WEBVTT - Tech Traders Shrug Off Maduro Ouster

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Though in San Francisco.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up the AI trade warring

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 2>back to kick off twenty twenty six Tech doogs in

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the Green. We analyze the optimism plus Tesla's China factory shipments.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>They rise in December, but still drop in twenty twenty five.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>What that says about global EV demand and what do

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>expect from CES this year. We'll go live to Las

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Vegas to give you a preview of key conversations across

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>our network. But first we digest what the markets are digesting.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>We are thinking about a very macro event, a geopolitical

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>event that occurred this weekend, nocus Maduro and his wife,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of course, being removed from Venezuela and being brought here

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>to Me York following a series of airstrikes that hit

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Caracas early Saturday, and the market shakes off that geopolitical risk.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Thus far, we're up more than a percentage point in

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the Nasdaq. We're looking more towards an AI trade. We

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>go under the hood, though there is search for safety.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 2>You have seen seeing gold rebound. Remember it's sold off

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>hard into the new year. Trade Bitcoin currently up to

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>two point nine percent as we see not just digital

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>gold on the higher side that's at ninety three thousand,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>but spot gold at two point seven percent higher. I'm

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at the US dollar currently trading flat, but we

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 2>had seen significant moves in the US solar more broadly,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and we want to go to that macro level event

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>right now because Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and his wife,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Celia Flores will face trial, that is, on narco terrorism

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>charges in New York in the afternoon. Joining us now

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Blomberg Miles Miller, who stands by in Brooklyn right now,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>just talk to us about the imminence of the arrival

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of the ousted president.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they were taken by an armored Bearcat vehicle to

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>a landing pad in Brooklyn, and then from there they

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>flew across the harbor, past the Statue of Liberty to

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street helipad and we're motorcated here. Of course.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas Maduro and his wife are both here at federal

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 3>court in Lower Manhattan this morning and they're facing narco

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>terrorism charges Federal prosecutors alleged that Maduro intended to benefit

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>terrorist organizations including park Eln, Sineloa, Cartel, trend To Agras,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and the Zetas. And here's what prosecutors say happened from

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>two thousand to two thousand and six while he was

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a member of the National Assembly. They say Maduro moved

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>cocaine under the protection of the Venezuelan law enforcement And

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 3>if that is not enough, they say that they were

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>able to secure diplomatic passports for some of these drug

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>traffickers to move drugs and money in and out of

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Venezuela from places like Columbia and Mexico. In one instance,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 3>we are told that they use a state oil plane,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>a plane for the state oil company, in order to

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>facilitate the drugs moving in and out. It's not just

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Maduro and his wife who were charged in this. Their

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>son is charged as well with being part of this

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>drug conspiracy. If convicted, he faces the possibility of life

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>in a supermax prison here in the United States. And

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>we finally got some information about his legal team. We

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>are learning that he's going to be represented by Barry Pollock.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>That's the same person who represented Julian assand as well

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>as David Wilstrom, who represented the brother of Juan Orlando Hernandez,

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>of course, the former president of Honduras who was charged

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 3>right here in the southern district and was pardoned just

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago by President Trump.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Miles, you standby in Brooklyn for us, But many wonder

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>how this is being digested in Venezuela. What do we

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>know about how Manduro is being deemed by Venezuelan leadership

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 3>And as people, Yeah, you know, we heard from the

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Vice president of Venezuela that you know, she did not

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>necessarily agree what would happen there, and she, of course

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>is being the person who is taking control of the country,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to be an interesting time there to

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>see just what she does, how much she'll allow the

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>United States to say, run the state oil company to

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>control the oil in Venezuela, and if she doesn't, what

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 3>will happen to her. But it's not just what you're

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 3>hearing on the streets of Venezuela, people who may be

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 3>frustrated by what they saw. You've got folks on both

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 3>sides here, protesting, folks who believe Maduro should still be

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 3>in power and want him to be released at his

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 3>court hearing, and those who say they fled to the

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>United States because of Maduro's regime. You know, the President

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>said just yesterday that the United States will run Venezuela.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Didn't give too many details, but I think it will

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>have a lot to do with the oil and the

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 3>strategic oil reserves stare as well.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Miles Mena, We so appreciate you, of course standing live

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 2>outside and I correct myself, the Southern District of New

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>York Court in Lower Manhattan. Will we were returning to

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>you later. Meanwhile, US stocks sort of shrugged off these moves.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>The powered higher this morning as demand for tech shares

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>remained strong even after the ousto of Venezuela's president, fan

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>worries over geo political risk. Let's get you an invest

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to take. Anna Ruffin is here with us, founder and

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Grenadilla Advisory, So your advisory is necessary right now? Anna,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>is it right for the market to shape this off?

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Good morning.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think this has lot short term consequences for

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 5>the markets, and I think there's a reason why it's

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 5>shirking it off. It's not a short term trading event.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 5>I do think that there's a long term consequence of this.

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 5>I know that energy companies are soaring because of this

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 5>idea that they will be able to go in and

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 5>extract some of that oil, But frankly, that's not a

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty sixth story. The longer place here really is

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>I think geopolitical think about where oil matters. Russia seller

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 5>of oil, China is buyer of oil, and of course

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Middle East we all know that there's a lot of

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 5>oil involved there. So if we think about where the

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 5>conflicts are around the world and where, where and how

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 5>the US is involved in those conflicts, I think this

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 5>move in Venezuela is more of a chess game that's

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 5>a longer run game, rather than a short term move.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, boy, has the tech investment community been trying to

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 2>dissect the chess game that is US China trade and

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>tariff How does it affect that in twenty twenty six

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>do you think, Hannah.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, throughout twenty twenty six we're supposed to

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 5>be talking with China about tariffs, and at the center

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 5>of those tariff and trade talks really is where earth minerals, AI,

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 5>chips all of those things, right, And so if you're

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 5>China and you're looking at the development over the weekend

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 5>and you realize that in terms of natural resources, US

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 5>has taken control over a lot of the oil that

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 5>they will need as well. It sort of changes the

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 5>game and who has the upper hand in some of

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 5>these talks that we're expecting to be in twenty twenty six.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 5>So I think this puts, you know, strategically speaking, the

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 5>US in a more powerful position in some of these

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 5>trade talks. So it'll be interesting to see how this

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 5>all pans out in terms of our earth minerals and

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 5>of course China buying potentially and video chips as well.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So strategically thinking for an investor right now, is

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>it wise to be powering video higher, to be seeing

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Tesla rocketing up on the green today? More broadly, should

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>the AI trade be back on for twenty twenty six?

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 5>I think twenty twenty six is going to be a

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 5>very interesting year for some of this trade that we've

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 5>seen powering through the years. I think, first of all,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 5>there is this idea that a lot of IPOs will

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 5>come into play in twenty twenty six. We will see

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 5>how easy or difficult it is for a lot of

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 5>these companies to fundraise, especially those that have really really

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 5>high valuations, whether or not the investors really have the

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 5>appetite for these things. And as for Nvidia and Tesla,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>they have other problems really. I mean, Nvidia has issues

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 5>with TPUs coming online, and even though I do think

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 5>that they have a lot of market share, still there

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 5>are things to think about. For Tesla, there's also bid right,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 5>So it's not so much that it is about AI

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 5>powering through. I think there's real competition out there that

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 5>these companies need to be thinking about.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting. We're going to be hearing from Jensen

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Wang later today at CES from Nissa Sou of AMD.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>What do you think they can give to the market

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that backs up the market share, certainly even video at least.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think clearer guidance is definitely helpful.

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I know that the Nvidia has.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Certainly given a clearer guidance for twenty twenty six, and

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 5>there seems to be a lot of demand. But they're

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 5>going to have to answer to sort of the next

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 5>best thing, right, So what's beyond the black Well chips,

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 5>what's beyond the relationships with open ai and other big

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 5>players out there. I think investors need to hear something

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 5>new in terms of partnerships as well as technological advancement

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 5>for a lot of this excitement to continue into twenty

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty six.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Sona, where do you stand in optimism versus pessimism for

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six If at this moment there are still

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>many more questions and perhaps the market isn't factoring in

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>some of the risks. Should you be buying in at

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 2>these levels?

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, if you're already invested.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 5>I think there's room for markets to run, but not

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 5>without any volatility here. I don't think the market is

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 5>so excited that, you know, analysts looking at fifteen percent

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 5>year over year growth in ESMP five hundred companies. That

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 5>might be exciting on a fundamental level, and hopefully it

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 5>broadens out to the rest of the sectors in the

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 5>SMP five hundred index, But there are multiples that are very,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 5>very stretched right so, especially with this talks with China

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 5>that not only impacts tech but also other areas of

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 5>the economy. I think we're due for some volatility, but

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 5>weather the volatility by having a robust portfolio, and that

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 5>is always recommended by the advisor community.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>What's been really interesting is well the ongoing drive dispersion

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>between software and hardware names. We saw that in particular

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, and our great producer Dan Katz has been

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>pointing out just the disparity that they saw in software

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>indices that fell some three percent on Friday, and then

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 2>we rallied in when you're looking at a semiconductor in

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>next in particular more than four percent. Is that going

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to continue? How much more support do we need for

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>software to show that it can benefit from the AI trade?

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 5>I think twenty twenty six is still going to be

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 5>a picks and shovels year building these things out, and

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 5>the demand there is for it. That's not something that

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 5>can be done in a year or two. I think

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 5>this is a multiple year story. And certainly on the

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 5>software side, there's a lot of experimentation still. And if

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 5>you're a customer sort of subscribing to some of these

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 5>things and dipping your toes in, there's no guarantee that

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 5>that's going to be sticky. I mean, I think we're

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 5>thinking about things like SaaS where if you have a

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 5>subscription to something and you incorporate those software into your

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 5>day to day, it becomes super sticky.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Necessarily where we are with the software on the AI side.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 5>I think people are experimenting, so until we can see

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 5>some stickiness in real incorporation, in integration of those software

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 5>into the day to day of the businesses, I would

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 5>be a little bit skeptical as well. And I think

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 5>that's what the markets are actually expressing.

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating love getting a little healthy dose of skepticism today

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>for Manor Rathman, Fanta, CEO of Grenadilla Advisory, Stay Well

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Happy twenty twenty six. Now coming up, the arrest of

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela's Nicholas Maduura is being watched far beyond Latin America

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>what it could mean for US resolve and China Taiwan relations.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>This is a glouemleg tech the arrest of Venezuela's Nicholas

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>madua when it's reverberating well beyond Latin America, some in Taiwan,

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 2>when they're already viewing the move as a signal of

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>US resolve, but the American strike is also star and

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>cons that is offered a template how Beijing could handle

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>tensions with Taiwan. Here to break it down, as BLUEBGG

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>senior Tech editor Mike Sheppard. You bring us the global

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical perspective from a tech inside here. Mike, what should

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>we think for Taiwan and its well ability to continue

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 2>in its current state vise of EA China.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, there are different schools of thought, Cara that you

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 6>mapped out right there. One is from inside China. There

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 6>is the nationalist perspective that, look, this offers us a

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 6>rogue map perhaps of how we could retake control of

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 6>the self governed island of Taiwan, which officials in Beijing

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 6>view as a rogue province as one that they should

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 6>bring back into the fold. Meanwhile, in Taiwan and Taipei

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 6>officials they're actually finding some encouragement from the US move

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 6>in ven As will as perhaps a way of signaling

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 6>deterrence against Beijing to try to do anything similar there.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 6>And they see it that way for two reasons. One,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 6>they find that the US has military superiority over China

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 6>in this area. China would not be able to pull

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 6>off the same kind of maneuver that the US just

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 6>did on Saturday in Caracas now. And the other reason

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 6>is that they see that this signals that Trump will

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 6>exercise US military power when he sees American strategic interests

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 6>at risk, and they certainly would be if China moved

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 6>against Taiwan, which is a lynchpin in the global chip

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 6>supply chain.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go that, Mike, the national security implications of Taiwan.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Why is that so crucial to the administration.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, they still see Taiwan as so essential to being

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 6>able to support a wide range of industries, especially the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 6>growing one on which they have placed so many bets,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 6>and that is artificial intelligence. Taiwan, far and away right

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 6>now is the world center of production of the most

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 6>advanced AI chips. Even with all the investment in production

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 6>that is planned for the US in coming years, much

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 6>of that is not online yet and is really still

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 6>being produced in Taiwan on the self governed island. So

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 6>any disruption to that supply chain would be catastrophic, especially

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 6>for political reasons. If we saw any sort of military

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 6>action by Beijing against the island, it would be disruptive.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 6>And Caro, we remember during the pandemic just how problematic

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 6>those dislocations in the supply chain were and how they

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 6>rippled through so the automotive sective and others, And that

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 6>of course was before the advent of artificial intelligence and

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 6>chat GPT and the wide scale uptake that we're seeing

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 6>across the economy of this revolutionary new technology and what

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 6>that would mean if suddenly the world lost access to it.

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 6>We would likely see the US respond, It's unclear whether militarily,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 6>but certainly with sanctions, together with other nations like Japan

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 6>and Australia that have already mused about leaping to the

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 6>island's defense in the event of Beijing trying to intervene militarily.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 6>And it's important to remember while Trump has remained vague

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 6>about whether he would step in with US forces to

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 6>defend the island, the administration just approved an eleven billion

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 6>dollar package of arms to be sold to Taiwan, which

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 6>is one of the largest and recent memory care.

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Always with the deep analysis, Mike Shepherd, thanks for breaking

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that down. Meanwhile, look this geopolitical anxiety that we speak of,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>so I have no impact on the AI trade in

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that part of the world. Look at tsmc shares climb

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>by the most it's April, as the company rides a

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>wave of optimism of artificial intelligence. Demand from About Tech

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Executive editor Peter Elstrom joins us for more and we've

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>heard how in many ways, there's two ways you can

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>interpret what this impact from Latin America means on Taiwan.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 2>But TSMC great growth, it seems.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, as you were just talking about with Mike, Taiwan

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 7>really is at the heart of the AI boom right

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 7>now when it comes to the production, as we saw

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 7>with TSMC, the show are up by about five percent today,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 7>we had Golden Sacks raise its price target for the stock.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 7>They boosted it by thirty five percent. It's really an

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 7>extraordinary increase in what they expect you can see from

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 7>that stock. TSMC has done very well by making the

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 7>chips for Nvidia. It also produces chips for Apple and

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 7>other customers here. But really at Vidia has given it

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 7>a ton of momentum recently that's put the company on

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 7>a tear. Its market cap is now about one point

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 7>four trillion dollars, up quite sharply, and Golden Sacks is

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 7>telling you that it could run another forty percent from

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 7>where it is right now. So truly talking about TSMC

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 7>becoming a two trillion dollar company if they can hit

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 7>that price target. That would largely be based on the

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 7>momentum behind Invidia's growth and some of their other customers

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 7>like Apple.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>And Nvidia has been helping Hanhai as well with its numbers.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 7>That's right, yeah, exactly. So Hanahi reported there some of

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 7>their financial details for the fourth quarter, their revenue is

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 7>up twenty two percent. Hanahai makes a well mikes iPhones

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 7>for Apple two, which was its very most important business

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 7>for a long period of time. But it also makes

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 7>servers that include those Nvidia chips, so it's feeding servers

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 7>in hardware to the hyperscalers that are building these enormous

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 7>data centers across the US and across the globe. Really,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 7>it has a tremendous amount of momentum because the big hyperscalers,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 7>including Microsoft and Google are boosting their spending by more

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 7>than thirty percent this year to hundreds of billions of dollars,

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 7>and that's giving a big tailwind to Hanhai. So we

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 7>saw Honhai boost its revenue for the fourth quarter twenty

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 7>two percent. It came in a couple billion dollars more

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 7>than expected at eighty three billion dollars. So it has

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 7>a lot of momentum here. It looks like that demand

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 7>for AI gear is increasing at least for now.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and ded iPhone seventeen did well. As you mentioned,

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>a key supplier, Fox Gone also known as Hanhi. But Viz,

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>going back to the start of this conversation, this is

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>as we see ongoing geopolitical anxiety around Taiwan, how much

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 2>always seeing these names invest in America and continue to

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>do so well.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 7>They are strategic acts assets definitely, as you're talking about

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 7>with Mike, TSMC the most important chip maker in the

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 7>world by a mile because of the advanced chips that

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 7>it makes for companies like Nvidia, Apple, etc. Has been

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 7>building facilities in the United States. It's putting a water

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 7>resources there. It got some money from the Chips Act

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 7>under the Biden administration, has continued to build out those chips.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 7>It is making a lot of progress there. It's able

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 7>to build fabs there that are quite productive, but they're

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 7>not nearly as advanced as what they can do in

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 7>Taiwan at this point. And this is part of the

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 7>justification by the Taiwanese government and also TSMC itself. They

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 7>want to have their most important assets in Taiwan. Partly

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 7>it's an economies of scale issue. They can travel to

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 7>those factories much more easily. Have the engineers learned from

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 7>each other within those factories. They want to keep that

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 7>most advanced production there. It's also, frankly a defensive maneuver

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 7>for the government that if the most important assets are there,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 7>they know that the Trump administration or whatever US government

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 7>is in power, is more inclined to come and make

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 7>sure that they're protected.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter Elstrom the global perspective, we thank you Tesla's China

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 2>factory shipments. They came in today and showed they dropped

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five, but there was a last minute

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 2>bump in December where they grew as though as the

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 2>company struggles with a slowdown in global sales. Look all

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>of this, as I just mentioned, a little over ninety

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand were in December, just the fourth month and

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five that saw an increase springing Bluemos Craddell

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 2>on all of this is the author of Hyperdrive Newsletters.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>So to get the straight Tesla had decent numbers in

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>December in terms of growth month a month and indeed

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>year on year, but it's just woeful for the whole

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 2>picture of twenty twenty five.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's right, Caroline. I think you know, we look

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 8>at the December number, and it's actually you know, resilient

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 8>and not just one of the rare up months for

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 8>the year, but off of a relatively big month a

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 8>year earlier. And yet when you look at the sort

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 8>of whole picture for this company, you know, they had

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 8>shipments throughout the year that were much lower and sort

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 8>of reflecting this idea that they have some demand issues.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 8>And of course when we look at their shipment data,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 8>it's both for the local market and for some export

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 4>So we'll get a better.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Sense in the coming weeks just how the sort of

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 8>retail sales work.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a second consecutive annual drop when you're

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 2>looking at China shipments. All of this comes in context

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that BYD is now the biggest EV player worldwide. You've

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>also got other competition coming from x phonemakers who pivot

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>into cars.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and China's market is increasingly cut throat. You've seen

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Beijing try to sort of you know, put some pressure

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 8>on the industry to knock this off and kind of

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, get to a point where pricing is a

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 8>little bit more rational, and yet we only continue to

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 8>see manufacturers, you know, offer new and more aggressive discounts,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 8>and that's been something that Tesla has really struggled to

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 8>contend with throughout last year and even dating back to

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 8>I would say twenty twenty three.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Briefly here in the US, that's competition from Lucid.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and Lucid I think like Rivian is still a

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 8>long ways behind Tesla. I think both of these companies

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 8>had ambitions to give Elon Musk more of a challenge,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 8>if we've not seen that materialize. I think we saw

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 8>some relatively strong numbers for that company in the fourth quarter,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 8>and yet you would expect that when they were going

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 8>from one model to two models. So you know, big

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 8>things ahead for them this year as they tried to

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 8>also bring out a new platform.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloombg's Auto's editor or Zara as we like to call you, Creatudel.

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Great to have some time with you. Tune in tomorrow

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 2>if we sit down with Lucid interim CEO Mark windhoff

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 2>As live at CEES. Welcome back to bluembg Tech. We

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>check in on these markets that shrug off some geopolitical anxiety,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of course when gathering higher. In fact, on the nasdak

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 2>as you see at one point one percent, you are

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>seeing search for safety, though Bitcoin maybe up to two

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 2>point eight percent. Gold climbs fresh again, and this is

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>after the ouster of Venezuela's President, Nicholas Maduro, who is

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>set to arrive at a Manhattan court imminently. Now we

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>think about the geopolitical context, we also think about what

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the AI trade is up to at the start of

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, and we're back on in video up

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 2>sevent tens percent, AMD up six tens percent. We hear

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>from both of these CEOs over in Las Vegas later

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 2>today at CEES. So the market wanting to hear more

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>transparency from these leaders. Paneteer shakes off some of the

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>sell off that we saw on Friday. This software AI

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>and FU software company is up more than four percent.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the key gainers on the NAZAQ one

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 2>hundred from one points perspective. So to is Alphabet, we're

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>up five tens percent. As still insatiable demand for Google

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and indeed it's Gemini iterations, but also it's TPU innovations.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more about the AI trade. It's resiliency, Bloomberg's

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Tech Equity Report to common Rhinokey is Hey and you've

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>been putting pent to pepe, but thinking all about how

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 2>an AI bubble has been much tokedal Is it reality?

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to pop? What have we been hairing

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of historical context?

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so looking at this in historical context is really interesting.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 9>I think we know that there's going to be a

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 9>fourth year of talking about AI driving the market. Are

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 9>we in a bubble? And so when you look at

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 9>some of the past equity bubbles, there are some differences

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 9>that investors point out that are important. So, for example,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 9>the duration of this rally is longer than the average

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 9>of the last ten equity bubbles. We're at three years,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 9>the average is about two and a half. But at

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 9>the same time, the percentage gain is actually much lower.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 9>So we're up about one hundred and thirty percent on

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 9>the Nasdaq over the last three years, and the average

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 9>for the last ten equity bubbles has been more than

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 9>two hundred and forty percent. So that kind of signals

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 9>that we're not in the sort of blistering sort of

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 9>upcycle upswing in the market that you usually see before

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 9>a bubble pops.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>There are also some other key things.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, investors are still watching really solid fundamentals from

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 9>the big tech companies, and actually pessimism that we saw

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 9>especially I think gain really over last year. You know,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 9>the investors really calling for ROI, you know, for seeing

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 9>more like innovation from these companies. That's actually a good

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 9>thing in terms of a market bubble, and it very

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 9>much differs from the dot com era, where investors were

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 9>so excited about the Internet and everything related to that,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 9>but they kind of overlooked, you know, valuations and some

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 9>of the fundamentals of those companies.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I felt like discerning was the word of December. Everyone

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>was saying investors get more discerning. They were picking their

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 2>winners among the AI trade, How are we set up

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 2>posts set off of an oracle and those companies. They

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>still did extraordinarily well for twenty twenty five, but some

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of that height did fizzle someone as companies and investors

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>tried to understand the debtloads of these businesses.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and I think the other thing that we're seeing

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 9>that's good is the broadening of this rally. So yes,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 9>people are picking their winners and their losers, but we're

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 9>also not seeing the biggest gainers continue to have be

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 9>sort of like astronognomical percent gains over the year. So

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 9>in the MAG seven, for example, only two in Nvidia

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 9>and Alphabet of like those were the only stocks that

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 9>outperformed the S and P five hundred last year. And

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 9>you know, the biggest performers are the biggest sort of

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 9>percentage winners that we saw were other stocks like linked

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 9>to AI, so the memory like the digital storage companies.

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 9>So that also just shows that the rallies broadening out

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 9>and that is generally more healthy for the market.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of health to kick off this twenty

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty six common Ranicky, we appreciate it. I stick with

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the AI build out in particular how secure it is,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 2>questions growing around in particular power and infrastructure constraints as

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 2>well Flex Central. It's one of the largest privately held

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>data center operators in the United States. Fully two data

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>centers cross eighteen markets here in the US. Ran Mallory

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 2>as the CEO, please to say you join us now,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and I want to get for our audience, really, Ron,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>how you define where you sit in the overall market

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>because right now, from what I understand is you're a

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 2>co location offering. So we've got well big hyperscaleer's got

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>neoclouds and then we've got flec centraal.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 10>That's correct, and thanks for the opportunity to catch up

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 10>this morning, Caroline. It's really about, you know, the type

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 10>of infrastructure that you deploy out there. Flex Cential is

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 10>taking a very pragmatic view on making sure we're able

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 10>to address the wholesale infrastructure, so the one to twenty megawatts,

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 10>but also making sure that we're able to address the

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 10>multi tenant capabilities that are out there as well, because

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 10>those are the companies that are going to be consuming

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 10>the agentic AI capabilities that we're seeing to start to

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 10>accelerate out there, so that the landscape is starting to

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 10>separate a bit, and flex Cential thinks we've got a

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 10>very strong position right down that fairway on that wholesale

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 10>multi tenant collocation marketplace.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Ryan, that sounds like you want to be diversified. You

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 2>don't want to just have one particular buyer calling you

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 2>up saying I will take one hundred megawatts from your

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>future project. How are you hearing though from potential clients.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Are they wanting you to be the sold right or

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 2>you've been taken in entirety of their business in certain locations.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Caroline, you're spot on. We want to make sure

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 10>that we're diversified in our customer base, and you know,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 10>the simple answer is yes. We have companies that come

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 10>to us and say we want to make you know,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 10>we want to take one of your whole data centers

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 10>and put all of our you know, GPU TPU xpus

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 10>in those facilities. That's just not where we're going to play.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 10>We want to make sure this multi tenant ecosystem environment

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 10>has a place out in the market, and our product

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 10>set is just perfectly fit for that out there.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Today, you talk about GPU, TPU XPU, what is the

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 2>constraint right now? For all of twenty twenty five, it

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>felt like the narrative was it's the chips, but actually

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 2>then it became the power then, whereas warries about water.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Where are you seeing some of the chap points.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean it's really threefold. We see land, power

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 10>and supply chain, and supply chain being that of you know,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 10>the mechanical infrastructure that goes inside the data centers. And

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 10>so you have to be very focused on all three.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 10>And you're not just planning for twenty six right now,

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 10>you're planning for twenty eight through thirty because you know

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 10>that this dynamic marketplace and the consumption models that are

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 10>out there, we've got to be very focused on the

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 10>long term gains and being able to provision this infrastructure

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 10>to meet those requirements.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So where does that infrastructure end up going. We keep

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about innovations, particularly in the inference side of things,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>and people have got anxiety about Nvidia's role going forward

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>as once the models are trained that being used, is

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it still all about the GPU? Is AMD getting a

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 2>look in what's your client's demand?

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and so it really depends on what the end

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 10>customer is trying to use the infrastructure for. You know,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 10>let's not forget that. Right now, we're shipping five CPUs

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 10>for every GPU out there, and so this dynamic integration

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 10>between the CPU world and the gp EU world is

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 10>really starting to form. And that's where this agentic capability

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 10>is being able to use multiple services is really starting

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 10>to drive this demand growth. And you know, when people

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 10>talk about AI bubbles there, I think we're still at

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 10>the forefront of this AI consumption model To really start

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 10>to put our hands around that, I think we've got

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 10>a long runway to go.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Long runway, what does that mean for your runway? Ryan,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>As we said, you're one of the biggest privately how operators.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I assume you're not just going to call some clients,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but from companies that want to own a bit of

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>your real estate.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, and so we're looking at this in you know,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 10>five and ten year horizons, and so you know, we've

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 10>got a firm path over the next five years for

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 10>that land, for that power and supply chain. You know,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 10>we're buying out infrastructure to make sure that we're able

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 10>to meet this growth trajectory out through you know, twenty

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 10>thirty twenty thirty two. Once you get out past that,

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 10>it's a little bit hard to predict what this infrastructure

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 10>is going to look like. You know, we're firmly entrenched

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 10>with you know, liquid to chip, liquid to rac or

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 10>and immersion cooling inside the facilities to meet these higher

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 10>density deployments. But you know, right now we're formally firmly

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 10>focused on getting out to that twenty thirty to twenty

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 10>thirty two deployment strategy.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Roan Mallory come back, I hope for Essential CEO operating

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 2>those data centers across the United States, a lot on

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the East Coast. Meanwhile, coming up what twenty twenty six

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>has in store for AI regulation. We'll discuss that with

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Jessica Nujan, director of the Central of Technology and Innovation

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>with the Competitive Enterprise Institute. This is b meg the

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>AI trade. Well, if you're looking at stocks, it's on today.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>But one of the headwinds industry leaders keep on mentioning

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>is AI regulation. One of President Trump's final executive orders

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty five, remember, was aimed at limiting state

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>AI regulations, countering what it sees as a patchwork of

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>local laws that industry leaders argue stifles growth. Discuss what

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six may bring in federal AI regulation. If any,

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's bringin Jessica Malusian. She is the director of the

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Center for Technology and Innovation with the Competitive Enterprises to

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you're a non partisan policy group, you are going to

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 2>argue against heavy regulation to foster innovation. So I have

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>a feeling you're not pro a patchwork approach. But will

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>we ever get a federal approach or at least Congress

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>being able to push forward one.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So I think the executive order that you mentioned

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 11>earlier by President Trump was in one part, trying to

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 11>get some of that done without congressional action. That's probably

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 11>now going to be a very successful plan. But I

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 11>think also part of it was trying to create some

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 11>political pressure for Congress to take on this responsibility and

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 11>act in place. As you described a patchwork of fifty

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 11>state regulations, there were a thousand of them introduced or

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 11>passed or considered just last year, and often their contradictory.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Often they're heavy handed.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 11>Some of them might make sense, but not all of

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 11>them do, and to ask USAI entrepreneurs to operate in

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 11>that environment is very unrealistic.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's interesting is even despite that executive order, many

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>California law makers are still pushing ahead with some of

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>their AI regulation. And then I think what other Senate

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Commerce Committee chair. For example, you've had Ted Cruz roll

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>out a package of a related legislature. He's doing that

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>back in September. You've had Marshall Blackburn looking to unveil

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>more potential regulation that was announced in December. There's been

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in the House as well. Jessica, what is the

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>most sensible.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 11>I think we'll start with what's the least sensible, which

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 11>is that the default situation if Congress does nothing, is

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 11>that you're going to have the most strict regulatory regimes.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 11>So think California, I think New York become the default

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 11>setting for the entire country.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Right as firms try to comply with this.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 11>The big ones might have the money to do that,

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 11>but smaller guys are going to say, Okay, we're just

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 11>going to comply with the most strict version. Hope that

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 11>gets us through. So you know, that's not how any

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 11>of this was designed to work. And what you need

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 11>is people on the national stage. That's why we have

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 11>the Commerce Clause, willing to butt heads even if they disagree.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 11>That's what hearings in regular order are for. So the

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 11>Ted Cruises and the Marsha Blackburns should talk this out

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 11>and figure out where we can get to some agreement

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 11>on this. But this certainly is the purview of Congress

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 11>and not just the most regulatory strict states or fifty

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 11>different states.

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, in many ways, AISA David Sachs has been thinking

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>about federal regulation from an administration perspective, but also they've

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>been thinking about how some of the innovations in the

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 2>US are enabled to be sent abroad. And we still

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 2>think about what in Nvidia and its access to China,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 2>really looks like how much is that going to be

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>dominating the agenda as well?

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 11>From your perspective, I think chips are a part of it,

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 11>But I think that you correctly identified the issue that

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 11>loom's largest off this debate is that you know, this

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 11>really isn't at questions so much as we are, in

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 11>fact in a race with China for global AI dominance.

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 4>That's just the reality.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 11>I think people who are looking at this on that

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 11>scale understand that tying and arm behind to back with

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 11>a bunch of state regulations for the US is not

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 11>a great plan for winning. So I think all of

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 11>those questions, whether it's chip restriction, exports or creating a

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 11>regulatory regime as we see in the EU they have

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 11>an AI regulatory regime that's bigger than their AI sector.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 11>We don't want to fall into that trap because this

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 11>isn't just about benefits to US consumers, which there are

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 11>many from AI and the health of our economy which

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 11>is significant from AI, but it really is also making.

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Sure that as we go forward, the world is.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 11>Running on US AI, not Chinese AI. That's been our

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 11>approach in a lot of technological times of innovation, but

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 11>it's certainly never been more important than it is with

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 11>artificial intelligence.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Some of the angles with altufficient intelligence has been meant

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>health and security of its users and consumers. This is

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>something that we think time and time again has been

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 2>affecting the social media outlook. There has been a void

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of federal regulation when it comes to the protection of

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>users on social media. Over in Australia, you've seen quite

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 2>drastic steps being taken by looking to and disallow anyone

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>on younger than sixteen using companies meta with Instagram, with

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Facebook and the like. What do you make of what

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia's done and what we might do in the United States.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean Australia is certainly like the first mover

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 11>in this right it's out on the tip of the sphere.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 11>I'm not sure it's going to be the silver bullet

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 11>for everyone's mental health and all the things that make

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 11>being a teenager difficult that they hope it is. But

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 11>they're willing to run the experiment for us, and I'm

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 11>sure that other countries are watching closely and there might

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 11>be some copycatting there. I think that's a much steeper

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 11>hill to climb.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 4>In the US.

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 11>First of all, we have the First Amendment. That would

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 11>be a challenge for all all like this. Kids don't

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 11>have full rights as adults, but they have some rights.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 11>And also these social media companies have their own First

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 11>Amendment rights to speech, so that also we have a

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 11>Congress that it often struggles to get so called must

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 11>pass legislation done. So I think it's two different environments.

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 11>We'll all be watching how it goes in Australia. So

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 11>far it's a lot of kids circumventing the rules with

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 11>VPNs and other tactics. And the fact is too these

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 11>social media companies that are targeted by the laws are

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 11>born and bred in the US, so it's a little

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 11>bit different politically as well. These are our companies and

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 11>as we talk about all the time, these are creating

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 11>a lot of wealth and value for consumers here and

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 11>I think we think a little more carefully about how

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 11>we treat them and what regulations and finds we subject

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 11>them to than the rest of the world does.

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Jessica Illusion, director of the Center of Technology and Innovation

0:36:51.800 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 2>with a Competitive Enterprises, thanks for joining us today. A

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Consumer Tech Conference CES kicks off in Las Vegas with

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 2>all eyes on the power and the impact of AI.

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on what we can expect. Buther Owan,

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Ned Ludlow, you're already there in Vegas. I'm following in

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>hot pursuit. But then I mean, we're going to hear

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>from Jensen Wang. It's all going to be about showing

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 2>the innovation and market share is still there.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 12>Right, Yeah, it's called the Consumer Electronics Show. But the

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 12>frank reality is you have the CEO of the world's

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 12>biggest and most important company talking big picture about AI

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 12>right in Video, calling this what's next in AI, and

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 12>it's highly unlikely that they're going to kind of surprise

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 12>the markets with some new product, but maybe some substantive

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 12>updates on the product roadmap, right and Video has this

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 12>commitment to releasing a new generation of GPU annually. So

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 12>right now there's a big focus on Blackwell, but what

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 12>comes next is vera Rubin and the Rubin generation. A

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 12>year ago when we were here, it was also kind

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 12>of the sidelines commentary from Jensen that ruled markets. Right

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 12>as it stands, we have a real bottleneck with memory

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 12>chips go. It was Jensen had to say about Samsung

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 12>and their validation of Samsung's high Bandwick memory. This sent

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 12>kind of markets into a tizzy. So the way that

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 12>investors put this to me is like, it's the first

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 12>proper business day of the year. Let's be honest, and

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 12>you get Jensen one knot and there's likely to be

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 12>some reaction to that.

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>You get Lisa su Quino as well, and what do

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 2>we hear from the other key player? And that's not

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>consumer evidently, but is powering the consumer?

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 12>You know a little different, right, you know, Lisa to

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 12>an AMD will want to talk about how they are

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 12>competitive in the in the AI accelerator market, and there's

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 12>an opportunity for them to catch up with Nvidia, particularly

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 12>in the inference phase. They have a role to play.

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.919
<v Speaker 12>But what we've seen with AMD historically is they still

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 12>have a very big foothold in the PC market that's

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 12>relevant to the consumer, relevant to developers. So with their

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 12>rise in CPU, perhaps we hear some news around that.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 12>The big news for them a year ago was that

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 12>they had their gear going into Dell for the first time.

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 12>So it will be this mix of like, Okay, we're

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 12>staying competitive in AI, but AMD is still there and

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 12>there about in PC and also in gaming in videos.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 12>Let's focus on that it still operates in those markets too,

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 12>of course.

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's origins all about your world of gaming. Team

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Blue Meg Tech's own ed Ludlow. We love it. Thank

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 2>you for more on cees come right here tomorrow. On

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. We're going to have some of the biggest

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>names in the industry, including in video CEO Jensen Huang Zeeman,

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 2>CEO Rollin Bush, AMDCO, Lisa Sue, and so many more.

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>But of course we do all need to head back

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>now to the Southern District of New York Court in

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 2>New York, where Bloomberg's Miles Miller is standing by as

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 2>we are moments away from Venezuelan president Nicholas Maduro and

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>his wife Celia for US facing trial on narco terrorism charges.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 2>But ten minutes out.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Miles, Yeah, that's right.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 3>They will go before Judge Alvin Hellerstein in about ten

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 3>minutes time. Here, less than ten minutes now, they cleared

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the courthouse floor of everybody, swept the floor, and they'll

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>bring them into the courtroom and then let people come in.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 3>This is such a widely watched case that they have

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 3>several overflow courtrooms in this court. They are alleging that

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas Medoro and his wife ran a narco terrorism organization

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 3>funded narco terrorists, using government planes to get drugs in

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>and out of the country, in one case, using the

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 3>state oil company's plane to fly twice monthly to Margarita

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Island to load up with drugs and then bring them

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to other parts of different countries, including to the United States,

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>using government infrastructure to do corrupt acts. Those are the allegations.

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 3>He will face that judge of twelve and it's likely

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 3>that he'll enter that plea of not guilty. What is

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 3>most shocking and very interesting in this case is that

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 3>he's hired the same attorney that Julian Assange use, a

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 3>high powered attorney from Washington to represent him in this case.

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 3>But these are very very serious charges which carry the

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 3>possibility of life in prison, the possibility that Nicholas Maduro

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 3>after trial could go to a supermax prison for the

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 3>rest of his life. There are people out here on

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 3>both sides, supporters of his outside. He'll be able to

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 3>hear them when he goes into the courthouse or goes

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 3>into that courtroom here at five hundred Pearl Street in

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 3>just about now five minutes time.

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Local protests, but global ripples, and we're seeing that. When

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 2>we talk here on the Tech show about what this

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 2>means for the future of China and Taiwan, we hear,

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of course of the Danish leader, Prime Minister Meta Fredericson

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 2>on their own National TV network saying that if Donald

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Trump were to attack the Danish island of Brelan, that

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 2>would mean the end of the NATO Alliance. How global

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>is the mindset over there in Manhattan right now?

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you see the global impact of this pretty clearly. Right.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Our government, the US government is trying to go into

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Venezuela and take control right now of the oil so

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that China and Russia don't control the oil in Venezuela.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 3>And it's actually very interesting. You see people here who

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 3>are protesting the Chinese Communist Party right here in Chinatown.

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 3>So it's global, but it's also local too.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Mas Miller, we thank you so much for coverage throughout

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the hour and throughout the rest of the day right

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 2>here on the Boombag network. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Do not forget to check

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 2>out on podcast. You can find it on the terminal.

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>So I was online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart from

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 2>New York. This is bloombag tech.