WEBVTT - Broadcasting live from Schwab Impact in San Francisco

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Retch swabinpat here in the Moscone Center. I just want

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to point out that UBS recently came out with a report.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>It found that millionaires already accounted for about one and

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.959
<v Speaker 2>a half percent of the adult population. They analyzed this

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three, and they said, by twenty twenty eight,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>will that love risen in fifty two of the fifty

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>six markets that it's surveyed. It's some markets the number

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 2>of US dollar millionaires will increase by as much as

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent over the next five years. Wealth management has

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>been a booming business for the last year, the last

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>few years, I would say, and it continues to be so.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's all kept those involved in the industry were

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>busy client assets at the retail broker age Charles Schwab

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and the wealth arms of the six largest US bank

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Search five trillion dollars in the twelve months through September,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty three percent jump is the group's revenue from the

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 3>business collectively topped eighty four billion dollars so far this year.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to it with a guest. He knows what's

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>going on. We're delighted to be here in San Francisco

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>with a Omar Aguila. He's the chief executive officer, chief

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>investment officer at Schwab Asset Management. Omar. Nice to have

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>you here with us. You see a lot. Tell us

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 2>about what you guys are seeing in terms of wealth management.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and welcome to impact.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having us.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 4>It's great to see you everybody here in San Francisco.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, we see a continuous need and continuous demand

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 4>of clients for advice. I think as people continue to

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 4>grow in their lives and they continue to accumulate, well,

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, they need for them to have somebody that

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>can rely on and continue to just work on how

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 4>do what did I do with their money? How do

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 4>they actually set up? And you know, it's kind of

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>interesting with all the information that is available today, there's

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of people that actually can make a

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>decision on what to do with their money. Seriously, and

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 4>it's just difficult to do.

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Why what is it that they're lacking? What kind of

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>information are they seeking?

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it's almost like when you go grocery shopping.

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 4>There is a lot, a lot of options. You know.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Back back when I started my career, you know, you

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>wanted to say, for retirement, there was one option, just

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 4>just a buy a target day fund. That's it. You're

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 4>based on what year you're going to plan to retire.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>That's one option. But now today there's multiple options, multiple

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 4>things you can do manager accounts, you could do it

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 4>on your own, you could do a model, you can

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 4>do there's several things that you can do. And therefore

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>the there's a natural human you know, bias that tells you, oh, well,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>if there's too many options, I'm overly done. I cannot

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>make a decision. It's almost like me trying to find

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 4>a shampoo. It's like, no way you can actually pick

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>something that will be good, and then once you pick it,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 4>there is a regret. It's like, well, did I pick

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 4>the right one? Did I not pick the right one?

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it wasn't that or the price. And that's a

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 4>big part of the same thing happens when it comes

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 4>down to finances and where it comes that. That's why

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 4>there is what we call a bull market for advice,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 4>especially when you accumulate wealth, there is a significant amount

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>of need for clients to reach a financial advice or

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 4>an RIA to be able to just find what is

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the right solution for them.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, though, is Charles Schwab offers both of these

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of different areas. You could do it all yourself

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>using Charles Schwab's retail brokerage platform, or you could use

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>an RIA whose back end is supported by Charles Schwab.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>How do you support both of those things even though

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>they offer very different things.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, that's a big part of you know, the

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the institutional knowledge of trying to do things through client eyes.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 4>And in many cases there's many clients that you want

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 4>to use their tools on their own and in many

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 4>in many cases, they actually know what they want to

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>do and they're looking exactly what it is and just

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 4>thinking about you know, like a supermarket. You know, there's

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 4>people that know exactly the brand they want, exactly how

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 4>they want to do it, and they're loyal to what

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 4>their pieces are and they will continue to do that.

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 4>There are others that are feeling more comfortable, you know,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>relying on an advisor for them to find what their

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>path is. And you know, both of them are reliable.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Both of them are actually things that have people. There

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 4>are some clients that like to trade every day. There

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 4>are other clients that want to buy it today and

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 4>forget about it. So there's a lot of flavors for everybody.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Mark, in the wealth management business, I'm just curious

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>how many people are you know, find it, park it,

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>leave it there. They're thinking longer term and as a result,

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're gonna have a great bunch of the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Schwab team tomorrow on Lysanne Sanders. We're going to talk equities,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Global equities with you have Client hop. We're gonna talk

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>fixed income with Kathy Jones. But increasingly we see people

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>wanting access to the private markets, private credit, all assets.

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 2>How much of that does that play with you guys too?

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, it is. It is a big part of the market.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think to the first part of your question.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's a lot of clients that like to

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>have what we call a financial plan, that would like

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 4>to have an asset allocation, that would like to have

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>a long term setup and the majority of clients and

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 4>our philosophy encourages for everybody to have a fundinancial plan.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Everybody should have a financial plan. And then once you

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 4>have a financial plan, you can set up your long

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>term investment objectives on what you're investing for. And in

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 4>many cases you could be retirement, it could be income,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>it could be you know, growing, it could be buying

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a house, it could be a lot of things that

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 4>you can do and then put them money to work

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 4>that way. Now that being said, the human part of

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 4>every investor on every client basically shows that when you

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 4>hear the word character currency, bitcoin, do you hear the

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 4>worst AI? Do you hear them immediately you pick up

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the phone and say how can I be part of it?

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Do your clients do that?

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Of course they do that all the time, and they

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>do it all the time in any situations where they

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>have you know, and then you know how much exposure

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I have to the max seven? Do I need to

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 4>get out of the max seven? Do I need to

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 4>hedge my So the normal setup of a human behavior

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>to try to act on recent information is something that

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 4>happens all the time.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>What's the pressure that your clients are feeling when it

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>comes to fees. And when I say your clients, I

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>mean the rias and the wealth managers who are out

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 3>there offering their services for a percentage of the assets

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 3>that they're managing on your behalf. Because there are a

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of robo advisors out there, including a robo advisor

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 3>from Charles Schwab.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, you know what we have done. We have

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 4>run these studies over time that basically show what clients

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 4>are looking for, you know. Number one, Yes, they're incredibly

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 4>price sensitive. You know, price and cost is a big

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>part of the driver for decision making. Transparency is a

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 4>big part of Going back to the other question you

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 4>had about private markets, that's a little bit of the

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>hesitation today for clients to try to get more access

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 4>to it. They're interested, they actually like to have, but

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>they're cautious about it because of the transparency and the liquidity,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, and in many cases, once you once you

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 4>explain that there is less transparency and they're less liquidity

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 4>for a private market, then they step back and say, oh,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 4>let me think about it. I mean, initially sounds great,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 4>and initially sounds like a great opportunity, and in fact,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 4>we encourage you know, a portion of their investments to

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 4>be in private markets. However, you know, once you explain

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>the trade offs, then it's started to just you know,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 4>make a big difference.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I kind of love to hear that because I think

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we've spent so much time at various

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>investment conferences and everybody just wants to talk about private

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>equity and in particular private credit. But a lot of

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>folks are saying, you know, you got to understand that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>you lock your money up, you can't get access, and

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the transparency issues are maybe not there. So it sounds

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to me that like your investors are savvy enough to

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>be asking these questions.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. No, And not only that, but the big part is,

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 4>like you know, the investors like to see, especially younger investors,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 4>they like to see data. They like to see information,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, before they make a decision. And this is

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 4>a very you're looking at him.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>As younger investors are You're not looking at me.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Looking at both of you. But when I actually think

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 4>about it, when we do studies by generation, you know,

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>like silent generation baby boomers, they tend to be a

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>little more trusting in that sense, and in other words,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>like they trust the advisor they have a relationship with

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>the advisor and they don't necessarily need to have that

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 4>much evidence. You know, this happens actually when my kids,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 4>even when I recommend a restaurant, they still have to

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>yelp it and try to figure out what the stars are.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 4>And even in many cases like that, what do you

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>recommend that it only had three stars? So it is

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 4>one of these that they suggest evidence. They need evidence

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>to make a decision. And in those cases, when you

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>compare performance on private markets and public markets, you immediately

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 4>start saying, like, why would I lock my money in

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>where I can actually in there? Now that's not the

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>whole story, but I think that's a little bit of

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the hesitation.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>We tease that we were going to ask you about

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>key behavioral biases to be able to look out for

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>in today's environment.

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 4>What are they said that again.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>The key behavioral biases that are out there in today's

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>investment environment, Well.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 4>There is, I would say there are three that are

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 4>incredibly you know, prevalent in today's market. There are Number

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 4>one is hurting behavior. Hurting behavior, which is exactly what

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 4>we're just talking about. And the Max seven was clearly

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 4>a big part AI Max seven Bitcoin and video. You know, definitely,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, part of like, you know, what's going to happen.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people will be watching this afternoon actually

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 4>in a few hours, just on that report. But that

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 4>that component about that and in fact, for that particular thing,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of clients knew what NBDIA was five

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 4>years ago. It's not until now that became so popular.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's and that's a big part of the what

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>is it called the fomo And that's one of the biases.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 4>The second bias is called recency bias, which is people

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 4>tend to just you know, look at the most recent

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 4>information and extrapolate into the future. Oh, you know, the

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 4>market has been up for three months, it should be

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 4>going up forever. And that that's the kind of behavior

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 4>that people tend to have. Well, the same thing goes

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 4>back to, you know, to when things go wrong. It's

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>like immediately they become like, well, if we have had

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 4>two bad two bad days, it's time for get out

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 4>and then try to just panic that right, And those

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 4>are two of the typical, you know, behavioral biases that

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 4>are very typical today.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Carol mentioned crypto. So I got to asked about bitcoin

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>because it did reach a new record.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 2>That's a whole show that's just about crypto. Everybody's doing

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 2>your show that's just about crypto.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Feel free to tune it, but it is.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it's interesting because it's you know, the whole market

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of bitcoin, the whole market cap at Bitcoin, not even

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the market cap of Nvidia. So I think a lot

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>of people would say there's still a lot of room

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 3>for people who are crypto curious at this point. What

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>portion of uninvestors' portfolio, if any, should be allocated to crypto.

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have had points of view on crypto in

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 4>general to basically say, like, look, any any client could

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>actually use you know, traits as a way to just

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 4>generate or try to find any solutions they have for

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 4>an strategic long term asset allocation. We haven't adopted crypto

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>as being part of like what you would use for

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>the long run. And in many cases the reason why

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 4>is because for our strategic asset allocation work, we normally

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 4>try to find what are the fundamentals that allowed that

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 4>to be valued and what are the economic factors that

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 4>drive the performance of certain asset classes. You compare NBDIA

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 4>to crypto. Well, in the case of media. There is

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, earnings, there is clearly financial situations, there are results,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 4>there is everything else.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>In the case of this is actually regulatory SEC filings right.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 4>There is exactly they are accountable cash flows, the cash

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>flow and actually there is that product out there that

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>you can touch. In the case of crypto, a lot

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 4>of these prices tend to be driven by supply and demand.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 4>It's supply and demand driven. You basically have people have

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 4>asked me the question and said, like, well, but gold

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 4>isn't gold the same like gold is also supply demand driven. Yes,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 4>it is, but the difference is there is a bar

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that you can touch.

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Mark twenty seconds. Top question you think on everybody's mind.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Are registered investment advisors right now in this environment? Number

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>one question? Investment question.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 4>The number one question is you know, what would we

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 4>think about the market, you know, next year, given you

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 4>know potential less regulation, potential tariffs and potential changes in

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 4>the way that you know the sec you know will

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 4>will move down their agenda next year.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, good stuff, Thank you so much.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 4>It's good to see you guys.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Great, great setup for us here on this Wednesday. Omar

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>agolar He is the chief executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of Schwab Asset Management. Joining us here Schwab Impact in

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco.

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business This Week podcast. Catch

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Apple.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Car Play and then Brout Auto with a Bloomberg.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Business act or want us live on YouTube.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 2>Co Master Jim Stanevik live at the Moscone Center in

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, Schwab Impact surrounded by registered investment advisors, the

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Schwab team and really all of the support network that

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>goes into the investment advisory world. There's just so much

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>going on with its security, transparency, logistics, operational. This is

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>what this event is about.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Also, something different about an event in San Francisco. Lots

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of umbrellas here because it is raining a lot out there.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 4>What happened?

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 3>You come to California and you think it's going to beautiful.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I had planned to go for a hike later today.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 3>That's not happening.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 4>That's fine, that's fine. Can we work on that. It's

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 4>all good?

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 6>All right?

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Listen. One of the things we want to talk a

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 2>little bit about is the fixed income world, because we've

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 2>seen the US government debt market declined since mid September

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>on expectations the president, like Donald Trump's policies will boost

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>growth and rekindle inflation. So we continue to see I

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's safe to say in twenty twenty four the

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>narrative of around fixed income kind of evolved. We've got

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a great.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Voice on this.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Manji Buriah's portfolio manager and head of Systematic Systematic

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Edge of Fixed Income and custom SMA Investments at all

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Spring at Global Investment Title.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 4>It is a big title. Does that fit on a

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 4>business card? Is there an acroative you got to turnover for.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>The second half of title?

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 4>That's true?

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Actually, well look, I mean you are responsible for overseeing

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 3>all active factor based and enhanced passive fixed income capabilities

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 3>and solution joining us here at Schwab Impact. What's the

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>conversation that's happening right now around fixed income given that

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 3>we have an election result, right, but it's kind of

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 3>unclear what's going to happen in terms of government spending

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 3>and also the collection of money from the government or

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>by the government.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's ups of policy away. So let's

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 6>talk about what's in store for twenty twenty five.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like you have like transparency around it?

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Not really.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>As you set your forecast out.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think any of us have a crystal.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's your best shot.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 4>That's my best shot.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 6>So let's think about the policy that's actually been outlined

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 6>for twenty twenty five. Right, So there's going to be

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 6>deregalation coming forward, right, so I don't know how much reregalation.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 6>And where the second is around tariffs, so you know

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 6>potentially tariffs, right. And then the third one is tax cuts, right,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 6>So tax kits for corporations are wealthy individuals. So when

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 6>I put it all three together, they're essentially inflationary in nature.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 6>So I think what's in store for us? I would

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 6>say there's policy uncertainty, right. Policy uncertainty definitely translates to

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 6>more wealthly across the different asset classes. And then also

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 6>if all three or one of the three is enacted,

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 6>I think there's potential inflation pressures that's going to actually

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 6>creep in.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's moves by the Fed.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Then I don't know, potentially a pause, right, So from

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the pause December or pause next year, potentially a pause

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>in December.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Really, if you think about the you know what Chairman

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Paul has been talking about, right, So the recent directric

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 6>that came out of him was essentially that he said

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 6>that we will have to obviously be data driven, but

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 6>he said that the rates at this point, the policy

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 6>rates are in line with the expectations. So if there

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 6>is sideways moment in inflation, if you don't see that

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 6>creep down another like notchdown in the next month.

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Or so, potentially a pause.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 6>But if you look at the fet fund futures, that's

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 6>actually pricing in like fifty percent probability.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see what the data says, right, we get

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 2>more inflation reads before the December meet, right where we

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>used to have some data as you said, right, Yeah.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 6>But what this translates to in my view is right,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 6>higher rates for London. That's really what it really means

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 6>for fixed income, right for twenty twenty five.

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>So where do you find alpha? Then in the fixed

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 2>income world, how do you do it? How do you

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>find it?

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so if their rates are going to be higher

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 6>or moving sideways. So I think there are kind of

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 6>three pieces. So one is focused on income, right, So

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 6>you got to essentially maximize your income by diversifying duration.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 6>So one way to do that is to really kind

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 6>of position across the curve, not really positioned on one

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 6>or two parts of the curve, so you can essentially

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 6>ladder across the curve.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 6>Intermediate to long term rates is where I think there

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 6>is alpha just because of the policy three five I

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 6>would say five to fifteen, five fifteen or five to twenty.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 6>So because of the uncertainty in policy, I think there

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 6>is going to be premium demanded by investors, so which

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 6>means that the long term rates are going to stay

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 6>higher for longer. The other part is really bring in

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 6>some international exposure, right em international debt.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So where internationally internationally it's a lot. Are you just

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>saying pick a basket?

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 6>I would say pick countries where there's divergence in market policy, right,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 6>so you essentially have some amount of divergence from market

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 6>policy perspective, and then look for quality. Right So I

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 6>think look for assets where there is potential you know,

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 6>physical stability, you know, balancing of the budget and things

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 6>like that.

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think you've got to pick wisely.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>We got news last week that the money market funds

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>have are past seven trillion dollars in assets. Yeah, maybe

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 3>it's good that I'm not in the job of managing

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 3>money because I thought that as rates move lower, things

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 3>would move out of the money market funds. Right, Well,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 3>how do you look at that seven trillion dollars in

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 3>where it's going to go and when it's gonna go?

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean that's the trillion dollar question, right, for the.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Seven trillion dollar question?

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And should we assume it's going to go anywhere? Are

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>people just gonna be happy and comfortable if rates go down?

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Then they might not be happy?

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean that's again assuming the rates actually will

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 6>go down rates.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of people assuming in the crypto and

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the equity markets that rates are going to go down.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but if you look at the allocation to crypto

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 6>or any of the owls, that's a small portion of

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 6>the overall portfolio. So I would say if the rates

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 6>stay higher, right, not to four percent? I think people

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 6>people don't really think about reinvestment risk, right. People are

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 6>worried about what they're going to make over the next

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 6>twelve months.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, reinvestment risk, So make it taking out doing something exactly.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So if you think about, like why ladder strategies

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 6>are really popular is because you don't have to worry

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 6>about reinvestment risk and you can actually position for, you know,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 6>potential policy surprises. So I would say that's that's really

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the key question is what the Fed does in December,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 6>what the expectation says for the next year. After September FMC,

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 6>there were like ten cuts priced in and now it's

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 6>down to three.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I think could change again. Mand you twenty seconds. What's

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>the question you think every investor should be asking themselves

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 6>Just quickly, I would say, are they diversified enough? You know,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 6>do they have enough diversification in their portfolio? I think

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 6>that's the key question.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, great stuff. Hey, thank you so much, so much,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>thanks for having work on that title. Acronymic.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm just kidding. You're gonna shot in next year.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, man, you berea joining us here portfolio manager head

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of Systemic Edge, Fixed Income and custom SMA Investments at

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>all Spring Global Investments. We talk to their team a lot,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>always get some great insight.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting a two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>New York station, Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Mac Journal.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>How about you let me drive?

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, who's.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Gone to honey?

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Please? I'll do the gravel.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's wat I want to drive.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes Well Bruneld on

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, TikTok, everybody, we've got what about twenty minutes aft,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's be right on the money, better on the money,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 2>eighteen minutes to go into the closing bell. It's a

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 2>big day right in video earnings. That's certainly our focus

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>front and center. I'm looking at the trade where up

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>near our highs of the session, but it's not an

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>exciting market. It does feel like a little bit of

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a wait and see mode. You've got the nasdak lower.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>We just heard Charlie talk about it. S and P

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>call it relatively flat. But we're just kind of waited

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to see what kind of message does Nvidia say about itself,

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>about the AI trade, about the momentum.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to normal Inda and Matt Miller they

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>were filling it for us, but back at they did

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>pretty well.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 4>If you they were awesome.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't get any ideas, guys.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But Norma was talking about how Bank of America came

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 3>out with a note that said sort of contextualizing how

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 3>important video is, putting it on par with like a

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>federal reserve, meaning other economic data.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, given it's market cap of you know, three

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollars, it kind of makes sense. But we'll see

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>what happens when they report today.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Trading options signals this is going to be the most

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>important catalyst left this year. Let's see what Brian Vednick

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>has to say. He's chief investment officer at MJP Wealth

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Advisors one point two billion in assets under management. You're

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 2>normally on the East coast. You're here on the West

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>coast with us.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 5>How are you doing?

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Great?

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 5>Great to see you, guys.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So how often do your clients come in and say

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>so about that in video? About that AI trade? Tell

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 2>us what you hear.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Look, it comes up a lot, because you know, that's

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 5>been the driving force of the market over the last

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 5>eighteen months or so predominantly. We start to see a

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 5>little bit of a shift second half the year and

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 5>the broadening out of earnings, you know, coming from areas.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Outside of megacap tech.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 5>But look, this is an innovative trend that's still going

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 5>to play out over the next five to seven years.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 5>And we look at Navidia tonight, investors really want to

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 5>hear is competition changing in that space. I think it's

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 5>more about not necessarily the demand, but can Navidia deliver

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 5>on supply because when you look at analyst estimates for

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 5>revenue growth year over year of over eighty percent, and

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 5>these valuation estimates on future growth because people right now

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 5>are overpaying for growth if you look at it from

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 5>a traditional perspective. So if those future earnings reports are delivered,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 5>we're actually not overpaying for growth for Navidia, They're delivering exactly.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 5>But I think that the real issue garyl Is goes

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 5>back to your question is with the new generation of

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 5>chips coming with Blackwell right, it's we're starting to hear

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 5>little rumors of can they keep production up to meet demand?

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 5>And if those things start to show that there's an

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 5>issue there, then that opens up competition to come in

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 5>from AMD, Intel, other places. And then the other part

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 5>of just add real quick is the tariff conversation, you know,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 5>the policy pieces, this mosaic that we're all moving through

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 5>as investors. Well, if you look at Navidia's business, depending

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 5>on how that policies are impacted, they could have some

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 5>never to impact from shipping coming back for some of

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 5>their Asian made products. But then at the same point

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 5>in time, you need to hear from them to say

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>well that actually could those tariffs even boost demand that

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 5>could go to the Middle East, which is something that's

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of interesting.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Explain explain the logic there.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 5>The reasoning, Well, because when you think about the things

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 5>that have been said on the campaign trail from the

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration, they are creating a tariff regime that could

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 5>be disproportional to different parts of the world. So if

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 5>you're making something in Asia and you get hit with

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 5>a significant tariff, that can change the pricing for your product.

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 5>That could impact demand.

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 4>But then are there areas of world that would be.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Outside of that somebody else that benefits, right, right, And so.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 5>Could Navidia boosts more demand of their products going to

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 5>areas that are underserved like in the Middle East for example.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 5>So these are the things that investors want to hear about,

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 5>which is why we're in this period of time where demands,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, expectations are high. The mosaic of these puzzle

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 5>pieces need to play out a little bit more to

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of keep that sentiment going, I think, in the space,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 5>and that's why tonight is so critical.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like we yet know what the risks

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>are for twenty twenty five? New administration, new White House?

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We've seen President Trump there before, but I do think

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a little bit different. We're seeing

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 2>what is administration looks like. We know the policies he's

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 2>interested in, but there's what you say on the campaign

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 2>trail and what you get done with the Congress. So

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 2>do you feel like we understand clearly the risks to

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>investors in twenty twenty five yet, so I'll.

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Be just overly transparent.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>No, well said, you know, I don't believe so, and

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 5>just to be that a little bit more to that.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 5>I mean, anytime you try to predict what Trump is

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 5>going to do, just don't because it always ends up

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 5>being a different probability outcome. And I think the thing

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 5>that investors are dealing with right now is this push

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 5>and pull between an environment when earnings are expected to grow.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, tax policy probably will be extended that will

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 5>benefit stocks, and deregulation that part of the discussion. You

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 5>know that the Fed still wants to cut rates over

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 5>time to normalize relative to where we're seeing inflation going

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 5>in different parts of the economy.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 4>But then you have the other side of it.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 5>You don't know exactly how the votes are going to

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 5>play out on certain policy decisions. You don't know definitively

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 5>if some of these folks are going to be nominated

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 5>and go through the Senate process with approval. So I

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 5>think this mosaic and these puzzle pieces I keep talking

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 5>about have to play out, But the market will come

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 5>back to fundamentals in a couple of months, Carol, that's

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 5>really I think we'll.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Be like earnings and valuations in.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Consumer those types of things.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I have so many questions here. I'm wondering about

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 4>two and a half minutes. Well, I'm going to go fast.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>How do you view the market as being a check

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 3>on President Electrump and his policies.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 4>We know he follows the S and P. Five hundred

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 4>so closely.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 5>I think anything that helps to support messaging is important

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 5>to the administration. So if the markets are moving in

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 5>a certain direction, if we're still getting positive economic growth

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 5>on a quarter over quarter basis, if we're not causing

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 5>a labor shortage due to implementation of an immigration policy change.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Which would be very tough, if you're going to overnight

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 3>pull eighteen eleven million people out of this country more

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>or less.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 5>Right, So, these things and you look at some of

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 5>the people that have been put in some of these positions,

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 5>they're better than a maybe people that Trump had in

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Trump you know, one point zero and being communicators. So

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 5>I think to your question, Tim, it definitely matters where

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 5>some of these economic things go.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 2>What would you say the tone is or what you're

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 2>hearing around here as you walk around and talk to people.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 2>What is is there a common thread in terms of

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>what people are talking about.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 5>I think, recognizing these uncertainties, the thread is a heightened

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 5>to where fareness of risk management making sure that you're.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Not worse than a year ago.

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 5>I believe so because I think we're in a totally

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 5>different part of this unwinding of the unintended consequences of

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 5>policy decisions that started back in twenty twenty, and now

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 5>we have another set of policy decisions that are coming out.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 5>But going back to your question, it's very hard to

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 5>do a probability assessment around politics and what Congress is

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 5>going to do.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, you know what they're going to do.

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's say let's say Matt Gates gets confirmed as

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Attorney general, and that is that a signal to you

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>that Senators will allow the Trump administration, will allow Trump

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>to do whatever he wants?

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Can you extrapolate that from that?

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a I think it's fair to assume

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 5>that there's a signal that there's more people in Congress

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 5>that are more supportive of Trump now than his first administration,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 5>so that, yes, there could be pushing of the envelope

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 5>in a certain direction. But I think going back to

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 5>your earlier point there, it's unlikely that policies will go

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 5>to extremes because of the unintended consequences of how it's

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 5>going to impact the economy. To me, that's the check,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 5>But it takes time for people to realize that as

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 5>it plays out.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like you want to fast forward a year

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>because you feel like things will settle in, will have

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a better feel of maybe what policies will actually make

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>some changes. That's just kind of my gut feel.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm going to say the classic advisor thing or

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>investor thing here before we go. This is the reason

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 5>why you stay broadly diversified and you don't have all

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 5>your money in just a few companies, right sec Tech?

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Got it, Brian, Thank you, thanks for stopping by. Thank

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>you guys, Brian Viandick, President and Chief investment Officer at

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 2>MJP Wealth Advisors.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, all available on Apple, Spotify,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal alone.