
00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:20,960
Speaker 2: letting the American people know you should expect more pardons

8
00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:23,759
Speaker 2: before we leave office.

9
00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:26,920
Speaker 3: Well, this week we were struck with the stunning news

10
00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:29,640
Speaker 3: that the White House has announced verdict with Ted Cruz.

11
00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:35,360
Speaker 3: Wednesday pod was exactly entirely, one hundred percent accurate that

12
00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:37,559
Speaker 3: every word we said. And by the way, if you

13
00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:39,960
Speaker 3: didn't listen to Wednesday's pod, you should listen to Wednesday's

14
00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:43,279
Speaker 3: pod because we predicted. We said that the left wing

15
00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:46,640
Speaker 3: media and Democrats were pressing Joe Biden to issue a

16
00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:49,600
Speaker 3: ton more pardons, to pardon the rest of his family,

17
00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:54,520
Speaker 3: to pardon members of his administration and now, and we said, look,

18
00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:58,120
Speaker 3: that's the direction they're going. And seemingly in response to

19
00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:02,640
Speaker 3: our podcast, the White House immediately came out and said

20
00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:07,119
Speaker 3: expect more pardons, and we're seeing a list of people

21
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:11,440
Speaker 3: now that they are contemplating pardoning. In addition, we had

22
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:15,360
Speaker 3: a major Supreme Court case argued this week a challenge

23
00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:21,240
Speaker 3: to Tennessee's law that prohibits sex transition treatments for children,

24
00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:26,839
Speaker 3: and the ACLU has challenged this, arguing that it violates

25
00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:31,000
Speaker 3: the Constitution, that the Constitution requires that you be able

26
00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:35,039
Speaker 3: to mutilate and sterilize children. That argument played out in

27
00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:37,440
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court this week. We're going to lay out

28
00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:37,920
Speaker 3: how it went.

29
00:01:39,120 --> 00:01:41,720
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's truly shocking what they were saying in quitting

30
00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:43,720
Speaker 2: some of the Supreme Court justices, and we have the

31
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:47,000
Speaker 2: audio from those arguments that will, I think shock most

32
00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,400
Speaker 2: parents out there. I want to tell you real quick

33
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:53,720
Speaker 2: about a cool opportunity for you, a chance to win

34
00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:57,280
Speaker 2: seventeen hundred hours to buy any self defense gear that

35
00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,240
Speaker 2: you need before it's two eight.

36
00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:00,640
Speaker 1: Now, how do you win? Right now?

37
00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:05,200
Speaker 2: You can text the word America to eight seven two

38
00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:07,720
Speaker 2: two two. Right now, that's sexy word America to eight

39
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:11,000
Speaker 2: seven two two two. Now, who's giving it away? Well,

40
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:15,120
Speaker 2: the USCCA, and the USCCA is doing incredible work to

41
00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:18,000
Speaker 2: help protect people just like you when it comes to you,

42
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:22,079
Speaker 2: uh exercising your Second Amendment rights. Look, I've had to

43
00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:24,440
Speaker 2: use a firearm to protect and save my own life.

44
00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:26,600
Speaker 2: I had to pull the trigger, and I wish I

45
00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:29,160
Speaker 2: would have been a member and even known back then

46
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,560
Speaker 2: about the USCCA, because with activist das around the country

47
00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:35,560
Speaker 2: right now, you never know what's going to happen, even

48
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:38,240
Speaker 2: if you're in the right. Many das don't like law

49
00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:43,000
Speaker 2: abiding citizens carrying firearms and protecting yourself and your family

50
00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:46,040
Speaker 2: is so important now, not only when you become a

51
00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:49,200
Speaker 2: member of the USCCA, and they have over eight hundred

52
00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:53,200
Speaker 2: thousand Americans right now that are already members. Why because

53
00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:55,960
Speaker 2: they understand how important it is to get access to

54
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:59,280
Speaker 2: their Protector Academy where you learn vital skills like precision

55
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,720
Speaker 2: shooting and how to fortify your home against criminals. You

56
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:06,120
Speaker 2: also get access when you remember to the twenty four

57
00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:10,079
Speaker 2: to seven Critical Response Team. That is the most important thing,

58
00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:14,320
Speaker 2: and it includes the benefits of self defense liability insurance

59
00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:16,840
Speaker 2: to make sure that you and your family are prepared

60
00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,840
Speaker 2: for anything. Now, for a limited time, you text the

61
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:23,440
Speaker 2: word America to eight seven two two two, and you're

62
00:03:23,480 --> 00:03:26,840
Speaker 2: going to get the usc CAA's free Life Saving Conceiled

63
00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:30,639
Speaker 2: Carying Defense Family Defense Guide and that chance to win

64
00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,560
Speaker 2: seventeen hundred dollars to buy any self defense care that

65
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:35,920
Speaker 2: you need before it's too late. So text the word

66
00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:39,720
Speaker 2: America to eight seven to to two right now. So

67
00:03:39,960 --> 00:03:42,119
Speaker 2: we talked about this two days ago, and as you said,

68
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,120
Speaker 2: I'll say it again. Go back if you missed that

69
00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:46,600
Speaker 2: podcast and listen to it, because we talked about this

70
00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:49,640
Speaker 2: idea that was really coming out of the White House

71
00:03:49,640 --> 00:03:53,320
Speaker 2: that they wanted to expand the list to people that

72
00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:56,240
Speaker 2: would be given pardons that could also include the President

73
00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:01,320
Speaker 2: in theory, pardoning himself. What we are now is the

74
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,160
Speaker 2: White House has saying, yeah, it's coming, and you should

75
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:07,080
Speaker 2: prepare for a lot of people to quite possibly be pardoned.

76
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,040
Speaker 1: So just get used to it.

77
00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:14,000
Speaker 2: Your instant reaction in the White House now confirming this story.

78
00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:16,359
Speaker 3: Well, we put out the podcast Wednesday morning as the

79
00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:19,960
Speaker 3: sun was coming up, and several hours later, Politico issued

80
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:24,320
Speaker 3: a report entitled Biden White House is discussing preemptive pardons

81
00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:28,159
Speaker 3: for those in Trump's crosshairs. It was written by Jonathan Martin,

82
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:33,480
Speaker 3: who's a longtime Washington reporter, and what he reports is

83
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:39,839
Speaker 3: that White House officials are debating issuing blanket pardons to

84
00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:42,839
Speaker 3: multiple people, which is exactly what we predicted. And here's

85
00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:47,520
Speaker 3: what Politico reports, quote Those who could face exposure include

86
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:51,960
Speaker 3: such members of Congress's January sixth committee as Adams Schiff.

87
00:04:52,880 --> 00:05:00,839
Speaker 3: Liz Cheney also mentioned Anthony Fauci and other as well.

88
00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:06,800
Speaker 3: And so that's the initial list, Adam Schiff, Liz Cheney,

89
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:11,279
Speaker 3: Anthony Fauci. That's who they are discussing. And what is

90
00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:18,040
Speaker 3: striking is there are now multiple elected Democrats explicitly urging this. So,

91
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:24,400
Speaker 3: for example, Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey said in a press

92
00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:28,760
Speaker 3: interview quote, if it's clear by January nineteenth it revenges

93
00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:31,800
Speaker 3: his intention, then I would recommend to President Biden that

94
00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:36,039
Speaker 3: he provide those preemptive pardons to people, because that's really

95
00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,720
Speaker 3: what our country is going to need next year. Another Democrat,

96
00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:46,479
Speaker 3: Congressman Brendan Boyle from Pennsylvania, likewise called for blanket pardons.

97
00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:51,320
Speaker 3: He said, quote, this is no hypothetical threat. The time

98
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:55,200
Speaker 3: for cautious restraint is over. We must act with urgency

99
00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:58,800
Speaker 3: to push back against these threats and prevent Trump from

100
00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:02,960
Speaker 3: abusing his power. I will say to I guess some

101
00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:06,039
Speaker 3: modicum of his credit. One person pushing on the other

102
00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:09,240
Speaker 3: side is Adam shift. Now, to be clear, they're talking

103
00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:13,200
Speaker 3: about giving him a pardon, and Shift was quoted as saying, quote,

104
00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:15,640
Speaker 3: I would urge the president not to do that. I

105
00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:19,680
Speaker 3: think it would seem defensive and unnecessary. Well, I got

106
00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:22,599
Speaker 3: to say, it is stunning, and you're right. The White

107
00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:26,960
Speaker 3: House is now publicly saying expect more pardons here we come.

108
00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:30,000
Speaker 3: And it's a question of just how much they're going

109
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:33,560
Speaker 3: to abuse power, because it really is at this point

110
00:06:33,720 --> 00:06:39,120
Speaker 3: stunning and apparently that everyone who may have committed wrongdoing

111
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,560
Speaker 3: is panicking that there may be some accountability, and so

112
00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:45,760
Speaker 3: they want to pardon everybody for whatever crimes they might

113
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:46,279
Speaker 3: have committed.

114
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:50,039
Speaker 2: And you talk about Adam Shift, Let's remind people back

115
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:54,960
Speaker 2: in twenty eighteen what Adam Schiff did. Adam Shift introduced

116
00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:58,920
Speaker 2: a bill to keep Trump from quote abusing pardon powers

117
00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:04,400
Speaker 2: for his family. This was on CNN on Don Lemon's

118
00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:06,720
Speaker 2: show back in twenty eighteen.

119
00:07:07,320 --> 00:07:10,440
Speaker 4: So the president's pardon a Scooter Libby congressman has inspired

120
00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:12,840
Speaker 4: you to propose new legislation, what exactly would it do.

121
00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:15,960
Speaker 5: What it would do is say that in the event

122
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:19,760
Speaker 5: the president pardons anyone in an investigation in which the

123
00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:24,000
Speaker 5: president is a witness, a subject, or the target, those

124
00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:26,760
Speaker 5: investigative files will all be turned over to the Congress.

125
00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:29,880
Speaker 5: The Congress ought to know whether the president is using

126
00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:34,160
Speaker 5: the pardon power to obstruct justice. The American people have

127
00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:37,560
Speaker 5: a right to know. I think it is clearly constitutional.

128
00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:40,640
Speaker 5: It doesn't prohibit him from granting a pardon, even a

129
00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,680
Speaker 5: pardon he shouldn't grant, But it does say that we

130
00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:46,240
Speaker 5: will be able to at least find out whether the

131
00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:50,320
Speaker 5: president is using this power to shield himself from liability.

132
00:07:50,480 --> 00:07:52,720
Speaker 6: It offers transparency at the very least.

133
00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:54,880
Speaker 1: Wow, I mean, what a great idea.

134
00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:58,040
Speaker 2: Now, Adam shiff why aren't you introducing this legislation all

135
00:07:58,080 --> 00:07:59,960
Speaker 2: over again so we can know all of the peace

136
00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:02,040
Speaker 2: that are going to be pardon, why they're being pardon,

137
00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,840
Speaker 2: in all the files that show what the information is

138
00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:08,320
Speaker 2: behind it. I'm waiting for this Adam shift of eighteen

139
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:09,119
Speaker 2: to appear again.

140
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:12,560
Speaker 3: Senator Well, and I got to say, under that reasoning,

141
00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:17,360
Speaker 3: that would have the Department of Justice forwarding the investigatory

142
00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:21,440
Speaker 3: files of Hunter Biden to Congress to the Republican majorities

143
00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:25,320
Speaker 3: in both Congresses. Under his reasoning, he just argued for that,

144
00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:28,000
Speaker 3: I'll be curious to see if he thinks it should

145
00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:32,600
Speaker 3: apply in those circumstances, you know. Spoiler alert, I would

146
00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:35,240
Speaker 3: not bet on it. No, I wouldn't either.

147
00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:38,360
Speaker 2: Let's also talk about Politico's Jonathan mart and what he

148
00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:42,439
Speaker 2: said on TV about this pardon list. This was after

149
00:08:42,440 --> 00:08:44,960
Speaker 2: the writing in Politico. Take a listen to how he

150
00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:46,080
Speaker 2: described it earlier.

151
00:08:46,360 --> 00:08:50,720
Speaker 4: Go titled Biden Whitehouse is discussing preemptive pardons for those

152
00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:54,439
Speaker 4: in Trump's crosshairs. In it, you write this quote, President

153
00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:57,760
Speaker 4: Joe Biden's senior aides are conducting a vigorous internal debate

154
00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:00,679
Speaker 4: of whether he is shoot preemptive pardons to a range

155
00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:04,040
Speaker 4: of current and former public officials who could be targeted

156
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:06,520
Speaker 4: with President elect Donald Trump's return to the White House.

157
00:09:06,520 --> 00:09:10,200
Speaker 4: It's according to senior Democrats familiar with the discussions, the

158
00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:14,560
Speaker 4: deliberations touch on pardoning those currently in office, elected and appointed,

159
00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:18,319
Speaker 4: as well as former officials who've angered Trump and his loyalists.

160
00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:20,320
Speaker 6: Those who could face exposure.

161
00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:24,000
Speaker 4: Include such members of Congress's January sixth Committee as Senator

162
00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:28,880
Speaker 4: elect Adam Schiff and former GOP Representative Liz Cheney. Also

163
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:32,520
Speaker 4: mentioned by Biden's aids for a pardon, Anthony Fauci, the

164
00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:36,199
Speaker 4: former head of the National Institute of allergy and infectious diseases,

165
00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:39,400
Speaker 4: who became a lightning rod for criticism from the right

166
00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:43,480
Speaker 4: during the COVID nineteen pandemic. The President himself, Jonathan continues,

167
00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:46,600
Speaker 4: who was intensely focused on his son's pardon, has not

168
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:49,840
Speaker 4: been brought into the broader pardon discussions yet, according to

169
00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:53,000
Speaker 4: people familiar with deliberations. So, Jonathan, what does this look like.

170
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:55,840
Speaker 4: What are you pardoning Anthony Fauci for? What are you

171
00:09:55,920 --> 00:10:01,079
Speaker 4: pardoning Liz Cheney for who've not been charged or victive crimes?

172
00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:04,319
Speaker 6: That goes to the heart of this deliberation.

173
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:08,760
Speaker 7: William, why this is so delicate because the White House

174
00:10:08,840 --> 00:10:12,280
Speaker 7: Counsel and a handful of senior White House aides, including

175
00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:15,040
Speaker 7: Jeff Zionce, the Chief of Staff, are having this debate

176
00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:18,520
Speaker 7: right now in the West Wing, which is, do we

177
00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,439
Speaker 7: leave these folks out in the cold and potentially expose

178
00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:25,160
Speaker 7: them to Cash Patel's FBI and Donald Trump's White House

179
00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:29,120
Speaker 7: for any number of charges or of some kind of

180
00:10:29,520 --> 00:10:33,440
Speaker 7: you know, the show trial to get a measure of

181
00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:37,600
Speaker 7: revenge and at the very least make them pay six

182
00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:38,080
Speaker 7: figures in.

183
00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:40,480
Speaker 6: Legal bills to avoid such a case.

184
00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:45,760
Speaker 7: Or do we offer preemptively pardons to people there's no

185
00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:48,960
Speaker 7: proof they've done anything wrong whatsoever, and really may not

186
00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:51,720
Speaker 7: want to pardon in the first place. That's a real

187
00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:54,920
Speaker 7: tough call, because if you don't do it, and Patel

188
00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,760
Speaker 7: and company come after some of these people and you

189
00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:00,800
Speaker 7: had the chance to give them an oculation.

190
00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:02,640
Speaker 6: Legally, that's a hell of a thing to regret.

191
00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:05,640
Speaker 7: At the same time, do you want to pardon somebody

192
00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:09,439
Speaker 7: like Liz Cheney or Anthony Faalsciet and suggest any kind

193
00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:13,280
Speaker 7: of impropriety that could only add fuel to the Trump

194
00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:14,840
Speaker 7: aggressors in the first place.

195
00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:17,040
Speaker 6: It's a real tough nut.

196
00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:19,520
Speaker 2: I love the way he describes it the ed. He's like,

197
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:21,640
Speaker 2: it's a real tough nut, Like this is a hard one,

198
00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:23,960
Speaker 2: you know. Should we just admit we broke a hell

199
00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:26,600
Speaker 2: of a bunch of laws and just hand out the

200
00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:29,160
Speaker 2: pardons or do we act like we didn't break laws

201
00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:30,800
Speaker 2: and hope they don't come after all of us.

202
00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:35,080
Speaker 3: Well, and I will say, even the way he's reporting it,

203
00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:42,240
Speaker 3: the Trump aggressors look the idea that anyone in and

204
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:46,719
Speaker 3: around Joe Biden would be held responsible for laws they

205
00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:51,280
Speaker 3: have been broken is treated as a pearl clutching horror

206
00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:58,320
Speaker 3: for the media and for the Democrats, and listen my view,

207
00:11:58,360 --> 00:11:59,800
Speaker 3: and we've talked about this at length.

208
00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:00,880
Speaker 8: I don't want to.

209
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:03,079
Speaker 3: See a Republican Department of Justice. I don't want to

210
00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:04,800
Speaker 3: see a republican FBI. I don't want to see a

211
00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,960
Speaker 3: Democrat Department of Justice. I don't want to see a

212
00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:09,800
Speaker 3: Democrat FBI. I want a Department of Justice and an

213
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:15,360
Speaker 3: FBI that enforces the law regardless of party. And that

214
00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:21,840
Speaker 3: apparently is a terrifying thing to individuals who who previously

215
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:28,800
Speaker 3: consider themselves unaccountable and not bound by the ordinary constraints

216
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:29,200
Speaker 3: of law.

217
00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:32,960
Speaker 2: Well, and even look at Bill Clinton, for example. Bill

218
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:35,880
Speaker 2: Clinton is now coming out saying he wants to stop

219
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:41,199
Speaker 2: the cycle of criminalizing politics. That's pretty rich from the Democrats,

220
00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:43,680
Speaker 2: after that's all they've done the last four years. Here

221
00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:47,240
Speaker 2: is Bill Clinton at the Deal Book summit. It's a

222
00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:48,160
Speaker 2: New York Times event.

223
00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:49,920
Speaker 6: Listen, you think Biden should be.

224
00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:53,920
Speaker 7: Pardoning pardoning Trump, And by the way, some people think

225
00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:55,800
Speaker 7: that Trump should be pardoning Biden.

226
00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:00,160
Speaker 9: Well, I do think we should stop trying to them

227
00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:01,119
Speaker 9: in law's politics.

228
00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:04,680
Speaker 6: But on the other I think we should both.

229
00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:12,080
Speaker 9: Of them because because obviously and the people don't like it,

230
00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:16,480
Speaker 9: and they're not going along with it from right to left.

231
00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:21,160
Speaker 9: On the other hand, you have to ask yourself, if

232
00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:26,199
Speaker 9: you do this blanket thing, is there anything a president

233
00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:30,160
Speaker 9: could do that he would or she someday would get

234
00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:30,839
Speaker 9: in trouble for.

235
00:13:31,920 --> 00:13:32,600
Speaker 1: I mean, Senator.

236
00:13:33,040 --> 00:13:37,480
Speaker 2: They weaponized the FBI, the DOJ, the entire apparatus of

237
00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:40,600
Speaker 2: the White House Executive branch to go after their political

238
00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:42,720
Speaker 2: enemies for four years, and now all of a sudden

239
00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:45,360
Speaker 2: they're like, hey, we should not have Republicans doing that.

240
00:13:45,440 --> 00:13:48,400
Speaker 1: Republicans never did that. The Democrats are the ones that

241
00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:48,960
Speaker 1: have done it.

242
00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:54,440
Speaker 3: I'm curious. Did did Bill Clinton say that the first

243
00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,319
Speaker 3: time Trump was indicted? Did he say that the second

244
00:13:58,360 --> 00:13:59,440
Speaker 3: time Trump was indicted?

245
00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:00,280
Speaker 9: No?

246
00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:04,920
Speaker 3: Did he say that the third time Trump was indicted Nope?

247
00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:07,600
Speaker 3: Did he say that the fourth time Trump was indicted?

248
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:08,080
Speaker 9: No?

249
00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:09,960
Speaker 1: And he didn't say it when they were rating mar

250
00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:10,680
Speaker 1: Lago either.

251
00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:11,960
Speaker 8: Yeah.

252
00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:15,240
Speaker 3: I mean, it is amazing. And by the way, Bill

253
00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,720
Speaker 3: Clinton also didn't say that when the Trump DOJ was

254
00:14:18,880 --> 00:14:23,480
Speaker 3: prosecuting people for peaceful protest on January sixth, when they

255
00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:27,680
Speaker 3: were using the violent acts of a limited number of

256
00:14:27,720 --> 00:14:31,880
Speaker 3: people as an excuse to engage in political persecution. Bill

257
00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:35,240
Speaker 3: Clinton didn't speak out when the Biden Department of Justice

258
00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:38,520
Speaker 3: was targeting parents for going to school board meetings and

259
00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:42,160
Speaker 3: speaking out, sending the FBI to intimidate moms and dads

260
00:14:42,280 --> 00:14:45,880
Speaker 3: who are exercising their constitutional rights at school board meetings.

261
00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:49,960
Speaker 3: He didn't speak out when the Biden administration was firing

262
00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:53,520
Speaker 3: people for declining to take the COVID vaccine. He didn't

263
00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 3: speak out when the Biden administration was coercing private businesses

264
00:14:57,360 --> 00:14:59,960
Speaker 3: to fire people for declining to take the COVID vaccine.

265
00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:04,040
Speaker 3: He didn't speak out when the Biden administration sent over

266
00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:07,960
Speaker 3: a dozen FBI agents with drawn machine guns to arrest

267
00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:11,520
Speaker 3: a pro life protester at dawn in front of his children.

268
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:14,120
Speaker 3: By the way, that case, the jury threw it out

269
00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:15,840
Speaker 3: when they tried to put him in jail, and the

270
00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:20,360
Speaker 3: jury said this is ridiculous and threw it out incredibly quickly.

271
00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:25,520
Speaker 3: The absolute and brazen hypocrisy of the Democrats that they've

272
00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:31,280
Speaker 3: suddenly discovered, uh oh, don't use the legal process against us.

273
00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:34,760
Speaker 3: And I want to be clear, I do not believe

274
00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:43,000
Speaker 3: the Trump administration should persecute democrats. I do believe they

275
00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:46,920
Speaker 3: should follow the law and if individuals have violated the law,

276
00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:49,920
Speaker 3: they should enforce the law. That is very different from

277
00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:53,680
Speaker 3: targeting and weaponizing DJ You know, I sat down this

278
00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,440
Speaker 3: week with Pam Bondi, the nominee to be Attorney General,

279
00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:59,440
Speaker 3: and the entire discussion I had with her was about

280
00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:02,800
Speaker 3: restoring boring integrity to the Department of Justice, not about

281
00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:05,800
Speaker 3: turning it into a tool just to be used to

282
00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:08,720
Speaker 3: target the other side, but bringing it back to what

283
00:16:08,760 --> 00:16:11,760
Speaker 3: it is supposed to be, which is having fidelity to

284
00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:12,520
Speaker 3: the rule of law.

285
00:16:13,720 --> 00:16:16,040
Speaker 1: You talk about the fidelity and the rule of law here.

286
00:16:16,120 --> 00:16:20,000
Speaker 2: So the question now becomes if the President decides to

287
00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:25,480
Speaker 2: walk out there and say, I'm going to preemptively pardon

288
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:31,280
Speaker 2: everyone Fauci Schiff, Liz Cheney, and people all around my family,

289
00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:35,560
Speaker 2: all of maybe the business associates, for example, around Hunter Biden.

290
00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:39,360
Speaker 2: Is there anything that Congress will be able to do

291
00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:41,800
Speaker 2: to stop this or to rein it in. I go

292
00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:43,680
Speaker 2: back to Adam Shiff when he was like, well, what

293
00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,080
Speaker 2: we should be doing, is ushe have centered all the

294
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:49,120
Speaker 2: documents or is this pretty much like he's in charge,

295
00:16:49,400 --> 00:16:51,600
Speaker 2: he's leaving, he can do whatever the hell he wants.

296
00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:53,080
Speaker 1: It's the power of the presidency.

297
00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:55,280
Speaker 2: And even if he wants to abuse a pardon power,

298
00:16:55,320 --> 00:16:57,960
Speaker 2: he has a right to do it. What mindset should

299
00:16:58,000 --> 00:16:59,800
Speaker 2: everyone listening have on reality?

300
00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:04,760
Speaker 3: Now, look under the Constitution, the pardon power is essentially

301
00:17:04,800 --> 00:17:08,560
Speaker 3: an absolute power. And and so there there is not

302
00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:14,280
Speaker 3: any limitation in the Constitution that Congress can enforce on

303
00:17:14,320 --> 00:17:16,919
Speaker 3: the pardon power that is given to the president. The

304
00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:21,080
Speaker 3: only limitation is is public pressure, public scrutiny.

305
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:23,119
Speaker 8: The only thing that constrains.

306
00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:25,560
Speaker 3: Presidents is they don't want the world to know that

307
00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:29,720
Speaker 3: they're utterly corrupt hacks. Now, I will say Biden's got

308
00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:33,560
Speaker 3: a problem in that because he's already done the Hunter Biden.

309
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:35,359
Speaker 8: Pardon.

310
00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:39,160
Speaker 3: And I'll read from from an article in Axios, which

311
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:42,919
Speaker 3: which often reports on sort of inside gossip in the

312
00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:46,439
Speaker 3: White House and Capitol Hill, and and and the story

313
00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:54,040
Speaker 3: is entitled behind the Curtain Biden's Haunting Twin Sins. Here's

314
00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:59,040
Speaker 3: what Axios reports. President Biden's post presidency now looks bleak

315
00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:03,880
Speaker 3: as is brutal final months. Some top Democrats tell us

316
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:07,760
Speaker 3: they're so furious about Biden's abrupt, clumsy pardon of his

317
00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:11,439
Speaker 3: son Hunter that they're threatening to withhold donations from his

318
00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:14,639
Speaker 3: future Presidential library.

319
00:18:15,119 --> 00:18:15,800
Speaker 10: And his.

320
00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:21,520
Speaker 3: Quote twin selfishness. What it says is why it matters.

321
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,720
Speaker 3: Biden eighty two will limp away from the limelight, widely

322
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:28,640
Speaker 3: disliked by the public and now loathed by many Democrats

323
00:18:28,920 --> 00:18:33,320
Speaker 3: who blame him for twin sins of selfishness running again

324
00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:39,280
Speaker 3: then pardoning Hunter after repeatedly saying he wouldn't. That's the

325
00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:43,359
Speaker 3: real constraint, is just public shame and disgrace. And the

326
00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:48,160
Speaker 3: question is are Democrats capable of of public shame anymore?

327
00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:51,359
Speaker 3: Or is trump derangement syndrome so bad that their answer

328
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:52,880
Speaker 3: to everything is range Man bad.

329
00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:54,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a great point.

330
00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:56,240
Speaker 2: I want to take a moment and say thank you

331
00:18:56,280 --> 00:18:58,119
Speaker 2: to so many of you that have been involved with

332
00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:02,159
Speaker 2: the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They are wishing

333
00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:04,600
Speaker 2: you a blessed beginning of the holiday season, and as

334
00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:07,720
Speaker 2: you gather with your families, grateful for the blessing that

335
00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:11,120
Speaker 2: God has given us all, let's also remember those who

336
00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:15,439
Speaker 2: are facing unbelievable hardship, those in Israel that are in

337
00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:19,480
Speaker 2: the need of food, fellowship, and just hope. That includes

338
00:19:19,520 --> 00:19:22,159
Speaker 2: the people of Israel who are threatened daily by the

339
00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:25,760
Speaker 2: attacks from enemies on all sides, and during these hard times,

340
00:19:25,800 --> 00:19:29,600
Speaker 2: Israelis are thankful for the fellowship, for the food and

341
00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:32,919
Speaker 2: the basic assistance that they are providing, truly life saving

342
00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:34,679
Speaker 2: aid when the rest of the world seems to have

343
00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:36,480
Speaker 2: turned their back on them.

344
00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:38,960
Speaker 1: Your gift of twenty five dollars.

345
00:19:38,680 --> 00:19:41,720
Speaker 2: Will help provide a food box to an elderly Jew

346
00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:45,000
Speaker 2: or a Jewish family who are suffering and in desperate need.

347
00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:47,479
Speaker 2: A gift of one hundred dollars will help provide four

348
00:19:47,520 --> 00:19:51,359
Speaker 2: of these life saving food boxes this holiday season. Please

349
00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:53,840
Speaker 2: consider standing with Israel and the Jewish people.

350
00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:54,840
Speaker 1: You can go to.

351
00:19:54,840 --> 00:20:00,640
Speaker 2: Support IFCJ dot org to make a gift now port

352
00:20:01,119 --> 00:20:04,840
Speaker 2: IFCJ dot org, or you can call them eight eight

353
00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:10,280
Speaker 2: eight for eight eight IFCJ that's eight eight eight four

354
00:20:10,440 --> 00:20:14,880
Speaker 2: eight eight four three two five and you can give

355
00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:18,200
Speaker 2: right now. Senata, I want to move to this other case,

356
00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:21,600
Speaker 2: and it is a case that has really been interesting

357
00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:25,240
Speaker 2: to follow the Supreme Court hearing this case on gender

358
00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:27,400
Speaker 2: transitions for minors.

359
00:20:27,440 --> 00:20:27,640
Speaker 1: Now.

360
00:20:27,680 --> 00:20:29,960
Speaker 2: This has all come out of a case in Tennessee

361
00:20:30,560 --> 00:20:34,879
Speaker 2: where Tennessee was arguing that that you must protect children

362
00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:40,600
Speaker 2: from harm and body mutilation, especially at very young ages,

363
00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:44,760
Speaker 2: and the left and the federal government saying, well, hold

364
00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:49,280
Speaker 2: on a second, we are in favor of this transgender care,

365
00:20:50,040 --> 00:20:53,080
Speaker 2: arguing that even those that are two, in three and

366
00:20:53,119 --> 00:20:56,120
Speaker 2: four years old, they know that they're trands, so let

367
00:20:56,119 --> 00:20:59,680
Speaker 2: them be sterilized and castrate themselves. That is what the

368
00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:04,520
Speaker 2: eight THELU lawyer said in his own words while he

369
00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:08,080
Speaker 2: was arguing this on TV on CNN. I want you

370
00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:09,960
Speaker 2: to listen and get your reaction to that.

371
00:21:10,080 --> 00:21:13,600
Speaker 11: I would say is nobody has to provide this medication

372
00:21:13,960 --> 00:21:16,560
Speaker 11: to adolescents. These are not doctors being forced to provide

373
00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:20,359
Speaker 11: this medication. These are doctors who are wanting to treat

374
00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:22,320
Speaker 11: their patients in the best way that they know how,

375
00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:24,960
Speaker 11: based on the best available evidence to us. And these

376
00:21:24,960 --> 00:21:26,720
Speaker 11: are young people who may have known since they were

377
00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:29,560
Speaker 11: two years old exactly who they are, who suffered for

378
00:21:29,640 --> 00:21:32,400
Speaker 11: six seven years before they had any relief. And what's

379
00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:34,879
Speaker 11: happening here, it's not the kids who are consenting to

380
00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:37,359
Speaker 11: this treatment. It's the parents who are consenting to the treatment.

381
00:21:37,560 --> 00:21:39,879
Speaker 11: And as a parent, I would say we when our

382
00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:42,920
Speaker 11: children are suffering, we are suffering. And these are parents

383
00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:45,080
Speaker 11: who love their children, who are listening to the advice

384
00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:48,080
Speaker 11: of their doctors of the mainstream medical community and doing

385
00:21:48,119 --> 00:21:50,240
Speaker 11: what's right for their kids in the state of Tennessee

386
00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:51,439
Speaker 11: has displaced their judgment.

387
00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:55,000
Speaker 2: Now you hear that argument, and that to me is

388
00:21:55,119 --> 00:21:58,040
Speaker 2: just I'm sorry, child abuse if you're mutilating a child

389
00:21:58,040 --> 00:21:59,920
Speaker 2: at two and three and four years old.

390
00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:01,679
Speaker 1: And that's what Tennessee was saying.

391
00:22:03,119 --> 00:22:06,800
Speaker 3: Well, Tennessee passed I think a very reasonable law that

392
00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:13,240
Speaker 3: that prohibited puberty blockers and hormones and sterilizing children, sterilizing minors,

393
00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:17,200
Speaker 3: and and we're seeing multiple state legislatures that are acting

394
00:22:17,240 --> 00:22:19,600
Speaker 3: to protect children. I think that is a reasonable and

395
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:23,880
Speaker 3: common sense step. And and what happened is is, unsurprisingly

396
00:22:24,040 --> 00:22:27,760
Speaker 3: that that the state got sued and the ACLU argued

397
00:22:27,840 --> 00:22:31,000
Speaker 3: that that that making it illegal for a small child

398
00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:34,360
Speaker 3: to be sterilized and made permanently unable to have children,

399
00:22:35,320 --> 00:22:40,480
Speaker 3: or even to be mutilated, that that prohibiting that violated

400
00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:44,639
Speaker 3: the fourteenth Amendment, the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

401
00:22:45,200 --> 00:22:47,960
Speaker 3: That that was the argument. And and this the Court

402
00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:50,520
Speaker 3: of Appeals upheld the Tennessee law, and the Supreme Court

403
00:22:50,600 --> 00:22:52,600
Speaker 3: took the case. And and so that that was the

404
00:22:52,720 --> 00:22:57,320
Speaker 3: argument you heard right there. The ASLU lawyers arguing UH

405
00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:00,520
Speaker 3: for for being able to sterilize eight year olds using

406
00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:03,000
Speaker 3: the math the lawyer laid out. The lawyer talked about

407
00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:07,560
Speaker 3: a child at the age of two might know that

408
00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:09,880
Speaker 3: he or she is transgender, and they might have had

409
00:23:09,920 --> 00:23:13,120
Speaker 3: to wait six years. Last I checked, two plus six

410
00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:16,440
Speaker 3: is eight. And so the legal argument is that eight

411
00:23:16,520 --> 00:23:21,159
Speaker 3: year old the parent should be able to sterilize that child.

412
00:23:21,160 --> 00:23:23,560
Speaker 3: And you know what if that child decides that at

413
00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:26,600
Speaker 3: eighteen he or she wants to be a dad or

414
00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:29,600
Speaker 3: wants to be a mom, well, too late now, because

415
00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:32,480
Speaker 3: when you were eight, we went ahead and sterilized you.

416
00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:35,600
Speaker 3: So there's no going back. And this argument went back

417
00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:38,480
Speaker 3: and forth. Right, I'm going to make a prediction. My prediction,

418
00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:42,360
Speaker 3: I think the Supreme Court is going to uphold Tennessee's law,

419
00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:46,360
Speaker 3: and I think we may see a breakdown that plays

420
00:23:46,400 --> 00:23:48,840
Speaker 3: out along pretty familiar ideological lines.

421
00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:50,600
Speaker 8: Now, it was pretty striking.

422
00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:57,919
Speaker 3: The three liberal justices all were asking questions that I

423
00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:03,520
Speaker 3: got to say, we're really extreme and showing the modern left.

424
00:24:03,920 --> 00:24:09,720
Speaker 3: They are all in on mutilating and sterilizing children. This

425
00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:13,680
Speaker 3: is not a fringe view on the left. Today's elected

426
00:24:13,720 --> 00:24:18,119
Speaker 3: Democrats and sadly the left wing activists they put on

427
00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:23,720
Speaker 3: the courts are absolutely committed to this extreme agenda. So

428
00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:24,720
Speaker 3: I want you to listen to.

429
00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:25,639
Speaker 1: This side of my org.

430
00:24:25,960 --> 00:24:28,600
Speaker 2: Justice out of my org downplaying the risk of mutilation

431
00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:33,239
Speaker 2: of miners in this back and forth, in these oral arguments.

432
00:24:32,760 --> 00:24:36,880
Speaker 12: This is what she said, cannot eliminate the risk of detransitioners.

433
00:24:37,240 --> 00:24:42,720
Speaker 12: So it becomes a pure exercise of weighing benefits versus risk,

434
00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:45,520
Speaker 12: and the question of how many miners have to have

435
00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:50,000
Speaker 12: their bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits is one that

436
00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:50,720
Speaker 12: is best left.

437
00:24:50,800 --> 00:24:56,840
Speaker 13: I'm sorry, counselor. Every medical treatment has a risk, even

438
00:24:56,880 --> 00:25:02,720
Speaker 13: taking astron There is always going to be a percentage

439
00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:05,760
Speaker 13: of the population under any medical treatment that's going to

440
00:25:05,800 --> 00:25:10,719
Speaker 13: suffer a harm. So the question in my mind is

441
00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:17,520
Speaker 13: not do policy makers decide whether one person's life is

442
00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:21,760
Speaker 13: more valuable than the millions of others who get relief

443
00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:26,160
Speaker 13: from this treatment. The question is can you stop one

444
00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:29,359
Speaker 13: sex from the other one?

445
00:25:29,560 --> 00:25:33,080
Speaker 2: I mean, she's saying, this is not a big deal

446
00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:37,119
Speaker 2: at all if you're mutilating a child, because even aspirin

447
00:25:37,520 --> 00:25:40,320
Speaker 2: has risks and effects, So therefore, just put it under

448
00:25:40,320 --> 00:25:42,040
Speaker 2: the category of everything goes.

449
00:25:43,400 --> 00:25:43,680
Speaker 8: Well.

450
00:25:43,800 --> 00:25:50,040
Speaker 3: That sums up today's radical left. In their view, severing

451
00:25:50,160 --> 00:25:56,960
Speaker 3: a child's genitals is comparable to taking aspirin. She also claimed,

452
00:25:57,119 --> 00:26:02,560
Speaker 3: quote millions of people are getting relief from this. Now,

453
00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:07,520
Speaker 3: thankfully we do not currently have millions of children being sterilized.

454
00:26:07,720 --> 00:26:11,720
Speaker 3: But let's be clear, that's the left's worldview. Is that

455
00:26:11,880 --> 00:26:16,400
Speaker 3: sterilizing little boys and little girls, mutilating them, making them

456
00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:20,879
Speaker 3: permanently unable to have children, that should be happening on

457
00:26:20,920 --> 00:26:24,159
Speaker 3: the scale of millions and millions of little boys and

458
00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:27,520
Speaker 3: little girls. That is Justice Soda bay Or here to

459
00:26:27,560 --> 00:26:33,640
Speaker 3: take a listen to Justice Justice k Katanji Brown Jackson.

460
00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:36,359
Speaker 10: Drawn by the statute that was sort of like the

461
00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:40,600
Speaker 10: starting point. The question was whether it was discriminatory because

462
00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:44,280
Speaker 10: it applied to both races and it wasn't necessarily invidious

463
00:26:44,320 --> 00:26:47,000
Speaker 10: or whatever. But you know, as I read the statute here,

464
00:26:47,640 --> 00:26:50,720
Speaker 10: excuse me the case here. You know, the court starts

465
00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:53,040
Speaker 10: off by saying that Virginia is now one of sixteen

466
00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:56,000
Speaker 10: states which prohibit and punished marriages on the basis of

467
00:26:56,160 --> 00:26:59,320
Speaker 10: racial classifications. And when you look at the structure of

468
00:26:59,359 --> 00:27:02,440
Speaker 10: that law, it looks in terms of incontinuing you can't

469
00:27:02,440 --> 00:27:05,840
Speaker 10: do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics.

470
00:27:05,840 --> 00:27:06,960
Speaker 6: It's sort of the same thing.

471
00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:09,359
Speaker 10: So it's interesting to me that we now have this

472
00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:11,879
Speaker 10: different argument, and I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten

473
00:27:12,160 --> 00:27:16,040
Speaker 10: away with what they did here by just making a

474
00:27:16,040 --> 00:27:20,119
Speaker 10: classification argument the way that Tennessee is in this case.

475
00:27:20,480 --> 00:27:22,280
Speaker 6: Yes, I think that's exactly right.

476
00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:25,320
Speaker 10: That there is absolutely a parallel between any law that

477
00:27:25,359 --> 00:27:28,720
Speaker 10: says you can't act and consistent with a protected characteristic

478
00:27:28,880 --> 00:27:30,200
Speaker 10: and all other contents.

479
00:27:30,720 --> 00:27:31,400
Speaker 1: You hear it there.

480
00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:34,959
Speaker 2: This is another example of just how extreme these and

481
00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:36,600
Speaker 2: that's one of the elections, by the way, are so

482
00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:39,479
Speaker 2: important center. I mean, this is why Donald Trump being

483
00:27:39,520 --> 00:27:41,840
Speaker 2: elected was so important, because when he's not, when you

484
00:27:41,880 --> 00:27:44,400
Speaker 2: don't have a conservative in the White House, you get

485
00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:48,160
Speaker 2: these radical activists who are Supreme Court justices, and if

486
00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:49,960
Speaker 2: they have the majority, this is what they want you

487
00:27:50,080 --> 00:27:51,320
Speaker 2: to be able to do. This is what they want

488
00:27:51,359 --> 00:27:52,640
Speaker 2: to happen to your children.

489
00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:55,800
Speaker 3: Well, and let me break down what that exchange back

490
00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:59,919
Speaker 3: and forth was. So Katanji Brown Jackson, who Joe Biden

491
00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:03,840
Speaker 3: put on the Supreme Court, is comparing this Tennessee law

492
00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:07,480
Speaker 3: to the law in Loving versus Virginia. Now, Loving versus

493
00:28:07,600 --> 00:28:10,960
Speaker 3: Virginia's a Supreme Court case. It's a landmark case that

494
00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:15,760
Speaker 3: struck down Virginia's ban decades ago, many many years ago

495
00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:21,159
Speaker 3: on interracial marriage, on African Americans and Anglos choosing to

496
00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,960
Speaker 3: get married. And she says, quote, it's sort of the

497
00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:30,080
Speaker 3: same thing. Now, Virginia's law was an abomination. It was

498
00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:35,080
Speaker 3: restricting adults making the decision to get married. It was

499
00:28:35,680 --> 00:28:40,320
Speaker 3: deliberately doing so on the basis of race. Which, mind you,

500
00:28:40,440 --> 00:28:44,720
Speaker 3: we fought a civil war in significant part to end

501
00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:48,440
Speaker 3: slavery and to vindicate equal rights. And we passed and

502
00:28:48,560 --> 00:28:52,440
Speaker 3: adopted the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth Amendments to end slavery,

503
00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:55,760
Speaker 3: to protect equal protection, and to give African Americans the

504
00:28:55,840 --> 00:28:59,200
Speaker 3: right to vote, to ensure that there's not racial discrimination.

505
00:28:59,320 --> 00:29:04,520
Speaker 3: But in the less, not sterilizing an eight year old

506
00:29:05,720 --> 00:29:08,880
Speaker 3: is the same thing. Like that is bizarre. And by

507
00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:13,360
Speaker 3: the way, the person who responds to Justice Jackson is

508
00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:17,840
Speaker 3: Joe Biden's Solicitor General, the top lawyer for the Biden

509
00:29:17,880 --> 00:29:21,320
Speaker 3: administration before the United States Supreme Court. She say, oh, yeah,

510
00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:24,880
Speaker 3: they're exactly the same thing. In our worldview, you ought

511
00:29:24,880 --> 00:29:28,160
Speaker 3: to be able to mutilate children. It doesn't matter how young,

512
00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:33,640
Speaker 3: the Constitution protects your right to mutilate your child. That

513
00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:39,600
Speaker 3: is a bizarre view, That is an extreme view, and that,

514
00:29:39,920 --> 00:29:44,800
Speaker 3: sadly is where where today's modern left is.

515
00:29:45,920 --> 00:29:49,440
Speaker 2: You may be shopping for Christmas and one gift you

516
00:29:49,480 --> 00:29:51,600
Speaker 2: can give that as incredible as the gift of helping

517
00:29:51,600 --> 00:29:53,840
Speaker 2: someone be able to protect and defend themselves. And with

518
00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:57,080
Speaker 2: increase crime and violence around our country, we need to

519
00:29:57,080 --> 00:29:59,680
Speaker 2: remember that personal safety and security for you and your

520
00:29:59,680 --> 00:30:02,840
Speaker 2: family is the most important thing in life. And that

521
00:30:03,000 --> 00:30:05,640
Speaker 2: is exactly why I want you to know about the

522
00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:10,760
Speaker 2: Berna less lethal pistol launcher. A Berna can save two lives.

523
00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:13,880
Speaker 2: It is a great compliment to owning firearms, and if

524
00:30:13,880 --> 00:30:16,120
Speaker 2: you or your family members in a situation where you

525
00:30:16,200 --> 00:30:20,120
Speaker 2: feel threatened, then you can start with less lethal now

526
00:30:20,200 --> 00:30:25,520
Speaker 2: Berna and this less launcher is legal in all fifty states.

527
00:30:25,880 --> 00:30:29,000
Speaker 2: No permits or background checks are needed. I own one

528
00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:31,440
Speaker 2: myself and I've given them to a lot of my

529
00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:34,080
Speaker 2: family members because I have some family members that just

530
00:30:34,120 --> 00:30:36,080
Speaker 2: don't feel comfortable carrying a firearm.

531
00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:38,040
Speaker 1: Well burna is the answer there as well.

532
00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:40,720
Speaker 2: It's also designed for easy use by all age groups

533
00:30:40,760 --> 00:30:43,160
Speaker 2: eighteen or older. So if you have a child that's

534
00:30:43,160 --> 00:30:46,360
Speaker 2: living an apartment or off campus, maybe they're not twenty one.

535
00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:49,560
Speaker 2: The Burno launcher is what you need to give them.

536
00:30:49,640 --> 00:30:53,440
Speaker 2: It has powerful deterrence like tear gas and kinetic rounds

537
00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:56,600
Speaker 2: with a sixty foot range, meaning you can put serious

538
00:30:56,640 --> 00:31:01,640
Speaker 2: distance between you and the attacker. One shot can incapacitate

539
00:31:01,680 --> 00:31:04,840
Speaker 2: attackers for up to forty minutes. It's used by government

540
00:31:04,840 --> 00:31:07,920
Speaker 2: agencies and law enforcement around the country. Now, I want

541
00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:10,120
Speaker 2: you to see the videos of this in action, and

542
00:31:10,160 --> 00:31:12,920
Speaker 2: you can see it by going to their website burna

543
00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:17,440
Speaker 2: by RNA dot com slash verdict. And when you go there,

544
00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:19,560
Speaker 2: you're also going to get ten percent off your purchase.

545
00:31:19,600 --> 00:31:20,800
Speaker 1: So it's going to save you money.

546
00:31:21,200 --> 00:31:25,280
Speaker 2: That's Burner by r in a dot com slash verdict

547
00:31:25,520 --> 00:31:28,720
Speaker 2: for ten percent off. That's b Why r in a

548
00:31:29,240 --> 00:31:33,160
Speaker 2: dot com slash verdict and give the gift of protection?

549
00:31:33,760 --> 00:31:38,040
Speaker 2: This Christmas final question on this issue with this case

550
00:31:38,080 --> 00:31:40,520
Speaker 2: coming out of the Supreme Court, and if you look

551
00:31:40,560 --> 00:31:44,040
Speaker 2: at the way that this was being argued, and I

552
00:31:44,080 --> 00:31:46,400
Speaker 2: think one of the other things that's just so unhinged

553
00:31:46,440 --> 00:31:50,320
Speaker 2: about this the argument for medically mutilating minors. Is the

554
00:31:50,400 --> 00:31:53,080
Speaker 2: fact that the issue really does seem to come down

555
00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:56,680
Speaker 2: to money. The amount of money that people are now

556
00:31:56,720 --> 00:31:59,160
Speaker 2: making off these surgeries that's saying it is it is

557
00:31:59,200 --> 00:32:02,280
Speaker 2: an increase year over year of over fourteen point four

558
00:32:02,320 --> 00:32:08,080
Speaker 2: percent on average, So the transgender surgery world and then

559
00:32:08,160 --> 00:32:12,640
Speaker 2: the lifetime of care is expanding at a fourteen point

560
00:32:12,680 --> 00:32:17,000
Speaker 2: four percent rate year over year. That's why so many

561
00:32:17,040 --> 00:32:23,000
Speaker 2: medical areas, doctors and hospitals are advocating for this because

562
00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:27,520
Speaker 2: they make money. Vanderbilt said very clearly to their doctors,

563
00:32:27,800 --> 00:32:30,080
Speaker 2: either you get on board with this or you get out.

564
00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:32,160
Speaker 2: We're not going to let you say no to this

565
00:32:32,520 --> 00:32:35,400
Speaker 2: because there's too much money to be made in quote

566
00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:36,280
Speaker 2: gender care.

567
00:32:37,600 --> 00:32:40,280
Speaker 3: Yeah, there are vast amounts of money at stake, and

568
00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:47,560
Speaker 3: it has become it really is a strange obsession of

569
00:32:47,600 --> 00:32:51,080
Speaker 3: the radical left. It is it is a virtue signal.

570
00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:58,320
Speaker 3: Remember we had on on verdict a couple of months ago.

571
00:32:58,400 --> 00:33:03,320
Speaker 3: Seawan Theory. Shawn Theory was an African American Democratic state

572
00:33:03,400 --> 00:33:06,320
Speaker 3: rep in Texas. She was an elected Democrat. She had

573
00:33:06,320 --> 00:33:10,680
Speaker 3: been elected for four terms and on this issue, there

574
00:33:10,800 --> 00:33:14,680
Speaker 3: was a bill in Texas to prohibit mutilating minors, and

575
00:33:15,400 --> 00:33:18,520
Speaker 3: she ended up voting for it and the Democrat Party.

576
00:33:18,920 --> 00:33:20,880
Speaker 3: She described on the podcast, if you didn't listen to

577
00:33:20,920 --> 00:33:22,400
Speaker 3: that podcast, she ought to go back and listen to

578
00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:27,840
Speaker 3: it because it's incredibly revealing. She described how her fellow Democrats,

579
00:33:27,920 --> 00:33:30,520
Speaker 3: African Americans, and the Texas State Legislature would come to

580
00:33:30,560 --> 00:33:33,080
Speaker 3: her and she said, did you have you study the

581
00:33:33,200 --> 00:33:36,320
Speaker 3: damage this does to children? That if you give puberty

582
00:33:36,320 --> 00:33:39,719
Speaker 3: blockers and you sterilize a child, that it does lifelong

583
00:33:39,840 --> 00:33:42,360
Speaker 3: medical damage to him. It's horrible, And she said the

584
00:33:42,960 --> 00:33:46,160
Speaker 3: many other Democrats she described said, oh, we know, we agree,

585
00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:49,440
Speaker 3: it's terrible, but you cannot oppose this in our party.

586
00:33:49,840 --> 00:33:52,880
Speaker 3: They will end you. Our party will end you.

587
00:33:53,280 --> 00:33:53,480
Speaker 8: Well.

588
00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:55,680
Speaker 3: She ended up doing the courageous thing and voting for

589
00:33:55,720 --> 00:33:59,400
Speaker 3: common sense and voting for kids, and the Democrats recruited

590
00:33:59,400 --> 00:34:04,200
Speaker 3: a primary challenger to her and beat her in the primary,

591
00:34:04,240 --> 00:34:08,839
Speaker 3: and they spent over one million dollars in a Democrat

592
00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:13,760
Speaker 3: primary for a state house seat. That is how radical

593
00:34:14,440 --> 00:34:17,480
Speaker 3: this issue is. So there is money, There is big

594
00:34:17,520 --> 00:34:20,319
Speaker 3: money on the other side, and it is enforced.

595
00:34:21,200 --> 00:34:22,520
Speaker 8: In the US Senate.

596
00:34:23,239 --> 00:34:26,760
Speaker 3: Every single Democrat has voted in favor of mutilating minors.

597
00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:31,239
Speaker 3: There is no dissension that is allowed on this. And

598
00:34:31,280 --> 00:34:34,480
Speaker 3: I got to say, and Joe Biden is enthusiastically in

599
00:34:34,520 --> 00:34:37,120
Speaker 3: favor of it, you know. I got to say, also,

600
00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:42,120
Speaker 3: look this Supreme Court case. Part of the reason that

601
00:34:42,160 --> 00:34:44,960
Speaker 3: there is is such focus on it is there was

602
00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:49,400
Speaker 3: a previous Supreme Court decision called Bostock and Bostock is

603
00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:55,880
Speaker 3: a decision that interpreted federal anti discrimination law on employment discrimination.

604
00:34:56,040 --> 00:34:59,960
Speaker 3: And it is currently illegal under federal law to discribe

605
00:35:00,040 --> 00:35:03,600
Speaker 3: and employment based on race and other characteristics, including sex.

606
00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:07,719
Speaker 3: And in Bostock, the Supreme Court took a prohibition on

607
00:35:07,760 --> 00:35:12,240
Speaker 3: discrimination based on sex and construed sex to mean also

608
00:35:12,360 --> 00:35:13,359
Speaker 3: being transgender.

609
00:35:14,080 --> 00:35:16,920
Speaker 8: And that decision that was a six to three decision.

610
00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:21,600
Speaker 3: That decision was authored by Justice Gorsuch, and it was

611
00:35:21,600 --> 00:35:24,240
Speaker 3: a fairly shocking decision. A lot of people were shocked

612
00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:26,680
Speaker 3: that Justice Gorsuch wrote that opinion.

613
00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:29,280
Speaker 8: It was joined by Chief Justice Roberts.

614
00:35:29,920 --> 00:35:32,239
Speaker 3: In addition to what were then for liberals who were

615
00:35:32,239 --> 00:35:34,319
Speaker 3: on the Court at the time, Justice Ginsburg was still

616
00:35:34,360 --> 00:35:37,000
Speaker 3: on the court. It was before amy Cony Barrett had

617
00:35:37,160 --> 00:35:40,280
Speaker 3: been nominated and before Justice Ginsburg obviously had passed away.

618
00:35:41,600 --> 00:35:42,839
Speaker 8: So that was six ' to three.

619
00:35:42,880 --> 00:35:45,880
Speaker 3: On the other side, I don't think we will see

620
00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:49,320
Speaker 3: the same outcome. I will say at the oral argument,

621
00:35:49,480 --> 00:35:52,680
Speaker 3: Justice Gorsuch did not say a word, not a word,

622
00:35:52,760 --> 00:35:56,919
Speaker 3: so we do not have any indication from him as

623
00:35:56,960 --> 00:36:00,480
Speaker 3: to how he will vote. But Justice Roberts was quite vocal,

624
00:36:01,120 --> 00:36:04,000
Speaker 3: and what he laid out is actually the reason why

625
00:36:04,040 --> 00:36:07,160
Speaker 3: I'm confident the Tennessee law will be upheld, which, as

626
00:36:07,239 --> 00:36:09,960
Speaker 3: he laid out, the proposition that that the Court should

627
00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:14,319
Speaker 3: be deferring to state legislatures and and particularly when you're

628
00:36:14,320 --> 00:36:18,640
Speaker 3: dealing with contested medical evidence, that state legislatures are far

629
00:36:18,719 --> 00:36:21,960
Speaker 3: better suited to assess contested medical evidence and make it

630
00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:25,840
Speaker 3: a termination and make a policy decision. That that's that's

631
00:36:26,000 --> 00:36:29,880
Speaker 3: how our democratic system works. And and and I think

632
00:36:30,360 --> 00:36:33,600
Speaker 3: Chief Justice Roberts, reasoning that he articulated that the oral

633
00:36:33,680 --> 00:36:36,400
Speaker 3: argument is going to lead him to vote to uphold

634
00:36:36,400 --> 00:36:39,080
Speaker 3: the law, I think we will see.

635
00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:39,920
Speaker 8: I think we will.

636
00:36:39,760 --> 00:36:43,880
Speaker 3: Certainly see Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, and and Amy Cony,

637
00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:49,520
Speaker 3: Barrett and Kavanaugh also their arguments at oral arguments suggested

638
00:36:49,600 --> 00:36:52,520
Speaker 3: that they that they would defer to the Tennessee state

639
00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:57,319
Speaker 3: legislature as well. I hope Justice Gorsach will as well.

640
00:36:57,320 --> 00:36:59,680
Speaker 3: I think there's a very good chance that this will

641
00:36:59,719 --> 00:37:04,080
Speaker 3: be a six three decision upholding the Tennessee law. But

642
00:37:05,000 --> 00:37:09,279
Speaker 3: the fact that the Court decided Bostock the other way. Now,

643
00:37:09,320 --> 00:37:14,279
Speaker 3: Bostock was a question of federal statute and interpreting the

644
00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:18,200
Speaker 3: words Congress had adopted. It was not a constitutional case.

645
00:37:19,120 --> 00:37:21,960
Speaker 3: It was not interpreting the equal protection clause of the

646
00:37:21,960 --> 00:37:25,200
Speaker 3: Fourteenth Amendment. And I'll note, by the way, there is

647
00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:28,200
Speaker 3: a third outcome. So what could the Supreme Court do here?

648
00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:30,120
Speaker 3: They could do three things. They could do more than

649
00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:33,760
Speaker 3: three things, but three key things. One they could affirm

650
00:37:33,840 --> 00:37:35,879
Speaker 3: the Tennessee law. That's what I think they are likely

651
00:37:35,920 --> 00:37:39,319
Speaker 3: to do. Two, they could strike down the Tennessee law.

652
00:37:39,360 --> 00:37:42,880
Speaker 3: They could rule that this law violates the Constitution and

653
00:37:42,960 --> 00:37:45,600
Speaker 3: therefore is null and void. I do not think they're

654
00:37:45,719 --> 00:37:47,640
Speaker 3: likely to do that, but I think the three Liberals

655
00:37:47,680 --> 00:37:50,719
Speaker 3: will vote to do exactly that. The third option they

656
00:37:50,719 --> 00:37:55,040
Speaker 3: could do it is they could reverse the decision and

657
00:37:55,120 --> 00:38:00,520
Speaker 3: conclude that this law is sex discrimination, and under the Constitution,

658
00:38:00,760 --> 00:38:06,200
Speaker 3: sex discrimination is subject to what's called intermediate scrutiny. Now

659
00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:11,160
Speaker 3: the toughest standard constitutionally for legal analysis is what's called

660
00:38:11,239 --> 00:38:16,800
Speaker 3: strict scrutiny, and racial discrimination under the Constitution by government

661
00:38:17,280 --> 00:38:21,360
Speaker 3: is subject to strict scrutiny. Sex discrimination is subject to

662
00:38:21,400 --> 00:38:24,880
Speaker 3: intermediate scrutiny. So the middle ground they could do is

663
00:38:24,920 --> 00:38:27,560
Speaker 3: they could vacate the decision below and send it back

664
00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:32,120
Speaker 3: to the lower court to apply intermediate scrutiny. I hope

665
00:38:32,160 --> 00:38:34,680
Speaker 3: they don't do that, and I don't think they will,

666
00:38:35,200 --> 00:38:38,920
Speaker 3: but there is a non zero chance they might do that,

667
00:38:39,040 --> 00:38:43,160
Speaker 3: which is what makes this case. Concerning all of that

668
00:38:43,280 --> 00:38:47,160
Speaker 3: being said, my prediction is they're going to conclude correctly

669
00:38:47,800 --> 00:38:52,000
Speaker 3: that the Tennessee law is constitutional, and that is a

670
00:38:52,080 --> 00:38:54,160
Speaker 3: judgment for the state legislators to make.

671
00:38:55,120 --> 00:38:57,760
Speaker 2: As I said before, this is why elections are so important.

672
00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:00,360
Speaker 2: It's why it's so important that conservatives get elected, because

673
00:39:00,360 --> 00:39:04,640
Speaker 2: these are the people that make unbelievable decisions, and it

674
00:39:04,680 --> 00:39:07,759
Speaker 2: deals with kids' futures, and this is a perfect example

675
00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:10,200
Speaker 2: of it. Don't forget We do this show Monday, Wednesday

676
00:39:10,239 --> 00:39:14,759
Speaker 2: and Friday. Hit that subscribe or auto download button and

677
00:39:14,800 --> 00:39:17,440
Speaker 2: the Senator and I will make sure if you see this,

678
00:39:17,480 --> 00:39:19,600
Speaker 2: by the way, please share it on social media because

679
00:39:19,600 --> 00:39:21,560
Speaker 2: that's how we reach new people write us a five

680
00:39:21,640 --> 00:39:23,160
Speaker 2: story review if you would take a moment to do

681
00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:25,520
Speaker 2: that as well. On those in between days, grab my

682
00:39:25,560 --> 00:39:28,919
Speaker 2: podcast so Ben Ferguson Podcasts, and I'll keep you update

683
00:39:28,960 --> 00:39:30,680
Speaker 2: on the latest breaking news there and we'll see you

684
00:39:30,719 --> 00:39:31,960
Speaker 2: back here in a couple of days